 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
9 d k& K0 V) z; c1 I1 z; u6 p楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!- [8 U e2 F% @1 g
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
9 q6 I* `, q/ c9 g. e2 b, J% q; `# W `8 |4 J* P
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
. B- s) h$ U% L% I* i- Y" P! n2 R( m7 \/ y; F
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.% c% V( D5 H; p( _
( ^1 M" u/ a% H& A! ~不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?/ p1 `! ~# f1 R- j
2 p6 ^6 L; y' f3 ~: b6 K/ ~. |
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
7 f6 z5 i/ C& s {: l' p$ s! h1 \7 ~
" `' `: h9 n. z" Z+ j; J关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):5 M3 {. x2 ^: `
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.* y7 I! Q# t$ K0 ]
4 R( k, A! A& gOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".; C4 g! ?: ]+ G2 T# C
* m4 h0 C) o6 i* L5 f; w
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.4 p% y' K& r2 U3 K5 Q- G
, O) e8 N; Y; F% l) y) _' k! c
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|