 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
. D. v% p0 d* n& I" G- K/ HDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs- V$ r! G# `& y- W. L
* a' p+ b/ L2 o' D7 ?2 a
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.5 E) b/ m* W1 L [( m
) w0 i# w2 A9 B7 G9 y) YMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
6 K; \9 X/ B6 a% {6 H- E, z3 X* @7 K4 y( s' [# f+ i
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
' Z, p( [$ h) Q9 ?: O/ D, x
. x0 L3 D) q' W$ wDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer., m. V1 q( B/ c' Z6 R* O0 q! Y B2 E
- ~1 `! ]+ O- Q8 [/ w$ o
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
9 l, G" y& ]1 }! t3 W* x
- S6 W/ w% E" @, ~5 rDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
1 N2 Z3 ]: }6 P) q2 ~! R' c
% r8 c( F$ X$ c( ?0 H; n* lDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction., R( l' l' E' r$ q$ ?
9 N; X" N- B+ v& U+ Z, {2 k5 W9 wPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
/ U4 y: i+ I- h$ N6 N- |
( |, g( c; `: s9 r/ X* E- t. \Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|