 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
, ] r1 J; Y+ z0 }$ {( z% G3 Y# R) T; j q- ~* `" C0 u
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -9 }) U+ O5 f7 E9 r
' K+ b w: A5 k TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
, D) m0 I& {' b; N5 D% Z* x9 ~4 x$ iexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third: C; [4 ^; I; z V J
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic: b) [$ C) j9 A1 d" A
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit, P* c1 S/ R4 J& Z
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
A$ a! ]' j( G; `# I# W/ Lmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,# e+ N% C* Z# A9 t5 H$ C
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
8 L: o- z# D8 ~0 h2 _9 VLePage Real Estate Services.& S. T5 R: E' K9 @8 t
. f6 V! L6 C! r6 e Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
- g- r8 u b M* S2 I; [: gare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic% K# k( O0 f. `8 ]( y* g/ P
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
5 F" T+ a" Y% |; P/ u2 zsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
$ N% W, S8 m1 ~; X# Kresidential real estate sector.
+ ~" _0 `3 q/ n% F3 N: E2 ?* z$ d
: m' n' d1 z! X Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
* v U( d% N+ u8 b. l {occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
, Y. X9 ?( H, Z; g% \( h; B8 |year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5622 E T1 s4 i$ o1 V$ L4 c
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3807 O9 c+ L$ O# ~4 j+ d! v6 e! D
(+13.2%).. b; m$ u* ]& l
3 [! ~: S! x$ T+ e "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth U/ a, a2 `9 v9 W. d$ P
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the6 C1 v1 i, I# U4 o! J0 F |
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
" S, Z8 g0 A5 ~+ A+ ipoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
% ?4 L) `. y: F( m0 T+ |president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.7 }8 H& F; d+ x0 Y
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
7 S) @3 s" O, h- s( Swelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
$ a& T+ }1 @. G4 ]8 F4 X9 ^4 mbalanced market."
' P, F4 W3 T! b& |3 a5 `$ _ K$ g' c4 C
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,6 k$ D6 Y* O) q$ K. q3 \% A7 g
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift' V* G0 x5 H, e v
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
- {, f) F' q) Mthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core$ K/ S% Q5 N( e C6 p
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
- V- M0 U3 Y' M6 j5 g7 Fmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record" K! }' z/ E3 Y6 Z% L2 o' @
breaking price appreciations.! K& J: F! ?: N% k2 O5 Z8 s
- v- K0 x ]% {5 b
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
K j3 ]) P. R& j+ k! jeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
8 @$ v( D' T, Ilargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
, K; U, H- C9 N9 ?; n
. v- `1 F7 i1 i5 a6 Z In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
0 e3 G- }# o* z5 C$ yeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
1 W W, c3 j W7 H9 o, N* wconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off# ~! Y4 D9 @2 L5 f
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
# ^% a- x1 ~+ ^In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
) Q4 B, C" z7 G E6 J5 k3 B( e; ^greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
3 g( V( r$ p% n2 W' H- a, Iprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
; e; d- h `3 `! ^! k/ Z4 d6 Q5 I$ s- R0 }2 v
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing3 j! V# y# e1 n r
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and- A* O! n6 E* C& r: Y9 |$ k- Q5 w
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada) X! T; y9 B& H2 ?
are markedly different than those found in the United States.2 G! m; D* E' V; w3 [& l
( x4 v3 r: L3 x3 U+ X# w Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
; b5 ^4 \6 w( _American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's8 q H! i# d- l L8 G
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
$ Z. F0 m# i% U& O3 B& Erelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
$ N0 `% J& G' W0 [/ v$ e5 baffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the. o H1 U l2 [4 z: G8 z
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
+ p5 j9 e+ `% g2 L. q' Kaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization, |8 Y6 Z. }2 T1 M4 f
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."4 a2 V$ ?' l; ]
2 _- R' x" j0 F <<; X% I# ]$ u/ b9 }; E
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
+ _: n0 d9 Z( L7 ?8 q >>- Q" K9 L0 m' U; `) A2 Q
' J- c- {$ x/ k, H
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
% r! e! t; \- }# N8 I- j9 o0 H5 V/ U1 SHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate* X5 q9 w7 t: y. M
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time; K4 H I0 S# C( k" j2 J( _) M9 ?2 V3 B
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
5 J# |' p% p) w, r6 W8 E4 E0 zrenovations.
5 e$ ^5 J) s6 E6 z/ Q6 e7 Z9 \5 y3 h
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
6 Z W( f* d1 d% c' Q0 dincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
/ A/ E) p5 v5 X. n7 c T) i0 ncompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and( u4 R9 F2 x) s/ H- v3 U2 Z8 B# ]# g4 V' h
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
?4 X3 U" a! V( A5 r
+ q- t4 ` ]8 ^: v The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer9 o$ B5 q2 [& }) T8 m( o7 w
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the( G. Q% y2 x5 U9 S1 U( i/ V; i
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new: S1 O( J- E+ Z0 u# Y, m3 Y
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores% x2 u7 o: j o3 ^' Z
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
( B. b3 a4 m: j$ l7 wand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.* B2 D4 H9 I0 B
' q; X! h \7 M: P1 t In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced T4 s# H! @ H/ \
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
" z# x, c0 Y4 C) L! e- i% ?homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers; Z2 Q) e0 z. N4 c
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian9 `0 C( w8 y( O4 r
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing6 q. R. T6 N* v- v! E! X- l
buyers with more options when looking for a home./ Z8 [" n& N0 B% k# ^
1 i& X% V; @7 r5 e6 ]( I1 _
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
0 g9 ~1 b" s( _. ?0 `among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes: C+ V; H& B5 T. B _
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,0 @7 Q. E4 l( T4 j8 `
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last: u/ R% }; W' n& Q
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
1 V; A' o! L5 t k2 t/ A) r- f- x7 S) i6 y+ t6 U
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
$ E) L/ G9 p& e# x& N9 I) @prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
- P) Z3 \0 o, d9 e0 f1 m$ A- ilevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
, [% ]6 t1 j2 L! |first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,# W; Z: ~/ X K( F: K3 C8 v# j+ V
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
: k3 o8 R! |$ Q7 U9 h7 V/ @pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
# i- x+ D0 ^) R& R+ rmaking a purchase.9 L h: s* k: M0 R- q/ V
1 h+ r2 R% v: b* d9 y. i
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
4 N6 v4 O: o0 E* H4 e: Wmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong# x6 H9 Y) a, b/ u, J& J
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city3 W5 X4 Q# a9 d* ?; b
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
) Z7 X/ ]( ?: `: ^* Uattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
8 A) Y* F! i: M# M$ E7 L; tamenities.
; i! `+ _* @0 Q& M- Y* R, X# @" K8 w; E9 L. W- `) f
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
9 z f2 \& Q `# A% ~throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand4 t% f6 f: t1 W
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has. u: V1 k( ?( _* t
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been3 I1 g. q( Y/ {6 G
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle2 k) P, u* b" v7 C- E
residence, rather than for investment.5 Q; e, g5 B& k9 O; a3 J6 h7 _- B+ g
n$ ~$ e) a% L9 @
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as4 b! r0 d" M, b7 g L
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
& g" ~7 f+ H# {1 Din a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
( }% r8 e/ D1 U4 cconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
- Q- }# C+ l$ d( Srate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
* r' |( f7 ~! h/ m% f1 Lthe market.% I) q) G3 [3 j# F h& M
" j2 X! ?8 \" f$ }+ g! t( ~) z8 h6 i In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through# w. o% G6 r5 X. J) P! z5 {& R
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In) Z' X% E0 y% }' f: ^4 X
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring4 y" Y U: M6 P+ P: K) I
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due* i6 t1 u: K6 d- g2 J
to the shortage of available inventory.
' Z! v3 W- t3 w+ D/ Q/ e3 b, u0 p, H8 Y5 \% ^- M% G
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its" s$ S4 O0 {/ P4 @, J* M- M( _$ N6 A
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
2 [/ G- n- V, p2 O# Yvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
0 i. z* c" {) Zstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.9 D2 D9 ^; S- M5 h6 j! ]& B
5 ]& c' `! }# F1 I5 ] B* Z
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases. Z- f: N* q. {6 P T
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low: N* W5 s( R) ]9 ~* V
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
2 }" o5 W) E: D2 ypressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
/ D7 t+ f" }/ ~% M/ D1 @prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer) ~+ ]# A0 L6 Q6 D5 }7 \$ q& w6 N% C
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
2 n. ^0 I$ t" D( v0 q2 Ybuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
# ^- M% H$ [# ]6 w4 b* ^
9 |6 V! j) t+ A0 O% V; u& O Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
; @9 k, Q/ d6 V! [: O; X' D9 u) Yas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton) S, K1 O$ h) p: f
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
0 D* f( c3 h8 z$ w* q/ i8 J: ~: l- p/ Tmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
4 Q `) A4 w* [" I$ `increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve5 @% [! e0 G p: N
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly" X, J, K) ^0 B: p* m
towards the end of 2006. ' ~. V* I+ [! d7 l. U9 K; o
- ?& T; ]/ q2 y1 _) @
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of+ v4 a4 H& }# l! k8 }& m2 W% a- l' P
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable& S3 O% b" a5 M; K# }7 s
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse: `0 }# a' v! x X/ j
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
# w3 p& P; r w* g6 f+ ^. vforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
, M1 r( l$ G* a& A! H" C9 zpressure on tight inventory levels.
) J6 [4 a: L: r. I* P( U, { M+ e
( _) C, ]- v; Y# F! i Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic8 |+ m$ v( y. t
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people* w% \" {8 U2 Y# U1 s
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
9 H% I( y( _% J% A7 M. zwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
6 k& q* `) O" P) h$ A# M/ tfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
8 `+ M8 _9 x& p+ P- U; b( T0 s& }$ ^) m8 O$ Z/ v
<<
1 R2 l& S4 y4 }2 l _$ A+ D8 [ Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20060 e2 a/ B/ `: |$ V) J) j
; N0 `* P; z$ W9 D( K r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& U3 M4 x( ~; _ Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey3 ~3 X2 d1 c; V: X+ X* Q9 {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 U1 p4 e: j/ A( H q4 {
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
1 z0 Z) b" g% z5 n. E) `6 x; h Market Average Average % Change Average Average
e& O* n- w( y3 ]# ^# o -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) i& W9 R( C0 c3 Q \ Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
1 f k3 x$ f) B7 u+ d/ R s( O -------------------------------------------------------------------------* G# C- B: u' ?9 t
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000) A8 L4 O4 h% f( Z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 W( v0 f: s3 M" Y6 v f Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
4 o* b0 a* m4 W( A; {# s& Q ------------------------------------------------------------------------- i7 C6 W2 w6 m" l% E+ n
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
! f6 u, R5 \+ {5 u- @& ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------( }5 u9 ?* a7 D, s: O" y. E( F
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3335 o7 m+ k" @- E! C7 x+ N% m, p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) E& g \+ K% y- ^- T- I d8 T; w Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583+ F3 V* ]- E7 B! E% ?+ w% C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 h, }5 C2 X) ^+ y: D
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
7 b) _* ]0 r( W$ A* B -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ t8 C% _, O) E- t3 F
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
: l& J9 J/ I5 c; d5 g -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# x$ ?' c( W; M Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
. r. V3 E0 o3 M6 | p; |- s, T -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( R0 v. J) ^' Y* t" q% B% f# { Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707$ c, {; @1 W0 T0 z9 ~
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' ]- h; Z. C% ~3 y
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500! d* n" H/ A$ y- Q5 W# w: d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ w* Y5 c6 b/ C
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
7 E3 y/ N, Y+ Z' p -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- _+ v& \: k# a Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714% I6 }" A/ f6 `2 C9 N+ c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# Y/ a6 Z( F0 R# w9 I2 P' l+ ?
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500, X" s4 d+ X) D9 t% e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& c5 n& w% u% V( Y( D9 f1 k* e \% _
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
. r O7 R3 K6 h3 u% u -------------------------------------------------------------------------! D0 b( g, ]6 v) F
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
# B/ z* N7 z+ [# h -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( I5 W+ d. N; i+ ^* A6 B2 k- r% X' R2 O% H ?
-------------------------------------------------------------) [; I q' \, v$ Q! N4 R
Standard Condominium
# ]! a) Z9 C( c5 H -------------------------------------------------------------( ~$ j& U& X( [3 P
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo! F9 j/ q9 W% }5 Z3 l+ T; W% t( \
Market % Change Average Average % Change
) U' z) X% o' O7 s5 k# B: W) K -------------------------------------------------------------0 z) O. }5 g. J- n% ]
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
* N, ], ~0 S. O5 a Y& Y, t -------------------------------------------------------------
8 e0 `* U6 B/ e$ `/ O+ O0 R Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%5 Q7 b6 j) ] Q. o: X! V7 A
-------------------------------------------------------------. }: {0 _. s, r$ y& Y9 Y2 q- W
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
6 c+ q+ A* W( Y0 v -------------------------------------------------------------% Q" X8 E/ N9 m C. O
Saint John N/A - - N/A" B6 E* e, p7 K1 ~7 i- T" _' v) j
-------------------------------------------------------------" A7 x8 V! o) @/ c8 c# L4 ~
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
1 K+ e% k! U' t, u' Y -------------------------------------------------------------
$ W7 b8 o. }% e u Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%2 M6 A) o8 H3 M
-------------------------------------------------------------; s. @* P8 t- Q" v& b
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%; q/ t' _1 ~+ \, h
-------------------------------------------------------------$ I, s ~2 E9 C' Y: I
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%3 J( @' c0 r3 y' T+ f2 f; X
-------------------------------------------------------------
. e! a* s6 d! B Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%0 q7 J, d8 K5 M9 G8 }: M
-------------------------------------------------------------
: e0 H* H+ w, c: m" e. u# c) E Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%! N& q; c8 N) J U2 }8 K4 I, h2 z
-------------------------------------------------------------
. d c! J: n- E4 F. D; f; p Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%1 N" ]: b2 }! y( V3 U k; J0 l
-------------------------------------------------------------+ l+ z9 P: E/ A T
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%& \9 P' B' V9 l# ]1 h
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 k2 u; X7 L" ^+ C; f& M ` Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%) Q7 k3 l, b2 r' F- b
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 e: D$ C! N# U% x/ L! \ Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%3 z2 i* d- R6 T" r0 k, E; O9 S3 p
-------------------------------------------------------------- P( k8 F6 c: x! C
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%) @ L3 J- `, N, D; l5 |
-------------------------------------------------------------" g: S" o1 S- P$ q, q7 I/ t
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
5 ~0 R, @# E. w -------------------------------------------------------------& M8 E* P7 W9 E5 `5 m8 [# H, G
>>) Q8 n& F1 V! w8 r% p$ m# D( x) a) x
* W$ f2 g+ l; Q. S; q1 v* P' \
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined; i( V* Q" x+ c5 V& {6 ?2 Z
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint) b0 h: f- \3 h+ Q' J9 Y
John and Victoria.
2 o5 o! a% m9 Q" J8 S# \( L
0 w. I3 d$ J; y0 }' I$ j The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most/ H X! O, ?/ J! n; ?" _2 v3 R
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
3 O0 v0 @# a/ k ?& Hhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
3 z- c9 _) r2 T I8 z% Rreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
' I; a4 t! I0 k0 P4 p! D9 }: w3 ~* xtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
2 o* w; F% `8 M+ J* O4 S' xacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is- _5 Z' x4 P+ b' X
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current4 \9 ^6 K" Y' A8 R. B6 x+ N
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable% V {/ c$ D X s4 L
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on% k, T7 p) h, M2 [. M% S
November 15, 2006.
3 l: I8 ~' y$ [6 e8 t Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
* Y1 h1 D7 Z) E4 J% K! Zfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
3 D1 W( y7 g6 O2 T7 w9 Jprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
1 f2 k" O; b& o& Zavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|