 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
0 z3 H2 A) l* Q* v, j( p7 D; U" r2 R8 ]* a8 O
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -# s6 N4 |- B) j1 ?$ C: E5 r
+ }+ x% S# w8 V) u
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
" o* `* c# R& Oexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third4 a6 }/ I3 }. o# l9 V/ P. ~
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic- q5 W9 [4 f% r
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
0 O- l6 q# ~- C3 pprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
! W* t2 W* P/ {' {2 {' d$ wmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,/ g8 G' w! P" |
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal% g8 _6 c/ P& A. x# g! Y
LePage Real Estate Services.
4 W# h# C9 v( p1 ^% f1 ]+ }
! N3 i7 S& K6 P% C7 f Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters8 `% z% E d: T; |: g6 w5 W
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic* t, {* b9 Q4 A
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
* @, e* v! E- T5 W, Hsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the. E @; ?4 U. u2 F) t7 `, r
residential real estate sector.
" h0 H. c( b! e& k# a
5 c! L, h+ ?; l& U Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
& B% u. E% G/ Z, g- l' Hoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)7 v+ I+ U* W' p+ y5 n& o2 ]+ u
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5621 X5 @7 U% S9 E+ k0 \7 p
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
6 @0 D* w# u# m7 H. q0 |+ _% B9 }6 W(+13.2%)., b7 o) N) d+ d! N4 p
! F$ c* Z6 m! p ]4 c& D6 p "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth8 d% \6 Y8 @2 h- V) }
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
, ~0 y* t' Z4 V* q, _$ u* Cfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are7 H& U3 h( z9 ]+ W# Z( T0 ~; i
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,8 ?5 v2 _; \' {- g+ z
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.+ Q. d: D6 B; L+ f, ^, N. Z
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
% k |* J9 E# x$ S3 m5 Cwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
3 A: Y9 {! f: D8 f8 ]balanced market."$ J3 h: ]& S: ]" f1 P
+ z6 Y& ^. {% U. h) R2 e+ A
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,8 }. o2 Q. g$ |8 H5 k
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
. A. ^, P9 }" M3 n, R5 T: ^to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
) \" G u2 }8 r3 t/ U" Bthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core C1 l. d" W4 D! Z; o! T' H; P
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,- u' i7 H% w6 o8 x f
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
" D7 S" o; c# h- |( J$ }- ?breaking price appreciations.
) _( u+ ]8 }7 X3 i3 h& Q
; w/ z7 j U% o4 b& D$ Z* T Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding2 O0 h, S9 C- o
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the' r- W' A( b1 O# I' N L
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
3 c E" E. E/ h4 M, N# F: W1 E7 A% N, w1 A
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid8 f8 S/ L6 x4 V( ]& ^
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
) T0 i; Z. ?: m6 s( K0 H: p1 Qconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off' N% T. g- W( R/ i5 _6 w8 q( O
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth." M+ A; l# c, y6 }7 F
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers; e. A" M7 @" [3 ]6 s
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
+ h7 Z/ _, n# z9 w3 s$ H" v& _7 m- jprice appreciation when compared with 2005.; D; k5 c. N; K* ^, L* B0 x3 }
2 t1 v. e* W/ ^* g While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing: F. S- b/ p1 h* U2 B8 p
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and( s+ r. H$ s' H- P
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
4 Z2 s; R6 [- D; M+ v/ aare markedly different than those found in the United States.
0 y# K4 y# |' B/ h% e R# i L$ ^0 u4 X+ E
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
* @: a, V; d+ O ?. X9 m6 rAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
- @: t) B7 m9 J5 k# Ifavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the* G+ \1 j* q5 G" I0 @2 W% o
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general7 E* [5 o/ p/ x
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
( V# G+ K& Y0 |% Z$ gdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and: Z+ D+ b% a; P% v% s# p4 T& R
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
+ k; ~5 @3 y& \mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."& {1 J5 S( x# b. f A
- \' ^. O# ]: Z: S, q
<<5 w2 K' m' _; ?* X5 l6 ?! B
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
8 h- u+ Z$ X) |, f! |" g) N: M. Z >>
# {9 k% A& s( ?* Z; M4 A$ i* g/ z1 G' N- W
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in$ Y$ G- N: h8 m6 j) h p+ ^
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate1 J- u0 ~( q- Z8 Z: I/ G( Y
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time! f4 s1 c) l7 ?& d
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of0 I) a# J0 u& C7 j* i7 y$ P. A
renovations.7 M- A& y* P8 k$ k# D
w9 J4 D' B; A/ _. r' G$ T! F+ L
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
% Z' v: u s" n$ C9 D- Uincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
( t0 @- A4 `5 \+ ^3 Vcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
! k' n6 A2 Y | X1 USeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
2 k: C8 V' ^/ p' I+ d; [. J; P
P. C! R- Y: {( ?' u. f The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer7 T: a& K) N; [( |9 [- |) w
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
0 ~, G2 O8 F s; H' f1 Gquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
7 G1 R6 z+ U7 R0 X2 C { _% j2 P600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores5 O$ F' @9 G0 B% e
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes) x% z+ J& f, N& T6 J0 E
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.: S! o1 w# t3 W& r+ F: B |/ k
9 L1 U8 v. v; ]' q
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
& i0 _8 k4 x. _1 ^9 J- oconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their6 e1 T, F* {4 s- n8 U9 c( q3 n/ ]* m
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
3 ^0 g7 q) r, h5 Q% owas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
6 e, ^' C- s/ c' p0 d, [2 B9 ^4 V" Ndollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
6 c6 H2 Q, ^* f) W0 ^buyers with more options when looking for a home.; }0 e4 ?4 ?7 \$ m
4 e' _8 a+ F* b0 L7 S1 W Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
9 P: E) z; l) s: lamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes, Q8 _) _+ y t/ T4 S" b2 U
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
% R( t3 P& y! |8 C* B" @) }5 Mas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
: ]( J0 y a8 l2 Q2 X" ~; {few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
0 D: z3 M! d2 h2 {) V- S$ @0 w9 F
' W% O4 g0 M- @& ?5 T Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house. N, o$ H. M: f! n8 p
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory- `2 W9 t0 x V& U* H8 `5 W
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting5 _9 _# J5 w) _6 z+ c; N1 \
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,- u2 W0 X* e0 R k- S, F
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
5 v* n3 a/ S! D+ K* |pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before* P* ~ t _) ?" \
making a purchase.2 @ U: [( D7 J
& S3 \) H s4 w' `2 H Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing! r/ J+ x' S* F0 u/ Y4 d) R
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong8 |' l5 A( O$ ^0 W& X8 [
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city8 C! k, c2 k% V+ W
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
+ @- F. I$ p& B' a v' Jattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown# l U/ A: L- V, j- y$ c: h0 r
amenities.
! `0 H: [- p0 x1 N; d+ M2 Z4 X3 C! }9 \$ A" _
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
7 B/ q' P6 A5 ^+ V: Athroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand- j6 P' N- R# g4 Y
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
4 @1 }+ G I) |continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
" B/ s$ Q+ a# C( g [driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle4 p& X( A9 Z) `" ]8 n& S1 W
residence, rather than for investment.1 F4 i' q. F, B
& V, E3 [: V2 J' N
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as" M4 C: o3 X7 k f) @: ]
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
7 o% u. u7 I, _2 q+ t- @in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
4 ^; a3 w# ^) u, y$ c+ H7 hconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
$ L0 \; \- x! q) z, O+ w" J) orate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter# c1 g2 w% T0 {. o! I& t6 [
the market.
8 g* P3 H. @( n, p" P" K) Q1 p& A! _7 M( A+ B1 B
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
0 R0 x9 @9 l7 e9 I$ x8 nJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
& s, K7 B H$ zAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring: }- H! N+ g) C. b; @5 M
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due4 C( m6 r0 T% o f- h2 e- h
to the shortage of available inventory.( i( ]+ `4 D0 D6 }6 @( r [
0 [7 g. P( a- k5 c! c" L1 W
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
, n3 h4 N% o/ d0 C1 r1 @, ^momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
1 u+ G+ D8 u- g( |7 P( r0 ?vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
9 K- N/ T8 O$ o9 z# tstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.0 X/ v6 H8 g5 c) ` p. \
3 I6 d' `, T' [# i
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
8 y$ l% | I( k6 e& F8 v3 ^5 C3 [+ rin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
/ F# I4 w0 Y& x; i# Wunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
! T$ m7 u/ h" K& R% n( fpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
( w3 G) O6 ~( s2 C7 jprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer9 g) X k; \1 M* \2 Y
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
8 s( y6 l' o8 F3 `& N; s$ ~buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
# S& p; U; F6 o+ k) f# |" h+ [1 r0 o# N& ^+ b- o! z4 d
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter5 ^$ T7 {5 I/ A0 c ?4 |- f4 y% T/ k
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
, J9 }) p. O" x2 Rremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,1 L% [) _! F0 c' x# d# {
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
: [; F% P" R- \3 t- k, F; i$ hincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
1 P7 u; l6 Z; f; P3 h% `in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly; w8 N; g" f" D9 [
towards the end of 2006. % X; q% L4 Q" s- S8 |) n' Z6 h
4 T4 Z& e7 q3 f7 y+ l6 B+ m
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of, Z" i4 W6 D7 ?) I( W H
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
0 L' [0 |+ t0 _to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse6 j0 k P5 N- y, b
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to0 D$ r5 T M; C: O7 q/ l+ V' S
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added; g$ u9 l. T+ q( H1 J4 `
pressure on tight inventory levels.& I# J" ~& A& \
1 {. c7 u4 r) P! |6 I, N# V( _( V# v
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic* J! G6 G$ ^* E: c
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
' r2 |* w1 N5 V$ G4 O. ginto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;7 K5 I2 i7 R7 S9 R# j$ V
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching6 V4 T! L6 @) z) `& ^! q4 K
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.. s7 T# E. }5 i" B- ?! T8 n0 @/ _) A
8 `0 t" c; m- R; u }/ w
<<
# u& t5 ~+ J# q5 N4 u) K Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
" j& L& q; G* Y, J$ O" I" l! W! B* A3 ?: B3 i) L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& t# v7 a$ f/ R) ` M8 P& a Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
8 m2 D. R' U; o4 g) \: j -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 X! D5 U7 W: D3 r1 u 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3: t' ~0 }5 ^1 v2 y/ ]$ s/ a/ L
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
- g# x( a. k; W$ N -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ k; _0 N C* t' n
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000/ a |" g: O1 P+ x) O$ u- T0 n3 p
------------------------------------------------------------------------- ?9 P: N, Z7 X& k
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0002 F0 g& `, N* T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 [4 G( Z" z& O! Q3 U Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
* }; {% T& e. u: j1 o- r) R, v -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ E( F. F2 m4 W% x/ {7 H l Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -2 F5 R7 J" [& l" a8 ?7 ]( F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 ?( Y) O7 x, x6 k* M8 l
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333) g z$ p: _# y3 N! e5 K5 }, E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 b* P" e3 Z. l Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
& W- W7 K, p, F -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ d" X# f2 p* ?1 i8 C Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185, L/ `( X y" P5 n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% p, u/ t& i+ W* j" z6 O Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250 Z. l& u/ l% U2 Q, i, `% o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 t C: x& c& y: M
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766' y+ `8 z! N. F, d- p/ i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) Y+ u' j7 s3 \5 |( h* \- ~+ U Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707* V3 S. o( P9 X& D& Y: z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! x. {0 g" X4 H% ~, L1 v: } Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
2 t6 p+ Z/ H' c4 B% D -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ V% ]' O' c& y: G, P! t; a6 b
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3891 ^+ Y! [8 u/ i2 N: H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 l3 a' H. A0 M2 Q& F
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
* Q; G2 I$ _) G -------------------------------------------------------------------------' X( e( W4 b% N9 G
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5003 @7 @& }' k# M) }0 L# X( @, J9 E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 n. O5 i- R& x3 n$ G$ m Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0005 u* _$ J- [* ?8 @4 k6 Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ |% J; W, y$ K' J; \( `' Y9 q
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
2 i% H% G% p( j! N" ~7 z6 F, |, } -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) T5 `4 j L8 ~. n
6 Q: o/ w( n1 Z$ [ -------------------------------------------------------------
' `' J* z+ l# { Standard Condominium
! R/ ] r6 P# v6 ? -------------------------------------------------------------
/ G% p" i8 f W 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
) `4 `. w8 o/ N0 V# ` Market % Change Average Average % Change
! w( q0 d- e' n -------------------------------------------------------------9 m6 ]+ Z. `0 D- z0 ^8 S
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
* o- u0 j( J, `0 D" s -------------------------------------------------------------
0 H- r# n/ n- @ Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%8 Z! F' Q. B" @! {6 U' W
-------------------------------------------------------------; @, K; q. e8 Y! k' b9 E0 A
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A. a% ?# R- x7 o3 C& H
-------------------------------------------------------------7 b6 ?' L3 K, k
Saint John N/A - - N/A
$ [ x# _" c" I) H5 Q0 Q -------------------------------------------------------------/ A2 G( H7 t ^! G" u; ?0 p2 ]
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%: A m) J! K/ G) e3 e: |
-------------------------------------------------------------
) \! f3 |. z* a' \" Q, O2 g Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
+ Z8 b: x0 E- u( X -------------------------------------------------------------/ e1 p. h1 ~0 c: _2 v, k( h
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
4 @) _" t' K2 v: [; i -------------------------------------------------------------
3 p3 ?! w/ d, E4 K' j Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%3 i) y* W& f$ D2 T: U/ B
-------------------------------------------------------------6 B. i- P' f! i) D6 y9 Y5 u2 l7 ]' N) j
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%/ U0 \! c3 v; n. Q# Z
-------------------------------------------------------------
; } Q- s# j) Q7 Z Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%3 I) o" t% ?! W% [
-------------------------------------------------------------) i7 L" W% g% E
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%) [' X! Y; ~' P8 A& [
-------------------------------------------------------------0 C9 n6 y+ w s; R _ f! @
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%: k' Y( y `% u+ Q) Y
-------------------------------------------------------------0 G# K. T) [! i7 K* k. u ^+ W
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%1 a5 x' n) X2 f$ T3 b
-------------------------------------------------------------
( e7 P+ F8 } ]8 n2 \8 X8 k Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
, A. I' _, s$ I3 d7 w" b0 R -------------------------------------------------------------) t' P* d* |- P* c: t; T* G
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
/ V4 I" x, U/ |' f& u* s. Z -------------------------------------------------------------- s3 ^6 W }$ D
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
$ b: }9 p5 U7 s3 ]+ k& F9 X- l -------------------------------------------------------------2 \& k* Y4 h% h
>>
2 r' E7 b2 L* R" M- h& H/ H+ Q- D2 k5 |2 _3 o
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
. s# r2 }% N5 r r e- ?in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint, U! R, ]/ }$ y6 t3 x6 r9 V* c
John and Victoria.2 M( j3 K- V" H; c6 {8 a9 ? O
0 o- _2 \; i% c; ~
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most5 Y/ k# n/ ~6 j4 t' B
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
P" T& p L& K" q/ n$ a0 S- A/ y! Ahousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release- `% l- C4 n# n" f5 b: b
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price* Z8 C+ m! c/ ?! V
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities! V7 E+ P7 o H
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
9 J! ?3 }* i; Q7 k) K7 c2 kavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current; X/ l, X! D, m; h2 D0 p" a. T
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable. h1 G* c5 |; Y# z% i; e
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
" F4 ?4 E% V3 V6 d! SNovember 15, 2006.2 {5 o, d- u4 V8 H7 r5 w
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
" `- P7 d6 a1 \5 Yfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge6 l3 q5 T) n/ L" i; K Z
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is7 I. ~# n% Q. U9 c: B: C2 J
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|