 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
4 k( F& p2 j' x& r3 I
2 O" z; Q. u) y r; G/ l0 L- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -! \* \5 l. M8 l8 V7 E9 u
, `/ y; m" l# s' B
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
% O: q7 e2 \: e5 uexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third( v* V- ?0 _ H
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic4 w; k7 @) z1 ?, z' K( A
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit1 A0 G6 L) w1 D. j3 c' A
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
: w- { x# t/ ?' o# H6 R2 Mmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
) O6 i P* e( S4 `8 i" qQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal- ]' @6 ^9 X5 J
LePage Real Estate Services.
6 `' X2 t: `4 |0 g! b
. }3 W( P: f9 F Y7 s Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters( }7 D# j: z N1 k
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic; j2 p$ C; K h2 G6 V9 e
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and5 G1 h9 [8 m( v5 Y |% n
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the" \0 `9 B6 q; M& x) L
residential real estate sector.
0 ^1 N! w* G9 h$ E8 }+ Y1 r9 E( ?( j' j' b% l ?# W0 I- i% K
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
! A2 g- e* U" L3 R& j; loccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
# F! u, \0 D; ayear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
, [% g( f5 `) y5 u+ t( \(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3809 L% S5 S- _2 \% K6 s: R% s
(+13.2%).
& P! J4 I0 S6 }! N/ f6 R& s
2 \( o6 A' h% o" g "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
) g, K' b2 j+ r1 ?2 u: r" r2 Bduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
* ?" O8 E' W% |$ O/ A) |frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are9 X s$ Q f; ~5 O. K$ E2 Y
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,- C# m) R( `2 ^6 k
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.% H5 @" r: n; w. i/ `% e
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
. O! f: A) h3 K! _6 Zwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
; G4 x4 U. H! k; O+ _8 s" cbalanced market."
v) M# ]( m( b# F) I( ~# w1 l$ F8 n# ~3 t8 g
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,* J8 S6 U; t P( s+ E
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift. i' d, y: ?1 H0 g
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued8 }9 s3 i' f2 f" o0 P
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
4 ?8 b% c( n9 V: W7 a/ y6 y# M/ Xenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,) s) V ?+ E, e- k' }+ }
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record% q: p9 l& g2 G( C
breaking price appreciations.
7 Y( v) g- x/ D
# i( o7 y2 y ~* @ Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
2 m" O! Y" h, |4 s* oeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
, [: _) r+ W5 W* v6 ?3 G' clargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.% B" b9 J7 Z; ] t% S; y
' f" f. u$ j! { ` In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
- f3 t3 N+ C; e6 i7 Zeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer& _; k! }* K- k; x0 N, C) r6 l' O
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off) K$ p5 c- W# T4 i1 @0 o
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth./ D, t: V3 @ a- s" d& b5 N( U
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers: A. t, E/ i) Q* R
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
; Z% [' o1 U. {$ \; E: y" iprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
) P5 }0 T* G% H, ?
7 ]( _3 H7 e0 ~ While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
/ h ^+ o( Z f0 G& Omarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and: J' l% b+ d/ J# W; n
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
9 V, O4 j# } G6 Oare markedly different than those found in the United States.
2 v9 [% C2 Z/ y- X
( _ a, z. U4 n! F2 y; { Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the- A4 G2 r) n( |
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's3 P% p/ z& ^3 w
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
# ]0 g/ |% m5 l% O8 E4 M2 hrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
5 u, k, H' q% z$ t" c% I3 @affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the# j6 ^& M" K) X
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and+ _8 ^1 H6 a. J |+ p5 k
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization& t- Y! m2 A3 s
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
8 x8 x1 L D8 \4 ]9 U0 |" y( m
4 r8 D R* r1 y' I! A5 t8 t% [: D <<2 W6 ^2 I" T' m% {7 {0 R4 o; W
REGIONAL SUMMARIES! o- J) |4 q0 N+ I
>>8 N. P6 H2 ?. v: m* _
1 l7 K2 ~% L4 ^( J
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
7 j6 m/ x; t4 O. |& [; g; F" Q0 _: wHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
: t) Q+ q4 j- ?- C5 Nof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
5 S) E' V, r* G p; k8 Flooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
1 c/ t9 C' O2 p) U z* x" urenovations.
0 `. A% ]3 b% Z/ ]9 v" Y/ g3 c7 T
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight: G }% U+ p6 J: x! C: x
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation% j4 Y7 _! I, P {( o
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
/ {& d, g5 m7 N2 z+ _( LSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
O: }- m3 J( _8 F5 U$ S3 {6 P: \8 E- z) c, Z
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer6 z; |2 v9 P; ~
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the- O7 s4 C3 g; ]" E
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new6 ?6 N: P# f) @. _& C- H* u, `
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores* a2 Q9 H. o! u5 G' e8 I
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes7 z; O; k5 k( K9 N; ~ R
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.2 K6 b2 `5 I; e; q
6 v- t6 v) P' [9 x# k+ [7 V% u
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
5 h. @6 U: v2 f0 l# qconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
: a4 w f) ^! `# K6 @( q' Qhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
# ^" o6 l, o8 ]; l4 [was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian9 P& C2 j% k2 E, W" D( e0 m
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing6 c. @1 k0 ?2 C! M; f$ O& e
buyers with more options when looking for a home.1 Z2 z r& I' [0 a
. a/ p6 h5 T( t( Y( K Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly# l: I9 W6 M, q& s. r. c. T
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
& ]2 I' S6 u& @priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,1 F# C* o5 w$ d- m2 O7 C8 I3 V
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
, u( N: q Y! f: a) Pfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
8 o) t3 d8 P8 j$ b1 w: Y, L4 }9 h% w8 ?6 d/ v
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
0 {7 S: M2 {& |: j1 I" B1 P. [! xprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
" o% k6 }2 X/ d9 Qlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
' @: H' B8 H) A$ Z2 Rfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,3 X/ I0 Y. L3 Z& S9 d0 U
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the" e ?6 S% _2 V) l7 m& Z
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before$ K7 z. m6 h7 R4 G l
making a purchase.) ?( @7 j8 L( B% N
- Q# e- y1 |7 X Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
5 p M9 f( \' N' Y' Y+ Dmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong( z( Z$ e% y7 B* [% w, f, v( u
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
/ e2 W6 O7 S7 E7 B5 Scentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
% i9 r/ C n2 u0 J x4 v$ Pattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
8 [' S" h8 \- a& m W zamenities.
+ i, M; D. y5 C! X! t. V
0 f* t# m7 J2 O The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels, W" ?: y3 w, z, L# P2 m
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
S' W, n8 p( W# vacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has9 {' N: ^; d' _0 ^! x n$ U9 z4 T
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
5 c+ u# i4 F/ B& \0 tdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
7 Q8 |0 i! }" E1 ~; M7 I" Iresidence, rather than for investment.
1 G0 e/ @: O. p% Y6 V& \. [" i& ~. t! j0 `( q# Y- E" s
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
% H; `, g8 O/ U4 x3 ]house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted5 w9 d, s& S [9 `7 m
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
# r+ q9 G% g. i7 {confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization6 P. g: k4 ~3 a Q- l2 x, r
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
7 N) V' J" `6 |$ F4 b1 zthe market.
% T* K! F+ e: K1 U0 ~8 T: E* S) _" ]4 s4 P( _( b
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through0 q; v' {7 D$ }* B- V
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
" W+ ?; N6 N$ y2 LAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring% L# V6 r8 {3 F
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due3 C& V6 I1 Y% |/ a/ S
to the shortage of available inventory.
( r" x# m- b$ W, M
4 ]$ z9 ]' K8 Y$ q" H( S7 [& S Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
: r% L/ B1 k( N0 g. v1 f) Wmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
# b( G" S' b% R- w, Uvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses9 X" y% |) @' N9 }+ z: h
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.# c6 E0 M3 r5 \7 m: Y8 ]/ z5 m
3 S- ~6 Y" M- j Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
& p* q% D1 e C% Din the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low2 W' V+ O: U( ?( Z1 Y- Y0 V/ X
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that" C; W! t5 k% K1 Y X2 Z
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
6 [. i; u. d3 }; wprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
- X; z$ m5 N1 ~3 F/ T- Wseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
- A) h- I# r7 g: J1 abuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
$ e( t" h* Z6 e
4 `3 t: n4 |6 B/ C/ U6 Z1 W$ a Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter: \) Y$ ?) V* P5 s
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
B! d9 M9 L# O4 Gremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,4 p* d2 \& v \
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices$ Z+ X; P* o0 L
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve" p |/ z/ }* U7 d7 V8 n4 u9 |
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
! X. l! I' @- A) S/ N, v' stowards the end of 2006. 4 \& I2 x' T) _% w1 k f
5 h& j+ P8 ^5 ?1 O. \ ~3 S2 Z
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of( Y8 n* h: l- E! i7 K% s
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable( b- q I3 L$ @/ k
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse: \" x7 D/ [' v. ^1 C% x4 k
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
+ \1 X! Z1 p" h. _& Hforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
0 B( O4 G2 M. apressure on tight inventory levels.
% w1 O% B5 d6 o% _8 q8 x# J1 G" w) O
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic) l4 O4 g3 g t7 }% W1 C* m6 z$ T
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
9 s' i7 E' B$ q' d: dinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
4 j3 u ~& U, d0 cwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
9 V0 F* O7 q! c5 ffor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.9 c2 a+ _ m v& J4 h) h
# p" ^3 q$ w$ Z! o
<<
" i: y$ M8 i$ {4 N; X3 y Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
) z) f9 d$ w5 s( x) i% z, D0 H9 ?' S. s4 y5 v8 N" A* ^* x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! I1 x# A; E: c/ p: u Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
i/ ?- c" i$ H* g- n' u; l3 D -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" L- ^- I- @; n9 ` 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q34 D2 Q, J+ E$ v2 o. R4 {2 o% z
Market Average Average % Change Average Average5 K9 a0 _! ?( k4 q( Z* Z5 a1 q: _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; O- {8 j& w- V, \6 A
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
0 |6 e' x$ q5 F/ Q& V0 `: Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 R/ |* S) r, ~, s+ _
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0002 m9 Z+ X9 \/ Q# N4 Q( o6 ]3 w) s
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' K9 {. ^% {# `" F Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
6 n* L( x4 _( j) c -------------------------------------------------------------------------# k4 J; x: R" ], D% I* Z& P
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
9 g6 {5 m* w# Y/ `. ^9 j! y -------------------------------------------------------------------------) X! K7 G" W! C, Y, P* E2 X/ t
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333( w( b& p' V: B* |: ]' B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. g8 Q5 R$ _8 ?# n* J9 P1 ?
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
5 z- J3 R. y q; e: d5 t -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- m P/ e. ]. I Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185# ?- b. M( m$ `0 n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, |+ F9 W% n6 r' z Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
7 D$ W' a' K u% V5 m -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 e$ l' s2 Y ^- E7 @6 ?- a2 U
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
6 |1 `6 n" h* V, j2 G2 |& {# [4 ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' k- ?( G7 D* a' `" O2 E; I5 _. c Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
8 N% k* g- F3 {. x' @# ~8 {" j -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ s, c% L' L- X9 x' O4 m
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
% g( H3 e: E0 \4 }( p- _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------' l6 h0 Y/ ^( k; g! _5 L
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389$ {, u7 A, o3 w. V7 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, s, p1 Q) s( x* u! B8 Z; u Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714. c; W2 X7 I$ o/ P3 I3 |( [
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 `6 V y0 t+ A/ {% o) a. Z5 C Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500* }3 o" I0 L0 v* p, e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' y7 i4 A- Q; {: g& C4 p, } k% }- @ Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000+ E! |+ `0 G) N9 g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' A6 b1 }% U" b5 z8 a National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8600 w! c; _, w+ p+ I2 [0 E7 G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& F' l( Y& ]' ?& E6 h# D8 M% s* u" O5 x: t1 d5 k% ?$ \$ o
------------------------------------------------------------- ~/ ~* i3 m5 ?! J( z7 g- g1 z7 }
Standard Condominium
; i+ v3 z% b0 D6 q -------------------------------------------------------------8 c* C( o% u5 F
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo0 ^1 o; q2 `$ S4 q$ y
Market % Change Average Average % Change
- b! G' g; b0 P( L# ~ -------------------------------------------------------------0 [& v1 p, E! B
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
. |: {+ ^ s g4 r -------------------------------------------------------------$ G" ?: i4 y w1 S5 D/ {0 A# Y
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
9 }$ Q: m" N, s0 ^3 f0 F" U -------------------------------------------------------------8 a4 B- B6 P* u H8 L
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
1 x" {0 F9 z9 U0 b -------------------------------------------------------------
# I* @5 @' p' c$ O& Q6 @ Saint John N/A - - N/A
" S8 J8 c$ p* r# Y& z* V+ y( j& n -------------------------------------------------------------
- D9 n; m8 q! a8 f( r5 s4 U- K St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%' f, ]- B }2 m$ J1 Q Q: T
-------------------------------------------------------------( |1 x Q+ u, O, I/ I: q$ x% t
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
g0 |% A0 W3 o+ d8 S1 g -------------------------------------------------------------
* g9 z% r2 H+ `2 m# i Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
6 z# {9 z( J6 t( [$ m, A -------------------------------------------------------------4 k. w* p. Z5 p& ^7 k
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
( N% \# d/ d* I -------------------------------------------------------------
) h l: s( B7 f6 D5 x" H- ` Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
# G. h8 l+ _8 x+ T1 s, c+ t& N7 m -------------------------------------------------------------: |* I: h2 h& }, g' A8 m$ n, T
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
( E+ j5 h3 ~+ X6 V, h/ ^ -------------------------------------------------------------
* i. M' e% q ?! A Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%/ Q! ]& k$ ^: c f* F( X" y7 w7 w
-------------------------------------------------------------; D7 N+ N+ C+ L$ J
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%3 S) p+ Y5 `6 ~# Q4 J
-------------------------------------------------------------' F3 l" k) e: ^ h
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
0 V0 m8 Z2 s4 N# Y* t -------------------------------------------------------------( I$ j: e4 U }
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%" s @% B1 j* { Z# x; l
-------------------------------------------------------------( q0 z# P* K* ?* U% @( m/ s5 a
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%' r1 `9 y5 m% J$ Z
-------------------------------------------------------------
. Y( A) j- y2 u$ b$ f5 A' b) ~; d$ \ National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%) I) l- Z2 D% q6 ~+ R) M, U) s( L+ a
-------------------------------------------------------------$ F5 F* |# D" T# Y1 g8 T
>>& Z6 Q7 a8 C3 n) q4 k0 [
4 j, ~$ {( Z9 X# N Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
" O$ o& e( w% Y$ ^in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint- S& X2 L, n9 [' P; N
John and Victoria.' G) z/ N7 ?* e
9 G# E+ Q% {' y, a- k The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
7 l) {# y5 i6 Ucomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
' J' ] [7 K- }4 Z4 whousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release3 w4 `) `5 G- J* X e( j* j" p
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
- I; F* H- W. L7 m# Y m- vtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
& j4 @/ x0 _/ a v" jacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
* F! c2 v i- P- s1 {4 Kavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
- }' Z! i- t2 q% Gfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable. Q, e: ~: e* A [" B' p" E% k
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on9 {4 A; U! y8 F* \1 J8 k+ l D
November 15, 2006.$ r) q- {2 S W: ]; w
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
& b/ Z* |2 |# T" S" V* q7 ^fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
) H. E" b6 I( h. Q& j! mprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
2 H+ E/ C0 H5 P5 Y' J) ]available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|