 鲜花( 53)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
This is a column by Mike Holmes in today Journal. Holmes, in this article, has detailed some very good points which I failed to say it clear in my previous postings. It's worthy to have a read but for those who are too busy to do that, I would like to summarize it as follows and hope it would work as an alarm clock for those who rely on inspectors to determine a back-off or go-ahead decision on one of the biggest investment ever in their lives. " X5 `9 ]9 u- n! x, }) q
1. Currently, no national licensing and no federal regulations for inspectors-some may have joined membership of inspectors organizations, but it is believed that they use it as a marketing tool.
4 J: [0 n/ S: _1 l2. Home inspection may only provide the public with a false sense of security-they don't have liability insurance; in cases they fail to notice major problems or mistakes were made, you can sue them for only the amount you paid them, i.e. the inspection fee; the expensive costs of repairs will be on your own ( since March,2009, B.C. is the 1st province to offer such protection)
1 x/ y0 N0 b) v! E% w4 f, h3. Anyone can claim to be an inspector and many of them are self-taught.% @4 d1 l% z; Q5 ]" P% O$ }3 \
4 ~% H2 z5 I3 \5 f6 T$ o* L So, when your inspector reports too many of minor problems like nail pop-ups, dripping faucets while there is no other serious deficiencies such as leaking roof or foundation walls, it doesn't mean you need an instant back-off but be alert and make sure your inspector knows what he has done and no check-up for serious problems was missed. |
|