埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2402|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 9 {; T9 _/ D, n, u

7 n4 |" X4 P, D& m; h1 ]- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -$ v& g# C2 j& q+ e, ]( x* r% c

8 W7 _2 \8 J$ x' E7 f0 ~6 h" d4 F    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market" k" ~' l) W  n+ Y" j" h
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
7 g6 C" |" j+ T- A5 O8 x/ Vquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic# q! N; f3 p  f5 k3 z
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit6 B0 I& s% F: e; J& ~8 K8 @5 D: @
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and& |5 f) z% ]0 [+ D/ |
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,5 Z5 p3 V' B" N) o* r( G
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
2 H, y% a( K/ e, v, }3 CLePage Real Estate Services.
+ X! w/ Q* D% W/ Y, s3 |/ O
* W: t, L5 U. h% K+ N: h" `    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters2 Z- Z* D" n( Z$ K8 j" k
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic% F" l# P" {# O+ F  D
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and$ l0 |+ p  W( M: Q( ^; k6 ?
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the) l3 ]. m" ^6 E3 c* T7 r
residential real estate sector.0 Q5 `% o9 F& I) P$ E; t
! k- S' [8 ?8 r' l( m) M; K+ z
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation6 H4 e1 k! o# l6 c) s* R/ ?
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
  _/ c* r% N! X) [year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562& B* f8 j# A# H- n8 G
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3803 L8 s: K/ N( v* g
(+13.2%).# \' H/ u3 K* d) o: r, }1 N
4 {# h. X& i& O: s% g: v
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
8 l' d6 {! e+ A2 f  k# K1 v4 y% Kduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
# b; {4 |; I0 Nfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are* F1 n1 X! U3 ]8 H+ m
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,) u3 e7 V# t8 G
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.& {" Y$ n# M2 d. B6 N2 T. }
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
3 y" a3 B5 K4 M3 a3 T  @welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
5 s4 [7 x7 r$ dbalanced market."3 i9 M9 U' }2 ]3 _; T1 M

; `/ M/ u6 X( Y+ y, B9 n    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,4 n1 h, k# ]( X! f/ `+ d( L) J
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift" ^7 U! @1 i9 ~. J1 T
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued( b, X2 P# k9 l' G: r
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
) T5 K* m! h' T. q4 x+ Tenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,6 W$ T9 G3 C5 i+ M5 R: q
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
. U$ T/ l1 K: a6 r6 C0 Nbreaking price appreciations.9 N  ~3 ?5 Q& d8 x7 w, S$ A4 C

# N! h' U4 C* ~9 I( D7 J' G( j0 m    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
- [' I' W8 ]% N. K" W4 Y" L8 Veconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the  N1 C+ f( ~# N
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
6 w% c* x+ x4 \: Y7 A4 y% Y+ w; R/ U" l7 F+ Y, n# y% f' R" P0 Q
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid1 ~' r- C" i6 X1 q: T! {
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer9 o  O6 y3 S7 a5 v( F
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
9 c) o$ n& W8 J3 _slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.! c6 W& A& L7 ~& k# a9 D3 W
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
/ [+ s% z3 t( M( y" k' P9 @) Zgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
0 s+ ]5 v: g7 tprice appreciation when compared with 2005.  S0 K% z( q* G% ?
/ M9 R. l- k1 X5 |; w
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
! M$ ~3 q9 Z. p( smarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
0 R' v5 h2 X- R/ l% y# u' T1 s: sfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
7 q; V2 K" X8 Q# [0 x8 X7 k' zare markedly different than those found in the United States.
& p+ |) @) {9 w: Q3 R1 W3 {/ i$ D
; I' d. _: W$ c& m- F6 L    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
3 d4 h. A0 v2 M8 z4 }, sAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
1 O( T8 y- \6 z" jfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
& x- \" ]- i4 x7 S  Rrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general$ r/ w* _2 z$ j+ a1 l0 @: F+ C
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
* N0 U, Z4 h. B6 _7 P& Q% @( E1 Vdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
6 \4 a: L1 N: G2 Q, g! b4 ^aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
9 Z2 J  Z& o/ d. e. y3 Nmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."% U8 B7 y; L+ F7 ~
- ^/ o, p5 O9 j( s3 s7 s. `4 y# F
    <<
- A, v; I) j4 ~) t9 n( Y: l0 V: F                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
! U8 @" r' W, D# b6 U    >>
4 @2 C" Z! s$ V1 I1 X! x
; R9 k* _1 P, Y4 S8 V    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in/ m! i$ s# i4 t8 ~' l
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
& Z2 P' a/ I' o9 \) n% mof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
- i0 D, C3 \: Z5 f5 }3 v4 @looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
( ^. O  p0 C, X" Q: `renovations.# s3 c$ C' P( |$ |2 Y  g
6 F% r4 }$ O( _5 r% @" ]9 A/ E  s6 w
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight6 [+ Y3 V# u9 E) Z. P
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
3 i7 y/ Y7 V; N! v  O* z3 pcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and3 f9 B% I8 N# F0 q! _6 r7 H
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
3 z+ X- M4 X( |+ Q8 T) Y; R( w$ j- N. F: E8 n
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer' }8 V4 ~. w% J% O! a: P) k
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the% J: V% u9 C; O" H( H$ i
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new& k) V' @6 j  s* c/ d% G( r, R! B, A
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
2 Q$ I$ d) k& S5 G/ d$ Ato the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes/ b3 p! R( ^! u8 B3 Y
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.8 C; n. q( I9 X

: R5 M4 ^' {$ U5 @) Z    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced8 K% `0 B/ z! s
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their6 P! G7 X4 q: ?( d$ t- }. a
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
; j+ K% [* ^- o2 [% \$ Pwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian+ v7 b- e2 e0 U% Z) C
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
8 Y1 H9 d+ t% N& \( r& d  Zbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
% u8 x, z' x8 {) q: i; A' ]3 }7 Y6 i
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly. V7 O" Q6 k! j( f
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
2 t  D* }! o! k9 d: J. m  x/ Lpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005," S" ?& l; k. R# b6 K
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
! R9 o: z0 R* e; Ofew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.0 X- ~- Z8 `  s9 B7 q( _' X

3 q( N6 O3 e* k4 ~    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house/ m) L9 ?& r$ @$ @* w$ F; d* [
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
! D5 h7 E6 G' m7 l4 Hlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
. `0 l/ A: I& Ufirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,/ U: d8 e6 G: t/ g2 j5 ]
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
# V; {0 T# i* V* zpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
7 P8 H: N2 j; Kmaking a purchase.. d; J, ~% t4 _8 g9 ?2 K

- z0 M* S% ?* P2 l0 {& c    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
+ e; U6 C1 D, J9 q% v5 f  Q( @& xmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong9 M/ R; h5 M5 O6 h2 t4 ]
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
" a- M+ p, ]! o, V' {1 n; w1 A% Ycentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting/ X6 p. _% U3 N7 e% O
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
1 N, S  q# q8 Vamenities.5 p" ]! E( m% Y; S1 |
7 m+ a9 \3 q2 a5 I9 l
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels- ]* p8 B$ n; g- k7 P  c
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand) Z. u1 P- s; S3 c, m, @
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has+ _4 m7 e2 @' x, U
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been1 L+ H1 T1 x8 \- y' |( ^# p: b8 |3 _4 T
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle) A4 w  h1 A, k- j3 ?
residence, rather than for investment.& M- t  S! s; N/ }

( Z2 d1 w9 @# R+ E7 ]( p' Q, z& ~    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
8 a3 Q* Z1 c. H# r! ^. W; R- ]house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted/ s& m' u% A" Y% [" f
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
( b$ @, M+ r. U7 I7 }+ Econfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
4 f- t" T+ w, A3 M  x4 J6 y* erate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
5 T; a$ a* H& |$ y2 a3 v. J# wthe market.5 Z" ?0 a5 L. `6 |0 _1 U1 ^6 k+ J

0 ]) @  A1 ]7 L0 c    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
' K7 i1 q- u+ y6 v* }7 T5 ~3 O5 C' TJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In& K' y% m0 b- g
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
/ V2 v( e- [2 t1 ymonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due7 W8 O) x2 A$ f9 z
to the shortage of available inventory.8 R- m) j4 t: ]0 X4 s" g

- P2 [: ~/ ^6 @: y2 F: ^1 U) R1 }. \    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
( [1 m9 W" ~  p& J. z- Nmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains9 C- J% a5 A8 ]& _! h" ]% L
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses5 X- O, Q3 b; ^" n( D% I
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.& s. D/ r4 U6 g5 P7 I) E& i) R

$ y& J+ X. ]  u# W9 D+ `    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases0 E& \4 o7 w- `
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
- X5 w- K- u% C9 s: Vunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that! x% Z* n& s7 c: d& c
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring) M2 x9 x/ P- l' m& i1 t, q  l
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer& Q7 ?) Z8 x- j1 \
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
, P$ ^$ |5 k- ^5 q+ P2 X7 vbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

: q0 }8 T6 T! f7 g
) {* C) q2 @4 }" ?0 A$ ]1 p' L% i: t    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter% E3 F, G  B1 j. b+ r7 D
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton: C5 n2 J: `; c1 s& j
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,9 D; D! _, W) `" n4 ^* _) `
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
4 p! {) k0 B. G- z7 i! eincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
9 z9 [0 d0 d. `. Win the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
/ G( {( g# t, Y# f* Ftowards the end of 2006.
    1 j$ q1 U+ M. a

/ Q# [. x6 M3 o7 kWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of# C" e: I1 m3 Q) t  Z/ `/ p
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
1 G3 x/ f/ v7 ^: rto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
! M0 [) N( R2 V& m: wgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
5 G2 c  ?1 o' @$ s  v4 K+ W  qforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added: v+ v4 s. J5 N/ n0 q
pressure on tight inventory levels.
) j5 P! T8 r& G' v6 a: Z* n! t% `( I' h% J7 ~4 C) i; E+ m
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic, A# A1 b7 n- ?2 n
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
% ]5 T& _5 l9 o( x, q3 ~: Ointo the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
" v2 o* v/ x9 `$ @9 Wwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
( Z/ ]) Q+ {# s& O" a0 |/ n- |% kfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
, l2 ]9 M7 Z. d+ X, t; }- t& z/ m  h/ `  B
    <<, |+ y, S1 Z! D+ ~) D( z
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006' E4 ^9 c: L8 B' A0 r& P

; Z6 g$ }9 g/ S1 c5 q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 ]& n' v: A) q; q  |
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey2 ]3 y; M0 x$ y1 H* g6 h  _
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: W9 r5 j0 ~$ t& D0 _; t
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3) Q# d6 k. l$ S: V* x+ p# x  P
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
/ Y  h: l- v! L9 A' h5 q* v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  w* h% p9 H1 X& o    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
  O$ n( E1 m5 ^! u4 ]" |& F  W9 K    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! |: I1 e$ a' z2 H% M8 N    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
4 I* `' `4 k8 F  Z8 z7 e2 Y7 F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' u4 w0 ?. N0 ], W    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
  |  ]2 w% e" k7 j/ Y8 k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 U2 Y3 `. x- \    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -& p& F- p' G% C4 d1 \# g. X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, W6 H2 ^) e2 I1 N    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3339 r! x, h) }# j! H) w; c
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" |6 b) ~; W. A3 M- A2 O    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
! l( C% H( |: Z8 J$ q" k6 y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 \6 s% L7 G7 f% y    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185( |7 g# Y) H8 `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 ]- R2 E; o! _    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
6 K3 [0 j/ Y5 N9 J# `6 T& H    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 I2 U) }$ ?7 V& q2 h    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766; }& Q+ L1 T4 B1 u0 S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% K. p* a/ m( {' x1 z$ L4 ]/ e5 Y+ H
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
5 s4 F+ T: w8 a9 a2 A. L; `4 S    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" T; \4 \: q9 B5 D, m    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5003 C. X2 ]9 T/ X2 I$ y8 k
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: ~3 v1 A1 d' v" w$ i) v4 \8 ^2 q    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
- x) s; a8 a( @$ C( g1 i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# f9 \, m+ {4 H# `    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
. W1 G+ x6 R1 L; k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 o; t( G. t; H4 r8 @* ]) u
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
* [3 p5 G5 _: V5 o+ w- @& L- ~" s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 r5 {9 o3 E9 w" ]7 h
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
/ T' O' K5 i* ^  N$ Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ a' K8 a2 ~) b0 r  M    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
5 }% O. @$ ]1 W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 D  d+ l( w$ z5 }

9 h, J% v8 R" C" w1 |( Z/ P    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ k. Y. D- f# ]8 s                               Standard Condominium
. @* [& }" y* T" [1 T% t3 o( d/ @    -------------------------------------------------------------! X! h# P8 e/ V& W
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo) q/ ?6 Z+ \/ C2 l! t
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
. v" v" S9 }5 ^2 Q3 ~0 M5 a4 _! O    -------------------------------------------------------------
, v. Q9 K6 C. Y$ {9 C    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%  D8 N. V  B! T. q! f
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 D. _& G; ?; _3 ]
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
- h% j  c8 l: a$ c3 A- r; N( j    -------------------------------------------------------------& W7 k9 ]2 m6 K9 B: w+ c" X% \. k
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A& C+ S8 @# Z; {8 u" w
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# X2 V% r6 J' m: j, {& f    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
9 z! C$ b0 d2 k% J' n! L    -------------------------------------------------------------9 \% U( Z, j: z  D7 ^/ [4 D
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
( X* x! j5 h+ `% s: W7 D; O    -------------------------------------------------------------
: l% R  H6 @1 m- _. |  I    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
$ ~7 ~5 S+ Y- C    -------------------------------------------------------------
- i6 w7 M! s  B- K0 F# S    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
9 n& d# ~6 U) X2 s: X  B, G5 c    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ V; A* Q( f) n. ^+ V    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
3 O0 W" \4 P- h' M. G    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ X2 t3 H8 @! v( S: j/ `    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
& h1 W3 W4 E1 }( x    -------------------------------------------------------------4 V. ~: T3 F  |8 A& W
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%& r* \# X2 g4 F! K+ u
    -------------------------------------------------------------; ?" k2 a( G9 y, G. _
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
8 H: x( B: R* \: \* J$ L    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 x/ F, Y* c- y: C2 H/ |3 r    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%  u# ~' i4 Y! ~, K
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 Q* E; Z7 i! ^% u: h* p+ I    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
2 i$ R" P6 J. X. f9 A    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 w* T( ~  W1 h4 V) N% l& W  A9 y( A$ d    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
6 E! ?+ L; x% D0 B    -------------------------------------------------------------, J% b3 y1 C; C$ Z
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
1 b% p1 w  N7 W5 w    -------------------------------------------------------------: E* o( O" }4 o. j. |
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
7 N* w0 @4 V# d9 Q3 M. m- O    -------------------------------------------------------------* X& m6 W6 C2 v, K1 C, X8 a* E
    >>6 R+ ?* K) r2 L- p& O) O
' ^- t% ^4 a5 _1 C) `# j) @
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
9 T: P. c# J& |/ O' C. h9 H8 Y% vin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
7 t- ]3 C% f, I3 N. M+ r, BJohn and Victoria.& Q2 v& b7 M: C4 Q( |& w5 ~  k9 n8 [

+ h: l- B4 v+ T    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
3 O, c  y( ~% S' [3 q. ]" Zcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
$ _6 d  b) y1 X6 P- |housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
6 |( A. Z2 o. O; h6 F4 V9 }% z/ Wreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
' n  c4 u( t/ X: i$ otrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities* U: c8 S# M/ m* @8 N0 j
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
" M1 U  N6 x$ q/ j6 [available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current2 P9 y9 X7 r# w  I" Y$ ^0 i
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable& @7 k7 a3 V7 m6 z$ [( K  `  {
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on& ~2 V! ^, I& F. X1 p* |2 Z2 V; G
November 15, 2006.7 ?3 z* q( Z9 b4 t3 X2 u- S
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of# F- c9 x$ D. W7 Z
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
$ S& O# @3 \8 L# u0 Aprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
+ G, X! O! _8 mavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-27 09:23 , Processed in 0.063436 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表