 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
4 ~) |; ]3 x- Y$ J, J3 \$ L5 i4 ^3 j9 R/ Y9 d" w, L1 q5 a
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -$ s N3 N) J' o7 T" V3 ^0 Y9 Y, l
. D/ B* K- Z+ c5 K* u7 ^ TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
7 Y$ u2 P3 J- texhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
+ t9 Y. g( W4 A, p7 yquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
& f" {) Q3 q2 [6 u6 s: [in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit6 [/ W2 K7 [, W G9 n0 B
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
. Q% u2 q1 ^6 \; A0 k" K5 cmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,5 ^% l" h: E" @( z- d; I) j
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
0 \, N# D) g; K5 z9 q' y# S4 B1 TLePage Real Estate Services.
& [: V/ c1 T! d2 L; O
% R, x% H% a% d9 g. R+ Y Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters) w6 Y# O& u; p$ k
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic+ {( u! g& }. J" L
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and7 b/ T' y( b e k" y# n6 n( z/ j D
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
) g# x; _" q4 }" @9 S7 p- ~' nresidential real estate sector.) N& o( H4 ]8 H; Y
0 |# @0 g+ o, [) Z/ p. M0 c9 ^
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation) d( O7 s" z4 q! c/ @
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)( b% L' x/ p. M0 z; C* Q1 D7 [, J
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5620 s- |+ w9 @9 e9 `( y
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380* H: u" r9 o; F% e7 L
(+13.2%).
$ d! y8 Q5 C3 O2 [/ P8 L( y; \. o& L" `7 T5 l8 ^
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
1 P, g8 x8 k+ L/ q2 mduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the5 j8 }2 y- Y1 D$ j7 o6 d' o6 n
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are! J3 d4 p: w2 D5 [7 T1 W
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
( b& c/ ~' L' p; a' Ypresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services./ X: I) J$ V2 R# K+ v# S. _
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We1 l' T) T$ X3 c* R1 Z
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy$ d O. W/ l7 S' `5 B0 O) h
balanced market."
. F+ N# m# B) Q+ @) u) W. J9 V7 Q8 S" z3 l1 W l
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
. s8 |) Q) p2 Nconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
6 m" X8 \# @" R0 }+ t; `to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued2 V9 ? Q" F6 R$ P0 H: W! M
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
! a& H4 z' g. x. y/ Lenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
8 a+ a9 x. G1 S7 I0 j4 zmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
/ f) m3 P5 C. lbreaking price appreciations.: q+ z9 K* \6 ]3 Q d+ C
! z: Y% f. i F! k% C
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding/ K% s2 y |7 N2 x: M
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
) N) `0 b0 w6 Ulargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed." H" w; Q4 q5 H% s, X+ f. Q, I) G
, a% Z, L3 {$ u: S% D# |0 z v In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
6 D* d4 w: N8 r4 W' w! teconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer6 ?" S( y7 |- n# g" T# V
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
) h9 Z w# x7 T' Q% X, T; kslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
, u; [# F; D" W& R) }- M* mIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
5 l$ x" F/ H5 M! h, Vgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of$ m2 E t3 }# g8 t; `" _- z3 V
price appreciation when compared with 2005. c0 g1 a! B% m8 F) B
$ n2 \7 p: { M( V% P While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
9 R8 d" M3 I: k0 [1 n! w7 @market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and7 V6 x) [4 t0 Z& g5 O l
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
6 w6 [! V z6 ~% Y( X. C+ y1 `are markedly different than those found in the United States.
' n6 s2 _1 A9 H1 c4 Q; f( w: O C$ d3 N3 M( f1 p$ z
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
: c& @, s2 o% P5 |6 ]American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
& x* d& @- ^) w" D2 k/ Bfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
6 i, d0 v x# ?8 L- M3 H4 g" w; ~relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general" I# k5 s& p `' M; e+ o
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
; r% }% }- }: ]- gdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
/ _0 V" W. E8 G. Uaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization5 v6 @7 X6 u: f4 K9 J
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."4 J* M4 ]& a F: W* e. v( f. c
* l7 o1 k, q6 J4 a <<: s9 n9 q/ U) y; \ |( ]( D. |+ y O
REGIONAL SUMMARIES3 u4 B" ~- p8 D4 C1 ?
>>$ Q: `. Q$ F+ R7 @9 H! J
! K8 e" V9 v2 T+ f Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in/ a* Z) J5 y2 R
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
2 ~( Y( \4 m' e t* Vof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
. _2 i+ T ?4 i! j% nlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of+ ?$ o }, N A$ W( a8 V ~
renovations.9 Q5 D/ F# {3 v/ c* S3 z$ U# k
& _. f# K6 p: {8 ~& m: w The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight1 B n# S- Y9 z0 n7 u* w. z6 o
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation: S) j4 O0 F1 S
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
5 k7 E1 H8 X6 h5 n! V4 U% o$ PSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.- q( r0 N3 n9 D
2 L9 W7 L; P/ J8 V The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
5 i7 h( S e2 \* y( f0 i: wslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the% l$ L5 ?/ i* E
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
7 l$ x& W6 i! Z2 S600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
" c5 ^% H# G( O- A9 cto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes# y- n% M) c( C: X
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
; Q' {. L! {$ \/ W! P: }
3 s- v6 l0 V! v( n9 j! L4 S In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
% t( N3 K+ Q* }- j- k3 l/ Pconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
4 _, P$ B# ?9 T( f; @7 L' u1 |0 Zhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers) H. ]' V* w7 F
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
+ C4 ~! G8 F5 Edollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing- P! y; a8 J# F' @0 V* H& N3 n5 B
buyers with more options when looking for a home.' ]& g3 b1 H) Q( J1 Q/ w
7 ^ {$ m4 q- I* c+ X Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
0 V1 S$ q0 j" v8 Tamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes7 Y7 Y- g5 ` B/ d' U0 B- `
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
$ e! H* S( h5 e3 Z% Qas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
$ g% ~2 z* j; C! P9 }4 ffew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.2 z# ~/ W0 m/ G
7 R( R3 z1 M1 h( l3 w( E Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house! t% P5 _1 d3 X: g/ U0 X4 Z5 @
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory/ n- M6 \8 f+ D% ^3 |
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting& I1 Q+ g( `( G: d7 {0 }0 f) u
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
# a& ?; H) I+ q1 Y- u- Twhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
2 C' J6 I: Q* h( V* p7 t1 F4 xpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
' t+ i( \+ ]" umaking a purchase.
7 f" s& o K. `+ M( v" Q, P
* s6 ?; K$ k3 N' E Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing( K! Z E9 q) U& \. S1 P, {( s7 p- j
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong2 K3 S- w* |6 |) ]4 z2 Y0 _# Z
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city4 w+ Z, x& [* S# a& h% N8 @+ e$ S
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting I7 w3 y5 E0 T8 }( z* K; T. y
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
+ L2 W: _0 M7 l% oamenities.
" M7 h2 K" T' B T6 Q* z% `/ Y5 ?+ Q+ ?: k
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
* L$ }' m1 w; w! f' Wthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand6 r) J1 R1 r/ Z9 b2 t
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has3 t3 I8 X8 ?! g* M9 m! G
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been& u8 X5 a( M1 }' |& k/ d
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle4 h. A9 p g% X$ d) U
residence, rather than for investment.
& N; M. W% z2 ~8 y; P8 z* w! N+ V" X" ?1 h H, L
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
" {- J& u) r( E, C" Xhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
! V1 c4 c! p8 F$ `, [9 ?& }) uin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
5 A3 H1 Q8 T) x- Rconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization' D2 ?% H& L. B5 e- D
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter) s2 O# n3 I% O' g' [# S o" D
the market.+ H* e; ~6 p- [6 V; S$ K
$ H; C; [$ f( ^, ^8 v$ C
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
1 }1 o% @+ a5 ?0 N: P! `July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
f; c8 x# L+ IAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
4 `$ s6 [5 |: P. ?! U5 n- nmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due5 ^: G- d( i% T* F, x% f# U9 a1 ]8 d
to the shortage of available inventory.
+ {, S# d7 [( E6 z
2 f/ o( j1 H3 O! i& _ Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its* R( w7 A' v* N5 v9 R
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
4 R/ \7 X, u4 ]+ V ^! Svibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses) T( [. m: A7 {# b/ T* @5 P
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province., k$ \8 ?4 l' p; x+ ]% j1 [
4 C3 T# J% O# ` Z2 O) ^ Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
1 U r7 g3 I7 rin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low7 G8 I* e3 i# r6 f
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
4 g3 B3 D4 D* P5 t- q; u( Fpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring6 F$ N5 F2 O) N% v' s5 A3 B
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
! Q9 S' u" w9 W( E: Mseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
+ J% d# n$ {! e6 q4 E& o- z5 wbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
- Z u9 i1 A" [; V+ [6 p5 y0 Z& n; f
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
- P; @9 [6 M, C* Yas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton, a5 l4 }6 Z" j. O) E; Q% Z
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
' C6 F: o# k" j7 l, Smaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
8 d. p5 G6 o9 y( h! J6 Y, V. c4 Kincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve# y& N3 B# }! ]+ w0 c1 R, B
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
$ w! {; v6 o# `$ ftowards the end of 2006.
0 o' ]% _) N' ?+ l
$ c/ u) O2 m" j1 W$ C3 X# \While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of; B7 F% s+ N1 t8 u5 ?) h
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
/ g) Y5 ]' M" `% W2 U: {to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
: n# q+ H2 P: ], }9 M# `group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
- i( X' g s. v5 z) W* iforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added0 y6 C" C9 D( v
pressure on tight inventory levels.6 \0 v7 Y' Z) K5 [( G8 G5 }& {
; [2 v& ?, w( q Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
_9 b( b7 b, Nfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people( H4 z( D- k+ h! }" d" O
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
7 A* M3 G* q/ F) b3 Q5 wwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
1 l, T P% j z5 N; Ifor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
9 K/ `/ A" o/ d1 {. u$ L& x K" O- a) ]; R+ \/ \
<<
# m4 V- A' n* i Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006. i9 p) i4 {2 F4 ^! R' }( E/ N
. o9 q+ y j8 S, t! {& J( x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 e9 p; F' L2 U- [1 d
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey3 Q" E2 c3 `* j7 p4 y2 }: M0 F0 f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 g* I- @3 `. j, k# u
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3: e& G- C+ J$ `4 T8 |4 s) Q' [
Market Average Average % Change Average Average$ l7 S, D9 Y3 X9 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 x+ W' l1 P3 F8 H; ^
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000& ]1 }2 B+ z* V9 @1 {9 R' s$ v+ @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! l7 H- |- ^: Y. N7 k' l4 _7 `$ W Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
# s7 o& f! t* I, ~# |! ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) ~4 |3 e8 E# L: x; a% _; Y4 D7 b Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
4 H$ w. N+ d# A( E: e2 k4 Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 A6 S; D9 }8 R0 J r
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
5 K9 ^& T/ a) X3 _: Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------- W: ~, \8 [8 n# Y2 q2 }! ?# l
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
# B4 ]9 X/ G) D/ m -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% g8 v& U" H1 F0 x" ~ Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583) I* E# o+ l* O( D& v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 T( P5 M/ Y+ e% |* Y% A5 a: ~ Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1851 Q6 v" b4 G6 a3 c3 @8 }1 o {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& B/ C- z4 h9 D' u- g9 j5 w: |, F$ M Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250; \) i$ d) f4 g, w% r E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: T3 \ ~: b* E5 b
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7664 t6 I% P) C. Z/ q* A, b r" g0 N
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, I* F7 M7 E6 ~2 ?# B
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
8 g# m3 g( B5 R -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' G$ l7 W9 X" B- V" q. e Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
0 K ?$ _1 e& D3 Z% N -------------------------------------------------------------------------! g! ]" L7 R" e+ d! u0 [1 u2 d( ^
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
# ^2 Y' O2 X! P u) g2 ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ w. `. l- B9 v* D8 n5 u7 q
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7143 x1 O9 t7 q# p o( F5 U' r: y! ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 L+ k2 w* V3 b8 P
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500. J! D7 H9 h e4 J; J p4 `7 i$ s* i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 I0 I4 X9 f3 \$ T+ O1 X
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000: Y9 d. ~9 K B5 ~( f' a# H7 D. B4 {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* {" O/ S _' g2 z National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
, s0 o+ [% h. W8 }6 r& e' I -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: F: K7 C5 t9 k j: G- d [% C0 F( i y9 }3 V% b5 I0 H4 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------
- o; n* O# ^; c& n Standard Condominium0 ?2 h' a9 e" k1 n; e @' K; K
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 W% y$ t1 z0 I! P/ y9 q# r 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
: c7 ~! x) k: m1 m9 f" t Market % Change Average Average % Change5 N9 O& v% Y. Q' N% B0 ^* i9 b, n
-------------------------------------------------------------; f9 n3 h3 L) t7 Q' u& ^: I( h
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
2 a3 V3 A& ~1 h. H6 Y- S T -------------------------------------------------------------
% K( I5 _; ]( ~9 D. N0 P5 w Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
7 I# n7 _- B9 d i6 I" f -------------------------------------------------------------
1 J y4 M3 M8 c G/ j4 F Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
/ Z# a4 [" e- c) {9 Q. B ^) }" Q -------------------------------------------------------------/ d! S/ J6 E" |4 T% c
Saint John N/A - - N/A/ T4 a( O% U8 m& i* _' d% C0 c
-------------------------------------------------------------& h6 ^8 h# B5 J2 t! Y1 x/ j
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
# m7 N0 n! h6 P1 v7 P -------------------------------------------------------------
! n" I2 I5 p; ^" k Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%3 V# }: v( s+ }- J) [
-------------------------------------------------------------( H5 K/ E0 A7 n K. M. Z7 v
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
. s/ _% H: H, K' A -------------------------------------------------------------- N) S# x" N" h0 l
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
5 o _8 S/ ~; S& j -------------------------------------------------------------
5 u3 K8 ?# k, L0 n* i& x Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
, l' h% u3 O, g; \0 ~/ N -------------------------------------------------------------
# B8 ^+ O, C7 x0 k) B- S Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
( I: {$ u5 X; ^$ F -------------------------------------------------------------, ?( T+ v% L7 v3 O# U: c) P
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
, F, p; Z5 I# {- u5 ?; F/ A -------------------------------------------------------------3 O, r' f5 ~8 ]5 u: h9 h
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%: W2 ]% A4 \- ]% C ^9 K. k
------------------------------------------------------------- i$ I' l% F2 m8 S& n
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
$ W9 h" U( D3 x3 h( a -------------------------------------------------------------: A( U2 o* _7 P. x6 l ]: o, G
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%' s7 ]& f/ I' A, j, u Q) f6 ]& E
-------------------------------------------------------------6 v/ Y y: e5 F
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
( D: u5 a0 l8 n -------------------------------------------------------------
% f/ p( X( h: V) \ National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
! ?& K8 y7 h$ V! y -------------------------------------------------------------
$ D, K) ]: o- b" a >>
& M3 _, z" R3 m2 B6 n6 G; S' `# ~; ]8 |: j0 z' v; q' K
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
# `! R; f; ]' `in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint; w. c( c1 m1 b- \
John and Victoria.; e) Y- w% f: z5 x: _
, Z9 ]- }# a9 r; m) {% z& [+ b2 ^ The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most% n6 r6 W" R& ? [2 Y# O7 e
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
8 Q4 I/ Y8 B: h7 shousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release) }/ A9 Z" ~1 u+ [3 ^
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
" Y' ~7 q# a* J1 U1 q) utrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
d1 p2 C; W- b/ J8 \- ^# `across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is# l( A. K" y9 t9 R" y
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current* Y" O& n/ m' R: a! Q
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable9 a: k: ~2 w2 }$ ?4 j
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on2 ?6 F+ | i; l3 w
November 15, 2006.
5 Y7 O6 v3 d; C5 B* y3 ` Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
0 }, K5 `8 T j0 S. O8 Y8 {6 Mfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge6 e+ F: g9 n8 k1 e
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
& Q2 @* ?# p9 t1 \3 `6 N3 navailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|