埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2132|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
8 K" C: e' b/ C5 i. \1 C8 @7 Z
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -/ q% |$ J$ s9 w' Q$ q/ R& q& ?( Y

- J9 R0 d( M' p$ H    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market. v& ^, }. Z0 I& V! t% y0 f
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
3 w  z( V- u- y. E5 X# E6 Kquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
- g! a8 a- |7 Tin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit  W# k$ b" Q' S( O  Z
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and& \0 t* `5 B+ q, F) u
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
5 S% k  L( R! b2 j3 AQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
5 W' E* C9 d$ g3 H3 U2 B0 `LePage Real Estate Services.' f3 ^$ v, b; ~: R3 g2 b, ]
& a+ Z+ h$ I' m  J6 O& I* ]
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
- a9 b7 N0 N6 }' d9 Iare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic" [. @8 g" M, o) I, s: F
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
+ X$ u8 G& Z& H* Qsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
# `! B  L1 O  }2 M* L4 e* [residential real estate sector.
! |; h+ G" c% ^  D
' x3 X8 v" \% O0 R! O% @& P' Z    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
5 Z( X" }8 N. aoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)( _3 [, R3 B6 K. v. g4 u
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5629 t/ s! k1 H* k4 R  J. n+ k
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
; K. t; M5 u2 i8 M4 w(+13.2%).
) r$ t  M, c0 _3 C$ R( N& I! V8 ?& Q$ n) }! e( K7 j- ?
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
9 s; T) W* X8 E$ yduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
. a( B9 w& H! l( d) u0 R1 Rfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
  Y. S+ m3 }6 r1 U3 C, m1 f) I) Wpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
2 I; ~% \( c, a; U, ipresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.0 ?" i; N0 g9 _, y+ d5 Z
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
* A) t5 c& A8 W% g/ dwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
$ t& I3 G; f3 c' G9 w/ U/ Mbalanced market."" \$ j% i4 k) }* P1 X3 m& p0 P3 }
, {/ T% Q7 v- E: ~! K9 t8 b% O0 ^* D
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,4 h( l6 n$ c2 G8 E% P! r
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
5 y- Q$ M1 t/ I3 H5 q5 P$ dto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
& u- J+ I0 `! C3 `8 Q" h" F; Q( ?throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
$ j0 H" j* |& ]/ L% Z: a8 Ienergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
2 ?" m" p( U( G; G2 c3 \manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
5 s" G. a: x: A6 r9 W  Jbreaking price appreciations.6 I' Z/ L* w1 w1 L0 R  w# n

# U" l& w5 C7 x+ L! J, x0 f    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding8 B% @; L  T) D5 s0 A6 s" Q$ ?2 v- a
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
$ p& C" H# K2 j, }: e8 u; Jlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.2 W: y' w  X; H6 D9 n
! P; t6 S# Q( Q4 c2 C- i9 X
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
! l/ z" r+ `  s; h0 qeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer/ Y* m2 Z4 o# h' H% j& C) z
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off; E, l" I* _* B4 _
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
" P& ^; _" G, Z8 r9 l, m/ iIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
$ S3 u" b0 j7 T. Ggreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
3 O" j) C0 P1 A# k/ r( p5 m. o5 Wprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
9 x: z6 P7 [' ^% J2 e% J; D9 h8 t) N% |, C- w/ {2 T6 N
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
, a& k4 N& C0 x9 s# e; N- r* v: Y6 Q1 jmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
. \, I0 n* ^" G  q9 z" q7 `; ^financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada. i) w% P2 q  j- |8 V: \
are markedly different than those found in the United States.6 f) E- O/ h5 ]1 m/ W7 `
" x: M2 s% g; d# q
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the8 ~8 i) X4 H4 g7 E
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
- d4 K. {4 w, X0 Vfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the8 F! C! d! Z. I
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general) G: {! }& G4 A. B7 v
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the+ k7 ]; u: S% s# c
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and4 k' T4 |2 O) {
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization  U$ q# u  m+ Q& `4 }- V
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment.": |7 j9 C' K9 \) c4 c# P+ J
3 g  I/ a( b6 e$ v) S- Z6 F% M+ m
    <<1 H! f/ _2 q; D' M, n
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
8 n. T1 y3 o7 B    >>- r3 G6 D3 v' T6 c
0 w7 D' F% N2 J( ]4 p# k
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
8 T: g, J' G" j# k; v& VHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate; h9 }' k- A6 [9 S/ H2 K! P  B+ f+ T
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time6 g* k0 M7 ^4 Q. F' Q- J( n: y8 X
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
$ A7 ~- T1 i3 R2 S  V3 e, I4 B/ Grenovations.
8 l3 C; s! ]' v9 n4 [1 l, w2 ]' d- z$ Q0 }) D& ^1 c" r/ D
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
) \" \" |9 ]' R: @increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation. _# \& |: n/ f
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and4 r7 \; H  S! n' l8 c, T5 m9 I
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
8 H& L' |! S" h+ n3 |0 r8 T! I$ ~  w  r) O% T: L1 Q8 o, I
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
( S8 _$ `( C3 bslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the4 n( K- h5 ~7 G  e1 }6 U0 Q
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
% X+ _. g1 ?+ \4 Y% y, u. a( R600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores5 W* U2 `( q! A9 p7 {& u
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
2 |5 I6 p/ D% Q% t7 r3 }and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
# v1 }  x( V' q* s. N$ F5 b" T' {1 F1 Q) S
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced2 |) U7 m2 y5 e
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their  O; @$ C& f. {) f
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
/ w# W6 z. x. h: I6 u% s9 xwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
7 Z% C+ I2 p) d2 T2 Pdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing  w% l5 v  f! \$ G3 }/ D
buyers with more options when looking for a home.( C# T& T3 ]9 ^# {. G; y

/ x! S! v# {5 X2 P    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly0 d5 F# f% H6 b' f7 h# _- S! r
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes2 W' U2 l, E$ ?3 ^
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005," L$ D1 ~1 F( ?$ S" [
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last* M6 e; T$ L/ r9 N: F3 \
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
& s9 I9 F% t$ K2 ^" Y
3 J6 a, f% Y* F- P    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
4 R1 u0 O* K7 j% r) M7 Y, Oprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
; |& ?+ h- ^. j2 Alevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting% ]: Q" k9 C/ @7 R* m7 g
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
& V: w2 R# z! @* owhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the9 {! h9 K' c  a9 v# y0 @- ?, Y% j
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
! n( X( a( Z; xmaking a purchase., H3 S' c5 V- U" Y# ~/ z0 Y
6 L4 g8 T, }) ?4 g
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing3 K% d7 m' \0 F3 d$ _7 Q3 ^) U
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong+ {6 x3 k/ z- p) B
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
- \3 j4 N/ w! S1 T& y3 Xcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
/ Y5 B9 T$ m7 m- @5 l" R4 p9 |7 ]attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown/ ?! ^3 q) J0 q3 }& c' \
amenities.. B) v+ t$ l5 R2 Y6 a* i( H9 a

' q+ K8 w# Z) m# ~    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
  O% q% {( s% q7 Mthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
: F3 v5 f6 _; K+ C+ m$ ~across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has! H0 i6 J3 y$ w7 d
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been* Y2 ]# r" [5 H  s" V$ N+ y
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle! \! k5 ~' F7 v4 [  C7 D
residence, rather than for investment.
; _3 V/ g' ^+ W
9 N! B& ?* v) A    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as& c: O2 r' n; F4 V" z" m
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
* U7 Y/ t4 [  s* |. X- y3 R$ kin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer% c- i$ x& m7 k, p7 t1 k. E
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization2 P6 I* I3 c* A+ k& D7 l6 a% R4 a
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
/ s! y6 A1 C2 Q' @" _the market.0 a# ]- Z1 f, K' b7 L2 ~- @

! s6 a, B, q' r( `/ J1 w    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
# H0 L, v3 C  n  G0 V: w9 j% I6 n3 mJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In: |1 y0 C, V  k8 U
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
, N, S$ w4 N" L) T+ Umonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
. @$ v5 d: G4 ?  d6 R& ], t! Xto the shortage of available inventory.! |0 O( Y: k8 l/ y! t* O1 n

. |" \  ]( z% F  L  x; H    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
- V* q% I" q3 h" H" A: ^momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains. `8 I! q; \7 G: U1 O+ j# ~' j+ n
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
  q+ x" z5 t% a- n( Ustruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
! c" d. j0 |+ N3 c- M8 {3 L
( g4 f6 ?2 l' K5 s% t    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
/ T) }6 f2 u( |0 B$ N$ @in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low& k0 p8 X) {' ^$ `: O2 ~
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that% [, X% `; Y8 \9 n
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring: a- R- s/ o* \" c, P* W& l
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer6 y9 w! `) y0 \, u% W
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as- C& W9 ~2 p1 ?8 O8 u5 Y3 t& l( |
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
, R! @6 s% O7 `# P
$ E8 z: ~. E$ j9 b
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
' V  K+ `4 K, Vas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton$ g7 B1 U% U/ J# j7 H
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
  s! I8 o( Q9 m& q% K' b& J3 U; e0 i2 Pmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
3 u: C9 [6 n# o6 _/ G$ g3 Dincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve$ z1 K  p/ w; I# h
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
* w2 r, U+ [$ d$ G0 vtowards the end of 2006.
   
3 ~& N3 Z' o) O5 L( H% J, ], X! n( l7 M! ^
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
7 l; o; t+ [, H: ]  }inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
- d# j! S5 x' J+ o, T- Q+ e  Hto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse' y) E6 D1 u6 _2 Z1 i4 S. N: f' ]
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
& K2 G/ A! }% h3 ^/ Iforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added1 n+ V, ?& W* c; |' V" X
pressure on tight inventory levels.$ N& n4 o2 c& J* L
3 s- Q' G% p" _. V2 D2 N& [
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
3 P5 ]) J0 U/ z8 x/ J# v/ a* Ifundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people, ?* @4 R- I; e
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;- P( f4 c6 ?8 Z: ^3 H% w
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
) y" x+ O: _  \* a' zfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
& Q8 i; [" }$ K3 Z: t+ _% v0 @& Q# C
: {8 ?( c) N; J) Z( [! [    <<
$ \9 o; v2 g$ ~      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006; r& E' R) C3 l4 Z( v7 X5 Q+ A

+ h+ y) Y$ W) W  i" P0 k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# O* F% ^# m, c8 b4 P
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
1 `) D( K: j8 \7 P, @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 |) f9 k4 M  a                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3) v2 `6 I) |3 L* F" Y5 ?
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average. x  J9 k9 l+ X& m
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% n$ ?, H. C& W/ f9 l* x, {- e
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0008 a( E- i: u, t5 j* l2 Z& C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 s1 H( ]. f0 M
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000$ ^# ?2 T! E! d- U0 p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% a7 h. z+ A7 d; b8 ?. |# O, f; }    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000# F* t% P; T) Y7 M0 v1 E4 E
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 y0 d: h  [) \
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
6 R8 N2 e- Y; h- _- \1 w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; Q% ?. _* ?2 ]0 S9 ~- Q* M
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
& L7 u7 ?# k2 K    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 J  i. j( {" m$ [9 n/ r    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
; N1 e1 Q0 O7 w1 b" o% d5 _' o/ Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ u" v" f" s. }) [    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185" Z2 X  z6 S2 j2 X( H
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ Q7 g( o$ q6 S" B, e! k    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
& T) @4 P! b, T, A% ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 O* G- {, ^4 j, Z. ~* t; ^9 Y( D    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
) t* r; Y* P, a+ C! d" i2 n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 c* F8 Z9 N5 f( r; H- N
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
; k7 P6 \( }8 S    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 t7 x2 W, u$ ~( L    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5000 ?' x6 W! c* X3 p# u
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ P: W# p  ?, v' v6 ~+ s* t
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,3897 y! W% G& s+ [0 t: F9 t; j: ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ C5 [$ y: S' u
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714$ M( g4 O8 A  P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 [6 z- q, [1 M
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500; |; n4 c- b2 c. n) {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 {. e6 y! T) A( J. A4 d* b# d
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0003 p1 c4 x# B) e% ]& d6 v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! F) M! P2 Q" Z& z    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
2 ]8 N! }4 w  n" }$ h+ _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 F" _/ V& S7 C6 D$ L* I" i! c

/ `! x( }) |. {3 J9 i' R    -------------------------------------------------------------. t1 n3 {8 U- \  w# K/ Z
                               Standard Condominium
- H$ l0 C6 {" e6 U5 e    -------------------------------------------------------------
; H& y0 C3 |& e* [                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
) }. Q) h8 D! q7 E" D- U3 v8 f    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
/ z  V" @" x6 j, v5 y+ ^: n5 r    -------------------------------------------------------------0 v6 B4 ?- u7 K* v
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
( k% R  s9 J3 ]( V& w: S! }- J# i    -------------------------------------------------------------6 s# \( e9 O! p! T6 p0 a9 V
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
2 b, C2 K; D) t5 G    -------------------------------------------------------------5 J; \& g* i; A/ @
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
. I# n- |' h& ]% Q1 w2 P    -------------------------------------------------------------3 ^$ Q4 H1 E* ^/ L0 V8 v# u
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
& ^1 u  r3 Y) C! x% ]: q5 h    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 `$ g5 Q% n# I  V* c* d, n3 {, |    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%) f( E+ @7 b" h7 k" S
    -------------------------------------------------------------0 [* M+ m5 [2 [+ r6 i2 S$ G9 T
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
/ S5 }; K* G% H, c0 I, Q  O    -------------------------------------------------------------4 {2 r5 Z7 r  H! _/ [
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
! G$ k: w/ y$ [# Y    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 B* b& ?  [( p* g9 w2 r    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%* t! z- f& |8 G' w1 U1 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  k/ {/ d4 B& ^' @) c( R6 H2 I    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
9 C$ x) L* J3 b# c/ [    -------------------------------------------------------------4 ?7 @. ?  }3 {& P4 u8 Z' c/ y) s
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%" K. r% u$ n5 V: G, \. S
    -------------------------------------------------------------  E% ?* }  C) u( t
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%, ^/ [7 F- m2 u+ W
    -------------------------------------------------------------) p. Y3 M6 X  _4 y( e& b
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%( |4 w" |) b% f" _4 s) _* K) w
    -------------------------------------------------------------, t8 L+ E: W( @' J$ m
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%- I& w+ W& ]& l+ n3 U# ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------8 u' C0 p" h* a; d  l( {* O
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%9 h" l# N2 A$ y. S: ~$ N
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) _' I; T$ ^8 \1 m% N, b    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
% s( g4 I/ U$ `; L8 L    -------------------------------------------------------------/ }4 X; a$ ]( o6 h) ^/ p7 j& d# \
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%+ R# ?% j; W3 S( G
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ t7 g) h. f. @: b$ A    >>
* e: j! _! ~. G: n* g# _: E; N+ p9 q3 S. L5 D
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined1 \: v, S4 a, H' H9 f4 V
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint5 s5 o# T, B) I2 O0 a) {
John and Victoria.3 d9 y2 t$ {  [" V) X/ ~
& E. p, H7 Z. i0 I  {
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
5 o* u& S' g7 E- Wcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
) Y* c6 v0 q( d* H* e+ g/ [housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release* \' B& i2 v4 t' [9 e9 v
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price( ~5 w0 O$ A; Q9 n! F8 g5 f1 g
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities# Y; {& D+ S/ ]* U
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
# ~+ Z: e: [; ?/ X1 [available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current' i# c6 {( P. `
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable8 ]( L9 O, s6 c. M/ q" j5 B, T
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
8 e0 F7 a* Y% K+ mNovember 15, 2006.
$ p1 {" I2 [+ D' T6 P: g    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of" ^- ?& t( a; @& X% j
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
4 I' A5 o2 Y8 I) yprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is/ O. S5 ^9 Y6 f  v- D
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-4 03:13 , Processed in 0.100279 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表