 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ' a }: z+ n7 A7 H' m. O; h+ i Z
6 f! e3 z5 W ]' t7 E- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -! g7 I& B8 P, E# W0 v
( Q1 u& i6 w/ S/ Y TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market* O3 r7 O8 h H7 z4 S
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
9 t+ {( Z% _' n7 d# r9 w' ^quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
7 V' v. _; r- j% E; {in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit, g- H; b4 z0 S# [- p7 L
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
; F* v2 ^7 g! Z# q* M- Smore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
x9 u/ t1 R% c! I, Z; r9 m, N: PQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal" y9 G: E% W2 G3 k# J, P
LePage Real Estate Services.
4 i# g" o8 j2 q4 |6 h0 Y6 u) C4 s* M% ] G P8 n/ H. M# o* c# [
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
, k" e9 K/ ~' D5 N% _8 Y Nare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic. \. K* v5 [( X: [6 [; T7 h
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
9 k3 C' v% [: b: |9 fsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the. G0 Q Y3 w! N( z @
residential real estate sector.
- I4 h5 Q; C. @5 Y+ S6 l! ?2 n( V$ R# H8 N; W' U: N, H& V) s
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation, y8 r" h9 L; x3 Z' F% a
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
4 b* Q. l& K* ?: R% qyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562- l; o/ B2 S& w K5 c! N' }
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
* N) t9 T' T0 c(+13.2%).
- s( d" T* V: ^5 x& N8 }
& _( l0 g. o( { M. ~5 S "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth# `/ |4 N! T. @! ^) Q
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
* X( x3 h$ K8 h2 m; B7 C+ jfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
2 t, X& y8 I1 Q2 g% ~poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
( ~& ^& c5 W. Y+ W# ]% n; J+ npresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
1 E) ]8 m# R# m"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We3 W. \# Z6 u2 f8 L3 |
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
9 |* @6 b- S& V# M4 zbalanced market."
, k! p) W: A. }# n3 Q
5 _* y9 B' Z" ~- Q0 W3 X Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,3 A! v0 \9 K! H8 {$ m' M
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
& B: m! v8 m* x1 r, ^! E8 ~; h" Z- mto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued! |# F/ M9 I. v: n U
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core3 ^5 p" ?& z P# I5 F% ?2 {
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,. R5 I1 v( F( y6 K
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
# A! s7 M- }, Y( _breaking price appreciations.9 v. W7 Z3 Z. X" V0 C! x
! E( j$ c' \, W& S
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding8 j5 p" W7 e) b( W8 t
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
& x' X6 ?9 b t x0 j: y5 Mlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
4 k$ R/ L% ?. N. [9 T# A* h2 L+ U
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid( v% Q9 {8 e& ~) _9 E; u
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer' R0 Q: S0 B, X7 `
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
# M- Y/ f9 M7 K. |$ yslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.6 m+ n9 S5 X, K: E0 C! t$ l$ }7 k
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
' Z2 M) `( o0 i' [8 n+ ?greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of' j/ I3 K2 S6 w8 p
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
0 E: g( S. b4 J% p+ { ~0 Z' \& H) ?# {3 b H% F. t
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing' ` ]0 L; Q" Z, V
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and# s T% n$ q8 x5 E7 t) }
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
5 h. e. h% J' x4 a$ J ^are markedly different than those found in the United States.0 a+ R2 K2 g' g! i1 \) m# I! }
" C% U$ l2 z1 t% u+ g7 H; r
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
+ X$ c7 e& Q& a; [6 s" W# U9 J) vAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
% s- p. L( b. {7 u8 H3 kfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
) l$ C5 j8 E. Z) b# jrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general* S* a# K R/ m& w
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the( u% ^. J* X i) t0 P& A. e0 i
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and. A( t8 X: u/ L" S: ?* _: k
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
3 P1 V3 E- m# S/ I* K5 tmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
6 f: N- @* l1 F7 ]; t
2 {0 W2 x) l& i( G) f* J6 ?/ w <<
: l. I6 w4 R+ m' v! C# T+ f) V REGIONAL SUMMARIES- e4 E. ^' o- @8 }2 r, o
>>
0 b4 t/ A6 o* Y4 ~ z. k6 K1 o% n
+ C( z' m M7 Z Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in3 m+ x" g2 z: l* k0 a/ V
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
# w' ]) O+ O7 N' G+ Rof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
8 W2 [- W" f+ e( e- s) Rlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of3 ~: {0 z( C+ ^
renovations.
+ t- k0 G% A7 t4 F2 Z$ N) L' e" x9 @7 r2 q1 t- v( I! X
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight7 {$ r, C9 b4 w0 `1 c% M: @
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
: {; J$ X9 {6 G4 M5 e1 kcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
8 K5 |& U' Z9 l2 s4 g7 TSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
, R# w" J7 G6 l* V8 `9 y) e
& ^3 C! G1 q0 Y8 Y/ n% U2 A7 r" F The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer4 { ~- r! |$ V7 V
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the6 U: G1 \* E/ J# K) y& `$ ~
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
1 y9 F% e4 |; q600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores% R1 U9 o& D/ Y* A
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes" f [9 @1 f7 i6 O/ U
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
5 O- W1 N( B! V2 O/ h7 N: Y. F& f1 R% m `& a8 W" b# c+ d( Y
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
4 _7 J/ a# N) Q" m/ L% i' }& Qconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
|: m2 W5 c( q# r3 qhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
: E0 ]: p, \ t1 Qwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
( ?2 }- m* y" r0 Wdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing# L$ i1 R9 [0 x# j/ p
buyers with more options when looking for a home.0 J5 M; K2 _. j5 A$ j% {
: F: k& X' p5 ?, @* O& f! M. w Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
8 v9 G" U$ H3 y3 R% eamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes' e7 O, v/ b' u4 I- E* I) P0 V7 O& L
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,4 `7 s, o- j3 |- u) I( @5 e+ j
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
7 h2 {" G3 S; Nfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
( h1 g5 E) I( c, g% h7 T2 H6 v' Z/ j0 K5 S" d1 X8 q H% K
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house8 v# i5 B3 s( c/ K8 s1 D
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory9 g& t5 C9 A4 {% Z2 F, V
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting$ A: E: d- k' T) Y: V
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1," I$ ? P u2 b! r) m2 _) _/ [! x
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
# `5 T- F: ^7 z) l/ @% _* I& Ipressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
6 O' I; e' q( I- Umaking a purchase.7 V$ f: R9 |& u2 ^2 c3 y
# { u! a5 H9 ^2 C& U. D9 D V
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
% M- h' E! ?6 ?% D! h' P2 |markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong. N/ y6 C2 ]' {
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city1 P2 e& p- }% J3 C, k6 h% N
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
) v7 Z( O$ ~. q- ~2 n& r1 Iattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
- ^2 Z4 Z) A+ w) ~" S8 p1 Mamenities.
: _8 `& K- C3 S9 e3 n8 H
; c, P3 r3 S, A# l' Q The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
) \# [9 Y- S! S; g" Xthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand- K J# @5 W. B T k
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
4 m' n3 l2 v6 R' Acontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been2 O2 }" Q4 ~9 k' `" ^- y9 |
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle2 W0 t, \+ L4 `! L- D
residence, rather than for investment.) c! Y3 M/ l! @4 J4 h2 C1 L
3 d7 M; c2 v% a# `
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as0 d. D& U/ _* y8 \0 S \$ d
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
( o- O2 Y. E+ v: H7 E; _in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer: ^( e. U1 B! a/ e2 V$ Z
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
* k) E& ~0 m; Z' urate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
9 H. _3 a, C9 |; Z) f; X" ^3 F5 ^the market.
! }) w* {1 B$ {& t! |5 s
+ l' k" T# {" E, r In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through) f1 W2 h/ S8 I# f$ l2 D
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
5 B& J* o2 T0 H4 nAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
' F1 O. r3 s k) l! dmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
% A1 P# t1 X% ]$ i& x" j! ^# [to the shortage of available inventory.
* z6 Q, T0 h, V% L f4 K9 ~' o/ S
) d4 D3 L K( H1 c Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its4 x! I+ y" p8 K5 L1 a8 i
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
, E% C1 @5 U5 [- X8 Tvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses4 x/ T# s8 d4 N4 I; a
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
2 z: Z' |. [( @6 d/ [; a6 l( k' U! ^2 D* G
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
3 `& S$ L7 y3 q8 nin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
4 _0 n3 Q/ W A, ounemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
% B8 K# j$ \- u5 v' _3 t! t* Apressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring2 R. {- a; V+ c( g
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
9 @4 m/ [0 h( N$ |season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
* A3 g2 h, i' l. ?buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
) C4 ^2 Q; Y' y3 d4 q3 _, U
i7 d9 j' F% F# _+ z Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter b7 f8 n, C0 v9 s- X" V* ^/ ?
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton% ^. J) Q* M( _3 P, Z3 A+ M0 C
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
" a3 Q( I+ l$ Dmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices( O; K* [& i) W- I: t9 D) p0 ?5 b, N3 N
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
% t, o9 p3 C1 i, K; R6 gin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly D2 B5 R0 q6 g% E6 x
towards the end of 2006. $ r+ V' g$ u B/ y
( V1 L- N* V- ?# i& f9 s3 OWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
' ]( U2 J2 ?2 y2 \( q5 i1 Minventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable8 F# V1 R7 I2 {) H0 ]
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
" ]; y( g/ L) Ugroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
! t, `0 k& ?5 D4 ?% Vforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
1 p- s! q' G+ S9 B+ C* D( ]1 spressure on tight inventory levels.
; M* n* c$ M: w3 w3 G+ a; E4 v x+ L$ z& U8 z* j
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic1 t' u- o' ^9 g1 ~1 ]% w; h8 J
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
, e. x/ W: U0 s7 d* hinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
+ ^9 O: U5 [% \' V& W1 @% { wwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching2 f# t# @$ |2 ?7 x5 _
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.8 A) N/ o4 G! t* F% G% P
+ h3 F, T' d' N7 N# a' b0 f) u
<<' q+ a- g; _" I/ A! P6 n- |
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
3 \; O# U* l& a' C: w5 U# {1 K( T; |6 p0 d% ^! d; ~
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" E+ N- a# t7 ?4 s2 b
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey! I4 v1 n* B8 F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. _( K- k4 P/ G) P$ I; q2 L( n* I 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
" M9 K+ _* L$ O- G" ~3 ~ Y2 s Market Average Average % Change Average Average0 g- w' g6 P/ L0 b
------------------------------------------------------------------------- j$ @6 d' ^3 G+ o4 }2 F
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
( {7 [* w6 R: I7 Z7 [& E Q; [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 o6 i# @7 T0 O8 D5 o4 b _ Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0007 {! C( z1 j2 D( S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 e. u# f0 g8 e# G. c; Y Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
. F N# j7 Y" [/ q1 V! e% a4 o -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ e+ c- s7 L" T4 ^* _( @ Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -' N$ z7 Y ?3 a$ _) }" ?' N: b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 v8 R* y6 ^; r5 I
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
{6 r+ v. ~% S( U( j% { -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 g) W# @9 @% p- P) d9 O& r
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583# ~9 ^4 ^0 \3 t7 g X. x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! Y9 @& \* E" f: M5 m Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
, `/ ]* c0 }' v6 w9 Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ ]7 } B a- j0 d6 x" I- U- [: G Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
& S3 A% R5 P$ t, B -------------------------------------------------------------------------* {: K% v S' y+ g
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766- u6 J1 _9 L( ~* y+ M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ R4 K' b+ `9 S, ^: [# z
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7077 l* l9 x) v- S5 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& h5 C4 h5 p6 ]7 V |( U5 U Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500- t% y$ W4 k1 R7 b6 _ c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 v% ^. Y8 O2 t" T! f0 K
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389$ Y8 z& h; C) V0 Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 b3 p* z* i6 Z s: e* _ Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
2 a3 e' @1 ~( v, r/ I8 w0 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ N: i/ k. b) o7 [. x Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
e9 R: V( z( u: m- L -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! W b% z7 g" p5 j' w Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000- i f* F0 F' j) o7 M' z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ n$ }! d r, {% ^ l4 Z National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860: }) {* l# E- _( k' m, {" i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 R% m7 C/ l% e" K6 t
1 q* e+ H! @0 q2 k0 J -------------------------------------------------------------
7 \0 M( d& Z/ x# e Standard Condominium5 D+ R( w0 K8 t) ^2 X+ i: ?( t/ _
-------------------------------------------------------------" @! _2 A$ ~+ A! {
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo6 F+ l2 T7 I+ @
Market % Change Average Average % Change8 c4 ~* Q) _: M6 U4 r( o: O$ z! l
-------------------------------------------------------------
( l$ ?0 m; d6 p' E1 E; }' E/ ` Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
6 T: p. g! j8 L# c" x; A& V, o -------------------------------------------------------------! k. D" l P8 b. Y5 V
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%+ f6 t$ ^/ b+ Q- e
-------------------------------------------------------------4 B+ ?" D( \$ }" s) n6 g+ ~0 C
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
! z' @/ f+ o: j O -------------------------------------------------------------- x0 [" E- K( X# `0 ^# w% q. z: q
Saint John N/A - - N/A# h0 X; [) V, I- U* s1 p$ ~
-------------------------------------------------------------4 D4 G# r; U ~5 p B/ |
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%" b5 A2 Q* |" R8 x1 \9 S
-------------------------------------------------------------- Q, Z% ~9 B+ o! ]5 S
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%0 _5 v4 e% j: j5 w
-------------------------------------------------------------- t; E7 {1 f9 _# f: F
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%$ _& O0 ]/ V' r' b/ Z6 N( H( a
------------------------------------------------------------- F/ b( ?% n+ A1 o3 u7 w
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%( t- f/ H4 [% f! V/ x/ I" @
-------------------------------------------------------------- p- T2 B: W0 X4 {
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%, d! h% H' T# s
-------------------------------------------------------------
: Q6 M/ k, u/ t+ ^ Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
/ I8 r3 H- K2 V- S! J1 x( _ -------------------------------------------------------------8 I& i: t$ V$ d9 K' r
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
3 K# H; P4 X, j9 i: U/ l* T- U' A -------------------------------------------------------------/ N( Q' h: ~' f$ r- Z0 P7 p
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
h* n6 M& U# {2 q2 k -------------------------------------------------------------* O& E3 p4 }- ^ h* | e
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
z0 B" w) f1 x- k6 Y7 @- ~ -------------------------------------------------------------
8 S3 t. z' Q. c1 I! o, g Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%/ P9 X9 T; V6 z; B; p3 e: t
-------------------------------------------------------------! _& e9 l# A, z5 z% K# I( \- f
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
) p$ @$ n; W2 c, W5 ?- u0 H4 Q -------------------------------------------------------------& _* K; t$ H ]' O: v
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
& t8 S4 j- w" Q0 t0 @ e! w -------------------------------------------------------------3 g9 u0 C9 ^% A" A4 K; Q
>>9 e# x1 |! e6 \9 Q. w: \
# P- i# o5 B% p4 r Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
3 `7 S' E3 X" U, Qin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
! D' j% M. z; B" W9 C+ ]John and Victoria.
: f" m/ ]( L/ _8 e
& Y1 P+ b0 W- P, d N3 e The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
f, Q. R' t+ {7 Scomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
9 `; s$ ?" k% M" V$ P |# M" [$ ]housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release. @$ q1 P. n: q: r
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price: b2 e/ J& f& @6 D* A* p; s5 K
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
! ^8 B! W: \: T) h6 iacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
' k: v! v$ T, A% C" R/ W! l4 ^7 j: havailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current5 h1 c2 X4 g0 j8 a9 U6 v* m
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable- p. _- A3 o1 Z2 R( |# s
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
& T' f7 F* n) X7 vNovember 15, 2006.
4 S' l1 Z* j9 G& W+ v0 ^ Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of7 W+ o) {3 @, `: ^9 `
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
* R7 ~+ Q. f9 c uprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is6 K" s; G* `! X3 r
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|