埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1999|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
1 p8 n; C" [7 f0 r3 m% s4 R1 ?- H5 I' ~7 ]1 X
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -8 y# z6 H2 T# h' D

7 Y, f: P" d# P% |1 {8 ]; s0 a% Y9 ~( l! a    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market- E; S$ F' _" P9 s/ Z, j% u
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third0 ?+ M, v3 w; f! Z
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
* o; Z5 x2 Q; H& O0 M' A, Rin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit- f/ \4 X; T' ]) O& \$ E
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
+ b. _; d$ \+ w7 ?more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
# m' i7 a) W% M/ B. Z: W' V6 fQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal" p3 Q, P/ E! p3 I$ Q: n! I5 D9 _0 `
LePage Real Estate Services.
1 v5 K# o" c. d( Z4 b+ q, X7 e1 B  q8 T0 p8 U& @7 N! Z' x
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters7 V! V& d% C2 z' Q6 n. A, r1 T
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
/ f$ C1 Q- n9 H0 w" ?: _conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
" B! J+ M/ E% e4 {4 G9 {+ Y2 i9 Dsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
! G8 P0 t& B1 v$ |, m+ V) f. D) Q: Uresidential real estate sector.1 V6 x0 ^/ h  Z! ^, A& C

3 F* H4 |" K" C. W0 ?    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation) ^6 |( W  [0 C# c, A
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)( B7 n5 Y$ Q4 @8 H+ x% g+ x
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
- j8 `0 E9 [& W- w2 w) T. y- E( ?(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
& u2 a! ?: M5 r: }& h(+13.2%).% p# E& e9 _* f# W- }5 I
9 V* x7 F0 ^" T
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
  l( w% E/ |3 E7 vduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the0 V( ]; c6 g, N
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are. r. c* u0 e/ G9 b: r" {! _2 E' X; J
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,2 ?4 F, u8 K  D/ y, P" W. _
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.1 c+ }- o: C/ }
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We+ a* w$ @, h7 v, x
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy- m& g9 z2 K' a# `( Q, x
balanced market."$ T9 C  X! J. N5 T7 G1 a# {  E  s
. J" ]5 D. s+ n# j0 J
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
% a! \: l' O. Y. j' Sconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift. \( I' v4 _8 f; u9 B% s) V, _1 Q) }9 i
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
* S, R- l7 K$ o$ T4 c* V  Zthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core5 e7 x/ r3 |7 z
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
( u" {, y5 z- ~7 Zmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record( Y& s5 t3 F" N$ F# @6 @
breaking price appreciations.
2 P7 g8 o3 a' c: b" V" f2 f& _- i4 ~9 r* o( Z& {1 X
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
0 ^1 ~9 b, B" n- R6 {economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
0 O+ g( s- j! J1 h. H, Z1 Wlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
) k' @& B& z: ^) e/ T" D" l# G( \  T) @8 o/ @
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
# N; z. a* F& V9 q! }3 }+ D- leconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
# w4 X4 P, o. e+ G9 r7 cconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
/ B/ J, F% [5 K5 e+ w# L. [slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
8 u% s& L6 G" t2 r  D+ `9 ]4 eIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers( c4 M7 B& R, F
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
+ w8 ~; v9 J. a# ?6 Y6 C! @2 g  sprice appreciation when compared with 2005.0 ^" r% {6 n! O2 `3 P: c3 x  B
! f3 `) |/ m; I1 s3 b1 _
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
+ D" A9 h- ~3 F5 S( s: {market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and7 b9 M1 E1 }. c" ~% {3 f
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada  Y! l" B) y% f. P  p
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
" [% d: f3 g/ H. `
! i% _% q# t4 O& R    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the1 E+ F9 m# k2 A& }1 B- j
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
' g; Q* j; x; Nfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
* _4 Z! D2 }  s& Brelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
- _$ s! D9 m% u$ ~' ~6 e- M8 S0 naffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the) a+ }) k# C/ Z1 T; }) A
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and; t' H, B/ {5 j) r7 {7 z
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization: L# P. f+ c6 E4 }
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."3 V. W( K) k3 ]7 b

0 G7 {( p. O1 K+ k5 X' Q    <<
. P; N8 c" O# |                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES& x9 W' W5 B( ]  o4 U1 `- v
    >>
% e  N: V( l2 `# L' s! f* u+ L9 l& z  N1 p/ \9 C2 y
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
# k. k: _& [9 _* }: T+ oHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate/ E9 G7 a1 s& w; e
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
. O, `3 v- S7 T0 Nlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
5 @3 Y1 S; q# Drenovations.$ c6 v$ A8 H8 H) {3 G
; y' ]( A' N( S( w( L+ C
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight' _0 @! k/ q, w2 E
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
, @$ v0 e7 O- j0 I7 r  N5 [compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and% ], z2 L, j, h; _. ?' A# N& N
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.4 a/ X$ X8 P. U+ l- ^+ w% ?
, U4 e) y( H7 \9 h+ O
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
: o* c8 Y4 f, Qslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the% B5 M/ {+ d# X0 I* q: ^) B
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
$ c; @& d1 G! w2 f& S600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores) R5 S- E1 ?! R# W, i
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
+ o) ?% P; J1 \: Aand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
+ q1 {! m8 f% c3 }3 r/ o+ Z
0 B/ t# v& i9 k    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced8 o/ r4 l0 U& n( j+ S+ m5 M  W
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their: p- @$ t2 J. ?2 T5 G
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
1 }% X+ ?" I$ R3 N; q* a! }* Owas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
. I+ q3 _0 o( [0 X) Qdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
2 R# ?6 d4 v0 F% Gbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
( k0 W2 Q' i$ g* y! j5 Z, V2 d$ M4 N2 Z, s8 c* m& {
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
/ R8 A3 ^9 `- H! s/ B: samong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes& I2 D" }" c& p9 s0 W
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
* a: G; F. C9 a5 }& Ras some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last4 t  t' I8 B2 W* G3 C0 n8 s1 W
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
- F/ `7 _- {, B8 |: J
3 l! L& F% _- f    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house& B/ t1 u0 N; P" ~
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
( F& j9 [& @% Q( C; [levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting: M+ G3 W* v) ?# [* Q! h' M0 D. w. V
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
; a7 R5 h" E( X9 K8 Q# L. R; B9 Rwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the( u; N* G4 W+ k% }4 t
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
  F) K6 N# |1 \% J8 a1 ?( Ymaking a purchase.
9 h; b6 ~2 y. A3 @3 A7 K9 ~! o. Z
2 r* o3 v% h% Y$ |( W9 F    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
8 R+ h, e( R$ ?3 ?markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong- l7 I+ ?# r7 t! G" c4 ?$ D) E
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city- J2 y5 X5 q' _) B
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
1 z" v8 P" `# l3 l9 @2 r' A. Q' G7 Vattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown! W% o4 ~! z" i0 h
amenities.- i1 z, l1 b+ r/ T' N

/ ^7 R" L5 ?1 O* k1 E1 o    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels$ ?6 Z0 a4 h3 ~( D4 |! W9 L
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
9 H$ a: ~6 D, o' l: @* ^2 q" Qacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has% \1 M' ?4 M% t& B# g
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
& H. r5 }( g; udriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle3 m1 L% T; N, b, d
residence, rather than for investment.
5 u, P7 Y! z9 p$ ]; g3 P- K) y& a7 f: U# n* Q& s# o7 s8 c' N
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
' K$ V+ [  F3 a) \5 G2 Bhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
+ n; [5 e3 X7 A) F5 Qin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
8 w1 j  T- w, w# f; ?confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
5 N* q7 e6 o2 h; Irate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
: Q- L& ]1 f  P2 E9 s" Cthe market.: g. I- y$ t6 X2 ?0 H/ t

$ Y+ Y. V$ C% A7 I5 M  p# n0 u    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
, b$ j( t  ]2 b4 I8 D, UJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In6 i7 Z- S. `+ s+ M9 D' ], N
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
4 d6 ^) i* u$ n% |months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due% P3 t! C+ d1 i$ C# g
to the shortage of available inventory.
5 G  d0 `& ^& y3 _! |# p. H, Q6 s/ x: a
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its7 q) ~* o  g5 t7 w! K+ Y
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains) V# y! N" z- E4 O
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
8 Z' e( S% v9 q" Cstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.& J& O6 O( v5 l2 `! j6 V* r
, E7 {# @" k1 T: e
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases/ K! h' Y) ~& [% M; B$ K- z
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low1 A% c: X. ^+ o5 L9 b
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that- z! i2 _6 H  @% |5 W
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
. Z: X" ~6 o4 g% jprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
. S1 I0 x; t7 _+ D9 Tseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as- m; Y$ o# q  O" B: w0 k$ H
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
7 N# ~( B& m: v) P  F9 d
; T7 E- S# }5 R+ a% u- d
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
" J) e, [7 n6 a! Y# x1 I: k4 @as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton$ B+ X& p# R1 k; x
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
, |5 n1 ?% s( c* S7 M: P1 Bmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices& W2 D- b5 G, H1 `
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve( z8 W4 P2 r: s6 u
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly2 c  |6 \& V+ U
towards the end of 2006.
      ]" g/ h, r4 e( J$ h( x/ |% y- s
' ^; m4 i: ]3 q0 a5 ]/ d4 M& L$ I! X
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of0 h/ H- m$ n6 `$ B# o
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable- T( ?9 [0 u7 g1 A9 k
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse5 H  g% t7 V0 J* t& d
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
  F5 F7 ?$ O/ v7 _2 Cforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added' ?  J; d) ^$ ]: J
pressure on tight inventory levels.9 v, I7 D* p4 T( m

2 r* `9 R  f% p' t9 r9 Y6 N; T    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic. ^9 d! u0 |& |+ b" V& r' [% m
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people$ B: H3 W0 t3 `
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;$ K# ^* G' r4 q# a8 t
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching# b/ C3 [3 q, n  J0 y
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace./ d/ ~) {( D3 }; ^& n2 S) P
, v3 U) S# F+ m
    <<
9 h4 F! C. Q$ m- i' J- M( L      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006, @7 t# \3 V" _8 ]+ k! k7 m' h4 ]

+ q6 R: w# V, N; f( ]3 P    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: M8 N4 z7 S; O7 |! i* i7 A                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey% _6 D. ]9 A% C5 S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. I0 H& y( M6 j) S# K" Z! ]: k" K                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3* u' e& n$ X- D
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
+ f7 |2 p* i& O8 |1 R3 f5 l( g/ J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- x0 W0 b( N% }; E1 {' c, U
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
) X- [" y! }- B4 z/ p1 f$ ~. X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- t  B4 n( P1 L# Z3 |1 p* M
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
, e4 \- o0 l$ h) A" F. V& f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& h4 L6 ]2 P! |" K  p' a. b3 y    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0006 I% L! F5 I  h: S4 l/ d
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; |; a: a1 A) \$ d( ]4 I* p
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -  s, P. m4 y& ?. {. N6 S+ U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ K% I+ }5 i1 P/ |    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333+ X; r" v' |1 m) E# C7 {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 i) R) n+ {/ k$ W; j, m
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583- a- ?6 p1 h7 Q4 j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 n. l5 g9 s3 g4 l3 R1 j& t
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185; T3 q7 O% e$ O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" Z2 c  B6 p  d" _5 o4 ]+ E3 |
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
* F7 Q$ w/ F8 W+ v3 f1 U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* K! N6 W% J$ ?
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
* X; _3 ^. l4 f( Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 x3 ?$ B1 J7 {) o( C. B& Z% r9 N    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
, L! s9 S. B& E/ B% }( J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' F! g- k, E$ r. h( T1 L# z
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
1 V' [  ^9 I. G( l* T5 _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# I2 E7 w% k6 O5 r    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389" @# {" z* U; ]4 _- j0 U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 h% A" a4 K. h: p& F! D. s0 d7 w/ i
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
7 L, h2 _4 D4 a1 h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, B1 o; b1 d3 N  d! ]    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5008 J" G  L; i+ {6 P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% B( j7 E5 e  h, J, b8 h
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0000 \( d0 H: ]" p  k+ Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 }- g' w1 y3 Q" l0 _
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860. s9 G2 y5 t1 j3 }2 T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) \' m8 X) {9 Y+ ?
& m' N- T% Q1 d$ b* I. V
    -------------------------------------------------------------7 T7 Q, r1 b# P
                               Standard Condominium* e4 @( @% v; u6 {# ]6 e! }$ i, a8 t
    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ h3 i: Y7 b3 p, ?9 i                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
0 S( q8 ]. I% i# B  T" P+ x    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change! D- }1 {5 C3 ~* F
    -------------------------------------------------------------  o4 I- v9 k$ T: b' J
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
+ i( [& p. Z; [( F+ f+ S2 L2 H    -------------------------------------------------------------! R  T0 R+ i6 B: C" L
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%( {" v; f. F: D* K6 s
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  ~8 A# k: C8 a    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
) O7 |: N/ T7 S3 W    -------------------------------------------------------------. R6 g5 ]8 L9 ^) z8 _8 }( G3 q( G
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A- b. G! B2 I3 ]9 x
    -------------------------------------------------------------
* B: ]+ Q# T4 X4 x& o    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
( p3 F2 |2 i( _* v1 c8 r7 w. ?. m    -------------------------------------------------------------) s7 _. v; Y- T( C; i/ j& {
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
" L9 d4 y; e6 w$ `    -------------------------------------------------------------$ I% y+ X" s0 z
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%$ W' V9 i& v# C0 ~! E6 Q0 c, n
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ U6 r3 B0 n9 B6 y5 h' w    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
  ], S+ l8 I2 `# {. T$ k; z    -------------------------------------------------------------" P. B& ?" Y7 ~" A+ s  t& w
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
  f& O) n9 v# ]    -------------------------------------------------------------
% `( L) U* D6 A$ ^0 G$ x' y8 i- W    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
* w' l8 C2 F: d( A9 W" t, F9 P    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 J# [6 l' y' k    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%/ o- K1 v2 O1 C, H& [
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 S" _* B3 k! U5 t9 m% x, G, K* P    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
# F3 H  U  U1 V% A* W: e3 \    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 I' v2 p4 R& A% b& l    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%7 N: }# z) R! E; L; a
    -------------------------------------------------------------; {" r6 ~0 ?! D+ x
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
* x3 \9 I- }2 I3 R% U; B! t    -------------------------------------------------------------5 u' l8 s. Z( l
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
% v' Q" P3 R8 `/ k$ e6 X$ S    -------------------------------------------------------------6 U# m0 `6 z; k0 t& V7 U6 j
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%9 A; O( _% u( ]& X
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 h& ~, d. N2 I: T1 }5 d    >>* s- V# [1 n$ w' J$ T1 u6 K
' r% c/ w4 I; V
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
  _- \2 `) F+ ^, q1 G; ]9 Yin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
( {" b- H4 b6 |7 O+ `1 B+ f+ g# M; _John and Victoria.. q  L3 A9 m3 K
! q. u* m+ Q- b1 _
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
" w1 {5 ?: P9 fcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
' i) F6 ^6 H: K1 K8 yhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release% x+ Y7 K) L% ]% |- Z/ q$ p
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price) p5 t- u# ?( R" Z
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
/ }7 P+ }* G& a. @0 Aacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is# {2 l# f0 _0 ?$ j
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current; e5 H5 [" {6 s8 a
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
0 \. J+ K" E7 b, x6 E! Rversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on( ^4 d% A- `$ H
November 15, 2006.
& y  ]9 x) e( b8 w( z' g0 O    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
& |  Y) g6 Q5 I" U9 I! \6 u0 j, ufair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
/ q: Z# q8 q3 t- w- j9 eprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is% T4 s+ N. y/ E: P" }6 P% `
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-7 16:54 , Processed in 0.127102 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表