 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
/ Z; B1 k7 S& H0 p% t' g, F
$ D& m- T, v9 v- N- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
+ y9 x% U4 ^. A4 _& P1 o' P* W5 \" G7 j# H9 f" p/ p
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market, j) n: c3 M0 s. \& |
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third1 }- h( V6 s+ Q$ t2 S
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic4 K1 x( r8 o; m! ~
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit z4 g" d* Y% g; q6 t& ]
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and3 B9 b! X: W3 t7 ~1 E5 Y% }( l
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,- Y2 x7 v2 p% e# e) U7 r
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal% G: O( X6 d/ ~" Z
LePage Real Estate Services.; a% N% @0 k9 M7 V6 H* m
7 q. F8 ]( ]& D1 E
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
8 }, T$ w& b" J" }are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic* q" k5 Q" x1 c! e; [
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and+ u# G F) J" _9 t
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the9 l$ h' K1 l+ J$ A4 Y4 u( n" R
residential real estate sector.
5 R1 y0 @" [4 R) O$ S4 U7 A$ z1 S5 J+ ]! y* L% Z5 ~: D
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation0 C) ]* Y. g3 D* ], n
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)+ O# G4 g; W8 @1 L' L$ Y
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
, l1 R5 M2 y- q6 A3 z(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
# z" O5 @( `1 z9 o(+13.2%).
% D" a$ c4 h$ y; y! W6 }, z$ z
3 [2 ?7 s0 g9 L. n8 t+ [" j; } "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
& m, q* X& W9 h) X- G; uduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
) I# U: d$ t y j$ n' `; n& ^frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
6 `: P5 S( T7 N9 V* wpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper, @4 a0 I3 T+ A( E
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.8 C" G: l" t2 M( t$ o! Z- @
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We6 @7 W& F+ { F9 z8 Y+ c( [# B
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy8 B5 L- M2 w' L& R
balanced market."2 c1 b: r. Q, j* i& ^& K5 q
, L6 w' C0 n! I9 J1 g+ O- Q# Y( G Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,3 Z* `2 D9 _' L/ ?5 M' p
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift" {- M' V: v0 J$ t3 x6 o
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued9 Q B- N. s {* d/ v
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core" r; g; i/ f! {6 U! u( D
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,2 H I0 J' `& `1 T7 U; O) w$ c( v
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
: q& Y3 L+ Q! G0 P9 B, wbreaking price appreciations.
9 g. w0 W# }! W+ q6 l- p# A- T: m+ M0 v
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding: ?; N/ e0 \2 U% j
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the( W7 i. w9 K# U5 g9 U1 c
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.# X5 W; L; k3 \1 F
. _( s% X W( N
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid7 C- m/ g! }6 C: M( f- P: E- ?+ z
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer" T1 s t$ U9 J. }4 w+ C
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off5 h# ^2 C/ q- P7 v1 N+ f* U9 c
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.+ G0 X. {+ p$ _
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
+ X3 G! X. B% @greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of, x+ c2 J) g( t* m V
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
5 U; F9 r: Y1 z( E9 o& R6 ^5 A# N! ~/ g
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing; V$ t/ p1 S1 w' ?8 Z
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
1 e4 ~6 X4 p0 b# |# i4 A; Wfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada7 x' Y. J3 V- X1 I( A# h3 A
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
* f, N) F' H7 ^0 w- l0 ?. E% J$ m* I( i( \9 c% k
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
, y, L# f) D* q: ~! EAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
0 G2 A$ l- r* u8 f5 C/ bfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
# G7 Z: u$ A6 e! L. j3 q- Zrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
4 C3 u) R8 U5 M( }* G8 p# Qaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the5 D' m/ X9 T# L# Q3 W9 F' A7 a4 k
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and9 U5 A) H q. k6 {5 L! O, w& m! c
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
4 S& M& p& n+ h) }/ N' m6 e4 F6 smortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."; E+ Q* C+ b) T
9 ^- A6 i2 U/ b- m7 u- A
<<7 {6 `9 E% _' b
REGIONAL SUMMARIES; g3 }- ]$ ]( f
>>
0 W% a: t7 B$ s( P! O4 J" _- M5 s( J0 t: i7 G# ?- |3 H( a/ Y- ^+ C# o( Q
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
, B, M0 y* a6 x; _, `Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate7 [% Z& E" }! J; P# W+ e8 G
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time) F- k% r: R9 U( X
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of, a9 t& p U* J: d
renovations.
" U1 P5 ~3 E1 t0 {
+ F/ R- i& z5 e' N7 _0 h# F. c& d The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight7 t9 L+ o# |4 H/ j
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
; z" a/ y, |+ ~* icompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
% m& \- G& a- _9 j% C$ n5 cSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.9 F( \4 k/ T r3 s( i; e" r
5 v+ z W5 t! H. L8 L3 N! n The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer, x3 r6 H0 Z6 m1 C! k2 R* ?
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
2 z/ p4 [0 n0 W0 R' Squarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
) j! j% `( B' Z+ r600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores$ B2 }+ C9 p* r
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes" R+ ]$ D; N3 W8 M% o& P
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.) ]6 P7 v/ k1 k& h+ P B; f% g
. x- b) D3 A4 N2 |7 S In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced* Q7 v9 s) [# Y. H' J
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their, H! A9 V' J1 I+ X: i+ w2 h
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers3 y$ }7 x% c% D
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
, h/ o( p: R% V5 W* Sdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
; E# R9 n! ?: n& |1 Q9 Nbuyers with more options when looking for a home.2 l! R. C0 L' N8 f4 Y
; }; g3 O( l8 H: u5 U6 v Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly/ X# o( R4 }4 @% u8 d
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes. t8 l4 c1 n+ s2 X# C! I- t. s/ ~
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,3 A) p' v; J: s ?
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
+ ]8 Y0 f# d1 ~# R: W" [7 Ifew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.1 |* c# T$ V, w9 m) r2 c' `
& P6 j( X7 [; I7 C2 N1 o Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house& l ]" e% d3 S; M
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory7 r1 W4 N& h) Z! Q. g ?& ]
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting+ ~2 _: ^" ~3 N0 G% F
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
1 b b" Y" e, ]# K3 d, [# iwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the# k' r- J5 l2 i3 Q! g: T
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before8 p; f( g4 z" Q0 t; P& R
making a purchase.
% @+ u% S* g D2 o, {* f4 S
" a& W0 J, s' V8 b/ k$ i- D+ p% u0 t Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing# X# h7 ?6 [2 Y! S
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong6 [: Q" g! Y/ V6 ^) p9 l+ u
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city' H# z( f: @9 f5 O' X( n4 N. Q
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
" Y8 l/ m/ f# A( Rattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown1 b3 }" V, ]1 J
amenities.4 ]" q, T% r# _* b/ i9 O" m& V
" ~) G A7 B0 p, p9 n' B9 [5 t The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
6 |, J4 X$ F& g* t% l5 fthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand# |$ @0 q) u( t0 a, s1 M; c, C
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
% O, _! h( Y* I3 q" T4 A% ?continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been1 r6 U( _; n+ n" Y5 B
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle/ n6 @: u/ O: j+ D k
residence, rather than for investment.
! d" B, q# B+ k* ]1 _6 k) W& M! p& o* Q$ K: r
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as# E7 {6 g+ o- s
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted$ S3 U( B$ K5 |+ Y' \. u$ f* Z6 ?
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer) F& Z, \9 i5 W f1 {' u8 P
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
2 C/ f! ?; H2 @, {. z8 B9 z6 B6 Rrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
6 M, r1 E+ }1 U9 S# U0 }( @8 ~. ]$ Z) vthe market.; I5 y6 w) e) A1 a3 ?- ~& b
0 Q$ L7 U: D2 m, J9 ^6 V5 l
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through, G& D0 D& x! A3 z
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In) T$ A x1 p" {2 l+ H1 o
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring/ R- F" a8 s9 g
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due9 V; J& ^, ~8 k
to the shortage of available inventory.
% X. Z1 k8 w% ^" r# ?3 m/ |6 w
1 ^, J3 [: W; K, Q! \ Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
- j% V& B* t9 j1 \6 c: _) o6 U8 S+ Zmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
, _% b- c# H0 D: x7 \( B/ svibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
- U; Z# v5 A4 b4 E3 T+ W9 O" z1 A" Dstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
5 Y t U" c# ?; O
1 i' O4 @8 r' L7 M" } Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases8 N" K0 V* H5 V! W7 m2 {! ~
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low- T/ d/ q4 u- u) O6 m3 V( z2 Q/ V2 L. b
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
8 `7 F9 c% @' M% G, ^$ j2 tpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
+ c( y$ r$ a2 u' dprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer4 h( T9 E! K3 s- b
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as1 f7 A# Q$ y N
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.: h# R) ^% t( {/ R6 q$ N
( |3 y) B$ @0 o9 m4 N6 o
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
7 l% O- S/ w" \as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton/ P$ `2 u7 s1 x5 m& L. z7 V1 g
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
8 ~# Y- W2 W, k! Omaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
$ i+ Q% D0 H* A- P0 K; @% q ~increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
; O6 p& r/ c' K) _" ^# @in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly( _- V: V: H0 o/ u; P
towards the end of 2006. * v% g8 g: M, r& s1 U0 c
7 L( j1 l0 b5 HWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of3 m. c& w' L% g" [ a( a, p5 a
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable7 p' w r8 z8 j! N1 x' |
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
- ]3 @7 z' u/ L: M! c9 Zgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
' {: L, W; y$ _foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added- y! Z6 Q1 L4 K* k. Y8 W- t9 Q0 J
pressure on tight inventory levels.$ M2 _! v2 Y/ [, Y) W3 l' X
1 }) m! U$ a8 c0 m( C: V9 L- {9 s
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic: J) x/ w. i' L
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people- R0 @8 _( Q; J2 ^2 L8 E' h9 j
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;: F$ ]1 O2 G5 @# R6 ?9 s! U+ T
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
$ Z* h. C, o% x: jfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.) X& l O* W3 d. O; v, I
4 R0 P: u0 {( Y' x0 Q- V7 m <<
' j$ Y% A$ a/ l! \% h" w Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006% o# Z& n& n. g( U% Q
0 J9 g# k# E7 h. e0 U/ X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! i, K0 z) ]" M/ T9 J9 _3 k
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
7 A" g8 ]9 S7 [/ G9 n -------------------------------------------------------------------------' U2 c5 @+ o6 ?9 J; `7 D, C" x
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
( Y0 s6 E5 w% L1 P/ P5 G$ g Market Average Average % Change Average Average
$ }( |0 g; \* J: |$ p -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# ~1 P P' i( E3 Y! y Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
+ M' I) Y. q4 D0 Z& B" \; G- ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------# Q& w5 C+ q/ Y9 G. J
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0001 D1 [) x4 k/ n5 R. T& M! t2 M7 j. u8 u
------------------------------------------------------------------------- _' S0 K9 }1 c, F9 `
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000( R- @- y& z8 w9 C& i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# v, a3 d: ^3 y- j Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
* E- c+ Q8 ~* O" N -------------------------------------------------------------------------; D8 m/ d( ~5 c7 S
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
$ z* d+ B2 a( m) a -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) m. }; \" q. B0 x Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
( [. A, C( b9 N4 b -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 l3 W; q8 @) N6 x Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185; K" K& v/ Q0 U( s! z2 c) ~
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 W; {$ x2 K( P e) X. c! f+ }" {
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
0 ^" o. b" Q* s$ C -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: ]# {' v% e: S; l Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
* G2 U7 H* T% F+ W2 Z1 C- O l9 P1 R -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 g' L& D9 L5 t9 O" \# J Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
* u, X0 |0 ^, Z1 V* }: R, y% g* w- { -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ D. c+ M. V. V( _3 B
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5001 u. f2 d, Y x7 \! L6 A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% }8 X. k. W3 |
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389$ Y& g5 h M) v' p4 O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 c" t0 K1 S$ k% H V& W0 k
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
4 c4 z/ I/ w7 @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 Z) f1 o* m) ? ~) J$ [
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
6 f9 L2 v6 z: F) ~3 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ [7 D. g. E& P5 J6 n
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000' p! o6 ~, w P; f0 R0 W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. ^" o% V6 \' ?9 T5 [# N
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8609 c. |( @$ X1 @. f' { v9 r: |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 |! M* w ?% f9 [) l
5 b" { _8 B" T( y -------------------------------------------------------------
0 u$ z( T* ^% @. k; y4 j Standard Condominium" J( u! Y0 D0 e7 I$ X
-------------------------------------------------------------1 _0 w1 Z, Y+ V% c
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo* ]& ~1 ?" B% ^9 s
Market % Change Average Average % Change
8 U0 E1 H1 Z4 u! Z# V1 p -------------------------------------------------------------$ A! _3 h6 x5 b
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%- {1 l( m4 j7 `& Y" N: J4 C$ K( C, G
-------------------------------------------------------------/ Z+ M# {# N8 w/ r* e
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
' \ f0 v7 k% ?, |! ~ -------------------------------------------------------------4 F+ C' [) z7 [" `' L
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
# }" h& F: m2 H -------------------------------------------------------------
5 _1 |9 K/ p |) I H Saint John N/A - - N/A- N; C* W L: U( \' A
-------------------------------------------------------------2 V8 O1 ~2 m, V/ C6 D n
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
W/ t; V5 y/ X. N% Z5 O -------------------------------------------------------------
1 F2 l' \" Z- j) i2 k1 @ Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%/ W5 N) Q* @4 J& x5 z
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 e8 O( b5 l& v3 {2 U8 Y& X Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%% P: p+ {" W& [2 _
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 H0 {6 B9 ]7 G7 T8 W$ K Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%9 g) y6 u+ {" J4 `
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 x1 {! b: M% b1 |) T) ]* W Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%- V6 Z6 B: \6 S' C; C( P: h
-------------------------------------------------------------1 ?8 r" V+ C, t/ |, G
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
; c+ n; d9 d7 v% G -------------------------------------------------------------+ y4 l |4 l3 f: t- U) z- G
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%* |6 e$ i/ V+ }' B0 |# u
-------------------------------------------------------------% T( {1 i# a ^( {
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
' N6 {6 {7 y0 ^* V -------------------------------------------------------------/ i, d. |6 e2 v7 c$ O
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%3 c3 v7 |4 a$ O; s8 O* `
-------------------------------------------------------------
# v+ e% y" d; Q s Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%8 m# }" `' N4 m
-------------------------------------------------------------) H4 N. v7 y* ? W+ H; Z; D
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
/ s# l' S" S* E2 t( w$ f6 ]% g4 v) x3 g# O7 Z -------------------------------------------------------------
. y4 J" o: O9 t$ Y! G National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%! @+ N! Q4 `$ B6 ~% O% Z
-------------------------------------------------------------, b- {, [' s4 g8 @
>>
' D! |4 p2 H% `) t. a# i2 B1 d/ g$ O5 S$ G) a; l
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
, |- b/ u6 M% S( win the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
' `; H1 S* W) _$ I! e3 WJohn and Victoria.2 d: Y0 Z2 p6 m W
% f9 s5 k+ t# i& B& | ]
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most! q$ y, d( \6 o$ h, g
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of& T; L- O$ C) g- m# A: C8 M
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release% X9 t- P) W) t8 r/ U
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price7 ~7 F4 Y& }8 y. t* `7 W
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
1 r% E2 u1 L" n6 Bacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is" T% i; z: O9 u3 `2 ?5 L9 v
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current/ t5 p- n, }$ ^% G: t1 e
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable* K* W4 u _. ]/ d* R. \
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on: p0 {& U1 H$ Y# ~: c4 U3 I
November 15, 2006.
! C$ W) w+ V0 ] b3 ^ Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of* S, N6 v0 X B/ H2 P
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge+ J1 T6 Z7 k+ I- F5 w/ u: ^0 |
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
9 B0 h/ j6 Z3 ]! e9 uavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|