埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2003|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 4 e1 g+ f" ^! j3 j6 H
2 L* p" N" L, Y9 r& a% d! y
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -; f& H% d0 h+ q4 R
, c( C  b. y' w0 i3 _+ t
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market# a* z, ~) T( [: S/ F& ]
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
( V1 t8 o# Z( Dquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
2 [9 V1 E5 @6 H) G& b, f$ _$ g4 yin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
) C3 F! P9 \) J, xprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and1 y3 T  j1 f' g- `
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
' ]3 S* u7 }0 Y- Z4 zQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal3 L" P1 z( Z( t8 o/ w" e
LePage Real Estate Services.: b& }4 W3 i, d! D

/ r- Y4 n- B$ Y8 y; T1 q    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
) ^7 ~+ t# I7 @  ?! x8 n$ xare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
3 Q. M7 j9 p- X1 U& R. kconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
1 ^0 w* S3 b% Q8 K- D& `( p2 ~sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the( I, \6 b3 s4 d# U9 ?7 ]
residential real estate sector.8 e" \) L$ B- \

# v6 @4 a! Q$ e; z# F" h: m6 R$ a    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation* M6 q; y3 k+ Q  k% f8 g. f/ j8 o1 P
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)  b' N3 f( C7 w8 [" @& U9 I
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
/ Z& A; f; J) g7 b- [* o8 ^(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380" b. \3 U! ^/ n  R
(+13.2%).; M5 H0 \% h: l

. @% \1 `% x' |+ F    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth: i* j' L- Y  F& G' M2 G
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the) U' @& K, \' D0 p
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are2 v, E' h0 n- w+ [+ q' u
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,4 r, |% p  D$ G+ k5 U# x' o
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
8 D& o. S, D; M"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We- y0 t& R' B! q# {: l- A
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy7 a, o+ r5 H+ ?# z# e4 B
balanced market."1 U+ q2 d; m7 {
9 f' N1 P! T3 ^
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,3 ~. Y- k- b3 p( j8 K1 ~
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift2 I- r* x. B8 y0 i& Q% G
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
8 @/ [& x5 o0 f! Sthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
4 k1 x$ @; \# N! ?4 {, oenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,$ t0 H$ }4 E7 ~# o' j* X6 X
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record0 [/ z" g% V# p# P8 X
breaking price appreciations.% `7 {' H$ m7 u3 m' R
5 V9 y3 }2 w6 d, E$ K
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding5 z7 L* m4 V7 Y8 V
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the* C1 _3 {' I0 I3 }/ H9 Z4 S% Z% j
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
0 `' l9 J2 c# o) N! \# U3 u
# f3 V9 p/ F8 o, C) h* R: I    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
8 E. V( R: [4 _economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
, k* u9 D8 r  k. E) C9 y* n8 Vconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
) ?# v; M. W! |0 E* a8 [, Islightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
# T9 [# T1 Q& Y( U8 `4 W' b, GIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers, z  i% }" \4 n! o+ y5 @+ e
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
* ~( p  W9 v1 C  B5 I8 J# y$ Dprice appreciation when compared with 2005.' ?) l# {2 k1 V/ v( z6 e8 d# u

/ k) g" z2 Y1 j  z6 w9 ~* }    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
0 Y* K. @' t, \  P7 Fmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
$ }% C2 c7 O; }; z2 k. ifinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada! r! y0 x# k3 l$ c
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
5 X, e% k" W5 D2 Z, f) h0 ~1 a) D
- k7 j% H0 X+ u4 J0 J' g* S    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
! I: N4 D" G% K% m4 U' {' qAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
; z3 O) E8 ^# ufavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
$ J/ H8 K/ m4 F, H! b' rrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general4 y; c$ C4 x! \3 L+ l. M
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
3 f" u9 v9 O: N; N) F+ O8 {downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and+ s/ [# ^$ W! l5 `1 Q2 C4 g$ L
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
0 T" l0 G& v8 r1 [  umortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
6 O4 n& C. }$ c1 j$ d5 F8 s7 c
# O/ Z$ j  ?! W1 E% j    <<% h  ?  p! e, s
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
7 g! D* Z3 F/ ~    >>
. L) c7 p; K& ?0 ^0 N) |; I- G: k2 j& B$ M- V: J/ t5 f7 U
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
( N- C2 I( l; M3 GHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
% q. ~8 n) I: M$ |1 h0 X; zof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time+ M, i' P3 T, [; b; y+ y
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of2 g5 N" j1 C% f9 `
renovations.; U6 G! n! I, a" j- r+ ^

1 m5 o$ F2 s3 @1 P" L2 t  e    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
8 _1 J/ o2 K; Y1 M: Y- Pincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation/ Y+ q( T& S% }; `$ c5 W  N
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and# H* F7 |9 `1 t: n4 L
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.) p* m! n8 y. X2 f

4 G! C9 w0 u! ?! u$ ~    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
, H7 L! r# W0 {; i$ ^slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
. ^% f. P/ g- ^* B6 {: pquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new( m6 O& R8 S( k# f8 r# c- |2 d7 B
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
6 {& J. g5 v5 v2 U2 `- vto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes# S+ G4 W" v) V
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options./ q: O5 T+ b" S# m. g
- I% P$ C4 M  b6 a6 {7 f! C9 z
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced- t4 L( b" n; A
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their4 [" V7 b& d( S  M
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers) Y5 F2 b3 b' e9 V
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
2 [/ p0 c& k- ~* H7 t  Qdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
3 G# E1 P- M. L+ G) U% q5 Pbuyers with more options when looking for a home.( }) H' {# G' k0 x3 g7 J
* r: |- Y8 h9 C, U" p
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly. ?  O5 a# W( u
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
* J0 h# s8 Z  i' |3 ^priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
  M) J' ~- D- m/ t$ _" uas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
1 [3 ?" a* D& U; p6 efew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
3 y" x6 k8 ~3 C- ?6 U* y2 Z- c
" a" f* A$ S+ L6 f    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
( z9 U9 N# D* \& Iprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory* U0 c/ u2 j" @( ~: f- M  y7 F$ ]
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting$ t* @; S1 @' I+ R& i
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
2 J. K# i- W' D7 ~: gwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the1 b6 S6 a" M5 O, X
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
$ w- l. \# q- ?8 Q( O, P$ D+ Dmaking a purchase.9 R3 X6 K% l1 u# p

5 ~  X& ~) s2 c& l3 @3 Z    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
2 Z' A1 |5 Q( R2 W. J8 bmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
- d8 B1 Z  O* a! Z" z( j  Lconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city: C( }5 V" P% x8 J  [
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
  Y5 i! h8 A  R+ t4 s/ m  mattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown+ L9 k6 d% Z- b& b" o: b
amenities.
- I0 B' k0 r" S; O
1 I% S& ]5 ^) \9 U, ]  r  e! @* W! k    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels" J/ P$ I% O7 h9 S
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand( z7 i6 L- S1 ?2 u- F* ^$ a# @5 @; D
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
7 b" V. R- h6 b3 Fcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
1 X' W; [; f- Sdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle7 @! o, u' ]; J" R0 V8 x# w: a8 f
residence, rather than for investment.
; |- v0 o5 }7 n" [1 F
5 C5 S+ h, z: M+ d& r" Z    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
; h+ i, `. ]9 N8 thouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
5 z/ G% q0 i$ U( g5 \" T; Cin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
8 ?1 v! ~6 o5 O/ F% P' `8 gconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization! Y  x) d: Q  G% j
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter; x, ]! l$ ^+ B
the market.
1 D: O) t- `) {$ V' M/ n  e% n2 E4 ?& Z2 M+ e6 S# z
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through; D# h( Q7 v8 G; ~1 u& y3 U
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In/ D- C! A2 Z/ U$ ~. S5 y
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring) ^( N/ s& g4 a. c9 w* c: F
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due7 n3 H' `* u& O; W# b# t
to the shortage of available inventory.
& E4 `) J( ^) b( d! X0 W4 z+ b( V* N. m2 C* {% f3 R
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
( ^, t( Z/ U9 F; Gmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains2 k: E- \  X6 c) Y2 ^9 G
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses+ {# a  U) n, b. t# Z
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province." ~, `7 I) d) u$ c6 D5 c& Z: Y
+ M; K9 s$ G& ?9 G( e
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
9 q. P5 W$ G) {9 q& |/ ?7 _in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low: y6 }' D* B3 A3 e. f8 d: f$ v
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that' }; J6 z* O0 B2 R
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
/ f$ X; C3 I- l: K7 [2 W! ]3 eprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer8 ~2 [/ v6 o$ E/ w+ b2 m
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as" ?% ~! A1 P5 v( {; f( c( x1 M
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

+ [, t6 X/ s  M9 A* i& c0 R" u0 O/ U2 @' ~9 |: x4 }
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
7 W* `! W; h5 t, P3 |; w% ras activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton2 U' L/ B3 l: @: t
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
7 l4 U' b5 g6 B/ {) T4 [1 `maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices- r0 _9 B+ A2 b# ?
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
/ t% N; [- q3 Min the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
% P, S' F, Q, Wtowards the end of 2006.
   
1 Q2 x1 u/ n, q" m1 E6 `) z9 C3 T3 M( x  G$ l; g! k! z2 @
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
" X# V$ ?1 X# T2 ainventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
% s7 X- I! \1 v6 k: _& E5 d$ ~to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse, z  n( }: X1 |* r$ r
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to4 `- H' w! o. f1 Q
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
6 \' \9 B4 d5 s/ F+ zpressure on tight inventory levels.
5 `1 J/ }, q% _: v% U
' h6 h7 M1 |& d2 ?' ?    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
4 ?2 \' B: |/ L; [fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people# g$ v' \5 ]' M( J9 ]
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
- {; z7 {$ V( x2 Iwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching: d! H2 O3 T) A
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace./ V3 v- F) D2 y. y3 T$ Q" Z

1 ~$ y& |' C0 m5 K    <<- Z" m( \6 n" K" h4 O
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
3 O+ z/ z+ ]& f/ e
- H1 t6 v! }; W' z1 K4 P5 |5 @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* F9 n( y; s7 n! }% h2 a+ U                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
* ~2 w3 w! Y0 f7 |% ^! X- j* x    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ J, E" R& a6 }) @; C6 a: L                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q39 @  I( ]$ Q  Q' F8 z# Z, c, t/ E
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
3 W  a+ o5 [* ?$ j6 D  Q8 X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; o$ G# z" Z; J& R  ~
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
+ D$ d# p6 z4 d& `) \% I5 x    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: ?5 S) w3 d  ?% |! I
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000- t8 e/ F/ _5 k& B  I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% V: A4 k% }  d7 W
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0007 n* R6 \" K2 J$ [4 u2 m+ t
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. n4 U# }7 e# \, `9 ]8 s6 w/ W' h  ?    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
( |- X: s8 Z' ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& Q7 G  F* s( a7 g: i# Q6 V1 F
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333- [1 @% [4 D2 U! a  |# R, v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" |2 g+ A8 E$ X3 R8 d" m( H    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5834 J" w* E# P3 `6 K, L6 @: @
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; R3 _: C% ]9 }    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185$ N, O2 Z4 ?2 D0 U1 ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ W) [1 C" J# v# f- S
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
: [% N7 l4 F) M4 M+ e% m' {8 p  ~    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  A: ^$ B* ]  u9 y    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766  Z0 w3 H6 r. `' r1 O3 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( g- o+ V6 P' l( \' @4 M* q* D    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707" {! ?, P7 }( t8 D) E" I! j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- b* j8 Q! E+ Q& ~5 U
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5006 j" E' I) N7 u. I; U3 j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) ?' I9 _) U- g4 }2 J9 K. F8 O8 B
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389. y4 n! w+ E6 W2 f5 @5 p& X0 }
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, f+ k8 y3 J+ z$ \- a
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714' ^/ @2 w: a% G) r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: F0 Q, m* a& R# I8 J, F7 z/ i    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500* A( e* m2 p# y4 {8 o/ _+ t
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: H* z. s; x  X. }. f2 H! G
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
: {; G; M% _8 S# O4 e2 e, f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; ~0 R& ~; M9 Q6 x0 A
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860( B( B- n+ g& F5 B/ A9 |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 L8 g8 m: \4 x5 S) \& ~8 H2 }
0 q7 `' X$ G! S7 b    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 J; [& P) a$ E( C                               Standard Condominium/ z( \  p# ~" n7 e- M/ Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------; G" o7 S: M; Q- v  |; q
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
6 @' S; c& b; L: t4 o0 n    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change4 q* c+ \/ m1 c! f% q8 c+ h! y
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  }& q4 P1 |  l! N8 R& H1 g    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
5 |, t- ]2 K1 \    -------------------------------------------------------------: a# f! e# H, d
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
7 ~# i- E1 M( R7 _- |# X    -------------------------------------------------------------6 a# s7 V! e0 Q& ~5 ]0 E
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A0 }) x; F! F( {" ]4 J+ T, X
    -------------------------------------------------------------
- }. a! u9 N: u: o7 }9 D: u% i    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A: S4 p: ^0 N4 `, d; b9 I, H
    -------------------------------------------------------------
! S, b. W6 I; H2 Q7 r    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%* h, r7 c, u  C3 y2 R1 Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 d! m( u6 K  J- O    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
% ]  u  `3 x' D: C( G+ ^% R- _    -------------------------------------------------------------
: T9 x3 f8 O7 G0 b& G  r: M6 w    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
- q+ j) \5 p8 P( N  s; `1 G# [2 n    -------------------------------------------------------------$ h/ ]3 V# B8 B' {; R: \
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%5 ?1 L1 c' `' c' d/ }- c/ P% W; A0 x
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 V0 p* u1 s8 p. J
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%# c! d; O3 i7 ]/ U3 m* f6 i* ]$ ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 G4 x! {- B' e8 S# m
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%8 q0 @9 I- R2 V/ b# N# C
    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 t8 D7 L8 ?5 u2 j+ \& J6 D    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
# y' C- Q2 J3 {3 u! S    -------------------------------------------------------------+ \5 z4 m) T6 i) T, M0 P
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
# O: K- y% ?2 d! O; m" Z% D    -------------------------------------------------------------
' D$ \4 @: e1 u# x    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%7 }! ~0 G/ Z4 q; ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 M. ~! a5 t! I) [8 ~    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
- t5 ?, m+ T! R6 o    -------------------------------------------------------------
& _  H% [  x( R  R' Y: {' G    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
& T  `+ J/ G2 v9 c3 o7 }5 N    -------------------------------------------------------------
" m. r. b  V  ]  b7 a- ~9 s0 Z    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
6 n# ~1 Z& J* Q    -------------------------------------------------------------
' f+ _# \  ~: E2 F. W/ x    >>
% M) \8 x* V  g/ Q3 S5 [5 A1 [
% B1 ?; ?; l; C; `: g  F    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined' L1 N/ N9 X; e
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
1 c( v/ c/ {& J! n' `8 k  i6 w% {% ^John and Victoria./ |/ J5 [0 k4 l- r
* l* J: {  P/ ^1 q
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most# }3 f7 {: Q; A" U$ G' x
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of+ L+ b$ x# }* T: S8 K
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release% U2 T3 J5 H4 Y! \1 Y
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
! O3 p" t& T8 }0 V: y' D2 Itrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
/ y0 R/ n- T& iacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is( b" j8 b5 E. k1 O% Q3 f/ L* ^$ N1 p
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
) D, F+ w; j3 A! i: Vfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
1 j3 u( y& v- h- Oversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on% E. W5 u% F2 Z* G
November 15, 2006.# Z- \% Z1 A5 d* w! s4 z; `
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of- Z: M8 C: Z  J2 m5 s
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge4 a0 C7 l( ]# j$ @5 l1 ~6 B
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is  S8 v6 c: ]) t. u# x1 y6 d
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-9 05:28 , Processed in 0.131577 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表