埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2110|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
: l2 V: F) h! D, f9 j% p% `2 G3 C3 j! @6 D- T0 K
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -% e3 O2 ]0 C2 C: R
1 m- S1 t/ M6 f4 z  n
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market; Q4 T# H# J3 q
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
0 a0 ^1 M" A) j3 U3 a2 l; ]) oquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic' `7 s* D" [7 G' ]; P2 _
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
. f# k3 I& V- P- M% Pprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and3 j1 f. [. N1 N- k9 Q8 |& U7 D+ X
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,: `4 T0 }4 c- p1 i# B% p
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal' I2 m& w, X- S
LePage Real Estate Services.: u. P/ P8 X; [" g8 e7 {0 Z2 C/ O
4 [4 y2 L$ @: O6 i2 u5 z
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
6 M4 I* E3 R5 K: S5 Kare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic2 K5 ?. j. j3 R: ~* r& f
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and5 l8 L! f  r2 V% H% j! q
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the+ d) B' w! Z+ L5 X) |8 c
residential real estate sector.0 y) t6 V, F3 f9 f
4 I* v9 o% B4 v+ N7 h
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation/ E& k5 y* w+ K- P
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
) {% G+ t9 a  a' P* uyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
$ C$ s$ ]) A) l& P3 Z(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3802 a; A$ ~2 Q8 h$ f& D+ p9 f+ @1 n$ c$ @
(+13.2%).
1 b, O2 Q- t8 A- s: g# K3 c4 f  H
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
% e9 P: ~, [3 k; Tduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the4 }4 c5 Y) `+ {
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are& U  d# b; t7 V4 J+ n0 Y8 q
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,9 ?3 e! I$ j) S4 z  ~4 K0 Y
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.2 w# D' }; r& o# B3 n" E* r
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We: @, L: r5 B) R0 Q, R+ ]" Z
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
7 E; }3 [3 n' M! `/ [# mbalanced market."# H* i% f/ w* A# q; }& |/ F

6 Y1 `4 g8 q( s    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
7 e8 S0 N3 r; `" [considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift; y' u* v6 E) Q# u/ X4 J( G3 j! h
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued' m: K% z$ M1 D6 l& l+ G
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core0 [9 V8 p3 Y/ K; g% I
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,- {7 a! ?7 @" _; {: p. d
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record" Z! E4 [: F: M3 i4 g3 T% n" P7 ?
breaking price appreciations.
: E  a% B2 _2 b& C4 k; f3 U
; C8 N' g) g0 S$ Q( U" l    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding& j, y, L! q( r+ ^  S
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
( S8 A0 Z% ^: S) D( w& o" zlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.* U0 J+ v% i" p  v1 b0 r
( y* ~6 x9 e5 r. {9 I7 z
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
5 K% e3 \# Z2 I; d. d2 leconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
9 e; i# T; \4 s7 a) W. s  N. @) bconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
, E* `$ w( V7 s4 g9 R- R( J) Oslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
- t  O2 w1 y' \5 b/ ^! d1 fIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
5 Q( ?, y! C, U* N+ Q' r2 ]9 agreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
) W: |; y) ]+ a* z  ]( b: D; Fprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
7 P5 y& v! Z2 v$ c; A  l  u/ A, U# [4 [. m1 S# p$ V
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
$ c9 w8 ]; R1 N  Q$ rmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and" o" T: s+ Q/ g# [$ I% D5 i
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada) q% a4 M0 }* U$ C6 ~- E( P
are markedly different than those found in the United States.$ w6 W- a0 X  \/ F* D8 [

: O' {2 @: s4 A3 e# h6 U/ m    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
4 v6 t7 n- f& R$ w- aAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
* I4 y& @7 L$ j6 `7 W0 bfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the: T$ }  H) K+ [! ~
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
& S/ N, e! j* P+ oaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the3 Q, ^$ ?' m2 I8 ]4 `) N+ d
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
9 E, N* I5 J5 k+ |2 n) ^8 a" y1 j" Baggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
% }: C7 D2 q) A- ?3 }mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."4 k: x+ u$ X$ B  L! [
2 N5 u& q1 F4 }) O5 f  ?4 e
    <<( ]! }" o) c; d3 H
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
* A; M1 W, q/ o  O& H- V    >>1 ~. }8 W; m; |6 ]& d& U
) w1 m/ M: O, P. F" x5 i& {( f% O
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
, W: k. }4 S$ U6 m3 G. jHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate' ~$ E& x/ K6 R
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
" v- C9 e" @1 U6 n9 mlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of8 O2 u$ T, l4 ]* ?/ @5 }9 f, x
renovations.1 n: J' c9 z- V
& N- W. I* t4 s2 D- h! Y) Q' o
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight3 E5 R2 I* c' O; a
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
9 o) k( B8 u+ A6 F& s3 c, [' H1 \3 Gcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and3 R* c4 @% D' K' [: r2 i
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
( M, S. B0 X! E4 `) h# z
. l& `. n6 j6 u: Q. g* |' P, h1 \    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
& i' `* R. F, |# _& Oslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
! B  d9 T$ K* X% ]4 j9 {quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new' P7 ?/ j1 d% f4 l6 l
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
% o3 ~7 F- e+ O: Rto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
% H3 W) R. D; V7 P: [+ u6 Eand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.! \3 M: Z; ]6 c+ n% Q' w' ]
6 ], u- h3 @3 z7 c  o
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
- Y- N) l6 d/ s! O" |9 Q1 Gconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their! \- H/ k, {/ h" K7 `
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers; e* X3 u3 K0 G' b' a
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
7 ]; x0 k. S6 Y/ L* ^4 jdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
# x" ~- ]% g% y/ Pbuyers with more options when looking for a home.1 z2 _3 J. q# [

! h6 L$ t# l. z* d    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
+ }. ^! h) @) k7 m( W0 eamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes  {5 k# R- [9 O
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,3 ]. Y3 `" F) K. |
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
, o2 V2 P3 X3 p& {2 Rfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.3 y2 W; `+ v9 f2 G$ t6 |
1 V" Z! G/ b( O
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house+ F+ Y7 f4 O! O( @! T7 a" X
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory$ K& r; ~& L6 N2 r1 b- H8 {# l
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
& |; n* h% D3 }, [first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
8 i7 r' p* {+ s6 j4 q, l! Ywhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
" T2 O8 g1 p# qpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
, z- @1 L9 V. E3 g" y3 }$ i$ Emaking a purchase.
+ H( h, t6 K: L1 m3 ]7 ~2 K: n. E: |1 Z! d1 q+ r" ?$ Y
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
4 m, f$ ?% K3 v( Mmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong& y# |) o6 n$ B
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city5 b2 `% C. T' g4 U5 S4 b
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
" S% o: m) H* J4 I: @: g) y$ tattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown9 c! k) P8 t& V
amenities.( _  ^0 z. {4 B1 G0 w
; p  E- g+ P& Y* j( _& O7 \
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
5 a% Q/ {, e4 g: z  ethroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
- C* k. S! L5 J+ B9 R( dacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has9 j+ B; Y  c# U) G2 b; D+ G" g: m
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been. p8 i" g+ a% g: a
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle* G, A- d+ t  B# Z( @6 r$ e2 l
residence, rather than for investment.; Q3 G* M  n4 C1 z" c5 d
! j: o- r4 }' b7 i2 ^, t
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
& f3 A& K7 a- v2 Z, g' e& shouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
* W# t. V& ]) R8 Oin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer# @0 I( r8 {! G% P3 m7 e
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
0 i' [/ M7 a" Qrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter7 o- j! J! H- S" k' e1 o
the market.& N- {8 n. ]7 j

* z6 K! g, L* l3 |) l+ Z! ?    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through% g( C: X: ~3 r* ^
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
" C6 Y  g& a5 r1 Y8 f) A% yAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring6 i! ]7 ]7 C( k- ?8 d4 {0 L
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due7 n5 R( h6 W3 j/ h6 w# J' {* T3 W
to the shortage of available inventory.
$ o& ^( ~2 H6 Q& Z. J/ b3 t8 [0 u8 j* c6 d# A6 ~4 S9 j
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
. _% ?$ R6 b4 {! f3 P; c! |$ V# cmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains2 C# i. W. c1 k( y3 o% h4 c8 b
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
$ P. ^) E" I" q2 @! m) ystruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
8 M/ J# N) P! }  {3 X
8 x# p/ g) N" C1 k6 D5 y    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases; H! K1 W* J4 V
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
/ r! h2 K" U: E) j& punemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
& @5 d$ ^3 z8 q* _) Ypressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
% q4 f, r; C9 U  mprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer/ K- a$ g; f; x! h$ f( B/ {' I) ~
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as, \' d1 O( g6 s) i/ X4 Z
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

1 m1 T% E$ r6 i0 l* o7 r5 K5 k/ i) k' ]1 ~) I, b8 C& @
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
& [5 |3 p: e' F7 o5 P1 Bas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton! x( k/ ~' H+ D( q" V* b
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,( ?: }+ Q, P5 M' l7 ~
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices& \2 P1 m# o' h* r2 M* {4 C
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve2 {- ^, p8 r9 O" R, r
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
; u% ]9 l1 D0 w6 s2 Q. a0 ~+ btowards the end of 2006.
    6 K3 ]( U; @7 Q# h

6 a( `' T# n& v2 V6 rWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
+ n/ T3 V9 Q, d9 i/ w9 [: E9 a. [inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
8 u( _. X% [. N* c. H& z$ Pto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
5 r  S' m' I' s. ?1 egroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to4 v2 q4 y/ N2 M) a2 `: V
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
/ P7 l; D  I0 C' z0 ipressure on tight inventory levels.
6 \+ U6 S" F! N+ c( @. O
  Y1 w3 C& t6 a. A4 F3 _& J0 J    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic+ t. h1 W; Y" _2 Y
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
' Q" A" ?6 B( s1 }: Z) A6 `+ [& Dinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
  A% w  s; a1 ~while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching' V: @* ^, K/ K( I+ L: b( k
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.5 C8 M% [1 P: Y' Q% G( a
; ?* R) B: P9 A5 d4 l
    <<
! R- v4 O* X& n" r, H; C& k3 O      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20067 G, w5 j& k1 w3 q+ `

+ N  i9 ]) d) s: f# Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 T8 q5 Z* A8 V% t" c4 a/ `                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey/ N) ^* _$ t- |- N# P  h9 n5 G' M7 M
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) l( n) l( a; j
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
1 {/ r) |7 B( K+ u2 Q& ?    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
1 |# x3 C: I( Q; i8 k, O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: ?+ a6 K" N5 r1 ]; u! ^    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000& l4 J; t; o' i- ?/ j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 ^9 {! b- y( T5 Z7 z8 m
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0002 C  b' G. J  ~2 J3 ~. \
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* x- E- C" w, d% ^2 ~; t    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
, {8 r" Z* X  V7 k: L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 R, r, ]% ^" z. m6 q8 d    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -$ ]* \, F8 `; O9 n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 U  R3 r# D5 S: S
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333, \# r4 I5 M' K$ o+ s! U3 r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 E& E+ v2 B0 r) G" S
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
; U9 a+ J2 i1 t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ y3 j$ W6 k8 m7 l0 T+ }0 {
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185# y/ C5 c; A. m$ g0 {7 F0 w4 b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ k. Q3 N2 C; C5 f- }  @    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
" w* {: S( w, h. R/ H. H    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) p: Y* T/ _1 `" j' p3 g/ y0 [. I
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7669 `; w6 i3 |8 s+ d
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ u& T, Q2 e9 r. V3 `    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707" X( x) D% w. H: H
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, K$ ]8 O! m; K" I5 M    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500+ I" p# C! O0 Q9 C2 W  k. f$ N
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' V( U9 ?  e8 q" _1 \    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,3899 Q6 S- J: r: O) s9 E
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 _) R) G6 e; o& T& j# p2 w4 E6 _    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
% O7 u4 a) {0 P) G2 k1 o! K    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. v6 k5 L; E8 c6 Y: C  r    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5007 M/ `/ d! c$ }$ x/ {7 ]  j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  m0 P  R4 w6 e
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
4 M; s3 e: O1 R( ]# t1 D' Z! K    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ D9 x2 q" g4 A$ f: S    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8606 w3 w" D  @/ e, \4 i4 [
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 H% x. C: E5 O) Z% I& {& D% y: n7 `/ i9 T& M& Q. g
    -------------------------------------------------------------' ]! J- C9 b, z0 X3 L" U+ [
                               Standard Condominium
4 h+ N7 D! E; ]    -------------------------------------------------------------# ?0 ~2 O0 s: z5 H$ p+ g
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo+ o4 J$ o0 \8 u
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
4 {9 D" q1 C  B4 G  N4 n2 Q3 Q, [    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 F/ A/ p: K5 j' e/ x. I    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%" G, m$ y9 c& Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------" a, c; M& n& x: ?& ^& `; j) a# d' F
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
$ D+ u& y$ b# }- n2 J    -------------------------------------------------------------' h. ~$ J6 e, E& x1 f# b
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A8 L& V" X, t, O; q) d4 t
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ a7 K/ L3 {$ U# X    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A/ _' k5 m, l6 E
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 f- ^$ j# D% B4 _$ ]0 ^    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%( |  ]! {4 l) S. u3 Q) l6 z+ T1 L* c
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 C  W/ m; O4 W) q7 I% c2 [5 c
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%' G4 l6 L! Z0 r% f) d
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 T# K3 @! x2 r/ ~4 \$ Z2 z    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
6 b% @9 T* A6 }( T1 c, B. b* C% q    -------------------------------------------------------------
, ]- i# g& C" B' X" X( @& k8 n    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%3 ?6 \0 u2 E: S3 f- b3 f
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; q  ~. M. ]+ ~+ j" k! A- r2 V3 ~+ R1 W    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
: W/ r* L6 h# E    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 v7 c% g1 \$ c2 |. P    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%5 ~$ ^: ]  h- z% ]; m
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 w; b. f/ i( I    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%5 Z& ^* z+ b; C4 H8 w
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 g6 Z" o  H' X; O3 J    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%  B6 N8 |' M/ \* g, p4 a
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ D' i% s$ i2 H1 w' M
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
  L% i, Q& r9 w: f- o0 p# H! }1 K    -------------------------------------------------------------
' A& g0 _! o# j    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%8 a) @5 i8 H0 L& F  K* w2 X: b
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ @/ b" Y6 T: H3 S$ e    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%: e3 J1 V: U. f6 r
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ m  D1 o5 v7 y: q2 ]* C: N$ J2 r
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
' j1 ?: m6 ~$ z! u: f, Z* [, Z* [0 u    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 L+ o; _9 f1 a  J- `    >>
2 W3 ?3 y" s( Z2 m1 ^9 W
$ i. N' y9 B5 Y* b! E    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
" l. e" Y; b( T5 }8 O5 }in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint9 H8 e  o# N( c+ E7 C3 t
John and Victoria.+ v: z' h2 B4 c& M) |

# }8 B* K/ _  Y! O6 L; q    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most" C! M/ C3 h$ x+ Q5 S$ N+ y
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of0 n' @1 k; g; e" |
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release" V5 }& ]  m& G- r6 ~- |& r  }
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price) H) f5 C$ k$ p  k' r
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
5 G" k/ a% f, {. H, A3 ~( G& A* uacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
5 p9 _+ S- Y+ n5 y2 Javailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
0 M5 X( ^8 J6 C# @, ]- [& Efigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
8 U" y* A! H$ A! G8 yversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
9 h4 F" Q8 B; J$ @9 f* l% q8 xNovember 15, 2006.: j9 d- u8 ?$ @6 Y
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of2 a" [7 n) E/ w3 d& ?4 ^0 g
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge. B& @# u& x( Y$ Q9 b0 h5 `
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is, b: M. X$ }/ w8 X, G
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-29 08:05 , Processed in 0.163028 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表