埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1665|回复: 8

Real Estate Reporters

[复制链接]
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:04 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Attention Real Estate Reporters: / @  ?& a+ s4 r& R! Q) U& @

: V+ u; s( j* s2 A1 W. t. SDespite US housing woes Canadian real estate remains upbeat   |2 d7 k  f& A- ^
    TORONTO, Nov. 5 /CNW/ - Leading real estate experts are predicting the US6 e6 p5 H. J# r! h" Z& s
commercial real estate market will slow in 2008 and follow a similar pattern- g9 X* h0 \7 ?9 @) D$ s) |
as the current residential market. However, according to the annual Emerging) C3 G. r: h: M; |+ }2 [
Trends in Real Estate 2008 report, released by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)  Q( f& r+ P% H0 @6 x
and the Urban Land Institute (ULI), their Canadian counterparts are much more
7 \0 D; @) M1 [3 u% Rupbeat.
3 n: k6 N" w$ Y8 B    Now in its 29th year, Emerging Trends is the oldest, most highly regarded
0 h: `" A! ^% ~, c7 D0 tannual industry outlook for the real estate industry. The report reflects; C4 W' u: e. D5 T. v6 \1 ~# [8 C
interviews with and surveys of more than 600 of the industry's leading real
8 @' M+ y0 b+ `estate experts, including investors, developers, property company6 t4 h5 \9 ~' Z8 y1 Z4 R
representatives, lenders, brokers and consultants in both Canada and the US.
$ L4 w! F; Q) F: T' ^9 K3 x* cOther versions of this report are conducted in countries around the world3 p' Z7 Q0 S4 E  h
including Asia Pacific and Europe.
4 F. P6 P, I# m) ~+ y4 l5 {, P    According to Chris Potter, PwC partner and leader of the firm's Canadian+ i" {8 J- u3 S* T) p
Real Estate Tax practice, Canada benefits from a more conservative investment
4 G1 }& u5 ^; F% Yenvironment than the US. "In Canada, institution-dominated markets appear to5 U% A8 s& q* x$ k* }3 f, @5 B2 h
be avoiding 'transaction mania', but real estate values have reached record
9 ^3 P' `) u6 p0 Khighs and a strong economy has accelerated tenant demand for space."
1 i% @$ x  [& y+ X    According to American respondents, a healthy correction south of the
8 w& b( ?- c3 T7 H: |border will likely bypass long-term investors but penalize late-to-the-game
, U* Y$ F$ X( {1 Z8 Tspeculators and overleveraged buyers. Canadian respondents to the survey
6 |. l* ^; l3 T! W' I/ mremain positive about sidestepping any serious impacts of this possible US
+ \! p9 y$ n, O4 kcorrection. Close to 36% view their prospects for profitability in 2008 to be
6 `: Q# }" x, n, v2 T% kvery good and a further 22.4% say they're excellent.1 q. l1 G8 e  \* O+ S! T) R
    The strongest areas of real estate business activity for Canadian
" H' U- V% R; G) A9 w* [respondents is predicted to be within real estate services, followed by  \( O. [8 K0 O* D1 J& l
commercial/multifamily development and homebuilding/residential land
* ?6 P6 c* a) X8 Jdevelopment. All property sectors share positive prospects across the country
$ q- N& k: |2 M& ^( mespecially industrial and retail with respondents, on average, stating
9 E6 F" b* v. x! y& ?. [# ~0 n' o$ |development prospects are expected to be modestly good to good. The
+ g3 T& K2 O+ ?5 x4 Iresidential for-sale market is also expected to fair well, but might need to
0 L$ h9 ]0 V- l+ q) wtake a breather as homebuilders cannot keep up with the current pace and- P; A$ @2 [$ Q& H; U! }
single-family housing looks overpriced.) Q  I& ^' j# P8 j
    Office stock is seeing limited inventories and dated product fill up with
( O7 T/ E/ q# c. g, ], Xtenants. Except for Montreal, where office vacancies are nearing 9%. Canadian
& z* @4 J+ |" d& e! j- Bmetropolitan areas boast below 5% vacancies, and rents have room to push
' V2 @3 F7 o6 p9 t+ ?higher. The survey is also showing that costs and land scarcity is limiting8 Y6 O8 v. ?1 U% h  Q3 u
new development. Hotel investment and development prospects are modestly good,3 a) S1 k1 Y/ L! Q" E& q( J& z
and most respondents rate this sector either a buy or a hold. Rental
) ~3 l+ \- w, G$ C2 i3 g" _" c/ D3 \apartments are doing well in major cities with high immigration flows. Primary
$ f) Z& c% C3 Lwestern cities - Vancouver, Calgary, and Edmonton - are veering toward housing8 k9 f- t- c# h
shortages as workers, attracted by a plethora of well-paying jobs, pour into/ c1 X( c0 p: g8 X" B% X$ D
the energy zone. Apartment occupancies are soaring in these areas. Development
9 L7 H' l+ a6 y* Nin other regions remains difficult because of costs and land scarcity.
! E& z4 T/ R: F* B( {. E) j: v4 ^" q7 B' t
    Canadian Markets to Watch
5 p, c" U, |* }) {4 l2 m& l2 M
2 o2 G$ j7 m* I3 d- l7 e    The report comments on how Canadians like to live and work in central- {) s0 A& A" i8 e
cities, as long as they can afford it. If housing is too pricey in 24-hour; ~0 W; a  c) `" }
neighbourhoods, people move to inner-ring suburbs or beyond and commute back
) @3 D9 w+ x! Z! J# {$ M$ @' dinto the cores. Investors, especially the institutions, are concentrated in( I0 p% E* ^5 E+ d
downtown areas too. Planners and developers focus on infill and more vertical
- e/ H$ G- ?+ H/ J* J, }projects, which reinforce the urban cores. The hot-growth energy cities out. h8 L5 ?) U4 V
west - Calgary and Edmonton - score the highest ratings for investment) m6 x* k. ?% U" R
prospects, development, and for-sale housing, although it is not certain
; G" u' q9 S$ P) N, pwhether the recent announcements on royalties will have any effect on this.
* P2 B6 X% \  i5 I8 c9 fToronto, Canada's premier global pathway city, and Vancouver also have high9 P' b, f: K9 r0 C( x, p
ratings. Ottawa and Montreal follow, with Halifax lagging.
) @0 Q9 t$ l& U! v* P( E/ p2 C, O
- f: l& d& Q8 ~# M( s    Calgary/Edmonton6 U* H3 r* p1 L$ j

$ c5 Q. r1 d; |5 t. h5 ^    Calgary is the Canada's "resource" capital and North America's number-one
/ T2 [" j# T5 j$ x+ Uboomtown. Survey respondents foresee strong buys for all sectors: 53.5% give a' v  P) X. ]( T) J' J5 l
buy recommendation for Hotel Property, 52.8% for Industrial/Distribution,
: q3 t1 o" ~9 o8 w! K48.1% for Retail and Apartment Residential and 44.6% for Office Property.
- V% y, H1 i  [2 V: {# B- F# vFurthermore, on average the majority of respondents see Calgary For-Sale1 d- T* ~( t) [8 R# R- T
Homebuilding prospects as very good. Edmonton is closely mimicking the
0 h. O5 j+ r% p% g" ACalgary-style growth wave and as long as demand for energy resources stays7 m6 \% v2 s5 F4 P
strong, this market will continue to do well.0 z5 `$ P# h0 L, @
) Z# c' O' Z4 z! d% h6 q& E6 U
    Vancouver
7 {7 H+ Y2 v/ g* S0 R5 r+ ^% O! v+ |9 ?
    Vancouver's diversified economy is roaring, the mining industry is
: o4 `* |: Y& ?* _: _0 t; ^booming and the city provides a large port and a high-tech center. Outrageous
7 d0 R# _: K  \real estate prices frustrate homebuyers and commercial investors and the
9 A7 ~9 |0 R1 A9 F# Q/ Ymarket is extremely hard to crack. The 2010 Winter Olympic Games is also a
4 i6 m" A% D" D8 p2 ]growth driver and accordingly 44.7% of respondents give Vancouver a buy/ U/ W2 \1 o2 b- C* {
recommendation for Hotel Property. A further 43.5% give a buy Retail, 41.3%; _/ d" Y1 X1 f- L
for Industrial/Distribution and 36.7% for Office Property followed by 34.1%
" J4 O) l* S" _for Apartment Residential property. Vancouver also ranks in the good to very- Q. t* U% T' V* f# u; T+ c$ n
good mark for for-sale homebuilding prospects.- @2 p$ h. ^# ^- [# K
; p2 H2 Z8 |& w. ]4 P5 q  d3 K
    Toronto. P4 d; ^2 ?) H  A& f! h
0 Q+ F  \/ F! V# Y
    Toronto ranks as a major global pathway destination, 24-hour city, and! Y$ T4 Y0 o) ?8 e  e& ?- H5 [! o3 L
manufacturing hub. Compared with other national financial centers, the city is: r( j+ Q3 B/ v. M4 X# B  i9 C
relatively inexpensive. However, the rising loonie is hurting manufacturing
0 G- n$ h% |$ L7 Q! Gindustries, and clouds over the US economy threaten to stall out momentum.* l0 H% U* _: t9 z% X
Three new office towers are under construction, adding 3 million new square8 I* E- Z' W7 U$ W  {
feet of office space. Notably, Office (49.1%), Industrial (46.2%) and. l0 ]8 A+ {/ j7 H. p
Apartments (40.8%) are given solid buys.: d$ P1 ?/ x: l& k  k7 M- F; u$ R
3 x0 J0 @' ~( F
    Montreal
5 v3 g& ~5 j) F  j' F5 |% G
" N. G) `3 U+ x3 d    Montreal continues to face concerns about market stability and overall
8 P. h7 U! k( R) tgrowth prospects as major companies no longer choose it as a place to set up
  R+ t# \- j$ P4 z# Jshop. But, plenty of government offices fill space. Of the larger cities in
' r9 L1 O" \! j& E" t2 vCanada, Montreal ranks lowest as a "buy" recommendation in all real estate1 R/ z, y# D% Z0 [9 l
sectors. However, respondents generally rated all Montreal real estate sectors% g( Q, ^8 H0 r0 R1 y* i& w  n
higher as a "hold" recommendation.
1 a* u8 Q: Y  j8 p6 l+ N8 U$ [; b" j* ^  [/ q% `
    The report notes that best bets for investors for the coming years
6 E" I2 Y3 x# [include a focus on all property sectors in the high-growth western energy: P+ A( Q7 P, V  _( I# }2 Y4 S4 r3 D
markets, hold on central business district office space, develop infill condos
& Z/ r+ ]+ t/ O* O( U0 `' fnear subways stops in Toronto, buy infill sites wherever you can and invest4 i7 t& K- m+ U% J3 [, @4 C2 m
overseas. Potter concludes, "Domestic opportunities are too limited at current) G6 n9 n  I; R
prices."
1 E, T: ]8 k% X5 a# j    A copy of Emerging Trends in Real Estate(R) 2008 is available at
9 a" y; x/ F. Z( y- ?www.uli.org or www.pwc.com/imre./ a7 [5 g' ]- D5 x5 O3 J
7 q" _, w% n( b+ @7 ^2 o
    About PricewaterhouseCoopers3 n) {* h4 i; D. ]! p; H, s; J- V" Z
' o- x. Q) d5 s* Z+ l7 H+ a0 i
    PricewaterhouseCoopers (www.pwc.com) provides industry-focused assurance,7 ?! u  l/ A2 C& O( M
tax and advisory services to build public trust and enhance value for its
0 g) g8 @! k6 ~6 t  tclients and their stakeholders. More than 140,000 people in 149 countries
' a; D' r* \- f, L3 r+ sacross our network share their thinking, experience and solutions to develop
% K  t/ f4 S% J2 F: H" Qfresh perspectives and practical advice. Now celebrating 100 years of9 L" P1 T6 m  t) a4 q
excellence in Canada, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (www.pwc.com/ca) and its
- ^/ \5 Y' r4 }5 R9 I9 Srelated entities have more than 5,200 partners and staff in offices across the. v  D# [% ~' \7 f
country.! J7 F! S) M; k" @% b# Z2 ]
    "PricewaterhouseCoopers" refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario
. B" x& @) i: M% L" b2 \limited liability partnership, or, as the context requires, the& N" [$ z; I& [$ L; D& h
PricewaterhouseCoopers global network or other member firms of the network,3 ~" ^* S+ t8 F2 l, C; g" d! r
each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.
, A; [! Y' A# S5 ?1 n
) w: w) w/ J4 [4 W3 N3 W1 G) n    About the Urban Land Institute/ y$ T: s# L6 M
4 m; q7 r! K; y1 Q3 t
    The Urban Land Institute (www.uli.org) is a nonprofit education and
  M, H: o2 z1 {* P, g8 C! presearch institute supported by its members. Its mission is to provide4 s0 |: v6 i. [% `
leadership in the responsible use of land and in sustaining and creating
' `' W  g/ u* i1 g3 f- r1 o; u$ F9 athriving communities worldwide. Established in 1936, the Institute has more  V1 k$ p! g5 |5 U0 j0 H
than 38,000 members representing all aspects of land use and development
( s! T6 ?8 Z& M" V9 `% Qdisciplines.0 `5 m. f* {0 B' a2 j
    The Urban Land Institute is an active and growing organization in Canada.+ L% {7 ^2 S# J
With nearly 700 members across the country, Canada's first ULI District
& Y$ c! V) Q( ~8 Z- ^( UCouncil was established in Toronto in 2005 and a second District Council is" [( y, j! p) t6 F& p8 ~9 K2 a+ u7 l
now being formed in British Columbia. The Toronto District Council will be
& r9 j/ e% f) f. s" N% xhosting a special event on Emerging Trends in Real Estate on November 20th,
% R8 u+ @( R1 c' [  z" J! v2007, featuring Jonathan Miller, the principal author of the report, Blake
( b+ J& y% O6 I7 o+ y: p1 xHutcheson, President of CB Richard Ellis Canada Ltd., and George Carras,
7 ~5 P  r6 P7 c2 e; z7 K4 J9 S4 dPresident of RealNet Canada Inc. For more information on this event, please4 K, X% e/ s- w( q; l
call the Toronto District Council Coordinator at (647) 258-0017, or look on& l2 F: u1 h  Y! P
the web at www.uli.org/events/index.cfm?id=3066." C) @& `3 ?! q7 }0 R

7 T  {) s. j7 S% p( ^# F+ b7 p7 p+ \5 F- O' T, {4 ?
; V# ~( P# y0 j3 Y8 \/ K% _! _
For further information: Carolyn Forest, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1 v" c9 r$ [% b
(416) 814-5730, carolyn.forest@ca.pwc.com
, H8 o4 P3 |8 Q4 r* thttp://www.newswire.ca/en/releas ... r2007/05/c4080.html/ _7 j+ V7 D' v9 _- Q! {1 S

% F  Z/ l; F+ Q5 }1 q" {[ 本帖最后由 QWE321 于 2007-11-13 09:08 编辑 ]
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
 楼主| 发表于 2007-11-13 09:06 | 显示全部楼层
注意房地产记者采访时说: 8 k. k# i+ k  W$ m* X
2 A( W3 K: ]9 j" M3 f8 }) J
尽管美国住房疾苦加拿大房地产仍乐观
7 C/ Q8 B' j" V1 @: B  i    多伦多, 11月5日电/新华美通/ -领先的房地产专家预测,美国
* Z. A: o( A& s& g商业房地产市场将缓慢,在2008年和遵循类似模式。
  j1 N# Y( X6 q: p* i由于目前住宅市场。但是,根据年报新兴: x  Z7 s4 m# J6 h- P6 U
趋势,在房地产, 2008年发布的报告,由罗兵咸永道(预委会)
1 x$ d8 q6 s+ e1 p. l4 X, `和城市土地研究所(宇力) ,其对应的加拿大得多  u# q9 G% k% J1 K* E, r. |8 {
乐观。
! ]  W( p) c- _; p8 A0 Z    现在,在其第29届,今年新出现的趋势是历史最悠久,最受尊敬的1 y1 w3 B# J0 B+ T- K9 r
年度行业展望房地产业。该报告反映了7 K( f& J4 E0 J6 \9 h* s
访谈和调查, 600多的业内领先的实时
& b+ b+ G  V6 d( P0 y# V. z地产专家,包括投资者,开发商,物业公司
" j( P$ Y1 Q; P& W1 L5 ^% g. M6 Y代表,放款人,经纪人和顾问公司在加拿大和美国。   s& F5 x. j+ Z: S; ^, @1 U# e
其它版本的这份报告是在世界各国纷纷
" K2 t; p* C! S8 A8 S) h# O& i0 ^4 J包括亚太地区和欧洲。
' V3 l* e1 {  B# ?' `1 F* F    据克里斯波特,预委会的合作伙伴和领导者,该公司在加拿大, i% D2 Y9 a7 A6 F( T$ z
房地产税的做法,加拿大受益于一个较保守的投资% ~3 i5 l) t6 u- p& {
环境比美国好。 "在加拿大,机构主导的市场,似乎
% B0 c9 v. p. Q! v可避免'交易躁狂症' ,但房地产的价值,已达到了创纪录4 g" r8 K- K! L5 H% K
高点和强劲的经济,加速了租客的需求空间" 。 ; s$ V; ^5 x5 _( r" U- y
    据美国受访者中,一个健康的校正南方的
& J6 m. Y& U- a7 [& A边界可能会绕过长线投资者,但惩罚下旬至该游戏
2 y9 _% Q! _% b* e炒家overleveraged买家。加拿大民意调查被访者
+ Y/ v) {+ L3 a, H4 i继续积极回避任何严重的影响,这可能美国! ^, \7 ~4 _" [' [# W
更正。接近36 % ,查看他们的前景,盈利能力在2008年将
0 @- ?8 G$ h% E6 k非常好,并且进一步的22.4 %的人说他们做得很棒。 " J- I" b+ w1 Z
    最强地区的房地产经营活动,为加拿大
- a2 R0 @1 X9 U( s2 B. [受访者预测,要保持房地产服务,其次是9 B: m# o: _, {- V+ ?
商业/多家庭的发展和住宅建设/住宅用地
2 X2 b6 P; I) R: n4 N$ S的发展。所有地产行业分享积极的前景在全国推行
' f+ T1 w: ]+ l7 x尤其是工业和零售与受访者中,平均说明+ \' ~4 F& |+ T" \# n$ C
的发展前景,预计会虚心好,以良好的。该
; \' |  b% L$ M! x+ S住宅为售后市场预期也将公平好,但可能需要. A1 r" r3 Z0 q4 A* O
以喘息为营建不能配合当前的速度和3 {3 V7 U; [* _2 h5 W
单个家庭的房屋期待过高。 4 N! F! V  O; ?8 {2 ?& @. t
    办公室的股票是看到有限的库存和过时的产品,填补了
" C0 Y( r7 g8 v! n0 c# A租户。除蒙特利尔,而办公楼空置率接近百分之九。加拿大
. ?. f4 M$ ]+ N5 Z% c: U' G大都市区夸耀百分之五以下的职位空缺,以及租金的空间,以推动' S; |: l- ?6 q9 y% W% F- \
更高。调查也显示,成本及土地稀缺限制9 @- A: u2 p8 c- b) d1 h' Z
新的发展。酒店投资和发展前景是良好的谦虚,
. j3 ^2 t9 U2 y' p和大多数受访者比率这个行业无论是购买或持有。出租8 J1 z$ F! W5 }9 h) I
公寓是搞好大城市与高移民流动。小学
0 n, y1 u: @1 v# [/ i: I! s西方城市-温哥华,卡尔加里,埃德蒙顿和-正转向对房屋9 h9 V( _1 ?2 ?$ ^) [& s: t  u4 c
短缺的工人,吸引了大量的好报酬优厚的就业岗位,倒入
. G" K' W6 T, H  R! b9 S能源区。公寓占用飞涨,在这方面的努力。发展( x: q9 W  V/ ]  J  e
在其他地区仍然很困难,因为成本及土地匮乏。
5 t' ]" A2 [) e* p5 q9 A; i
/ k: w' ~, W! b/ Q) x    加拿大市场上观看
- u. z# a6 d  O: A7 V- Z, n! E0 _/ Z3 x) y
    该报告对如何加拿大人愿意生活和工作在中央
0 O' I4 d5 v% f5 M5 z城市,只要他们能够负担得起的。如果房屋是太昂贵,在24小时# I$ B4 h& [5 G2 D2 X: g7 P7 d
居民区,人们搬到党内环郊区或更远和通勤回' j+ y; x; X9 a' M2 j- }; L# Y' h
进入内核。投资者,特别是机构,都集中在
4 U+ _; y, `( E( _0 s市中心地区。规划者和开发商把重心放在加密和更垂直
# a3 w; ?; u& I' q* c; E; w: D项目,加强了城市的核心。热点增长的能源城市. {% ^+ {8 Q7 @5 d
西-卡尔加里和埃德蒙顿-评分最高的收视率,为投资8 d$ }. `: K& u
前景,发展,并为出售住房,它虽然是不肯定
/ p. P8 d* l1 k; Q# k7 H4 G7 \/ U是否最近宣布对版税将产生什么影响。 4 a1 M# V) [0 l8 b2 Y# G" O$ K
多伦多,是加拿大首屈一指的全球通路的城市,温哥华等,也有高
0 r; c6 b# r2 `5 v评级。渥太华和蒙特利尔跟进,与哈利法克斯还相对滞后。
/ u6 j& o3 B+ ]3 b- d' ]0 y- L+ G0 j& H4 y+ o& D& K
    卡尔加里/埃德蒙顿! c  [; C/ O5 I7 Z) n( |

  o% j1 P( a6 Z: J3 G; W    卡尔加里是加拿大的"资源"的资本和北美洲的头号- [! l  {1 T+ W# u. S; ^4 W3 O4 B
新兴都市。调查的受访者预计,强买,为各阶层人士: 53.5 %作& V, h& x* I$ \; N0 f
购买建议,为酒店物业,为52.8 % ,为工业/配送,
! J; S, z4 I. o2 n. }) S48.1 % ,零售和公寓住宅和44.6 % ,为办公室的财产。 2 H  D& f1 f# b4 ~) p
此外,每日平均有超过半数受访见卡尔加里为售后
4 m4 f2 v- @: `- w3 }7 W住宅建设前景是非常好的。埃德蒙顿正密切模仿了
) ^6 i9 N+ z4 f& ?卡尔加里式的增长浪潮,并且只要能源需求的资源留% N5 n3 N3 J4 Z- H% C
强大的,这个市场将继续向好。
7 V' G6 c+ F; i* C% k, R
' W  a: s: @  j$ V% \    温哥华4 _9 T) |: {- `8 C( D* O
1 |; }7 s+ \& D9 p6 c& S
    温哥华的多元化的经济,是波涛汹涌,采矿业
3 f4 Z: E4 o* q( ?8 P2 Q+ ]$ X红红火火的城市提供了一个大型港口和高科技中心。岂有此理
* @+ ]1 J! L* T# l. S, \  A房地产价格挫败购房者和商业投资者和
: X+ A! ]; w8 G2 i市场是非常难裂纹。 2010年冬季奥运会也是一个, P& L. z: @5 e$ V) [- Y9 S
主要成长动力,并据此44.7 %的受访者给予温哥华买进
* u6 }: @6 a7 K9 G" e$ y0 z建议对酒店的财产。另有43.5 %给予买进零售, 41.3 %
# {( E- M0 C2 F8 {, q- K1 ]( Q1 X工业/分销和36.7 %办公室财产其次是34.1 % ) \4 p7 O# |9 b' q  p% ^+ {
为公寓住宅物业。温哥华也名列在好的很
  y  H  e$ h3 T% z良好的标志,为买卖房屋建筑的前景。 ( j4 O4 w- N8 ~& F' L4 q
- v2 _) G+ W$ h5 Q! ]( T9 H- N; @
    多伦多
* J" h& p( {  \' W& |2 e
9 `7 y; N0 I4 k+ \6 z2 t, `    多伦多队伍作为一项重大的全球通路目的地后, 24小时市,
7 k1 R; z% T3 e3 j2 l& U制造业枢纽。相较于其他国家的金融中心,该市正" c9 A) h4 g# J/ i  Q
价格相对低廉。不过,加元上涨是伤害制造6 C4 b* q% d! ~8 \( J
工业,并云在美国经济的威胁,以贩出的势头。
; z2 D0 \& ]+ O) m三个新的办公大楼正在建设中,增加3万个新广场& _) ]& ]* P) F' ]
英尺的办公空间。值得注意的是,办公室( 49.1 % ) ,工业( 46.2 % )和! B2 V  z" i6 o
公寓( 40.8 % ) ,给出了坚实的收购。
/ `- l* T' c5 `% _# C8 x3 h! h$ Q* O
    蒙特利尔5 A4 z& ]& g/ Q. z" k

6 @# T0 }5 b7 K! h- z' e    蒙特利尔仍然面临着关注市场的稳定及整体4 e( v4 m; o" Y  O/ B5 n* d$ _
经济增长的前景,因为各大公司不再选择香港作为一个地方成立/ W3 J3 m6 F4 `4 K4 Z
店。但是,大量的政府办公室填写空间。比较大的城市
3 C) c1 P5 \6 W, j* m" I  O# a; B加拿大,蒙特利尔排名最低的是一个"买进"的建议,在所有房地产
- [. w" r0 g* U% r& @部门。不过,受访者普遍都被评为蒙特利尔房地产行业
/ q& p$ b' M, r+ B5 C高为"持有"建议。 / q$ ~0 K% I! T& M( o$ {

: M$ x; W  Q& o' c0 P+ J- P6 s9 I    报告指出,最佳的赌注,为投资者在未来几年, j, Q! j0 w& t' @& F( q# u. N
包括重点放在所有地产行业在高速发展的西方能源: G) u$ F( r3 n* ]3 Z3 y
市场,忍着中央商务区的办公场所,制定加密公寓  X& X, |( k3 p, O- x" u
附近的行人隧道,停在多伦多,购买加密地点在何处,你可以和投资4 G) r5 z+ I/ f& E% B. Y0 m+ r5 ]7 e
海外。波特的结论是, "国内的机会太有限,在目前的8 t& j* K# d# x! H5 N
价格" 。
3 n3 s1 Y5 L3 w' b- M    一本新趋势的房地产( r )的, 2008年是于
- y) {! r; l' S  q- fwww.uli.org或www.pwc.com /伊姆雷。 * I: c' }; M' F# l
9 u/ ~) r# x3 }8 f8 ?! w" z& \
    约罗兵咸永道
8 G7 z6 E% H9 l. N: u
9 Q% b( z' q- U6 Q2 ?) Q2 ^' [4 N1 E    罗兵咸永道( www.pwc.com )提供行业为重点的保证,
1 D- {( g( }! x6 I6 U* t  ?) |税务和咨询服务,以建立公众的信任和提高其值
& k3 E3 d) ]5 t* Q) }# C客户和他们的利益相关者。超过14万人,在149个国家* n6 Y8 e8 G5 s* _
跨越我们的网络分享他们的思想,经验和解决方案开发
6 z! T# s& V' p0 U" E新的观点和切实可行的意见。现在庆祝百年的5 ?% X2 X4 i: n9 p0 C# p
卓越在加拿大,罗兵咸永道物流园( www.pwc.com / ca )和其
* K% A' [- V. f0 u" _; Y相关实体有超过5200名合作伙伴和工作人员在全国各地的办公室
5 M" F4 L  |" ]国。
7 O6 c9 \' C0 g; _7 d# f4 x) X     "罗兵咸永道" ,是指以罗兵咸永道物流园,安大略0 g. c4 j" F+ m& \& ~/ a' `* [+ A
有限责任合伙,或视情况需要,
) J3 C0 U) q4 j- n. k普华永道的全球网络,还是其他会员公司的网络,
# t+ f- f9 J9 H9 \6 {4 S5 g% T' ~/ s每年这是一个独立的法律实体。
$ r# a& d. \% Q! @5 E0 W7 Q: L4 @
1 M& p% ?* o8 J7 W- }    关于城市土地研究所所长
! E7 o1 R  U7 U1 {2 n- p! m
6 o+ W& g5 g+ G0 X: H- Z    城市土地学会( www.uli.org )是一个非赢利性的教育和
/ O1 k5 k) L- V' C4 L研究院的支持,它的成员。它的使命是提供
1 S+ x+ l8 G3 q6 Y4 z) o4 n领导,在以负责任的方式使用土地,并维持和创造! L7 ^& l/ |; p! [: j- }
蓬勃发展的社区在世界各地。成立于1936年,研究所更+ Z& [7 @* A. @, v" A9 ~; O+ t
超过38000人,代表各方面的土地利用与发展
; Z6 g9 V' S& ^6 w1 e, Z$ n学科。 . W' f7 }' I$ J1 D: d3 v
    城市土地学会是一个积极的和不断扩大的组织在加拿大。 1 X  g" u0 e  t
与近700名委员在全国推行,加拿大的第赫内斯区
- Z) v# T9 Z1 l( N* z- X' c1 ?理事会成立于多伦多,在2005年和第二个区议会
& C; V4 Z0 l6 J( [$ Y现在正在形成,在不列颠哥伦比亚省。多伦多区会
0 k2 Y: |6 }" O! A, {主办了一次特别活动,对新出现的趋势,在房地产上11月20日, # n9 p6 m+ I4 s( C- ~
2007年,包括乔纳森米勒,主要报告的作者,卜力) ]' X! `) S0 `7 j# X# q3 C6 q  a' n
资讯公司总裁世邦魏理仕加拿大有限公司,和乔治carras , 7 D" `2 y" c: e3 y2 e3 r
总统realnet加拿大公司的更多信息,对这一事件,请
1 K/ D/ ~4 A$ H2 A致电多伦多区议会事务协调员( 647 ) 258-0017 ,或一脸无奈
3 V0 j- r5 L. ^" [) m  y; _0 k网站www.uli.org/events/index.cfm?id=3066* N; u- _. H( ]6 M5 @9 l, b, a7 ~
* l- }3 Z' w9 I* G( ]; O7 s

- j6 V5 R) ^0 w6 v
" h% k4 g# ?  a9 s$ y3 d更多资讯:卡罗琳森林,罗兵咸永道物流园, + [! w! `9 m' ]! b
( 416 ) 814-5730 , carolyn.forest @ ca.pwc.com
鲜花(4348) 鸡蛋(18)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:10 | 显示全部楼层
楼主的这个翻译软件好。
鲜花(3) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:15 | 显示全部楼层

Up

老杨团队 追求完美
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 11:20 | 显示全部楼层

5 |2 U- N- y! _6 `2 _
3 q5 C' W/ S2 ?& \  ^4 q! D6 H1 T
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 13:54 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 15:37 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
看涨派的忽悠水平有很大提高,请继续努力。
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 19:04 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(49) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 21:54 | 显示全部楼层

( X/ b* c/ @1 _( c" k6 l& Wu
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-10-6 16:36 , Processed in 0.181858 second(s), 23 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表