( R6 d' b w8 C, l( S/ }) D
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995. _- ]4 W3 ~# G3 n1 Z* l* _There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected.* ?, B. O6 j! ] L% Q
) h: i7 x7 M/ k1 k3 {5 L( I. F* @. j) h
信任zsm2002和scuba1995,不信任另一位。该如何投票?8 G( F4 e3 `% C P" D# V# }* f
pchell 发表于 2010-7-26 15:45
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.7 F5 }+ S" C# x: a3 r/ p. \
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. ! H9 `9 h* R1 S4 Z' W0 U8 ~/ `* A" }& Y% W9 v1 g0 Z; V! [
& U% ^/ n# V/ U2 X4 ^( e+ z" u3 R. t( y% k+ ?
/ ]5 E! X3 l% I( X I' F4 v
, e# I O5 W- w0 i
2 l% I. v, i5 p( s2 A |小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
# G. \/ _5 z! u4 e% }4 O
: z6 O; t) p) C& M7 ~- E: M, w" p
没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理, ! G# h1 W; f# S& D6 K' f7 W* [- h/ E9 r$ l! v2 [
但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实 2 Q$ I7 B0 U6 E2 q4 E; A0 D4 ^4 H* V+ |8 A# D5 v
记得你以前也说过,觉得不合适可以改规则,在此之前,你我都应该尊重规则