 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable + y" N% v- X* y$ X$ R! ]- W0 k" B
! p& }; ?8 W) {2 [
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -; y# p+ Y& e# D: `% _6 I) d
: B% d' ~' @2 l, ? TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market, j$ C; m) Y& P9 R, T `9 U
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
7 K, U: v7 [2 wquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic% F9 y1 L* D' z- X2 }
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
5 s, Q( |, c6 d' T3 l" [( Dprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
' I) `& ?( M3 k5 i, `7 E) j; lmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
6 _- a0 U! ^* v+ o) M: I- [Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
9 N* o6 t' z9 k3 v! ULePage Real Estate Services.8 I# H! V+ A: w: M0 u
% ?. V4 J" ]% l! @& P1 {2 x- f Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters; H Y" H1 e1 O6 @; ?5 V3 L! H
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic" }; a* X; Q9 G0 P8 p3 O
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
$ s( v% e& l, k% v' J8 m1 n3 Isound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the* c: F4 ~- X! t" ^- a7 _ @
residential real estate sector.- q( i7 T" l e- e3 C+ G
( j7 @9 { Y! s- N& T. Q p5 D Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
' l5 w% C5 D& M. f; d7 e" n. eoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%): D* S. Q0 _# C) S8 G
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
. G* \% z" W' `8 P4 ^; S4 c2 J9 ](+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380( I6 Y% P& N, f! C# c& |
(+13.2%).
1 N- P/ Z0 h5 E ]& g. u7 y0 @# l/ _! j7 @% N& _* n: n) Y" Y- q
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
. ~) H% Q+ @0 U. d: Dduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the) X* C; E7 d v: H) d
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are8 f6 T. `' w& o- c
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
- Z/ r5 W! }% c9 m, bpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
) H; S. W% q) i1 z8 Z"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We6 G: I- r, d/ m- \/ U
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
; f4 e% R, F: o2 S( \/ k/ j3 Ybalanced market.") p: r6 `% R2 c1 c) Z
N% W1 Q5 S1 D4 I, H5 W
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
. E/ H0 n3 K8 T/ b( lconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
+ M7 o; J- P: s7 I( O5 m" Lto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
7 W# Y: P# L; Z3 fthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
" b+ J0 U6 |5 z4 O+ z: Penergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
3 z9 R O/ [# \& _3 a, w( U( z! y2 Amanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
: F, H; ~2 T4 zbreaking price appreciations.
7 c/ {! A+ R! p J, O& ~* P8 l# h; z* O4 h7 t8 m/ Y4 T# y5 J
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding0 ~; _/ ]2 J% ?9 H [
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
J; \) J* Q% q) }) d! f1 ?largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
" L* I3 ], Y" M6 m& y; v
: ^5 X6 e+ j! G m- \ In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
1 `8 V# \4 K+ ^economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
; k5 `6 D6 U' F& v1 Z' [ n& dconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off) V9 ?# q3 z. r4 I2 @9 a
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.2 i. c: a9 O; Z
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
2 B9 g3 K; s( K+ F' ]3 U$ y5 z8 z2 agreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
4 e) G. b; G9 l* Q" `" {price appreciation when compared with 2005.
/ ` A* w' p" \/ y. A- v* \ C% v
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
, |; [- W( k- Hmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and! _+ t: k% @* o x M3 j' {0 [ M8 `
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada* D% X* K, h7 S. W& H
are markedly different than those found in the United States.3 y1 z# |; n& }! X: M+ E a$ b/ I
: X, f2 L; p4 L2 a1 y( ?1 k7 |! { Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the2 I. A$ l% D* M$ q
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's. u! m2 m9 `, i$ }
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
Z+ z, s4 i" Urelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general e3 x7 Y5 C6 h/ U' X2 S- `
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the2 e! i; k9 v+ o, k% U, ~% S
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and3 ~" k6 n/ g2 B: r5 Q
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization, J6 ]/ b- d5 o
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."" I( W6 x+ h& \8 S
/ v: U# e& b' L, a5 Q <<, b% d9 M; I% l2 k5 |
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
Z1 \# p i, b >>
9 r$ h# g4 q8 O0 @& ?2 Q6 b
. e* O+ \; b: Z& _+ W s6 r Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
/ |- x! r: w* S: n/ s& ]Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate) k" C6 d/ |/ e: ?! g
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time9 O4 W( C" ?- y
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of" M# D" {3 u6 d- d
renovations.% C: ^, B5 [. h5 B
2 K8 }) T) q" E& P
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
- o9 q4 m/ E* F2 ~1 wincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation- g! E: |4 [8 i0 U3 d9 B1 i
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
: J, ~7 [ x7 J/ cSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
# f) ?$ h. W) V4 {/ {5 G! c
* ^) ?! [+ d9 O: p+ q% B: M; L) q The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer1 \- I: {/ T7 ]4 ^ o9 ?
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the' h5 ?# U5 `, X' E5 [0 w
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
6 Q. i! C3 Z8 _3 K! R600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
! I1 }! w$ j) N* g& [) V9 Zto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
5 x3 Q% y5 [' S0 A) m* vand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
4 k2 t" [* J3 A0 O5 T9 S C& E( E6 x
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced7 p' o* H( Q4 Z7 ?; g; D
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their& x; p, x. H3 y- R* H0 `" X( G- d b
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers# ~- d3 h0 [! m
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian: B3 X" y2 \, y: b S+ h; c5 ]/ n
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
$ w1 a H7 I7 C$ I W: h2 _: ibuyers with more options when looking for a home.
: E2 D5 K* H5 _1 W* a: h0 |, w2 H# g8 z/ a
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly* w( |: Y2 h) T& S
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
/ y- a6 Q+ Z1 ]$ ]priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,1 Y/ Z9 e+ K2 |! R$ R
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
; L {3 l9 X; Afew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
# d8 l1 ]1 r. Z3 }% R8 ?: c
' M$ g7 T8 s G& B3 Y Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
- a5 Z' F7 y tprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
- I# b" n. A/ x* W& h2 `3 y" klevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
0 i' K* j% A k$ R3 kfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
/ L1 ?& m# ?) h/ t, J: nwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
$ F6 P0 O7 A |. {7 Ppressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
" D0 H% x9 c' H" P) _" Qmaking a purchase.
6 d$ B1 g, K& [- a0 q2 [
; y& J' l( k4 K; }- [& o Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing- x9 f' {4 {! j3 v& {
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong6 U9 {# V+ B S3 F' l
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city1 K4 l. v! G8 @. M+ R3 N5 T
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
! {: ^/ z: K) Z: c+ oattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown( u3 W% u% W/ e- f
amenities.
9 {5 b4 f; i$ H3 D; Y
r6 o9 F5 ?0 |8 [- T% v The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
3 l: T) K& d y" uthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand. t. r2 m3 g( O; N0 d! A( T: b
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has) w! M& P6 r { i
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
. A0 B2 v" [6 X/ x, S: ddriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle; ?1 A: }* f& x2 E& P9 r0 S3 y
residence, rather than for investment.5 |2 b* K S. d6 B4 E5 l% H" C3 F# P
6 v# l1 n) |3 T
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as) o* r' w, A) s8 u/ y8 [( n
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
4 \" x/ X) D F3 Z: X, [in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer& c0 W. K. s: ~
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization# {* w7 w1 }9 C0 S- D5 C! q
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
: b6 d9 E k7 gthe market.
, a* z+ E7 I4 H* K( D g
; l) N) A& a# c6 r; H In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through+ O2 l* p2 R. u5 w1 {8 U( l( q
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In4 z. v+ T0 O& z1 o* [5 n% o3 A
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring. R8 F, E. N3 j$ ]
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due9 {8 r5 U" }/ i7 s6 x) p* f- H
to the shortage of available inventory.
+ ^$ H2 H) X/ R4 T8 n7 G5 o% E! l# ~; z; [* q( K
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
9 k0 Z) p. y) D, z# h+ y4 k7 Dmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
3 W2 `% `% m6 kvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
) V' K& \1 A3 k9 E; Y b7 K- vstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.6 {9 i5 W* _! `
6 j R2 y: U9 s) r$ {9 M( I" k
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
7 Q O2 a% O/ K: ]3 Z2 g4 t1 I) [in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low, D, Z, i! C1 m: X G
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that! P( U+ ~5 b" U2 B* F3 h% A
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring# M R# M3 n, J3 `* w
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
4 Q/ s2 C5 _1 j& T: Hseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
6 |/ P) O9 e. Rbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
9 ]5 y/ H5 U# c% z4 I: A% `( y3 t$ e" \# S; g R
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter. G3 N5 k& J2 l2 B O# |; }- H X
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton; o" E. n' r# X
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,1 \7 a, z, v5 c- n- [
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices7 X1 V n0 ]8 {4 u5 v. r
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
3 W, c* L. p& T# xin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
" p, f, U4 `: |3 G) ztowards the end of 2006. 1 E- |4 i3 C1 O; b8 Y
+ J( q4 e: @, ]7 o, bWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of( [! Y* q2 O9 u# K# n
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
( B8 r& Z: X8 Y) J u! q# Fto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
/ {" d) V( y- u! [* ygroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to( {$ H/ K% t* \: v9 m6 A4 ?
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
! V& F3 ?3 w( Z4 a5 Apressure on tight inventory levels.8 M, u& b* ^: m' n0 k8 W/ U ?" d
6 U; |$ { Z* h3 |/ f Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic6 z5 ~+ M, A% ~: V4 G% x6 K
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people1 ~1 k# o& a: \
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;9 T: P% e2 t1 B+ b& ~4 [
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
% O! [7 b/ E8 V0 J; A9 k5 Yfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.1 U% m' g9 l. F1 l9 I: M( V
" {- L! W* y1 Y <<
4 ]7 }' m1 F# B" v5 ]8 D: b4 M6 u Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006, O, b8 j7 T! X6 Y/ P) R5 `* I! b7 n
- w" o- J" u& T" E -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; T% R: y9 I9 M& e- p( v5 U0 n Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey1 t9 h6 I5 k3 S' F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 c2 m6 k# O# l, d
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
; G# n* h# I- s' v# { Market Average Average % Change Average Average- B/ t6 b, a5 T) R9 }+ L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 K) r2 P# F# o+ V& o" I1 N Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000! p, A: u+ I+ } J3 ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 C& V6 |1 F, } A0 U+ y( K Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
* S, E, l9 X8 O$ {/ w% O+ y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) G/ a. M' V& `7 a, Z5 H Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
8 k1 g0 {2 p8 T+ O g6 Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ Q. g8 d2 \9 h# a; k- K( s
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
9 C0 r$ M! @; j& k) f5 O$ {3 [/ \( C -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 H* |- Z4 I- P/ `2 Z( P St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333& H: o5 f4 j9 Z7 y7 \; @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ h" D8 C6 L3 B- O ?; J! O; }# B
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
; V. j$ s v" h, o! e7 y | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 x& e. `7 q3 E+ e: Z Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185$ H- A& [8 l5 m& y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( P# I9 G q5 b) a8 s! @5 c; M Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
3 H9 v9 V5 Y" Y& T -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 C0 C. H" i6 {, G% b
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766# g) T' e o4 ^# C8 L% l6 S5 J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& y4 A# K) S8 I8 _# A5 \ A
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7072 X, E: y4 p+ g' \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( W1 ]6 ^# u- Q/ P
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500. v6 a& Q! Q5 _ ?
------------------------------------------------------------------------- O5 ~) y. P, _, U7 s7 c
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
& r7 L d4 S: v- L -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 J4 n2 B' h. f& _ Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
1 G1 z6 A; j5 } -------------------------------------------------------------------------" Q7 R/ T& |& u: C8 `
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500$ X1 T0 ?8 c( d7 o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ c4 ]5 [+ F5 u) {: a Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000. T" A9 f1 E& B9 W- e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. A0 i8 A3 U0 h National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
4 I1 q4 a( \: G4 E -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 U1 k- ?1 |! r' z2 M8 n, P' u- G
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ a- l( s0 \ A, U! V Standard Condominium! s2 D9 K2 J3 K! w0 L' \5 t
-------------------------------------------------------------* \ G5 l( H+ @' ^2 A5 m5 N+ Y
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
[3 T; ?- Y0 d7 L6 ` Market % Change Average Average % Change4 o# l( ~9 ^! ^
-------------------------------------------------------------3 D5 y1 {( \- w& g
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%: s5 g2 j$ g( Q& E; H
-------------------------------------------------------------
# q0 C0 P/ ]# l Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
# z; N$ j% n# G( d' M! x -------------------------------------------------------------' K# X4 O/ r! x7 _4 ]8 ~
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A& ~- x; z% e7 k
-------------------------------------------------------------# W# _$ \% r3 |+ M( G# ^
Saint John N/A - - N/A
9 Y5 W% v, \ ]8 P* U+ h -------------------------------------------------------------: `! B& \8 E2 d3 z3 u2 q$ H, S
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
' ~1 h; S/ Q( D8 U! T -------------------------------------------------------------3 D! k, f% E8 I5 @9 q9 ~/ g; \
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
! |* ]+ U; B3 K% E4 ?/ F! U) j) J -------------------------------------------------------------% Z& t" T4 l" q1 z" @* a5 d% B) d) b
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
' }4 k% e. [/ G" i! s -------------------------------------------------------------
8 M* c& `1 ~. `, @, @% b' Y Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
6 D: u6 G5 W* l3 E, T" X' t -------------------------------------------------------------7 G- u! E* {8 Z6 @+ ], K. }
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
9 u1 Q0 i- v' n) L" |. L -------------------------------------------------------------
- H- e: B3 U- \. n Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
8 C. T# h9 }* D -------------------------------------------------------------
& d4 |/ d5 P: r% O3 m! V Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
3 v4 n- M& @' |2 k5 J( c -------------------------------------------------------------6 l; w9 f; W; L9 ]* ?2 ~$ ?
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
' O8 D' D, y" U- b. ?$ Y -------------------------------------------------------------/ G' L* F; r/ W, _7 M3 |$ v
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%: c7 J0 O9 Z% g" ?
-------------------------------------------------------------3 w$ D# g9 ?- |
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%) E% R6 G5 x- L8 a/ [; R* F+ N
-------------------------------------------------------------( [5 z3 { u" F3 r0 _; d
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
/ G ] `, n, R) l: T5 G* m -------------------------------------------------------------, M7 f8 {6 K- s# o
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
* G! n% T& ]! e6 i R( g3 y -------------------------------------------------------------' n- |& `/ }( Y7 P7 d
>>
1 d+ P6 X9 j( l) i9 s* P! g, C9 j* W' a& O/ c6 d
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
9 ^- f% n0 ~2 F7 {( }( ]2 R3 [in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint. l) m8 D8 `+ D5 q, k0 e
John and Victoria.5 t5 v7 e. L5 M) T. L" W4 }) Z' i
5 k' F9 R* s; d4 z5 } The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most- d% s& H1 g/ K" P
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of7 C3 a3 c, p: L" A5 I; k
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
& f. h% Z8 J* g0 u* Jreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
& n3 @ ~' E1 F0 W5 Y; _; |trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities0 l& ~% p' P& v) U, \
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
! X; a: f+ M& n( ?available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current8 ~ a! X4 S7 p, l
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
1 S+ r) E8 H/ H- e) Lversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
1 z/ P8 y1 m5 tNovember 15, 2006.* J3 u! E4 I) Y, X M% ~( p3 P
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of" t* X9 p( x& p7 G& V* ]* L
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
* }8 ]4 S7 u* Mprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is' R$ B& c* V* g. r! }9 O
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|