 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
% d2 k; q. B, D- D+ x楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!& b; [) h- } p
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 5 Y% A L* r- d! r- {; c% Z
# j! P% S* o% K您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。" t3 _3 p) ?6 z& G7 b1 H3 t) P
: e( p; T1 }9 e, G$ F# m9 t安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
1 U, a) J# L! q( K# y+ }. |; D9 E' p7 o3 U# b& j0 P" F
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
: {6 o0 ~& S* _
6 K- U0 w* K8 E3 a5 P. A另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
7 e" T K; q/ j
l6 _+ H1 e- _$ Q& d' V关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
. \9 h. b* E& e5 U! y$ Q! |Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
Q9 E3 O. V9 G3 J& m* c$ k+ |
* K' @( }1 h- R$ F1 P& H! P4 @Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
( h3 v5 F& |7 e9 c$ S3 l( \
% N* w6 h& p& D8 s3 `But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe. f5 F7 O, h, O
4 S+ k) X0 O- o d- ^2 z
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|