 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
, f" V! W' c5 H' S
7 i' G8 K+ A! g4 c- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -/ r' e* B4 l. c
- G* g: a( f/ \% [ TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
2 b8 g# z; {$ Gexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
: Y) l5 j1 D% Tquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic( b% L2 b4 K% f5 c
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit' A0 r, G& [8 X; z' i$ ^- m
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and7 p4 t- l9 M4 g- c S
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,( g: y: v* {; [3 u
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal+ C* B/ E: _) |0 f4 N8 ?1 b
LePage Real Estate Services.8 F( ]8 S) c" f8 }1 G
. ]! E6 l; W) @4 x& q# D3 Z Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters% \2 A: T1 i+ m+ L. V' C
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic* B, V, O( a7 a# Y+ m' P
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and/ I% h# P; i! l+ k
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the# G$ c# Y: W, R0 H) T, v
residential real estate sector.( ^0 k0 w, P; q! o- R
+ p" u. [* F8 s3 f Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
0 G3 k7 Y# j$ r/ i2 q; s1 f1 Xoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)- h' k& J( s+ A0 f r' ^& O
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
5 x! ~: n* T4 |3 C: q8 X(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3801 z6 v1 r9 [3 N# m* t; \
(+13.2%).
$ v' O- |8 g; t+ E& `9 i; r& b$ s+ Q$ [6 D( S$ z3 g
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
0 H7 [+ q; c$ Z0 {6 Yduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the T G/ W3 F& Y' _4 q
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are+ K3 m7 ^5 U5 \& ^
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
0 ^. N, Z: b! G+ `' _' Gpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.: T$ P3 j7 k* p y* ?* `7 r
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We$ e5 f. T) z: B9 t
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
- H# F$ n* u- N0 V' ~3 z* Ubalanced market."; V/ U1 G) I) e0 _
- T. e% F. S# ^' y
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,$ O, }% l, L( L3 z' ~" P
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift4 E: Z3 ~4 X4 `
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued% s' _% D- f8 }0 ?# l! l4 n; l
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
) r- ~9 g, @* R" g" }5 ^energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,$ J; I! }. ^, h4 v; S
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
! L$ d# [% M+ f- Wbreaking price appreciations.7 o+ h1 s! `$ x8 ?* p
! P2 y6 L& p) o- P. [- x/ Z+ d Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding$ ~" A- r" K/ `9 p
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the/ w& J6 @: ?, b3 m
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
2 K1 \. g! o1 ~& D( ^) n
2 T- a0 l3 U8 S. K$ J5 u( u In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid/ j \7 v. w9 L* T# }
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
% `+ [. j: }4 j2 n2 E, d6 v- \confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
% M9 E: x( ?+ ^3 o& [slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.& {. x2 j+ b% q6 C
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
4 ~- E: ^; I7 L$ jgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of8 e) B0 o* n2 Z E# z% P
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
0 @& ~& z( c2 j6 H- _; Q) {' m
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
4 f: z0 ^9 ?6 ]& {8 \, r& Hmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and2 y9 ~ o5 o/ W5 i# v* }# [
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada, ~% Q+ J I# K6 {
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
( R1 k. t& h( H( [
8 |6 k+ I+ `& K/ o4 A Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
+ s) F" E: Q5 F, j! R, n( f( fAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
' P; B) B6 Z% |" wfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
. U9 \7 ^* K1 j1 D2 Y- X/ brelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
+ U7 p2 k- ?/ z, I& U/ Daffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the, s# E% }1 C. {
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
+ M0 N& ^4 ~9 E7 }aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization; k& y- @- l* w8 x
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
9 G4 S* o; W1 O5 y
# h! z8 F: l7 c7 w# r& P$ H* I% n H4 W <<
3 [' T2 F* |3 q6 z! e u" j" o9 o9 d REGIONAL SUMMARIES
+ ~+ x! l w6 A! h1 i6 B! L" j >>3 ~$ V* R/ X4 x% ^
* n# M8 D6 ]. ]
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
7 T5 x! K9 |. }8 ^8 {7 S( vHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
, Z6 N% z; {; b" r, I% \of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
. R+ n/ O# w( P; M( ^$ T: r; ~1 `looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
7 S2 E5 r" W+ r% vrenovations.
+ J/ m1 L9 [5 e% \: i$ j, r" y
: [( M7 R; \3 t7 E2 c The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight# w; E$ W. p6 Q' l v
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation( a/ s: ]* K+ E' o! _3 U( I
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and A6 H/ s; v7 x4 r3 m- e
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.; ^ L. {$ z8 W& W8 \+ F3 v
Z8 H i C0 c( V
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
7 t+ m/ S I4 U9 J" H2 A+ ?slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
4 k( ?$ r+ ^- ^quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
( C v. b/ M! U4 \ D5 G600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
6 R) K- C1 M' G( M' x1 p9 Pto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes2 z& z! }* h( Y& d7 x
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.9 [+ l8 s' H! z
. v; i; K. w' X$ I/ m7 e0 ?4 W1 b0 b In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
: c- w- h$ F9 u3 }conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
/ w# e& J/ c7 T8 M4 chomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
3 s+ s5 p0 U) g3 v5 ~- \. d; \1 ^/ owas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian$ _$ k. S( E* X/ h
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing* t7 {2 w) r! N {, q- B
buyers with more options when looking for a home.5 ^/ [" f. |) d& ]- A
( F) S) `8 ?: I6 ^6 a2 F* g" O
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
& @( a7 V" V0 Camong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes) j. ?5 i* }0 m' @% j# u
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,1 N' f3 o) W6 x/ p+ A. R, w
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last2 c: [9 C5 a M8 S; h7 b
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.2 |7 h5 @* H1 h! t9 |1 `
* E2 T, r) i- Y# s' A4 ? }2 V
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house8 M3 Y4 d/ H+ A# B
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
+ u J; S: K1 dlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
' T" n8 T8 g2 B/ c3 S, t: d! cfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
% i) S6 I! N- w) S; |when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the; X0 s/ {4 r9 ]8 c
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before3 C& K* r1 q$ D$ V
making a purchase.
5 z# d; b/ W3 u/ c# P5 ]1 X) S f1 J2 c4 ^
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
/ ]/ I+ N5 F& E$ ]7 e) }markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong) [1 L& v5 T7 f5 U9 J2 \
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
, y- Y& t8 V; u0 ]centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting4 I5 s2 Q' d" [! X( D
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
( E& U7 g+ s2 l. a bamenities.# k8 \2 j k- { i" E
" @1 t5 w9 N( D8 V4 K3 F6 m, l The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels4 S) C, l% d$ N
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand: ~0 N. V, }8 v' M
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has9 j+ E2 [6 j* }; ?5 O
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been3 f: l) s+ y3 `
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
4 O& l( q$ A; S) W3 H# @. Fresidence, rather than for investment.
0 L) K1 T. p2 L' r# r
! Y0 G$ n! V2 d& x The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
* ?: H; W* D( o$ q9 u8 ihouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
6 u* D2 J! d3 Din a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
4 I# W7 d& N" {* M6 P0 Vconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization+ {9 F5 p' ~ F* d5 v9 V% e+ h
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
+ ]# @0 s' R7 a0 J+ ?) t3 h) I- w* Bthe market.
5 g$ M: N2 x) C) c8 j+ d4 R1 F8 R9 i* Z5 }2 P
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through$ N, ^: o1 ^. Y8 Z# q- [& ]- U
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
9 K$ A, E0 i0 [% ~6 ~August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
3 U+ U4 F9 u# V4 Emonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due f9 o0 d& }2 h3 P
to the shortage of available inventory.3 ^* N6 |8 k. Z
. x) P! R( J5 Z Z& _% X* t' ` Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its1 v5 L$ |4 ^( H. E& E, Y
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
2 |; C+ H4 W2 Z3 e! Wvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
3 B& S$ L8 d! c. |& y$ F/ jstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.% @! a( l9 ^4 j
" j) ?( a) V: t0 g) z7 B' X
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
: K- k" { A0 q4 X3 t. y( tin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low& [/ G& L! d9 Y; A7 H
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
) P% v! n; r8 y0 Mpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
- E& e0 i+ l0 I# M! L& a0 S, T& {prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
* W: l. T) o( F) p; X0 \: Wseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
5 [8 w' K* f& V7 Y% `' Z$ E+ u% ebuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.( Q+ |- z; D9 b4 {8 L A3 t/ C
1 R% `6 K) i Z1 M/ Y8 l Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
; [! |8 g! J/ o$ }as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
( V) B( e9 y" [remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,. b; u/ Z1 n; E; e+ \4 F$ t* J
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
! @* t9 |$ H0 G1 jincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve2 j- S. [4 e b
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly N8 ~3 B; D; P- c" b2 s
towards the end of 2006. ( J3 h4 _8 C' v# w9 y4 r$ P
- b. _+ K! H: }/ V0 Q" C
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
8 C$ n6 ?/ _$ L# \$ O2 zinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable) V, y4 k( a/ D6 ?. p- n
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse. \* y1 v7 {3 b. i, [( u; v
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to: u q8 R$ W8 v2 g9 U. a% y
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
6 b/ y9 ?9 V' Ypressure on tight inventory levels.
1 v8 X! m3 _# Q/ b7 y$ J! c9 o1 x7 e& n( G$ |' T
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic7 F2 v5 P. s: Y% r% e
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people5 U/ T: l) S; [- m9 G: x2 W! _
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
. a7 P6 x7 W7 G; e- nwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching- _, n" U8 J0 C9 Z
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.; J# d- U8 k' Q! {0 ~! K( N3 f
4 d+ {+ J% M5 a
<<
; [8 D* O! R5 s9 W L Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20061 v) V* [) J4 f+ ]/ C' v
+ E! y$ |- d" E& i6 u3 Y$ x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" ~) B/ {+ d+ ^5 W; T2 ~ Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
* P; V G9 `1 l ------------------------------------------------------------------------- a5 N7 K; N( q
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
8 M5 c) D+ v" o5 L3 |) y9 t: m Market Average Average % Change Average Average
! ]& F# n5 P( v& N& N# o" H1 U: i -------------------------------------------------------------------------# z4 D. ^6 }0 n$ C
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
5 K, [1 r0 v! N7 j' ]; M -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 ~4 { a7 }) l8 g
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000' U8 K7 n0 I1 [& W, [
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- F2 l' q* Y5 t% u# |
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
3 e/ c1 h7 U5 i6 S; d -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% }: K* Q- m6 C: E) N1 e( v. ^( W Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -1 V/ h) p1 J, F; P$ z) q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 k1 Z8 I( ]. m: e2 V( U1 o
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333 _) C# k* @# C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( T& x5 t/ _+ T& R @3 C$ E# a Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
Z$ H, g: R- ^5 |' d4 W -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ n4 A h1 U6 N; e, u
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
- g- B$ G$ X+ k -------------------------------------------------------------------------' J% f& U! O+ a
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
, a0 `6 F1 F2 g& _* v" B4 c -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. S& w1 ~; O% n9 l Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766, _/ Y$ \, H: B3 D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 n% g( v) Y n0 A$ W) m
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707. L$ q; n6 P7 ^2 x1 D* M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 e9 z$ Q. n% j6 ^+ X8 K' ~1 i Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500" @4 N0 C g8 }
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 O+ `5 T$ h2 C! L1 I
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389$ e/ I* ?. V" I
------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3 A( \( X0 X3 D
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
1 v4 h# N) ~% j/ c' g4 }; q -------------------------------------------------------------------------; {9 n4 m1 y% P
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500" M! U0 a$ m! b- Z, }1 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( z4 _! V/ O7 W1 B8 L* X3 M9 j
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0008 N: o$ H4 ^) X! _1 a3 n8 ? `
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 N2 w6 \! j* \9 C6 ]; h1 K National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
4 @9 [; R. `7 C# o S+ o J; C -------------------------------------------------------------------------& A) T: N+ T% l+ e
5 W5 i! a3 ?. }0 ^! X
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 z7 U3 _1 V$ g3 Y: K4 S2 S( U Standard Condominium% m% B ?$ }+ i2 `6 f' |+ W
-------------------------------------------------------------
) f4 w" f" {7 F9 y 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo8 ? C( O; y6 B, i; E4 {4 u' H
Market % Change Average Average % Change0 b& q- u) ~3 u7 j9 c3 c' m
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 k- ]+ T* T i Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%. T6 U. {& }. ~2 P
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 }/ h1 y* d- ?2 V" `, {+ f: p6 w ` Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
' q! Z+ x9 B. A$ I -------------------------------------------------------------2 i1 @9 A4 o$ k/ S- L6 c
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
z1 D9 [- ]3 v$ A7 x -------------------------------------------------------------7 j8 Q. x* ~3 V- _4 p
Saint John N/A - - N/A
: Q8 g3 Y( t3 a$ F' _2 N -------------------------------------------------------------
" n( r* E$ A" b" l9 Q6 h St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%8 \5 H+ u' u, Y Y/ d9 B& X
-------------------------------------------------------------
: ^2 x) ^) n/ w+ C Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
9 G9 X; g% n9 C% d1 K -------------------------------------------------------------
+ l. n q3 d4 w* m& ~7 n Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%; X2 q+ S. q& z# Y1 U& }7 ?0 v
-------------------------------------------------------------
' `9 G( \2 B, j# D Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
5 t" T- d3 P7 x -------------------------------------------------------------. q- }0 h h. @" n2 z; y; j% Y, K
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
4 z! t0 O {4 T& b+ @, ~# P ------------------------------------------------------------- c9 @: E) [: |
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%, @9 Z6 O2 p2 R( e" i$ h1 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 ~4 j! j( G" k H3 z. _ Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
5 B" ]( d5 k& F9 i& m -------------------------------------------------------------
8 e/ s) x7 z! t4 n0 h0 _" ^, [ Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
+ \, r! i$ B- c4 @ -------------------------------------------------------------7 a& @* o4 H; E+ |/ q
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%- ~. y4 S% j% g# x. h, p
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 J: P, E8 `# g3 V Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%9 \; \! e8 a6 I5 ?5 c6 a# K7 y* F
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ _) r/ Z' t1 j Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
" s: k: S" e) C, M2 X% J -------------------------------------------------------------
% s1 f+ t! v' Q) f' a1 v National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
$ W7 i# M* Z. M* W; ` -------------------------------------------------------------( `( [6 t+ y; V# U4 w! K8 U0 [7 i
>>. B! h: F1 N* P
# C/ x. z/ b) o+ [2 f) c Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
$ S: A4 Q$ u/ n" V+ Vin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint7 i4 P0 h& I$ o% N
John and Victoria.3 m1 T0 A y7 u- W
1 O- U# r/ f; Z1 v The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most) w0 g2 M% `8 p w# h8 A+ T7 D4 q
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of. m3 W E5 r( o9 C3 c d1 I
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release' f K' Q2 g4 h9 L& y
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price) Z& r7 Y/ z/ @
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
0 L6 U, R$ H, U; {3 Uacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is6 C. V9 `3 y9 m+ K b
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current; N% N1 V/ y1 S+ f4 Y! l
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
$ q2 h' N% W# h3 |* O) J/ t* G/ Uversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
6 g( b* n: R& g6 L: ]November 15, 2006.
+ B7 @: Q+ `7 s4 o0 r Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of2 G) S0 p; S3 @) a; [
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge- B! E0 R( F) \6 j+ p9 f1 [
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is: B$ I) U) k: j
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|