请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348
3 D4 C8 F0 E* p
' ]' `  g+ |4 y; g2 q. k值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348

值这个价钱吗
粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
skybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

; x6 Q& U- L- w眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
Tax Roll: 9982751
- {4 Y; s6 ^, {# w7 U5 mAssessed Value: $497,000
- q2 F* {) G5 M100% Taxable: Yes
100% Complete: Yes
! C, v4 N: u, U; v/ z6 J1 wNeighbourhood: Richford
Property Type: Residential
, t0 Q5 n5 a! M% z( N0 E* d# |Land Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
Lot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
; r" t6 d* T$ ]% \' PBuilding Count: 1
) B& N$ R- r& S5 |* D$ G6 j6 xYear Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
Approx Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
+ U9 t; V3 e+ z8 W! B, ^(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
4 X  T) o& u. n7 M# r+ y. R  |Basement Development: No
) W* w3 C% R( A) P) X! xGarage: Yes
0 _* L) Q7 u8 V) f  Q1 G1 GFireplace: Yes
Walkout Basement: No
: s( d( k) i) Y& K, DAir Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.
# `; }+ Q( d+ R
you better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.