埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2386|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
! d% H" Q, I1 |8 Z! O' n8 V( D* t
1 B3 N1 Y: S( k5 F7 ?% V* a# J+ e- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -$ q2 ]* y) s. h1 J

$ v$ t* P/ ~( u4 X- K6 u! b1 n    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
) f& ?# N) v# `/ Vexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third3 R  g, C; s3 B$ h; A
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
; R9 ^* m* |& T! A/ fin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit# {7 J9 y2 a& ^( H; \8 X
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
* n) i6 P3 e) E- imore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,! F/ U6 X) S, a, k' q7 u5 j
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
( d9 J( t8 h; o% lLePage Real Estate Services.- {' s% T1 u5 }
6 v: U6 u! p# ]' f
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
7 V! o* n5 i, ~3 W$ w( vare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic! E- H7 i* H- Q) j4 C
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and. B8 v( K# c5 T; M2 X+ G
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the# V$ s* p) a) O, f1 Q! f
residential real estate sector.
; g) ^% p8 W; A- R) r- G3 _5 ?/ P; D0 O& r) A1 \8 Y! \' n" ~3 q' c
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation# h% V8 p8 A! b
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
7 P! l- k* F$ h# t- m5 @$ tyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562- S; A0 Y% i; W5 }8 u: e
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
& ^2 M% Y) ^) O' Q+ x# {7 E% X! n(+13.2%).
  R# K' P( R1 w$ R8 ^/ q2 u2 O/ n5 t. {" t- O( e9 g. v
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth! m% c- q! W0 b/ t
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the4 D- H9 \( J4 _( I
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
! r! G) R( g+ {5 |7 |9 spoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,* h5 k. q: h4 J: j" X. O7 Z: k  d
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
6 s& B6 G4 B' x& ["Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We) u6 d% P! x; V. P) k. z* q
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy; W, Y: f2 s' i/ S7 N, d% d7 m5 b
balanced market."( ~, p1 g9 F9 q9 s

$ |4 d6 G, {, X4 i    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,% ^- r; U& C% U9 N
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
' _% O/ j. U- U  q+ A, oto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued4 q& f4 O2 O! T7 y% C
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
! D$ D8 G0 R7 a$ M- ^$ j; m) Jenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
+ p/ U; E5 {( j/ V) C7 ?3 Zmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
: h3 a6 s9 r3 {) C4 Ubreaking price appreciations.& P8 [0 }: [, u- `/ S
+ U5 U3 I- }8 }" u/ n& ~
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
: V! `  T& H6 C8 K& ueconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
, u9 [. _2 E0 o  I3 {largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed./ k' b+ {$ h5 N) S* H$ J3 R
1 a6 i' s" F1 {( P4 y& Q/ X( `
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
5 q4 _/ b4 T0 G9 D9 neconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer* s% L( ?  b! Y+ S2 v, I
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
9 f. ^0 g8 v2 K% Uslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.' G& }4 k6 q7 U0 V  o4 M8 @0 T
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers& @) q3 \1 R4 [9 }
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
+ ]9 n6 m  w0 o- Fprice appreciation when compared with 2005.' a6 V$ |9 m+ F8 r

$ I8 _) U$ _, g  c7 J    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
& O) P/ s; u" S, imarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
& U7 ~) A; `) o" a4 l4 ^  ]- E+ }financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
  R: R5 G+ e6 O2 sare markedly different than those found in the United States.
- ~% M2 y. V9 k
5 M& `1 i( M* m8 C    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
7 N3 P$ G' F( ~; `4 MAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's% v* q, ~- c- O) ^! T9 \8 t+ ]
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
9 q% F6 }, V& @& s/ vrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general" H3 E& P7 ?$ Z  J3 G3 j- o& L& Q
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
, ~! S, |. X( k: p6 o7 w8 |2 Wdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and5 |) C3 G% p6 S: _+ f% K: C8 |( Z
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
( f0 E' t# C/ P- H* ]2 Lmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."  |: t, h# U* T$ b6 @+ J

  R( B8 y, [. `& _( ^1 _. b; a/ l# o    <<
; i) o) G+ X* J& M; B                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES3 s# R9 v: V" Y+ j" u1 i
    >>8 f. Y+ ^( ?  ^0 c$ R% J1 R% k$ d9 @
, i, k. O% r% I- z" y/ a* B
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in5 W  F7 \/ _4 q* N* f
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
# _: J* A# N3 i( g1 B! M- Z1 Xof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
( n5 x4 y9 u  ~) g5 \. mlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
; }, \. S4 x9 [3 j7 S  Crenovations.* W) s6 k9 v1 n3 K# `+ G1 N

% k/ G: O  ?$ G. @8 K  s! Y    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
) x8 T9 k) i2 T5 f; Q4 a# sincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
* ?- Q/ K  M+ V9 F7 x7 x  B0 R" Acompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and, d5 F& ?/ V! _7 z
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
- i3 u4 F+ e* J- \; x- l/ _6 h* u8 V$ Q
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer0 ?" A" q3 s$ S% H1 ]
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the4 X, ^5 q; ]$ l2 W. f8 e
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
! }' D- }* K. U% d6 M: ^3 V600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
0 u$ v# ]1 ?! G8 j" yto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes+ O, h) `* R+ u# V  D
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
! i2 }0 K; C) L$ j) f, p& z; ^$ _
6 q" V2 ^' T3 ^6 A& {    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced% X4 H" m8 |& K( G$ {" R8 [
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
2 D( x% a0 P8 A- U  }+ Q( ahomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers& v" C6 V* M2 F8 P) m% J/ D- Q
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian. h' [5 P; t- e
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing1 f/ P6 I3 Y6 g2 q' p$ b" ]
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
6 ]& ^1 g) Q9 ]* j0 ?+ H
" Y1 D' p  E2 T1 F! K# G3 p    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly+ L1 ]% P5 |$ o9 f. p& w- m
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes0 `. m) v/ A2 X( z3 e
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,, D5 l1 a" {- U+ O
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
* q$ D2 s2 y  u2 e. k( B1 Dfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.+ u: {. r7 F$ K: q
+ s1 t+ Y! e0 v3 J2 v2 K- d- G
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
! U* J" j/ u( I- T, |3 }1 gprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory& H% C. x+ V" @! x  C; F7 `
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting3 H7 T6 I8 T5 G
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
1 w" |, B. z+ P" y1 Z# r& y0 o# g) Swhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
  w8 I# Z& y  Q2 ~& G) B! h  r! \$ Fpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
0 N. ~; T$ M" I* O) ^2 K( ~& Ymaking a purchase.
. X" _! z& z( R+ S( S. F( ~" i5 G; |0 b7 e8 s: N: @  @8 H
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
: h+ s! B1 |4 }, W1 |; j! Zmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong$ F+ h) \' ^, @' {7 N' q0 k8 ^4 j
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
9 ]$ a+ @3 j4 R) b/ b6 z) N2 ecentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting  y- D- q' c: O
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown6 a: Y+ c+ c& X2 m) T7 K+ G
amenities.
8 |$ s) h* `4 z5 Z5 V# M( A/ b7 ~$ S  N+ c0 J- w6 T+ H+ H
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
& i" Y$ d/ V8 u" h+ P+ V9 e8 w, ithroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand9 C' l8 d5 |3 `, p$ G5 D- g8 f) z
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has8 N: s* O. a0 Z$ x  \. {2 Z& ~3 O
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been8 b2 G  U9 w/ G4 `2 g
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
3 t& s" P$ s. w* U  k& dresidence, rather than for investment.
+ {1 _3 @7 x; Y  X! }: T/ K$ {8 a# d" u
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
% q8 J5 N2 u$ F; e; Shouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
" ?- I  Z! j* W2 xin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer$ `2 O: @% M) x% S, H
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization5 R! p/ O" M! ~
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter! j( Z/ V% x2 w! Q. V; q
the market.
# e' W9 U; Z9 n1 W/ v8 h) M% b
# Z% }1 }5 ~# _; e" n    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through' u8 N7 ~3 r7 |; X  V. X5 ]" d) x; x8 g
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
5 V7 g+ {: t+ T; K; ZAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring5 t( ?1 X+ E$ V- |! d5 O7 }
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due' H6 E' E0 c; Y  I5 t
to the shortage of available inventory.! O7 t- M# \$ F* M4 U& F
4 V5 [5 T+ `4 w7 D5 c+ W
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its9 S$ f0 V, z& M$ Y0 f
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains8 o1 K) X& N5 o5 w3 u
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses" Z* ^4 D  f8 V! ]2 }9 l
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.2 z' Q5 G5 J5 l
$ q, F( A# T& M+ A  Z& i
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases# R8 ^7 {' V; M9 i( u2 C) e$ Q* i
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
+ r+ {7 m8 D% Eunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
2 y0 M' O, t% g; Cpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring$ H$ A6 K5 F- k' t
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
. \( e. N6 G- w; e) p9 g5 u+ fseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as* ]! ?) V& q& k6 j' B9 Y( u
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

) @" Q6 D; b# z  k. L0 ]& H2 l$ i+ b# f2 q
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter# Y) @8 A& m8 z4 J
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
; w6 i' H9 R* o# a, ]remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
- e9 @! H' ?( b2 Amaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices) B( ]" q" j/ I" x7 L# {# A
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
5 [1 C7 W0 t! _, i; M6 |in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
- ^( M$ r2 E: L7 j* ntowards the end of 2006.
   
# `7 x. X  v5 x8 S; l8 q9 k! }' S0 a; {! ?8 e* }. H) q/ P
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of& n) y, U6 h) ?0 s
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable/ h5 t7 F2 ]+ ^/ H6 L: B
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
! x5 G$ @' W. l, v( ^0 N9 xgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
) @' q9 Y& v( ^, A$ }foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
+ U/ e+ v" i  Rpressure on tight inventory levels.  y2 U% A! y. n7 s: m( y8 G
5 E. l! m' {4 Z
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
; C! }; b- f; _4 ]: x( I) Q' j) Zfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people. ~/ `2 Q# C: k* U6 N+ G* Z  B  @
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
* f- u/ T2 H- R4 _while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching. S2 S  ]1 c$ t
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
: b4 o/ g5 w7 L& z4 s* q& x' E3 M- K/ K0 S
    <<
9 m0 h9 e* R" d+ K" |1 \      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20064 L: w% R! g' U5 Z1 J

+ f! |% ?: ]6 C* Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( j2 Q! |/ N) P
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey7 M6 H& ?! s1 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; j% R' y' F, B# y/ p; }; `5 ?, m' l
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3  H+ s2 m5 O# x& l& @# i/ K
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average! D2 F4 `1 y+ i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* v& M* E* s3 H- D  L    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0005 a: O4 J, a$ }  n. j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  A) V7 l9 t2 F- K7 b
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000; R+ x8 u9 n: t1 {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 y2 l* ]% v8 \6 t+ M9 o    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
, Z" P' I2 ?" K4 v) I6 Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" c3 \" Q. @* _7 w; A: p    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -3 a: a5 t. A2 n# }. X* X& C) I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! b/ s' k' T9 L  h2 T% A6 R
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
/ w: Z* g8 j$ t6 B0 }; c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' A4 j  ]1 N! G/ i, x
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5834 [1 `5 e& n5 {: B% J* I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 t3 C: F5 }4 C: |    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185; R: e3 t, n: X1 d  P  S! ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ X$ P, b) M1 u% r% J6 E9 X) ]
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250% a5 Y1 w& q  |1 z$ S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 ^! F; T* J: _7 Z    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766; E4 x4 i, Q) D* o/ S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" s  t/ K+ B- V$ J    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707+ J5 [2 ^6 H1 u9 h
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 Q" P( t6 a& y8 {. T
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
9 G; e( \- Y) p  W  ?    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  v1 X; j- o# j6 j" B
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
  T, U* o9 y- m( i1 D$ O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 S/ Y( E3 d; `+ d3 N- }3 `    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714- w) v; X2 |7 T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 s- X5 O! c% s% N5 e) x$ s. |" h9 @    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
) r0 Z/ N. K2 T6 d+ T- Q1 T3 H    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ \6 P" r, j& t% T. B; k/ V8 @( h    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
. G; p2 X& {. Q( W& H* I# @0 x- I: C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ k1 f+ {7 y: B& t# {    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
( ~2 e3 w8 ]! ^. e; \3 D    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: c: V) {- T. {6 K: Y* D. K5 \2 W* X
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 Z6 E4 [. |0 i' P% J1 M7 j7 ~                               Standard Condominium
- e2 E8 F# f* o; l3 _; J    -------------------------------------------------------------8 b3 K9 K/ X( E! {8 a% e
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
- l0 h! _4 A9 _& j4 J: q4 |    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change1 f/ T4 I. W' d5 X8 r- a
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ w' _3 p9 l6 P8 r3 s: u
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%1 M! k8 w% T3 G+ @5 z9 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------" L; j/ [% p) H
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
; x! U: V6 ^5 Q+ Z    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ x# M. x6 l6 F+ h    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
& W- D+ _, q2 X* o! [    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 ~/ g: l( }7 ~    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A8 |6 P" D$ o' `( \% Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 ~7 F/ }# o4 M1 A6 \
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
/ }' J1 j) Q3 s    -------------------------------------------------------------: v6 w2 a) H& u" {" t# i; w- S
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
  H- d" J: D% {) E7 ^8 r3 Z' B    -------------------------------------------------------------
; ~+ G+ Z' k* I/ z$ S    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
7 |" a# o' {' F' F7 o9 a    -------------------------------------------------------------5 X0 Z/ {$ \5 K0 a5 b7 v% I
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
" g7 P; O, [) n) E) H: |) l    -------------------------------------------------------------# Y1 _" ~4 x$ ~3 q" M4 h$ z' [
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%- K/ b* X+ {- R; }. _
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( }$ \8 v- B; m, C& _6 K/ j    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
+ k6 [- S' S7 _/ ]    -------------------------------------------------------------7 J/ ~1 c0 v  o5 G
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
/ H6 T, \$ w$ C1 Z    -------------------------------------------------------------1 b9 k8 A8 Q/ X- H% t) Y
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
) K% q' Z6 I# ^1 L9 v6 t9 x/ P, m4 V    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 u6 t; t% v$ Q# @* n3 q" b    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
+ n3 Z8 }: f/ z0 h+ l    -------------------------------------------------------------, Z/ d9 E* e5 y1 i9 `
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%2 Y1 U. `  f" X% f+ U: s
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; \& d# b* [& F8 u' n    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
$ g' T  D. E, ^8 U. a$ _: X    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 C9 L* c2 _$ f6 |    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
2 n, K* k1 A6 ?- f    -------------------------------------------------------------
% h/ A& B3 U# r4 m# `- r- Y# J    >>2 e6 W& w5 Z, P6 Z. s" ]  F
% I% ~- A) R6 e/ d; ~
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
$ u9 I2 G& a# Xin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint- K3 p) ^9 |/ `2 }: T
John and Victoria.
1 Y3 c/ x5 j( J9 Q" P3 x" N/ ^# W1 I. m% x) f; l
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most+ v, `0 G% }, V9 {/ s- B  A
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of& i9 z" `, m) d0 V4 U
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
* {2 Y/ {% S- A; Z3 t4 w/ mreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
9 n& N& v. k% b: ftrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
5 @! ~2 v6 H+ e- `2 cacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
7 q( M# V: G9 ]! l6 Javailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
* b$ C$ `+ K  y6 C2 X* xfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable+ D4 _" i: X' x1 q3 \6 `$ x
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on2 b3 g$ |1 W+ P: d0 b6 V
November 15, 2006., U6 C) a/ ^* ~* |% m1 Y4 ~
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
( a4 Z" @0 ?, r& E6 G9 Rfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge* A- W/ h' ]6 \+ d. I0 r
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
8 D$ S5 O4 {  m+ Ravailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-22 03:29 , Processed in 0.081287 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表