埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2047|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable : z' z* }# x2 N3 h& u* F
8 a  |/ Q% m1 \0 `
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -( c* S5 N: _1 b' J

, v/ O& q0 s4 l3 r    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
2 W+ n8 i/ L+ c) d3 g* U( [, wexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third% Z; w8 A' \7 O+ P% _
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic3 H! o. G/ B! Y3 l  O% e9 H+ b
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
/ g1 x. Z* }4 e3 a- kprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
& V" C* A! A& Jmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
5 \* f: _; g* t3 O; j4 s( ?Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
# K) ], c6 F! j% {, E) DLePage Real Estate Services.
' H) M9 E( K3 F9 O+ R! g8 a6 I& p- Q% X% F5 b( u/ Z) [5 U$ ?; n
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
1 o; Q" u0 |) p- f, J8 }6 sare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic9 ~+ u* ^  ]1 O) E* a
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and: b$ C2 o8 N' i& x: r9 T
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
+ \; f% t' l6 Yresidential real estate sector.  O! ^" @$ |' }
6 S' _; ]3 W0 ?4 Q' D1 x
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation. H  q6 B' w( e% v, s% d
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
( N" `' q$ j7 t0 C( ]: m& Y, }year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562* Z0 T3 z6 ]9 [% B" }  n
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3802 A! F( U! F( H9 j# E7 l% ]
(+13.2%).
7 n+ d' W1 ~) f! |6 u9 ^. p8 r5 o1 C6 W
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth/ N* I; A3 w+ E$ f8 E! Z
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
' E# F! O  T5 P3 |/ {; ?frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
4 ]- ]# [, T4 e( @" L; x" kpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
5 X; ?8 V8 [: `( I) d$ npresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services." a' V# Z" v9 n  K0 b
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
% i2 g8 y$ h) }welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
/ C+ {7 X3 B8 |  O' Bbalanced market."$ V* B0 x  v! v# B# q+ n
( }. m8 L3 f5 [& F. I( ^9 \
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,: e0 y/ g) p6 I  g7 A& q6 v+ l% V: z
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift6 E' \+ F6 A9 k7 Y& z
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued6 L$ I* e) _: `* j/ s8 g
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core  M+ v. Z& W' {* d# F, M' f8 G6 l
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,: V& M) Q4 ~% u8 P
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
- T1 _4 ?- V+ H. G) ebreaking price appreciations.
4 E6 O2 L* ?. a/ W: y  R6 }* A) d# x, T
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding5 i; C- M! K# n$ J; N) j
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the) b; `' m# y0 l; J" E2 j1 V  Z) p- G
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.6 S7 y( k1 \  P# U! X* l: ^# ]8 A

& ]: k7 ?$ S0 b& ^2 t: q# R$ r9 B4 ^' C6 n    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid7 A* S( h9 ~% X
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer8 z+ G% n& R/ k0 I, @$ Q
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
# A/ m* ^  ^% w9 [slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
/ l# H8 v; {& P  t! ?- l1 XIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
4 x+ c; M( u9 g' w) G6 v, hgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
7 T# D/ j, I3 l% Z. }& B( ?+ }, D! kprice appreciation when compared with 2005.% k; Q$ a4 U% }1 ?
8 q# H- s3 g6 s2 h* m( `
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing  H8 q* T8 S* h- Q" q
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
; W" D6 j$ H5 Sfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada+ O( R6 ~( @. G& G' G
are markedly different than those found in the United States.8 p0 i" h: V- a( a% W, n0 X
: R! e, Y1 }% `2 g3 K+ h) a9 q
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
% P/ \" }; H# F9 m! IAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's- `+ d6 _5 ^! W7 v% C, t
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
, f( h4 F" p1 u, }6 d2 h: rrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
3 z" i, k+ `, ?5 |9 A4 T* D1 laffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the+ P; J9 T, e( N/ b6 ?
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and" b" ?* Q0 D- l0 F6 S/ b
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization: G$ ^+ a, m' b7 S. l
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."1 {! f( k. K4 ]4 ^" |# d  t
7 o4 x0 O) q% T% \  \  I
    <<# K& r! e! j0 O( V* G1 M  |1 r
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES5 ?% H7 C( i( g# M. R4 [
    >>
" _# {. p$ X$ b) r( f. H) }1 X9 T  y2 M- L0 V
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in0 s! Y$ U+ T; [' V. o( X
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
% {3 ], ?" S+ w, [7 t5 Hof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
& t8 I+ H( P- {0 o3 {looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
& o, A0 v7 f8 `) r! Y; _renovations.
0 w9 T2 J9 k4 z9 z$ u/ V+ i$ ]8 }
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight! ]" r: W- C; b/ u) o
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation+ F, r( c6 u2 d9 H8 m- h  u
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
3 I; f# d. x; N2 u  g6 \6 x) s. USeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.6 z" M* E; M( r
6 X. I1 c* s: u7 A, ^. T! x! K
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer4 O- t4 R4 R/ n; b3 F8 f3 i
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
3 @  S2 N) h" ]quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
0 K1 [, \' {. K  T; Z, x600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores7 O1 e8 G" r9 _
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
3 a5 Y) @" U) F) u1 m- jand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.0 r% G* i) L1 H( W1 e/ R) `

' A5 N" d5 T0 w# q5 }3 j6 _8 P    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
- i8 f* S+ \1 z5 F  J  Wconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
: }( M$ t: Y- d( q' e' N$ ?# mhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
" _# i0 Z" c5 O: l# \) R( K1 Kwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
. X, F+ B2 L, r0 qdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing  Z  A9 p: W+ l5 `# B
buyers with more options when looking for a home.: l3 l7 @( _" `0 g+ ^3 S
! A  t: n9 L+ A8 B; e
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly1 F: ^4 F  \- ]% O
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
5 `: f- k. a& v& a4 {4 |+ y+ o9 rpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
, M0 t& J) P  j  i+ w$ ~( `2 Y! Has some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last5 t* U5 M! S  S# t
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.6 Z% m7 {$ |9 V( h  D1 W

/ F! U( t8 L9 E/ ~' q# _    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
- O: g* B6 {$ j' c8 B& rprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory8 @& ^" E; P+ c; R2 t
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
* Y9 H; N" |' Z9 D" yfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
5 H6 L4 y" U) U! Y9 J5 Gwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
/ T& _, l8 A3 |; y( @) Q' `pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
& M" d. ~) G) [/ t+ \( z! G* Xmaking a purchase.6 i* V+ v  Q' l& k" r" @' [3 y
" b( g0 @7 j' }- `' U6 ]# m
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
* L, P6 S3 V7 ~+ u6 D6 N# n; wmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong; w, f+ m* u) [0 b
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city2 k/ y# h( [6 E$ I# @" F8 H
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
5 S* G0 A3 U4 r7 E( d$ gattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown. Z/ a6 a% P  R  i
amenities." n2 R. }! T3 P, F8 ~2 z2 A

% L" G! p  b% T; ^; @: J    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
6 H5 J9 W* s3 M  D) Xthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand; u/ U6 a  a7 u: M& C* F
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
8 v7 C4 A5 r/ z5 ccontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been$ N! ^, F0 p! A( y, ?4 U
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
5 p& \2 ^0 F4 o( u  Jresidence, rather than for investment.2 Y2 j0 Z% |6 ^8 P6 A4 p5 g

, z3 {$ k/ i0 G) s( a: L# x    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
5 c; Q/ \& |5 vhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted  A- [/ |8 Q& r
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
3 y- `* ]# g+ p2 @, g! Qconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
! m* c+ ~  p2 Srate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
0 l$ G3 a! |  X, `. G+ F' v: Vthe market.
4 z- K$ g8 s+ ^% U0 Q' [. _3 w7 N
: Q7 w, ~# ]# J+ [8 H    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
! ~* \6 |0 `0 C9 NJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In; C" H3 @* {, u8 l6 N4 ~
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring& ?; H3 `) l, e7 L
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
3 r6 |' Z, l3 b- kto the shortage of available inventory.
6 T9 ~! B) ^# C: z( P! |. _8 j& H0 z9 P" {# h
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
# S$ G. q- x% C5 }5 S! U& A1 {" kmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains# L# R3 [( W/ A0 d: x) x8 F. B3 H
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses  |$ ^. B) N9 z5 l. F
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
2 ^5 n* ?" @( n& O4 s) {9 ]" w4 s- P
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
, E/ q4 |& p" b4 i  y! c1 ain the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
  c+ b& c+ |- zunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that5 I1 m4 W, B4 U: j1 A
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring  y8 ?% E9 r+ _# C, T. F
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
/ R' |( ^9 a* h  w  Y4 Tseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as3 a, X7 n5 G- w
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
2 s0 u7 |+ Q/ G: g% A( @9 A" g
$ ]2 g; z  |4 A& }3 E1 T
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
$ q, N7 \$ E+ c/ M& T5 [# ]2 T, }as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
5 t* q) p% u/ c/ @( D# Oremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
+ A/ {: U0 {: c6 s% Jmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices$ ^) u2 p! G8 \. `# _8 P# }' b
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve) ~4 f  v% X% f6 P
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly# R" D2 E3 i% H4 c. c6 `
towards the end of 2006.
   
9 W* o" z; e5 f7 n3 e; d
2 C; n5 j& O6 U2 @" eWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of( H5 n, m) f+ d; l; _
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
& ^, Z/ t( X4 Hto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
+ \7 r' w7 D9 t% n; q$ Dgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
* @( I+ a8 Z# R/ X" \foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added2 B9 J- ?! ~" g5 c0 N" h
pressure on tight inventory levels.: V* b2 P7 @) Q+ q4 T0 c5 f% A
8 d% h# F; ^/ ~2 h
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic/ x. U2 F! W% ~, x6 V1 [9 W% c- t
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people" e+ K. y  J, j- N7 n1 W- x
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;8 u: N; v8 p" q+ o" \4 A) S9 W" u
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching+ i- S3 V7 n& z6 L8 }' o
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
2 b: l4 F0 u( b' r; {! [
- d1 g$ A: s0 Q0 O+ ?+ O4 T- ?7 `    <<  j, D% E( Q# }* ^( F
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
- V* c* j! _1 ?: n& H9 y( `1 v) n9 M
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) `9 c( r* E' `% ?* J: ^: l
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
- F1 E4 Z' e# V0 V9 G/ K    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; Q3 ~/ @1 g. c
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3& F$ X1 v5 ^$ o6 F# n4 l
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average+ Y  B9 U7 I) Q; _6 g8 j$ v; v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& ?1 t( [: `% `% P& R
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0008 V! l& U; ^8 R, s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 d) }9 r# A# T5 s2 Y; |" u    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000% [. P, U0 E8 S2 K' z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ D9 H5 {8 y+ j- M( W6 o    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
2 {3 [6 {- u: H7 g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) }& A. [4 }* `1 T5 v* D" n
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -: g" L& Q: R" |" M5 G( h$ `, J$ Q& `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 E/ f+ ~5 j0 ]2 R    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
# |* P# ~5 i9 y- y9 r: L) G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 `7 c) M; ?# v8 A9 }% w    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
  |2 L/ j- B: s9 G; ~+ g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) z1 C' c: i1 l; V. C( L5 n4 A    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185- M5 [: g2 L. M1 @& }; D% P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; d0 a) y; Z! Q7 Y+ b9 \9 ]4 r
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250. D0 ?% l' b6 }0 D; i4 b9 @
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 M' i3 x  c- ^: K3 ]
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
  g& ~) @5 x5 s; S    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ }; u# Y0 f5 k" w6 b- c
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
! d! E) R/ ~) b* z2 b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' H2 x: M$ w* C" ~' k4 J' y4 ?9 D    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
; C, a- v- O( ]2 _' g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ l- j' y9 A* O/ }1 T0 e    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
) {9 _$ x: V+ x9 m4 f1 l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  Q6 Q# [0 A- `
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7143 B  l+ v) l) Z" L) c& i' @' ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' S. x7 e6 q% D3 o) H- [& x% \( V    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
  E1 h, U1 G1 f' W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, p1 y4 v9 }! \& w! h    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
9 i3 h8 ^  l+ v: S& M% ]9 Z; H    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 o+ r" l5 ]1 |6 |  o! q    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
- z$ l& |! d( @' ?% Q9 {    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) b5 m! T7 A, P  |

2 F; K! c: r1 E/ I& C' n    -------------------------------------------------------------" }) {% S+ X9 |/ a
                               Standard Condominium- b& L2 E  N# x4 Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------5 E( @2 M# |$ h
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo5 c" ]6 ^/ o6 q$ u. M0 N! P
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
% D/ M/ r$ ?2 h" x    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 p, R4 I: E/ c) f, \( Z3 B    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
5 d0 w- O5 b8 S( ?- ^( L    -------------------------------------------------------------: v/ |' E, a1 b% i% e* ^
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
. x& `. ]6 g$ @  }& o. ]$ w* f    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ {8 F9 B/ V. q' ^7 n    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A! P( z+ T* D3 w9 Z8 j
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 v* t' N# n1 ?0 B
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A- W$ n$ F. `/ P( ?1 h
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 v2 W& u) [3 m- D7 k0 N( L    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
: F, [5 {. L" e# L% J" R% _8 `2 S    -------------------------------------------------------------
" o6 b- j7 b: f7 \    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
7 }9 C# c$ C: F5 ]8 b' \; W    -------------------------------------------------------------
; O6 C) z$ j& r8 e- x2 o    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
( ?* Z- b# {, c6 T% R    -------------------------------------------------------------  S3 P% S5 Y2 k9 V- [/ b* T7 Z
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%& _) v  h$ }- n1 @. W$ _, ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------% U/ X) f) P$ E1 T7 O" y& L8 V. o
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
. @9 G" k# h+ _: R9 J, B3 d    -------------------------------------------------------------
. `8 M7 }# Z1 T' {. p; b    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%' {( v& i% Y/ @- g; R3 ?  _
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, `7 M6 k: g0 `    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
* h4 ~& R( x5 e    -------------------------------------------------------------7 s3 B- ]! q# v  c, B4 H
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
, f  y! L* x4 P/ R    -------------------------------------------------------------
  O2 P/ {: s7 U1 K, M- [1 P    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
0 a$ ]: q) X2 m! b) g; h; d# b    -------------------------------------------------------------4 W+ ^8 |& h7 k; {  D( u
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%  U5 w% Q/ u0 k: L' A7 K3 {0 T
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" p8 Y2 g$ {: s0 b- Q    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
1 e* F( V, O9 @) H; l) D    -------------------------------------------------------------- A9 L3 `: R8 o5 [4 j0 N
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
( l  x5 R7 y2 i    -------------------------------------------------------------) w6 _3 [  g' f! n' K5 m: ]( V0 H' {9 P
    >>
. S. t  I* U9 m* p3 g2 G
, J* ?+ H6 {/ v- R5 k) K- Y6 t: h    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined# C' j; y# V8 }6 v4 p4 e  c
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
+ l# M6 A* r2 z) u2 K! `John and Victoria.
, k+ M4 ?) K" E* t2 g# x" X
4 V0 L  v- Q+ z- x% N    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most' z# J* s7 a& r- D! ?
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of" m2 J9 U+ O2 _" j! z
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release1 W# I' s9 Q  W, W1 d" ]4 v2 I
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price2 q0 x7 c4 @9 ?* p, p1 O8 G$ m
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
% l# [" d( J% L! p, F4 s0 j8 J3 Oacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
  O+ e" [# w: c) H' @available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current: L6 n2 \& y1 p- p& L+ U4 a) m
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable; z7 F& G$ I8 y% U% v. g3 ]5 u1 \
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on! r$ s- \5 [/ D1 a9 L% D
November 15, 2006.
5 K& n1 \! h3 O: i/ C# w    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
/ b+ S, [- V& u- l0 K6 Cfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
$ `& Y. T6 u% @) @, A  Rprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is& u1 ?  A* N7 G6 F4 e+ C# Q
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-24 09:33 , Processed in 0.137272 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表