 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable / J% u8 `* M+ z7 U
- w# q S% M7 f% p8 Y7 p! a( X
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
, G# S+ V) d/ Q# B4 t
4 _! z" L+ t% a: s% v2 c TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
7 l# \* k: j M% m) i. fexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
: L! v' V. N. Xquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic4 R q$ q; e3 _
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit* T p; j& K5 c, R* G& M/ T. \$ e! d
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and' B# w* V- x z& w+ c4 ~
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,# f! V N! u0 ^$ Q: h
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
/ p: N2 O0 f* G0 S9 {; N4 ULePage Real Estate Services.
* s4 w/ s1 d3 S7 j. C/ ~+ E# ?4 ~2 h. `, N7 q" Z6 P- H/ a4 v
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
; n d% l3 D2 T+ _are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic ]5 w( J& R1 n% n. S
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and7 @1 @- `7 s0 x7 Z
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the6 j2 g# N& D8 s
residential real estate sector.; d; P- x5 \3 y! i$ J* Q0 a/ r
* H$ ?& c% R1 i8 |7 h# ~4 U
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation# }0 x' |3 g# K& B3 O* r
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
" @% O1 r2 w x# }+ fyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562" `) c; o% b: N L2 e- ~/ V
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
% J7 O5 v' b0 G* j(+13.2%).
# i7 [' s9 v+ \* T
, \, O2 J+ X' B8 m, b. @6 e "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
# I0 i4 U, X9 c: G: [' }during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
2 ^+ c& W" [7 w/ ffrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
# O6 V. P. ?/ M9 c& {8 r' Apoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,# |; G8 X+ m( R- r8 r: g; j8 r9 c( O
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.6 q2 k7 b4 v& n2 w
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We, H& }5 x- f6 z3 N! G9 a2 B# \
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy! q1 Z. Q3 k, l0 v" t+ N
balanced market."
( _1 u0 K9 g$ H$ K0 d0 L4 `
! g \1 g% r3 m* q# C Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,3 {" R7 M* y' g# G4 u
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
! i# X2 N: ?. \" Uto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
3 D% c' u1 |& T" Ithroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
0 g5 n3 z8 D) w @. Wenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
0 I+ | [& t5 [# a' z# z* D: W% [manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
: }! Q' Y4 a4 _8 o: E! H: vbreaking price appreciations.& b* O& `5 r2 p1 ^9 A6 |
2 V' V/ F& @/ D' D. s
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding! r6 m; C& ~ G7 ^0 Y2 E
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
0 ^- l8 i, Y& i8 d8 C2 q5 u0 Glargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
. m7 t# `! z+ W; l4 e# w: m+ q: k, u* Q; p- S6 ^! {
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid0 E5 ?- J8 Q. a3 R1 u L
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
# ]( W! ?: z! g- A: d7 `confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
& t2 E# d) w% O0 @5 S( fslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.7 `2 [+ {' d! U+ `5 u7 M
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers. U" {5 `4 V( \/ J. o9 l
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of5 t: N& l8 ~' }1 d9 _
price appreciation when compared with 2005.# ~) K; n. M& c' o
+ _9 X4 {$ V' c& E While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
7 a9 ?( `) a8 x: ?4 c! rmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
3 R: C: }* w! {4 Efinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
; b5 C6 b0 D4 V4 Care markedly different than those found in the United States.! P) _0 Z9 d5 n7 f: a3 Q
& E" ?: T/ O8 X# J8 p6 _& k Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
) ?& d4 S% U- s, m6 W" }/ u! aAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
; d$ w" z$ W; _/ W' k. a7 ?# q. kfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
! H1 O; [ l: A' lrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general1 C" `: @3 s0 L# @( T
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the7 H+ e$ g2 F# }+ U+ c& E$ v* C
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
+ [. G; M- j& ^$ \$ C baggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
7 ]0 K( Z1 `+ t3 ?: G, T/ f0 s- G5 z# N; Kmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."+ o1 A& h$ g4 i4 E
6 E/ r: t0 u7 }7 ^# A
<<8 } F. E- c5 h
REGIONAL SUMMARIES2 U' [0 R" E# B' b& g
>>& l; f( a! Q) b) G" \
+ z- A$ a: u% E. z# m' \
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
[; Z( k! k! d1 A! N2 fHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
5 t; b6 b3 ^3 Y0 A6 \of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
?1 Q- U, j; m3 E- Wlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
( K' w9 r' @( q* R- Orenovations.% K/ X* V7 M- V, E+ |
4 f' @1 M" c7 z
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
, p4 a; O- Q; b' N# V0 s% W nincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
: F2 r2 @4 J8 q; Pcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
% T# ?: ?- `7 D& I6 BSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.( O. I! o$ N9 k* r
' u8 p2 J d% O; c7 C# S/ @- H
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
* W) C; X2 m0 @! i' \9 B7 z$ Yslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the W' S- b: x* a( K) X# f r& d4 B# t
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
, L3 K( u7 R7 X- T6 n600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
; d9 R9 ^1 S9 ^9 [& w+ m; Hto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
5 m. c+ E9 z. B# f4 |$ {and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.7 |8 i1 o3 I9 f/ o# ~, J
$ C* f: Y6 }# O% x% x( b
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced; [' N; D7 E H+ ?) ?% ]/ ]9 G
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
x* N: T6 ?; k% G5 v7 w. a; O* Ehomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
# n7 V. W% n% Q$ }was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
/ G. A, p3 P6 J: m- Hdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing* l J0 d3 B! ?6 C2 _9 [& V' u
buyers with more options when looking for a home." u' [3 y# q3 C4 V$ m
R8 p1 L* }+ d) n* g8 k" I& F Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
* c: h$ i( _. `# t$ Xamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
- ~9 O9 @% y5 Q; J0 e/ Ipriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
, g! z6 f/ a+ p3 R3 Was some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last# c. ~+ Y1 m0 ^$ [) g4 \6 c
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
& l& f3 i. W% z" L6 I) G2 W" W
4 a/ a( O# | Y$ o1 _2 X5 b Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
2 h7 [* k/ Z* _" z+ w% _: yprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory: V/ D! H2 ~0 z. e$ h7 o
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting, V- b$ m* f- i/ A' F0 B, e; `6 J8 Z6 ]* I
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
' ]+ j7 j) f2 S% h, w4 ]when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
7 F3 k# d8 D1 Y* @8 Z2 jpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
4 p; ]/ J7 B6 x4 K( a: m" d5 p# a8 qmaking a purchase.4 E5 I3 f: J7 w+ \3 T
6 `. f8 I% O) L9 a% ^6 \) m W# r Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
, s- L& L- L6 y; g& V, Z) s1 Smarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
& W1 P; c/ L" Y7 k2 dconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city& y7 D- p, e: ?8 V% X y
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
2 X0 a4 B' R0 I+ i# }# ^# w( Sattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown" {4 |/ }/ c1 Q
amenities.
! b5 [9 b. K8 ^3 N7 o ?1 Q3 J$ j; ~# w7 ^
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels3 b) B! o4 h5 Q1 T6 @
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
) V, y# a! j' L% Tacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has; Y% H( V9 v6 I9 h+ j# P4 |! {
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been2 `. t$ y2 y: D, A
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
& [7 @) S8 b: `$ b# nresidence, rather than for investment.' W1 I- R- {3 N+ m5 ~, n4 i; ?0 {
; N! u/ u1 G: w5 v; P0 C6 j, i
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as2 h$ y% d2 K1 S7 J
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
1 Q8 a8 O% Z# R) A9 qin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer! k* L2 n1 M& V7 Y$ ^
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
5 o) c0 n# a$ X! s+ C& arate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter: Y3 O+ ?0 I# a/ H7 u+ C
the market./ v8 b) z) E# { U/ e3 Q
5 j6 T E0 O/ R
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through- }1 }: n/ _ t
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In/ G% S# ]" m' m' z! p+ o( f5 L
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
3 G3 w }; d1 r5 b1 p( [months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
) | k( L( t5 `9 ~! N8 ^to the shortage of available inventory.
5 v7 N$ O( ~. @8 H2 \. P- p; e3 {2 W
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its) Z# r" C3 R/ t! ^+ X& \
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains; A/ I" E- T6 n( u2 h" D E
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
Z" u4 o v9 {+ p+ qstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
/ a* ]9 k" M2 q$ o, x1 O, |& _6 o* l" j! t( E; k% }- s
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
8 d" P9 m2 O7 h$ I1 {in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low3 T- y' x' | r2 R9 n/ d
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
, x0 H; _7 j4 ?) tpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring8 h) N9 `- u- N5 |7 ]2 S
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
' ^& G; N$ h& [5 D. K5 kseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as& P" X7 f! C& v. _0 e
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
/ }( ^6 R _ \% [, z' w1 y8 s" X' ]# r+ m8 b
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
; c8 g, I: e5 V6 w9 R. has activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton% A) ~& |# O+ U7 L
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry," M* |4 ]' j# a/ D4 M7 n T
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices* |1 g$ b" I7 Q. V
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
' E# D7 Z; G2 O# Z5 \, c5 Ain the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
, P6 M( l1 o& \" L) Z- I. s3 N8 ktowards the end of 2006.
" c6 r# |) }5 g6 [4 H: t3 N$ ?
2 g% r- j( j# z6 p2 J" UWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
/ x4 z* @& i7 v" ?% r* vinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
! S! R8 C% s. Yto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
4 }. ?: l. o. G$ q/ |- sgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to, C1 U6 k3 O) D1 H9 C- t
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
7 @3 O6 a2 X/ K8 ipressure on tight inventory levels.
! C0 t' x/ Z2 x; a/ b/ P( H* b* z9 Y2 E+ C s3 W
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic, ?- ]( S$ Z8 V2 _. M; a
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
6 H2 {5 i+ ^& y1 R$ Iinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;9 W% h9 O+ ~+ B) }6 P
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching- [$ I0 X7 w* f' }$ g
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
7 L& t# x! z: z+ t& D' _( _' [- w5 @; v. P6 }
<<: i, X* z# k$ j0 I* u
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20065 u$ m( I9 O8 `! |5 h, z* o: B
; M. ^5 [! s( e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- o s' S" E' ?: \
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
* {6 k: T- R: T2 p( _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ q6 b& ?4 ?, v9 s 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
( M# Z0 c+ \; c# _/ G; W% ]! { Market Average Average % Change Average Average
0 F2 M1 g8 r$ G" Z1 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% e, l J" L; |( M Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
+ E C, W( j3 i, t: m4 I# h9 q$ E -------------------------------------------------------------------------' N7 U, |! ?! Z
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000# ?3 S" L; I9 D( E% C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; q( L$ \2 |; s$ h0 b/ {) Y Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000& T7 a3 M) F' E, l1 A7 i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% {; p" L" r" K2 i) j- ?) i+ V Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
6 B8 d% ~5 m% _2 N% d% M# I -------------------------------------------------------------------------) Z+ V; X/ B& h' ~' o6 a7 }
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
/ q8 \, ? b# _0 J0 E+ V( C/ B7 u -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" r U5 n+ v# _: V) k6 Q7 X; J Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583+ t$ T* Y, _$ u$ u7 q' X! ^3 I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 Q( j" D( p% k. n. q Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185* g- Y/ H+ B; K* s2 f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- u F9 _1 {: J# y3 e
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
$ {* t7 Q' e6 ~. i -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ {! r; `* T+ Q( m0 R! v" D Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766' u* e" k. L% z* V1 q R+ U4 _* K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) y( k1 y" l+ f+ B, X Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
' ~2 K$ c) m# v2 ~/ l9 U* p% d -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 g' H; q. h) `) ^! z; F
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5001 l E1 `- c; E" M: ~9 i# v3 L0 q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ R3 H; c, G$ f' _$ @+ G
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
l; h0 u! t5 h( F' R6 w -------------------------------------------------------------------------% S# \0 D% @: g. d! B4 M
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
# R u% D5 t: ~5 l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 W* A' I2 r- v( s Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5000 ?% r$ S5 N( _& C0 D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 H% C, [' m3 K( ~
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
7 d2 [8 V6 o% G% ~4 I7 l -------------------------------------------------------------------------# J1 l7 s! H6 \
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860( q2 X& i, \ Z* x5 p- ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 l$ s3 n6 d) t5 Y
! H3 H5 `5 ], } p. ` -------------------------------------------------------------
7 ~8 D3 {: H4 _# B2 n. B Standard Condominium$ b1 r+ o1 H2 u5 z% u; F R9 k! e
-------------------------------------------------------------
# E) \% V# ?2 O# m 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
4 {. E0 c8 x9 Q# ` Market % Change Average Average % Change( _( W8 `- C8 ]6 I& Q
-------------------------------------------------------------
- G8 H$ Q/ v1 Q) ^ Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%$ d+ u# A3 R% \( m
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 A s. K! p8 X; i3 l5 q Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
& _. Q0 e3 `/ K4 w" [" ^ -------------------------------------------------------------- p) t" e8 i' M6 C: q
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
' n9 I- L, P% {: {* U -------------------------------------------------------------
' X% M P8 w$ ~9 _( [- f/ n0 j Saint John N/A - - N/A
) m- t: k: s4 W; q1 W/ ` -------------------------------------------------------------
' h1 E# J2 q4 R7 i* X& ]8 A" r2 Q St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
: b% H& Q x$ ?5 G3 l! W -------------------------------------------------------------
5 L) F* p; `- K) z1 }- g, t Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
: f9 n/ Q: O/ R, n -------------------------------------------------------------7 K z8 N" Z) i0 ?2 M* \$ s$ [
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
4 l v2 p0 |9 y2 v& h -------------------------------------------------------------- T7 M2 l1 v4 D7 f" [# f: u+ ?
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%0 C" p0 V6 a' m( _3 }
-------------------------------------------------------------, L; |! V( L9 P5 f
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
% j! H, Z9 V% A4 D1 A! Y -------------------------------------------------------------
4 m& k0 g& B$ ^) o$ b/ x Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%) E$ {2 [0 C8 z/ ^" e
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 _, w, K3 V" Z7 c Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%7 v4 h$ ^5 h0 T# m
-------------------------------------------------------------
F) w& @( R4 m, O Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%+ B0 l6 O" T+ J5 q5 Q* w
-------------------------------------------------------------) M) t4 X& X+ f
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
6 h" Y8 m# }, F& @! i -------------------------------------------------------------
: r0 w8 o' y8 J. V* k( o: o7 _ Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%: {8 g6 ?1 N+ T! ]0 z$ r6 i/ b
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 T N1 Z* L: O$ k* A Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%% Y8 N1 z2 r( ` J+ q2 w/ y
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 g; ?9 V- w6 x$ Y6 |3 r; ? National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%7 C: |' ^3 P+ `$ B
-------------------------------------------------------------0 ^" {% A6 a6 v8 Y$ U; B, c
>>7 d' R6 S( @1 c! U3 w3 H
! u' G% }% j' u% _0 a5 x
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined8 @. n5 p4 O; N$ z# [7 u
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint: d/ J: ]& q6 P7 j+ Y/ m
John and Victoria.
' B- H' _" G4 K2 J* i4 n, W; B; n& Q! s8 \; P8 \% y$ y
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
' u* Z0 d( q% i8 \0 vcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
+ z: \7 c! ~$ r( C# Thousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
4 C2 i; S% j- t/ U4 D, [; ]/ @1 sreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price# J6 l/ M. e% t H6 I" Z
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities6 h# G5 g2 m/ O! w5 S5 k" R+ y
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is' c- [3 T1 q) _8 U
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current+ D, U8 D# ~" ?6 R* ~+ i. _" x- [: E) [
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable# x0 c: r3 E7 M3 U- n# d9 }
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
$ ?$ X: U2 }, h, L" y9 oNovember 15, 2006.
/ E c: w- K i( i Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
. P8 K& m( A' E! e. Qfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge. X6 I+ J- k8 j+ B y6 B6 ?
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is( a& S f1 F- i
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|