埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2094|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable * h9 j& j- T# u4 _9 `1 m

1 D+ Q, D- M  v* Y" c  H) v- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
- l& g3 H4 g) K5 I
: L) C5 o9 E5 z1 |    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market: x1 w) O# V. K2 k2 a9 G* ?
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
( n5 {5 Y2 W! T2 N2 ^  [$ g, tquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic( w( I  J+ T& `+ e* J0 H
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit- C( V8 l( p) V/ g6 t) D
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and; U, W- o* g, V
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,7 M/ t: A9 ^7 B' w
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal7 X9 g% O6 [, w9 _" C
LePage Real Estate Services.
& b' E. @1 B. e; ?& S+ u: T; l, y4 ?9 T; U# _
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters6 S9 Z0 h3 p, B" f# k/ q
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic. \2 q' k9 O! U% u. r' J: a
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and2 |& a0 b0 A" D8 z
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
+ m5 G) Y' D6 G0 F& Fresidential real estate sector.
: Z3 Q1 X4 v8 W/ p% ^5 s" v$ c8 F' w, p
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
; A; R0 b5 n: h5 J  \! R& Yoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
1 G$ F& X+ B9 \6 U- G$ syear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5625 L/ w: u+ Z- f# n" Y6 l
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380+ F3 G' m; t7 Q! C4 P( N
(+13.2%).
- ]9 y2 i; w& _# H
# ?! Y$ x/ A1 E7 @4 ^    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth1 U( H* n3 _/ ]6 C
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
. m+ h7 W% w/ Q5 Jfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
4 P  U4 K6 S6 Q- k+ q: q; _! |4 Kpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,& k  v/ H5 a9 L' ?# S6 }
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
$ H, v/ e% L* ^+ Z- v5 T0 F"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We- I. b0 v9 i' q% z# P" _
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
  f5 Q5 A( R! I2 _, y' M2 r0 J3 Vbalanced market.", r* l: ~# G6 t8 `$ W- i
- q3 I& l  t5 S1 |
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
8 L' J5 b1 I: `2 s- B7 qconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift% D1 j$ i/ @& T- s
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued5 d8 y$ t  C6 S" \! ]  v$ d
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core6 r: s% B- Q4 {/ Q; p5 h
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
7 z+ m+ _3 r2 x/ gmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record  W! A, q4 n9 N9 f2 W
breaking price appreciations.
' j- z. _$ i9 T3 a1 R2 U' x  ?' O7 g. J
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
" k5 N: J9 r1 K" n' p! Beconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
) o7 }* ?" P: I- Y, l" f/ Vlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.* g# |: Z- F, s6 f% _2 s
5 V9 `4 M) ^  W# a
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
  t) x, d& ^3 `2 @economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer0 E; g+ x9 Z2 S7 t2 W
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
- z: J" U( k6 e6 X" jslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
3 C/ `; f4 k4 q6 nIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers5 z. z: K; @  s# F2 ]8 @
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
' Y5 ?3 b8 N3 R2 H  k$ Yprice appreciation when compared with 2005.4 y$ f7 C. h1 f( }: N; u; u9 y

# x! X* t2 g, b, c    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing/ ?' D& H$ k& x! F% e, ^
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
: a  G0 b9 B+ g/ lfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
/ ~, b! z' o2 L0 W) I/ _2 H  `are markedly different than those found in the United States.% }, t+ T6 p( ^( C8 J

* T' c+ b, ^7 N# ]  [    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
. y7 u3 U3 `# K. z1 w4 x4 AAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
( _) L0 k: Z  g* Z0 G$ p6 wfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the2 c/ r$ z0 C7 o4 B/ k! W1 K6 e
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general7 x* j, @5 W+ L. I
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the/ k/ A- o* y+ q% b- S% g
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
. ^, l2 e& j7 w  b' Jaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
  `4 {6 Q6 R" |9 }mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."; T! v3 h- P. i  h9 `7 x3 ?- Z

1 L5 k6 E) k' {) ^    <<
( v- f9 t: [% r' p/ l: h                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
* n3 G% j5 v# }" D7 o- ^    >>3 ?) U  @1 G, `9 @1 G, z
- b. Y; @0 V4 Y  C0 H
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in* M; u) b: h4 {/ \' n) I
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
7 ?9 t2 V" P) c  n0 K6 Cof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time4 U7 k( ?+ ^3 q- Z
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of! E  f( ?! c9 s
renovations.
, v" S7 j6 \1 j  ]7 D* S, V3 _; v( h$ l9 l% {4 Y# R
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight& d3 i6 ^- r0 l5 b; U' K+ q
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation5 B7 l3 {. g. h( w/ J$ D
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
) l* v7 Y7 q; {* _September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
9 D6 _2 I8 l# y! [1 w+ k, z5 Z! }
1 M7 A1 a+ R2 _' m+ V* e4 F    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer) q* n9 q  R2 L# p
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the( D! D  {2 W( w" S
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new; {% }  b4 c' K2 _& |8 u
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores* [) A4 j: k2 @
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes$ ~9 s; r+ F5 q; p. `, |2 e
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
; Q" V7 l( X$ F; g  O
! z  [! f- v  g3 u    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
0 s$ e+ S" y$ i: a$ T8 lconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their) V* M3 X7 d0 J) J
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
. `5 U  R$ K& }/ `: ]* O+ d( Pwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
! }7 `( t& ]. h+ c! udollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing% U' J! N4 E* c2 I
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
$ @$ {3 _+ A% I! J/ u0 v- n
3 `" Q( `8 L) r- l: v    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly/ R7 c8 x/ E* w/ H. K+ ]! R6 F
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes; w' K) Z1 n3 a) b& O5 x
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,: c) E/ b* R$ ?+ e0 p5 V1 X
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
4 Z1 Z' X: ~9 n# h6 T* r4 J+ v1 Afew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
4 X( ^7 {) }2 s
8 o* P# w# A0 d    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house0 A' W" j: G3 P' A9 W
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory7 z* I1 c4 N$ |- y; {
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
; w5 F; z2 X! z* B- g8 Ffirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,. |% r/ y- R. S
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the6 G6 e, A* U$ k! p/ M' y
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before, i: G# i6 p* f0 O! m
making a purchase.- p  a* [. N5 X0 l
5 L" e/ G/ H7 @* B4 C/ Q% X* h
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
8 k% L8 H' y, K' O- v2 {7 kmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
0 j2 @9 b1 {  t4 bconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
1 a0 g) _! _. Pcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting/ p- K/ D5 _/ G  S! q* k
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
6 u7 c- J+ s, D( I) Y: o( Z4 Ramenities.+ |7 D9 p5 c) H4 w4 Z! m; f
& ^' a# `& E' h
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
& H- f$ }  i, G% r8 m  I- Bthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
1 @6 g% x; g3 ]6 e. T' i2 }5 F, Hacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has* U' ^' \) d* }# G: @
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
# H* a! Z7 N/ M4 Ldriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
* w3 H/ a/ @& V( F( _/ @, F: Xresidence, rather than for investment.! x; a0 F. h( k( T; I

4 |, R" ~! `0 O% v    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
! \1 T6 @) a8 j4 b% p, k$ Z9 S* zhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted% d+ j1 J& o0 E( L" M
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer( j7 y- r! [. c; P& h5 M& B, y, V, s
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
% H& v- k( n9 W; d( r. m) L2 A  jrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter5 A  _$ h2 Q8 r0 B" d& X) r
the market.  r: q  O  m/ i( Y! ]; A  _
: T1 P  G+ Z9 y, ~$ j7 o; V
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
+ l( M$ S+ v/ r5 b2 P+ PJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In0 D8 y% f+ k, T* K9 M* ]
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring* J  \; H5 S9 n2 u; y
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
0 p0 ~7 p, \, U8 M& ?5 O, hto the shortage of available inventory.; F/ x( k! ]7 [: i
4 z. @( r- {' O9 b( n5 S7 G( a9 {
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
. x1 \1 `* Y  |# _- K8 J: ^9 i% _momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains0 P+ K3 [7 S1 h) D& q! b  T
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses. K4 J9 M9 r' F; b' U
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.  H1 q8 j- o; q

( G$ Q7 V6 F! D. k4 }1 M$ T    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
* H1 i, J! o7 G$ A( u3 {9 v) Nin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low1 v4 G: r" }; p* X$ u& N3 Q' K
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
0 I& Z6 {9 M: c8 Ypressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
! H  s8 U' O. a+ w  g5 ^8 D3 E2 oprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
) k, b/ A. ?! G! h% k  D0 _season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as' n. `9 Q6 X* b$ _5 @" Z8 ]
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
4 j- V: b# d* r$ D! |8 ^
% B/ W% ?$ F' n+ w8 h
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter7 t0 P. ]6 v, d# L
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton) j1 G9 h* {1 I# O  y
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
) P6 x& c+ j, {maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices' h0 S( p1 I$ l/ m- n
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
! A7 G1 b  K' J; L) c8 Ein the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
- x' Q; |5 O8 d9 X+ j# Ltowards the end of 2006.
   
8 z5 y8 k1 |' [; K9 q6 r" v; }# h$ v! N2 j* ^
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of! J# j7 w: m& T+ W  u2 [, x$ x4 T, Z8 S
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
# O3 ^5 e* [: o& g& g7 Uto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse: M) ~- F$ h/ _, S7 g6 p
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
- {. S- J' Q9 Z1 P1 |foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
  F3 I" s% O  g6 Y6 N. z6 Ppressure on tight inventory levels.
% H9 l2 h9 \2 M( D$ `: k
; M5 o# e* F2 d6 N+ ?; D* `    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
& o3 k" u: }: x: ?/ g* X  Mfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
; l- K& O2 z+ i. g2 a  v5 zinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
9 {% ~8 n3 ^# z, l" Twhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching. S, {5 `4 }' O0 c0 i: _
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
0 m8 v* e0 ^5 h1 e9 \  u* u2 Q, M3 v6 ]0 v; M5 T. J! y
    <<" b9 z9 m4 k$ ?; ~& W$ H4 |, G: U
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006# E, G* Q& z% v/ x: l, b
7 T! X$ m6 I+ V% h  y$ p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' n7 C! r2 U5 N' p* I0 L8 ]. w
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey5 }1 B* ?7 N8 k- W; O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  j: E% w9 K: n2 [' Q; A                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q37 t/ q5 n5 ~0 q8 x
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
) s$ H  y( P# [2 x    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 K# X( w9 s# J1 h$ e3 p' t4 o  Z
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0007 K+ z: C# W8 r- s. I6 {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* l2 F, i+ V8 }' v  Z" M    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0009 [4 O* N7 }6 ?3 z5 e) ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% j, N2 J3 I1 X9 N2 l0 S
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
1 n+ k7 Q. y" D& M5 L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* C. m8 c+ p4 }; C) d1 N3 K4 H    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
9 m/ g& E5 D  j) u    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% Z' \4 v3 A) \4 o& m6 n
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3338 i1 P* l' G% B
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 q& ]9 t4 Y+ p3 x: m% S* l" a
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
8 W- L& H2 Q! b1 M    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( ?! T( }! x" e7 ?; Q& e0 F7 u    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1856 I) Z0 [# P* S3 {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 c/ x5 u9 p1 h0 M9 s2 @" ]    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
4 f' k) ~/ n% c/ Y- Q* T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 E3 U9 Q" l1 _1 w4 Y( x
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
& B  X7 w. c6 `% `. \7 f% h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 {, G( X* k% j" @9 W9 D4 X+ A3 d    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707! o/ V; m, T' F4 q, v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 G8 ?! ~6 c0 q  A- _1 q, {
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500% f2 s' ^' i( k4 u
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 w" R, p: l7 s3 s2 W5 X+ q
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
5 B4 _! V2 a$ t& O* J1 J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ W5 B+ T8 O! V+ L    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
, D9 p7 O6 t* T# K3 T# m, h$ }    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 |/ ~& ]+ u, F5 S$ |1 m! P    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5004 {% @; p- d6 i2 n- v  j6 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# l4 x5 R' u" ?) |% E' Y    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
, z- Z) d) l* E. W, ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% X+ ]5 b# L1 N$ i
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860& `! `1 F% m- R& F$ k% v1 _
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* |: r( [6 X! ?. v7 s2 _8 U+ s! S
% \" e5 p* k/ x0 T5 z& o    -------------------------------------------------------------* R' T( |- E; ^7 E
                               Standard Condominium0 X$ l; K4 V: {3 K, Z- x2 W7 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( J) J/ t6 b, s                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo6 r& ?5 b0 `0 a. U, ^& T& }
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
! G* Y& F' ?, C3 r1 u    -------------------------------------------------------------
' B& W5 ]" z5 w& j5 ?    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
: G9 y% z  g2 E8 S, }8 B    -------------------------------------------------------------  \2 f3 t, `! W! \! o
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
& n& o1 O3 c  x0 P6 O4 T    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 [1 f9 F: N* S( B    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A9 E: [% M1 z* C8 M5 Q6 W0 x3 I
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 }% R/ g: O7 ~
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
# O  Y) X/ i# v2 t1 R3 z    -------------------------------------------------------------, G) T  h" ]& C% m; ^# |
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
) r7 R. E! O" W; M* W    -------------------------------------------------------------
; W, t+ g5 e6 F" ^2 i    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
2 i9 C  s# |7 }    -------------------------------------------------------------
, r: P4 K4 n/ n    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
+ r# a$ d) G2 Q: t    -------------------------------------------------------------) v1 T6 j8 O9 ^+ I) S1 c8 d% m
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%* i9 b* C. ?; n: a
    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ y# j+ ?- f0 p" l% G' g& l    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
( D! \9 ]! \9 U$ n! C7 b3 F4 l    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ P2 Q6 _  u6 Q: G2 N# w    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
' U; N+ @, G  |3 n/ I    -------------------------------------------------------------8 i' x7 e. ~; O8 _- I. ?! M& H
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%- P5 r3 W2 |) G, O- z0 s
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 n# r9 q" F  n( i3 ^    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
8 b0 P& G% \0 e3 Z    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 x" L/ `" e! y" e5 ^# W0 U    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
2 j+ _- x+ ^( v% O) h% H2 k    -------------------------------------------------------------
! E$ q) B+ y" X! R    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%7 c# e5 W+ @" t
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  d1 U' Y: `4 m8 h$ m    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
5 t( G# Q  ]( R" x( f" q1 ^& f7 R    -------------------------------------------------------------
: U; M; D+ B) k' `& G$ ]    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
# D+ R! }* A7 I" N! K4 o    -------------------------------------------------------------
: C" t8 V: ^3 z& }$ P- z6 z/ F9 [    >>' E2 ?) F* W6 E2 v4 Q6 E, N' K

6 h; Q4 u" _5 |    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
" X: p" l& U; k: Jin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint9 a6 _. W+ t) U2 h
John and Victoria.
( h4 y( O9 n" e& X! t9 p2 n6 U& ^3 G
' [9 m* t( o$ P, g+ G' V4 [    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
# k% ^+ m4 ]4 t8 A+ f. a- s% rcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of% Y0 o: C  h- W/ F+ `2 c
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
  ~) h7 ]# `; s$ H. g1 jreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
5 J7 J: Q. }. M9 \trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
& c6 }5 A3 y& R; M- x. }: c6 Kacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
, `8 \1 W5 `6 f; Gavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current5 Z! @7 k( C- n: C+ V4 T
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
0 W! E0 g- S& {4 n; e5 Y7 H+ wversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
0 L. }5 M- I8 D( C, |9 aNovember 15, 2006.
2 c* i5 ^; U; j% i4 z    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of( d+ \" L9 B# ]5 D3 x* p
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge' q& n& n5 z$ r8 d
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
7 D' Y6 q' M8 h- W# l& cavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-22 15:56 , Processed in 0.115300 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表