 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
4 [" O( \1 \0 c H( t
' u- W" c1 y* }% h4 `/ J4 s9 X8 g- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
/ ~0 H7 [) V7 D* Y- M5 U& [( ?0 K2 w$ R
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
4 }% m [" H7 R- ?; Lexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
9 c" f, w/ ]. }quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
+ B- M6 d4 P/ ` Z" i6 ?in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit- r3 H! r4 n, L5 l: s: V$ W/ C
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
& `( l3 c9 o( c) w# pmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
# F' Y0 f# c0 x, W. jQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
" i% C) d: M$ [+ h+ U+ t3 |LePage Real Estate Services., u( _' ^$ Q0 v# h$ r
" g. b6 N' s8 [6 d Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
. K9 m: f; d$ B; J5 z8 P+ h1 u. Fare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic0 a# K" d6 q) Q8 j) h8 J& W6 n _
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and+ p$ d( M2 u" w% x, R
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the: V( x. T! C+ B8 q+ Z
residential real estate sector.9 U# ^( o/ j, F& d- S- Y( q
( ]2 p. E) g& S4 H
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation+ D5 r, v3 \% V+ [+ T' M6 r5 P
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
! l8 T3 g- h6 \4 q# F. D2 yyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562- U( b. e6 f% ]8 W0 t# i2 `
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
: ^( }7 R) s9 n2 r0 q. j1 F2 Q6 [% n(+13.2%).
% d* M* I# d5 A+ d- d$ k d/ N' J, J) \7 |9 \, N: Q [
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
; e7 ], x2 x7 G& Rduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the) |, J1 B& V9 Z: c0 ^
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
( x# }# r( [$ C! K& p+ gpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
+ Z1 o) E0 m3 d4 u" e5 f( v& S2 jpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
+ S" m0 U! v c; r; a! Z3 ^" D"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We# i2 |' s* y- K# D" }
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy l6 _# b% N5 O; v
balanced market."* y: O3 z; K* y# i9 x4 C* K
0 o ]( e: T- v( w1 F Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,0 v8 o5 Q& b/ c/ {( B: F
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift4 A8 H t3 }6 v
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued6 s( ]' D. P2 T* G( ~9 y Z9 B
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core7 H7 _$ I7 ?! |7 ?8 z8 x0 _; t' V
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
7 C, J' V* E& W5 X* `5 N6 Kmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record1 I5 I B. q4 N( Z5 [( z8 o) l2 \8 X* Q
breaking price appreciations.
6 q* j% V2 t- x0 I/ E, \% t/ t
T" R/ X2 e. z* `; {: V Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding& \" R, d# b1 C) k0 u. q
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
$ `0 M1 E2 i9 f& @, Ulargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
z1 Q- ~5 V9 k/ G ]9 M8 ~2 C3 K! L; c
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid: |9 x) q) k1 |" G: |% S
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer* ? n9 R) p' E9 c3 w/ {
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
* U. d5 I$ i. A ]- z* ~slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.; x: K; |; S k8 j' d
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
. ]/ @9 M6 N q5 zgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
' Z& z1 i% c/ Xprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
7 j8 M8 ?6 a) y
! ?% ]9 S7 S% l' {0 b While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
}9 ]# f9 ^. q9 e9 @market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
; q. ~6 J8 K! c6 m3 pfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
1 b5 j# C" i- b: _7 X: Eare markedly different than those found in the United States.
# Q* r1 F0 R0 S9 U" f* w. M
8 g6 [9 e+ S% b" m! j* g( y Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
' N ?9 B9 v5 ?) m; F7 I6 OAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's' S- h y- S( \5 u: l7 Q
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
' C. E$ L9 d4 V, d% Nrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general" s% }+ x. b$ p' g1 w4 f! q* t
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the+ M$ W& Y0 m. l0 e; d# l
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
, n. A( r& K& S% b' F: j& Caggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
; l" N2 w V/ zmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."/ j8 q* h: [2 d% C
% y, ~/ v% @% h* I
<<
' ?) y7 T3 n& h6 k- K1 B REGIONAL SUMMARIES
* z) Z t0 P# u$ q >> X, b: ]$ k' r) }$ o; Z' u
2 |, X/ z0 K7 J0 b3 G( ? Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
- P/ S1 V3 |, [) b# zHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
, ?; T- I3 X1 [( a, ^- cof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
5 V" k7 s% d# vlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
' o% o/ N2 S7 y3 T! Yrenovations.
5 a2 ^- K- K$ e" L& e- D1 H! H* V7 Q: k
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
7 R9 s( Y3 g, }: q& mincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation% F( G9 \* y% Y0 X* Z
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and4 I" S% B9 C# f
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter., e [* V5 ?! P2 F0 x
( a% V1 D( U* x" K6 X$ \! D; I/ P
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
7 e- [/ n, E H) Q7 `. @- H* W. Tslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the) G+ q- c7 J1 P7 T. @6 [) c/ c
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new5 [$ p- e4 U; @ H, r& g k
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores& Z8 s; u0 H1 [7 u5 E2 i
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes6 G O9 Y9 t! ?5 c) K0 d
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.7 Y. l8 v& k- p; X# e
8 x* Z1 K1 Z+ t% D1 D, {3 Q In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced4 l+ O# B+ w" C+ B" I
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
+ [0 E! k: q3 F$ mhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
* v1 f' X D1 G. U+ D4 cwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian) `- S% Z! J: w; `
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
( S1 {# t( P) k* Wbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
9 a. ]; g1 p3 W% j# R9 E% R5 n5 ?- n- p9 B7 e' Q! B
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
) b+ N/ i* Y7 K0 [0 R2 Q$ q5 Qamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
w) _( _! X' I! c+ wpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,; s6 N( J5 A& E
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last! E+ [) I/ b; I4 D# R. `4 g7 y5 J
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.6 M& Q4 a3 \2 ~9 Z& @
2 k* k( g/ L3 }- [# \% Z Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house9 }2 [- I7 R$ ?% [
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
3 X7 t9 q4 C( x( H, Z* ~2 @% rlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
0 G# X1 f4 h2 Q9 \' ?& B4 M2 _, {first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,: @! ~$ R3 E2 L$ P
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the( P& M/ V- |. I7 r+ f7 I t. p
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before* ?/ T2 u( ?9 M* d: E
making a purchase.
# C6 G5 e$ S( Y' [# c! e5 N. e- W
. U; f3 Y* j# l6 A! h" s9 t, t" f: ? Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
, D" s; p h/ m, E: a/ ^markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
* e5 `2 J* ?9 f. r% uconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
! T0 ]3 }, ]$ O4 |centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
# l+ H/ t/ B7 h" cattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown+ D; I) Y( e7 q- h$ g# T- E6 Z
amenities.- S% O! Y# r# C4 |9 T2 i
2 s2 z$ D1 `% p' ` The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
/ {+ I) C1 E9 G. n" A. L" y* wthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
8 y" |* T+ \3 o9 ]4 y5 lacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has R! }; U/ P7 n8 e+ h3 W
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been( T& [( P; f# @, r7 u+ D1 p6 ^
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
8 A& o8 `! s# s) x: i$ ?" {( |- hresidence, rather than for investment.) e; u N& G1 ?# V* B+ ~ j
; x6 t- d9 S7 l0 V7 N3 }! Y6 R
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
/ j' q$ A" P' _; b; w: P0 i! vhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted; ^; B8 r% Y. X+ O' u& O0 k1 B; j
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer5 n) T; Z# [( O4 b5 Q: r
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
8 @. S* r, _; H4 q* o1 H+ l7 Q/ vrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter# i" Y& k+ R! n0 k$ Z" }# w
the market.
9 W3 H7 j) d) g- q% W/ s! J( }4 A1 {# q
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through, a4 V8 }5 X: d7 i
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In% b' H+ N# b- t8 b( F! s
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
5 h7 u) W: z7 k6 X2 Pmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due P: s+ a m9 X! |% S
to the shortage of available inventory.
$ L* w/ b! t5 O* J: o6 y7 G/ _, F3 D
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its5 r+ Z% O# z* U. o
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
( W& K( `9 `4 a# l: P8 F( Cvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses( B4 ^# f+ v+ r% w, b, Q9 P
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
6 J- z8 S( X4 M4 {/ w
- A3 E& {0 C) p Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases8 X0 X3 F9 G8 Q: R
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low ]5 W# ^% F0 Z) c0 F
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
) g4 s" Q! L$ z, N0 Q i' ]pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
4 r* n& p" e$ y2 Q- dprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
4 r3 u) W9 C" N5 F- Hseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
! \& r" `, e1 H5 B! M# Xbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
& y4 D' E2 k b( d. O2 |$ o# |9 p" E$ Z e# B) }3 L
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter- h5 D3 h5 h' h. k! e3 ~
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
: H) U& |4 _- J- dremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
: u( ~: q4 u: {* c* t" y! o1 K/ pmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices% ~+ t j) `/ N
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve! H4 y6 z6 `' ?
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly2 _" P" T& c5 {5 z+ T9 g9 T
towards the end of 2006. % c/ A: N# i+ z' M' `& v
8 V8 K4 c+ Y+ j7 m6 w8 mWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
' p* Q4 }# m. _$ uinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable& F& m' z! V& m' s2 t8 e8 C
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse, q* ~5 G# J) v5 {9 j% \
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to1 T. O$ K' `$ d5 Y! H/ Y
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added' N8 S& [+ F% O" _4 q4 g
pressure on tight inventory levels.
: Y! l6 }# V# ?. i$ h; b/ z* f
9 k1 f1 d( t1 B3 d5 p Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic. S& F6 b# d% H. i
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people) b. ^* {! ~( C7 S& r9 a
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
: v% ^7 L, S ]! @while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching& H3 ^1 T' K4 E6 V Z4 f# t
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
8 D1 J0 |) R4 ]$ y
6 ^6 n% F% o: X9 F0 @( B <<
; o' d4 }1 f6 {6 F. D. v+ f Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
3 }. v" ?6 v& ~1 `1 A7 m7 v+ O" O. p7 z, U; [1 y2 F' U* U/ Y, X" d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, H& Z% y% f5 E4 p9 ? Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
8 ?' Y" c' X( l' y3 ~, p -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) m: J/ q3 t& q1 V 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
" P! ^+ t% e6 W9 H Market Average Average % Change Average Average
2 p" Y1 o. E: I$ D" l -------------------------------------------------------------------------# l/ I' f0 v: w1 u
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000' [" y& Q" L3 d- J7 n% i5 N! I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* o0 M4 X" f( l6 w, V' _# @ t& N Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000! N; Q* D8 B. O9 m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. c/ a" d; ^, I K3 D; N
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000& K# W9 l4 w7 J) `9 H% Q; R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ P1 v& Y8 T: D( W3 r# W
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -- h5 q2 C7 ~ X6 ~8 R. N+ V: y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 [7 f2 z7 s3 Z/ v% l( ^. |. L9 } St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
( B% K/ b* Y( J( E: n -------------------------------------------------------------------------" q% K! i6 R! ?5 a2 Q/ h a# P
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5839 P" H# X, B- G3 o; {; E+ I' g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 o; E. R3 Q* K6 Z* H: w Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1856 K- g4 @( _' j( E% k2 z0 [
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: y3 B: z( }7 s; Z
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250/ d. l( {7 I% m! d5 t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. m" h7 F. u- m7 {8 L8 V Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7665 L4 X% A( a* A3 v S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Y7 k5 a6 @0 n5 K% b
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7072 p' W/ B, \- D7 i5 k# c5 S8 g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 l0 ~* w& n/ Z" I% t
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
# p7 z6 D/ H6 e9 I% v+ J: o -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# _, Y7 v# ]$ {; X. o Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389: l4 J% H; R! ~' A M& Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, q! M8 ~9 Q; p( ^1 B
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
' [' m7 K5 H6 M! c* X' ^" W, l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# T( {% T+ Y( f! M& b9 J" P Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
. G. p5 O" T% n9 G) ?8 h -------------------------------------------------------------------------
e- Z+ E! t# f' A" d$ D [ Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
/ b; @3 j& N0 \. l: L) t -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ L& I& P: Y2 f: R7 D- v# B
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8605 r" w+ L" l& }
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- H' n; P7 x" d( }3 V
, y1 ]; t( S6 c/ ] y -------------------------------------------------------------
& w6 S: h2 c0 W, F3 w' W/ y Standard Condominium
% b5 h) S* P$ q5 X) ]6 k -------------------------------------------------------------
9 T1 x; p% y0 y2 s0 C8 P 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
{' K d) l. [; Q; _3 { Market % Change Average Average % Change
0 Z, k2 ~( y8 O+ H& b: R3 k -------------------------------------------------------------
8 Y0 s# f. R; H: l+ F0 F6 p Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%' F$ I7 }) f3 R- E) X, X
-------------------------------------------------------------) G' r- Q8 K6 v
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
0 @* p% |) r% ?# B( m N -------------------------------------------------------------
! {# b& z0 t' X' h/ w Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
# I; x$ ?7 }8 f' V' | -------------------------------------------------------------* L" H5 P( {$ C' l& t( X4 U
Saint John N/A - - N/A% H5 ?* I! _5 ]2 X3 A! L
-------------------------------------------------------------3 a. i/ W9 ?% m$ ~( X
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
9 U& D# Q5 Z7 w& G: O O! l -------------------------------------------------------------3 q. `3 C/ ^* `0 f0 c4 ]
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
/ P! H \0 }/ |5 Q) Y -------------------------------------------------------------
# `, l, z1 b# Q- F$ E Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%# ^; T; p) D5 q+ M6 M
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 ^" f' \' Z2 H) z' v7 _ Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
8 v" y' q w, i3 L" H -------------------------------------------------------------
& n& u# ?7 ^% T5 N# x Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%7 c0 y7 J# w# ~$ ^* \
-------------------------------------------------------------, X! }" R7 [2 M
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%. r! S' B6 J# O% }6 S( q2 E# O
-------------------------------------------------------------
& F/ ?& `" Q) m3 p5 S Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
+ E0 m7 D* I n- ^9 @ -------------------------------------------------------------$ b% r1 Q/ Q6 v: A4 O" U
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%9 n) V( v$ b# U w4 F) u
-------------------------------------------------------------
% j: {7 p. X; l! L9 k$ | Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
! W: @: W% C; Q1 t -------------------------------------------------------------+ }3 X# N$ M! i
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%+ }7 j/ u6 t% {: W$ f
-------------------------------------------------------------5 x& }( i6 _2 D- I
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%% d) Z3 G% a0 q6 W9 T
-------------------------------------------------------------1 W( r% o4 a5 H: w: R" Q/ K
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
9 B7 g, d x, ?5 G: O -------------------------------------------------------------8 ~3 K* P& Y) i; D/ A, E) ]
>> u2 l- I' U, A: d
; @$ P/ c3 F5 ?: X" K
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
* |' d4 j) P& b) g" t/ B2 Lin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint& b" |/ s& g$ f$ W# \: g/ }* c
John and Victoria.
& h+ ^5 n E/ x, a! i9 c' K7 K$ x A2 |5 L5 v' a
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
0 ]+ | L8 ~3 vcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of) Z$ T5 ~; b2 _* f" p
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
8 x8 i3 A# ]3 l0 }! ?! G. sreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price+ t+ {. e+ M. ^- y3 F
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities; f- `: I" _& e8 O7 a+ n
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
$ D7 H2 a; c! i6 E3 u: p4 navailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
' S: R' z: z3 B% Q/ K- k: Xfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
6 R7 S3 I+ u& ~5 H! j* uversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
& S" D- L3 d2 g# v1 e; VNovember 15, 2006.
, ]7 A0 L# p4 @4 h. X Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
5 ?: a, i* w# Vfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge! l" V, G; o0 p% \
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is+ v; T& ^! f- N2 p7 w" _- A
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|