 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
( m6 E6 m" u4 a7 V* J. W; D
( \' E5 ^) [& ]' I' v- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
; E: y j9 K0 E3 P: p" q
& {' D; g% n, y1 Y' N( s TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market6 B, p$ V7 t% X0 H& ^) F
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
+ ~1 G5 M* K. Bquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic5 ~: W4 K: N0 U* o' Z
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
- h/ V2 f% c2 a+ Hprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
& c% a2 o/ [! bmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,$ \- @& {! s- \- G0 g
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
5 c4 G& l# I1 ]0 W, ]' V3 uLePage Real Estate Services.) S$ [- x1 x3 U; a
! I3 @7 `7 M6 O4 {
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters2 l& n- D4 h" g
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
; b0 R( i9 i2 B; dconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
5 r! k: X9 M8 k1 tsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
+ k3 q1 c: F& N b3 D Y4 @" @1 zresidential real estate sector.
l3 g% Q, ~9 @5 ]
/ v, V2 |+ {/ W9 F0 j8 { Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation! Q7 r0 l; ?$ O& \& Z
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
7 f* b7 r! u" K0 A8 ?4 D$ vyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
* k" x) U$ |; t F(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3803 m) H) j$ Y2 z- l5 a6 n
(+13.2%).
, {% x4 s7 v5 g1 y" j
4 x/ {! W% H9 g! C/ { "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth. ? {2 l' i/ w' g
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the$ f, _/ `, x1 C- G" y6 f
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are; h( `! r$ @# w1 |% E3 f. w
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,2 l! X. Q5 q( @ f T7 q& P
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
! P9 T) `8 |; I- ]. W( v, p: x"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We9 ?/ r- A3 e0 F9 U7 p: _& u
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
" u5 l2 J! B% U, g8 n0 Q! C* Ebalanced market.". F, z( a. |9 M2 S" u0 U
. M- v9 L: n* v; O- U2 e: W: X
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,% s9 ~6 Z" Q w+ h% W) m
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
" t. [' z' P$ u- P3 p$ z/ S a8 Dto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued0 W' g4 h# q# B
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core! H, G( m% g' W: T! ?3 q
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,# B2 Y9 U6 P' h, f
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
) a' n5 I) p3 w& mbreaking price appreciations.
: M [) b5 Y! P: Z4 Z4 t4 i. K3 Y7 a/ [
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
: K# c$ T$ D5 P; Xeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
* _ Z6 V$ h$ _+ K5 slargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
) Z5 ^. W" a4 ^! Y6 `! ^, A+ F3 m& \+ G$ B3 i
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
: ^ A# Z t6 |- aeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
% Z2 [9 U# G2 m1 N- Q- Y Z M* y: w6 wconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off' B" R/ I2 }5 ^
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.) N6 k( r8 U; U `
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers( ]. _- Q) A7 X/ `
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of2 a% H/ ^# [7 w% f/ q
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
- w s$ F: X. r% z5 o9 W" P4 j; b% m% r' b Z* S9 l
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
0 E' z$ J# f' x* T* |4 `. emarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and' a/ @1 Y" x; I# C* w) L
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada' N3 v4 F- j! {3 x: F7 L0 a
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
! B* B' {; J3 X% }2 l5 Z- d. K
9 ?' v/ b# i" d Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
1 A$ T) h5 y, Q$ \4 }American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's& J- O! R& V3 Z. U6 O. j
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
, U; _6 ?. O6 E! Q0 erelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
6 T6 Q2 X3 q! iaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the2 p) a7 C3 R; ?
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and7 z B7 d" n& c5 l, P1 ]/ X
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
$ ?- F ]* q( g3 e7 o& X3 l2 dmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
( ~7 u: S- p% u3 c6 u/ A2 L0 H
( P2 \) Y6 k/ M- b, i8 m+ T+ V/ Y3 z <<
+ v& R$ T. c) N: f REGIONAL SUMMARIES: x4 P+ m" ^$ ~+ S0 j, p/ I- \ F
>>; J3 X c' M' C2 [0 U
2 R6 F! ~0 N, Z* L1 i. k7 N
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in) d s: [( ^3 n- o
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate* y( Z! U: k L# r5 e. q# P% j9 v% u
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time8 n; H& P$ v3 S! \9 J) V! a' x
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of! B7 d# X2 q2 o. b) l6 m+ w1 ]8 a
renovations.
4 s. B) r9 A2 |% |
. S# V2 B2 V7 U/ T _ y: z The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight& n B& k. \; Z$ W
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation6 o* W! l/ z: |' t0 }
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
, P3 E$ r2 {( ZSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
2 M! o3 H/ V" _( `( `- E) P6 l% H3 Z( S5 x9 U
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer# p$ P c) M6 Q% q2 ^" p3 c% I
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the3 V" I; `2 y$ I$ c. ~
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
1 z8 A5 e+ M5 E" E600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
1 q5 c& X) X& z+ H1 ]/ Zto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
2 @: v) a& m* ]9 band are instead opting for more affordable housing options.3 X/ C6 Q7 X. X: v- p/ w- W
, M. Y% p( I' a3 V B' r+ K. H
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
* \" u* U$ L0 N2 a& aconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their0 F) C( e$ @! @4 H; N
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
& h% }4 \0 B" S8 r* ?3 P1 Rwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
B: X. m% m+ m- L- X5 ?' ], @6 V/ ]dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
+ k. {* |% ]( p/ |buyers with more options when looking for a home., m% b2 }, e( w' g! L( v
4 C" H1 q! U, ^ Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly' ?& S" [8 \7 U2 P' h! \, X
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
5 p5 V! `# } V$ ipriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,/ F5 w5 c9 I+ v0 u7 i# E; a. j, A: ]
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last0 j' \! }- B+ H: r% y) t
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.+ V$ O" `4 E8 x' _
- {6 v! A Y U7 l5 B
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house" l5 ^* o3 H; J2 o
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
* W0 Y6 a2 p" E: v/ S! g8 olevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
" {2 n5 @# ?* W7 q3 Sfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,! X+ K+ p- f/ y1 \5 }# q) B
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the# Q8 G2 \4 |/ H/ Z; [
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
( R- y$ U. s' Emaking a purchase.: g* D* S; n- C6 }6 W" a9 k
' g) `1 R' O( b6 S Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing/ {7 v8 A& b8 B O+ @5 R6 h) @7 Z
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong: N" f) j } X. x4 v U1 P5 R
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city8 s ?+ A$ D- C8 o8 o5 n y
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting; o$ u) @0 V! t4 d' u" L
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
. }1 f. M) J! _amenities.+ ]! j3 M5 K$ w' Q
, a4 ?; E- H0 ?
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
) b+ X/ }7 @# lthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand# A; K" @9 z2 P* z* c! m
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
) g' {4 h# U- l3 j0 icontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
6 M4 `1 x2 W/ L0 M* vdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle0 K# w" g0 g$ M
residence, rather than for investment.
) w) a ?, R6 T2 F; ~' Y2 F( d
" v! |8 f+ I) a8 r d u* L The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as9 q/ C0 t) L& r; E# x/ s
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
' M/ F0 Q' M8 x$ n- `; qin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer5 z) i& K% o; g) o
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization& E) E0 ^9 h) c- s8 z) q; z" X7 V
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter |/ j! ~, Q" b4 C! k
the market.9 p: B1 o& v: U- K1 q& u
8 U9 X( v4 t% L" `( `9 c& H In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
) E# h# }& c- r' M! c) L' d7 gJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
3 i' G4 A6 L! eAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring7 e3 B7 S9 s% W4 \, [. p& [
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due2 D5 L: y, X2 Q! ^- p$ p
to the shortage of available inventory.5 \3 k' n1 Q$ v' \
9 k( |, M0 e* W+ K# { Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its; C2 U9 k, h' p# ]. g, p
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains7 E7 V% i0 M5 D2 _# D9 T
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses, S$ v; d2 u/ v( r; k" C3 h
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.: f" c }0 C* @- n, d
+ Y- U+ U D) ^+ ` Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases r* j! \8 f/ R) |9 }: l
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
, G( a9 q' G8 s [unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
# a# S( J9 I5 O' E$ wpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring# D0 X ^/ d! A/ v6 q' T
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
7 Z9 a+ w8 @% V/ x( p; T5 Hseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as. Z3 d) Y& \+ D# z' P
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
5 y: ^ k3 {7 Q- }* P
) t' T. D4 \% L& }! X" @ Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter% u3 Z. t. W# ]$ n. }4 M
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
3 _$ a( N5 U6 u5 j, d p* Iremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
0 g6 _/ G4 R9 W2 I4 o# W1 L; y$ Imaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices+ f+ z" `) v& G* s
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
' O! Q$ q& }! o- z9 L8 Yin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly% S* F' v3 z1 i, [8 \* x( V# z9 p: o- j
towards the end of 2006. 4 s8 j: I6 V7 ~
+ r. n" g, d; z$ x3 V& E/ PWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
# d/ M8 d9 a* Uinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
* C# j. o6 a9 T" ?8 u# lto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse0 `; B% f8 z3 C& Y
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to6 Y$ T! ]' w) U4 I) A
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added% S! A8 ?- V9 \7 o
pressure on tight inventory levels.+ a$ z2 ]7 j( P ~! b
& P5 X- Q& w4 Z
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
! f4 ~! J9 ]/ v( v, zfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
+ N* D1 U' s' u8 D4 ^into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;2 X4 {2 |# t3 F5 ?
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching, \' Q8 `: H- G( Z. Y/ n( Z/ I6 K
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.4 G) A' Y- Y$ z" K5 x7 d
' _" J1 w; a) T$ b0 } <<, u; \6 t# Y7 c, K/ C# h0 ^
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
$ a* y% z$ J4 G% \1 K7 I$ `( m8 ~3 Y8 W4 R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 n3 ~- i0 o# N& s' o, ~0 | Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
/ t+ f" U* G. c6 n* P8 D9 t) | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& H" b. z: x8 U& A2 p 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q37 z% t/ s: k0 x4 c, j O& E4 S2 a9 y
Market Average Average % Change Average Average$ x* _- N* @! D7 ]- T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) {/ G7 E! c# y5 P/ d Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0006 r$ ]5 c2 T1 d h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
I* \7 I- C) Q8 t. V Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000( `; O# j; a" M9 c; i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) o1 Z4 J3 n: R! _" o
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
* O& |9 W4 d0 `, k5 v& C* X -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, E. x6 ~5 H* a; R& k/ i0 y Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
# s9 O0 r. \) R5 s X6 r5 Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 j* H3 z1 t& Z" x6 V# N+ n$ r St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
, W& n# G" [8 V; L) T* Y1 |% ~2 f2 u% V -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& G V: p8 D9 W2 B+ z3 J% B1 d8 t! j5 ` Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583; B. x* d1 [" U+ Y: n* B. D* R( I8 d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! a4 r/ V8 F" }; o
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
8 l5 B, M" h) J1 W g f -------------------------------------------------------------------------" U$ k. F N" W# P
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250' v( K/ k& i1 B6 S$ d% n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) F" \7 y& W. W/ u6 l Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
8 V3 V j+ Z* E2 r6 }* F -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, m; H- k0 \' l: [ Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
1 A6 Z( o1 @3 a$ @7 _' r3 T" L+ K -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C, k" d; Q5 k) q Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500$ D [; @5 n; L1 d, o. z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ Z* O: N0 b( ] Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
m$ f8 B* M4 |+ F# z4 O -------------------------------------------------------------------------* n+ _$ \7 V% L [
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
1 ~* i. {+ q, I -------------------------------------------------------------------------. J) t _5 g" ^+ Y: x: s8 N
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500! @) `7 M; _* p1 |& z0 v; C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% |% v" S, b: l Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000& `+ i. G9 y; h4 ^9 ^! }+ n) g; V. ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 J! y4 F( S0 K& N National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860 M# X& ]8 p {+ P8 t1 b7 y2 W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
u9 N4 {) o$ I+ z5 G- m( a! r: t
-------------------------------------------------------------7 \4 N* A8 ]; h* @: e
Standard Condominium
/ x2 X- C& D# y8 u9 p+ w -------------------------------------------------------------
$ x) _% n6 J m) G" o1 a 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo8 }6 c9 A; s& G8 F: M1 D
Market % Change Average Average % Change
7 s S" e) z/ R$ B7 _ -------------------------------------------------------------9 P* u- w' |5 p9 g1 H7 P7 B5 r3 ^
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%) a: s! g; S0 s( ]7 ]1 N
-------------------------------------------------------------7 Q) ]& c6 R7 u* V9 @
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
, Q9 S" j- w- K6 t -------------------------------------------------------------2 D1 ^' ]: A5 t& ~" f; v5 ?& S/ w
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
0 c2 f- |6 b8 t# [$ p: \1 S -------------------------------------------------------------
; `9 i' I% r9 H Saint John N/A - - N/A4 F, Y1 v2 E& G6 S& ~& [
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 s) e0 `: q5 S6 F St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
/ n4 K0 E# D- t: J7 \2 M -------------------------------------------------------------
8 r5 @2 @4 t4 N q; E- m \+ M Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%; H$ k- C5 U% F/ Q; C- Q) T8 D
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 k- h J5 |3 t7 G' E! `( `4 q% b- n Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%1 u; c$ S Z% e8 K2 b
-------------------------------------------------------------
' A& T. R' i& m4 i3 G Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
* w5 [6 \8 S' E. m -------------------------------------------------------------
% J* G0 ^4 y& c) z C# ~( h/ d7 L Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
: p1 c( a3 i) ^3 U4 | -------------------------------------------------------------. ]! _+ e. u$ U
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%% Q" _/ a' N5 a1 L% [/ ?
-------------------------------------------------------------
' h2 ?. V5 {; v' F& X Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%) t4 `# a. s# _/ E
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 q" v) p% N9 }% A' V4 _ Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%/ d' O) u0 \6 E; W% z
-------------------------------------------------------------
% M0 Q6 m" Y" V7 i Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%% Y9 q9 t1 k4 d0 S. }9 H) c$ G
-------------------------------------------------------------% `1 @1 P) S2 z) P7 ]
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%, o8 z7 {9 @; H0 b: e, F
-------------------------------------------------------------8 V7 k1 ?4 g" q* q; i5 P* j
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%+ n8 R g- B' G: p' W/ M1 v
-------------------------------------------------------------4 k' [2 A; A/ J' r; }6 ]
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%; B. T$ a# T. h3 a1 x" Y
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 r" o9 ^, w/ {6 Z >>" r& C% c* m5 ~! r0 |
; x! \2 X" m* O1 g Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined2 S9 l* Y3 `3 o; r. v
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
2 Q9 C [0 A; \0 A( q! D& hJohn and Victoria.+ J; U2 t3 K L+ s9 t
6 Q( s& n' M9 Q5 v% \8 F- f+ Q
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
1 k0 @+ ~( U8 kcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of9 D0 L1 ?# y- j6 S0 |. j
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release* ~- [. ]/ g- E) C/ F+ @& }
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price) f. k7 q. v/ V B& U- H
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
1 i* h3 f4 B# }$ C8 l$ i. l: H5 q, Dacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
! G7 I5 w! M0 n3 Davailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
/ m6 o1 u9 S, m- L+ o8 Hfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable: ?, w) X u1 ^5 a! l, `/ _& ^
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on# }, |: z2 D: S$ c
November 15, 2006.( Y! f, ^. c K2 |2 e
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of4 o/ t8 U( m- Q: l
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
/ F. x& s" V+ {: J4 Hprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
2 K8 c7 O8 p& z. b/ Iavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|