埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2400|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
/ s) t- s2 U+ `; p2 p- x
- d: c4 a7 a9 V- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
: U( c& X6 O" ~! h$ k7 G" \4 k' {+ ?2 ?* W4 j, M; c
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
' k9 `% M" |/ A% k3 Uexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
1 z# G8 \- d' z0 |& Q) N) S8 h) w. nquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
% L; I5 Y$ L  b3 R3 `& Kin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit- E6 D9 o# B/ C# L0 p1 i3 {, f. P
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
5 ^. H6 c+ Z  @- n% P- ~" Omore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,# B5 T1 ]0 g7 W
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
0 x5 s  F, m4 Y2 k. L5 `# G1 SLePage Real Estate Services.
; T& {8 C: z: e" }
8 \$ `1 M- U2 R  j8 _% h. [    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
! B; s" x3 \2 u  J+ @0 ]are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic5 T" T1 U$ k8 t; @, @
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
6 p) ^9 k2 Q: G, ^sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the0 B% n+ I& s4 p  `" J
residential real estate sector.  `  T6 h# R2 z7 m& H, H) I7 ~
; z) T% d; z" O3 X6 q
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation  D6 U, \1 X; i, `3 v+ A" A
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)9 H8 w7 J% j  M4 N! D
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562* l: w* t" [8 o/ w; Q
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3803 B( A. U! b/ @7 J- v7 e4 c1 Q
(+13.2%).1 C7 J, i  V$ W5 f8 f
2 U- [8 H- U4 ]2 ^4 @2 v3 s6 n
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
/ e. I! u* e$ g) }- A1 P  E" ^during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the! y9 P4 r5 B, l* ~
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are: E. ~. e5 S. {/ x* L) ^: h9 Q
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,( k4 H3 d' m$ C  f5 `
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
& n. z5 W' x3 e) ?5 M5 e1 F"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We1 y) N# N3 ^! ^5 ?" r
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy$ s2 E6 \% u# B' X  A& e
balanced market."( f! U4 V; s. W1 f6 }

& `  P- D! L% \9 y: I! j3 l    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
+ d# H  |  P* m: i( \9 econsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
* M$ v$ e; H3 T; m. mto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued1 L* g3 x3 ]9 w# P7 d
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core& ~' b; h: _+ g- N: i
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
3 {4 k+ j1 U6 h2 Y# E( G2 _8 tmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record9 {' p: }% H& w" R, b9 U4 P# z
breaking price appreciations.
6 ]- G( U2 \5 n! j; S3 J
" H7 h9 b2 _* N8 N3 h( j0 t    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding& k6 l1 S% R! Q, h* Q  J
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the; D6 a9 ~: e; O
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.% D, `0 t- j7 x
3 E9 }9 V9 c5 v
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
; t' U4 h. g- l$ A; f0 deconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
0 C6 r" d& P% m7 P+ `; [confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
; x% O  y; u6 {slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.( `& X% \$ w3 j" J: [2 F7 o+ M
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers5 @( o: D2 \! `+ D+ ~
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of1 v3 N6 O/ a! g) k6 b0 q1 b
price appreciation when compared with 2005.+ }& B2 f# r* p/ O
! \+ O7 R3 H: u
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
9 T+ |, a5 B/ T+ n# I8 _market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and5 S, u) h  @# n* p
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
: Y3 V, j0 S" N7 L( {are markedly different than those found in the United States.* T6 a0 t" M! m; P! ]' o& z

7 y% J+ z0 P9 r& ]+ G    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
! ~9 b1 Z. _8 M* U9 JAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
9 C- v0 `  R, b( i3 E7 T% x# L1 afavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
/ `6 K0 c; L6 k- _! srelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general' u5 `, s+ P9 N: g6 Y
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
" u) K8 J% E% T$ X7 zdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and& c  h0 B( J, e! y: [. t
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
% ~" ~# h6 k$ r- y# Z# _+ Rmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
" e* z  W+ q' y% x- r5 c
" v6 Q( W% y7 J5 h# L9 i4 V    <<
7 s+ X6 j) C; J' l& q* K+ {                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES2 Q2 a+ [" u" ]1 c% w/ `+ }
    >>( L0 t& V! ]: `7 M

# f5 d3 ~; l  O: V    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
& C' z% w0 M. b1 K. aHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate8 q6 I( r! \- ?1 w$ ^* Z4 _9 v
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
( v  D; ?/ L6 c% ]) W" w% B( r: ]0 ^looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of. \' Y: T% k* p& U0 M" ?" H% z
renovations.: t) l* W$ A8 ^

4 `4 t5 E% {1 M8 |" M9 X    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
* n- H3 ^# q2 ^* Qincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
5 j/ R3 C/ g  J; ?7 G* X% [& y0 @compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and  N/ f/ |) s* Z$ F% z
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.# c- k8 h! {1 ^# Y

( ]# g/ V- }% }: C    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
7 W  F6 V4 ^! \7 }slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
* ?2 c% N8 u% Z. P( u$ v. Y, Uquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new% M4 K" j  _* F3 \* h
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
$ p' A, h, Q3 R) }2 R; tto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
( p- O, G/ r* \6 a4 t- ^and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
, s. V  h" x% w/ {3 e8 Q( D! ]5 ^1 o8 }
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced% Z. l3 O& L+ v# }/ C* J) M0 @
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
: W* T, f( ]! x* l, \  J0 hhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
+ _, U* |. K" Q4 X* fwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian3 c4 J; v* T. s4 O6 R* d2 t- M/ ]' J4 n
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing# w/ _+ L. B' r( l/ x
buyers with more options when looking for a home.$ L9 z6 z% c/ E8 @: r4 S) ~
' r# h7 D( B. K# n* y5 ]
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly* W4 E# g9 K; {  m
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes2 P" t" z" [4 g
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
/ K. S: f" s3 s0 V1 uas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last" }" j% S* F6 |% s$ J6 {/ g  [
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.. i5 d. T, g8 A( c. K

$ X5 W5 f* ~0 W7 j    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house! x2 k: f6 P( T: D0 P9 Y! I0 H- X
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory9 p/ V) \5 C! n8 F" ?
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
: ~, i( y5 w$ ]7 m  t' |first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,+ ^0 Z) B9 K5 i& b, F0 o7 h
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the- J3 m5 E, y  @3 n5 A
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
- G' J7 f: \  O8 _making a purchase., F' o/ u9 ^, Y$ y( A( D
2 e- Q6 Z  G" f: s3 s* \1 ]
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing" `1 R6 q' ]1 q4 v
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong0 F2 ^7 ~( F$ m. e
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
/ p3 @) F% \# r8 r9 Jcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting" z) ~( B% n: r* l/ t+ I/ T
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
2 l  O- f- u6 Q) z, |0 B5 L2 s& Oamenities.
/ y0 {! T# s) D- W) Y. u6 o  g1 K6 f6 E0 I, u5 I' h
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
5 c  \1 E2 x+ {! n% b) tthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand. e7 L% o( j! K$ ?& V
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has' A& i5 Q( x9 H+ v( o
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
$ G4 z; T; L+ Q1 ?! a, d% Ldriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
6 o: S- ?5 ]& j, Jresidence, rather than for investment.
$ s3 t. S& s) o% H* f* a- O' D, r1 A+ u1 v- I- y) j: L2 P
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
0 \, N/ s4 y! _$ K. t1 khouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
  S9 z* s& Q0 s7 V& Min a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
' K$ v; u: U4 T8 Dconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization) c" x& `8 C' t) Y4 U  R) U% j/ t
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
8 J, Q9 `0 C& u. X6 t7 e# x) `' Ethe market.  E$ z8 R6 N! z$ r6 x& a5 y% z

6 @$ T( l- m7 y+ p    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
' m# k3 H/ m; e6 cJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
( {2 y2 y1 j# U' ^4 k4 ^August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring' h8 V7 L( `$ V; ?
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due2 q: v  ~# ?0 N) u, q
to the shortage of available inventory." s  C: ]1 O6 ?1 L0 i3 r
: Q( Y) V( ~- X& {
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
6 W0 A) j0 h4 J& C7 cmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
5 S& ~. B; o2 k& [vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
7 t3 x' ~! \, H* Ostruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province., ]& O+ d& |) |8 G

; }% @$ V' b$ `) o& G    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
3 ~: y: i/ V  Zin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
5 H. a. e2 [# ~7 munemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
2 M) F# s2 Z8 |8 Cpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
. N1 ?9 W* y" S# S# h2 M( J, iprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
5 V- [& T: ]1 H8 d, I! Gseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as' E+ d7 m& o- ?$ C
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
! v" I3 M' X5 R9 @' o+ q

# ^( w2 q  q4 v: |7 l    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter) E: T3 Z6 A& r$ k
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton( F: l& P/ t1 Y( Y) b" z
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
. X, y( j4 l9 }1 mmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices& r* X4 D$ e4 \2 T  d' E  E
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
) S& e+ p  }; [in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly% a. n5 G$ S3 u  q5 k
towards the end of 2006.
    6 K4 \8 t% z" [3 x
* p% z% {# s: _+ B
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of. P& g* F% s5 C, G
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable# P6 G0 p$ ?( u7 F2 q: q$ o
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
+ ?8 G1 K! y+ U8 Z8 ~7 @6 lgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to9 u( [8 r. M% j7 H: O8 a
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
( V& r+ P+ q7 a& v! mpressure on tight inventory levels.
( E1 r! o: y5 m& P5 l/ \5 W( S  E1 P4 q6 q, l/ H- M
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic2 v% c+ \3 C$ ]! E$ Y6 O1 V$ D
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people6 [$ R5 C0 W. Z: J2 L
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;- x! v; R9 B- u% S
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
/ N  C5 I& \; T1 Bfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.6 Z" X0 [# r4 O* B/ s
9 `8 H1 w! ?( L0 J1 }% N) ?
    <</ z- |1 D! p% e5 V- l% i( i
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
1 I& T+ K9 O8 z+ Z' W4 L2 N% O9 f. @3 |/ u8 Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 @2 R6 [  U4 F4 G! Z" V$ O                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey5 [+ T5 D7 t4 Z& e  l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 {4 N) ?1 X- i7 F9 p2 z# `2 F
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
  ~& V% J, k* y    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average6 ?( g- Z; O  Z+ s& A) t
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; U/ W& \  a0 h4 ?- r. A- P
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000( V* W" F" b( [  e& [+ ]0 s9 E
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 X  D% ]4 g1 c* e
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
. R& g1 k; e3 S6 d& }0 N4 N2 f- w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: [3 d% j0 a- A2 I
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000' Y' Q5 X3 B+ ?7 f
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( ?2 @! R6 u( Q/ ]$ r
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
5 S$ d) T% T/ _' J& ^* k. g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 s! ^; H, j" H8 A! U
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
5 a# M; M0 b; b/ s; m    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: B6 N/ z0 P3 B" u
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5838 c5 v0 K% |$ ]8 O6 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' ~3 K/ i& g7 b: ]3 V    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
) e7 l' e4 w0 Q. R6 _- i( b; C4 i- V    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. d  @4 T9 k) P/ t3 R! [! \    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
1 v4 {& O1 `4 |9 S. j2 z4 o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 h0 [, n  U( @. C8 |0 t    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7666 H  D! i( e- e+ H% P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: n2 i! M/ y; H1 T2 W% d    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
3 g; N2 P0 H2 x$ f, d: W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. c9 f  @7 ~( s. h$ _/ Y- n
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
; J2 r4 W( q; H3 ]3 t6 ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ @  ?) s# G$ ?2 V/ q    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389- Z5 \6 W! E  m$ o& V! D4 h
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: x* y& D) I% D% p5 b    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
" q( q) i# R% M, Y; J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 b8 a, T1 X+ D    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500' l( F7 B/ n, F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" i+ i0 @, \& J% Y5 N& H    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0001 ~; H# I& d$ T. c
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 A( y/ W* e4 z    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
6 U6 E- I/ |' t! x( X9 i4 F" n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: C8 N' y' E& _7 J  p1 u" O7 x' N) n2 Y5 ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------% D- w/ n: |9 h1 v4 O, D0 `, X
                               Standard Condominium0 E. J4 ]2 s6 q4 {, C; `
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 j; W/ o# ?! U- K- C                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo3 B7 B' H( p% T) l
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change4 C4 i8 C5 F& [7 h! @7 Y) Q5 E
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 o! r  P5 I7 _! k
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
; v8 R1 h) r! F, U+ u; }/ L$ Z    -------------------------------------------------------------
; ~% t2 p. Y% `* T    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%/ E' E$ O3 v* }* d8 V& B
    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ d" K' I. c. u% s7 F1 u9 C    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A# O) g+ f: ~" t1 H) b$ v# t7 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------) e/ [& \, K7 z9 L9 w* j: m4 S. ~
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
+ }. b6 X* h3 ~( ?    -------------------------------------------------------------
- y5 w$ @% [& X; B& B    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
% I' r7 `7 ^7 n3 ?' u: h' I    -------------------------------------------------------------
" s, \( B+ `  ^    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
( w% i" m4 V6 x  y    -------------------------------------------------------------( d) S% R6 l% {) y9 }* X+ m6 T8 }
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
1 P3 d/ G6 F" V    -------------------------------------------------------------4 T. z0 Q% Z9 h) j: l
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
" ]7 Z' e6 M) {- |" a9 Z2 p9 ~    -------------------------------------------------------------0 z5 u# ~1 B8 E3 @
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%: R4 _, J' N$ r( p- j; ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 _& a6 I5 c1 g) V7 `. n1 E5 T    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
8 ^6 b+ y+ }4 z* `    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 n/ X, {* y$ P" Q/ i# m    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
0 S8 N; r# U% S8 w% t! K, t- [    -------------------------------------------------------------# d" h7 m7 _1 d0 ?9 g, ~7 z
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%- X! [* X. g0 M% Y" T. R
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# n" t" \6 e' h1 [    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
. ?# ~$ w* r; Y8 _3 ?    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 l7 \$ r1 }7 d$ L    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
2 ?) I7 p8 `+ @    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 }3 [, n" B- a    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
4 w# \& c2 ^0 k    -------------------------------------------------------------
& K6 w% z0 h" U2 i) D% k    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
" k, M; o* U7 x( y, f  z# K7 W    -------------------------------------------------------------
! Y5 }, y) t1 K% o, o. g    >>' i/ s1 O8 ]6 r, H9 U. w+ Q
" [+ R- T# s$ o9 G+ j/ v0 h
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined* Y& G, y; Q' k6 E
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
% ]$ c0 l& W8 NJohn and Victoria.
  U3 `; j# T) `0 G, G/ o0 j
4 B" I* T8 T4 u* A$ `) {9 L0 h/ {! P    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
7 P# d5 O0 P$ M) f" a6 @comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
0 N. ~  H3 B3 q# [+ Y# Yhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
6 t1 u8 v+ }2 B2 b1 z. m# P  ?references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price, e5 e0 L% l- U% w
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities! D* A% P- X$ I$ [9 h
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is- G, h9 \+ E5 e
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
. O* e$ z9 p) ~8 w* Mfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable: u3 z& R+ a$ J; P
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
, ~7 B4 B7 z; {$ V) O5 s( DNovember 15, 2006.
$ Y1 m, I: J- F3 b7 ?/ B' G    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of! P- N: p/ b$ E% o, Q: P8 a) D/ q
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
/ U5 r4 T4 o. ?% A/ Gprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is1 s- Y  [- Q2 k9 p# N3 u7 }" f
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
理袁律师事务所
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-26 14:42 , Processed in 0.122033 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表