埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2188|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
: L6 C7 `! z+ }  \. ]6 @$ E. Y
7 P- j/ a, r- q/ |- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -/ _! A' i9 w" ~6 K0 r
  z) u% C6 Q/ O4 w
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
; t7 J. I$ B# `4 n5 {8 H# vexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
. ?' V5 p; z  d2 }: D/ gquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
* k/ ?$ Q# `' V- Q! S/ uin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit, C4 o3 e8 f! D% V/ F6 a: K$ G, Q
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
% M0 n- v) h; fmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
# W. i. i) d# |4 y2 i- L( QQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal7 ?( {  X; |7 k2 `
LePage Real Estate Services.% E' R' n$ X( G3 T& r* _  m1 S
; q1 |: j% B' K* O- q
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters2 [3 w: Z  k, H/ p
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic' w0 I3 w- a5 q" q" A% q3 [' m
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and& i) v3 ^8 ?; W2 m" C
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
+ l& a( T8 @" w9 k& k' ]9 k+ gresidential real estate sector.  I$ X! [  j7 q! n
- ?& r! q* K+ Y  U, }% J) m+ Z7 V+ g
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation" L" c! y9 l/ }5 Z
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)/ H1 r2 d; j3 L  g" M/ a
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562) r9 P$ I4 _* `$ \4 s9 o
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
8 k- u6 b; j, v& g- |/ e( b(+13.2%).
( ^) C' C% F  A# X& n) ^0 Z1 C' x2 s
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth7 ]' B4 Y% I& n2 t$ u, w6 _
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the$ s1 g& O; X9 z# b9 x0 o- ]- e
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
+ g* K' J; \! E. |poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,! ]4 F& n# t! V7 k; n
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
, t2 ~  U6 F- J# U1 Z! j- v/ T' i"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
6 r9 _1 C# }  a) dwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
; [. [- E( e$ Y, h# K% X2 Wbalanced market."
9 b8 S5 W: j/ [- J$ v" Z, \3 q0 x, Z0 S4 e
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,9 c, {0 w7 v# X- P4 G: p6 e
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
; H/ h/ Z% X: {. D, kto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued- V, o3 y% a7 t9 r: S/ w
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
. b( M. \) S5 a( Venergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,5 G( a$ c5 k8 n' c5 P
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record0 K/ v' S% o; d/ M7 _9 v; l3 b3 Z- P
breaking price appreciations.+ i! L" r# {* V1 f7 [

4 n0 k  u% X# j! ~  J    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding" U/ }; W4 O) l: l( m
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
! A- `4 r+ T3 j* W! z+ }; O& Ylargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.- k0 @& J3 N9 }* U; ?8 {( ~

3 [; y/ ?; I( Y( E    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
4 R0 t4 ~$ F" A0 t6 ueconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer! a" x. d# t+ I9 o4 {% K3 ?+ d8 y% r
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
6 ^5 K1 M$ y9 b' m9 J1 islightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.7 a3 o0 l$ m! g% I) V: q
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
4 P# y  \: y  N' ?0 t0 K$ Fgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
7 l: O7 c" a* t- M4 L( v7 Iprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
0 W/ p" N+ ]5 D! p" @. s; ^5 k6 ?& C/ B
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
- n) x* E0 c# E* W5 b9 nmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
5 r% |7 @6 [! p& D% yfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada3 `! n8 N  ^; P& D+ |; b
are markedly different than those found in the United States.& s7 ]3 K: o) P& w
6 v% P2 H* }( B2 R
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
* ]' s) O, b" F. yAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's5 Q! A  `2 F  A7 P! R
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the' S0 q/ ?. n- y  R/ c  X$ a' ]
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
& N  z9 w4 W2 T" F0 k" h/ R" saffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
4 V; R9 y; g! a. H/ edownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and2 t* t2 F# l3 n+ x' C
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
1 [" ~5 ~  u& J( K( }mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."$ ]! L1 d3 o. b3 ^

8 Y( _$ e$ e8 g! @0 Y    <<
5 B/ r0 Y( z5 L* Z* g                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
6 x& q2 S$ `  A8 `; E0 r# u    >>
; G& [9 b. C8 V" A* Q5 |( t# Q; y& z6 w, }3 O
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
& n7 o0 L! B0 K7 hHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate' u/ x9 J' z/ a( ~: N
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
; [) F& S; R1 U, Z' ^4 d8 u* p1 jlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
& L8 [5 S  y" U# g+ N4 ~renovations.3 |) h1 c0 C: C

; J6 _" o2 E# i1 }+ x5 {, i    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
2 E& J. T8 n" R! Q  e' {! zincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation5 ^1 R, [5 P" d3 `8 ]& H" ^, q1 m) e
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
; m8 S; K" J+ I6 B6 ?9 F4 m9 FSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
4 d) K( y. o$ b5 k. R/ N+ }2 h' ~$ j" @3 Y: b
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer3 H4 |# l3 {' b2 V8 P2 L
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
6 c; v2 w+ R" e/ r) zquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new; x8 W* |* A/ [  {4 K% k7 X
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
& Q8 @0 d, s$ h" Y6 o$ b2 g+ Yto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes0 v' f" x3 k. h4 O2 }5 |
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
  q9 E% {; R5 m6 q, K: j) k
9 p8 _6 Q0 v" w5 _. [3 J$ h    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced5 c( y* C- G' p
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
9 V0 W1 F  F7 X; V4 K, J0 chomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers* }  N4 b* T, y. d
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian- ?$ i) C* ?) t8 i+ o$ Q/ w+ }
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
3 I: W* A2 ?! E* T9 ?, w0 Bbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
0 u2 T4 V% k  D  i* ]# Y0 A+ r; Z) ^/ M/ e9 c
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
: [3 e( `) S* P+ ?4 pamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes' p+ R/ @8 e% K3 c+ @+ }
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
. t% V3 y7 \" mas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
1 _( q  E2 D* X0 n8 _( U, ?( afew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.2 U5 d' ^6 U% b- y

( j8 l+ }- V+ F) F: ?    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house: f% b- J" A& M' u' l. ^1 v# {# I
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory& f0 A$ t3 ?' H$ M# ^/ e' k
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting5 w" T( ]  o" i7 b
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
+ \* O4 v- L2 @- ?when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the; W6 E( G+ j2 ]) }
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before# b- K+ @, O0 u+ _
making a purchase.
+ L4 p4 @. T) n. W- v1 D( N2 r- F
+ Y, D8 ^' O" L: k# M    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing9 _4 V, j% D& _/ @0 b; g
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong2 Y' h5 X, J# f+ f& U: H
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
, L5 ~6 }2 i# g& f6 E6 ]centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
3 S2 w( Q  `, v: Y3 \attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
+ k- }% q2 H: W, T* x! t, hamenities.4 p9 }" A2 U# T$ l% n! q: J9 t

3 |  E: N9 r7 c6 v* s    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels, W& F# B0 F# C  Z8 v
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
  ~+ P+ I- R# ]9 P. Z$ b7 iacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has" w' {1 s# U$ c) v; B# O: q9 v
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been/ ?  S, n! [% a
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle* `) y1 |1 ^: N0 @, D' [
residence, rather than for investment.3 g4 g8 r4 h2 I3 c
* A8 h3 q0 W) m+ q. y$ w
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
6 [) Z0 Y, L9 D9 Khouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted  |' J6 w3 a+ A: R  u$ q, o
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer/ ?8 i- M3 T3 ?5 Z& ~5 _. ~
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
) `* y7 B' j' _4 a8 m5 erate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
) F7 I! z2 N8 h$ }) S, P1 `. kthe market.
' d/ s% e. |; @% Y# A) `
( G7 I/ K6 v' [2 f, Y# A2 C/ M% \0 N    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
2 v( L+ R7 s* P. TJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
4 V; U" j8 k" Z  r; D; y  _# cAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring7 S$ t( Y* h, C; ^/ Q
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
# N* V* F: Z% C, g+ n7 C0 C0 gto the shortage of available inventory.) X2 [" e5 ?1 Y1 s2 O
( L* m0 K1 Q) m2 e: u8 F
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
% ]! L$ F1 g2 ?7 E) _momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains/ k- Q/ N  J" x: d
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses' V9 w/ {" X; y9 p
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
4 G3 O- `: d2 f2 h( A: w5 q- W+ Z0 d, J  E) s* ~' H$ L
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases# K% J, U; o# ^% s, Z! d$ n% n
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
+ E5 `& ]" R, w& A, yunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that2 h) X' a) s1 g8 |
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
' T$ U1 r6 e. \( k3 Eprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer% h8 ?5 I4 a& w7 N' @; ^& B
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as) n% B) o) m+ U: n# y1 k8 |; h
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
1 u3 C- Z1 W3 O- T% H
' C) U0 _' j" [8 x. l9 f, `2 D
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
& H% g( [" @6 fas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
, Z* l& F) L+ F1 G6 Hremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,% M; T- v  ~3 C; U! t
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
4 L. F2 u$ p1 T' `increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve6 O+ g. K. q2 u: {. X/ d# J
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
! C. j; Z! M' A7 M; Y3 ptowards the end of 2006.
   
) C1 _/ }% ~2 i3 j, ~( N9 I- n- P
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of' s( E* w5 b: j
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
1 ]# g9 X" f) j2 x% h5 M! jto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
! M+ j8 m/ e5 R6 ?. ~% Ngroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to8 U" Y' p) h- T8 o* I' Y' k; y
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
9 M- Z2 \1 M0 U) \pressure on tight inventory levels." {6 [4 v  V0 d8 d9 d# r8 V) n# _
2 m- n  Z! Y4 n( s: l( i; a( F
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic% [6 A5 p  V. u% P& @* `5 U
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people) R& y* i; u2 i" ~5 b1 w. t4 f
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;! ]. r+ I% o2 U- X5 S
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
! l5 g& I7 ^7 j4 z$ {1 ^. `for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.5 I& i: |1 h; \/ k
7 p& g* @7 c- a9 C. M: A% s9 k
    <<: j9 T8 q- h' p8 Y& g
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20062 l  x' m/ r2 ~1 x9 \  `" \6 s- z2 y
. g- |& r+ H! C; i+ T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, Z$ _( z* G& u( b9 m( Y# e, i                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey8 F+ B1 _, l8 I: C0 U- J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% |0 X) I' m( {% A+ e9 g
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
1 v% ]0 n: v/ ~& d* l    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
+ Z/ u  T# }; K4 K    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) x8 w' A1 _4 q/ x  N0 c0 {; S/ |
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000" o' b' x- q$ n8 Z4 p$ c4 c
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 I7 ~* r: q' q" C5 p9 x
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
; A9 ~4 I. r' y4 X: \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 Q% A$ e' h6 q+ ]) _
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000$ a" V8 A, G1 A! {% h+ \
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- K, l& `/ J. n
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -" o& c4 I- t2 g3 m4 `6 U- S4 G3 _
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 N8 u1 Z" n) W: z$ v9 m
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333' E; |7 H, Q/ {+ g. P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 |5 r! S% e4 R/ b/ b+ k; _4 v
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583: H9 U! ~  J% b6 v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% ^7 B/ m* D/ k' w0 r
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185; w, F& `# L" |/ ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# t9 u4 E2 k$ T1 p    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250) T) P7 ]7 e7 \" v& g8 B- U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* L! W0 g$ }1 L3 p( l* O
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
* X& H0 \! Z8 _# W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ T( _+ m+ V! p; e1 d! t+ h
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707% j: H; z+ [( I( B3 o  ^1 F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( }: c! d) Q5 W  W
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500" c0 V3 G6 R( T! o+ o* x
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( Q) W/ y' X9 p  I    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
- c3 t6 w6 `! C0 I+ @) s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 d* e9 y% p+ e5 W! ~6 I3 Q$ s! e7 V
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714. |) a$ `+ e% b0 g8 m( M& l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  Z/ M" O- J6 Q" o6 [) N
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
! D/ p+ R4 V) y9 A# t1 A  E" ?/ G# l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 d0 b' a$ L5 h0 V  R
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
5 y* U: r$ L  o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 ~$ l# \+ ?4 Y, G+ z
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
. V% v& P2 o& Q8 w4 B% W; ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ n) W& s3 @. }
# _: f: v1 Q  ?# U2 R    -------------------------------------------------------------
! d: J% o9 `% d; w                               Standard Condominium: n; Q, q: f) m* ~6 P
    -------------------------------------------------------------7 l2 g( i4 O0 N
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
) j" ^: X3 `. m  w3 ^" `( G% n    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change# n6 X+ [2 [( p4 \  D7 q
    -------------------------------------------------------------" t2 p+ c! u! F& ^4 Y0 y  B4 b8 F
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%  C# S5 S# E- O; q; n
    -------------------------------------------------------------8 b( e9 `0 [1 a& B, {/ t+ y7 R; b6 o
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%7 o  z( }( i( ^6 v
    -------------------------------------------------------------5 ~+ s4 Y0 ^( q, Z$ w+ N, Z
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
+ Z$ [4 \7 @2 |/ T    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 J9 W* B' h, [! c    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A/ {/ C5 \* s) ?7 r1 b
    -------------------------------------------------------------
! K0 D1 j9 q+ m# G  C1 W9 A1 B' p4 \    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%' B0 F5 ?+ N* a' h( X
    -------------------------------------------------------------' k' v# C4 ~9 G( s# m$ D% h
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
# M9 {5 i% @3 T    -------------------------------------------------------------4 Q; T( z" L& T% y% S
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%6 W' v$ {! G6 e6 H% J( V7 n
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: W# K$ E; K: |- u: q    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
1 \% B. y: X+ `4 B# Z    -------------------------------------------------------------& E& ]( v5 h6 l! K$ h1 s0 P) b% O
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
- B) e- `* P4 U0 o6 Z! E5 p    -------------------------------------------------------------
  B+ O' L/ |/ t0 y    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%0 ?9 C+ ^' ]9 A- q
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 P- y1 F  Z5 F, x    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%% i8 W& q0 X; V3 @" o6 X! g8 I( b! ^, F+ C
    -------------------------------------------------------------1 j( B* O& {8 v+ j& l
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
/ Z: R$ ]4 _/ O. |! G    -------------------------------------------------------------
: F% r4 B) j0 q# q$ y& I# T    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
9 B% h, {1 z5 c$ v: P% v% C    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 [& }  ~3 ]$ y. Q    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%% q0 ^) H4 V- h( c6 N# M
    -------------------------------------------------------------8 B+ W% r3 b: t) m" r+ w0 Z+ @9 d
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
2 g, \7 P, e4 P' m: d2 P    -------------------------------------------------------------; }/ t& U8 U- G- t8 T. a1 K$ c
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%1 }  J, G9 c" p) ?& z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) r) v% \9 F4 h: u! }    >>' N# t/ D) M; R: @8 j1 z$ k
( t1 `& h, h  M( J) g
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined$ f* V- v  A' k5 z+ b$ e
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint; q' {6 R2 f1 J/ @$ E) X
John and Victoria.
% `% M' d2 E# r# p; q% O% R7 u2 z* D3 ?1 `
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
% M3 e- \* H% C3 g, `$ H6 jcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
# ^. |+ L# M) U" C2 `housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
0 H+ R6 c% v% I! {$ dreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
* `9 V/ T  a& }0 Y8 l, }3 k+ z0 |trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities* {8 x1 m$ d! j6 x2 c+ [
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is) D2 R8 r; [8 ?3 j3 w6 S& C
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current9 A' D6 W% @- v( l
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
. r, C3 G" F4 |3 wversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
6 b- Y5 P6 H1 C/ f7 SNovember 15, 2006.
/ k6 c) F3 r( K7 v- o) N5 Y- u    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
& i+ q* f8 ^6 w$ v3 I  b8 w* lfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge( s+ H% V+ l' y' H9 E
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is5 c$ w( i- r, i2 m& C8 f; K5 y8 f. h
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
大型搬家
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-19 09:38 , Processed in 0.128563 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表