请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348

2 E. M/ Z, R" s: B+ t0 N值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348

: ?+ r! \2 W) @' R" x6 E0 v) Z值这个价钱吗
; d( r* R1 N) z3 v( `! v# m粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

8 ~( S9 K# c8 J, r: T7 B, y8 [9 ]去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
skybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
% Q, i7 [0 y, q7 vTax Roll: 9982751
! M/ ]5 H8 j9 ~9 u) S& [Assessed Value: $497,000
100% Taxable: Yes
100% Complete: Yes
1 z) B/ L/ g. l" g* aNeighbourhood: Richford
" ?4 u$ \) ]( ]3 P+ G0 J: {Property Type: Residential
Land Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
% U6 W, Z9 d1 Q; N  l5 I& g5 YLot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
7 q0 k* w" o0 t, i$ HBuilding Count: 1
Year Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
Approx Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
" L) W( f1 y9 i- L2 x9 |+ f(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
3 `9 J7 i0 f7 _! S& VBasement Development: No
2 |! u) j7 i$ Q4 W! }Garage: Yes
( X4 V! E  n3 a' k' CFireplace: Yes
Walkout Basement: No
Air Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.
% t3 {1 f, q8 T# K; D8 d( N
8 K: V% A$ s  @* f# y+ nyou better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.