埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2395|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
$ B' u0 K; E9 K% [8 W  L
4 l4 D9 s% H! {' t4 V7 N" w) F/ J- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
7 s0 }1 @9 [# L% J1 z9 j% r  L& F' \
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market' h$ u) j% m7 C" r3 N* X8 @
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
- N7 V7 s/ ?' {! @+ s) U+ Squarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic$ T' i' C9 u( @
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
# E" H. ]& H0 E  Mprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and3 M) I5 W. Q7 I9 H: C! y
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,: J5 I2 x5 x+ V9 q
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal! N+ Y+ [; [- \- ?+ R
LePage Real Estate Services.
* K6 d. i! k, X* n
# j0 `" `0 o7 _! X+ h$ W6 x5 y    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters; c; S3 s, b  d
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic: q" H( T9 o6 G6 Q( ~) e5 E
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
' S6 R0 a$ H" p5 hsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
! J% X/ J6 F/ |9 }, sresidential real estate sector.! S4 s! c7 J+ @9 R$ [" z9 r2 w7 T9 f
& `) ^; w2 G, `, |+ i. P
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation# ?) a  B) f" f
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)6 X! S; N: I$ }& @" L
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562* ?- [  M* @7 q1 l+ h7 g
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3807 c4 s( d$ @9 r! O* M
(+13.2%).% d/ f5 f, b+ P: W/ c
5 y+ [  x8 d* [  Y
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth6 W. w+ e- T8 g0 @: w& H: f  e
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the% R: c2 S) p& J0 ]4 B$ W
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
; i& A, s7 I% x9 S: tpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
  q' R/ c: S& r0 @$ q8 |% ^& T: Npresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
( N# W/ O1 Z4 H4 `  `7 T9 L; n"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
( X( I8 |, q* Z" n6 d# ywelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
3 i! L$ B5 ~! R- m  Sbalanced market."
& C5 B+ X7 a9 M- A* K  D2 w
6 h" D6 }- @. ^- O% I2 D4 k    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
9 m  S) F/ C. h+ i+ Wconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
2 r) G$ D4 ^; A# Ito balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
% ]4 g- @2 U& v% s- I2 d/ nthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
$ @& z: e: i& f( S& l+ d1 Kenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,; Q( U- A' ?8 o
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record/ _2 d" h5 w$ u$ S& j" y5 J8 c
breaking price appreciations.
3 y6 J# _" Z" a. o, M* ~# w9 W8 T/ t
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
! k/ [* g, F' v$ L" T' [economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the* o4 |1 U2 l4 y4 u3 z
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.5 f0 P/ F3 t8 n" U: g
7 w% G1 B( ]- T$ t- d% b0 t, I
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid+ X' e! h1 |/ O. E
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer. W1 m* U2 ?0 y
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
' O+ i8 j$ V8 G+ g* m' ]9 Eslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.! ?' q- }$ P/ h  u
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers8 q, B5 Y# f: E2 F$ }6 v
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of: z: K* j% x  S, }
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
1 b1 C6 Q/ }- a
. y( e- d2 C  H0 N$ r3 f/ v    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing, Q4 \7 G7 I7 `. a
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
0 _2 {1 E- H4 x6 q0 g2 H  C9 @financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
5 D  D# p7 M$ G: e1 Dare markedly different than those found in the United States.; b5 i; Z7 a0 q& v3 Q" @, m
3 I: T+ s$ n* F; I6 H
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the9 P9 f' x2 f1 [
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
# ^! |2 ?1 w8 \- P1 O; vfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
0 ~' L9 w' c# j* j( X; ~relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
, ]$ t; I4 z& `0 Jaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
9 |" j/ J4 V4 P3 R% P( [downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
) D- l1 o0 d! H5 V: s; g; qaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization0 @8 Q# z/ ?: h+ ~, ?2 J
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."1 W! D. z& k5 k

1 P0 u( Z& Z) q7 k0 @% h# I! i    <<
. }1 Y9 S$ u( B& n: X6 H  `6 P  x- i                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES* F3 {, R3 E: r$ [
    >>- t( k% {7 X1 t3 n; _

+ n1 Q& \+ X0 K. o) p7 w8 N    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in) {4 V; y3 |2 K7 L6 h$ c) v4 f
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate2 u# b: H  D3 W
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
$ O  i5 E/ t4 h1 u) v: llooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of, w8 h0 ~8 @- p! ~$ {
renovations.
1 P: W$ ]* b5 z3 W6 j. F. t3 H; \5 E6 I; E
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight+ s2 q1 b' [8 |0 [9 y; _
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation% ^: I  [( d/ x7 v
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
% A" D9 j: h) U- m! uSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter., E: f( Y6 P! m5 k1 _2 w3 u2 D* ?
) q$ o, V  S; q& x$ s/ d
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer% n' x; z; N: S& M" Q
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the. {; v& n! K) O) d
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new; V4 H2 {* J) R1 m
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
& p6 n) Q! {+ g- j1 s7 }7 R* ito the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes0 h) D2 h& Y# q/ M: L
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.; }$ |' x6 f; `8 ^$ O+ N

  t( J; z8 `; P! D" D) d    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced2 w8 v3 j; A. g$ x. ^+ V2 t, Z+ P" z
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their8 M+ H6 J9 F. x+ N( k
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
2 W- |# Y* }+ S  j0 Xwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian5 X; ]; w2 E7 ]+ s
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing) s  \' }& }- @3 V. i$ W
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
+ }; u9 `6 l& T# J2 v( E8 N6 K9 S% r' C0 \1 l/ Q/ w8 j
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly( K9 Y( N8 K2 b  C$ O3 M# k) N
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes, @# J5 c+ C; @! A
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
! b. ]% }% o6 S# g# ]as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
% S2 A) g2 s  qfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.7 a) [1 z3 Z" s1 ]& D) A( E; I

5 w, q  c1 l9 [% u    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
5 l4 v' F: s% {* h& oprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
1 R7 \! T' H; Q; n+ v' h% Klevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
8 a( L5 v+ o" |" \3 @( W+ Jfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
& i) o: t, t, X  \when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the; v5 G. t4 z; Q( L9 J8 ^
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before& [" t' z/ o% S5 D+ m* N7 i
making a purchase.
4 ]' W0 R# Q) P! i5 ?  n0 e6 x, W  D1 X* y, X3 q
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
& \6 }6 U$ x' ]# S0 p6 Cmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong6 a+ Y- w0 N9 R$ N: z& d
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
8 a# v* D% U  o: r9 i. Ucentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting; Z! ^7 q1 D- w3 }
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
: v1 {% G% m9 \( b2 J7 oamenities.
! \; V, k, _, e, q% Q6 \
5 s7 t" P8 ]  `% a. S6 Y) i    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
( s" y( x) n' J! U1 e/ Y6 |+ v" Qthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand) k8 H: M: e! x5 Z
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
' W8 O5 g* o2 T) j+ x$ w' \continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been. a6 b; X/ Z- T% \3 S4 ~
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
5 v# U: W. e% L0 g$ Q: f3 Nresidence, rather than for investment.
0 C0 X) U& j8 D4 [3 c7 d" E
/ G* @* X) L0 u9 `7 c& o! ~/ Z    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
/ y9 J0 `- ~: ]& P4 }2 jhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted3 [# D8 K- \& \
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
. `- f$ c! ?. F8 C" S; jconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization4 o+ \" v9 x9 s  e# Y5 W
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
9 X, Q6 a$ A6 }1 w3 l+ }' g' sthe market.# F7 V2 P2 N# d, ~. y: V8 H
6 Q* f/ }( T# t8 X  B
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
" V7 o1 Z* J( e- ]3 z# ~6 VJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
& r4 ]' m+ F7 Q* l- F, WAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring& q, U6 E8 r$ U; p* i+ T. q
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due- z7 p& ]$ P- Q$ m* X# v% Z4 @: V
to the shortage of available inventory.9 m+ \9 y; c/ g
4 c2 f- P; k. z$ _
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
8 u+ U+ [( O3 C  s# A5 Cmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains5 @2 s, S4 @- h$ Q
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses  I0 d$ j& }; V. q
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
/ ~- k5 d% W2 `8 g0 X% Q2 ~6 y- C! m2 O) T, |) q" f5 T+ z0 ?6 P
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases, r. `# Z% Y4 w) W8 f; \
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low+ S/ w5 N+ `% q- h/ p, Y
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that# z4 _  L. K8 P- [5 }3 e
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
; N" q; o, A1 a9 v" [8 d: q: ~1 |+ wprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
* P( Y" o0 \; x; \+ G; ]' qseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
& T9 y* s2 X  P& Obuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
8 a, U9 ^: q( @2 I4 N
, R- H' M+ W9 i3 p: d3 H
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
) T3 J7 i$ x2 W( T6 ]9 c1 Q/ das activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton) R* S! z# o9 S& G5 |( x- m2 ]) F
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,. |7 K( k$ ^; K) G
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
9 B, A" g" F% T3 N7 Jincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
+ i) T3 }: l6 g7 M- H/ v6 nin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
" C6 S0 ~2 r% l6 f4 ]" ~9 s* a$ Ttowards the end of 2006.
   
; `2 F4 @  X! V0 [, r
. i$ C$ q; y# B2 X6 _) TWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
9 V" G( C' v' k. e6 t" yinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable  i$ |& ~6 S' _7 o
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
* Z6 c  Z( J/ ~# v% i) j* e- h! jgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
: o/ I* H4 ~* Q6 h9 F& Gforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
5 Z! U$ k3 Y0 ?% l6 ~: l; f8 Wpressure on tight inventory levels.1 V2 r- o( b5 B. C- ^, z( A6 w. k

+ N6 T8 ~. y# @$ [    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
" }- }9 O1 r: p6 A$ O; efundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people  q1 ^8 a+ H. L! S, _' |+ o
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
: c2 C& F* p4 H9 Vwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
& J6 y8 k1 n4 z) c/ ufor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
5 |' z2 `7 G0 B, ~* x- Y7 Z4 }& Q9 l7 F8 B; v& Q" f  {3 |
    <<
% A, E3 S( `" T2 C/ k5 m      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20062 ]  t) s* |' d3 J  {8 S3 H, v7 u
8 v# o/ I( U& M1 b- w# D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ j* d7 W6 t* h0 {" x
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey( L/ y8 g: n# D* G5 N* _6 c$ z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 Q) y5 O2 @) S7 y' A" a! \
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
: @, a* a2 J- a+ s2 \) R    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
; w* v1 L. q: s" d. W1 v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 x7 V' T0 i: Q. P    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
. f4 h) x( \) [) z1 R7 c& ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( ^0 b: S, z' z$ E* [6 ~5 D
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
$ @$ x* d/ K& x; I1 q! l- \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; |8 j1 L1 A. e5 U) M
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000" R7 `) O4 r* U+ \5 u3 W4 `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 T0 V$ A  J* a0 q7 z0 X    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -0 k) h+ `2 g2 t4 u
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" L" {( ^& P  r: A
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3335 w' I: Y2 z- C1 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' G6 ?" f4 Z$ i& n) }; E
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583$ Z" S- |  ^9 j( r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 x3 c+ X5 H+ W% v. N& w9 Y9 f    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
2 z9 r6 y8 q* ?    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ P* r; D2 d6 |. n9 Z2 s' L    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250% k6 e1 z& X# l- m; }
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; y/ t- a. ^$ a' @  T    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766; d  z" h# |' V8 H
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* P; _7 P6 S; Q5 ~, y) s2 r! ^, f    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
/ Q" ^1 ]; R( r9 y" B    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, E; K& v" R$ M! B
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5002 j1 o+ E2 x6 B) [, [5 e* S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ~2 }& C0 J1 A. A1 C* H, y2 x. Y
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
, K* r) z- X  g1 y: s2 f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 q/ }# Q- s/ A* p: L
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
2 u' R! [1 F  Y0 f$ O! U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- l! }! ?: P) f1 ?; ?! i7 J$ t    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500* @2 x2 C) o& ^" N  j$ A  m6 O! I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& c& G3 i: Q& Q" y8 {6 Y; @( @5 `
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
5 g4 C" d. Z7 z, F  t1 @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ p& S& }/ o# z4 c7 q5 s- f  t
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860% W  `( |; R- I. Q: S. X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ v0 g, }( Z, r# A* A; m) E4 z& K' Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 `- F4 K8 w9 i" n7 t& H
                               Standard Condominium
: q7 G: C3 z& b+ [$ C0 Z/ k3 A+ \/ i    -------------------------------------------------------------! a1 M+ T$ v2 s9 a) T) I% M
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo) _& i  w0 \  A: a( |: c7 J
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
% a5 y8 v: P8 w  {! o    -------------------------------------------------------------
( s2 Z7 E3 y1 L, L2 T4 A1 b    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%8 c2 p5 T2 E  J( f
    -------------------------------------------------------------
- h+ q1 g- m6 R3 n+ j3 g3 j0 y    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%3 Q- U* e. q, z1 z
    -------------------------------------------------------------% V; r" z9 H) Q0 o
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A7 k& ^  B8 A% K$ `7 u! o- V
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 w6 z0 y4 W8 U1 w! W' R4 f3 f" z
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
3 z+ B0 e! `* M* ~3 M    -------------------------------------------------------------2 X! e0 y( _& e1 _% F4 X0 _; x' r
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
( D; R' C+ a4 T. D    -------------------------------------------------------------
: k  `+ I4 C1 y% i$ q    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
, z3 T% Z% v9 R    -------------------------------------------------------------
. E, ~( y, A; d* d" f% ]4 F9 v" e    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%; |1 n! V/ c& o6 T2 d4 E
    -------------------------------------------------------------. ?3 W% l1 D7 u( l
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
5 A. s* J$ [  h  K6 e& x    -------------------------------------------------------------
& p! Q& N& x/ t8 [    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
+ b. I0 Z1 d" q2 H9 m* F. F) Z    -------------------------------------------------------------$ ^) M( M% a7 E  G9 }% v. j: h
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%7 y- h$ @- v, _* w& q7 k* c
    -------------------------------------------------------------# u9 E" o* ]+ r
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
5 `/ q& O/ e5 B  V# q! v: u    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 T3 }0 M* {. e) i# R    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
6 ?' t1 A' D7 ]6 s    -------------------------------------------------------------1 u; A' z$ K2 H- }, s
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%* T% g9 ~. T6 q5 b9 C% N2 M) }
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ w8 m- k2 e: G9 |- b4 U) e2 i
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
& G& C! }3 [, y5 F% b. K( U    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ Q. S' ~+ H. ^, `    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%9 Z5 H0 M# q/ b8 z# W8 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 b( F- P! Y& X& G; E) \0 D! a
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
# p7 E  A! f; b+ ?6 C    -------------------------------------------------------------
' b8 u: d4 {+ N4 o8 j! N: x5 O" q    >>
* W4 V- ^$ L9 e' `! V- T
& o# [, J4 p. L" f4 ]) Q& u    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
3 b3 K4 N9 `/ o9 P, z, v( `in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
" W" L: V0 y7 z& H8 a" D$ |, t- e* UJohn and Victoria.
! O7 v) \+ v- K, d; e5 q  Y: E* c1 J5 Y; Z% X, n
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most+ K* K% t3 z* `1 K) Y
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of0 g# d6 j8 g& u! p1 Z* D# r
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release, H, n4 c: m. Y( K
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price$ i; q. ~! C% U( Q( J" C9 |- \
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
% A: ^' p7 G( |* }% {: Hacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
$ m' o4 V3 o9 }; ?) w" iavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
# k# M2 U7 G: K! i6 B, ifigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
/ l6 p4 u1 S3 v, h& x1 y1 Tversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
5 z5 m  H7 b' E& _( Y: z7 KNovember 15, 2006.
% ^8 H. V2 b! [0 y, G    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of) u- Y& Z' x% J1 h
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
' o; s9 c( H; `* U/ f, Aprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
* i7 \( Y" i  M4 S6 Favailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-24 23:37 , Processed in 0.302488 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表