埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2194|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 5 D* |; N- |9 g

# P, a! ~$ K3 g2 b. D& B- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -# i/ e4 h1 e  o3 s. z  H5 Q

8 ~6 e* h- k/ \/ h0 r3 u  B    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
5 |/ h: c) i7 C+ W& P/ o1 d6 aexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
& w1 B& ^8 s% m. u3 y! T+ oquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic: c/ f* E# I+ d5 O' _4 ]
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
0 Z; {! |. |" g0 }% b1 Z9 tprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
2 c: d8 B; |6 L5 q0 Ymore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,- B3 w) \1 q# h+ G$ ~, C; s# D$ u
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
/ m" `, J$ C) o% \1 jLePage Real Estate Services.
8 `/ e  q! V9 ]! e. @& k% ]6 O  e# ~4 F4 G- _! y0 N
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
- G8 _3 u* I" f; ~9 qare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
8 F* l( k) n8 h9 M" Z/ Tconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and- k; l0 e/ F2 {$ c3 ?9 }9 _, z
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the' A( o) D; v) p# [, Z# j
residential real estate sector.1 @% |7 q' l( g: V; O$ D. t% O

0 Q& j7 r$ }2 g: c  E) r$ |# y! {    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
, d: U( C8 Y  l3 n9 \1 toccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
1 \' }& Z% C. J% b3 I& R1 Xyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562) Z/ Y: C5 f( T3 K2 g8 n  _+ r
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380- U& T6 p7 o% @0 R
(+13.2%).
% a' k. V0 }* J. L  z$ `
. F6 a  j/ Q* y9 S) k    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
1 t- E4 b5 @+ [3 wduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
4 D; b7 G3 W9 p2 kfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
- U  t% S; L0 ^" O1 O; spoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
, p! |' |0 M7 J; c# v4 S# m( T3 rpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.9 _8 j  j- ]' k1 g+ t9 ~0 q
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
! _7 B' {# |8 S* wwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
$ s, y% e" K. D. G" H; y& Cbalanced market."4 }9 H0 |, a2 g2 N
2 d+ e5 x% ^/ L% |' K
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
; J- ?" j0 w2 r$ ~  }considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift/ k3 G2 w3 n! }
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
: _. L; v7 T. tthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core0 E4 E+ ?3 Q# _6 c1 v
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
& `0 |$ _3 V2 p+ Q& H- B# Pmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record' I) z" I0 w' U9 B1 P
breaking price appreciations.
" s' |  H6 r2 G7 \& i3 }* h# L
0 y2 [( Q2 i  s2 l/ n    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding) {7 b( r0 @3 g8 M
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
0 K, \) S: H/ K' q8 `largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
3 K! Q9 o8 e1 {$ N9 y, S9 u. Y5 H; Y$ }
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
# x( u' c2 X$ b+ Z$ [0 `" x5 }9 Keconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer( A& a: M; X2 D
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
: R+ U: K8 Z: D& d" X, Z! qslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
, R. H* K5 ^0 l% s1 |, z& tIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
) e& E' f7 O; {4 b1 x7 F9 X6 Mgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of7 W5 D& o7 h  n) b# W( l
price appreciation when compared with 2005., T/ M0 J6 C) W  Y3 |  p* N

3 i1 \0 ~. i8 W, P. g    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing' Y& L2 j6 b: Q* A
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
& Z( L3 E) `6 B- U4 \4 W3 O0 `financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada" _- i* s- u2 V: {1 H0 ~* f
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
  ]! q; w6 L1 k
5 |0 j9 {* l6 H) X3 X    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
' @- V9 b8 D& H' K. [9 rAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's- ]$ K' i, q% W! B  g2 C  y% O
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
: j+ f, ~8 C  H* `. Drelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general( j. E+ g1 _9 p$ M* M
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
4 U  y) W1 J2 xdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
1 F0 U4 W7 `1 W& \+ C$ eaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
1 p$ k  ^- `: Q  g: pmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
# p3 p$ M( j1 W2 B6 F7 s! c1 T" ]$ r/ D+ S% h
    <<
1 w7 c* {/ ~$ s1 J( w# U# [                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
2 C1 w4 M& }" \6 X: O: ~: m    >>$ d9 X3 N$ y+ w

- o* l2 t1 n2 F3 r    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in7 ~1 b- Z% j4 s1 c% I! C' d: U
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate3 a- m, g0 ?) C
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time' e& J  ]: S' d' X
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
6 d7 V0 p: l" g( H$ rrenovations.2 f8 [; `. u( r3 C# j2 \
4 H3 X7 x7 M8 L9 J/ p' o% g0 t# _
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight5 E7 T: q5 I: I( Q+ o; [- ^% @% j+ M
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation: T+ |( p1 B- m: t) b$ j' F0 e( D( D
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and' \2 T. @# c/ O- l
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.; P" \/ `4 ]) m: x1 Y+ B

, w9 e7 }# ^" Q' ~9 U: \    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer# n" n2 k% A) g2 K
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the. {" o/ d% X/ _; G( H5 Y3 i2 u  Y
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new( |! k; `1 y6 a/ i' C; E1 [
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
  A' @) k$ l) z8 `, lto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes) Y% Q' k/ ~  P8 B& O
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
0 N) \8 x9 e: \" m" a+ {7 u! M
0 W2 w2 k. N! H/ @( u  y    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
( P! O6 O  `6 g1 w7 b2 O$ @" J; lconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their& @, d) A7 E7 G' {
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
1 E* D# w2 e0 X6 Zwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian( I0 X& L- ~% |6 Y. h
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
' V  d1 u4 D9 l0 y, obuyers with more options when looking for a home.! ?  ^# M( p2 v. b) k: f6 T

' H5 e4 u4 _, \, b3 Y7 s    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly- e) e% v' z3 k& f& d) a
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
7 J  @; [3 O1 p& s4 ipriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
4 ~0 c) g: ?$ S* D$ U, k, E3 k4 xas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
% Z8 d- U7 ~9 b, Lfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.  G: g- M. a$ p/ a, C: z

8 y) G0 q5 _8 A( k+ W    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house3 E/ W+ X9 `6 c
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory0 O, {# H, B$ r; S- X) d$ ^
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting% o5 k: _- Z- Y8 y+ g- k
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,& t" Q; X+ h/ x5 D. |
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the( C) Q6 u4 Y, Z6 I; g
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
8 d; Q1 [# H5 V, A4 B3 Pmaking a purchase.6 G8 |% e$ r  K7 n: y# e. s
6 [/ [. _6 @* G  l
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
3 d9 n& |0 S% h& _. fmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong% [/ p3 U/ ]9 B# U' C
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
% c. f  t! n. U' S8 zcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
: C1 I- f. h2 I. s. o% Rattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown3 ?; a% L( \" p& K, |
amenities.! `( A: H6 I# I+ `9 F9 ]
/ L, C+ Z; J5 |: X! ]2 K
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels1 J; F- p2 D+ N. L: U: R8 x
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand, U; G1 [+ _4 M- R7 Q2 t( Y1 d1 w
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
. d5 M, i3 B: a$ |3 @continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
* m% c! E7 ~6 q2 Q# U, g( k( }% Qdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle9 n" u! J# \" s9 `+ E
residence, rather than for investment.1 K- O3 p% `5 K7 z& ]
' k* p; w& r/ Q
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as; d$ L: e' e$ V
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
) S7 f  z9 f8 F$ hin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
6 k4 N3 C1 q0 [/ Cconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization2 {/ D7 V3 V8 n! j
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
7 f* M( X$ P, I& {6 ]6 ~7 Vthe market.
0 P+ O$ _) R/ c% _8 B6 d4 q1 n+ r( O, a1 f' x- r/ ?. X# u5 U- l3 N
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
" k! l# P; v1 ?' i+ L+ x: I3 N% _July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
; c- L: z1 e5 {. s/ y# G) ^August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring0 V* g* f! ]' d( [; y: s
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due' r$ Q9 U% {. S/ j* r
to the shortage of available inventory.( j, {6 L$ E9 k% X! K0 @( M

. p8 ^; [" `% q9 j! ]2 ~, T1 U' U$ Z) H    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
1 g$ o5 V0 X) \4 o; _momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains& O2 s( Y* P1 Z0 b& C/ W6 O
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
2 n4 v- O! R/ Kstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
. G# q. c( L% Y- [
7 P, ], A4 ]* ~1 @    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases; _  s! N7 T) H0 a7 X
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
8 _8 A# E- @- V' Y. aunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
- w% m% `! |# kpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring9 A. ?& c) y" q7 `+ S
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer* `) ^8 H- p7 r% U4 ^. R  Q
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as8 t; {# i6 A5 l, _: X$ f1 V
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
: K) S! S) `. H, Z8 i8 w9 s" u

/ v! H& N$ V# z* n    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
+ m' k" }* T! g/ ]6 K9 {: r1 Zas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton7 s3 A! F; k2 X3 Q- \
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,9 m& o9 {9 g2 |3 f
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices; q/ J5 s2 M9 ]$ P
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve) P0 V0 j% d* s1 ?0 D0 `
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly. Y& A, d! Q7 F  n
towards the end of 2006.
    ( E3 o- C/ w. @3 J/ Y

4 u! [$ j/ w3 R+ Z8 O5 g4 yWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of, a2 |8 Z/ l0 |8 S3 {/ E7 ?+ p
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable" r& q1 G5 d3 B- |# o# c
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
7 H+ T% m- \3 Cgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to( ]: t8 r4 ]# }9 Z
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added4 i4 D3 \* o  K
pressure on tight inventory levels.
6 w# P# I) G& d9 l" ?, z1 u* I/ {, }
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic5 r' R. v$ H% v- y
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people6 s# |+ g( Z7 A1 u5 x- ~1 ^4 |
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
" M% D2 L' S+ @2 a; {" Bwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching$ n0 i: g0 @' U3 P. G. \) \1 ~
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
4 L1 ~# q" Y1 e! M) f' W) \- `
) L& [8 H9 P$ o" h  L1 a& H! `    <<
0 o# h' `, ]) [      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20065 Z7 j3 T4 z% A$ ]% t% h- _' w

: p) o% C4 {+ g. p    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 o5 M& G8 C' E- k% k, r
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey7 K3 k! r4 l, m
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( ^* F. T1 v! B
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3: l- E: e3 S9 o
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
+ i# @0 G; N9 s! t# a    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- \& M# N8 I7 b( v7 `
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
% o! [# H! g0 Q# P    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 Z& |, y: c) u8 o& t5 G* V    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000; u5 c4 q. f  D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# ^+ ]+ V4 \" h: l8 t! l3 l    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000- m# D. u, k* _7 H- K8 U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 S8 U$ N- P; [* F7 W    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
- }4 D9 g6 b8 ]7 d4 ~/ u5 k, c1 t+ ]5 z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* w7 z% S& G  |7 l  ~; I
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
! ?. T( v4 P3 e$ S' _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 t$ l, N- Q+ Z( G. M0 s
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5831 e; g4 N# g4 r& k9 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 D, k3 V- |6 t
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
4 k+ y) s+ \! Q& h* m' u    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 C* ?% p* V' Y; n% S4 X4 l    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
$ d+ [- `8 j1 T: i1 O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! u( P/ s: J; E. T+ L! j
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
0 p6 X  S1 b  ~( N3 u    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! h) g$ T1 V/ o; k
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707/ m  h$ E9 l( A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 a. z3 U6 Q9 t
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500- f" o) \# B" o/ S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 a7 u+ f* y* n* I" b
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
+ m& A9 s4 w3 Q5 F5 y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 P( ]4 c* M+ m4 t  E    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714' m# S* `) P7 B# s" a
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ o$ z- c( [% F, j2 c. C, {6 \
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
1 Y5 Q6 V& K& p" y8 Y( n1 o+ }  a    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' K  }) z& }' ?, {; e* _    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000" ~$ T1 j5 L* y( X6 @/ }8 w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 J$ t1 b+ a  @2 h: V6 s' F4 d4 b    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
; D  e; g" f* w; E( a    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ K/ n1 _* U! }8 Z; \
7 L; _9 {4 q, t+ M    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ h, ~, r+ Q3 _  M. @0 q' E" F                               Standard Condominium+ C( }7 c' e* ]! n
    -------------------------------------------------------------& i/ m3 [4 F! \+ @3 ]
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
) p; y" b$ v0 M) }( F/ b  A$ E    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
. B$ y/ D3 k; A' @8 M7 f! p6 w, M    -------------------------------------------------------------# Q6 X% q; W6 U+ W  t$ Z* e- S
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
$ a" k! d) I6 A2 Q! Y! t, n    -------------------------------------------------------------
# Z0 a1 U5 \$ Y" j/ r; m    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
4 u, z7 ?' }4 n: r/ f* j2 L    -------------------------------------------------------------! I8 G/ x1 v7 D/ j. {3 B
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A( V* F0 a2 }; J* X& F1 L
    -------------------------------------------------------------- I2 U: _; _3 |( d9 l
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
) r$ a! l( g/ B8 W    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 b. b: y. M! `    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
$ Y- m' `) F+ N7 B    -------------------------------------------------------------  c- _1 Q: z' N* l% a6 {2 r
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%& X; I6 C3 C& D2 f, ]3 v# z
    -------------------------------------------------------------& S/ w0 R8 h: P2 H3 o4 O
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
0 ?9 @7 q) c* j- V! m" F    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 v9 E4 P1 d( |$ u2 A+ g- `    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
  W4 m+ ^0 t; f  c4 e1 g9 |( e    -------------------------------------------------------------
, k! i9 L' @; ], u) @    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%4 @2 H' L' a; v. k) y( Q* u
    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 t. J! r7 k/ F9 P2 j; m/ G/ [    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%$ g* M9 H5 _5 Z! z' d/ Q7 }
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: t/ Z& x' Y: ?3 R$ R    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%% }& O" c; N% d5 l. t
    -------------------------------------------------------------) q6 ]( _# \/ p' n
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
4 ?" |) q2 g+ I1 @$ s    -------------------------------------------------------------
; A! z! C9 R/ G% N( u$ |    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%- |8 \# J+ W+ D1 z/ ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 Y" n! _2 x/ z8 L    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
5 p+ N! Y+ i! G& ?4 S/ K    -------------------------------------------------------------0 n3 A4 r. M; R+ W4 Z/ ?7 I, f% \8 R
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
. x, H- z# a- M3 [, \8 h    -------------------------------------------------------------
; r2 L) d6 R+ ~+ y! D9 u  t# u$ E    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
; H& w& p! i' M( g0 `    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 Q. ?, G+ {9 ?8 b/ z    >>, Y- p$ U0 t% O2 o4 s" `

% F- r# A0 E; A' p" [    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
+ P5 Z; F1 h1 r5 }. f8 zin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
! q, ?* Y8 R' x' T2 s, hJohn and Victoria.
, p3 {8 z0 W7 ]( ^8 O% p; j5 Q+ A# N0 v( E3 }  s7 |
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most# v3 Z2 q' b$ p( p9 c4 o: N
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
3 |! n( \  J) \% P9 a' K. Nhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
- X+ J  Y( M7 `references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
" n; K* h" j  ?' q& etrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
3 y/ Y0 j) H% g4 D4 C7 ~" ^: pacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is( F" B& y! a8 G1 {+ j
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current! Y6 i# S/ @4 j: O9 \4 K$ ?
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
* i' N# ^- q/ r0 A+ C5 L4 [3 X" Hversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
/ m* r) }+ d- @) jNovember 15, 2006.
+ D4 _, X- z+ E, d$ |# W% j, _    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
; z7 \7 |9 x8 m4 K# e. Sfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge' K8 }( [& V1 ?2 X' C: }9 {8 R5 c
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
6 m/ l9 s7 X$ G( \available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-22 03:55 , Processed in 0.135869 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表