埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2137|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
7 b9 f( g; h6 \1 h2 R0 e7 w- l* N# Y8 q1 A* A5 {# e" {+ S
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -0 E# u7 }- l$ @

5 p) K, E4 R. d! h4 @* x( g5 `    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market& |. @+ L, N8 M# H" x
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
0 t" U  n3 Q8 e3 x' kquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
' z/ V0 o1 r" O8 E, b% Cin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
+ F/ N4 E7 H$ g% {) Hprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and& v3 E0 |5 B- s0 G- T/ \/ v/ w
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
# E& g3 `8 Z+ y4 ^% e, w7 ]( fQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
. i" Q, K- y' N0 q3 Y5 f5 QLePage Real Estate Services.. @7 U( p. s  v6 C
$ G$ A6 W: I+ |- d! i
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
- _+ t% k  h) [( i) |) P6 {are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic% N! I2 o, n( H, g, e/ y
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and* a$ m4 z' |. J: B) c% ]0 G
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the7 o# r9 h( ~3 a9 u6 M0 X1 C  Y
residential real estate sector.
( N1 `8 y8 l; K* E( t! r
- i/ X+ x. g2 r, ~    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation" Y" a, Y! E( O6 b: k$ O
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
$ b6 h7 j. ]# N. B. t! u7 ayear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5620 V2 S7 m  m3 ~  O- z8 P
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
3 `& w5 t2 `4 |( b9 w(+13.2%).+ ^. [2 t  l7 J, L4 J) X$ P
2 P2 I  Z6 b" @% g% p# n
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
7 _0 J" t$ D+ f2 o: qduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the+ @( @$ H' L# ?1 R
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
1 d: _8 w( [- B* @poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,* B& b' r- n& Y0 ^" a+ O8 i
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
4 [5 g1 q& d1 {2 u& K6 F"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
8 |+ P; T! v/ W0 P' S) awelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
! c8 x* `5 n. c# ~* Mbalanced market."
3 X; b  [$ O* R% Y( g+ a; `9 [% e* D4 h
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,. s" o0 S' Y% \: r+ _
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
( H7 G# M7 Z/ rto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
5 T7 K' u( Z2 ~9 R1 ythroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
* q* c& b4 X# V: f! Z& X& W  k" Henergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,1 d; E& L& Z) m+ _1 i8 X2 m
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record( O% y& d+ A- g) G' t
breaking price appreciations.
6 |( M* x' m9 ^' G8 a
& P6 e; }8 R* y    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
; p- C% m$ s1 K6 s. z% T3 v3 peconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
. F, D1 `( d% J; n- A2 w) x6 D* ulargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.; T2 [4 j9 }! E. |: p5 D9 m& h

: R5 ~6 v; H# a/ z! s    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid9 @+ T5 i/ }" I9 H9 B9 l$ k
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer" [$ V1 n8 N. V; Q0 m0 e* U
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off2 D/ X, a8 Y! o1 N
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
5 b. s# o6 N8 X* r/ h7 ]/ u4 qIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
/ U' x2 ]! ]/ jgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of/ W7 p5 M) e5 _% C
price appreciation when compared with 2005.. }+ S7 d6 O! U# `2 ^

4 Z- K3 U9 B; e' q) ^3 H. M9 i9 `    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
6 J$ s1 n- Z/ C3 f0 J. o) cmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and% S1 ]) G) p2 c  g9 B" {
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
& B7 I  @5 b9 Z) ^* u  ^are markedly different than those found in the United States.! \/ b% P+ b# X# Y3 I: m. f

* w% _1 B0 V' W8 _9 \$ O' a+ }2 p    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
6 s: m9 o( A4 L0 c* ZAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
% ~9 a: \" L( k. s, A6 R! B  jfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
$ G3 }8 F1 X" j" n6 [# J# x% srelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
4 ?; l8 z; R6 O: Uaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the% {9 O) \1 K% k% k8 \5 _' ^
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
0 J# e' S2 |, o' x0 k8 Zaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization3 a0 W; Y# G. M. b
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
7 E  W- A* g5 k" B2 q  R' J
4 V6 w- k+ H  P- F& Y; X9 e# K9 c    <<* S' Q7 v1 z" S5 u; t! g4 a
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES9 v8 J  ]8 Y2 f: v
    >>
6 E8 }$ W- G6 `0 U: B* d9 Y0 t
# p# i- k, k* G. P9 ], R4 `! d! D    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in/ @, S/ j3 j. S8 S
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
! R7 W& o8 K% H5 Y# ?9 z! Pof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time% A) l0 \6 G1 Z
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of8 k; t4 p: C6 @8 i
renovations.
6 r. A, ?8 U# @4 g9 i7 h* b8 X8 M( Z+ X
. x% v. m9 @6 M# R) P5 T3 F8 ]+ I    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
2 X, f0 ?5 y0 q2 ]9 e7 Sincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation7 U9 \- R3 m; O1 S
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
- a0 }6 C, u: ]% T- J$ RSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.) ?6 b1 `: g; \, Q2 a3 B& ~, F
. B: n+ x. k* a+ P, u  @& _
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer. P  w' r$ A1 W2 u
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
/ F1 r) L, j- f- i: uquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new  ?: }1 o' m! z
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores' A  r- z4 ~: F
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes7 n  l, f+ l( W# g$ W# W
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
5 {- j5 W$ A4 G' F6 M3 T1 u# W% y* b$ Z
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced( x3 {9 R4 F, f9 {/ k' y/ ]
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their9 |7 T5 X9 ]) p& y
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
# \; E4 G. J) i1 ^/ a' O# jwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian& ]- I9 O3 @9 s; C$ B
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing+ c% O9 R5 P% U
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
$ C& T0 C7 V& v4 g% ~! k! X, x
: v( |+ R  W8 g5 e8 x6 _    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
. ]+ o0 Q/ h  F5 K, J9 iamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
# A$ D+ E. W: O6 Z( G" zpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,* _, A6 u# Q; h, h* t* S* M, l/ x
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
7 @6 M8 ~1 P" g0 U) d4 Tfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.4 e! A5 P' T) P2 v3 `

8 e( X* J% t4 a. v    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house/ V( ~$ s/ |' Q$ A6 U. h" X
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
/ `$ v2 `& [0 @% g, x/ {levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting- T% {) w. c1 b9 j$ k! l; U
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
% J( P. J% _- Awhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the$ |7 E, O" d5 G, r: c9 e7 E: O$ t
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before) X$ k; n  D7 F
making a purchase.6 O, ^4 V- l; f* v, x8 D7 {
+ w) k) q7 b) w3 m( n9 X- w) v
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
% G8 W2 {! ]1 g# M" U4 Rmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong  |8 `6 D1 D# m3 N3 I: s  ^6 ~% B
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city- w7 h. ^6 p  a% ]
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
: l3 y  ^2 j6 pattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown/ r, C+ l, V5 K$ O" A3 X
amenities.9 o7 k/ D( y' B, i

( I5 c  k# t; g1 h+ p' x+ p& l    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels3 ^: F1 O, h1 S  D( G
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
+ I5 F# l6 W# F- m1 W' iacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
2 B! F; j4 X7 k- lcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
$ }' G/ Y* {- I: O; @/ Sdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
; w& g% B8 T) M3 V5 Kresidence, rather than for investment.$ }2 A5 Q9 l$ U. u4 H( k4 h  B

4 f+ M1 u, }+ K5 R    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
! c% |9 t# }4 {house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
: v4 B- r2 r5 [+ _/ Gin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer+ a+ d  Y, T& x7 d
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
# l& S5 P/ v% K5 j7 hrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
7 C9 p! Y! f- ?9 x" C* Rthe market.
1 |6 G. |& M/ u  K. i& f* S
# g7 w# U4 h! p* X6 p& _    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through# b: ^- F+ M) K) R* j4 h1 d
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
6 s' S2 i/ m( q; G$ t5 b9 c  gAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring" H3 `. e( D, [$ Q8 r! w2 X- O
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due% G. j1 P6 `! s& p
to the shortage of available inventory.
+ b' O2 y" |7 w4 S) G7 ^9 e- b
8 |$ z* _. d7 q3 P3 v1 u) @- O    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its5 c# W( {& u* x6 w
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains; V0 w; Z* @) T2 O+ M/ ~) |
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses  g/ w" a& t# O2 `4 q
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.: X! i& V& W$ ~6 q
6 g2 n9 c- ]9 `0 a
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases1 G! Q, L1 m. o4 [
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
1 g, p6 p* n8 z$ F1 s; U5 v. X5 Uunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that9 r7 J8 {3 ?' e9 V" w
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring1 l" u. r9 H! y) f6 k! b" t
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer4 V  j- e! x% O1 P0 w6 S9 j+ C
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
' R3 V2 i" T' x7 fbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
$ S0 K4 {3 ^3 S% D2 N
- t7 |/ s+ K6 a* O) T6 N3 v
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
6 a$ f3 |. S: `( p" M1 has activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton) f) R$ [: x$ `8 n- @3 k. [
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,; }* w6 s9 T6 L% P+ M, Y
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices! s6 z# B0 m5 h6 `6 w
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
6 T% z5 E. F" d; s2 Lin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly9 B7 v& a- ^. ?" v) p) ]1 X
towards the end of 2006.
    2 o9 p5 i5 W0 M

* W2 m6 M# ?  s; o( NWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of' ^# h. m4 h' f3 ^/ I  Z; a
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable6 ?: n' {3 q+ ?. E* k; l
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse% Y8 ^; O# e  }- k
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to/ r8 |. l4 G$ H0 Z5 f/ M" l8 V
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added+ S3 S/ Z% `: W0 k9 Q6 f
pressure on tight inventory levels.
; ]7 n) G2 D9 T6 f4 }
" f5 |2 e3 S1 [7 W; Z3 u    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
/ V5 b2 C! a; l$ X; Afundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
5 c7 L* B- w. h" @: sinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
) L+ \9 A4 P6 Y  D  X/ X, h: @while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching! \9 l- V+ d# l$ W- T+ }" @: p
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
/ }7 b9 ~" s( q/ G" ?6 B7 l4 o: ]
8 m  I0 Y8 M! P; [9 r# _    <<4 ^0 L; u5 C/ U
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20068 j7 c5 q+ Y! _. V  e
+ C0 s0 r( O- c4 v5 d1 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! \' u  t. |; d* e9 I
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
& {7 B& n) [* ^, p- \; ~. X" n. T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% U* U* v. h. X
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
( j' x! Y  H, h" i2 Q$ m    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average" L  p" V5 n2 L- _. D9 \+ b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! A( R% ^# ~6 p; j0 o+ @6 i    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000  y0 w1 x8 S, U2 ]7 n7 `( w7 F2 \
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# X& d3 `8 j$ W" ]7 V5 B) V
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000$ q+ m- e6 B, I# }6 k  f* i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 z* p' ]4 E+ G. c5 L    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0007 p. o/ \& O6 h' N9 N: D( ]/ f1 d
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 C, j+ x+ x, n
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
. \) t. b. r" N. t- E( r8 g3 A7 I    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 h% \" y5 E' t, P
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3331 M8 H& S6 _* K9 B
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. y& G# i0 l4 [/ I8 N    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
% X, |7 \; i1 l3 V    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  Q; d7 ?* ~8 d
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1852 O, ^$ x% u, t& p2 G" @
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 J9 l5 U9 D* a$ P! m3 S' @    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
' J% y8 }3 C1 C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 ?- G: r. V4 ?! H, x( f( k    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
9 W" |! o$ v5 \$ D' d1 X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ I" Z, Z1 J' R# ~/ W+ W
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
! \* @1 _7 [6 J: Y$ I    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% K8 S0 G/ L) Z( y8 |9 k* J9 ]( H    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
9 b  d0 ~2 H+ R    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 o+ H% J7 F: {) W' o+ E3 V! F- h    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389! [! I9 {- l/ h8 P1 F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 s/ y! Q* Y, F2 W6 [2 o    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714/ S! n5 l, r/ J" {6 n: G, g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ L+ C. Y* n: y% u, W5 e* @. J    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500; _* e9 r: }% S' Y/ t/ y: W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 [  b. R$ V# f7 y1 \    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000( m! j! e( A- x; U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ c  o7 ^1 T; `, i  c/ @0 N    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8602 m* E, T5 m7 F/ c8 a2 h+ J* S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! z! |6 H2 u0 B6 y% t0 K6 U" n+ S
    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ Q7 M  I7 I# X; c# W8 U                               Standard Condominium
0 {( F0 H( m- T2 `    -------------------------------------------------------------
( u' Y4 j+ ]: U- j  d" v                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
; q2 m' `3 V* c& E9 p    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
( _4 X* L* G3 ~8 g( R: |    -------------------------------------------------------------
' B( g% P* _+ x' T* x2 @7 K, x! r    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
: R% \+ v1 T$ \    -------------------------------------------------------------7 R# Q; ?3 J: E1 J
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
  B: C" x5 s" o+ c    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 P4 y7 G: W: C6 H    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
+ q3 b5 s0 k: v' Z* e    -------------------------------------------------------------" v% ?9 N4 n$ k
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
7 Y4 e. a2 P* w8 A9 X1 ~    -------------------------------------------------------------# p; V2 l+ W8 o: V
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
$ [% F7 R4 X/ _9 L+ V2 L$ N    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ {1 {" n+ }9 N- a9 ]7 M    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
7 Q# H. ~& Y4 Z, Z' `$ _/ z    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ B, z( d! I! t% H+ ^1 `3 x    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%" v) C' M$ E6 C+ X
    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ c! N( P! K' G4 o! Q    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%" D" U+ P2 ]7 O+ G# Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------# F1 N  _, R  j' ]$ J/ I3 R: ~
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%5 c6 v6 [* c2 q3 n* P, _
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ w0 g2 s7 O- y2 I1 U2 [; w
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%: t' S0 y8 J% O
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" U7 z% e" ]: U$ S  D& K- L) t    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%; h! b" r  v6 h: h" t
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# e2 {- _8 D4 @8 c% k8 F" u    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
3 M* P' A& [1 S9 V    -------------------------------------------------------------- H' l& m. D, e' D3 l& J
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
% s$ q7 e: e: u9 A; t) f0 F  G8 X    -------------------------------------------------------------
, a$ p" Q$ ]2 ^/ Z6 q    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
' w7 X6 a& i6 d    -------------------------------------------------------------+ {* L' g% K3 n$ }9 G. n3 o5 H# i
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%; p* p! U2 X. U; R9 d  f
    -------------------------------------------------------------# j& d" Z& q3 l. ~
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
9 q. Q6 c7 x! W! M# f, a. ^    -------------------------------------------------------------
: Y, D7 L( m# x3 V2 `' ]- I; y    >>' q2 m) Y3 d2 ?
! J/ J' E8 d* E% h
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
& D$ A/ ]( T5 Z& ^% t* }in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint& r8 [) v% H3 z& _9 Y9 `1 ^/ H
John and Victoria.3 N, A& B/ {8 f- E: D  t
) ~. d" l/ G' r) c) g7 g
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most  R8 H; i% d- F5 ^8 F
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
4 J& h! @0 P+ x8 lhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release# X  n2 o4 V9 X# c6 a# l
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price" M. O' v  Z0 v9 u% r5 _
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities: V& ]& y+ D6 L3 R+ r
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
+ y) O9 ?" {9 bavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
1 o, h$ }, q: Ffigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
6 K* J, B$ p: j) v7 Uversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
$ L" Q! g/ \3 {November 15, 2006.
* k$ k/ ?0 R4 B    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
& E! x; C5 x6 Z1 n! Sfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
% N* \: K. l# f% L* \7 v0 N" z: Mprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is) ^0 \* G, I- H0 ^
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-6 17:49 , Processed in 0.116460 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表