6#cactus_2009# `8 @( ~3 s3 k9 d( ]
, `2 O8 n! o9 C; m( S
This may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best of riverbend area. If 1-5 ranking with 5 the best is used, it probably will be 3 only.
. [/ N4 E6 ~7 rThis may be a rare case but when rabbithill road was finished through all the way to 23rd ave., Whitemud Oak subdivision emerged as a mid-level residentials, so it is not the best ..." d0 A) ^! g" y+ `/ ~
ceramistpalace 发表于 2010-1-17 21:29
" \& a( z7 G8 }9 c" q! g
+ X: f- Z. t9 f. V7 ?+ i6 u
So which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then?
So which area in riverbend is considered as 5 then? % k4 y( C9 x7 g0 Q/ A! j6 y" e特北京 发表于 2010-1-18 09:32
1 [$ f; i7 ?6 d& H) aI would think, for older areas, eagleridge, whitemud creek, newer areas like magrath summit, terwillegar gardens etc. are the 5s. But what the 1-5 ranking I suggested is only a rough classification, for some particular areas within the 5s, one may consider them as 5 plus which are even better.
http://www.leebourgeois.com/blogs/lee_bourgeois/archive/2007/12/02/e5ce8ef1cc0243ec8a8eb4281c885af9.aspx g; z, L. B. Z5 _; S7 K( s$ M; E' L3 f: i8 k5 \: S w: m& i4 j
1404 Latta Court in Leger is Sold!7 }+ F F- e! b
Phaeton 发表于 2010-1-31 10:47
# A6 V j# K8 Z; i. N" G/ J
0 i9 `* ~3 V/ _' w
That's 2 years ago. 8 l" [% N- i9 R- G3 n8 |2 p- q7 q9 `6 I/ b0 N
Don't you see "archive/2007/12/02"?