 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ! p8 Y% D& o# n1 i0 t; h
: S- v6 j7 R1 h$ D6 D3 r4 p3 S- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
4 T# h. v- S" A7 t+ ? `6 t" `
/ x; v: D9 w8 T) T6 L TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market" O5 d& Q" ~& ], W- }9 Q9 z
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third: x6 o( Y) ^6 H5 |1 n, [& p5 `) |
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic* G0 g0 v# r+ v2 U& p
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
1 V3 y2 R' l$ S2 Z. R4 @/ kprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
8 i: @! D# k( D" Dmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
/ t9 s! ?7 U/ V/ v* W, iQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
1 L$ O$ T* F) q C/ F) o( lLePage Real Estate Services. B9 B8 O E. T3 p0 j- @7 V
) }7 {) `; e: E" N5 X5 @9 q. o$ \ Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters1 @0 k( F6 h( Q3 S4 F( D, K
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic* e+ L: d* n% Q+ A1 V
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and, ]0 [2 e6 s, O3 h4 J) C# c
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the* B k" I# W* ?
residential real estate sector.& i9 G Y6 o; D8 j; ?4 f4 |/ I
0 x+ _; @; E$ d Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
% s6 V B# }. D, Doccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
; i% V8 G( p4 s8 H+ F) tyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5622 P: m! v% {* i w, P8 n" c9 E
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380& [0 _4 W4 w8 y+ ^3 x
(+13.2%).
6 `+ [1 N6 f( I ^& u$ e" M5 {! z# \ K- C) g( N% @
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
8 t& f: F( W. \/ Pduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the& Q8 q: P6 V1 S7 W- n3 ]/ h
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
$ _( h7 h6 R: @+ R# bpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,, H' {! \. j5 X. Q
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.( T7 V! A6 {- F7 c, s5 l) l' \
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
# Q% N/ M0 b( d9 c" T4 j; p1 Fwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy3 g) k. C# l* T4 `5 X
balanced market."
, {# p7 R! t! k& o% D( Q! J& L% v* c6 Z7 m7 @5 _
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
) b+ I& @- j/ T! i+ P7 p- A3 i4 Gconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
: |8 F( _% [& j) G4 W0 Ato balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
$ x$ u" S. F0 E$ M0 ~& Jthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core& Y' b+ \0 E- [5 c8 h' i7 z
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
" ~1 |7 n' a4 c, J8 tmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record9 u. h; [$ [) o9 x. H. x
breaking price appreciations., N. V$ p* H$ P, f9 Z
( g0 \( _7 K/ t- T- e
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding' x! V. P& H+ u) n" |$ N, ~
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the o4 B+ E5 \5 N. b: H5 J7 T
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.5 h7 x- C" C3 f5 {7 q8 k
q5 f O2 v4 c+ E In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid' w6 S7 |$ C9 ~) E
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
) F5 p! u$ S- |7 S- U6 |# Wconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off, L2 j' ~! q8 o& x
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.% S' _" C. \* @" ~4 }. C
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers$ @( u% s u! p, O3 h
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
8 Y. j- Q" c+ r' u0 }% j( U2 t/ uprice appreciation when compared with 2005.- y6 J9 }: o& R% e0 }
5 S% [2 z( f6 J While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing: ?) h: Z4 f' D
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
. a& g7 A: d" C3 l7 G' K) N" a! @financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
* u" g7 l- d$ W" c0 _0 s' J% l4 T, ^are markedly different than those found in the United States.
, z+ d! ?: e' E( ]! \5 _9 n' B Z( t) s) m
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
* l2 f) y5 l( x P; e$ Z$ jAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's4 F& M* K0 h7 [2 w
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the0 d8 C& j+ K/ C4 f' P; A, X1 k
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general# D/ D4 V4 b9 `( n/ x
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the" l1 x9 T; S9 k5 ?' N e6 p
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
" @( [2 y, g) L. L: G$ ^, Vaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
, P& c/ n3 Z7 i& h/ H0 w3 b. [% Xmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."# Y: _% p- a/ Y2 C
! T% }4 Y& ^, c' O& B1 g <<7 _# G& _5 [# L9 r
REGIONAL SUMMARIES, |, V/ _# ^) z6 A3 K
>>5 X S7 a5 E* H/ D2 {4 W6 {, a. J
( d* ]( q/ c( e: o8 Y2 f
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
- @& Z5 v7 I7 u+ k$ QHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate. E* Y0 [) t5 [' I. Y
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
; [& c* ^4 D1 B& T8 {4 Plooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of, X8 W( R+ L4 g$ o* X& H& x
renovations.- y9 @( w/ t- \+ U4 U/ \ Z
6 n7 k8 Y1 {* i$ [8 e
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight' T. ~1 N4 {5 x k
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
6 K9 ?9 X* r; L$ H/ tcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and; J. x2 }/ X& M, R
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.1 v# X: N1 q8 A ^5 c8 ]! z- A
( P7 F! h# S& P7 s7 v( d2 }# z
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
- M- Z* V D/ V/ C5 M) zslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
, q. ~& d. @: v p* @- L8 Mquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
, r) @7 `' M. o5 U; C7 ^- E; _% k600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
& N! U- \) U# W+ Uto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
3 a) o# W7 x. X. r7 W1 T4 _8 Q' Tand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.( n6 n' Q& T2 A" z, H9 t, j
, ?# N+ s2 t0 a! t
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
" b1 O1 L5 k; Y+ ^conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
1 c" e) N& ?( ohomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
% z/ W; _5 G$ [& R' b3 vwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
" T5 E& r( n! r, | `dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
! ], Q9 v: q& a: abuyers with more options when looking for a home.
9 t+ K4 _$ u7 ]; L" \
! D. S! J$ n, {- ~ Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly; l, ~# }. ?: n7 ^
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes: V! K5 \3 l( k, E) P: K' b
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
5 \4 [6 ]' w9 e+ l; }as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
* q0 Q9 n/ o* L5 D+ K0 `few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.. }4 I' E; H6 ?+ \- }
' Z/ T1 }+ M, c4 x$ e. b7 z3 A
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
8 H" T9 ]% F D9 Nprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
' _+ v3 ]% Y% P# ^0 |" J3 Tlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
- s0 e* o i/ b Pfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,) M6 B% T! s2 G% h* o
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
: E6 c% Y: L% t/ q1 m# V( Mpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
% J$ a7 r W9 q& k# k' Y+ umaking a purchase.7 e9 g8 H; f" e
* g" K" ?; y, b _- |+ B! x2 D Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
, r' s: {. q& P; p) s, nmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong; @2 }# l# h8 `
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city" G8 [' @2 O1 s1 L! E0 K
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting( \5 x7 u6 _6 M% u7 z5 e3 {
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown7 I& U) n" `: k ?
amenities./ A6 x, t) L% {' |4 P
. [; |# K5 w H, X* }( m3 l- m$ Y% p The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
$ j4 N Q7 b- X* X) D1 uthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
: ]$ [5 \8 h0 g/ s. k* f8 Macross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
: I& b% a' i- `3 G @continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been. R P: R: O! ~, r7 x
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle, x o. c4 x6 L- L, z$ `
residence, rather than for investment.0 o& b3 k$ }0 |3 m; c; j3 D. j9 J
) E- I& _2 \# \8 j7 A The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
& v; c. ?$ Y2 @/ ?* B* h; Phouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
, A8 J" i2 o5 K0 U( w/ S6 vin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
. V9 \& c# W: n, Lconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
$ |& j" j: S9 O9 Nrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter$ B: p/ w3 ?8 o: D& Q5 [; k+ D
the market.
: s! P* ~0 E' A( z
& G- n# F0 {) P9 m% } In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through0 O; A ~5 O: p$ |# ~$ L
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
6 T" D" t1 Y* M6 v$ r3 cAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
/ i6 x! ]% _) }; Vmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
" k+ A) Z# [ h! t4 Y3 ^7 n. `* T; Zto the shortage of available inventory.
! K- ]! [ h, ?0 P( |: b2 Q0 y
* a* }5 s6 ~- C) ~+ R+ M Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its$ F3 s3 Q8 b& H
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
0 C, j3 R: F/ @! Y) N' n! L& ~# o- cvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses5 d; O' u: q4 T
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
4 O2 I6 T Q, G2 q) O$ _" G q" H6 K# n' I9 ~3 ~) ~
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases; Q2 p; a) B. m8 m a
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
( c7 i; x2 [6 ]unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that( [ ~, T1 m7 C; b4 U
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring {& q8 t2 W6 f1 c t3 o3 I
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
9 c+ M/ [; P6 W! H1 wseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as) \* Q, {: f! H/ v0 R- X/ k
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
6 f2 I1 E. @& \# W7 @+ h: m
# h; L# y5 G3 B; t Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter: A$ {: l* X; O9 ~1 b! M% Z
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
" {& c7 R5 S# ?4 Y) @! ~! [* }remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,' w6 G9 h' P: Q/ Y+ z& w
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
) A8 E$ S4 `0 a+ U& Nincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve: k. `# j7 t. o: h
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
- h u% i2 s& Ntowards the end of 2006.
7 Y# P% a- y2 p; W3 B( s8 a3 g4 E( X) n$ W2 p7 J+ B
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
% b5 B! v) A; E1 M6 f0 @inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable* w' [+ Y g# n% b- a
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse1 |- d3 X; c" ?' P9 [3 k4 C0 z( A
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
' o7 b2 P5 R1 O: j5 fforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
7 X* e8 U8 I7 h& f) \. Xpressure on tight inventory levels.
0 N* F' W/ c' p- i2 N- R a O4 R. h9 w& J* R" I
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic- n3 g3 F3 \/ H/ @+ F6 R: M
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
5 ~( x8 _2 x; Einto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
; _# E! I% { ~& Y2 r2 Uwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
4 [# ?3 {4 q& R% T+ r6 E) p6 R5 efor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.0 z) b: T0 G& y
# t5 n ]* T: C2 ~# m# U- j# K <<( ?/ o; m: `: ?
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
! G1 m6 @& Q3 A0 Z& X8 s. ~% w+ p/ j/ Y6 c; J) C6 Z# c2 u. Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 k2 q6 G) ?) I9 _0 g' L; G; g Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
1 ]$ j* B9 i" ~9 q( c/ d -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 \1 y9 c) ]/ V% H% G 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
/ V, R9 U8 Z4 ] Market Average Average % Change Average Average- d3 F& P& j. Y" p4 H1 _4 y6 J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) M8 X1 `4 @$ e3 x( `* J% ] Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0009 n+ i2 y, c' N/ d* W5 P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 z Y" m, D; v. P8 |# Q) N Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
$ G, C* j; f, b4 R1 H) I -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 b v6 v, E1 { d/ Q6 m. J
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0002 f6 j( a; [( F6 R3 E) P f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------3 l8 H- u2 m/ w ^. w4 N3 u+ ], [
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -. p. v3 u0 c+ q J7 j2 g( O
------------------------------------------------------------------------- F& S8 c3 V3 M& H3 R* m
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3339 z' \2 p+ u1 L4 N
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ R( K4 s1 v* g7 L/ w h
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5830 {3 |; S; O6 P! ^1 t6 P, C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% z, a( l2 P- u
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
( \' F: ?$ k8 w: {7 v0 B. N; w% U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 g7 u0 b% W3 |" f, ?3 k Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
( e9 K/ w4 u. N -------------------------------------------------------------------------; I5 H$ Y8 d# W+ M$ \2 B1 W
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
! z) Q) C% ?/ R* U9 i% L -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ P7 x7 U) Y" O0 j; Z6 \6 c8 ^ Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707# [! F- R) }; Y1 ^; q) p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& ~ d3 `! M) f2 Z4 {% g0 f
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
. L# E% Y+ d5 t7 Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" b9 ]/ n* H6 b# G: R% f Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
5 a7 N# q" a' @/ p) L -------------------------------------------------------------------------: } A: s! I$ u
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
) H+ F4 o- Q5 L, ]# | -------------------------------------------------------------------------) K% L } j9 y
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
\+ U" o+ l- {0 |" F8 m, \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 `! S& I+ ]! S3 i+ V: R& j0 O
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0008 Y$ N" w) y4 }) b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' `6 A7 F( _1 o' K7 r% g4 k National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860/ l, c2 }7 E" f! |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
W8 `2 _' c; |0 [
8 z! h/ [* I8 i/ L/ H -------------------------------------------------------------1 p$ ^+ D/ g$ M5 R7 c t' X& c
Standard Condominium
' X: k: { O# ?2 }+ V' d -------------------------------------------------------------
- l' i4 W5 F# A& a6 ? 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo r2 p& v: L; @- }% f
Market % Change Average Average % Change
. g# `; @9 E0 }& K -------------------------------------------------------------- O/ m8 y. o; C7 l7 n
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
' k/ Q" C' I3 @) h& \2 @6 w! @/ [ -------------------------------------------------------------
) [ w0 k+ g/ p: S Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%' l& G6 k" z% s9 P! V0 E I6 q+ Z
-------------------------------------------------------------0 K: P/ }' W- r2 x
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A; F9 h% q, N; T: U$ {) j3 C
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 ]8 C6 l, ?+ X Saint John N/A - - N/A& d: g; |: f) T6 c+ r
-------------------------------------------------------------, K, o& M4 M s/ Z6 W7 _, i- a' r
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
' ^% I* r9 c/ [, E -------------------------------------------------------------
+ @# T# d D0 |2 F7 M0 s Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%1 t. ]3 K& w, w' y
-------------------------------------------------------------
& g1 A/ _1 |3 q3 E1 Z. D- v# V Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%- O n6 r! s4 i7 Z; }
-------------------------------------------------------------+ A/ {! c0 L* y C
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
( h: @" O1 U! E/ S- R4 v -------------------------------------------------------------
y+ Y$ m9 J- M* _( k Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
( H4 n( ]# O6 l. o -------------------------------------------------------------* E! n A( {8 f5 b$ w
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%' m2 G- I k2 B2 V, N& p
-------------------------------------------------------------2 r U9 l( D* \
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
) f# j/ m% A7 B0 Y! F1 E -------------------------------------------------------------
; a+ I7 A8 T0 J6 M Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
- b! N, L, z. N; P* [ -------------------------------------------------------------, _1 e2 j; g" r& t5 a
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%9 T7 S# a' B H7 [% i5 ~' ~# r D6 m
-------------------------------------------------------------5 A+ n, L1 i5 }( g7 @- F
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%- z8 b5 r5 f/ K7 J
-------------------------------------------------------------
( b5 ]# B% g V5 j$ B" t Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%! A5 V9 S$ C2 _5 q @2 Y; f
-------------------------------------------------------------0 O! c8 m" k" }" A* L( T
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%1 c0 [4 H- P- @2 b1 m* P1 b
-------------------------------------------------------------5 F4 I3 O1 z8 q" O8 C7 T
>>8 x6 P: ~6 j( Q$ n
! T6 W/ Z/ S/ Y6 T4 f
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
& I" `+ Z9 G. }0 b8 P! U1 Y+ O7 yin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint: }# _/ \( `1 J* U4 l" Y
John and Victoria.
5 F {' i2 b& [8 X/ F3 X! y+ V) S7 G) p2 B8 }1 V0 m: e" O
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
% S+ P( e( C6 P) _( [+ Jcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
. j- B- H3 N& Y, q, ]$ W/ Rhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
$ S4 ?' n3 Y& f; m; x9 Xreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price" O' ^% h; M5 U& c; j
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities& D6 |1 c5 J( F7 H" q
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
3 d1 [* k) b# X/ ^: Yavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
0 i* ^0 Q) f! R3 ?# L; bfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable" M1 {. A5 q0 e3 k3 U6 e3 k( \' }! z
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on. O7 R5 t% k- z$ o. Q
November 15, 2006., _7 K1 B9 \5 S8 c9 a3 k7 J( W
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
2 \9 {1 D8 a: n- Y/ K& l8 P$ afair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge4 C# G$ v7 Q4 F
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
, V/ Y$ o! a+ R4 s8 k! c, m5 Pavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|