埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2293|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
8 w: s+ u, E* I
* @* {: t. Y$ C) E/ U- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
2 s; }4 c" Y% B7 @  J- b. @& q- t6 a" g* Y
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
: G. f3 D& @& p, T9 lexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third" i6 S. R" o4 R; o8 c" G, P1 _
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
: C% m9 {4 t' I+ [% k7 I7 iin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit( G' {. J+ e6 V
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
! W! A# v5 ?; z* B: O9 W! X: Bmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,( h# @1 T9 V9 [) S' S  u
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
! z4 z& |4 n) OLePage Real Estate Services.1 {. C$ G" n# N' I3 A3 @

- U4 g: ^$ U) Z6 T# T4 j    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters. H# F8 R" |0 Q+ C
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
* S" T- F1 k' J% \- Cconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
  |6 J8 N* i  J( b, Msound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
4 g6 }0 r% K7 z: C1 F/ j! N8 A* ]residential real estate sector.
% k; v8 M+ q2 [2 a4 k: D
: V4 |2 _0 ]9 h* `8 A    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation! F" r( _% b: r/ I8 Q
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)" t+ S# l, Y# r* b7 N' i# O" g
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
" M  W  P: ^; m) f  d(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
% G9 h5 E8 h$ _" [* n+ j(+13.2%).
* o3 P0 Y1 P2 c! Y
+ T2 H$ B$ Y, V4 P' i  E8 k" V    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
# v& o3 j: b' Yduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the% a" ~2 L* V. x2 F
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
! p8 x0 v1 }( j/ u+ }: ~1 jpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,& `9 U4 N6 m' v
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
8 A: _) D" d4 ~/ m  ~0 c% m4 `"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
- L: w, Z4 D$ K' x9 I3 @welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
& g+ V9 P7 b3 }8 o/ f7 h- mbalanced market."
* X( ]/ b9 l) h9 N1 `
' I4 n  b" c+ O8 a9 V8 u    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
+ G  T+ J7 }* G: B% {3 tconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift0 h1 ?) L& u7 R* d: |
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued, _+ L/ U6 h- ?3 h
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
8 {9 r# m8 u( M/ U% x% d7 tenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,- U* t. [/ G% h' N  \
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
/ |4 n0 G9 d2 k0 j' k5 hbreaking price appreciations.
8 t/ L% _6 c; w/ p9 @2 @
$ x2 ^. f8 H& W7 N2 N) @( a+ {4 Y    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding2 b* {' o2 {! s0 y. x: b
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the, w7 n( }  U; A6 l
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
- m; e& p5 Z/ Q% u3 t" V& X# \$ f. _* q0 _% N2 g0 O& S
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid* `- e& Z8 {+ ~' Y7 `* W7 t& _
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
3 g. b2 Z! _  ^, Z2 r5 W1 qconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
# ~) o& m; _  k4 d0 N& E  ]9 P3 kslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
" I& ]# A  x* v7 i0 e; o: m. T3 o3 HIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
0 c9 X1 y5 @$ `: C& e) Qgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of( _) Y- V" c5 w6 U& V' w/ o1 Q2 e
price appreciation when compared with 2005.; r7 _6 B* v: o+ [' A, v  m
5 m/ Z- z) ]( I4 s% S
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
8 ]8 V4 V5 z. d2 G. K# Qmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and" \& v9 T# H) n* v% K
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada8 ~+ i6 M/ p8 D% I+ a$ g7 A5 g2 E
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
/ e$ D- N9 ^. z/ s1 W9 F# F# L9 W) R: u0 C* t5 u' q* ], f
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
' s% s8 [! l2 \7 |# \7 ?  w3 B0 fAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
4 p) p3 C/ j( l. }7 O) yfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
, ~, L" s, l6 g4 y- t6 trelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general8 ?/ @7 ?1 h- c# K; M/ X6 @
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
5 n- ]5 w1 A/ E, U) Tdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
2 w4 K: d: e. Y9 T( m" waggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
) `* m% D8 r2 E* pmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."; M0 D+ B7 k$ A

; n; B% q6 d6 y( i    <<
( l  y+ \; h. z) }4 P* x                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES2 p# e# U2 o0 X; F
    >>4 X& Z" K9 W: F# C

" L0 P9 j3 `  Y; B0 a  r6 Q7 W    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
6 J7 o: m+ h8 w6 g4 ]2 vHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
, K, M9 W$ s5 @of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
% y( p: t* h. k! ulooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
" o$ ~" W1 _7 `& `% U" s( zrenovations.
/ E: Z, g  q$ Q- k" Q
6 @7 F# v1 i. h$ w5 `7 q! ~; n4 A    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
' Q# _6 ~4 _8 u0 H7 G/ t: u0 Q" N9 Cincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
/ |( n7 E) y0 K4 I$ ycompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and  N9 h1 K6 k2 R  p
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
; _' O& s' H1 p. X: D1 d, A/ F+ K% M( f9 j# i/ x
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
- |3 r3 V! G- {6 N+ Kslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
0 u& U, s2 ~) d5 I0 Hquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new* k) G9 a1 T6 ~
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
% c! }7 x6 \+ I2 Oto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
! [2 ?- D& d" iand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.. o# \, B4 {/ x9 a. d
$ x' u) r" F) l1 Q
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
' I; ?. K, ^0 Sconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
2 r5 f) D6 v3 ]# f- Zhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
( U) ~( b. f  A9 U9 Gwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
0 S( F$ s$ n+ \+ Wdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing0 R' ?, ~) R2 ?2 {1 L
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
2 ^4 H( H, G- g4 W3 [3 Q6 f3 J" ~7 |( d
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly# A! S4 {  F& p' w8 x
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
- k+ s7 N1 T: n; B+ m+ C; C' Spriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
7 Y2 ?. i7 p# D: pas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last8 |4 S$ ]1 G3 J1 D! F0 v
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.! d8 E) x. V. ], e6 s3 o6 K, F: o

- d4 L. Z( D8 ~+ A4 k    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
$ q0 R# d( j# R3 }: \prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory6 O/ \1 J. h4 }9 I% I) h( Z
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
  m1 S, L2 H. ~. C* K" c/ X1 xfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
$ |' w8 I0 S3 V/ Q. P/ cwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
7 K/ E+ [4 D+ z# [5 ^+ spressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
4 D' z. I8 X+ `+ a% Lmaking a purchase.( ~8 y6 k9 k) U' R' U9 I1 O1 p
8 ^5 C7 U0 ~/ K  H8 Z) j
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing$ G* G1 [1 g  ^, g& Z
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong4 g( O5 ?9 _# M: O
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city' H0 S. [) L# R# A
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting% i' h) E! D8 U+ i* S2 M
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown% O; }$ i5 t* X& M
amenities.
4 h* o, i( J# Z( ?6 [1 K; T& ?  w/ j
3 n% j. k3 S7 \! ?3 E: ~( {8 A    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels9 T6 w1 T- R' r0 |
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand1 \* T* K  d. ~4 N# Z6 a+ v$ D4 s/ R. _
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has- h1 g6 W8 h* d# [- Q: `
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
. m( ^3 \- ?& p0 J* X* ?- Wdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle3 P4 f8 q3 q* k- J8 d6 p/ G
residence, rather than for investment.# ?& h& w8 P4 y% I

% n4 T7 J1 l7 P1 t    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
1 ^3 z( w  V$ E/ y- Uhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted5 T3 ?$ j7 ?/ @, N  b
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
) }+ a& {9 G% [* z5 I/ L" Bconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
; b4 e. i3 s& L# O1 j3 R& \rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
' K/ ?/ e& j5 U" X! Sthe market.! t. O1 ]' w' {! r% y* a, V

% `, H8 W' ?. f7 q# b  t    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
% k( t8 |8 I- P" p( TJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
0 ~! U% ^1 W1 m' PAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
8 y) X/ E6 l- g% z0 N) Gmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due, M; x5 Q* `: \" O
to the shortage of available inventory.
9 a# ?5 r5 z: a2 i( \0 m
& ^2 I% {9 j7 [1 }: d    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its4 _$ g/ t4 p* ^/ U
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains( m$ w; i0 e6 V! H0 B$ U1 Z
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
% X, r6 u/ c* C& t! }3 i4 ~struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.* C- _' J( j5 v) n4 _) K4 X

; n5 c, j+ {9 r+ `* s) B    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
$ C( v0 ?: G  x: q7 H; q4 Y, p, Xin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low: k. W: m0 C0 L4 G" Q; ?+ l, r
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that, B. M* d4 E/ m" u8 L5 ?; i$ P
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring& ?: p1 }) Q. s) a
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
4 Y- K8 h) F+ Q4 W/ C3 R' aseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
4 e% @& s$ ~* m4 Ebuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
+ O4 x5 }; X# n. G2 B9 T9 `
; l. l# F. ]! i& `4 Z% p- Y0 f
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter5 b" m/ |' W1 z1 c8 N" k+ [6 }8 i( K
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
; f1 c4 q9 |+ x0 v3 e; qremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
4 ?' T7 i" I) n! m9 o* C6 Tmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices' t1 G& k* V1 P. y6 v
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
8 G6 E. m5 P! w% s1 ]4 Oin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
: f; w( F( I- @! R! |# {towards the end of 2006.
   
0 e& ]. j, [. w$ p* w8 z- T9 w6 d1 U; o* ~$ D
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of+ S0 v( U) U! u. M
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
4 D/ R7 D  D" j: ]8 C/ eto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
6 Q; G) l! T6 |9 h  K; \, ygroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
1 v* {$ V8 d4 S! @foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
5 J. f* D+ d4 f; B- C+ |9 K5 }pressure on tight inventory levels.
" D. ~8 C5 m6 O7 i7 ?: V) X: n  D" E' {5 F) v+ T$ R
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic* q* t/ d1 M4 V/ }
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
1 u9 f% ]2 t& m) M3 O. ?: G- ainto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
% ~) ?, E+ O# `! Gwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching( Z9 ~5 U" l5 i' c% x
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.) Q) C, u5 v3 d- B$ G  Z6 l6 u

+ ~5 K  e6 W( q3 Z& r4 W( G    <<
; i! ~/ m- T" h      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
' P' I. r8 b5 t5 _1 [: [. K2 s: c: O4 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! {  y6 {6 x, m. w5 R& f                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey5 Y' Z. ~4 |( m5 N$ J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  y) @* p5 d, l) t$ S0 y                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
% {) `& a7 l. J( i. j- z" }    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
6 @) U6 g/ r0 D- |; c1 k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' }: i: W% ]) j  I. j4 z9 |    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000+ \9 c. q7 o- r6 I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, R/ D: I7 c. F5 r2 j  _    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
8 ~; ]4 D5 G9 n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 g1 W0 u5 ~; S! u7 l" p    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000" E" a- ?% Q: ~2 A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# B5 V/ o3 G) m& a: P1 m5 A1 S    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -# _; x- J3 b1 E0 u* E1 v0 T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 O) D2 c: T  r: C
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
  f1 A! @7 |0 _$ A4 y5 i6 n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 }8 F8 {' ^7 B7 ~3 Y  [
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
& e$ O) r8 K% a7 O  s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. b" [8 f) g9 S# h6 U' z4 w& `    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
' C: D6 q- r* b* n3 x* k* t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! [" Q% M$ a7 j9 S4 ^/ I" G    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
4 M) J- G! S8 M0 B    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 A( U4 i, `8 X" \) s) p. j+ N2 {    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
+ l, p* m2 r  r; m. m    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 T  G. `/ t# Q/ h
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707/ D- X8 m4 h/ c0 C$ [- w* W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( m) G- b6 z3 P* U8 B) v, t' Y    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500. E8 n9 e5 x; q1 z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ j! {3 P* E9 g6 M
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389, d& x3 V7 ^: k9 z' m3 @4 x
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 a& k7 R, \7 A* o) b) [5 [    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
! Y* f) Y3 I. Z) n% Q2 |+ ?    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% ?4 Y4 i2 }2 X8 W
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
" W! ~& {8 Y+ M, C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 |1 j) b0 W' d( e  e8 N" P    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
6 b: `, e4 t- Z% ~0 U  j    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' |* U! N# T' z) M    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860% [8 u) z- N0 f- Z) Y9 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 Y5 A/ g) a3 V8 c8 i5 X4 X/ B: C5 J4 {$ W- T  |3 l
    -------------------------------------------------------------* `. K' F" s. t4 z  @9 e
                               Standard Condominium
2 z+ Z4 _0 U6 X$ M. f5 u* t5 M6 q    -------------------------------------------------------------$ u( M+ i! e5 h1 L3 \+ b4 n
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo( g5 Z' U3 X: q1 O# p: K
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
8 C( e7 P" z% ]/ v    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 w& U0 {  t3 y* U. O  @- X' s2 R! b    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%% V7 A+ u% S8 U( z
    -------------------------------------------------------------* A3 N# P' i9 e
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%8 W! A, X) G: ~9 ^; f  `- ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& P' |4 g2 X' S7 I/ Z7 ]    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A" N3 J3 O/ B% E/ S: C
    -------------------------------------------------------------) Z  {  M* g7 X) K4 K0 @, a6 r4 m
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A$ O1 h' V: H8 H" V' x
    -------------------------------------------------------------' X' d7 i  Q' u4 O7 G
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
9 A" ~) t: ?% _( U, F7 Z: H    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 p! H; \8 ~) n. t    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
* _4 T2 q& N! [  p2 a    -------------------------------------------------------------! C5 e: d' w% [4 g' [( @  x  r
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%" `5 C8 o5 ]" P2 i6 }: T; {$ a
    -------------------------------------------------------------! A9 v% c$ j% a5 O. B/ [0 ]
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%& v' T/ z6 p3 g( q9 w6 j
    -------------------------------------------------------------
! l. {; L# v* ]. ^9 Q% f    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
7 J1 {$ h  u8 `9 e    -------------------------------------------------------------
' w, ^/ \; c6 K    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
1 {( }( A# K) Z& O9 o9 E- L) ^$ V    -------------------------------------------------------------0 s4 d" y( F+ E
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
, F3 ~1 W3 }, y    -------------------------------------------------------------
" u6 g# p- w0 k" b$ y( z5 ]    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%5 V% `* b1 J+ C
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 i8 P" X0 ^% G( N" N2 E3 h    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
2 N: f% ?1 F7 x' ]: \* K    -------------------------------------------------------------
, Z' O# T+ _- q; R3 T    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%8 S9 ?8 E# |! a! T/ z
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 f1 K2 X4 r9 V; \' u, {& D
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
- ]! U: K3 _  `: e9 c, {3 P, K    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ |7 A; [! z! j" K: K! C  y; G; F1 ?    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
# L" ]5 V/ r0 F  T* Z    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 p7 A7 F8 S+ ^. g    >>
. G1 l- p9 Y! _, N1 C- `
/ e$ ?4 F; q; Z/ k    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined8 {* E1 v8 P3 n: t- o
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint2 h. m* W9 ?$ W* p0 C' y
John and Victoria.' n9 I" N  T8 y( ~$ e  d
9 ]3 e  [* Y, g8 X
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most" j' ^7 X9 J5 a6 y2 _: z9 y
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of: C7 \/ z4 K" }: h# P
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release. Q8 D4 m' {! `5 _  G
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price1 K5 o7 ]! C  G- T8 u
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
( P* |  ~' R! b- e0 M: gacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is, F( g% X" I6 |; E8 X* U
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
  K* A  X2 W( a" @" p, sfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable" z, s5 D" Z  [" k/ d. o* |
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on3 u3 A9 u. f8 \4 q! I
November 15, 2006.
' N1 V+ l5 J/ a* d) `0 m1 G    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
1 G$ p/ ]1 p6 c4 `7 V0 bfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge  y" e2 L1 x7 t; O
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is9 Z# A# f8 G" \* V
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-29 07:33 , Processed in 0.117047 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表