 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
, T/ a5 W7 N" Q2 Y) H& G* I5 nDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
\7 e5 d; _& x1 W
* ?6 U3 _9 D }3 Z9 sEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.0 t5 L- f; K8 F$ V
; Y' k1 _% X+ W! u T' jMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
# _5 }+ N B' x, M/ K! o. x8 L3 u& h7 r8 i% H3 |5 R/ Q/ N
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.- J3 I0 {; w. e4 Q
- ?: E( h, a$ L% P3 T! v" W5 Q+ e6 I2 SDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
6 P" v: H9 N ?8 l+ }6 q' D. O a* E0 a3 g7 D2 V) a2 {
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives." [9 O; }6 y( i4 I
4 w; @- t+ X# n7 q/ T4 z
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
% A, j, D- s9 v# ]) @' b' u5 n
. K" {% Y; `0 D! A+ }Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.. i: I7 ]6 |1 |; q0 V# Y+ ]; t
: H! h5 ]- O& T! n0 s' v. MPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
; G# c! X# g3 m/ k
" ~9 x/ g% N2 `* }+ JDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|