 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
. o# z! Q, m" g: X) S. V
/ K6 f: Q1 P6 I0 R5 \& t2 D1 F- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
) F. H' V7 n% R# H. }/ s& _2 o+ d" x2 c2 p4 R1 N: q4 Q
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
8 s' \$ b2 s6 `- Vexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
8 S) G* h5 A. a* T& \quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
0 b. L' @% d4 A# fin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
0 z9 S3 B9 W/ |* Pprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and v) b. _. T6 i) J3 t; N
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,5 s2 K; K. t8 l- x
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
% T5 n- ?; b% o1 U/ c! o) H" ?LePage Real Estate Services.
# u/ O5 g& e5 H& i' S! `' B3 `7 F2 r+ F6 [# R) ~
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters/ w6 {6 ^8 y6 F! W" D' h
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
! z) e4 i0 b/ t; z$ @3 D% ?conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and9 h: U2 Q4 r& |1 s# h, x
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the3 _* [( r( C6 Y
residential real estate sector.# e8 ~1 O2 {. K1 {/ ^5 g! @- |
3 [" G/ o7 \( K Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation( }/ K) C# Y1 }! i$ _
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
# K0 O9 _6 [& a: F2 l" R$ Oyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562) ^0 P6 D L! `
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
b% K# L, }" X" r* x(+13.2%).
$ T& E5 \, S3 ?- a) T5 B \. F+ [
% O; \. l2 o2 z% z "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth& Y8 U6 R7 y# v) G0 t! H
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the! b) Q: _5 l n {
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
& `- M& r( E! Z- X% m A" Opoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
! T: [9 h( M0 D7 }( S' f: G4 {" Apresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.) [, ~& h1 h9 u7 S. `
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
( V% Z' Y; ]2 H! @) Y. u/ b0 Bwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy/ ` ]" K" p$ F- Z
balanced market."
. E& W" {' O W# f, c0 j% ?2 t
, Y! e, ?' U0 e! w1 m3 ?6 k: u Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
. G' m& @) ?* ?' O- b/ W3 Bconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift3 R- X) W. n: q/ e+ A+ H$ H
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
- u/ L9 g1 E! s& s( f1 rthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
! `5 Q9 s2 W$ U/ ~' _3 aenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
7 a) Q. U; ]% ~2 S5 W! Emanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record! C" {9 v- Y* ~& z6 b
breaking price appreciations.
. I/ |! j" Y9 V" V! s
1 W5 ?3 @! x# l5 \6 T0 E Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding1 l0 ~4 R" p) Y# i" [6 h. J
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
! N7 b8 R: c5 b- `/ @largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
: ~6 ~/ T) V7 u( ?: v
* E- Q* d; F! H. o( u) [ In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
, Y1 g; \ ]0 \/ g+ M! feconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer7 M6 r: @: G" }3 y$ N
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
. ~2 Y; M5 T x9 d) Hslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.0 l! g8 B! Y' c$ C) l
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers( t6 i1 Q- M1 l- U6 i& y% b _
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
+ ~* O( x' r8 z& i% Lprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
( ^* X% z2 _- U$ w: q% C# Q7 O6 B0 s, H( Z/ z. u* g
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
3 [2 h" A( k4 J Qmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and1 u3 H1 z7 T: H
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada; p' O5 M* \7 G2 Y, v
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
' W. T8 R$ @$ V& p8 D" @' n9 A3 J) @6 y' b5 S
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the- f; S2 L, @1 b; W+ I6 M! n
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
9 f8 u7 A" I9 t4 M' a" bfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
* @7 S' ^; A9 v, `relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general4 G, I" |3 s6 \0 w
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
$ P4 |6 y4 d+ m5 odownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and: M# S/ A% x% N( D
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
+ R( h# }3 _: P# j/ Smortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."3 J$ @5 e1 d3 L7 c+ C Y2 r
9 f* o: I5 {, i8 T' N, |
<<3 t+ n5 q! D0 O. ?) [, P
REGIONAL SUMMARIES- ^; D+ q# V1 {. {" e! r, H
>>
. d; R% O4 p& }4 M8 H9 I8 @: Z# B0 ^+ A1 u) }
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in, h8 W' i J! ]' `$ X, t$ h
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate- L2 R( v T @: z, @" R5 I3 I7 \
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time: A( ?9 ` b2 q7 j
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
, j$ X0 B( k5 l) k9 Srenovations.& Y* G A; C1 Z/ P# t
5 H4 k' M; k( X, U" s1 K* N' } The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight. M( l% G0 m) o# X, C" G
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
, {/ G+ D4 W: U0 F$ o4 p+ O1 H `compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
7 X2 V( r# S% A# DSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.$ u5 z |: g2 X4 `/ S
- d; U) y" C" k; J* s3 K ?$ a7 ~
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer2 i3 B5 Q+ _3 o, y4 O* L
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the: Q& @# S$ v& I5 \0 B
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
* o% Q6 S: G; f% V2 _# P' V' L, R5 B600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores) L/ ^. l3 |5 t1 e; B
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes# m% ^; T) ? @1 s3 `
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
% _* t) }8 k& T# G3 M( ]4 @, C( ?
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced2 c3 A5 k) L4 G3 V6 u0 m) |
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
5 {, ?' d- B( U3 ~4 b% C# E3 t Ahomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers0 z6 M5 X& C d5 f. k7 d' H/ Y: M7 M- Z9 T
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
1 }# _% \+ w' p5 Rdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing* g) }3 s: X; {# s; T
buyers with more options when looking for a home.+ N1 c0 C& q& Z4 ]0 Y- d
' A7 h6 A" i4 N Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly8 s( Q( z& d# p \1 u. N$ x4 n
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes/ o" }) z M7 f7 j
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
0 P/ [( @" T# K( R7 r& las some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last( g$ j7 l# B6 P: n8 r. Z+ A. Z
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.' n& _- d9 w$ S( c9 F# _7 g0 L2 U+ u
. b% R" `4 ?! o9 `) v5 r
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
6 S! J/ u( E2 n0 e9 Bprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
6 \( O0 P) z) A! D7 D6 Ilevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
" ~$ _( E3 @0 r5 q1 Rfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
1 W+ m6 a' N/ \7 f" qwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
% H3 D: ?( y6 d7 n. Wpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
# p% e, J, d& k7 n( F" j6 `6 Umaking a purchase.
& u0 y ?1 t7 w% @- M1 k" \1 a4 ?/ J4 A4 H
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing. [- U, j+ _) w2 P/ ^* {/ _- N) s
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
- J& L5 W) Y7 o' E, ~7 [( M; W% @confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
3 E6 {" c0 l5 B! f' Xcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
) W+ R# ]2 ~% K5 C- F3 c& v! a+ g3 vattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown/ k" s3 w8 k' U( W) ^$ \
amenities.4 G2 h2 K7 X1 x u* |2 }+ p# x
% S2 B! }' h% T) {
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
" @4 h$ d4 z9 ]: Zthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand5 Q' z0 B& H5 w' ^# V0 |% U
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
' ?, Y. g P3 |' g# J2 n. Rcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
: w, Q ^9 ]+ F/ o. A: Adriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle; e, C% K! C2 t
residence, rather than for investment./ _0 T2 \. Q* L; E: H# {: z! l
: }0 o5 r k+ l4 ]' H6 a& ?
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as) E g. L# q. G$ Z. h4 v! b
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted, L" `) Y7 `- C3 k" j+ F/ |$ C0 _
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer# l [/ r7 P# ^% u8 V/ V& }
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization- l$ W) W8 m/ x" `8 C. O
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
2 ^3 j7 i+ ^2 `2 M/ mthe market.1 z! n r6 ]; U
! ~' |8 m& H+ s# H6 M; L) ]3 r. y
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through! L" Z& L' \1 N7 _: Y" _6 x
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
8 ]: Q$ u: n! AAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring _ s! c$ g1 U8 ]
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
" u {1 n1 J5 q4 Oto the shortage of available inventory." Z) K d7 y1 p/ s
- p! y4 m% ^6 E# _, F$ E4 N Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
& g# x& r! p" @) N5 F. Z0 Lmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains5 C8 @0 \5 Y5 O* U. F0 o. O
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses& r) F' s, i+ L) ?2 N
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.$ C1 s, V. d4 U& c3 ?
3 J l: P8 o1 K7 P; a' X Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases+ I$ f) h3 B: b; q
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low) y1 \; @! C8 J) O, s
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
: h9 c7 G5 ]0 M3 w, Xpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring' M! j2 I1 r C" L
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
$ U \! r# s" }6 Y1 Cseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as6 W" O5 T. T# T Y
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity., R* g$ n7 U& n% [% U1 E
) S$ }6 q8 Q+ z2 d x$ J8 Q
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter. r6 d9 `* l* r9 o; k
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton0 P9 q% X5 z9 v. _3 G
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,# y" L7 m9 ?1 l3 b. J; I( l
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
0 J9 U9 b8 D. L( J( sincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
& _8 \- ~! X+ s* f6 [9 P: a4 E3 u3 Lin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
! w: G2 E# W( {; V( z& y3 jtowards the end of 2006. 3 @1 y3 `( l' N b& m
9 d$ o5 M! Q7 E/ p5 L+ ~7 cWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of* \/ V3 A, v5 K( i
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable5 V) U! K1 `; y, W4 K
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse* o2 l: D1 Q( k
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
H* j+ I7 \4 }( k0 r. i6 ~- Vforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added9 }) M& e0 [/ T$ B
pressure on tight inventory levels.
) T9 @4 Y) g5 ~/ q' f4 Z1 E# u, y; O6 k+ ~8 Y4 m
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic; j( f \5 \( X+ z9 W
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people3 S& l+ a0 G3 N5 v: o+ p
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
4 Q! a/ m n. R% S' \& {) @, q# Fwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching: y9 u/ ^! U' r% E0 t6 H
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
9 t' Z* H' a8 T0 ?- |3 [9 W$ H! d! l6 @. h% L9 ]; J
<<6 l5 j; X" v! V# d( p" l- U/ [/ ^
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
2 Z. q! d, C- j) W) ~4 b3 V- m- n! o: v3 z E3 O8 n$ ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 `* S3 D+ U1 k) R
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey7 s& l) E6 ^' P8 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, I% \5 G/ j* m0 R8 e 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
3 K p0 M/ z+ y" L8 c Market Average Average % Change Average Average
' p, Q- ~7 Y5 R$ D! c- L -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 a4 E6 M! v9 C Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
# j' Y. E" p/ y1 A- Q7 ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, X$ S: v8 f" @ y/ z4 K0 B) c Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
' P9 b' D: e- c7 E& ^, Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------; I; ~9 h; {; i' K2 C) G
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0005 P8 u) b0 j# v2 q& X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 u \+ {; A; K/ B; _! P q
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
1 D) Z; H9 \6 v* }' n -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 H& X; v. v% u& V8 ^ L; _5 \
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3330 R. F* A( G3 n6 Y! y9 I- B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ z& o: b5 z, L& {1 L f/ P& v Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
3 n) t5 f, M( S" r! _' o -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, Z2 J) B/ l. _ Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
6 z9 b! y5 p1 K2 I% z" }2 D -------------------------------------------------------------------------" F0 u% }) S: _: ^* j
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2508 B& C! E. o3 p. ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. R) c. B; j }8 R1 T& i+ ^, {
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7663 u+ d1 S+ {* }: u1 B4 K$ O4 a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ x" x+ a0 I* h. a% |( O% q
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707 n( ^, N7 G/ K1 ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 _7 G: y5 j( M7 ` Q) } Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
, ]! b1 e% o8 D0 Z, ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' i" K( _$ ^; l7 @5 s Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389* \$ v* N( j' J' m, s$ b5 u1 V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 R' i' B* }6 G8 C. _# s Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714 O$ J! U0 |8 z3 J8 P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------3 W6 \0 p) ?- Z4 r
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
1 @/ x# k) r' C! \' B/ O, f -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, C0 S* H+ Z: o Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0006 I7 h% H) `+ l% j6 x* J2 O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: a3 w! g7 X- S8 c$ F9 v7 M# b
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860! g5 V6 A5 b' r, ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 P m; t3 ?* K$ [8 ]% U4 O5 Q/ E# X
% R) S8 b4 ~8 k -------------------------------------------------------------
9 n, r0 G/ e: j% p5 e! Y Standard Condominium
& K. t1 J6 Q$ m* I1 N -------------------------------------------------------------
/ f: z( I' w5 }1 j 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
! {2 I. t% E/ R$ _% v. _ V6 r Market % Change Average Average % Change
( q. D% {9 L! m5 O7 @( o -------------------------------------------------------------) ~! t% O/ ` B& C$ O8 F- ^
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
. W2 X* e) s) {2 t -------------------------------------------------------------$ ?) F5 j" l7 W
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%4 z& h! F. Q1 j. N
-------------------------------------------------------------9 R5 @1 ^$ R. i* @' ~
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
7 L" M6 _ \8 y$ C; d/ Y6 ^5 M -------------------------------------------------------------2 y* g: s3 c% Q* F" R
Saint John N/A - - N/A6 d, X$ ^ i; S6 g
-------------------------------------------------------------
, h& F+ W3 L' X. w; ~ St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%) A0 k& S5 h& M4 v/ ?& ?4 U, l% l
-------------------------------------------------------------) d% W5 V. I/ j4 x z f$ l
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%5 R' r8 S" v3 Z C' z
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 F" Q a$ e" k7 H1 n2 y, { Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%: M7 R \ v8 B7 u5 V6 h
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 w6 ~- u9 @4 L) f- z P/ J Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
6 |! Y0 S) H5 @% Q -------------------------------------------------------------
) a8 W; i8 i K& h Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%! e4 X! h! q9 U9 w
------------------------------------------------------------- u, s: b! F8 [! K+ g, p
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%" l) k6 H* O' [1 Q* k0 v! ~% M% r+ ?
-------------------------------------------------------------7 x( ]# M6 n$ ]) Q) f' ^% }" X( N
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
& _9 K8 N0 }1 j" Z5 g- C* J; ? -------------------------------------------------------------
% j& w7 N& X& B: i! M Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
0 F7 |8 ^4 ~) Q" O -------------------------------------------------------------3 A9 q4 i# P5 D% j: s7 R
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
4 P8 X6 e _. ^1 J+ l% m" H, F -------------------------------------------------------------* s5 n! L+ _- P U6 U* b5 _
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
1 {7 k5 w" P* n, _; ~0 _ -------------------------------------------------------------$ Q% E9 V: Z+ r" }' }
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%. j' m3 v7 A+ F$ k% g$ k% i- \
-------------------------------------------------------------
# S, G$ A; F' N0 B+ f National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
% ~" U4 [1 T7 @% C -------------------------------------------------------------
0 E' \. {8 }9 V0 V: k >>! J% D' I8 @8 j# J' e
- h% I1 r) E$ x2 F
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined& N4 i4 x* a0 _+ ?+ V/ c: ]
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint8 ^+ s# {& n3 j; E
John and Victoria.
# x) l2 m1 a3 m' D$ m/ f
# B, X4 a% D7 `2 G/ T1 M The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
3 s) y0 x5 X. J( I3 o- Hcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
, [. w& Q7 u$ ahousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release* m$ y8 d) S. j, w/ K7 M
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price! @: d' `3 G C/ h
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
, L+ c: l5 W' K8 Nacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
4 R8 q6 r) w7 x$ \- c/ o2 favailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
3 l ^5 i7 Y" Mfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable4 L7 e* k( |/ S8 p3 h1 f
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on9 l$ H$ s2 a( K y# M! f
November 15, 2006." F0 P3 ^% V- v, M: `6 F8 j
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of4 D+ j6 j0 U% c8 W2 H& g, t7 C
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
1 @$ N6 q- w3 R' l, m. \0 e$ U7 O* tprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is, J) ]; q6 L9 o$ ]4 e% l& c* e
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|