 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable + _0 Y- }5 q+ U
8 M1 k/ d& J% R4 c8 a- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -) E. h5 Q, ^5 m9 p$ O4 ] M
4 G! K' b0 ~. Z3 ]7 f3 L7 a
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
/ _5 Q7 W" w0 n7 sexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third" ^$ F6 E4 z; K" X/ q8 P @
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
! ]7 q$ k0 F# H2 K4 p( X" Kin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
' I; p; P; D+ V9 O3 eprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
6 P3 j/ _! [; F* ^more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,- C9 H2 r, i* A
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal* a/ a$ Q7 i) u9 n
LePage Real Estate Services.' A2 ?6 O; ?/ Z1 [
+ F: B: _8 b2 V8 B Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
7 D/ J$ Z' b0 x* y: N; l/ i' G) [are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic! z) G& w5 u" B+ J
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
9 s& @3 {5 G. t( b3 Y& u7 ~- p1 Dsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
Z; C: @* b& sresidential real estate sector.
/ E P8 m: S) P9 b* d) g. R; x3 f8 }' ?3 M. m& e' t
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
! j1 [6 J9 a7 U6 @5 ^' uoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)) y- N* z! Q: c: s% A1 I
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
# S4 s r2 a6 B: M/ I(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
% t" X) k6 Z* N6 _(+13.2%).
& c3 Z1 ^* S' z( Z4 e% ?4 |6 B2 q4 Q9 e9 m7 |
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth2 p1 u& N7 ?* r8 M$ l1 r
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
. B+ B0 z1 b+ f4 x9 |. X1 _frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are6 ~- k g6 {. r, F& ~
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
) W7 a O! d9 P: R9 T% z+ fpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
q2 m& ~0 I9 n+ X. t* V# E"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
# M) D; I. a$ X8 r' e {7 b' bwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
. h7 P z* S$ B# u" q# X3 @, gbalanced market."5 E7 T& F& @5 x: g( v9 @! b
8 e+ f/ @* S4 B; T Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,6 e) c5 ~; m% Z+ {
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
- |* Z" P- q+ Pto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued6 p0 V3 Q, u5 T, `/ B T% P
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core6 h" t) D7 f% u; J4 p
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,+ ^9 W6 U- n- u" S& d/ `. o& Z: a
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record) U+ E- B7 q8 o) U
breaking price appreciations.
! a. T$ r8 }$ B: e h3 H
5 J4 a+ n% i+ r3 E% x4 @3 f Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
( W1 P8 E l5 `economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
* f. T' S. ]! x* Z1 n& |largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.* ]) j# k4 }1 W
; \' K+ m* J2 U& b7 X' ~ In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid+ W* _) q$ e1 v) ^% B' [2 Q
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
" S" L& F* v! F* n5 zconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off3 ?; d5 }* v/ y
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
+ x+ p4 U7 M* P* Z" yIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers, v- |$ [- B; c! H
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of& S* }1 e/ f: [% X* S1 }" |
price appreciation when compared with 2005.' J" l+ g" F7 H! i/ u8 V
+ X8 @/ Z& [6 t/ Q0 x0 L1 Z While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing Q9 g8 Y1 S, D% q( ~3 V+ T
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
" P" E: N8 A- n2 n' Wfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada5 a0 n1 t4 |: ]7 h: [
are markedly different than those found in the United States.& R' D3 ~) E7 r4 I7 p
' {, Q# w" h( N4 L1 x! O5 E: b
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the" y! B F1 D7 U! s! V: N
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
6 Y; d+ U' \: s: j2 T/ \( ]favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the# B0 m( k! K( H0 E. [3 }8 [1 D6 k
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general" b/ m u& V s0 i$ x! m: C. i
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the6 F& a* Q: g! ]9 `+ @
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
# o. u+ G( t/ E! oaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization3 J+ H( K8 E, T7 T
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
% W, P- a y9 t+ @1 q" ?
6 Y7 a7 }; k5 Q5 a) T <<
- L% \1 [) s# A2 i REGIONAL SUMMARIES
, F u- A8 E8 F: d/ d. Z >>
8 s+ I: v$ W. T
) b7 K1 ?' U* i2 Z Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
, P; ]* L1 g4 ]- ~$ \2 q, kHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate1 s5 C4 ^* [$ R, H
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time3 h1 k0 c- R6 K. c' v$ L
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of3 @- T7 Y) P: N# C ^
renovations.
5 e9 A* i& Q) r2 Q# d9 p" r7 x# v; q m3 p& H `
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
8 |* g; ~1 v( M2 H1 w3 `( Xincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation1 f: l! S; d; o+ A0 \# V1 T$ s
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and( R0 h# a) j5 c4 Q% \- T; y6 D/ v
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.2 {9 r0 ^ l4 ]! R% X. h
# ~8 C2 D e. d5 G) Z7 d5 ^
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
1 K1 M3 [, Q8 p8 i( k6 P3 tslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the f4 p* o9 c6 T8 D* e/ E3 j7 k
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new1 z6 Z+ H1 t5 ^+ B
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
8 V" P5 K) p% ]to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
+ q% e; W! u8 t+ @: Q; n% K4 w. I: land are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
# a! L0 |5 @0 l7 f; ^" b
) a8 x' V# [- l6 }1 e$ Q* h In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
* _/ Y$ L$ I% T& Cconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
3 p. G8 W8 U Y9 S+ u p$ yhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers" O, e& w% C& K
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
5 Y) E$ Y! j$ odollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing' D& f# t/ G6 I# x
buyers with more options when looking for a home./ |6 }3 D2 D4 S
; P7 r" c4 T- Z7 x$ e! g j0 e
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly4 {, Y, _ W7 d9 G$ |. u3 m
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
2 D! ~7 b# X- @7 ]- fpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,9 j9 O9 t9 A) u1 E. n' `, M, \
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last' }/ K3 e( w% k, K! C5 O
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.. q1 O4 |6 v1 [9 c% c
7 i- \1 c, W ~0 \( A h6 ]7 t9 ~ Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house- P6 T4 ? z& I, b" a) Q
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory6 u7 K& Y5 c# p1 A' W
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
+ I0 _8 y& H* D, O1 ~first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
+ H9 ]: R$ n% G7 H( Wwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the: Y6 C; g5 y* T0 n' [6 \
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before; R2 [! X- w- p, D" R' n! f
making a purchase.
U! T6 Q4 `# c# X1 G) q: H# V4 T$ ^+ L8 `5 H
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing0 H: l) Y) k/ W7 p) b! @. T, m; x) p' n
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong6 W" }$ K9 M) x3 ?& u- h# A
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
/ i1 C p' K2 k# ]centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
l# U( q! h/ j% q$ c3 Cattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
! o/ Q1 i* m# ~amenities.
0 E. j) u7 o$ [2 c, z0 @& v9 r
2 d9 Z$ `- w. p+ m( T The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
8 j% C) t B. D/ Q3 M% v+ fthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
, w$ @3 @4 ` B; I6 bacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has4 n( C; E& o2 Y
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
! h9 B% E, o# I& z/ qdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle3 h' I4 w4 c- _: y! J
residence, rather than for investment.' s* L% K% m- n) |; w
3 ]) @9 r7 f6 g0 b The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
7 `. m8 @1 M4 `: `house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
! o) k+ D, x) k+ s! Nin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer6 @1 I1 `0 `5 m/ N7 ^, x) _, x1 A! D
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
! J7 q @; ` t6 ?2 Nrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
6 ^: x9 P( G& @8 ~8 m# t% B5 `the market.) B4 m8 c! W/ f, q
+ b. l1 J; L& g+ p! N3 A' w In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through* w8 I9 H' E. F; T& j3 H8 w0 z
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In2 s4 E5 S) o% Q$ x
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring) E! o3 ]0 t0 ^/ h
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due# Q/ U) M2 \% n1 Y. R% {
to the shortage of available inventory.
% X5 i" Q6 n. W+ }. ?. q
, E/ B) W U; k+ ?- i! B( w9 D Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its0 _7 j- y7 ^# |2 H4 j* @
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains' c: \, o6 b& U8 Q$ U! [
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses. L# e8 M1 Y5 `# x
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
* c7 U/ q) I4 h6 q3 l% G) ^
) D" t0 l6 y% [& A5 B# {% f+ c Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
" a. }7 o9 @ `4 ein the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low4 i% z9 ~% c- P( f) C" q
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
) i9 ~" M: h' W% r5 {pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring+ ?9 y" @% J: f" T p$ ?
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer5 \, ~0 z, ]0 B- ]. ?* ~
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as# ^1 C1 ?% F- L' C2 n" p
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
9 E4 |- ^: q7 z3 \8 o
. [2 B& C, v( X" t* ] Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter: B/ @+ S7 J' Z0 ~$ D
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton8 a/ b( S) O6 ~8 i# p5 f8 R
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
% X4 Z% @0 c0 \maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
7 l1 v& }! V5 _) d1 z7 o7 S Kincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
& [1 R L) m" R% h3 iin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
9 N' j7 N6 T$ B! ]) ^" Ftowards the end of 2006.
6 P h+ @! {- c3 x M& R- c7 c! q1 ]9 }+ G
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of0 \) }9 _, _6 j2 K6 R0 K+ k" \7 F
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
) a% ?- S( {8 i- z! Wto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse9 e- E2 ~3 m& b" g
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to7 ]1 p. f+ u. \
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
8 f _* P0 J$ y" `' Xpressure on tight inventory levels.
4 K) c+ G, ~7 P& Z3 f# ~( D# u3 R* |2 O, I8 ^" H
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic' V5 t( a6 r+ e& l+ \
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
1 @* [$ h+ s: @" e: a& S4 r" hinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;! \) d2 z1 j8 a
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
; r4 l8 ?: ]5 q8 ~! y2 `for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.) m; X7 o( C2 n) \3 \. D
( Q, |# j0 C3 m% c. l* ?; Q
<</ m$ y9 d& i7 t
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
# O4 I( R- x& i ?) e7 K2 @" y* ]1 e% y0 O) P- A8 Z- M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# g3 j. |2 Q* O Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
3 {! d9 k# n/ f0 ~8 P* ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 q, K& N% `& s( `& [ 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
/ b6 J5 D& Y! e& K# g Market Average Average % Change Average Average* s" J! B% r0 I% D% e) M, y3 w% W. F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 a* |8 d T# V# s& [/ o Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0001 I: K7 B' g4 q7 H( Y) g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 n9 a# o6 C; s" f" U0 y0 A! B& A Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
1 r6 v: W! e) @- E% l) s -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ m; t# g: y5 d2 q9 Z* g! A5 z5 l
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0004 b! D; ~- R, Y1 b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( H* f& Z+ Y. q* C, ~ Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
6 o {2 \' ], B- z# j -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: }6 Q# Z8 a u) i+ X z# D St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333; t# L( |; Z6 o6 F% J' ^/ S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ S8 W& \( y D0 M Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5839 Y1 P* W0 W1 J1 R( ^; u& ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; B( N1 l9 ? x/ q Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185& D* O5 |8 A) M2 x3 y: x: b3 a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! `! j4 h$ C+ m# T& \; \ Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
5 \; |; o3 ^! ^- V -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! K# [$ r' y) R0 l% p7 J Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766! w5 A; ~' P: K# T8 c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: K5 ~$ X& s+ _9 L) s% l4 m Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707: X0 G! \! C& `- \% A! T$ H6 c+ f% Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) ?8 G5 u( B/ P# B% q: C; G/ C
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
4 J4 n) P6 a+ z& @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ x; l0 {2 l4 G, b) v
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
$ V/ A/ L2 h/ `; c2 o9 }+ a -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' A% j7 ~2 w0 n5 W: i Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7145 x) R! f1 n: W& D5 l3 Q( C1 A; L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ G8 t! I5 k% k' a0 }: r8 K( {' k
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
H6 ^, L( R" K' K. a/ w# J! n$ h -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 ]4 n% O8 i9 a$ I- S7 j H
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000# T/ m: F) _' P* @. F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& `- j. P* q( c# d+ D+ V
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
* l( L% J( t4 ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------# x# j% \/ j+ ^, u
+ k$ n2 B% G7 s
-------------------------------------------------------------1 i: y* X8 {, ~2 q
Standard Condominium# d0 Z; N* }: b2 \
-------------------------------------------------------------' y$ j. C: w0 h. z9 C. a
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo+ f- b/ |: \# D# v5 G
Market % Change Average Average % Change
7 \' |& _+ i" V7 u# E& E% P -------------------------------------------------------------' W# R3 `# |7 A% }
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%: Y$ K/ D2 o3 j: R; l+ V& i" i
-------------------------------------------------------------! q% P( b+ P! r* ?7 t
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
2 N! C. \% ~ Y- @ -------------------------------------------------------------; C/ A1 e1 Y7 w% C
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
% u s" J( s$ o# Z/ e# g- H -------------------------------------------------------------
7 B% l. R* k' R5 }3 d# } Saint John N/A - - N/A- E$ @. A( o1 m- u( F( ^+ e! j# B9 ^
-------------------------------------------------------------( ~6 c1 P/ R/ s$ ^9 t
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
0 J" V" r/ i9 ^: m% a6 V -------------------------------------------------------------9 u8 i4 E8 [; ?% _% {4 p
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%9 e& A7 Q7 Y! Q! V; ^* a
-------------------------------------------------------------
% ]6 p3 W4 H8 I8 \2 n y Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%/ M' }& l2 n' m4 r: P
-------------------------------------------------------------
b2 p1 M# R! G. O# ?7 k; P# d: K/ @ Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
" y7 G% x# i- ?* U C3 f) v -------------------------------------------------------------
# H, j6 M. y. ?- x4 y" [ Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%; E7 i4 a }3 f( s; C4 s+ \
-------------------------------------------------------------( o9 P) B& [" P3 ?: B
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
1 n* e2 G+ B8 J2 {; M8 M -------------------------------------------------------------; a: B. }5 ?0 H3 b t
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
, P$ C6 t: H- v# P/ M -------------------------------------------------------------# J& K+ _# Y2 Y. y' D5 n6 g! W: Y l
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
2 Y7 i$ ]6 q x' d" N( N2 P( c/ j -------------------------------------------------------------* s3 w. M/ V7 G/ s u5 S+ s
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
; Y0 b, A0 l2 h, I8 _: q/ x -------------------------------------------------------------+ z3 | @* Z! J$ h
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
) n" h3 G3 @6 P% {7 _5 O -------------------------------------------------------------
. R& K; e; x V. b Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%$ o, s+ h* F } B @
-------------------------------------------------------------( A0 w' q/ S* T2 ]) C7 b8 f
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%5 H `: j* m- s# y& B' i
-------------------------------------------------------------
; L& q+ C9 D2 ~. K >>
; ]6 i4 t/ j+ n+ h1 s/ \) {7 t& V- d9 X3 H- R
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined4 `0 \5 J4 U5 A9 F
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint$ ?/ g: u6 _3 ^1 L5 b
John and Victoria.$ o" j" o' M# O! I+ ^+ O4 G
4 V& W0 V2 v# I U! U
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most" R- Y" d: C$ B7 E0 t
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of7 G2 N5 K' @; B- p4 |* P8 d
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release. E( z: M% ~$ B q3 v% |
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
- D" \# ]7 [1 J: c; u" z: Gtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
: d3 H$ I" Q7 h1 r- qacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
0 e. w% B4 }$ M0 t" p5 `available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current x: n1 G% B4 N& z4 n' c6 M l
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
! y2 H' y; B5 y* I9 cversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
5 \4 i. i3 [0 i- m0 r4 BNovember 15, 2006.. ^% Y# D F6 G d
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
9 o0 W) s$ k8 @2 jfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge( c! B5 _, C5 E0 J5 z4 E
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
2 [0 g7 K7 Y5 G9 `; favailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|