 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
8 \: G+ b2 x+ i9 @" T. P0 ]- j7 w: ?: K- d2 [9 W' S5 ?
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -7 d7 G9 w; u, C. |2 x3 L8 y
; Z; w- P0 B P. k, Z TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
$ ^$ @( ]/ k; Cexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third8 k+ j4 @( g% B* y
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic+ _. \0 T T$ @3 H9 f6 \
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit) }7 ~& S. Z$ p! C S: z( e" ]
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
# g7 `& ?- ?# \- O$ l$ F. r' rmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,, t) d4 w& i: g0 B
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal% |) q4 K J: @- j/ p
LePage Real Estate Services.
' W& g- I6 q6 _/ D
3 X* \5 s4 x$ `/ e! h; M Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
2 A% a8 v R% h+ dare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
+ t! } E! M, w4 b6 M) pconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and! l' K- Q* X8 Y5 R, p
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
( T3 M% E6 m9 B$ [- \+ N- M4 lresidential real estate sector.
* v5 e, F4 W) m
* W/ R( q, J" R& T$ ~ Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation9 L" Y2 F, D* q! i+ W/ r
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)( e K! m& y0 T$ K! _/ p
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
/ K" e7 V- ?. r6 ]0 U: L(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380- E* V7 T [% S) K
(+13.2%).9 }- R$ p1 o6 F6 ~( N
6 P/ p, Y! ~( G7 i8 b
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
$ l4 U" V B7 y) ~ n+ o: A, C, oduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
. m; {8 ^! r) rfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are% E) V% F- A! c- n$ O0 n
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
$ R! o! I/ S+ }0 Z% npresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services., z3 y% W5 {1 ]* q
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We& j) s5 e8 N' I; d
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
! g7 @6 q Z; x. ]! ]: y$ \$ kbalanced market."
" {% w! q2 g. @9 N6 W6 z8 F+ x( K
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
( b" U) C9 Z; A! B, X0 H0 Dconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift( q: t$ d3 a+ w2 j; i
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
( W8 ^! E; R8 A6 J% u" athroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core1 G: r2 J6 Z0 R( e. V K/ K
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
) j0 n& z5 }3 jmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
9 X- L4 H* j+ Kbreaking price appreciations.4 e, I% `- V4 @5 K5 t
- A- X. u& n+ c- r
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding2 T# f) b+ p' L+ M( y5 w G
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the# b* D% k6 B# t
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed. ~0 M" P: G/ a2 M4 u' l! J+ V: [, M2 c
6 I: {! I. F% c# b' O% U In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid, Y" k6 ` l3 V8 {3 }( Y) R
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer. d$ K2 R2 c, Z3 K3 N$ f' }' f/ ^5 x
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
3 N, e/ X' |) S, J, c2 fslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
. |7 {, A/ o5 E2 kIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
2 L2 w$ y' D D) ^) x1 ]greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of4 l$ `0 A; S( |) Z1 k
price appreciation when compared with 2005.5 F; F% s) B( X3 T' c& d6 }$ h/ L
$ P1 _, ~4 C2 `" T* K
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing: z, U; F6 E$ D" N8 g8 F! _" Y
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and4 D) G N9 ^& b
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
8 t# R2 K5 s# y! Care markedly different than those found in the United States.$ a: J! e% o# d: R( M2 U2 C
; A2 Q) M+ t+ z* J. t5 ^* A Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
; \/ g$ `6 J* Q& i2 bAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
* B& n# T4 f6 @/ ^favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
* @/ @8 E8 q: Yrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
z U1 b5 N. xaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the" c0 n) J: d& u4 {6 Y1 T$ H
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and4 c1 B( X( s8 a4 ?- j" z$ X2 q
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
+ @0 Q0 _* e3 ]% w) l1 \3 D' G9 @mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."' n. ~0 c" O1 @. R9 |& Z' E
0 F& X3 g3 p& Q5 c$ l5 I# z1 B
<<
& {1 V5 b* d! C/ F6 q) N0 X REGIONAL SUMMARIES
1 ^6 ]" M+ X& ` >>
6 n0 Z) \' x- k( ]' C3 d8 ]! W( l1 g% t" v# B( M3 |- I
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in& a# K v: x1 I" \: [
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
6 D% i1 F( U& I" [& Dof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time$ D e% y$ `5 c2 p% U" n9 ]
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of) G, B) w! y% }9 z
renovations.- \6 c$ k* s+ A5 n% ^
p/ u- M: z# i* B% W
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
5 j- K& ~2 I+ yincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation8 W7 {- M. o5 ~
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and! J. u* a. D/ ?0 A, ^
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
! K% |5 k* a, B+ b5 W% P" z3 S5 K* L
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
4 e7 K* B5 t' V( x% ]8 V2 {slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the+ |- {: \/ Z2 p# l4 Y
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new/ [! s- o A2 p
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores5 q3 I, E+ ?2 f$ {9 { N5 g0 a
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
# }. m+ @- k, R9 M6 Z: `and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
- { p) Q/ k7 K: Y" ^6 q* w9 ^) J4 h1 x3 F* y9 c. f( q
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced( K8 o) d8 x& c0 l" ^
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their; l8 \. H6 I% _7 R6 P
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
# w3 O9 Y( h' f+ Mwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian! ]3 ], t( Z# F/ |: O
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
+ c9 L& v. ?' m. {9 t2 p' x" zbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
! l$ ]# N& n* F8 B
1 |0 b: o# i) h5 {. _" } Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
1 D/ ]- }% O( I* T* Bamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
8 b5 L3 J2 z* ~: Z, \/ P0 a ?priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,' e3 B2 v! n* E* ]* Q4 K" \
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last ?5 Z+ H( e$ d, m# V
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.' u$ f. Q, p) A( ?. _' H8 s ]
" N+ z+ Q# v Q! a! M5 _ u4 { Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
( Z, w ^8 |( ?% wprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory' k- L5 g* N4 K; u
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting& ^ w g# ?* A9 x9 z
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
6 R# a5 ^# G& j2 H. K3 }when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
/ U, v4 ]0 i2 E t7 l0 \- apressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before: A" E4 O8 C& j# x8 t
making a purchase.! j' c9 r- r0 P% |) z4 n7 B
" D% V4 d5 R1 G( f Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing& L) R& l1 u) b) c
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
$ G2 {$ ? F, @2 Z) E z% U) s. lconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
# t2 C9 B+ T. i7 ecentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
# H- @# c# T& z) V! E6 o5 Yattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
; l& h2 P% V2 g0 G; ?amenities.
! X5 c# b+ i/ G* K, M- x# l/ G) E$ k3 z
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels1 Q; {# \ F9 U6 d8 k: x# ?1 t4 v
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand" x3 V" b# P* k4 T# g! R- x: n
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has2 O1 q$ o4 K% V: _1 {
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
, W# s9 V) v" adriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle3 e: g4 R8 I8 F7 C
residence, rather than for investment.
7 X2 ?/ U" w' I9 A, z" Z5 m. H2 C" Z& G+ {) H) i$ q& c3 A" q
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
2 K0 `2 Q) U+ j% R' E: Thouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
$ S+ x' m7 m- W: uin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
1 W6 E+ l1 m: m* uconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
9 C8 w( Z. P+ F' A; G5 irate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
8 J) z ~' q) p7 f" S, Y4 R- Qthe market.
9 R2 D! N) j9 |5 W' r9 V# j. `: y( x" E0 y
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through7 W, g/ Q% X0 P" i
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
; C* I+ z' A9 k8 Q' n0 c1 d) WAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring5 \& ~4 r: l' e/ H: L
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
! k% J2 G' t, vto the shortage of available inventory.- b; \ X/ @" j- D$ {4 @
% c: W+ m; c, r
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
& G: ~5 d5 E) U; p) Pmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
, M9 {" ?0 g7 J2 P: svibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
2 D, z, ^1 k$ u5 h; gstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.; X8 I2 z% v" A6 I0 ]$ F6 z# ~
/ t- Y4 \& m4 G/ Z' J) G$ ~" D Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases- }% C: F+ e' y8 a
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low0 g7 f7 T/ }" b$ O4 ~8 Q6 J
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that% Z# D' e& I1 n7 b- h
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring$ h8 V7 ]7 j) G1 l6 Q, w
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer6 d. a$ `6 F8 }! p6 k' h" w2 s6 }
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as' @9 ?4 |8 h- w
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.! o3 M, j+ Q" R* l
3 e7 t. [; l. u* ?/ e" W e% }/ ~: u- w Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
+ f: c3 A, g, D; cas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
. r4 f6 K6 D" g1 aremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,! R6 G5 j6 V6 U
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices7 z/ {$ r% L/ g6 G# n {/ o
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
5 B% r8 J* y5 V) ]) T* Nin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly3 F, F- Z* }4 v8 ^! n: K' K
towards the end of 2006. * O+ c; _$ r+ p; R* c' R
$ c) @; X. x0 Y2 TWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
! q2 A7 K0 ]4 v( P+ f) iinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
2 h& I! G8 R4 C# v, _to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse7 T2 E7 w* \( p3 g5 z# C* ^$ M- D) q
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to% g5 K9 q! \+ H
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
. B# G2 m+ h @- y: zpressure on tight inventory levels.
6 E( D9 E& ]/ ^9 J- ?# q3 \' t: r/ e
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
8 I2 J U! g+ M1 s4 w% F$ }1 Gfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
1 W* K, V/ y' @- w+ G5 v! Yinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;6 z# C r8 }# T9 Z
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
4 x! k. A0 t" J2 Y( M0 `& l6 hfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
7 B6 `+ O* }+ ]2 Y) b0 t$ G8 [$ }) [0 ^4 f: T7 e8 g
<<
& T3 s: ], O% @# o: N Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006+ K# F/ R& G8 c/ X9 w! Y8 w
9 z/ Y/ ~4 z5 z5 K: C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" u8 I9 I) |; `5 a4 \ Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
- y$ X% w; `0 w% Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ r7 A& J$ h) ?- t( A" {0 Y 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
- H/ ?: O9 W' C; ~ Market Average Average % Change Average Average* w) ^- i, C* i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 |# ?: T1 G6 M! A2 W Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000- k% E" T7 ^; @* o5 B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& d5 W' A' ]2 }( I0 _& ^
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
, [9 d% c8 z. O+ O# m3 n( E1 \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
\0 A1 X8 w" \* ?( p* z0 h4 U7 T Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
' L7 w* o% S( W% r -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 `1 p; W& b4 x6 a Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -! F# ^0 w. i6 P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 b7 U P; Y$ c1 T( C! R
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333) j' P9 P1 ]3 X3 K" ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; s0 `: y1 q/ S* Q p Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583( y; {" O0 z' i9 f! s4 P" g% G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) J! o. c; d/ {4 ]; X+ k Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
9 \( X; }* j9 T -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 H2 k4 r8 }! C0 Q2 H. ~. s% Q Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250* c; {# m2 M. M, |& d1 e; Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ?( O7 G% V& X+ @( o8 p" ]
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766# h( B" D7 A% U9 T0 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 h5 J6 L/ Z. z( t3 B Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
/ g$ H% F. \- K* U7 k4 s -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 }, N' b) \/ b; k! v2 X
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500+ `6 ?6 V( v& f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. b$ n* k- x6 F1 [ Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
& M2 g- h9 ?! v! w" n: E -------------------------------------------------------------------------( `! A5 c, i+ j7 Z7 Z
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7143 i- A5 X5 p% Z2 ~' ~! Q2 v. K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" a1 H" g/ e& H8 m
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5007 }9 V7 T, H3 T" I* Y2 a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: _8 O, C/ M' T; Q2 h0 A
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
: f. g+ w" d: d/ O, L -------------------------------------------------------------------------( S+ _! F2 I' n
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
2 }9 e- x3 @0 t( |9 ?* p( r1 ^* x ------------------------------------------------------------------------- N) G+ ~3 j8 R
9 n8 v9 K9 F& F, x! [3 ^
-------------------------------------------------------------5 l/ A6 ?6 M+ y- K" K: P( t/ @
Standard Condominium! g- l3 j/ w) u# V% d
-------------------------------------------------------------
& ~$ m! {' P3 x2 S% d5 a 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo( b$ n2 \* v$ L! J" K5 r
Market % Change Average Average % Change
0 Z) h* z2 R, `5 l0 | -------------------------------------------------------------) q+ T0 A; N- R) y" T+ P
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%9 }$ \8 I5 K1 Q4 J# [
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ P5 m. @0 ^/ q7 R, y7 Z' R- D& o Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
! D/ A4 f& K1 k+ `9 F# T T6 d1 U -------------------------------------------------------------
8 u# Y7 S5 M, p$ h& d2 @$ T H" T5 ^ Moncton 4.9% - - N/A. K; L( g; ^7 c9 U5 Q: q
-------------------------------------------------------------; \3 N# M( p/ x3 }$ P
Saint John N/A - - N/A
, f5 E0 B- ]9 }0 j -------------------------------------------------------------9 A" C' t, K8 Z. @
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
# Q0 n! x& E) B( e1 V8 K5 k -------------------------------------------------------------
. F- y$ f/ B+ P8 p* _# |% r3 O Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
' Q" x6 E3 f6 j) o) r9 F -------------------------------------------------------------; z% M5 w5 ^* o1 f* ~% W3 R w
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%! G2 k- [, A8 @
-------------------------------------------------------------
; f2 r% N0 b$ E" _1 X Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
2 _" K' s8 b* D. T7 T- v, v -------------------------------------------------------------" J! }6 t/ ]+ L3 v
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%$ W! `1 R( B# Y1 d2 [6 {+ ]. R9 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------3 F3 ^' I' R1 {( g* E2 h
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
/ i/ B2 M# p- v4 E/ [4 I5 p -------------------------------------------------------------
1 R [" |- a5 k( G: G t Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
2 h+ R# O9 \8 ?! M) W# C9 T; `' f -------------------------------------------------------------# }( p& i+ I6 R
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
& g' [7 o2 B9 x# _' _ -------------------------------------------------------------: e" y8 Y+ U2 Z# \7 Y5 n) e
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%; b/ d% b" Q3 e v8 m
-------------------------------------------------------------
& E2 m( x. S- t& m1 h Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%$ T+ [0 h- n4 B# W
-------------------------------------------------------------) R- A2 W2 ]# ~
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%) R g5 T& T3 t8 ], ^4 I$ [
-------------------------------------------------------------) g0 P8 S# L8 c" G6 N* m
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%* T+ ~; S+ U. u8 Z" \" t
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 X% I. Z( X3 r$ Q! O >>
* {6 ~7 f& a! r& X0 P# \% O+ l4 y/ O9 D" m2 O1 U! Y0 B; S
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
8 k2 I( l" w! F3 R6 e! xin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
( s% p M8 L! m. h/ CJohn and Victoria.: l" u; k$ H9 }, D$ p
7 f* X8 ~+ M9 A. Q3 ^ \4 X The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most# `: S0 _# J% _( C" g, p0 {2 I
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
- S7 x: A h, z+ V& qhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release: x- {& E; K, D" A& q) u
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
4 {% B- i; _5 P6 U6 strends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
( n: V7 F. T' [! r/ r/ x, {9 C4 Eacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is9 _4 N% Y- i( D( ?, N) A: _
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
$ X+ M% Y1 D, }3 T# tfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
' Q: h" r( J/ e! g$ Y7 }version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
' y4 @! [) d" v! \! M( {& c7 oNovember 15, 2006.
/ E% ]( {. I3 `! e. y Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of X! K! k+ C4 d3 T' a" ]& D( G
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge: Z( p, h9 a2 u- b- |9 X, {
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
- B& g% ?0 M% R7 `available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|