 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
8 H6 G7 T' P9 Z& q8 Z+ Z9 Qfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
$ N: N5 t. H7 p' D! Z) U9 ?6 x( N# Sunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
`5 J1 |2 i$ D0 K( l# ?6 t1 }prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by* u4 u% ]' E) W F8 y, L2 s& T, ?
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
* ~8 y( z. b1 o& H) Zoverpricing compelled a level of residential construction
- t; P D/ _$ i4 [3 J- athat exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately. n+ {. ~- ?0 \ G* H0 @! g
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past. k$ V9 L3 w& L* h/ e. j
three years.
, S/ c' @1 T0 Z( t- W- O8 q6 m' PBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
3 D9 [0 c- Z0 B; Ctheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
9 X# P' w5 @" c2 O6 `) ?3 Kaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects+ Z% Z% e5 @- X$ f2 z
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices& M" B! z2 T! j& G- x
to fundamentally justified levels.
, L2 _$ C6 {# v& gWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
/ Q1 [- V6 F& {" I4 U E6 b5 ~where homebuyers buy up too many houses and+ c) m' h0 A, |3 M3 c0 s
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
7 o7 T* g6 _) z) K" u0 U5 h. O. Ewhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although* g, ~: M7 z/ ^2 l7 S2 ^
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
! o6 c8 F/ M4 e& n( X0 x/ J“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where0 r4 o a( {( T2 x4 K8 [* G. s1 V
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
$ g6 A7 J: Z. p' o2 Othat is now being rapidly reined in.8 }/ R9 E% w, R* [$ V
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,# A! x. g( V2 B, N/ u# z0 \: [: P
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
# g5 G, R* L1 Nmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
3 P/ @- }& e3 U* Con markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers) w8 [% G" z4 ^/ a1 o1 `
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will
4 |& E0 t( h$ c+ c4 T( Uremain choppy and new residential construction will be
) D9 a. ?( W8 b) }- I' C! {dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
* }* R" r3 a& S) ?2 ?" W r% a) k0 [is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this5 `) {9 h, o1 d
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide+ Z( R# t% J. ~; ]. f( w2 I: d- h
residential construction will fall further to around {6 [8 W' R5 {! O q
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units( }( ]4 Q' h% w
in the fourth quarter.5 o. Z- F: p; a7 O8 s
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
/ |. H1 M' s: Y( \, Bwe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run% |1 J3 t9 ]- ~4 m( R9 N% a
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each' o @7 x4 O. Y, s& B( c
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home" s. ~3 y- a5 e0 Z2 U2 g) s
values since house prices should track incomes over the2 x4 z4 V; S$ K C7 [. j
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we' ?2 d1 {& t- v! Y$ _
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
& C2 G7 u2 e$ ^of residential construction.
3 k( _; q t# v5 ATo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
& C4 b$ n& Q' m3 Q- W8 U! t“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction; Y2 L( d1 N' X$ w1 Y1 d
would have occurred if housing had been priced( g5 ^4 t1 ?8 ?9 g1 v* Y/ Q4 A
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
7 ?0 i0 x) O/ a+ O" `. L0 Cfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new6 _0 W2 j( W- K! z* p5 f9 j" d
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
! d. ?5 V% z" w# x7 j- ~many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.% @" I# d8 B6 Z1 e8 Z
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,7 k) E! R- S- T p
where housing demand will further contract under waning
& x; A* p: Z, U8 n; Opopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
" \; h+ d$ G- t4 Ealready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the2 f) d% }' C; v% p( [1 k; f! [" O
very time that the resale market has swung into strong7 @* a+ Q" {; m, `7 y
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces! u. w) k2 M5 l. T5 x- e
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural" _$ I4 M1 [2 J/ _/ E3 H
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.& I& \1 T+ u1 w% E2 m
Québec shows signs of strain – especially given the; D2 J; X/ p, }: \
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de! Z9 u3 r* Q% F6 Y
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
1 Y3 {4 [2 k# [6 K$ Ugiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership4 {4 J6 A3 k2 |% m% z& B
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a" U6 B. G* I0 @1 ]4 s
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears( h% ]" |, h7 _' k4 s1 \$ E
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto; K$ B( Q# u. l% ]
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically3 D# Y0 i& Q# I$ U% A
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
! _$ k- h( J+ A3 v) K. gconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will5 \: K6 u* H4 O
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as
9 ^& r H8 K+ e$ g4 ?+ Wcyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
' }/ p* C* N: dspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
0 p! t1 o% F3 C$ ^& T$ ], y7 \2 fresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we" G2 D+ B2 I0 |( D ^
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from7 `7 t ^- _# Y, q; s
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
( f; g9 a$ s$ o. jyears, which, along with improvements in affordability,, m+ d; ~& u. o0 A0 P1 ~# L
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
% Y3 Q1 V3 Y) K- I; q5 q% F+ YOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
5 ]3 n- w* c- T, G' NMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS/ T: _& C- y: _* a
Grant Bishop, Economist7 Z1 b0 ^. G7 ?
416-982-8063& i( n+ b9 O) e" Y% u& T4 p
Pascal Gauthier, Economist
7 }; E6 ?; ^( c! L416-944-57306 x5 s# W; d$ o9 ]/ z. [! i% j
* Z$ p3 W( Y* _: ~, X5 q. y' S; Bhttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|