 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
: q7 \# L$ z2 |& }6 r4 l7 C8 Y* D) @7 v0 p: J
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
" r# j% l4 f/ G- y
7 H! c# W3 m3 y, M' D" Z; B' q4 I**********************************
! w, ?/ R& D4 ]/ f( k+ JAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
/ W: v* F6 e6 K: w* O/ q1 |8 V% v3 {# x+ H7 ?
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
4 p2 i5 D: ^" D2 c N) R ^& x0 W2 k
( s8 h2 T' _- u6 x* X, d2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
) e4 p1 B- e5 G* W, A. Z* a. Z5 o. J; Y' I, |5 S
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
$ Z f, Z. _+ B N
0 m: V ]# I/ |) P4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.* n8 M8 m: {5 J. i8 z1 A/ I# z
1 q: W9 Y$ F0 ^+ w/ x- a. y, o8 J+ U9 o
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|