 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 8 h: v& f4 ]* @' I0 c1 D: c
0 L8 ?% B- [6 S: f0 u# [ S# s0 }( P- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -( n: E% Y( M4 X8 J' s3 d
% K1 [# J$ ` X* i m
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market' \7 W- n9 k# r
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
- G) [1 o" q2 b! F4 \; squarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
; O" x" T7 O: I. A6 Y2 ?- Vin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit9 Q. X S0 L0 B: {( o5 |6 {
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
4 u1 Z- e: h0 h! i. V+ v# {more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
* y( b2 |3 P9 nQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal C9 r9 L) u/ s" t$ X9 ~
LePage Real Estate Services.) Z4 ~# M# j4 V6 ?6 S6 u
: Z, d" r* e* y5 t4 U% J' f& Z Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters6 P' l7 ~! {) s5 m1 D
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic1 ~* h$ Q3 C8 a o4 b# B9 ~; r
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and" H0 g" d5 ^ C- ]% P
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
0 Q/ C6 K, M# ^7 tresidential real estate sector.
/ V% y1 U" d9 o0 c5 m1 ^
' @& s& W' E! X; o6 `8 c$ ~ ~ Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation% n; ]5 f4 r9 V c& j7 t: j
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
/ m! N4 s) t- l/ A3 ]& tyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
/ d& a( K% t5 \/ C( F(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380% x3 p2 b- f9 c2 V
(+13.2%).
' g; r% n) J( a' @# \# n4 S* `) I. A) i3 Y+ w
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth) S$ Z6 X, s: O q+ ?0 z
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the! ~. r8 @+ \- _ ~/ \: A
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are$ E0 u, n8 k6 I8 ]
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
6 D' I- y( J$ H! S2 Lpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.+ S; B( w/ Q0 K' x4 A/ n" n$ G3 N
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We* z# G1 U' c3 L
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy2 u6 S6 F0 G: h3 O
balanced market."
" J0 Y4 l, w( O: ]" f/ S7 L
: g! p! Z' ?/ w: O& B Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices, ]. g, u3 Y4 z6 L! ~4 `: w
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift u& G$ ?) k3 \1 V: {& ^
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued; I/ _% O7 ^8 s: P; b( F( Z
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
' ~) a+ K* }) {1 ?1 j* nenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,; \; Z$ l/ v4 [2 V3 e
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record$ R4 h1 r/ Q% ]! U! u* y
breaking price appreciations.
+ A! b& w( d7 [* C
: k/ O @9 q$ O Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
8 L* c( f! E* ]5 \* x6 Q4 n$ P# x0 `economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the8 l- @% F' {$ E4 K; \
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.' P" M, J# q6 `
8 m! c- G4 V, J: y$ \$ B6 @
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
4 R* ?! w# W8 Z Deconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
: d% `- {5 A: e+ x4 S6 Aconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
) z: g* r; E% F7 n/ U1 ?1 ]slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth." h! m$ q! o( X" q4 M
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
6 k, b" @- n w9 F" P) ggreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
' p( T9 f$ T% e& {) R3 g+ cprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
z: V" e8 j/ v o0 q7 I
, p: Z& C, q7 P* O- v While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
1 K( m, {- u4 ?+ h: y8 w3 E7 bmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
# e* o' d4 I! Q+ k# l; n% nfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada. m3 C9 k* k* G$ y2 l/ r o& M
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
& z& y0 R. y9 t% Z9 x% o5 v' A
. g, X& ^- q: @8 n, G8 Z Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
9 U, W2 W, I4 [American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
- q4 {- Q0 k0 ~2 W {favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the% i5 x# K5 o& [. D/ M
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
' g ]7 ?- S5 r8 m. J8 h6 i! Baffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the0 A3 c9 ^; i3 P% T: T- c
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and2 }, L x4 e8 j9 P0 D; U q
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization. t+ L T; [2 x6 f8 C
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
! B# E/ G/ {, B X$ ?/ Y5 F) p' y. `& x& s- S! d. Z
<<3 I1 ^3 @, R( X
REGIONAL SUMMARIES: a* `! [2 \* I. b8 r% d( F
>>* s6 P' _7 x& }3 z2 i; ?
! Y e( z4 v9 K( Q1 n; Q" P& `7 }" c
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
* R9 t$ d& r+ \, L3 a" v* M: y9 PHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate t5 g& C8 Q0 k! g: n
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time: Y+ v9 G" {. X+ K% e, Z% a7 J
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
5 V/ u, Z4 `; J( u0 Prenovations.
) H! D, r5 c+ Q8 u5 \ V) T
Z6 d7 w; c/ \( | The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
1 U+ M1 j" i1 P4 n7 Qincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
9 v. c8 F7 }; O3 gcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and5 o1 k8 i5 J: t& X
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.( e h# p/ M* V' i# r6 A
. x3 W8 C9 N' N2 V: V3 [
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
R. N' A+ Z: X$ Pslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
# I I, s+ a8 Y4 ]) w9 }) gquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new5 \5 c* [+ F0 h. o
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
+ k/ Z m9 n: ~ }to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes, a0 @' a0 V7 \7 B5 y( H: _
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
. [' e7 [* a! z( b5 a8 f& I! V
5 I3 G" `' ^* B In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced& c* Z+ w! o! e2 V" B) d
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
4 s3 g; y9 L2 w/ n6 R1 Qhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers) y& O: \: D% V' @
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian. t- L- U4 d& x: n* ~) `( d
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing# G! c9 J* M- T( R+ j
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
+ K' |$ X+ X3 {1 I6 [1 C7 A
/ m, S4 k! S. M6 r7 U3 u) L4 B( x Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
8 m5 x1 _5 L$ @: P5 U6 uamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes$ ?; \: j& ]2 J+ [$ S, J
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
) A; i" o7 H/ d& m3 Y1 ^0 gas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
2 n+ T; _6 O, g6 K/ wfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
9 a$ u, q: C3 A& H( d4 C% u8 ]# ^% x
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house: Q) F' S2 q( J* @4 x4 i8 J+ `
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
3 n; r/ G$ l# C& ]% m/ Flevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting( x! x" q6 \0 A- h4 L
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,5 T g/ K4 h# C. r; M
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
/ e9 C% R* b2 Y* ^2 H9 bpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before( k: o$ i% C" H4 K" K3 ]
making a purchase.
2 i8 e3 b/ H X2 F e
' S+ Y3 u3 H# W7 ]$ } Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing( {, N' b& J2 E5 C# Z- @
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
! }% v9 P; @! a, Jconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city7 t& _+ }* h% b3 y; t, a
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting, Q1 C% G4 a" I( V& v7 U
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown+ ~ N+ k2 z$ b) ^& A' D1 u
amenities.
) X6 {9 o/ N0 Q7 V( p4 A1 f
6 U9 r3 e7 L5 ?! A. e( A The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
/ `6 q) [; q6 V0 ]7 m! pthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
/ I& _" s# J! N0 w2 tacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
5 s, m! H( i% Q/ V% Ycontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been" Y! l# s# b8 X9 a) g' {/ {
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
& F, t/ g0 I/ a, d: Y! s! F2 kresidence, rather than for investment.$ t) {& j- n$ i% Z9 K) C$ @ e
5 U7 J) I8 d$ s3 x0 u The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as) P6 Z4 `% ~, M3 E% U
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
( {7 h+ |, E! x8 {0 yin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer# Q' m( m2 W6 t! L% n
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization( J8 m! Y3 k/ L0 s$ y5 Y
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
% e( |2 a5 \; G4 Uthe market.1 ^3 h: y3 x' K/ C7 n! I
: @) R2 U: Q3 P& J7 i
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through0 q& E- X1 h. v$ Y( H/ G
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In) ?) H+ a7 z+ \* \4 u2 `% x& a* C
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring& Q. k3 f0 v. Y3 p: e" q V
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due2 e; x8 O$ L7 G ~+ x e
to the shortage of available inventory.) K. X. H. M2 f- W" r/ Y
# s# Y' _0 E6 m W$ @2 {/ Q
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its; o: j0 ~; [: {2 c; V
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains9 M. [! C8 a( l/ [) |( \
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses$ l; K: F0 t4 W4 G$ W5 h
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
* ~) e' V- f* F9 r, t" y5 P+ B1 Y9 i' y$ T
_/ O+ R! l3 I: h Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
6 l6 k0 a9 w7 v, g0 ^% Y& pin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
9 l) h& b$ O; U9 q( n( M- b. v/ M$ junemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that- N* C7 i: t; o$ o9 ~: B
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
! `& Q; O* i' T. T* y' Pprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer% f+ v$ G; _% V5 @, ^( D
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
8 P7 U. e4 r% h/ k' D$ |buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.$ i4 U5 }% G/ H. b, j# j
8 D# N- X0 U9 ^# Z+ u4 C
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter F# |3 y/ q' g. @4 ^' m( e
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
! Q& ^9 _6 A% P" z$ yremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry," B" [) F+ G; j5 ?
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices3 c4 s% G+ S2 R: E. j4 |1 e
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
( m, ^" Z# G3 }, K! Rin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly m4 n3 C3 v. G( X) U8 k3 `
towards the end of 2006.
/ W1 o; y9 K& ^ W0 w. T/ q" |% ^) M" S8 S, y$ O' c2 `
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of$ B d; U* O) f( [) `4 q7 W% ?
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
& @$ k. M! M( j# Lto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse2 P+ T) f9 W0 {7 D: q' k' G. e+ G
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to( a, t$ V! R3 d- H% X3 ]2 e
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
3 ^- f7 |' y! x6 r3 { tpressure on tight inventory levels. n7 o7 W+ } F6 x
( c6 C" g. ^5 b, ]+ D% z4 W Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic# M; w/ y! o- L& _9 k
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
, q( [. }& Z0 R$ `& Iinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
8 k5 x# F( j# H3 _# `while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching# `) Y8 f! j8 o
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
) q k g# }/ Z+ T' U- ^; }6 }7 Z, g# J& @) S& G& y% q# t
<<
4 ^* d# N; N6 d. o) p( F0 e" N Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006* r2 @+ v: h( U# B
+ A; d5 E- X, Z: l" D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 i7 B' h0 m6 r8 R
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey, X8 C1 t* q9 K: \8 a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 G) W/ v- Y$ l6 ~ 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
\* {) K/ e; i+ |: |" v6 I Market Average Average % Change Average Average2 I% \! Z k" H) B% K+ Z3 G8 s
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& h% d: \4 `& h; h8 x2 l5 U4 Z Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
# j6 T/ ^" E0 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------% ~) j W& g$ N7 n8 u% p
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000! l1 V7 c( ?0 ~& e8 b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' m8 w, {. h3 k$ y6 R; c Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000" g( o/ a2 v/ o r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 W* Q, c5 X& h Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
) _2 {$ C% _: z7 I2 G. C0 Q# A2 D -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 R8 M) Z5 |9 h- P) }
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
7 ^' {, R2 X3 f2 ]: g u -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 f& p" b$ f( t9 J$ ]. g1 }: g Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
: ?7 ^5 E$ v5 d. J7 U7 e7 G -------------------------------------------------------------------------& c+ C" g9 P f5 ?0 T# P0 |4 J: h
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
, k2 n. F" K* ^% f: Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" t5 O1 @+ W( c& [% C Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
' c* I& b9 z& O9 I -------------------------------------------------------------------------! E% A! b/ \: }& [4 Y0 \, R6 N
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766$ ^* F H7 H: D! P, e0 Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 j) D! H: t2 H& y" E Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
0 V1 j2 w8 B/ s -------------------------------------------------------------------------, @7 F& P0 |2 ^0 k# y3 D# n
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500 e% L" T3 N1 q5 u+ O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 l w" `* \. v Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3896 e8 q: S6 W7 ~+ r$ E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ _9 ]3 |* Q1 y" K# L1 A) O
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
7 G, I/ r/ b4 j) V5 _* c' y7 o -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 q: e- n g& N6 P5 C" S Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
! x" s, g* J+ `. W7 [+ U0 |# M -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 c2 a/ D- e% Z Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
4 l. m8 h7 l9 S( j- R7 M -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% Y5 ~3 n# \/ B& u2 D. Y2 \$ k National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
9 A1 r4 r% k: Q. F -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 w3 T9 `3 [* l
% _2 C' M4 a. g -------------------------------------------------------------
/ F& v6 u+ T1 U; d8 s% E" J# h/ a z) U Standard Condominium
# Z1 g; `- E! R3 N) G; g! Z; H -------------------------------------------------------------% `$ s) `3 S# ^. J
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo- y/ G7 M( s u9 d/ f. `" W
Market % Change Average Average % Change! Q$ C$ _& ~$ w9 d% a+ n
-------------------------------------------------------------$ m( }& I, [7 e! x
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%# I: `5 L4 F/ F& i; O+ s7 R0 t
-------------------------------------------------------------
( q% g( C5 t$ i Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
9 W& C1 P1 j4 i- C; z( u -------------------------------------------------------------
+ u* @: Y7 p1 E$ a' Z Moncton 4.9% - - N/A# w0 ]3 L9 P# s3 X! m; Z! }. T
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 r$ Z1 S( `8 m8 ?0 b Saint John N/A - - N/A0 p( V* Y+ R6 x, m
-------------------------------------------------------------
, b1 {# R# L. h1 B( y# ?: d4 u St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%3 u5 i" q+ S$ ]* d
-------------------------------------------------------------
^9 n3 |& W ~3 k& a, M Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%: M4 X# T: Y! J1 y4 A. F, S9 D
-------------------------------------------------------------* H8 |0 O8 k ?* h1 Y
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
6 \4 `: u& ?0 p; P4 f ------------------------------------------------------------- a. A# _& ^ m4 ]; Z. {; n
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
4 a6 N+ n+ s4 l* ]9 h -------------------------------------------------------------+ c$ d6 Y; L, z% N4 h" Z
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%, |- O9 G& y6 @# \& W2 g- p+ a( v$ w0 _
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 n9 r. H- ~, ~2 X' E Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
' r! Q+ o) V8 w5 v& j' a" \* Y# _ -------------------------------------------------------------
6 E- A$ t) _1 R/ E8 b) z6 X Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
& T3 s V7 ?& f. ~5 t% } -------------------------------------------------------------
1 ?1 l9 S+ v) U% B8 y3 T Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%1 K" D; l0 U. B! l2 K" M
-------------------------------------------------------------
) w1 i2 G' w3 X7 h7 B' N) s9 d5 h Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
' a+ A z7 k0 k* j: ], o -------------------------------------------------------------( t0 t& {: R1 m- I3 k4 |9 \
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
6 s5 L7 Z# P" F M -------------------------------------------------------------
9 B6 @* L/ y9 B; A" B/ A Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%! h' w% A( R" r
-------------------------------------------------------------1 x1 n3 ~! J* | t/ d
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
& L% M& K- C( U- ]7 r& Z -------------------------------------------------------------
3 w O9 X1 w- x: l h >>+ U, D! V& d6 O0 I3 I* a8 w; D
# i2 H' w6 u9 P% Q2 D& F
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
& z0 \* E; K! y; H3 t! R: {in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint+ M. v, }, ]% q C' A! V) K7 A; B
John and Victoria.
7 ^1 z- e# h- q4 o
1 \! G; B- _" g The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
% E5 k5 z: {9 X) rcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of5 c5 X, T% G! V5 g9 P( K
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
' n' \: E5 | t3 {) |5 W2 Sreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price7 ~. i/ w! a, m5 S' U
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
) B9 d7 j4 w, X/ Sacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is& I) p4 u( f7 J8 x, e/ h' Y! `
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
+ h( T4 }* [1 O8 H7 g+ ufigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable* O( F- N' ~2 R! w9 @
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
6 E3 h5 R% n8 U8 ENovember 15, 2006.
7 h# ~0 R5 C( U, u3 C Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of" I& N: d1 J7 @
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge3 H ]( u2 [. j9 V% k" ]6 @5 q
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is2 B5 i+ d* d7 m H$ I0 w
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|