埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2197|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable & Y3 b" o6 y3 E2 r
$ \2 l* ~' x  l4 x7 t$ `
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
) B3 ^# ^" a9 D$ K& O+ f9 J1 J( g0 W5 v' ?# N) _* C
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market2 `5 e# e% o& b3 y, K& e
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
# N1 {0 g5 b0 d( s$ kquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
2 G0 k; b5 r5 k; y& s/ x% `in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit+ Y3 T+ F' l7 y% t( A
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
( ?; M$ g6 Q" ^9 }8 V; ymore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
; E/ v0 T0 l) O) R- B* S# N' ?Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal: q  R, {& u& k+ Q
LePage Real Estate Services.; P) ?. z6 ~6 j8 O! e3 S7 }5 K

, p& J8 k( z/ ]$ |    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters# V7 U# t1 l* `3 g& ~! k* y# J
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic" \2 S1 k: }* O  {) Z5 F/ S
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
$ q0 e: B0 b$ y; O& P, z  csound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the6 x% D) }; o  i2 B& F) |3 p  Z
residential real estate sector.3 g8 W. T% L/ ]3 r! p0 g1 G1 T( e* ~

) x& R* b* W/ M/ Z2 O$ H) N5 k    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation/ [6 ?' C# D0 P$ q# ?2 x
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
# D% K5 n4 X( U  X! g0 Syear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562: O: x" N$ `: p- c5 `
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
! F* M* h1 c0 c& A2 ?% W$ |+ x: P(+13.2%).
) ]* B0 y6 o5 g( K4 n& |
, a& I9 k) O% J    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
3 Z$ w2 M% N1 C' bduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the7 S8 f1 c; ^/ ~" X, i$ H
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are. ~. o/ ^4 V' y- A9 t, f; I
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
  P7 T9 e4 p6 I3 G3 x9 Fpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
+ o- X3 z- n2 }# L"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
" k: v2 j4 {: v) \' qwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
- _9 w4 W6 r+ \$ g! vbalanced market."8 @; |, C( j! w1 l/ w3 y

8 W5 t' B% C# V    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
+ u+ N6 N( v9 C8 }# C( m3 xconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
' e( k: x, J3 v$ X! \to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued+ G  L# G( a7 T' G
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
8 T! X0 `6 B6 ^9 [& {  ienergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,  {2 J, W% R8 c$ ~" \+ \' U
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
. H8 \4 Z$ q, _breaking price appreciations.6 q" M/ b, i$ g: h6 u9 z

* ^9 q' k2 H& I6 O2 X0 U    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
6 @8 V: A; E/ a6 u+ Jeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
/ [) z3 R8 g, |* c: M, v; jlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
+ ~& B% K* B: p
6 [. a, V; t+ ]- R1 s; S% j    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
4 ]/ P8 ?% T, d; ]3 J: |" Leconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
6 c3 g; D0 r/ }! i3 Gconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
0 O1 @3 a" w+ C: Qslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
7 {1 s( o. A. w% r# o& s! wIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers/ z" ?# r. q5 {2 _1 W2 o
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of8 Y0 K4 U8 ^; \! g
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
6 _0 W0 w4 R1 a) v/ @9 z9 T7 c. e9 D" D
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
& j+ X& E: B% ]# B& L3 Umarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and/ Z6 p% A  R9 o; Z& e! u
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
, U; B5 j( d% r( V; r: bare markedly different than those found in the United States.# q+ G. x" @- t
) [1 f3 n: w; |# z: E2 p
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
# x  S9 N/ a. o0 r2 vAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
$ }  d  b- L8 g3 V. x4 r8 g3 K/ _favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the# y3 D+ p7 O/ J0 _9 m# a+ V
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general- ~% S' F; F1 K: T: J( _- I& i5 H3 c
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
, `6 v  `2 E% j! @) ?downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and$ o, @! w; Q0 f1 j8 I
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization( J( j, H' B/ v1 J% d0 I6 @' `
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."( ?( ~: _+ H: j8 d
, z* m# f2 E, S" h( v0 Z( D& F  ?
    <<
0 L- ~5 \% n* _4 _- {/ g$ h& F                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES+ z  _' F) M, o% S9 O3 }9 r( o  o! o
    >>
" W; {/ X# A: c; g( Y7 i- e! i# `) b) x2 }; _7 J
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in9 [( ]8 ]. v% w6 M: f' m" \
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate1 `2 ~% B6 @& I1 C7 ~
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time! W- l: L4 p+ D* ]  b3 s
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of5 l  Z" C7 C9 D
renovations.8 t2 a! o' ?3 d
& n# u. |; q3 \8 P
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
2 p0 p) `$ j9 Y! L$ Y' _# h+ Z2 uincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
8 H: T: L3 t) k6 K! \* q; [compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
3 _) F& b* U5 w( @5 F; hSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.& q/ U, U; m) \/ p4 C

: y" ]$ v; E! w- j    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
; K+ O, Z, `8 r5 @) aslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
: q( W  {- J  ?quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
+ O) I9 v4 r1 m! B. j600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
- w- N: q- \, @to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes$ c& z& E8 X! J# m" W4 }* {6 c$ V7 E
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
: N) |- g& @0 N9 M9 D
2 Y% b* Q7 [8 u    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced7 L+ ^% |& k- }- k
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
4 m8 l& d' ~( K% mhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
6 V2 V* D; a' b% i# w! {was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
; x$ u% V0 J( Q  l  b# B$ qdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
/ G, X6 ^: _9 pbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
0 s' k( M: K  ]6 i0 L, T
. v% W: F( K; n2 D    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
9 w, M) F- o( x7 uamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes4 E* C  j) V8 T) @& q8 I
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,0 q& p. d5 L* D8 \2 m& W$ u
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last: E( U  o7 x. k& `; m3 v
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.2 S! a9 [# m( l3 _' i
& j# v, M+ V8 \! U9 C8 s2 [1 M! ?
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
  n# {& M3 M6 m4 u. sprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory6 d, p9 r, D$ d1 i4 O9 U7 q' o; Y
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting  t( h4 C( T. M5 Q
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,+ U0 X5 j! {( v. f" o) \
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the1 c6 p8 c4 k( `/ P
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before% E, |8 A/ K+ v6 m
making a purchase.+ A/ `0 S( |8 m& A: t$ c; r
- Z! s- o( F/ M3 @. m
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
2 K( J' ^( [) m$ O! `markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong' `" R( U4 H& I/ p, V$ y" w! H# j
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
, H( T9 J8 _7 }( X( e& X1 gcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting$ [$ t" r: |& d, J
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
) ^7 g$ W8 X, T) Namenities., v" @3 C. E5 A% u$ y: C% h
0 y; h, X* Z/ _) Q; }- [; @- b: ?! M
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
! j; u$ E" o$ Z4 n8 K3 V9 dthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand. l$ y! w$ i7 B* y
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has2 [2 V! n; @7 [1 i' I; ?
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
8 M7 T, ]: B* c7 \5 {. F0 Q4 Rdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
/ M! l" V7 B2 S  N# g- p, Kresidence, rather than for investment.9 |% s1 j7 X- H

6 R* y% D1 S  v2 K! c& D    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
# g3 f- t3 h5 qhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
4 U- l: `8 U5 zin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
+ O9 f) b- w5 Z* \confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
; x. H! u# q" Crate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
& z) n6 w* M& ~5 Cthe market.
% g9 k' |. X+ X3 y& N
' ?2 ~$ [* h" G/ p& a! O    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through% X7 B, l( O1 @4 q: M( N$ f
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In, F/ k+ ?, ~; Y* ^: V: s0 ?
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring! q4 k: R+ F. c
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
0 K5 e% A' u" V5 \* {% N5 Hto the shortage of available inventory.9 V' M: i4 n, B5 B$ |9 j, b
- G) t& @9 j* [/ D7 I
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
, [! A& N, ~9 J& Zmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains8 q' m- B% m: Z- B: ~6 s2 {1 B( i
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
- ]1 l5 Q+ t8 Q9 m& Ystruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.  k% H( d+ N4 ^: e; K2 Q+ g

/ n, e( L8 q7 k$ x2 I- w    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
' p9 X3 R; z: [in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
3 Z# n9 f7 A( P# A$ @; o* K& Eunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
' ~5 D% y1 C" hpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
; H% c2 [1 Y+ y: Hprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer1 X9 u" v9 K- d+ U$ Y5 d
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
  S+ p/ s. Z, _) {; c% ^( Ybuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
' ?  \; D" o; p1 O, i. S) w
! K  X0 i9 u3 F" c* |6 }  P" a
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter$ _) a+ F. J' G: a9 ^  M* G
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton- F- S7 q3 t4 H6 T" P: j
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
4 x9 c$ e( o* ]maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
1 x) L; j! x& U) N$ }increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
$ N7 H3 L+ M4 s2 A, B) [$ X1 X- n& v2 gin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
* T& x2 j) n4 J8 a6 vtowards the end of 2006.
    / R) [2 c' r8 h, Q) u
% x% @$ G) h9 `+ c& K5 }$ L
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of2 q" L- m5 s" {% V
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
- V$ P/ b4 `4 j( d4 Sto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
. s- {9 M, n5 V6 Q: K7 B3 s# Hgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
/ k! `+ j5 a" `) N9 Y2 nforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
" Y! V- B  L! D' X4 U* upressure on tight inventory levels.9 ~' n8 |- ]5 {6 |+ `
# L0 E- g, |( U) M
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
% l0 {& Q, m  p6 a0 `6 I( M9 Bfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people: ^8 t) o" H6 E4 q, H1 D
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;# l. I) l" O  k- j4 V; G) v7 W
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
  W8 r! u; \5 O& R4 Ufor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.5 A" q5 E& w# P+ A5 c5 k$ n
: ~; \9 W! x+ }" j3 \
    <<
, S' z; ~" c- j( @      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
$ O& m4 _/ p- f& F! F: D* u7 J4 h% L7 g9 F$ T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% v( ]: u# @3 b: @7 L                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
2 m: R( j, O, W5 E% M- P# W# J3 |    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- [2 A% \4 l7 _. y6 J                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
6 M# ?4 L* A. v    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
7 f& b4 Q5 X0 O9 ~6 ~$ @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ c5 Q& \, @- r% a, [& w
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000& s8 W# `& F% S* f1 t) X8 C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* p3 g$ S: D1 c7 m+ n( c& i    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0005 ?1 S) c+ {+ x
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* B; D. y4 a& P; \: Z# _    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000/ q2 h" j5 V" `5 R" I6 J) o' }
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 h( P# B8 K- _( _6 A* [    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
+ y8 y  \8 h% G" Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- c5 f& o. z3 M  t1 _    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3337 M3 J4 b! u, ]% H$ w$ ~, q( h% ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: H+ f9 K8 s) n" @' o: G: F& O  H    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5831 |% e+ j  {' v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& M+ M. Y& I3 g3 l$ l/ _$ {
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1856 J' f8 Q3 Z! Q' _% S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. j, q& ~/ F9 p  k" @* ~$ @) B/ n
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
0 i$ A: @8 i0 s- c" |5 j    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& G( T( h3 a& W$ U8 s/ J
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766& S2 J; }* ?1 B/ F1 r+ U5 F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  T+ P% E  b7 P" b5 e' O' E4 |/ S
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
3 M% t! I' |* z' @8 Q0 [/ Y# Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# t4 M; G( H, w7 n* [7 q0 G
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
6 u% F5 B6 O2 E$ Z/ p    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* T; [# N( X9 I9 u, c9 v
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389. a8 M' P4 b* t% V
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ U/ R% @9 G- j; ^7 P* q# H/ I: S$ c. s    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714/ w) L! n3 m4 x5 [+ O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" x9 Z5 ~" q6 t  A! \! y    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
( u  i. P2 B- ?% b" V" v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  k0 v# O& [4 y4 l
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0001 A7 J# G; O3 y0 d
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' @. c" D0 m, g- ^9 }
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860# V9 @: G, p* M; c5 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; O+ Y4 \# G) h3 g" W) w3 E

4 y0 }# v/ Z" v( l' V5 G: t    -------------------------------------------------------------
( k2 C/ r6 L6 w. n3 g                               Standard Condominium" ^" ], @% s! u# R+ ?/ a1 ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 w8 K+ W+ u" h9 Q
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
0 B) K0 ^, {, E- ^3 ~, B    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
* \# L  i- c% R9 Y& _  c2 B; k    -------------------------------------------------------------& Y" g+ Z2 m4 i
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%3 Y( R" X. t0 v( j$ K
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ D. ~- ?2 `. n
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
+ o$ F$ y. b6 N. i( L9 T    -------------------------------------------------------------
& G# V& M* [3 F    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A( s1 g' o) t4 x) t* h. K- P
    -------------------------------------------------------------
. y  a& v. M. G( ?9 x( |' {    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
. T' N( z8 @$ t8 S/ L" {% B    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 [8 x0 W) O! r* V    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%# z( {4 N% n/ }( B# ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  h$ }8 h) C, k& j# u7 y: x3 T. ]; K    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%  l! w$ H% ~6 X. _3 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 Q. `  g2 d8 z' Q9 y7 X1 I* i: k    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%! P+ y! Z% h' Y( @) ]9 {% f
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: o: p2 Y: E7 i6 q' T( p* c( k' R    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%- ~& F* K% }/ _( p2 ?9 {2 a5 S5 k
    -------------------------------------------------------------. V7 P# W( e; ]1 p% K. t
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
4 R. P$ o8 [% @- P    -------------------------------------------------------------/ E5 F2 q5 \9 X. Z! R& O
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%; n- r0 [- d6 o3 ]9 c7 ?' r! F
    -------------------------------------------------------------
- y' s, h1 ~( r1 ^% o: u! ^- r- n    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
2 H% P. x4 y7 e1 B) R8 \    -------------------------------------------------------------
  O: W) G. V1 |' q- D" [- L    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%# k# f" f  t* ^  S7 T9 d9 b
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 \& n, O5 K- @    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%2 o+ {7 @9 b* T( Y2 M5 Z6 P; ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 f& u6 W! i$ I; J# ]    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
. V: A' h6 @8 [+ \8 g3 Q2 p6 M) f    -------------------------------------------------------------& ^2 u& f5 ~' V9 J. C
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
+ I" F4 A9 `( `    -------------------------------------------------------------
' o0 ]8 w$ |3 A9 P7 p8 v! K2 z    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
( u6 P; h2 J3 [- q) D; N! v5 s" \: E    -------------------------------------------------------------4 c/ G0 ~/ d5 D+ G# M% u
    >>
: h* ~, Q% [8 k4 |( P, r9 R
8 I, ]3 x7 Z4 `    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
+ X. H" \; X, q: k+ ]+ \* Min the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint+ H% r8 ]1 a  T/ o* |' @
John and Victoria.
, r' n6 ^; |5 c4 N2 t* R
* i  U- j. B. `3 H9 z    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most1 I4 n8 a1 L& O9 a& M
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
/ D, L& X  O6 i/ Ihousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
( ~$ E5 j9 o. D; W3 freferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
2 b; Q3 b) |4 gtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
3 l0 p$ D$ t6 S2 a8 J! Hacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is8 t: d; B! `; Z' \
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current- g7 a) R/ k3 Y* P! f. h1 e: J
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
3 |0 \9 j8 e, ]version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
/ z- F- k) k5 G1 nNovember 15, 2006.
% B. R* C& e$ `+ C2 _/ ~6 q    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
: K) X' V3 w# P$ M4 U: tfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge% p! d. a( H# _$ |) @2 }# S+ b+ w
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
7 J8 P# i+ t! W1 l% P! S9 Mavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-22 22:26 , Processed in 0.128769 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表