埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2338|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable - Q& m1 o0 F+ q# E8 q8 T" V4 h

0 \9 ^1 x8 }5 z- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -& a& q6 y6 e9 [& ?% Y( L% @: H0 ]

" h, ?0 l+ T  H: N! b    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
: {7 A9 x( z9 [5 \exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
4 |; J" D+ C8 `, ^. v- g, r. Jquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic5 X. \. U" U7 H/ z; v# i1 M. L8 N3 Z
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit  f. t  j/ U. N% R
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and* U0 \* I) P1 U) ]* O( X
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
8 [9 Q" W4 E1 X% l, A, \Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
0 [; Y4 ?1 W  g$ L* B% W; i& xLePage Real Estate Services.4 D+ @" ~1 D% _. w/ x0 D
" G% A+ ]" T! F3 j8 B
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
2 q* q# E1 K0 l/ K  z( }are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic; c9 t% }6 N( C6 _# N
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
& y# }$ R% v' _% R: W+ `: x/ ssound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the  G4 E/ w8 i8 P3 z5 U0 E
residential real estate sector.
$ o2 f2 l" B& b$ g  @  X! h1 b, R( J. {7 }8 Q2 K. m1 v: k
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
! l' @+ x6 b* d$ A: l3 b0 i, Z9 [occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)- p4 m0 u4 }, _, q& h
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5621 k2 K; k9 g$ q
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
( x( k2 d5 k1 B! t% M2 ^0 W(+13.2%).
+ n% N* X- b  `
2 G& M9 |2 y) s* A6 z. z& k- ?    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth& `+ \5 X/ q2 b" w! I& }$ ~, n
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
  [, {" M! X' ~2 j6 _frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
  i4 j5 V' k- K: f0 L9 zpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
! O- x( b$ I0 T& N9 S9 tpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services., u) U+ f3 t7 n; w6 S4 H2 W+ k
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We4 J8 U5 ^" @9 T9 T0 d
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy8 l% j: b' h$ C' Z; X: V0 u
balanced market."0 `1 v" L% _; p; B5 W. n9 M
- b" ?& y; d  R0 h+ f& H
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
( g) I5 F& U0 }  Wconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
/ h+ h% W- P, Y+ X# eto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued& Z8 Q$ L" A& Z; \  Q' b
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
4 X0 u" w3 t' |& b6 _1 yenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
8 M4 h- j* C9 |3 X1 F5 C3 gmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
8 O2 a% G" W, y6 k' V1 y3 h5 Cbreaking price appreciations.! D* ^0 [9 V- u0 n
0 _! _8 c* R+ S0 N' s# g) {8 r* s
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding( y8 }; |1 V! L" A
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
. Q* U  y, G1 o8 Tlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
! P: P' y, n0 {8 Q* D. H
# y0 [2 x8 C1 R7 o    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid5 K. y4 ?- [' f  C
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer. H2 `+ |: g. v, O2 [
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
; y3 k; S* w0 j3 s  `: Bslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth., O  }/ E( ^7 y$ C
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
* E& d2 X; V$ ], D' cgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of& E: R) _" F* c6 i5 W  E+ a
price appreciation when compared with 2005.: m/ X$ ~- i8 s
1 i0 l/ A" E5 n0 m6 n: h( L- Z
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
: ~0 u) C# q7 Q4 B% u7 e. }market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
& o* ?1 _4 N2 w( }2 u; @financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
; f3 B9 w0 E' m; Ware markedly different than those found in the United States.. O, j, D" B- e7 G6 y; n
& c4 _3 h/ f9 c0 W8 H6 X/ _. S# D
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
+ u" n* E4 w: Q/ _2 }2 |* @+ m: b8 |American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
+ p8 `0 m, G5 afavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the1 b, W; Z/ R& \
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general; G1 `6 Y+ L" b9 ^+ U# W
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the/ W# F8 o' ?4 W
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and7 `9 t5 s) q. z% x8 j1 F* Q( M
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
, r- J# _; ~$ mmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
" \! W0 Q, q& G6 K! B
" ]3 g! V7 W  }  O. n; q    <<
( L" \* a7 \' g5 F7 x                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
* U8 n8 a! r* _% w4 a    >>
7 G3 e+ N0 y8 j+ A. x. U. X" S! g& \$ F7 d) N4 W
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in# m: |  I. ]: z; m8 k9 v5 p
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
8 o9 G- o5 x# q  jof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time: P6 E, N$ A" T
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
4 Z" x8 c& s6 t3 g, A& R/ {: _2 Drenovations.
0 z0 e3 u" N/ p, b
! a% K8 k2 ~/ N& x3 @0 V* l    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
! l0 x9 J5 b9 u! e2 x  m" D7 K& c* Uincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation0 d+ C2 o/ k  L; t4 \- g% ]/ h: J
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and6 I0 L  [% n+ ^: s
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
: E% s. A/ E$ B( s, _6 w5 E  ~/ X5 w0 ?& {  D; c/ b
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer/ F7 `4 j7 Y1 R7 x6 B
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
5 b7 a+ j( Y0 Z) xquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new6 u/ W% _' Q: ~1 P/ k5 f8 J( k4 p
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
/ X; ]3 Z9 I" Dto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes' }$ k. n  ~  M4 ?' l, |
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
7 s  q/ K2 f$ _( k
8 q  v/ b" j: M4 o6 C4 ^/ v    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
: A, V3 ^. z9 i* ]2 W' \conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
1 x3 y6 n9 ^4 |0 chomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
" H) V+ S! n; u' f# \7 Dwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian) h* V& |( m  E0 A/ O, s
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing1 m% h# N3 S8 u. n$ Z
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
/ w/ p1 H9 k" N0 X
: H  z. w/ L/ a7 q- a" f    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
2 J( X+ L5 _9 `3 q* Gamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes' h0 j9 _0 C2 l$ O  C. G: E) f7 z
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
. H, ]. }3 J- Y1 ?1 I3 O: R. Pas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
; D$ f% @: y. h3 n! a9 N5 bfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.& b" i( w( x/ B# a% r- Z) O
  H% U# t, ~( u) S
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
% q& m( `8 ]' fprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory5 d( o) E: A) r. n0 a3 R# R
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting5 \8 @  {/ W6 z4 g! c. ^
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
, G$ U2 u" Z1 ^when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the* G. x0 P3 D4 R( _9 K
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
* S, ^& x$ H; l& z  Z4 Z2 Omaking a purchase.
3 ]5 |9 O. I& W' v& r+ d% F! I9 ?  u
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing: E% J- q1 n+ U; R
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong2 V9 P6 F$ _- f7 H; F0 ~
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
" ^/ z! m# \" Mcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
( C6 P: y8 ^. j2 c8 }attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
, z9 n" O! N8 |3 U/ oamenities.& ^. `, ?; {, L8 M" \- M& i- |; w

$ O- c( I& _1 _. X1 s* ~% ]    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
7 j2 M' O# G) v% b/ Y! V( xthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
* h! [  h0 G7 i# V7 xacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
+ I# J( {. d1 t2 d" c3 b% Q- Hcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
" h! ]. Z& D8 xdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle( ^" J3 X1 l( ?4 `6 q: \/ B
residence, rather than for investment.
9 B0 v% f: S5 c4 I* _
1 O7 j5 u. f1 ?* h4 @: {; O4 [    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as% _3 u0 J  L1 l, r
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted/ l( F' K( z: N% V
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer9 h3 \; l: {: C) z6 G' ^6 ?& \
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
  E* ~) r% J/ w, jrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter2 C9 p' z( S- g. `5 E7 l
the market.
7 Y6 i' y7 ?/ ~/ \5 G. E+ [' x) k# a' N: }) F. S' N7 D' N5 C
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
7 }0 k: t3 a0 a. F& RJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
; R& {0 o6 g- f3 cAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring- N5 C7 ]1 Y: i( ?; @. x  G
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
% O& k" _  J0 R3 z4 Nto the shortage of available inventory.
, @& ~! G% g$ Y
8 ?5 i  @! q- y9 k9 R    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
) d& g, o3 y3 ]3 C; cmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains- ~5 C: a7 a* [* M  O- Z" P
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses+ K$ A! b  _; }* I
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
# `  j1 @- G$ g1 x) m9 t% d
+ J( q  [1 U9 M5 f( O    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
- a% s$ w4 }: C- }% Zin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low9 O" r7 z0 U  r( U2 h1 m
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
/ d, ~- U! W5 v( z7 jpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
& }' T" O. N* mprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer% ]& c/ C, e/ q- y" H
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as. S& K% ?1 E* j$ c
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
1 v% I* C2 u0 _

3 U6 @6 f+ x% c    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter% g( E1 A# E: M( R0 i) y
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton  i* T" G- R* T1 \7 H4 t, X- W
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,* M$ n% `' Y, ~" _' Y! J. e( C
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices/ ?2 t+ Q  X  g& J7 H; i. b$ o
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
0 I$ r: G  @% E' q- L1 ]+ uin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
# L3 g- _( J  L* Ktowards the end of 2006.
   
! C! F/ f0 D& Q1 _' c3 x& r$ P1 B$ D) Z5 C  u
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
- f. [' t* v5 V0 t. o: Ainventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
- _. i) g. S7 {1 Oto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
4 L, G. q& I# b1 O$ ^; v& Hgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to' r% @% ]% T' I5 ~- V1 n
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added3 u: z" O$ S  K" [6 ?7 i. B
pressure on tight inventory levels.
8 V# q, w1 C7 {
4 q1 f/ j2 Z/ A* t: q    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic- A9 p6 [+ H& Y+ L9 f, ~
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people, n* V( i  ^# u  Q
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
, X/ t% ]6 N6 M4 u! [+ B* ~  _! @while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching# l9 [3 N2 K6 Q: m' q
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace., P" {) I8 q$ ^" n# _
- z! w" D( E8 {4 x- W* m$ c" _
    <<
$ x% K  P+ T5 n) v: R) S- [      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
$ ]4 `) ~8 M; y0 s6 o1 V# t, n  d6 |5 I( Q8 j* _4 d1 }7 D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! \9 @. n1 {2 M- P                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
" s% L+ \9 ?( N' L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 H) N, [# N6 D' n: {: t
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
- y1 U- x2 P# W2 ?$ R9 v, _    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average, X9 P9 ^% e$ b: P; n$ H
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ `/ D$ f7 o+ r' f
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0000 ~5 G) a7 l: v! |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 B) O+ i' ^; F5 v% \5 R
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
2 Y7 O/ k0 f" O2 t! `; f; W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" c9 X/ X) W/ F, F/ w! a! Q    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
, ~+ n3 y: s1 v% u: H: ^8 v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 f7 L- J) r/ F) y( I: ^6 B
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
5 k9 g. H% h  ~$ w9 N$ A% @* c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% u- q) h  a! `: |% H    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333. t" {# M" A: R+ `" g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. d7 z: E3 [: C
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583( @6 ?3 y$ b. c# [2 j; k0 p: C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# D4 D$ |  z0 r/ B  W    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
* E" X/ b# L( G* q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Z! `$ o# ~# y    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
9 C3 L$ p+ w% v8 |9 J) O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! \4 M2 r4 b' Q3 |; L) q& p! M5 i7 z    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
$ T& |' R, o1 x" d7 z8 v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 J/ V; v/ P  V" k3 d
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707, f$ P: O3 X6 I$ |' W  E5 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" P- r1 a- Y. h7 w/ T: @    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
- Y/ S: z! d( D$ `! t" `+ O* O( ~    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 d7 c7 l8 p% Y% _* c' s4 Y; v, [( h    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389. k0 U# E3 }3 Z. m3 ?+ C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 U0 [+ P- W: w# }1 V
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7144 y( I2 l3 E0 Y9 ^$ L
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 y! e4 r( C/ K% Q
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5006 w; r% |' T2 m& o$ R
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 b. j( K5 S, U6 `    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
* n1 y- Z3 G- v- Y+ c. k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 T  b  e' Y' B$ x% k; C    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8609 r+ [. @# g& a3 e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* T2 L- ^& o! l: `- p0 R3 p& N* K. l. |* \3 ]6 ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------! R: J( G2 w( U# a+ p; h
                               Standard Condominium
0 \/ a9 q: ^* U. Q' P8 z    -------------------------------------------------------------) o0 U4 G2 c; `  V
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
' [, u0 B" V1 @0 J    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change, C9 K  ?$ i9 ^0 T6 R3 k" J2 J
    -------------------------------------------------------------% A- j( Q4 V# ^, z
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%/ [, M! w$ G" b  U+ |& g' w
    -------------------------------------------------------------( [9 D, p) ]" @2 q7 \. K' O; n
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
- H, Z2 a3 X$ s    -------------------------------------------------------------! N( x8 S% ~2 X& {2 a
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A& B: L5 |$ N) X/ S
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 q; k0 N, N  o1 D+ p    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
9 i0 O$ a: X: U1 A    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 @% t: x" }: [# ]: I, b, M    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
( _! ?8 l: ?8 t. r    -------------------------------------------------------------7 c) t2 }$ h# n+ P" G7 ?6 ]
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%- V7 {! L/ a; H/ ?: t; m: H+ S
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 H! o( ]  H7 A. Z
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%% N4 S- x" Z1 p2 v( q+ A
    -------------------------------------------------------------- a* {5 O3 Q) N& Z" V
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%- d5 ?+ Z+ R7 i0 d# \9 ?) \
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( \0 r! |: e; \) ?/ o    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%0 a2 m1 C/ Q/ U: s& m/ t" i
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, Q! R2 K) W+ {- |- l! V& r    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%% l: U; `9 D2 W/ I, W% b
    -------------------------------------------------------------& A7 `2 a* [( F
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
% y! E5 A  s! D; t5 @. C* }    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ K7 {" w# ]5 t: }2 w* s9 r$ r    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%1 s) O8 G+ C+ X' u5 y1 S
    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 W) o* b9 b% `6 g2 K# \" P4 B    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
) x$ x' Q9 F: {  B+ b5 N    -------------------------------------------------------------
* {/ M5 Q, r6 s0 w    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%7 V5 p, f- n0 `+ a, B+ r: K
    -------------------------------------------------------------! I1 a" l0 X3 n/ A
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
- B% F) S; \& W) _    -------------------------------------------------------------! g" m+ O1 x+ X5 x
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%  n6 F( R9 R# k
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( g4 A! v) r" `4 B* ^& k    >>
$ z# [3 {/ T. f" Z1 ?% @
9 Q$ Q; Y, R3 n1 s0 c, g5 D    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
/ F& O" t$ h; c/ {: p5 ain the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
& t4 ]0 }2 A# J% g* p/ A1 w# z! oJohn and Victoria.
! a/ c) d7 D" K! k8 [0 c
0 p  H; T1 R0 f9 K! \. n    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most& R& n& q7 k6 l/ x( w2 {) q- S) I
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of1 K0 s, E/ l0 Y3 d* t
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
; b1 ?- H! w0 B5 S- ]" zreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
+ ^' L) r, Y* ?trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities1 b5 K+ v: V3 \; G' i  B
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is1 y5 r+ m5 V6 A; ^3 q, o; B
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current+ c" I% y) p, w/ i3 A
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable8 q$ a- D" p7 ~4 u
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
7 m. A7 n  ]5 J$ YNovember 15, 2006.6 r! K6 |7 l2 u! ?
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of( h: [1 g+ L7 e2 Q* ^: g
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge7 U: ^9 h2 Z& s  l4 y9 P8 Q5 M
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is; G. l- d) t9 C
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-10 22:28 , Processed in 0.282091 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表