埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2073|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
1 p5 f* |9 b. a# g
* Q  u9 E( C* Z# W% S- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -! F9 W4 E, Q! ]. Z* Z
5 ?" I# D# T, X$ b0 R
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
! ~3 S  r: p* ]/ sexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
8 s; m+ F# k+ _quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic2 H8 _4 a% |1 B
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
$ X2 R5 x* d- @  Z: e% o, uprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and, M% N# D5 O- M9 f0 ?
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
  T! `( x! p$ v1 E0 ?3 YQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal% u# H' w" _- n4 B6 @# l
LePage Real Estate Services.
; `* c2 m; M3 G9 x8 l9 G/ u
% V5 x9 j) g" w; }. p    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
" |  h. j3 @6 S' b7 d5 Z5 {are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
" p- X  d+ H2 j) `conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
" L5 m8 i5 b" W2 |sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
0 P& G9 Y, A9 C9 p# H( nresidential real estate sector.
8 f" \' y3 J9 ~5 B& N  S$ [' c6 E  m3 a: }+ [: W. n
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation8 U- I7 y6 F$ i# i/ Z5 V1 x
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
- N/ \! ^9 N$ p3 Y" syear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
. a! P4 N1 y5 r; ~" X% H(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
8 x5 H# `) G% \2 w: u4 i5 Y(+13.2%).
! r' n: g1 ^, Y& o# b' i: n* N/ b" u7 ^! [0 `) ^
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
! o+ i( ^  O( v( E2 aduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
3 w- F* Z9 R- a* @) m) Cfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are! _9 k' l# x: B- s2 a+ T$ b4 r( N
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
( q! V# h: t+ J- @: r  cpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
! h, W$ D+ Y+ ?9 F  D"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
' E' |3 [8 Q& D7 rwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy+ o8 n5 d1 s7 N, z$ Q  f
balanced market.". j" A1 s/ `  v. a
3 i4 Y5 n4 U, L- ]
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
) ]+ C2 }" q$ n' ?considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift( Y3 m5 J4 ^  {" ~
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued6 Q, J$ ~, E% r/ U
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core! k" r6 {! E/ x8 N9 J
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,! H% M, L5 R) e" m' _  ?9 t
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
" ]5 B& e/ _8 j3 f" obreaking price appreciations.0 ]- {" t4 }( ^3 h# m& ~
. j8 T7 M& C6 X  s; m
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
6 g+ d4 Y0 {0 h) K. Y3 [4 [economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the7 r( }' _- g; E; H) _) f! A$ x
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.+ @& Z. S. [* @( B8 |
! \$ R9 V9 J4 @2 F. t8 b, P
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid1 F0 B7 O+ J6 ~! z. a5 w( N
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer1 w7 \; J* `% @, q" K% s
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off0 I5 K, \- H) H
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
5 Q; K: k' @, F6 z6 P1 ]& K' Y) jIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
! p8 S+ C3 q" l1 Y( {5 Vgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
2 E1 z7 m, S9 t# P4 Mprice appreciation when compared with 2005.* D, o8 Q! @/ X" v: S' v- @5 U

8 L. ]8 [9 W2 I! O5 d+ Q- f3 W    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing( `5 Q/ x0 K6 m9 Q
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and. t: t* }& i( l, z. C
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
  i- V( s8 h1 ~% p3 G' Lare markedly different than those found in the United States.
" [% w& I9 R( F+ V0 i. g$ D' u: ~' J
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the" i+ N% Q, B) M: j$ r) ?1 G
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
  |3 E" ~, |5 Q! K8 n' G; Mfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the  D7 M' ]! |& V' l/ E, S6 [
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
# b' j/ G" H5 o" aaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the7 h, C  v8 V6 z% u# {. k4 ^. h* h
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
6 _* M2 n9 y: S1 v( Y) [; Kaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization2 c* g: P$ G7 H# \8 c
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
7 \8 b4 `- t7 J) H
/ u. `. R0 q, e8 R    <<8 C* g: G' [( t0 X
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
# W1 M  E9 A4 f7 b, F$ K    >>5 Y) ?& g" v9 ?3 E; [6 x
$ v% ~9 [" S! f
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
9 O! b( x7 Q& d8 NHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
. W! f6 F7 G7 t" T$ ]2 H+ H# vof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time, w! K3 z# p& Y
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of* p- o& b* \$ f8 f" [( ?, |
renovations.+ L4 B: |0 H  G' G, f/ p! @5 w- S$ x
' t' ^7 @! \$ o8 D9 \; Q' a" g
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
- X0 F. W; p5 @9 l2 {, }increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation( p- P4 j3 \8 y7 L
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and7 t; u. a1 \% y+ }! N$ G5 ~( A
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter." _  X8 @& P9 p+ P4 G$ g
0 e, P% |2 M( L+ n, k# v8 r3 m
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer: [& M7 Q2 P% B( y
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the8 H2 r0 t4 K. f" o
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new6 }$ ^$ U/ {1 Q6 H8 B
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
% n6 l' T/ N( d( b5 ^/ Zto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes; L) g3 Q9 _" u" [
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
4 [) K9 _4 _6 v; {
# W+ e" |$ U+ n: J    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced1 P0 k' K+ Y4 U) b8 U
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
" ^6 g1 V2 {; r* _# f. }/ B$ thomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
+ q* ?- b* w8 P$ K' ?was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian# H. R. Q$ f! f: Q6 P; O( b
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing# a3 W4 m6 G* q
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
6 D5 n% M7 [( B' d) d9 N* h4 N5 W+ v* `) {
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
, r6 V: X. y+ v6 v5 I; V, S  w1 @among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes5 w2 M8 L% x0 q. O  @0 W
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
0 t: D; D; F  }3 Y  A7 l4 Nas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
5 k7 s( M/ A# |' U: n& T8 Ffew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
: W* {/ `9 w. e5 B9 y- s
& I' ]2 ?% T8 z+ U    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
" @4 E: ?. u+ M$ bprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory! F7 P, o7 Q; Q, A8 b* |
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting! L) I6 c' a) M; ]
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,- A/ G( M/ M& A0 v
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
0 f- L9 b$ |1 t) Ypressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
* k( [& ~9 u- G! G+ N7 ]making a purchase.
' E' B- [5 a3 M+ x( h& F( ?8 j! o! r+ X
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing8 F( g5 l& c6 o, O3 v- h3 D
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong* s& t" y2 |$ t4 A- z
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
0 v5 M% u) x' L, v0 z" x2 O. Ucentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting' B) X6 R  _0 I6 w1 A6 N6 q
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
! O2 {' X  ]* {" z' N" z/ yamenities.
5 q' G7 v2 y" G6 u- ~9 Z* F3 \. @
/ y+ ^6 h! j2 b, z" X% F% V2 ~    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
0 d8 e  N( e" J, h0 Vthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand: _& c9 _+ s# p- W6 P
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
. n' y0 @1 \! a8 Fcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
' p- r" S# s: A) Y. k" ndriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle, Y9 |% y: {& p3 U5 u# n3 ?
residence, rather than for investment.% D3 {; V) |) y* a# U/ x

$ a  y9 K3 Z0 ~3 Q& k# \/ n9 v    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
+ L( N+ `4 Z- S$ P/ |3 Q" }; ?house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
8 s& ^4 ?  d% X* Kin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer8 r. w1 S( D- N1 b- z, u
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
6 c/ t4 f! R0 |8 U. c, [rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
# }7 Y" ]% h' c% [! g* wthe market.
( P  @3 w2 x! p" x
/ |, p8 p+ S3 v# W    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
( L0 Y- r2 C5 l9 S7 XJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In9 N4 ~; Y3 |8 s- Z" j1 l
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
/ e* R( h" K* p. d4 E( d2 rmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due; O  b& f; ^: d9 @2 M4 W1 E7 s
to the shortage of available inventory.
, m3 N3 G$ ~5 x  W3 g
2 f4 e! S& Q2 U+ d1 p8 B- i    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its5 v& M0 w7 r7 H+ y" x7 O
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
% s4 d/ m( ^$ a" \# \- svibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses. q0 J8 U3 b9 V5 ~
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
( Z2 S! r8 a& Y- r
0 m9 |& P. k2 _, c8 j( g6 O( k2 M    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
: p/ W0 _& l& J' o  N" G- N+ g7 `8 cin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low# j; F, D8 W3 s, g6 ^  M6 W0 z
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that* z6 r8 e$ k5 M/ x5 R) N6 g* a$ P
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
  o- ^& E" n) E5 d0 Y0 r: @: kprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
9 F# a1 q, n, H6 E' _2 \season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as: {' t& X: @/ {! p" o. G. K
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
2 c* \2 T9 d) g8 b. G, j
& Y, R# a5 D" {+ N2 G
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
* D. r( O3 V- e- ]as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton  o) {) j5 g, v( t
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
9 I8 s0 e, P5 }9 |, fmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices6 e" Z! R  F% g" j4 V
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
6 E1 X/ _: s9 X8 N2 V  lin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly/ T0 t3 i- }2 o! {9 W& z
towards the end of 2006.
    ( Z. q# r9 _' a8 K+ J. b  U% L
. R3 ]( U7 M5 Z4 R5 M
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of6 u, @  J6 C" u( J5 W. b4 w
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable2 D1 ^# B2 T& y
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse# P! o$ y9 W1 P  m5 U: |# o
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
& m% b$ w4 e. E& E, k. z* K. |foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added2 k5 y/ M- C( h' Z+ Q  I
pressure on tight inventory levels.8 i% b) m: p! \7 n

! D  c2 i# j, b9 v* W    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
6 Z, L# [8 S) Wfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people! H  r* d3 @4 w3 n4 I
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;" @/ g( }0 X2 H/ w& w
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching6 ~  |: q/ m0 q5 u6 D
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.) G' {% L' a4 U" {+ D
$ b7 Y! Z2 A+ m7 D6 H
    <<  W- [$ @" @' d4 N( o+ ~
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20064 m2 C* g4 n7 O3 \

* p2 e0 U* Q8 c$ W5 P% n# l, v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' X& y" E6 h1 W
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
  P: A* o& y; @, v1 a    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 @7 X8 w' T; r) U( f( [1 a
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
8 s- X9 e8 k4 r4 q. I* v6 G    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average; U" y; y  R) r4 k* q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! g0 x' t* i2 s. P
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000: W5 \$ a5 n9 ]8 x3 M- `9 g" \! A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: @" S. ~" g* @* t. w    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0009 P6 _$ D$ f: O& M0 m
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: I: \) F1 J3 E' G* e2 s    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
# I4 i5 y: z  a7 c! ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 e/ o" h+ \# I
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
9 l6 i' j0 D8 m8 G5 j    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  j/ g& V" s7 y& K& Z    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3336 L1 k6 ~" r$ n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ W& h  h6 p8 w) Z2 L    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
9 J6 F# t7 k8 y! B/ G- S  s7 f6 B    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 R. v. c5 u9 v- `
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185, P! h6 l6 s) j/ P. ]8 Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 Z+ k6 |4 z& \/ z' X" z
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250( {; a( u, }, |, o' ~, N% [  _$ {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ], y3 a, v) t4 f8 Q2 T, `    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766* G9 [3 ]! Z) o% g( O7 n! F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) ^* L/ Q; _6 T) {    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
) m! v5 a* Z$ ^  v9 `0 o: Z+ r' z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; Q% \" b, x+ b; w! u
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500+ @. }) U4 W, W' S3 c
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- V9 I! V2 G! I0 U    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
; v4 C3 ~# A+ ]/ b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ [5 a2 @7 B& |
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
9 o7 Q' X; P; s8 F+ }- E3 W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# c" O3 j3 x' [* L2 c5 H6 N    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
& `+ S& O  h3 o: M    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# R0 K- W+ M% g    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000; [6 Q, S% n0 K: g9 T! ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% E: q8 {) z; Y% f& D    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
  g( e# b! q+ I/ L8 [    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 s# Y9 \1 _, O# N- \+ r: ^! E( q# f9 |
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, n- ]% G% [6 j9 i                               Standard Condominium2 e, m" }4 w7 q9 C8 I" Z4 M
    -------------------------------------------------------------' N& `$ g( E( k+ {% M! d' U
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo' Y7 ^8 [. R1 O& w/ g" u6 b  f
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change0 K- \; _- O8 P$ z6 m
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 y2 t" \; }8 E, u) g    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%3 T! I9 o4 U3 A: n- e
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ g/ g/ P/ V! U3 \    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
$ Y$ H. s7 C5 F+ M4 |/ G    -------------------------------------------------------------0 g) W4 {8 C1 {1 I* @
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A$ s: E7 z( G, T  W; i7 |
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 P  v! W% @( q/ [9 @0 j* n    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
) [# H$ f' {; B; Y8 _6 X. x4 D1 L0 d    -------------------------------------------------------------* `0 x7 l2 s6 T  O. I
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
4 q6 q* f) [; S    -------------------------------------------------------------
; ^2 R8 u4 j; _1 ?; z) h; H    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
8 v; T& K* V, F: R    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 W5 n5 M. u# Q! K1 }8 f    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%& x# ?6 ]; r, j- B8 H6 |% a5 Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  C3 ]+ O  v, |. C6 G5 P! k    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%# ~: _+ n  a/ ^3 [, [1 ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------" w9 j: ~0 S, z4 a; k
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%, z3 \5 H+ T) r% g; i% z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ S7 t0 j5 S) K    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
6 [; p4 j6 D. c# S" O    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 u$ H; L$ ^. a- D' W" _; S5 q    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%+ c, A: @  q: D: x
    -------------------------------------------------------------" o, p4 ^( Y5 L  ~! w
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
& U! z* n  q8 C    -------------------------------------------------------------' g; y1 i  D# @. `2 Q
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
9 A" u7 [9 {- P7 g6 I  H    -------------------------------------------------------------4 h8 o0 r9 @; F# J- d6 Q
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
# b$ \  y0 `9 o. x! V6 r    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 a6 g, d1 S7 N( t    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
, |+ R9 v! p  F: b! O0 i    -------------------------------------------------------------
& M! E; E! z8 \6 y    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%, r% v  |/ f% `- L0 A
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 |; e: e2 x2 B# g8 W& Z
    >>
' ?" B: c4 W6 @0 \9 m. m, c: [2 L* X3 }  U2 W+ I: i" ?3 k3 I/ b
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
3 |+ g; t# o+ G/ f  Kin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
5 j/ x- _) I" Q5 r6 JJohn and Victoria.( `2 f, w8 @/ ?0 p2 B

/ o3 R# a8 |, [1 j; J6 C    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
( }% [! V( U. @6 Tcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of/ [. |' u5 K. p
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release5 W9 E4 W1 a0 @# o7 o! b
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price+ ^( Z( [1 P, p: E, j
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities" s) u1 c: [# d! x6 ~0 M
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
1 |. X* b$ z9 F% Uavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current  b; ?' F, f- d( h$ ^/ `
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable( a% }2 R) w% A; T- r
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
$ I% d5 k9 n# bNovember 15, 2006.
1 r3 U& u' O" v! [! R    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of( \, P$ C' D6 _3 [7 u
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge, P, i; l% W/ B
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
" H& f! a8 P/ F* v7 }. Lavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-14 03:41 , Processed in 0.109546 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表