埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2380|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
) v8 e0 A- H2 V0 J% {- s+ M: ]) f7 H/ ]$ w4 X3 Q
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -- S' v5 }0 Z2 F
- ]& H  `1 u. [/ F# P3 ]2 z+ S/ U
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
( F. o! j6 U0 m1 |exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third) Q9 {. w$ j( f! m1 F# n
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic% s- h; d  ]* {+ `; b
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit- j) g: A9 W& a. U- q5 v8 }5 b
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
: |- X* G2 S. c8 `5 z7 v& zmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,2 S$ |" e9 |& ]$ ~3 K! t
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
( |9 @2 N/ J: e2 d, Y# OLePage Real Estate Services.
: u. N) y6 u  A3 E% l. ?  J0 r4 x! j, f) P3 @6 J1 @
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters  a5 [' x4 x* m' _8 s6 \2 \( R
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic5 f. j! ^# u( |
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
, X8 N* R8 [) p0 O1 s, Isound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
# \( x1 I  i. d6 k6 L4 Aresidential real estate sector.% ?9 V- p4 Z' u. P6 d8 o  h
6 o4 `' O* \1 Q+ ?* p5 S
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
5 ~% P+ w% w+ p& h4 Eoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
  @, [1 N8 n2 y5 K+ zyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562* n2 |5 T! P; O; c& ^
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3801 t4 h  z* P( O( }9 P
(+13.2%).7 B; t: O) s# |6 D7 `
8 O9 }. ^( B( {% a
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
4 K! i. s3 T5 C* a+ ~during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the1 N6 U! C  `0 `. ]$ v
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are6 o2 t5 u9 o; X" l
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,( @8 N) r, c# X
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
6 ?# v/ V4 H. @" O: T"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
/ s5 U* T) n- Mwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
8 O2 k/ B+ u/ t( \8 w7 cbalanced market."
2 q) I- F* a; n
4 g. W7 O# s1 g( {* A2 Z    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
2 ?, z' i' b! mconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift; V# q8 H4 \! J5 `
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued1 p9 R0 E. S/ l" a9 f' V
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core* [6 ]% a, p* C
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
) I" ^! H. h: ?1 Pmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record* r3 J/ x5 ?. N5 f# g
breaking price appreciations.% y, |$ x) F  g' c( S% P3 L

+ _4 ]$ D$ @5 q/ `! ~    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding" o9 R  ?( K: {: o( x" c$ ^
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
6 c: A* H6 a8 M! i! Y5 hlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.# u& a" S. O1 _

7 [  a6 R" ~; d9 l  j    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid& e; L: [, Y8 j
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
/ P( T: @8 ]0 D/ x2 vconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off( T* ?- E1 M9 I" q
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.6 O4 ~% \$ P% c# ~) j$ t0 S$ [( i+ c
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers" O7 d& e, B, B3 C0 c: x2 F
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
0 d0 ?8 W! d3 sprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
; f' {7 L: G& n- ^. {0 _5 [6 \6 c' x: l; U- D- U, e
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing0 T" X0 ]% u! W6 p+ S) m
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
' o, m: ?5 x/ V# {financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
# R+ v+ ^& B- d, Pare markedly different than those found in the United States.
/ E6 K) `7 Z9 q
5 L0 R$ S  u- y/ B    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
& H$ B% \8 L% ?/ _American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's4 b# t  e6 |; \8 @# [
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
  s  b+ k, i0 m/ ^( mrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general  v+ b" E1 X5 J4 V% g3 @6 l2 H5 s
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
, x3 r" ]2 ^4 s% M( I5 Adownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and5 p6 `4 b$ ~2 [7 B% {4 S" u" A
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization" k$ K, L$ W* m- O3 f
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."; H3 ]8 a) K- m( Q# O
1 _! \. c, m3 D& F5 y# J2 x: Q7 z$ K7 Q
    <<, n7 h8 x  r  I) p- Q$ R
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
8 E% U# i7 O$ \! a- j    >>
: |9 S1 C! r1 b- ~" ^: c. H; A5 s: V9 {" m% b+ e  ?9 A$ n/ \" O
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in1 N: o$ h$ v% _5 F5 b' {/ Q% a
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate. P- _( ~) _* ^7 @) Z) S. z  W
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time/ U2 ?: ?) l5 G+ g# h
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
* H3 Z4 {, }$ _3 P8 a3 E. Wrenovations.
7 l: W% s$ t: f9 E1 G: T- [* x
& l, M9 v  w; A7 e  H4 I0 S" L    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight6 p( s" w* q3 R2 e2 G9 n# A
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
4 C5 R" p& ^, o! v+ x7 gcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
9 ~- q0 }9 Z# M# WSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
  _- c6 r7 E/ B8 @- q2 Z) A4 N- D, J$ B0 l$ b0 }3 d, b3 H
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
, X% {0 P# ]4 Sslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the8 a* _5 Y+ S( L% J. h; r
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new6 i# @0 b/ X4 b4 W4 J+ w- r
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores1 h8 ?9 u! O5 Y- F3 `
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
* Q( q, j* x7 _: b7 X' `# a9 Cand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.6 U: P  f$ a4 w! Y) ]- L8 N$ J
( v: T" ^: {$ D  _9 Y3 u& O5 S4 C# G/ Y  Z
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced0 v/ p" |4 d' F4 U; @9 E
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their3 c! ]/ u- M' C: {
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
9 L5 X& P# P1 n. G; Bwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian: I3 z/ S; m& _
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
$ s) K4 W/ q% Y8 q" \5 e+ t+ Ebuyers with more options when looking for a home.) y+ l' Q2 \# ~9 ~

  t  Y$ L, c- c% f" }    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly& E) h/ g$ f( N, \& u" r  M
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes. o0 q& F2 \1 U1 F8 X8 c6 p
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,0 n- t4 N- V, V3 H. B, {
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last9 c4 j& p+ ^( G, I7 S% N. y% V- a% ?
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
, N! }4 u" Y4 h) e$ R/ ]
8 b! C  ~# s, H    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
& j4 s% d5 ~/ r% Y; {+ O9 K+ hprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory8 Y! N1 U9 F+ Z$ ^3 d6 `, S
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting( H& U7 l5 U  i0 Q* O- i: E  N
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,( L% A9 K& |7 `/ k- K1 f
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the/ {% `! Q. v) A; Q  T9 _5 _' s. Z
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before/ z, p# ?3 f' Z1 d( H
making a purchase.
, x- Q& O& P! h: h- I3 z/ Q8 ]5 e; r0 g, G- {$ a- c. z
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing3 _9 Q* Z  n# ~2 O7 m
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong  G, O6 s, J* l  o
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city; i' K! @8 J9 x: s' X( }
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
& C' L8 j4 F7 b- lattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown- v% G/ H- ^% s# j
amenities.1 f* U2 J) ]% P: G

( ?$ P" Z' o8 f    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels1 u- `8 i3 E! B* \  Y4 ?3 C
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
: @* z+ I- @. n/ s9 g# |across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has$ |8 L2 k, e- b8 _1 N! C' ^
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been( V& {# S- r7 K5 U8 c/ C3 P/ _
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle; e' \! @+ H: s" z
residence, rather than for investment.
/ l1 U2 u, p* L2 N; Z
% Q) B7 a" h4 E    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
: F* m2 O" Y# f0 \8 t  \$ Fhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted0 k6 P+ F; H% T6 X: `: U# W: A
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
- q1 v0 ^3 V' V$ aconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization% V5 k- x' b3 }+ @+ p5 ^
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
, f2 ?' z7 c4 q+ A. q8 e* Bthe market.7 n" K6 @6 k; Y6 a7 x2 v7 J7 y

: I8 x+ b( I$ V" D4 i    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
. o6 i- J6 a& X4 IJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In7 @/ D- ]+ w6 v3 D& Q) k% `
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
& p, e0 [3 t8 Emonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
* E4 k; \" N6 G! {1 V' Jto the shortage of available inventory.
( c: {" Z  x' _2 [: M4 f
& s" h+ {+ @; W) r+ P' W    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
/ e# ^8 u/ ]* f0 Wmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
  Z# [7 i. k( w# Jvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses4 Z) A5 c8 P* R
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.& K8 G, S$ \; S1 N

% Q3 y2 V5 c* |2 l    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
9 q; V& L# C- e. \. K$ Din the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
9 T; Y8 h  ?$ ?% z1 {+ X, v$ Iunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that: A' M+ ?+ p5 J2 Y( D5 K
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring, r. h: a: a6 V% R+ h' t, A* P9 ^
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
5 F# D# P- Q1 Vseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
2 |8 `& A7 P" q, P+ xbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
) c- F" C7 z2 _* ]7 c4 e& Z, D

1 X6 H& V% x( p  h/ y) u+ _    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter, r% L7 d0 p# ]$ {$ k
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton0 i- c' a; b9 [  C! p
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
2 `/ j: o2 H' L6 wmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
. W* P$ s, {( U3 |$ f. |% a2 i" Bincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve' r: F. c: u. Q4 |
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly% x1 o2 [; {& H( F
towards the end of 2006.
   
+ [( C" v7 T% m4 U1 T5 y
1 ^% W7 L  H5 Z! _- mWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
2 b/ o0 C; l4 j3 Tinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
3 u3 p! b& a* `( q2 j/ B9 M- Nto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse& I1 p+ l) f- s, q1 s. C
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
( H3 O( q: L  U5 h3 Xforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
3 v+ o0 m1 b% p: n& y+ Jpressure on tight inventory levels.* {- m2 k- V& u+ Z0 I8 H/ i
) i: j9 v; u; C
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic! P. J* Y3 H( S! t
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
9 o" P4 Q# e- q8 ^; U$ r/ s% jinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
; I5 F  T, a; p8 Q  P# o  F& a: X7 f. Ewhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching2 x4 Z$ M7 M$ x: a, `7 A* ~
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace., }4 |! Q: W/ ~7 p# C/ @

+ D$ ~0 Q% [1 X4 S    <<5 R7 ~/ W6 G' D* n) V$ \: X0 z7 r
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20062 Q7 C! {& \. i
* H. s  u$ M% y" a& D) H
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 B- l  y3 Q( x8 n+ P$ T
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
8 E! f+ t8 s/ U! q" ]7 m+ \2 Y$ M    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Y1 c# a2 ~- R) L/ j9 Y; c                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3, d; z" D$ p4 w- C( ?9 D" [
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
" f1 S  k& {' h. `/ C. `, r    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' }! _4 t1 U. g7 t    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
" U+ _" l& R; v" h% n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 a2 f! ~( `0 t" f6 |6 Z
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
* V  d; `# u* E# r8 Y9 F( B/ M" ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# z+ G& r9 Q: A% b
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
0 N- H8 E# W' ?# L% I    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% u$ e+ f4 d( V9 C, t0 w    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
( \: I- o  {, [% f/ f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; t8 n# e3 b6 n- J+ ~% f5 c    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3338 @# c8 }5 P" K/ J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 }; a4 y. R3 n3 a4 @2 ~
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
9 V% |" |4 H( C8 \; r5 ]% t4 u$ r* s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( `  x, Z1 p1 Q* ]( t    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
; F. E/ l. o5 ~6 b0 E/ C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 H( w1 s% \. F7 I7 ^3 e( D    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
$ t' `; ~- ^8 O) X( t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# r- e1 N- y; G- \  B
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766& Q" E% U* m" j: {# [9 `7 Y& Y: r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- G* N+ Q: {, u4 k( o; x; |, V    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
( |( X/ B( E) P3 i3 e5 ~    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! L  j5 c* g2 [) a  @    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5003 E0 D7 S0 p3 t! U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' P& n' j- S5 }" n6 V8 _8 f) L    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
% n( `" r) b( c5 W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, i: ]1 r6 s& O, i  @6 H5 `
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
. q. u& {0 `" I8 d+ t9 V6 a    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 |$ H  L; e9 }; }* |; v  M    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5003 s) p6 \. M3 @6 B) @
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ e, @6 u# T4 j    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
. Q6 Y' G( {5 e" \9 }/ T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: @- L5 @; f% A; M/ H; Q: U    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
$ [9 U- y2 ?1 \0 Z# {  ?    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. w6 }8 I2 |/ c* a& h
6 O, N  d4 b* X' E; c  o$ s
    -------------------------------------------------------------
. L" t9 L: o( I5 v7 b# ?                               Standard Condominium* u8 U; S; h- ^4 T, e: y, `2 X
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 o  m- e! w' V/ `& H6 R; @
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo$ t2 [6 E9 S4 ~* ]! Y1 w4 h
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
2 Y' N1 [+ m) W3 g& e" N' ^    -------------------------------------------------------------( \6 V1 W! q0 v8 l
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%; T2 J) f8 o, p& W
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 [0 `5 X( a, Y2 Y; N$ O    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%2 p3 Z" i% M# B- ?7 S2 l
    -------------------------------------------------------------
. C$ e3 g0 B% `    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
5 E. A1 a# N5 ~: D; W    -------------------------------------------------------------+ B! N! x( H5 e" w- [$ O# L
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A' \1 V. }) F, N$ Y4 h4 A
    -------------------------------------------------------------. j8 \( g9 b' }; z; t5 S6 C- {
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
$ r$ F* z4 B! q2 g& m$ R. o, c* \    -------------------------------------------------------------9 L" F4 P1 V" @' C
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%* Z( ]+ A- u/ R! L4 [1 {- }
    -------------------------------------------------------------' C! o8 }% S) o  W" x3 Q
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%5 a' V3 p; [5 S
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 c+ ?! a. @) ?' X% a" V- t6 d& {    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
( B) u. f( h$ W8 c3 h* ^0 B  i+ x    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 E8 }8 c6 q5 k8 C4 s    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
2 `  p% ^( z. M0 T4 q    -------------------------------------------------------------  R+ L8 \% U2 B9 r& s
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%/ A7 a0 {; [1 D+ C; C' Q# P. k3 p9 D
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, @% D3 a( e+ T5 O: {    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%9 v! E0 \1 K6 J3 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------. P( }# N/ }4 K5 Q9 n( `3 ?
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
1 I( w. {( }9 y8 \- w7 N( O    -------------------------------------------------------------
% n8 L6 c, _7 {5 M    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
1 Q% Y& d5 _/ x( f. P4 z    -------------------------------------------------------------
' G+ d7 Z- A6 E2 |' ]. Z' d    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
8 d( \" ]5 _( u9 ]; C    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 f) _( r, G) M% \# O    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
, L$ P; q( b( }1 C% j    -------------------------------------------------------------2 X, T6 [' Y6 |) D/ S
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%8 }$ S! k* i1 P0 R- ^1 c. X
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 N; G0 q, ~6 q& I5 o9 }' B    >>1 k# N- x! l- _' Q) a/ h& t5 T5 o: m

; S0 N* C, T/ b" y# v4 S7 p    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
! b* o8 d- R- U9 T  S! \  Din the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint* q" l" H- Q) g: A+ p
John and Victoria.
) X6 k4 D" O2 l1 n1 k% n: }6 b7 |7 c3 u* i5 k
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
" w! f4 m- {4 `+ \! ]comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
: u. [0 s3 T! e5 |( ?( }housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
2 N  {0 |1 }2 c  X0 |references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price" w; N2 U  w9 [, M. K5 d
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities3 b, P+ n7 z2 f# e" F
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
7 W3 y, K2 n+ |8 Z1 Z' |  Eavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
3 H; m. b- R* I) {% o: [9 C/ n9 Lfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable  s1 R. O4 A" Y7 j4 _
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
* q' A. {& \5 w! _November 15, 2006.' I. Z; M6 O. O, ~7 K; h3 B6 @
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
3 K' A2 y$ j0 ^* m, g# w/ w- k% d& Efair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge( S+ |# T; }$ L- v& Z& X8 N
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is% q6 w& e8 s: N5 ~5 a. F
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-19 20:58 , Processed in 0.118573 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表