 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
% D7 m0 ]$ y2 ~7 L* v( }
/ Q3 `# h( C5 i8 ^# [0 N; O- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
* z7 [! ~9 ] [' |0 n$ e! Y; d# p5 f) Y& B
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market% v' g4 I7 U. g' h
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third5 N5 ]7 o% @! f( [0 b
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
4 `( Q: T5 Z3 q& ~2 lin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
1 f5 j, S8 d1 Y+ pprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
7 @. F- ?0 J$ W& U$ E4 w( a" Umore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
0 m* o }# o, l$ NQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal' m2 P" O# Y8 l0 k" z
LePage Real Estate Services.
8 p! Z# H3 ]2 I5 e, K) W, p/ u8 v1 [! y+ k3 p
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
6 T5 C+ V( z( mare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
, q/ D! ?* s8 F5 C: ~# \conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
" \. v2 W# d9 A+ _2 osound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the7 g6 l- g, \" z4 O
residential real estate sector.
]: ?) _( w0 w- p( o! `! S+ f+ l* Z) e# H$ G P. I
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
x, @6 i3 w2 v7 roccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
& q) j0 @% E# L4 F% A0 tyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5622 A o+ B8 g7 H3 ?9 |8 v& s; T: e
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
7 M0 M1 t, C' Y ~: H1 s1 K(+13.2%).
# c s9 ]3 g. E# E' ~5 z6 o( V( C6 z
G0 x4 v6 H, c0 N f0 S7 Q8 s "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth# f3 a* B E/ z3 O
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
! b7 W4 Q: n" Pfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
2 [2 G5 m. `0 `1 K( U6 e/ \poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
8 O9 H4 Y% D' z: o# K8 [* X0 v3 ^president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
* B1 H6 I0 E6 c; {+ R0 n"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
9 C# U- [& a% f1 U+ ~! G" \welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
+ N4 G- @8 X5 \/ x V4 V9 X6 l Lbalanced market."3 g& n* o! i$ I$ B
& ~4 S/ r3 e. G6 q L4 H5 x) X. A
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,6 N' Z) s |7 d2 D, U3 r
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift8 W Y3 b6 }# V/ V; [+ ^ R3 V
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued* W1 x, n" {3 i: k) w
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core m8 z0 i7 H0 M. l
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
: V. _7 o j1 h# B( x7 Tmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record5 x8 V) z; H5 C. X* I
breaking price appreciations.; m, y+ V/ d; r
/ I$ G8 X0 J+ B' r
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
4 y( X% c7 h, ? E) v* R, |# aeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
) {9 R: l6 k3 ]8 U6 |* \- o( \largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.' |! W: [) A/ O1 k
9 C) l: i/ k6 ~% S9 T In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid+ l2 ?( {+ w4 q4 b$ l
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
0 Z* }" o l% l. Y4 X) P cconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
1 V# n4 N7 s1 K- ^" o6 y: V% zslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
. h9 @7 B, q% X8 o) N; S; e* sIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
4 a/ [1 g; w% Y+ K# {1 k F# jgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of1 e" L+ R, d* D
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
, {8 Q. Q7 }, \3 \! o1 Y; b6 Z9 y' v( [% p8 z* Y4 G
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
1 v& ~7 ^- M: q$ Vmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
: | h( y5 J* ~ O. t) Y: e9 X9 Lfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
) a$ n$ f' y) |; g; p. g, jare markedly different than those found in the United States.
- z" h! ^' ^/ u9 x: d- X! o" Y. ^+ G' h
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
, A8 {' ~& @, E: R' T! JAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's5 J: U6 \2 K" ]0 c4 E
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
- p. q7 b0 S$ `5 Z Crelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general$ T: t1 r. d* D) b
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the2 Z7 N% w: S; C- A7 e5 ^; H
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and2 |# A0 p) k& r% D& y0 b4 r3 g
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization+ A) ~+ v) `8 y' }" K
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."8 s* X* \% q9 Y, M+ C
7 |: M' z9 m. v" `
<<
; i/ P! d+ _. P: g; R$ U2 E; R2 | REGIONAL SUMMARIES
4 q. n6 v6 l' g4 T0 ?' f s. n8 J >>& o# z. {& E" M/ H% k
% O( a2 t1 C# C Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
: ~* f& P/ `, j' x2 YHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate; P# F% V0 i1 [; w" v2 Z* A
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time* j2 p- D% U- j" {
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
" H+ S/ }5 X5 ]9 ~* M( B; K! p2 s5 |renovations.
$ `4 j; o; d2 ^1 l+ S- V( L0 I# V
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight4 U- _5 y( W& h
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation- }9 e2 ~3 A% F# `. I4 y
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
: L. m" F' _; b" n0 LSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
7 p$ U1 q3 K5 d* a9 s( Y! g3 D
1 L. d5 o- O. Q" }8 }( H The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
: Y, T$ v' X2 Yslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
5 m! t' s; V0 w: wquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new: i4 d, z. D9 H0 V1 S
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
8 D9 P: C' E! s8 ~to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes6 a, w3 L9 E2 @$ _& k c& U
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
/ t4 _0 M* g# I0 c+ f5 j! P! u# S$ `% }
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
. T. T4 n4 l% G6 d: s9 Y* `conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their1 y) z$ d$ Y" Q3 Q5 [7 w! [6 R1 R
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers5 e4 c- a8 l; `- \
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
! ^ n3 z" A5 |8 e$ E$ A8 qdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
: F$ j) M7 |0 `buyers with more options when looking for a home.2 d/ ^* V) v7 T6 ^7 y! j
) ~" R5 s/ Y8 A& N& M
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly* o7 W, {0 a+ t! [) P2 U& g. T7 ]- {) k
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
0 ~8 Y1 v+ i, F7 wpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
2 E5 u% h% ~+ B! |- ]( O" ~as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
9 u8 K2 H& ?1 C$ G1 |- \few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
* K- l9 G; z, e3 S/ y1 k* s2 J/ X# J7 K3 c9 {2 n$ N* Z) m
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
3 B* n( C. {/ A$ `& Yprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
; B; r9 W9 d4 V% L( v+ E. C$ wlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting3 X: U# d( O: V* t2 T2 x
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,( Y5 s( |, [; N" C$ U" u
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the% `) n) P, @; b/ O6 M" o7 `/ X
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before/ z9 Y n" R5 U9 w% B7 n+ R
making a purchase.
6 c; |* Z% U: K+ n' d- j% H* H7 k3 @$ _5 d7 E: n
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
o: s$ C: ^6 z4 Hmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
( @( S3 T5 J8 m$ I% Kconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city* T9 Z# n, p: H t: z' b, R
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
! L& i1 A9 E! u- M* u! R% \attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown; M" l) M% n1 c/ ?+ t
amenities.1 | ?" y) m U+ h
/ C. Q5 ^. Q, M The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels/ ~( r1 W7 Z! x! k, O8 _
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand j# F: i% P* Z
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has, ~2 l, x) y" Y2 l; j' a4 M: k2 e
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
1 G- G& S7 ?4 p) y7 N0 m4 @1 v8 A2 Wdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle& I) ]9 t, n3 u) Q- l. j1 P0 N
residence, rather than for investment.
2 V( p1 f" ]5 O: I# q5 t4 f! z5 H* [/ M* ~- I: i
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
" l1 Q* m& S* N7 r( v' h; Ehouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
$ w' p* n9 ?) B. Z9 |; sin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer1 i) p* t% P" H0 h$ P1 v& M0 ]
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
! Y7 X0 |0 m3 Z k) ^' n: X. Wrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter7 W1 k6 T0 z) m4 t6 w
the market.
! p& Y A+ D6 g$ w
9 h& d! X; i. w* x- T* z In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
+ i1 L" Z0 I/ F# W4 ^$ hJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In% M; ?2 L6 w9 |- P6 e( b, j1 w
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring* \- M+ B% W' \3 }% Y/ p! V
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
+ N) p3 U# K) O$ gto the shortage of available inventory.
: o! n. {, Q2 A
# M# @1 E$ O0 V6 B& H Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its2 p) ] F# M$ N3 J: [* _: j; Q
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains0 W3 } e0 |% v
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses! {2 @1 C- i! t' ~( y% s
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
5 Y. `# W" G3 i* i; R; r6 T8 b( e* J$ D7 O; l
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
6 C) Y. O- p' s- d+ |4 win the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low. V% f" O! R, Q# O* K: J* c
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
1 b+ O/ ?& a1 J8 z6 _# gpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
- g" ^+ Q5 U9 j J: y; b+ nprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
, o4 i9 p" p: X& ]) dseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as4 ]7 V8 X2 j* T0 B5 T% W3 p& ?
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
0 d1 B& {0 Z) @. C7 U$ }9 O' T! f- g1 ^, m- X
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
8 |( [, e+ \0 v8 fas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
6 W6 x1 e o& R5 zremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,5 [" r' {- v# ]/ H+ V
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices% Y0 z) L7 n# S2 G+ _8 s3 [. e
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve! q- T+ i% K6 N" T1 `
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly, A, R+ q9 F: E
towards the end of 2006. 0 R* m3 m/ r3 \( `0 D
5 z. y8 I" C- `; EWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of2 o7 O- z* s6 g" n/ i* \
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
- m' ^9 b7 v5 x& I/ j3 C: Yto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
5 C, d8 x( W: S) Vgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
1 P& V! l# @& B3 qforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added: ]6 Y y$ R5 {
pressure on tight inventory levels.$ B4 i& ^2 L# S: `
, g n$ g* B; v
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic9 D+ k. s5 }2 E- E
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
. h2 E8 q7 y2 ^/ J/ C0 [9 winto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;( O3 ?* [& y5 h' u
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
4 B R* k" B1 s/ ~, K$ k0 f% Sfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
2 u, `1 m& N) _) P# C: E4 X! V6 ?4 f
<<
# Z& a- R* d: y) T/ R7 V Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
" y" m, D2 L% Z! f" ~# P" D
9 l' k$ @" ], s! p; d -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 a$ [! g' a7 Q- v1 s, R% W
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
1 t/ C0 T9 H8 B" O. }& w6 F -------------------------------------------------------------------------* {, I/ A: j( E" Y8 Z
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
) J$ ~9 J. _! E Market Average Average % Change Average Average! ~* `) {+ _. l# ~& C& v- J# e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 B7 J* p3 s4 q5 n4 E! q- I: Z
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0002 Q$ A# u& P+ G8 S% N0 E4 G1 @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 ~5 {) |: g5 B
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
- X/ p1 i- o5 Y& C1 { -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) u+ a/ C( e% I4 G2 q& Y Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000, Y, z$ v+ M' m9 ~) {9 C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 P7 G9 Q5 n9 T! W/ A9 |+ K Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
) h+ Y* r- I4 b$ p% v -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 `$ W6 X" e; l. d St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
* U; q. I, _, V4 A1 M6 W. b ------------------------------------------------------------------------- G5 G& N- C8 s9 N0 M! I
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5834 K0 \% R8 \' N: Z% l1 A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
O4 K3 d/ O& ^+ n ` Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185, p5 j, }! c& b9 P9 p* j' v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 ^" Z* @; ]. @' ~# r q2 l Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
' E$ j9 {, u S: ^7 N& l -------------------------------------------------------------------------! _$ ]% Y, ]( g; |; s
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7664 E; g5 Q. I- }# _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! T# S" ^, N- M! E; i( O Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
( E2 V% I4 k7 x/ M9 |+ X" o4 [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 Q/ _3 D6 y" U' C+ T
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500' M+ L0 n8 z# Z9 M0 q& x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& ]9 [ a8 u, O Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
5 k( h4 E0 G% c" A' J8 W -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 ^3 q0 @* e% Q9 o Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
0 F" k3 x4 _3 s -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Z8 s [. O* Q" | Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500& X+ j. U- ]) t9 i% e, `
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( i+ o+ {& \0 f5 W m! g9 E9 y1 z Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
" ?# B5 T: ?& @1 t( i2 j( D8 b -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 M+ A* z+ t* ?) d2 s6 D* O/ g
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
0 i) @/ i) ]; r) h, n) ^( w -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 a! z+ Y. k) F+ d: m; Z% B3 w8 z8 l9 O, Y6 M. e
-------------------------------------------------------------6 Q( ]1 b4 W+ I1 w7 g
Standard Condominium) \+ ^$ z; w% B- q
-------------------------------------------------------------# y: B1 [% X p1 L! a+ T/ g/ _4 R
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
- U% m7 h9 |# h Market % Change Average Average % Change
: H# p! O3 x- D* s* M -------------------------------------------------------------
: ]7 k. Z. B- c% @4 Y Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%2 n. `4 A! h$ c/ d
-------------------------------------------------------------) I/ a2 m: ~$ X) I
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
" e! k, f F l0 W4 Y1 x9 u/ q -------------------------------------------------------------+ X( `3 P9 }: A) C8 S( |3 w
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
2 [$ s; Y* [, u g$ s$ X2 e -------------------------------------------------------------$ V C6 E8 {" L5 L) [. q
Saint John N/A - - N/A
, Y9 t* H3 ?( J3 l# ]: v -------------------------------------------------------------/ F0 v1 S! G; ]
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
$ U$ ?' [- S, s/ \ -------------------------------------------------------------0 F8 z3 n1 Q" k) e
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
% O. ]7 l) c) {7 a -------------------------------------------------------------4 _; D7 O# h: y/ f/ I* V
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
1 e( X& t8 G( L" U" W9 w5 [; J" v -------------------------------------------------------------8 ^0 Y' j/ Q! a+ Q; [/ J
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%' D) O9 o1 L2 I0 A' c% N
-------------------------------------------------------------
' B; N! x0 o5 v Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
! } k, V" h' f& b. d+ F -------------------------------------------------------------
2 D6 C: W4 x) s9 o8 _6 a' o4 M V Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
: o. u& Y3 C* [ -------------------------------------------------------------, M+ W& B) }% @# L/ ] i0 l$ j
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%. ?6 B/ `( I8 w* C' _: @
-------------------------------------------------------------0 {: n. A4 S: M& j+ Y: c, g
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
/ J' Z. S% x% G7 P -------------------------------------------------------------
! X7 d( m$ e, n f6 t( H' I Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%8 V* i7 {0 l( l9 \$ C! B3 s
-------------------------------------------------------------& C1 [9 ?5 W2 I2 J% K
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%" M( t( Q* }5 V
-------------------------------------------------------------6 F6 G2 } l- l, k1 c
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%+ K6 I+ l% m8 c# |2 r; E6 g w0 a
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ o7 m5 c0 {" E) U8 r National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
0 D& ~) \( r2 \# u$ h" ^# j" I -------------------------------------------------------------% w8 g2 C& E1 Y/ y5 M& t* ~, X4 W9 y
>>
2 y8 n P) A6 |0 R$ S$ w& V- P4 [
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined/ o* {/ ~7 i: w: `- D
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
& m7 y! [- S% Z1 T5 d7 D7 \6 FJohn and Victoria.
2 u9 N2 {$ i$ \
3 K/ k e0 X U: t9 V5 F% }% i The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
( N* d& x7 s( M8 p, Z7 y3 Ecomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
( o Q+ R( `9 b k( Ihousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
+ J" ]* V$ K8 { ~% j+ z) c, {) N) wreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
5 U) V$ J, [0 gtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
2 P9 z. T7 r( o$ E0 qacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
4 U5 b) J2 p( ?; ]& U$ davailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
) L" C. j0 k3 y0 {7 W! v4 bfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable+ K0 K, }' ^7 Y# T" y
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
! V {& B; m) KNovember 15, 2006.+ z( l( O/ d9 r+ j% a" z( l% S3 |
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of1 k) `$ {$ q& R5 L; t( B5 X1 I0 f
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge7 x, ^; J0 y) w" i: J+ z8 x& `! B% b
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is4 W% g7 w% l4 l7 Y0 h4 [8 r
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|
狗仔卡
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
显身卡