 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
7 R. h2 Y% l" D) U, k* N& W( S
0 K: i' \# ?8 s( e( T- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
5 G# R. e' `/ t" v1 w @. W+ z- _0 [
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market# ]2 R0 Y0 z7 O) {' T& \
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third3 q0 e9 y+ k( B5 w
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
* O2 `# B# I& z/ F, ?9 B0 S6 fin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit* w% V: y: F1 _5 R9 C
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
4 V) c4 C5 \; g8 Qmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
: P% c5 }- w7 i% O8 C+ pQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal* [" X& [1 `6 ^$ R$ o; W, ~4 x. |( m
LePage Real Estate Services., Y, W4 V2 T2 P c% K- |
, \1 F6 s% o/ ^# T
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters+ y/ F8 J% S: `' A
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic0 a1 ?, m1 h f9 u, H% H
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
! w( i' C' l0 m) q2 Qsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the# h6 {- c+ g1 V# E% y( E% s
residential real estate sector.
* [, F6 X* g$ i4 i' ^
; j5 a: c3 G) a! s' e Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
: D7 R* J- Q, G# U- Noccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)( q7 |6 g' M6 H9 C4 d! l
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562* s1 k2 r, E5 f0 R' E" s
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
! G# D4 O0 ?! z(+13.2%).2 O- o4 W: H' V- B9 X6 [- n' m
0 T Y& L8 u% U) C/ ]: B "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
. l2 Q+ X& R' D5 v2 Rduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the0 S3 H- M3 l2 ~6 h7 ]8 E
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are. c B* c1 ]) |% W5 P
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,7 ?9 A' W5 \" P# I, Q- p V
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.+ X% I8 z/ e3 o$ i9 S$ x) G
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We/ T3 l) x: t# i' m0 l
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
?0 t5 D4 X- i9 P) cbalanced market."
w K5 J' M$ G, c3 ?1 P; {
; o5 p Q7 _* q- _) i Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,0 q* ]1 a# y& Q
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
/ A, F {; g6 a: j I4 }+ eto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
1 q; Z, Y! W# W# C7 lthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
1 @) a0 q* c* l" d* |energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,* l. S: G! K( ~- F5 z5 u
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record. _4 ]( e) l5 a1 z
breaking price appreciations.
: F/ R7 Y* {7 K5 W8 j
. u5 n* z0 l( Z2 F0 U Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding' t' D3 |1 a- P. i; D; z: L
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
2 I! n$ Q, Z- E P6 z1 h' }& J2 u3 ulargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.2 S& d; A6 K! i& G" B; }
& R+ `+ Q. Q( h5 R) O
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid! w: v2 L6 m! P! X! f3 S7 [
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
! r3 m3 O$ p5 t0 E, K. ~) ?confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off: p, }5 y/ L7 w6 H) L
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
W7 A8 K) d2 R0 b( LIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
: j, H- k$ l8 B: e. Vgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of' y" S5 m3 X, w- |+ c/ C( k
price appreciation when compared with 2005.) J, n1 {/ q* b9 [5 H4 Y% _4 |
1 K1 R2 v- h3 a0 @6 c* O While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
, P) q) }( N W( x6 o, `# \1 wmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
5 P9 M: W3 w3 N& m7 xfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada+ m1 _$ W$ U9 v2 I. I. _! u4 K
are markedly different than those found in the United States.) {' @# @1 K. I* }3 _( ^3 t
* j0 C3 s; Y& B1 ?9 z Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the$ Z* E$ E# I7 d! X
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
- ?3 S2 u( [2 @/ Z$ E; K/ tfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
7 i, ~& i' L3 Q4 m+ ]relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general0 |$ {& s1 D/ h) y" R
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the% I0 V# q, U2 `- ]) y* I: Q
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and8 C/ d; q5 C0 _5 N. w" \
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
+ c4 M+ p; W) p4 @2 pmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."/ ^$ t; R0 o$ \# k! Y, u, {
% K- [ S2 I& g <<
) E# b& ]1 J" @ D. [/ |7 ? REGIONAL SUMMARIES
. l" u8 Y+ q+ m9 Q$ \2 M >>% {( R. T4 _5 x9 F
/ j; G! c6 |( ^
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
4 r6 m- O4 ]- G! MHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
7 ]" w i5 Y+ m2 gof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time* _% \6 x, c5 Z7 r* ]
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of$ M* G+ y* H1 C- ?4 l$ o
renovations.
' X: D- _4 g7 ^7 r6 A0 Q ]9 c* i% l4 T% F% ?$ F( R8 v N
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight4 d; J( g+ a3 r" U0 M% `* V, C
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
2 Y# ~. V+ z9 {* @' kcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and- g" P3 A5 p9 ~
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
6 @ `6 U+ R: {8 D$ y8 I& n, a/ E: O6 R) ~" g
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
6 P7 b- i. Q. {2 m3 \" Sslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the% J2 p& i+ Y" q
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
( H0 @/ i- ?- J600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores) _ U4 _1 F \) E: L$ l$ [) c
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
/ i! U! ?6 j- C2 j2 v# D; U6 [9 mand are instead opting for more affordable housing options." ?% t* W( L- l9 D2 Y. h
, m; t9 i) ?0 [ Q8 L; ^, s
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced a2 I" ~5 I0 j4 l
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their2 r/ u9 }( Q' ?) M8 H A! a
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
* ]0 B' q5 d- X) o: gwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
" T' K6 |6 `4 J5 w5 ~; C/ wdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing/ R2 R: `/ A4 G% K5 {$ r
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
2 D& _. M6 w7 ^; F( ~2 H; X
: ]) \5 Z4 R' P! A( C% M Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
& m: y* T1 r" [% t& s( lamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes6 S1 L$ G2 D [/ f2 \8 \( `
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
9 D5 Q' F6 _( m3 w) @5 p1 a1 @% aas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
/ l8 V" T9 c. s, x: g6 q6 ffew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
$ S" t4 u% ?' q3 |6 S! D7 T9 y
! k& m) w: z. Q5 y3 _. p Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
: g; z" ~5 X1 L( Y1 Z1 Vprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
& d: p% q: ^" O$ M D9 i Ulevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
$ y1 W0 H" Z }+ [: l0 Ofirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,; y1 ]6 w# f' `9 W8 R, N2 t
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the- i4 c9 M. c; F! j3 ?; e. V3 S
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
^: X) v1 ^6 x" z! W3 E" S6 bmaking a purchase.
8 z- F. O( m6 P* R x# Y% ?
% b; O$ d! i3 g Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
( x0 s! |5 {6 n: ?5 jmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
" s9 H$ W2 s3 f: O4 h# p# H8 oconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city8 V+ t3 ^. S r" f- Y
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting- f. l- n2 r: ^2 _5 t7 o
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown3 f! `3 I! s* K
amenities.. F8 Y% _4 n( }4 J( X, L
/ z" n/ f. F6 T
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
* K' `9 ~7 T* p4 P8 b, O" uthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand) q6 x1 ^" [1 X
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
+ ?0 r# e' K! g2 Y$ [& x5 w; g+ u, O a: wcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
3 T; \5 ^0 e% K3 D* P% R3 K" Zdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle- b p7 S3 f" V
residence, rather than for investment.. h7 H! z5 z; m/ K
9 d) n$ T' u, r- u' h0 N The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
! h8 q6 P7 |! c$ G, ? [% m7 Ghouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
% u& W6 s7 {# K: {5 S/ @: e- |6 s6 \in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer O H7 t4 o; R4 d8 d- o/ f. h
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization' U1 q. k, n; f% U# B
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
1 T6 M: e( n3 ]' p$ S& E4 y( Dthe market.
! [$ ^# ^! w- [2 y( u" S* P* O# x0 n" x l* L. m
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through; M; `4 | K) R" m+ _6 V/ c
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In. {& S: U* S8 e4 ` @! C$ o
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
" H5 E& Z: v. ~4 {8 v% c5 @7 a& C, lmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due- y* c2 Q4 L1 Z8 Y2 ~% V1 h; w
to the shortage of available inventory.5 E$ G. q/ U0 g4 ?$ F% R: Z0 {
2 s3 }6 [$ p! l) Y3 B1 \$ J Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its4 `/ H. s+ X) A" u9 W) Q+ m2 Y# J, q* s
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains0 o: s _' H4 {
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
5 r$ z$ R3 ?0 X# c g# |struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province." U6 w2 h% f' K) Z0 P3 g
& a- H5 P6 [+ m9 A( e+ p
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
5 L8 Q, D8 n+ J$ Win the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low9 J! @# ^( j e) b( |
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that- a, Z. N7 e" [4 {) l
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring& w/ r) Q5 U$ d, R+ v: ~
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer$ L# x0 A8 i' i# R& y9 U4 X/ |
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
& F. m0 d' c; S. i, w. ]buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.- K( D. s( W8 A- _7 a- y. k& c
' u& J- g+ G. F/ ?, F) y+ u( B
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
# ~, b; e5 ~ M- L9 Cas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
* H6 _. x2 t% ~6 ?% ^% s9 ^remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,# ]2 D+ d/ ?4 d+ l: N5 V& t4 _
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices# `' I+ }( I8 a) M5 d
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
|$ w# H+ j) u& z" jin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
7 J: B- Y# S( ?0 \: y7 g- ^towards the end of 2006. " d" B2 W/ L3 p' G
; i7 I% b# p# S1 s1 v& Z) \/ a
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
1 C% i) h' G# ?- Ginventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
) V1 Q" p- F! B$ x; }to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse j& [3 h, N7 ]7 Q4 h$ q* Y! L
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to) o! _6 C# ]2 n% k. o% \" \: [! m& R
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added. a. g' x* e7 C/ G! U/ v6 Y
pressure on tight inventory levels.
6 B5 ]" F$ V5 @* Z+ [) C1 m0 P* U% |4 P2 y3 _5 M$ q
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
. n# Q- D; L6 y, x2 v; Pfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people$ C$ a/ u% w/ q( c2 J+ I' g' D
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;' e9 z0 H {+ _ ^
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching6 N* e; v& G! Q' }9 K
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
% k6 E9 y' d+ d) w% n7 n% Z! B
3 N' j# ^ g2 H' ^1 r2 i3 Y <<
) m+ \3 M b6 e( B8 [ Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
% O: Y0 k, c% ~$ Z& L' i- I' h* |/ [, t. i0 K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) w+ M9 D- H) Y9 b2 U Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
7 x5 J2 w+ V5 O8 t! D \! s6 T -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 }1 T( [2 y) C ~2 T 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3$ Y9 j& h& N: q
Market Average Average % Change Average Average! n! S" P; U, f8 F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, z) _. }* C) H* |* W) ? Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
9 y K% f4 g' I5 J: r% l -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 f) o+ i$ c% u) A
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000$ n% \6 G3 `* w9 {; s
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 D1 Z6 d+ c8 G/ N
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
% g/ v3 L) {0 y3 A: k1 Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------, }. ?7 x/ H6 L* e( [
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -* U3 T* M) }4 a9 M' Q8 U
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 P+ k9 x* [, B
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
3 V. |$ u! X2 |# r& l# Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 A$ U% p5 m% B* Z3 y
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
# {) f _$ F, V! B% W W0 x -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 m6 D: q' W; `4 p& H Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
$ l, y% R% y8 {" R1 b q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; O4 m) G4 v* H N1 i Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
% W' o+ C6 a( l# @" Y( |0 @9 Z6 e -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 S$ W4 O( w! {% _2 a/ k Z8 a6 B
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766! j" M+ b6 C) c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 ~3 U. o2 \* S+ x8 M: c0 T8 g+ E+ H$ ]
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
7 P+ p: q2 P$ e0 ~9 q% } -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, L; R* V; G8 i" h; V5 H, b3 o Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
; }2 R! Z- w$ j" L: Y( R, _2 ^2 `7 D ------------------------------------------------------------------------- e- Y" a( y! n/ J
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3897 {: O0 x7 m- w, ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) }) [8 a% v+ S& H; Z
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
' f) C$ v- r) U( t7 @$ c- ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Q7 p, \% R8 N( N! l" n Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500) B- V# t1 F' N9 R* x. z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* o8 s1 [- H( x4 r, ~* K7 B Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
. x2 e$ \' g( Q% t# ]6 C* I -------------------------------------------------------------------------" D" J+ L" B$ O' d8 W7 g
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
# v7 B, i3 q7 B8 ~" ^- _6 g; f -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 Q. t$ e; Q5 X. A) k# X Z8 r
& P- F W3 ?9 |3 x6 n -------------------------------------------------------------3 j5 |5 K! u1 B+ s; W- [7 t
Standard Condominium8 w3 }7 w% h/ [3 ~8 [
-------------------------------------------------------------
- M, u4 E& W! }6 s4 @- E 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
1 L/ D! U# l3 Y Market % Change Average Average % Change
9 Y2 a6 ~5 l* f$ K* U+ \ -------------------------------------------------------------. k7 p1 c0 x) b, i2 d
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%$ j1 G- P! b [# w; R' p
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 {5 J2 \' v0 v' o Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%) b. T g4 q" B+ F
-------------------------------------------------------------9 h J8 U! x) G$ ^& f
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
8 [# C: f0 B$ a9 D -------------------------------------------------------------" X: F, G9 y6 s+ T3 v- b
Saint John N/A - - N/A
1 e6 o& `' Q# w% ] -------------------------------------------------------------: _1 G6 c5 }4 O
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%" U+ j$ P! H9 }7 O* B0 w! c
-------------------------------------------------------------" T9 @3 |6 g7 z5 Y$ c
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%9 w# X6 W4 X7 f# e$ V d0 M
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 ?1 f. `' N5 F' } F Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%- F# J# j% C# ^; E/ Y' ^! I! S
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ ~' {4 I) }$ Z! Q Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
% x, t6 t6 B. Z& c" M& x1 s G -------------------------------------------------------------
6 T7 {$ p; |1 i1 k3 r( j Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
7 P" b5 B k. R6 R9 ] -------------------------------------------------------------, v( K( L0 c8 C, K3 Z
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0% a6 ~; r* [" j9 b# W8 w% F1 o
-------------------------------------------------------------/ k5 s% }- R0 r! q' ~
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%8 f/ o8 u$ y6 l. p
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 H! w% T4 t5 q Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
8 j9 o* c _& J* f" m$ i -------------------------------------------------------------* K" E" z# `2 \! B6 H% y) U
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
. [7 N% x3 ^3 ?8 r7 Z7 j e2 f. A. b -------------------------------------------------------------9 M" v' t/ @9 j/ W/ p, ]
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
8 U' N+ p0 ]' ?3 Z0 J -------------------------------------------------------------2 [: C, z9 p) A) e
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
6 y G2 |+ T0 W -------------------------------------------------------------* H5 ~% o- l& C# ? h
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%1 s7 C2 ?" K" I4 C! y! s
-------------------------------------------------------------" ^/ O( S+ i5 q; I
>>! V; Q; s* l1 q2 J
' O3 L7 k" r6 i2 [) g- E
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined0 S) U9 |& d1 k
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
5 n: H- J) ~9 \. pJohn and Victoria." l# I: d) T7 Q1 n( J# R
( P& \- f" ]6 r9 j% x( D The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
* w, L: Y; T3 \& c$ k/ scomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of& m, ]" K& C& m8 C6 g
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release K* {; Z6 w7 f& w! o
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
4 H. E6 a& ?5 U6 S+ wtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
- [, a7 w1 X1 C- `" Gacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is& z, f# U1 o/ o# w; A1 L- V1 |) |
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current6 J$ i, G9 K* a" K. m7 s$ [2 k" Y, ?4 }
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
+ s+ |1 S( R4 G. x' tversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on, w9 X3 j5 l; Z" ~ D( \: R4 T% h
November 15, 2006." X/ `4 b! O! n) B- u
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of9 R9 T: | k4 R# Q1 }8 O
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
/ a0 l* J7 R0 `2 ^0 ^3 S0 lprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is% m/ V/ H5 f" w" }7 }
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|