埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1746|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
- J: E2 B# X% C, `from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
' o: t' j9 c, m. ^3 ^unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house! j% f* M5 K9 A
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by5 B9 `8 a& K! V
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This- k! L5 w& q- [, i. {5 a2 }
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction7 d* ?0 X2 T; r( |  r+ D5 T
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately# R- `4 Q; B& |/ J% k7 h% T+ ]7 ]
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
5 T( e0 g8 A; e2 H: L/ [three years.
; C8 U7 n) D; qBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
0 _( P% t0 t) J, Btheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of/ d3 {6 _) `4 d% N5 T
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects2 I* D1 o" y: Z- C( ?2 }
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices. [' W+ [) R! v9 t) k: P: h; g( M6 b9 [
to fundamentally justified levels.
/ k% Y! d( p2 W1 K: O/ _* U& s# cWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
) w! Q4 s- K2 K" @; [7 N8 u* A" qwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and% _& S3 @3 Q& A+ L# n: ]6 c* |% S
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
# _; y+ u0 }. `- z" l* `where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although; ^) z5 f6 O7 Q* x, `( \
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
/ _2 Z5 j  S& q/ l“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where- t2 M- s0 H! v( |# t+ M- X; J3 S
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch1 X! I" ?/ p9 ]1 ~
that is now being rapidly reined in.
0 R. |. l- H* ]+ a' b6 K( QWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,5 h7 c2 _- s& o& m
the construction of too many new homes over the boom% q4 _2 U5 V! H+ o+ G$ A8 l+ {
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
& m) ^% R" ?! ^( ?" w+ c/ bon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
1 f; D; w3 b" d' H+ J2 [0 \1 {+ gfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
. G. v5 U. @8 e# premain choppy and new residential construction will be
, x2 @' w% i4 X6 fdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
1 ?$ g0 w7 ?' i4 ?2 R4 ]' m5 fis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
$ O  Z! B7 H  D; p2 w0 E: ~1 fto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
' L# `! w( I" R+ w) p4 R3 iresidential construction will fall further to around& D' N8 k! M$ I6 Q7 [, `" G8 |- l" T
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
5 T/ m& n1 Y4 {5 G$ Z' R9 I- iin the fourth quarter.
$ W( T2 ?0 i0 |. w9 ATo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
, t# p! _, s( V0 y% Wwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
/ f  D1 m: n  Afundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
4 b* E/ [/ G) e3 c" h" b9 c8 K0 {# }province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
( b2 B& m" {, J1 F( e9 h- Kvalues since house prices should track incomes over the2 |, u3 a6 u% j6 W7 }
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we+ `& L$ H1 M/ {# E
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers/ K& H: g* p5 x0 A9 U# M
of residential construction.
) i- |  @4 ~- ~: n& E3 NTo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a& N0 o+ ], d/ k& w
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
! _5 V" R4 I: \/ B  \, g( @- pwould have occurred if housing had been priced
) `/ q. S8 o5 X+ I% R6 y) Foptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
. i+ ?, L! g4 ]' Dfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
6 w' K+ z6 Z8 ~5 V( h' munits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
4 l- b2 m7 j) U0 |3 u  dmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
, O2 |/ T; l& ]* i8 ^9 C( ]% KRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
* q+ ?  x# V; X* c2 [, U- @2 J$ @1 Rwhere housing demand will further contract under waning- c. t$ S% S/ V) ~( m& a6 n$ n2 J
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
) E5 A6 D' n) [- O7 [: r9 v! u0 }  Talready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
) b! g- Y+ E2 w( r6 f1 @very time that the resale market has swung into strong" z- {* h5 f. D  J
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
9 a% W4 D2 l) }9 `5 Z. Lhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
# v* ^3 d( H$ g0 @* R2 `8 `* mweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
" [4 {6 F- E- E( k$ N3 `Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the
( b# P- |2 }( P; F' ^strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de" p* I# L" L" Q
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
/ Z: N$ s( ^/ W2 a0 p: Y6 n6 Agiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
( k+ |1 @( G) F1 x: ~4 p( Trates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
. i, }, A4 D. F. ?" o3 T: ecyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
8 B) ^* N' G' c+ b* flimited – with the important exception of the Toronto1 \! v& ?# }2 @
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically0 m+ i8 l. P, J
high levels of apartment-style units presently under/ n) a0 }# i& W1 V
construction mean that record numbers of condos will! ]1 k) @7 {4 N: @+ D( Y
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as2 ^; l& R$ k; M6 b3 T3 ~: `
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
" R$ e0 O& m) ?' c% N  U# u. gspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
: B2 x( Z0 D( G9 k5 g% t! |+ \residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we1 s! P6 x5 Q( A% ~" |
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from5 y) A' b) c: {
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming) r8 e& w3 M# q$ _
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,! e  Z) `9 L4 B3 p! ^, g
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.$ q$ Z- `8 n8 p* |/ k: U$ d' \' z
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING+ `. L  @' g/ D3 H
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS3 z5 o; d& C- m9 r1 N/ q+ P
Grant Bishop, Economist
, ~! v$ D1 |* |: ?0 M( R  I416-982-8063' D6 \; u) G0 N+ X- Q4 s& v& h
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
: O% x9 O1 v2 e3 \- g416-944-5730' S, Q' S- r  t; N  h$ C: Y6 O3 k
  m+ \  [+ g4 [+ H3 B. S# x
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-30 10:46 , Processed in 0.068023 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表