埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2048|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
( p" L0 {1 v9 T4 H# S0 h( X
0 ~+ v) B' m! {# @8 O! R- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
5 ~. R" B0 p5 V% ?9 t- Q
0 w$ B: u( a5 i! H, `# }2 w    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market9 a4 I6 R" q: T! E: K, X
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third  n# ^' i' m5 {" @
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic2 D1 x! p; A/ P% V* m+ c. j
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
1 _) n2 q; L7 }: B9 ?7 Hprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and5 A$ y# ^4 O1 ?0 e% v7 C' U" [2 g
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,' w: x1 o: T9 \7 |
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal' \8 x4 m& T' s: N0 D
LePage Real Estate Services.( F  j& R: E& x6 T7 F3 T; E2 d

4 H$ `% u1 ?9 L. Y5 s6 b    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
2 _( F: A7 \, f. q. X8 qare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
; Y9 x. L9 a, p  q( J2 V5 B" xconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
  l7 s, H: x, m7 w( \1 l: e+ n+ P/ }/ nsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
* y- z% I; F6 a. \7 u6 O" S4 `3 o' Kresidential real estate sector.3 {$ t! f" ~2 o1 T, b6 O5 h' h

* C6 p& `5 w1 e9 J    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation& b; ~5 \- T" a$ Y: ~) E
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%), @4 Z" t1 w% h
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
0 p  g5 w9 {. \$ f" m; Q% |) Z(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
' P' Q2 O5 N% S* G/ m1 s) R(+13.2%).  j! B# q" d, o, z+ _) Y
8 p. P4 f8 {  B2 m' D
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth& C4 M) Z* r! [5 g  o% J5 h1 H
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
4 v1 n9 R" `% S$ j% d$ o  o, P5 Sfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are, t# S) X/ d1 S: v% q, w
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,4 b" @; k- K9 K+ P2 L7 a& @- L6 s& M5 F
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.; v7 d8 P* v& r: D" \$ ?+ k
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We1 Y$ R( }/ p  a
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
; ~7 T9 u; F2 b8 S* A# I$ P( Q. kbalanced market."
4 D7 A& E" w3 ?9 B) l5 R2 f- U: b  t9 e/ R- h+ {+ O4 B. v7 g  e
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
! F$ M$ P& r* x" r: h1 |considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift# |' K( x5 ~/ A) `3 o
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
+ d% k, r; V2 V) n: jthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core" h- t* a! R6 ]7 u
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
% {# b; [& D, K/ [  k4 B1 X- ~# G/ lmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
. I' }- i# @3 P; Q( pbreaking price appreciations.7 ]0 v  P1 }/ x

8 ^. t/ K' i$ \% q# X7 k, P$ X( `    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding0 v6 m+ q9 v1 T. n$ D2 ?* h
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
. ]' y0 B2 t  i% Olargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.7 i6 d" B# o* M
  {7 l4 _& r$ U6 [  R) D
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
/ _5 C: Z5 r: E7 f( Geconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer. G- C; p9 ]" k0 V$ [9 E) c6 ~
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off$ J& m/ c  {. p4 Z( s
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.: L1 Z, |; E! t( h6 h, X$ w
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
, m  f. n# z  K6 E, }, A2 Vgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
2 Q7 g3 d7 E* b& _, ?% v, zprice appreciation when compared with 2005.# c4 b0 g0 B4 Z1 ?4 C- \: d

* h" B* e) @0 k' Q) ]3 l    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
6 C$ M& H- {8 S; Emarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and1 O5 _* z+ d* P0 A) R# q6 N% z
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada0 {# m, n* [3 j- X2 F
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
0 Q8 Z% d+ Y# h! Y; J$ b( j2 n8 ?  d0 W5 T
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the2 Q& E' y0 |" {( k2 N8 c
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
  G! f6 B* C6 Y1 j9 afavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the3 L" B: p  G2 o# [4 D* x) e
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general# H' o+ e4 m7 y8 \: y5 r8 O( l: E
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
5 l8 }, O4 M- Tdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and7 c8 v1 g2 T5 K9 i; L
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
' r' W  R/ F5 c% T+ {2 T1 E' R; @mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
$ Q# E% e. Y! l, {+ o5 _: R3 P& P3 k; i9 N# N! t7 B7 w8 B2 z
    <<" M, L$ G+ C$ p2 ?; m  O7 d
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
2 f( ?+ B  {0 r* l) q' h- m    >>
; P! |5 M5 @8 {" L- a" Y) p( E) ~! s* i) q2 H* d2 T, [7 F
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in  e; D0 Y. L( ]/ Q
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate4 J: k$ {' {9 q( G$ E' m  [2 p
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time6 }- {- K* w8 u) r1 S3 B6 @
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of2 [0 g- a2 `4 {+ g7 ?" h
renovations.4 f5 _, S! u6 `9 A/ [0 P$ b8 W& M
0 t7 A, C( E; x$ z7 b) c, I* W
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
  I) Q: v: n# _4 h/ Jincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
% z; {, Z% q9 fcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
2 g6 U/ ?4 L% K) XSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
0 y( g1 f+ y/ _0 Q, p9 |1 c
1 Q% B% d& F0 M1 L/ l1 J    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer% t3 b1 R+ U) }2 l
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
9 |3 _- o: O: Gquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
6 J, g# M+ G7 l! C600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
$ t+ }- Z) \8 z" M# A2 @) fto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes% S/ a( [) `& H3 W) u) O
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.! ?+ \2 F* L1 j1 G+ D

- P& u/ ^- _# ?/ j: D: I    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
- k; ^$ W, P, A5 a4 zconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their9 D& a' p' N" x) ?# e
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
7 u* y: q! R/ x* ?9 a" C) awas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian* W+ c0 }8 i0 f+ {( `7 {4 |! `( ^
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
  U! K& e' y- T7 N* [3 `buyers with more options when looking for a home.
# F: |& \7 X& r# S* O1 C9 m/ f: z7 c- X1 ^6 Z
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly$ K! T$ X: ]5 A: K1 j6 q8 j" [
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
0 K3 G" k; {0 ?" u" |  l: mpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
! D2 G  r! R) H- V% Q( pas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last7 g. _  V& T6 l. w1 L9 P
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
% z# t2 t) y1 r2 P; s4 t
2 ~) i8 ^  |$ U    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house1 ], u( S5 Z* }+ T, L6 }
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
7 ^+ k0 `) N7 g- x, i0 T  m. rlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting1 w# G- b1 L! r: n3 A* M
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
6 j8 d" m. T0 m4 Twhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
, _. ?, C$ L5 J" `, H" }! h# ]! Mpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
& G1 V% R: q# ]3 Ymaking a purchase.
) M* G" K3 f" ]/ O3 m4 H) r" K
- j- v1 U6 d+ f# F    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
% j) n% j+ p  k) y; G2 B* _4 ~! \markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
  S- N7 G# Y* X2 y; h1 A/ b' M1 @confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
$ b7 M& ?3 A) x% [; W  @' }( n! ucentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
. {: r- Z$ M3 d  T# `, |attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown2 p: l" |9 j" ]9 K4 w9 P" m& m
amenities.4 I$ P: i7 a* u2 F0 O, A2 r

1 [+ \0 x5 j  A. J. E    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
" O& p) N3 R* \' hthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand5 [, i4 F% x4 J" S  y, J
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
/ m+ G8 W4 y: ]! b! Gcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been5 a0 t0 _5 r- I8 R& v
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle; q, N$ S2 ^" ~) c( e  [5 R: P
residence, rather than for investment.  \" t0 u+ t7 Z

3 }% i$ K/ ?) N, `% D& A    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
8 X  m9 k8 ^  [$ B* N: Nhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
& ~1 f" \2 X) M0 zin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer) P$ }: K9 b, k
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization2 U' ?5 i0 F" D( y; l5 g/ Z
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
7 D5 H! _4 v  O5 `/ K: t1 j& Z' Bthe market.
+ f" V# W- ~# h! O) H" v+ {3 T9 x- d% p& W+ ?& A$ h+ y* o( B
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through5 V' n; n# x. }% t2 L* [
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
( O% F5 C+ a# ]. S- [August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
, ?, ?2 ]5 O7 H0 T; ^1 smonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
" j& ^1 g% T* Q9 M- j3 P( R- U3 cto the shortage of available inventory.
" A' _; F5 @1 g3 P$ J) n9 K  y) R) m6 P" T4 W/ b$ B8 B  @" P% A" O
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
4 C4 z* m' o& w2 T# j9 Fmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
/ t9 u3 z; M% c  ~) X. U, Kvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses  x' z- S7 O: Y2 d  ~! `
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.: v; d9 O- c4 V8 M" a& K
* t6 P+ M, i- l* g+ Z/ V/ R& Y
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases" V" |' T! k4 s( N0 e6 V
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
, [2 R7 C, `3 ]: h1 `' c9 Aunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that7 O  f! o! }+ q: E+ s
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring; N1 C% d% P: M: ~( W" m, \
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
% p. Q& b! w) L( nseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
3 X. f1 w# G) }+ ~1 F( B: \& x5 ibuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
* i8 K% s/ i' r5 c7 V, N

! u' u; f9 K+ V; Y# G    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
! d" J, k, o' N% vas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton8 C2 B0 K- Q9 {2 g% n- @
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
  i; X  Y4 w% m' a, Zmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices; ~1 u) w" \* x" Y* B
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
( b8 p1 C! l" J; {8 [* ein the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
" y9 h# U) g8 Otowards the end of 2006.
   
' t% j( n  E, R3 ], e4 B$ {0 v, G# Z. {6 i5 `' j; d! O* }. g
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
% T6 F, A, p; f: k3 N) w- Binventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable5 V; X* |& U. L' b0 `4 `- K9 `
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse9 v" V& t! j8 e' j1 C3 t
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
3 Q+ F7 J0 @' R( B8 kforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added" w/ G# B7 C" Y7 M5 D1 D" X
pressure on tight inventory levels.  H2 J. c3 j, _1 b

5 V% P9 |& x" W( i4 ~1 _) U3 n    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic# Y& I2 R+ O. d  r
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people7 l# w# _, ?8 k: n2 O# z3 L6 O9 B
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
, X1 M" q% U$ \( E5 Twhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching0 I% A2 {8 D. Y
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.% D* R* J* f; C3 K

' g4 n2 e& C4 P3 L/ n    <<
: C' J. }! n& z      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
0 a8 l5 K6 N2 l. J- J7 D+ t: G$ v, n8 @$ H6 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" s- k. Y) ~# L1 D: a' {5 n                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
; L# h* p0 Q' m8 N1 K3 B5 m2 P; e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 w3 M! }- J8 e& {                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
! d9 f6 p4 c  W, N    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average( g8 M9 ~# y8 _# @# e" {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  u% Y7 S' t1 m( k( J8 T    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000) J4 b! b( _. a/ T" x( Y" v$ b6 K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ Q6 L- m( l7 S
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000( k  f% P0 N7 a9 ^2 K/ P) `4 ~( `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' s8 U9 V0 K& @' K. o
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
6 A0 G' H0 s* l+ F) q) `    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ W7 E) I" C9 t9 B# W1 M    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
! @  [( e" l* e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: r8 w- x/ `& v% y    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333$ q) M9 l8 ?' z6 d4 _" l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& A4 S$ g% d1 g8 a  g( p
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
4 @3 h) |/ c9 ?; C% {, O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) j1 n) S) q0 }- `    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185# |. S( E& C7 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) c. [7 s9 ?* H) E    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250* r$ e' S+ P4 h2 ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 u9 ~" E2 S" U- b- p+ x! G
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
1 [$ d/ k# S- }* f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 i( u; N) c7 y' C2 p; j( x
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
& D& Q- T! B! z! e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" ?( W+ O+ ?( t' m3 o    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
6 ?$ C& g. T7 X& W! B    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( |2 C, \( y- T3 k0 L& S    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
+ m" w7 Y0 q6 a6 q* f: g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" p$ |4 A! @* J2 [. j
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714& k! R# d# M+ T. t+ l3 A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# G/ ^. t, H( J/ W: m6 v2 o
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
2 Q3 @" Y, U, q7 \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; r% u$ w6 ?1 q    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
, f9 J+ V7 A  }" |8 }4 v, X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) S- ~. s0 c8 ^0 {
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
3 t; q2 C) J, l, l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' k; R  x0 ^; V( O! T9 W% p9 _
( W4 x  X/ K8 {3 d: h, Y% j
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 f% B2 S/ Y9 ?% T! B( Z
                               Standard Condominium* o; M5 [- W4 c, H. F
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 b- i6 V2 t: W% u& c% j                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
9 F/ I. |9 a& M- u    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
7 [: m# N$ e1 K" X4 o6 c# R    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 P0 x/ K% O7 O# J9 t( I    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%2 D# Q( v6 |/ J# k! p  f
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 ]8 {( y( I, P% G- k* l& H7 p    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%; R' G7 F. y& d. s: z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' w9 h" ?  I6 V" T) m; C  ?; |    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
" W3 O: W/ J4 a0 r/ \    -------------------------------------------------------------
# ^+ S) E, ~+ G4 V" ]* k    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A5 r& c6 @: ^# @' `0 O# J2 l
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 ?: i: N% ?! _! b    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
" w; D) s% d- J    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 C* w, Q$ @8 t  y    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%1 Z: t& P1 B) e- l, j
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ Y- g6 n& }/ V3 j( g
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
3 s( \# D, f% \/ ^9 R& l9 r    -------------------------------------------------------------
; h) A# T6 S4 C! b6 E8 H8 V    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%% h# s2 H4 F) f; d
    -------------------------------------------------------------. D3 D0 X( P# g% x! S6 [
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
' F; h5 E. A) x. }0 t2 S    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 q6 ]( j- ~6 H* \# @    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%' q7 c4 t3 F0 R, n% L
    -------------------------------------------------------------" T* k8 @5 m, D. f& Y; `9 {1 `+ T
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%( w; _6 k; |" y
    -------------------------------------------------------------1 Q+ Q8 r  u" L% e* T
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
6 q3 u) O( E: Q    -------------------------------------------------------------! [/ v& e* d, y8 _
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
: M% v" R0 @: x3 t1 N4 ^0 u" o! ^+ F    -------------------------------------------------------------
& Q2 n3 J0 Z* [* e& t# v! _    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%$ z6 ~5 D  _% `$ @( Y0 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 u9 j/ ^( u: w9 Z  r: r' v% U" @# E    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
! M8 K  d, U' l    -------------------------------------------------------------
" Y5 C6 o! I, c& p    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%9 }2 h( A  S# w
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ O- P- ]& }3 e
    >>
( W) G1 c, @' Q
/ n+ }$ _' }" ~6 h% Z/ _' u1 L    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
' \5 R3 H8 K2 s* qin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint5 a+ H  {3 k8 K' p* M
John and Victoria.' Y6 w5 D4 |! k

( J+ ^! r4 ~8 u8 ^5 t+ v7 i+ E    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
$ ?: F$ `# ~5 \3 c" tcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of( x% }: T& x* }- ~
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
# ~! r- N6 r. w4 a: L$ Ireferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price9 s0 J& K. U# Q
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
! H" ^+ @( l5 }3 g3 E+ l3 ~% x& Kacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
3 l3 e7 |7 T0 b' f$ qavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
( g; P" e5 [7 H/ f2 h7 U- f. k$ `figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable7 k  D3 K9 M3 F9 `+ p' h
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
) J& a/ ~* P+ y( u( H3 J1 ~November 15, 2006.
, Y% `9 {7 z1 c  ]: Y    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of5 u, T# _& _  I0 m2 b5 ^* t% W
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge( [0 p& [$ @6 {) r( K$ Y
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is# c7 a! }' H" w/ {/ j% |( x/ `  B3 c
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-24 17:14 , Processed in 0.098162 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表