埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2413|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
5 _& c  y6 a5 Y, ]4 P6 y
+ p; k- D. U6 E" m' y- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -9 K7 `6 U  Z' u: I

1 A& L, T5 k8 x. D  f# ]    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market4 \4 H# q# g4 N0 F  g( w3 \: N
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
: ?8 z0 u. ^* Bquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
4 Y7 a# |/ C0 m) V+ kin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit6 i; y% G) G* f
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and, w2 z3 ]1 o/ g1 B$ _) N+ j
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,/ ~3 g2 O/ _2 @
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal+ L% j: H/ A' J2 _6 `$ H3 s* l# P* r
LePage Real Estate Services.% }2 y8 e$ ^" w1 e- q  h8 F1 p* O
+ u/ P5 q$ q0 |% P4 t$ _
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters; E/ M' F2 l! @! S4 }
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic( e4 ]& \, B" e. Z" T* q
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and, d0 J) Y0 f, }& I2 S; }
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
9 _' {' e  b1 Q* n# L: [1 lresidential real estate sector.) r( B- @6 T& Z# m, q2 `' B0 I

: C/ w6 {1 M  [5 @5 g) U    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
0 S3 }) G  g2 }' b; Z1 s4 poccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
! L' I/ S) o* F$ Oyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
: k5 u; E5 e9 |) e: m- \(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380, w7 E' m. A; L1 e3 b
(+13.2%).5 S$ D6 P4 V' d6 U2 |3 e0 H  \
/ Y8 B# [" v% s" V; |. {
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
" t4 U  y4 O, M- [0 J1 @6 \during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
7 s. _$ K2 X7 P* [: J9 y% Wfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
3 g! F+ v" A" u/ z2 Ipoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,) e9 S& |+ V# M3 }+ x0 n! r
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
% i+ A- z  l2 {% R& m# J/ G0 V5 f5 U"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
% H  j$ {* D/ P1 @( pwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
. Y, ~- F1 d, N6 @$ mbalanced market."
! c; _( r. D5 Q( X" k
, `9 {( E3 `: a* P- s    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
- Q  y4 R" L$ w' U$ aconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift7 S% z* O; Q# L, k9 v/ x' x
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued7 d$ Q, X8 @2 y% n; J
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core7 F& a8 }5 X7 ]7 p1 V' O3 _2 W& U
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
" t5 W6 m1 }) i4 v3 cmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
: D, ~, T4 ?9 q- lbreaking price appreciations.
* r7 n# P0 K- Y8 \9 x  f1 r* p
0 b9 [9 i9 b) B& j    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding$ a' i4 W2 K5 h+ Y+ P# S; g2 l
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
0 y6 ~, q. ~* ?- Z1 _) Elargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.9 A8 [' \0 c# u( ?* Q$ @- G4 z

* a- ]. R' K. X  {& V2 R    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
% e5 s7 l* r2 P- Deconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer& V; @5 o% ]2 `) F7 Y
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off2 Z: @5 X' k( s/ w6 `
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
% x) s$ i, W. nIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
0 x# |: k+ ?9 N( E+ a, e! s) cgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of+ n: ]$ X' b  n% O: `# A  @
price appreciation when compared with 2005.: l% p0 i6 m5 n) Q) y
0 n2 Z- q2 c! l4 V
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing; P  R$ t  V& F; }( ^
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and& I/ l) h% C/ `4 ]; n
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
7 i6 Z5 h* G$ [# ^7 _/ \+ ^! Vare markedly different than those found in the United States.
$ k; B3 V7 u( _9 J- p9 ?' Y& ^$ C) ~5 D2 Z# e+ J3 M
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
; f9 E' W1 l" A8 X4 I0 z  T& SAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's: X$ S6 x' M, A1 t: z
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the- O& L/ ^/ T' M1 i/ H# q) H, B! {
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
, `0 q: _5 {- V) U, Maffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the( j  R: A& p9 R: |
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and  p; }' T/ J4 V7 K0 \8 [4 w0 q
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization- K* B& G$ r* U, P  Z9 m4 C
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."9 ^+ P+ e; r5 y$ j. j
' P4 t  o' ~8 J8 ]5 z
    <<) V; Y( `4 I8 D2 B" P. q
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES+ }. b6 V6 U9 V& ]1 O" A6 o
    >>
* N$ s& r9 k4 q/ D6 o$ ]+ f& P3 R) J- h
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in& g$ d5 I) l4 d3 [- L( |+ s
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate" B- p, c# f6 ?5 e5 \
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time; j! e7 I$ L9 s4 j
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
  f' O3 R* W& W( A7 v7 [& j' D' Brenovations.
* O3 w8 t6 d4 O# ^- m3 Q0 U8 b4 T# J/ L
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
! i! m# K9 v2 |% I" pincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation3 X. K; `$ z/ o8 h
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and, U) X7 j! o# [" l  @7 z& f
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
1 F' j; R8 C0 f9 |+ e/ _3 M4 n" m' @& P  T4 E: E6 @6 \/ M
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer: m0 [- n6 g' s" a4 f/ y$ Z
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
. t' ^8 t- W- u+ |: t; ?9 z6 zquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
# s5 S) ~" p1 u+ z, t600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores" ~3 H/ C& K! D
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes5 I9 P! f1 S3 r3 O* ]/ v; _6 x0 ]
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
/ P# p# E5 p- C1 l& g
: L' m' [7 [0 ]    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
& X# X- q% I8 V( d( e8 |8 Mconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their6 A- }; x- j! W' @
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
8 H, R( y# I: O4 C& ]' x$ `- I& swas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
' k- i1 C7 S" v, Y: t- Sdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
- {; u: I9 H/ i1 U/ m: X2 A) `buyers with more options when looking for a home.* a' K8 s9 b8 K3 P; H1 q! L
' D9 F# i3 b; V; J% Z3 D  p( V
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly5 m( F; m) ~9 E9 \* Y
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
9 F: r$ b4 E* \2 `5 r/ D0 mpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
, y7 N$ Y2 _! e6 p5 j4 Zas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
/ T' P% l6 K$ L# l; `few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
" Y( U3 n4 Q& L8 g& Y/ `" g! ~; x7 N% `# [5 s
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
  j" T4 r9 Y. Lprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory5 h! Z2 S# s( ?% |) W1 }: j
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
" b: p5 _# R% l, Pfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,: T  i9 S( I+ x! k0 ?) A' J) F
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
/ f* b! h# z$ spressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before3 M& g4 H  i' T  C- {8 r7 J1 Z
making a purchase.
. u. ~$ v# W+ X, `8 y
: j% u. z- k+ G% m9 U    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing/ `, H% A! m8 t/ n# h5 f: P- x/ p8 T4 k
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong5 f, r, ~8 |: N$ o! j6 Z& c
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city; p0 l3 A7 F% i0 d* Z* F$ d6 V; \
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting% g: `' z" c2 F7 g" p
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown% R' o8 F: E) ]: u6 R6 o
amenities.
( ^) x' ?% }3 e3 a- e* _/ J  g. S9 i, u0 s- ?
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
2 c0 a  x* b! {. u. @throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
" f. b. ?; ^0 \- x) o: Iacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has4 j! x3 d% l* _# x" M( W5 m
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been1 V" ?$ W6 L, i+ B3 f# Y
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
$ A' P/ [6 b, s" w6 k- @residence, rather than for investment.: ~+ l: t  N  L. ]5 a8 |5 {! H

; M4 i& f9 l: @  X  r    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as7 X: D* x& Q2 c1 q& Q* ^
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted5 a% ?9 x" P" u/ X3 T
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer9 l2 s, F- o$ l( W0 ]
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization7 @0 s0 ~  q$ u9 A  |5 o/ E
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
4 t+ c7 t6 L( ~9 v2 z0 ~the market.
" z/ Q: H* u2 H- F8 B7 h+ z( A" J0 }6 |+ q) g2 G
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through$ z+ i- m6 F# Z1 G' |
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In( X. I5 B7 ]0 M, X5 y( d  P
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
3 F. F- K  Z: h5 ^6 X9 u0 i8 e/ M: Tmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due6 U" G9 D$ m3 L2 @/ n3 g
to the shortage of available inventory.' n. f& V' L5 a8 m2 X% ~
) X" L/ y. R8 l  \
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
# v7 h: }! Q4 M5 C5 dmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains0 j1 b# u+ @, k$ ?' I
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
* S; X( E) ?5 i, cstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.3 [  n9 Y5 G3 ~) F- }
1 i. ~  \# H* k- O
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases8 `2 D2 i# n8 u0 t% @. n+ S
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
" H3 N' Q0 s. e9 O( Yunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
0 {0 _! j  G, E# G7 M! lpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring0 G) x" B; f; s4 n
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
+ S1 A/ c% F) xseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as9 J, `$ N# d5 p8 w# N. E9 B
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

" D. n1 ^/ l+ G7 t
* p1 R5 `& k6 [6 j0 ?+ B1 ^' N% i    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter4 v: h- S+ F* e, }+ H8 l! g4 g' A
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton$ ]  {7 F( e7 z! G/ v; K! O
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,  r4 B, E; F( d
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices) |. |$ H* t/ P1 N6 ~$ V
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
9 j7 _' ?7 U: _: N) _in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
4 [' z- v& y$ m  k' }2 S9 e& qtowards the end of 2006.
   
6 M$ g, O$ l5 f# y/ N% L% L* @7 i( @# B( W1 Z6 j6 N
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
9 e+ V# r+ e0 T3 Ginventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable! E! I. A- N. m$ u. `
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
- n2 g' ~  d+ l9 z' t6 Y( jgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
  A( p  |+ X/ sforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
; N7 R: X0 h1 P& S; o9 y# \4 [* fpressure on tight inventory levels.
/ ?  w0 X+ q; o4 c2 N$ X, s( D, k  d- a/ L/ |* T
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic$ S! y$ W$ A2 M" Q
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
! |4 w) C! b/ d8 ]8 j/ Yinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
* d, ^3 c4 x) S7 }  owhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
% ~, b: ~  H0 n) ]& g; V6 n- Yfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
+ x$ F9 I1 V1 x8 f- W2 w
% Q, Y3 d" O# r    <<1 p/ I3 F5 N1 H3 A1 m2 R9 Y
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
, B( A5 [8 R2 X2 m1 G0 }5 Y1 N+ R7 A3 z( G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 R6 T# F/ }6 F8 P, t
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
, F9 |/ \+ v' S" y4 S! [    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) z1 e. G& |- U. K# @                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3, n. j2 D5 P2 h$ r% ?
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average! r0 h) S1 v. a8 y9 t2 E4 _
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- s3 |4 F6 G. e7 X  B: n  }
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
: S; p* ?( i6 ?8 r    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* F, y* \2 B: {    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
$ ?& O7 \9 E# ^+ H& M( E    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 z, I% z. u4 |7 w    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
2 U+ _6 x/ V! z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 T$ H% S+ e0 {7 U2 |" h5 \$ {    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -/ e7 p% i+ n( M5 C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: z. ?+ m0 G, P" T& b
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
9 h1 r7 I/ k% j; u# U% |. {9 }    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 P. `0 `9 `4 R& v
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583' D7 _& P6 R! I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ Z6 G6 F- C6 q5 B    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1852 y" [+ m: ^' r5 E- \% }" |% v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# `: K1 b0 o: c& X- I+ ~$ g0 u2 {    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
  V6 ]# [7 r* ]# W6 Q5 k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 Z6 k/ l1 J; D( }
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766& i; \3 c( k% S% j3 r4 m! S) S, Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: c1 {7 j6 w% ?2 H% s    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707& C% p5 S8 v7 ?$ t
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% B  l& Q4 M' A& v- |7 h    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5006 v' ?! U5 y7 G9 A( q) |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& p& @$ O9 ~6 N5 x    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
0 n% F& j; c. e# Q. x    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ^4 J% \- D! F4 m4 l    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714* A, c+ v& b& s" U9 w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 A1 l- s3 p: P  B" k# [6 W% u  n    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5009 e, j, X. H0 O  h0 ^. k; D3 H" q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# _" }2 W$ U0 K) R3 ^1 w1 @% h0 f
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000- [/ _* y/ ?- ~# A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 p: |" s" g5 B; X# t% P    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
9 |" J4 k9 V4 H6 `+ n& J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: }- Z$ p, n/ W6 D2 {" I( k) Q* b

) d7 o& Z5 _7 X' [( Y1 ]4 F    -------------------------------------------------------------
  f0 U6 \) v' |# w                               Standard Condominium9 h. F9 d4 h  o; T, D
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& l, `  ^3 ~/ w& L) U* X                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo/ S9 q; c" V  x# u! T3 O
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change  X5 i+ ?# @8 k$ B7 h- S* D
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ [; K4 j1 h3 h  U
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%4 j3 Q9 ?7 B: `8 ?% B% F
    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ H' N' Q( f9 S8 r! l. l    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
8 C- p' k& l% A( R8 ~' {    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 ~8 Z7 Q: p5 K: u0 Q, `    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A) J. d7 U0 L/ m0 D/ l1 |( J
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' Q; v4 u: P" f( e0 I    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A7 j0 w, x: \* s
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 D: W" m5 w, K    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
$ s3 @. x6 x5 O. E5 ^' n    -------------------------------------------------------------
% U8 I2 ?$ Z0 x    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%. b$ ~3 t! d' G0 _
    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 b1 |1 x& j5 D* e/ e    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
0 E$ i7 s" [  |2 N- D    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 C( L, M; J5 P! j" z    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%7 k0 ]& X5 b2 z) J! ]8 o; s
    -------------------------------------------------------------; M" W( `) f9 N' C! p. n9 h/ \
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
3 H7 V2 r4 p/ _    -------------------------------------------------------------% d; M6 \) {5 x, p' N
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%( Q" P2 U- }1 H! K
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 l. {& X( {* ~5 K8 X* l  a
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
) p1 c: n5 ~* W" {$ v  I: N0 W* \. _* ?. |& J    -------------------------------------------------------------
' m. u! I  ^, c- T: t    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%2 o' B  \( G9 I. H6 Q- I
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 ]4 t& }$ r# E
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%2 o- ?7 p4 M6 g
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ ?7 E  U3 e- v% U6 p. `
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%! Z1 z6 ?/ o+ E- S9 s# c- t1 Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 ^8 @; r2 H' S2 n; |0 N5 j
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%$ k1 x4 u$ i7 W: a% {
    -------------------------------------------------------------. l) J: c, p! x% H, g( N( Q: H4 J
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%9 a) s, B! a0 O8 u* s+ s
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, r6 B  X: s9 }) K4 U  ^& _    >>7 ~+ T( C! [/ I0 ~; M: R9 Q: [4 v6 }

1 `1 v/ B: |2 S    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
# Y( [0 i/ H0 t% win the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
0 G: }) @0 z; gJohn and Victoria." e: |, c5 i# i! S
* L+ G6 v7 v1 `8 c8 W6 L. b- h
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
5 `- u2 e7 {9 E9 |7 V: N/ pcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
1 P( s+ l" G6 C6 Mhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release. n* M8 d5 E7 P, h
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
. R% N/ r( ?' [; X) Ytrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
' m, L7 a- ?& ?across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is' s  I+ R0 n$ T) i
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
% t* R0 m/ g/ m. c6 P: zfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
$ u5 X4 M2 Z0 }2 s; g5 xversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on) a% j+ f" y# y5 C# c" t
November 15, 2006.3 \- Y/ h# S3 n" r9 U; k
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
! f* l9 r! ^+ Bfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge4 X( S7 a" C" F) J5 X7 q/ o
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is$ I: v1 M; b# u! g% `
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-30 01:57 , Processed in 0.214165 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表