 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
. Z' R# Z; ^& M( i9 c m6 c, [+ Z" }& I2 ?- J D
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
6 u0 b8 t, I; I9 a4 B. H5 \" K6 \3 d' Q' A. f' r7 \
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
* D6 L1 `# A: N' b/ s" \& jexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
) J d& \, @5 k G( _quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
. z: X! \. @% g+ [6 W* q1 c* g2 w. }0 Xin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit: Y: m8 L( c# f- F
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
4 \9 [9 U7 A( F2 E9 _more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
3 Q7 s- F: u* A# D6 ?6 Q) X. FQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
2 \% Z9 ?) M9 Z |) s- m6 hLePage Real Estate Services.
+ m+ S1 J# ]7 u) K b: c+ D: v. d) W1 f0 c9 p% t; P) S2 @0 H
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters: l( K: ^4 N9 V# E% ]
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic0 A5 B& x( r" N$ c
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
b6 o% n4 L! v' c9 C& ^7 usound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
: }$ q; S4 G8 t; |. iresidential real estate sector.4 E/ t w/ [: v' G
# V$ i5 p/ p( J1 s& i
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation6 L9 c/ |9 a4 f
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)% _+ Z9 M# [9 P
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
9 [, o& ]# ], N* q$ }' X0 O(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
- Y; D* R) O+ |7 D/ `" F1 w2 j2 B(+13.2%).
5 Y1 c0 n( S7 k: i
* _, b9 A; K" A# J& k. u. [9 O "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
: A) _, x k6 l& D" P9 Zduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
5 A% K9 r6 c+ Y) l/ N! m$ }frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
# C" T$ m) @( L6 a* {poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
- G: n1 _6 Z( N& U* npresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
9 ^& A H4 M7 M* o C"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We8 @! f# V3 V) K) Y
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy' O* }( r) Z/ s
balanced market."
. Q" W& `6 o8 s \; C
. L, u A0 \, c; ~ Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,- S$ i. d: Z0 q
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift/ R+ C! m* y5 r4 w6 P4 J( d& A
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued" B: Q# u- n0 g: z% @- P
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core& J5 _! `& d% d5 I8 f8 ~# U' e
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,+ o0 g/ }- J4 O% m3 x0 A
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
: m1 ]: U" }( a5 b( M* t' g [3 Mbreaking price appreciations.
+ C) V8 {+ z7 C
: F6 ~* U3 T9 t/ {( O Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding0 B% `" v1 W' o4 @
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the" ]+ z8 K/ A' N- i5 h7 s
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.9 P S+ P0 l; q& @, V( E* }" o' v
8 x# ^! N, Q3 h: Q1 ~# o; u In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid6 G, _2 j5 C: C) @4 s
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
" _" {+ `: l8 I& h! I9 i1 r& Nconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off* X! T: D( g+ J0 i! V
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
8 v/ X, F; Z) k; x' P4 w! m7 Z7 Y- OIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers2 q8 i8 D4 e# _! ~4 F) H
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
9 t) J: S1 t; g$ ?9 A$ a. oprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
+ l9 d0 ]) y9 a- T
) W% w2 v; ?* j0 q0 t& C. A! G While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
1 _+ [) G( y0 }+ T8 t7 g) jmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
' I- P% z' j# [financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada4 X9 B' C" @; Q1 ?. H# f' Z$ Z* F
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
o8 m. |% |6 t9 V! k! f+ i7 T9 a7 |$ J1 ?( I, ]9 d( `; K) n
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the6 i+ x7 K6 i* v8 O
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's! j1 Q% g/ L9 U
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
5 `/ O& K& W$ c9 n w" Frelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
7 H4 m+ j5 _4 j2 H. A# \4 Xaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the" e# ~: w1 k5 R. j* K
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and3 v0 Q/ c, Z' R
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
4 a& N/ e6 Y4 T) @# F# Q; F, zmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
j: O* W p* ]. c( R [% v
1 B4 S! g8 v4 Y8 b9 s! Y0 p& i" ?9 E <</ G) |# e& C; C4 X
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
( c8 i; V/ `& `3 b- \ >>
/ _4 z2 m8 o" Q' F+ d; L$ {8 T. p1 r& j5 _ L! e
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
. P9 j6 q" k7 z, UHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
* @1 {$ Q1 t/ k" o* K5 ^of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
+ z$ _8 w* t" ^( ^. Q. _looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of$ ?) W9 I/ @$ q( Y
renovations.( S. Y& Y7 M5 y# i
7 w$ z" x/ [4 q: B3 `: M5 x
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
. b% ?/ S4 a% L9 J& J; Rincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation- B( w) |4 z7 l
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
" u6 e( D4 J9 E7 h* [0 z* SSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
" b# {: V# Z. B9 X' [
' a: H, J7 P( H: u5 A7 f The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer: A5 t ?$ v# B2 j5 Y' i. P/ Y
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
4 k9 n; W# N! ^8 W8 d! f) `quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new& @5 J# X. J% v& h' I1 M5 j
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
' A- f& `0 {1 s; G+ Cto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes" E% G. M* ?. J& J( |
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
5 E2 l# p4 h0 a+ h; j2 W3 g
3 r4 b+ P7 B" @7 s- _; o9 c/ d In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
- p) b8 K4 @9 t5 f% p5 Cconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
9 [4 [$ d2 R; d6 H+ Uhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers) ^* T+ i% b. P! Z% y
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
0 j5 m4 Z& C: P0 i* Mdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
; G* _6 c0 L2 _# N7 v6 K/ Xbuyers with more options when looking for a home.+ V& ?, ^9 s, L+ M$ L7 B( F6 ?9 c
5 M+ G* _: k3 K6 J8 {- {" G
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly& } K1 X9 s/ G
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes" E- b) l6 A5 z n! z0 H4 H
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
9 G. ]) n) M& v ] w6 ]* Uas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
4 l0 T( W3 n1 \' Q" S( e! V" m; Jfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.4 H6 M P x' { C* h$ K
1 p3 _* R& m9 d# P: Q Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house: \9 h0 q$ d- B4 ]
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory v" M$ }0 q3 D) @$ z
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting( b+ C: t. c6 J+ \4 \5 q: l) x
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,) n% D% x+ E! Z7 V# `
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the: I4 M+ s3 R, Q2 U; U+ w
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
' K( g/ z4 X+ [2 F7 Fmaking a purchase.
1 f8 d$ N8 ]! ]6 @! g4 q+ O/ u9 a# x/ Y# V
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing" y' [) r: ~8 S) W% S
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong$ X ^! N' { I v
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city+ o7 F0 Q) C/ n$ U( H. e2 C
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting1 e( m" h: i1 m
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown! {* o6 A, B l/ c7 p
amenities.- Z( p+ G. z2 d( u2 B+ _' J i
: ]( f) E! U& J" Y Q& W8 ^% X
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels4 i$ B8 a2 N' K9 i4 N
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand+ U* [$ s4 t/ G6 c- M4 s1 k
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has& b- |4 F9 a+ w) z4 H* n8 q
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
7 \9 c; M8 b0 n: P. Z% u6 {! h. Edriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
6 m1 ]5 B+ @; _& H6 N! z& ^ sresidence, rather than for investment.+ R% P+ L/ S$ ~
; T+ g% i7 S7 f; g+ b# r6 t
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
' ~; |( H3 I% F4 j3 \house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted G9 \2 Y! Z7 M9 x0 q" e
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
& N# C- r& _- x( F6 P' ]confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
( q3 h4 o/ o& U4 u3 k4 B- frate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
" Q# Z) S0 [' n. E: n- r+ Z9 ]the market.
5 t$ v# d+ h5 c1 @
u1 C) }$ V. o/ D+ M6 R4 L In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through# y. ]% I0 T2 K9 N( v' G- @
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In5 s4 E9 \' W, O0 N
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
2 c( B: B+ y- g( {months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
- w3 F _7 S4 Qto the shortage of available inventory.
" l/ q9 T! W9 x* o1 i2 Y! y# p" y/ A1 f; }
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its( T, i6 ?! o8 Q6 ]
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains2 ~- ]* G" M* B
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses6 C! {3 x/ w% s9 S2 B% C) j
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
& p7 `2 ]# `+ t$ s* Y: X+ l* ^2 v/ I0 J V p
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
, v) \' \2 |! I# p& e' x [in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low/ l& E9 D. v6 c- b" M f/ k- U2 U
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
6 ]# H# g& N0 x3 y/ Gpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring0 t" W' E8 P/ j, x8 U; @7 R, n
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
s2 L' r' s( Pseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
6 O1 k0 P' I4 \6 o( U: j) }6 mbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
4 N, _+ d% u2 r5 q9 x6 M4 p1 p# `% h A" Y, z Z
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter: c' H+ _# ~3 E+ H1 D# Z
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton9 S: l7 S( J- A0 J3 n7 G5 n! H
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
8 h1 P6 ]1 o9 }6 ^5 Tmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices' r0 c# z1 w2 ]- |3 X
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
/ L. K4 _& u. _- g3 Nin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly- ?. B+ o& Z" @. p6 g
towards the end of 2006.
' f9 c" ]5 l0 O) }; d) ]" s) S! ^1 s
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of0 m% u Y6 D# o2 q# M
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
8 ^$ \) P1 }5 w+ @to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
- _2 r0 g3 o. P2 e5 Ngroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to: C! G: t6 b* ? Q- H7 P
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
, p) d; l: h- I1 xpressure on tight inventory levels.6 e) E- N* K$ g1 C) s
! X- N1 [3 W l
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic% @( `; q7 C" \+ k6 N, \+ F
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people' _# j( o; n3 E$ J) w" J% Y
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
; `# Z, K0 ]1 ^. y0 z9 s5 {while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
- W8 M7 y8 A- R- k8 Ofor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
7 G3 m' b% `7 V. d* d) w- M; q# l9 @% `3 [& S
<<. V/ ?" e. x; a6 {; k: X
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
. V( R2 U& ]" X& q4 F7 `: b( _ T) C( I( p0 K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# u+ v3 R) x$ w- ~1 Q1 i: Q+ ~: L% U* s
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
8 g. a9 l; }" [0 } -------------------------------------------------------------------------) B1 X* I3 `* z9 B; {( Y2 x
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3* ?4 e) X3 h6 K5 n, |* f. U. T" B
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
: Y8 }1 {: y0 w -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) H7 P8 S+ I( L% W# X Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000 e H" t6 D( o# ?2 J+ S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 L3 ]/ f x% S; w# } Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
8 c# v9 _) F; U$ w -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 S, e" G0 i7 b( @' E2 n Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
8 @8 R, R# V, v -------------------------------------------------------------------------- s9 z/ @ a- g* }& @! B
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -9 h4 r; z" C3 |3 p5 O4 R7 e& t9 t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* c6 w+ V) Q2 @1 w9 v
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
# @4 P7 O+ A9 j* @" n -------------------------------------------------------------------------* p9 `2 ?# ^% a! G& |- ]9 Z
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
) H( j8 b! l) Y* l- G -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 O; r8 r, @' V0 X* A. B$ E/ e j
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
1 ?2 S. _3 ~- d/ O# E, C -------------------------------------------------------------------------" J( v5 n9 h( i( H9 V
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
) E; c( @* j0 ~% @. C# a -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 W4 {7 X: `3 W) y. f# D Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766; J2 w: Q5 i% t* g5 X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, k: s' v* g1 }' F- \ {- J
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707: }( U% q1 H4 k. T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 \9 u# o- j* a
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5001 c( h; S* ]; ~7 ~7 `$ H/ V( X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, O' a4 }2 G9 I
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389% M/ A+ c5 o- B M$ p5 s( R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 \. X; x% ]4 L5 c9 B
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
, \* f! {* l4 f3 D -------------------------------------------------------------------------: c8 b" l7 b% v* J& m
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500, c7 O \& v. U1 d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 w' e2 Y( {- z4 v: \5 `4 w Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
, b# B$ b" | }4 s/ h9 b -------------------------------------------------------------------------; m! z* {! H/ Y& `: H4 a' h
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
+ A% i% c' E. f: m: Z" ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ?: W6 Y) L1 [ w: I; y% W: {5 j, r& d! ]: `) u/ f) d4 i+ W
-------------------------------------------------------------' b* r) C8 U8 T. s6 L: F& @
Standard Condominium
1 e4 k; S! ^( O -------------------------------------------------------------
+ m" ^( {3 \- S 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo5 n0 M3 M8 ?2 m& C* q( K
Market % Change Average Average % Change* @- t/ h6 Q3 B, O. U7 V9 t5 C9 K1 ~
-------------------------------------------------------------* Q. v( @ t0 b( \
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
# ~ P+ {8 t( U6 y+ Z -------------------------------------------------------------3 b6 e/ K D7 K- v
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%5 C' D0 `1 ?# E& o+ b8 h3 y5 F
-------------------------------------------------------------
( o- }, m6 T% W. }0 p1 P Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
. s% {: h. w3 o1 ~" ?: k: B -------------------------------------------------------------( ^+ R7 B3 l4 a7 ~2 }8 s, e
Saint John N/A - - N/A" t+ C6 H6 J; f" A2 ^/ Q0 Z
-------------------------------------------------------------8 l- h- Y+ s/ _- c
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
- M8 i4 L5 f5 _ J5 n- r -------------------------------------------------------------
, X, t$ b; \7 ?) B1 m. L. k Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%9 ^2 y0 O `5 s% {' t
-------------------------------------------------------------" t3 l4 t/ Y$ z4 Q8 U
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8% N2 C* |% v% f' S [
-------------------------------------------------------------
" M. t' l9 C$ x Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
; k/ V2 M* y8 w" z" E+ z -------------------------------------------------------------" ^7 t7 \, ]5 x H
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%5 v- P/ d" h7 o4 y( K5 o7 X
-------------------------------------------------------------1 ?* e1 @$ W* V) R
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
0 J) K9 @* ?3 @/ b& D3 G1 g; {7 Q% Y -------------------------------------------------------------
7 O1 y8 p) [$ ~& z7 _ Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%7 O6 F0 _0 Y# \/ m: C+ Z; L
-------------------------------------------------------------0 }$ _2 r0 }) D- y
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%5 K, v0 X: |5 c3 R# u" v7 B" d2 s
-------------------------------------------------------------! g' s/ @- d' [3 h3 O3 ~
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
% W$ V% P( a/ ^$ t2 v7 J -------------------------------------------------------------
; p3 h- s# i, B# O, y: }6 E! H# k Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%7 i) ?0 w, ^5 d6 {/ ]5 o) F
-------------------------------------------------------------9 v6 L: O5 B b- ?! z1 C! p7 V
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
+ [2 |) S* ^% @' t -------------------------------------------------------------
* X( M* i6 m9 {- k National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
9 U! b; O& w( H$ A -------------------------------------------------------------
; Q& F$ s- S% Q9 ^ >>
6 l2 [" Q Y) y2 W0 w }/ @( e& \( }: N; L9 A
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined" l( r+ m/ ^& U
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint- Z2 a' N+ | |/ l) A/ X& q
John and Victoria.) ^* G/ B5 O" ?% X6 |6 j
* s; x' E" k. }" ^8 { The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most, V& K' x% e* h0 K J$ ~3 k% w
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
: @. w+ D8 }9 w# Ahousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
1 k$ ^! l) H1 M; ^. wreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
+ D D+ B! l% B: R6 O ^trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
4 O L0 d# e. i$ o/ {across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is, B9 m/ p. q% z% |+ y
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
' O* i# D% p9 M5 F8 t' }" ffigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable: c7 B9 b/ h# i8 ^, v5 n4 f
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on1 }9 O- |! \4 Q. C0 s$ A
November 15, 2006.
$ p) J7 \' [' U' u; | c4 a* @ Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
% W; v; b* Z5 k, }3 Z3 v& B. x) Yfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge1 U9 p. W* i2 U2 o5 d
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is" b) M- b- ^* `3 R' o; X( Q7 B) D
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|