 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
5 c) C' k) I/ c8 e& l+ |, K; V+ b) y' b. ?0 P2 q5 W8 a9 V
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 - g- ]" c4 l- n9 C
9 T& {; L% u4 V/ W5 N5 _ TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market* p- b; j9 P- N, e- Q* z. h* x, W4 p
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
1 G7 f' ^& N& Y: h: Z5 e7 c @. M0 h% ^9 squarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
- Z5 C4 O% F8 q! Y9 V2 @0 f/ a8 Uin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit2 d+ O5 U% \) W0 @6 G
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and6 Z% f/ G8 ^% S" R
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
* A' P* P c4 I3 y- g; T. \$ }Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
8 C4 `: q- R" o3 c2 W1 K& kLePage Real Estate Services.
/ @- K$ D: Z% M1 b- U- X3 X
- Q9 l5 i4 N- A. j$ ~ Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters8 g. C7 ~& `% `6 B& t7 ^
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
) U% y, C( `: k/ i9 Hconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and- y' v7 T7 L; m2 m5 t
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
) z. s7 T" W& B7 s/ Q! e vresidential real estate sector.
# s9 `+ M% I2 |( a T1 o( L- r* b2 y+ i. u5 G$ k
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation" F, n) m! t+ S3 V$ W
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
n1 R) J8 G" Xyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5622 B* U( r2 D/ l- r2 l
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380% d) v4 R6 e2 G. T( C% B( C+ ^
(+13.2%).5 C! ]- F, x# ]
! k0 O4 V: T. B( v/ E5 J "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth8 Z, ] ?) k- Y- l( x
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the3 v, J+ X' e7 Y$ ^7 X" e
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are6 ?1 `7 p1 x- {4 U
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,! k6 w; n! W. M# N
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
$ s. \6 j* z& u& o0 _"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We% ]8 {, o h: b4 K# ]
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
9 H. U5 p. r' O( P- d U; S7 Ubalanced market."
' [# C9 ]/ Y1 f1 T9 J1 V8 k! y8 f# ?+ j& e
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
4 u9 R$ j9 C' pconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
: F u0 n5 l7 |. w4 I/ O1 Xto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued, b+ J' H8 O+ v) r% {* t
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core- U+ _5 Z) ]4 m
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
3 Z! o! u, `6 o7 b- ]8 C0 c" dmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record8 R) R9 I6 T% F1 u1 E6 ?
breaking price appreciations.
3 E2 P( ^+ R3 }) D
# I( P0 m7 N! m7 q2 `! Z Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding# E: b, k# q- ^3 K- A* r
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the4 J! a7 f+ N8 ^/ n4 q# h0 i6 V8 }
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
% F. t) H% Y, ?# X5 W% N* Z$ W% G3 i3 r6 Z# B y2 _
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
}8 f4 Y0 E' `5 C4 Y# yeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer% E6 |' O% q: {4 i
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off: F8 H$ u$ u, d
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.0 T. l( [0 R8 b. j9 w( S1 C
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
& S; ~! K% F$ c8 A" N7 egreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
3 K# O: x& y; G- w0 q4 Gprice appreciation when compared with 2005.- @$ t% E& ?" c6 X! F5 Y, H- c
" g9 b/ h$ `0 K/ n3 h) E/ {# u While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing! R: u }% z* H& M4 `+ I/ V2 X
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
- _4 T3 w" Y: @financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
8 K" r y: ~/ e* Z2 b. Pare markedly different than those found in the United States.5 x: Y7 l5 p0 Y# z6 I
7 p9 C* S( ^# j
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the) U" ~3 Z. i* ]1 R' v- e4 y# `/ w
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's. c& X8 n1 X4 S, H+ q8 `; E
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the! y9 ]3 a* f) ^) a9 ^- W( v6 c+ @
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
) { v7 M* Q! ^% Z2 t3 M6 q5 b z1 Vaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
6 P( F& T8 h+ @5 d, p2 W! ~/ cdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and! c b! V# f# {" e# U
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
7 y' ~$ I! b0 F3 k: rmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
5 [. R# A6 t9 A$ w8 Z
8 y% M6 V3 P- d+ I' ]" x7 b; ^# y <<
9 L9 i6 M6 T$ l+ r9 y( U REGIONAL SUMMARIES
* q4 U0 E( o' T$ n( W >>
% r& V \, h' M9 @4 l; F; b; P# k
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
+ K3 |" g! F }9 @ b0 gHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
, F7 `3 _- y' B: ]9 Mof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time. c. Y" Q. ~% A+ V: ]
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of: W, n- c1 `, Z/ R* p/ [. p! ` v
renovations.
( @4 e+ h" k7 Q; V1 ]8 `+ a+ O% ]
9 C) j4 E6 u" L" S6 @ The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
$ J6 T; _* f& Y- P) jincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
) T- f5 j" Y3 ]8 E1 j- xcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and) v3 _( k( @4 x+ `
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
& d5 ]( c( P: _( R& Y( Z8 T+ w1 X
. o: O( |9 v" T7 Y8 _' ] The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer; @* J. L, ^9 l" p5 F7 ^" o/ F
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the4 `' m/ {. ?' J7 r2 t5 K$ m) t1 n
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new" V+ V5 m% J1 H7 l( [( E' a
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores! k2 `+ G( ?: x, G3 E' g
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes1 L. ]( g+ f; n) r: e8 j
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.* M* [7 c! b7 |$ S' `9 s
1 |+ X, I# n6 p. q; ]( U In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced' j+ h/ I% N# B3 ~- e! H3 ]
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
7 k- s1 V1 V; x& @- e6 Hhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers; [0 o/ `6 A2 T. @" [
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
' x* G( m. i2 Fdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
( `! c9 y% q7 D0 D6 ?2 b0 \2 _buyers with more options when looking for a home.# G5 C% _( N) ^+ ]* K g" ?
# q* m! a; y& ?' F* { Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly$ B8 I& {- k, L5 e4 s
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
1 z6 D) P9 O' b2 h2 Vpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
7 R. W+ [3 T7 a& zas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last5 H. N* l$ A7 i# _( `4 H
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.7 U; V& ^) X8 c' G& ?. Z9 v
: [1 [; l) `. \ Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house9 e# j! ^1 C5 E
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory, T& c% M9 k' |, s6 C. @" W
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
) k3 \. e, K: _first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
$ K+ G, w& {! K0 D$ @when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the: t* J7 C) b5 q
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before" J) B9 n4 R, J
making a purchase.
% J' B3 n: f, J6 U3 r2 j
- V) a2 A) p& L+ t Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing& [& [0 y1 z6 K2 l
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong7 E; K7 R1 H3 D6 i
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
( k/ J' r9 E0 [centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
! }) h$ @% y8 ]attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
8 j+ D; A) v6 `# P1 {- U( Qamenities.) `# l2 x. D1 r; ^7 S
V3 J% @1 W' C- P0 ^. u
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels0 V" g+ J1 ?" W( l) U Z! F4 z
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand% F- z0 ?, a1 X c' ?
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
& C+ M9 z6 Z" R% pcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
$ u; w9 r3 c2 Mdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle0 J) L/ T0 k% j& L4 G6 ~/ D. i
residence, rather than for investment.* }& |( M/ ~3 | r) ? p/ @9 ^" Y
0 x8 z6 Y! P, j9 B The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as# v- Q# {1 E: ]5 Y5 `# F
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted. H! \8 N% u1 C" z1 Q k3 m
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer n5 y3 N6 g+ \& C/ q( u
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization% W. c7 {) i) G. p* p* v
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter" J+ g! B' n! C7 N
the market.
( ~3 ]: K4 \' j1 _5 J/ l' A2 J2 x! E8 o% `. ^% Z
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
$ Z: l/ p# M: n+ x) \3 E& s" lJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In8 \1 @5 z2 s @' S4 R: ?2 i
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring8 J/ [# i" `4 n: q8 L
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
. p3 f$ Q; F. C. Y8 ]- `to the shortage of available inventory.' r# _+ ^2 k& p# r8 c, b1 W
( j2 o: c+ d$ ^8 V0 p
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its2 h% a! q: ^, F( \' R0 v3 E" q+ T
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
/ b3 S: }, ~4 K% v2 t: Vvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses4 I2 y+ G! a J/ S2 G
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province., N$ N/ [1 K3 I+ f+ s+ b4 l' U
/ A. D& [3 g* _( X Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases- u( z3 ^ M! t
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low+ A: ~- t) B; q/ F
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that' V K% V+ A8 t% H
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
+ S/ h8 \, C- z6 Z" r) wprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer4 I$ d/ k! ^5 w9 I4 g2 r
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as! d- e' l$ {) [9 a# K
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity." j) a9 ^& f% Y6 R; m
2 N7 f0 m, P# j/ w7 Q& c" B5 L9 | Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter4 S& I8 ]; ~8 Z5 B0 B/ ~. C2 w# K g# b
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
$ u9 B3 }1 O mremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,1 F2 M+ r- l$ U2 _
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices, p8 F2 x( ?" i6 ~: {6 u
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve% @3 S* s& y! P# W( R
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly! u) j& @( S+ Q
towards the end of 2006. , Q4 h5 ]- X0 d$ U; F# T& N
# X: b* F+ z2 f7 I y
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of/ F# e* c) R7 Y0 s+ H* [* M
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable4 \9 [% c' w `' r
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse8 J6 U. q6 Y7 F7 t
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
. @" `3 U+ v" D! R* n: t3 Gforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
$ @! k# [: S% ^( P4 ?7 ^7 dpressure on tight inventory levels.1 u) I, p6 Q+ ^4 G8 F
, s7 h* K/ q5 u& n! [6 B
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
1 Y4 t/ ]8 `5 d' P+ Pfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people7 g' X. [2 g; \ ], Z) E0 e$ T/ u
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
! I3 m y5 R% o: Ywhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
$ @% V: j" k# X9 O9 u9 Tfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.! h r( d' u1 {' Y5 {
4 X, X5 ?/ e. g
<<
. G+ _( C# q+ l Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
s x6 K7 |; S; H% Q: t U% t1 x* d4 j/ {. p z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 P6 c' w6 S2 V! n
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
F, Q" g7 X+ U& U- }' Y5 W `; S -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. ~! l. b; g1 I0 h 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
8 ^( M* @& k ?/ W8 n Market Average Average % Change Average Average: M( }0 F6 y7 r3 N
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: B8 t& ]; i, m" I- L; V) d Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0006 V. @' j$ O: O' G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ H4 }% I# s5 D! `6 n7 [) `
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
# c4 _4 A8 _7 r7 h -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 a6 I( ~* `* r. g4 s' {! R Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
8 k* T/ o5 U$ N -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! [4 t+ [9 F, S P. m" o' T8 g Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
% D+ S8 i e1 s! Q/ y; } -------------------------------------------------------------------------' P2 W9 Q6 o, ]6 Y. u
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333. P) }& P: p V9 w5 N5 q0 u7 s- {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. n0 U& W' u& b3 m1 G9 d6 `: [
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
! E& H1 X7 r c( J3 b0 D1 l, O -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( Y( T5 d! p1 p! y4 \; j Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
3 ?9 f# {% v' d -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 Q: q, [" H; {, e$ z2 l Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2508 y0 x3 P4 S+ L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: j: t. [& @$ C% x5 P' V- t% F
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
: n& w* g; F$ z* m- W2 l) f0 r7 N -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 ~ f% F A$ a: Z" F: F
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
( e3 Y& z3 Q- e4 N: V# {/ S -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ C0 X: Y) ]3 g' p. ^
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
: I# s5 x& p G+ t -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. L8 x* k2 h$ h, G+ ~ Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
( z8 A& R7 Y Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 }; N. V4 D7 E% W7 W+ g, T Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
+ v+ ^7 g U$ n, ^( Y5 [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ~4 q0 T7 W% L& s; x& e
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
% v( q3 y1 e! o$ e$ Y0 m -------------------------------------------------------------------------# n# e" I" I' {' d( j
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
' Q1 m& t' f7 W/ w -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" A' Q( s& w& \8 A" x& Z% D: [ National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860% I; c# N0 I. H$ e0 h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 {9 ]) M8 P" N8 F1 V* O: U& V N' G
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 f* O5 y! B4 m) S1 j Standard Condominium3 d, Q" e1 m3 v: g4 C
-------------------------------------------------------------" |5 f, N; ?1 H$ w* L0 J7 @
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
( Q) o2 [ G2 D* [7 x Market % Change Average Average % Change
, f+ \ D2 H4 D' d3 A0 @ -------------------------------------------------------------
" l/ `0 q7 Z- l! V4 n& r Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%5 e/ l! C" I; W& U2 g; X
-------------------------------------------------------------
, s4 V( Q& Y; Z6 n7 y& v Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
2 E0 n( A0 K. b- Z+ v8 o -------------------------------------------------------------
d. A4 |1 y+ }1 S- |8 \/ ~ Moncton 4.9% - - N/A/ f: t0 ^* J3 A w
-------------------------------------------------------------
" r0 L9 d* y4 K: _8 t3 }* Y3 } Saint John N/A - - N/A K! k6 m) ?4 D8 ?: d
-------------------------------------------------------------
# s) U0 ~1 {5 o# F% x9 ] St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
8 P2 ]. }& P8 q -------------------------------------------------------------- f" S& ~0 W7 }- L, {# l
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
( P) G1 C D% p0 @ j$ A -------------------------------------------------------------
& K' x8 r8 K2 j8 o Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
( j& j0 }- m- w3 M -------------------------------------------------------------
7 \0 C* S9 m% T" C Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%9 s; b0 `+ {1 { B( \5 }( C1 B
-------------------------------------------------------------* g( N( V3 E% {) B
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%5 C' m* T4 h% A
-------------------------------------------------------------+ Q& y/ q; T5 D* J2 T2 Y
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%7 `0 ~; x( o4 x6 m1 t. @' r3 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------" k2 K1 S0 h$ Z' C9 A5 l
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%/ p" [6 t& X1 H; f n1 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------5 E: F- t# ]1 l' P* H
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
: @/ F0 x4 F, [+ P -------------------------------------------------------------
, s) G( t4 `( F H1 D Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
: h' S7 W) o, d3 }( g -------------------------------------------------------------5 ~8 P4 Y. |2 u- Z" t& U
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
D1 l5 r9 v& i* ]! I. X7 J -------------------------------------------------------------
! ]3 J5 i% S8 z3 O$ Y$ {" [ Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%# U, r; U0 d8 n
-------------------------------------------------------------
! K v& H/ M- { Y National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
( v ^2 z) J( w$ ^ -------------------------------------------------------------
& T3 Y9 P5 \( y. p, W! O* U >>
8 i* V# {7 `+ v ?' ?# v; X3 `$ W, V& l {
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
5 {% {2 o4 @) e! g* S& T! i8 Uin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
; w+ I! D) s$ A2 u) NJohn and Victoria.
2 e2 q+ M: o! Q8 W* R
9 L) B* G8 K' f7 { The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most$ ?' |1 T4 c" X, h) s+ q$ A
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of3 M# ~: p4 P4 \! a* `; y
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
, I# T+ L1 B6 O. Sreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price7 o" j$ r9 K: V o% {
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities5 n3 m# ^% [! |! V! q5 Y. Y
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is6 P' [: k8 l: i @
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
/ u/ i: i: v" t r% Ffigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
% R- Q8 p1 z' D* y, y& N+ x& A) f) Cversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
/ {8 @% N% ?: a2 n8 q' RNovember 15, 2006.' o* C, ~7 H4 j$ e
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
' h) e$ w4 K* gfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge& [ m& M! l; N
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is" i6 Q/ ^4 G ~) G
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|