 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 7 H2 A0 D) I8 k0 N0 i; y
6 G! @5 m7 u b1 o' Y& d0 @# e& ?' i+ T$ X- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -; x" r0 ^8 u2 x
) E3 x0 X# ^9 X1 y
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
2 b& k$ `3 _! r3 t# {exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third& A" ~7 F" N3 Z5 T
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
) @% G8 t/ V2 ^) q% sin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
6 Q2 u1 d A) h1 D$ J! H5 {price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
' k3 w. R5 F* q0 B+ Vmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
* E a. ~- }. }# DQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
0 S8 t% U, N4 a3 zLePage Real Estate Services.
, y* k6 J6 F8 e" L! c8 a I4 w2 y% ]
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters! B: E r4 E" s! {; u
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
: Y6 m: p; H' @" V4 a0 @2 Z3 q, sconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
T: B, y0 k* m, |sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
, B/ n2 _+ m# E) ]- Fresidential real estate sector.
+ b: i' R1 U4 B4 l: b, A/ R" q2 `. E! ^* J. O3 \
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation k- i& ?$ \7 `: K8 j* ^! i
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)) W6 {4 p' _, Z+ s
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
" n, C: |. b. R; \(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
& b8 a, K0 K( ~8 H(+13.2%).+ q5 q# s* S2 _3 o; s
$ W) O' q. v4 |& |
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth/ W/ N" [9 L* {: E+ w. D: \
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
! {. i" y& J! f6 `$ X' Efrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are+ ~$ G' G& g2 @0 w1 n; {+ t! _
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper," C4 H8 ?& w4 H8 ~; P6 ~
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
% J5 w5 U8 G6 d# ^"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We5 E s7 D8 O# m( A
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
/ s# C9 z, S9 \5 m' lbalanced market."
2 A: j+ ^( c+ ^; _$ O# n! q- b/ |& G N' N7 K+ v- }
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,( {1 Q( Q7 c# W. m$ h1 p' a
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift' j% R1 h# I4 m1 H. l1 Y4 }3 J
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
' U" K# f& s( z4 bthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core+ o9 a" C% w4 y- z/ ~) ]
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,5 `* `, E6 m- M/ ]! l2 m! M: i
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
& K. `( R/ c! o6 c. E: s+ `) D; ybreaking price appreciations.% V3 X. W4 ?3 f( [4 f. g* y
* [( f/ ?3 ~( W7 }" P' f( W* d Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding) L* k; \7 d! W. \' A! P
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the4 P, \. q5 W% u2 L1 j
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
2 C$ N$ x9 B; W6 a
. K, m2 e- l, e* A0 A s' r7 C! N In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
$ z, y1 ~4 s4 D. ieconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
3 q2 ~7 k! X- {) ~confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
/ Z! W; F1 H3 Bslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
" Y/ U, C% \* N# N: c' wIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers# k1 q" B8 p' E' I# `% @! e. L
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of* l' g" {$ J5 x6 Y( q) ]
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
) z1 ~9 J8 J Q: N4 E i/ z4 I0 z. l9 q5 m- [+ p, u0 L) G3 c
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
. b. Y G, w L2 N4 X7 Cmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and2 S' J$ J8 d, a0 ~# i! ~$ b
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
6 w3 C* L0 x8 H, vare markedly different than those found in the United States.7 c$ H; S% |2 G2 i& Q% U
$ j2 P5 @: T& w/ _7 ]! C
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the; f8 [" l7 D7 E6 ^) t# @
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's7 p9 R# {# W' i. J5 w, c
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the" p# E6 P; U/ @: T
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general0 R" L/ @& Y3 Z3 f
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the1 B7 T+ |9 }( d, a+ y3 H8 k4 }
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
F3 x# t6 N$ J) z. c3 Xaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization8 x7 I) a- |9 L8 P" f6 d i
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment.", w+ c) M/ ^0 H
% V6 L, X7 m, C8 o
<<) C" W2 d" m& J& q! N) h
REGIONAL SUMMARIES8 J" z2 Y% c6 {2 L+ h8 x
>>
8 @# v# c; Q4 R' c# t+ Y- H" i( P! k9 ?; M% G" e& M
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
) k3 k2 N% i8 h5 E c1 mHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
# C# C- Z9 _8 g# ]1 ^of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time+ c8 X7 V! I/ B" e+ P' n% w
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of9 A2 l. Q7 r; G% v9 p2 Y; W
renovations.1 F2 L. h4 }+ t% H4 n
6 N+ C5 ^1 Y' d. w: [" D The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight0 e: U. p& [* c
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
8 D8 A ?0 c/ U" b3 ?' w& p/ ?compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
2 H# O5 U1 D* d' `1 z7 g3 JSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.4 E" e3 y3 p- B% x5 h
/ P8 G7 ^5 H$ [: S' z$ G The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
( d& H( O- R* o1 b' Gslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
: a! a, p6 ?5 nquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
8 z: A5 e9 b* @* C600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores" X1 _2 I' ^* p0 p' i
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
w9 |4 i A. L' k2 \2 h" Nand are instead opting for more affordable housing options. H- T: m: |5 ]8 V
{. W# i8 Y( d8 F+ @0 T, B In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
. r, k. w6 ?6 Y# |' |# X, [, {conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their/ o1 T* k; o( R' V) o P4 H
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers9 w* D! w& R( z
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
+ a9 o9 f8 ?2 r4 E4 Kdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing. V: F( J$ V. j. S& F
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
8 m( s' _, F2 A, E
2 W2 C9 `9 @5 q: M3 H% a( {: S Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly. b; }) F% v- ?7 z* X! Z; y
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
1 j7 I8 s% H- R& ?7 Y+ S9 rpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,: }6 @1 y( ]0 U7 |
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last7 _! T' B, n( o* k$ s
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
) @- p5 M3 q+ Y& T7 A7 W6 X! `' E) V0 v. M8 h
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house+ t% V+ e% @. D' f- u
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
8 \3 u6 T( U; w: elevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting& k- s9 F. K% Q y% q: j. K
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
4 p/ g0 _; u& q) D6 n& K$ t1 ]- gwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the, s ?. Z& I# N1 E
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
6 W! r' v+ s" y! e5 d hmaking a purchase.5 i0 X' V/ K' b6 \/ C$ C1 C
7 a* |! V) ^5 m1 `. r Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing& l/ A) e0 X5 S$ \2 e
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong" w$ ^' O4 d2 Q8 [6 I9 @
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
% o. U6 Q4 `, {' \& P- `centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting F& f1 b- y, A4 `: F
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown* S/ C1 Y; n" D$ b k) ?
amenities.: j. y4 d4 O" F7 W4 x) ]
7 q. R8 Q+ }" N; n; K4 s
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels1 c4 `: z. n3 A
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
6 z6 C0 Q; I9 L- S* Dacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has% y3 p/ L, b" |( q5 O" W
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
- j O, b" Y, [$ g! G6 {driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
& t5 _* p h w3 } l1 |' {0 v( |residence, rather than for investment.
& n( k, C2 s: e* ?
% A4 a3 `) ^& E& P The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as+ G2 z* K) B# _9 w# r
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
" y& C& h5 F: `, O% Y/ w rin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
% r! B3 E% X+ t% j3 ^confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization/ ?1 Z; i8 d* ^7 m$ R2 p+ M: U, \# F# s
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter3 n) H0 c' \' c5 n. d" M5 C
the market.
. a2 N* H) Z) s: ]7 T+ s" \3 Y6 m) V9 u0 O: O9 _: Y
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through$ B8 z, E: C% K
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In; y1 u8 {- m/ {( o2 v
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring& \3 r" R- \# [% Y' Y
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
9 u8 G3 }1 ~" D1 H8 x3 f r Rto the shortage of available inventory.5 ?; \0 v2 j9 I( F y& E4 I( f
( b: k+ _& l4 F% T3 g Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its5 W j) P3 }5 W) u6 M1 d
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
l, j3 r9 X- ovibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses6 l/ X; U" C' t9 G9 J
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.2 e, j' W/ T, {9 q! F
3 m7 `& n6 F; O. Y( L
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
# \+ M) b/ ?9 L1 s! L+ n! rin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
4 |* V0 i, i8 Y+ t, ^: d. J2 Y2 ?unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
& H- p) Z# p' Lpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
: o: @2 C% L1 a' tprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer' }/ n8 Y( J6 M8 _6 Z
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
?) v% v3 V8 l4 O) l) X9 kbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.* S8 e' {4 r8 Z" L. {: C8 v
: k( |+ Q3 }% t4 l
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
& ~* F: C* [$ Z, Aas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton; B+ m+ ]3 w E+ B/ c9 E
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,9 p* @$ ^ H* R0 ^2 ]' Q9 E0 z* [. F5 m
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
6 v! {/ o0 e( D7 h3 U/ mincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve/ s4 S( B7 n' I: G6 ?* L: Y
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
9 A" U+ W5 g, I! Y& E, J' x7 Htowards the end of 2006. ! f% ?' g" _1 h, ]4 F
1 l, p8 p* R4 t4 r
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
' t+ h! r- O' |9 n! Ainventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
0 ~' x( c" m# A5 Y+ c4 k" j3 _3 ~. Fto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse1 X4 M$ a U3 w( P# u4 \- c, n& d% h
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to' a3 z# f$ F. s: E$ I6 H
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
) s' Z8 A; p6 z4 spressure on tight inventory levels.9 a0 F, w4 ?/ J* `# c0 X* H
4 P( S& ?& ]" B. h1 i
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic. u4 y x) X2 i
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
8 \" [$ }- t; vinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;+ ]% r3 t' a, K+ ?% d1 K3 |9 A: L
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching7 y# o+ u8 K0 Z, b" I1 X6 J
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
# }+ I. Z6 U! z, a; V- i
' Q; D7 v* }: c3 O <<
- c/ ^' q4 C2 P7 m Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
" f" ~/ [# G2 W
& t# H0 v9 ~* g* k0 l -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ M9 r. V* M; d1 Y
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey$ i' L$ R% W: Y) R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, _% y( ]2 l& Q* f3 B, Q 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3( A% t' i. s' ^' U
Market Average Average % Change Average Average; R# W( h9 ]- T8 d) b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 A) W: S6 m7 }( M
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0002 I+ w7 C, Y3 a4 I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# q8 }4 k6 n4 J. Y! G H
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000$ R9 B. J h$ W8 X8 s* K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# K; E- R |7 a+ k Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0007 M8 v* z1 A c! @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 l1 c; }3 N3 v5 A; ]& e
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -! B2 i9 f8 C3 B( v+ i: X- d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 t: h! C* \( i3 g! l St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333$ K/ J0 c d4 u9 D( \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 d5 y( S( F* w5 |/ L) S8 Z
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5833 d5 S2 s' m% ]! ?/ g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' }# t3 Q- l) l" |: [
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
4 E. D; C0 B2 i8 A* ^' @! s4 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------) \7 R0 T6 c, Q/ Z2 ?
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250, L+ e, j6 r6 t/ j; u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' U8 E, z, K" t* \' M- z7 Y1 e
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766 V7 d9 l/ ?. h. P; l- C& \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* z) }, B0 W7 E
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
6 p: ?0 z m1 q9 u' B -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 j5 N" w& X" C( G7 F Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
\2 V% O( z- B W6 [6 C# U1 k -------------------------------------------------------------------------# E' @! N* ?0 M$ \
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
5 ?( G9 y+ k$ ]9 _9 O: \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ k* p5 _7 m; t Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
1 p9 t( s, L* d: T( C4 n -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( Q8 X$ E, F/ W Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5007 Y/ B' Y, H- H3 e1 R# H3 l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ \5 S5 S: X; K, g% Z& n9 F) R
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0008 [" F. g" u) P ?* v/ J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- [4 A, f5 s- L5 j0 R3 L# r
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860" I2 c9 h6 f9 `
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; X$ ~ {' U$ X* t+ `$ W
' K r d: y1 k# N- M6 R -------------------------------------------------------------
8 N$ y! g3 O4 @# x- ]) C Standard Condominium q% {3 B* C: q5 K* G. `6 h- h
-------------------------------------------------------------8 F$ y$ V0 T. m5 `. O8 w* l
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo' k$ v- f2 J, X# a5 J& ^# ^7 k5 A
Market % Change Average Average % Change
( b/ `. ~# U6 }5 l# B8 m+ y" B2 h -------------------------------------------------------------
' a/ Z6 h. ~. q% w% r H O, ? Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%$ j4 k% `1 |% Z, _
-------------------------------------------------------------
* U3 D# ]: l; g# j: B4 Y; g Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%. G; ^+ `' o7 m4 _1 Q
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 F) p, s0 _- Y Moncton 4.9% - - N/A4 ]2 R! s1 |3 T/ ~6 y& ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
; M4 g: J# @9 G. U6 M Saint John N/A - - N/A
; u' J* Z( |+ f% S+ ^& o -------------------------------------------------------------
" b h2 P7 g- W2 r8 a St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
2 K# S+ ?. A3 B" p& p. z -------------------------------------------------------------" G' {/ G( y3 W H& ~1 s
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%) N# j9 O" P& I B1 b) f; }$ [! `
-------------------------------------------------------------. a6 b% I; l2 {2 x) p9 K, M5 h
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
9 ]4 a5 u0 I+ c. [ -------------------------------------------------------------9 x( j( T0 W, k7 ^) G
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%1 J+ ]1 X# u- a ?- E
-------------------------------------------------------------
* D6 r" X9 u. S0 h& j Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
+ T; ^$ G" L/ i% u0 x) a' g -------------------------------------------------------------
: |% f5 C0 {3 P0 ` N6 ~ Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%1 _$ I9 D2 q2 B$ w/ |, U
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 X( S4 U/ p0 s) _. L Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%9 ?2 l: C2 c. U |
-------------------------------------------------------------
. z1 w$ Y3 @, y Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
; W k! S9 o: w4 t -------------------------------------------------------------
8 R* r Y( O6 } Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
/ D% p; m- G9 g# J& a( T; \, { -------------------------------------------------------------! q6 e3 r7 [, A# m9 U" O
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
. G+ C3 A3 g( J# w -------------------------------------------------------------4 }0 k3 z, V& G2 Z& O, ]$ @
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%3 J" J& ~9 G$ L, R5 l" Q8 [. h9 b
-------------------------------------------------------------# ^( ]& L8 m1 e, Z6 o6 y
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%0 f% y( I& G0 @3 Z6 k f
-------------------------------------------------------------! C* x7 F5 L. F( `
>>
2 N h1 h6 @0 G! T
/ T1 V+ ]- A- j+ f Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
5 V' {7 c' l* m6 y. t- xin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
8 R: B' W1 R: V, S9 S: P3 sJohn and Victoria.1 \$ v& o5 z1 _7 Y& _
4 d8 x9 A' v/ Q0 ]
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most; x% J- H- t5 d: T+ e8 n
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of( E, _$ N, p5 c$ W5 @
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
: D3 d6 p6 s7 L# d# O( Dreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price Z/ g) ~# P' P$ v0 |! S* j
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
7 P% Q9 [& K- Y* o" ^! |across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is% q. a0 p- P2 u0 e' s: T: ~: V
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current2 Y1 y& N" n) F: x* R/ {! W
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
; D( U! |+ q! k% V$ }8 V' vversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
' T2 i2 m' [* Y; B) _November 15, 2006.
2 G, c" V/ L+ W; U) j8 ]* Z Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of2 A5 L+ O4 i7 w
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
' N9 e- ]+ p% R! c/ Fprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is4 b) X. d( g4 ^) U9 _; |/ I
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|