 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员9 o; S6 s% R0 s( s6 M5 D8 Z1 M
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
* R+ {) h) F) n) e3 d9 m
, v. L( Y& W) k8 q, n7 ^( A, W- VEDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.& ]* m8 N) O' [' z
6 L8 [- d7 K1 S J6 v3 `Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
) W: G# p7 t8 Z: F# [
: Y; d1 S" H2 e& l, T: N0 NThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.& ~0 P8 y% G% O/ t1 J* r
# J n2 I0 } |
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.4 w4 h! ]' a8 e& H$ t0 A7 y) |: W5 z+ O
4 Q, k/ V6 S$ F1 k6 e
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
3 A1 c0 `8 L! j+ h. V( f+ E" T4 I+ s3 l1 [1 |; l Y4 J
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.' R# u1 A# F1 B# p
. K3 A8 z$ I, E+ T' `Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.6 p$ j3 i# t" c! i
# ^7 ?: ~! R" Y5 c* HPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.% r( P& z* U5 [! p: c
; `. U+ G" c. ]9 G- z0 X( QDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|