埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2036|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ( U- o& y7 O5 G: V+ t1 _$ u, K

; @) B3 P  d$ y& ^( s$ `( @3 P  p: ~- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -: y, K5 j# w/ N; C. K, e6 [/ M

- Y: X, }6 t/ x" k' |( c7 O; @    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market: u+ V* E' G5 c% X. M( O
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third: C* d8 V! r' ]0 ^
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
9 I* I! a# B8 q6 l# u% {in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit$ H, I( s# o% L2 h, Q9 C( }- ~
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and& g4 Y; D$ ?0 ~- O" x
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
( V4 Z& J' B4 Z$ m  I4 E7 i& A+ ?- }( QQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
- h3 U1 \: d6 E8 I1 `LePage Real Estate Services.2 t- E5 L4 A1 T4 D& Z# w* W1 `

3 h9 X+ O  b& x* v; n    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters6 m) E3 z: t4 S* ^; c$ r
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic* ?6 `& F5 c  y5 t& w
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and; t5 h5 W3 c$ ?) E$ P4 k* M
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the/ B: V. E& a7 H
residential real estate sector.& t2 K4 m; U+ a3 ^
7 t) {& x/ Q+ F2 h
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
' r8 o" w" @) ]6 p' T0 X# coccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)& A0 m5 H$ m: `' _  |
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
# }3 }* A- c5 K! ]/ v& U(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380' }  n& @1 K, w% `" W6 a. B
(+13.2%).2 C% i- G6 M* ~3 [( Q; m. B

4 x7 n2 u4 l. }8 @    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
- S% F! g6 i+ |( I" ^during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the$ l/ L6 X4 [5 r, Z
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
: C9 C' @1 x7 t* Rpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,$ q; S6 K" X2 r% ?* _
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.. U* B& u  E: Z; V) y1 b
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We& A% O6 @9 Z4 x  J5 L
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
% S4 l- g2 U- @balanced market."8 t4 o6 y4 p7 T, D, }  R
% E- s" K: m9 S3 p; Y# R
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
0 D' m4 @: L9 H6 |considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift0 _- Z" A  L6 n
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued; r* |/ i9 t) \$ P5 M- A& O- z& v
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
" E" P, ?' F# R3 ^energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,* W# u: x0 d, a% ]
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record" N! s# F; ]- R+ s/ L8 ?! e7 a
breaking price appreciations.) e" n' }( V% ~$ y" O
8 U# |" u. f. d% J
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
/ s1 ?+ b, p9 a6 Heconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
, v' A% B; q1 f5 P% O! t0 ]( n- Ylargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
1 j  ]5 X1 r1 w/ u& s
8 Q; p$ I' U; K( f: |    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid- _7 K! \$ w- B1 @
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer+ B: h5 X! v4 ]) b! L
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
0 E# T# h/ p/ [; z5 m+ Tslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.3 t; b# T1 n2 S" L
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers9 L, q4 N' R; y/ [
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
( C% H& ?+ q3 t( tprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
1 h1 w1 c2 a  k! s: S3 {6 h* I8 v, J: t& g) l
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing! V" b; U# u) m: J. c$ a6 c  t
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
+ v) {8 x" M0 y' b4 h% Wfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
. w8 s# Z0 K0 Yare markedly different than those found in the United States.5 N: ?* B9 ^+ h1 v
! ?9 s* v! C/ j/ X
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
) ]- C2 X) z8 j' W6 n5 O1 c2 LAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's; j8 w# L: U1 \8 E7 c* j9 b1 }
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the$ J5 j0 T/ [( b6 ^
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
8 I% T4 }; w( h$ V6 P5 U8 _affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the3 c( z* `# ~1 Y
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
9 B9 x) K0 W/ q! ^% L9 E6 ?3 jaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
# ?5 Y, ^  J9 _$ C0 n: S% [mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
! \2 V) ]' b% n) S( {! [! Q
2 {8 X+ u* j- ^( b4 ]9 k+ C    <<" i+ }  V5 M# S; f8 ]
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES* A% Z! }0 z8 j+ K
    >>4 f4 L; k$ o5 D$ c

) {: [, g) B& c2 W    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in: \$ _2 D7 c0 c
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate2 o  \6 d, K; X5 T' d  U! X8 W  v" P
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
- R3 T$ v! D9 i9 ]# Glooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
$ x) @! \& f/ z" Mrenovations.
7 |% |. R, Y; y! B# H0 O' z- Q4 Y/ F6 |
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
) C* C- y5 I5 C8 u: U! dincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation4 i# p0 D% e1 V8 a3 Y
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
( I3 w; K/ M0 g* uSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
7 p- `# q7 D# g8 A; Z6 v% M6 M  V& l" E; L  ~. A
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer9 J7 W, {& ]& a) G1 ~* z
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the  J  V& c) O1 x* Y  P- \9 X& e
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new' }! @: j# M7 x, ]5 Z# C6 F8 j
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores5 c; ?( H  t% e/ |; k4 D
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
* t, @( a, a( u0 ]% U# a+ E; G" I) Z3 Wand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.3 s3 U' B" I1 A; o, e
, l" o2 m. ]! j
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced5 M' ^1 C$ p0 x3 C3 K/ j
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their$ ~( {9 z1 _+ g; z
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
7 F# W& C7 L2 n+ h# Hwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian0 E  T% N4 d& D% Y8 N! a' _- L1 H
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing* z; ]1 A' l/ ?( R
buyers with more options when looking for a home.# e* f! Z" Q. Q, _, m+ j3 ?
* Z% K5 W: ^2 Z* h( _/ ^  Z; o# R
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
" d& f! s" e/ Q, A# p$ x2 Qamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
$ ]: W1 N) P. c; Q+ Opriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
3 H# i0 n+ `% E4 ]& d) d+ B6 Xas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
' i, L, u1 k5 g1 N6 Tfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
, l! {7 ?, j8 p+ Y
8 v5 \4 X% q) J% z; z4 C    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house1 S0 {8 s3 ?' y( f
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory6 K. D) r! L3 K/ h- {( e! L. r# ~% M
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
' y* `5 ^) R& j2 @first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
5 f- k% ]- J: ^# F2 e) Pwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
( s, D0 C1 B% o+ B/ @3 E5 `- s, \pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
! c- R5 Z, o9 i$ C$ i3 |making a purchase.
$ \3 d* o0 M7 `: z4 W
1 O  r, F4 S. W& K) f0 n    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
) Y4 \8 u: e2 ]9 @markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
$ ?  N, U; T5 x/ M8 h. m/ Kconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city5 O1 @. [% u* H
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting0 B  z( O- A5 @; v5 i& h# W
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown! D% l+ a" p: k! g9 [! l$ ]
amenities.  T! u1 z7 c/ `5 P

/ j9 B& T0 r8 Z' l  i    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
) `& c, l6 u  @0 k; s  qthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
) `1 |6 G# d/ r/ B/ m1 a$ U  Tacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has2 j& Q' A. K  H0 n+ N  A
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been- @! B& W% A5 H+ E8 y# Z
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle: W8 U; H- c& A2 g9 _, T9 q9 q5 u$ U! R$ o
residence, rather than for investment.
$ v# y2 b& l* W/ m5 A/ B% o# c+ B: i& w* I' H8 R, R0 r" ~
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as/ X  S0 a: b% n- ?2 {
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted3 p: o- E3 \- k6 M% u
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
& l% k5 L: t$ X6 m% G; dconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
1 V1 a/ g$ F" Wrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter, h5 [) d$ [; x# E- t
the market.0 Y( {5 W6 f8 R- ^# m: }5 d
5 G6 C. R: M3 P2 Z+ J* l
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
$ b% L" d4 M! ^4 _* \5 E8 gJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In  H' T" D% g" C( B
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
7 T9 [/ ?' _, F! Ymonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
" i$ h9 y: Q) G8 A3 |6 _2 vto the shortage of available inventory.
' Y# j4 Q* ^$ [! P) }  Q& Q2 f+ Y5 u& B8 x+ c$ w6 W& o! |8 y
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its  W6 W1 @5 d1 g4 U# @% V  Z8 o1 ^
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
/ V4 m1 O: ~; e2 }4 fvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
9 W! h! j* r: U/ F. ostruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.$ y1 I8 F% A4 r9 ^% E/ D) p
/ M) L9 _$ b0 }  r9 s
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases* |1 m- b5 f" Q7 M1 ~1 h
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low% ]& E- |( y2 g% @/ x" O$ Z
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
; U; y0 u, n9 _( s: R% Hpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
/ m' I4 y" ~5 L* M1 B0 N7 J. @0 Uprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer# J( g- k4 ^; v+ q
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
8 J( W6 K2 r( ?6 x3 L2 N0 nbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
1 V) Z# w2 l# h

9 N* a4 G0 n/ E0 O6 M    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter0 A& a: v8 [: ?
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
1 B7 k) i/ I6 t& W% u, h& [, sremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
' P* L- T0 z" T! rmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices, l! a5 [1 F: Z( a5 K; L1 ]/ m
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve  b3 R. U# o0 h; w2 h
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly4 T9 M' u" x& c# Q! j
towards the end of 2006.
    1 W& S1 M7 t/ n$ @: m* I9 j

3 R* b3 S" h0 ~* O0 P0 qWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of+ v8 o: ~6 {, i& V
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
2 h- K& j* M) b. Z- d! b* Q+ m5 Gto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
  M$ M" X, }+ rgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
6 f  N% {# z; Q+ D2 |8 Lforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
! j( q4 ^) A0 R& T3 O2 H6 \pressure on tight inventory levels.2 A* n7 s' b  ?2 n2 V9 J- U

  H$ L/ M. Z% }6 b0 r( k/ B    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic9 D; N7 M( l' j8 E$ y
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
; Q  l; J$ ~. q0 ^into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
, P: J; |" T( ^# A( C6 n0 Zwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
: }. l3 o9 s6 I1 q6 N) Mfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.) b' Z+ K4 X/ A0 ]2 A3 ?

$ @  H6 h$ l8 F7 C) [" h, r    <<
: ^) [5 s/ R# c) @% W      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
( s2 r, f! Q1 c1 E& u. X: S3 h0 x
/ Z4 D: I" r. S    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) c' O, @: Z) u1 H( K; o, Z/ b                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
/ h7 l: z# m4 d, j    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 Z# s3 C- M8 P% h6 [: I' I                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
% {/ d$ m' [3 F' }  r    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average" |2 w! a/ r5 }, Q- K8 K1 D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ h( y' I0 e$ Y" s
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000! y4 r' @; q# c4 t  O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ B3 k, M- N& {5 f2 R- J# N- ?    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
3 E4 D/ {. O* n) C* v3 y2 k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ y) a  y/ N: r9 ~! o
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000+ R$ t* i5 M6 J4 Z$ B5 f* t6 c
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 A. R6 q* x. a7 P5 [% e* @6 e
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -% ^: N+ }5 [+ b( ]2 v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 `, M1 A1 f4 ?4 A* c$ F5 d$ `    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
( m( J4 o! V' D/ X' c; R- b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 [8 ^$ V( n0 _, a9 P' m    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583! f$ N8 x5 h8 {- W, u: d! c& s$ l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 q+ \2 |5 r- W/ y; d' o9 o
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
9 Z' ?6 Z3 H& z5 m8 g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' u# Z  K! N, @' c6 |( B6 l3 E
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
6 R# z, m+ ]6 c4 ?0 o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% g, V% d0 W; _    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766  s. T. {! Q3 a
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- P+ r1 t0 R' O  L" `1 H
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707. p6 y8 k" F, t) v4 C) O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# x' |* p8 [7 b5 ~4 }    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
& U/ X6 G) J; B& K. A1 r    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% o- G% ^" c+ e  a5 L% r
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
6 ?% s# C0 V8 w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' I7 l- H5 I: F9 P- g3 g    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7145 E2 M- [  [4 {4 ^- ~, O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) P, Q  g* p; A" r( s0 N    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500( ]) {8 Y3 z/ P0 O: l4 e$ @8 ^/ E7 a
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- i/ g% ~+ j. K$ ]2 n
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0006 u) K' G# z  w" k6 K/ d; O- D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& J0 r$ N" z% n( Y. R9 T4 i
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
+ M4 R: M% r2 \1 k4 |7 P    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! K1 d9 l& e' [! t; W, N3 h3 m, ^# W- g# R4 w8 Q% p% c4 k
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 h) _. a; P5 O5 _( t6 K
                               Standard Condominium! @" P$ f4 s0 O- ?/ {* p0 s5 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' P$ O  a6 _( X  y2 F; p$ D+ z                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo% z4 F* Z! n( x; j& E! F
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change: I% x: p( x' B# [
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 L* S2 p& v& s, S3 G. M* c
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%6 @# E* O9 k" H5 T9 `+ x7 j
    -------------------------------------------------------------
* \+ U6 U1 P$ q) n  G$ G    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%- j0 v& z0 J/ V, ^6 [' D% _
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ X7 [6 J1 J5 v9 k
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A  V/ t# j0 n5 G3 A, o
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) R# M3 q! W) u    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A) Z* K; E3 h, i8 j7 {" N
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 _) y: n0 o! \2 F+ p+ ~8 d    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
# k, V) B- o/ Y4 i1 y% @& \4 G    -------------------------------------------------------------
% `3 x$ ^9 F" @% O7 ^; h( f- {    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%, {3 `2 L8 ]( }$ b2 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------& n& z1 j4 C! w! q6 i+ d
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%0 J8 F7 S  V: d" Y$ T; K
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# K& A2 U  I4 B( v  N# k' q" D: A/ ~    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
3 J4 l. \- W$ z7 Y    -------------------------------------------------------------; ~) h1 @! x+ b
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
# d" ^# Y( G$ K4 `    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 m4 ]# k4 b$ H7 w    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%3 e# {6 |6 x- M; X/ B
    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 S& h' S# \  h9 C    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%# n- D* t5 _. B" g: T; V
    -------------------------------------------------------------% Y3 B# }$ Y. C1 k: U
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
3 O* z! o# Z9 j  ~    -------------------------------------------------------------
( A; [9 @7 R; o) L' z0 Q  A    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
& L; t5 s6 [2 L- i. n) X    -------------------------------------------------------------
) D1 O! s. q8 r. u4 @    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
' {) G2 t1 I% `  W! [    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 p/ ?! C5 i0 m3 I0 X% \+ O0 @    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
% \$ U3 Q7 v! L: A  P    -------------------------------------------------------------9 r/ j7 l9 p5 h4 t
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
7 U- B* C; U: F) t  q- }+ d/ _    -------------------------------------------------------------
- C! K, e6 @: W2 s- I. C    >>
  e' ^) ?) M: y5 `/ d& d
0 |+ O9 b3 \6 K5 c9 u: f7 B    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
& W8 I3 ^% w3 l" q% m% f0 l9 Y, din the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
+ x( J% R0 [. I% G  gJohn and Victoria.0 y- X4 i$ H0 @% E) R! ~" d7 R
: X6 u, z$ r2 @, \% B3 s5 M/ l# c
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
7 I/ v' E1 A7 }' pcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of1 R3 `7 B8 K$ `9 ^
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
5 |" H2 p  ~% q7 h5 R- n8 o. ureferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
" m0 T2 x) d8 L9 Wtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
4 L% c3 i( j' yacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
& X6 ~7 E+ q; I3 javailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
4 j9 Q( U4 I6 i) hfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable" `* b* C/ K2 |  s
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
& K  u- g' y* p6 n  mNovember 15, 2006., d# `/ h8 {# j; }( r
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
# y' d! m+ H5 c6 o5 w3 Yfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge. V7 f* X! ]" j
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
) M2 ~4 s' @) l9 b0 \" ^; u) m2 Aavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-20 23:26 , Processed in 0.149185 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表