埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2175|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 5 D" W, _' G4 T7 E+ [8 f2 j  n0 o
* V5 O* {6 @2 ?$ V9 }( s& p3 W
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -0 g6 ?8 M; j% h' [; `( b; _! R' G/ b& N
1 c! Q8 g7 J1 s/ n2 `: P$ ~
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market6 k. M1 d  A- D% g% O
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third- N3 K+ B+ Y( r3 U
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
1 L% d4 y: K, _, e- T' Tin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
. N/ a7 C  C- _/ g& p) jprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
. k$ E6 m3 p: z7 J7 Jmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,! t7 Q0 e7 Q0 E2 T* e% v
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal& b5 h. i. k1 f
LePage Real Estate Services.7 g: L+ T4 f3 l4 P

' [6 y  i7 u* i: o) r6 S) b3 h    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters. Q/ \6 i; `& M. [& E
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
4 M+ f9 i% y, B: ?4 |conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and) J- Z7 K2 U/ {% L. w* q/ q: j) g
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the( K, V1 i8 z4 r# I( L$ m
residential real estate sector.$ @$ j& x8 t8 Y9 J# ^

0 Q% z& a4 ^- T    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation, f. N) l/ j- F9 M; P3 d' D. _. w
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%), w7 p6 ]* J: q" }" B5 U
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562( J+ a$ I& h; r' L  \- T3 N
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380% k" L! P$ V8 \6 Z
(+13.2%).
: \" `( O2 V, O4 q) a& [$ z3 r+ v; c: d: Y; \* A. W$ q
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth: b* u% i0 l: V; z  S3 H
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the  L- K) J" W( T! J' O  `( P
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are! t. O) y% F4 v' y3 u
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,( a; d/ j' ^' S$ `  c# c8 J" q
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
3 U7 v% p0 n: ^9 [8 |"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
- n# ~; _4 B+ E( A! H* M5 Lwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy# `" L$ r( k" _+ j8 m
balanced market."
. d: A( G& K5 b2 }& g2 g# \+ y& v; w+ r/ Q6 x
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
4 _; m5 s2 B0 Y7 s" q: H& cconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
; m, ~# a5 J* V9 yto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
' R8 u$ ?! E3 z- x* y0 Tthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core  D- D7 P0 M- O! o, w' }
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
8 q3 o) b! S5 {& wmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record, K$ a5 L2 m: A/ v
breaking price appreciations.6 b: y$ ~8 Z7 {( Z. p2 z

9 {0 \7 {0 b  y. j: f( |    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding; n. f* k8 ^6 c
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the. i+ R0 _$ j( K, g$ Q
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.! R/ M1 ]# f7 c: k" P9 t+ B, V

6 J: M# `+ C& s& W    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid6 W2 b0 x% e6 N0 B1 [# O% Z
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
3 O/ [  L2 m/ m  k) H0 |$ _confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
8 g7 Z1 A' D5 ~slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
! K1 O$ l% m0 f6 Y: m, {In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
! \& F5 w0 l1 Fgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
/ h! o4 k4 f  Z5 F# A8 C" x) x: uprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
$ g6 G& ^+ w. y. Z  c1 Y4 V* A* N1 ~
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing. v2 ~$ l! ?' j) I
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and, c, n( m6 j8 a; g8 p+ ?
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
9 U% b/ u$ _" \" Q7 n4 B! `are markedly different than those found in the United States.
7 a3 s4 {, A' L; u2 f4 u: o5 ?& N/ L6 N4 Q0 ~
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the; u  c$ M8 D, k7 ?8 Y
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's6 b  f3 R* D* {5 M) T
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the/ t: A# i2 Z! S! V* ^. M# I
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
1 O2 P4 Z4 V3 @8 d  g; [affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the. g1 {" u6 F% ~& |- c
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and* v/ m( s8 ]7 B/ T( ]
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization+ `( _" H  [# c+ h% \9 q, a. g
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."# c7 F7 j/ P0 X; c& J

! F2 m( d/ ], K% k* u) Q    <<
* F. f- {/ `: u# R  p                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
% N4 K; \( j+ R    >>
1 J( e' y' n2 `/ M( F+ p4 a8 W; W, v( h+ m- e1 d; r
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in" i' \* @) h& @5 o5 r* `& m
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate) h( K3 j# \. D- \4 |
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time; H* H" A, V3 B1 @
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
  F& m" j  _' H  K! Z  V, nrenovations.% v9 \8 E! _6 |8 s) C2 O8 ~

; j, P! I: O2 `* Q4 ^4 @    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight, o( V& n; b1 Z7 j5 {
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation- M4 z1 t$ ^2 H/ e7 b; O
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
. E5 ^  f! Y% W5 r  U" c. |  GSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
! @1 s0 p1 ?* d, m" m! ?9 B  y9 w# L: ~7 g
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
( M. y- L) C6 ]9 t* E9 ^7 vslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the$ Y9 ^; r  _$ H8 K5 Z1 I2 y# S
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
, |" ?* [0 L3 P* t4 Q" x# E. o600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
1 i5 `( |/ o' hto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes  l: ~- |6 H; F8 e
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.) y% e# k# ?2 t2 |1 e& I8 w" C$ m9 F
( u. p/ y( ^0 d# I' f$ e9 |2 S2 x
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced5 e  B( q( N: q# x) [% g$ }
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
5 G9 x. {0 v3 Ohomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
$ ]7 M0 M" f6 i2 L( P% p. ~" swas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
3 n  j4 `3 T: i0 G9 E4 F! bdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
0 O: ^# N$ V2 b7 J; X# S8 P4 f; pbuyers with more options when looking for a home.3 o* u3 x8 t! v
  o3 u1 J2 w" S( f" C5 y, J
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
3 q+ Y. i7 z; H; |$ S+ lamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes& H4 E8 x# @6 d' u
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
) O9 u7 M* o  {5 ~0 t* E7 ?! v: ias some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last) w" i, M5 T1 c/ e# {
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
6 r4 m% D! p. ?0 q3 C& u) F1 d  q3 h
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house9 G2 A2 m" c  x! c/ X) q
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory! N8 J$ }% G% W# e3 F
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting& H3 O( C- V* x, z; v
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
# c5 Z- n0 |9 J* C1 ^when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
4 I' x+ l' @, Jpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
' V5 Z3 f0 ~' B, G0 _: ~: S. z3 I" ^making a purchase.5 @2 q, }/ U! n

/ h& O* `% Z3 ~% |    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
3 M0 k% t7 O6 g8 K# Y6 p2 E  ]. bmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong- i7 A9 S0 T2 z" y
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
3 b( M( ]* S7 scentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
" N7 ~/ ?6 h; Q6 b6 d! w& M, j4 Gattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown7 W6 e) @& ?$ }# C
amenities.
. |/ V( p/ j6 I; t6 h8 ^" l- y! k5 s, \) @+ i0 ?$ u" H
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels" A+ @% f0 n! c" a( ?9 j5 `! ]
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand* }# a  R; A5 g/ f- ]5 F5 `
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has8 i+ g) [1 G% [5 G1 R( ]" L: X
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been5 \  A7 G2 v) l5 a. i2 K
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle: W& t3 c3 I( R% N
residence, rather than for investment.
. R: `4 f0 Q6 Y  d6 j* e! ?5 R8 C! B3 t* n! H1 _6 i9 X
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
% _3 S: k& M+ Y, ]3 T) mhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
6 W  m, M* @3 d/ hin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
8 k  Z+ X5 N( _1 C: {3 x9 Nconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization" a$ j4 F% R1 b8 T
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
& f$ M! t7 {" @the market.* \" X+ d) C- Y6 w/ @; O$ L* N5 i
1 A# {0 P8 m2 L, E: A. \5 _
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through& J6 {6 i/ p3 @" i2 l1 u: p
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
' w% a9 U8 E. gAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring# E+ Q( H2 Y/ p4 M3 g. F$ G. g
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
: f$ I+ ]4 ^5 [- t# W: Gto the shortage of available inventory.
$ R. X- Q6 `1 f
6 p% }% `6 p; V  q+ r, p4 S2 z    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its! f- e) t1 Q) @. S5 t" Y4 D
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains  g! }9 k5 Q/ U1 x$ O) k% n' `5 @, C
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses& N8 L1 w8 H) M9 x4 p; g+ t7 W
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.; e- q1 M7 D5 c9 p, T2 l# T, E
3 k0 z  b3 \0 ^+ g
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases; p6 a" W% X, K' R# }
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
8 l0 E! z) Q9 T6 h$ nunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
8 E/ _1 ]' C  Lpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
% y1 q# x+ ]: M! y9 a8 qprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer; [2 q8 H) \2 k
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
# Z' D1 a/ l+ G2 h' d/ N7 S+ Zbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

/ q1 B% D& N, p2 H1 ?' \4 b4 c  Q8 W, U" Y3 h) [& h
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
" e/ V1 G( E9 C$ d9 P: V7 Has activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
. j9 q  t; [7 b2 a  cremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
$ I: N  T: ?, _4 S" Cmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices: c* H4 y' W5 X3 x' O' ?
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve, y; G0 I! E# D
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly1 T- [* D, p. q4 X( L1 @
towards the end of 2006.
    / V: E2 L8 h8 d/ r, Z8 l
/ D4 b. ^4 m/ V
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of4 p9 X3 W) V" U
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
( u& i/ y: k7 b  W. Oto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse( d& r: G" |1 D, a
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
. G* y. v& O$ r! W) }" m8 p% rforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added1 T' q& |; ~& `5 r
pressure on tight inventory levels.# ~0 N; W( a9 `

7 v  }, b, p$ K& [    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
+ F" }. ]  }2 E( Zfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
1 g" P: }3 E4 u, B, V  Winto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;: G( H: b. S9 }) b% X* d) H8 u. {- j
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
) X2 a$ p$ g8 u5 O- j2 Ffor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
5 Q2 j) ]2 z$ q
; l1 y! M: m; m3 Q/ P    <<
  f+ d, G2 ?7 d+ J2 z  g7 n/ Y      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
1 D4 b6 h$ z: v5 u$ P6 a9 [; L$ k# n% ^8 w6 \: [: I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 r  n* d1 O7 z: l3 }: @
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
- _1 D8 ^2 U. f  B+ O5 Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 I% n4 h+ g7 o' e+ \" ^
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3# F) x0 v  k5 l, R# T
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
0 H" ]8 n; _+ _  A+ L" u# ?" ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: H: s8 N+ L$ L$ J
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
& g4 A  C- z; ~" K  x( R+ ?5 W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 f& R: m& o/ P0 ^4 f& l/ z    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000/ N, o6 z5 _! T% D# i6 ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" p8 X6 I# {7 g+ X    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000' L1 E4 r# i% L6 r& N8 D  n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 m' l3 @6 L% o: [- l
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
( r0 \4 f6 s% p0 H* Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( ]- i4 C8 b* R    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
+ F# c8 o; c; ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& {7 p( r1 i" a2 ]7 P. V& D    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
( }5 y6 L7 [4 P; i+ m3 N. ~. h; q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 N( \. _4 }5 G% `5 ?, G+ [" i8 @$ r
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
- B( F: K) U1 b; [    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* [7 {; x7 n# }% l
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
, u" B, T5 J7 m- C" u, Q7 T& ?3 _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( v0 W- f+ e3 {/ P* o& J    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766* k2 ?: K2 N: d; b! |' C; y, p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' W! U! U5 Y3 N  G/ U7 I    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707! i$ [8 t/ j$ ~2 {, q+ }- b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ @9 X7 V, q# W6 o3 i
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
2 |' B4 f1 f  n8 k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 m! t2 d/ u$ y0 X/ l    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,3890 [" l* Z5 z' W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' T2 b  r! f2 d8 C/ C* b; t    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
9 r  y9 f& M+ D+ g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 t+ W- N8 J8 A( o* i& K. \$ }    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
8 r. ^# l) a$ w9 d) P1 Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 |* N4 }* I9 A. @: }4 R( q% x
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0002 c6 R4 }; L5 M- n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' n( r3 Y& b, I# W/ X
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860  Z% m5 X$ T( ~5 ?, C- b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! U- D  @) ?- o0 M6 Z) Y# U; ]5 \
  b1 [: {0 [$ i  l
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" [& @6 o! r( @, ?; Y# o0 u& b; {" {                               Standard Condominium, T0 v+ P& @* v/ H9 N
    -------------------------------------------------------------1 q$ U5 L- E: c4 L# ~. E2 O6 p  z5 L
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo2 a5 n: v' P  Z: D
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
( A" A# c7 v: G+ \" Z. k" X/ g3 F5 ~; }    -------------------------------------------------------------9 R( c* k, E) _* d* z% n
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
+ D/ r( P# L8 _2 s, E. M4 c    -------------------------------------------------------------
' u  C# G2 c& ]% J5 y, x' R4 P    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%  n6 g8 V: \# M2 }% z1 j# m
    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 J4 [5 L/ m1 R0 h& s    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
0 D1 k8 A  m) q& B; I& h    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 x9 F6 |. b# j3 d6 K; ]; \5 [% ^    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A- `+ F# Y3 H/ g8 v3 J- v
    -------------------------------------------------------------8 h' Q7 _  _# j& E( I
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%7 m1 ?* ~+ ?4 D
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 f+ A( `8 F- M3 `    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%$ ?, X1 ?8 X( S& ^( Y5 S
    -------------------------------------------------------------6 ]' s! q; G  i2 @  q4 F3 i
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%8 q1 t& q0 Z+ T" M/ @- O) a+ A
    -------------------------------------------------------------  s% }* G+ {/ @% G9 a- t5 r
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%! r5 ]* K! C8 H3 z$ G8 f; g
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 _$ d1 r/ A; N6 X    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%; A# M: e2 h7 [6 d
    -------------------------------------------------------------- c& ?2 D. P$ y1 O) i6 U. m- w; ~
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%9 N6 ^, v- }0 o1 y* @) d
    -------------------------------------------------------------  ]1 W& E3 x% u9 ~
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%4 D4 W) [1 s6 b, i; k, v
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& e1 N+ s+ B! z5 B5 |, y2 W5 M    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
, \$ r! a/ I  V" S    -------------------------------------------------------------
- d' r1 t6 c. Q    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%. e8 h) y% q+ [9 i2 l, `
    -------------------------------------------------------------  L0 b+ r6 T3 J5 a3 K
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
8 n2 q1 O7 `# K( ^5 E    -------------------------------------------------------------. Y) \. i) K  i. b
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%6 r5 ?1 ^; J2 i3 G7 g2 P' ^; {
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# ]3 U4 Z1 I" h& A& P$ Z% W    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
; |: K& \3 o) C5 y    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 }, y5 G! ~& U1 k5 ^    >>/ }! y6 z: [! L3 W/ M  t) m# h3 L
6 i4 f% Q- c* ~/ J* I8 y
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
6 _0 N2 h# B6 F6 ein the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
& T# a; {3 _0 CJohn and Victoria.; Y- c+ u2 P2 H4 V/ K4 z& S
' }( E. Y+ r  N% z8 h
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most! e) E1 B5 f5 W7 m% E6 l! d8 L
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of& o! F% O2 m- z; {8 ^
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
- M1 {* K( ]0 n7 r6 rreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price9 C- s" n/ }) F! P. H( b2 V
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities+ Q) ?4 ~7 A8 Z' L5 H$ r/ L* I. K
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is  w8 H. ]3 Y) t/ U, K9 q$ Q
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
" f( h; }! O& {4 ?3 Qfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable, j+ z+ @2 d" B3 u6 U% Q4 S# o
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on3 h# ~$ k6 w  X
November 15, 2006.: ~2 H* w, }- W8 i  R
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of9 s3 Y: H" C+ N0 t. _
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge6 S" ]$ }# N/ n7 s
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
; A: i8 x! S8 |8 Y" p+ b: mavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-14 14:37 , Processed in 0.270324 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表