埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2107|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ' R9 `( D. X2 X9 Z
+ s9 U& l% r. C0 {0 D4 a4 \
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
- G, F. u6 K' i' p+ k
' p, f+ a9 l. g& ~# U7 f    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market1 l+ C* I1 u/ T6 G) B* @4 U  K: ?
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third1 Q+ p6 r$ M% @
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
; W( f( N" G0 Q8 c0 O! l5 @, Yin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
8 w; t; J% M  [+ f+ Aprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and4 o0 _$ i; _/ i  M) F* M
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
+ P2 }+ ^. {! \+ bQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
) l+ Z& U+ c% oLePage Real Estate Services.  r* A& j, L* ~$ C0 a( L8 J3 |, [

* j1 J5 a6 T' d( O( I8 Y    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
$ ~; i# U! f1 E: j: k; sare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
3 Y6 o7 a$ [3 D: uconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
& k7 c" ]; w; \9 c3 Usound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the" ?9 K1 Y) u4 Q2 r
residential real estate sector.
4 d5 b5 k  @! }6 k2 ]; X6 ?1 E
- F1 k& e. g% m. t    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation0 n) `  H" @$ K2 {  y
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
; Q. m' h1 f- r0 I1 Tyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
+ M3 ~. P! \2 f(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
2 z+ R% P5 X, v$ T( `(+13.2%).+ V$ o; T  B* X: e/ q
8 n: e, {5 a3 G0 L
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
6 ?. |+ Q$ ]/ Dduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
8 j& ]. ]( l2 M) m- }frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
2 a% H* b- ]" u/ V5 _* }poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,8 j* I5 Z+ M9 T3 D% v
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
4 ^4 [- G- O6 B4 A"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
: F' P2 {2 m' I0 b  a4 z0 j7 p. X7 Twelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy8 j, n; |- h! y6 \
balanced market."8 s% c3 a' D% W
( z5 Y; G* r7 O% w0 n7 K
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
: ]: e. w' _; }# e& J: K, Tconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift/ C3 g+ x- A% y1 z
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued% p  `4 \9 G3 `  D# W1 O
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
5 _7 E$ [- e& r' ?5 d" w% i9 [( ienergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,) }  M! J+ O) X5 G% Q9 v; r: H
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record5 c" t1 v9 f( z7 ]" d' [8 A9 p
breaking price appreciations.9 U8 _' |# |- }1 N

/ G" C2 B. w  X$ K  a! i    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
1 p( v; u- ?  @3 C6 Peconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the3 I' l1 Q" f' z1 i
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
. @7 \6 o4 m% O  g. G
. |2 F7 W, ?: f: O- Z! f7 v2 {    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
9 J* w7 _! X3 |' f: n3 N/ \! Meconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer$ _% n( I/ ?; W8 ]$ k1 Q
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off8 D5 @: g* {/ Z$ ^" P
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.- m' z+ o6 @/ I
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers- n& r0 N4 r+ b& a6 M
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of1 P; j6 u' F: G/ g' P) O
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
% g! M2 Z/ W: O* e
* Z# l5 K) y7 ~1 q. h    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing3 j" }- s' N" s7 @  O
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
' B) C4 N3 H8 L* Y( k4 F( w  Kfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada8 ^- n; U2 _) I
are markedly different than those found in the United States., U# S$ S) A$ X7 ]
3 {# t% C7 X8 ]& p3 @& ~* F) a
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
% F- I3 |1 B* R; OAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
/ y4 T5 v- [& L) j8 }- nfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the6 J3 p$ E3 p' a1 q. H
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general; G6 Z0 N1 r  c  ~! a8 X
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the. B% J" W6 O& C7 ?3 u, d5 N
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and  @- o  _7 Q* W% A; K7 u+ D
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization' y. A* V& T1 D$ H5 ?
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
! _  @4 u0 m% [# y, h% H
; P, T, ^; S& L/ s3 X+ j2 N    <<
, j+ h- R) O: V' M7 p& O) F                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES: Y. H8 K( ~) J+ W
    >>
; G, q& s# C8 J, W# N) x( C* R' |' G; H/ L4 [$ q$ G- j+ r' l& D) F2 S
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in. I, _! a7 U3 r$ e* I+ G. ]
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate, `0 T$ m8 o1 y3 G1 M  W
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time, P/ H6 i; P, {) n. n, }
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of' i; t1 W7 [* _$ X% x# N- Z
renovations.
6 q+ x$ j$ Y3 D0 @
, E4 q& Z$ B# k2 n5 i  T8 \    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight& c& {- O# S' o+ ]6 \
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
+ X. o5 C: T- t: Mcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
, H8 w  Q. A) F2 {# s. o1 ?: k7 M3 rSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter., f; ~) Z0 A. n

" n3 M1 t& U4 m- q' ^4 d    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer# _# C! i4 W6 J, `: [8 ]( c0 @
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
" ~9 X6 R4 j! m! ^quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new! F  z% M; U6 G- i8 M
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores+ n+ F% {+ H8 k, ^( ^3 z" r+ i
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes1 f4 S/ c6 b8 u
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
9 ^/ I. u# E: ]1 Q4 v) ~1 \! @
+ D) O- ]# O& B8 s9 W    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced/ o+ K' b# u& U, o; c
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their8 x# @" j5 A% s' `
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
. {7 {1 x3 C% X8 zwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian" c9 j7 v" r/ H. z# h  G
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
+ o  O* S7 K' m" {2 I2 l& ]buyers with more options when looking for a home.1 C- B0 F: D# k
1 _. Y9 p  Y! q- X+ c# @" p
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly6 u; }, W  _5 S+ z5 f0 C
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes' w+ W* ^" V' h, b$ k% s
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,3 i; I& r& Q: D6 ^# P+ R
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last- ]  F( R0 k$ g' A3 f/ i% z4 w
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions./ D, u' M  I) t9 m9 B" C$ h
0 r) l6 p7 n2 W( [. }; [
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house3 ~' _$ X0 _+ `3 Q0 S5 M( s
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
0 |0 U0 D. {) K& V! Z& Wlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
- A8 p) g* b$ _! ?first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
5 d" Y6 ^! |. P# q' p' N5 Wwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
) [, r! F6 W2 S# d6 E$ y' Ppressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
' s( T! w0 h' @% @; emaking a purchase.
5 h$ r7 _" |- m8 A! S5 }, p; x7 U' H+ C. g, f
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
" y1 W; k- E/ ]: Z- f! V  Dmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong- f4 f: ^, E* `* n+ ^0 P6 _
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
2 \2 k7 z9 y  i$ _3 b% rcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
6 ~, w! \; o- `4 g+ ]attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown) a6 ^- Z5 t3 Z. [7 J* Z
amenities.
6 c5 O) i4 F) L6 @$ d' d8 `7 b, ^! c- O% y. H
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels5 x/ J/ s" g% M# z% g, L
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
1 [; e& Y$ g7 I/ Z3 Vacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has0 v& e- n: F, _7 W5 p+ r
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been! a" D; X4 J9 [* j$ n; L: A
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
8 ~# W# b& K# {9 o  e1 z. Hresidence, rather than for investment.& V% H% I$ B/ A- x# k5 o0 p9 x

& |& }. E) A6 D" y    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as; ]) Q" t3 g% F) v9 h1 m. r
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
( t% ~1 r5 B4 C9 x6 S# D- d- Tin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
; q' n& I& X+ p; d) W6 yconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
/ P* m: h! E, s: N$ Y3 D9 ~rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter* K' b% `: a/ }* \7 w
the market.
1 w' h9 q" p% ?  n
# M, a) O) v5 T# p& h! X& |    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through# F& m1 A! s7 G4 R. {3 F( _
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
" C( S" R" n4 a" e- h" V- N! mAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring- T: L# U) S' W0 ~- L1 }: ~
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due* T8 h" J$ W  U7 F6 M  e
to the shortage of available inventory.6 E  }' C$ L7 q2 r' F9 P

6 q7 x4 p2 r9 i% t& [- l' Z& L, u    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
7 _. L( c  D- X' i; Hmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
8 f5 j, Y8 x: Wvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
' u2 H  ]; k3 Hstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
! @  U, I5 s  h' o4 C7 V$ Q- p$ X* v
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases: V* t% `$ D" [4 J# f$ k6 c# R
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
2 O. p0 r: `6 E# Lunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that+ q' o, h, L6 ]+ S, {7 R$ G' {! j
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring, {; m2 k( q8 H; j6 u1 p- U
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
) w/ j5 l9 Q  c: P7 Oseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
7 E0 r% I+ m8 n& f9 }9 ?2 T& Gbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

  }* m. j. H$ U0 G, T* t2 |$ A% y4 L) y3 @- ]
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
7 g  E- i3 W/ z' l' U" k$ gas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
' a9 K9 x% ^& W, Eremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
" e* h) P6 D$ q8 n+ l. c. Y+ Cmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
2 c; u. D. k2 u# m  oincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve4 F' Y1 W# D( J
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
( P9 T6 `8 }  T* s; Xtowards the end of 2006.
   
/ k& l' L+ }& `; n! o+ H* B
% L6 j3 B1 F  \& rWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of6 d* x9 R# P  d2 x6 Q" y
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable; w, N) Q3 y/ h
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse8 ?  e5 O* t4 h+ x# J- }; L# w
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
& R$ o& p; ~" N$ pforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added, w- E( M* Y; |# D
pressure on tight inventory levels.: y/ V; S" P* ^% p; [
$ ]! E9 W6 a; i0 w- p  L7 @( ^
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic1 b2 m" U( C9 h$ P  S# _
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
( q/ \- K$ v, D$ X8 E! C" Minto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;, R6 X) h) |) f/ \6 j
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching# V( g$ |8 }9 }& H# V! O" u
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.! d9 B, @" g% {' Y- ^- y* U; I) z% f

1 G/ v% V. \, _) F+ u7 `' _& A    <<$ x% [9 _) Q3 w# a7 l1 t
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20064 {+ Z9 L  v: e# E( j- X
: ?/ ~9 I4 D' u9 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  v$ k6 q0 ]% |6 c" l5 @; z# z                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
# v1 F& I4 i! X9 n4 _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ V5 B/ d; S, J" J3 z                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q38 w3 W9 c0 c% [- R
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average$ G8 i$ I% b" S( f. Y% s0 ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 k# s. }7 m' o, a
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000  _2 j% H( B* w# b2 }# y& F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 ~  G9 [, p  u! Y: U% E: x    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
; W* J  C2 P/ T; e5 X$ x0 N& q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 D/ {1 n( T& d/ c
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
+ n/ l+ ~& w, k6 e8 [    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 ~& p" F! x: O; L+ @% N0 G0 J
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -$ X* K, m6 J4 E+ W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 @& L: ?9 |+ o7 b) G6 P' ^8 i
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
' G' C# Y5 S2 |1 @5 a6 w, E  ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. w; \) S" G: G: [# a
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
, }! v# R7 C7 S: x6 ]7 P" Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 ?6 d2 s$ B  d- j/ P  C    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
8 W* Z; e& T4 x( B    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ g) n- b" P2 n) [8 P4 D2 b$ q7 @    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
9 e0 }4 ^1 c6 H6 ?/ C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ B" `' [- o5 \+ x    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
. ?( ]% r8 B4 @7 S5 t$ W  l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! N- e6 F8 w# s4 }% r" b+ r    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
5 q+ i8 Y2 h0 |$ C/ t- |    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) y7 I& C2 P' o  ?3 \
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500# m9 Z! D: O! T8 u$ ?+ M0 Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 I9 k! [) \  h% g9 t
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
5 T- t% a" h$ ?  l5 ~. c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( \. `/ p# X* O6 Y! C5 I6 P    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714- b2 {4 _! n$ e2 v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 @& B4 C; ?% u; ~2 r& x* @    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
3 n' e  Y' l/ R& U; V    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' |8 p! r' T7 v; O; q/ ?    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
7 r0 ~" \/ F1 R    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 E" ~' m! z) C  |$ w1 @
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860$ b6 K: a) }/ j, y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 \4 j, ~" _/ h+ N% Q  I/ W
) {  i' z5 g, k& V
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 M: Z& {9 N& E4 Q, z* _3 Y5 O                               Standard Condominium
& r: J( E4 K1 G$ G$ }* P2 M# \) P    -------------------------------------------------------------% Q1 w% E# A) s4 Y% x
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
; k: H! S9 |' I& Y    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change/ d* T3 g+ ^9 h
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 L- p* D6 E4 H& Q% [' u: T
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%5 [- q& F# z/ ~5 E. B" k
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ J1 S2 @5 |" v, H! R    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
% r  ]  K2 O' N    -------------------------------------------------------------
) \8 R4 {2 R4 B4 V# }    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
+ d8 ]- d3 B# Q, x4 M5 t- e' w    -------------------------------------------------------------% k( R5 ~9 Y! b
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A% U/ v, W: C% Y9 w  L9 o% r
    -------------------------------------------------------------- K8 U! j/ j+ u9 u+ T8 I
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
7 z( ^: g3 A% ^8 P- Q2 L! a- ^6 D    -------------------------------------------------------------: w+ s+ w% ~* x8 t5 q0 U
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%/ y& @4 U  X4 l$ }9 C- L3 Y+ M, T. k
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 m+ l, N- t0 S( [* J8 p    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
$ F1 p# |0 V- H0 E" D4 s    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 h% e4 o2 J" W! E. J    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%( C4 S: J6 \1 X$ m- C
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  \) y% W* t$ c9 s7 }    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
6 n- G) J& C1 L1 G+ y1 B    -------------------------------------------------------------. y& l9 N! K% j4 \+ Y4 E6 K: K
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
1 M2 u, F+ k& W/ o5 m    -------------------------------------------------------------
! p! [, y0 g; W, O4 S7 R    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%- T# J: g- x, ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------7 S, E) i. f. M7 s& _- s) ]- z4 L
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%9 A9 W6 t1 N$ C# C- i
    -------------------------------------------------------------# `' j4 `) G$ e6 O0 F
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
! `8 `7 A  `& \% i0 u( ]- Z    -------------------------------------------------------------+ i+ J1 J  t( j4 S
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%  N# o3 D4 I7 U/ b  P
    -------------------------------------------------------------6 g( C5 `. j- U* d- V
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%. }: ^; d/ i% P
    -------------------------------------------------------------6 o' Y$ Z* x# h3 ?! i0 x, l
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
! X4 Y) \' j( F+ J& y% H  x5 x/ c- x    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 {, q- S. X5 s, W9 ^    >># @, U) R: N+ A# g" T" Z2 X& b
- N' c( R. K  A' k2 r
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
  Q: O0 H' d+ n% u1 Z; `9 o! Win the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
; U# A9 {0 J+ }John and Victoria., R$ X# b- s! g% J8 a/ e6 t
. F+ L7 c$ g8 d2 v+ X& x' u: m" ]
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
. h: k' o  t0 ?! b2 j! L! Ucomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of3 C1 K% Z2 k* Y& V- B
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release) ~  g+ S' `$ X  u7 p2 {
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
* Q* z7 i8 Y8 g9 ztrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
: z7 S8 b; F' e4 q# Q, \across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
: V9 p' X) K3 L& y$ G) xavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
( |5 o9 ?% \" t: O( ~- Gfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
" ]0 ]& T" Y3 @4 I, M4 S$ lversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
, r9 m' {# i9 T( B3 \1 D6 ~November 15, 2006.
3 t6 n5 r3 `  p6 |' o    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of5 y, P, \+ e: M0 i1 \, t
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
3 |) i5 O$ J+ S  j# {0 ?* k0 V. jprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
+ V8 y  W2 Q/ A! o9 Aavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-28 02:20 , Processed in 0.094522 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表