埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2099|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
- s% l: |2 j2 v5 z0 P: m# L. e7 s4 _6 i8 F
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -( |9 c2 N% N# L6 Z( j

( p! ]: ?, q2 u, `7 m) d' M7 |9 P    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market. ^5 J) K; H+ ^3 }9 X
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third5 }; E- i7 U3 {! E* Q
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
& Q' Q3 N7 }# r; \3 @in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit( i+ a$ v( Y8 r+ D1 N
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
1 ~1 H  z$ L. Q! s3 Cmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
0 l- P* N7 t$ l0 `( F, u0 m: ]7 R. U4 OQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal: w1 m( n& S# k9 {. D
LePage Real Estate Services.# m3 y# i7 X. I2 Q- e

- ^0 d: E; C) d! s, H- @    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
+ d& H9 I- s2 |# V: u' }are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
2 U0 x1 C. P. Gconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
) U; h* X2 P3 @; W2 ksound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the% _. z& A5 c8 D( D; u; K( `) I
residential real estate sector.
3 }' C% e9 \/ D; H$ L$ g- O  l9 U; }$ m  K6 }  g, p  X
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation: m$ u2 }! p0 K* ?, N
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
5 a' s1 {) _$ a5 o, q8 iyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562  Y/ T$ r1 O: P0 d5 ?% I2 j% M
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380* Y8 H" {* O' T( ~; |7 |) q/ c
(+13.2%).
' ^! Z" |' h5 E+ q$ A
! R0 c. c+ a. `  r1 Y" }, o    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
5 [! P: b  J! A" ]7 j0 n+ {1 mduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
2 V. r; w1 s# ~4 O( B5 h9 pfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are7 c7 r8 v  z0 `- E! @
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,6 a2 U. ~9 V4 m; w: f* j) h
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
' g% s5 z1 x( G( E) u"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
! ~5 W. s, |8 B7 ]welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
) |1 `4 P$ r. J5 Q. k; F2 Fbalanced market."
' v3 ^0 W' ~% F% l9 E# g' \( E3 k8 ^$ x+ C& U
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
: n# M% u8 `1 x5 ^' J# Uconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift" Q% Q& X; B& r. A* w) J2 t
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
$ j" ^9 n/ R0 n1 Y9 D6 Ithroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
1 I& p! N1 ~& |2 Y$ [energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,7 `, v' }# c3 B" }  ~
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
2 @8 _& c+ U/ |6 _breaking price appreciations.9 h( w6 B6 L$ o
+ b4 ^6 D+ Q  G$ ^" S
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding5 Y, x6 g! s  }1 m$ ]
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the9 j; M0 R% K9 Z0 \8 z  f$ c( u
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.$ G" p1 |$ q1 ]# \& U

7 X" F$ v& D7 F" Y  F, R    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid% x( w2 N6 R8 k+ t! P
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer+ `) x1 a0 P8 l8 |, s5 U( n$ B
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off/ b7 l$ p) D6 M  n- L0 Q2 a
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
" h0 C! ?/ ?& `/ jIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
1 k3 t5 H( m) i" {* y4 R- _9 X, hgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of* x% [/ B* f3 B3 w
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
* d( k  H7 j0 O. m7 L$ D0 E3 H
* b7 J" X% Z" D    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
* @3 X5 M4 f: Z8 c0 [" `' ^) J0 F! Xmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and) e) A9 ~0 X- x. v
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
2 c/ b$ h! s6 Z4 lare markedly different than those found in the United States.
+ Y" h, m; V7 U1 n: d4 J* E- Q4 \" z, Y( |% a8 R4 J: H
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
& F+ D( z0 }6 z& |American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's5 i. L2 P$ m8 }
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the2 J3 z! K' R. j
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general& g( _/ S! ]% R9 u
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
3 y* A2 ?  P: {" S7 \" L3 l8 ddownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and( p; S( D9 m7 C5 h" W* K
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
: a, Z, k% m" w  P- g" s. Hmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."- e0 {- l" n3 f. i$ w% H- K" j1 T

9 A" Q" n! H# R* D1 p5 i" ^    <<3 [! a% m) m+ P, H* N3 N
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES$ D1 k$ r% M/ ~  Z3 C
    >>
9 N5 a4 X. ~+ G: n2 F7 h) _; O4 Q7 |4 Q; A" [
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
4 G) l& H  n$ ~( c* c2 ~Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate' c4 s- n7 J8 M- }
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
2 b0 W$ o/ k9 O& h) z& U/ H$ Elooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of' l6 [' k5 m6 p; X$ l9 ~
renovations.
" _! b* w! u& l+ X4 G5 M6 |+ l& H4 s9 r% G
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
, v' U) k4 z3 Q# Z+ iincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation: }+ x. f. i3 m7 j! L: O; J
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
0 E, E& q& t7 L; K1 FSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.6 ?+ M$ d5 K8 b. ?6 {

7 |* f; s" M" J" e' X' ?: `    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer- G+ G$ H  }$ V4 f& J0 k0 q8 c
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the4 `" I' ^6 B& V0 G
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
) u$ k; [; l( R% B600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores+ K$ m2 A) m9 e9 o( Y2 \
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes  `) N8 z8 p, Y4 e3 @: x+ ^4 X$ P
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.! A/ i+ C/ p; @

9 j% F5 G0 w3 D# Z' Y) Q4 |$ t    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced5 Z+ J; G" k& t2 S* Y7 ]( {; b* Q
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
  E' {! \0 f! r$ O. @homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers4 h( p0 l( c0 B# `, R
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
, E, D6 O' R4 e( c) y7 }, b1 A1 udollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
/ R9 b) @0 S/ R/ i8 Mbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
: b5 j: g" ?; ~# V; w; |- _; [# A4 `& ?+ I# `3 Q1 M+ x
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly+ N) o+ u. g' T0 E' B
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
2 l# E. W: V1 ?! R7 Q, Tpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,2 j: Y8 A/ f  y% v4 {: e
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
) K) y4 H3 {! S# ufew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
# z0 k8 @- }0 k# r5 R+ B; @5 e' U6 A- e$ i! B. C: r
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
7 X9 }+ E- U2 l, Wprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory/ v# a  @: S. _6 f" @
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
/ q) I0 A- x- f( v- cfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
4 k/ A3 I0 O2 u" Xwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
( H0 A- Q+ I+ I8 r+ spressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before" B& m0 F& b- t' v' V- l
making a purchase.  ?7 Y) e+ R: j# u# h6 j

5 ~0 V& U& z# M9 O    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
- W+ O. C; f5 a+ O0 rmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong0 `/ O0 ~+ ?0 }0 I
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city$ Q0 a/ ~8 ?7 {, ]' q
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
( [9 O$ f9 i$ @7 o9 T. H2 Aattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown, k$ w2 l/ V( c/ [
amenities.5 r( G% w8 D# \5 e
" O7 ^! U' Q8 |- v& g
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
& p/ ]4 h* X9 p+ g( U* }throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand  q3 V) B% t$ p2 w
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has" x. S, R6 ]: p6 `
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
: o0 T  i; V; E; edriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle9 U" F  P0 y. _& H$ o
residence, rather than for investment.3 X5 |# ^2 u3 r& b; e8 i  g4 i
2 t7 u/ N, }/ f' T$ R+ {! S
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
- l- F( o& f) y  u  q# thouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
8 y3 k. V) l& i# C$ yin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
: i6 o3 v! {# P6 P4 a1 }* Rconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization' I4 }5 n6 c( x6 s
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
$ h: n" G+ D4 ]5 hthe market.
7 m6 g' W7 y$ |1 x" X9 t! h5 L3 K7 i4 a% ]
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through7 g, q2 }# }) W# d: S, f& W2 V. Q9 e
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
  V- e7 B5 _! IAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring- l. K0 u; ]+ i3 v
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
1 C+ X' J( j2 M* e% Y& Yto the shortage of available inventory.
% Q% f" W1 O. V' C! O) t9 l/ {" S
" Z$ G* `. {; u; j1 E5 ^/ p    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its6 a' p5 ~2 E9 s+ a& S
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
7 B. g+ n" {9 {% c- ]2 H0 `6 s$ dvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
  f+ n/ W, x5 Z& J  l6 ]struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
' P' L; }/ W9 l& E: g0 g
* x1 ~9 \& T$ o! i4 g    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
( Q. D  F& G0 z7 i4 G6 min the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
1 [! B# n3 ?& @/ funemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
% O5 @( F& k5 E5 W: zpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
, m2 n' K; q7 ]9 mprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
' e0 J! L5 s) fseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as+ s9 @& j6 a1 J5 L4 J: S* a
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
, n2 q* U# Z, D, R5 _6 p

0 |) E' {9 \% W    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
$ j) S/ f$ _; [* y$ h7 H) jas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton; r9 ^/ [5 Y; {" I" w; b
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,7 B7 P1 {. Y, z% W% F
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
% ?2 D, z" T0 I+ L1 f- w* Bincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
. a2 H* j9 x- z( W) |% t* X4 Bin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
, D* E' p4 c9 @3 n4 X- Itowards the end of 2006.
   
6 d- ]& J+ i/ V# `9 G  _+ ^
7 s. X( ?( {& W3 }* _While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
2 H3 g' A* b* p! N% a4 h; Z" Ginventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable, d; h/ h3 x0 |, l/ T
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
, m5 e! _0 H( ^6 [group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to5 P; n# D. T) o# l; A; i$ Y; |
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
/ y# s! v9 Y% t9 Spressure on tight inventory levels.
: j$ Y4 P6 i; s! e& P- ^
6 r2 e. \0 q) q; g    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
9 v+ O5 I7 r( W4 Tfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people% \$ R! S+ }" k7 o9 N# y0 I
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
1 z! t7 J5 a' Y) f6 ]) o1 f/ vwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
4 h" p1 v+ B4 _  [; E$ Zfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
0 T' ?. }( ~0 U$ n8 a/ _3 p
4 L. |3 q, ?6 V9 j* ]- ?4 c6 A" ?    <<
4 y, Y! H& ?& Q; R      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
  }: R' R  A8 L8 i! V& t5 h- }* ~, ^: E' a4 \, ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Q1 J3 M5 N' l  R3 c9 p" p                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey6 _7 u8 t- S! O9 q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, D4 O5 P4 o# u0 x                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
( [5 H! j& V5 p' t+ p  t    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
5 V% w$ a7 \! @2 G8 h# u    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 m' H0 C+ U" E- b
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
: O- B: i4 y3 _$ _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ \5 Y* f' N. Q! @: @& I* h- t. X6 ^    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
" o+ \3 T! m  M  C+ w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) B: u+ d5 r- h. ]
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
5 N& U7 i& T9 E5 ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) E( }2 b1 S: m* R# Y
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -) }) ?/ ], w# ?8 S2 i# ^2 P4 {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. x4 ~( J- v- V0 q    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
( S3 Q2 ?; w* `5 h* I6 D    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% a3 T- i1 G/ h( ^9 h# N' S0 c
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
5 O( j9 a8 h: D: B    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 N3 I; ^! D: m/ X( l4 e    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185, D9 J$ H5 T4 c$ `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: B3 Q* A  f% @2 E    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
' u: |* G  n0 F0 d    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 C8 }7 [' @: s3 ]  o$ M
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
: \' [/ I5 f/ A    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' Y: q7 a  F! y2 g; X
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707, B+ B2 J" z& @. R) o
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: m- q/ e+ t" N2 R) T, D  H' ?    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5005 W& {# v" e! h: i* P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 X5 N9 D. N& l' g4 s* h" m# z" g, y    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
' k2 `% l6 _' z& {, p1 t3 J4 J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 P3 I+ r7 @* Y: Z# G    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
) F8 R6 r: E$ Z- w: T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. i  }  d4 P* F' p6 \0 A1 j: j3 [
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500- b& y( I. J: C) J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% i6 _' A4 }$ n6 N  {$ O  T5 z+ `
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000% w; \3 s& d& @6 \3 \& m, g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 n2 |% z/ {, L
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860+ p2 B3 W$ l+ p$ G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& a8 U& w2 d( p" R4 b3 [! Q
- J1 P7 K4 {. `  ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------0 X9 l, m# `0 S1 i  X0 `5 X& j
                               Standard Condominium
+ h* M! D/ h& A! F* d    -------------------------------------------------------------- J0 i  ~, s7 Q/ ?
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
8 \( N# P! t1 Z* {! n: J    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
2 t  E2 F& r* p  M! e    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 G  A( n2 t& U7 t" B- W5 O- N: `    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%: C& r& w+ V8 {& p, e# U
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 p6 T& H3 l$ [9 ]. t$ e# e    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
2 N) `4 u: z8 W9 I. o4 [) F: `    -------------------------------------------------------------# b  R4 [" D% u0 C- X8 @# G
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
/ J. t# t6 G+ k3 c4 Y: J/ }    -------------------------------------------------------------, C7 i8 k& n3 j$ q* U( A
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A4 I: @+ ?, [' \1 X1 q
    -------------------------------------------------------------
! @1 \* i! {7 a  D5 p7 g* {    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%. o. F8 \7 d/ [; F+ x  \! n
    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 N  M* y9 P9 m  C    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%7 V- ~% L( k- J9 m9 ~# N$ u) U
    -------------------------------------------------------------% r) D$ h2 R5 L
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%; `$ I8 h( a4 d
    -------------------------------------------------------------' g- b: U6 |  D4 i/ k) f4 x6 m9 j
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
2 \8 t& S; ^2 k5 D3 K) C    -------------------------------------------------------------: ?) X: V3 X: E
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
4 D& v6 S3 m6 K4 ^1 z" y# O    -------------------------------------------------------------' Q8 h7 q( x! h" t4 ~
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
3 `4 C- U0 _' c+ ^9 X    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ i) f- q' Q+ t0 x" ?    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%4 R& n; o$ Y0 j" k2 G8 {6 j
    -------------------------------------------------------------( w" Y8 Z$ d0 T2 R& _
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
2 J7 {; u+ {& n' ?( C    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 ^( i( v4 d& s' _6 E  P    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
2 w/ l  d- s/ l: S    -------------------------------------------------------------8 a: S; c: T' k0 @" s
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
8 v& p0 V* A: K/ k1 J/ b    -------------------------------------------------------------
# P' L' D( @  y    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%) i) I* V/ q: W1 W2 }
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  P; h* W3 v0 ^    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%- E& i! n" ]" D1 u" k
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' A5 m6 P+ T& j    >>, H/ K2 R$ g. ?6 [5 N) @" I

/ o' @2 n6 d/ ^) R# x0 O0 S    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
& Y" S4 q0 m" ^0 Ein the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint6 x. `7 K% S3 Q5 E8 H
John and Victoria.
. o* h# n0 D2 B" J/ U( [( l5 Q( c3 E% G3 Q. ~; T# q
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
" n3 w6 k* q+ Z7 N  ?; {$ ocomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of. t7 _4 ?' u" O  c. D" n' T  A, l
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
8 u0 I' e; \( ^references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
9 j5 \, A* r2 G# q/ f$ H& a- |! htrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
% R( O) w, p( J6 cacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
/ s3 `! R3 i" i; O* _9 R, yavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current& u' D5 F4 i# v( W1 \
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable' A7 W6 C2 d  m
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
/ _; g6 c+ E5 a' T& G' g' qNovember 15, 2006.
6 m( w/ ?2 w1 D1 S5 c    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
" E; B) ?+ V7 tfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
7 B3 U5 P( ~, ?- |! O5 |; {provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
: ]4 Q" M3 E4 m7 D6 }7 U& C  Ravailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-25 08:08 , Processed in 0.185826 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表