 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
0 x& e- A# q; a# B
" j2 x# H; Q% s1 S- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
7 U8 g5 L% v' ^8 q5 V& d# E! h
$ {$ I; q4 F6 x( ?& Z! L/ m TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
7 }4 C9 f9 T, }$ p, s9 Texhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third8 j$ E& |( q& g8 S/ T! x
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic: `& c$ } ~0 j" \
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
! b! }, g E& k( Y, Hprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and9 ]$ ]) N& V4 P/ H
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,7 b( d! Z, F- x& V
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal" A$ a1 y8 { X W% v/ _
LePage Real Estate Services.
% K! \$ K0 r, O5 U+ B! S
: L/ L6 D. X# q Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
# H* G6 R4 s# C7 Care forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
7 L, U6 e6 S3 J8 Wconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
' \: y' G5 @4 y4 t# rsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
, ~" e k( a6 ^" c, x/ |- _- l( Nresidential real estate sector.
j* S: X8 k0 f/ H3 \( a. V
4 S2 V& e# F0 l4 W Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
6 _$ v8 n+ d6 F; f0 ]' Y; }occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)7 w! Z3 ]4 ?1 [# C* \
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
' O8 c5 ^5 {7 ^5 w2 b(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380! C* ?5 E$ L; t% o5 o) \
(+13.2%).
8 Z0 b; M: v+ E+ h
g6 t: Q7 N. A0 t3 i7 D "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
; T9 [) U l% e6 P0 d+ Uduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
j. g) c. H% a2 @% W1 B& _frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are3 v; J; x% @/ A* \8 q
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
* r ^& R" p1 Npresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
0 G8 Z2 D9 m) Q) _" L& N& B"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
) \, z# b i# I/ o" e$ Wwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
! _7 N; t3 A2 P) c; Lbalanced market."# T: A& m5 j' R8 b% F
, p; S) i" Z. {5 v- l Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,! U% ~, c! A4 k4 h1 L3 \
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift/ N" {$ c" Y- \; u2 Y4 d
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
& Y2 ^; g+ _& V# ]1 g/ Ythroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
# P7 Q2 H- `! `9 Penergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,3 A! I9 i+ t1 g
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
0 |9 l! s5 O& a: Obreaking price appreciations.1 T% O3 O" H4 T5 _% [3 l! M
! J F& B! d/ z ^- Y1 X, T Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding0 c. H9 v' `, V& O4 [ V
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the# s* L4 \4 P/ a- C) M: Z- Z
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.& v% h; {8 C) o( v6 E& _
[) s! g. G; X* u, [ In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
( M" B% h* r7 w! u# [. s0 meconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
4 \+ `9 f/ m5 H2 e' k3 W5 Wconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
4 y7 o6 k5 Z! D7 a: xslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
/ q0 O* |5 [' l7 b9 J/ IIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
2 [" `% U( t/ O2 fgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of! \2 J7 e0 l) s g# q8 r' T, h2 }
price appreciation when compared with 2005.6 S# [( h7 A8 U7 C: x: `
( b6 c6 W+ C) L& r& z: y While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
/ P: C ^8 H0 K. Z! {) d) fmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
) u2 m! ?* r: |5 a$ mfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
! `+ s3 I; ?; Nare markedly different than those found in the United States.3 x5 i7 X- H( f( r, c5 U
5 M, z1 @$ ?3 |$ { z" M
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
2 r4 }3 a% ~- z3 l8 s3 S CAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's( R% H. T) Z d" [; X$ `- Y
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the! J' L* i, S6 N' v3 J" d% Q
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
2 h/ i6 G8 @2 faffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
5 u; {- A \% y7 b+ O. d* U0 vdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
1 t( S: q$ X0 V5 ], faggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
" I/ U# `' M0 N+ ~* b8 }( \mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."" f/ Q! A, W4 ]+ s, x; V1 F
" k. v5 D* G1 C5 X
<<
% z& j, G- j- I* z0 \; X# K9 l REGIONAL SUMMARIES& r, p/ U: s! J( C
>>
# x @( P( X+ y3 Q
0 a: ^ g4 ~; T) k/ ~6 k7 w! M Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in0 m& ?" @& X }" Z9 [; P) u
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
+ Y1 }4 N& h9 Q4 uof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
! |, v: d' F! E9 t2 olooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of# w6 O/ z" H+ y/ o
renovations.
' w. @5 ]2 f+ o) R" l; e* [( o* {! B: E; W l0 p r& v; z. T% P
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight+ A/ a% K: t4 e$ x5 c& |
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
5 g9 E. V. p7 ?/ j5 A- i. H2 ?; jcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and9 o& M9 m( h) u
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter./ S e" y H z! N, @
: R: R9 c' @9 ^6 I- l; W2 h
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer# a+ w5 R1 ?: g; k
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the5 {: Z O" o& z- _; X! c( s" U
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
' D2 S+ ?! r* p9 y600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
; [9 m. T# J$ d3 Cto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes. _/ J' }# _( t( t8 g+ n p/ d! V
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.3 `5 P' N! v5 ]9 G( \* s2 X
1 p B# j, g% {, H In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced$ X9 I; t* r8 J% D
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
2 O& L' v3 A% {: W ]4 hhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers# D3 z" N; J: H# C; V# r" P( h
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian Y( c: _6 w$ i. ^; E0 U- a4 \2 K+ U
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
; t8 L1 K& ^& {# S* y/ ?1 q1 i, a% |* }buyers with more options when looking for a home.9 ]* h0 d' M/ z, j& L* ]" e" v
0 a2 n4 u+ p8 N' f1 @! Y7 ]0 K Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly; D9 a; A& Z$ d5 s6 M1 X) b: Q9 D
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes0 I! [7 u6 W8 i% c4 o$ v
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
) L7 b9 n& s/ oas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last" h/ I* f# q, `# q4 c9 X
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
( S2 v( M0 f z( j0 y& e* v! o3 k. }. L! q9 o- m; [3 Z4 r
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
7 A* c0 W3 c) k2 Z; lprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
1 `& M: p& a# f6 \, ]# glevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting9 J- L$ Q6 l! D- c. `$ k& F F
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
& q! m$ M! B7 m' w$ h6 v2 Vwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the( `: @# P3 P" n8 v/ ?
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before% V8 I' Q' X/ p& u9 ~' I# d
making a purchase.% s I' Q- |# t# r* M/ H9 N2 m
8 q3 v) x+ F. V# W/ |& X0 c+ c Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing4 y9 Y" ^% P; R% C# V) J
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong* |) L$ a9 Q* U
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
( _ Q3 y& \/ ccentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
3 e2 ~' v i6 t p+ i& H( I+ Nattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown6 h7 N5 Q- \+ s+ b5 c }3 b/ J
amenities.* Y3 I5 f' L7 m3 l2 ]
# f/ o' c9 P! R1 O: U
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
! C) X( {5 C; Bthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand) c$ d0 D1 e7 {1 }0 s# e' R
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has H! `( E0 H) L9 ~7 Q% {
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been9 B* J+ N Q9 b7 _) b
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
1 ^/ o; F; H2 z R6 w8 H% S' xresidence, rather than for investment.
, `8 T x* S; x& J+ i) ^- Z! |, p5 _. j0 c
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as" G: D9 U' R+ K3 P% Z8 f; T
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
* l, C0 \% F! u; Q) z. D7 t: }( Rin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
9 g. P! U7 _0 \& \: b& _% E# Zconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
$ p! e9 y7 c& d- erate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter% K+ B# O1 P& C* E3 h
the market.4 f1 Y' K" O6 l- v3 }# `
% m. F0 @3 F3 r# f. b0 ] In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
8 m9 i3 \0 j tJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In$ S4 Y" G8 `9 m0 }- \
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring$ f- b' E* U; N1 E( Z- c
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
, u# n% r2 {4 }6 N: S. J& pto the shortage of available inventory.
/ u& o2 I6 C5 N8 G" [
9 ~% c+ ]% g6 H; B0 L# l Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its* K& x( I& x, k( x( ?
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains* B% c7 v# }0 Z6 ?+ z9 J
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses' ?: j& [* ~: Y& P- X$ k# j0 A) f% p$ D- @
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
! P& P# {: R9 H& }# B R0 `8 {1 f3 r, b; u/ u0 s
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
- G- |/ N$ R D" ]5 s: L) n4 Iin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
9 v6 W7 f4 f4 {( H' kunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
- u, N5 F* b C! h* Y) Mpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
# e5 i L8 C5 `$ x: jprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
* D8 t( M9 e6 W- E7 y2 @season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as4 ]. X. Y% x3 a* N8 }
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
" h& s' _* X& a" ~/ W5 G9 ?' Y1 f& G: H1 j+ W. O% L+ j/ `% x
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
( F6 w4 r p6 H) @3 I; m* ]9 y4 Vas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton) B7 F# K3 E1 \% Z- @/ r
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
9 h1 d! ?' u1 F7 i2 Imaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices- X7 y3 A) q: s7 o& a' {$ c
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve9 B/ Q4 Y, V l! J
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
; C' ?$ j& J# f. i# f' ctowards the end of 2006.
) ?/ c8 b+ O- f3 }
3 Q0 t+ W. U1 U: {8 t- s* wWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
$ e/ j; @, X2 Iinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable3 X5 [* U( Q% d2 E
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
% U0 i% O- W3 ]" C1 T. V+ Y2 u0 ugroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
% r6 e% N" S5 F# o- Hforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added/ w& k% U7 i6 n+ k: X/ N6 o! D
pressure on tight inventory levels.: h. ?9 X/ ~1 E
3 s* }8 |+ T* N+ J- O
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic" B3 H8 C$ i( K# u
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people* b% ?5 C Q" d. s2 C+ v& L V: w
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
% ^1 K5 X/ o" j5 [while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching& J+ p* c2 Q- q/ w
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
6 f4 x+ `& F0 J2 _6 L" _3 C! Z2 ]( I5 w
<<" W) K" M- e( a
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20068 z0 B, f) {4 D5 R4 R* h3 Q
; p4 s k& A9 l5 q! N2 }! Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ o) E s( T, Y6 v" R9 v
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
1 Q& A# B% T1 T, ?" v7 ~0 W, z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# K, i, x! _+ I6 |% y( X 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
6 x& o$ }. S9 L Market Average Average % Change Average Average
/ h/ j2 _, M. t -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 m$ j% z a) k& p Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000: x9 C7 U# B2 _- O3 s# {2 P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' e. k) H, M; t( {) l3 M& h
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
5 O2 y! m4 q/ j -------------------------------------------------------------------------& h$ l8 W8 w. x5 R3 V$ q
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
' a5 h" T/ g7 U) i4 q! e# e -------------------------------------------------------------------------) V+ y( {" y, O1 w' T7 e
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -& h. O- C) T4 x7 M3 `; r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" U+ k: i" U" J St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3332 l/ H( \7 \- X. ]0 w: d8 A+ D6 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 o* L% M- l1 Q' G: U6 ~7 D Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
# N" q+ U i: k; t5 n -------------------------------------------------------------------------' e2 Q( T: U% N% h5 k
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
+ z0 f2 u- X6 h3 s/ A. o& t -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 y0 F* N5 Z% z9 T# L# y6 n/ o8 D Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
* ]) b' m1 D1 T4 c/ g- u4 S -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, O4 i2 Z/ J9 A9 e/ d) c Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
" F) r0 q6 c( b -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) w: [2 l) Q3 E; h+ E Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707) R% p; } V% f" y {; l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- D; I1 Z. A+ R1 T$ ? Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500% c5 x$ I( D" V( i) _, \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 L5 v. A9 `- _6 @0 M) f/ g* O Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389& A" i% l# \ s4 f; e# b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 z0 L4 T1 Z) P H Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714# w' G7 h0 b$ n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ m. F) C: O* j$ ^4 ]- W9 D
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5009 i9 ]7 p& e' n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 _6 W9 I0 T' _1 a# r Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
' K; L/ P9 ]6 O+ l -------------------------------------------------------------------------: @! j5 U' |. _; |- B
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8606 p a- a# `3 Z# M/ w) U# U% x+ S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 z2 t# u6 t7 r# f" x, q, g
% T1 }) e1 Q, V5 w) @% { -------------------------------------------------------------1 o5 N' K: J2 Q. N
Standard Condominium
# F) ?7 a1 Q' v* k) V1 l. g0 d1 T -------------------------------------------------------------3 W# x T( ~. j& N2 l3 W2 K
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo5 z3 H5 ^; t+ e# P- f; Y
Market % Change Average Average % Change
9 U4 o6 u, M' h, [ -------------------------------------------------------------9 I, L/ a. x9 u0 }
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
* [8 ^( q8 u) K2 _/ y2 ]& L. \ -------------------------------------------------------------* g0 [# E( w- [/ o6 ^4 C0 J5 C
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%+ g6 |2 T, c% R0 w
-------------------------------------------------------------+ L+ X( [* D# f$ e, ^& X: b7 `
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
( f1 q: g1 f2 G7 k -------------------------------------------------------------% q; }8 Z) b( |* }7 y# x* h
Saint John N/A - - N/A" ^' @& u% P% X5 a1 ~" j
-------------------------------------------------------------/ o. q' P; s9 `6 m; A
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
" D* K" a$ B8 `2 i -------------------------------------------------------------3 ` }8 K$ _0 l2 a* c. ~* ]
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%* L! v3 \2 c5 F& e. g$ M: N
-------------------------------------------------------------& D( ]' o- g: A# f! b
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
8 r/ E8 [& ]0 O3 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------
! I8 s0 Y" `, {, o7 W Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
" s: ]" h& {% i+ y7 K- A/ A8 A -------------------------------------------------------------1 M9 n5 |' [0 e2 I8 n
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%5 X$ ?. t) P1 [/ F) G, s5 h4 k
-------------------------------------------------------------/ L' |& [$ A r! ~) L" U" F
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%; C8 P8 G8 S7 w# H
-------------------------------------------------------------
* s- a( w, Q, v$ h Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%3 S+ h; E4 h$ m( w1 P1 L. {
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 E; @- e- w: X& W! x/ V+ T Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%% i3 o: L2 p7 `+ k* r
-------------------------------------------------------------# ]# @8 D x) J9 ]9 O
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%+ u# p* b, q9 D
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 w0 I! b: V+ A3 ] Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
/ S: x. c' B% {* o1 p( U( v( ? -------------------------------------------------------------
( @+ m" w& a& C& j Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
; r) i8 y* L! E# |# Z! A -------------------------------------------------------------
$ V* ]5 R" s- |2 }% A8 @ National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
4 _6 E; ]$ {- |0 v) ~4 ]" b. Q -------------------------------------------------------------& `4 }# I! \3 S8 }. U
>>
H; x7 C$ B) W
. U! ^* |1 H( U8 w5 ~( r# z Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
6 V* V3 |4 m/ M: y. W) Gin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint: @$ }8 S1 T& s2 X1 H2 u8 k* a
John and Victoria.
2 A0 A7 r" \& o: C( @& Y4 K6 f
: b0 W% I z4 ?( D' G The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
$ w q& F) C5 Hcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of- g. Z4 _" N5 n- a' w$ B6 ^9 M8 J
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release, d) k5 q6 G+ B5 j5 F
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
5 v( N- ?* z6 @# ^% w7 Ptrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
/ S% c0 f- C4 v7 A: M4 racross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is' S0 S" E6 R# U& J5 A1 w
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
: J# Q# L6 P0 i2 s" ffigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
3 P# f4 T2 ?; y2 o3 o# xversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
& i/ }( W a' ` \% g' s4 hNovember 15, 2006.
5 X- `! ?$ L% Y6 ^2 T4 Y M) q Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of$ G( g5 A5 J4 U v* Z! T
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge- c- A* l9 i% \7 u9 E9 U9 p
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
( ?5 W4 \& u$ M. h: zavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|