 鲜花( 53)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
This is a column by Mike Holmes in today Journal. Holmes, in this article, has detailed some very good points which I failed to say it clear in my previous postings. It's worthy to have a read but for those who are too busy to do that, I would like to summarize it as follows and hope it would work as an alarm clock for those who rely on inspectors to determine a back-off or go-ahead decision on one of the biggest investment ever in their lives. / i1 H. z$ n9 q5 U* ?: W5 J
1. Currently, no national licensing and no federal regulations for inspectors-some may have joined membership of inspectors organizations, but it is believed that they use it as a marketing tool.- f7 C4 }( p5 {3 v4 F2 Q
2. Home inspection may only provide the public with a false sense of security-they don't have liability insurance; in cases they fail to notice major problems or mistakes were made, you can sue them for only the amount you paid them, i.e. the inspection fee; the expensive costs of repairs will be on your own ( since March,2009, B.C. is the 1st province to offer such protection). ^) q3 l5 W& ]: S1 ?5 k
3. Anyone can claim to be an inspector and many of them are self-taught., K1 e5 V, o5 A% D- ]2 f6 E2 T. }
0 B, e9 f8 C2 s2 o+ B So, when your inspector reports too many of minor problems like nail pop-ups, dripping faucets while there is no other serious deficiencies such as leaking roof or foundation walls, it doesn't mean you need an instant back-off but be alert and make sure your inspector knows what he has done and no check-up for serious problems was missed. |
|