埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2125|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
! s# h+ ]7 E# p% }( B# y
' V4 {$ U% `1 T; R+ P8 B) T- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -5 C. W/ c7 W: e, i
" f5 n9 N) P/ `8 z0 T) U7 `
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
) l- v8 X2 _/ P9 U( O+ {exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third7 v" _3 c; C$ f
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic3 d) W! c4 |5 _
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
* J- p  a% r- @/ }price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and' n5 k" ~, a3 v" I$ Q+ Y' l+ H
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,) `2 d) ^8 h3 |( @$ Q0 ?; `
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal7 P/ Q- s' C( K5 S" W. c+ x
LePage Real Estate Services.
0 s. B/ s# x! u: k3 W* w; B+ n3 T$ o# U4 l8 m  w
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters* y% J3 U' p( F0 V+ H7 |
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic- ]% E: g+ T  C! W9 ?5 i
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
7 M+ l, J6 t& e$ Z8 U& r/ W8 e0 osound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the% l% a$ m, z( j
residential real estate sector.
, l# b' |, |: y
& X3 `8 U$ n9 ]) ^4 r8 d    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
$ F& |# o) c( W% U+ u# E6 i+ r3 Qoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
! \( b" G1 E- u' n: ~2 \: wyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562: Y  S3 o7 N6 S* |/ w( n
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380( J5 `  L2 h4 m8 y! ]' r; A, u
(+13.2%).( ~) g9 ^; f6 G( B/ p
/ k* p3 n) }; r
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth! o6 O) r7 X$ {- Z/ f
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the. `+ O8 _+ f/ _, [9 ^- }, S
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are6 A/ f) b# o2 |9 q! j2 i* Y) O- c$ n
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,; q5 M2 k" |+ a/ c* ~! b; \
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
% i9 H- `% _6 `' l' b"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
- w2 Y% C/ L0 ~welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy9 L) C& W! a  x' F
balanced market."  j- h, \% o* I1 F: x4 B5 Z

* {- \- i" B. T3 {# i$ A: t: U    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
7 p# _% a1 E% Tconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift( x1 V# V2 s9 h( o! i+ z, Y
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued# p+ a1 h6 K5 k. L
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
1 n2 r" t3 w- }. n9 P1 h- V% Y0 Yenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
  `9 Q* L3 i! c4 U2 jmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
$ N! q/ _9 A' Z3 Obreaking price appreciations.; |3 Z1 M' ?$ h6 Z# p

7 z( j, }9 k0 ]    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding* `* @8 K) N8 l' E+ F) @
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the/ E8 x/ ~/ K( |6 x/ d& L6 M
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
% \* p5 B3 g0 n+ i+ t+ |2 h, L  E: P# Q# T9 H# H
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid. {% A- z. C, s/ L+ b% \
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer/ p& a2 V/ q$ b" G, S# a' F8 u
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
4 ~. v+ Z2 H/ j1 E5 Gslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
* }. f6 t  F4 D8 o( o# z& ]In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers  T9 Z: F/ o* }0 ~4 i1 }1 u
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
* m  Q, B: l5 w0 S; ^price appreciation when compared with 2005.
& L* V6 P7 u* {& j7 w8 n% t4 f' @$ q! r
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing6 G* _7 y% P5 Z1 f, m
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
- H4 P" T3 b7 R% X7 j/ H4 Cfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
) N6 z8 A2 J2 u# D& O/ uare markedly different than those found in the United States.
" M. X% L+ u+ |* \, f' T8 d; Z, W- w
3 {4 [9 d. B+ d! z    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
7 c+ o8 _  Z9 l1 k6 t, n7 qAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
" x4 c# k2 `+ e: y6 lfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the' {* {! W4 X% g% M. w
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general: X6 \7 J7 {) [* h! \
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the+ h- X% O/ b) k& _( u7 K& f" z
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and& ?4 n' h3 X. @1 E
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization  ^6 Y! A, g# G5 n& y3 G9 G( B
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."  v: }# A9 f) L. \1 A
8 O& |6 z' K6 J, U7 S
    <<
0 r. ~) t/ J) V9 m' ?' K                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
2 ]7 @+ I' E$ N0 g1 G! j    >>
9 `2 l1 o' X; F: U  O% Y+ M" k; `1 Q" ~
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
7 I- X0 B. d: Y' }Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
, B# e% h* i0 A: G! @of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time4 x% V) x& w) h( _- m. W
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of4 D+ v, H1 B, p7 K
renovations.# @0 ^4 @4 j% y  M' M8 V! N, I: j
8 O  N+ V: E) F& z
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
5 t) U: Y4 ?+ T, Zincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation; F$ I8 a- f4 L' I: e) i8 X! p
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and& Q" w$ }7 N; Q4 c% Y1 m
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
8 L& t1 {& K, r
5 D: `* c& l) }" A; I7 C* {    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
2 ]7 G# S$ W0 f) d5 ~! E) y. i0 fslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the' |0 L2 F  i- Q. B* e  B) x9 v& N. m
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
. ~  \) Y( F! q% u6 `9 u$ u# `$ _" }600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
  Y+ _* x! o' B! H7 ^; Eto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
+ F9 i4 T& e+ k; ]5 x/ o4 band are instead opting for more affordable housing options.) [5 k2 a  W! x, @
* {6 s, ]0 m' }4 f# {3 H" w
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
) P/ X9 O% E6 W1 Y# v6 bconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
" f. |0 Z: \* Z% B# {0 D% [( Fhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers" Q: j- b) W8 H/ ^
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian+ h% C9 D" h1 Z2 U5 i7 D
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
: C. g: Y) C6 t8 I" U, C7 V( [buyers with more options when looking for a home.0 T! S' [8 o! f) E% L4 g
, w1 d  v3 @: `& m
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
0 ?8 D9 K* ~4 y, w. f. X* F- x4 Damong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes4 X$ }. t( b6 [3 K* O1 v+ m- }$ Y+ s- _
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
5 ^: ]: x( L. V2 Cas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last* g# S$ g/ @& a) _( m" [
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
7 L% q; g8 @& T6 B8 Q, f
, _9 [5 u; }+ N& {    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
$ {  Z6 i: r( m4 `  |prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
/ W5 ?5 X( V# q' M: k' t) ^5 D  z9 Rlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
& Y, q$ K# p! C9 ffirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,% @$ z3 p  ^) X# O7 u
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
6 E2 i: B, P( W! {1 }4 Wpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before$ g* x+ A6 v4 k2 U( |( I5 N
making a purchase.
  V" |' F. I4 s0 q$ S' u
& X' ~% Q9 I) ?& T7 B- a7 V3 |    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
) H6 {: y: C2 `markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong  R: a4 R' v+ D% u5 W* F
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
( }$ j- w* o. ]7 `6 y5 S  Rcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
. `, v6 u- N6 s6 d# a0 Y$ Tattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown# J- |$ T) g+ y, @5 ?
amenities.& i' y: G2 T$ W, C& @+ N

6 l8 M' f6 F. v. m9 s  S    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
) ?' J) u) M$ O. W% Fthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand+ p, _: {& o% a5 b" J
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has# `$ Q  K/ v3 t% `, _* ]
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
1 o( O" ]1 @( w0 ^/ L/ V. u# Udriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
4 Y) Z; }( C% p! P" Aresidence, rather than for investment.
& T+ L8 K5 f( i. Y; s" f8 j$ W6 I7 ^: ~' _- }
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as* D0 S+ P* D# g( v( `
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted& |8 Y1 t2 p: v, ]3 v+ s
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer* z; d, X; }3 `+ ~' s: I
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
" }/ G0 L: R6 [/ mrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter& C# S3 u3 I3 Q; l
the market.0 F& s9 ?, W) S

) N- D, }% {& d2 @& J% U6 |    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
6 ^2 b% r' K$ x1 \+ v5 s0 PJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In. f, e) @9 [4 a5 Q. o3 w- X
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
1 M* I* B7 n5 }2 o4 q4 {months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
! d3 ~, E( m. f/ j% z% U+ Dto the shortage of available inventory.
8 U4 i' q) {# {" t2 I. |% V9 q0 p" B! y- B1 G' c
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its* A- r+ Q+ k/ N0 l
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
; E0 G" N7 D9 ^vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses, B* m. q$ K/ t9 ^7 x4 o# F
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province." Y& ^% s* y$ `8 U% R

! B( T/ C+ y3 F: V' v    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases& O" e- i( r  d( Z5 B7 Q8 N2 S
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
/ m$ q2 e. Z4 l7 Funemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that. X/ E7 R: o) g. `0 O$ ~& i
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
! E4 E& `" b6 V8 P9 s& Oprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
7 T. L  m3 Z" X  B6 rseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
* x# y7 Z: y" f. s5 u1 |buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
, m. J* i1 B  b7 s/ ~$ c" p% b
" S" U6 u) y6 m: u7 {) m- m1 v
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
' l6 n2 C0 Y2 V* kas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
4 F; P4 p  {0 K7 _$ ]remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
9 S+ U- U' ?( _( Pmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices. y$ @* N* z6 q4 p0 z8 m
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
5 N9 h4 S  g1 _1 x% ~in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly. z( O0 x7 Q9 R( e# \% G# j3 e- |: r
towards the end of 2006.
    4 l/ f. a. u! g% d  J# p

$ V: q: m7 S9 e6 ^% p4 \+ \2 QWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of) G; U( {% ]+ B: }/ P4 Q
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
7 q2 _2 I. ?. L& t0 ^7 X4 P& T( y! vto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
+ C) l6 f* a9 J* a4 u; M3 k" N' W, xgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
3 L1 L3 B7 W/ c0 Q8 n' W6 T" e4 W  hforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added) X  k2 V$ L2 o/ T$ A! U# d/ F
pressure on tight inventory levels./ w) \6 _3 S/ l5 w. _
$ \9 a8 Y( Z1 p) C8 e1 g- l
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
- z) t' L5 p- }- s( u5 i; dfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people( P: t5 b* Q$ G+ {
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
1 `/ B# A) M8 O" o3 Zwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching7 F1 x( |: h- Y1 J# F
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.$ b3 {8 ~* N7 f: Y' Y: T  H
; q, Y: W" q# ~8 Y
    <<& q. Z7 A: G! e6 A( I/ I9 r9 Z& b6 l
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
. \0 l! t$ Y% x$ a7 x( ]# Z! x# n( L7 l( M6 q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" }" j. H: A7 Y7 l# |+ M
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey) G6 x. D' C, ~! G' e; [/ I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 F" ], N$ s1 R8 o: k6 `                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3, ]' j1 d3 `5 r
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
; T5 R4 H- M* P6 ?. {  [# Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& @+ {% d) |! U% b5 Q& k* r    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000* a; W3 [; A5 x
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! d8 o- t; q- s7 P
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
! @6 H; Z  p9 [' \; E# b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, }1 ]  d6 E2 R    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000- N2 A6 {- s# @9 G; \
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 F/ V4 k; y' a" C    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
% g# \! w7 F2 r4 g; E0 R/ D: }    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 s/ t& a. R6 b9 V    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
9 D) v- L$ f3 M* U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 v4 `: Q0 A! c! W9 T
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
1 p/ `$ N- N/ S& ^3 j6 Q0 {. x: ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; O  V9 G1 f' r2 }4 V5 H    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1854 C1 D' H/ i) c, T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* h. M( C+ P" |6 x) ~) J    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2508 r& R; M/ f# T( {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: m0 s2 U0 |* y' V5 E( _9 b
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7661 o+ B) a/ c8 p4 ^7 e9 b( m# l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  x  V5 {0 |. [* P
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707! l3 Q6 L  q3 K% O( b; }6 d2 f
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ p* Q6 k* |2 r; l+ l
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500  B7 m1 q8 [3 a+ @! d: A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- u' G  d, L( }6 Y2 H; E9 n8 F' d# q
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
: `9 H, y+ {( A# D; w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 x  A0 w2 F% E$ o- h    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
5 ]+ {& g1 {+ g% `9 ?+ g# l1 S, ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 y* j7 |& w1 b4 @! |0 G1 V+ A
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500) R: |# c+ Y& d" Y7 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 x+ ]  X* f1 o0 R9 }( p$ P
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000$ \) Y6 B$ N+ Q$ v' _3 ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' c: X- v( K, `8 e! P    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860! K3 n; s% G" c# p: Q; t
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 [* i% K; \& M0 i, r, c
% `) D3 Q5 W. b  L7 t
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 `+ H7 P( V0 U; o
                               Standard Condominium
5 o. h4 u) d% Z4 T9 {, y& d    -------------------------------------------------------------; C/ m5 \6 q0 Q% H. G( C9 M; u
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo0 W. |' j% f6 f3 ^4 F; i0 b
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
& g7 k. @  F. h+ @7 t7 ^* ^    -------------------------------------------------------------  j! a; o0 `7 I9 i% \) W; h
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%/ o* e3 w3 a! e( {1 O: |
    -------------------------------------------------------------& ^7 @4 X" X/ I# W' ]! G
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
4 A) f/ Z7 x* `% i  I5 R, q    -------------------------------------------------------------" {# b- z: A5 F1 d/ A% {/ j; G9 H  M  _7 W6 f
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
: O6 v5 D# J2 ~2 i/ S    -------------------------------------------------------------
; @( `3 x  q7 D# q    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
" W' S  G# c: \    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 u" Z' Y/ n1 f2 m" k7 h0 }    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
* q$ }' V7 v0 R    -------------------------------------------------------------
; B" L/ W/ A7 Z$ s- S- X" t' g4 e8 q    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
; t5 G; L3 E2 j" s. l, X  W    -------------------------------------------------------------
) P' w3 a$ h/ v- V    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
7 h# L- V* a. }2 U* ^    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 J( k9 r' B% C0 k" U! p7 n6 c    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%  ^3 C0 {. ~2 \* ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------! u8 F' T! |& `6 D* y
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
0 a) h7 @' b" s+ [    -------------------------------------------------------------: J' P3 B( a7 O7 L& |3 g
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%% f" N9 u5 G" U% j
    -------------------------------------------------------------0 Q. E/ E  h7 N
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%3 y8 f5 o) I9 o! q9 R- P! Y6 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 k' a& g1 G8 C. @# ?
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
) B, {$ D) k2 o0 z8 R! C    -------------------------------------------------------------7 d$ E6 P1 e4 p1 S% a* V% j+ x: E
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%" u2 K5 [4 A6 ^" E
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ n6 p; [1 [; u+ c) J: y8 ]
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
1 K2 G3 F/ x7 A( h+ R' h% a+ w0 ]    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 W" \9 d7 l2 b$ H* |% e( u    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%: I. n+ t& J# D3 A8 O) [( H& w
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 i+ F7 z% t3 o4 U
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
! T4 u% v9 d+ t7 m9 ?2 g' {5 r    -------------------------------------------------------------# x' h5 p) `& _: l1 X6 b7 n
    >>1 ?- Y- R7 w+ k1 m7 ?4 r

" t+ c8 v2 G& i) \0 p0 s    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined. k* |0 ^( @4 t# H, m
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
- y, o4 \0 ~0 K3 ~" {- wJohn and Victoria.4 J" M+ e$ r) f
3 k0 H1 S6 d- g) g! E
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most! w: L$ M1 S5 x) Z1 T& b% z
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
: [" x% I  x  _2 H. thousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release- k( Y7 `, }8 M  v1 D9 ?/ j1 `
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
% a" c9 U+ e/ a  Wtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
! R8 n' Z( K0 Oacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
2 d! V$ y+ c( I& b8 \# u, Yavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
/ N4 C, X" S0 ]9 k, ofigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable. o, f- Z( N( D
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
5 j& R+ L: O' v! F! G/ Q1 QNovember 15, 2006.  I. V! l6 ^$ T; u
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
: x. J/ x9 O( n3 Cfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
3 x: ?' H$ }. n$ Dprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
  }) ^) I* p( M3 i3 z* Bavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-2 03:38 , Processed in 0.184932 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表