 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 % |# @, M' r( r3 z
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!3 @! W- c0 T# m8 v
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... % A) y) y% Y7 ]' n
: G O3 ~$ l& |3 d$ z
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
) w+ h8 L6 A* ~7 O3 }4 b" p
) w; b" d9 k" x: `& T: j安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
. T% u2 ]9 B% y& g3 l
$ j0 f7 a4 _5 F不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
4 B. `7 |" V" l! U3 y- P. x$ b3 R3 o* E F/ A: C/ |
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。+ E+ A7 Z: v- {/ `9 k. S4 y
2 h$ ^* b: L$ ]0 i$ |3 S- A关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
0 z, I( _. k T1 w( M( I1 DYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
4 ^$ N6 K4 {; [& g# O0 R) ]6 x0 |1 x5 f9 k) S+ w: [
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
& l" O; Y Z! R; r
- y5 i) m; l F4 E; E1 hBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.3 P: t$ b, W- K# A3 S( U0 ~% x- g
; T3 S/ M% l P% ?, R# C% h0 C
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|