埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2176|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable / ^' e" w0 O' b7 H/ C2 L) ^

8 Y: m! ~4 d9 {1 C1 \" \3 R# I0 `- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
% [( K  G1 |% ^. Z6 H4 H
( ^4 p  Y$ V2 p. n3 H( d- A& v4 c# P    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
9 f$ o# i7 Q# N0 H/ |exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
, y  J4 j" x5 h% V: jquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic$ b; R% I+ A3 t& \0 X2 A
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit" y; U3 h( C6 T/ P3 F5 ]; g
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and# N. i8 [3 C9 I# L
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
3 ]( L1 O2 w: l2 AQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
/ G% t  _7 S+ D/ V2 BLePage Real Estate Services.
' ]& w3 \8 v4 W& k% |5 w3 D
- S/ e( [6 }6 G6 i9 x' b/ c    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
# z6 I% {' e! L6 a% v0 c7 vare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
: K) c& |. a+ ]! c, C- g9 l1 ^conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
0 \0 l, ?& p! v. x: R2 _* T" jsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the; d7 v# {( r# G1 ^$ O0 G1 W/ }
residential real estate sector.7 w5 D! q. t3 T0 B) h: F7 E6 V

7 P. w* w/ R* h7 S    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation+ k4 k9 M" M$ M2 f# g
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
+ r  h" ]- q: R1 b9 ayear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562" a' M  e+ n& X9 E6 M8 V/ E
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
+ M( s4 ^* N! m6 }. f) ^(+13.2%).
1 E% n7 n) V- {/ X9 A$ J
$ S0 L+ C! X, c! `' i. h    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth' c3 s7 L8 I8 n4 w% X7 r7 E- S
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
* Y8 g; n! J) K5 a& b& ~& W. Wfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are7 ?1 s7 P( A/ v) X: x
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,0 ^: f- \* H0 m2 [- U' q3 U
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
: \; W9 X0 S. T, |: [: X1 E) @% L"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
0 n6 z, A7 w0 P5 ^welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
' r9 K* V( T: ]2 _; z5 w" Qbalanced market."
" z8 g% K1 K! T# V- y7 Y! j0 l$ M5 d0 I6 b7 x
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
( D* W8 N  ]) Q, U# T' Sconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift8 N8 ^; h$ K3 T0 Q7 p
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued) F: @+ C+ l6 @5 P. f
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core+ j) X& X+ i  W- m. j  }8 x- z
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
5 i& `& k5 J; J$ A& Z6 o/ ^manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record" x! E# T  K% y
breaking price appreciations.' x: A# T7 L) E3 v5 \! p, M

" _' k; ^6 V& `. g( X    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding3 k8 R; C# Q' T, M6 ~
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
4 m& P# s. P, V- J& ~+ z. Xlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.3 N* i4 @  {, w4 h0 M& U
2 S+ M" m5 {4 I
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid# R) [& m: }3 `6 s0 y
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
" d$ i! }( n! C( q! Rconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
3 L: t/ A% i- `( d0 F: ?slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.1 h, I9 C9 o( B, F+ a9 `
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers0 q4 H( Z5 \  Z: {3 R1 w
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of1 o$ ?3 K9 \: a" l3 i  c
price appreciation when compared with 2005.) u! X; J: {  o( P

6 a1 D9 i" ?: k7 c    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
  }0 x& f+ Y' w. ?market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and# g2 J- f8 Z) Z
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada( R0 v2 s1 F+ n/ m' z; n& q
are markedly different than those found in the United States.2 E, S1 J0 \7 b" q. q$ f

% Y2 X! k$ Y% N% v    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the. F3 K0 @6 p3 J
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's& f4 \) D1 @3 K- {/ n3 D, j1 o" {
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
- e, X3 Q2 G& @' R  K7 ^( o# ?relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general9 b. y# j8 R5 u! f9 z* @( I
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
' ]1 h; p! c8 u0 X- t- J: K. Edownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and( K/ l1 M7 J3 k8 g: [
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization. a7 T' [. N# b+ o! `  |; p- K# K
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
/ ~* }4 G( i5 t  V7 G1 I( q0 w  {( |( g
    <<0 G2 P# u& q- B" t5 R% _( H5 e; {
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
* J$ V! e( N. u$ G  e  E, u    >>
& [/ e1 _+ X% |' ]" m" X8 u3 k0 Q
. N* l' _  o( }! p' y4 V( z    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in* e$ E; A, _% e, j2 F, ]/ b
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
( c! o; C' A& Z0 y! jof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time8 v+ ~# q& T3 I
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of# q$ i0 W1 w/ L
renovations.
$ ?5 e+ L. Z4 M6 @. ~$ k+ m: W# G" [( A) `$ ?$ O, D
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight- {" P# D- V: S3 J* K! }0 x
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation- M! m/ P' f' R" @. s% t
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and0 V6 M' b2 M& B
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.7 g) S" `( B' d$ G' R

  A1 I- ]$ E: |2 h  F& D) c5 C    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer! A1 ?" L. v& l2 C
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the7 s9 W6 S. _- c0 g5 n
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new' N. s+ M: Y: y" z0 L- G
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
% O5 @9 U5 r2 c  ?  y- A- bto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
: \4 y0 Z- R& i9 Q. P% f" K1 K5 Yand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.* t* }& a  v6 v! [# v; ]

$ |* i) G! P0 o    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
; q+ W- W  @2 Z% |1 p  P9 ]conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
# L, \+ l3 X, t! d/ F: Ehomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
5 @3 Z* {; t: q5 P$ n2 ]( l: i' Q4 \was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
& f9 L; S' Y- Q# A7 \. w3 s+ gdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing$ O/ m  r3 J; P" J7 j' n: m
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
+ P# }& Y; _; w0 y" J; R* V4 Z* j% o
5 P, R8 f" r0 x7 m# N    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly/ m% h! g- k. V: l' d1 L+ P
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes. h# s# T) l4 i( [( a9 X
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
- y0 `$ K7 x- f4 C/ Vas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last  G" A; _6 x5 C& }
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.8 I( b9 |& Y/ d; K, i

6 C8 L6 T, }! V% f. b    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
1 C# l- M7 L5 }prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
0 W/ t& d0 t  Q9 w. ^levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
4 r" Z; }- M$ _# d( efirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1," ^; b$ E7 ?# s4 E4 X0 X
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
1 `4 [4 i4 R2 `6 m. j* t9 Fpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
, V" P# [( d+ Q4 c) Imaking a purchase.% S- Q8 ?1 A# q  U

% r" E& F. y9 ?- f) u3 v9 W- i' W    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
$ P2 r' t- j  L. b3 K5 vmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
  ^% T4 u5 j# ~" tconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city; J1 E( e0 Q3 Z0 N, C& t: F
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
. ]( ?: y  f- [6 M) i! m' ]  ]% D8 @  [) tattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown" A& k$ J6 M1 X) n6 d; z/ g0 `
amenities.
5 B+ J( Q7 u' K* P& J6 {2 n, e( }7 r# V3 q2 T1 V4 q* {( `/ d
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels5 e- O5 w  f- t+ |8 o
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand% k# h+ B. v: O/ g! K$ p% I
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has/ n+ A: e# b& U  b( `* B% O6 \9 c
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been; r: R( p% d7 U1 j! [
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle2 M! C* x/ W4 S. u5 j" h
residence, rather than for investment.+ n3 x0 |# X* B3 e1 L

; P2 W+ D: n* A, F( j8 x  Y' V    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
/ A9 h7 X* e! E  Q! Bhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
; b$ I; U' Q, Z+ g/ Sin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
, _  L" [# B) U0 {confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
. f0 i) E0 k# o  q/ C, B6 Prate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter; X3 J, i7 V+ Z1 d
the market.2 g4 J. I) S- q
. d, q+ k# q, `2 \/ V1 B5 t; ^5 l
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
" r  ^* Q: Y$ x( a  Q$ H' nJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In  X7 W7 i& b# J: r, l" }
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
* y: S, B4 r5 ~4 xmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due& s* E) s9 @1 y
to the shortage of available inventory.( W. W- F- z* x1 `, P0 y

! a& g, C7 F( @2 ^3 O6 V, q    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
$ `" m* F. h/ y+ A( n. Imomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains+ [: M" N# d, H7 {# j
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
! k' H, Q# `2 c9 Ystruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
8 u$ S$ l$ P8 ]5 }7 `% e( j1 X* c2 h
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
$ n8 ^: }+ a" U1 zin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low. A3 j, X0 r* y2 ?* }9 ^0 J
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
+ Y7 l  T3 j8 y- z5 {pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
, z: d9 J% k2 v' f" @, }6 ^4 p) ?prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
/ u* C8 c$ A3 e0 r% o+ w; lseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
- [" ^1 K- H" t# _buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

1 ~; N8 W  P9 x+ k, j; c5 f/ T7 Z3 I$ \+ B
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
4 K$ H4 C2 s9 ras activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
: |9 w0 l/ J& p  N$ z& W7 vremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,2 H7 e& j& T, J+ Z. \
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices# B8 ?# {9 t0 ]; s# {
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
0 ]! x+ W( q+ X) vin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly8 C( g! W' }$ R
towards the end of 2006.
    1 T! }& [# u% A/ N1 I! t5 p

2 O  o& F7 b6 U  K; ^+ UWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of" N1 ~* o  z: M0 b' \8 Q
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
/ z" a" U# d" X* W) ?to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
' W" H+ \3 S; B1 egroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
- c1 h: p! k) B$ g$ M" eforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
3 h$ [* q4 o! w+ B) D4 s# {8 Mpressure on tight inventory levels.
( R3 V9 x( y( v  ]4 ~
$ L7 t! H6 f+ X    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
/ F" X: Z5 y) ?/ hfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people. u3 H' |  T; _$ W
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
5 d( m  i1 s# O9 J1 _+ Q! m: Lwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching9 u8 v3 E& A. N7 `3 b: k
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
* {8 k8 a4 x/ V' y5 e4 E) e
6 ]2 p& i1 h& x/ f: c# F    <<5 B- }: h: E8 E& Y# f: u
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
6 |$ }; w* \. k3 k- m& p8 C3 X* F/ k
' u. l& S6 D! A. s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 h& x. t2 n: d0 Z                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
* A: ]; I$ Q1 y4 y5 ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; y7 }8 ]3 I$ }6 f                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3, M$ c, ]* R2 m0 \& Y& l
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average. R3 Q" Q  ?( Y& Q0 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. q+ S+ _% ^& `2 X; g0 C, g. Q4 Z    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
' L8 i9 b! W1 [+ }0 ?    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: _) v! B# |# k1 q+ b, \( G
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
" Q$ `; q2 E8 L, H3 Q. o0 i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 b& S6 K+ ~/ t6 f9 x7 ?
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
" k: g) ~2 L' E+ g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& ?0 {) y0 {% }% @) G1 L: {8 G! b
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -$ L3 W  |5 \0 m1 _1 r7 s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* R0 q$ c4 m: j/ Y    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333. G. a# h! `" h& x/ ]: a! L" _
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* u$ a6 |1 R) W1 j( ^- U7 a- Q. z    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583, u$ x0 d1 z& U- D% P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ o3 d4 T- ]- C5 U+ s* n
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
  p7 f) A0 v- W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- O; ~0 E! ?8 m4 v1 L    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250# R3 F; X! z6 K0 T- {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ a4 Y$ _+ h! l) g! a7 s    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7660 t8 `* T4 f! t- T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 N4 |/ |6 @5 m( G- L; d* x
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7079 w0 K: l! z6 Q$ _' H2 d
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 c: Q9 W+ I$ q' ?9 x; {
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500+ ]8 t( Y' c7 c: K) p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: \$ V  N& |! h* b: \( u
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389# X' i; M2 T3 k0 H5 \& p2 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" `/ K, `' t+ Y' z    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7141 n# e( H* @0 Z2 Z: B: |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 {/ `* H: L% ]6 H2 \- E
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
" w& j9 t; u# v* x% U  J0 p7 \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, s" c7 ~0 q1 U" f+ K7 r4 p9 e    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0009 B8 \1 B% ?/ O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 E0 U' k2 x6 O2 \" ^5 h    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
0 I% J7 F$ v/ w  M    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: _3 V+ o' ?* w5 \
( z# P" ?* Z% w1 [; C  u    -------------------------------------------------------------
; }. [. B7 c! _( O- k8 l4 e                               Standard Condominium
0 G& R2 F" {6 a' i    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 @( O1 K! z/ @  {                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo# }7 h2 _: U% `  y
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
; Z/ U, o, m) S    -------------------------------------------------------------( M1 w- `4 S8 I. z% `% r9 k
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
$ k& X1 _5 D! l' E* n6 V    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 v! D/ ?5 }: C# p# `/ k* G( \    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%$ x" k) \5 P" V# h* W. a+ p
    -------------------------------------------------------------
. Q5 c! C1 V4 R! A7 K+ L" l    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A& }9 f  Y8 e& z1 m! B
    -------------------------------------------------------------5 |$ q# j! u" Z3 y, O* r
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
3 }/ e. ]) l4 }+ U6 z. {    -------------------------------------------------------------8 b1 G; F: L. i# c( n
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%/ \$ {3 f8 E" M/ F" |+ O0 l
    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 ?) e. G% b# z2 P! W    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%" S3 t2 A5 W' w* h; y
    -------------------------------------------------------------! c6 x" K7 o$ F8 I$ |% }
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%: b( J' |" k# m; R' x: ?/ W3 q! F' z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; o3 u! J. ], y( O: D& i    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%% ?4 ~$ }( s- P8 K0 c
    -------------------------------------------------------------! f% K9 J  r( Y/ r
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%- `* X3 Q- K: f) j: f
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 X/ R, ?& h3 z    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%" W, q+ S( p+ P
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 h8 ?! [  }2 a5 \$ M    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
1 R$ n. ~3 ~8 u: z* I5 Q    -------------------------------------------------------------5 M8 L! k+ z/ X/ x! W( j4 U  [
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
8 \+ U1 H& o  i    -------------------------------------------------------------
, ~9 u* I; Q  h* _! f    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%# V" Z: k- Z) N) z1 o. {
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# N' I) X! C7 ^! ]    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%! s# I- x' k. J7 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" g, D. J9 W( }  g- s" ^& p    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
$ l9 w2 w6 D4 Q$ L0 W3 Z9 q& m, U9 I" T    -------------------------------------------------------------
  H; j4 B  d" }4 q2 a) j! Q    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%5 Y% z! Y/ L" d) ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 Q$ n! {( ]) s    >>8 B! o% j8 ^. S( a- s

! y) |# ~! S! \; [) r    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
4 j0 L! Z  i; W+ w0 S( B! Tin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint- u- H% m, F! P3 I9 O" t
John and Victoria.
1 O9 ~5 @8 j! W' N
, a4 p" S0 ^2 y: v0 I9 G    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
2 h( o9 h. V* c. @comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
: [' t+ M2 Q! Shousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
, y6 M9 N  ?+ I# areferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
8 s! g+ w, g( p5 l1 M+ Htrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities, y7 ?) b8 E( z' t1 `2 S/ y
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
" T. L% Z+ X( O' L5 j5 S, }2 c0 Savailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
; m/ \3 {" n/ B. xfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable2 N1 M1 ~4 u. l$ F9 B* [, C) F
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
- D" X9 ]5 [+ v$ }/ RNovember 15, 2006.
( Q* ^3 @9 H( U2 L9 e0 H! h    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
2 ?7 k- G- A& B, g' c. _. hfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
: x( C( J& d9 q3 _1 o. ~$ j$ yprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
7 P: q. i' R0 i0 uavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-15 14:05 , Processed in 0.147331 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表