鲜花( 21) 鸡蛋( 0)
|
楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:4 z, o3 G3 T7 S; n! d
# y) A" _# @* w' p. l
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
3 r" N1 O0 `% u4 t
3 h4 m4 R6 m3 F5 @$ b**********************************1 ?3 R% L5 L9 {/ D# ^
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:( b3 t1 U2 r5 s1 i! E7 t
: D. h4 E6 l2 t9 N* ]. l b
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4." c# g& i0 E' e1 R0 |& m
2 O7 j! R' L# A6 Z
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.2 K* A/ |% c' F
% W) f& [+ F u$ a4 ~0 Y
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
; I- F3 j" s3 E* B2 M9 H& \. s1 R# k. [9 w" q; A
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
! E: g2 Z3 l- g9 u$ A8 }0 E( s. q; `* g* b; K" H* r
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|