 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 M/ w( h9 @: W0 N
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!: h; e6 U) Y! T1 b4 V/ d- c* ?
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
8 s8 ?( u* V2 o& {% k% l; Y' h
; B1 r7 L) p5 a9 r0 U* g) q3 ]7 c: @您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。4 u0 S1 ?. q( f+ E# y
4 x1 [" ~2 i/ e, S( J
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.. G% y/ v; C9 ?2 e6 x" w" w, P( f
2 Z1 \& Y# @, \+ V, T
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
. P7 n8 G$ B; E4 c* M9 G' K9 N {) v+ _1 ?9 X
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。; M' P) E" s3 w, ]; d; F
1 W8 }. o6 |" Q# E' ?$ |7 |- k
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):* L8 S% N+ u! U4 v) I
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
1 F8 j8 T! O8 y; D5 Q' r' Q: |9 e
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".6 T( r$ G6 s# ~, \. ~
* O7 T7 Q% ?& p/ E) j4 f7 tBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
+ m! f! K! W& Z m# ^0 U6 q- B) ~. G2 o! C. A
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|