埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2183|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable : m! }$ P) A4 c/ W" L
3 O) H- ^/ t2 |
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -/ r' ]& x  s$ A- C5 V& {
& d; @* X# p: u# N$ m+ s
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
; W% x1 }6 f& Dexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
! N% A. P" i, ~0 w6 x/ Z# @quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
( I" M3 p2 |& F; @$ lin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
1 S( ]8 J& H- a. H, r2 @price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and- w- L: f( W& x# B) [  d; I
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
( K4 q6 W# R1 ]( w. e$ ~Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
0 v6 ]6 j% ?: S* D' l- _- j9 O8 eLePage Real Estate Services.. d; |  j1 G% q
% y, n+ z, w& }3 k" {0 {, ~* P
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
% v: T# C7 M+ dare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
4 `; t  L; u5 Y! Z9 E2 R9 w% [conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
( `7 X( m, ?3 C1 Hsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the5 T" J, `6 P2 |) g8 J6 D
residential real estate sector.) o/ o+ D3 g  Z- U4 O% C; a
3 C7 @' z5 l* t  |
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
2 ?. L# Z, g  D' Y6 v" ?3 Loccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
/ z8 D0 {; O4 Y! ]year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562$ I- T8 q* P( L5 v2 p
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
3 _. {8 d" }; A2 O(+13.2%).
2 @( \6 X9 v3 g! \3 X/ c3 B6 |$ ^9 \' D, x7 \
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
; G" g1 s; f& a( hduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
& U) E6 e6 V7 C: n4 o9 |; e( ]1 i# \9 Zfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
+ o0 e- n" `, k7 o: X! bpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,: h0 U4 }! y1 V
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.  G2 w: k! P* i& X! z, m! {
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We- z" w, m3 T- {3 f7 W$ b
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
8 r& r0 J/ f7 C& J. Ibalanced market."
' L& Q/ ~; z  Q* E6 l& ~! Y( W' }5 w% o. t; J) M, i0 s$ N
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
3 F* |; \# b4 C6 g# }considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift5 r" L0 E1 _$ i! B! @; [& z9 c
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued# q; I; s7 B" d$ t6 C9 J& g, x+ |; a3 H
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
6 a, z5 A, D; venergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
" b# _4 H  N  [! B! B. @- {8 B  Umanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
; n( V: g8 k% U; G: L* X4 ^. g; Kbreaking price appreciations.
* X* z" e; O7 c( E( Z6 G# I; I. }7 C7 j; r+ f$ x
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding- Z  y, x8 }" n
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
# Y. W$ \6 A, R. p2 ?7 C) _0 Nlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
7 `* R  E0 W; q8 I, D" E: t* c. O) Z8 M( \$ e4 l( ?
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
* x' V- s$ p: Y. H& H4 Leconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer6 r( h8 S& h, A- [* W; H' p& P
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
: F! b0 F/ x. @slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
( h+ K" [! x3 D3 n" g% b0 ?In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
4 X/ ~* f2 V$ g6 p" _4 jgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of- B  m+ c7 }# K2 T! d
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
0 b6 k3 A+ q* o) @% f$ g3 U0 |( q' o7 I1 K
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing9 K- ~3 m; T# I% y! W: ?' x
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
8 o# j7 J! t3 `7 bfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
" g, j. U/ U$ V0 l2 C2 @are markedly different than those found in the United States.
0 R1 Q/ _% f. A2 a
( ]( @" K  R8 D% b" T8 I" y1 ~    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
5 n$ g8 Z* C5 {5 m' DAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
! C' t9 w$ y* ?9 x4 @& J4 V4 vfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
$ h  U, \: c; g. prelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general0 X8 K! c4 h2 r3 e$ ?$ C, K
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
8 F- d" J( i+ J  Edownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
: _# M) V0 A& r! B8 D4 a0 i3 D5 aaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization+ N/ T% p- y0 L9 p
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment.", u6 |  N# I. J1 L) }% i3 m, d; Z
. O) P  `2 a' ?5 T' z% W$ ~
    <<
. H- \" Y# F) ^7 ~1 H# E                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
% F) N5 @1 S1 i5 D    >>
( R1 M; ]" Z, Z8 d5 y
  x! j# p& ?8 \    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in; g2 M6 Z: O7 r$ Y
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
# g+ H: b/ T- R. l6 y, iof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time" O; }3 Q* n$ |3 y0 e$ f8 n! L/ D
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of! b) N# ]& z# @* F9 W; p( K
renovations.6 e$ m* f/ X8 L' A5 U5 v5 U

8 Y- |; E  F9 m7 c& B" i    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight) J; r/ I3 L  b0 v7 j- J
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation- Q! @! b5 R0 Q
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and- x$ ~: s% l0 X4 B7 Z1 n
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
3 B' u0 h. {- n4 J" \4 {2 G7 w+ u7 y7 `
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
( k/ w2 Q# I+ ^slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
# c- j2 S/ e8 p3 E3 ]5 n, rquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new8 V5 Y! g' ~! p3 h; B% e  H; j/ A
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores; l0 J6 k6 q: y- D7 C! ~
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes  q9 q+ [8 z! T% P9 m' W" V
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
' |1 C' l: v, @+ y* ?0 C% b6 a! k% ]0 r9 t- g
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
6 J0 W: P% y- N% u* g/ `/ G( Vconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their# L+ l: x6 }4 w5 b
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers- n( F- X$ R3 h+ j5 s
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
9 v6 V2 i' j+ u0 O( ?! Xdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
- r( B5 ~9 }$ q. @" `5 pbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
9 v( ]* a& I$ A" y% X8 _( _; F' @! y1 u/ W- a
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
  U. _6 j5 \3 V1 t7 L$ ?: F3 v( i/ Y) lamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes2 x. C' ?& ?1 o( @, U: V# Q, w
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
- Z! d3 h2 i" ^0 r$ R# Kas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last7 _' ^0 |1 e( f* `7 z
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
' \: _( h# \$ K/ k$ z/ i5 t) _  q# W! ~' L+ ^4 f0 \/ f
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
0 X% ~0 X+ z) u0 Pprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
4 c( G7 b8 ~  q5 a6 i- }% glevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
& H7 H; S* J! D. g  m. y& ?/ N8 ]first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,+ [) }. \) c3 y, K4 A2 U1 V( W7 f
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
( D! h; c- z9 |9 Q) f5 {pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before# n1 B" A9 E4 `
making a purchase.3 ?. `# o! X' P7 ?; Z+ r: V

5 K' c8 l/ G. v9 \3 P4 i    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing. S' w5 y9 Z/ r( n6 l" G
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong2 Q7 H& I8 }3 _. c
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city7 s- M$ U- o4 G6 T( C1 ?
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting6 _1 ?# |0 |" w7 K3 J, q
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
: N& [! |( q: P+ d/ T- h( _! mamenities.
2 j; T' X) T& |# C; l: O$ q' o! {0 J0 p, {9 a; w
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
  Q0 d3 |5 T4 _throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
4 W+ e- @+ b9 H3 \) y# `( Uacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has8 d! J3 G. X0 A
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been- r0 O  u2 F5 h9 `
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
: G1 D4 _# ~$ R7 Q0 r- t* eresidence, rather than for investment.
# ^( Z  P! v, y) ^/ Y; f6 Y& {' E! A3 d8 ?2 \% |
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as. o3 |! ]7 J. v( k" x0 r
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
7 i, }$ l3 s1 m. uin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer, j3 e/ N2 w4 h7 ~" L
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
! K. J/ z4 o0 d& m2 v# n* O5 Qrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter' c/ [0 k2 p3 \  e0 k
the market.$ k8 s; i2 d4 y
4 g3 e  R7 E# U" E; u& Q
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
( L3 H3 Z1 u* M& w% b* k7 yJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
7 _2 R- a2 }$ b( V9 m4 x" ^( y% X. F4 rAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
5 x. t( `9 \7 r3 Y8 J8 i% X, `5 lmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
. @* }& T7 [9 \+ ]; Q& w9 Nto the shortage of available inventory.
! W  F2 h* b6 t  c7 Y  S0 e) [; g6 K8 y$ X5 S0 s
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
& l* Q7 U' `5 L) emomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
2 J0 }. H0 @9 ^' Uvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
, |7 r; ?; |( P- y2 w& T/ Estruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
2 b- C" b# W/ n: I
+ z( E8 s: v6 y; X6 x    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
3 R0 T( x- b7 ?+ g8 X0 f# y3 _6 n1 nin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
" q/ P7 J) V% J% W( V  Zunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
+ k  F/ ^; K* |: o0 Ypressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
# |% y! x5 {, w; xprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
) n3 ~/ y/ z0 c3 p/ f, sseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as) b/ Y2 b! c& v* a+ G) g
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
# B- R3 s% P! ~) }8 R( l
2 @% {- S  B) x2 ]
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
; h2 P( o. y8 T* y1 Xas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
! C: a. T" i; J! ?# ^7 }remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
! V7 c$ D, `& @maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices# g, M9 v- q5 k- s; I1 j  B
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
+ d& k6 A' |0 Uin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
9 g* I. V$ M5 e) J) b/ Ytowards the end of 2006.
    / r8 f0 ^) U* o4 j6 a6 Z

! z2 c; _# w4 L" }* oWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
6 I8 u6 F! a6 e5 n$ Uinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
2 {; L0 X. z  C4 ~to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
1 ], G4 q6 \  J* f: A) hgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
3 Y3 A1 Y! v" I- X3 Dforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
: E  Y' w3 A! @- ^6 \& ~0 ?pressure on tight inventory levels.: Y, S7 @! e1 p; j' W! c6 L  V2 X+ [
' C5 m- u, Y2 z6 |* H
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic- _" f- y4 r" F7 w( W* s
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
# a: \5 o8 V8 T( }  o$ kinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;- V# R3 f6 I$ H6 ]: q
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching, H7 h, R/ M& g5 ?! h7 v$ K
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.. w  }0 y. ]% ^+ f. m3 A

0 g+ Z5 H* T! s    <<( B. S, A9 p, r. H: D& K! C$ ~7 n
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20066 x, S( x- j4 u) k2 O% c# o9 h
  @" g2 l2 X, A' ~% {$ H
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: m4 m( E/ J- S) }0 \1 o" e                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
0 D9 W" W- x% \4 v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ e' S3 p/ m4 V: C" v$ Q$ }$ ]) i; y                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
1 {, Z% w' B5 A% b: U  a$ a    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average$ n8 X! V) z: a2 M6 r. v+ g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: h) M8 k$ E6 l) q* p1 v9 L6 ~
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
: k, u9 }3 g1 w. P! \& n) }    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  T; ?$ V6 l. l0 H
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0002 A9 X' ?3 V+ t1 m1 V+ k1 A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 s. K+ ^: x- Q
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
8 m; `2 ]* y# `3 T3 k1 d+ W: m    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 x5 q  m& C6 K3 L6 D/ ]    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
1 F) T3 V2 W; W# J  f1 Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) k+ |: |3 F* ~    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3333 E' y  U: y: D/ {: y7 ~# @; K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 k" |5 n  |- t8 A, J0 m/ n
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
4 [7 K' ^7 j6 D) o+ `! |    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 W  }: v6 X; f+ h' P* b
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185! C% M$ I5 V6 h0 E1 ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: v4 k6 h+ {2 [$ g' x
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2502 X; s: u. V2 }; t* a7 |* n$ n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 ^  e5 D& y9 O! u' i' W
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7662 r7 @7 Q6 j& T, h7 A; ^! E1 I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! M6 `' D9 }0 N3 A
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
# D1 {' Y  @" l: _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! H1 f3 I( @2 \& C  X" n, L6 Y
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5009 Z" Z: s( p3 B- O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( M; y& V' F' g6 o% A    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
! \; L6 n4 H7 j8 P5 q9 h1 \& O& F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# \8 D5 l) k; `3 b! c    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
3 o' A! P0 ?( H% s& O+ K    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ L. l9 a* Y& j+ V  Y    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500" F9 n, Y, ^! Y8 t) S0 f
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) k" Q- O, y+ c; G
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0007 j1 H" I0 K& k6 r( U% f2 W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 Z: J- f  i" g) `    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
+ r0 R7 |- f! V3 u" P5 U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. k& i5 J" ~% {0 [+ V. p: |
0 G1 X( [7 t. G0 S6 T
    -------------------------------------------------------------; h& a) [1 ~# i* S
                               Standard Condominium
1 J) ], K; b3 D; E0 l. [- ]9 m: M    -------------------------------------------------------------$ H+ d2 x, [6 T/ p$ G- O# G
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
2 g, i$ I, i7 O% e3 r: h. t    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
$ `2 ], v$ N5 z) P9 ]4 ]    -------------------------------------------------------------+ Y+ Y. C: [$ J2 m) y4 d
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
- X6 `0 r' U" n; x    -------------------------------------------------------------7 E4 f8 o8 M" M( l+ U
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%& \9 R' h( c' Q0 H) m$ I: d: H% d
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 l! e6 K) u) Z4 R, X" }+ {
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A3 L/ u' W: h' s5 E) ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) L7 D* `1 q* X( v    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
3 j7 X  g; V5 ~6 d- ^9 J- N3 K# ^, i    -------------------------------------------------------------
: P* |) `2 g  E3 V    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%: ]* ]) G; E1 c
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  a% `$ t1 d; c( [* Q& M    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
7 M  R+ t6 ]; K" D: d+ L4 E% S8 H$ L    -------------------------------------------------------------* ?+ X( k" P3 _: z
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%5 F5 O7 }) h* }0 V
    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 p" i4 s! @) @. L' N! K    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%% `. _+ v" R8 c; O* R- U
    -------------------------------------------------------------* c* t! J: z# F* F8 f
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%  H" Z: E2 ^7 n, h
    -------------------------------------------------------------0 d7 n8 C! T4 G! F" F
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
/ A  u0 E# t) g& R    -------------------------------------------------------------
( {" @  Z6 ]$ b4 S    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
# {+ X, [+ m- ~3 L3 q    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 Z- D) f) _+ U" |: a) k    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
$ P/ j! I" w$ R4 T" i    -------------------------------------------------------------5 N4 ^7 [' U- v
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
/ L( n2 v; ?& J2 i3 \    -------------------------------------------------------------  U' z% e+ \* g, q; H
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%5 p. y8 O0 L+ O# p' t  @( u: S
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 ~3 F$ q/ S  N- l, `( ~' n    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
/ a* O& {) C8 Q* R+ N) G; R    -------------------------------------------------------------
& ~" [+ W" A; D' i) i    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
+ w0 v( u8 I1 N0 r9 S! c    -------------------------------------------------------------
# S2 d+ m% t( W! ~( @    >>
' e" o# H' t! ?
+ \5 t" F$ d# v& n# l    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
: [) t9 S% ^1 U; z8 T* Jin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
9 j; w3 Q4 q" R" F) b( F' Z6 PJohn and Victoria.
) w& R9 {. U& _+ R0 X3 I
) S. s) D7 Z. W% m    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
: x. I' M5 ~2 h& K5 ycomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of/ `; I9 c0 J- o- V' h
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release" C9 J5 O3 y/ M/ [3 T# D
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price0 F3 x2 r% u* T5 e. }$ D
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
' {: ?0 R9 A4 S1 y, a+ P' bacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
8 Y  ?2 g" q$ i. z$ l' T% G) wavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
" p" I, J9 d) ^4 R' Ffigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
) O' }: ^; z5 E( X; @version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
) r. U  M0 T) q8 B2 Y: R+ bNovember 15, 2006.* T" g4 O5 u" p5 X# U' N
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
4 h$ A1 V; R9 C# ^, Q, i4 ^( kfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
  V# f# y$ O( _& Zprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
4 f( }+ A1 [( A% h7 N5 iavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-17 23:06 , Processed in 0.179702 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表