 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
! \) W' P# }1 }7 s楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
Q+ `* N& P1 W' V* D0 scorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... $ |9 Q+ I- q4 G
& H- ]; f$ u% k1 g( x
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
1 ]- ?. d" \/ p. V( G7 K. W; f4 k, V; E" X9 P9 m$ T
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
$ g; q \: r9 v" R' x5 e: O1 }
. ^) a' F, ~; y& d不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?* A9 j! ~' K* F7 V$ G% x* l9 }6 Z4 |
- c$ W7 _: v9 x$ p另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
6 A' N6 p6 L3 r# X9 |$ ~2 S# E
9 B8 c s' Q2 ^# D/ |+ p6 `7 i关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):+ w' k" E* K4 L! X- s3 d) s
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
d6 j' k& {( m$ t
3 S8 \0 \0 a1 v9 [6 T- E( u9 uOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".# ~1 n. G% d/ |! X6 I3 A
2 V9 g! L% ^! W/ t
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
! C+ g7 G! p# o; E. ~( O1 j5 d* Y# _- [& y5 ]( ]2 R# i
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|