埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2359|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
3 W% h* S9 [1 s$ K7 P- X% _
- B% d: {/ j' X6 C$ N- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -3 R7 v# ], S# W1 g7 v) ?" R
* ^- a! Q3 s- U4 s3 K
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
* ~6 a2 C, X% r' I# Zexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
  F3 L# ^1 k# |! v  r, V! ~0 Jquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
, ?& S; T. K+ ~2 I9 p- l& Sin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
5 r, L+ @4 \" _price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and* G, d' V+ Y7 O/ I  a! W: k- [! [) j
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario," a+ W* y! V* @
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
5 d' m; t  j$ \% E3 I6 z$ qLePage Real Estate Services.
: h7 ]- h( Y. x4 h- ~2 w
5 C- |# J) \/ I( m    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
  f5 c  y9 w  A! ]6 dare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
/ \3 C0 J4 ]- Q' P- Q9 U# Gconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
3 y, Z8 G3 _( |" P: M  U" b4 msound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
' O) j, _1 Z, h! fresidential real estate sector.
  a- G9 a) q& S& w! H
" N7 L6 B  G: w& n) d; d6 ~    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
. P4 J4 T* C* b( {( {occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)( u, Q0 S! g3 G% w3 V& g) J9 X
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
2 c$ w8 a2 E$ ?9 m4 G8 R( J0 d(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380. }' P" h1 `: {4 i
(+13.2%).
. o. ?" E1 a* o/ D: M2 D9 m8 o4 R4 w1 ^7 F
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth9 o. ^+ G8 h5 a) R" z0 H" \
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
4 f6 Y/ K% Y( `* D. Jfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
- A9 D/ c7 F2 S  G: @poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,) ?: M2 R& K. L( D2 h
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
  i: h1 M$ b) n"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
' v. Q6 o  x1 Mwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy" }/ ?1 ?$ E2 W4 w) k
balanced market."% U3 q  o* T$ M: J! R& W
5 R- h8 K3 Z' ^. u! L- [( C
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
, L4 H/ V$ S5 ~4 m" [considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift7 I  A; u4 _( @/ m0 p, I6 J9 b( A( Q
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued: P0 c; \7 |- ^+ o- S8 e- S
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core2 n3 N6 ^5 e5 ^3 ?3 w, f: K+ o. J
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
  T' e' t+ O4 a7 ?3 m( Jmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record4 L+ w% |" G/ Y3 L
breaking price appreciations.
& I1 {9 ]8 X9 L( c: g2 e+ R# i' T6 D9 Z8 l' R( s" y
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding) A2 _% C* F$ a. S$ H- F
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the: o# B2 u5 Q# y" X. S
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
4 q3 ~6 b4 r: z! K6 d% G
" a% ~5 D4 B9 g4 [7 F    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
+ X0 J  n) {) Q( M0 {4 L/ ieconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer2 {  q* H" O, p  F6 |7 N! i
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
' w$ c  p, M( o0 F" i" |. `slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.8 R* x( j4 L8 U: E. k
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
- [; z' [( |, x* Ggreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of1 Y$ k: |- W9 F( M
price appreciation when compared with 2005.' W9 ^5 H& Y6 W0 p

( E; j8 O4 k/ M& S    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
" a* X& ~/ ~: B$ M3 ?market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
. Z# b3 ^8 `: n% Q" x* P: H" g4 _financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
. J& l, ?6 Q, ?! vare markedly different than those found in the United States.$ O8 z6 q5 O* J3 X, N+ b* Y+ r
5 [1 f0 [4 k! k; J4 ?
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
: N( s/ }7 v- ~$ h) k( t  qAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
3 _* t- j" h/ I+ s# x( P. K9 J  Afavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the. K5 R1 d; A" P5 v: u
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general$ }. |) b& p. n$ x
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
* c# N$ g) d7 j3 O9 ^% Rdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
' ~, w- k: h: U4 `+ |aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
) I; ^( X6 j6 X9 H9 q4 Imortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."* p6 k, e& Q0 |6 G* _4 P6 F
$ b5 S% c* n& M8 Z1 w. `1 Y& L
    <<
9 t1 n& J; ^5 E4 Q                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
/ O$ z  X( Y8 F    >>% N7 N9 K7 F, B7 `9 M0 C! }. \

9 g3 P+ u. H6 o* Q# `: F    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
- Z5 {1 X: x* c5 p# i% DHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate; r' I: v; Q, S6 V4 D
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
' G. v- n4 T# r& e  Rlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
+ i( p8 e8 H) {% P. B9 {% Wrenovations.
$ D2 g4 z, \7 Y5 v2 \
+ `* K9 S' ]" ?6 \$ z! }% x    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight8 ~: o) h1 h) q, C5 ?4 F
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation1 }- f  g8 H5 s) e3 r
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
3 K5 b8 X+ `8 nSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.* n4 t! z8 j4 m* w
+ B% N, M5 `8 o6 N- h6 s" j& |
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer5 z7 F' X3 ]. V& _. O
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the/ Z/ ]- c, @, N5 e3 s4 g9 R; ~
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new/ t9 n! a/ s3 w; |: S4 k+ K0 d
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores% v+ Y7 p' y; ?1 c
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes$ N) J% w6 q* M) S; r$ P; O' L
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.( n( e3 \: g# q- j3 n7 l  M' }0 A

( O' X, R& n' Z+ ^- h    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced7 N( g8 C# b* ]0 ~6 {' f7 k
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
3 W; J' H* Z) D# u/ y, L" c5 Xhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers0 I# Q. ^; m. p  K9 p" d7 I- O, h) M
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian; {! a, V, |0 H; q4 G* U) U2 m
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
; f3 C- C$ |; t$ _3 sbuyers with more options when looking for a home.2 i& Z% b! w3 H% {4 B9 U

4 b0 T" n4 h3 `# G    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly: v3 v7 m  E; J' U# a) k  e: `
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes2 v0 X+ b( l( m* I4 t) }5 i$ @
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
& i' p$ |4 A0 M! Vas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last, }# Y- p. ?, v/ O
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.3 u/ y, {' r, N' v! ~2 E

3 Z- C# d# B7 L) {0 @+ t    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house' i" y. ?, A+ B
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory* M! D. F% R# g& r
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
3 u' d! C2 c( |: ^% U1 k& }first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
4 F6 b& H( F; q7 }$ u4 l' V7 hwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the. p* H! T+ J' i& J
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
. _0 w0 X/ ~' `3 jmaking a purchase.1 G  A& E3 u. b/ H/ R; ^- G

8 g; e/ N* ]& S, L% B; O    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
' z5 ~2 e, |% T8 umarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
5 ?- S: C* x+ H( h, nconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
' u+ Z0 P9 d- q% S. Qcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
+ Z; A* a/ a7 S* o' [. f5 wattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
2 C/ _* g; e' ~; o0 {3 }- E0 @+ jamenities.
1 c5 i) X& I1 q2 S# e7 N* [; F
" {( n/ b+ H' p# |- Q. |    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
+ F" |$ e7 M) D2 Xthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand& u; A+ |" J4 e* f6 r' V; e: Z8 C8 w
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has1 k3 b# J( h! s5 G$ e
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
/ Z- t3 l/ a8 [* o  {7 ~driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle% b7 C/ E+ e" u" j
residence, rather than for investment.+ @- m) @1 e( K; o. z0 p

) L7 u5 |/ m5 k9 j    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
$ _9 N  c! k5 U: I5 a, j; jhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted1 e! M- J+ q4 I8 t
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer& z" u$ s# Q4 M2 E( Z3 y
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
1 u2 Q/ m$ h" B# h  ^1 nrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
/ G5 t+ M, g1 qthe market.
+ u1 T7 E; A4 [/ D% Z, j3 b: }# g8 \4 s# d! s  o. W( b4 e
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through$ l. i; z- z1 n
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In% @  K% ~# F0 y* p" e
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring1 L" r+ l3 {& w, X5 V+ {
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due/ Z4 A1 K( x+ T7 J+ i
to the shortage of available inventory.
# x# B0 n) b, @9 X( e4 A1 g/ J& c$ @/ Q. o
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
, Y& ]/ `. Q( f$ Imomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
  @0 V) b/ c% W* [% Gvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses& w, U* S' }1 D$ t7 y' K
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.- [; Y  n; n. Y& ?- K" o1 b
: f- ^; ]1 Y$ ]  r' u
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
% A' X: k% ^9 R6 S' S7 j. ~in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low! {* e8 w& {5 Z/ ]8 r7 z
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that/ N+ o. e; N0 r8 J
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring- w" N- y7 Q/ g; \3 R& Y
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer0 u( `) x; N4 k# V; Y. B1 O; D) _: S
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as# ]$ x+ W7 X+ g0 C
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

, z. A6 \& ~3 u
7 L) a# O7 `; l    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
9 F7 n, X& @9 W# U5 l# B4 Nas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton% a$ D5 a4 C( D1 R. }- S
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
  w& P1 E% E0 Q$ H* R$ Amaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
) b& h' n* F* e+ y9 ?increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
6 C' u; |8 ?: s, sin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
' ?1 D  e# w6 u0 Ltowards the end of 2006.
    9 T5 K; ^3 _1 D- i! p: G
5 k; o' D9 Z% G7 R: [. h$ L
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of) ~4 U. V" {& U4 M6 `% n. O
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
  J3 l8 }1 z; k5 K8 C! `- ]to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
. T3 ^. X' G( _; Q8 G& o& @group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
# w# _0 L; y- Z: tforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added; H- V+ }+ S" S
pressure on tight inventory levels.7 d' ]# X$ f5 }- A

& k6 x) I5 u; c( J    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic9 L2 S% P/ ~4 F, q/ N. D
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
: m3 D' s7 l( N% U0 @into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;1 W8 b2 d9 @+ |) m+ M3 m# a* a- W
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching$ G- C$ h; ~7 s. v+ O# _' E
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.4 j3 R1 a; b: N! Q* D: y
9 r; Z) \* `" t- M0 _6 \
    <<
" Y# u1 F4 ^+ H7 P$ g) T      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20065 u0 c( h' l; ^# {5 T- h
! v8 |2 a3 T" B3 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ i0 R& |' n+ q
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
0 k5 q; f* n1 L& S' f0 e0 l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 u+ \9 W( B- c+ t. y
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3. d9 o8 @1 c: Q! i+ K$ s
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
: E" C' k! F. K. l5 j9 o! J$ i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# R6 n6 R$ w7 g1 X; u. X    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
, p+ n* r" o1 j# e" g8 [* u9 p+ l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. O% u% a$ S& Z2 B6 U! h    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000) j8 D$ Q3 ~& k6 g* T5 F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  [1 K- s; S' Z0 E9 _- z7 e    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
2 R& A* w+ ]7 Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% i: P2 }" O7 g& Q% w    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -* m$ M5 X+ |, T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& ~1 ~* c/ h' v% ~" u5 i    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
" b- i3 x6 C1 j2 Q8 @8 d: b1 L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" A$ s; N, R2 V* m& O8 U' x" b    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
9 t+ G1 G0 x) k* d    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 E' R+ a$ [3 g: |8 r    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1858 ~1 x2 n$ _3 w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 c3 k2 C4 {# _" q$ j  R    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
! K: i7 d; D5 u  L0 ]$ n" [4 I    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 W9 n; V: P. ^1 }1 f6 N& v, q$ H; t. k    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
" [2 |+ g' T) L3 r) M4 m4 N3 o! q' ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& r) |. }* q# s% r1 a% y0 f
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
% @9 I) q: _7 L. O& p' W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 a& j. |/ V  Z- Z: `/ Z* C% K& n
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5000 F0 `9 w, ?' H- q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* j# L& x: u5 V) O7 ?' I- I    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389: `; e. X) D2 c3 P9 @
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 C# n# w: n& n2 B  G    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714" y6 j: L$ T& k/ v3 z4 z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 S7 x0 T: ]* ^8 b
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
# {+ }+ k7 x! X2 l$ U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 v* L; @& h9 v' {3 w( U    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000/ I% T) n& e+ J" G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- V8 m1 i3 Y! K$ u% X
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
( `" }2 F# b: ^5 H. Y% r    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 S+ q  X1 k: g' R; `- @- O5 X
/ U5 ]; W, s  @9 J+ U- Y3 ~    -------------------------------------------------------------: _. T+ s: `& T# G6 \# r
                               Standard Condominium
9 F5 ]; r8 b- A7 ?# c2 h7 ^7 O    -------------------------------------------------------------2 g. |# N" }5 K( S! b6 f
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
' H5 `) Z2 a5 x5 {  S    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
+ M+ V# ?+ T+ F    -------------------------------------------------------------/ l  q) V$ l  ^' E- k
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%  H. I7 b3 u6 J
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ {8 r- u% d1 w( b, R+ R, T4 x    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
& ^3 w; I, u5 s( b    -------------------------------------------------------------
. Q- I. e* O3 ]3 j: O    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A* L+ q) x8 n. O; r( J
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: D: ]# {  z9 n. }* W    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A' S# Q% ^5 P; t% d) h3 t
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  A/ }' d. n' ^4 r$ u" D$ O8 _7 Z4 j' m    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
) s) G+ n9 Z/ E' M7 k    -------------------------------------------------------------
! t/ ^- F6 a. `, s) L1 R4 L; ^    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%: S+ `3 L- F: K% [" u: G% V. z6 |
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: C) T4 n& K, L+ x* u5 H    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
6 O* m* k+ R3 L- ^- i. M+ h% Z9 G    -------------------------------------------------------------
( }2 S5 R5 Y" B/ K) Z- j6 {    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%( q; m: _; l2 J& E  @
    -------------------------------------------------------------
. g9 N9 j9 `: g! W; m: S    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
4 e' W, _! M  e5 _7 t0 [    -------------------------------------------------------------# ~4 ?- S# ~; {) ^% @
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%4 h2 C0 C* u, M3 T% r5 P% _
    -------------------------------------------------------------8 Z3 Y; p! z0 p* r- ^
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
' `* M6 F/ N  l    -------------------------------------------------------------+ t" E, M. a3 N) z
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
" h  v( ~) p. x7 _9 G    -------------------------------------------------------------$ y) U, ^7 C3 z/ ?6 x9 h- F
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%4 i5 }* `- Z; C; j7 q
    -------------------------------------------------------------5 g( l. V, Y; E: ?0 |4 W
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
* Z; V- w6 n9 ?: i' r    -------------------------------------------------------------) K, |% n# U  _  e3 |
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%/ h( t: q8 A2 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  r6 e  e" L1 U5 F8 g    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
( w1 q! |7 |9 Z* h4 r7 @2 X! A    -------------------------------------------------------------! y9 w( E* h" P
    >>
- r1 \$ K: t! t, V5 w
( Q0 {# u2 N: L8 j) h  ^/ L    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
9 }7 Y: X3 ]0 r; e+ ^! jin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint  S% [! }( ?/ `' C, Q
John and Victoria.
- u$ v4 a6 L3 a7 h" v+ V3 x* K6 M( x. i8 ^& N: `( i* \( ~% t6 N# \$ }
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
& d' _( J7 \6 Pcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of7 b' q: F5 i5 H: ~. _4 a
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
& a) o8 W1 r; r+ p$ E0 i0 q/ Zreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price/ t7 j4 O, d+ P* K- \/ N
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
" G% _: i" |- P- e- Wacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
6 P# p6 \# r( ~+ `0 z0 H9 gavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current1 j) t0 y% J; x3 N) L
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
- }# J6 v. ~$ V' x: Dversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on2 X4 X& P5 @* S6 i
November 15, 2006.
% N9 m! O0 [; r1 d) B# h! C    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of) Z+ }: x2 W5 E
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
/ a# c6 Y6 b* d/ b7 E) ?% Gprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is" W" W; o  Z1 Q2 b7 V' \$ K' s' r
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-15 16:26 , Processed in 0.252826 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表