埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2013|回复: 2

[其他] Dow化工亚省工厂将裁员

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 13:59 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
" G5 Y5 a  P& X6 d+ ]0 ]Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs" h% B5 O# ~( C& ^

9 ~6 V5 j4 ^  @6 KEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.3 u3 a. C7 h7 P  w
4 l& V! b, t( ~1 ~  V
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. : E3 a* }0 q* E8 r; H" Z3 o

( g" b: F0 J" o5 HThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
  Y! C" W6 x2 Y, {2 K) M. h
/ }6 |& Y8 x( h1 \3 |Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
0 a( y7 m0 c$ P; t
, L' y& `, A1 M; n6 \Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
4 c* A6 u% I- x
6 Q! M! m1 \1 d6 {  P6 ZDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
$ W. ?1 b7 c, i" e( Y
2 T" i* y) ^" v! b7 _( mDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
( K4 p9 M5 J, B0 L; M( b, f3 ~  M3 v! ~; j
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
6 g+ ~9 ]0 P* r1 X' w. {
7 ~4 i' d! k2 {+ Y1 A2 h) IDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.”
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:03 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-2-4 14:57 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-8-8 08:35 , Processed in 0.154589 second(s), 14 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表