埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2144|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 3 q9 m7 z: T" j
% H& s, ?; @2 x) @4 A1 Z% K5 S
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
6 [) b: `7 C/ C5 U5 h* y/ a; G5 k! v
" n. X6 F4 v6 v) M0 f6 W    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
% o) k( v* e2 p' p, b* iexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third5 @; u' S3 B* s# @7 Q2 o
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic0 Z" m9 J# X9 K
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
0 c' v) B% C  M: j- Y/ Iprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
- V/ p0 Y1 h5 ~" u, O( H# B' Mmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
- n+ D- R: o- S/ m/ d/ VQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
: H( }9 `2 w' P8 m* @2 M" L+ RLePage Real Estate Services.; ], @5 x' O8 ]$ b% J# C8 _3 G
1 I5 |$ f- p- i7 [+ M9 ^9 S! G
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
: C0 L4 {/ g3 y) t! Y0 ~are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
1 W7 u" G0 @+ B8 xconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
6 R& U1 L7 @9 l) _sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
1 }- t, ]/ {: B+ A! r/ c! qresidential real estate sector.
9 q0 R, h' I! b6 j- h
9 U1 @! z4 T1 a/ Z! h    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
* }& q; w' S- y( moccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
) s! o% u7 ~" ~0 b  z5 qyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
9 l+ u; m. I0 i(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
2 M& L- B3 i; ?% V. O$ L(+13.2%).0 j! U0 f) @5 s) F7 g
- X- J, \3 Z% Y+ H* `) s( B
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth5 y0 }1 `0 [. y8 J
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
* U0 d1 k- X; W* v, r7 Sfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are% S0 w: j0 s3 ?$ F! J
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
5 t; X0 \3 S) K+ Mpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
' A6 l* W* d+ X9 A7 p+ X7 ~# L( F"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We; h) G9 J$ p: }. {/ P+ C
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy, D9 M9 ^  e, T$ X: T* K, q2 A- C
balanced market."
* M. ?* n+ l$ q6 z8 L% i+ g7 l8 p5 V
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
7 o6 J' ?7 s5 v6 M" J% R4 _considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
' W' G- i4 B# Gto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
6 L+ [, {/ V1 s0 \# V8 B9 Othroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
% g3 \& w7 t9 _# O- cenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,( H) Z3 p2 Z& b5 z2 x& h
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
; Q2 Y$ d8 E6 K. g% Ybreaking price appreciations.4 ]% ~( @, g7 S( }' b! n* t. L
& o# f, A+ |3 _; K
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding" }+ T( i& i+ X" H2 M& h' K+ O
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the9 L* x$ ~( C* C% ~$ n( Z
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed." _! [% R/ p; x: f4 y( f: `

( ^8 [% A/ v* G  T; f; L' I" n    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
* \2 |3 H% z& B% M* heconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer* J4 t9 f0 r- Q
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
- S( G$ d* [! g0 l2 G, ]slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
2 ?6 {) X$ T& FIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
5 w0 t: p% F$ U# m+ Q- Mgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
+ Q& o" j1 [9 W5 Qprice appreciation when compared with 2005., Y- c3 u* f3 l9 `
& o% L  W4 _- M9 x
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
3 K- P" K' d& h  i$ c4 rmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
& {' R# R5 B5 O  T" o' {6 W3 Qfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada. T; \" }' B5 D8 P9 F. r  b. s
are markedly different than those found in the United States.5 ?) P# S: O  V; M& l/ r; U

) |- {* o5 @  \3 M: f9 i    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
5 ~* y  N5 {1 q# KAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
, N+ Z  F+ B* t; V8 K4 x, qfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
& i/ a0 N" S! |2 }: C; y, j  ]relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general7 d, k, a$ u7 E, }
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
9 x7 l/ i. U5 L" wdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and$ O# w9 t0 e/ {3 ^
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization/ U- b( O. \7 O' N$ I6 I$ b- e
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
; F' M0 }# P% _
8 z0 c0 F" |2 m; M/ a7 l' L    <<* k  Z; @5 o! S$ |. t* H& W- y  P9 F
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
; T5 X" R( [' O+ y    >>
" j" G- L7 F  W% Y& O, D5 |4 i- W5 `
. v! k4 A: y' p. }/ D3 P% [    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
, t; M/ X' y* @% {% dHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate0 m' e" y6 p3 c5 h) |+ F8 I
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time& Q3 }2 [0 c( N/ W9 v: {4 W9 g
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of' R% w9 O6 [! |( K
renovations.
) U" B+ r# |# H' q- N# P3 ~2 G$ ]% b0 Z4 d: x+ I3 E9 @6 j
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
& d# `1 [# ^8 |; z, ]2 Mincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation+ h7 s& N, m1 t( d  @- g
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and* w& Y, }$ Y2 ]* |$ H) d! ]
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
* p0 N, w# T. r: |
: L' K( n0 {0 ]    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer5 m' w- G" n5 H# E* G
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the% E# c/ j7 s& T: ?: N5 @
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
  k5 c$ A- f# Y1 R3 ]600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores# m) h5 H- o( ?& h* b
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes1 _* z  x" K* S  U
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.! x5 d( p1 s  w

" o2 V& g& Y/ H0 Y/ i. u1 a    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
! t$ A! c: j& o- w. `& }conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their7 O$ A. f0 ~* `, `! x5 t
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers1 T' n7 D% A, z, }9 \# `9 }
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian/ O3 ~* V5 K* N2 b4 g* x2 n* |! |$ X
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing# Y- h# W0 N4 ?% M
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
, z6 o/ D. I4 s0 O. p4 w9 }# {( `1 s1 \% `" }: _  j
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly. I2 @  [$ \1 q1 H
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
+ r# Q6 a) X" G' |; m% A% mpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,- g9 i6 D& ~% j# x, M. f' t
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
" [! [2 s# d8 T( p4 m" sfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.1 y; s' ~. g! V- O; X; G

. ^$ ^- X, ]: C  B% J: Y) z! p    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
4 ?) f5 O$ y/ P( T6 p* O0 o; b5 [prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
& _- |" ]0 M7 [% i  h3 ]levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
6 y: ~6 j% m! T1 d  ?first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,7 ]! y& Q7 z0 ?, o* N
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
4 W( q1 x5 B1 ~; A  Z/ o. a, C9 spressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
7 J9 P: u/ D( M3 Jmaking a purchase.4 J" z# H! Y# U+ r2 d5 N! B
4 k6 p$ q4 J: [+ Z5 a) T  A
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
% l+ k3 y. R  P; ?0 Lmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong- X5 b2 Q7 w) t' j0 M  K
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
. G: G: e, b, }4 i: Mcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
7 P% f5 L: j6 a0 i( S' H7 j" Vattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
$ U+ v) o- u3 B6 P6 Wamenities.
( D% v: k1 j5 ]5 W: b( R* c0 i. v- @% N5 X1 ^5 I* K. t
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels, R$ D& h( \/ M2 B
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand& ~' s( Y# u4 w) ^5 v
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
" U( R# ]! q) b; V. g8 Z' H3 Lcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
) R0 P! l) k/ y  I7 q6 ?4 r6 f4 ddriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle1 t9 O: k$ [- W; w* [$ F8 s2 c& C
residence, rather than for investment.
+ ?3 F+ N/ X' K3 W1 T1 b# ^6 P
) {8 g5 Y" ~0 Y( N    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
; W' |5 e; `( L3 t$ q. T5 V8 hhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
( {; g5 o& s6 u5 o/ a6 nin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
' i) W) M9 ~, g+ iconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization! w5 O+ I6 \7 |1 {) @6 _5 _
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter3 w( j, ]7 H- ?8 U
the market.2 g& H- N. A* c- i
5 A% e( Y3 X" U# U( Z
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
! J* S7 w9 e0 R% M; XJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In% D+ ]' \$ S3 D8 w3 Z1 {0 D
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
( G6 {5 ?& o$ ?+ _% L6 R/ l/ U5 t! ]months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
5 Z8 B/ P0 M+ Z. v6 kto the shortage of available inventory.
6 I4 V( B# J2 a5 [" E0 i" l
! Z7 |/ w% o) Q- K0 |/ x    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its, s" \$ G2 w0 N) K
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
) o7 t" L9 t9 f7 @( |! a: Yvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses( B# u( n( G4 m  e2 ?8 [" L
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.. [7 l8 C1 j, I6 m6 W
, x8 Z2 m- r' x- c( I) ]
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases. ?; L; X3 Y$ o3 x/ `( q
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low/ O) }4 r& U3 v
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
+ n" u# R, [, n% S: S/ gpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
* {8 m. G& o, r2 @- {: Qprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer: J  G. w) G2 k# F2 Q
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as! E: L* ~# l9 B( G! [, k# h
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

: _2 R1 {" _0 k: c' l
  y% m$ ?5 d; @/ y& {    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter3 ^5 n# y/ `) @9 X9 ?
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
! d: n; o' W: ~! b9 n1 `# V" ~remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,/ n2 f/ M' U, g
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices! I4 s; N; K5 q+ d; L) ~6 q
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve5 n9 Y2 x) }/ V
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
- V' A- ?; b3 f' k( ]0 ]towards the end of 2006.
    9 I8 E$ {- \# ]* f

4 ~* N. C; A+ t# u! t. D: R( kWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of0 D( U( K5 q" P/ W) R& F, R7 }/ I
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable- b5 l; |# b3 S9 w2 O: r9 n- J
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse# ~/ W" g5 A1 q  V6 G. b# o  P
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
6 {- q: J/ \( Fforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added" q4 t, I7 B! G6 [
pressure on tight inventory levels.
$ q. P$ F& X/ e/ ]- P5 m
5 P3 X% `1 M; |1 g( i( p" D    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
5 |' x0 h5 y. E6 b6 ]fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
1 p9 a/ b! c, ^# D  J( c1 Ainto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
3 D5 s: `$ B' G0 Y4 W( C7 Lwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
1 ^  y9 V7 v6 {+ L2 kfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.  d" t$ N0 J! k" c( g% X5 }3 o6 H6 \
7 V6 T1 l$ v: t" V
    <<+ B8 J, e" }  [# M. z# j
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006% M1 b) S  l2 d* C& B7 ]: j% _+ O

6 f7 D' x. l4 {9 p. ~5 l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: b' e4 ^/ }$ n  k                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
% z# N- h2 ~/ b# W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' x1 B" ^9 M# v, n" |  U
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3" n: h. n: i# A9 a
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
7 x# l& y4 f( a$ a! `1 e$ i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! A0 N  d  d8 {+ S) R    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
* f- s+ O. l3 L2 w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ I# S9 C/ C' n4 E: \' P    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
$ X+ U+ t) R3 n5 |: T" ]  c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* S3 x9 W8 h) J  c  `1 X' X    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
0 B3 ?; z, v" F0 m4 B) J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, `, y  b" v3 l$ y
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -( j, S9 u0 n" S4 j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" t8 h) O' \! Z) C8 E    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333+ t3 P' Y, t% v2 ]9 k3 ?0 {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) X/ C; b' S' C1 B6 H: X
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583  E( D# H4 u0 V& x  v! ?/ x9 E
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 [  ]9 z' `9 e4 D) d
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185% S7 f. f  j( n1 A- F2 C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) p, G5 V! r: X. j6 X+ E    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
/ h* @* \$ |1 l5 m- [/ a    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ [; ?( o3 `% x! y: \! o    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
0 z  z& c: W& S3 z; ?1 [) V9 n" ^$ m    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 y) k1 n0 Y" i8 k    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707# w, C! O1 S, {% w3 s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 N2 t% R: t$ N& r& U    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
/ H# L; ~! ~7 ]! k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( t) o& Z8 _. E6 \" k    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,3892 n/ I4 D  a2 }  I3 g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: S* }7 t, k$ v; r, J    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7141 p; W) w2 ^" Q. X* R
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 U8 n7 b8 E; V5 C
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500  U& m' l+ v6 f* C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 L0 V0 N/ @0 d    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
8 H; j5 n0 a" E  ]  U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 j; q8 W, Z/ T
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8606 m5 Q8 I7 u2 K  E$ m3 Z% V5 E# j' K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% K9 o6 l/ E! I' f/ F1 V4 W9 x( ?. e, ~6 d3 W
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 Y  F: }) H' A                               Standard Condominium
$ t4 ~" w& K2 x# w4 D4 N# w# o8 G    -------------------------------------------------------------
. \  I% J4 h- K% R) L                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo; Z" \" p' E+ R
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
* f0 l1 I) [! {% r! F$ ^9 p6 W- m    -------------------------------------------------------------
% C" A( ?/ V9 Q( f7 v7 x    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%* t  B9 S; z! H$ k+ }
    -------------------------------------------------------------5 u" m0 u: {2 g9 w6 K
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%. M* ~, V( C* ^+ t: i2 G' E4 S
    -------------------------------------------------------------0 u6 G$ X( v) Z& v8 Y2 Y
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
( w" Y" h1 l' Z% T0 \    -------------------------------------------------------------
- Q  ]3 ^( W/ Q) p- O    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A9 j2 U. ^, }% `5 z) H# i
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 N, d+ t6 T, c0 h+ T/ B    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
3 h6 \+ W8 a6 `9 J3 q) |" E    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 v9 T6 P2 u) {    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%, I6 O: M* j5 D! I4 p
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& T3 I/ R7 R$ I; L# [7 f( _    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
- |4 B& K, _  z" A    -------------------------------------------------------------0 E2 a9 P0 U% B# b* F' l
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
( e; @5 Y0 x1 J2 Z) s' b7 e    -------------------------------------------------------------
# y( k* X, L% Y8 e8 [- ~; @3 x9 d    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%+ b' `' `5 q8 H1 y' I/ Z1 s) A8 p
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  h! x, i- \; s% L4 V' C' t& L- X" z    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
" v" E. q) s3 o6 N8 t  _5 s2 H    -------------------------------------------------------------: Q0 ^7 W3 K9 f% [4 v
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%# J7 g; a* Z+ o0 C( v! h
    -------------------------------------------------------------; @' Y5 u* s. k6 h- g+ T
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
2 u5 y) c1 `5 |8 |2 F: X    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ t- I  H$ A, \( W    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
+ s; K1 ~( ^9 x  Q/ @5 T    -------------------------------------------------------------9 {" Y2 G5 K" k! ^3 C
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
% x! L2 a' R9 P" f2 h* d( G    -------------------------------------------------------------9 r# M' @+ r3 R* ]
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%. K6 n" E+ }; k: i9 C, @) b- J
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: [- |7 q' m/ }8 p0 l! P3 O% x+ S    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%$ [2 ~, C6 u- X3 O0 z) ~* n! \1 e
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: l  f( Y5 I# B- j    >>$ {9 p, _" |) q, ~6 `) _- o+ }7 @6 P( L
. _* S2 J! i4 X
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
1 U1 Y4 x& d. F; `in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint- m/ ^' ?. F$ c( Q5 h
John and Victoria.
, Z6 M4 O3 r) D" w! h8 ?2 \+ U- U. K% y2 s, y! z5 }9 l
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most4 m7 O) b- n# S1 R, B: [; w1 U
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
% `$ p, V& T& V; X8 ]. Thousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
6 a' Z  |: r1 [: w1 G7 D4 A' e2 }references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
, Z4 J! M$ Y: A: ?trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
, g0 e. n, a8 {+ A9 Facross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
2 ^$ ~, d5 j- f+ javailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current4 D# M4 r$ q3 R
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable  ~7 e) E/ v7 l( [( N- t6 u, F
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
) w! _! O# q7 g( q. C# ]November 15, 2006.
, ]- ?7 K: D, O: v/ z4 i* V3 p    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
. D% i( \" ~; g) ^0 C, `, zfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge1 B& B% n6 Z- {& X# k
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is! u6 i0 g( ?. {: `/ ^5 V
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-9 03:28 , Processed in 0.097997 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表