 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable + s ?: Q+ [2 W: m
0 k& F% c; e* Q
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -9 u6 L' m0 I) M6 A
) J& g& \ C& R, Z
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
; _1 W8 Z/ M; A) N) C$ pexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third7 n K$ y2 K. v7 H2 C4 U' l$ j) a
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
o6 W: k ?7 d4 O b7 fin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
5 Y+ C: A. ^9 ?: d$ E4 j7 O- x/ k. F) eprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and1 _) h7 c" h- S5 z, ^
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario, p3 [5 A' V* p+ |- S( p$ n
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal K, p9 j- j& P( Z/ c
LePage Real Estate Services.
% Y9 Z& c$ B2 x, Z& l4 c+ e
( ]* ^ E' e0 t9 T, { Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
! k' ?9 O9 k4 g* `8 lare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
& F7 H' m, R# k; Z1 Oconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and; g f3 S2 R. p' w
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the- n3 H0 r' L" H
residential real estate sector.7 [* T& j2 J8 B
& `% ]% u" a/ G5 o" f, n6 q+ B
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
3 D' ^; @( u& E! r1 u( moccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)3 Y6 e8 t8 q) o: n- P5 N
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
! V- @4 a u8 q( t- G0 H4 a. |+ F8 e(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
% D- [ L p' H+ ]/ \(+13.2%).1 E+ i H& B8 v3 R9 e' {
# u+ ^4 @$ J) W6 N; ?
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth* r1 ?3 C7 o. t% Y W6 ^2 c
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
2 B w. G( O1 d* |9 {. ffrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are8 i' c) |0 ~2 U/ |) B% ^
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
7 C# G+ R8 R, l2 i3 kpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.8 u* T) }- S, u; ?: A( H
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We G' F% s& \: d$ J5 F
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
5 n5 w( A1 c" g: `$ g. y$ y7 rbalanced market."
. J7 k- |, Q6 u- p, Q, p2 x d5 U( R9 V3 L
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,( w& {; f: Y" c9 T V
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
) x4 I( J# M& s d% nto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
: I4 f% o& U4 ?throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core& r( x: w6 c" _8 m( p, Z- Q
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,4 l; F: B8 r: p* D
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
6 u( y+ o+ I- Z, N W/ y2 tbreaking price appreciations.) Q& z" G+ b g9 N& N
0 B; [; g* _! S8 O% K1 C& z# J" M Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding' Z" A$ y3 `. l! t: g" x* H, \
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
$ E+ ]6 Z9 e# _+ j5 Elargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
5 C5 K9 s$ `" y7 V0 [+ a4 i+ b8 [) O) o
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
! l, @% [4 b# l& Seconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer: m4 ?3 x& ]! H) l0 S0 G" u5 F
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
) Z# p+ m* r5 C) Oslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
, I. I, g" x {/ C" [, K" D: y1 Q) hIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
0 \6 |4 H: a) P" U1 I+ Qgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of" c' ~; k* M% H9 y, `7 G
price appreciation when compared with 2005./ }% Q& Y2 T+ A) y: {9 w
9 V2 [ A) {% b* k# q
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
( {3 g6 N6 V, Y, b5 \* `, Cmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and4 K+ e) a# o1 f1 l
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada# Q9 ]" T9 z0 J; B
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
9 }$ r# A p }; l+ r
" S; R& s$ Z, D, g, a) R Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the1 L! y' {! o5 H2 A2 Y1 g/ K6 p
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's3 W/ O' F, ?4 V% Y: f. x
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
) p1 A/ k5 Y/ C Hrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general1 }# E( K) J1 |2 K# x$ N; G& I6 n- s
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
' D# Z9 \0 A6 [downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and# t4 d* _5 C3 f. c
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
' ^% k7 F, n- ^" F4 nmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."5 \# E& X7 m# j1 ?
0 R$ X) V; M" ? <<
7 Z/ u6 }* n. g REGIONAL SUMMARIES
7 D1 W8 O# a2 w) W5 T- p h0 A4 d, G >>
, k. }7 ^4 q4 ]) }) ~. K% g# C! D6 H/ Z7 ^
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
3 S1 c: W! ?$ ]$ ]9 q# a7 b* AHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate$ W7 s6 u% g3 {$ h' L9 m
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
1 U0 U# Y5 s! {looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of- I0 b* k# {% H: x
renovations.
h: n2 A+ g7 J7 _% e7 l0 F; W2 L
8 w, p' L9 q0 U The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight% J' R& i2 P$ L/ @; g0 P. o
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
- o9 {4 h4 i' l3 a9 Dcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and M$ K, i# X/ h. a! r* K4 l0 u0 t
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
5 V! j0 J/ v6 O2 T7 }7 @' N! N8 F3 Z9 @# w* ~
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
8 I3 d- [% y* [: _slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the. h* k! q- D+ w1 V5 T
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
' k `% w) O5 f; U600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores6 {3 ?8 X7 x- h+ |6 j( V+ d
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
# B3 V+ K1 X: t f2 band are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
* E" u& R5 R1 ^& ?& b/ F
T& y) Q! y5 I In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
4 C4 x5 Q' y; p; J/ G7 u! Pconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
, O2 |$ t+ o' l, M, I' Y( I4 thomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
& [6 s: x# `6 _- _3 F1 Xwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian( F( F4 }1 _; i6 q! m- U" K
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
! ?! a' ~+ f, kbuyers with more options when looking for a home.5 N R; J+ x& Y, o" G3 B( ~1 k# x
+ X) u2 r1 L& J, @. @! A Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
1 C; F0 b2 V' zamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
" D, y) L' g4 [/ {& L* W' ?2 T) epriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,7 `! \- R, L) I2 q3 @; C* {
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
/ P) L# Z; A, a, {few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions., f3 c/ t2 @3 `* M1 s2 ]) X( i
# B" p+ x( S c% o& V; a4 D+ e Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house' W& d# E8 H' W$ ~
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
, y3 c( l2 x/ c1 H6 r3 y$ {levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
3 W* T0 M1 B9 c+ [# nfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1," A( q- g! K0 w e0 A) T7 m4 M. S
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
1 e" O( W; ]1 D% Rpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before$ ]/ V( q5 _2 {! D& n" [$ {
making a purchase.0 u1 i/ w9 Z2 b4 m5 |
1 ^1 l; I5 Z8 c! M- J6 {4 I
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing$ J# J0 Y( H( u# L
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong# C+ p! o+ W8 \& o
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
+ H7 T4 t( I+ O" G1 L% lcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting8 o. ?* E! c3 V+ G; s. k
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
- W/ X* V9 T( t7 B9 Eamenities.7 B" G* n0 `/ E- X0 l C
: U1 A2 y2 H9 F& X' x
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels F+ `, F6 m z* u9 d4 |* N
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
% H- L& Z, d( D3 w1 V) ~; qacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
9 @9 @( D C0 r" |+ b: acontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been8 w) ?- z! m v0 Z4 S
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
9 Y3 q7 M. [) n! i1 k4 Aresidence, rather than for investment." w/ i8 v. M, [+ ]( D; ^
% i' u( ~* y2 Y" v; t$ K
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
' x$ D7 t1 N- v" ]* R* Q. R9 Xhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
' t1 d! B, c$ z8 x, zin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer, T% z1 z8 ^( T9 ?( _2 j3 c
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
- Z0 m4 h- {5 S. u1 \ trate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
& |/ n1 a% k! u( X* ethe market.
' C, s" e3 a) b" S1 ]' e5 R2 f0 W" |$ ^' S9 V1 t( [
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
c' t. ~7 o6 V: c7 `% |July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In* U! ^+ Q/ A% g# \6 f7 m/ \
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
! |; O! H0 C" k5 I0 bmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
( e$ o& x) X( J: y( U& f, Rto the shortage of available inventory.8 X3 c$ R; _/ B0 `0 r' Q+ Z4 b
6 G; `9 J& s, _- p6 J
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
5 d! \# ~6 P/ H+ c7 n8 Qmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
6 n& \! q! ?: e" _$ {vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
# `- T' g9 b, B8 X* y) {% }struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
5 v$ f+ @& A& ^9 y8 J
- A7 k% Q( U, h; z N+ A. r6 B0 `4 x Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases2 s$ k# T/ k. ?5 M
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low: U5 L, U M8 D4 `0 r j9 z/ }/ ?
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
" p" {' z# n4 |# o7 H4 o8 z( }pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring- P5 r( j2 |4 T% ?( w+ I$ k
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer. Z& G5 A9 z7 r
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as' R; [ T& _, w* J, R# J/ |' {
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
0 v& S# @ O+ N) @" m( Z" w% t4 u( {" R- m
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
/ i) }7 S# ]* @/ Z+ [as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton1 B( [8 ?! G' k; u% Z2 ^1 D, k
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
* \1 I4 X3 ^( j# u* C5 W* D1 w7 Rmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
0 A! l; u* j: Z9 |! s4 lincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve% d+ V- G8 Q( n9 S% w6 C- A/ g/ B
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
& j& Z& O) }. U0 W2 d, ~# `towards the end of 2006. 1 g0 f& _( `# P! U4 H K) [
: n( ]; T# F9 M4 |! h
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of# S+ j1 s J/ L( Z& T* w. D
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable" U, W, I" d* P- f' l
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
$ }( d( v T3 rgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to0 ~9 M- |& x9 `3 f7 |
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
, f+ Y7 I/ t- m% |# n) ]pressure on tight inventory levels.7 t4 ^5 U) s4 q, i8 ]
5 o o s$ }( k- O) S3 W Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic; R0 R. ^3 p# A4 l4 f. `3 z
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people6 K$ R& Z" R8 V5 n' S+ j1 Z
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;+ z4 [/ _5 {; Z* b" a3 W
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
/ ?9 p" @3 s) D1 q2 w* J* H& [for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
! |( u" f1 d- L0 c; P
6 L& t$ `7 C; R, G: c << [" ~+ ?% Q5 U% e( _" G- B
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006. I9 ^+ X. y6 f3 |
) Z+ z8 r+ s! j& g$ _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( r( [& b" o+ c Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey- Z& ~7 q! O) z& F! M( l9 W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* n1 N q" _, K) l [8 n7 B
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
& }9 O3 d: U$ R$ C3 N4 I" f; F) ]2 C Market Average Average % Change Average Average
/ q' b) _8 r- a. F, s+ i -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 ~& u9 x" e" q. l$ R& n) d
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000( q u* o" N+ ?9 I0 h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ N% \) X& j& t8 b* u. {
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
K% s* @( r4 J# { -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 _$ c/ B7 {. F6 F4 h' H3 V
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
$ c8 U6 t+ P4 E -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; o# D# h" H" {& F9 c# I3 s4 ] Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
/ J+ T, x f+ P- Z. j0 D. `+ [1 Y* J -------------------------------------------------------------------------( |5 J5 p4 ^& _5 [1 l
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
* l( S$ i& C8 n -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 L/ J0 V2 I& L5 L0 J* U0 D' m
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
; i( @( a% m4 @% K+ o6 a: m. U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: P9 y7 g, Y) g0 i6 J% n' T) _) K Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
) F" F3 y7 k) }5 j! m) g- Q& q0 u -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. F) I' W( A: \/ Q. Q Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250/ w/ C5 j( W" P- {# n2 x# u- {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) I1 e' G/ J. z( I Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7669 @ x1 `! Y) n4 w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 Y. G$ F* Y# P8 I Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
0 n& u& _: s+ |9 u2 j7 A$ s) \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ `% w4 p+ A" |, M9 ]
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500: ^9 l8 R. I8 O) w' x' ^3 a$ ?0 {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ N4 `! \0 A% ^7 L7 g
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
' s) O0 a7 \4 ?5 d- {6 } -------------------------------------------------------------------------' @0 R2 X3 k# @ m; c8 H2 K
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
$ Y* s4 }, f, W. U/ x; r -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 V& q# B: J* m) M
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500, V6 u3 {5 D, F7 U3 m X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ J+ j# h. j! C$ g( y1 {6 ] j* w/ a( J
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0005 r4 F Z2 a3 Z# c7 P0 a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ^% ~/ c P A4 D, W National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
: F$ n7 y* V; ^% ^& h. W -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ N& S, [9 ^7 F, r( w, ]& p3 x; Z- }
-------------------------------------------------------------
, {( \- c3 @+ c Standard Condominium& l4 F' R# s. |2 Q# _
-------------------------------------------------------------
' C: ~/ h$ Q: v" P ?8 O 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
3 t, R' i: _/ |5 s% v! |% R Market % Change Average Average % Change
0 j9 _' ?. I% } -------------------------------------------------------------4 a5 G7 E5 D0 M! ~3 u
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%# ?) t# ?3 M9 S: J
-------------------------------------------------------------
; a! `, P1 _ V* y! r7 g! @: R+ Y Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
1 R3 [. C& ?: u! l. Z) d -------------------------------------------------------------
. z& a9 _* e2 v$ q: S/ [( [ Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
( \5 l: L: s4 p" ^6 F -------------------------------------------------------------
. |- J: b$ W" V! }* @( P" o( C Saint John N/A - - N/A
8 ^: i) Y( B( a2 r- K Y$ u -------------------------------------------------------------& z2 F8 R9 ]( O# q* A0 R; R: {
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
$ |* ^! |7 ]: q -------------------------------------------------------------
$ G7 L) w+ _0 ]" ^2 v Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
4 {! ~! `+ C/ q' R -------------------------------------------------------------: E3 p G+ `) c$ `8 X# ]
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%# s$ E% k, r' T& E
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 U" B# S( L; T2 f3 T/ J Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%& l* P7 D+ l+ z
-------------------------------------------------------------7 l5 D9 Z4 J; O8 C# V) _
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
1 P5 C7 K" F. p- K- b- R! ?7 Z9 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------
0 w. T1 I* Y. W; z Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
! x& a5 R. I: L% C% H( f( G3 o' o) @ -------------------------------------------------------------
6 G G( k3 L# z6 t1 ~2 z8 R Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
9 d, p( {+ j, _( @' v2 S -------------------------------------------------------------# P F$ c+ h1 Z0 d1 R a" q' [
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
$ L2 }7 v5 D8 @# o. x# [ -------------------------------------------------------------
1 \& @# h7 i% {! M/ y9 F: s( a/ ^ Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
9 s/ ?' T0 U; W1 k8 B+ ^" ?7 i -------------------------------------------------------------
/ j+ P. }1 E4 K" ?3 u Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%7 m& V8 J7 }" C: C6 d P# r
-------------------------------------------------------------; v9 A) G. ^0 P9 z
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%( Z; v! R$ n4 @, z0 ?! ^
-------------------------------------------------------------
* V6 f8 N$ w0 c, |$ e5 Y' X U National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%: p3 \4 j0 H5 @' w: s
-------------------------------------------------------------
( i3 D K5 t( L7 R+ n1 Z >>
2 j# s# @( [7 K5 ^2 k3 v9 N0 x
9 J, H' S0 ^# A2 R Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
. l, L7 Y# M$ g( M# O$ kin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint+ [* l1 T! k6 J. `3 F
John and Victoria.
! M; k* M1 O! g% Y9 U, q
* g' n* M b. J' s- I# J/ w, e" Z i$ I The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most: f& }8 v* E+ P
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
8 h! l4 ^+ a( E* G* [housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release5 E5 y; T; {4 \2 J. Q- t& j; _) T
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
& f/ u4 y# ]' n% W! v+ K utrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
2 e" X3 o, \5 Q' T2 y: s: Macross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is1 Z! r0 | w8 R& c/ j; e
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
1 {+ P7 Q }7 r$ c- O* P6 R( Gfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable. C* l! {- j1 ?3 g0 i* \+ K; i
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
+ ?' O1 p# A4 p% R# C! N1 UNovember 15, 2006.
. u" [9 Z4 c6 r9 R/ i& m Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
4 C/ ]8 K7 S7 p0 ?% s3 kfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
& Y9 u$ w! x" i% G1 m& Lprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is3 K1 N) g) e2 W# N6 c9 _
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|