埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2391|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable & Q9 _; X) c( {3 X" h9 q2 R
; e) n8 B$ s6 h/ O  ?5 v: k# e
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
( v0 R2 H! r9 i2 i7 s# T1 W! C, {, o$ r* M- y5 i! \
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
; r+ z' S  R: [exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third* P- o$ v" h& {; G+ y+ g- Y1 n3 J
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
+ E( M! p! @4 x3 B5 {* i( D* t- din the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit; Q; f% {8 V2 u% X, m
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
$ m% d3 I( j& \7 Vmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
7 [) Z6 O" u" HQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal# S$ a4 ^/ i8 H- ~2 z7 {1 Y
LePage Real Estate Services./ v9 Y# E7 s* j& G2 q" h5 w
" N8 o# R7 d. E4 B) `6 ?
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters+ }; G# k8 T, t' D- W+ U0 a
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic/ }- S% j3 r8 O* X& ]3 k2 k
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
3 t% y2 a% B' a) B( W5 ~: `sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
. o; ^+ E& E+ l2 kresidential real estate sector.
9 Z5 {8 J8 f5 k, Z" ^$ M- k/ r$ z4 }8 D5 h8 F% y
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation+ Z( S6 E0 G  j2 o+ p4 ~( w
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
+ R8 c: b# Q, f; ~year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
6 j( g3 B" C  C& n, e(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380) T9 S2 b* y3 r7 W
(+13.2%).% _; \, ?3 M& D* o  f

$ \1 Z& s) ]2 |2 C    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth9 c* B$ a9 V% b. W
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the8 E5 C' a& E$ y) ]. \6 \
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are& B, q; b6 l0 ^) c1 W8 E$ ], O
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
3 d4 Y" w) d( z0 U$ g: dpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.' U0 h7 Z' s3 K) p4 L! k5 _. s1 g
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
( P7 k4 B+ |& Owelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy& l, ^& h$ u. F/ Y& _* Z# f* C
balanced market."
& A6 c4 ?7 }+ O5 e0 c5 b  J: x' ~5 C" c6 e8 f
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
' q: P6 X7 U  t% _8 {% gconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift9 q7 Z/ O- Y$ U/ U' q1 U2 p7 t
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued% u# B  s% i9 _, O1 x+ I" A6 h
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
6 k6 o& v" o' S: [; ]7 lenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,7 B1 b6 ~, [8 i  `1 H) w$ A; N
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
2 M! c7 K( v2 abreaking price appreciations.
( r; N* Z4 o& ~1 b% F# A, D; h( m
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
0 F3 V$ z7 @' N: X1 D4 ?3 Qeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
' X$ f, N5 X$ {2 Tlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
# K  T' [3 \6 q
! u  e1 Q) g/ q2 S0 J    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid0 t! ^2 ], k8 u/ _, H
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
. J5 [% P* T  ]9 ]; [, Z5 Xconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off6 _/ ~2 |& n: N  v7 |  b
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.5 b' s  I* r0 C$ w! ]
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers& g- j# ], P- Q2 }
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of* P2 C2 y( _0 a8 i; ~8 T: G' P4 q
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
  U4 k* V+ v! N  v' l8 b/ T, k5 T, ?* D' P
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
4 ]5 c8 b, X4 P* F" D' q4 Ymarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
2 b( S4 I% u( dfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
& i4 h# f$ b/ [. }5 }+ [7 ^2 Nare markedly different than those found in the United States.  E9 q+ ~* V$ i6 `3 ]2 }) `. c
; Z3 ]. W( P. T& B- G
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
3 `; ]- D0 x* H  q3 B5 B6 a/ oAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's3 I4 P& O2 s: }/ I
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
( x% T* C6 c6 W, qrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general' I3 A. c) q/ ^. Y/ w
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
' p3 h  {5 m9 u6 ]: ?+ a4 m) Cdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
3 W! y8 P- B/ z  P2 d5 l6 U9 e7 T6 raggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
2 c) B7 u4 D8 A* I' {& t. Nmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
* R( L. d) {- }# J
3 O  Q0 p8 R7 b+ D. v    <<) r! X0 F3 w6 n7 i
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES; v) L/ y7 y5 Y# D( o! [2 R' J6 U; Y
    >>
$ M/ t0 I: P2 R3 t  u! K6 X5 z0 Q- d
3 ^$ G2 t; y7 ?. W; h0 m2 _0 R: }    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
5 _; o$ b' o" p. RHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
  C  t8 w! ^# r. k! y! A- [of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time2 ^- G4 A3 J3 P7 q$ ~
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of% d+ W$ w4 g6 r3 M, V
renovations.
" k5 s5 O* S. G9 I
/ {3 W4 ?8 k2 P1 G7 l+ @& Q    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight( F% P8 D1 B# E) l, @# y6 x
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation; j9 L0 u! R8 Z2 g
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
/ k+ \4 }  M. r8 p" Z7 C" ^  B+ GSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
$ x* k% f! H+ R! A0 M% _+ g: g8 ~# [
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
) T% A+ @& U+ o. C, k% y$ tslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the7 V9 g* }; H; e! _  O* T
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new& h+ x+ a, F6 Z0 }1 r7 b/ i7 {) r
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
0 X% \( W. D, _7 Z, W4 |$ kto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
, J1 `. l0 i% q! }and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
9 E$ s3 s; ^% s6 n7 I, y! q5 c
. P8 A. e+ V; L& _; Q' M    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced/ u# ?* h, R$ Q6 I, j
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
9 F; X9 s) {) C" }' P! H! _+ yhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers' `9 T" {9 [1 E, r
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian9 T/ K; x5 s0 _9 D0 O
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing3 B8 t- r) Q8 n3 Q6 |
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
& Z& e+ Q5 e) G) J; @/ o3 ~/ \( g; y* U9 s: f! o! b
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
, |) }% a" O. e9 e5 ?2 E  kamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
" Z  ~. _# L( T2 w7 gpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
0 d# ?; M1 {  Z5 N. N6 ias some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
/ h8 L( n7 H0 s/ J9 H$ g' Gfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions., c, `  P% A$ |, E
; H$ H# e$ L$ e, {4 z' w* V
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house% M0 j, B, G0 R$ k; K
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
9 u8 P! L7 m  rlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
+ K3 V! I! y" F5 [$ X' D0 Ofirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
6 g4 u' X# U% f- D# o9 t) P# h6 Lwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the5 ?* n  I, F) \0 `' K
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
* a$ W) ]) b) P; Zmaking a purchase.
5 e1 Y! n2 X' o- D3 @
5 z1 J* P$ O6 X% X% y% r4 F, }    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing0 R5 ^5 i; T. d$ Y* P/ j
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
9 K+ v6 R4 o& vconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city5 P5 v+ ]/ S; G; w5 ]
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
# G  W* O+ v5 ^2 w4 s( q/ {attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown" d) v# s) l& a9 V* @( C' ?2 `: N; y2 r
amenities.+ D8 g+ H( ~8 T& P1 b& |

5 F; ^( j4 k7 g3 M6 j9 g    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
3 J3 E' s/ @) B+ [8 Ythroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
, t/ F* i+ z' h! i# n2 i6 B" @4 u: wacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has0 ?. Q. [) ^. d( t; R6 \
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
6 t4 s7 ~9 E1 m. @7 `; q' Fdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
. P: u# l7 t0 |+ v. aresidence, rather than for investment., b3 `& Q8 `/ ?4 z
/ |& S8 I& w  Z, L- P! P1 i
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
0 |) D6 f0 w/ M$ w2 A$ Nhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
$ W' r/ e# d! o9 a) X; gin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer; y% n7 M6 t$ e$ d- \
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization: p% s  ^( f' z$ Y
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
% R! M& V! a! Z) o) O9 Othe market.
) S, }6 f9 L2 U9 e2 M5 k- V
& _4 ?6 X, ?' |+ ~. n4 K    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through* o! u+ q' |( `7 P) B
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In) @6 a9 P- x+ K. ?" s
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring* e& e, s" w9 Q' o
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due. b8 q1 }9 |& a$ s% K" p/ {
to the shortage of available inventory.
& f  k; C$ {# V+ Y' f' I
* E# K0 D, \6 h- I  T    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
: A, k+ M2 t: g0 O  b3 |& smomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
9 d/ L( b4 p9 r+ x4 i1 Ivibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses( _- Q+ }7 h1 N; B
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
8 t: n% A; ^  C! q. }2 ~
+ H+ _# L3 ^) x$ Q    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases, B; f9 j: @7 s
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
( T; |5 U5 m! p+ i+ X6 C4 _' o" junemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that& a+ i6 @( R9 c; x; k1 C& ^0 S% O
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring+ B1 c4 Y  j' K
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer; @0 @+ C: U0 @
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as9 r) G1 x8 @5 p7 l% k/ ^7 D! T
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

9 l+ t5 F+ H- P! ~* e3 w& v  T/ T
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
' B( I! i7 v& M  oas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton' E3 I8 i# ~) b( W9 A* H& @
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,* `. e: E; {$ I7 y- B' W6 G7 u3 i
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices) D. M6 d5 [; ?/ V+ f  ^
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve2 C; p- r" \( C/ C0 ]
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly/ n9 ]! M( z" s5 R
towards the end of 2006.
   
8 N' v8 Q( `& q* T/ ^  P& d$ C
5 r3 U! G! x9 v4 J! dWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
( B* Y8 t  \5 R, R" v% ginventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable7 J8 h6 y. N( I$ b
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse. e4 f1 P& c6 z  o% n  W2 m
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
; I, o6 K: v- Jforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
8 @7 k0 q. k2 z$ @% W0 ipressure on tight inventory levels.
* R- n9 X: j$ F+ }3 s1 {- L, K; q$ F" x- x
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
+ ^/ G9 @3 a" _. \8 Ifundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people/ u8 g6 J: _2 \) m& [5 a5 u$ a
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
: w9 c1 u5 o0 r; o/ ywhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
: J7 Q: J2 Y) ^) N: j# V5 b! ifor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
) a: W; S/ F5 [4 T% F6 h- j5 W8 f1 G
    <<3 f! N5 d( m4 G  {+ y5 }
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
  e5 _) W& m( [9 p3 x, ^  m: ?% d- {" }6 l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 w6 d7 }" {) y% I
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey: G$ i( G+ u2 Q: w+ e7 p/ n5 u
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; I/ j9 M- O* v
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
: ]* O8 [( N% a- p/ E- r    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
+ N: ~. l4 ]! J. u5 `1 n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% Z' G1 p6 v  Z" E$ ~+ i. N5 Y# D    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
1 e7 c5 ~& y2 H0 ^/ u  w7 I% h- H    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 N  I* D  b$ l    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
; E2 q( r: N" N. y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% I+ W, V: f/ n7 C* q8 n9 E
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0007 S+ `, y* ^$ K5 m$ v9 L1 S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 q1 _( }  s, B* a% e
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -4 v% Z0 |2 a, N1 S. D( Y# A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Q% W5 d9 e: B    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
7 F  m- d% P; t* Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' @+ \1 v; y1 X- C& d1 a& F3 }
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
8 t3 {1 v$ M' ?    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! O9 I$ V+ V; [    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
! y/ b2 I) \4 g( c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 z0 [1 z& t7 t/ P( d6 R) V    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250* Q2 ?( Y8 K& g& S4 t# f
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- a( l( B. H1 b8 }/ H* W8 |0 v    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
$ G; N; k/ t1 C7 W, d* g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 ~, B1 G5 P* @0 |% x# g
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
2 W1 M- S' M' ^" J+ r; P! P    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 Q. _& {0 s+ O& k
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5002 M, \" b8 y: F% m. D3 H+ C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 c/ S. O) n  S% w( t    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
9 g! C  i" w) |9 V- p    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; h$ @7 V* `: Y! J    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714) j* x; R! a% v! Q* U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ S  B, ?. F, s4 |( H$ D    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5007 }8 `, }( J6 G8 T# L1 ~9 y7 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ M% j% P$ q7 v* M% F. z    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
+ s3 m* i$ r) s& z! g* o' P    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 s9 A5 F0 }" S9 g! C! N* `( x
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860/ D& h# d3 ^# M0 N( u% C' k
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, E! }1 v6 J, ~! F6 Q
! H) s: K' r+ f; [( M, a
    -------------------------------------------------------------
! R( ^' y9 F) `  a% s1 }  Z6 G. S: k2 \                               Standard Condominium4 _( z1 x3 {4 C0 C$ s3 g/ O
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 c3 Y% Q) w( T9 x/ q
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo. b' W$ F- m' ]. F! W( x
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
0 {) F3 P4 S7 _; Y. i, D; H/ f4 C4 a    -------------------------------------------------------------
. M0 U& o7 `# V    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%7 W; `" Q+ K& O
    -------------------------------------------------------------
- b) O. T& O" l    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
8 p- {% V# o( s8 B    -------------------------------------------------------------
# e, _4 F. L' k) h" W% O    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
5 C& T$ G; v9 y3 _: T/ h$ o    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ Q1 m+ _% G/ `& r/ W    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A' A; |$ I, i7 F0 `" H" W
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ G' f5 c2 j* a; H    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
6 C, t1 T, @8 O2 X    -------------------------------------------------------------
" v  p# I, ]9 u6 Q0 [; J, J+ a    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
& j+ C9 k6 S: M* a; x    -------------------------------------------------------------1 T% S! D9 {+ Y# Z
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%: V& m; ~3 y3 m3 I& Z) z% d  W
    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 |: l/ R6 t1 g9 U) d% b    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%& n5 H7 J- y) L- y. Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) ~1 \$ e8 |' a7 ~/ L    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%. o0 S7 w# T; K; _1 s) d& F
    -------------------------------------------------------------5 P+ b* B! R6 \- D1 T* _4 D
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%4 M8 V. _, o: o
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 _" v1 d; t3 v+ b# o    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%+ N2 f1 v( Z9 {8 A0 Y1 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------- K4 F+ J! [1 ^# \8 b
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%7 `. M/ Z9 [1 o' F" L; l: S
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 x9 o- f& ^' \
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
7 t1 F% {3 n* f% X1 l" _" k    -------------------------------------------------------------5 \; |, G! J$ V" j" y% s
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
5 j8 N/ T8 A' K1 e    -------------------------------------------------------------
, \: g) R  }& e) L+ ^    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
. v4 X  u8 H3 z' N" C) n4 k    -------------------------------------------------------------. H8 w3 {+ G) i  M3 Z+ ~, m/ G6 f
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
0 E" z+ i2 Y+ T8 \; ]    -------------------------------------------------------------* _- A9 o! ^0 w6 w. s: f( n: v8 f
    >>9 H/ X1 n6 \8 ]+ s
0 g6 r" L' ^" M* L, p) E% l
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
4 J( c- x$ G* a$ F0 p) w# Sin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint) o4 Y' i7 t4 r4 k! [
John and Victoria.
) ~. f! v0 i2 ]0 _% z/ g# S$ l8 ~
' h% A( e% U7 ~    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most4 C2 c8 Z7 j- d) V
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
3 Q, N" W5 ^1 z5 o3 [; ihousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release: E# I. `+ `- f! @
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price+ r* l' M/ D, F3 R+ b
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities/ F7 e& Q  o3 Z/ i5 ~1 F
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
/ c8 q6 J4 a2 F9 U$ c$ `available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
4 r% R+ P; A; B2 Tfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
3 ^5 [0 U' ?, w! Z( Q/ kversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
2 E% ]6 Y9 m$ f( y0 kNovember 15, 2006.$ `, B! ^* p/ ?; g
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
  q5 `, l9 `+ R0 ~' Lfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
' U  O* e' Q9 qprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is% \) p. H% F! G
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-23 21:29 , Processed in 0.113877 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表