埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2201|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
. X* y& k" n# n7 x* }+ S% r  s$ U8 o- h/ B4 M; ?" c
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -. e* t! X# f+ d
" K: t4 D, n1 i) x
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
3 ~8 I2 {. J! t, t! ]; G0 i9 nexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
1 f7 `6 r5 c. `! y* p) |% @- iquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
" E& D/ W% T5 ^" uin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
$ h1 S5 O% H$ `% R9 {# T- iprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and: `, A! o! ]5 ~% h
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,4 l6 k: L2 {3 ~1 F- b3 A2 _
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
) ^) r4 o  V+ GLePage Real Estate Services.% q& G  p; |, O, u* N
' F: [- m6 A4 Z
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
+ C' j' |' Q3 O* l- D# i- Xare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
( P" j$ h4 G5 ^conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and- h2 ]- L6 c; d1 v7 h
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the- h+ N) e! V! T
residential real estate sector.* q! q9 b. N+ j5 L
$ U0 m1 T! N7 ~! r. d0 o; j% p# {
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
4 P' S$ ~) Z8 aoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
7 `$ m) ^+ {3 w* t% W, Hyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5626 D& O; R- a- }1 V  C! {) f% |; s
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
1 M. O# m4 \8 K+ t0 E0 E(+13.2%).
, \* ?' K2 T; q$ U
/ h% C0 w/ B9 ]! n    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
' e$ N' w2 P$ y9 B( B( ~during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
7 |, F  O0 V5 P# {" w! H0 Hfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are! @  z! _* O% o; G
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,  f1 \/ I' R8 B5 `
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.; k8 O3 B9 O+ Y& f5 ^+ p4 m. d* W
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We( _$ K, ?0 t1 ]9 c/ ~8 b# v  z# }
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
, A: k* r5 P+ Y3 R4 S# [balanced market."
1 P" i% ~9 O7 i
" B6 C" T8 ^6 O1 b: c, G$ D    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
5 W& r6 Q! z& Z% d, @considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
/ e, A7 g% T: ]. \, `. lto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued5 `  X6 i2 D' e6 a& y( _4 u
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core& z) n& m3 n4 q1 ^. T. A6 C. Y7 Y
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
; o. @& m4 c4 B: zmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record# |. d' `# g6 X' C7 k* U
breaking price appreciations.
5 S$ w% D# \# w9 g( M
2 O% D/ l) _% j: k: S" p! X    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding, v# l. r" }  `$ c
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the. J$ f) ^+ G  d8 i6 @
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
. `  |' A( _! Z5 N. A1 r7 N$ e: L- T9 J) ^! ~! k5 E
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
" f8 \& v. d* O0 z: Q: |economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer) _4 V% V8 S6 V: I! T7 s/ q
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
' ^# d3 s" X5 h& }+ [+ Tslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
- C% G- B; ?# {# f# j1 o4 AIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers& N* Q- ^8 l# |
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of4 N/ g& L* H7 ~
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
8 @2 c. B9 I; s4 N- l
6 a2 [. X+ G; H( `% V$ R: v    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing- V+ c  }% o" B$ [0 q- p
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
4 `, W3 w7 S. m8 g0 |" R- S1 Zfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada2 y! {  }' _& T  ?
are markedly different than those found in the United States.; ?2 D' Q2 F. a, }/ E. F& D

1 Z# f0 Y! a$ l" H    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the( T: k! q* i9 P& e- Q/ P2 p/ q1 t
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
  M9 e1 v. L- ^# Y" qfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
2 @( u/ z, }3 _9 g* w* X2 k6 Qrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
/ C) L8 b  P# ?7 A0 p4 F; }5 a, haffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the9 i% @: ]7 K: j+ X- y4 ?0 b
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and1 P' i8 U' Z7 E5 D1 z. z( u' [* y
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization" k* e; e# t. Z8 e! `% e3 ^/ y
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."4 }: P, u8 _1 E( ^
8 M% T" m; w& d& m9 t9 V- a2 }. C
    <<
) N4 B. m' g" s( u7 I% g                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
* ?, U  ?) |( s! j4 B    >>. i2 m$ L9 C7 j1 W1 _( {

+ Q( [! Y; F. D0 B    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
5 L( ?" u0 _! sHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
. c8 e1 l. u, u/ I1 ?/ H5 U" dof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
% o  v1 W* s# e* d6 E% ~7 W$ S: llooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
$ R# \; C3 T0 x( arenovations.
2 X! K( j: o: {- y7 o+ k
) W1 Q5 `2 B4 }4 S2 M8 [    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
5 Q4 K1 R7 L% \% c6 jincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation; a( @0 z3 T) d$ A+ W
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and, D! s: f, s" I- |% w% M' J8 V  D; g
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.7 p+ O% J" b+ O) S  ]1 v

4 E8 A* ^7 [7 c7 m- n& i    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer2 z. P) [! |7 [$ ?" ?; D
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
* ~; M9 ?; S* N) Y1 w/ t3 Qquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new0 ~' m4 |# y5 ~1 h$ P5 [
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores! H: o! q7 o* d: N, q6 n$ x
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
# D1 @3 B6 L. Xand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.8 [0 T" l) F! U' t' O1 b+ M
. G. P5 [" e0 C+ H% \4 s9 E
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
/ [3 D1 ~9 x! [8 vconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their. X5 M! ]8 }, P$ d, b
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
+ [8 b3 G' @1 D( i" gwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian' o2 h: s1 T, K. C8 M- j* U
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing- J+ \, R: ~" F- W7 k2 U
buyers with more options when looking for a home.! K* ~8 ]2 p8 |% k! A& n% Z

2 l/ Z( u. w9 T) ?    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly, Z8 L5 ~& T( _; T
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
2 H3 ]; }5 v$ Bpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
/ J5 Q. Z' x. N0 ]8 [as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
# w' g# C$ a7 Y4 u. a- K) Ffew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
1 v# R, j4 l% j7 p" X
$ W" S  b, V/ y0 L8 a$ \    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house7 b! `- y$ w# o- ^4 h
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory' M4 g( T3 S' t4 s, Y# R
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting9 h8 b+ @/ ]: u) r+ E
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,( }, f! a! H% T9 f8 G# u
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
) N/ W- G" w% `$ s2 Z5 h, ypressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before& B% j" f% i" h0 p* e3 s! z
making a purchase.
0 y# H, Y9 N4 F5 r) ~* W! ^  _4 N0 d5 u9 O% ?, {
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing; j- B; `1 `" Z9 Y# [
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong( e6 q% R2 D( f$ b! n1 n
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
) M- X, j; r6 w1 }centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting& t9 T' Y& u, t8 n
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
; v$ p* ^/ d, q1 I6 M4 B& Uamenities.
3 S# s1 h8 m' i  G9 N% A$ |. M4 {9 w' [& T4 w9 s. F
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
, T% R  j: h  s) @0 zthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
3 Q# R  E8 ?) P2 {4 D% M/ Dacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
$ B4 @: b# D# R6 ucontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been9 S- ?/ B4 M& v5 i$ S5 w
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle* L( e( X0 o7 d$ c) a2 g+ b
residence, rather than for investment.
: U' P% P. ?& a' {
% p/ z: e- ^* X4 M( S    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as( e7 o- t. t0 o( X8 T
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted2 G) f) x) S0 I( [! @/ f
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer! E8 s8 |! W9 S/ b1 x
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
0 H% R* e0 q1 Y2 ]' z: T& Krate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter2 r8 Z9 s1 s$ s0 [& u
the market.
4 {. B, S. I& {6 g8 U) \: C3 {  X* ^4 f+ N
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through1 Z5 j1 }* E: F( `
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In: p# b" }( Z) [6 _+ K
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
- e/ q1 b1 J3 L8 @$ l$ {- @  l( imonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due1 L/ I  ]  f% I, T- z
to the shortage of available inventory.2 Q' O+ N6 p- U  z$ c& S

: }1 R4 o4 ^! H) V    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
& I- b" G1 [* k& X" U# xmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
9 f# b9 Q/ ~) ^# l& E; F) yvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
* U2 `% v7 f, Rstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.: v3 a- z  z: k- C& D, ]/ I' D' Z- ]
/ q0 N$ u" O! v6 z- C
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
1 E, ]0 P) V2 @( E( O! min the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low; p9 |& b/ x; a9 R9 w
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
7 F& H, A. i! k9 K) cpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring+ Q6 ^4 u5 t5 a# U1 |; `
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
/ x) F8 P: R/ R# [season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
! C0 j* J) x- a# }buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

$ r! L* b1 X- ^. E: \) r& F: G
+ u6 H1 A6 }% r$ q& y    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
! G+ C# ?( ]1 ]0 yas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton# j  C. g5 q& Y% \( H
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
6 a" e9 F/ [9 v, T, Omaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
- [/ c$ i4 h3 ]$ b  Z$ h7 G* Pincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve1 P. C& l' I3 ?# \+ s
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
: Q  F; Q4 z! t# h7 O6 x+ U0 [7 _0 u% Ytowards the end of 2006.
   
6 R( r2 Q5 F2 U, t  |+ G- ]
" w2 m) f, a" v: f: D2 sWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
' b( a: r3 S" ?- N' ^inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
% V1 T' R4 ]  V0 kto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse2 G3 z# D+ S- A% g
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to' P! `5 [4 n8 Y$ k1 r* Y5 ?) g
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
6 w" P& }1 h- Y: G7 Npressure on tight inventory levels.
8 F" y( H& j  n& Y% N& W. c
' `/ B8 P+ K# R. G" z    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic# ~: R" }& T+ ~0 a* x6 E
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
, S/ Z; N* C  \6 g- Finto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;4 v2 F. T$ @: U3 d
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
/ y5 e7 @! q% ~' N; T2 ?$ Mfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.( u! t+ L$ x; {6 y

& J1 F2 s, w6 J4 C    <<# e, g  R3 E2 j3 j3 N
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006& @" _" N, \, H2 Y
8 J6 {8 x7 z, R2 F+ H+ |  ]* ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: F  j- s; q8 q! _                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
9 E7 X" O+ a9 i6 T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  }7 o: f- f; @* D! t, Z7 J                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
3 U- @$ X  S9 n7 g$ c    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
) ?" |6 [* V0 ?: q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! r" _+ M7 K2 C, z: r0 V    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
7 D! A+ }, b0 I# w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 y- y2 N' g/ i9 |0 D3 }9 I; f
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
5 Z$ }' w2 _: Q6 Q  Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 c  L& g5 L& a. S( @    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000! F% K' P" Q  }+ n$ [/ O9 v/ n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: A" f" U7 ?/ j1 O- B% ]1 ?    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
# l/ R+ k2 X4 |5 H  F& O( U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 {9 [0 R! H  a) H8 x2 B# i4 \
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
0 j/ w# Q/ G9 W( ]; |' k& c7 T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 w0 ^( n; c0 _5 o
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583: t* V( f- {& E- _5 T  |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  x; Y4 ]4 ^* G- ~    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
/ T# w2 T( _( L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ A, A( k  ~. o# l! {8 u    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
  K) a/ q/ z# ?% ^) t+ r- M    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 a5 Y! X  E$ A0 R
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766+ S7 t7 i: Q. H; h4 N6 u
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 k& w* a+ }, Y9 f    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
- O2 d; G. Y& N2 t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  K" ^% R0 R0 c& R
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
# `! u, y. |7 N+ b$ b3 l' D    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' c; P* W7 H$ h  a9 o5 k    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
3 t3 ?$ u2 U' D/ w) n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 c5 I# |. o0 l4 f5 b    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
0 F' V5 f, D# V8 w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. p7 @' Z# J3 M- p$ G- [' x2 \# w: o
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
" p* G9 g' e6 O/ O, B    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 l2 h1 M/ Y+ f* `3 g
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
6 ^$ `+ l0 ?# w1 A9 N% A    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. T/ j* U3 G% {: e9 V: a
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
, f# N5 l0 g3 e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; j3 h6 _  I5 K1 {+ `3 S0 p1 l1 `
) F1 u  S6 k% I. u, b$ K- L, n    -------------------------------------------------------------7 b9 |  l: `  C( Z. Q
                               Standard Condominium
1 C! p$ ?" X9 x  s    -------------------------------------------------------------, S! H' q  O8 f6 [  N- C0 w$ h
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
4 G5 K2 u: `! L( I( t: X) X    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
2 q: k/ P, T! [) T    -------------------------------------------------------------6 ^1 x, c. v1 q7 e6 F( b& N0 e. T
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
3 T# g$ k: I* T    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 D" S2 T% y' }+ u6 }) T1 z6 `    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
: l+ k; i9 ^: Q( L) ~# t    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 }+ I' V6 ]- ]0 l3 D" z' y    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A! h: t- z; s5 W$ P8 c1 P
    -------------------------------------------------------------7 \" H& ~  ?% u9 q8 |5 e* j
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A) H* @6 C/ X" ?4 W' C( ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------  y; d( |9 O" E
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
0 m4 \) O+ b1 C6 h+ Z+ Q' T    -------------------------------------------------------------7 A; k8 |( S9 u% t' u
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%1 z0 \6 L) p, C1 r4 {
    -------------------------------------------------------------  w. T; B6 l$ Y& |' B
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
; u; b7 X4 l9 [! R6 M    -------------------------------------------------------------9 V* N6 F2 G4 W( M
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
$ {' S8 R0 I5 J    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 d% e3 s9 X1 r+ U; n( k, v5 C( a    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
& H# t+ F6 R/ A$ A1 j    -------------------------------------------------------------7 u3 U6 ~- s$ o) v6 x0 E
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
% d# S* I* z3 K$ u) N2 L6 U4 h    -------------------------------------------------------------! B. E- Z& h3 o7 [7 ?
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
& h1 t/ v( m% u, k, Q    -------------------------------------------------------------" _4 K$ d- n; x$ Z6 X
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%. F' P, r2 h4 y* b0 ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------5 [' N; c# ^8 z( J7 G' b  R3 Q7 h
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%( F7 Z+ l( w( A5 h9 w' g0 h+ r
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 }5 N! N$ @, V1 I    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%% R% F8 b( B% L+ X+ U
    -------------------------------------------------------------
. |# U4 {, f* o0 L: z    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
  V; N- C0 A- k0 n% Q3 Z4 U, H) l    -------------------------------------------------------------
! w9 H$ k% R& z    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%9 [* {8 r2 B- t8 N" X: I" z3 v' [: w
    -------------------------------------------------------------; J! Y. y1 h* j/ F+ g7 b9 d
    >>
' d+ Y. j( G$ W5 C" d' g6 J; b. y$ _
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined1 S9 ~) Y# s/ Q. v5 ]
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
" O% n- J- k6 G' l7 H+ F' eJohn and Victoria.
/ R/ O* V/ F. E; F
" o' n8 C( T! V+ Z+ l2 {4 r    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
  i$ I* J, l$ G0 P# ~; gcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
/ b& _! M) H3 d' m' n7 phousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
" g/ @3 A/ U0 Y5 Z5 rreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price2 g! h* e) x% [- P& C$ |
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
; _5 ~6 m" F7 p; {7 l' I5 Kacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is  K$ _' h6 @) X' l5 z/ I/ }
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
- Y* F: {$ E3 L+ _" ifigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
% j: C( f: n9 l" n- D. Fversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on, q- x6 M  o0 A, ?2 J( c
November 15, 2006.
7 m* m2 g/ }& O3 }0 F: }    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
' N$ b; X( h  y: `fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
2 y+ j& ?) H2 g3 v: @provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
4 F+ e/ `- q* p. T/ B6 uavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-24 07:24 , Processed in 0.097346 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表