 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
; J% e" R' m9 y9 {5 F楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
$ p& Y n/ b2 f) _corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
7 m( S! Z) z& E$ `) w/ D( @: M+ `" A7 s2 g
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
5 A3 H% i N* d4 G" |' Y5 B! `
]/ A" T7 s, J( a安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.& I8 E$ T' @7 |0 G
; i# G9 }; O& ^4 E: M不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
% z, c6 ^8 {% c/ ?3 W
' j; ^! g2 e& r1 Y5 s' o8 D另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
8 Q5 n. {% {" I, T3 K7 ~
$ G1 f' O& m. Y关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
* i5 g) z- N/ x: W4 F& ?2 HYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
1 N0 q# @% u- {5 O- Q1 u% p' u3 _+ C; t3 R5 y3 i. V2 w Y! B( O6 Z
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".# b9 s) }0 E; g
$ L* w# s: a+ ?: J1 R1 yBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.5 d- j; _1 @* \- D% P3 ^
5 Q# O7 r5 F L$ L, x# d
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|