 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
9 Q" h1 r) [6 i$ k5 z
4 x+ `/ `: g1 h7 X- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
. z6 W" V2 o7 a4 V* Y* |9 N
4 w9 d e4 d+ | TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market4 m2 |& m, V5 n. p# e
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third* K7 p q; s! E! W9 @/ L
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
3 p9 j6 L& v# `, d# z7 Oin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
! n/ g/ J1 H. r# ]$ k. bprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and W/ s H" @& v% O1 n( J& Z
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,+ ` q* s& o1 d* n4 Z
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal: R2 c F- s: v4 j) X+ A
LePage Real Estate Services.
& [% _0 j8 E- P$ E
8 S. E; {0 Y7 ?' H Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
# Z; H4 {2 e3 ^/ H% S/ c1 Dare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
" f3 m; O, H! O! O3 O9 _: iconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and* f- i" G2 g$ o; } t
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the, g* z, t2 N7 [& f( L" W. M
residential real estate sector.
* n ^$ ^! V, B/ A( F
& @, r/ Z; D6 o: F Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
& \8 X7 o+ F( Y+ G/ ?( f- Foccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
& [# O0 h3 ^' R0 d' eyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5625 T1 s$ L; l8 d& F$ H
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
% m( Q% a% ^- `$ `) ?+ n4 @% X(+13.2%)." j9 f. V) q! l. }8 c# @
: B6 ]# T% m) v7 S7 F4 j% i
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth( F" W/ J0 A; \) k6 {
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the9 g3 p! {# t% t' L0 ]
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are6 D9 v6 y, z k" C
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
9 E s1 s2 N: J" Y, d2 e4 f! z2 Y6 |8 U+ cpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
& l' k7 a8 D' ~0 k+ t"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
7 w+ C$ w5 Y' {3 ]5 @welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy/ k: u0 K' [2 n; M* |- H1 H( t- Z, @* k
balanced market."( Q# U d* g# }* M4 n9 D% S
9 Y4 a' [* J+ Z/ @% |
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,+ {4 _5 Q2 R0 B
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift7 P* p: @1 o) n9 b* R$ [
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
+ P: K- S7 {8 g* Ithroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
4 N; D- I* \7 I* W- Y( t, s. G9 A7 Lenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
: d( }8 c2 o7 p& G8 x' Ymanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
+ z5 O# k# a7 U* R; Cbreaking price appreciations.
5 I. t; V* a3 p; n
+ X" E+ W+ D: q$ a Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
# ?2 q( a8 Y$ P% e3 @economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
8 E( ~: c8 v h6 ]3 _1 elargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
6 y4 x# ^3 N; l( |# J% l8 T
. D" c0 A" Z- v' L: _7 O In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
7 G2 _: ?- |) U! oeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
; ?: q( x; q$ Vconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
" M5 {+ [. {* a% F4 uslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
, n; o$ G: S$ S4 x& qIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers6 z3 C. V' p+ F5 ~* ~
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of. u; s/ N: Y$ n9 c
price appreciation when compared with 2005.6 B" Y. Z, R) a3 J5 K, N
: B1 @) V# d+ g0 F6 q. J
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing& ~" m3 v/ |' h# o* p: X+ {' q
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
# } j+ Q) _; ^" Yfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada% o/ ?' c9 u5 l
are markedly different than those found in the United States.. I K H2 G( O& ~& T
5 d; O+ L" @, v; f: }) Q/ v Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
( W+ ?5 k7 X! T% Y2 X6 u/ x. o, C4 yAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
. q" E" R' d3 A2 g- Cfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
, h' ?! {0 z3 j$ f7 j1 Arelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general; Y: P, H( i, Z+ u
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
M3 j, q. w$ O8 w" A, M% ndownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and; ?# j$ ?# k! K5 s M; I$ }* Z
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization0 ^9 O, g8 a+ _) _7 w
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
0 A" a( g; ^4 Y m1 D' w( R, x
<<. g) x7 V6 W) |
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
9 ]. g! W' o$ c6 E >>( `! j, Q+ V# Z' Z
[% T D' n) O2 y8 f
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in; d0 I. R5 e. K, k6 D {
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate% M' A* C* {+ ]1 v+ j1 D) H
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time! q, ?: s: ~1 q6 T- R6 s
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of b- ]4 e1 N/ U+ `" f
renovations. h; U% q" t% P9 x: z/ L: a" a
2 f# l% c* N8 |- e- q. [ The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
7 w, _3 @! q5 f. H4 N8 X/ u" l; B( L Sincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
% q: [; n/ y) h+ D/ b% Wcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
0 \/ u! s1 K6 \: b# \: hSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.2 C) O7 G3 l3 I5 g$ I
1 |) G3 Y$ }- `0 {# h& b7 D The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
& V N. D& i3 ]- Y, B# d- T+ oslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the2 {$ k- A6 {' ^3 [2 B" C
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
# h% F. E! X5 D Q) d2 v600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores* I# n& j# S! W
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes/ S% I6 Y k. E# h/ k- h
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
6 ~$ v+ j v3 K9 ~
3 Q8 l# d- s! z B) F/ q2 {" K K In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced, Q. d- t( \7 R" ]$ I: T4 n
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their2 z% c( h# n: s& ? l
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
+ E9 t! h+ J, b. k9 {was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
) X& U! J0 x# j: o# Pdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing/ Q$ c5 C9 {6 K4 D* n7 y
buyers with more options when looking for a home. V, _$ S4 T8 a4 o. n0 i
# o$ l9 `4 H) F4 T5 q* u
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
4 h- h: H8 Q3 Ramong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes8 `& N V7 J1 S, T
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
& t `- k t+ [ s( p6 `as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
6 Y T, x1 ~; i( ]3 b5 pfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
- y7 O# l2 M' u3 j0 v
: s& }' h/ n5 @3 _. V! g6 R Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house* A8 |$ |* c- ~ N" t
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
( J5 _0 }, H$ b8 M5 P2 Hlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting, S% V6 b; F6 O9 y
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
: n* u$ |9 @' L1 }7 E2 p4 bwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the! ^+ x1 a w o% g6 [$ z! Y
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before2 O9 e0 C/ |8 u- _2 a$ u) U
making a purchase.
' k& {/ J2 X9 |2 c* T8 c7 i) l U+ E% A- f6 Q
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
. {0 a+ W4 j2 e5 p* ~markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong: ]9 O$ E, y. H! }8 s
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
4 Q) b3 ~6 e6 Z' ^; pcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting, q5 D8 P1 ^2 r9 ?
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown7 ? _4 m3 d, s
amenities.* |+ n, |% n2 z3 [
; ]7 l8 I9 l' X% ?2 } The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels& c: C- ?: f$ c+ B
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand. L0 W8 f& X* p8 s, V5 i
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has; V3 B2 s4 p+ f T3 G. b* l
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
/ c6 k" T" n! C5 h. {! H2 b8 zdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
( n5 O7 D# v% U+ o* _: ]4 K5 p) xresidence, rather than for investment.) |$ i. I( z; D* u9 N- X
7 ~" s2 K- \8 q. O; z1 H8 _. P0 @ The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as* j6 z, P9 S; \5 M$ }& l5 W
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
. }( s$ |" l% c, @5 Gin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer+ _) D6 V( l _* j
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization! `. i4 P' B" O8 k( X5 w
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
" g5 Y2 |. a6 L- F" f: G% }the market.3 R4 }- S5 L. s H0 h( R
# k v1 X0 p4 I. u' O* w0 l In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
# ]# w" }6 d7 @# ~( f, }July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In' A7 [* C5 |0 o6 S3 E* q5 u
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring5 s, W3 t# C. n B! e
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
# f* @$ v7 M7 k% N/ Uto the shortage of available inventory.+ X6 t" a7 m; `2 T
8 ~$ }% h* l0 k, L* F7 b Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its9 c P+ f! v* q3 M5 ~
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
% |) w; }3 D0 c; l. lvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses! f* v4 C1 n3 x7 k7 L6 F. v
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
8 `5 {- c+ Z2 l/ A( h
6 v; V* U8 I2 ]' i# k& X0 g Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases) c8 X g1 }9 p- s0 ]) z; F
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low# V/ I3 O) A- ?/ A, C( `
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
! ^/ ]1 C: R# x' ^, e4 L* Opressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring9 h$ V6 N8 d: J6 O- v6 p
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer. M: F+ \8 n2 q9 p, {# S) g5 X* S) o
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as- g/ t7 J/ P# w& c& X/ g( J8 C/ N
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.- W9 c, }, X- I/ p
1 J) r9 u$ a/ c! a( B) } Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter4 Z* M# L1 N" g% J, Q' u
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton) O; @3 J7 c3 R
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
, y z. X2 U& Z, wmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices: g/ x$ y& O, \" Q
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
$ E6 q% a7 `( v' Fin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly9 \8 ~+ U+ i. p
towards the end of 2006.
. U% {* l! t |* c1 P( m9 ^/ R
- \. ?! O& k* R2 _3 f8 VWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of! m% `5 ` Z0 S
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable; g1 {/ W; y5 t+ u9 |
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
% i; O! c% @( pgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to1 z t! Q- k. R% |
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added" `, A" Y! z4 D. t" F: @
pressure on tight inventory levels.
' b( k; I; l1 y9 S9 B$ G0 o7 Z, U1 Z8 @* t9 H/ W: [, _7 M
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
* U& G: w( k }$ mfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
7 S4 a7 b4 G3 F n/ d5 Einto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
0 c7 ^0 w2 x5 O3 Y- q8 L! pwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching9 \& g4 O9 n8 V3 t7 y3 B* x
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace./ Z0 \* A1 b4 e1 d6 C' s5 o
7 S* r4 |- K3 ~; ~9 F* z. h1 F
<<3 { i+ ~: w5 Q: n) _! K8 c
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006- R' R( M ^* m: y9 [! e# X
2 Q3 G3 Z6 V8 U; o4 C2 Z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 h+ N* B: I4 a
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
4 j1 n Z3 k) R! \) h3 b0 i -------------------------------------------------------------------------; z& F: ^$ t, i9 N
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q39 E% _7 |5 O& K# n* U4 Q z, {
Market Average Average % Change Average Average0 B# Q4 k) k; L0 o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 l3 f/ _! ]. W9 |6 p Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
0 C6 Q; F( N! F2 i' u' U/ n+ f1 q -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 _3 N) D0 a r) y; S
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
9 x: a; G5 q7 p: z% A y8 c -------------------------------------------------------------------------. x8 D0 h/ F3 f0 {
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
9 l" {8 n( c2 {$ ~9 I -------------------------------------------------------------------------: ?5 |6 i' _& a+ K$ ?
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
" x, W: S" M) B) f3 }, O -------------------------------------------------------------------------' Q, J, }" T6 g ?7 S0 v" k
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333+ D+ s4 r6 v: b- |7 j( ]9 u8 f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------3 K$ M& _3 ]4 B3 u% o# d+ G1 ~) u
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
" N7 _: V7 R8 M1 t5 C% P+ C -------------------------------------------------------------------------( Q2 \" \' `2 d6 t! Y. l! _, C
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
& P( G- C, X* H) X% A -------------------------------------------------------------------------
N& n! w. Q" V+ j Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2504 `* {* J4 l" d* }
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* O N; K5 F, f' ^- [- w# z
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766) E4 B; L1 \! V( A& z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' Y) d* M6 l4 I8 Y3 E Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
0 o% n l4 U; ^7 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 Z9 c" S1 J1 `9 e& C( O
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500$ r7 g2 E$ T P- T1 s# E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; m8 G6 r6 J1 w7 g! [
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
) x# P4 o3 ^0 |# U7 K0 l. | -------------------------------------------------------------------------& _7 L' ]" ?/ Z! ]' p) s5 k" [
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714- c q' \- M" i% d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& R* ?' m, G! b+ B7 F/ s
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
0 @: M# W: o4 _4 R# A2 G -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& q3 g# a% E( l# ^ Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000. i$ y* V$ L+ B4 G1 X+ a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 N) a* v0 C3 F5 C# k' \+ d5 K, {: J% c
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860& s; b0 N; X, ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. l: w3 h$ W5 T7 O" R
4 Q/ L' H' A$ } -------------------------------------------------------------' C& c5 N k7 i& W
Standard Condominium
, n7 L! M& o8 c -------------------------------------------------------------9 T6 L$ A7 ^/ m# L% P5 @# i7 }7 }
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo3 y3 M: J' n. w+ E; j$ ~6 f8 U
Market % Change Average Average % Change5 O0 C. }# \$ P# g& w
-------------------------------------------------------------
, R! m( h1 W/ s' K Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
E0 t U) N% g8 Z6 i- ?$ Y: z* D M -------------------------------------------------------------3 r, A9 u6 x" W2 T
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
; _" T- {/ n4 g. s -------------------------------------------------------------" {- X; e' \4 o( g- x- h/ T$ K+ B
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A7 c" V% |5 ?8 |* u" C e. {
-------------------------------------------------------------
% S- H" P8 G8 e }/ R9 d Y Saint John N/A - - N/A
% P, z# N6 H- Z( _4 U# S1 s -------------------------------------------------------------
5 ^* K2 ~9 _6 w# U3 m! c( \2 g: w St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
2 c* F) A/ c6 ?! s5 D& m -------------------------------------------------------------
1 r6 u3 e3 }* o! x+ X Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
! f- s6 C0 b& j$ L -------------------------------------------------------------: ?9 K0 e! r {4 p) \
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
. [6 d; U7 J* L) J -------------------------------------------------------------+ Z e. Z7 \5 A: F% k
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
8 h$ v, ^ h f7 l- V8 g1 x -------------------------------------------------------------$ N* u- S3 X) b7 x
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
5 f' y( }6 i8 e, B% b -------------------------------------------------------------1 L" y: d. o# U- i1 _1 ^% j3 X, y
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%; o9 L+ b; l% n9 h" k) z
-------------------------------------------------------------0 c% p" }% u; I4 h
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%/ m% z: _) X# Q6 B/ G5 @
-------------------------------------------------------------9 H- w# K2 T8 m! ?' ^2 W
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%9 q, B) N! Y* n3 n2 ?5 c* N5 U
-------------------------------------------------------------0 I+ L2 _( W j1 y; t
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
! F# k: x2 [6 j -------------------------------------------------------------2 Q& t3 d" R6 `2 F i9 g( a8 m
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
& o B' o% A) w* U -------------------------------------------------------------
# }6 v& `6 K. C. E$ ` Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
: Y( m" [, f" j7 E; R1 t -------------------------------------------------------------
2 t. ?0 f* u2 |9 B0 w7 _ National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%2 {% [- x/ X2 m: r6 U% \! n
-------------------------------------------------------------. K6 s( N7 J! v' h- l( L; u# _
>>
! @/ P& k3 d: ~+ Q$ Q X! a& } H& {. P$ {/ Q$ g( E
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined" t# j, m1 J8 L- F1 B& ]& \
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint' `0 |% n: A! O7 O: m
John and Victoria.
- U# e- B* }0 w. X% O
. V4 B% k3 p5 M3 G. f The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most/ |, G% `. C' ?3 A" L% L* K2 }
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of/ W, i0 {, e, U `+ z' T
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
X; U& O& p: C7 O# n3 qreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
6 C0 W2 ]* N; D8 K1 Etrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
! l" u% l/ X5 v+ w% S9 Facross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
. N3 f7 o6 m, h: o0 [% havailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
. Z& s8 z' g9 F3 C4 T3 O9 u! Zfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable6 c+ k& W9 j2 X% s: E* b
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
t% W( Y1 S( q6 j8 WNovember 15, 2006.
. [4 ]5 I2 g! u u Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
$ l7 D. R+ V- y, V" v6 M4 @% S8 y+ z; Ffair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
7 _9 ^; {' i. Sprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
, p5 H, B& ^8 u/ L$ o# davailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|