 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|
楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
5 n K& Y4 H: r# k楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!# ?* l4 o I% T
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
( H2 a+ f& H& Y; N" u/ V1 \& M- a( T2 D5 Q) U# C) g* a$ s" }
您说的对呀，我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理， 所以听您这一说：我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了， 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。. G+ b8 P. v' g+ B+ c
# V+ N, v' L4 `5 V R! t$ o) U
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有：可靠性高（故障率低，ｏｒ ｈｉｇｈ ｒｅｌｉａｂｉｌｉｔｙ）, 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
5 N: y Q- `# p& P7 z" e5 ~
% X$ G/ u+ {2 C: a不过，你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择，Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗？
2 s. V9 {- w5 c+ W( t
( H) J! U- H6 {$ I- E" Y另外，“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息，偶要查他个水落石出，好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。. y1 r6 R. l7 c# c! h
* X6 b* K3 w4 }& ?/ w关于安全，我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 （SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了）：- j4 C& V% @* V. g& C: q
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
% X. y" b; e$ ]! k& Y+ w' s9 {; N, Z, E
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".7 ^8 d+ x7 l% f6 R$ t
5 j: u0 R1 t1 P' yBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe." ^; s3 T: q/ l% Z, r
3 B" b6 F1 y/ n[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|
狗仔卡
发表于 2007-12-9 21:44
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
显身卡
