埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1943|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
$ I  S( q: E  l$ i
% y2 z8 _# n+ n/ Q4 g; ~1 n& Q- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
0 j$ N. V. y0 q# C$ G- R3 a- n5 e0 K1 {  r2 [/ R! ]
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
+ k$ ~, [2 e& f& {3 P) F; Yexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
6 E+ v8 b0 }# R4 e7 _: equarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic& X! Z1 N8 ?' I9 Q; J
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit7 \8 P/ m% y: q2 _1 a) U
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and0 c  B$ P/ s" _/ R/ Q5 q4 v% }& g
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
" h/ V, N  \; f: b- }, F7 A# k7 CQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal* P/ Y. n  X( r
LePage Real Estate Services.5 V- ~# u, b2 k4 v0 j% a. Q
+ N' l0 z7 O. l4 g/ U
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters$ b$ e  p4 o; w. A2 b
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic' ]+ _; C/ o+ `/ @
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
& n) K  S5 g6 t; u5 msound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
! r5 N& R4 k* z, ?residential real estate sector.
( p! S1 f8 H+ q" I9 h0 K8 u/ B
1 X: P7 C1 [! K9 v5 D6 r  f    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
1 ^! K6 c8 l& `* |% z: Voccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
7 N6 l$ y9 j/ y, Ayear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
' N: Z0 F1 w+ c(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380% C  I! c7 P! j  w0 {7 y! Y5 o
(+13.2%).( _8 y+ i$ N: P  k- r/ M- @. N

3 h0 X+ a+ L% X6 O5 }& t    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth/ Y0 S) _2 C1 k) a. d' j
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
& v, s. ~1 B" A. F$ ofrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are9 I5 v" S8 Q$ C; \$ |  z  C
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
- q3 `. `( }" }% g# Kpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.- s0 m5 ~% ~* o9 }$ ^; }# F
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We4 ~1 K: k& X! A% [
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy& F$ N) O; Z$ n) {. q5 a
balanced market."
& x8 a' G8 I/ L+ O0 ]- M
0 L- V* Y+ F/ j2 m    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,. V$ h1 B5 U/ j4 K
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
9 h- W$ M' t6 D" p2 U: wto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
/ ^8 L. `7 B1 Y  f( tthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core$ D: K+ X) @+ A, N& {2 H
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,8 u; S4 w! A& ~0 Y* c$ N5 b
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
/ @8 Y& X2 d0 o- o  @: Kbreaking price appreciations.
7 ~" p1 p4 j1 F$ r
% E* P1 y. c2 i5 R; L1 b6 c    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding3 E- Y7 k1 i& e  m2 q( a
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
$ _8 w' V2 P; g. Nlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.6 n0 X7 e7 |% W1 `4 D+ N1 U( ^

+ l+ c% d& a3 F6 |4 y8 _7 X    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid' v! x* o' D8 Z9 D! _
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer. h. F2 E2 T. x* G" @" L4 L7 Y
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off3 J. c- }* H8 P% N9 ~& P
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
( U4 n2 ]2 w- m! A* p9 LIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
9 D! C1 l8 X/ X, K% pgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of2 P- ~3 t' \; G) {
price appreciation when compared with 2005.8 Z3 Z9 |% y, t# w. x6 t

: _4 q! K& H/ A    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing4 @# L# P. t) m/ l
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
- Z! J7 X/ ~/ t& D2 n! m/ L0 Bfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
1 Z, m) q2 t1 f$ aare markedly different than those found in the United States.
# g  W6 l* I& h  x; w& @4 F$ }2 e) X3 p5 [4 C
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the+ @9 i# |- L  I& Z0 {
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
$ }0 C) B( @4 p( b: A( @9 ^favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
. h5 _8 v( t9 w9 Prelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general/ b* _8 y/ y$ x/ }/ C4 R$ l" j
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the$ l9 `( N, b* s2 J- F4 f$ k
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and9 Z; ]) Y% B/ t1 r
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization" g' H+ l. p) J! d: @+ S: ?% O! t
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
! j: [$ |0 b8 ^
9 v/ P' _& V& C% a  Y3 V+ N- B    <<
1 [3 b# S  Y3 n& _  D                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
1 r2 [* g6 q) u& m" M$ X8 l, c    >>4 b( ~8 G4 b* ~. I& B/ H
' p: b6 t( R7 G& B! c8 b) }
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in4 _3 t, [) p6 L0 ?
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate) y5 O* I$ a; J. h! O% Y
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time  u- j5 C; W0 ]2 s( L2 C) }- K# b
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of. A. y+ \. p. j& O
renovations.
1 T, H) i) W" W3 y. z$ F6 v7 g' Y5 W) F2 T3 }
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
0 o9 L3 R( n' r% `; o. o+ [# {increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation0 Y7 p- R: j! y- P, J! n
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and, H  m, b3 H: k: }, I$ v, _1 f
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter./ _& f: ^% y" H

; }- v0 p3 u% z/ p6 @    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
4 ~2 B; M, y$ G' ~1 cslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
* ?5 l, O) I1 Bquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
( [' e; y( s' d; ~, r' Q600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores$ v9 p; w9 R% v# ?3 F
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
  _. h7 x1 M7 L  U- j" gand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.8 j* M$ N; L0 `, V- N/ z
3 [) h8 {6 j; G! @
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
1 B  Z1 z8 b* k+ G( w! Jconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their0 A# W: Q; @+ E* B% M  O$ `- x
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
0 ~' E/ q, X$ _  awas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
' A) r# W8 `& h% i& t- {7 I+ W. ~/ j6 udollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
$ K5 H2 \  l) N' H; }" Y8 K# d' Qbuyers with more options when looking for a home.# A, x& {. ^3 h, b& |% n
* M- q) l  a4 N
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
% A! H* Q' g. camong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes$ j3 R5 }. u; L* S6 x0 M
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
$ T6 |5 G% f: z6 q, `as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last+ q5 A  S5 s+ F" _" j; n
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
6 ]/ h! t9 q+ y2 c, [
2 x1 N) }' g/ f. n+ m    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house! X9 {9 Z$ X# {! k' w, j) x- ]
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
- L; X( O# V( Y2 A0 wlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting9 N6 V( R, {  F! U
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,# P5 _) B+ Y8 x* Q
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the' e. J4 m$ S6 }7 [
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before# {2 q. l2 H: i/ }2 b' }. t
making a purchase.
! [, t' r0 b# _, S, }
7 w9 G2 e+ O: m2 l: h    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing: e9 g4 s+ b3 V' B  |) X* @
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
- b7 O& s' T- `confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
9 D' b7 t5 T( W% acentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting: E; d; n3 d( ~; w. S  F" N8 H
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown$ D: E2 J4 ?* A' r7 F
amenities.! n* |, ?; R2 x; w! X9 f( I
9 l% t/ {1 U1 x$ k) J
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
" M3 h0 E( }; {% k$ ]) `throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
+ Q5 @4 u, N# x# d; M, r, x, g- Wacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has' n2 I& c. W4 g- ^; ~7 a$ h
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been& q  c5 s7 `" P
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle9 z  z( s  k, X
residence, rather than for investment.
: G; w1 }3 V% \# {3 w2 {$ F3 t( @' D3 ~0 M1 J
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as, ~: c. I: ~# `* F
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted/ ?' A9 Q( D, l
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer, O- W3 L, |6 ~% L2 w; p! `+ O
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
8 p4 d' R# @# s( i' \4 c# Srate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
5 j! M, ?9 m: R, `8 V/ xthe market.
" A6 b" Y. V5 {! j" j3 T# M. G+ k1 P3 @, G. N: @! v
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
, I$ O) ]9 H& b% h0 L" K, oJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
  }; i1 F7 T- T: w; D# y* c' bAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
  j4 M0 Y/ S3 g! \6 ~; L$ B' P; Bmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due- W7 V/ c: p, r1 S2 ~8 Z- Q! S
to the shortage of available inventory.
' Q+ ^5 v5 A) W- A- ?7 }: K0 W/ I
& v+ ]& b4 Y! K3 g/ }    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
  \7 ]  W8 G# ~* Y0 p# dmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains; @( L8 l8 K: m  S5 T! M
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses, u7 K" C+ W: K) p
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
8 l$ N$ {  Q* B% h) S0 ^4 i* X9 i# I6 Y' x4 ^# K) X# A
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
; ~7 f- J4 G/ ain the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
, w0 M3 Q$ v' R( ]6 funemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
/ x, J* n* y8 N/ b; v) A) \" y; Xpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
: R& f$ i( G' G  Kprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
$ G& c, S- n2 Useason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
7 S8 r* N  @" }  n+ obuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

) J7 t" b! t9 W
9 e- y) F- v$ `  L    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
, X! f. ?& J- I% `) T( k2 r, Kas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton4 n0 b8 h# q7 G- ?/ Z
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
$ ^0 Y/ ]5 C7 E- \2 y( L, pmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
7 F2 x1 f" Q1 ]; d3 g3 rincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve+ M* @; n! |8 a% C, L; b
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
4 B4 d1 w& \$ R  @% Y1 Z" Dtowards the end of 2006.
   
- a3 D  R/ U1 j6 q( o9 E9 W& H' e3 m4 j- A/ ~
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
7 N* |" Q$ Q+ cinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
2 i; x% j) l* p" Y/ _, H4 g2 [6 |to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse/ s: A( B; b  V9 {  `+ `5 T
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
2 q4 R) z- y- W% r- fforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added% Z4 {$ W7 g* r6 F7 q* J. Q7 M: |
pressure on tight inventory levels.0 v8 e# e! f3 _6 o- Q
1 a# f+ g# {2 O3 Y6 u& l+ a+ [) }
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic5 H4 [2 T& ~: m) A$ ]
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
; h; X: G& K9 S# e) B3 L. Yinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
" p) t2 Z/ q  K' L/ iwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching& Y! L6 p. ]3 _6 v1 G. k
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
4 {& A: s0 E! o- B: p
" i8 Q' h& E4 d    <<
# j& ?/ |6 `( B! D      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
; j* {. g: v: U
2 @0 y* F' C7 s4 Z/ C( T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 p2 x! ]9 D+ c9 g. \7 {: l                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
6 R5 f" r2 y0 V# |+ |0 c" l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' @) o# B1 e9 R- L/ \) v
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
' x/ l0 o- }( A/ w    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average4 n, y* a( o9 b" L1 p/ s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 f1 T4 {: I) x3 M    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0009 S& m! `( A  {( Y( g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: [* e8 y, O2 H0 U/ @" k4 ~    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000* d' g3 a' Q4 ^, q- Z$ t0 F5 X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 ]  k& O% ~4 ^% [: ^" V; A1 }
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
4 v4 ~' k9 p' y6 I% o/ J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ A# _' \) G$ c6 @3 P    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
4 L! u9 Q" J) j1 {    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 f) P; g* P- n7 H  K6 p6 ]    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333! p" w' _) G' ^# ]0 B1 R7 C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" C( H; A% U5 g& \
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
3 p" w9 {9 \( v( P    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Q& ]* A3 _- w8 ~. O& y    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1850 B) p5 ^( _: i: N  l( o: i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ ?9 b+ T* r4 e1 F7 A
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
4 g9 b1 o( U7 f/ E/ f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 C0 X& x! }& [' j# x) ?+ ~
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
7 x9 f$ I' }/ x* ~: o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 N5 e% ^# C: ]/ ~4 [$ D8 T
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
3 X; Z: o2 i6 x1 D! n; \6 k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% j9 D+ L# H" }5 L/ y7 n5 p
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500( m4 I# r/ m  V8 e% w0 w0 q% K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 N& y1 u. ]& M
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
  n4 `9 d$ W, J8 o3 `$ o) P5 a    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 @+ X" |( }* {2 n  M    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714# {) F9 d2 r7 P: P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) x+ F# v7 @7 x8 z- K  q6 L( L: B$ i    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500! X& u" t- q# v! p. I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: D. m7 e6 H$ ~4 R* J    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0005 ?3 W; O8 ~: x3 o: S- n. b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ e: e! q  T: P- L8 ^/ G& @    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
6 W4 A! X- m! r/ U$ j    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* F8 j. G/ ]9 P2 L# j/ m( ^3 d! B5 @% w7 K& I8 J$ r( s2 S
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 H9 h9 j  X) g; h' d2 M2 ^
                               Standard Condominium+ `8 @7 R7 D7 C  V% f
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 O, R* t$ B7 h- B                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo5 X* |- }. r2 }3 @" t: [0 {  \: t
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
" B; M2 U0 p! X# T0 C/ x* z    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 o' d9 `  N0 x9 K: J    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
6 n, R( ~5 k# p    -------------------------------------------------------------  V  x; i( w& ?3 S  {5 |/ C7 X
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%: W& S/ t6 y4 N0 O& U4 e- Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------, G6 V) ^1 m+ R0 h/ j. _
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
+ T  ?4 s* L; ]: s# K    -------------------------------------------------------------2 K% c* R" a* u0 j( o
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A" D4 e  E& T6 F4 Y& e2 o& M' V
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 ]. B% G5 d  U    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
( Q, P9 n4 K* u+ D    -------------------------------------------------------------% w+ O2 g$ B6 w: k9 f6 g# d
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
3 Z% ^! f" g# _' l    -------------------------------------------------------------' V& Z# ?. Z6 ^6 s4 q9 o
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%$ p! N' s& d$ {1 _% a
    -------------------------------------------------------------
% n% r4 O/ h3 E    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
9 Y5 E) P7 f5 }0 W2 `    -------------------------------------------------------------  s9 H& v* [% H( Q
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%. Y* W$ j' S" h2 V
    -------------------------------------------------------------1 n0 e+ E, y( L; |
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%  N7 W7 I4 y. u; {# p
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) X9 o; d! H- ~2 f    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%* Q6 @0 o; e# L, A- R  ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------' a5 X4 e( Y; y; ~) |4 ~4 _# Z/ P/ X
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
: S+ }" D% S: a3 q; F    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ M# V7 T! S( R2 ]/ ?, y$ R  m; i2 d- q    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%, B1 w/ F7 t) q( q( p7 K
    -------------------------------------------------------------
* C  I$ l7 g* f4 a    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%( x: r  ]" W2 _) }( D9 ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ w) w, I, ^8 D1 v& P
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%! y2 ?1 V: A; {9 `  k
    -------------------------------------------------------------. o$ Z, E+ q9 X
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%& t. R4 d3 r2 ]# t
    -------------------------------------------------------------( _$ _) |5 b. D9 h- x  e
    >>
' D: y4 s6 }7 S' r  s6 z. [4 ?4 P4 B' Q4 }! T
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
; n% t  p# a3 Fin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint% I& x( i( A" N
John and Victoria.3 ]# _  ]& h. n1 a: o
/ b5 H% Q! u. ^* e
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
: z+ Z4 J: v, {: Ncomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
9 [0 A% c0 L. d' i5 nhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release* h  p. p) h  x* o; F
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price0 ]6 q; K1 r$ p$ G* v
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
; p- `8 M, h  W$ Y$ A; `+ O" gacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
5 [& v- }4 `: ^available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current: f" W6 |7 L" `
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
$ V; z9 ^  `5 |/ s$ |version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
9 Q1 l# B9 ]5 |; E+ E8 gNovember 15, 2006.
0 `# S5 ?: S* V* \* R    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
6 G2 j7 q: ~. T# u) J' f: f' r1 K. xfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
6 c3 Z; D4 p8 `) b  Aprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
6 I& b1 \; z0 v- Yavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-11-19 10:53 , Processed in 0.201873 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表