埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2196|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
$ V1 e; G$ B! q
" r# s2 P7 P* y. K- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -5 t# z. }" Y2 L. M& G
" h+ M9 |1 r! j0 r9 C9 U* K. H
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market0 i/ h- X2 E) U; s" n
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
5 r" d  D$ a  f4 |# \/ Squarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic" W4 ?% _& [7 }, B- O2 J
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit: q2 e7 N8 D5 ]( y! y4 _8 ?- l
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and" c4 m; Z* G+ n  e
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
. H$ x* ^( X& A8 dQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
5 g9 `7 ?* D- K$ PLePage Real Estate Services.# Y1 ~% m" Z1 e! A# F

, F/ }' f9 ?2 ?3 d0 L3 C    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
) X" L) x: L3 T2 f5 @+ mare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic  N4 c7 q  _0 v8 s; E  \4 H2 N- t
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and2 n9 Y) r; F. f. E5 v. o9 Q
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
3 h# u4 H# q- G8 |# I2 Hresidential real estate sector.' T; ~% w  x; l* z# t+ V
& [& `; ^7 l1 @1 V9 @% \
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation: a- b- F& Z$ [% g& |3 q, r0 X$ _4 `
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)! Z+ B/ e7 p/ D6 e+ ~
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562  F9 M( M) D6 o5 W/ x1 c
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380' h1 R- r8 _1 n2 z% ~
(+13.2%).
5 A: Z8 N5 n0 f' O4 _6 o8 \$ A# y7 m5 \. x: I3 U9 w
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth' I% G5 O, z: L7 L* l7 _
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the  n) q1 m6 T! |% m1 {
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are' a) z1 c- E- g( C! ?
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
( x7 V& \2 G4 }# W5 ]president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.3 B  M' P% Z7 t* G) I+ {; t1 S
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
2 D! c/ C7 h# P5 |! Y' G/ Zwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
4 G6 u9 \. i- H  B! l1 x# [7 [/ P$ Sbalanced market."
! u# [0 Z8 Z6 {$ [  L( z
( {2 h( h- v' U$ ]/ I    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,8 V2 |9 j( y/ o( M# @% o
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift8 E0 ]! T1 q( W$ R" f  P
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued6 `7 U3 b! g; r! h
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core6 E9 w" o9 T  O. a- I/ B, G" N- [
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,5 w4 E* f; T5 l/ |$ Q/ a
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record: ]# x. r. I/ u( \7 G8 ~
breaking price appreciations.
* k9 |; @3 b) G' r
# U4 o5 s1 G  [/ X, V) \    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
3 Z3 v# ^; Q5 v8 w9 s, jeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
7 M: p. G2 ^# o) C6 ?largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed., G* K* q: m& O4 X
4 T1 B5 Z) I$ @+ o2 v0 P( d  k
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
/ K5 @6 r3 D. b  G6 ~8 s- N( E+ Ueconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer2 ^( \3 ]) q( G/ x4 F$ W
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off- o0 x: B. Y3 a( \" x9 n( U# M: w
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
: F+ G7 O1 a6 G5 \; Z1 Y5 GIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers4 k! J( E1 C; @2 x5 @  B/ `1 V
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of7 F5 y! U4 E+ Q, d& T
price appreciation when compared with 2005.3 r+ \. q' r  ~* x

: |7 k8 R( S, ]    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
+ U% k) J: C* P0 Emarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and* _8 L7 y4 r/ a, j. A( z6 x, U
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada3 c, f8 J0 P, `/ F3 M. g# H
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
8 ]8 Y' v  C) @
6 y- x" T! b+ R2 Q6 Q. }9 V  V    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
" ?6 q, S& F" }American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's3 k1 q. C/ `2 V
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the# z4 W  m& Z4 Q  z# R
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
8 ]; D+ i/ G; O1 X0 h9 R+ @1 d" O5 y* V' {affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
+ d: C- j: C( ~; Fdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and( I: u4 [# h4 c% M  @
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization0 i; S' O3 E/ a* G/ V
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
& z7 u  g: X9 a% e
4 u& C6 b  K/ X4 S: Q# h( T    <<% {5 d! i# G- }! N6 k6 q
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
. \8 Y; L0 L9 ]( D    >>  i1 Q3 X1 Z4 n  I7 F8 v
% K; V1 U% q$ A' L$ G5 K
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
& W% h7 O3 W! v- V3 DHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate" J6 M! q3 w, ?2 p9 P; U) D7 ]
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
  l" m; v2 m$ ]1 V6 a' Q% C6 |looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of: I$ r: p# _) Y8 }5 h1 ?
renovations.. u# y' U7 S8 ?3 M1 D
) F2 l' }3 g% A
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
/ X. b0 c0 D; |5 sincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation% w  v6 p; [. f7 _& H3 s; N4 f
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
  B8 t' {- g9 q, l7 Y# t( t) q4 d& o9 }September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
8 ?& ^6 T0 y; Z# @: w7 \" L+ r7 N, P: L8 U! I# f' e( ]
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
; g( a, y+ b  G$ n5 Y( D5 D" sslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
: T3 {! y# }# t' \1 v" kquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
+ G+ g! j  K1 F7 O" g' b( z600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
3 ^1 ~2 S% F2 a% m: J; T; {4 Nto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes1 A4 t" f4 S3 V, a# b
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.7 i1 h/ w. d: |7 `& Q
- C, ^  w$ c' G- k1 E4 f, x9 k& E( I
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
0 l& @0 O' n$ U. [conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their- d. l2 D1 V+ T4 K/ T
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
- J$ o( v  q6 u  m: a4 j2 O% jwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian/ F( E1 G* w  y, a) ]
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing- j% _  z1 x! t8 f. I
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
; c9 n& a. E) v$ T9 v
0 |& Y: H' n, \% Y# O    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
+ Y- }3 b# Z, R5 I- Samong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes  v1 B" _, j* |5 v
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
* E2 `) o0 E2 L; h* L! ?as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
9 ?+ F; Y! R2 V8 ifew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
" s; r7 r2 n" N7 Q3 }9 G9 S' ?! z* n4 C+ m5 H5 ]
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house" Z" p' s4 P& G& X+ K0 g) }. D
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
$ O$ [8 r; f  p: Q# g2 R2 J( \levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting- c' \  P- R+ {7 W. P5 H0 b2 q
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
5 x4 M9 U8 H* m: C* wwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the: w5 W& b8 I6 f$ J& ~) [1 J5 P
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
% `" x' P, ?* M5 Wmaking a purchase.# q6 L/ e. ?% M5 D6 |: D% }
5 i* |$ V' C# ~& `* X. g: ?# s  b* [
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing! U# S4 W; i# e
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
8 q: @4 n$ k& M8 K4 x- n6 L+ x4 Econfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
2 q2 L5 H/ `) G, Xcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
' W/ E; N  F4 E6 y0 d2 T$ t& j" ?attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
; D" P* f  X! O7 ], h# ~9 G, Uamenities.
* n& B: A2 m/ u) O: t' b2 o! X# S' i
7 e( W1 U9 Q7 @3 @  g    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels# s) l! i3 \- B9 U4 X# ]
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
$ W: e, A3 H; m* Y7 R1 Dacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has9 F+ ^7 I( `) q* R/ R
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been/ q. C1 A/ T# U8 p) {$ C4 x
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
' v1 `6 F) I! O8 Cresidence, rather than for investment.6 Y5 z! g7 Q) m

1 d6 n/ ^: |$ }( r" E% s; u4 b7 g    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
% F! f% r" I; P7 f# U2 O" Jhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted1 A/ ~8 A% \! Y# P+ m3 C. w
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer* t$ R3 i$ L% G) c- g0 _
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
' h' [+ w- J! Drate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
6 S$ _6 \$ x9 R3 ?0 Zthe market.
5 J4 u: C4 ]! u0 B' J+ ?5 o4 j4 R) I6 k2 _. O1 B# ^
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
1 Q* P9 B' _. sJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In4 j5 T# N. |6 h
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
; f% l2 _9 O. K/ v2 B: ^3 `months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due; M* c4 p6 d0 O: m1 t1 Q% y
to the shortage of available inventory.
9 o7 |( Y( ]4 S2 A: W: H% \5 D
  j$ [2 r$ t* M/ m5 W1 D. e" j    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its( r9 ^5 G% }! }6 F0 V
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
4 V0 U, U4 i- ?; z7 ?" evibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
& H- P/ _" Q5 ystruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
& ]: s, O. k( U2 x* Z3 A9 m; i1 x8 W" |9 j
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases: t" z. F# p5 v& a* o
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low+ I; W) w* A0 i( q
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
* p! R. d0 [5 E0 \pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring( F. t8 P( n& K
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
' V$ G! |+ Y, {0 G* {season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
1 q% D+ t9 Z4 j& K- B1 c  e  O; ^buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

& ]/ V% n! m& r  s/ A4 f3 a0 w/ q4 A  ~& \- o' h
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter4 c4 _3 F1 Z- s* d- j
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton5 g/ V# I1 W; n7 m0 h: D* ]
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
2 k5 U- t7 S2 P: y, M3 Dmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices" F4 C2 [- y* P& T# q" |! {& x) ^% ~, Q
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve" o+ G& Q# z7 h0 G
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
7 C3 y# K) q: S1 k& X- {/ ltowards the end of 2006.
   
. k8 x. N; w2 i* X' U( j! v2 ?0 S' G& r6 F. D' d
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
* r) I5 n# N* _! M0 jinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable) p* j7 p4 ~9 I
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse& ?$ T' O# s  G$ z. {# F1 t4 y; H4 M
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to' J9 F9 l0 }* |" V$ \3 M; S0 e
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
8 N# |" o$ w8 ^9 ?3 Z. D! zpressure on tight inventory levels.8 B* ~1 |7 x% G. r3 `! d
& T  u: z8 w0 A4 U) ^2 C2 k
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic9 V  V. [5 @' U0 p2 R5 o/ J
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
* s( J6 [$ Q. k7 F1 s+ g3 uinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;$ D! c+ Y0 Y2 d
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
  d  I" c4 M1 d( `3 x+ J/ H# `3 Jfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
" o% T! z0 r( j* C
9 |. ], C' k- o    <<
1 A/ w# W  @7 [5 W9 B" x$ [* L: H' u      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20062 p* f+ Y' w) C. n8 E0 U
. a8 z' v9 v) `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ H; D. N9 J- x* @# {8 L( O  H
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey* U- G6 X; n9 j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* C" [2 e; J6 o; L6 s3 y
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q31 f2 w. F8 n' J3 V9 u# K3 |
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average: Z0 e. ^( K' I3 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 i  C& u! V; G' e' C
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000* J& k: W' M: v* u- y+ W$ D" Q8 s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, F& n5 |5 q5 q  R6 I    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000. p1 o5 V2 p5 M5 X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 O& S( r' `3 ?# Y' E6 q& A
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0003 v3 w& f6 K' f1 \% S/ d
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; K$ i6 Z) q' z- F: R
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
8 l5 J/ m/ e& H* e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 O. S6 i9 I" k. k5 |/ h    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333: K# U( S  [; l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ E% J) W* b% U6 M0 J$ n  E0 u
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583. O1 g  k+ b5 \; o. X3 i1 o4 [
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! ~5 Y: B0 Z9 f) r, a; S
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1850 S$ Y- h1 W- z4 ]. b% |8 @
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) A, A/ M; F+ P3 ~6 k
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
/ f, B$ J* W* e$ h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; y1 l. _1 _' P' D8 P9 Z2 D    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766" o, T$ ~! n+ w& ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" D) T$ m0 L4 i" p+ A3 f  }- i9 a    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7078 n! a/ k7 X# _# O( X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 r. u, H& E% Q2 `    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
8 e# \1 S$ f# R! U* |8 D3 a# ~    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# q5 s% O. k& l8 ~( ]    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
1 t7 m% N5 V9 n" a4 \+ w& Z/ {    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& L: n  S! @( K% A# U% J* @
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
3 E, `' x# W- Y9 _; K6 n# O0 y8 {9 c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; p; p/ t$ s1 {4 c) O) j    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
+ f1 U( |0 D' W8 n: {1 x  c9 d8 W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  s' u' f1 \* L) h9 _
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
6 O' o" U% s$ s# k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; y& l; V$ a3 z& e% D  r# q
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860( S/ k' f7 w# O& L- X$ O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; e0 X7 V2 F0 h" F1 S9 r, s$ a% r2 V4 {# j
    -------------------------------------------------------------1 D+ c' N) d2 G! A4 o7 `
                               Standard Condominium
/ @) n" X6 F" v) w( T    -------------------------------------------------------------; b  d! t  ?) o. Q7 o3 f! i
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
5 b8 @0 h! [2 w4 I1 C4 D5 E/ Z    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
7 D) {2 G) `. V! T! o    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 e/ {: ~& n% y1 p8 L; y) j    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
1 {& g6 o7 B& L+ G9 t" M% w    -------------------------------------------------------------' R( W; `, }% X0 o. j5 T+ h! U
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
3 S) P0 N$ S& I0 z. T    -------------------------------------------------------------  E% }# P% V6 H1 v8 I
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
* V7 F) P% ]0 V4 l    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ j# [$ N+ H# |0 o3 |/ o' i6 _( M% e    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A" f% D5 E1 c/ r- g
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  p: X' _4 u  W+ l    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
- b8 z! \# Z5 W" z    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 B+ @/ @+ G# T2 P, D) ~6 q+ E    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
& E! p4 y, i3 d- O( _6 V( i/ R    -------------------------------------------------------------( L& d, L: O4 ~
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%+ Z0 E/ X5 H2 \4 K. |( d
    -------------------------------------------------------------! D# A4 b# U1 d* `- u! [: z3 k
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%; n- @$ K* j" B& A% e) ^% P) ?  [
    -------------------------------------------------------------0 T' l- V/ w7 V& u* P$ c6 A& W  X
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
) ^4 b# o; F( t8 O    -------------------------------------------------------------! [4 ^! ?! J  V0 F; m" e
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
2 J" O9 c% e; m3 c% U! ?    -------------------------------------------------------------; I& d. _! ^( e* Z
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%1 D  s$ m& o7 e# L
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  m, u% `- X- r; T% H; O. a    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%4 A1 T1 F, ^- h: q2 J
    -------------------------------------------------------------, ~- m0 f% m: u# ?( ~# @! C
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%6 y" o' ~3 n! R( R! V$ E8 r0 v
    -------------------------------------------------------------6 w+ n- l' H9 D7 A9 ^) z$ H
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
+ |" c" Y! U7 s% P5 ]    -------------------------------------------------------------
; O) }1 b* v+ k5 l+ R- z! a. x% r    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
# p/ E8 }  o0 [+ C/ F$ t    -------------------------------------------------------------- H! H* s5 Y- [$ B; Y' y0 @
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%5 G  X: i2 z: [9 D& B4 M
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: ?0 r! P: I8 R. Y7 ~    >># f8 }% W- O( {8 I+ [5 ]

! X% A. c8 h7 i    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
4 {% q1 r4 u5 A5 o7 s% bin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint+ O3 W1 ~# _: N3 @) U1 u
John and Victoria.( `+ v$ h( q& Z( i

: Z* W: Y% X/ s2 q    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most2 N+ x7 E+ P  a' z, F
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
: P3 `' q% i7 b% ohousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release  f+ r. P! U: H+ [( H
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price% g% n8 c+ S; H7 J6 V& ?6 Y
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities2 ]. ?3 S: N0 e- d* \
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
2 ~4 h) Z3 O8 K! }available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
9 o. w, c$ {. H+ F! A/ Cfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
1 Q0 P. S7 x. \# N! T* i$ f" Mversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
3 j, f4 H* K! n0 _4 M$ i2 c7 L  [November 15, 2006.
/ x% F' ?9 W( l3 k3 a    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of$ M& V" y: E3 K0 A8 G- q0 O
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
2 ?) u3 S$ P( G+ Aprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
! J( F, n9 x5 @  V- Q& r. ?7 ravailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-22 10:46 , Processed in 0.127022 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表