 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
! a6 m7 ?# P# }- u( s: v
5 x5 U y+ I& V1 A& g- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -5 b$ z0 q+ a/ A
. K9 D6 ~5 @& ~, E7 U D6 {2 ]* I
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market& {% t) I* P3 n) f6 n5 c; D M
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
U5 W9 S" C) x8 A8 vquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
; ]$ o! B! E! R8 l' O x- Fin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit) _% k% O* A/ c, z( V" l* `
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
2 [' N. h5 p1 B" L1 hmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
0 i8 C) ^3 B; y% @Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
7 d j# _* A; h- g0 S% v2 T9 CLePage Real Estate Services.) P1 p; v) Y% S4 m8 A! O
( q, K8 o$ E( G/ D' J# X
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters- u- ~4 k2 d( g. I0 Z0 ?
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
5 i' @% t6 f3 pconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and( \0 W( q' C$ a, m" D3 {
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the6 r; c: c7 T+ U
residential real estate sector.
) t% ]0 E( S- ^6 @7 y1 ^) K- C0 D+ t0 F& M8 [
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation) r& }7 k9 L N6 i5 m
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
7 M" H! D: C# |: D, b# ^+ S# K, }/ l" eyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
! l7 F5 E5 X: I7 q(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3809 O% B$ Q* P+ p$ {; P
(+13.2%).
+ a) M. W7 R& i) ~
: r% l: W7 X) c. f "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth' L$ r/ g3 S! w/ @1 }
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the; G8 i. a3 ]4 D: ?! _
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are- Q; n& Y T& T1 L" L" W- N- m
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
4 O6 o3 }% b @$ C' D+ xpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
: {/ o T/ k% d8 w H/ s* S! s- v"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We8 ~ L- k$ t) Z) j* v! t* R
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
& X6 N7 X6 X$ {balanced market.": X! a+ D% B& U8 \# s- t
; b6 D; s; K& `
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,1 H; L9 s+ f( d% Q
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
! C7 @$ x/ a; Ito balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued8 O/ q" p7 A; n" X
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
+ X1 y5 ]: Z, w. l3 g. G% h4 R, q; Venergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,1 j7 q! p+ O) E- o. O0 m, x4 I" |0 r
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
# E9 b4 Z* z* i( r2 T% Xbreaking price appreciations.
8 _) x5 u) t9 b0 A5 ?1 t; |5 b* ^4 E1 H" y) H
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
2 s, n0 N5 c% M% |economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the) e0 s6 c. |0 g |
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.5 j. ]8 b B/ r. v8 ]5 R
3 _2 V& A% L5 g2 r) A* ^4 n# A2 \
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
2 P' T! W! y; k, Q ~economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer5 g' s; {* E# x8 F+ L
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
8 i. Q0 h1 N5 {slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
# _8 g' B# |/ qIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
$ A N% b; Z& {6 D; E D# _1 agreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of/ D+ O% D+ R7 _7 F
price appreciation when compared with 2005.9 \" f3 K# @% e& q4 z
& r3 Q1 f- u- X) {
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing/ z6 h( e1 d# G( Q: A/ i n5 ^
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and6 d" S* U& M Q' T4 H! U
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
; U. G) E) {, }are markedly different than those found in the United States.& I# x; a4 F, Q6 j2 a
; z' H3 _- M8 f2 D" V Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
: _5 y" I+ r0 p+ nAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
3 h, W- _, S. {& d: lfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the( i- g% t9 u: b- L7 E
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general3 @ [+ a8 A4 H) Q# L$ H
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
: I6 E7 |2 t' ^0 Q5 q3 x; Y& G( Hdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
" {! ]& N# n) M8 Zaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization) B! K4 R" t! X& X0 g5 T4 T
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."; T8 v5 V' @+ p4 _+ q, z
5 v4 l% ~4 s/ z1 H7 |" `/ U <<
% r' L2 g' \& [' u REGIONAL SUMMARIES) g3 L G- G! g% f$ p' b" \9 M4 C) ^
>>
6 S, f0 [: m3 ` `
7 h1 u% \' a) |& j, s Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
5 u# l0 T$ A# ~; ?* h( THalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
8 m/ `& E, @8 T# |8 Jof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
p% Y# G" q, l0 r* O$ @looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of3 [1 _. l& p, l% F0 G4 E: `- F
renovations.9 x1 B& S {+ M0 L2 W; w) W
5 j' ~6 s9 r4 v& w H% f! E
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight" P, j3 Y0 {' a, `$ [
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation' l: e: @' h% f: H
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
& O2 b5 I8 G) Y) t+ r1 c- u- fSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
: K2 ^3 p. F3 ?( e6 W7 B6 E+ V
4 B( \+ u" i, D% r1 Z7 J h, K& \9 A6 \ The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer- g" I8 J3 u+ ]. N/ A
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the6 p+ Y. T# g5 c% H+ z
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new, I7 U# w% \% N0 c- l& C* P
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores2 s/ q4 C; M: I3 X
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes5 j' ?7 Z9 W/ X i
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.( W8 g! _- b- Z
' R9 I& ~! @2 _ In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced) [& U6 P2 Z+ l0 v4 ?7 h. D8 u9 o8 j# V
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their: V4 o- U. ]2 q X
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers( }; i9 X; |2 I7 h8 E8 I
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
4 a3 ^5 ~: F( [dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
6 r W: g1 k4 R1 l; w5 K' i0 Obuyers with more options when looking for a home., [2 H4 c2 @7 G! S) o$ x
1 r" m6 ]: g" A Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly7 o( W4 I2 s* n8 z! S U6 O
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes2 M' d7 X7 D: a/ O
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
+ o7 w& x% p$ w% was some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last& d8 e' J+ K" I; e5 L5 M/ z* b! H
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.. q, m, I" W2 ?
0 m1 R4 C3 X# h# u9 H Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house3 k ?3 @! Q9 q
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory- ^5 _5 P) {/ S, g* B) |: Y
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
( K% D1 r! `* B& N5 s! n# B6 Bfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,8 r3 ]- _ p5 o" c- k/ z
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the- e; j" J7 @7 | c5 M
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before v4 a; `" v: h$ u7 |+ r. K9 H
making a purchase.) I7 E0 _) G3 i! N3 b, p" a) H
: ]+ G; H7 x/ O5 h
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing- o" J+ x, p [+ D' z+ O0 z5 \# [
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong2 X/ n5 @2 k% p% q4 G/ t
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city4 Z. d' q1 c* ~. b( Q
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting* z# j1 U& F4 e, ^2 s/ m: w
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown: ^# A/ F& _9 i) I4 I
amenities.
, U+ {; A) B8 X1 f0 U
! i9 G, u9 M" c; S( q! D The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels% S+ x( s+ P- n$ W1 f
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
8 U' u9 H- _! G" [ @across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
8 P' I, M3 m' ^" M) wcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been% N- A) }" [ @$ h' u8 i/ u
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
8 j: C$ x$ H4 Hresidence, rather than for investment.
* X; C/ H9 L; F) g9 I" A
& C+ G }9 [8 L+ L9 i$ y7 C The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
/ Q' g q% ^7 W! S% Bhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
8 B, r/ a$ _' D0 I5 l9 B: S8 sin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
4 ]2 V4 l! I# Xconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
# q, U0 T, \5 a! X8 O. X- qrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
. S! ]; W* I" c& cthe market.& v5 X$ F( h8 @% m
4 w1 |+ H( q* w& ^* z2 H
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through: p. N( P, i" Z: B4 s
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In# o! P9 V! d$ D+ [) C! P
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
* T" t/ d" q' f; F# }0 \* {" Jmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due$ y" M5 n$ ~# b9 q4 `9 L* t
to the shortage of available inventory.
[6 L0 h7 }+ u) k( t, x; W1 B3 \( |+ V: s/ D, z- w
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its2 N" _. r }, x/ r0 K ?1 ]$ |
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
0 f+ ?" a" i! a k" Dvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
6 \7 H, b( C% {- i$ H+ I; ^% zstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
7 {, T3 M+ _$ o3 f
, Q* v1 x' M4 ^9 g Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases* \5 |9 H* p' `5 j9 w) b6 ?" U
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low2 L6 D3 h+ O5 y w1 U
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that& O8 _- ~, f8 g6 h
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring% u7 X' T' z' S4 u# Y5 @: j l: }
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
7 l1 F* h# B& U; {6 Z& H0 sseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as. G; Y1 A' Z6 e$ j" f
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
2 v& Q. S6 Z3 U( K) S% v2 u" r, z x
' u# C$ Q/ S% e Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter7 g; v. A7 a3 R% v4 u9 Y& }
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton( \/ P' [- ^. ~' b( `
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
1 c1 A2 P# a3 j. L& O6 {# [maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices1 q; n! E3 W4 `: n$ N& f
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve' @6 P; g: Z& [: ~# Q, u" q
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly X5 L8 U9 a! u" A* {( ^' e+ ~' L
towards the end of 2006.
* U5 R- M0 \1 r% v' Y3 }1 ^1 g% T: Q* r7 x
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of! J) V: S2 @8 F& m- A7 V% w
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable. G' Q3 F( L2 I- B; K6 L1 |9 E
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse, x* G; e! x, x7 \
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
) E3 S# G2 a' [- V* G; D ]2 S |/ j s. nforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
% d( d- ?+ E* ?8 M1 ~3 ]( J" _) f# rpressure on tight inventory levels.+ Q7 D: _3 f# b5 m
0 V2 u: z) u1 J
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic6 o* v0 J5 N( I% k4 z# ?5 P: }: u
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people; _; s5 ]; n+ ?3 ]( Y l
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;# H2 L) k y4 W8 T" n
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
' n s: R! O, ^, L. ]2 q7 ?+ mfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
$ y; m$ m. `+ X7 m F
8 w# \4 ~! d0 D- h1 s8 F* X+ Q <<( C) k" R' g" `2 F; k
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
X8 ?8 ^% w% U/ D" F! M0 s2 u+ ?3 h% a0 ~, k# ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. y4 u0 a) Y$ D- x# f0 @7 p Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey9 N* q8 I+ d- B' W ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 @3 m+ m7 O- a# o& M. T7 F 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
" Z8 p$ a# u3 a% |% i, N7 w. p Market Average Average % Change Average Average
3 V8 m8 B- l8 ^) ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------& A0 v) g6 L0 L1 W2 e9 ^
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
7 J& t1 j& T( z8 l- ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 n7 L! e1 ]) D/ f
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0004 m- H, ]% p5 y0 U) \. t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: i" ^/ O& F z0 s. G8 I Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0007 K6 g4 g# l9 ?" y5 e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- d& t3 r, r# }, O, [/ t Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
3 ~$ B% X& o& Z$ T1 w -------------------------------------------------------------------------) ^- r9 p" W; X3 Q" [- e' i j; H
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
, l7 H+ u9 T8 _+ O d -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 a- `: e2 W9 h, T' h% J: x Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5837 f3 u. Z& W8 g; c2 j$ u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% A6 R( E% T& I! x% c
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185; N5 q& @' O9 [0 _6 E- P$ v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ r/ s2 W. O) K* v, R$ Z6 ?: }% `* T
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250# N- M' U. |) O& x4 f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! b1 N% w8 D' o& D! s2 c" p* m
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
% |% N& G% V) B. C4 f" N' } -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 d# _1 a- f3 F" ]% S6 p/ M
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
* q3 M$ T5 ?" {8 j# P6 U9 T: k ------------------------------------------------------------------------- {) Y9 C9 J& E% K$ C; r6 ?1 w
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500: P5 E" K1 K& }* ^) P. k$ m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 \- E" A3 p. b, t! a" ? Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3891 n" H1 k+ {! B" d& M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; r4 W8 j Z0 T3 q6 D w/ Z
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
* _, R# O; e) p9 J -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 B6 @ `7 w7 @ Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5005 M: a- O1 }! C0 N+ P+ d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 I) `" o0 N' T) U Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0004 ~# N1 B7 i2 d4 `
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 H& C. U3 R1 G5 i& F, N- w5 ?6 E National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
Z/ r8 q8 a, `1 q& K6 t -------------------------------------------------------------------------# d8 O& n, o/ o( I5 G; `" A7 i
, p `; w2 F1 J7 Z. {" Z6 a' O7 i
-------------------------------------------------------------% g+ e! `# Y, y. N ?6 p& J
Standard Condominium
6 e' W' z7 z& d& M( m -------------------------------------------------------------& n. q* j0 N- O+ c# Q' l
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo: X; I/ j2 e% K+ L2 V
Market % Change Average Average % Change
: ?1 F! D2 S* }. j3 ^ ------------------------------------------------------------- d( c, v6 {0 F* [# f: e6 b( [! f
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%7 `/ o9 d W) j" a# r+ O/ o
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 g% {% j+ A3 e Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
# ], `0 J0 E+ r: ^! Q- [ -------------------------------------------------------------
' V2 O) p+ U& \# L4 T Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
6 T& C5 _" b! _; w8 @ -------------------------------------------------------------2 ]3 K6 u4 ~% y- V0 y! N9 M. ]
Saint John N/A - - N/A
' x0 J; U0 S. u* L% i0 U% ]* I' S -------------------------------------------------------------0 }# s' H+ \$ o Y2 D; U2 Y ~. Z
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%( L: F& E; j' F: p( M, f+ F) q8 ~
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 e2 k# x( k2 z% r Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
6 K+ I5 @, b5 H: l$ U. p -------------------------------------------------------------* ^) u) ~% P" i% [! {
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%& L- A2 v6 B7 E6 D7 Q+ ~/ q T
-------------------------------------------------------------
) M2 V. Q( `$ @& ?5 y% {$ f6 q Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%: I9 {# j9 Y k" s; h
-------------------------------------------------------------0 x; E5 _8 p7 y6 }/ Z# x
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%2 p; w: Q+ t+ y/ m( C# c
-------------------------------------------------------------" F. h7 g) |% U# T
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%8 Z& ]/ q0 i) O. G" E: ~" {
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 u* j( L# `; m# G" x' u! z) |! N$ G Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
: _3 S2 C- \4 k( s2 R* g# J$ B -------------------------------------------------------------# G) u: _/ P L" U! |( L; C+ t4 l
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
4 ^/ J& ^1 L1 z- y/ v -------------------------------------------------------------! w/ i& m8 b! m g4 f! Z7 h
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%% H$ p& L8 @' g$ E, {9 e( y* `3 [
-------------------------------------------------------------. A9 l' Y" r4 u- L( E6 x9 x0 b
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%, K. P/ P% u+ n% ~. m
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 H% I1 u$ [ a Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1% w# Z: U- N: ]% x0 c' H8 v+ T
-------------------------------------------------------------) B1 b6 q% @+ C- a
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%: G! P/ w- |' n0 ?0 E
------------------------------------------------------------- K K- F' z- n, y, ?+ [" b
>>5 Y) f5 A- ^/ N, h
) V! `$ j$ [% W8 }
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined8 a& u. t Y8 P0 i9 L
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint/ b0 k# m2 s' Q& t: y; M4 T3 V
John and Victoria.- n* ?1 h/ J. v( M- l+ h+ g" I. Z
6 r# C# `5 d: C& a# | The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most- W( \$ x5 a8 s1 v# n9 o. ^4 [2 |( P
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
4 n$ z0 d( k6 x$ u8 Ghousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release/ g3 x/ H& P0 H" x. Z
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
( x# {& L9 y' x, P3 j: D& \4 H% Xtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities1 I+ g0 b$ A \3 w* x4 d
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
# M+ v1 S- n2 Gavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
+ y y/ E) P0 f# q& ~3 ~figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
+ |3 A) q7 O- Oversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
, I' g# f4 v8 l- _" b% C4 GNovember 15, 2006.9 _- m m. M" B: x8 i
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
4 g8 D1 k, n0 J- m" g+ w3 \fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
+ c) l- s1 F% Y0 ]provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is& z: K4 `, g" v# M
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|