埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2429|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
: ~! N* b5 n, V: l
1 O$ |) P- b) W0 b8 A9 F/ r9 {- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
8 @  t4 V2 q* [; s  ]) B: b
3 {7 t0 p: U/ Q    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market; @5 W5 H9 P( K. V: l
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third1 h8 P1 h4 S% |4 h: [5 O8 r: C* f
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic, H( ~2 n; }6 Q* z3 M" W1 S$ m. X1 r9 S
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
6 Q7 O% F) N* N7 ~" ]" `/ `price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and9 @- x; ?, `# P! s5 l
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
! f1 L9 }- P& T: p" y9 uQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal' I5 I* Y( e2 h- v
LePage Real Estate Services., s' b; T" y' N* K, y) o( S% U. _3 U
# d. R: ^& Q) e# Q, h
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters' T, k3 s; [6 d4 i  O& Q6 U4 w
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
. N. D; a1 B$ y* C4 {conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and5 K7 Q; h! o, ~% m
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
  D+ ^3 \- T3 a* Q$ @3 k3 dresidential real estate sector.
! Y! ]! L" T: s( b. z6 ?( T( W$ D8 {7 _7 ^" O. P* M
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation) e) A+ y  v; h
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
( R( S! `% z. m3 d/ f2 Oyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
  V; o* n* y( B(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3809 W7 Q; P" p2 x7 P) V5 y4 t
(+13.2%).
" z1 I. }4 e. N& E- p" l
# D1 C  A. {: `! r; x) d/ l    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
0 f2 z+ ~- v' f/ c1 A8 o7 fduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
) D$ F% t$ ~- t7 qfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are" h" o2 U9 |  g6 M
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
1 L" e( g. Q0 b) q+ O9 X5 f+ Y8 {0 |president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.2 Q, D3 o) G  L$ D3 |( Z
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
' b  m- u" \6 \1 s) l! Y' cwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy* n! k/ }" k* ^! E% `, m2 D
balanced market."$ J+ Y: c) G8 M5 a9 h, Y

! ^4 y4 T! n1 Y- ^- U4 M" P: i. w" m    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,  U0 g) \; ]: g* z: o
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
9 R% O0 Y6 [9 H0 x7 U7 {& J8 y  kto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued, f. O7 q6 s+ \0 x* R: r4 q4 H9 B0 j
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core1 `: T* Y% h, v/ }
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
2 i6 R  k; V; xmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
% H1 n; ]( p- Sbreaking price appreciations.
& m4 K" i4 J) V2 q4 g& ?2 J3 w8 s! \! K2 c0 ?. y0 G  c
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
  B% r! c  @* P' k% w2 teconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
& i, R0 e- F' C4 ?1 J2 clargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
# ~) V, G$ w# f1 Q+ O9 n8 z$ q: v/ _
$ }( b, Y. K1 [7 `2 x5 m" p6 I    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid+ B. J+ F2 o& u9 \) b. y
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
; w. w/ q; j* M: b0 @& Qconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
* o; f: Y0 `" Kslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
! l( S# f" m/ P# f% t8 h. t; LIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers, C) k* _4 I9 K
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of9 ^- R5 L6 ?* g$ W; Q+ {% B
price appreciation when compared with 2005., M8 p% G) A6 X$ A& v( {9 N4 C5 i* Y! X
# g6 C. O9 \. `/ X
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
; _* k. z, k' N! q5 L, B" l4 smarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and7 D8 Q( u$ e" F8 \; |. i4 t5 O
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
! H+ ~2 @6 L; f% t7 Hare markedly different than those found in the United States.
; U4 j" y+ R, X1 l7 Z0 ?, Y
! H3 ~' v# H0 F& d' u" Z3 G0 x* v- J    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
3 N) x: Y( c! f2 A7 z% ZAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's+ \+ Q7 c$ s# U( c, o
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
' x( i  B0 i4 R  i5 S( Prelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general: O$ e5 j8 Q6 T$ R5 o* ^7 t
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the6 V' Y7 b" X6 a3 W0 d
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
8 S1 t6 y1 C9 K3 t0 e: faggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
5 H. }4 u9 W, p6 hmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
; h6 a+ t% @: S2 Z2 p8 H0 X- T9 v& n# `# D: F0 \" i) r8 G
    <<
  m6 ]$ i' A# z- b9 q) e                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES/ U; ^8 g- k7 }
    >>
- J' l+ a) J# J1 z# a4 ~; b- U0 p0 F# L
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in# @: w8 V3 U6 A2 t5 c' o/ \; ]* ^5 ^
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
7 D) O3 p2 I2 H( f/ v0 Yof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
# C, w3 C% J6 A* u# N; Olooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
3 Y3 l5 G0 d+ f1 N% w  ?renovations.
3 ~" j: s  f. u$ w; g8 R( O$ }5 h5 Y8 P* |8 |  U6 _
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight; Q4 X! u3 F) x6 E/ q! h
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation8 P( e& W" S5 w% o; Q
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and$ D! n( ], \! J" X# d
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.5 m5 n8 |0 ]) }& l! P. M, q
$ j5 I$ c  m5 F( w+ Q5 \& F
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
! p. w* N7 T' j0 x1 bslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
/ A5 x: n  {; k0 H+ h- lquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new" t$ z. y* D3 Y
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores* q8 Q2 n# I( ?- x4 A! V2 o
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
  }( J2 d4 k$ y8 C, X. T: Z& zand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
( z. g1 V9 F7 |6 e. e6 @* g( @
, I. h5 C! L% @( G7 c- ^7 Z    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced& W6 Q5 K* c8 D/ u
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
- a" w2 X: f& Z' Dhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers- `9 f% {4 J; }: t
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
  K8 w9 g, X( x9 S* u2 gdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing! s; q: @# P  P& r1 H) _4 H
buyers with more options when looking for a home.1 A) F* A- H- N& T* @
7 p9 A. e/ @6 p1 u# [* R" ^: d! S. L
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
) B. u; L; N7 h2 U0 M! Uamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
! H! m# c( y9 h! K6 ~& gpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
1 e- p% k& m& V9 Yas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last3 d: Y& K! L% N! k) i
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.7 k+ l/ F, w( o0 S5 b
! n4 T% Y6 L1 C; x3 w
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house0 e# m8 G7 T4 `5 g
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
+ s: E5 Q) l  g1 m+ ^levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting5 U+ ]; B8 }3 U7 z+ u- Q! v. Y& s
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
. e- [5 b  {# p6 n# I- H& U6 C1 X% Wwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
) V/ ]- E4 O3 e! A; @3 \pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before5 v/ j; N1 E  Q0 M0 J( q2 z
making a purchase.
& X7 z! F4 \3 W) x3 V' g  q
# {1 s  z4 @" v% L$ O    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing9 f3 p2 u/ p3 L  T, A" f  R, h( ?
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong. M5 ^, J0 _- H8 ]# O8 n
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city4 c" ?. R9 g; [- \7 I4 v
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting, P. [2 N" I) e- L8 Y) R: \  @
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
( }: l; w5 G% l% y7 h% T$ Bamenities.: @0 {2 c8 X9 c

7 R2 @% i4 t) t" q1 W- e    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels  V4 x& Y4 r$ D' u; \; i
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand  a3 ]- q8 L% b4 s0 v
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has5 H$ z3 i% \' E; T. \# j) |! `
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been1 {7 A5 J- Z) T& I# }4 b
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle3 b# ?9 ~/ U' I$ l# t4 [
residence, rather than for investment.! {2 I, O! C0 O; L. h! Y
7 w3 z5 v: A8 X9 r. W1 @
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as% E0 q- `% T' }- r7 }
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted4 ^3 Y% {9 a+ }  w2 ?& X* {
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
  s( E+ K, F- b: \# pconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
( w6 X' }9 y" x" _! zrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter! y. e* F8 q0 d( }
the market.
% g2 ?- |$ N5 Q$ M/ u8 \" V, {+ H" Q' V5 W! U5 p( f* c: X" C
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
) Q  E: s. |+ t0 kJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
) ]& R1 F" `; OAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring7 m& Q- n: i/ H, Q# u) _
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due$ ^+ v/ v, d' P3 ^$ Q
to the shortage of available inventory.) n; ~: ?! A$ {$ \: X* \

' ?; e& r2 y( Y3 F    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its2 a) k6 J; N& C* N# x0 I! `
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains* C7 s( E  |" c8 G- W) A
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses# _( F" I" P5 J6 E
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.1 R- F7 c. E' y8 t3 n

$ C) |  P; r, Q% N/ \: |    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases3 U3 x1 M% D1 d! r) W
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low: q8 f, t3 D" C6 n  G
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that8 O" o5 J9 M" I$ A
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring) B2 R; l2 `8 J( T  ?" }
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer& r* s( I. D3 ?; U
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
9 ~7 Y; Y8 b' S8 T1 H8 o! E+ B) Fbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

( D) N) U0 l" w) N
% L9 d3 b# I, |! Q- u0 u    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter: \& _9 Q- ~8 d& f8 y
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton! D' Z* [+ l8 V! |) V
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
" D3 \/ E% M( u5 fmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
3 {; [0 O  L2 L& h1 e+ a3 b- O5 vincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
# l0 W! l3 F' f/ _- a' w% C" Yin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly8 ~+ k5 j  E* W- {; s; v. `! S
towards the end of 2006.
    ! ~; _$ S" |9 X

( c0 U. ]5 f0 p" v% o4 j# e" N/ }  BWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
3 r. V% b& C" X) i" _inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable, s+ n: ~6 e( o
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse; J! z; Q% ]. ?# f5 E8 W
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
" q9 y: T) x% F+ W+ @, Vforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
7 g" h; n  O" y3 bpressure on tight inventory levels.
; @; ^% x  h1 s2 e: |' _
' D3 F: @- p3 }: B. c5 ?    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
9 C8 N8 S; l) U* l! i: Lfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people& Z2 k: f, ~& F5 m
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;# y+ ^0 z' |$ d* h
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
8 ^, Q) r+ ?/ rfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
7 A+ v  o* @* x; Y* X5 _& P
# p' |- f* n8 z" x3 v    <<+ z! |4 O5 z4 i0 J5 G
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
4 r8 T! R# E3 f5 P$ ]5 u
3 S% Y) _9 |( y; a! ]: [( X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. @" j% C) ?' e, B6 l' ~' A% K                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
/ l, p( R' h4 g; b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- L# s, Y9 V6 F3 S& w, Z$ T
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
$ A$ |5 L' c0 |& m4 V    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
; ~$ I4 [* h, J7 J6 ?1 ^9 p    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 L8 W  F, Z2 W# H6 D+ c    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000" a( j0 N. Z5 r1 G5 `0 I0 j. `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( k" K( p1 l: B; Q- c    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
3 ~8 Z' ]( i' |) T; a2 }5 Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ M0 v" n. f; C5 d6 W5 v2 [  h2 U    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000% |# |4 x% k7 ?. s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 r* V- c: g6 A0 F; b0 D* S9 L    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
& O  D/ a( v9 Q1 m( C" ~) M    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ A! D' y2 |* M3 |
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3339 }) S" y8 T& w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 u( ~/ c& L* z7 K- [4 M/ ~    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583) n$ K& H* }) R& T& s& J) y# H( g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 l: [7 H* S& J  }# N; h. H    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
0 X0 W5 |7 h  a, I; Q0 f1 T, ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; R/ V& |/ Z' _4 ?: j8 d: M    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250" s9 e( F. u* _. ?& k" `: x: R* H  ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* @  i. N( Q+ b  h9 _
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766, C7 x: O/ c; Q. f6 C  e9 N
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 `, E& ^0 y3 }. ^& |* `
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707- J& ], y& L' c, h2 E; ?" }% ~' t
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  V5 S2 Y' ^, Q    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
- y! n/ [  O1 k& \, H: [% @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 H! A. j6 v$ n% Q, j, v    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389& C9 g6 E, Z, S8 Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# u" R& g" ^8 v0 @( u( n" |
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714# e0 _5 ?% b& H( ]  y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, H" Y/ H8 n( j; Q    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500+ o* s! `( Q, \- X* c/ v5 w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* G; W3 l5 r2 }( h  p4 \: N8 b
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
" Q. t2 Z" ?$ ^- n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! h  g0 R+ ~1 S5 R. [
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8608 z- i! j2 U! V3 |7 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ e- A6 v' c" B& _
* a3 }$ c8 T9 r' X& k5 C
    -------------------------------------------------------------1 f0 h% K  Q8 f: R# J4 @# X
                               Standard Condominium& p) z- }5 @/ ^3 s- x0 V
    -------------------------------------------------------------* C# Q  Q' S' ]& K
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo9 [3 m4 d7 {* M1 }3 ^
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
9 M7 T+ e0 d# X    -------------------------------------------------------------, Q  t6 p3 k; K7 X  P) F% z
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
! r2 `6 Q+ Q; S3 X6 x- \    -------------------------------------------------------------3 X1 r/ V5 ~; j3 ]$ U
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%7 O1 P" ^( H4 w) r) ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------0 n, j7 D7 I; K/ s9 t/ i( t, {
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A( x( l4 b2 ~+ e: h' B1 @, Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) J" k/ P( g, Y0 u( a    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A1 _9 l& w$ x* x& A2 H2 R9 W, m* T
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, _. E# I- C6 K" l! U    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
$ j) p# c6 ?- c- ]; A1 r    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 |0 z9 v' G4 F$ C' y8 Y    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%8 O/ Y7 l' y8 r/ |0 E7 V* [
    -------------------------------------------------------------8 g- ^. d' z6 R6 A) `% E+ T9 o
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%7 R; L" M! K" f+ d  ]5 Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------! Q& L& K/ B  V1 N6 T& R
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
: b& g' V% H7 A3 @/ F, o( y    -------------------------------------------------------------
, V+ d8 L3 `& N4 S! N    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%/ S, f  P2 m2 ?! c- a$ i2 ~- q0 U- f1 t
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 f! v/ j. }. V/ o; ^    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
) Y4 w4 G" i& i8 u& U9 o6 {    -------------------------------------------------------------! ~- r9 _5 p" d; U" y9 {
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
" y( L1 D# I8 b  a: ?) g    -------------------------------------------------------------+ X3 v! l0 f3 Q$ X$ o
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
  H4 t! k- |4 ^    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ p' t& _7 A4 f9 F+ a3 X+ e    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%' j* B* z  K1 z( ?! i
    -------------------------------------------------------------: D- H; A/ Y: D. D/ }
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%6 U& [2 ], t' A$ H* A" [: j
    -------------------------------------------------------------) k; R! W) ^% N, B6 S/ b
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%3 S0 @! O' ?0 I% D# h+ F0 r% i' Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 Z$ w; Y3 v# S/ D9 s; _& h) |
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%* a' s% ]2 ]% _5 d
    -------------------------------------------------------------! \. _$ N, M. l& L- p; ~
    >>
6 S/ ^. G1 R) i+ q2 ?8 B4 S4 z1 c: e
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
- A% z+ V1 T& n: W' ]& K2 fin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint) q$ P0 J! N1 Z4 {1 l9 ]- {8 W% r
John and Victoria.
- L  l' U2 c& i! v9 f# v
7 m. |( H& {8 {8 y, R    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
# v6 S& \* `  k. Fcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of% K" Y/ k! E/ q( U/ [, b
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
2 e1 g0 C" s* [  Kreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
, S% b% }2 M: P' Q- }trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
# {8 v& w2 a. z* |across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
4 Y) |) \# k  B5 }$ G6 kavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current9 k9 S- ?9 A- |3 q9 O; _( E
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable8 c  b/ s" _) D0 J8 l
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on) h( O3 g2 G# E, B; l' Q9 W
November 15, 2006.2 X6 a! l" z, M& i0 X6 ?+ ]2 S( D+ D
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
% ?7 M0 C) f7 ofair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge! q$ p7 e( K0 y  }) N* e6 {
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is2 H4 M# A$ w1 D, @* b! m
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-5-3 10:46 , Processed in 0.152726 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表