埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2325|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
3 F! a  s& p- m9 j1 _/ d) L* I/ l* r  }5 c5 D
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
7 ?+ O9 O$ v+ j7 o( p2 h: f
& Z( w/ z, w3 v, A) d    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
) a. c, o- T! Z+ q, r3 |) a; kexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third& t0 v  ^" n8 g2 |
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic' t/ s: X$ B& r: ~+ b2 q, _# N( w) W
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
/ \! [8 S: y6 o: ~price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
( d2 o) C: y5 t" S2 j: {9 H! C. Rmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,7 q$ b0 q+ O# r! q  F" J$ A9 @; Z* E
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal7 F# {/ V" W, o; }9 j1 Y
LePage Real Estate Services., _6 T/ d( @8 r' ]
# x* c7 P3 e# o% J
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
# L/ |3 w4 S& E. S4 N" Vare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic$ A+ o; [' u2 p" E& H6 \5 B8 H
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and/ t% [2 ^" i  q* {. F
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
$ ^) @( _/ E3 B& Xresidential real estate sector.! h& a4 a+ w# k& W- S

% Y: O) _; V5 N    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation8 k; ]* Y/ C  F/ ?0 [
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)0 v! u) g( O9 f3 x' `
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
- g) G1 ]" k( D7 ?0 D, h4 E/ R(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3802 \6 h% L! s% X6 U4 ]
(+13.2%).
' p) h% O3 C6 S; W
; E3 S, T  y0 J! ?* W9 E    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
6 O) D. J5 }7 U2 {# N- P8 [during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the: o6 m/ H- G5 r7 w" b5 ]
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
/ \8 J+ i5 i, c/ M) F* E/ F; Rpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,3 p" }" W! ?% S6 z8 l. D9 m% q
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
3 \  G1 G) z; S! d) y"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
- {# ^+ L+ {' F* T' O' Pwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
% f" R7 a: G# k+ Y+ L. F; R8 l1 w0 Cbalanced market."
# B' A( I3 h5 h0 u+ @% k- x' p' s
( B% X8 H+ b+ M" I' l4 ]) N    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
7 Q$ I0 S9 @  jconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
* ?) Q* ^9 j2 F$ r, u" wto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued, C6 q( m8 R' _/ }7 j
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core- s# ], R2 u+ \" G# n
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
) n; W2 }9 W! c! o6 a& Jmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
8 s" V# V5 C7 ^6 c  }' }' t# jbreaking price appreciations.
7 L: _) J2 V, G+ b& P
. V" `( l6 o8 D/ H" H( p* n    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding% f% C. q& m: z: ^! \
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
* M4 I" s0 A! h6 a# M. Ilargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed./ T* Y! x- ]& f$ K( d- L+ D( ~
8 T2 Q) a3 S' v& A. N
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
! A  `" e5 q$ i3 \economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
; D, j+ b7 O8 |! P6 a8 }confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off/ h# ~7 q  d8 `
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
  A, g" |1 z4 ]) I  i, ?& |# |$ NIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers' _& Z5 X5 X& {7 H: ~4 ~
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of3 y) G' L3 l& D6 Z
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
' R- k7 c5 G$ L4 `- x3 p9 S0 `1 t7 V% \$ V
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing) [$ w, ]& p, H
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and& J. Q7 W4 z( G: Y
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada# t& W! N& ~% w# d
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
+ Z/ B) j+ r: i! X4 e8 m, n; J8 W$ R; a! o# M# i# w6 ^+ E
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
+ N* @6 b1 w* ]" dAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
% {: W; u7 K  }/ W" Sfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
/ Y8 t# i& K" \8 p  [relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
7 X7 [# k7 X9 I6 N8 j' @affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the6 Z; a+ f- C* k) ~4 Q! z
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
( f# z/ R  a  c- t4 qaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization4 a0 ]4 d/ g* Q' ?, {8 K/ {
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."' T2 z( z1 ^/ z( |  M
) a, A% F/ l% {1 z2 }& I% n
    <<1 g" z: c+ X: u9 [% l$ m- e1 \( ^
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
4 D* g3 J/ f# A4 \+ r: R  n! [    >>
* i6 Z1 ?2 S. E* I0 T, Z
5 M0 [2 P" g. n; ~2 E* A    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
" t0 k- x! n- w7 [Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
. C% L# D/ l7 w5 q! `of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
6 N0 }& }1 G) n& V6 H9 xlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
4 H. A) W+ k) H! P4 ^& }. Qrenovations.) v* A7 t  c3 ~4 ~; V( k5 G
/ o' p: _! K2 J( D+ @7 m
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight( j' T7 G$ D! @0 e5 ~
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation: S+ e7 j. [/ T& ?
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
: |& l: Q; j4 H) f2 _9 xSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
6 q( b0 N6 x# o- G% ~' |
& h# O6 r; Q& c( T9 x1 {1 i    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer! m5 h" L/ U) _9 c4 A# _
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the: h; }. ]3 b  J- d0 g
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new9 N2 S: U& @$ q9 s" J  h( C" u8 ?
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores  }9 Z0 |1 ^% {( s7 l
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
5 y( b/ L! W0 O; a4 Y% w$ Qand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
  [' O9 A  c+ O" a" F0 I8 ]
* B! B6 N6 u) u! |    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
, J# K1 t/ K2 v! Fconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
- L' z" q. [- Y# Y1 Zhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers1 Z& x) _. o- `
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
3 {3 X3 ^: C  h( ]& o( v3 Gdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
* }: R4 i: d" z, ^8 R5 Y* M: J2 K4 Ibuyers with more options when looking for a home.. p+ w' F  X0 S; C2 [8 O
- h$ V: N; X: u! [. E) |
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly0 W6 ^" l. C' i+ z4 y
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes5 O6 D7 q. S2 m# M
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,. W1 Q. q% w+ B; p6 p( L- g, B) H
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last& x" Z. Q- i3 z* V
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
; S; l# B( D; _; Z7 V
; i* M" J  Z% o* ~0 @    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house# S# e: j' N3 F- _
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory7 r" f+ M% Z9 E/ b
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
7 @2 s8 i& f  S# @& E/ wfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,! N5 ]9 C5 }! E3 j
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the8 m  g. ?# R+ G: Z
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before8 K$ T# U1 l' Y% _( U
making a purchase.1 @% }5 [, d7 b1 J' M9 ~) l
% X% T: [. _4 h# w' ]* c$ r
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing* {0 t& M% |% @* Z, g
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
6 H- |9 G) `% Y( M7 xconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
( \! M, ^& A  ]( v3 U( G- k7 K1 f9 wcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting. ~; f+ p+ h9 z) r9 S
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown( ]# a3 J0 _/ m* q: q4 [
amenities.
; q% o& w  m& {  v+ |. g, t( d% q( G% @9 d% ^
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
6 `: O1 [- i6 `, d3 [5 Gthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand, ]# q1 B9 B& C
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has; \  Z( t. \1 ~4 N) v
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
% d+ j% V+ }: C5 m( jdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle7 L. F5 [8 ^1 ?1 _% K) @2 g
residence, rather than for investment.7 a& N2 h9 t' ]+ l& a

( [7 J6 z/ Z: B+ _3 l- Q+ O    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as4 _& Y  F' o8 w* I8 l
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
0 r( k* k  V: Z+ q) qin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer9 M; ~- y' p! R. [% ?; K
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
, C4 Z/ O8 D& r( Q) \  prate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter. X( z( ?8 [/ K3 N9 u- Z% z
the market.
1 r/ A0 S/ D% H4 I& g0 Q% D4 A
" q: X8 \6 e1 f+ s+ j* o0 K7 \, X: }    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
$ k4 C7 e' B1 v7 V# j; AJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In1 |, ~! m( E8 U  |$ ]( W9 @1 F
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
8 P* V9 C8 J4 E" ^months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
+ @4 a) i) b- x' Y/ Zto the shortage of available inventory.
" Y0 B1 d. I, |5 D; p6 K$ T
1 m* J1 X# Y$ I: b7 E! L    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its* @" W4 p0 k3 Z
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains0 I/ c1 A& j# F
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses/ _& l% {# l0 C/ H) z- z
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.5 ]) h: e/ B1 N4 j$ o6 G

& ^. _6 d% z  O. K4 [' n    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
; w' Y$ `$ t: W: E1 {/ M. [, M  a; Kin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low5 g. s. @( v5 J# L. }
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that$ @, X. S# l0 V/ x2 u5 C2 B
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring9 m# z3 R3 r" E  r$ T* J
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
$ g! ~/ z# K3 i. l6 wseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
* Z. f& D3 @4 g) A( m# dbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

3 ?& z9 v% |$ _1 a" i. r7 p: s/ }9 F. f0 D, J
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter+ L& J4 f# ^4 n% k; E: A3 i
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton! T+ o: y) T0 y6 M2 Z0 v- _& `
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,( J( q9 u6 K( z, t: Z# Z
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices3 h4 U  M  c  T8 x8 s$ S
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve; F  G6 f8 U2 W6 i3 L+ |
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
2 h* b% Q# ]3 j: X/ U9 atowards the end of 2006.
   
# F) v0 ?8 H0 w7 m
- i4 X0 Y7 E3 x1 p1 h6 w" K+ jWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of3 R" |% b7 A0 Y, ]" c
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable1 _- q/ V- N' V& ]% N: g1 E
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse; d+ F' |+ K0 H+ E! ]- F
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to  L6 j# L( d, \
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added' U" q1 g$ q. @1 x. S1 x
pressure on tight inventory levels.
& N) u; |, V* G. @, i2 M3 \7 q) F( M* I7 M9 w9 E
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic: ~' R7 X/ K+ k/ k5 E# w
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people* F7 a5 \* |) v0 E6 v# Q
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
! z. w. w1 \2 ?% j5 j! `while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
9 Z# \% F1 ^" ~2 g5 z" J$ _for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
) n# x$ t2 m) G; T2 J( t  K# N1 g* Z6 [1 g5 }% V
    <</ G/ e; j) [& H# m" e, k! U8 N
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006, X4 U4 t2 k6 J2 r
, B* b( B1 P! x+ b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# d1 h" H. V, d' `' r, |
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
: @1 I7 p; v$ D+ Z* }    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, G& W# G, h/ ?' E+ Y4 T
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q35 A1 g' m* l$ l
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
$ p6 k! \- c  I' u    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 e0 i% o  C* ?) A    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000+ Z& F3 m3 Y8 c
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" I' A$ k0 N7 k4 @$ i    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0009 `  _8 C( k7 Y9 j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: |0 D4 {* ~( i: L    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0005 f; |- {- f" m- y+ m
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, B+ y7 ]  H; @
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
  b- H3 u( N& O9 i- M8 B+ y# Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# g  p  @: P% u
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
4 w. x, b% I0 R9 v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; e* b) x5 x1 h! B% v" R. h
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
- C: C3 x3 Y. a2 e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, T7 b) Z& a+ \, F$ `! |' _6 d2 t
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1856 [: d) ]  n$ B6 z& }  n! k
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. x& f: v2 l( K    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
2 x1 z* n- d5 @+ _# V/ T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 {; }4 e3 B. v$ j3 z    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766( J8 v& j3 @/ F- D- w) o5 }, q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& l$ ^' J& \# s" f' U4 t+ Q
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707* h2 A$ s+ B& K; j2 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ U! \( p" W2 T! g
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
5 {; K& U. g% D1 a- v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 b0 K0 V% j: g/ U0 H( f
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,3891 }$ t4 {% _% V+ O" r7 Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& d: n- `: }! Q4 |8 p/ Y    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
& \  g) A: f: h* i+ B    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ W0 D, H% _9 v2 v
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
( `( O. C! i, B! ~  x$ f: K( n. D4 m    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; u0 l7 H+ d- b; u) z    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000- R2 y* ~+ e0 k2 M+ f4 \
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ s+ U. g# S! n  r2 ^' b    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860; E( Y7 K0 r# q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# ]% T) ~0 n# D7 G$ n( Z* j( N1 ^
8 c6 w0 ~4 |! M7 `, \' Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------' u. [9 A3 i" b* F2 s
                               Standard Condominium
  |3 d$ [/ B+ Z; c    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 M4 u# p3 f# `, x                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo8 a: P3 a  \# Y/ Z
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
" x6 T4 d0 D4 E2 }* F! E9 f    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ x5 k9 y0 \( a5 `. N- M: I+ s+ w    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
6 T3 k% F3 b1 O& \0 U  h7 y. Y4 F    -------------------------------------------------------------
( h2 f. ]# g( Y% E7 ]  M2 d- W+ f4 ^    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
+ ?3 j, I- u" H% O" f. L- f4 {" B: ~    -------------------------------------------------------------6 N! L. y6 T9 _' A) O( B! T; E% \  j
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A- `  y8 k" h) M
    -------------------------------------------------------------
* @! c  N3 ~' m: \. f    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
" u; e4 a( a; x2 v; y/ R, _    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 h( B3 S, S' I    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
% m$ i# z1 ]% R" a) r7 v5 @    -------------------------------------------------------------* b$ {  E" m4 L, K* I8 K
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
) p% T5 O' N$ e1 q1 o: K3 F    -------------------------------------------------------------
; E' Q3 e+ h0 k. I    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%! p9 k8 ?- h* a. O7 g
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: E, x! D! O- E# j& m1 u; C    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
8 a2 M  Y0 D! k; B    -------------------------------------------------------------
- E1 r7 A1 v6 }    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
* B3 W7 o# B; M    -------------------------------------------------------------4 D0 r$ U1 H6 B) b; a0 r9 k" ^
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%8 x8 {" ^; s$ u" m; @
    -------------------------------------------------------------5 E% _) ]+ B1 ~$ W- @1 P  N
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%- a4 [& z% `! ]0 Z7 k
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ E0 X$ m* b( j- f' j
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
, o, j7 }# _6 h1 I) @" ~2 [    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 p' P: w  u& `6 x0 o    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
; z- [" W" y  t% P% Z2 W* _: Y0 H* }    -------------------------------------------------------------* j- X9 O+ x2 m. c( x2 N5 `
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
$ H9 ~4 ?$ T% f# k  I    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 h' X# b# U0 q9 e  h, b# j    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
8 u* j' c+ B* _6 p    -------------------------------------------------------------& y- |' I* m% N& ?, n
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%* G6 l3 F" E# m# d5 c
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' {7 y6 r5 N* W" r    >>
5 i0 c6 M, `5 S$ w9 t2 @" J: I
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
& b& I8 h, |! m+ [) |in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
* L) {! @( ]) rJohn and Victoria.
, V7 p+ a& ^5 U& N. z* Z
7 D: e3 K0 {8 ^7 F: c    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
$ t' Y6 d; r: A2 i" _comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
  I! Y3 B1 n4 W, |0 }housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
" N6 I8 ]7 Y7 c6 }  Z( f* Z* q; kreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
. T; B( l9 D! i! f( `5 F( M/ xtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
$ n& u0 K% p! Y; E; m" bacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
+ O. O, V. ~2 }; r3 b" |) yavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current& X+ ?' \7 f2 S$ n' R; g! r' |$ G; ^  @
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
4 U- J  S1 J6 Rversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
8 k7 r6 {" `2 f* t( {& N$ Y0 oNovember 15, 2006.
; T9 ]0 C# o! I- N    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
6 i* W9 _/ n- r7 Wfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
- c; B3 F2 v+ fprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
) b5 R) r' P: F. Y1 X) X$ m5 kavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-6 11:55 , Processed in 0.253671 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表