 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 5 \6 C+ t4 r6 Q9 u* {
/ J& \6 z8 |6 _6 w- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
1 j2 x: \( y9 W1 O' n. O7 T0 g0 D6 B' Y3 I; L% B
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market2 V+ L+ m0 R/ ~' B1 t
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third. V: L# G" F0 s
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
) u# f3 c+ B" L0 ]. Z1 e$ X, E) bin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit$ L6 H9 Y6 f. Q. U, F. j
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
# Y# G+ I9 A* N( d+ Tmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,4 B0 K4 h# f9 W& V7 R
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
1 l& S2 o9 Y9 c) [LePage Real Estate Services.2 O8 F6 D4 U5 ]% }* T% C
* \$ y+ @* f5 g3 j) F. k Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
& p% |' h. h( o1 _0 W9 \5 E3 A( Uare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic4 |. N3 d Z1 Q
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and3 J/ W7 o/ [7 N$ }# [* `# ?
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
& t) D- U9 d3 n. L& p" fresidential real estate sector.* n1 W- m: `2 q* \* L0 F% j) {8 V- E
1 {$ U6 S5 l& q( k* e+ R1 @. C
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
6 T- U: W v% xoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
. ]1 ~& j: y3 U. D# M( h* ~6 xyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562/ W8 E, L0 O1 n: s
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
7 l- o+ q* w0 {% u% F(+13.2%).: c2 L/ M7 L$ d
5 P- c8 O, ]( A1 t- o2 ^( ^ "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth8 u3 `* u* X9 j
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
9 |5 U6 `. ` y7 O' Q! O, Rfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
' W$ G$ c. Y) I6 l. E- Mpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,8 R* F' ]* f& X9 }- R# B8 k3 {
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
$ q. v2 }: O1 F5 Z2 w r"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We5 `' ?0 d+ ~9 d" h0 x4 K6 y
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy W. ?2 F* _; E! G( {, }
balanced market."& v! P) N% o. a- B X' @
( n+ e$ K* p5 m& R3 i! l
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,3 {% j5 @# x/ R% o
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift$ x# i- L7 y9 U
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
3 F1 s) Y6 V6 gthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
+ v5 `6 ~+ }: _7 f# denergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,+ Q0 J' h$ h) K
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
5 a$ N% f! q+ s1 K! X. mbreaking price appreciations.
/ Q5 ], f4 a7 C% T2 X8 {. @7 N$ I' ^8 Y1 ~- T$ K# b
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
- s- t2 \: Z8 r: Q+ l! Ueconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
1 y% w# P0 E: D/ H' K( D+ Plargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
, a) l/ g" J) y7 o
8 c3 O7 V2 D1 T# i In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
* G5 j; U- b$ ]6 h# K) W$ [ v& veconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer9 @+ N/ M9 _( f
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off3 H& a# C b+ d8 l: D9 C( K
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
' p' Y/ s: v. r! m- ~In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
" \" A9 V& F$ ?6 [0 `5 k G# z# dgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
3 e2 D! v8 q1 w6 W* R$ Xprice appreciation when compared with 2005.3 K" {4 `7 ~+ b2 |
+ h4 ~2 ^- |6 ~3 d- v( ^ B
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
1 l) c4 P5 V5 ]market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and2 Q% {4 X- S% l) S2 l& D
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
* h5 @/ j% z6 M8 Jare markedly different than those found in the United States.5 A8 S+ d- ]; U% P+ y
4 l5 N: Y/ t" h Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
7 G0 D+ ?) C- U1 F( l& j* y nAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
3 ^! r w9 z0 ]favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
" c8 G ~& `- |$ h, L' `relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
, v+ ~5 h6 C+ L) M3 uaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
: b- ]9 i2 t# m9 ?5 F* o+ `% x. e0 xdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
8 ~4 K% ?6 Z6 i+ Paggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization5 b$ J& m8 U/ \; {8 `
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
! A4 H. M! l) @) e, D* G J# X2 @ a, P" b
<<
+ f _+ c$ D" }9 O& H! t REGIONAL SUMMARIES
% m* ~' x, \3 ~ >>
0 \ H# J& Y$ T& A% T
* q* [4 \+ k* T% U q1 p# q Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
3 U" G$ c# R/ |7 T5 f" iHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate1 e; k/ \6 q# d0 e
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time8 i8 u3 } \+ A3 \, h7 v7 k
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of, Q" s5 f5 n9 k) o
renovations.
' p) C5 p6 I5 s/ [) F" y3 u. K* a& C& L7 S3 c M* Z+ `$ ?
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight6 j$ ?7 v5 D1 `9 _! G Y
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
5 I4 f$ b% m0 [# |* Hcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and1 p2 K0 ?7 O/ z( C+ R% x
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
3 s c* R3 h" }: t
( {7 |6 n, `9 z& j4 s* M: L The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer# @3 }" u3 S: V/ M) X
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
3 N- M/ F; k: v# x- W( |9 wquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
' ~; ^+ B0 u" `' q$ a0 ]" U$ V600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores# E5 _( l( K9 [) J. o5 v
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes: q: D$ e% I) |
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
: ~7 K7 A$ s' l5 w; |7 i) ]) b9 c, z4 x: P8 \/ L# K- n( I( S
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced, ^0 H) C8 }5 B! ]
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
s6 _+ c: n1 L( whomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers) e; V! j' V+ j; a
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
. h9 }+ N1 m \: v4 cdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing! D8 {. o# K/ l; Y
buyers with more options when looking for a home.# X# P) x6 r ~+ P; B9 y) J
8 B+ _$ X' L) |1 R, ]. M- i0 |& D7 Y
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
6 p9 \, m7 G; B3 Qamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
' x; ^) H, t4 L- j4 h- H# Ppriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,+ n, @5 a y& o% q' E0 f% W. N
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last7 P& s- X, c/ v2 i: ]. H# h- N
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.$ S. l% W# z, N( Z3 L# M2 y* h- Q" }
1 f6 u/ d$ M0 S8 @$ o8 p! d8 Z Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
: b" I6 r( ]* X% D. w; c( a' nprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
+ W6 [9 }* W) `( [2 k* w. @) clevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting ?. @; D# b# @8 ]
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
" Y) {) {1 V2 ]0 y. R2 Mwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
' A) M9 A: ?1 ~2 P9 ^pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
; ?: P: n4 D K. ~* mmaking a purchase.3 x! Y, g* s/ m; }
. e% D9 f' u9 J, {$ j+ g
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing' z- n+ i9 Z+ f" W
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
( ^) n0 C4 O; @$ k5 \confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
. \$ x1 }. t8 e2 }0 icentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting, Q% d/ W0 z% Z! ]1 j M
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown/ |9 u0 _7 P+ h& Y+ g; Y% m* G& W
amenities.
' W0 D& o# r* e$ R7 J9 [9 K
3 B% r# r8 X1 [; ?/ E/ p9 L0 L% v The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels- m! Y( X, X+ L" g" h
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
b$ I# T6 [! Q4 |. _2 Facross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
' n$ Y5 |5 z7 t% J ` ucontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
: t. q" i: ~' V% {. e/ mdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
. V! h* G0 ^2 h# g. S9 V( Dresidence, rather than for investment./ q8 k+ Q6 s! i, f) }$ x
2 k/ A4 }. }: z6 w/ ?( l
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
' l9 {$ Y, e: N! y. a( Ghouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted1 S3 S6 T& N6 G2 {7 t, F* D1 r
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
1 ~9 \/ A; l8 Hconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
; `4 _1 z, H8 n) K5 |0 l, trate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
, \3 x8 w8 |4 H7 Rthe market.
9 D7 {* u( L0 H" g
2 ?% x0 @( X) F4 a3 D3 a In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through' E) f, s' q% B3 Y d
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In$ ~4 A5 u1 I M8 T+ c7 F& s
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
# {: J+ N3 g( P# }$ }. {! {months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
0 o! W8 \, g) v8 m8 U* Z3 Bto the shortage of available inventory.
" M$ K( P5 b9 J ^7 Y
6 i; |/ O" U; S' [# W i2 g3 U Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its# I# Y& G; E: s$ y; S
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains- z* t/ y2 B. v7 `5 Q* E
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses, K0 [6 r' ~, y& m2 G9 K6 F V
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.& O+ B5 Y; [% v s5 N6 e" r
8 R; N0 a. L2 B6 d _
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases! O: u3 J6 Y" C8 v& j% Q
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
8 f S$ Q( Z5 h% eunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
: o# ?0 }4 i3 Q# {pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
3 P% [/ u$ k' N# kprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
7 @& r6 C8 m4 V, Y7 h/ Qseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as1 D+ P& |( D' v
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
- {' Q+ f" X( B4 h; z. ~ N P/ R" r3 ^9 k- q, O$ Y( I
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
( `. h* G0 W1 H& E' ]* sas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
5 U( @8 k" N1 [$ |3 A; nremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,9 C" @5 i( j$ m
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
- X: X0 y! {* Z+ u+ bincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
) K, n$ d! K, e4 ~& c6 k, w$ j- F. b1 Gin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly! e/ A8 e2 c% z4 ~7 i8 k2 B
towards the end of 2006. 9 G4 F8 P; ]' m5 E2 D
1 a& D4 F% V5 X9 l1 ~
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of5 i6 c% {7 m7 l' m
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable! m* `9 [3 |" { G, r8 v
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
& |$ X# l+ F7 y/ @0 P" n4 ^& L4 Dgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
7 M' d' {6 q" n6 C Y# k: l8 tforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added1 K) T+ T5 q9 ?! a
pressure on tight inventory levels.( ^: z' \; I& s
. l- L! E4 ] ^. U) K Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic& O9 G+ z% L, A$ i8 ~- M5 A7 V8 X
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people4 {9 _' U) v) ~ F; u% x; s! w. t
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;2 }% i" M1 x2 r* S m& M
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching! _/ D. |% Z* _
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
+ I7 R/ A& q3 N0 ?& Y
" N6 \+ N4 ?: m3 f( V; f <<5 X* i# E; `7 i' k. g+ A( B2 R
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20061 B, j: p/ v2 f4 R; I' t* |# U
0 y5 q- ?& d# ~* K8 p. G -------------------------------------------------------------------------; j( a* l: _+ g" V: B% R! Y( [9 [
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey" Y8 v: _, i4 k% J# z: S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 c$ M3 u/ N. ]: }
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
. ]4 u( M% s9 D3 b3 {4 }; x Market Average Average % Change Average Average
( g. {& Q5 o# L; g4 V( l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 p) G @5 V+ g/ J4 G Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
3 Y2 }+ i7 A9 k g' ~; Z: K -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ T/ [4 R3 b/ b4 k
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
' z, J& e$ ]- d" x -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, J# `% N5 e+ l2 a Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0002 c. {+ e& O7 Z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 I; R; G( @4 I4 Y7 D4 ] Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -; T8 d o O6 l# W& \4 w% v9 ?) Y
------------------------------------------------------------------------- k3 a, N# R! F, J6 q. t
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
) ^! O, c3 A9 g F& P: E9 H -------------------------------------------------------------------------, `4 ]5 Y: a7 N4 H
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
3 A! x7 Q: z w) R: L7 N -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 X* M0 M& f. X
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185 B% x: `6 u; m+ }, `2 Y! f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) f1 Y1 @, F w' W c Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250 W; B: s$ W4 @% K2 ?6 I) ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ ~3 l0 h2 V) |! N0 W7 j* Y6 c Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
4 R4 Z) m* A3 Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; ~. `+ r7 T3 I* n j7 s) g' A Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
( ~+ X7 `7 @ A7 v/ c8 m) `; O -------------------------------------------------------------------------* |6 Z9 }6 t' H& ]% U( y( a u: f
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500; |8 s5 f- _) E4 m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
R* K0 r8 I# r8 B Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
' {8 \" p `3 f: J' ?: H& W6 q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 a8 l. q7 ?) B9 q' y1 R& @ Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
' c3 M |# p4 I \4 f9 s" X -------------------------------------------------------------------------& f( e# Z, B4 k6 ?1 b
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
7 S) L- K7 j! ~! P) C% W -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. f# ?* y+ p8 o% O0 `5 ^: p Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000- Q' O, ~# b2 O* @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; G' T0 r1 z. A9 }! q6 ?: d
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
9 C' t/ L" ], w- D+ B; L5 o -------------------------------------------------------------------------. E+ H+ v# Z9 {/ T% j
3 d8 k0 o5 q/ ]$ C# v, s
-------------------------------------------------------------; Y' P: p; d# c( R& {! T
Standard Condominium$ r& m" C& }# O- ~. d2 O% w
-------------------------------------------------------------0 ` z& @# s6 j& B+ G5 I) v, ~
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo- }: F, D1 [8 A2 \5 L
Market % Change Average Average % Change% K; B6 z- R" f5 \
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ w* A. Y- a, g4 f& P Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
; O, g1 z0 B, m8 I -------------------------------------------------------------
0 k3 ? Z5 E" A/ w4 [! x/ q3 t Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%8 O6 Q2 V/ g7 p9 z7 z) B* R
-------------------------------------------------------------) r' M) e. b* A' `6 f+ G
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
8 f' D- V! Y( i: P6 k5 H: T -------------------------------------------------------------6 T' k8 P8 X7 g
Saint John N/A - - N/A
& R! @ M; _+ C" A6 i/ b9 ] -------------------------------------------------------------! N2 R' o! v* z& Q8 W& P T- N. w
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%4 J( E% t) @# M
-------------------------------------------------------------; c$ H' |4 h7 K1 l. ~; F
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%8 ]' ^& T( F; X @6 l1 d1 ^5 \
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ s9 Q' w" N9 U$ V9 o( p Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%. B( g, a; t% v. s- h V S
-------------------------------------------------------------. p3 G/ @! e& k* n9 D2 U
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%$ F* ? @3 x& q& d4 f$ s0 u
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 o: O" C$ S3 l5 r2 A Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
. X& d, T8 |+ |! X( e -------------------------------------------------------------6 L- j1 _) n9 F2 z) q6 k# b
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
) z. Q Y3 Z% m+ W+ B0 s -------------------------------------------------------------
6 o0 }: h9 [! y# C1 |! g7 \ Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
% p& V. j! u# g/ T3 F2 t -------------------------------------------------------------5 }, z! g6 R \7 |, v5 j
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
: p* H: Y. U3 n: Z8 O+ D" [& w -------------------------------------------------------------5 F& a/ X& s- Q! r+ m
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%& \8 }* l+ k' b0 A% E7 e2 T
-------------------------------------------------------------; w) \2 b* I& _
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
X; c) l0 {( `! T) c* C -------------------------------------------------------------
( `' F2 o4 h; M- d; Y; P Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
2 w7 w n8 P3 @) A2 d% B1 _ -------------------------------------------------------------
+ K( P( B& c7 M; M: E. E National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%. m; Q& B0 ?0 ^2 f9 Q
-------------------------------------------------------------1 J* k4 |8 ?2 _7 C3 F
>>
( T* I. Y& l+ j8 c( a2 S- R$ ?8 C8 |" w; Z/ k2 [
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
- s* r; [) [" O# h [6 m6 win the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
( i" I- ^: S0 U% v7 pJohn and Victoria.
0 P$ S r4 D4 t. k; T& {& g3 S# o% Z9 Y+ Y
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most4 J; C, j& u$ s+ `; D
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of3 r5 N6 P: W6 T/ o0 @' T
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
7 ~& V2 g5 p, Z9 ~7 c1 c" zreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price4 n6 q- \+ h& u# P3 _; ~# S
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities6 D2 f8 B; Q! b3 i. x& S* Q. [$ N
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
$ E" w9 I4 E' Q. A9 |1 a5 @, Cavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current- B. J# r7 E. Y. o
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable6 k! |# @7 d+ C! ^5 \ d$ j* S- H$ r
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
; Z8 M5 w7 C1 `, c GNovember 15, 2006.* ^( |( k$ }+ y+ B: @
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of% g; |2 h) [' K! z5 u
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge3 S/ m, A* b: a' G% }
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
0 I# a: \- w9 Q6 y2 vavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|