 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable % y. l8 q; ]9 y$ B% {7 ?
6 q% k0 ?, S. A. Q) I( b ~
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -. S# @5 X% z' d$ \+ \0 z
2 w9 c# K2 c! T# H3 R4 ]# ]
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market/ L, p2 n; U" a% X$ R: r+ v* u4 |$ _
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third# a: h6 ]. K) I1 k
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
) ]9 {# Q4 d) [in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit3 x, d7 ]; O! |9 ^% n; F
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and( C5 F6 m9 D P \& ]/ ~
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
& |; v. e5 }( e* _( qQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal* i9 i" g$ Z1 x6 B
LePage Real Estate Services.1 b; j' M0 |, K. M4 a
+ h) c4 J1 a! p4 p% t
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
( z4 a: H- j$ k W" Bare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic! p" b9 P* l2 w" B0 h" z% b
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and, Q, T: a5 F8 _
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the/ a. u6 j: h+ b; H! e' k6 m* ]
residential real estate sector.8 j, Y- D6 D% [. J
/ I/ i% q r: j3 W
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation8 r, J+ S5 ^* z
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)6 a5 j$ B& x9 |
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562( W, k/ w+ l: b/ ]
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380. L3 } p- P6 d
(+13.2%).
( O! Z5 K2 ^5 _6 f8 |5 f' h( z1 \. | S7 c8 Z" t
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
1 X v/ c- f4 w8 Z0 Qduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the9 {& D5 J7 A- S0 ~
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are! V5 }5 b$ F9 f
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,! R! k2 D, n* Q# B
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
: c) I4 w1 X" B/ A- @, g, o"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We0 K6 {& T4 L# e
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy8 o) F9 G0 A8 i
balanced market."
! g8 q: E/ C5 j5 r8 U7 g" Q; v+ N! N4 y7 H( M0 x! c7 O. x3 W8 ?
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
- y% c* i: d: ~0 d2 jconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift8 H0 U$ ? L) E- u1 n
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued4 V$ g- k, L- z0 }; q% j
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core- S2 R8 Y8 L) @
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,8 M& W7 _& H9 S
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record n b. t& b# {7 {& }5 {
breaking price appreciations.
* ?! D4 L" m! I2 F4 ^$ `* r% f2 \ h) Z) y z
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
1 Y0 e7 a2 ]& f5 F. x1 H9 O; ?economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the1 p5 t$ z+ h3 N! m' d
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.! r8 F. u( W& L. V5 U
3 z' S& X: E M2 e- {" G In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid! M! v5 W; M5 {& e/ f) {: a
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
: ^7 ~7 P3 t, v3 Econfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
5 S, D, N+ l& O+ pslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.( |: w) i, x- h( |) ~; e- G
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
) I0 ^8 _6 `1 y, o! E" rgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of5 c8 [9 p' y4 ^% ]0 G9 `
price appreciation when compared with 2005.; [/ @3 j f: i1 f2 g. A! R3 q
0 G4 ?( [# ]7 W8 m While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
" g, d& |: x( l8 D) [- q6 x8 }$ Omarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
4 U) y- M r$ W! _' M) j4 qfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
9 ]" C& l5 b( P* ~# M* s- Zare markedly different than those found in the United States.
" K6 T( M R2 q
. P0 L4 [; n9 V* k+ _% ~ Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
' N/ u4 d! l, ~1 F; E& ~American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's% V) D: P0 W$ e, i2 P
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the2 j' K9 R. |: t d2 H6 s0 E4 o
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general7 Y6 r+ @* f6 B' w
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
, h1 o* m* d' }' k: ?5 k2 Rdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and5 p% n3 P) h2 k) V6 Y2 }/ s# e
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
) f* G0 j2 F0 A/ u0 Emortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
6 j% h4 G2 k& @! v
0 k6 B; O7 ~0 C+ h$ x3 M! F( Z <<9 Z/ ^2 A3 U. Q! }) X3 o8 F
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
# ]6 a7 e, s0 ^3 v >>- P+ W0 J( T6 L3 i4 O) N O
9 [: A/ Q- W/ K% Y; s8 Q+ v! w) }' x Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
# g/ p" X2 m6 ]2 h- kHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate* g% a, T$ M8 ]! i$ B8 Z
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time& t# R- \ _ L1 k
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
) r6 L5 G( U. G( m% K. T/ Erenovations.
7 I# Q* [! A% G& G+ L/ u# q6 E/ P H+ }) q
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight+ y: Y9 ]# \: x3 z0 _5 j- A
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
/ V6 u9 o6 z( g* C* Xcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
: ~: }8 F- n. dSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.: w9 ^- C) `" G6 L0 ]' A7 f0 |
5 D) ^: \% _; G5 O The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer3 t! j& J) j8 a0 p) i
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
4 w6 V: p/ ?5 jquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
% R j% `- m$ ~* o; o0 r6 T600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores. \! k% M" y8 y7 M7 P: z2 ^
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes2 ~& \, h g! q3 K: n* E
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
8 Q) t5 ?, P; P5 b8 T% R
7 C/ w% r; P, y. w4 ?! ?7 N& p In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
- z/ s% F& U: C! Bconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their: L" A8 ?8 B4 b6 ]. X, G
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers8 ~# T5 f& K& R* e6 s' \! Y
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
* ]; D: o6 {/ f5 V: ]dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing4 a: W) }) F' Z) ~1 d& t3 |
buyers with more options when looking for a home.& o! }$ t2 V& D3 q- u
$ C9 ~! a0 h B9 P
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
( j! t) c4 u. V* e+ i8 eamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
( Y( E5 m; L1 _3 X" [priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
* w: k7 @- }% f0 i, t1 ~5 W) yas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last* @6 r4 f/ X j8 ]0 `8 \, ^' l
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions./ t9 T s1 J; O
6 k/ W( \, Y: h$ v& R. ?4 t8 {0 p
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house) A! R5 D1 s- d* a# V# I& ]
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
4 C; A+ `: Z& O. S+ Q. ]levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting0 n @6 r: ~% b/ w
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,# o* f0 Q( ~$ ` R
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
& t9 Y( p1 i$ Rpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before# O" S) t, z D
making a purchase.
& e7 t" a/ I5 Q
! o# j6 w7 u5 y) F/ p Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
, `; d0 _+ U' B# y: X6 k, Rmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
8 \; X- Q2 M# Q9 ~1 q+ T) [, Vconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
, `8 X H& [# k, }& mcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
. J# {3 M! }1 {. Sattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown3 y# u! D$ L+ d0 F. V" {8 }
amenities.
" N1 l, h1 e1 ^$ z. T2 L1 T, c; q9 X. s8 j$ u4 ~9 }
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
" V% e0 Q9 Q; w# w; A. q% Zthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
* a* ~* E" ?6 \* pacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has0 o: a$ \; x) u( J
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
. w ?* Y3 B1 @1 [ F ddriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle- Q9 V9 |( g8 i+ i) Y+ i, n9 A
residence, rather than for investment.( a r. N7 i* `, S
6 S8 ?* z, G0 x9 q6 N
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
( C) ?) _+ V3 bhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted3 [. ^7 @/ Q" C! J" d+ Q
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
) k" {; m0 j0 z2 X) p/ Qconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
# K. E; C! P0 o& orate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
; ^* ~7 `' t5 Sthe market.
% j: Z, q) T+ ^$ x `$ @! t) S
9 J r$ k. k8 S% ? In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through1 ^1 Y! @8 y, T, u
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
/ S# `- N- f: v+ HAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
( ^1 t& L8 E" }: Z/ }+ l: Mmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
, q6 H# H- b# n {3 E! ato the shortage of available inventory.
: h$ p. I! C; _" A6 D/ U+ d7 R+ s; M9 F# }* l
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
' b2 R/ M5 y4 z- ?2 X$ [2 O' amomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains) T4 P& U V2 @3 \ f
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses% J4 j- U2 ?( @
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
; ^1 q y. t. } I9 Y" W; d& h3 f- b e, q+ f; U0 O# J
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
1 Y) _ d3 j$ N' u; L) jin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
& H& v8 D1 ?9 X `0 N. e9 G! vunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that1 T d4 f. o; y; J; P
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
0 u7 l) L2 Z8 | s6 b8 ?prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer8 @9 R" f& [2 G3 I( f
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
, i/ B2 f3 f4 f$ J) L$ zbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.# Z d+ {4 t8 x* ]( r0 p
4 b# u( m k& ^+ P
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter& m E* E$ _5 \% H( ^& @
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
- k' C e3 B9 ]6 T* p! Q1 premained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,6 V( i: C# O/ [5 t, D8 ]
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices5 r' m% @0 A7 Y+ @+ K
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve1 m; `! \! i& q2 V0 \7 E4 q$ Z
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly: f- d, Q& i. N
towards the end of 2006.
u: p3 X8 B6 M% Y+ T0 g2 V8 s' I, |+ F
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of& C4 D% j* D4 y( \9 ]
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
1 v' K- L7 f' G% Eto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse# U, @7 b- l' D) h( s
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
; l- K. P7 v0 c$ r- ?+ |foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
3 e" g; g* }2 o: s% c$ Y! Epressure on tight inventory levels.; N, R- F1 m7 S
' ]+ L0 ~ S1 k
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
6 @: D& M% W: Ifundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
6 [6 Z6 z t9 I' U& G7 xinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
( K/ G! J0 r3 k4 U# Mwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
, o. Y4 `7 k- L7 J) O1 ^3 Tfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
, [0 a/ ^9 c% a2 u2 ? T" P# a5 D
<<
8 ]1 f7 u* `# K P Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
$ Z/ ^! }) }0 Z( i( X: y2 j0 y, m/ D i6 K" r9 n
------------------------------------------------------------------------- ~7 F" ?+ s' B; y1 A$ b
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
+ c4 v+ t% T, E( Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 c% V. {" _; ?. ^ 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3$ w' u$ j' g7 ^" J$ f
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
: x9 ^! A% F% U! | -------------------------------------------------------------------------) a3 K( L+ _+ }* H
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000, U1 m7 c/ n. R0 t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
~7 d/ g$ B! d2 [2 e! S! [# d6 U Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
; y# ?- e% V) W( P6 {& u -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- |; ^: [2 U2 c b" ]: E Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000; L# u1 `8 s0 b9 Z" b Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 G- t" x& Y2 \8 E. y' @ ~
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
3 Y: `: \! w6 G% s- c$ J -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, A7 t' l+ s* y- v1 ^" { St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
. d( @1 x( o: D4 ?$ i8 i% o1 } -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' {- x& L0 h+ Q4 A' n2 \ Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
$ S7 n4 } ]% k7 s4 I -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' |* ?2 H: [& s+ g: E' I Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
! u' K4 O% [; i5 I/ G% k -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 G9 {2 { B4 |8 i: o, y$ G# H Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250( p A9 W& y& i+ n9 ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. I4 B w4 k$ l$ E& R Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
, A% L1 c5 o1 Q! C/ b3 t6 S -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* a) u9 d1 F& Q9 S. ?8 j Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707: H& Y, b$ S4 K4 O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 n( w- e5 e8 i! r8 z( W; W Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
& J4 Y0 y& J* i, r+ p m -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 B2 e6 D5 @" e B3 Z- X( Q
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389: S5 A5 j" B# p* P! [6 j- a$ c. w% L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; c) @* J6 T+ R, a# d
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714, _8 x* V/ E0 p6 O* p" M( c: s
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: n3 b1 @- B' |/ Q) O) j @
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
1 b- Q! v/ P$ [3 n3 L -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, G! q2 U' q* f% u' e' u$ y# m W Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0003 ~! L7 }, _5 d1 R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) t7 y( p( ?3 ~9 ~
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
7 |$ }5 q: \( X( } M. C! n: W -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. u' Q3 A1 V; w# w+ ]0 H0 G$ e* L% F8 [
-------------------------------------------------------------( J) F) g) Y. t* z: x
Standard Condominium
) n) x! d8 ]: t" [" n, |7 O -------------------------------------------------------------( \ I* X: L( F
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo6 \9 l$ B1 {, v- Q2 }
Market % Change Average Average % Change
- I* {# \ H7 I6 z -------------------------------------------------------------
/ k( ~" T3 l4 A8 v3 w& T Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%1 m0 I& O* o- u: S1 ~
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ G. M; s# ~7 A( Q* S0 E$ v Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%; I$ S6 I. ~( v8 T3 n6 }. k/ N- X) q
-------------------------------------------------------------
! h/ ?; c% a* S" k& x Moncton 4.9% - - N/A) t$ z# m# T$ i/ ~/ _; T4 D/ j6 r
-------------------------------------------------------------( m7 K4 W5 A) o- w- x
Saint John N/A - - N/A5 {: z# }, g1 K( R/ w$ `
-------------------------------------------------------------
( A/ r5 `& _8 T: R) H" J St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
6 C& X; I, p- y9 [ -------------------------------------------------------------
9 Y d+ M3 [$ w f) W Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%/ T5 @2 c9 h" K6 W1 _
-------------------------------------------------------------
) T; l2 ]; n0 P( X/ L7 [ Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
/ a4 y3 ]1 P Z8 B7 [3 P7 w. V -------------------------------------------------------------- t6 W: _" G3 K" L2 ?4 \
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%( r' n- t. i( ]0 t" H7 w# j$ K- r
-------------------------------------------------------------
; x" j. ? y" P6 P- }2 T Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
6 o" x/ r* W3 q. f, ]" z3 X -------------------------------------------------------------
3 j; u8 `- {8 G' V' G Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
; v$ n% Z6 Q; N- N' t$ L -------------------------------------------------------------) |4 @. {; ?. B- d% ?; M
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
! v' v3 h" G) t1 f -------------------------------------------------------------* }0 j& K6 ~3 y
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
5 i$ t, O1 L8 ]- f. a; | -------------------------------------------------------------
0 V8 R Q. |( I Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%' l% |! {& }* v7 R! @$ F, |. C- j. g
-------------------------------------------------------------# c4 L3 \4 A; C. q7 F. f
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%8 j' }# v3 ~5 c$ Z
-------------------------------------------------------------0 k1 {% V* n* E1 f+ W& e+ f" B; d
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%+ t1 N* V0 L& }4 @ P/ G# y
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 D1 h$ n, K2 e# R& { National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%( e+ `- E* P5 J0 t7 X L% d
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 J& o7 l: x E3 U& _( k >>6 e q1 H( f& x* @6 C3 l
1 {' L; j/ |4 T% u2 k9 `
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined, g' g |7 L x* }0 C6 Y; N! G
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint! K$ C* G) S4 I& y! a
John and Victoria.9 }2 M) V; m( G
( L/ k9 w7 \( e/ E- |7 U
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most3 F. q1 \( c0 e3 l! n
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of; Z- W8 \" m. g2 R
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release1 h4 \6 E3 A6 ^1 ~( c# x
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price+ E+ G& I" J6 n( z; ^
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities9 f- V9 K/ a2 x* O& t* u
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
% c% K0 i$ O9 K$ G+ X, c8 u* Q% Aavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
, X- d, c3 d5 ]4 t1 Z0 R- ]0 F7 y9 D1 Xfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
. I/ a& o8 {1 Q1 N! i$ Sversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
, k5 m& @" h& R8 Q6 v/ x/ l" g F6 aNovember 15, 2006.2 { g% i3 B- T5 `
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
9 Z! G4 i# U. M$ {fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge( k/ ]) Q8 V4 Z: L4 v# {0 \
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is+ B# m* A3 C5 `8 P% b! ]
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|