埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2443|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 3 d# q# ~9 }0 F, J, s' B

) y& t" M8 e& _% I1 b# _( g0 G- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
; f! i' G* F" C* g1 @* K) V. w, m) R/ D( l; D% i) f4 q7 f
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
0 D6 Z; r3 |' W, Uexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third% q2 w/ }$ ?) U# _7 u8 y
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
- `; w: ?* h% ~) ^; q( ?in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
$ R" e" f( t0 B9 K8 |price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and$ c2 O, V+ B  o) C8 P" ~( n  p
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,+ n) O3 Z9 s+ F8 _* P. C7 E# W
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal+ y: J9 q  n8 n- v! S0 K' Q0 `/ _
LePage Real Estate Services.
3 J2 C( G6 D! v2 v* H& f* l1 y7 F4 f! m0 N* l1 T7 k/ T0 `% j
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters4 m6 ~! Y; S1 M9 v
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
1 ^% u1 y1 y6 n; W( [conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and3 I# v7 _# m- Q& |+ t
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the# R$ }) B9 s5 s& h+ R
residential real estate sector.7 _7 L# o$ {- H- Z7 }

% i: N4 T$ m# \) p( |  @7 m& c    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
9 p/ w" f" V, t( Moccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
. m2 v- z$ s) B" P) Q! Hyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
" w2 S, Y- U# s' f0 ^(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3806 ~! t0 R/ h9 \% V  o- |+ d! u
(+13.2%).5 L" U* q, E1 X9 w

# @- \$ k9 k$ F$ k1 g    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth. M, d  {" }. K# u7 c" W, \8 C, D: O
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the' W4 P. a$ y) v& I/ g# {1 F
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are3 B% @4 n% O& ]# U
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
# F, B" p6 e5 f) c# g9 W) n9 }president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
. W9 t. p8 P: N8 L"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
  ^& o, ?$ |& m$ Qwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy0 E$ Y& _4 P4 n: W, q
balanced market."
- m; i1 G1 X3 M% P, d4 r9 Q1 j8 t' [" B) [, j, N" o
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
, K& |& W: O2 ]9 K) _considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
0 k0 y( k( @" Y. G+ @to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
2 }& {, W8 L1 H- d9 P  Ythroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core* [. @" T9 a6 E2 E5 H$ k$ ]
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,* h; g- S: ^' ]* A+ {8 M, J
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record! P% Q0 |& D# _0 c
breaking price appreciations.- G) u% N8 T9 L' ^: O9 Z
3 x# u4 P% F4 B8 ~, q
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding, Q3 P) }& a$ l1 U1 n( C
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
* G& V7 ^$ f# _3 slargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
5 d$ B( R; p; G8 G  ?
" f/ j8 p6 E5 k/ l) V9 T! }    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
1 |1 v8 w0 @& h, b2 B" heconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
; b% h% m+ X; ]0 `9 _' gconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off9 @8 t' U* z3 L
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.% ^: U% A0 y0 ]% O
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
2 H% m0 m6 M8 X9 dgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
, ?6 D) Y# U& S% H3 L: Uprice appreciation when compared with 2005.  Y$ @: }' L7 U. N) m8 t1 I  }3 i

. T$ A: e, V9 f/ x: M    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
/ P" ^' l# x% _5 v, M0 o& s# ymarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and: ?) Q' o( C( h; {
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
- `, P# q: d- Y/ Aare markedly different than those found in the United States.. ~- ]0 n( ~/ k1 l
) U, O; r% N, D
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the/ q8 N/ ^- j  R; C$ S9 I
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's  s7 Y' u* q0 {
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the! U( Z! h5 D/ t# D
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general; a$ E, B$ p1 X1 a, S
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the! p1 d  e& C( F7 Z
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and/ v$ Y4 A. ~8 R4 D% e0 b; ^4 b
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization5 ~- W" m; v; ^0 s1 y
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."/ U& V7 w: }, M0 \( p3 S$ [) D
. B) ], b2 {- r5 }, q5 m
    <<% b- B( A: e' u; }) J
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
4 r! o& f5 v0 Z) _  L+ H    >>
/ t. X% |& \! x2 F9 x+ u5 t* T+ A4 b
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in$ D0 c% ^( U5 b' w
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
2 W; D' S* P9 o8 x0 Q+ `1 C' E: mof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time5 v! [. H+ l! I0 z
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
% p: g: {  o8 z6 ?* l8 r, N9 grenovations./ k% c4 ?7 n$ D6 E4 V3 N
, m2 ?/ N! W( j1 [' ~! c" r0 p7 d
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight% G* N, L3 ?1 M1 @+ H: B% y
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
: Z" v! q" f+ ^& P, Ccompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
4 U& U5 P) h1 D4 t1 JSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.8 Y. n' e& m7 B4 Y. m$ D

# O: x/ e1 }, h1 G    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer* }  g' ]0 o  j6 Z
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the3 S/ @. y/ E" m# \. z6 h" u( b
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
5 ?+ N4 e6 Y9 U6 t+ P600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores- y7 H! |5 ]4 ]
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
8 U0 }! N% e; x/ Z5 n: V9 ~  Pand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.: m( T$ [2 }. f/ ~

& U" I, K# J5 h" R/ x) K    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
( |: S6 [; s: o. [7 z% vconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
) v& b/ [, ^9 Khomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers+ x3 [9 b0 [  U  V5 A2 l6 r1 n
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian+ [9 ], F+ o; [; n( Z& ~
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
$ t$ V/ {+ a7 Y8 g) o* _8 Rbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
! d  I7 T+ |0 D, u' Z5 d$ u0 C. k6 N: r
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
3 C1 N* F+ r: ]; O% \9 @9 wamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes' ]# `6 F% i2 O3 W; U7 }
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
# @* J5 \8 d/ w, z8 d! |7 K4 S5 ^as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last5 k5 m( p6 {& T8 i; ^( M; t
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
$ R" E# X4 K' ~
% Q2 x3 ?+ @) j    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
- O- w4 o, ^, @4 _1 V) {$ |prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory6 M3 z6 E& A; f' A( B
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting: E9 A( S0 ~, b' y8 H3 X
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
. |! i( ^' l3 O# c* l. Kwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the: m* C$ P1 O5 K4 W3 @1 d8 Q
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
4 V& J% e  Y" J  h& I( }making a purchase.4 J" f- t. x2 G. p7 Q$ p
+ Z; m1 i% q, [; A1 y' f0 a" T
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
* u; b: ^1 G" q+ @markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
9 s* @- H, R+ i, Cconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
8 i3 q: J6 {2 ~centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
7 T' }, K7 B3 q# K, Y" U7 X9 tattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
0 w8 R* L+ W2 P2 Eamenities.
7 H) h# F7 s1 W+ }- y3 |. Q7 x0 h, U" e) D8 @
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels; ]3 |2 a, s5 `; O( u
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
9 ]8 G" M; m+ s- m" J% e& oacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has, G  \7 w5 e4 Z$ t) U" C( P
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
9 d5 l* B: e/ D; f7 L9 v7 P5 b% _driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
; B% e" u  z( a) I3 f0 jresidence, rather than for investment.) @) V, F4 |* @* J5 n
7 b! Y. q+ v, J7 r; ~9 R# |
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
# A: d4 K" C$ g: }house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted9 K0 ?! x) w' B( Y
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer4 M: s7 G; |( ^  A& z8 C2 `; B
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization# z- \' f% g# ]( z$ w
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
" \/ g: j1 [) @6 q6 E# a3 ithe market., p1 X) C' J: O% g

, H2 ^; i* P! F' t& |( H    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
$ j/ V9 V) i! t9 q( `  ^  ZJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
2 U  `$ ^3 }  c$ S: P0 _9 [August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring6 f) M1 g3 B7 o5 k/ H$ J: |
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due' b" h' n: U( g( K" u) a# `! O4 y
to the shortage of available inventory.6 O5 p: f% q  ^6 B4 F

, X% i: R% g% p# B% T7 e1 U: b: R    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
! q7 b0 z3 J# X' Z/ d; Smomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains) a) {' m6 ^, G% g0 N" ?4 s
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
) ~/ @% x# Z" |! ~struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.6 N8 i  R+ |' s$ L, y
- Y& e& d( b% D! i
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases2 u7 p* i6 _( T% z. `* ]
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low, R( j6 O9 _- e# L5 }& g
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that. A& D# T3 p+ A6 Z: q' h& F1 W1 i
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
& h2 T! _& x- ]prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer. c0 E6 H1 `# H7 u: @8 d
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
7 N  E0 h2 H4 [buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

( q- I& s4 p% i* D0 ~
) O2 ^2 R( V; p    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter" g7 M3 \+ r, ]" C" `
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton0 [- c2 F+ m, o" O2 Y
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
% K, v# ]$ F! I6 P+ U$ t3 `- Y- Cmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
- e/ t( t7 D' O' rincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve3 d: Q" K' \; Z6 ~1 L9 a8 N- U
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
/ S5 z' u; g! U$ itowards the end of 2006.
    / o- t! `% l& Q' |

; r6 U, n  v4 O8 g: ?# Z/ RWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
" I+ x) u8 Y& Y( ]* H( `7 xinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
: j3 W6 d7 w/ f  [to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse  K/ L9 k/ p+ }# D1 K+ L
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
3 q) t, d8 G9 Uforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
4 s% _% ]/ X8 _1 \& jpressure on tight inventory levels.
' u8 l- L3 q/ C- Y4 u, g% G7 n2 B0 f0 X, U# \: A) X
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic8 s( m  B" }0 O5 |1 e: v1 b* h% T
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
& C4 F7 i* \1 cinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;1 b9 T. F% @: Q! s- H! r" B
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
6 A) a+ k' Q9 q7 k  ^6 L" Y7 cfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.; Z- T- z- X; M- o' D% F

& S* q% y# }1 B8 s# ~    <<
. U# F. J2 y! z2 r, G& E      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20066 o& q, h4 b% c' |

; \' [+ j% v5 f# v. h, p# `+ I    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. N5 ~# O- M6 J1 d8 v& o                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
8 T' ]! ]3 M8 n1 R) ~2 b! w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- O- p) s0 x( b3 e% x8 h                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q35 ~$ V$ L* k0 }4 |% `5 [
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average+ s& c! a$ }4 b2 D* X) b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 B3 U. Q' a5 t" I! T/ B; s7 v4 a
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000" b9 b' Z; t' |9 ]/ k, Z% }
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) y' R5 k/ i: |7 L5 u    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000* {  q4 }* Y& d* E" b8 H1 `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* k$ r. ?) J/ F
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0000 ]6 {9 {! j) X% X! m7 e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 b+ Z1 o5 d5 q* ]; q    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
6 v) @  |) T/ Y  B2 g- p    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 E1 @$ G9 `3 {  q, {7 u
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
  M* @- F! w" F& T. y% f; f0 b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ R2 s- b+ |% q/ d$ ~) V    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5837 I2 s# q: _5 O# ?0 y4 [. E" h0 P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 V% q: {+ T" f$ N' r  s
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185, Y$ H2 A; J* T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 H( [, j/ F- R! i3 l  v) z( V    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250, L1 r1 f. v' K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 F) ^0 `, c* s4 z; Z5 k
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
1 k  ]* \$ W2 h% w: E    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 ?1 v% l! i5 Q3 m    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
0 X; D. K# d) E3 Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- N; _& y8 U% e: S    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
3 @: C2 W, h; N6 k0 T2 A2 J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! K8 h3 d! o! D0 X3 P1 j
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
9 `+ A9 j1 n: Y( Y' `    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# W( }2 q% ?0 f3 B9 }1 F    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714$ ]5 }5 |, t" {* G0 w# b& Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 T; V, n0 X! l  u6 f    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
$ D7 f6 G) b! q0 u6 b' z6 X& v. g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 |5 D* |* F1 h6 i1 X* |7 S
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
& n& w: L6 z1 l8 j    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 u$ z; [1 |2 V! i; _
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
% s6 T  i9 B/ D# B, v& c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 @0 P$ b" H% F8 P3 y3 R5 s4 P
% G* x; w! M' P* Y+ G- \    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ t' J" k' D; V+ w& f                               Standard Condominium: V& E/ z: ^8 Z  X6 S, L! A  O
    -------------------------------------------------------------
* `' u) g& z; Y' M) Q' h                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
  @4 H! p7 `) n" X) z    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
8 c( X3 R' Q9 ~9 L" a0 E    -------------------------------------------------------------
' D3 K. Q, }$ }0 U) h    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
# H& L6 i: z) w; [' a$ }    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 V6 y. b/ D8 l' C    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%# f: t6 D+ [  _0 X! K$ j
    -------------------------------------------------------------
* i% l' p  G" O    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
; n1 q+ A* V3 J; T3 o2 q3 \$ K    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 |% v, p2 |3 {- N    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A6 O' K" c8 R/ y0 l1 {1 q  l3 Q9 }
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 B: U  P2 ?2 X/ _+ ?- ^
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
# h+ l9 T! o3 I" Q) S. m% x+ G1 W    -------------------------------------------------------------9 L$ u: O7 C/ t+ s+ {7 s. C& U
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%1 V/ V: }3 {* @! H+ |
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 p, ^$ t% l) [0 f    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
/ h* v& a( D) K+ K    -------------------------------------------------------------" W0 g& e) q4 F& s
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%; m6 ]0 Y! A5 ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------- n5 Q" k6 ~6 ]% a) A$ M0 P* V& H
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%7 ^% V" X% O% }. k
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" i' ~. @& J' @2 o5 e    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
7 i$ d+ J+ S& R$ m' e' q: a    -------------------------------------------------------------( i! U* t% F  H: c$ q
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%$ `! q' g9 C5 i/ N- I+ e4 R" }
    -------------------------------------------------------------8 ?" j! F, }, t. ?) u
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
; V8 [- n6 |7 I# G3 T    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 M3 i- O. D* _    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
; f' J5 W6 J8 h% q5 b) q    -------------------------------------------------------------8 Q" a) `1 y& b& W, O
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%( o/ ^! q# G% ^0 p
    -------------------------------------------------------------- U8 m& }( M- p7 j6 e  Z
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
( b8 h: G9 i, ~1 B( L    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 n" L# k/ i9 A: i( h( C" s- m    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%( M: {  S6 b5 `4 K7 `$ S
    -------------------------------------------------------------
! x: M6 H/ r, S5 K: N0 s    >>" D3 D% @4 M8 [. Y* ?, e6 y* k- t
4 s* z. V6 X2 u0 ~, v* m3 A
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
' G( {+ ?8 k2 I. a0 y* q% g" K% Vin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint% w- x4 B8 g8 @% z
John and Victoria.1 M6 s" A! x; C% \' {* S
/ C9 V4 s' c* O, Q1 I9 o
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
" _, r' r3 c: ]: E; |comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of5 W! q* Z  F1 V: k
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release) a4 I5 j3 g, i7 }" M0 C: R
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
5 i5 g3 r; R* N9 X$ ^' btrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
0 Z* b1 [! c8 d1 E1 m. Q9 ~. Oacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is' K7 m2 a9 f6 ?
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
9 U0 M" n* T( T# L* e, p/ m3 _figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
" L( ~/ B! _1 I' v2 [: C  |version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
7 O" @4 p& F0 C7 k, j* T- }November 15, 2006.* _8 i6 i! r5 F* A, T  ~. |: k3 _
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of& S% Z- J* u. I. V9 W% _) C$ ]- w
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
( W* T7 _0 M. `; J& b# c: e# `provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
* O! A6 c$ C2 d" i' W" Aavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-5-8 10:23 , Processed in 0.117584 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表