埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2146|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
& d( |7 _. E( D2 x
6 U. u% b5 S: i" V- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
! Y1 v/ ~, q/ ~- B. O5 x7 |; h- [3 {: T9 T
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market9 T6 V6 f- R, E2 d
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third, ?3 x& _1 x5 G% ~
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
" |# N. C4 v  J6 Z  I5 R( `in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit# o( \# M3 C3 D0 h4 D
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
" \* d& K) Z: l/ ~2 Y. U; \, Zmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,$ |1 z% X3 o* P# R$ v
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal, V2 l* \$ h: P7 @& _
LePage Real Estate Services.( @+ _$ h) b/ D' G6 O9 Z# Y& h
9 r* V* ^( y" Q; _# w. C
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters9 X. `9 v2 C5 {" f& W! O
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic- D8 g0 ]5 N4 p: K, L0 \2 U  B
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
0 {' ^0 m6 u3 `: n* f( vsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the# m2 I& [1 ], {  f, m( Q7 K3 F7 ~
residential real estate sector.
9 Q# A0 e9 c8 M& ?) O# C5 J7 `. j2 n' j
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
# c5 U' d4 R2 C0 S& ioccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)1 O$ G8 y4 c, X3 L+ t* @
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562" @5 \9 Z0 i& M1 s4 a$ |
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
  a/ Q& }/ Q* T" F3 b# [: K(+13.2%).8 z0 D$ g) g6 @
' D& o  v& O: n7 J, ]
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
: E2 \4 r* K) `$ Yduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the* S+ s2 }) ?" P' ~3 |; R
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
$ a( A1 p' u8 J/ P) O" Zpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,' j& a! j/ U! g
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.* ]: D2 u( i+ K' B3 S
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
  Q$ C: }! ~& Hwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy; `5 C+ h5 S* [+ p' c8 C- E0 ^
balanced market."
1 v1 u& r' s( K  X+ E3 j
1 e& m/ W# D% E& e3 c    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,1 t1 D3 h, Q2 _  S5 M9 t9 p
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift. C$ ^( z: Z( S1 p- y; Y
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
! ~4 k6 g9 w" C5 x3 p, Hthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core- [. j$ h5 @: ]- {* H
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,5 S( ?1 f  Y# {. S5 w' a
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
2 Y& X. W" \. M: Z, dbreaking price appreciations.0 a; ]% R1 K8 B0 W
5 G  w2 w- O; v
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
  k0 l" l/ v, {& f8 J& leconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
9 S1 Q" `# j0 X1 w8 elargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
, c& \6 \, B. Q& a2 M9 m& \. _8 R& v! p6 A6 P* _4 Z- d
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
6 W( R( U  _5 p, @economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer( Y, C4 x2 u0 I8 S% ]8 w# j
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off) }6 l  @. l) s6 Z6 b
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
* ?: D+ Q) S  ]' x% MIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
' b( a3 b6 k# Ngreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of# \  |$ G* B/ @1 e$ J0 s
price appreciation when compared with 2005.6 s+ O. G0 u5 Z1 o; n. n
9 _' x$ l4 o; L/ o
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
* a+ @) f7 U* S- A5 J6 }4 Xmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and3 ~% D3 k# O7 c3 q9 n$ \% ~# S
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada8 Y: p8 S% f# R# }3 _
are markedly different than those found in the United States.& r! }9 X) \3 P. o$ L
6 h% W, R" [& n: L
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
' L) v2 @$ e2 c$ M" i; d' yAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
4 P2 N! G1 _8 H& nfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the7 c8 I! ?. Q, j1 L6 |' z4 k
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general- Y; k+ u9 c; d1 r
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
' P( X) T' g2 @& g1 l$ C+ t" `downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and& {! _3 ?5 U4 T' x% K1 Z
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
" y) w+ G0 j1 U9 Amortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."1 h/ k! m- e0 p2 o

! y8 Q  W) L# O+ q    <<
0 h0 X/ j3 e5 ?$ |3 {                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES3 H" D9 ]0 A. @) [+ T
    >>: C: _. o( {3 O8 G! y  x. \2 @
% a1 g$ E+ S+ G: i( R# a
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
4 D: x% X8 m% S6 uHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate: r1 I. S$ o# Z% r8 {( [
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
% J, g& Y+ V1 D8 b  b( f4 ^looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
9 M5 r$ F" [+ b/ _- ?; P4 b; o, Rrenovations.
; N9 {* q8 g6 k1 b% c, ?6 g- M) O  S1 K* @  l$ Q2 T
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
& k7 ]% B1 x6 H5 a& e$ v7 aincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
4 X  A; r8 V. z  r( z% H, P/ c* ncompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and8 C4 E- H. s+ J, X+ O) c4 y. E$ `
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
, O' @! |$ z+ u
9 {7 j. x+ D3 ^& ?, `0 P6 U    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
% f$ T2 {1 |% ~: H( N2 U, v6 g9 uslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
4 d( X# n8 L8 y( f5 Xquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
8 q6 S; `7 E+ @" |/ p600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
% c- y4 ^3 o6 Ato the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes  i9 X3 Z0 i; O% A* |  l/ x( D
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
' d5 c- U( o2 a
7 v4 i% ~; o! \. t$ n6 }. K+ S    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced3 W7 U' O% N1 u. o0 ?" ^6 J2 b( W
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their/ ]% v& s, J) G) I
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
! a( [% \) i  ]was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
. j; ?2 l3 v8 y8 Y2 adollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing: N; ?: L* Z( j0 H  T8 a
buyers with more options when looking for a home.- J& {& t7 H: Z  J
) K1 ?7 y: V. h2 L4 @% B
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly. [2 {7 q; V" \! I
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes+ J; l, O) w$ B$ h5 S
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
" m5 P2 @; z: Q0 e7 s; _& ias some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last) V- J/ b8 _# `9 i& r$ M8 Y
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
! z# V' L3 N8 ~, e: d5 v* t
4 t' s! ]0 A# |" u5 N5 C) F7 P! A+ c    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house- f8 s( z" a. b
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
0 m! S$ x0 J+ w  d* o4 I+ O- F) plevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
4 T: A' U% P5 w1 X& |/ ffirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,2 m& V4 Y0 A! q7 }! T' q
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
: H4 @* X3 |' ^, s: Epressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
& ]9 R5 A( v3 u" |; r: y3 Bmaking a purchase.
( b: _$ e; }; J
" M- v+ y: ]' p( m9 E7 j& B/ `2 i' U    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing  a# ]1 z) g; q- N
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
0 D% A4 _  ?1 ~3 W: {1 W8 Aconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city% ?3 l* C% d/ L  N$ u! ^
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
+ J3 m; g$ i) ]! \3 Wattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown) ~0 u7 I% R- O6 Y! M
amenities.. h) E: n7 n* p: M& I

; o  L3 Z, u( |% a# W    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels$ g0 P7 y" ~$ N* g8 F: Y0 Q
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand. Y  F( J/ [6 z- }4 W5 \% m6 o
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
! W, s/ I1 r8 U" jcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
7 v! M8 k! q1 r+ ?6 ?! @1 zdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
  ]& @* x* I  z) x* r' n' A7 lresidence, rather than for investment.; t" W8 ?* e; @; G' V, `* o
$ u5 X5 I8 `! a# h$ R- F6 n  _9 x
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
3 e/ E9 x5 v2 l. B* vhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
: _: n; [( S+ G* X0 Kin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
, ]$ A0 x6 y& N7 k0 _7 v) Mconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
) J* ?* x$ N. N0 }7 M  a- Srate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
' w8 \) J& B/ j  a( l/ G% Z) Xthe market.- E3 @/ v/ G; D

. K! W; f+ h3 R: N/ C4 ^    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
! D+ z2 F5 b; N( ?5 kJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
' D$ i/ w" D) N+ D$ N0 JAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
% |0 S* S, ~4 V8 X" z  ]1 Wmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due0 F; E3 B' L5 Q1 _+ b: w; Z8 b
to the shortage of available inventory.
! z+ E% M% y) f  x6 T+ S0 F" ?- W6 D3 v0 l+ J, X4 l4 @; S) u
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
5 w. w1 g1 q* m. B% Y# R) zmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
3 @- F& Q2 `) T9 J- n7 ]vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
& I$ r# g) A; Q% {struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
$ k& J1 `; t3 f' I: @1 z* W7 C+ [' O/ |! u3 Q& d) i# K
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases+ s" ^, Z( V* a: o/ }
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
2 j! e' Q9 e' ~( N) `& F' wunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that5 t! [0 ]. g0 r: h# @3 N6 {8 |
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
  H; b3 N( ~2 S1 @prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
( x, @& N  b) O& ?season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
7 C) M6 h- P; F  K( ~) fbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

. q' M; S* O- t: a/ k( C& N+ o* {, M5 X6 E* d8 Y' q5 r% L2 q
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
1 Q3 A) ^0 d: m: s1 qas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton" [! n; P4 X2 P8 i
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,9 u/ O; Z' ]1 b# E
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
2 m/ G7 S; s9 Oincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
% h, f/ x! u0 O1 \8 @: x% u0 v  Lin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly1 F, F- R4 I9 c/ h+ C3 ~" L
towards the end of 2006.
    ; u! m6 A7 |2 z
; y. K" g5 K0 c- H1 t! W
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of) E4 L! N+ E. J+ Z
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable2 ~9 Y) H# M) Q2 [+ I
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse9 T: u' U' |2 p# S8 b
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to% W! K# E" N9 T2 B) v9 H8 S
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
5 Y" j/ l2 J- b3 L( Hpressure on tight inventory levels.
6 Z  j/ V9 z! q/ o+ s" i+ z8 N+ x# z( I$ M4 A- ]
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
! S0 }- r' m1 u9 z" Gfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
2 }# Y/ h: k0 K" U  B" E8 g0 Iinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
4 [( E, R  k/ K3 ~  Qwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
; |4 p) Z( C" y8 @9 {0 afor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.2 l& {$ E' L/ M, i: D" R! J2 h
8 c- y* P" C# m
    <<% w7 y% _! C: u+ J3 Z) c
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
- f$ K: M3 v, g( D" L$ u# x) E/ F8 e. [: N
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 A+ j. a0 r/ E) N1 ~1 D5 k- ^
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey2 e/ _" h$ W! n  j/ R( X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ P) t/ x- |: H) ]. ~1 t                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3  Z% [- Q* u% r3 i/ |
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average( `* R) q1 W0 P* t% n' d6 c; |: D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 \- P4 C7 k$ G( n' M    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000' w6 R+ n4 ]: |, G" |: X- N
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& P# e) x( d: L    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000; i3 b* D- ?# e2 _
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  U7 q2 M0 ]! H- z& @
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
* u8 ~% o2 X$ D& M1 Z7 a    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& Y. K9 T4 j( q- C" D4 R    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -& c1 \; p6 K2 L! m) @. \
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: }! ?4 B5 g% H1 D2 p: ^; n) r    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3332 B, e  T* D- K* w( \4 U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" P' f. d6 k3 T& Y+ W3 z    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
' |& J; q# ^0 u$ R    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* o; k1 w) y! k4 s* Q  L    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185! m+ x; B" m0 k' \  b0 |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% h4 U( G& _' W  K6 i% u
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250" Z4 \3 J: d6 M* e5 ]+ g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' K) F( l) p+ c+ u8 E7 h
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
1 U& Z" s' X+ r! W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ ]1 o, ]' n4 i% G7 s! U- D
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
  r4 R) r" ^/ u* c# B& C, Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 o8 O* k& c7 t9 b+ g
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500: f& |7 i) b* H/ r6 Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ z% J6 a3 k; {/ L8 Z+ m  n, g+ _
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,3890 u+ p$ c6 A# ~) t; C9 S( i- k
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; y, e6 N1 E: U5 l9 \3 k0 j    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7147 x/ o' @! A% ~' H' U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 T$ D/ P# Z; @  _0 d+ a) q
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
+ l' W0 D  N) D" g6 O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" g+ Y# z$ U# w, n+ L1 _, e/ A' B& E    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000  }' h1 [- O5 z; g0 b. @
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 B+ p$ W  R( I
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
& s1 v  \6 {" [( C/ p1 f+ c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( u* @- i: B% l8 |! J* s
7 A/ q" ]) g5 s. _: A) G
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 v1 D5 \7 Y5 K8 g; N4 M3 c6 P                               Standard Condominium) c9 d4 m+ J8 E7 L5 t8 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& J+ I$ O- g* f5 m2 M2 E# R. J9 K                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
$ k/ y/ Q/ G# {, O) {2 i- O% w    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change  B3 m) f6 n( W3 u; |6 S+ F. _
    -------------------------------------------------------------
! s' z) s  |6 E3 E. ?1 o7 t    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%, H" n8 u3 G: l
    -------------------------------------------------------------; u: S) M1 f$ R& ?# @7 G
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
" a7 H( k; l7 N) r    -------------------------------------------------------------0 L5 G& M% L0 o7 d! `7 B
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A1 ]' [, P3 W. G: B+ e
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" z* {3 ~; X$ X5 L    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
  V( m  \1 n: E0 Y/ b. j    -------------------------------------------------------------: M' }% {) ^9 }4 c
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
  U4 w5 `* e8 N/ O* b    -------------------------------------------------------------3 S9 q! w. |6 U4 e8 n3 x
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
# h+ x$ ]) T% Z& u$ J5 x2 a    -------------------------------------------------------------
# h1 W& @# i/ k' c; i  M6 ]    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%! U( T8 B% |# B% `; x7 Y0 P- ^8 l
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 [% K8 I% {! `, `    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
/ z# N# d4 W2 J1 Q% V# [' s( W- Y    -------------------------------------------------------------
& U# A9 C9 a, {5 C    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
4 Q* e  O) f) |9 e7 g5 V    -------------------------------------------------------------" a, ~1 X" l& S2 C5 A* u# U
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%8 `( s% w4 g+ g7 I
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ b5 U+ a$ S, K8 }
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
) i: }' m, S6 A+ x    -------------------------------------------------------------
- v" x9 y- M- p6 u    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
$ [) Q8 c0 G; G, z    -------------------------------------------------------------% X+ f" w% d4 t4 e) G+ C8 C4 j
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
; ]1 |: V4 b4 |9 r0 y6 E    -------------------------------------------------------------6 J0 Z6 q6 d6 S6 \# A
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
! W/ J8 L$ B; o0 n9 V3 E    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 n6 S" Q) Q- M    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
7 l9 C  e: n/ E  W# {1 B8 [& y) M7 q    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 G9 C3 i8 q7 }9 d0 c2 Z    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%, [( K4 `& T0 d) m, P8 S; C" o# I
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  X* h' a; ?1 D7 a- Q4 Z    >>
4 ^2 @3 f8 u, u$ l6 [. K9 C% L, u! h2 [# Y+ L- z
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined1 e; ~6 o1 N$ D4 F1 U
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
$ ~5 l, `* W0 I* `) eJohn and Victoria.+ E# S& S: z6 n7 m% k
2 W" y4 z/ \# W) q) Q# r% P
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
$ E* O" V% T1 |# K* a4 M( v, l- w; Fcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of9 ?$ f* h5 _6 d1 F
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
1 l0 A/ g8 q9 h# h1 ^# Lreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price( e+ @: O# G! }1 U
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
- f# Z6 Q6 n: @" z& zacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
* W2 u* E. a7 L: Xavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current5 F2 j4 _3 s  Q$ z5 F7 U
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
; k. A. I) i" h, {" G/ j4 @version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on7 u+ C  [0 {$ w- X
November 15, 2006.
6 _) }# A  r5 w5 A2 @    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
9 v4 y- [  g8 ^fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge" r" V% H4 D5 k+ p7 g
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is; K+ A" z7 I; a9 X+ R' B) j+ C
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-9 11:19 , Processed in 0.100482 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表