 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
# F7 @/ K3 s7 G2 I% i, ?+ M+ G/ N0 ?0 _9 S( T
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
* a$ p+ V! h, z- J) Q& q R& S9 k8 B' S, O, \+ {& n& G. w9 z
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market/ r6 _& H) e$ P. d$ g& _ O8 m
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
; u7 ]! @" y8 i, B b# K. fquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic" t7 ^% B" h, Q1 F
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
0 q- Q# i% I5 h1 kprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and0 z' x: |1 G% s( | _4 H! p' r3 o8 c- Z
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,6 U9 a" S+ u* M1 F. o& {" V8 t
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal! o0 Y5 Y4 r5 {# _
LePage Real Estate Services.
+ x1 B O9 A% U4 p* t
3 m$ A* X. E; \' T4 l4 L Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters( t. v. ?! V# ~
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
% Z- u# I9 W( w* ]" Dconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and$ u* K" ~- o0 x T6 p
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the* b! e3 z4 G6 M9 u! Q5 ?6 o5 U
residential real estate sector.
% ~3 C% O. d8 |) {. d
0 I) e) [' P6 w# {2 k Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation& i0 g0 y( g% A
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%); S2 S4 R! L: w( v7 H
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5621 t. U3 G5 D+ y, X
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
4 d; M& L! t, u& W' b$ v(+13.2%).* N/ o5 F& n: g. N
T8 g- h) b; X5 H" m2 X* j; T
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
+ _% `$ _ f) K1 tduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
8 V& w( o$ K9 B Yfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
1 K4 e, P2 r- h) G5 {poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
/ b) [9 }+ E- b# Bpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
% O5 F8 ^1 _4 y0 ]# g"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We# H' C, ]+ U) ]
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy& s) O, T' [! L% q) |' l! @
balanced market."$ D9 \: u; k% R. u# I4 F
7 C/ W: J/ \! _& Z! k: v Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,8 [' u2 _! k8 L. {9 p; {
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift7 J( Z2 _) Z5 v a7 [% f
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued- D+ W3 q8 x; j4 n4 S/ c3 A- e
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
V$ W% r1 T/ N. O! ]8 Benergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,0 I2 D' q/ U1 t3 n0 c. ?# J
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
. ?( p& w: B4 i5 K. a6 Fbreaking price appreciations.
' I4 V: H0 q2 @/ o4 c: z' A% u. a7 D1 f; B. n
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding9 M3 q; S( d. g& N1 V# [) T+ ^
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
, J& F0 b( N' E; g* `largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
, x6 v' \0 k4 q Y2 ?: z4 }) p% `/ X% Q; C, X
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid- S+ F x4 m: h& e- p6 W
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
; \: j+ x% [5 X+ x, Rconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
6 s( n0 g$ r9 G8 F7 Zslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
0 F# V. b U7 N1 eIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers+ _, K1 {2 k5 a6 A; F) ~
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of' {& X8 V6 Q: y" G0 M ^4 G
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
/ Y; B; R' P* f% m- D/ t! T: F2 F! y( l3 i7 N& {' }& l, m+ f" ^
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing" Z1 O+ T: T+ y+ ]0 r% f- W5 K6 ]
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
! y- {; M7 _$ q) j% V zfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
! v8 N9 d. D0 {0 Q; q; t; H3 aare markedly different than those found in the United States.
$ P0 b/ p( E& V9 m4 L( U' D7 f7 C/ v3 ?- o4 `; L; c/ C, E
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the2 o P9 D7 z; d2 j
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
, x. l, }; F- yfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the, w: p# {* o" l! J8 a( {- K1 m
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
% b( n5 I u! k. Z8 p8 w1 G8 Yaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
7 Q9 d# m) j/ W }downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and4 S: d. h0 ]2 ?
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization; X- A0 S# h4 P! h% R" i
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
" \) m4 t) @+ S. F/ u" Q5 ~) A* z' _1 ?% B
<<
; U- Z( l& @% \! p& y( f REGIONAL SUMMARIES
, k) P9 {% _6 ~ d$ O: M9 b. c7 a >>5 s3 R6 N6 f/ ~
8 c8 S& t x/ w% a. Y8 } Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in1 |% O+ |" z- t6 A6 C2 U! d
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
. V# U! w6 {& d+ {* g+ o- c1 x* d, aof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
) Q$ F# H0 ?! F3 D0 clooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of. r* ]5 y2 G7 U- B
renovations.
% _% o7 c: k7 q6 z
, V+ r4 f# O* n3 T+ S The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
! i, `1 h. A% n7 T' o7 O' ]increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
. t! n/ q' ^+ b a4 m+ Zcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
- N. @! ?7 y/ A6 D0 DSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
7 L8 f+ p$ e. n' v# J" g/ u# i; R9 ~0 i
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer7 a3 ]8 @4 @3 J
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
& r# x$ [* h- P2 Y- j" w( _quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new8 ^' L8 X- a" P
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores" P( Q4 Y5 s: q6 t1 f
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
# D! n9 v$ w3 }, L. Q6 o9 g0 vand are instead opting for more affordable housing options." C& G. P. G% O; \. i
8 j2 S* _: F _7 O: { g4 C
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced5 R: e @# f) `
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their$ Z) v' P; z1 U9 R
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers1 }8 Q7 Z2 g% c5 ]' @$ j
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian: V$ r0 y- V" X# Y( y4 c& S& `6 X
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing3 P& E. y. E1 {
buyers with more options when looking for a home.; O: }% {+ ^, ]; ~6 _% r5 x+ {
/ X% _6 g9 F) n* e, A. Q8 r Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
$ N4 J4 b+ j7 u- C l8 D5 r6 F" Zamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
4 v+ V/ e1 u b, X1 Npriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,( @ z% r8 Q$ q E
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last0 |0 I( v! Y+ ~" t, a2 u- I! y: d
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.+ z2 |6 s/ l. y6 R
! J5 s, g: d$ ]" L3 T8 z: z Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
4 {8 u' G; \% j: v1 |prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory: T. B: ?# y$ P0 B5 x4 p
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting8 X, ?( x) o: X4 d) c" l" e+ |" Z1 C
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
1 [3 j7 P8 a/ ~- K" N3 W* uwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the6 S! q1 `$ q0 u" X; z: D
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before: ?+ q3 P8 M( X% s
making a purchase.% O g9 |6 J4 D* e7 R' \
5 K* }! ^# w# X& ?
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
% i- S, S4 R& ?+ xmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
, f/ w( D4 i* v$ \: M# Jconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city9 O# }0 Z- b+ [" J" ~6 i% d
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
; g: p. M9 Y4 P4 ~attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
2 W0 m- h e8 B+ e" G5 famenities.) u4 S' u( y5 N$ Z! b
+ n! n; B1 \. D1 M
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels/ i* E7 _* ~0 U7 w& b
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand. h7 l" k' {: b2 d
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
. s. D' P1 t! ?- ~+ x5 i9 Ucontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
9 a! n' F# u- Odriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle- n5 D7 m! J5 |1 N7 y2 u2 }
residence, rather than for investment.
4 o* ~: e0 m5 u5 k4 o8 h& g; @
3 P0 Z% W" ?$ W s0 ^ The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as/ N* b- Z0 x- B1 {% v$ U( K( x& i
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
) ~3 g8 \6 [1 N3 q( X' Min a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
7 K, x6 e- ?7 I" ]! B$ Iconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization! j& r; S+ R8 @( o1 V
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter1 X6 O+ L( ], k+ _# i; a1 K
the market.
' ?* x- R) k% ]
1 a( g% `% D8 @1 B; {/ ] In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
R" @) @4 S; j0 i% {$ {July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
/ d; {- H* ~# ^, h5 fAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
9 w3 a& M* [( Fmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
; T5 n2 @; O, E; A. tto the shortage of available inventory.
]' `* @8 m7 w4 i
% Z" d( q% G1 i Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
1 H% { V1 z: E7 tmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains) ]# e' k% R" W4 K" D3 G% M
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
7 J( x3 H5 r& i# J8 m# g) Wstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
2 r8 Z J0 s' N) |- p+ F( n; C
' x5 N, y0 |: E: y+ l0 a1 u Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases0 o8 ^, W! X4 k. F) w6 N
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low' W4 \# a1 b% i
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that( X6 k- N5 Z5 _9 V, }2 m
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring6 k* K( x: p% t) |' _$ G% l
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
4 r# ~" O: t8 }/ @season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as2 Y- X* m2 H5 d2 ]( ~' E M7 E
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
# G" e1 Z7 H# C- T
% h8 X7 X- f: F% ~. H3 t( P Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
& \9 [' I$ w t" i8 s0 a% n/ uas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
4 t7 A3 j$ c9 Z, Eremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,) a! t1 X( X7 e7 X0 h' y" `% G
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
6 L, ~* y( V( q7 U! \6 l& @increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve8 j8 Y+ c$ Q4 n" r& _& T3 }9 k
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly) t/ N& b* o. u* ]; m, X
towards the end of 2006.
8 o: z: m. y* x" \2 O+ ?1 t) T- D$ V
w9 J- W# w1 r! N0 [While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of2 R( V: c! @! u) ~# E v- x* p2 I# B8 n
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
- m7 J: W& D$ V8 Lto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse& B8 _/ }' V/ G% `
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
& Z u$ c0 q. I3 t; r. oforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added* x- c G; A9 z/ ^
pressure on tight inventory levels.
. o+ N: d* x! K/ ?: G& `
X% _% \; z$ r8 B- V5 D ` Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic, {8 ~$ E0 G/ y a) h
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
" M: Q5 C( N1 k3 Minto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
( @6 d; ?9 q! V" R* ~while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
+ k) a# ~4 b2 z$ T) a% e2 nfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.0 Q" s' ^$ A2 z: y! [2 G4 L
/ }/ e4 _* x9 v4 D
<<
7 N" d6 K! v* d3 x. V* e Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006; T( I% B8 T% o* X
, L5 H! k/ [9 V# R' H q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* I. J6 \& f7 q$ L* @
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey7 D( W- B/ n7 z6 u8 A% j% m& n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 ^; E0 E, n* M2 U4 d- F 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3" u: R: z5 e# V! ?3 i" {7 T
Market Average Average % Change Average Average2 h$ a7 j `0 ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. Z+ I+ b m% g1 E1 d
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
0 p$ a$ c8 U$ f$ C -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 ]! a7 r$ {& C2 w. P Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000+ G9 N- R7 S" u. o# F/ [& t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" `, Q5 o* m/ }, J/ ]
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
( B1 z7 O+ m1 ?( ^/ m -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 K* f0 l0 z2 b P Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
: l5 S; R5 U+ b b# b5 K; s -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ W3 l' w; Q( q g# Z* I St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333' r3 j1 X9 b; y: g3 D# F) C \0 W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 P! C4 L; I0 \2 U4 g9 z) E
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
. m, }5 g- X& e* d* J8 d+ |* x -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* O8 B& S' A& r% k6 D Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
) E3 g$ w- J/ Y1 c5 G. L- w -------------------------------------------------------------------------; S, G$ f1 E5 T7 N8 L) ^
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250; Q7 _( f P+ {. q; {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 L L% M" N' Q. V& C* F Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766( B/ F/ ?( X8 F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 f1 R1 P/ e; a3 ? Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707# j' H: L+ n3 a2 `* x; C% p: z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; N) R+ m) D$ l w Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
( [% f$ I- X# O7 H# M) Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 ~2 P' W' X( t! b$ f) J) T
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
9 M4 \1 W/ z' Q; w& U& U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, |+ L. l- N" G* o) R) K- t Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7143 ]0 b: A4 K4 b8 W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 N" n6 U/ K! X5 g3 ~
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
& W# p/ R# c8 H -------------------------------------------------------------------------" O- b" H' v# ?8 |0 G' S h+ x
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
7 k+ b9 U2 w4 P4 z& V9 J% \% M -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 K# v2 K, I- _9 C n
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
, C4 U/ J5 Z5 R8 e! X9 ?6 ?, E3 {* z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 m. G* z2 b2 w* z1 W
2 h! l$ Z3 y6 T$ p7 f -------------------------------------------------------------& ?, U" |% h: C+ W. w1 Z& Y! @
Standard Condominium4 X% j# H0 a" y6 C
-------------------------------------------------------------3 c; A* j5 Z* q. F- `/ S
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
2 l$ c! b6 ^& t% U0 ^ Market % Change Average Average % Change
3 k! J, C+ G+ Z7 A& ^ -------------------------------------------------------------
! S5 }7 _0 Z% `; Z( t5 h/ ^3 U Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%' }# F$ E% C$ ^, S' {4 d4 y' t
-------------------------------------------------------------2 ~9 M( K# f/ U7 J
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
6 Z4 w A: A- i/ |+ y& z -------------------------------------------------------------
6 i: Z3 \ J$ Y Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
1 h: |0 F& d' ]8 m" i2 L -------------------------------------------------------------
* p8 y9 `2 M m, N' ~1 S Saint John N/A - - N/A
2 Y3 i0 G1 {0 I! s -------------------------------------------------------------
3 O8 v2 C/ M) Q, G ?7 a8 ]7 Y! y St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
# g" ?2 x# m. v$ N" _ -------------------------------------------------------------: O+ @; n+ L4 W
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%6 F8 { s8 _& j/ q ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 H3 v( s/ }, m) d! E7 d Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%' W, C$ r2 k- p# @
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ a0 B$ q5 k& [; m Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%; y- c: j. I" V: m
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 ]7 Q$ N5 p% i7 p' B/ A Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%( J" h+ R/ }; z# R6 o$ N) j, T4 H- ?
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 X' Q0 B6 j" O Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%: u" i# V6 p o+ M
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 \/ l$ {& m& }2 d* Z2 k( q Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
x1 D* p( ]! P4 ^, u8 n6 L6 p! Z4 Q -------------------------------------------------------------# H) [9 o' \2 J" u1 {6 E
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
0 |- |2 _9 V1 z' F" W: ~; n: T -------------------------------------------------------------
# ]0 ^- M9 I' p3 V% Z/ Y# d7 L Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%8 S' m c' g3 V5 ]5 c+ i7 S
-------------------------------------------------------------( Y( N9 y6 L: N: z
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
, K0 p1 A# v; F: h5 r) X; W -------------------------------------------------------------8 D; T3 B! r! w$ ?; w+ L
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
: t! R7 Z/ u7 E- W8 @: Z -------------------------------------------------------------! I& v! I9 ^, e7 M. x
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
) K8 i' s5 n4 o' m# M -------------------------------------------------------------7 C8 R4 p! S/ H; S
>>5 O$ X* V5 k- ]
1 ]0 W5 b$ z0 H7 [ Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined- \0 v5 ^3 Y- N! X* t" F7 T3 X$ P
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint/ J1 E! G: G0 S: U
John and Victoria.. R3 u8 B0 v/ X# Z' m
) v# B: v& q& R/ d4 @9 w# W$ Q0 k The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most, T3 Z/ I# _, s4 T( F1 r
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of7 A! J% k0 Q& r
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
9 Z0 K$ M1 C9 Yreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
' L9 U6 v# i- h6 z: q/ U! B' mtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities# N1 t- r. o F4 G7 ~9 }
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is$ u, Q8 P9 g: f# ^5 t
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current6 o$ E% w+ z: O9 x6 Z
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
1 S1 ^8 w/ N S" V. i& aversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on& @: p9 f6 d# N) o/ l y* i% t
November 15, 2006.* i6 ^/ E8 `* Q! W5 G# B7 Y
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
( O/ l y" ~2 m5 ifair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
, N; T- I, a* c5 L; y0 s. P' z: Jprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is" S" P4 O" k8 y3 R, V* U6 W3 n
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|