 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable $ k6 N4 E ^" l1 c( U( w0 @
- ?1 v8 N2 @6 c1 D7 [; R2 U G- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -/ [4 L: D+ i2 {8 Q& v
7 n. f/ {6 d( i8 k( W3 l TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market& o2 y d! P) Q' ?! ^8 o6 @' o
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third3 m6 X3 q1 r$ h
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
; x6 g: d& B1 C8 _! {8 qin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit% o8 s: R# b, I# }/ g2 v
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and# h! K, z; I- Z' Z
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
0 L. E; E5 g3 d) y5 lQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
) R8 c+ p* J! gLePage Real Estate Services.4 q# Z8 d8 o1 ?) Q. o; A) ]) _" F! S
+ c3 ]5 p! I6 h y( ^: F Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
! D' B0 R0 k! Z( L8 tare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
; i" L/ c0 w7 |. U; l$ @conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and) v+ G0 _9 i% H6 b. _
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
% c' q+ m5 Z. a$ y5 L, vresidential real estate sector.* `0 s: o. n o' S1 v: K' [
; T. o! G: D8 t O4 S+ z
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
2 D! L5 R3 F$ Zoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
# ~. u. H) P1 N. }- ]year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
7 O: l. Z3 ], L* _& y9 Z' f+ P( l& {(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
3 i5 }: l. Z/ L+ D* F(+13.2%).
. l" k% ~: [1 |2 {( n5 i. W& K5 ^; }/ ]* N7 D9 B
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth5 t, n- e8 a5 F" g3 Z9 f
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
2 n. O3 ]8 J# Xfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are) I- D; J% V; t) e; F2 F1 U. D) n
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,3 l! |' z l4 J( ]
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.( h t4 ?/ \) t% m6 {' r6 [1 G
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We& M/ Y* j8 N9 i h2 h: p4 f
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
2 I9 I! h0 N3 g- R* Mbalanced market."" z, ?/ u4 \8 E1 k
4 {9 C8 R$ q$ N+ T! C0 r9 b
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,8 d4 d4 G3 k% U
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift8 t2 E4 V6 t9 W" T3 x- m3 o
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
; O4 s/ r" p0 C- M: ~4 mthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core7 m8 p; @. A; y! M2 ^- j
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
& R! X3 K7 w9 v2 T/ umanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record+ ]4 r$ Q- x; @" `
breaking price appreciations.
2 x. ] s) `9 m$ g# i( w# |! a. N( F# ?( l
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding; N. V; H3 I h% C/ n
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
7 I& b- Z6 ~" X4 i6 \. k' flargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
) ]' k9 b9 z3 m4 }1 g8 t9 l9 E9 k9 ^) B0 f' l- \ j
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
~3 ~% {. {: X, k4 Deconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
# P. S$ ?/ [* g! q. T- g# |confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off8 F$ F' U# f) z8 ?
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
( X. n8 {- R+ HIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
8 A" a9 a! {5 M9 K2 o3 C' X$ vgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of7 V. s- V% a7 b- i
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
4 P* U! Y- P$ T5 O2 `5 ~' f6 B9 z0 o) u: t9 l
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing+ ^( v6 ~% c; K0 y' F
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
& A6 h {$ N& ?1 P( g/ G/ r% Ifinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
, ~; ^8 ]2 G, |% R1 jare markedly different than those found in the United States.
4 ]: D/ i0 M+ ^4 c( s5 P" I" Z
0 E% E0 r; N% g0 X! T7 A# Q+ h. w Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the5 s5 ~# h% Z, t
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
4 @* k- }* i, F. w* B+ `favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
. ~9 [" @+ h/ m; B$ K( p7 e$ ?relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
8 s( O3 l. K, F3 laffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the$ u+ x6 ~! f+ \3 u6 k* X1 S
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
: ~( x, k7 z+ V" Haggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization# d# z* t" u- H1 s! n4 w1 T
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."$ }3 e( r4 A5 K2 ~
$ h( u8 ^; |4 r- E, _
<<
4 e% l4 I( n& X REGIONAL SUMMARIES& X ^9 B# r% }' @- o# t) G
>>
* U! B, f$ q) {
' j \% C. p' `3 q' l+ J; l. C. e Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in$ T+ b/ x. y$ j U* g5 x
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate' z4 v' G# T. h) n# e' W9 ?3 T
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time+ E, G1 c5 r; m( w3 F
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of" t! K c9 C) [" ~1 N, l/ k
renovations.
4 `0 S* E$ E. D/ V* M0 ~' R7 p5 q8 s1 M
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
3 o# z2 D+ ~9 K$ A- P6 iincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation8 k! L& b6 X- Y1 Y) S) f& [2 k
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and+ q! i3 a% A9 m/ Y) H$ ]4 s
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter." g5 F! `1 {" @, c
. \+ i8 X: ^" q The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
" M& s' G8 J( x6 k2 D7 V( tslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
' q2 s/ B6 y4 j0 w2 @quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new7 {. Y4 Q: j- Y# @& A
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
4 q6 w7 v. W' B# e3 h E1 ?to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
p: F B9 Y" V2 Aand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
! y% K. q( d! v( q. ^( D. U" C! e( W+ ?5 z; z+ j: E+ z
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
3 q0 \" N( p6 R4 E& {conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their" x5 C3 d T2 Z' E3 [( D
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
/ h# ?: t2 v/ n2 x; owas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian ]: _! Z1 P* v1 p. d- Y& s
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing$ `% `* t' Z$ @8 i8 _/ @: G
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
2 G. l( } Z, E+ X3 }
- z! w. o; E3 u9 t) e3 W Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly# q5 U- Q# o. u, c" m; [
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes1 Q# N) o" M" g1 Q
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,1 p: O: K7 A, q( N. {* ?# Z
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last0 v1 O% a1 K& m7 b& p/ W
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions., g, s2 c! N+ H
! v4 S. p/ G) l* y% A" r
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house4 V2 U1 V2 H' z' a3 I# `
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory7 `; j; y# E9 {9 h5 y
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting: ~4 B$ p/ w# N
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
3 _* V' {* y8 Nwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
# _4 t# @' C6 ?1 `) n* \pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
2 L4 z4 ^6 x% g( A- ~( J# Y; kmaking a purchase.
0 `, n$ n) a: a* P' x; C) t$ M7 o% h, n8 C
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
$ M9 t" z) U. vmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
8 f, ~! g3 G" Vconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
P% k3 ~. s7 `5 a( V% }5 A1 {- W: t3 Qcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
. P2 n0 o/ h. B% ]4 Gattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
: ]( y9 F2 D0 ~ Lamenities.
0 z. c' B' o) Z/ M& ~: e
3 G( J' R, ]9 M# c( b% ]: g$ r The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
9 s! ?' }6 |. V! Q5 Cthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
) {% W2 ~4 a1 Q# b2 A4 facross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
! C5 I& _& m/ rcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
6 h& W" T, s! r# B* p$ n4 Cdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle( ~8 A" ]' Q$ [8 T G
residence, rather than for investment.% h7 n, `: _. [2 J$ N2 h5 B* h
/ ~- Y" ~" n5 U; S$ k+ `( |
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
& m( I8 c7 [: D4 N" |- [house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted: G2 u) I$ ?$ A
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer9 f; G: J8 \$ ]) P
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization5 V, n+ N4 y) g: H2 o
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
- M0 u u" Q' A9 h) f- g* kthe market.3 Y# v6 S% D) x' `& J W
: {. y* |( E# M3 N u In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through, R2 \9 {" w) r' z% n
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
, E0 a/ S7 L) q* H' ^' q# {1 WAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring& ^3 Y$ J# m8 Z2 J( |+ Y; ]0 x
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
5 U* g j" g' u2 O) A% w: Sto the shortage of available inventory.
0 n- o2 Y, A( t' G: i! Z
4 J6 D- S- g6 S+ P+ b, V" ? Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
( c! i" u' Q. o. g; e9 V2 }7 F3 wmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains E N+ @3 F2 n) A' \
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses+ i% g5 s3 J! c6 t
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
9 X$ {2 }3 O1 c' j' X8 T3 w: h7 }* h3 s. E' z
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases1 }/ H( x) }7 D
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low& _! X$ R2 S% s& g7 v5 n, c
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that* X' ], @3 T r6 I; D3 x$ Q7 ~; ?3 l2 K
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
/ t) X7 M: {# Pprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer, a# D; K% s9 |8 d6 u; q! d1 h
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as3 |7 ]0 `: x' ~- e! Q
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.1 k* {5 ~5 S* F7 Y4 H5 G: t
6 S! Y7 c6 E% E+ s8 F* S Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
6 A& A. a6 M( @6 Mas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton2 ~" I+ {$ C4 P5 |
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,! Z" ~+ k6 L/ {
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices" Q$ @" i+ p6 B; K5 k
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve. R3 i+ I: r( H- M# m d9 m
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly P0 `- |; W0 w/ _5 j
towards the end of 2006. 7 @7 U6 p; O" i2 Q7 q0 `
9 p4 b# |( Q* t3 |While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
( B- U* N4 i( r/ F3 y% Q Ginventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable! M1 G+ ~: X6 S/ t8 M+ D6 S' P8 e7 _
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
/ L! ?9 J n8 q6 t$ g; ?4 g8 kgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
* B: @& o2 `* a1 S$ mforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added- x& z4 B# y8 w H; g
pressure on tight inventory levels.
$ Z. v7 J2 p) R
" l$ N `0 G8 w) w7 H Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic$ r" u6 P: V9 X- C0 Q2 t
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
: ?+ U/ ?0 \8 X1 @# minto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases; z# X4 k0 s8 D2 B# N6 W# i( T
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
4 o+ Z3 b. z; Vfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.( D J" G) q" Z3 s9 n/ h
, P4 }" L& \: Z$ }
<<
1 A: Z3 e6 Z: E1 T( ` [ Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
. _, ~% Y2 V! f4 o0 ^1 I/ j/ s5 D% E& S6 t3 B8 M5 q( p6 Q+ h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. s! @( n8 o' O$ f1 v0 A- e: x Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
7 f1 P2 }$ ]" p' k6 t( Y0 H -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 c' h: y' u2 Y: O$ [# ^! h/ Y
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3" C- r( D. Q9 V/ [
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
( }+ T( x3 d+ B& P8 c' o -------------------------------------------------------------------------. j, j6 N* U+ q7 @1 p
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
/ i& n6 C3 ?/ ]% p. h -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 [5 I4 T& B! f8 {; ~+ J
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
/ Y- @" x9 d: ]6 Q) e5 G -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 E K1 ?; g. F8 M2 N7 A% G
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
, D; p" v3 h' N# t7 d3 p- B -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 y3 ]; l: d0 n( G4 K" Q2 G9 h4 M" h Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
' g! ], Q# i- L1 _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# j; N# L6 G4 k St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333. j5 w3 n, G6 b ?: W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------3 \% _) P4 h5 G/ R: m: x
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5831 W5 m6 [% `& c: y& Y- G4 W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: X2 k) _6 T1 j* {+ `8 h Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1854 n, z$ u$ T$ ~5 [( n2 x+ V6 w
------------------------------------------------------------------------- j; o$ ^' G' p; Y1 n( ?& p3 P
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
, O# P r/ t6 X E -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ y% b% H- t+ E' ~/ ~- c: K. } Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
6 M: T0 s1 v: h/ X( C+ e" J8 \7 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 U0 g) J( S. R
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7075 C" e$ g: [" L0 y: @1 Z. d5 a4 U
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ R& ?5 e2 T$ `9 O1 ^ Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500. j7 b5 a I( o8 a1 Y* V; v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. h" m0 h+ V: ~
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
5 T( T% s8 b. g9 G( q3 {# W7 v -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 D9 A3 V$ F5 t' H/ O2 J5 D( |
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
1 s5 f9 h& j$ c7 n: Y) B$ [2 ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 }7 d" j' g6 h9 n. J) u# l Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500. o |1 T' @0 q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 [1 ?5 H# ^0 x, v; }, k Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000* _2 h2 l+ A& |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ f1 p$ j; Y- W# r3 m3 d k
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
$ o X% o+ G2 d. _/ W -------------------------------------------------------------------------' t( p* c! `1 }: o# }& u+ W
1 O; _0 y$ P" V7 o -------------------------------------------------------------
% ?. V8 J* d. q: _4 f Standard Condominium
' b3 D$ v1 Y& K4 A -------------------------------------------------------------
& g4 _; f+ O7 J" A% D 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
- ?) V U4 D/ g; i6 k Market % Change Average Average % Change" {7 J3 ^6 M6 F! T! N% k' \& f5 M( ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
w3 {0 G3 L1 H3 I Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
5 \: I) V" z7 U Q# }' D( g -------------------------------------------------------------" N9 x3 d$ K n4 a4 ^7 K! h/ }
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%# ]8 [% H) C; l' N* A. c1 g# M
-------------------------------------------------------------' k3 L. R: d, b% o6 O* a7 ^
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
; C1 k0 [6 ^6 Z, Z% g6 [# S -------------------------------------------------------------: ^9 t, x: R' }- Z8 w) v! `. [/ U
Saint John N/A - - N/A; i& u- |( Q- l. ~! R
-------------------------------------------------------------( N) N, ]. \0 t& w
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
+ ]9 @' b+ V, L6 W8 k6 b( B( s -------------------------------------------------------------4 O/ _, r+ ^' ?4 O z
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
7 E- O2 ]; s8 N' Z O5 J( B5 I -------------------------------------------------------------2 L7 t# O9 D. V, K7 G
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%! X% d1 _0 c/ L7 M: R
-------------------------------------------------------------1 R9 Y( [9 f* W: a
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%9 K' A( D k2 \/ ?7 W; ^: [
-------------------------------------------------------------
, {9 V& j2 @' A. i( e5 L Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%8 R7 W1 k; ~% I
-------------------------------------------------------------/ M2 k$ W) o& u% G* f( U4 L$ n
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
) M( ~" A `0 W' C -------------------------------------------------------------8 W& c- X" F4 m( Y% l; s2 v" X
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
# r% p9 G* E6 O5 b -------------------------------------------------------------% c/ _" g# L6 b7 l5 l3 \8 R
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%+ l3 M# x! \; g" |- X" a9 ]9 H
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ s5 t+ }+ y7 X: V9 N Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
( C( @& h* y# m" L -------------------------------------------------------------
+ ^- {/ Q# Z% z; u" o; J" t, ~, Q( Y! K Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
( |4 b" }7 c+ h; R# k& m -------------------------------------------------------------
$ e, i( ^8 h, j* F0 B# y Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
, i0 _1 I' T g. H' | -------------------------------------------------------------; E) I" e; ^" I. k
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%6 W o! C8 ~' b! w3 E, {
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 b+ [* `* N# M6 b >>
0 i* z i- o- @5 @
+ E0 G" }& ^* D Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined1 A- K0 Z& ~$ N# E: O
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint7 r/ Q, s4 n1 g
John and Victoria.0 C# r) r5 f3 F! \; Q3 _; M1 U
! I6 w/ O9 z2 T% X) C" M- l The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most7 l- Q6 X% v/ f4 {& T
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of! D. ~: f/ u- r8 I
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release( _1 }# w5 e* m0 n
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price8 h% M* i. k9 `6 K* D
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
' |- x2 [0 f- p/ a( P; b0 dacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is( b8 @& F& n! ~6 H
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current5 t) S$ ~. o% C6 u& ?/ s
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
/ Z/ } H, x3 g) Tversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on; D1 e/ ^8 i2 v0 K
November 15, 2006.
) \; x$ t, \( b0 i1 V% w; a8 f3 f* ~ Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
- F( E- |1 w% |. Vfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
9 F5 e3 \4 T- [0 q) R0 P: p% z% h; i6 M* Yprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is' B; D. {" G6 a' @4 v J2 P4 h3 t0 O2 y
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|