 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 1 U0 ]9 M1 w' D$ f9 C0 g% V
9 }3 E$ g" G* c- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -5 U0 k8 b( }% `+ v2 a
$ a% v% J, D# |" h6 y7 G( i
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
' X# E+ Q- p* t+ g% {exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third/ Y0 e) n W K
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic/ O: F; _4 m6 O9 Q+ k/ h- B
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit+ A7 n. Q; I( s
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
5 M/ j; \' h. w0 Zmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,9 G% M% p S8 u; S6 {& q
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal i1 u9 ~8 M4 [% E
LePage Real Estate Services.
( t3 m5 ^: Q' L0 {. [- C7 m
1 X( i: O) |) y ^ Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters- Q- R3 O4 u" \4 ?
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
9 `9 e% S" |* @7 T! L6 V( @2 u5 d, fconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and# d' U$ ~; e6 P, v$ P; `; R, k8 X7 u
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the& a1 _/ I7 e( S5 z& u- c6 K
residential real estate sector.
3 b9 b- U( ^6 e6 a) n0 ?/ C9 R6 ~" Q2 F3 M# W3 m
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation1 T; @9 C5 M1 `& g6 [4 D
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
8 t3 V4 Z/ S; x5 G0 W3 X! X+ @/ ]year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
, _' |/ A- E* G(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
2 k- s; L+ @( B& Q/ V5 y" g(+13.2%).! z5 g' `% ]3 O: H+ @" z$ {
$ V9 `1 L+ }0 K3 E1 A2 I6 g/ s/ h "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
! `. _2 j0 d1 w+ iduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the! u- }; v& N, b' X7 S
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
% y5 w5 J! G9 Q( \! ppoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
3 a U1 n% Y- K- f2 S, @4 ^5 ppresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
8 e* e7 D F9 `) o% [3 o: Y- ]"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
& A! M& H% r' b+ ], \+ _welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy! r9 u" {2 M }3 v
balanced market.": r& D2 v1 g3 T/ Y
+ p6 [9 J* @# q! @. }. M Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices, b* |' \4 [5 i. X- E2 J
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
0 @( c8 A/ {1 s, ato balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
: e' _! v1 z9 ^6 S( {throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core: k1 j9 ]4 @' a$ m, I7 u
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,3 H2 O6 }# Z: y* _: C0 z
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record) C( o0 k' Y& B% I0 v" N6 [# N* s1 Y4 C
breaking price appreciations.' Y# ~% B) y; S8 X/ P7 q3 o; V' O4 R" b
6 t# O' c5 ^0 {. K# S4 ~ Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
' j5 n7 ~! W' x; S$ e: w& heconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
% K* M( m9 C: t- Y0 C( ]5 {largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.! j6 z' @% p4 z% x! W. B6 E
8 ~8 O, u" M; a$ j1 S4 n- V
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
' j% l4 d1 V2 t- b4 R9 f" \ Feconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
( r* V! X) W( } Q7 cconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off( g" N; ]; Z, n% \8 M6 F
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.; o& v1 d8 y2 X& n
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
/ \5 t& L9 E3 k" v" V) X- y4 ^greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
, D @- ?7 ^% L; oprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
7 Y5 i1 b9 ~, J+ U j( ^3 W1 Y3 D3 i8 h' ]- M) r
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
, H8 L" G7 \# `+ |* }market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
) Z, { }# e# hfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada7 F! ]9 A2 n' C% W) @- `
are markedly different than those found in the United States.* l+ _9 f# \, T
4 s2 ?) O' Z# z: h0 B1 F
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
. h( D* f- ]2 j4 EAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
9 y" Y6 U. K# S* H/ Afavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
: ]9 M D4 E. Zrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
, C+ N% ? H |- E1 qaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the; G8 }2 u9 _" }
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and% R0 L- {: d1 m4 S, }. R& h/ c
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization5 l$ [( d' j; N4 L: O T
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
& v+ `% ?- k& x4 g) Q7 X6 \. I
<<; \8 P+ P, K1 P, g
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
) E4 o4 X/ @1 t0 J >>) d* S) Y: ^3 G' I* l
3 y3 U9 t2 [. v Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
' q9 i1 W" Q: N4 ?% s( O" s9 E4 THalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
6 `5 Z' x5 m- Q4 B1 j- Eof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
: h6 v% D8 C) A0 ^) qlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
) t+ P) f/ n8 l; E8 ?4 \4 Erenovations.
~, w1 {7 L3 Z8 V% j9 B5 \* Y4 G k
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
9 `/ j# A/ O; Mincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation4 D+ x- `- j+ l( s: M& C0 [
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
7 @0 v8 Q! j. @8 N0 oSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.) U% x& Y" J7 M/ ?# q6 O9 x( B
+ z0 ^% p' G! {# ?3 ~, e
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
3 z1 [. L \9 C7 N: E3 P' D7 M" Gslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
; N) Y" d) Y1 N/ Y m8 Gquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
8 m( J2 |; H1 }) g& l7 h6 d600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores) l" d' e' P4 f( j: ]# }. U
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
6 \% @/ `9 v' I3 gand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.1 \$ B% U E( ^; q; S/ F
0 m: r) b% s4 l; o In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced6 T3 k; s) z- g
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
2 W$ `1 X; _7 j: q$ }2 N' j. P4 F+ Zhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
J3 G$ D l1 swas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian* _% y, p" {2 ]" X7 n4 N+ G
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing1 i/ o2 u, q$ }/ a2 i" E
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
* C9 }! w) N, P* l6 v( _# u# I! Z; r0 n7 q' H9 k4 [
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
' l, _, k% @* Gamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes2 G) x+ q9 O8 A4 e$ y9 g
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,* A2 D8 ^2 R6 x, t3 f
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
! M6 S1 @$ P& }: q( e4 h' dfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
$ x7 c0 h8 b- U( f7 ^: Q, X2 `
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house2 f: J8 V$ t* o! R- m$ F
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory+ ]& c2 Z, Z4 T D! {" C2 r
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
+ P K, ~9 s5 M9 o$ a! t# d7 H2 ofirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,5 t7 A9 ?3 K" o
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
, b0 t( D; W2 J0 o/ F3 lpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before% g2 Y6 V" W& H/ N& |* j" p
making a purchase.- q( I }' P! G0 a
' }0 ^2 R4 m% n6 P6 }' P3 {! q
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
, A: V+ n0 D8 c) B1 Hmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
" E, [1 S* z x, Rconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
$ o$ [0 K- M" |# }1 d3 C" r3 j' B- Ccentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting$ W L9 _0 q5 D" p" W) k9 B3 q
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
; A+ H) U4 v$ }+ _amenities.7 Z% P* d3 [5 x3 p
# Q) l% c" k& u3 X/ r2 {5 x) e1 _
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels' n I" y4 [* G1 L$ Q
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
^' |5 q. o6 K* hacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has" w& M: o% U6 b3 R
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been* E: E& L q( x0 ^5 {& }0 g( g* ?
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle+ N: x2 h$ Y# u' V9 @1 k1 p8 W
residence, rather than for investment.! H5 g. [, p1 ^& \
2 E1 D( x9 I' y0 M/ Y6 P: D- o; @8 ^- H The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
. S* W0 v) \, T4 k' yhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
' D. V( g+ Y4 P3 ]3 ], Ein a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
. g6 K: K+ s3 d9 L$ qconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
$ _3 e2 W* U9 Jrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
, n: W% _, `! u4 U+ m$ I- w/ d% ~4 Cthe market.
, D( E% U$ x+ g5 e9 T4 X; e/ f1 h0 e; p- a
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
! Q# Q' l1 X8 P5 h) k0 v4 Y2 RJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
, M' V5 K v4 @6 I* V+ C* G7 N) zAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
3 q+ [! J5 Q" l3 lmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
: w+ A) m( d3 v4 cto the shortage of available inventory.
! b. B8 j: y. R: E2 e5 l. }+ ^, H. l" I
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
6 Y. Y0 @, Y4 m) z( p) X cmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains7 E4 O' ]8 R4 Z
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
# [# `2 E: G6 Q0 S0 r& Dstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province., z+ K, S6 b, }" D W, G
4 i/ q6 [: V2 C4 z% Z& S. X& q! K
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
, P. m+ z5 [/ Lin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
- C+ G. [% a' t5 q9 Hunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
9 K( ?6 J# g+ _* m, M9 W4 Upressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring8 i- E- ?$ f& g1 F3 b' _. a% a* ?% |$ I! I
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
/ _/ x* r, g+ }% `+ m+ s, L( Eseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as# `; o3 {$ z1 e' c$ K; ~/ w
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
4 H* {9 n6 X3 |5 A6 I
+ t0 O, J. e R; F- t$ i Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
( H9 g9 y m/ @% W' H. {as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton3 B3 q% f+ S; I1 P
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
" c% e3 ^( N+ s4 y1 Omaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices; I# j2 y( |, W6 v6 {
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve7 B. R# l; h- a
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly3 O2 ~4 R4 i, X( q' A! g
towards the end of 2006.
) Z" ?; X3 c2 \4 X- G) y" V7 Q4 r% Y" E( W# o$ d: d1 {. j3 B! R
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
! A. a: C3 `2 t/ Vinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
+ f! T4 E$ F L, w1 z4 ^* U7 s- {to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
$ @; p3 i4 V: rgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to* M$ J- n! W6 o" W- Q& G
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
, H5 V) p+ ?0 ~pressure on tight inventory levels.
' L/ q; e: y" J5 h7 g. Q7 j. r/ C) c7 ^# b
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
% n9 k2 s/ k {3 X2 Vfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
, \6 E. e8 u4 c, y$ vinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;/ h' s1 [. {5 @2 m
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
8 D& R' t1 m5 W; [$ `for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.& O7 O, {9 [! L1 N
0 l0 U6 V y, ~) W* }& D, f <<
: ] d8 s" h/ ?/ n Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006$ T7 H, j- w/ M- }% I7 y
9 _# m$ u0 v# w! r5 z- N* o. U$ l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 s8 @# q1 z$ O& H X1 e Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
K- }; M: S& `, r) e -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) q; g1 k5 B8 n1 @ 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
9 r! a T1 d; k& r: D Market Average Average % Change Average Average D( v: m [6 F. c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% l7 ^# G0 p7 T, r) V4 @, F
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0001 k, g: y7 n$ M' E- F6 F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 M' }! P* Y7 ?- [
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
# x! ]& T: Q! @# A* w3 P -------------------------------------------------------------------------: f" [- T% \# }6 O
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
: O7 o: C& u. i9 s5 f6 @; L -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ T1 R0 X1 R5 @* l7 Q
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -/ n5 A2 T& C8 g2 W4 C9 e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 ?0 n- l- x3 F. E St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
3 M/ T( L5 P8 d, O -------------------------------------------------------------------------# ^4 C2 p: {* @- y0 j6 w: q
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583% S# w- M" g! O3 F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; v- U( D* |. [$ Z8 M1 { Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185# [% z' ^' L# P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* W& b% b- m1 Z- B9 J3 @' f
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2502 B; ~4 b; V( Y/ ^) u4 `% D0 L. J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& n- h+ E& D7 T& C7 \$ l& I
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766 D! K4 p. a( O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 |/ P. r8 k7 [2 H/ B1 P. u Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
# w8 {- i$ I. e; F9 O -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 \1 p$ y3 T R+ H) ~
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
( d% z& {, W/ E' V -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ U3 V( A3 U- }7 r# M$ b
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389! L! n/ R: J" {/ D2 U3 d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& C5 y A4 `8 C" R5 H
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
# B" \( C7 s5 Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! I- L% _# n% k+ R8 f Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
( T6 X3 { _4 A0 L7 H- @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! ~+ d0 W6 c6 G& E Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000- g6 L/ v U" }) Q# {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 u- X0 ^! y: p* ]) |% D* S
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
6 H* i2 x- D, A: g% I& { -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 @( O! R/ X/ {- _) O: t1 M* b
" A5 u, H" k2 K7 y$ ]4 R -------------------------------------------------------------
8 O4 C6 g: a* X9 K Standard Condominium
! Z& c7 m b" q -------------------------------------------------------------
$ `; f! R5 ]% s+ I" j2 ^ 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo8 w! S, r/ d6 F! ?$ C) h3 ?
Market % Change Average Average % Change
7 t6 U7 O+ f: k7 O& \+ L -------------------------------------------------------------# N% J) I" _* |) B# g
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
+ I- ~# p- u+ E$ w. ~' t* @ -------------------------------------------------------------
2 G7 }# |$ s( P9 s- |% O Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
" o( Z2 s2 N2 Y- ~6 a -------------------------------------------------------------4 x# S7 W6 l, |- g! {
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
n" a- o" M- G! C6 H: [- e$ ? -------------------------------------------------------------
/ {4 \5 Q, C1 ?, G1 f7 a# } Saint John N/A - - N/A& S3 A; D( l% o X9 C2 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------5 V' P% }/ b3 z6 _1 n$ C. e( L
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%; Y6 q7 B" D, b3 h1 j
-------------------------------------------------------------# k' t) d1 W: |$ Q7 l& R
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%! r+ ~3 {. m w! F Z' `7 h
-------------------------------------------------------------
, x0 K7 w" h2 r1 s7 F6 ^ Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
! v# Q+ j- E9 C$ U5 ] -------------------------------------------------------------
2 T6 T, E: o/ s1 g Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%- X( \* X# p% q3 l8 R3 K
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 m4 `* E8 V6 j0 {( k9 l7 D* ~ Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%6 o% v" G' e' h! G( q( r
-------------------------------------------------------------: I' l3 d& U E8 j) ?2 ?
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%& I- Y3 x" y! K; Y6 _; ?5 `
-------------------------------------------------------------% H S, k; P3 A2 l
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
# D0 K, E0 J7 V: b- ~ -------------------------------------------------------------* R3 f8 ~, o0 j3 w4 s+ z+ Z
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
- G* Q( G$ N! h3 g) S9 r; f/ O! H) Z -------------------------------------------------------------
. j. W$ y5 p' y' t Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%& W+ ~: U& L4 O: @8 e1 M0 e, J
-------------------------------------------------------------7 M+ `( L% H. v" ? j% g7 y
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%" w. X+ J6 b# r$ g! O2 s
-------------------------------------------------------------
W2 l; R; }1 X' v, F' s6 | Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%7 d* e2 {# w: D/ Z& | N- i
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ [ d' _5 A- v9 d National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
4 u1 O. C$ L8 A5 @' B -------------------------------------------------------------7 x9 @0 e5 l. z! Q- [4 A" R: B
>>( P7 M- R7 C2 b4 A- F2 x% ~
' m, r0 @! D9 T" i5 Z/ ?; s, f
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined+ e! S" J& t2 s! ?+ F
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
5 h" T' t+ M7 y8 q! Q/ h" EJohn and Victoria.
1 G/ f* J/ g3 n, a- Z4 E9 s0 U' X. `; ]# ?& \/ O8 A3 s1 P& ~
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most3 k+ [ |8 S; j" ]( c
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
0 ], I$ k5 o" c* ohousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release2 E: i3 K* B% \: i6 S3 u
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
v0 s& {2 O, I( R/ \# Qtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities5 a4 l, S( N9 B" o: \9 |+ g
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is3 D3 }. G; |' |; V2 Z: l
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
* o) D0 u0 j+ i L. R$ [4 I$ u+ u Sfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable* I. `4 a0 q7 o& Y' H4 |+ x& D' k
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
1 ~; k5 b3 ~ }0 B, E5 @0 q% p; INovember 15, 2006.
" ~+ P" e# D0 R/ @& Y4 | Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
4 S; b! ^# y3 n$ O, m8 Jfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge. W, {0 |+ y4 k( }' N0 g
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is2 B4 y2 n4 b: q- ^/ c3 u/ h1 J2 b# p" W3 n
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|