原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由: + I/ |( h; C j4 _ z1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行. 5 f+ C8 p3 k& F. p2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了. : x& t8 c* l, E) u# n3 G* b. `# E& U
上述两位仁兄都获得了减免.虽是下策,但如果抱着尝试的态度那也不要紧. . E( O. V c. p. y8 [# i5 j ( A% [* E7 Z% E; `1 @/ I: f& l[ Last edited by 社员都是向阳花 on 2005-2-14 at 10:03 AM ]
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,20054 I' v5 i, k. v( u6 H% j- ?. a
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb" - g5 Q! D5 e% n- L6 W& V h) ~- K; l! S5 q# p' d
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances." + j% {3 v" ]8 ?: } - e. ~) a& V- f0 e2 |7 ?# M8 D1 IYou should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。 1 `, ~) V! U, b* N/ n" b 5 D5 l5 I, }3 B: U" d, w5 A . p" S: ~- P" o* y2 p1 \
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM:+ m6 r1 n% j" p! p& R: {& D% t
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 z& e J$ n0 kThe title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb"% P% U+ d+ v$ h8 m
( a3 P m7 S7 u9 B
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
Hi, friend: * S. b1 _! {- y* j# T0 M9 G1 a! q5 y% u5 u6 x
Do you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.