 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
1 |+ w, d( ]) ]- r6 f; s/ RDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs4 [6 F- N8 T4 [- I3 R! K6 ?) ~
/ I+ Q8 a8 H# u5 h0 B0 N6 z( W+ ?
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
% l+ v; F4 x5 q: W" g, g% h) i+ f A9 T y9 I- @4 R2 x5 Z, h, h
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
1 v0 s l9 Y% z! Z5 W; K& ~0 ]( a z+ k6 m$ r Q4 a% ~; S
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.4 H- P6 i4 w( m3 }+ z2 ]
! N3 e& U3 k$ X! S
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.# {, k& O2 O( R
* { f) ]$ c8 D9 y& g) v3 c6 B& K$ Z
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
! O- {1 S+ H8 V( ^. m' R1 ~
& T( a/ J* Q/ R6 ~; IDow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
: t9 X+ h) R* B- K) E/ Z! M4 I+ N0 L4 O3 ?
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction., b4 q) v& `/ W
5 c8 @9 l9 _1 Z; y' O/ [; W4 pPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
' ^6 t6 Z7 D& V$ r
6 i- {0 B# ^- |6 i) u' k* P MDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|