 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
# P( B3 o/ Z. A1 N/ z+ m' p1 ^8 j' `) Q7 t j
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
; H. i1 V. R1 |1 u3 l+ T$ H) j( H5 I, i5 O! F/ r9 q
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market2 X9 j# d( i( ^. I" U# z6 x/ b
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third5 q+ e8 _3 H! K7 c; t3 t; P
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
9 s! y; o" l6 Qin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit; q1 x& {6 R' ]% y$ c9 q3 _# c
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and+ L2 g3 f- v* S8 u V4 O
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
- ?. k# M4 E$ P* b4 H) \9 `Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
0 P; g8 ^* o6 L; r: OLePage Real Estate Services.
- ~' [5 ~" M0 ?' `1 c2 s
# s2 b) M6 X6 ?) i6 G8 u: _; T1 _ Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters! \4 F: n' ~; G4 \4 m' I! ~/ ~: R
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic4 Z' i% ^5 I/ g2 E N
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
f8 e# v8 i v; @" I2 U: qsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
6 L7 ?; C- N J8 yresidential real estate sector.
4 e+ R) L$ u% Q7 C. i
0 l" Z! F0 g" w* M! w/ Y Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation; z9 l" s0 C I( j, G" `) K
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%): E( H' O/ G4 r" v
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562( l% H8 \8 |1 v5 }
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3803 E" x( Z: ^+ d# s) s
(+13.2%).( T2 J* J0 [$ U0 ?% n; P/ z
; L4 v: e% c/ m, q& \ "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth3 I' u* S6 ]2 e
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
) k1 S* n% p9 R5 [: r. a# W# `frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
2 D) c. @; x% b3 ?% v5 Jpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,6 M4 ~8 k3 s# {0 M) _; ?
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.& A5 z% F" H* p/ g& L# H
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We' F0 [3 V% e/ }: K
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy: ~ l7 A6 z- r6 D; i8 u" m/ r
balanced market."8 k& H S1 q! {, p6 c6 B5 S
* i; C( R# R$ W$ ]
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,+ S# t9 v6 {( n6 D$ G5 m
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift3 g+ c5 |3 I5 s! w
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
7 P) D0 m# o' I7 }3 b Mthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core3 }$ Z( _3 t* u5 K- @" |, H
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
6 A. g" b& K3 l% nmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record' {/ @, r3 c, x! C9 Y0 E
breaking price appreciations.
. b2 U/ x m3 ]8 W0 t# w5 X3 D5 p" S! d$ n# f" z; Z, l
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding( I/ B8 n1 I1 r
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the4 f/ B& }) B& C, Z* L! N- O
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
7 s0 B( M1 F4 r
' u& W$ h% C" S% [) Z In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
; Y2 C1 T4 e# L, | ]5 |economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
7 \3 R0 o1 z) v( E/ k: }: Yconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off, L" u% ~7 f' ?$ M9 A. Q m$ t
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
* A4 _# J. s( S$ MIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers. R+ Q5 v* j, q8 e6 g, P
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of( ~/ b$ t% O1 R% \" E
price appreciation when compared with 2005." b% Z$ Q+ x/ G+ u
9 V+ a# {- n" q/ o- a While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
, n% K, _9 I( h4 X- ]4 jmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and& ~8 X4 u6 C* S6 \7 S
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
6 {& Q+ s( ]% x- b3 ^* e" I* mare markedly different than those found in the United States.
/ z" O8 v& E+ I$ p
0 ?2 k7 {% j$ ]% }# J5 C1 i4 F Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the. F% K, o! S1 O1 ^% A( [5 Z% k c G' c
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
% [ E9 w+ a) S2 A. Ofavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
- q2 Q/ }, e+ A' q$ c* t+ \+ ` x5 Erelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
& v' U" m3 S$ m8 D+ K) ` vaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
) M9 m" ]( w6 ~) i: [ U& h5 Bdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
# ~9 `3 r. p5 U+ v6 q) i! Waggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
) E. _0 `; W! f* d# e, |$ fmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
( {6 A. T9 I ?+ z' z0 }7 Z0 o9 b: L
<<+ D+ n4 u' o5 M0 @8 m4 U# A5 g- v
REGIONAL SUMMARIES( U" t9 d- X6 {/ u
>>
7 b3 z# v9 } u2 Y5 R" I2 C! ]: _, j$ U C1 r
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in7 o! O7 C8 Z, O0 V
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
2 R, X1 Z( l3 g0 ]of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time5 b. E+ v$ c1 m
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of$ k4 D# r% n$ R5 b+ u. ~
renovations.- O/ K6 F$ Z6 i3 q* X% x
( m. l X: b0 R: g% O9 S
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
9 `# l0 T( n! R- |increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
9 j# p l1 f# J- X- Xcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and7 r1 l2 n, e w/ @3 J' J/ U* r3 r
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.( C: [5 k% J) [/ w
. F: {. }6 h, {* O* t6 |4 u The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
3 x3 m* I) r$ `4 D! r2 [7 N- E2 Wslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the$ @) f2 q; f3 J: b
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
; u' p: x+ M$ c7 }+ q, a600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
; ~2 {7 r4 M: |! K! xto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
5 h: ~0 D6 g1 ]! s4 y- {6 Zand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.! H2 F8 A5 N9 p3 l
0 W" A, q U( }; |6 e: K
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
" Y6 z7 M# _2 b/ Q. mconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
" ^6 B& b+ D) K( v, X8 ahomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
1 @6 {$ i" v% n- v* Dwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian; h* Y$ B0 Q3 ]% l* p0 P
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing6 D/ S, Y- y. }- N: [
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
; D6 N4 o7 W8 f A4 K( a4 A" e& i ~# @5 d9 \
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly7 Z) g7 Z8 q( V' v J5 K0 `- W) D5 f
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes4 s; B: y1 P% ], v3 n- C
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
, `) R: e/ p4 Z% O7 C: T* M1 Gas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
. K5 I3 `/ G4 S6 \1 |, x6 ]few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
9 {/ V6 \% a7 p- n8 N# w5 G- _1 I/ j: U. L8 y0 t5 m+ u1 M
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
# T5 d' Z8 p9 x7 X! V4 S: jprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
3 U/ _! c. s* p8 p; w* {, t( j- ulevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting+ J* z5 G5 \: c- S
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
& H, Y- f+ v- R3 S! \) nwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
9 U ], I9 o9 ~; p4 \( npressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
. L0 w' f. J5 F3 x' b9 j o; Smaking a purchase.3 y8 ]9 p! r/ _: j, X# P9 E" L" S( C
, u$ v% a* W; j! N7 R+ k
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing; @% G' a- y z1 u
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
1 S1 q" \9 E9 V% }6 {confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city7 T/ j: S$ f- `6 F6 v2 r
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting- p- U4 G* `9 C' E8 a
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
7 }5 L& o, |# S$ R7 Z$ A4 Lamenities.4 W- A9 ]5 a! U, k. I
/ [' O# N& h& Q
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels# a/ S) v$ o9 w1 M* p7 g
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
5 m9 n$ ~9 \7 |% V( F4 Bacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has1 L* F) X$ B7 X0 t
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been; [; f0 X- F j8 e- O
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle9 [5 V0 e$ `6 S; s
residence, rather than for investment.
/ S6 [2 t3 ^! Z! A
5 M. ]0 r; X6 h6 X7 ]) Q The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
/ K$ }& H& v: e {, Ahouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
3 {2 \# a) V, f/ f2 s0 K" n5 Xin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
& a# F, F6 x- Econfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
2 R9 c* L% [( Q4 Erate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
. q+ q3 n4 _4 @% E# Pthe market.( b' }* J, T5 K; j% u
9 H7 a! H+ ?; T, V, t8 {3 B
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through$ M: {) s( T; F' [ y, n$ a% J
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
2 {& O5 c5 Q6 A. _8 b6 ]* wAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring' g$ N! {9 y9 t3 ^2 y
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
) z& j9 R: S r) oto the shortage of available inventory." N" O5 X# d0 m1 Q2 R: H8 @" m" V9 L
$ x% F, j9 x" G, B6 C
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its0 M/ @" c5 S( @8 i U8 }
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
+ R: p$ o3 m5 L- [vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses1 S$ F7 V R$ g2 G+ q& }) x
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.. a1 e* c" y0 r% h
a1 M! c2 E9 r Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
) C1 s9 u/ n8 Z. i( a2 g6 t3 f% N7 iin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
3 l& Q8 H( y% z, Iunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that2 I j. e" h [1 u! i
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring( y% c0 Z1 x, x
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer. P( ^0 d3 Q5 `
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as, A. p; p% F. s8 U' ~
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
' u2 {+ G- ?. J
- f( W! O+ F3 O1 F( X6 Q Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
2 O, l' u1 E3 Y' R: n8 zas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton& l2 c& W* `" X# j
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry," Y+ E1 k+ x# E* v4 S" O/ v
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
0 z! x: j1 @. K5 s. d, t- G( Gincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
: ~3 |: P. O5 P, | Lin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
( _8 j1 ^4 X9 }" h- @& qtowards the end of 2006. ! v$ l) |" H; U( j+ q
" `- e" `# {' \! O
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of: V! b' R: S8 j9 y- f, K6 D
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
6 `" I5 X: _: a. i0 zto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse9 Y7 _: o3 C- u! F
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to4 a2 j, S9 C& H. U0 H4 `
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
; x/ e; ]& M4 f; R+ a' Q, }/ kpressure on tight inventory levels.
C, K- S2 g4 x5 w1 c/ q" `$ `0 c, t+ ]+ z3 I7 ]% K# \
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic/ f% l4 a8 [' B& t% h! e" y( C- l
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
: `' C2 Z" k% q9 \' R; {into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;4 v( {+ S1 Z" V. S5 r6 d7 s
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching e) m# y9 ~& a6 G
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.! U. B2 F" l8 T9 p3 w- l+ i8 _
* v# p d9 w3 ]% j9 ~* Y Z
<<( n& Y! w! \' c# j( b
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
8 J @6 @* U6 m6 a) q+ S$ H& m
, T+ z+ O; q( Z0 r -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ Z/ p7 q& t w7 {" [ Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
" ^8 y* C; ]/ w9 y3 q2 Z5 L; b5 Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------" i4 g1 o) [+ X- G
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q35 Q$ P9 R* J# x+ p& V
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
' y' V0 r9 ^" R -------------------------------------------------------------------------& e# I$ B" Z$ t+ o$ Y7 D' a2 J* _
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
. [8 @& U2 k/ r# F* @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ m C9 t) W+ Z! {, M1 u
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0002 w* [- i% z6 M7 s9 n' k" @. `
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: z. o; G; l% w& e' p% r Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0003 i8 Z. y, B: g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. C4 H6 O) E, f, l, j! o3 g Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
/ f* P6 @, X: p9 @4 P, K1 i9 j -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 C$ H$ j+ ^. c4 y! _8 K4 F St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
/ ?. Y# @1 s( g -------------------------------------------------------------------------) k" i) P* X% O9 Y) |0 n r' ?* Z* O
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
@3 M* R: o" |4 X8 O- X7 F- Z# r -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 Q( \) s/ b( b* `
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1851 J/ Q) q- G" ^9 Z, m) r- X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 b" I$ f# V4 z- N
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
0 ^7 v m K3 ^5 T. I -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. U9 V! X0 [+ C2 J Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
/ A3 S+ a' N8 l1 x( G% B9 g -------------------------------------------------------------------------( W+ \$ \: Q) r, E' c0 r5 E
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
( D% b( b; E/ p6 P# x. V -------------------------------------------------------------------------- D/ [7 Q0 y; g2 {1 ?6 t$ k8 H
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
$ _+ e% u d3 ~* W1 g8 e) h( \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 V2 O" `/ \5 n& j( o0 f$ t Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
% T. u( L0 w1 `# F# }, \% b -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ e! W& w- i0 w& E0 p+ |. O Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
; f6 H, j$ D, u$ c7 b2 X9 f -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: C4 b9 p6 H% }5 V0 Y" G Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
) ]/ l4 E& \1 _6 V9 r -------------------------------------------------------------------------* t8 E9 K( [( w/ L4 @0 @- S% ]7 F
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
& f; d7 P( F" v! X( W ------------------------------------------------------------------------- u2 |% Z- y0 F/ U$ b% O
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
8 s5 L! j0 w% o" x -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 P. X' \8 L6 U& D9 c0 C
/ @1 O" e$ l( ^1 e) }. u& j -------------------------------------------------------------
* h U" J# V- f/ s. i Standard Condominium$ b6 N7 R) k* u1 A
-------------------------------------------------------------
" T' n( ^) _ o3 @4 i. V" E& \ 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo4 {+ e+ c4 D' h# d9 v6 i
Market % Change Average Average % Change" Q0 w0 |! M, n" i7 i0 x! ~
-------------------------------------------------------------
) C9 [, G% j$ _% C$ l% l R Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
1 g S" V8 A2 a; ]+ H' V -------------------------------------------------------------$ f; J0 a2 }* i& c# i2 M
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%- e0 W/ _$ N. t5 S) C( L0 b$ F
-------------------------------------------------------------8 O1 r+ [' J9 [
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
- M/ z/ _$ \5 f2 v1 E -------------------------------------------------------------7 R% n, c5 K5 Y
Saint John N/A - - N/A
; W4 w" K, u9 F w& H -------------------------------------------------------------$ Z F0 n6 E9 H% \& g+ a
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
# t' b& j: E- F -------------------------------------------------------------) V2 C# o" Z- X
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
- h: K8 Y' n; @ D0 n -------------------------------------------------------------
+ ~* W9 p3 I* @ G5 e4 A: m. O Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
" D7 a2 ] z- U6 A -------------------------------------------------------------
0 J5 p \ \/ M" U4 h- H7 a8 G* }, |+ @ Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%6 t# _# m. o, e. p7 J
-------------------------------------------------------------
. T" ?2 ~) R8 A( G# ^* d$ k Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
% w" y" ?1 W" b$ e7 R -------------------------------------------------------------
& t! X7 B" `8 ^ Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
/ z' {9 _3 _ N. P* R! L) ^5 n -------------------------------------------------------------- G5 r6 [% ]$ m# K, q% S$ s
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
6 T3 N4 @- V' v, c+ _$ V -------------------------------------------------------------! \$ O- U! Q5 M* q: q n5 u/ w8 s
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
$ G1 I+ L' r9 u, }7 ?; n -------------------------------------------------------------
+ a8 J1 ^7 a' }8 n: B Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
& S- B% z$ g& q$ v0 Z' Z* X2 l4 N -------------------------------------------------------------1 S4 k+ _6 B; F/ b/ }+ x4 q" K
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%0 a' v7 Q' }1 I$ Y- }6 ~ v
-------------------------------------------------------------
; T4 s6 e$ @3 c* n' l Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
7 C0 x" P2 Z- Y. ]' D: i -------------------------------------------------------------
j1 t/ p) W! c National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%$ D7 u# G* \% i& j. }& u
-------------------------------------------------------------# p& q4 P" v1 P$ {4 a$ J! O
>>
( Z1 p, |" j* i+ ^% K1 g9 P; y7 A9 S Z( S- t7 C$ n$ A
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
* R/ ?: g; L4 y1 K5 s, h. [in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint' _2 \4 b4 X5 m0 U
John and Victoria.
& U0 t) p5 s# |9 k# J; w: |: C9 u
. y. {) `% Z$ M* t' t The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
$ X n. S- v; B# X$ t! q1 }comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
5 K1 Q; k9 ^& }$ U' Bhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
3 a. a$ ~9 P% V9 R: S& Vreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price3 P- `& I& K& P/ d Y" z
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
* [5 A0 b; c$ \2 Nacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is* u3 F" w. k" _' ]+ l: V/ E3 y
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
5 j- [4 M' Z( g8 ]figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
6 b) O. d8 U, _. R" T: kversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on+ P/ N, \" u+ _* Y+ x, o
November 15, 2006.3 A: {* q V! D$ t' ?3 u$ F! N. x
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of# _' r+ E* ]# L. ?
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge" y% S- x: r9 K" a/ T, m; V
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is/ @* N. [& p! T. [) q
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|