埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2222|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
3 R% j  p4 O! V  d' E1 l7 D" U# W1 W8 r  l5 f
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
5 C' q4 o0 Y7 j( `7 L0 x' ]/ ]1 D% b
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market' b9 Z% U0 M) H4 a2 J
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
8 L1 f1 G; Q# x& X3 `quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
: z. q, E  o; q! y# i# Cin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit1 S7 U. Y+ u$ N  f8 K+ E7 D  p
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and3 P' j& \" S; N' c2 L
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,0 H: W, I0 r0 e+ X
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
: }" \3 f+ y) y2 d* o5 \6 HLePage Real Estate Services.* o4 `2 U1 O1 F9 I2 I( l

7 z0 e# L; d$ U; Q2 ~7 v' H+ |( L    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters$ }- w2 Q) s, ]" g
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic# ]% Q3 h6 F; {* {" @" P; C/ j* V, a
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and0 b' _! J/ D, X. G  v
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the) @4 U4 C7 c( r2 J; K% V
residential real estate sector.0 g" g4 s9 W0 b  ?* k
% y% a# j1 U4 P& y. V" r" x
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
4 k5 v. ?) r5 ?0 n. q+ s" V- \occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
0 W( K3 J  ~% Y# {& A( @9 h0 Tyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562" ^& s/ L) O3 a, ~  Y8 _
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380: F$ |: C4 \' x; Y/ H# I, X9 n' E
(+13.2%).& H8 U# m3 t( A2 \
# K+ J& I- O1 t  M: l
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
6 W- u; }1 l. Pduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
! I% X+ a; M% R7 [4 l; qfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
( q" R( C, k! d$ N5 ]poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,* e7 P  S3 ^% h0 c' F
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
  A$ k% Q) L- }  {"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We. ?, F( K) k) T1 W
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
' q! V  B8 e" N( E/ {9 ]( wbalanced market."
0 V* ?2 \5 Z  s% F6 M  }1 ?! n2 i1 g. i) H( p
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,& S5 O! J/ A/ M; ~& `5 B$ a
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift% o6 @  O) X5 C4 m: m; O2 y% d
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued4 b, ]" n; m& [* B
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
( x+ C* Q6 v4 t0 [energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,9 K+ A) n% q' D. H. F' ]
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record# y+ D' w, H; b) ]3 u4 T8 J
breaking price appreciations.: ]5 V; _! e) `4 j1 Q( C* U+ g9 X9 F

& m, A# P/ s# z# o2 i    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding3 w$ y9 g; X( i
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
6 e) X/ I2 L. d5 `; zlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.( E$ L# p# I# y* R3 W8 o9 M
* R& A! u5 ~8 W" z
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
, e3 f: N: \) s! M2 reconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
; j! i& D0 U$ \+ M+ U8 Econfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
# J1 @. w" {, U7 S' Q6 ]1 j( qslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.2 m9 ~9 _1 i5 `: |* v2 @( X* v
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
" j$ G. N, ]4 ]greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
, h( X% V! w" a- A; q0 m1 ]price appreciation when compared with 2005.$ R+ B/ m: e$ v0 b$ r
6 h2 M+ L" q& y0 v1 P+ Y: y
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
4 H6 `) M* }6 g1 Cmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
& M# X3 C1 s) Ofinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
, K6 }$ g: W% G# care markedly different than those found in the United States.; {- @- I$ r) O" ?# D* Q2 Y

4 f( R, D6 |$ [$ o" l5 g% }4 |% G& [2 ?    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the- Y" p% _; Q: V1 n/ q$ c, h) p
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
4 {# M$ x$ Z' C, O0 Ifavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the4 l8 K/ A( [  ?6 Q
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general; ?  S. C5 _0 `
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the% ]" c$ n" t3 ~0 ]! O/ p, r
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
3 t. U1 h+ e8 G! qaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
# z7 ~( e: N+ wmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."/ Y4 `# _. O; @0 Z* K

- o  w+ A2 F1 P0 F, U    <<
; f& t6 ~/ k4 L( m: \8 d/ X                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES- }& R' R% }) s
    >>8 j' G+ B8 A" G: U. E& w

1 @+ G2 P4 w+ z* p" _    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in: }. |6 V' o: r9 ^2 c
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate" c2 y" F1 F" q: E6 o
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time; v+ Y! l) J6 @& M
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
% h, l! f- K% ^. Q1 Irenovations.& o! g* C8 o% h% P' n
) d( s( F4 k+ k) B# c3 o7 x) o
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
: p3 q8 }+ e! v; t) I) ]/ o3 Jincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
9 j1 ]. V1 M9 n" zcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and3 K9 B  @3 g2 k4 B8 L$ k
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
+ o( J5 Q0 Y! L# w* l9 ~7 X+ {% ^6 x& r" N/ Y, N  o3 G. B' e; k
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer9 r; b4 H+ [: @! x
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
; @! d- B) s5 j2 s. c& Fquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new+ z% K' O) e, O; ]7 q6 P
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores5 N" c7 m  I" C1 J' Q9 y3 O; W# |
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
/ B7 @. {' Y/ `; a0 o+ i1 ^and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
% n2 D4 s6 R4 q9 c) }6 m# N5 e- Y, k: T$ U
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
. g- Q! C+ U- ~6 jconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
- z+ G0 g4 m/ @1 {( `homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
2 A6 |5 @7 U" h/ _% [! vwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian( ^- e  F" Z* @2 Y" R* F  C
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
  B3 b; f6 Y2 f( U  v+ obuyers with more options when looking for a home.
; k* J1 q( t3 b0 X( ?& k/ `3 B7 b7 z1 T( \+ |: Z7 A
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly) y  m/ e7 E7 L# H* n$ c
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
3 C3 }( X+ b9 H( l0 ?* Qpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,( c! Y! W) e+ `1 z
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
+ n0 }+ e2 c6 m  {' I# N4 X% Sfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.* [) o5 B# O. m/ n) y9 P
3 n* T6 T$ c* g  ?$ ^5 B# p
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house  }0 R- v9 c* a/ M
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
" c# i* U" W4 I  t% B9 Wlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
: S% H/ |4 ?% J. M& hfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
5 b4 W# T4 Z' J% e  E; s# o0 mwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the5 _& }; u  K; e1 `% w
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before% g- S- \* o; @0 O- H. [$ }* ^2 C
making a purchase.
6 s; j: }$ a7 C) ?. m  p% J6 k% _* O2 ~+ n0 A( w% @- c5 u  W
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
! t/ U; w, u' s3 X1 w* R3 k4 z& umarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong6 I* Z& w: d$ k4 B
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
% {/ r+ Q% \! V) a6 Q) rcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
5 w* P8 O' u- W2 m% w8 G, l7 ]& ?attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown% |1 z4 X0 G5 n. d
amenities.
1 R4 n- ^4 o6 |4 \: f) s! ~* G( _% t
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels5 m" _) x( L! Q6 }3 s& _
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand( G7 e. L. |; i9 R- ]% p0 g
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has* B" l+ j5 J3 c$ ~
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been( [& L; V1 c5 }( t3 Q4 N
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle3 X1 A3 j% d+ F4 F# y
residence, rather than for investment.
9 v, a7 T# D& ^8 P( C, g( O# @$ a7 `" Q1 r, B
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as0 B% }9 y5 `. B
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted* |$ Q* b; u: u
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
& F2 [4 t1 P/ B9 s8 D2 {) Zconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization( F/ r! R6 Y/ I3 J) X
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
+ C, q# Q. x2 b* k7 p0 Ythe market.8 R- O$ J' P. i- K! I1 i
' y. A% n4 A$ W* M) G
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through$ b$ `5 l. _0 n: c* _1 r
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
4 R* |5 e4 Q& f. \/ v6 i8 {August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
2 ]! f) e6 `) f$ rmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due: S# T1 e5 L. k  @' Z
to the shortage of available inventory.
4 O9 e% o+ L1 W: Q% \& r  @/ y9 V; \( X. k9 _, b2 Z8 E
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its* G, Z/ H7 W  m; A$ s$ D4 j$ E: A
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
3 E( X! T& P1 r$ Y3 l) jvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
! l8 {- M2 ~! l- lstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.4 I; r! e- R8 a* o! P
3 a! e! a' S. j  M4 ?/ @
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
' z# p) w- @# r. x' p4 ~& b% D4 Rin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low% E9 M. M, J( I. U7 t8 i' A
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
' x# Q* P1 P* I! gpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring/ M. _" j. q0 a; r- G0 s  K
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer* v& [0 U6 @' B  r# y/ B
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as! v2 ?9 ^) v! x, x: w' g/ }6 ~
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

! V5 g7 x. U/ P* [! Y" T( M: |# p* g; T, }
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
, J" b9 z. [+ l: sas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton" n5 g# V8 n/ E  ~
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,7 D. z  ~( m& B" o# @! v+ ^, O
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
1 I# X* D4 o2 uincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
, d- {! S( \# w0 A3 x7 _. uin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
3 r8 o% ^' g& W1 b2 q0 Y* n# D3 ?% W7 ktowards the end of 2006.
   
" r7 \% j9 {$ \9 D; P
. @7 v. l2 f" E+ \/ h9 d) L9 ~While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
) }& U4 X+ g. c* ?1 N. `inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
; d+ W& p9 q+ ^9 u2 p1 P* M, [to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
! H# c4 c1 q8 D0 Egroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
; p, K, g, z& w: L( xforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added" ?4 c# `, P, W! a
pressure on tight inventory levels.4 E& j4 i/ @  J7 |2 m

4 V+ A( v5 z8 X" L    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic+ F+ t5 g* l9 }5 V: C1 s
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people' O& t$ v1 q3 C1 F- M% F8 y$ e3 \" t
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;  q' ~/ i* D0 \9 ^5 e6 E8 U
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching7 q0 M7 O5 C* e) I1 f; J8 A4 ?
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
* j& ^  ]2 @* h6 E5 s- ^3 N, v1 m% F, l  k* ?
    <<
3 s$ z" E6 N. o, K      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
' W' |3 z0 ~" W/ Q( ~
4 o2 g2 w4 l9 s! _) A' B    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 `/ i& }7 ]3 E5 |( C7 b) V
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey# c+ X! g( V0 c/ j5 s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& z" r+ i' X; w                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
$ u* L$ q, A" p+ l6 |* G8 ~    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average2 P: U3 |( L( `! D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& a. K6 I  _" O1 A/ Q1 z    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0003 h0 K5 u1 }7 W1 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 i5 K" k/ u3 ?$ V; z. f% r% ^
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0003 x, V1 w  G; P9 l) z  Q" ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' I2 W. R6 o$ u0 v/ N
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
* U8 m* k, r. c2 f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 r3 Y2 U% [+ W9 A9 A
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -: Z% B8 F* M* l, m' q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& X9 R: @. s. Y
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333) n0 z8 L3 Y; l: o
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# O  i; S( E! m7 o7 D- d6 e" J    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5831 a3 `+ l6 S5 ~0 W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( z) Q! @7 ?* O( \    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
3 r4 [8 Q0 \3 I( z3 l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 m2 z7 l# V) \% |- A    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2502 l2 @% X5 b- ]  _4 p* D: M
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 }. F& R$ u: z4 c
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
! A5 m% \: P! e) |' q$ u) j    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- S; R& p1 Z5 W. i8 @) T: C
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707" B' e# w6 t. H1 T7 B
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 t4 ?: W" T6 ]    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500' \3 G6 T" b  n9 N7 U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 ?# U, X( g$ @: m
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
5 y- b8 |/ D4 v. _" }% Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* b) K/ R, w4 f" ]6 t3 p  `5 H) N+ @  r    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7142 T5 d, ~$ h1 r9 J' [# g. |0 e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: q8 R/ C- o) f    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500, q+ |* }- b6 D1 k% T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 H) D$ M& B5 d  ^/ [% T- z6 N! d    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
+ g& I- X4 t$ v( n9 ?) l7 m    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 ]7 w7 {% g& z& Y8 e$ {; S1 S! f
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
5 o9 I% R8 e1 j9 ~    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 W9 v' C4 c' B; @

5 x. B1 W+ \. w) g# A0 G2 b    -------------------------------------------------------------! H" ?4 x4 B. e1 M( M5 V
                               Standard Condominium: B( W9 G. H/ [& i
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ P( u' w/ B; x5 x
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo( p0 T* z& O8 V* Q
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
- S& T' p9 ?( Q, J; z, O* g    -------------------------------------------------------------3 p) a$ D& G  q6 `# k$ L
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
4 F# `. x/ J3 P+ \0 R! y    -------------------------------------------------------------3 r; Q2 U/ p) A1 s5 x- b# C
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%0 X, v9 t' A9 Y; z* H0 q/ S7 j6 t- P
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 O1 [8 }! |4 D$ I- V6 ?
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
6 @! k( g/ M) i8 K# m6 y    -------------------------------------------------------------# V. @% Q9 C6 ]# i7 J
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A% N- [7 F' p" N2 B
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" n! }. a  S* h5 `: p# ?9 i0 v. k+ `    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%, g  d" z8 a9 t9 k9 I
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ \/ U$ T. T# e! f; r$ D
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%  ]7 Y8 Y. D7 V" q" z
    -------------------------------------------------------------1 \1 i+ c  a2 D( @( q- o0 f
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%8 O, j- X  |5 X0 ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) a1 k2 P! X7 K# d    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%. w7 W! J9 [1 T; W+ o4 q* F
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 k6 |1 e! M! A% Z/ Z    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%; F% W- `! J8 P5 I
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; {- W! G# d% N7 o    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
9 U% m1 r8 y1 w8 y    -------------------------------------------------------------
% P3 I& {: v0 a    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
. U% _) U0 E! e9 `1 n& W    -------------------------------------------------------------# G* S0 X4 ]1 S/ L" s5 @3 ]1 m1 n
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%; @* s& S  {, `) k8 t- i
    -------------------------------------------------------------* l- d  ~- |9 W) G, H8 {5 I
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
& J& M3 L) d6 n( k* N* x% u. f    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 ]7 J: Z8 g6 z+ b1 e    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%& z! H( x* f3 k' }* \
    -------------------------------------------------------------# [- Q/ o5 u0 e: M3 R
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%; H$ F2 z# f# c2 F- [/ |
    -------------------------------------------------------------
* c7 y$ f, i8 A" L" f( P& s    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%' n( D1 G. n( v# c, i; O! O8 f- K( Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 ?( I) k! O6 i1 p    >>: I0 h9 A7 X$ d& q7 c* a
5 f$ e- F: O3 S
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined7 b0 O6 G, o1 v- ]; n4 ?
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint6 \( N8 {0 Q% H4 F
John and Victoria.+ O9 `, J5 g# i% K; X
- V; I6 ^4 V( D8 V
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most( Y( x) o1 X! B# u+ g6 q
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of, c9 P" |+ j# [- I4 r/ d
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
+ v* o. l) S, S& Dreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price; h/ S( h$ a' B& S& O
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities5 ]( K3 \. j# D! q) g) q
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is$ M/ P; R: _, c" u) J+ T
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
5 m( i. d- r  n8 h& l/ Gfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable% W% {/ @8 t% C! |& t
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
! D8 {7 \% t; i9 w! K6 G6 ZNovember 15, 2006." W& k- p  g. k* B4 |
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
9 f5 p; f: x* z8 a3 j& `% Lfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge8 Q% @8 c0 e: X  A9 B* b! z1 X2 {
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
$ c  ]6 f, a/ y" R! L2 t+ f2 Qavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-4 01:56 , Processed in 0.120849 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表