埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2058|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
9 {9 C* ?  w* V0 ]* w1 r) e: |& {; a; x3 Y4 [
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
8 k/ [; i; E3 d! s. |4 ?( h8 x
' a9 c* z( R6 _; E5 A    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
% i6 a, {% a8 u- Qexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
. m' r+ q2 F: M. U& W+ Uquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic' [* d1 L$ [; J: e) {& w5 I
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit7 Z- `' {) F% y5 b
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
7 T, Y/ P" F4 kmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
+ i) q5 Y) z- j; x* bQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal3 O; y0 N( B- q  Z. g0 `" M0 l0 y
LePage Real Estate Services.- P% {; y1 {, O4 ^7 a1 M# ]% e: H
$ q( C9 ^. X+ L0 }
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters% y: ^( h( J( u  z( S, J* |
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic) r. r! E5 W4 t  J0 w
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and6 R; O& O2 s2 W* Q6 k& c: C% t
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
7 o" K# z  A. Cresidential real estate sector.
. o3 @; d, u/ J- [) B
- U' T- b- S( x2 o    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation  K+ y2 w, l5 V6 H% z
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)( Z5 o2 c2 L; ?2 P5 D
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
6 |% F6 d& X* k0 r. l/ \/ b(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380% G. U. A6 r) U7 _, v
(+13.2%)." K) F7 t6 n5 r# `

5 q. R- F; I2 l& T) j- M    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth& p$ |# N4 {: x" K8 O# |
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
0 n2 I  `1 G4 L# Ifrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
+ x9 t  n9 {  J* ?poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,, y; S( C5 u% a& K6 }" H; V
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
3 I3 H, U9 {; r"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We$ \$ U9 P" f- U/ R, F
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy8 b% l; g! O" M7 h% z: ?% J% f( s
balanced market."
5 X5 Y* h4 `2 W! E2 S& g, o
& M3 u' ]) K* z7 D+ M    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
# x* O) `) b9 m0 Uconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
9 a1 i" u* d( cto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued, O" k5 r: b# U
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core9 {  s! y7 i! S+ s
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,6 k# }6 f8 b* h7 `$ S, }
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
; p& J, [. n+ f9 Abreaking price appreciations.
: d" _, _! x6 l4 c( I7 b* ?4 ?7 y" r$ y) T
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding8 |# `* Z7 _4 k" _, J* n
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
, [9 _: h+ d5 W4 u6 s7 @largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.& J3 W, L9 z% M5 y- Y. l

7 z: a, y4 f/ c/ f' b. @    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
4 Y! i0 J( T& C' p0 ueconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer" B8 x8 H1 L, F7 z. B8 L; ?
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off6 i3 P3 q& r# M9 L" ?3 t
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
7 R+ M/ x3 n6 w% a% b' B' h2 y. PIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers  k) K8 e/ }5 @$ Q: F  t2 p
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
4 n* b+ H/ D+ J7 R% F. v8 y1 ~4 [price appreciation when compared with 2005.3 ?. Q2 Z- J( ?* j3 }: B# ]$ X
2 c: l  [/ V: Y  o8 I5 u
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing5 e2 J  b+ P) s( D
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
8 F, T" y% P1 j6 Mfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
( h/ N: \' \' q. b. A- w0 e3 s4 G# lare markedly different than those found in the United States.
2 X0 c$ a- f4 p0 w, V
7 U  e+ Y) Q! R0 c, J) w    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
; i& J2 F$ n5 Y5 FAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's, q; Q( n; C  T% x1 ~- T8 A
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
5 p- I: s$ I7 O* ]5 yrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
# C. [0 g8 ^0 D& u1 D* `affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the4 ?& N6 L* i  V3 X9 C
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and3 w# a: \- {1 J, |8 b, P) L& Q
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization9 c+ J+ z7 u2 [4 o$ L
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment.") f1 }! C8 \3 y' r

: a0 A' D9 l' \; ^( e# v    <<
5 U) D" B* a6 @3 ^9 `8 Z                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
, f9 V9 T+ i( P7 ], }* [    >>
! u+ ?  y* ]" r
  a; H9 G' P. _* B" N) b" g% ?    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in/ ~# H" T- H3 b* ~  W1 I
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
- ]& ~4 b* |5 Z2 A0 Fof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time2 g! F, M0 B- E& p2 N7 L8 C" C& j
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of/ J$ F( t% J' M2 B
renovations.# }, s: N+ e9 @, G
( I  z) M  {) a8 O6 [# s. q
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight3 v7 z% N* l' R3 }, t  f1 n4 p
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
& L4 s6 L5 ]  Y; W/ N- qcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
$ E. r4 M8 L6 A: a0 q# W% z  YSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
. a) @+ _2 e9 D  N2 T1 Z9 n$ }  E$ Q4 q3 q' |
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer5 t7 ~* z9 Z, i8 @/ \8 m
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
* w& _: z6 l4 B8 X0 t5 U' G& Iquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
, V/ n' `) t4 h" S) x, i# c600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores  }9 ^) E$ h+ l* N5 n5 F- {
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes3 {  X! E% }7 {
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
8 N2 V  D. S! H  B, o8 U( d" T! h: L' L5 p8 L/ L8 e
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
5 R; r7 A- m/ H7 u5 M* Cconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their' [; W7 G/ J- a6 v  {
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
& s/ _! \! \  uwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
4 F4 F# g$ S, v, K  J% o+ Tdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
2 B7 P2 m" x5 V! Ebuyers with more options when looking for a home.- L8 E9 M2 q% _/ h5 s# [& f  F5 ]

$ |. H, B$ x4 }& o  Q) b: [    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly/ n7 c5 Q& t9 K" G7 ]% i
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes: Z: d: G4 T+ I* m! _) }
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,8 ~- x2 {; W' h0 |
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last" T# b: a+ n  g$ O) q
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
- ]5 T. G, d1 o8 h1 K  @* O2 ?1 D+ F' G  N) Y+ b, f
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house, s) S& T! a3 E) S
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
" m; P: h9 n, b' @7 o( V, slevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting. k4 X, x7 U# M( ^1 N
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,  `, U3 o8 y8 a, J
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the4 G" b) T6 q: w5 Z% N
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before, l/ k6 c! G  C6 E4 R" m  n. y
making a purchase.% g* D6 p6 p3 I% c/ t
5 H. s* ?5 K5 c
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
0 K6 x! i% z3 W* w( I, i4 ~  O3 X9 Mmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong0 g( |$ b; Q. e6 Z/ m" u
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city. G1 |, n- l+ ]* b
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting) Y+ K% C6 r2 D. p3 {
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown2 s9 ^% W( t  A; G
amenities.
8 @2 z1 p: B/ y6 ^1 l8 M2 f
9 a0 h! e, G' v  a( b    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
$ F# d5 O! G3 o, f# S* p' othroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
+ ^$ `0 n( H6 X# [9 [' Q; Q, Macross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has' R" ]) U+ j3 g! j
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
  ^! c- \" q" W5 {! Gdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
. n% x# z% y9 g, Zresidence, rather than for investment.
& {0 [8 z( V$ n4 l
' M& C8 M" ]  |( l! {; D1 {    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
6 P; e3 M- j  v9 R) ]+ x) phouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted5 C1 m5 }. `8 {/ u
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
* O+ J( P- u# {% D7 O: C9 tconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization# ^) E) M3 `/ N6 W
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter) @# V1 H9 }7 j& L
the market.( D3 ]$ j7 E6 E8 i2 j

6 U' Y3 f  Q( |4 y    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through8 U. _0 R: _7 V. Q2 P  k1 f4 A
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In, F& E  B. q$ @$ c6 d0 z  y5 F3 T
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
* k, Q: {9 e9 {( z7 Q! gmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
9 f: x! q5 k4 v' H3 v& w0 nto the shortage of available inventory.5 ]0 |0 A$ g, b# Z$ X; n; H% N
$ L9 Z* r( W' N/ I- E: V/ k
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its, `6 H& l& A; \
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
! k5 k+ k$ p8 e8 _! Evibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses8 G4 e% _5 t, U, w6 g
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.8 N; |" O8 k1 j% u  ?+ J
, v6 }1 f4 _7 s/ ^
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases8 l1 x9 ~  O- \* |- T, q
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
5 N! O; G5 V1 Y3 L, W' P) F: x2 xunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that+ N. _9 n7 ?9 H" {1 _4 p/ z( Y9 D
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring' L, B' b8 S- l/ J  g! r6 G
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
% ?) P  B  G4 P& S; b$ dseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as  C0 ]' v0 o9 t* c8 M& X0 X: p
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
$ B: |8 u! z# y  s' f
$ v% i6 K% x+ I" O- u
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
' u/ W  x0 \* f1 d9 |5 d2 eas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton$ j% U* [7 q% K0 c2 F! n% @
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,; [( ~/ A, E' `& s' o" J( n
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices- J; ~4 _9 M" T: a6 S! I
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve( h5 B) c8 T$ m" V6 b+ J: p5 R
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly! T  d' H4 ?" ^# q0 F" }! o
towards the end of 2006.
   
& j9 Q3 m- ~% x( ~' f) m: {( T, Z5 m5 _& j
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
$ ~. P7 o; f  n8 O5 D& ?inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
" S) o: P9 V5 n8 v* j0 |to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
5 k, K! ]  H( M$ k2 W4 x' agroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to$ s6 a- T: S8 R2 g9 |
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
7 w  I7 s6 C  z1 j0 w/ _pressure on tight inventory levels.
7 \8 u1 b6 U7 K) @" U4 A+ Z- z
1 L1 ~: B" w8 F/ k    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic+ f0 [$ w: k' B8 [3 X
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
3 y! u! M: ]: f6 ^" u5 G/ ninto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;( K- x& b% \- Y
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching5 f* `! J: E4 D5 x7 m8 C
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.' M  e# A# u. j1 d$ s% z

* V7 E/ u3 O* C+ O/ \2 ?) B, Q* l    <<
! r: c& s* P! D5 q      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006" f7 }0 |8 l; y- i. X: n5 y/ d
8 A5 E  ^8 }: y) G3 q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' V8 M% i; V( v! ^+ d* g  v- u
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey& ^- E: u  \7 L/ t; d% l. W& o
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. j, _' V/ P' J; _                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3" n8 y+ o% g) f3 j$ w8 s- e
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average9 ], R, ^, f$ k  J) c' n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 j3 Z9 P; P2 C7 ~
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000. g7 f/ f0 V% \
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; e, R1 s5 C) j' T$ t
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000, U# k+ |; \. m: K7 n$ j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 t1 U3 o4 y# U$ |# @
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0007 |6 D' M5 Z0 z* |9 f' W0 D4 r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. @& I& L- I: m
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -* W1 I  r2 C" M9 j9 `% V$ n* [
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ t' w; U6 H5 Y6 d7 ^    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3332 W4 n" S. x: U! U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, ]9 i5 n/ O( O3 K
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
3 e( V) W! W6 x6 U0 M' A5 o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! r$ U7 x! d+ }
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
/ w  K) W# k6 C+ _$ w, F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: g. `" x- w: I6 T+ w* d% U. K. Q    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250  T  l+ U3 [; {, u
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) h" F' h2 h5 b& ^) |7 k
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
/ p  Y7 [3 y! J/ U; r; C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ^  Z* E  Z/ Y
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
% @+ t9 D9 o' n  k1 o; O% O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! q, {1 J+ t6 V3 b: O0 a7 s% S$ G    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
8 _$ N+ D4 P. L* C1 k# C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 f4 e! m) ?# O9 L$ R0 {
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
9 M( k4 n5 f* I5 }2 ?9 p" Q* d& H    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ l4 e; N" `- s" H9 A* R
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7140 l. q5 h$ r% `$ O' ~# P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ @* E: f- {6 x( d2 {- \5 ^
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
/ D  D+ p, Y& U" l+ U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 m' O  }* d6 O, J
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000# X, g  q) j: ~2 T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; R* A& I- X& I8 @    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
# h8 S5 Y9 N0 }, t# Y. `* }    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 i0 D- F1 C0 w( r
1 [# v' q7 D0 Z% E0 _: y' N    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 ?# G' }! i0 Z  H                               Standard Condominium# Y- {. v" e+ g, u
    -------------------------------------------------------------
% l3 C8 \- [5 D( R" D) ]! ^6 i, Y( Z9 x; \                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo3 M1 N5 u, S  ~! N% B' Q/ N
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
% N; z, j- \# {0 g( A+ L4 B/ P# g9 \    -------------------------------------------------------------: V4 _7 p' [. u. v& G1 T& g
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
% h6 I9 z; J9 t$ V2 V& C% @    -------------------------------------------------------------9 a1 w/ j. Y) [5 c* O
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
) P, H& x# X" R0 v    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ I$ D8 r: B1 c  U    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
- T/ E2 c7 P' @4 a/ ]! R    -------------------------------------------------------------3 L1 y: G" ^1 N0 @6 A
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
" O/ W2 G7 s: ^    -------------------------------------------------------------% I: i/ g# K  E+ g: j, L- s
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
  {% k9 Q$ z% @- t    -------------------------------------------------------------/ B  Q! ~" d8 M2 ~, L
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
' R9 _/ a$ U$ z+ w# S    -------------------------------------------------------------1 S% ^2 E$ S+ B& Z2 ?) n! s) r5 ^
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%+ U3 X1 n2 w3 }4 J/ t8 C3 T4 K& o1 z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 [( @: F" B6 G9 E    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%8 D7 X+ y5 Q; C4 l/ @7 m! l% G1 {8 d* M
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 o8 l; Y: p& I. H( E# X; w0 }
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
1 K& v7 k9 l' p! Z3 @8 v; u    -------------------------------------------------------------- b5 ?  c4 @. @# ]" s& W
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
. ~8 G& l# p# ~, y; N    -------------------------------------------------------------
, |8 I* N  \" t& J    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%3 X/ Q  Y/ R% N$ l: H2 v+ ?! @
    -------------------------------------------------------------
! \' u1 r9 b' E* r8 a* O/ H    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%* l1 {+ _5 U/ x1 k
    -------------------------------------------------------------, @2 U  C4 `) p! h4 y5 ^4 z
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
; U9 z! F" ]  S' a% T1 T; I. H    -------------------------------------------------------------9 |! D4 L4 z* k
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%2 F- q) k2 y) T+ d
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ |. A' K8 s4 j5 y& X' B1 v
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
$ o5 S! r) X9 M  P" d4 `    -------------------------------------------------------------# i6 N+ X0 l: o7 Y( K2 m
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%& o. G% w1 O- s( ]% E8 m2 r7 Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ N8 P4 c" u2 ^& F+ p  S8 j    >>
7 C& k+ ~9 z0 H- f2 U% P1 E! w3 @1 }4 V+ h; [5 H8 F
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
( ?" y$ i0 q2 \# |/ ^$ \0 sin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
2 E0 Y9 o4 H' x9 O& D# c% M/ FJohn and Victoria.
9 D- O  }7 U! D: n7 y  d6 k* z* y8 E0 Y; H
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most" J' f7 S& V0 g3 j( `- q
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of  j! B9 z3 R, v# F, i
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release+ {, y8 B  t$ s* Z. u5 s
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price6 i. m" m2 G" M' \0 H
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities, D8 D- v" Z" Q
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is0 I$ d+ g9 A+ y' {
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
2 U. q4 H" v- g# e/ o& J* cfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
9 c1 G# o- @7 B3 t/ x) N; ^9 r0 dversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
9 Z2 T  l. g4 w+ W1 yNovember 15, 2006.
9 x5 U# c) |8 u- w- r8 L4 ^, p    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of. v0 V/ e: S7 L% ]0 w3 E( K; g
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
0 s5 F: N8 Q! S. d4 ^6 bprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
: s( [; l# d! `* B. I2 p: Eavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-31 15:00 , Processed in 0.104273 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表