埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2425|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
  _( u# T; {3 Q7 i: M8 a0 s
: F) J5 K) Y2 @# X7 `- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
8 Q: v, K/ z0 T( _: d! B. p& o) W3 `* z' X
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market2 J6 k" l4 R  E7 ]# m! c
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third# Q  ?$ @: N/ a1 l; c
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
7 t. r) K& e: G5 C7 [0 vin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit- q% q- z: U) X9 k& V! u- I
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and  m, f. c5 o" U5 u
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
7 L9 u4 E" X9 r5 ?Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal8 D& |* M' l0 G+ l6 e0 ~/ a
LePage Real Estate Services.
4 ?6 y0 f5 Z/ d# ]9 P( P
- e0 g" |$ g' u6 d    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters! l1 R7 M' y' B5 n* V
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
0 Z' l2 }) Z  G/ Hconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and# h' f+ M& }. i7 U' T
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
  [' Q" S: D) ^! x# W4 X; j+ Xresidential real estate sector.- w2 G8 K5 E0 ~  z* d: Y) ~5 F6 u
# w- y: b/ h6 \" o! |
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
: P, y' U) o+ E0 e6 ]; Noccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
" f0 o; P- B* K- _' X+ _5 gyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
7 A- z& v! |3 ](+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3803 ~9 k* L- [. X+ r! S3 M
(+13.2%).
$ E& d0 q" o5 z! T/ G& y# n, p" t! ]
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth8 @+ p2 x  n+ S/ ?: m
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
( T: O3 B" A& r7 lfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
: U1 @( Z3 B: I; V6 N! _& opoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,% n' A5 @0 V: [: G1 ]" n
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
& N* G5 C, M% O, @" n8 U) j6 q! V"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
- W: H7 h' F9 Y1 N8 U1 Y4 u, }welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy, {& `: e6 P8 e' E
balanced market."
, e' A# ^3 z& R5 z! a/ D  N
5 d: \8 g  d9 c* a    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
4 Y" o* [3 H; g* d, O$ n% Aconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift" W8 T2 e3 S% x; ^: H5 k
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
. Y6 G( ]% l+ n6 ?3 ^7 othroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
3 e. R) j, a9 o( N+ ]" Tenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,- V# i2 I" p+ d! d
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record. i3 Q& C" s4 s! x8 P
breaking price appreciations.' S% `$ I% G# y- V- K

0 @. P6 g$ E$ C4 Q3 M$ Y. [+ I    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
3 b9 K! b3 |8 G1 G) ^economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the! P6 X! _/ W6 f9 b4 |4 m: o4 r. R
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
% S4 P% c% C. `. ?3 @& p1 [% h7 j- D6 J4 d' m
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid" q, n* H4 E% x1 h2 l
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer) K1 @4 \2 m6 n9 U7 _6 Y+ ]
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
6 Q9 b( Z: v3 l- ?0 A4 v  rslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
) y' N2 C) P, r' R/ u# dIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
# V3 G! ]) G) t" Ggreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of0 h; B! Z6 {( H6 b
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
& F! N: _) f7 b( H( V/ E
) Q0 z5 B- u+ b- }0 S    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
7 e4 `' H/ S& a( Z1 h+ ?( kmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and3 K+ I( k  g2 M
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
, U7 X( d2 N1 C6 a5 P) U4 _are markedly different than those found in the United States.
! J5 ?9 w) t; j8 j
! c. `# Z4 D7 @$ x/ C# V  F    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
. V! [6 W& L- P0 g9 B) b/ \+ UAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
2 x! \9 |7 e" w6 g0 |favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the7 h3 v4 {$ e" f( |% R7 x! u$ |
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general& P: R  @( C+ x% V3 ~
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the2 J3 e  t$ G; q+ G  g6 B
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and& l8 Z% _& |- |, \
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
. d% V! r: M4 V# xmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."* Q: n" E0 q, v0 J
& e9 _  {- b, f. K4 `
    <<
6 P1 X! U: J$ |, ?                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
3 g1 X$ k1 _( ?2 A3 ~( ^    >>6 ~6 k) v# B. k  o7 e  e% [% D
" P% v: ?1 O3 W, f: [" Q
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
* `# y6 w. ?' NHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
* `1 O: r, T% q7 F0 l  k" ?9 V- uof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
3 ^  c/ f* T: q5 i# H7 F' Slooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of9 l$ Q% o  Q, T- y  O
renovations." E+ x) k8 g# S0 H

9 Q& h; Y2 t4 b3 V! {' c    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
+ ]5 ]+ ]; z0 I4 w$ V, Kincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
# Y: \7 S- v+ V: zcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
) W, o+ C. N2 U6 w6 T* K* j8 ASeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.4 d% T& W6 Z, a$ @8 X$ Z( }, L
" O2 S% w: {+ R8 s' a/ ^; z
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer6 z. z7 t2 ^% D+ D5 R# j# m
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
2 k7 \; P( ~# t2 l9 M- ?8 o7 r! [quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
& p# \) R8 _4 A, d* R% G5 E* O600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
/ Q3 V' L1 i4 q, i& A4 E) uto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes( s! @, s: e* v9 Z- t  `
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.0 f" U6 E+ D" C, x1 Q7 y

! U" w; a6 P! m. K( [: H    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
9 H& V9 V; \4 Bconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their9 W0 E5 V4 Z4 G0 c
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
# J0 b$ J0 y* |' d  X3 \" V9 V/ Ewas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian: e8 k, m! @8 |% @8 d* H8 `( o8 C
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing! R9 Q, J! M6 U
buyers with more options when looking for a home.  F3 T4 l6 R  _: E  E2 j" N
+ H1 s, X2 {: U5 }  G! j9 \
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
* V+ w8 w' L2 J  Y: a1 Pamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
6 r3 F* U+ W: z4 t! C7 Spriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
6 T4 W; ?# Q  q/ Vas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
: f/ S' h* h8 e' ?" Sfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
( _8 D8 F& H7 d: R$ f  }
: b6 \6 [. c9 q$ l- [/ Z: M2 |* |. T    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house6 {8 w1 Z0 A& |. |+ s# s( a. ~  D
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
1 Q( \8 r, n0 O/ ~2 jlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
$ b& @3 r3 A6 @first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
, |$ @  ?: B! }: U, C( Iwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
0 m) v9 M; ]# \: Vpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
6 C2 I6 j+ H" m! g* _making a purchase.3 v5 _) S; a1 h9 D

4 Q5 t3 e( ]" t& d! f    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing+ c) S+ Y) u1 V  ^
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong  O1 ~3 o7 W6 H/ X3 b' H
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
7 o0 P  Z/ ]$ `centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting/ Q! b3 M% O3 S4 |7 |
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
3 R* d4 q, k. Q2 `5 z8 J  P! i4 Gamenities.
5 L7 a$ B4 P  ]5 Y' Z* |; A' R$ f7 ~1 k4 _
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
7 i$ y. w/ z$ l! ]0 r% S, M) H& Ethroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
. S5 s1 W" x/ P/ A) k4 Lacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has9 J: v4 r0 _9 a4 a" X0 J; l
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been) {" @9 j: V% D; h- y8 u1 L
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle1 W8 r" }1 h2 }/ L, y
residence, rather than for investment., a) A6 W- D  Q3 t
# u" R  e5 |9 _. g: U3 k
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as8 f7 S, v# v+ C* i: z$ K, S8 F
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
, {  `& V4 d* Iin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
4 h% n% J2 A# H; bconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization! U* N( f3 k' d2 o' J' ?
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
, P/ q6 {, ]% L( E' pthe market.& B2 ^" O. `6 w  N' R; }4 d

2 y7 Z7 _# n- c9 Y    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through) u  d! a. {' E& k
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In' W; u4 y# Y8 f) v
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
) `) r8 v0 ~- A' @, I% @5 ~months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due3 B# y7 P; V3 k( M7 U7 ]- U) Y
to the shortage of available inventory.
3 |5 C7 M* d* @2 Y- g3 @; d
; q0 R3 e1 G' D. Z! T* U; n# d( @    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
- C7 u! p. K; N7 Q- c* ?momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
9 Z1 y( P3 b3 Jvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses( k& S1 e4 L" L+ {4 r# f5 h2 y
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.* D7 G& z% L* w: w
- h5 O4 e! G$ @
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
, q; e5 G" s7 c) `. F: S- Nin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
: E. [9 c+ k6 {/ b# Punemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that# x) g6 \9 b, g/ M( q( `
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring( I1 W" A% \% O' |/ R' |! W4 Y% s
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
7 T( K$ k1 g0 J7 e& X5 R( Y, Mseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as7 v: N5 n/ D9 z  L
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
9 d  e+ R' ^( D- e  G" m

( l" J. X. l7 X2 w5 I) E    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
' S5 v5 ]0 h3 t3 i; M2 jas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
, @: ?/ H; @: @  gremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,8 [' J7 H8 j& z! l: u: N
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices) H( m, G7 m' n4 [5 R$ j' I1 {2 {
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
- n, v% s  m% x" win the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly$ {6 |0 V& U- t
towards the end of 2006.
   
4 K: }4 p( ~$ j. Z7 m
8 i' {: I/ K5 e0 m& [4 _/ u: IWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of1 O9 Y, `1 n. n  M8 i+ R
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable5 z* G# l8 j1 s) j6 a% q- P
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
7 F3 A  m* h" y* {9 Y% I. wgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
) k# E2 _' @: q4 ]. \foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added) Z" n8 j- ^. @: k3 z$ U
pressure on tight inventory levels.
) l5 Z9 Q7 R0 d9 P7 b$ Q/ g! _( _1 ]
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
$ c8 t2 c  p( r, w; n+ S8 o* H8 ffundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people3 X- m& a3 J+ y) n
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
9 y( ]  o' ^# Z7 f' bwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching0 B# P$ \! X+ i
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace./ M$ p. @% |' t  [

( z: G" V5 K  [1 t& X    <<
4 f" z1 C5 u5 ?0 G* x  o4 m      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
5 @6 c3 u8 f, Q- T2 W& l3 d) j9 H" g. l0 c
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& B1 o- |0 l, [4 i) x6 u3 |4 ^9 X
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey$ e6 Q, B3 u) I4 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" `  A( t3 Y* d0 `' `/ r                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
; u% e/ q+ j* X  w% m    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
8 I/ b5 ^5 }7 N7 [$ U8 U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 a# s7 f( k5 g& Q
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000; Z+ g# [6 v; c, l+ r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 q9 B, P  ]8 a" c& ^
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
2 Y4 H! I, h0 z( W1 t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 {$ L* o6 k4 p+ O6 Y) B( p    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
. E# I+ {; T( s( d    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 Y$ N0 W7 `  k6 M2 ~8 [
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -# D4 y% t) p; n$ Q1 S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 k7 S) x2 O1 m4 G  D    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
. V. u% a+ q0 g5 y5 ~    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 n- V2 c  I7 a, X8 e' n* R- Y
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5830 {0 Y$ T1 N6 J( M; y2 T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* b" L; b; P2 D2 k    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
9 g* K, ~! F0 U  G# N    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 A) s. ]; P* I" G    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
& A6 I2 E  U3 ^; e7 i  Y8 V4 n' k# h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 G, P0 J9 k% p% T; `7 C% Q, z. p    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766; ~- ~/ B+ }7 _+ Q) b( |# v1 x
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) O- ~# p' C- C$ s! s2 w
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7073 R" Q4 @, Q, V. q* j: a
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# \7 r, z3 y0 Z0 v; X    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500+ e8 z3 ]+ P/ Y- |$ A- Q- i0 p( O' `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 T, j5 g; S  @" P" z
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
) e( L2 L3 |0 \* z2 i7 ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 v: R+ l2 v1 Q9 F3 v
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7146 q/ G( W( d$ `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ C* H2 ^3 b6 I. |& `
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500! V8 \1 V- w3 E2 r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 X0 @' [4 t$ |6 Y$ n    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000, P8 `7 B/ \% N7 P6 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 L6 b! G1 k  C* F
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
/ h% @. z0 J, w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ o: g- z( {4 s0 J8 z- U  }& ~4 t* j, D1 \. W  p! I3 Y7 ]' S
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ K8 b- ^1 c8 k; `7 F
                               Standard Condominium
7 J6 }" @8 \) I  Y    -------------------------------------------------------------' h) t, w' Y' ~  ^9 i- C2 }7 w
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo& w$ n9 o+ n5 Q3 _; K8 e
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
7 N$ n3 w6 M; s! A1 a    -------------------------------------------------------------
, |! e3 \3 o6 m9 W' [    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%; Z& W& a6 ~" K+ _# R
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ d* a+ Y9 O( K  B! ?1 M- K! Q
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
' {/ \' }: b  Y% W    -------------------------------------------------------------0 G5 I  B2 U  X0 e& I0 W4 s
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A. Y( Y- s/ _9 z% [2 ^) f. P0 e- I
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, |& S# X9 k) ~, m- v1 V7 U    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A# m, {$ V2 o* t+ {* w# V0 Q% L
    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ b8 K1 d1 Z8 X+ }: S9 L& t/ O    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
+ E: f- o* q* j  O    -------------------------------------------------------------& a4 n5 _3 R: `
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%6 @) a, W* g( `3 x% A6 h" C/ U
    -------------------------------------------------------------* J3 v! |3 y- d9 f$ ?! N# {; h4 q1 S
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
/ n# P# E+ @, M# ]    -------------------------------------------------------------! }; q. G( j! o1 i9 v1 w
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
* S! `/ v- }  m. \# h    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 s, b% y) p  S! f2 V, W    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
; }" z7 w; y# ?! z6 |: y, g/ b    -------------------------------------------------------------' b0 t) Y& x$ q! J7 q
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
+ U$ U' h. A# O! z  I( W! W9 ]  T1 J    -------------------------------------------------------------
( X$ h( h" T% I5 Q$ d, ~3 K    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
. v5 g8 ~/ q. q" \    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 ~$ f. Y$ j( f. P$ r! @# Z    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%( N# U0 F: @( u6 `# |, E
    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ {1 ?. i8 }! E; b6 K0 u    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
2 J3 N+ v5 p  D, L    -------------------------------------------------------------
  O  o- m2 e9 L8 R6 q0 Q( T2 V    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%$ N' c3 j- J% ~9 |, o0 Y" R
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 I2 ^. ^6 s' D9 |2 f( V+ r
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%& ^) w1 J2 z- N# L/ @
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 I- _4 M  {) r# q    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
# P, K2 P& c2 g( ^" G0 D  P    -------------------------------------------------------------
# t5 ]  k& j1 O+ E5 m' g9 i    >>
0 q# u. v' `, r8 I! A  K- |7 K" D0 f" _" z* G. a
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined- y3 ?+ J8 x5 E# |
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
8 [8 r" I0 E( L+ [* k1 uJohn and Victoria.- k# a, ^) y7 ?: Q2 L2 M* v) w

% [( ?, Z/ {3 T, m    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
4 ~( W; S9 z: g  n! ], Ccomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
" a! r9 q4 a4 Q( A$ p  zhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
6 y1 x3 i0 k9 Preferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price* R) @& g0 P$ P4 T& Y: }
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
0 o6 }( p2 W0 ^6 ]" zacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
. s8 J3 W! P6 m4 D; O. ^9 f0 o) tavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
4 j& P; W' |9 X* s/ L  W* pfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable# H) ^8 d7 M4 N( y9 A8 d. V
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on" q; J1 c3 ?4 N9 I
November 15, 2006.
% F% E5 r5 Y6 l9 y% Y) i0 ?3 l    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
! @* U5 s( P1 x% d9 t1 ]fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
* y& |( R5 C. u* F/ Eprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is+ ~% x/ l2 h8 V0 k+ {5 a& Z
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-5-2 08:47 , Processed in 0.116108 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表