 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
1 D# `1 o' Q7 y' Y o
P/ [# B. v" ^& B; I- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -/ J7 V9 k2 V6 b- D" ]
( `. }; s/ q) V8 F I: e
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
6 w7 g# u I6 t: o9 _$ oexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
/ o# r0 o; [; x* zquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic5 j8 y. _: f7 }+ L! k0 t
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
' k- C9 M* a {/ Z6 D; qprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
( I9 _! y' b* ~% ]/ V2 m) S9 _4 ^* tmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,8 X; s, @" M! Y0 i6 D+ n) D
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal$ G( O! x% B6 `) f: M: z
LePage Real Estate Services.
7 b2 e. u% F" F1 `) g; n" k, D! g
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters4 B- S7 y, L/ d" S. U
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
& F0 \& Z7 o$ b, G% Z) Wconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
4 C \$ G" k. R7 @sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
. j7 N$ ]/ N! s- E0 Q. U( C7 Wresidential real estate sector.3 P) Z$ I( E; D2 d% W |, H
' b* V; Z- C6 _0 r) ] Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation# k4 z* @1 U0 U& y0 W
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)/ t1 a8 N" h+ W% ~) {
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562# M) c' Y3 I9 X
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
* Y; n) P8 w2 R, r# d$ d9 d Z(+13.2%).( i' n+ P: P) U `
+ o: e+ y& Q; T4 w9 Y/ u5 V
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth2 ?; {/ Y O0 M' L( A. F
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the0 E+ ]3 g6 v9 |
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
' A& J5 t$ J: ]; d2 `/ T# C Xpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,& Q" K5 B+ N) D1 d
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
# G# b4 k) N% f- P"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We0 q$ z, [9 G! \ h2 s
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy& J) J$ M4 z: x, O
balanced market."
9 _" l+ h& n9 z& h$ f& y/ z9 d$ Q7 a# w* H" X7 b' s5 f
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,: _! o9 X: Y+ g. D
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift8 u. c1 F3 V) C3 O7 b# b' n. m
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
4 c- u q- _6 X! e6 q# Uthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core; g: t" x# I+ ^. E0 T; r. H
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
$ L B; o [3 U- o& ~6 Q- O8 Imanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
6 ~3 v V3 Z {: h) a+ z& P: pbreaking price appreciations.
8 @# }# m8 W ]. n9 z- j" B; O7 r# i7 f2 q
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding- N F$ W5 B; p2 p
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the& s3 x" X6 ~ O
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.9 R) L2 P* z+ }; e9 y( K
# T. S- N. T) k+ r2 N In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid' D/ X9 R1 r' s. `& {2 V5 m
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
- D1 L: I; d- z/ kconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
0 S6 C! E, F1 L8 u7 T r+ @5 |0 V9 ~slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.! Q$ F6 F c# b5 o$ {
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers- u1 g# r- p7 W- e0 `& K) @4 v0 W4 I
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of& ?5 ^! Q5 @6 `% \$ X( h7 E7 \5 l( I
price appreciation when compared with 2005.+ D. g# C3 [' X2 b
% P4 c7 R0 {' x4 o. P% p
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing1 @) ^# p, D3 T) ^; s' x% J1 r
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and$ j$ V! q3 _+ i* l
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada8 f" }2 r( w0 x6 U9 U0 G
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
, Y' h; ?. i9 @ @3 G' V* M
9 I2 ^: p0 u1 }' t' N1 @ Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
& I" i& ^; w9 U U0 ?6 lAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's5 M5 M# H: U& l6 y
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the7 V6 t( ?1 |; Y3 q# b
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general/ l* F' b3 Q w( W8 G' R) j
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the. H7 H- m, Y p" |
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
; r: I4 Y8 z$ a# e' Kaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
8 I7 H" s1 g D/ z: smortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
2 c0 l( ~! H# N* d- |9 d! e
, c3 K7 J+ B6 s; u <<5 W+ S& P' u: e& Z7 ~
REGIONAL SUMMARIES3 [5 m5 v( A' S2 `2 E, y
>>
) s* E I0 @2 k6 d. s' Z
5 r3 U' k& I# W6 }& {! a- p# c Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in6 D5 P# j! l& K
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
8 d; n5 T4 i! F5 Nof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time7 j+ \* o% I% q/ }; e2 U
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of z. \- g; }; @# C, P
renovations.% F R8 T# ~9 N$ y) z3 ?
5 j3 q* c' ] Q0 t8 n* l The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight8 ^- Z5 U& }- E H# ~) j+ ]4 a
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
5 _( @" B9 m7 L& K9 \1 b/ ncompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
/ |* ?2 I/ Z9 e4 `* g- LSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
9 F ]; j. U" }$ u" |$ {1 U- ?& I' X0 E3 c) ^
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
1 }( O' r. D2 A4 B& Z' Kslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the/ \* P% Q: M+ F
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new" A, E. x( e3 w+ [5 M
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores* q2 Z/ L6 T7 \0 ]& H
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
/ P6 w$ }& X: ~. Oand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
1 c6 f: {) U3 k+ }9 P9 [& M4 j2 ^" G" k# t4 R7 |0 B. ?$ q) a
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced! X3 q; S5 n O/ h( L7 Y
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
* q6 h3 s8 D lhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
1 W5 U" v1 y; J2 vwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian0 i$ z5 D) O3 H3 X7 x5 t
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing6 S- y2 t! \' a
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
' G/ Y8 M3 T5 }: s* [; d! ?! R0 D
, @* V& A0 a$ O* t6 Q" W Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly" j( h& Z, w; G8 r: S% E
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes3 i) R) U; r- L6 I2 m
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,8 n0 h! ]" s" J2 C
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
# J5 y! R* R% x) A; y i8 r( h# hfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.: C# n! U# {7 m9 K& B1 c5 `2 V5 o- z
, b g, G7 L9 _5 t
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house( e! o$ r2 W8 m& z- X& O6 @
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory# p3 R. L9 E( p+ [2 n3 C6 P8 d) n; T! D
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting8 F: x/ \/ v" ^
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
0 T6 x# S7 P8 mwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
) u& B) q8 f* O* N! Spressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before/ {7 y1 M: d7 z
making a purchase.4 e) ^. {" J5 Q' f) Q; i
. u5 Y5 D9 X8 i$ P/ U
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
6 E+ z) s& _7 \0 P6 K) |6 @3 Dmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
1 F5 A3 \* H6 s- }+ D" B7 w. Yconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city/ z9 [0 N, f$ {# w
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
, P/ p# \6 \$ V2 }8 Rattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown$ o* k3 p. z/ X
amenities./ K5 ~& y# j& S: s1 f+ O5 c
3 A( C! l6 m. k% l8 ]$ v( f( J The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels8 G& P2 {& U. j7 F- C5 a! P
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand) V5 T+ u2 G9 ^* i! m& p* m9 X
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
2 k9 E; k; Q4 Ncontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
( v' e& r) {& z1 a- u$ G# N: a9 fdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
4 A( K B$ P9 W& P3 w( w3 c8 g: Tresidence, rather than for investment.
0 y) K- w3 |! B* c
o- ~, n( X: F. G The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
2 x6 w6 g) @4 W( @house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
. G' t6 T4 ~1 ^: xin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer) m8 m9 R+ n3 a8 A. e
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
7 a' A) o7 r& a9 c8 wrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
2 c* l% e4 Y. s* `the market.
, N: J# C; o6 X) l
6 D4 r4 H* `, D: d! `4 } In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through3 q6 L3 d; w) o
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
& c+ Y A& o2 C6 `2 ^5 R. M: v' n% K7 eAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
9 g. K8 R, h- J. Smonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
* t. f4 a6 D. ~$ v6 b6 lto the shortage of available inventory.* W0 S& Q' Y& m# r- }0 ]! q
5 D8 L6 ?; P8 M. u p' @ Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
! l9 A( D1 b$ c( h6 \0 l3 I2 cmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains2 S7 p4 m. p4 C8 k8 M) F- }' {
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses" ]+ W6 e- z' V
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.. y7 ~' L" \" m( {$ I3 b
4 E) n7 `2 W. o8 t3 F- y# r Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
- `$ Y Y' h) N: Y* t; Xin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
1 P0 Y) G! V, V5 d/ ~9 @unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that$ z H' C' x$ a8 _9 C/ j0 u( |5 n
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring; c& s" t6 {1 K5 ~8 \+ b
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer' {# N9 r3 A z* {. u; e) I: |4 _
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as( M3 q9 z. Y Q
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity. j! z4 S/ x$ \
* K$ a. o% G6 |5 H; W
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter1 L- T# l" J6 I4 L5 V
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton J8 v1 G' T3 `. g; G
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
, k- b K% K- [. ^- Emaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
; E: y+ l( k* y# C- yincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
9 Y% u8 i g6 Jin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly2 f+ H B9 m4 w1 o% R
towards the end of 2006. % f/ C( ^" i' e4 z$ X9 {
8 P" x5 q) w2 C" }* c3 oWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of K, W6 \# h9 H
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable/ j& V* p2 N( {
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse; u. \3 `, M: Y; S% ^/ _ V5 V) @
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to% u8 g- g; F4 x1 l5 Y' P1 _
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
8 A0 Z/ s* T6 Y# T) jpressure on tight inventory levels.$ s% x$ L) y6 C
% o3 X; \% p: T2 P' K' x+ M
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic( {! `; L. u! b. H6 f
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
0 ]' k2 L1 \% d- v0 `" o1 Xinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
* a/ a9 ?/ l [% `$ i6 Ywhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
1 [$ h: ]6 J; E* ]for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
2 j+ Z( N5 p2 {% k, _! Z% B3 B7 n4 O. b" n7 w
<<2 V& a# u0 D4 N) S, Z/ x
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20067 k- Z: q2 b& J: I% f) x
& k4 n. z9 y% E( ]( B" M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ m: {6 g. O* K; w# a( N4 A+ h
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey! j0 x% u, J5 V+ I0 n" o8 e2 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) K7 a7 ] ^3 T0 y* w
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3, a4 E( J. \: B8 F" i& U, n
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
. P0 a0 N5 }: [. X& z! Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 P5 p7 Y6 y" M; n; r Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
0 q( J/ H" O# n, J Z. l0 a4 I' U -------------------------------------------------------------------------" o! L8 n# w. K6 B* u# {
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000" ~6 _! r- k' c" e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# i, F# M1 t9 u2 A
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000( ^( j; x. S `( D( A# w5 M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
t4 \- k# M N$ ]& P5 S Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
1 e, ~& M- {- ~: U, R7 g7 G! S -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 J( ~# B) J0 V; G/ r
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
, I6 B# ~; ^# l0 v" e# ]7 W -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 J" {! v; S8 j; {- c! n( ?
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5838 ^' _8 b' C# T5 x1 I$ a9 S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) c. F7 e4 h9 Y8 N Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1855 A4 ~2 z3 s$ @3 E' X7 O: [. a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. }- Y X8 ]4 c6 _ Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
( f; R" E; X" B0 M -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 G. b0 k {7 T% K/ {6 R- Z) \
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766- @& Y! l9 R- R* f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 F! N$ t' V( {6 R9 c Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
0 O; W `: ]8 I& b/ |- v y -------------------------------------------------------------------------& V o( B( X! B0 [ U0 q
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500) D5 S6 A/ C* ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& X! G( \- E: L( W; z" ~3 @, y Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389. n9 D1 B- p! {( Y) @2 Z( @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 y5 Z' b- Y% P* w& J Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7142 F6 Y j# m- X) b H( i. B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, l7 N, [! ~, j% Q e/ a/ |. f
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500! y2 I0 n- F+ S* T1 G( r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, r7 [* e; J5 b Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000+ L. r2 j% M4 d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, U/ w' [5 j( @7 v& R% p8 E( [ National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
$ s3 E; a6 m. s, p8 t2 o9 a -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ o+ v& J9 z4 P5 W, }" c
/ S+ @( a6 @ B# Q3 U4 X3 T7 x -------------------------------------------------------------
7 s3 C4 Q0 H; W0 ^! C6 e Standard Condominium& k1 `* X5 w4 \; U
-------------------------------------------------------------9 J: T# z- F0 @ J. I+ H; f
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
- h8 ]; R+ Z2 t: W ` Market % Change Average Average % Change" D8 a9 K' j5 \( n/ W/ G z
-------------------------------------------------------------4 r0 [+ Q5 B- l3 i5 F& [
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%( i! g! M) G0 \4 B+ t3 F' S
-------------------------------------------------------------
, D( ^9 D7 X. [$ F. T Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
; ]: X3 s! D7 ?, g# M; T o: K/ e -------------------------------------------------------------
1 |* n% u- f( s% w( M- y. ` Moncton 4.9% - - N/A2 k' U/ [: l6 ?8 l
-------------------------------------------------------------, B' t y3 E: c" ~- T! W
Saint John N/A - - N/A' E3 k( o( Q0 j2 a( |
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 B# N, \# J1 O St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
9 I M. J$ r1 z$ _% \" e -------------------------------------------------------------6 m* x( c1 `6 T5 x
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%; f/ G9 t2 u% a! f$ D/ M
-------------------------------------------------------------: N V/ c6 c/ a. c2 A& B8 D
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
" N8 _; t9 L/ ?3 O5 T0 Q) M -------------------------------------------------------------
2 h* K) R" G) C$ m$ t. I Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
: E# J H3 f$ ~; v8 z+ w+ W; | -------------------------------------------------------------; ]: i- [4 \5 x0 ^4 S
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%& Y' w7 d8 S! q4 n" H' I4 k
-------------------------------------------------------------2 Z* A, |( G5 e" w
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
Z& e0 s$ c0 O+ [ -------------------------------------------------------------% q% \! L' A5 H
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
+ l' W6 l6 v, }1 j$ ], Z3 H" f -------------------------------------------------------------3 {+ J+ o1 x6 E* w6 p
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%4 U2 W( ?$ W1 ]0 k$ N6 e
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 s- }* |9 A1 F q$ k# U Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
. J! A& f' [" Z4 Q" ] -------------------------------------------------------------, v* a/ ]6 U, W. P# i* [
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
3 |5 j# `7 Y1 p# } Y -------------------------------------------------------------1 r5 E1 i! i( n7 Y" H% m6 o' M* ?
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%5 Y5 a' y7 g$ ?# i7 H
-------------------------------------------------------------
; U7 N( ^0 h2 P* u4 q$ N National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
. }2 m! k1 i5 D) J. p -------------------------------------------------------------# a+ D% G! V3 l3 h
>>9 Z: K2 I) V, M$ }4 b$ D/ \
y9 d! F* n8 Z$ W; y
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
. N) ~- \- `, p c8 D I2 jin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
# W% o5 o* o4 hJohn and Victoria.+ ], a" i2 [: w) U: ]
3 F5 r$ s& F, v7 c' ^
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
& [7 [- A/ P0 ncomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
1 Q; N! E: `, E" b, Phousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
2 W1 i# b, U" T3 w4 K- l, @references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price: u, [/ d& W$ Y1 w) `
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
, l- ^" ?( T; R; k- c: gacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
& q4 Q1 O) o6 @" B8 bavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
+ q# ?+ P8 I' M% \3 ]+ b+ dfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
: g( @( W" T9 i: Z9 m( O& L) Q0 sversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on9 j0 H7 c l, x0 ?: {/ k
November 15, 2006.
7 V4 j( B+ J0 K7 N Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
; G: `. e! B& R0 bfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge$ y$ _4 ^0 L3 \( }
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is; r0 _ o! N6 t+ Y8 {) D
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|