 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable - ?! a+ o' [3 O6 _: z7 v: O: A9 Z
/ T& ^ M- f" a/ J( q4 Q- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -6 v) y) |. |8 L# h [
4 f3 V7 _0 }6 L0 v- A
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market6 T3 D& F! M* e3 ~+ ~4 ~
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third* W0 l% T3 s; N! f. i
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic: X/ A+ ^1 T; j) N6 `3 w
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
; C" ^1 O# W: H: D. ]( tprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and5 u! |5 t7 |' o# g7 G
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,; f6 \0 r8 x0 l T- G% l$ T. [
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
. ]7 ~$ L/ j2 g6 H! PLePage Real Estate Services.3 j! V, x/ ?7 W* r
( m7 {, j+ h# C4 w" o4 Q
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
9 M& ]; u3 G5 T+ Care forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic& v" n2 n3 p e. \4 d0 Z5 D
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and6 o8 \; B9 h2 u2 K" [" }
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
6 a' |: D, X# {! S3 rresidential real estate sector.; b7 ~* h5 Q9 u9 [' k
6 k7 I+ z( M+ D8 c& j
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation& x" e$ R1 X; i
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)5 U0 O8 L# m! n1 d) `
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562 _! [' o D, Z! J& L0 Y8 ]$ \) D$ x
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
1 j1 X l( d$ E Y; d(+13.2%).
0 F+ [& d2 P0 T* u1 y& S# J) P0 l! G$ K, n0 C
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
7 c4 z' ?1 L! t8 Bduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
- _7 N5 J) Y: }4 k! m+ @frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
' m) V( h/ h$ ?5 j% npoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
8 z) a+ q2 s/ y' [3 z* Upresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.& P) L/ U; X- d3 a$ A2 a# K" |
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
6 y9 b0 j9 s$ {3 f4 G0 Cwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy9 Z1 w, X- d/ M- X/ C6 b8 C
balanced market."
, [& q' s" \0 v' N3 s! Y* M3 g1 Q9 K4 y5 U* [) A" j& A
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
s6 Y) X# [$ {8 R! C& Wconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift* q s& o! ^. K+ k) \& [/ `. v+ L3 k
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued/ ]6 q" L: T# n/ n: X
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core3 A/ R! i% i* y; W) Q, g; j
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
. y4 v0 \' Z2 [8 h2 W* }2 U0 imanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
* {. I" c, }4 n$ q9 Fbreaking price appreciations.
S. A3 S; ^& G) f/ Q; k
a/ ]$ K* _, p% d' `9 S x# ` Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
9 b3 ?0 j4 |5 m+ V0 @, Beconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the+ ?5 @" [$ r1 `3 ]8 s; R0 y2 v& R/ n
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
( e0 O( ]0 N3 n$ X8 e3 }$ d
2 I9 ]; A5 |1 H In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid: s6 K; W& v" h* Q9 g& }! i$ ~
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer& d6 y: } _- v! m
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
: D+ `5 q) C; @8 e9 P- q, Tslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
$ U# }$ r6 k" V" I! A3 J* SIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers5 u- [9 Q9 D( b) S
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
! d+ {, X, d/ F9 l9 j: J" gprice appreciation when compared with 2005.. |! ?7 x$ g- |; E1 X3 P% C& ^* D
3 v6 t: t6 ~3 | p+ U1 N
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing# t" u) e; u `. w' g; |' m
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and. W8 z7 S# D3 v4 g
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
+ s1 u. R( I1 o) c% F A" R: Qare markedly different than those found in the United States.
8 X. y7 i3 K0 }4 I* n. b( i0 e2 X; G5 y" u) f6 c* F/ `5 q8 s+ I2 P
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the0 |; ]6 M' N; |# i5 @, B
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
; U J+ ]. N; s, T zfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the4 A7 k T' E8 V. G3 B) j3 C, n) ?/ n
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
& ~% ?+ y8 B- }* S6 P# yaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
5 K: I2 b4 V, A" }* I# l( Mdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and, g. j$ n% o, A' o' \$ g( n
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
* I3 s7 B; n' A& Tmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
8 A- A D6 O# e4 E9 U2 ?0 h- S" a5 T- w/ b8 F; a& y% i
<<* P' \) L1 T7 U( @! \6 W
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
) v2 F0 @( ^$ h* i, z& B o1 Y% w >>+ O- H" ?) ?6 q e: _( q, ?9 W
* V2 T8 p( M( H6 z8 s+ p i7 }. S# ` Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in! j8 T( |& x( I ?6 s
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
2 R q5 j9 G; t1 N6 H- sof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
$ z& U3 F) M* h" g2 m3 c. ~# Y% X1 slooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of# g+ e# Z8 g; x" D
renovations.' I3 n- a1 P9 o1 ~# J+ S$ t, C
7 m& [* d3 F% L5 U, E
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
; |8 o2 F9 B U8 v' b! n+ ~increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation2 O/ O+ W. d* Z, K4 D- y
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and* v; d5 [) M1 y% q
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
1 X8 S7 h$ R3 { c
! D# `4 w8 u5 ? The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer, P' \8 G. {# r, v( }1 q! ?# C$ D
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
; P1 Y4 C$ C* p& G# X% o8 F( hquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new5 H! k1 [4 \8 {" T' o: [% ^4 j# G
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
$ e( |1 y7 g' M7 _4 I* ?to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
5 w4 y& o1 l3 u0 a' M% j% }and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.: i$ Y( a$ Z' e' P
! S3 I% `0 `0 Z3 Z: e/ x% i
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
7 n$ G. D; J5 S+ A/ `5 R5 Pconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their# p/ i$ y- J. z5 I' g
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
2 D$ G! y/ q0 T6 w8 D0 ^! M& N5 U( s" x4 Cwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
* z8 R. J _$ zdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
& ]1 M- q7 I& U3 C1 Tbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
* _1 K& m9 e* t) F# }) D3 S
1 B5 b9 L0 j: w- ?) G Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
' r" d$ c0 X5 p6 `. q( X" w9 iamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
8 e( f. R* H1 R% Lpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,! I$ q+ l1 S' r1 U. y5 M# |% j4 B
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last4 a' H+ z' C! c! V
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.1 m: o' X$ A. p# U% B
. r6 A' m$ o |5 F; L3 H5 y* z5 z Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house# I' l. u, m7 T: n! |; X
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
5 K( R/ b# A1 P! olevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting' v# X* e0 y: N* H
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
/ l- k$ n9 Y# g) j8 H+ {& Vwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the+ |" G% u% ?/ `7 t
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before; D/ f' I! s1 ]8 R p" M
making a purchase. d2 ]8 W* l& }2 x4 i9 G
* g0 V4 v, A3 `3 {5 Z2 D* D# C Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing6 R. `) h3 r4 ^+ [0 Z7 X, G
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
( r. S9 }5 U9 r/ t% Pconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
: C; p: X4 y0 G8 F$ p1 p! @3 mcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
" Q4 [# o3 V3 g6 s5 F! C7 R: v, vattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown3 U# u9 Y6 T6 k$ A* {8 v
amenities.8 l' D9 D' d" p/ q* j
) [: }" M' Q- T4 `5 l" S+ V: G+ j& b The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
a5 `8 g- s. r$ z# uthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
- x1 W% W+ f( T; q2 cacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has& j4 V0 z( o% |- c# ?
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
& I) M4 J( a1 h# z3 N1 I. ?# ^/ f0 `driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
) S s; ^: J/ P( K: X4 N. W/ Kresidence, rather than for investment.& d7 Z- @9 r3 C& Z- T( z* _
/ z) K8 z% n' O. a/ I+ }
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
; ^1 F! ?3 b9 U. N/ x6 z& `house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted. T( E" C8 Q5 ?5 c
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer8 G* ?# l" f. N
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization- u& k7 d; y0 m* @. t7 o
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter" r/ [# B5 q3 A3 J E! t9 S
the market.
5 S0 I. L, l6 z
; [% S: t3 i/ w) k4 q In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
& S- ?" C3 x% {' S" RJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
, i! [# ]$ A TAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring1 o- K3 W4 J* ^& R: W
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due9 o7 L L3 e9 ]) u
to the shortage of available inventory.
) c/ G: [% m$ r6 P; X% c7 E' f* j: V# @ T! x' C
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
, ?0 E) W8 {* @& m% u0 Fmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains* g( A/ |7 V; _6 e0 v+ n
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
: |" C) V' y" E8 v4 Z% Jstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.% C" `; v1 _5 a: g! e5 F/ H7 @6 a- F
, j4 L I4 y. e Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
1 q% b/ }& f9 l: M- W9 hin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
' I- E7 P* J1 w# u6 e3 \' uunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that! _+ ^' Y0 v( s' c/ s( D% X
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring. M6 v: [& Q' h9 u
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
+ K- F( W$ }, z! [/ ?4 eseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as$ S; l# M' O* `" j7 ^$ o" N; M
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.2 _. b0 J# p& J4 Z1 ^7 Z
0 }1 A4 X$ y( g% D0 J
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
" m7 j4 n+ |& z# K( Ias activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton8 O- p/ Q5 t" ?# u; K8 y8 J' j4 }
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
) ^% b. R( G0 X0 rmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices, ]9 [* o6 J" |7 a, E! a' q9 z
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
/ H- g( ~1 y9 r# O4 rin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
: |; C" a4 o0 y$ y. S$ y: xtowards the end of 2006.
, B4 R5 W: z9 D- L3 j9 w+ o! i7 ^1 o% b) G
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
- |: _! {2 e+ |inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable0 K7 {! K9 g* T* S' t9 y* A. a
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
]7 ~) F0 E0 U2 M, zgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to. }3 q" R1 y3 }/ \% S3 k/ \. _
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
/ o$ H7 s, B1 w7 t Lpressure on tight inventory levels.( y" E* W* p% Z
! {6 j$ j+ ~: }4 Q Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic6 x' P5 m0 e, x" B+ w' D8 r. Q' D
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people$ V# p; O( k+ x m G$ r: o* T# a! e
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;* Z1 C, b: |3 _4 d2 f
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
4 b# r8 I9 X: C! Qfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
+ Z C2 _* d% q9 H
q4 Z& m4 o) P* o. w) [ <<
; s) o/ C9 W) }+ q7 L Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
& p7 c; l$ C1 Q3 K: D6 [. t" ~6 }( |; V* W2 ?" }! p& q- w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. }; g, o6 S' |8 t0 |. C w9 ~ Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey: {" x' X! ]- X5 q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" }. h5 @$ B8 F: D) x8 M; O& {+ I
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3# o- S6 c+ J! O1 \( h* C3 j
Market Average Average % Change Average Average) n3 e, M. F) Q$ u7 |; B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 T( N' E; r" y% Z1 A
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0007 W& u9 {$ z( X9 a+ L& x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. _/ g- H( A \# ]% d5 u# W
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
1 s' O3 c1 q. t& c* M( y" f3 x -------------------------------------------------------------------------' ^* h( b8 B9 L. e( [4 }$ A, G
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
& D6 ?) I3 H5 Y% _( q) E7 O) Y9 F -------------------------------------------------------------------------# ?7 c! d# i) M" E7 j
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -! `% R* q) q3 e# W( O4 Z$ z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 k7 F6 S. d! m" k$ G St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
# x. @, G0 p1 Y1 n -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 B+ q# y2 a8 q0 a' _4 ^ s% R+ a Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
% m* I9 L; q( e$ f9 h9 c( S1 I -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 J5 ^1 H6 `2 e$ Z5 {$ V Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185' V' d1 ?" J1 k, j' T& G/ h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* g6 b, _' J. x Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
7 P, L! r% T) X1 r l9 s# l -------------------------------------------------------------------------% v7 c: b* r5 h: L
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
/ [) X4 @. n9 A3 v, Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------, N2 }7 v L# I9 u- h9 D, g
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
6 G9 W* G! W; h$ I: D -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 r" [9 O" L. d* J+ T7 [1 N Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500/ E9 j) V6 U' C. z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% \5 h- a' r) U9 n! I
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389( i: P# }' j/ e0 b/ i6 s5 ?" N
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 D, @- G! w5 a9 P
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7146 M3 U0 \( _/ o8 e7 X5 M' Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 s- v c3 n/ ~; c4 {2 u
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500$ Y6 l8 I. P* C5 J1 S- s; c! I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! y+ `- |0 i, L% n2 n4 ~ Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
, `* \' {, h! U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* c r+ ^/ E$ @. Z6 l National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
" z+ E, G) D. \2 p -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 [4 {9 w3 ^# ~0 O
8 J- S6 k. Q2 K) B
-------------------------------------------------------------
* g1 n0 G6 R- H( f) @" M) l) d( B5 ^ Standard Condominium) c, F# L3 n7 x
-------------------------------------------------------------% g* ^; k+ ^( w* E2 c
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo- C& ~" Z2 Z3 A; N
Market % Change Average Average % Change
2 u$ K$ M8 l0 M, _* N -------------------------------------------------------------
7 e- L& J1 x! `6 P- x- M6 A0 I Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%5 f ~! V, U9 b( S9 Y" _- S( P T
-------------------------------------------------------------
: K" n5 [5 i" [$ J- ~ Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
: ?' d. C4 }0 D, ]( B7 M8 G -------------------------------------------------------------
x; H5 a5 [% `- p* H6 c Moncton 4.9% - - N/A" ~0 b: G9 k6 ~: {4 v% O% ^8 R
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 `6 S: P A+ ?6 U& y Saint John N/A - - N/A
' L$ O, U/ }. s' r% r; G/ d4 n; x7 H -------------------------------------------------------------
* W) L$ p5 s1 v* p St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%0 L# h3 H; p# W2 Y9 b0 _: a
-------------------------------------------------------------. U; ?1 n0 S u! u
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
, q1 \: d2 V5 }# H5 x -------------------------------------------------------------9 X ~( F) i5 D) p7 I* T
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%3 P$ u7 a' v0 S k3 H
-------------------------------------------------------------
& h3 a5 B) b! o: H& ^9 q Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
& [& _. y+ Z) H% T- `2 q x -------------------------------------------------------------% R9 M3 k+ P; `0 W
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%" C- X. A! m" Q$ D$ z
-------------------------------------------------------------- J8 b2 W) w' F! { Y
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
a. m5 V$ p3 V$ |+ s1 ]0 s5 D2 a: c -------------------------------------------------------------
2 s, w; ]5 D( \; N" S Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
9 ^2 X3 E0 N" C# V/ e( l' a* ` -------------------------------------------------------------
/ X: ~0 b: `9 H6 D$ ~* T5 l, p Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
4 s7 H+ ?3 Q$ E! Z W3 i -------------------------------------------------------------) T# N; a% v/ q/ G$ W3 Q _
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%8 f* q; t5 H H! W+ \
-------------------------------------------------------------
! a- }5 I8 L) K, v Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%; Y# j. K: h h, S
-------------------------------------------------------------. g9 q" S! c8 f" y( s) J# I; ~( f
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%- Q/ z6 X# r2 T* ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ }( B# n. j" t1 ]: f National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
% q2 t0 x% e# V9 } -------------------------------------------------------------
2 @+ E5 ]/ | ~8 j# K) Z2 b, q* \ >>, F* W0 Y1 p: p# F9 x
0 G) {: R; ]5 p. B/ v1 b Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
4 }- N `. B7 d6 w6 Cin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
8 L9 _0 T! a! u: D7 UJohn and Victoria.
* i) i$ L4 b" k: h! d& Z0 I+ x; v' a- N- z, ^/ t, }" G
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most7 {7 O9 V+ B2 a. n ~- {4 \: @- i2 U
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
^+ N! I# P6 ^( U3 Dhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
) g" R) V+ X6 A, J0 ^% O5 Q9 `references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
' c1 G) j @+ L2 A) mtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities: S9 V; j3 C8 ~/ |8 @4 c
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is# I- H9 h6 p; l2 ?
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current: I: I6 V5 v! O0 U6 L- ^
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
: L8 f: l) Y- E- Q4 Aversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
* `0 { h& J% JNovember 15, 2006.; p5 n' a# q9 s6 }
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of/ h- H4 W. N$ G5 v
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge/ r8 q8 M, U% O' m" ?
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
, t" x$ n6 H2 f3 y7 L' x7 W, wavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|