 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 4 s1 t! n; z2 C& A8 I
/ i# D: H( N/ k6 J
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
& c5 K7 t$ m, E/ C- i* F9 [. C: q% \
) T$ r$ o v& Z3 q/ | TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market8 g; N* h% ?0 w3 B' v! P) x& M g
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
c# ~- q# e% M2 ^quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic* v0 B, J2 q7 ^( U$ K
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
. A, i0 d* N9 t0 \6 S5 Fprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
# U3 E3 p( I/ M& w: e" Nmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,: { f. ^3 |- ]/ Z! O
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal6 W' D3 D( H/ \8 L; i
LePage Real Estate Services.0 j& }! M: i% j' h3 ?
" K$ ~% z, M1 n$ n( W9 ]' M1 P
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
8 ]: V/ [+ K7 z# I% D6 K) `are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
0 J2 O' f: p! K' w3 O2 [conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
' u( o- Z' |) ?5 @6 F7 |sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the1 M3 E/ h, ^7 W: L
residential real estate sector.# T7 G: O3 O, |; y4 |
/ ^" x( y- n; Y+ z& R Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
& q! }: D+ m, @* [! ~occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)) I( e8 m( ^5 z0 H9 f+ t
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
0 Q: Y" Y+ q9 I6 D5 }$ q(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380/ i2 u7 ~) n+ ~4 X4 V
(+13.2%).
; i5 v9 n P9 y# l& {8 K
% j- B+ |& g2 z5 y7 S "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
0 s- R- J' p% V; {$ kduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the0 A8 Q! N" b! s# O
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
4 G B0 e0 d8 ~, ^' spoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper, d3 f% ?" `& \( n
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
, C0 H3 M8 _: m"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We C& u+ e& L5 c# m
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy2 U, k. J# E/ r L7 M" y. I
balanced market."8 _. Q1 U$ T9 n& S4 J! z# ?+ y
: X- m9 t% e) {, a
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,0 x+ a/ s9 k2 s) B
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
; v( w D; D2 n% g5 t# b4 Ato balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
# W) V' H/ g4 A- Y% Uthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core' @6 k% V( k3 M: `( |8 `1 D
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,6 l7 o( M" J4 j( t1 c4 S) X+ d
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
* F1 p. G2 p& x8 l2 h) e. E+ _breaking price appreciations.
3 c8 i7 w! J: V L1 e8 \2 S2 N% X$ f! q/ z7 a
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding6 n0 H( ]9 ~8 l6 L' `' R1 C0 U7 d
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the- W1 x* e: k3 C. @% {7 l& f
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
6 W1 h7 T' G4 w* ~
7 A$ O4 l8 c5 p& d! B' G In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid3 e' p- U3 n: `* G
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer, T8 @3 S R; Y
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off$ ?: r. P8 i7 r7 |/ y \8 Z
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
$ p9 }, _, p- V$ [8 L( S6 oIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers# ~4 V e- _. `8 p8 p4 l
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
" d2 K+ l' _/ f: _0 w+ {price appreciation when compared with 2005.
7 R$ X: K/ o |: T( v
) t0 M# G9 y' K% n& Y While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing# Z' ?, K. d, d
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and: o0 ]' S! ], a; L _
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
% d4 `: u" U( X- kare markedly different than those found in the United States.6 B& r6 I0 Q( h/ [
; t$ ?' ^" b& S Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
; C0 \. N2 @) t- P. g, m9 tAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
( B/ w0 o" f2 \, E* F" Ufavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
/ u* ]0 ?) ^5 c9 s' }8 R, {! Krelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general- F+ z6 x, \4 M! ?
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the& ~ z, v' j" N8 q! e0 ^$ Z
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and9 a! _! ?9 b _ M _' C& D
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
, K; m5 a) W+ z1 j% C7 kmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
/ Y! P9 v9 D9 u# p* r! o
% m6 b* u/ J f) \7 Q1 o5 z) p <<
! }; d6 `7 B$ ]. @ REGIONAL SUMMARIES
6 q4 V" W! c9 Q: s >>
y3 [" V; `& t4 m" I, a6 K6 z& D1 e2 ~
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in7 u. d8 F$ i& v+ a% E
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate( D) z- H* n1 {; o
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
+ W3 z( s. [* n7 Q3 Y' B# ^looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of2 z) e1 ]# E f( k3 U$ W
renovations.( S) e2 h& N8 \' ]+ w9 K$ Z+ q" E- p6 a
7 I, H0 k# R) J; P4 Y
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
! V# G: g& {3 m5 i% y: c eincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation, H( \, q7 c6 _; c
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
6 u% `, k4 \1 @# s, MSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
. p2 l5 B7 Z0 ?8 A" d* C0 S/ p' S2 W
: ^( h4 s; R+ H& H4 q+ b! i The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer( d& c( b' p, z
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the6 E2 ?6 J: O2 a% I
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
8 _+ L( z* Q; x$ m( ?600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
! }( }( w; P) F3 W+ D3 Rto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes- ^, h; `3 s% Z
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options., K+ l4 N, [# A; K+ R
' n) i- Z& c* W) E) s8 u In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
/ V0 n) W/ T& g2 u M- U1 lconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their5 o* P/ e* `! H
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers1 Q1 z& {- s# k; u# ^
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
. }5 M( e& l, R) F$ o8 Hdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
" g: @ N5 b, K& }- X+ n. q9 O+ Vbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
7 [$ F2 b9 g4 l
8 |. ~1 X4 |( q' r7 ^! \ Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
; a3 i0 ~5 P/ d) Bamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes% {9 y! I! H) ]% p* N" i
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,3 D. c. r' c2 @ a- S& r
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
6 L- W- l) ^8 q# A( ^) F* w0 o8 J, Gfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions. h# W, w7 W/ j; q; H! ]$ w
4 i" R: o4 W1 u1 k+ o; G5 W
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house+ b1 P; ?" |: q# ^3 I
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
, ~" \- L7 x1 {: q$ Plevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting7 g7 |7 ?: [8 K% z( u. m4 f
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,* J* C& v" R& u5 i
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
" W$ Y: ^. X' y9 c( H9 Upressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before6 X2 K# U6 E2 b. i5 ]* N
making a purchase.& d, h4 w& F; O( l( F8 Q
& V s+ i0 ~) m
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing9 a' u$ f e# i- c: x* X6 l
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong' i7 N! V9 x3 g4 w y0 w* v0 f: e
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city2 m% @' }+ u" ~( z5 L2 T
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting/ {$ T( D5 p0 |: ]
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown/ ?+ E- k/ v- Y' _
amenities.* k: I' w6 Z+ _
1 N q) f# X) U4 a* X/ q
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels0 t1 A& l+ {1 A! u, w( M) j4 \) P
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
3 K# k! s6 O2 \- e" P* m' }across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has0 m' f. b& U" _
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
4 }' I/ p2 d% p& p1 G$ P8 F+ Idriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
7 K0 w( M2 Y }% j& Q+ uresidence, rather than for investment.
0 F1 ]5 f* K3 Q5 l) B" j. ?7 S* Z4 Z8 C
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as6 u. y" U2 Z9 X% e
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted, l- @/ I) i6 A/ L8 o& u
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer( \! l% \, W4 C: Z2 H) I9 q1 [0 |
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization0 c) Y5 E: x+ d, R( v- x" g
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
4 w; N) P# I" x! othe market.
4 _6 ?" Z$ \- Z. M5 ^/ V3 s! U* `+ n
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through9 Q7 X" | d7 o/ ?3 s; B: m6 L
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In# N* I8 S" x6 ?4 `
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring& e; `- n l4 T: F# Y3 K
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due! ]/ e$ z! q* ^
to the shortage of available inventory.( w/ ?6 O0 [9 j
5 V* k# F$ T( J# p; {
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its) u7 D, P0 U0 {& O
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
& l/ t# G6 [2 H9 n& Y) Vvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
1 {; q+ e9 P$ wstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.: L, i# p; Z( j' e6 f( f$ z; Q7 j! c0 Q
- f$ a: U$ l6 y
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
+ Z. P: S. |* l! a$ S: a% H7 Gin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low+ V7 x* W9 _3 h6 h! [
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
5 x$ C0 x. G- j9 r1 {# b0 ?1 @pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
3 g9 @6 i- y+ A& C0 tprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer% `+ |' W3 F8 `3 q$ z. t
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
( |: f, A3 E& Z# P9 Y- nbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
; t; U. x* p, `. t& K
0 C8 B, l; L% X# [% A: R7 W4 V" O Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter3 Q. S; T" X) b6 {; V: b
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton! \$ n2 [- J3 T
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
3 r4 F y+ B8 n- V% Qmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
( b# S6 F% L) N) X' D7 oincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
% Q' Y+ M) T L) W; |in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
8 b( v9 S0 r1 R$ otowards the end of 2006.
]* b1 O6 }5 Y- p; k# b
/ Y' q6 E1 P1 v% KWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
7 V% _ `' F: g6 W" [0 ^: Pinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
, t; w- a9 f( Y7 w# f# ^% lto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
/ R0 b) j0 z9 j+ i2 W$ c7 f mgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to9 X$ ^$ V* [: B4 ?
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
B, K7 `3 ` L. h; I8 j3 F" qpressure on tight inventory levels.# }- {, j& b% i4 W0 f( O
- h4 c( D* B% U# ]! _ Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
1 C" l# c9 V1 O. ~- N# f7 O jfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
/ O" N4 P+ F+ [3 dinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;: R+ ?7 S7 x# G/ {
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
9 I; D+ P+ ?/ t6 u8 Mfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
+ N2 u. a7 y: r$ W ]( x3 v1 @$ _4 ^+ H7 y7 a
<<
( C& a/ c1 o0 k2 _5 } w6 _' s Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
$ A0 D1 O; |$ S, W
- w4 [: {4 r* q1 x -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ r/ V9 T D) P; G
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
/ f& L: o% R1 s1 @0 ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- v- x3 M3 J v- r# t. `# t& D& Q 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3: v6 [$ l* F; ^/ h0 X* V
Market Average Average % Change Average Average, ^' l% `1 K3 L5 V. c* p, g" {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 W T/ H; l& a9 b2 W8 M Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000/ m8 _' N) _4 ?- X" y8 n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 `% ]7 e. t1 G5 Z' Q1 o Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
3 }4 B: U8 W/ S4 u" O$ W0 I4 N% I1 u -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- @4 g" {: P8 L; [0 V& w0 L Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000& w# r& b( W: m, z# ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' a+ }, Z0 [3 y% X) @ Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -9 Z% Z0 [0 R3 I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" f4 D! a% L5 T+ R. o St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333+ h4 R4 |1 o/ c3 i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 j/ \, @( Z- Q# e. t: A
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5832 U: e! K. O& P d" F% D: b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 v0 R! f% m3 d8 t: k Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
" y( y: v5 l0 W3 R -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 J( B9 y3 n/ k0 A$ _ Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
, Q7 O4 p5 j, @& C -------------------------------------------------------------------------% g7 m( u+ |. M2 d/ [
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
& E5 i+ s& v9 @0 k G; f( J C -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ L; g V' X6 }5 q
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
0 m4 d1 s U' k8 D1 M -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 \1 K7 B" q. L4 B Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
" f( I2 e, }7 [& r9 ^& u% S -------------------------------------------------------------------------. q( l* q& u+ {- a
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
' I5 E' F0 t- U4 J- s2 n. M3 R" t: Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 ~$ x+ E* J' E1 C% K# c Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
) j0 Z/ q5 |7 U& x -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 f$ @4 o5 N8 Y& _2 ^4 b' `; _
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
+ Z. M0 f M8 |* t -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 O H3 c- N5 @
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
, F" h: P! A1 L3 M+ Y* [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! L' s% {" m3 L" p9 y J National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
' Y3 ?: x; C; B% C C) C% V9 o$ \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ U& Z0 H6 E# p! v" S- m
/ i5 i1 W( c; X/ u- @3 l -------------------------------------------------------------' X: k1 P" }, H* s, r$ B6 p
Standard Condominium
2 M6 O9 ]# g( x. K7 f- D -------------------------------------------------------------
: C. `2 ]* {' I9 u8 N6 M g 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
% m/ ^( k- x; q Market % Change Average Average % Change
% b/ K+ H8 W0 a8 f- E$ z5 h -------------------------------------------------------------8 c* o2 `# r9 q- [( @
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
4 e9 z( m8 A( R- y. b4 f -------------------------------------------------------------& h$ i; T# F, B6 N2 @. T
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
& m' ]2 i0 ]6 Z7 i! d -------------------------------------------------------------' l5 r6 V" s0 f0 v! V5 t3 I' K
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
" w1 Z6 `9 ^# F+ n9 ] -------------------------------------------------------------, P! Z( S4 R) X. b, ^& }( W# V! J! `. J
Saint John N/A - - N/A) s( T4 C- U2 v$ w' Y
-------------------------------------------------------------
" r6 y$ J0 ~4 C! s3 M St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
, u. V- ~* v( X: W0 L -------------------------------------------------------------
- U2 W3 _* }7 H* w4 t0 A% ~' A# S Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
! ^9 o1 B, P0 B; m; O; e3 C -------------------------------------------------------------5 Y* u& ?6 l: \3 D. m7 G, N& ^ x
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%5 T" ~1 j. A4 [3 @6 U/ V/ p& d$ [; ~2 p% o
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 @6 M, Z* y+ r1 h7 q) ?3 [9 v Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
" K/ P% {' u2 ]* s8 k -------------------------------------------------------------5 r4 e/ H, @) t% ?: O a1 x
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%! l5 k; H2 |) H
-------------------------------------------------------------
i& \3 ~* r! L) p: Q& j7 P& @. F Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%0 i$ j% k7 n, @9 d
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 C1 ~* w- F8 o# q Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%7 f; I; }: c* U2 |+ v! i$ V
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 l8 ?' {8 R3 z5 \/ N Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
0 h) n4 N {! A6 `& {! r( t( Y -------------------------------------------------------------
. p G+ _* t, a: d! b2 l9 h' W' k Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
4 L$ {" j! k- v2 X; U+ k7 O -------------------------------------------------------------7 ?" y4 P' G, V% C' d+ m5 O
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%- o- A, v* W8 A" Q3 C
-------------------------------------------------------------# m& a1 X3 }8 T: P! Q4 M6 ~2 P
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%) `7 m% B; S' w v$ [2 v8 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------
" N/ X9 O) M8 Y6 ] National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
- X4 P/ t, u' ~: z -------------------------------------------------------------: x. k2 H! r. X. k4 F
>>- H) A+ w A" _4 R
& g, v& ^) |! `$ x& X5 x Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined$ o5 a5 Y4 B" `& k6 | z
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
/ G) h+ L8 C3 sJohn and Victoria.
. ?, I+ T) h c) j
; ?2 J1 P3 A2 d; x f+ d! m6 h! r The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most+ ]1 f: w# q0 f1 t, f
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of7 J0 z1 ?8 m, R0 X* \7 J4 {* b4 w! ?
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
& x+ e, {, V2 V: Greferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
& `+ z5 b6 O2 z1 \- { n% gtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities/ L1 ?$ k2 y, S/ t& C
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
" b5 r4 v* L; ~0 [: I% D9 Uavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current2 }/ K% f+ W! X
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
' ?, v1 d& _2 K( _1 W/ E3 sversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on5 v# V- G- D$ t7 z
November 15, 2006.4 G! F: X! @$ }! c; G1 v' y6 O8 C. Z0 |
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of, t z8 k: ~" w+ y
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge/ T6 d- N+ _: P" G
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is q" q3 X9 y: L( g# K
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|