 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 3 F5 m6 k& e R6 {$ w5 _
# e# x- |* r8 k/ |, c0 p0 |
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -2 Y. d( k4 Q+ X& @. a, v1 ?
6 a: H+ H& Y# u, Y! z TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market- ~3 u' W0 h l" H3 n2 ^3 m
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third! P6 i% N5 U, z
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic% T# j/ ?9 t/ B
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
& }# k* u- Y' F3 L- ?price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and. \( U8 h9 X( W' u a1 z0 W
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
2 W3 S% ?* T# F2 C3 p: ?6 hQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal+ t! t5 `# S) [( l( N
LePage Real Estate Services.1 H# x6 q5 N$ {( m% k
0 J+ F, a0 t' x& j& r; s6 B
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
1 ~1 c3 a# a1 w/ s oare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
6 z- q# F9 m+ E6 z0 kconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and) o$ r; s! f- E3 S& ?% g
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the4 g% I& V5 f7 m+ z8 l& N
residential real estate sector.
3 t7 g0 B+ @* l/ i, d( R$ s' o, k" R+ [% |
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation. n5 i* | X, |$ E0 i) O
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)& R5 Y; }- S& g- v# z% H
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
; y6 j/ ^: k% b- X6 h0 r(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380) K8 J0 `- o; k( N" }/ ~# @/ V
(+13.2%).' H4 _) Y( V! W4 J+ Z# F$ f1 @1 R( s
! Z" b! r9 F% n1 ]: o "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
: I" O& `3 Z- N- @1 Uduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the2 s; a. V% n4 V
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
5 V5 N$ Y' J6 R% Y' Epoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
# _; K& ~* |2 G6 r. n& fpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
9 h! {$ o1 T% o) T: B. s"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
. Y3 V+ a9 @: F: G. c. b: swelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy5 q5 T( I/ ?! U, l! X
balanced market.") M7 h$ D& `( s- o e
& T) q$ p+ }* g$ z) a Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
" V+ c% ]6 H* x: t+ `3 q9 d8 tconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
) M+ j( M3 P/ [1 oto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued) H/ r2 m( ^2 ^1 d
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
- f; y3 N: D7 K6 Qenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,& Y* ?& V- x, X5 @& U0 v- d1 H
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record0 d1 ~% ^' v6 m: E8 m1 E; [
breaking price appreciations.& ^) ^) c6 w r
) y$ P- I, s8 v9 q Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
4 m1 O2 D' X/ X; O# e3 a8 feconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
" w' Z! G5 U4 H" s. }$ Llargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.- h4 l" O2 i6 r5 ~- W
$ _( e, u; u% F B
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid# l4 }, Y! O8 G+ ?- T
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
- v) {4 e1 B9 |! V( Wconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
3 j2 @5 Y, v% o0 k# Z7 ^slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.$ D7 H' ^8 F% `5 z. X+ B
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers, D: @1 X* E' J* H0 B% d
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
8 U. a: P- A- R' E" ], K! U4 v8 Kprice appreciation when compared with 2005.; P7 U/ Z! s1 H# }
; ]8 I- x9 V+ p While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
+ a! v3 Q8 g/ ^; p4 }market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
c% P) e, }! D7 k9 @; y% X' Dfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
& c5 O- H" I; _2 b; `are markedly different than those found in the United States.9 [ C2 m$ D Y5 s1 ]- ^
9 B7 }& s" l) }+ ~5 B5 C5 M
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
9 v$ E9 o. ]; LAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
, {. f% N0 A$ p1 Q+ h y' Q# F1 Mfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the& y7 N4 i$ N @8 u& Y. \* ?/ l# h
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
, O1 [" U7 A7 ]+ e* aaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
" k' M8 g: ^9 u- _! Mdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and; u$ d) W% x0 k. N" }* G6 _: M
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
/ @- c; f2 l% a3 i( i* Mmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
, j" i. J: } J: N' F/ \+ E# }' E& I) o: B
<<& R: G9 k" o- C8 l
REGIONAL SUMMARIES2 N" h$ }# m. |; l, @
>>
! w7 F; Q7 v0 P, r4 B6 U6 X9 h' }3 I6 Y
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in$ V. A4 j! K M3 |
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate) h- g7 p$ h# j! z
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time7 v/ }/ Y% F$ g! E8 T; N7 z2 f
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
+ o$ `" |, e/ |: x2 brenovations.
0 c6 @. r9 F) d9 V8 M' D
2 I, |2 I% s* d E W( [" e The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight! i" B* L8 ~4 W) M- R% E
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
! m& O! d8 T$ [ f6 Q9 g' G7 q0 lcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and9 h a! e0 W2 G; A! ~
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
+ g7 a6 g# A' q2 A9 x- G/ @1 g5 V/ x, n
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
$ \' {, Y+ H2 [5 O7 T" ^7 Lslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the% P& `: ^ B4 U0 W3 O8 I& B
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
7 Z" ]5 {3 T# J2 J600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
& M' Y& D' R P7 _( S- E. Kto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
$ K% G* a. C( k' G% ]and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
! |, o* g- p+ U$ q4 ~* Y, d9 X7 }" \4 R# G t
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
$ O" @3 d( k3 A0 i. z9 K; ?( Rconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
- `; U, u$ {+ q1 qhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers. C! E7 N! P6 _" l) `+ y$ q
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
* Z) h& a3 p) @1 p5 mdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing, z: b' [9 d9 J1 n3 @( b4 @
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
% Q3 G# F0 C5 H5 L( J' C) ~ ?8 w. `3 J; M9 U
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
3 y3 g u/ B9 o. m6 v# damong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
& ~% i# {6 I; i9 B" k. @priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
1 J* G' s+ H& R) ^2 m, ^as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last9 s' |+ g7 ^4 @( d' `! ^# }3 p W
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.* f/ x+ V$ c' X) Q0 [7 U9 F6 z* z
1 l# I" c9 O9 P3 u( q7 ?0 J. l( e" s Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house9 ^$ r0 t' @4 t4 ?
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory M+ M# p3 C0 }; A* H: O$ z
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
& `9 X, O3 l7 s& z9 d9 |first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
0 m+ B$ Z1 a/ t" g) iwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
1 H. G( a/ ?$ c6 vpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before1 }* E, w1 r9 s/ r; ?9 B
making a purchase.
0 u+ y' `9 r! o# A; V* t* L3 J
( i0 P. \* ?5 u# Z' O. y5 C+ q Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing4 V# M) Q# i1 P
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong9 c8 @# b8 {( O
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city# u. L, p: M# o" T6 R/ h% O
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting; |( Z$ O8 f- @7 b# r
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown, q+ {9 b7 T9 Q4 v/ G" g4 L! K
amenities.4 ~. N2 v/ |- s+ A( s
8 }$ Z P1 g/ O; l$ g The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels7 [' d! `" Z0 _) }) _3 v1 _ l
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
/ R: u: e ^, r+ w0 xacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
) o9 `* f* ?" l ncontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
6 H( T, X, W$ rdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
+ s) F- w- ~* N& h/ s/ O& R8 Tresidence, rather than for investment.
/ o$ p# _+ M3 V; k( T' K
! m# r1 v0 t" p( S x6 K The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
) V8 M* j, Z% w8 Rhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted5 g: \- [1 P, _" ]. ^
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
, F4 ?7 t$ [7 X3 E' I8 T" Y1 mconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization% d( _5 w6 c) M. ]1 M
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
* u3 Z/ w: e! @5 e4 Ythe market.' J3 T8 \0 s; m! b1 e, R: u
" H% F0 d: ~: O% P$ |) D$ E
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
7 e6 }0 o9 | B4 lJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
7 D- O0 N! _3 ^8 b5 M3 Z. E) r' WAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring" D4 N8 m% z6 \, I4 m
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
& k f7 `9 O' W. `2 c0 sto the shortage of available inventory.
0 d! U4 ?% |/ U' |, O$ y
0 X9 `1 H, ~& Y M, J3 q9 ^ Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its$ m/ D! v$ v: ], j0 ~( x8 Z, x1 ]
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains+ k" |: {, P. [; _$ }% X
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses! l; N* G& p) Q4 p3 z7 b& q" o
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
9 e5 Y5 u- F; w' J0 M7 |7 C" |2 Y2 m" ?# V; a8 d1 J9 [+ m
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
( y6 i: R7 V3 din the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low' X( n2 I, m* c; v7 _
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
3 v- {% T6 C6 v9 i, lpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring9 W) c6 z) Z" Z' k* P! ~
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
0 F9 d! S3 C# K5 Bseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
0 I) Q8 s. X* K- P6 c g1 ?2 P% lbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity." U4 O1 b6 }3 J% t$ z0 P4 M) n
3 Y0 ?/ D2 I5 U) f4 A" M8 V6 ?
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter, N* R3 d: F- _9 _2 L
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton! t& U' u: e. Y+ A( @0 w% |
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,: I; Q% J* ~. s5 ~ K" `+ x
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices# o% `; M6 |" C2 L, C! w
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
% w9 L K& i9 C' D2 a1 |2 m" n; iin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
4 f8 M- b, ^# c3 N- ]" n' otowards the end of 2006. . |5 R5 }/ v1 ^- r/ c0 S
0 ?1 H7 L0 x1 v! u! E$ g0 Q! B! O+ aWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of# @% l5 {$ I2 ?- H$ j- E
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable) ]# T% R+ \4 {- X
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse, s) ~! C1 t& L9 i
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
/ s6 M8 D, p7 |7 M; }) }. g8 |foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added- r) i% }. O) P. J+ j; @7 y; p" p
pressure on tight inventory levels.
$ h; z* \, _$ ]" R- O0 ?, J; w4 F: E: l% F6 w9 |4 q ?
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic( y* [( v; O2 o$ F: r0 u, N& V
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people1 b; g. p2 ~: u
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;' u% ~" W2 W5 l+ J
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching! ]( W5 f V4 o5 G* @; A3 [
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
3 o0 }9 \& v% X: H. {1 L9 V
! o: u8 g. E/ X) {% C+ F7 G <<9 n' u" v$ x' c: ~6 w* l7 g4 s
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
, E) t7 ?, L& ^( \& P5 ~ n
9 i4 j% b% j, l* }0 r* q- I2 v -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* z$ A6 H f% B6 I- p Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
& g+ @- @5 a9 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------
x/ ]7 {, I* K& O$ F1 A. W5 w7 ? 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q34 O. I/ }" L4 S
Market Average Average % Change Average Average: N b. D+ D8 z- N2 X" l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# _; [ E& F+ o# m' h! V, k Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
& @# N& N8 T4 D/ H- a -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; G. b6 ?4 h: G7 s) C6 @: m Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
- _3 L+ M" r& p) r% e: m6 _) A -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 x/ p! B8 n# m+ @ Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000& H% s7 ^3 j8 G0 c5 N+ j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 b7 G C' @( I$ c: `8 P y Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -/ I; \+ @6 Y W4 t% ]$ T* B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Q6 W9 o, O5 K- O7 T) A0 H St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333- c) D" X! ]. Q0 ?' U9 g# i* N
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 ^7 V" ?4 d+ l. X3 x; G Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583. h5 z3 P& P8 z: ]1 c7 }9 E, Y2 P/ u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! W0 C2 G- x1 r: c2 J g
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
5 g3 T* H1 }& E4 ?" [2 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( D8 z+ ?# v1 D" }! t Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2501 k- o% v* V5 L, }% |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% l5 Y' b x m: ~6 D, n Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7665 [- o; a9 s; x' A% B$ u: |% {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- I% ~- k1 z o, m* }
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
" \2 G" N7 n) @' ^+ ^3 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, G$ _6 l: p! n8 X8 B! c Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
8 m% g% z, B) `4 t -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 H% n+ ~0 X/ K+ P8 F) U7 ? Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
6 X5 Q1 G. I4 M4 d& I0 u( o -------------------------------------------------------------------------# A6 q2 ^% @ |& t( P: b; Q
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714 U% V) J8 K* u- s7 D- ^, v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 [ P( {: e" j% b* a2 M( ?
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
' Q( E5 T; z4 s6 X8 X) k. ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ ^3 b" X$ p: B2 b& Z9 z9 |# G2 E Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
1 S' W$ y% u) C* O( y* ?/ g" x. e -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; x1 ?$ t. h' C4 I5 D/ ` National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
4 n) m! l1 t3 k- S4 n7 P" Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& o+ _# o8 z1 l5 B% E2 f
" X* {$ I/ |( | -------------------------------------------------------------
) Z# K/ Q5 b8 `+ \! u Standard Condominium
+ G) x7 U2 U E9 A7 q -------------------------------------------------------------
: Q' R7 E# N0 g- v5 A% Y7 s 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo1 {. N' }2 \* W- Q6 \3 y0 o2 r5 c
Market % Change Average Average % Change4 c3 w3 I0 C$ x1 K' x. {* F
-------------------------------------------------------------& d4 K5 t5 `; p6 L1 m0 S& X% u4 }
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%) ]# c' a( J7 X3 L, E3 q! v5 E4 I: ]
-------------------------------------------------------------$ ~8 @2 d) ^7 E" o: b
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%* F0 e8 X( V* u2 `% g
-------------------------------------------------------------# D4 d4 v0 E V- A w# I6 J
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
% M" k' y7 ]0 g& }0 ~. Q -------------------------------------------------------------( O. N$ [, h( k6 ?( \; M
Saint John N/A - - N/A
7 }$ W: n; G, J* b -------------------------------------------------------------
' ?" c! Z/ v& c& t8 l St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%! ?. w5 R3 m, t/ ~& ]9 B" A/ b: q
-------------------------------------------------------------+ } C+ J3 A( i; y
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
& s, M+ C6 ~2 x7 G) O -------------------------------------------------------------
) X& I! P9 m& P+ V2 ?: E' Y Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
5 { U9 W( z+ {7 C; [ -------------------------------------------------------------
# d) Q$ h3 R2 X8 x" I Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
4 @2 d, ] C1 @7 ~# r -------------------------------------------------------------
h9 A: K5 ^$ {7 h" j Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%. k+ ^4 p. O I, E$ O
-------------------------------------------------------------
D$ C1 U; z1 l2 B Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%& c4 G! @2 ^+ n' J
-------------------------------------------------------------
, [" Y7 t# r) s# @ Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
7 D G( u$ R8 m -------------------------------------------------------------
& H$ e6 s6 Y& K; r& \" ~+ J Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%6 Q) i9 K) b, i( Z' O' n& J. w+ o
-------------------------------------------------------------/ u, t& }! S1 N4 \/ g/ H
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%" c0 N! B2 m, F3 ]4 b- A
-------------------------------------------------------------
; ~. h2 E% j3 z4 U9 [. n1 K, N; H" M Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
7 M, y0 }9 {7 T! `& o/ o7 x -------------------------------------------------------------$ e4 _: i! n; ?1 r9 A
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
; b6 W/ Z7 h" o% U; A -------------------------------------------------------------5 l9 z* d& p+ B" W" o% D
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
1 S1 Y& Y7 [& q! c) s6 \ -------------------------------------------------------------
7 Q5 R3 ]* w5 O' g3 i) ~( a >>
: A! D& ^. b! D" E2 [$ u) b
F" f) U* _8 V% I6 B Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
& I9 U c. D& ]. v% }& s/ ~" rin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint: n0 L" S' P; G7 J( T* J1 Y0 z
John and Victoria.+ o. t6 C4 O7 n8 v" k0 \. b
: p) s( i7 ~& \. ^- ?# R The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
$ |6 y* Q( C9 Fcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
2 c2 F1 q2 e/ z# b7 t& `housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
4 c* F. R% v$ [+ zreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
& r1 x0 x9 P7 c% [! |% I% d0 utrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities+ F+ L0 i' B* I% [) z3 ]$ `
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
' o/ f4 q: ?4 N; K) S+ t- R6 ?available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
( H/ O1 A9 W/ h- X7 Y0 ?figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable0 l2 U5 B$ R) l, k
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on( u+ s) C1 o( Q6 x* M! T1 r% l
November 15, 2006.
$ @) g1 Z T& i S3 V Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
8 N+ e' ? C5 c( z9 Kfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge3 r2 x( |+ u! h
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
4 ]! [& T; D' v9 o% D* M* yavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|