请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348
4 G) k) n7 h7 Q) `$ X
! K3 t! q  s" d- i' e9 r0 s3 P值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348

值这个价钱吗
3 `3 d+ o& a2 ]" E- e% @4 J5 a8 w: C粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
skybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
$ Q1 ?5 m$ K0 P) H, pTax Roll: 9982751
Assessed Value: $497,000
$ C+ e4 x6 P) _7 d0 B100% Taxable: Yes
100% Complete: Yes
Neighbourhood: Richford
; Z% L& \6 t7 ~9 S7 R( R" K9 HProperty Type: Residential
Land Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
! `3 l% p% R2 T* NLot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
Building Count: 1
! y4 a. a+ }* K: \2 H% zYear Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
0 V( V$ \% z9 ZApprox Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
; X( U; x' c" X7 H* {(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
) D  o, c0 b- I/ n; ?: d6 HBasement Development: No
Garage: Yes
2 g. Z7 u, ]# y, Y% d) A* M$ [Fireplace: Yes
8 D4 ~4 P1 M$ d/ a0 nWalkout Basement: No
Air Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.

you better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.