埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2018|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
8 f) n' [. @% g4 z
3 {8 r: a  N9 l- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -: Y/ U& U" n. X; E& ~
# ~# h. f$ k. `$ X, N  Y! e# D
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
7 s# R9 W4 v4 ~8 y' V; V3 ^exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third& n& j, E* h3 `" I+ y! s  z* q
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic3 Q$ I  K& N$ X  j
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit5 Q. b( d9 W% _3 u& U( @8 H2 C
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and7 B, ]* q; S* ~1 V; g, q  j* Z
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,9 Z3 p, T' E8 C; A5 W& ^
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
: C$ P! Q: T$ ]( H7 v2 gLePage Real Estate Services.
  }  A9 `3 S0 V0 g
7 O+ N* M; \0 p1 H, X! K    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters) M; Y9 U3 {. W! ]0 N! O8 A
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic/ d+ l: K* G1 Q; U8 A: @2 D' X
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
3 p: n1 G1 R1 I" [, x6 {sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
' m4 D2 Q- s& w- r" E2 Dresidential real estate sector.
3 P* l7 [$ L) E& D( {( t, |6 P( n: w3 A9 }% X
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation( Y' D7 f* G7 E
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)( ]1 N4 t! i6 X4 ]2 `% D$ k! i
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5629 w8 O2 N& ~2 e( o1 `: [
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380$ g3 \: b& E, ~8 x; H1 S
(+13.2%).
; F" E. o0 H& f) z5 B8 f7 ]6 e4 w5 {% ^3 }/ k8 ~  z5 Q2 R+ I$ `
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
3 s0 R  f6 M$ x* u; aduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
" a4 h! ~1 d& J. xfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are# m2 {' h2 Q# h" k9 o& J2 F+ a
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,; _5 G' E5 z# {5 [4 @7 O
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.0 b7 ?8 |# U2 E1 q6 F, r, d7 B7 q" z
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We* J9 O( E/ Y7 e+ N; j: Q0 m
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy9 e4 j+ r6 a& \, L  X+ ?
balanced market."
3 X9 v& U! c" m( D6 `
# c* h: `3 M3 E) A: s2 S    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,$ F( A( p7 e" p  \* s8 U5 Y" [
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift3 U# M9 e' Z& ^+ m/ O2 D
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
) q( `( P5 d3 o( i0 bthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core( C) N% A. G" B1 M, _' N
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,4 {, v7 k& c1 \7 P9 O
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
  z0 e& X- Z! ebreaking price appreciations./ ]$ E; X) y* O; S( N" F

6 B. P) P) R! P3 m4 y3 Y    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
+ D4 k$ ]; w; Z2 F/ T+ Ieconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
4 _2 k9 d: G$ ~, alargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
( B8 \2 j( C' p$ E* S% g: q& w/ B( B1 v7 S6 B- Y
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
9 T$ L( _! @# k  ?economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer2 a. {; `: j: [! K: s
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
2 o; E7 b3 o9 k3 C# t# w6 Mslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.# q4 x0 ^1 x" v# g
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers8 B5 D# M: u: E4 h4 H) s
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
! w8 s% |2 t: G4 d7 L8 _price appreciation when compared with 2005.2 |- K& x! o# z# h! v$ ^' C* ], A' O9 \
; n' A0 x: j- @( V
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
+ L% I  m6 \5 `; I0 I' y6 Umarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and  r! U, t* k: v0 }9 H
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada0 e- o( q0 ^# N2 p
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
, L  D5 F6 _5 w4 G' `' h
, S) A; @1 D8 C  p7 i    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the$ l  g: W6 ?; S
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
. W5 x( d0 }! |& e# R  z, J+ L% Tfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the" w& I/ ~3 y' I$ q
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
% f* i$ I6 J7 j( Gaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
+ Z. Q2 o/ T) Q3 n- G5 l+ cdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and9 L( s+ I  Q5 J7 c1 ?- d6 U
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
* h2 B7 a8 ?" e  U; y& dmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."( y7 d& {+ T, O% E  p
# x1 O- I# j& B9 y
    <<
9 D# P) }7 S9 A                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
& `6 S6 h% m5 }! l% T    >>
, w" F  C% I# x) q
1 y6 W' J: `" \6 Q+ h. W) t    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
0 J8 Z0 f5 S) D. m2 rHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
- B" u* F& Q8 P/ ]4 Sof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
" E* N5 x, a( t+ {0 Klooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of% V8 L6 M" i5 s: r* F# c
renovations.8 `2 d# u  \4 u3 m4 M( l
* c3 m! n: f1 M- I
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
; V3 @2 J& _( g( Y; t" wincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
: _3 `& j3 q# [. p4 A- Fcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and0 `1 g3 Q1 M& x% P/ U) o
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
+ K# C9 C8 ?3 o
* Q, w5 ^  x* b5 t5 R    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer7 F  F; N% n0 m- S6 k8 N
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
5 l# J" R' W0 Cquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
0 _  `4 p5 [( k" v5 b, J600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
2 ~% a- p4 Q1 q8 }, vto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes% j' i1 S) \" S. q2 K
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.- a3 h+ X" H9 M& t7 X
% |7 T! [/ V: b
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced8 ]4 r8 v( a% v6 c9 D
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
2 x& v" S( G  q0 P" V' t4 a, xhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
9 k# h- N1 i8 Q# J# ], w  j- H8 Awas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
- H6 j) X/ X/ U) x6 {9 L) Odollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
1 @5 g" O$ T2 ]# }9 obuyers with more options when looking for a home.
7 p) D& O/ L8 g5 l' \% E. w4 h1 a" Z) ^5 q+ U. b$ m% w
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly2 y7 U/ ?- k$ |- e& P5 u2 {
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
" j) t4 u  ~# Y) r7 opriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
* F, J$ H' Y) I' y0 Bas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
2 K% a2 |, r/ x6 mfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.6 Q4 e/ F; u5 p! l5 L3 w

6 m# X7 z, c! n5 t    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house( t+ B! d% c3 r5 ]6 i/ [
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory+ F' j3 H3 ?7 d# b( Y0 j( ~' T
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
/ f, M! I. N' X) ?first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,' G0 k  ]2 s8 a8 I; C* f
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
( t+ S( e5 D& }+ U# j, Y- L# Gpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
# c# A2 V2 M: l6 N( |1 a. j3 B+ Gmaking a purchase.% J$ L. U+ |5 v- |  ?& h1 f! A
$ V' W' y& f, {8 @/ ~
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
7 B/ y$ X8 t$ Vmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
6 s8 p1 j- v3 {' N; N4 C+ J# Jconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
0 E0 S3 e4 g) d- Vcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting% y' m2 P; t7 D5 d9 V, q
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
# p4 C, Z  `% Q: |; Z# j" namenities.) l- f, t9 U, u& i
8 n& w# a. F& }6 ]
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels1 T& e+ b: s% i. N( B  r2 Y
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
1 ?% w" D* q' Oacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
% l& c3 |6 [3 o1 L+ L' _0 xcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been; a" @' x- Q8 l- U
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle& V6 C4 ?* t0 N( F9 }! a
residence, rather than for investment.% u6 w+ R9 x" i
: P4 z. J2 h4 X: ^+ `2 u
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
* o1 }$ ?2 x  Phouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted* o* T5 U! ~4 ~& e. K
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
. X) D- E( o3 v6 g/ Qconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization& C# ]  j; L3 e5 L! K
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
/ b) l" T) h- I7 ethe market.
4 g2 S0 V# v  y! R
. c' \6 l% N; r0 b% G( g" f9 y4 q. U    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through' b/ r/ z  ^+ f8 q! K) z8 e; U' q4 q
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In$ C0 w$ B8 a, r/ [8 v
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring) L$ m+ |, R4 N2 b: _8 O9 l. G
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due0 e1 J7 r' q7 ]$ @, G& [6 U
to the shortage of available inventory.
% Y# b! \# U+ m( k0 r5 r: u0 V& d8 j. p0 b
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
( R! i4 u) r) ~  imomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
$ o8 |- M: @& J4 q0 xvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
8 g+ ]$ {: ^5 X- Wstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.) P9 ~# x; C. @
4 j! r0 T5 G' k1 F
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases) R0 X/ N3 L/ J( y+ ]- b
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low- X# B7 k. r! y2 I/ F! }$ v! o" m
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
* k2 Q8 h6 Y# ^pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
3 l, _  v$ |" Lprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer- F7 f- b: u( p
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as) `( D1 Y) a$ k5 [+ v( K; a
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

9 F" M3 m$ {! I" ]# y/ {$ F$ \
( m, U4 k; D! W5 X/ j! U- ]    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter# x$ Z* ?* p0 u# B
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
, u. _% N7 e# yremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,- w4 O# F% y. e5 i: a! E8 \
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
8 G' ?9 e; W$ {: \increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve! s9 b/ }. `( q
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
# L" ^) ~* `% Y+ ztowards the end of 2006.
    $ `$ Z; ?( ^1 r0 G

8 u2 J' n5 Z) }: G. \While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
  u! l2 s# V9 v* c, X* \" N/ K/ Ginventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
- v" @& M! \  jto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
5 y% E6 s- S  a3 hgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
# a* v$ _4 J; U% jforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
) A! V( J5 j4 }8 Wpressure on tight inventory levels.
6 k( D' Z, A6 b% G" o! Q8 n
+ D1 l' P: N( y  @( N0 c    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
1 R  `+ H) j/ e9 D* Mfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
+ B! m, ]7 ~$ q: ~into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
! l' J9 U7 N% ?while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
: Z, k* Z. ?0 D! \for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
' H* w9 F4 W: g8 T
7 F8 r$ t' t" m* N    <<2 s, m- K6 t( e# f) }9 v& t
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20069 M, I7 ]0 ?' `# x# V" p3 f
" v; C6 T1 d8 k
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 Q  n# g8 _. C8 E% i! p: T                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
, H" K  j3 r& L' T' o  V    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  L/ O, {5 F/ N! U
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
  f+ b' A% @& E$ U( @8 y$ d    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
; E: A) \2 U2 e+ P% K    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 ~7 ^5 K* C  v% s# Q
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
) S# v4 x7 e9 t% v; o" M: T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 k& D8 R% V) q! i/ W
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000* u$ a2 s" S* K2 n* Z" V* j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& L" U: _. k7 U& m
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000/ H1 e7 y7 l/ }' T4 Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 m! W) W+ g! a3 q- A7 S+ f    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
% w' H' H! s$ k: v5 _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 K6 W! w# E( e$ q" W0 S& E
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3337 H8 q2 k) _4 v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; }# D. q2 f( d' y    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
1 o5 i0 ?/ B. x: i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 E/ w+ ]2 ~7 w8 i/ `    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
. z' `, ^; F; \3 S! j    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( t7 g, Q/ ^; A* }) m2 D2 r    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250. `7 H& v! k; v; K: E$ j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% d+ t* f  p) u' o6 M/ H4 d    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7669 \# a! n) g* x7 F2 y1 y! ~/ A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! w" T3 B* [( V- B
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
$ t& F' z) ^/ ?0 W- m    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 z/ }( z3 ]" u  z7 F/ a3 P
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5001 k& n2 v4 n' J: h9 X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: G; y& n5 [. c$ \4 t# q& l
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389  }7 _& `& o6 f
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- e! G4 T' B9 E: A+ x1 o
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
: r" Y( ^8 m9 x' f/ M* H    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' X/ X$ h' a$ [! g( Z' f    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
( S0 E3 ?4 m3 u- q% \# s* _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 b# [. \; P- y" L
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
. |* V7 y' \% b, r4 s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 @6 p& C$ R$ D) f9 F3 ~4 u
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
/ B( W( e$ p5 g! F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 o; A: w' d9 Z- f, e* W& s8 h
- F+ Y) B" {* h/ I" l/ R" d    -------------------------------------------------------------7 N4 Y* Q$ y+ p% d8 f6 O# d
                               Standard Condominium
- H% m9 ^2 x* O) |  s- a2 g; z    -------------------------------------------------------------0 ?+ a% u, Z) U% u  \0 K8 B
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo! A2 u  D- V6 p" T6 Y4 b. ^1 y
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change" M8 z$ {& f1 y! u2 B0 p
    -------------------------------------------------------------! F2 b/ Y: n+ B/ z; z  q6 A
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%& }# x& O+ p' K2 r. T
    -------------------------------------------------------------
* [5 z2 J, a& h9 U9 b    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%1 F; s3 R0 ?/ _* s
    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 ^$ e9 L8 P2 g3 b3 v- M4 S+ U4 k    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A4 D' O  A# ~3 }3 N7 P
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# ^% I" f( x6 r% P( D    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
' l3 @! j2 Y, H' f# ~0 c    -------------------------------------------------------------
" ~# b9 ?4 {4 ]1 D8 O- |: U    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
9 ~4 s, z3 r7 E    -------------------------------------------------------------7 s" P3 y0 X/ c: v: V: U% |. D
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%5 N8 Y/ D7 }; V& ]5 V, O
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' }+ p6 N% G# C; c+ p+ U    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%5 n9 [  d. u  T# z" u8 T% b7 V* y
    -------------------------------------------------------------" ~$ \3 ^% M: h/ f
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
4 |! _) D5 U0 {/ K: j: d- @    -------------------------------------------------------------8 L1 k& a9 R3 o. M! u* z
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
  ?/ f' j) R3 e; D; v    -------------------------------------------------------------
! g0 n" ~/ o* U3 v/ Y( J    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
. D& n5 n8 a# m. H) h$ I    -------------------------------------------------------------6 s$ G$ c( }, e3 E5 V  h
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%. U$ M7 v  Q; i) u2 x" h
    -------------------------------------------------------------
% k& Z& J9 c3 B& N! L: e    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%  P8 K( V3 |1 [* X+ ?- G% \
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 V9 B5 ^4 ~+ x
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%( K6 z& M1 ?& L6 l3 L6 F- O* C
    -------------------------------------------------------------6 J+ w  W8 n4 f0 C$ G! ]( A
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
1 @# v6 }' A$ f& c3 a" y$ V    -------------------------------------------------------------
* A+ y& D; ^& P    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%4 o$ c$ f$ X: l, _
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 D! E' ?( @$ O    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%( A1 D* d1 D- s; I$ l
    -------------------------------------------------------------% Q+ \( L8 Q; W  R- A
    >>
# q1 ?' g0 A, c' _1 u, H; O; S, r! M# ^* x6 }1 t( c
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined9 T: F# r  K  c
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint% Z3 O- k9 g; K- ]# K& T2 D$ m4 U! l
John and Victoria.
% ?5 [  r2 U8 f( J( A) y
  I1 o( ^$ b. B  X9 O    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most( r' @. X; N/ T' |
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of* O. R0 `0 ~1 X! V- Y* C
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release5 _. v0 Z+ y3 B" [
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price/ L6 [' ], I9 L8 K
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities% `( N3 b3 m1 w8 k5 m: s
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
0 M$ R; N9 Y, D) g! aavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
* R7 |  V$ \5 nfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable0 R# B7 e3 S! O
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
% f" Z! ?; p; `  iNovember 15, 2006.& t8 T1 o3 U# B5 T- L
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
" g) z0 `) `3 V  P/ u* {* pfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
1 |/ `" a1 Q$ g6 g" N% `provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
8 F  h9 J- u5 Oavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-14 15:15 , Processed in 0.234335 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表