 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
- s% l: |2 j2 v5 z0 P: m# L. e7 s4 _6 i8 F
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -( |9 c2 N% N# L6 Z( j
( p! ]: ?, q2 u, `7 m) d' M7 |9 P TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market. ^5 J) K; H+ ^3 }9 X
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third5 }; E- i7 U3 {! E* Q
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
& Q' Q3 N7 }# r; \3 @in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit( i+ a$ v( Y8 r+ D1 N
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
1 ~1 H z$ L. Q! s3 Cmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
0 l- P* N7 t$ l0 `( F, u0 m: ]7 R. U4 OQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal: w1 m( n& S# k9 {. D
LePage Real Estate Services.# m3 y# i7 X. I2 Q- e
- ^0 d: E; C) d! s, H- @ Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
+ d& H9 I- s2 |# V: u' }are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
2 U0 x1 C. P. Gconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
) U; h* X2 P3 @; W2 ksound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the% _. z& A5 c8 D( D; u; K( `) I
residential real estate sector.
3 }' C% e9 \/ D; H$ L$ g- O l9 U; }$ m K6 } g, p X
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation: m$ u2 }! p0 K* ?, N
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
5 a' s1 {) _$ a5 o, q8 iyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562 Y/ T$ r1 O: P0 d5 ?% I2 j% M
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380* Y8 H" {* O' T( ~; |7 |) q/ c
(+13.2%).
' ^! Z" |' h5 E+ q$ A
! R0 c. c+ a. ` r1 Y" }, o "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
5 [! P: b J! A" ]7 j0 n+ {1 mduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
2 V. r; w1 s# ~4 O( B5 h9 pfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are7 c7 r8 v z0 `- E! @
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,6 a2 U. ~9 V4 m; w: f* j) h
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
' g% s5 z1 x( G( E) u"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
! ~5 W. s, |8 B7 ]welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
) |1 `4 P$ r. J5 Q. k; F2 Fbalanced market."
' v3 ^0 W' ~% F% l9 E# g' \( E3 k8 ^$ x+ C& U
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
: n# M% u8 `1 x5 ^' J# Uconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift" Q% Q& X; B& r. A* w) J2 t
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
$ j" ^9 n/ R0 n1 Y9 D6 Ithroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
1 I& p! N1 ~& |2 Y$ [energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,7 `, v' }# c3 B" } ~
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
2 @8 _& c+ U/ |6 _breaking price appreciations.9 h( w6 B6 L$ o
+ b4 ^6 D+ Q G$ ^" S
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding5 Y, x6 g! s }1 m$ ]
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the9 j; M0 R% K9 Z0 \8 z f$ c( u
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.$ G" p1 |$ q1 ]# \& U
7 X" F$ v& D7 F" Y F, R In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid% x( w2 N6 R8 k+ t! P
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer+ `) x1 a0 P8 l8 |, s5 U( n$ B
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off/ b7 l$ p) D6 M n- L0 Q2 a
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
" h0 C! ?/ ?& `/ jIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
1 k3 t5 H( m) i" {* y4 R- _9 X, hgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of* x% [/ B* f3 B3 w
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
* d( k H7 j0 O. m7 L$ D0 E3 H
* b7 J" X% Z" D While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
* @3 X5 M4 f: Z8 c0 [" `' ^) J0 F! Xmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and) e) A9 ~0 X- x. v
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
2 c/ b$ h! s6 Z4 lare markedly different than those found in the United States.
+ Y" h, m; V7 U1 n: d4 J* E- Q4 \" z, Y( |% a8 R4 J: H
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
& F+ D( z0 }6 z& |American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's5 i. L2 P$ m8 }
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the2 J3 z! K' R. j
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general& g( _/ S! ]% R9 u
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
3 y* A2 ? P: {" S7 \" L3 l8 ddownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and( p; S( D9 m7 C5 h" W* K
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
: a, Z, k% m" w P- g" s. Hmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."- e0 {- l" n3 f. i$ w% H- K" j1 T
9 A" Q" n! H# R* D1 p5 i" ^ <<3 [! a% m) m+ P, H* N3 N
REGIONAL SUMMARIES$ D1 k$ r% M/ ~ Z3 C
>>
9 N5 a4 X. ~+ G: n2 F7 h) _; O4 Q7 |4 Q; A" [
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
4 G) l& H n$ ~( c* c2 ~Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate' c4 s- n7 J8 M- }
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
2 b0 W$ o/ k9 O& h) z& U/ H$ Elooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of' l6 [' k5 m6 p; X$ l9 ~
renovations.
" _! b* w! u& l+ X4 G5 M6 |+ l& H4 s9 r% G
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
, v' U) k4 z3 Q# Z+ iincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation: }+ x. f. i3 m7 j! L: O; J
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
0 E, E& q& t7 L; K1 FSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.6 ?+ M$ d5 K8 b. ?6 {
7 |* f; s" M" J" e' X' ?: ` The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer- G+ G$ H }$ V4 f& J0 k0 q8 c
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the4 `" I' ^6 B& V0 G
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
) u$ k; [; l( R% B600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores+ K$ m2 A) m9 e9 o( Y2 \
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes `) N8 z8 p, Y4 e3 @: x+ ^4 X$ P
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.! A/ i+ C/ p; @
9 j% F5 G0 w3 D# Z' Y) Q4 |$ t In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced5 Z+ J; G" k& t2 S* Y7 ]( {; b* Q
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
E' {! \0 f! r$ O. @homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers4 h( p0 l( c0 B# `, R
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
, E, D6 O' R4 e( c) y7 }, b1 A1 udollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
/ R9 b) @0 S/ R/ i8 Mbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
: b5 j: g" ?; ~# V; w; |- _; [# A4 `& ?+ I# `3 Q1 M+ x
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly+ N) o+ u. g' T0 E' B
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
2 l# E. W: V1 ?! R7 Q, Tpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,2 j: Y8 A/ f y% v4 {: e
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
) K) y4 H3 {! S# ufew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
# z0 k8 @- }0 k# r5 R+ B; @5 e' U6 A- e$ i! B. C: r
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
7 X9 }+ E- U2 l, Wprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory/ v# a @: S. _6 f" @
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
/ q) I0 A- x- f( v- cfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
4 k/ A3 I0 O2 u" Xwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
( H0 A- Q+ I+ I8 r+ spressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before" B& m0 F& b- t' v' V- l
making a purchase. ?7 Y) e+ R: j# u# h6 j
5 ~0 V& U& z# M9 O Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
- W+ O. C; f5 a+ O0 rmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong0 `/ O0 ~+ ?0 }0 I
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city$ Q0 a/ ~8 ?7 {, ]' q
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
( [9 O$ f9 i$ @7 o9 T. H2 Aattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown, k$ w2 l/ V( c/ [
amenities.5 r( G% w8 D# \5 e
" O7 ^! U' Q8 |- v& g
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
& p/ ]4 h* X9 p+ g( U* }throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand q3 V) B% t$ p2 w
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has" x. S, R6 ]: p6 `
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
: o0 T i; V; E; edriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle9 U" F P0 y. _& H$ o
residence, rather than for investment.3 X5 |# ^2 u3 r& b; e8 i g4 i
2 t7 u/ N, }/ f' T$ R+ {! S
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
- l- F( o& f) y u q# thouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
8 y3 k. V) l& i# C$ yin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
: i6 o3 v! {# P6 P4 a1 }* Rconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization' I4 }5 n6 c( x6 s
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
$ h: n" G+ D4 ]5 hthe market.
7 m6 g' W7 y$ |1 x" X9 t! h5 L3 K7 i4 a% ]
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through7 g, q2 }# }) W# d: S, f& W2 V. Q9 e
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
V- e7 B5 _! IAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring- l. K0 u; ]+ i3 v
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
1 C+ X' J( j2 M* e% Y& Yto the shortage of available inventory.
% Q% f" W1 O. V' C! O) t9 l/ {" S
" Z$ G* `. {; u; j1 E5 ^/ p Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its6 a' p5 ~2 E9 s+ a& S
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
7 B. g+ n" {9 {% c- ]2 H0 `6 s$ dvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
f+ n/ W, x5 Z& J l6 ]struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
' P' L; }/ W9 l& E: g0 g
* x1 ~9 \& T$ o! i4 g Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
( Q. D F& G0 z7 i4 G6 min the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
1 [! B# n3 ?& @/ funemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
% O5 @( F& k5 E5 W: zpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
, m2 n' K; q7 ]9 mprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
' e0 J! L5 s) fseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as+ s9 @& j6 a1 J5 L4 J: S* a
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity., n2 q* U# Z, D, R5 _6 p
0 |) E' {9 \% W Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
$ j) S/ f$ _; [* y$ h7 H) jas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton; r9 ^/ [5 Y; {" I" w; b
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,7 B7 P1 {. Y, z% W% F
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
% ?2 D, z" T0 I+ L1 f- w* Bincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
. a2 H* j9 x- z( W) |% t* X4 Bin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
, D* E' p4 c9 @3 n4 X- Itowards the end of 2006.
6 d- ]& J+ i/ V# `9 G _+ ^
7 s. X( ?( {& W3 }* _While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
2 H3 g' A* b* p! N% a4 h; Z" Ginventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable, d; h/ h3 x0 |, l/ T
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
, m5 e! _0 H( ^6 [group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to5 P; n# D. T) o# l; A; i$ Y; |
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
/ y# s! v9 Y% t9 Spressure on tight inventory levels.
: j$ Y4 P6 i; s! e& P- ^
6 r2 e. \0 q) q; g Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
9 v+ O5 I7 r( W4 Tfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people% \$ R! S+ }" k7 o9 N# y0 I
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
1 z! t7 J5 a' Y) f6 ]) o1 f/ vwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
4 h" p1 v+ B4 _ [; E$ Zfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
0 T' ?. }( ~0 U$ n8 a/ _3 p
4 L. |3 q, ?6 V9 j* ]- ?4 c6 A" ? <<
4 y, Y! H& ?& Q; R Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
}: R' R A8 L8 i! V& t5 h- }* ~, ^: E' a4 \, ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q1 J3 M5 N' l R3 c9 p" p Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey6 _7 u8 t- S! O9 q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, D4 O5 P4 o# u0 x 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
( [5 H! j& V5 p' t+ p t Market Average Average % Change Average Average
5 V% w$ a7 \! @2 G8 h# u -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 m' H0 C+ U" E- b
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
: O- B: i4 y3 _$ _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ \5 Y* f' N. Q! @: @& I* h- t. X6 ^ Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
" o+ \3 T! m M C+ w -------------------------------------------------------------------------) B: u+ d5 r- h. ]
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
5 N& U7 i& T9 E5 ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------) E( }2 b1 S: m* R# Y
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -) }) ?/ ], w# ?8 S2 i# ^2 P4 {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. x4 ~( J- v- V0 q St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
( S3 Q2 ?; w* `5 h* I6 D -------------------------------------------------------------------------% a3 T- i1 G/ h( ^9 h# N' S0 c
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
5 O( j9 a8 h: D: B -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 N3 I; ^! D: m/ X( l4 e Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185, D9 J$ H5 T4 c$ `
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: B3 Q* A f% @2 E Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
' u: |* G n0 F0 d -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 C8 }7 [' @: s3 ] o$ M
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
: \' [/ I5 f/ A -------------------------------------------------------------------------' Y: q7 a F! y2 g; X
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707, B+ B2 J" z& @. R) o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: m- q/ e+ t" N2 R) T, D H' ? Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5005 W& {# v" e! h: i* P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 X5 N9 D. N& l' g4 s* h" m# z" g, y Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
' k2 `% l6 _' z& {, p1 t3 J4 J -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 P3 I+ r7 @* Y: Z# G Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
) F8 R6 r: E$ Z- w: T -------------------------------------------------------------------------. i } d4 P* F' p6 \0 A1 j: j3 [
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500- b& y( I. J: C) J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% i6 _' A4 }$ n6 N {$ O T5 z+ `
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000% w; \3 s& d& @6 \3 \& m, g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 n2 |% z/ {, L
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860+ p2 B3 W$ l+ p$ G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& a8 U& w2 d( p" R4 b3 [! Q
- J1 P7 K4 {. ` ~
-------------------------------------------------------------0 X9 l, m# `0 S1 i X0 `5 X& j
Standard Condominium
+ h* M! D/ h& A! F* d -------------------------------------------------------------- J0 i ~, s7 Q/ ?
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
8 \( N# P! t1 Z* {! n: J Market % Change Average Average % Change
2 t E2 F& r* p M! e -------------------------------------------------------------
0 G A( n2 t& U7 t" B- W5 O- N: ` Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%: C& r& w+ V8 {& p, e# U
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 p6 T& H3 l$ [9 ]. t$ e# e Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
2 N) `4 u: z8 W9 I. o4 [) F: ` -------------------------------------------------------------# b R4 [" D% u0 C- X8 @# G
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
/ J. t# t6 G+ k3 c4 Y: J/ } -------------------------------------------------------------, C7 i8 k& n3 j$ q* U( A
Saint John N/A - - N/A4 I: @+ ?, [' \1 X1 q
-------------------------------------------------------------
! @1 \* i! {7 a D5 p7 g* { St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%. o. F8 \7 d/ [; F+ x \! n
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 N M* y9 P9 m C Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%7 V- ~% L( k- J9 m9 ~# N$ u) U
-------------------------------------------------------------% r) D$ h2 R5 L
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%; `$ I8 h( a4 d
-------------------------------------------------------------' g- b: U6 | D4 i/ k) f4 x6 m9 j
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
2 \8 t& S; ^2 k5 D3 K) C -------------------------------------------------------------: ?) X: V3 X: E
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
4 D& v6 S3 m6 K4 ^1 z" y# O -------------------------------------------------------------' Q8 h7 q( x! h" t4 ~
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
3 `4 C- U0 _' c+ ^9 X -------------------------------------------------------------
+ i) f- q' Q+ t0 x" ? Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%4 R& n; o$ Y0 j" k2 G8 {6 j
-------------------------------------------------------------( w" Y8 Z$ d0 T2 R& _
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
2 J7 {; u+ {& n' ?( C -------------------------------------------------------------
7 ^( i( v4 d& s' _6 E P Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
2 w/ l d- s/ l: S -------------------------------------------------------------8 a: S; c: T' k0 @" s
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
8 v& p0 V* A: K/ k1 J/ b -------------------------------------------------------------
# P' L' D( @ y Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%) i) I* V/ q: W1 W2 }
-------------------------------------------------------------
P; h* W3 v0 ^ National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%- E& i! n" ]" D1 u" k
-------------------------------------------------------------
' A5 m6 P+ T& j >>, H/ K2 R$ g. ?6 [5 N) @" I
/ o' @2 n6 d/ ^) R# x0 O0 S Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
& Y" S4 q0 m" ^0 Ein the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint6 x. `7 K% S3 Q5 E8 H
John and Victoria.
. o* h# n0 D2 B" J/ U( [( l5 Q( c3 E% G3 Q. ~; T# q
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
" n3 w6 k* q+ Z7 N ?; {$ ocomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of. t7 _4 ?' u" O c. D" n' T A, l
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
8 u0 I' e; \( ^references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
9 j5 \, A* r2 G# q/ f$ H& a- |! htrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
% R( O) w, p( J6 cacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
/ s3 `! R3 i" i; O* _9 R, yavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current& u' D5 F4 i# v( W1 \
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable' A7 W6 C2 d m
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
/ _; g6 c+ E5 a' T& G' g' qNovember 15, 2006.
6 m( w/ ?2 w1 D1 S5 c Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
" E; B) ?+ V7 tfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
7 B3 U5 P( ~, ?- |! O5 |; {provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
: ]4 Q" M3 E4 m7 D6 }7 U& C Ravailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|