6#cactus_2009 ! D5 h A% D/ H r # k7 A$ F. g1 p2 Z! IThis may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best of riverbend area. If 1-5 ranking with 5 the best is used, it probably will be 3 only.
6# cactus_2009 4 A1 }$ K: K2 E3 X# ~! U0 M0 U7 X 7 t- C& a& d w6 S& R6 }' F9 H( NThis may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best ... , n6 M* Z1 y% T) j* [, mceramistpalace 发表于 2010-1-17 21:29
0 I; d& Y0 ^( T3 ]4 Q& V z; J% A7 b0 W! M
So which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then?
So which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then?+ c3 c# G/ d" O8 X1 Q/ N' p
特北京 发表于 2010-1-18 09:32
. ]; R# ? S8 k% h
I would think, for older areas, eagleridge, whitemud creek, newer areas like magrath summit, terwillegar gardens etc. are the 5s. But what the 1-5 ranking I suggested is only a rough classification, for some particular areas within the 5s, one may consider them as 5 plus which are even better.
http://www.leebourgeois.com/blogs/lee_bourgeois/archive/2007/12/02/e5ce8ef1cc0243ec8a8eb4281c885af9.aspx( Q0 L; s d Y# d! \8 }* W
$ y- D, Z% x, `% B+ Z' K" O
1404 Latta Court in Leger is Sold!% M, R+ C8 _" T' Y2 }& J* L
Phaeton 发表于 2010-1-31 10:47
2 p& t4 ~" X5 a5 j
5 M6 G2 f/ z8 ]6 V6 fThat's 2 years ago.# ]- n" _% {4 C# y6 K. E* r
( G1 w1 L* g8 z$ k; m4 _Don't you see "archive/2007/12/02"?