 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable / `" m7 _3 x3 l8 O3 C' U
" o: Z/ a$ @% M( E% X. j
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -8 @. L1 u' m+ q, I6 C' B/ }# K
. m) w! S: c/ V3 T8 s
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
# g% P& i+ A L- `3 f9 B/ w4 Uexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third# h5 W! y8 u, U/ V- f# ^4 t
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
2 r7 A& K/ l% i; N3 h$ ]+ vin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
9 f0 j& \' V3 Q7 D& X" [/ X9 Oprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and$ C# {- O6 {1 T; m* X
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
9 G2 L& o6 {) }Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal. v3 q, P) N3 {7 _2 J( s
LePage Real Estate Services.
2 ^. A( L! u8 j! u
( d3 C, g J. _/ F Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
0 q, l! V. x+ I$ T) A" d4 @7 eare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
7 `3 Z, a" t! U* N$ yconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and- G7 F V$ K! A9 w
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
/ x) {" D8 f& |# J$ A$ l) qresidential real estate sector.
3 c% C5 t0 c" q1 ?, s$ r# k% n5 d: U4 x1 n/ u
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation# p6 c- `3 ~" j$ C% y' x
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)$ e6 g' \8 ]9 W! E# w, ^/ k3 a
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5620 t9 ~; h- N1 D2 r+ r2 ~
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
% S4 Z2 X" o" b b6 t( m: t(+13.2%).
+ I- w& K9 [7 i" \# h n! p) ], @' M
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth! @9 i/ }7 S- U) k( E+ Y: a& m4 K
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the+ M6 p' I* ?* @3 R4 U" k
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
& t9 w! r. Z: w* Vpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
' o# ^5 b& S3 T) l; x7 |, ypresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
4 a$ X% R- s" H: O. S3 A2 {"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
8 f8 l! a! k4 ~; ?5 I2 Y% A* O+ jwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy- f |4 x$ g& D# U; a/ v' }
balanced market."
, d+ F# H6 v( F$ ?7 w3 x8 \! K- b2 |) X; k, K9 ^- r9 N. V: ?5 o9 C8 K
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
+ S. Z; P" Y! e1 C, r6 P3 d2 v' k- y8 Uconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
& y3 A, `1 K" {& ]2 n+ I6 vto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
' s) L. N! P8 Q- D- othroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core2 M6 y$ w3 m1 j6 D! N4 R
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
1 z" z) t" }% a. imanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
8 q X4 V' s& U6 ?2 m: B; _breaking price appreciations.
W8 \% O6 X2 Y# g4 [
, u) n* v7 C/ e3 F( Y. k% j" } Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
% B3 v6 g5 r: R0 j( oeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the! a1 N0 _* N% `0 o& x5 W
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.* N8 d4 d- n4 |8 x; p# V4 z
0 [3 ^! y+ n9 @1 y' z# c In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid+ [# D( S2 d: L, o! @2 M3 i1 B
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer# o8 k8 S! n. ]7 A# Q
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
2 Z! D; M/ t. q6 T1 M3 x) t- tslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
1 r( v2 I( J0 E, e8 {In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
2 q4 y" n5 |0 Y1 H$ agreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of, P: M" D2 \1 f& a2 h6 G
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
7 x' [5 F% T% B& b6 Q0 X: @
; a* F i% } w0 M5 n8 @! j3 ^: } While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing( j8 D- K% ^% r" u0 ?1 I. d/ n: M
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and" ]' f2 k7 L3 b) L5 v# E
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada) D/ [6 D# F$ H. d+ h
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
8 r5 j4 R- d' m8 l) Z% K$ J& S- F' t. J( T) E2 C( z
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the) s3 p/ _! u5 ~% x5 q" ]
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
. P& b# E4 Q! P% {favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
. j5 F- q F0 j1 {( q2 f5 trelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general$ Y+ u: P+ R; n- ] P3 k
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the* r9 O; X7 C( l6 Z: O' |" C$ K
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
6 N4 W1 b' b" t# Q' ^aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization) ~, y) J/ _3 x, ?; |, V$ d' o
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
& y Z- p2 M2 j$ y( L8 W# X8 R" }* t6 l, f0 y. O
<<
. k. f$ h& {& \; d, A REGIONAL SUMMARIES. n& h+ h. Q, h. J# e
>>
# ?0 }- H* M$ A& P7 K0 l, y( N% Q" b$ G
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in4 x/ q0 ^: w& K7 n% G ~/ P
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
& s" ?1 `( x( I/ Zof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time! Z9 h$ s( w. S/ n7 L2 s. f) d
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
) H% T& W$ |- E: Wrenovations.1 ]; h8 L' q/ h1 j- h& e( Q) ?
( h H" g; a# F9 B) W& @
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight" ? Q8 [9 }3 e; R
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
: _$ p& V9 m' w- M1 G* Ncompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
- K; M4 _% o, T/ ^" J' W4 P# aSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.3 U1 ~, B. m4 ]* a- x6 U2 H
! W5 k( r2 n) a The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer- s# x6 @' C* c& [- L O) {
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the% M: e! f; {4 N/ A' F9 t
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
! e" A1 {4 { e1 f2 e600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
8 l6 ^" T" h3 f+ R% U/ d- g/ ]to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes7 N, ~) Y, L# T9 ?; B; L) k
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
- I2 n6 P! e- g& v; ^, v a5 a9 i! K
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
6 q4 E4 Q& E& ~, a6 aconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their7 t0 ?9 _* p1 z& f
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
7 ?3 K/ r& E/ _5 z, }9 cwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
' o2 m$ L; a* t9 ~6 Ndollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing; i$ O( J g0 s
buyers with more options when looking for a home.7 G% Y5 p" U' w; Q; l- V
- p/ d1 B. g5 t8 |9 Q
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
8 H7 U6 i9 `! t$ y, [( o/ `among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes0 ?% \4 Y- r" U9 v. ^; g- H
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
* T* u& e5 O: z8 R, P4 ]2 Pas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
" |/ }. ]8 G7 F2 `- ?few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.3 t0 n D9 A7 E* |) W$ l7 a+ [, _
$ z. V) c0 {1 l Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house9 L- J/ o) e/ _
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
: _9 |% Z8 B) ?: ylevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting- U2 f4 L! {& Z- V) Q# p
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1, p) h; Y/ u* X5 H6 A
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the9 L0 m' B: p' ~4 z) x
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
8 ?/ v3 f; u3 e+ j6 x. M9 r' N: dmaking a purchase.
- h' A# z5 H0 i/ y" d3 d2 o) X. t( q: {6 y
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing; g! p& f( O; d
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong4 M/ h. m/ j. A3 y- J, G9 A
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city2 D0 Z& N% D) L* i! r c( y
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
6 o; u* j8 k: y* B [8 |: h yattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown! s% T; M/ I; A$ z
amenities.) C" ~0 G/ q6 S/ \. D: E5 _
8 B6 n! M. H( h3 O0 {0 @
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels; A) H# Q- P. l7 h t5 i
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand3 J( T+ @% A+ ]5 h& g& f' Z
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has4 I. T2 Q6 E6 l( O0 P" E6 V
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
6 b, k9 v4 N. F: c# g4 Q. M) a) sdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle3 h2 |. W8 ~0 a5 k0 K2 P/ o% g6 g
residence, rather than for investment.
# K- F U$ v5 l1 n. a* s( o
" ^2 K5 W8 b$ L l2 t2 H The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as+ G: r0 v2 \- ]; t3 u$ M6 R
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
! |8 E! b, v# D+ Rin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer J P6 ^' e% ]2 O" g5 l: N
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization% I, @# @7 A' G6 P* ^% S+ t+ B" `
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter- p) g% p: B# [+ s0 A0 n
the market.
! d+ N) T9 @% Z9 s! c
t( |0 j7 T, @$ k9 m In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
6 U1 s% d' i: O/ SJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
3 _- g. E! U6 L- b" ~9 EAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
2 Z- f5 M$ v+ V0 R7 u3 Nmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due1 G$ N( Q8 s" o& g. @
to the shortage of available inventory.
/ f( p9 L; s+ \5 j2 P0 D: o
% v2 X, J* H6 `( { Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
2 a/ H1 A. {; N# q* Z- Cmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains. F- A- k# d* ~# K" w
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses3 m& T! D% a1 U+ |
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
$ [5 i3 c% I' z R* h7 |! F
& A( `: u' S$ a, S Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
, x3 L4 F" f3 ^" P: n! R3 Uin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low! B- w3 y" C( }5 C
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
" R6 g- [8 ]5 w# |5 {( kpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
- i' O/ z: k/ n9 g7 gprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
& |$ \6 h& d/ O7 `season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
5 @, e1 i) j! z" R0 Zbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.4 d7 t4 j. x& F# Y. v6 W W* j9 W6 Q" T
! \8 @' B4 y( k; ?1 t
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
+ Q* t- z$ Z0 {7 J! b& k$ @* Qas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
# [2 R" U( c. R) f l& cremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,* j: X8 _8 [7 x% Z8 n9 a
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
) W5 `6 R0 i6 n. m) g8 m( a8 \increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
7 z0 J9 e9 X) V. X. Zin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
$ K" x! n: P3 p( |6 ]towards the end of 2006.
/ i# s8 ~5 F% [: M1 }+ @) [
) R0 _# b& `1 f$ R. a% X! a) i" PWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of8 ~9 z5 f( ] p3 F* W# I8 w" v
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable O' A0 T" O3 j
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
- [; j1 F0 B" Q9 R; l& A. J% Vgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
, B) D; g- o/ {3 q" _7 [1 N9 Z% O1 tforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added! s; e! o+ m2 I1 L2 D
pressure on tight inventory levels.5 k7 U; t$ Z, b* D
& P. H( w$ m6 R' Y* u
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic: v- m2 U5 W# s9 Y
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people' b: T* r2 L a
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
0 A) {) ^0 r U' `+ E1 ^2 h+ kwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
; g9 y! l4 n, u' x. Pfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.: Q2 u: O4 ^! d
* K8 Z7 S9 w1 q4 ^/ N% j
<<
% Q7 K; k# L& y! h Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
( K4 M+ l. b5 b" `' c' T1 Y( z
7 j* p2 l( S# Z/ w U! \8 B% M -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& x- k, R0 u6 O+ ^2 M# Y Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey* H- s$ f1 ~8 K( d" ~: e% V9 T0 w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; z: K+ U' V7 I/ D, n& v 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
; o9 @7 P8 |/ h; o8 X. D Market Average Average % Change Average Average, E5 h3 K5 x9 S E' P) {% i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 T; W+ U% v8 T Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000! Q2 T3 L; H' h. K7 `. R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' o# {8 {8 E% h& L5 A3 h! F Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0007 `7 t. X; m. S/ i* D& i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 ], t0 N& L |5 s# H. a Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
# q3 R$ f' R) L% g -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, t# L+ b) Q3 v$ N' Z1 F) z Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
! s( R9 f- l8 W; E/ R% F: t -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* d& ]& ^8 e& V6 P' p# K( m$ [; ? St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
! ~: d) J+ r5 E5 p9 v, [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------: E a/ k6 G" }0 o( c! ]( i
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
$ d6 w' T" m; c+ S- v! F( ~9 l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 X, x. @8 Y% W6 D" R Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185& u- ~ X7 E) }$ o( y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! S& \$ ?4 P0 {0 J
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250 Y$ v' p4 _) A+ G( ^$ G% l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* @) k1 l" ~' w9 M" ? Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
- M1 g/ W R+ h Q! }$ P4 D ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' E% }- |9 Y8 v" R' F Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
0 u$ ~. L4 v# G2 {1 @7 ]# n1 M. | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: W- ?" I0 o) I% Z" L' ] Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500% j- U; N9 R' t! R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# s. `" `7 T3 S1 M8 R6 t Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389+ L1 r3 m; f* v0 r1 M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, _6 V% q. `- Y, X) T. K2 {1 s/ `
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714. p8 H1 a! q8 t" x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 a* w7 f$ q) d& I: [ Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5009 C/ `6 {. Q1 G. ^# Y) p& g& d6 K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, B5 r; U- I% b/ a9 [* H
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0007 E& R4 S5 ^$ {; O' G' X; \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------3 J& R% ^; M2 P- Q6 H ?9 d
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
9 C; j' f" v8 g3 V; D# Z( S& W ------------------------------------------------------------------------- q+ J- [' X! Z7 J% H
# a+ k* |8 O8 ^$ U/ z0 y$ T: s -------------------------------------------------------------& F0 P7 ?7 @/ T2 U9 [
Standard Condominium, n$ T: ^; @# }: y# E/ s/ q* x
-------------------------------------------------------------, a# ^1 S6 k4 K; ^3 L
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
* h# E. S9 e) Z" g* I$ T* G Market % Change Average Average % Change9 w# {- w' E( S+ z5 ?5 U
-------------------------------------------------------------( Z+ B! y: G T( e, {2 r
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
& k+ X2 S$ W5 Y6 w. m -------------------------------------------------------------
' B( `0 W3 q+ r! O0 X Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
0 q o ^+ V7 b, N -------------------------------------------------------------7 K; B7 L2 J7 y
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A ]3 Y: x: h: o' I7 g' h
-------------------------------------------------------------+ O) c9 q! w- z( }: n' j
Saint John N/A - - N/A
# j, F9 ~: }: u: Y u -------------------------------------------------------------$ S8 b2 F( ?' B1 T Z
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
5 H& M1 }/ { ^6 r -------------------------------------------------------------7 q& C* O" a( G6 A% d* y' j
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%! J6 |9 {( g( I& {. ~
-------------------------------------------------------------
I9 ^, Y' f8 _1 @# d' N$ R: } Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
, w; h" _' Z6 Y, W -------------------------------------------------------------% [/ U, R2 E! f; E- X" c
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%3 r- ]- U: j. a5 X9 m9 W
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 o. ?/ W9 @: }7 G* c, a( O Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%. u* I$ A+ i7 M' W# c# E( @6 |
-------------------------------------------------------------4 S" M5 q, _- ]9 Q# K) K0 f( ]$ O, N: u
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
$ ]. J' X* a( G3 a -------------------------------------------------------------3 l# g9 ^+ Z5 B( q. d+ c# g( @" o
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
, t# w; x+ d: r8 S -------------------------------------------------------------5 @3 ?6 @8 C- v
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
- B5 c/ g# ^1 y9 } -------------------------------------------------------------
" t' u3 ~+ |. ~3 o Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%$ V# [& C1 G6 V1 h3 g- [
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ H: P* N& X) S/ M. V/ g8 ^2 w Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
# o7 E4 t4 X7 ^: C* V -------------------------------------------------------------
) Y. C8 n% z$ k$ Q3 C Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
+ S/ C4 Y _1 t @ i5 X1 ^ -------------------------------------------------------------
& L5 n9 S3 u: U National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
! n+ p0 S0 Q8 }# D- u3 @ b n -------------------------------------------------------------
; a4 p) d, C( h( @; j6 | >>2 C1 s( Z" Z6 H2 k; c" n( l5 j! W9 S$ r
6 `5 G3 ? C( H# M9 f- W% U
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined6 F) e) {' F0 A: w# Y* Q R1 ?9 x+ U
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint+ B- e1 r& L' m4 r/ N
John and Victoria.+ w2 p- V3 w7 ~) q% w& Y; v
0 c. e. H6 {9 r9 _5 Q: P
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
# @ p' s# @" @, m* ], l, _# `5 Zcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of2 M. ~! }( W. u7 [5 y
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release5 t/ K# d: J5 f z5 [
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
) A% G# ]/ O {; _4 O! rtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities) x5 W# q' } q' | v
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is: ^- [: g, K* P$ ~# L7 T/ ^
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
4 H$ b+ j4 V+ u- c, dfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
x+ M; T# i ~* b$ V! {version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
0 M. g1 ]# q( HNovember 15, 2006.
' g+ ]$ U) o! G/ t+ C0 j9 M1 c Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of5 V$ G: M! f# y/ g9 m
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
/ |; F' T* Y$ A2 J0 ]" Q+ P% lprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
8 c; J7 _6 @/ v& d& ^# pavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|