埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2269|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
- w- E/ B4 B  N& G5 b& K( o3 _& a: _- w3 S3 J0 t6 Y
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -- j- n) C( [+ ]2 ^  p2 k
; F+ ~; D+ U5 M! H1 v2 }7 Y
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
2 C( c2 B; n- t. O* {, rexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third, y) m# t8 _, p) q1 \2 d
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
# L+ E# R7 C9 }3 l# ~in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
* l4 G% s& J  |) G5 s4 Y* K/ ~price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
9 @- Q+ f( m5 T% y3 K; N; Xmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
3 E7 \# R4 \7 v- i# dQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
  T# E8 R. S1 Q5 P' i2 ~. ELePage Real Estate Services.2 M( `! Q7 r$ q! E

1 Q6 M5 L  ~0 O+ L- L) y    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters8 y, H) S( e6 `7 A
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
5 t/ G" j9 `2 R* x/ Xconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and! R4 n3 t8 N5 }) v& H
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the' r# C4 ]' _* I5 W
residential real estate sector.
# }% `* m+ M7 S& f# Q  N
7 _+ Y0 s$ J" I    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation) q- y! U& p7 `( x
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)! P5 M- |: y) l) f- H9 R7 f; l
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5628 J2 E: ?- c# `. f; g5 e2 _
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380* m! z( W; A* |/ c! m: s! G( u
(+13.2%).
& D( s+ p) t$ B: O" v! s4 [; S0 ?: z, o5 z( w; m8 i
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
1 b% y6 e8 K7 rduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the5 o3 `' B. y3 k8 B# d  Z) e, I$ v
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are7 D8 F* e7 }' @$ c" O, y& y
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,4 {1 a3 R; k; i+ Q  Q
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
& G# x' t( e% k8 l+ L"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
7 x7 ]! K) b' A# \1 vwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy0 {, k% c* A$ @2 y; t8 h
balanced market."
7 H, a3 A1 b& W
0 n' V2 Z8 q: ^: N6 M9 C7 Y* j9 M    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,1 @. v; i8 E" t1 H- W, D3 c) O+ P! r
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
7 n0 q8 v8 W& I3 p% w5 ?. uto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued5 J) E6 y% u. ]- o9 J
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core1 R) H' i' ?6 }. n2 E4 b
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,! ?6 n: o6 O6 i/ l1 {
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
% V% j5 Y7 ^) k# a1 ]% V# Ibreaking price appreciations.1 H8 N6 b( [6 X7 k
, Q+ x9 p4 D* p1 Y$ d- ]( m. s
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
. {/ H) z6 \" T9 yeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
  |/ L3 O3 V( X$ Mlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.. @- k( D2 n' M. p1 m

6 k3 y& @. L! Q4 m    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid, z0 l( f! P# `. o* _+ h6 o' g
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer$ H* M- e; V' m/ `0 X; P+ w6 v! A
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off7 B- T: D, P5 w8 h) D
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.4 B  |/ I4 b4 `: E" m
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
# S$ ~( N5 J' m+ A. ?- _3 u5 jgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
) P/ V( N  e6 d4 n* G  L+ Q% oprice appreciation when compared with 2005." A: l8 W( s" `% w

! v- ]. o8 s7 ]7 E    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing& o4 V1 ]. l0 U  T4 Y) ?
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
. T) L3 ^) A, v% Q6 Bfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
9 C6 Z5 A5 h. O% J9 G9 @are markedly different than those found in the United States.
+ q# ?0 m% M6 A* z7 T0 D+ c: _3 ~, I0 [* Z( J
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
! r5 \7 N- v3 I( Q' Z2 gAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
9 a+ i" n2 R2 A9 ?9 Efavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the1 {3 A+ M2 ]7 y+ O$ Y! @3 y
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
) }# z& I# @9 r' d: q) v0 Zaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
7 t( g# x5 t) S& V7 R3 ?0 Ldownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
. r% _  S) q( v4 T) @" k, s0 uaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
: w5 Z1 J3 ?2 }mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."4 J) X8 |3 J, O5 R1 A% C1 `. w
3 q& V# g4 m, o! @$ u. i1 I, O
    <</ E: [8 O* t, `, D9 y+ [: r2 l( @8 h
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES: J+ i1 S# ]; e8 \2 v
    >>" j1 x4 c! O( G/ h. m: d, s! {# [/ E
" h! R. j$ C# @  y5 y
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
* A) |* D& m4 w. N: D) sHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate/ _8 r3 D- p+ T- m
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time8 |* ^) ~7 N* w& M5 P' S
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
) u3 i- V  t9 L# Arenovations.0 p/ [6 D1 \8 A) U$ m
- F4 E) g$ |2 {. f! M
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
: z+ U4 Y) E2 j/ ]% X$ O4 hincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation% o) d: g' E9 ~
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
& ]+ @: ~# y9 _5 ]$ g- F: ]September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
5 ^/ d" T  C* f+ [- b7 V+ a1 ^; S3 a  K7 E3 y; H6 v# }+ N; |
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
' [  ^# Z: n/ W/ n, x( Uslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
. D8 t  c; z  A% C4 R% @2 e# |: uquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
/ x2 O0 Q* c4 J. o1 E# E5 L* D" q600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores! \! a: ?! L$ @; @' p1 d$ Y% ^
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
, c: o, b, L8 W" m3 e7 R! Z: \' C  iand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.% e- i  @6 Z+ H
) l) p" W+ t/ c/ L! O/ A
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
1 n# E& E) C# [; \conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
4 B+ \7 O: o$ s( y$ }homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers) i$ X' D/ p6 d& P( a9 e' [6 a
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
( Q: R8 I" ]! R8 z/ zdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing7 x) @  C3 [( t; e5 O" d$ l
buyers with more options when looking for a home.) |: U; u3 [7 c4 G/ h
1 `9 ^* V9 e/ X, e( r0 `1 q) _. k
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
& P" e  \6 v2 M8 Lamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes  w7 z9 o4 U, X3 Q" t6 r
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
" b4 L+ N/ v# ~  X$ u% l2 sas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last" Y* M, e" g4 O$ G
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
# e; X' S; h/ A# O8 e/ V8 g' ~  b) C& E6 j; j; c8 N0 V
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house4 q$ E& {1 S; D% T
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory+ s: L# n# }9 O/ U7 D: M( G+ F
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
* e: E, `: a, K5 V; f$ [first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,* p; L. |" a5 {, b
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
5 l$ t& X: ]$ ]8 W: Spressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
6 q3 a  V* t7 q1 z0 r+ k4 k5 T  Nmaking a purchase.: t7 V7 _4 ~- L& l9 {/ v
8 ?) J& l4 q. |& j! b2 a; l7 z
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
" ?5 _0 c- f% m, d3 m# U5 Hmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong3 B6 s2 h. I4 Z2 z: t1 i2 g2 H
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city: r2 t0 t; r+ |# j9 a+ ]; j7 v1 }
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
% a) M( \8 r$ B( ^! k: G8 Gattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown9 M  x' ?; t0 q* X8 }
amenities.
3 v3 N; h1 W: I: \4 ~: h7 J- K* f9 Y  U& _1 q5 X2 r
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
0 ^$ p' T) C- q: k; w& Vthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand' i  ]2 U) j; A! |% X: P$ W
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has# _- x/ T) E) {6 y  g
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been, w# n6 L$ g3 j. w7 [
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle4 Q2 O" q8 z4 H1 j
residence, rather than for investment.6 r: Q+ b+ |- [! U
0 n. q, H( T! a( \, z4 G) P
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
) k* p( k" Z' P& }3 l- O- Vhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted* I% |9 [. M( P: K/ w1 r" F4 P
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
3 J5 ~& u; z% z4 q- [9 Iconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization  ~! Z# x( J/ A7 k, w# Y
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter6 u( S! N4 Y0 _/ O
the market.  a0 R2 R  M8 j2 O" q! |

4 H- ~0 L1 B! A! z, ]2 v    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through' F, o, O0 {4 s' {7 ?' H% P! e, p: L
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In' N1 D, D+ @* g) n% b, F- b! a) U% p
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring  P9 F/ e$ |3 @  z& Y4 I, y3 ?6 r5 H8 y
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
  G! v% f: t. o6 \; J5 ~  U2 @to the shortage of available inventory.
7 P3 [- l- c; e6 @$ i0 E5 |
3 {* z& s. ]( u/ n& p    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
5 Z7 t- t7 e0 A6 |momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
* \8 ?" Z0 g4 i: s4 T  N( Evibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
* t' \% @$ {0 z* H2 n: vstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
& V  G# |# O) J6 W! |" x/ j; v6 Y% }1 N6 i
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases" K/ m& K6 r$ I$ {2 \9 d4 U
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low3 {/ Z& W# Y5 k" [5 M: J# ^
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
4 C% O1 Q" j& ^2 x3 @  q$ ~# Cpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring  B7 I( S% v9 g
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer# u$ o' O+ n) h# n2 I! A7 J1 h
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as6 O1 Q$ i3 y- E, g8 M/ P
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

: Q+ C+ R7 D* p
, k; @) s- W1 Y+ |6 m    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
7 Y; C1 g1 G; I! N1 ?as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton/ R- q7 B! K3 Z+ x0 z* X' @
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,6 v' h3 Q( Q3 K8 b( _  m. l
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
8 n  _. @7 S3 L& S& l( q0 uincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve0 C8 C; N4 }1 s& K* @
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly* t0 }6 q# R* Q" o$ ?
towards the end of 2006.
   
, _! ~( t5 F. y) @- ^0 v" C3 T5 Y/ p
0 M( C: n/ m& \( y+ l6 @While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of# H8 u) e6 {( _7 s  R9 U
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable' i' T* t' Y/ R
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse# F8 |7 S$ A" p& o& ~
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
: a* c. t* ?* V" {9 _% k5 d, ^foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
5 Y/ q4 d# C6 U6 qpressure on tight inventory levels.
- N  o, R. t$ f4 l5 X# ~( f  G" v
# o' Q# ~" O( E4 s! D' S4 k    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic- `$ f4 R4 v# U6 U3 t/ g5 R* w
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
  X4 _6 J, N; o9 W5 i. y# ~into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
: [4 d; r8 y: `; O- j1 y# pwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching, @7 ^, ~, H$ l/ B1 i, l
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.  L$ F2 H: R6 ^+ P7 K: m4 I' R

! v( [, n7 M& I# i9 J$ k( P    <<
, D" y5 r/ |( ]2 h; U6 i      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
9 b: a) [- J) ]7 o5 u/ l0 x* ]% b9 o$ {' p0 n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 n$ ]) D7 K. E. ?, {1 v0 X1 _
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey5 T4 _* w! k: V3 |) B6 Q+ t/ o2 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! m  l9 c/ L+ X# Q' B                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q39 @4 D- w2 e0 w) E; q6 I
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
8 a! K  n6 E6 A9 N7 o* C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' S- n: E5 i( u4 p. o    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000% r$ A, ~% ^5 s: C3 \: j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, E- X3 Q1 u: D$ _+ E3 t    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
1 d" e/ O* d% O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  a# P/ Y" l* E: u- ?5 r6 ~    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
; x6 w) P- U% e# x4 j2 s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ D# G1 i: ?0 ^9 b
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
1 [# b/ v4 A) F1 i" m4 y1 I    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% S. z7 ~7 @0 l9 s+ a
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333( m$ i1 S) d& Z" W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: k4 _; W3 {, J. U    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
! g$ ?4 e# p7 ~0 d/ c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  N" S1 D3 H' k1 }- u; b: P" O    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185* [+ t0 t  V1 r; ]+ e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 M$ i6 }" k  U- c# W) N
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
# W- Z9 B, ]( R7 w" N! r    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% g* X2 J& E- m# @. g1 B; p$ w% R
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766: j3 u7 g4 Z7 W; N& c4 l, Z' k: H$ D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( W0 Z, x; a. p! U- x/ I( c7 n
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
9 g( a& t' k/ N6 V1 u) u3 F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- g2 \/ {/ L7 N1 K* T1 H, V. [% E    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5008 u6 z/ b4 ?* k. O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 z$ o+ Z' i% n* s
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,3895 l; H2 i  N1 h! f
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- f8 L/ z7 v4 N$ K; `' g& l: f
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7147 I6 B/ }1 E( d" O. ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' \2 w% s" J' d. p9 a: f0 \    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500, d% e" D( m2 d8 }9 Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 C4 A6 y9 B" ?, S" a1 N8 {8 l) I; r9 k/ D
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0008 H8 n: Q- h- d9 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 |* N  [4 e* v( Z/ M1 D# q. Z$ \. B    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
! h, X+ k+ O9 A) D* S# m" i% o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! q4 R6 h8 j) G/ l/ W8 D

$ K) L' m) x8 }5 K    -------------------------------------------------------------6 D1 U$ A7 n0 l0 P1 q$ A7 s
                               Standard Condominium
# U) g) K; l- C# ?: w    -------------------------------------------------------------! A, ~+ o* ]5 @
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo) }9 z3 M- D; ]& V8 r" |
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change7 f. n: f( S6 {8 A: H
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ B" r6 K0 c5 N& B# p    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
% S/ z' F* d$ D5 J    -------------------------------------------------------------
  ^  @1 C7 r" y4 Y! c! e    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
/ ^$ F2 z0 A: X8 {, T: F# R8 n. M    -------------------------------------------------------------- ^/ I3 o/ D$ g+ Z4 C
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A5 n9 ~/ u- |, s
    -------------------------------------------------------------7 {2 W/ ^3 x  m5 `9 g
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A2 U% o. K5 ]' `. k+ a
    -------------------------------------------------------------. l$ B; F: e( Y' r3 Y  Z
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
" ]0 C% k7 n3 i7 a$ s- L- |0 Q    -------------------------------------------------------------6 C$ W: N0 C2 w3 ~# O
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
. V6 m' P" o, e. T" |: s1 f& Q# z    -------------------------------------------------------------
; V" G# n4 J1 o6 ~2 l    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%" n% C9 b8 @6 z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 }2 L( [- D0 W. L    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%) ^/ J5 u3 I( _: ~: Y7 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 |7 C  L/ w6 w- b) I    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
1 L+ g1 y6 e5 B% _$ k& T% I    -------------------------------------------------------------9 ]9 z" P1 I# c2 n  ^# x/ Y0 |* M
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
' C. G. ?4 n6 N: q+ W    -------------------------------------------------------------' g9 ^9 Y- W, T" `" y
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%, O4 X1 S. n. G. m
    -------------------------------------------------------------8 _2 q4 f' v$ t" G
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%/ C: i$ Z7 y9 l0 m
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# v! G) B9 S& \- ^; O4 b    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%2 @  R5 `" t; {7 w: q' b: e6 ?& F
    -------------------------------------------------------------6 F: F* y; s0 ^4 ^) ?& J
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%' E' g- [  `8 _* c5 T5 z' `/ g# H
    -------------------------------------------------------------. W4 t% v% w4 `( M
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%/ r! M( y; }" v% r" T5 v( x- V
    -------------------------------------------------------------! h) H! o3 ~3 U# }2 q* r7 e  n
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
7 R3 B6 B1 t4 D6 @; T# d) I. i9 S+ C    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 T* d7 m$ g% z% ^% x    >>
6 G6 D* B8 a' }+ J; b- S4 t) `1 w8 X' ~) j
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
* Y) n# X4 T$ R8 |9 g2 @- H$ i3 Bin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
6 C$ D1 O' l: _5 ^$ b/ _John and Victoria.
! k! D  H8 X! Z7 h- O/ ~5 [8 f" P6 c% M1 D
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most. J' b# j. O; W& {5 d
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
5 d. L2 S: R" G) \housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release/ o- K, [) @- i! z' ?7 n$ w
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price/ N  T$ L( _2 N. W/ ~$ N/ i
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities  }9 g; I! L& s6 f. {* T/ Q
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
5 Z. e3 N( _' y8 iavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current3 M3 w( Q+ ?- Z5 Y, E8 a1 ~- J
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
* p( u) a. ~# |version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
# T. e- G  h9 R4 j$ @9 Z$ h; UNovember 15, 2006.$ y8 _8 {" ]/ c& i. k+ T4 f5 A- o
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of# F1 A) O/ b8 Q+ S
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
5 t& h  D2 y" ^* f2 eprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
# n7 f" Q/ n- j: N& P; t5 [available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-19 20:10 , Processed in 0.128276 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表