埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2321|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ( d0 v) ]% T' E) q) @9 n

1 b6 M, m* I" J3 H; }2 b- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -; H0 j) F1 V* S; ?9 P7 A( w4 G6 b

, G6 T( d# W( Q+ V6 c# x. z    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market4 Y# @  X* }  v5 |/ W) N3 l/ K4 T
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
2 j+ I- h$ R5 fquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
' ?% r3 x, o) Nin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
+ W# i$ e6 B3 `: ~& eprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
( \: s4 D1 @$ Xmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,* Y! \8 i, H! o; ^
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
/ L$ h# H. Y# j7 O; B" U# rLePage Real Estate Services.
3 [* a3 G6 j+ s& |2 F8 r% |0 I0 t1 [/ D9 X% m
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
1 f" l) Z' g) Q- Hare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
2 p2 p# c  d4 }. s# e7 Nconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
6 ^2 ?, C* T& V# }( d  Usound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the9 @, l) K* A( B3 u
residential real estate sector.
6 L% {' b% @4 X3 U: h9 p
3 p$ }2 M( u  B' Z% M    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation3 V+ i* {/ @0 J* x3 W# }) Q
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%); g2 K; b/ N7 o) k; N7 O4 o- Y* u
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5620 U4 y4 p6 V1 k, O
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
, A: J8 R8 v4 v+ @8 Z+ ?$ X(+13.2%).
& g0 }, |( m: `, u" j* n; }( t  N/ y" A2 h5 P0 N* x2 y* L
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
; y: \2 d6 G' N% F" v' }during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
: M1 `. n9 E0 i* U$ s1 h$ c* m3 Xfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are6 W% h" c+ P2 X
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
+ R3 G/ x* _  X4 V2 S( B+ H2 u; y. Ppresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.2 D4 C4 Q0 w1 f. {" V( @, j' R' |
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
7 I3 P. f9 `0 b2 Q6 awelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy0 S: d  |3 H0 K3 r; X$ B7 d  w
balanced market."
! c! r* f2 i% B  l: V/ N2 S( x# z7 ]4 x6 d0 }+ s- S
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,+ H: {/ o# w0 M$ W8 g2 B
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
; Q/ i$ ?4 K) O( Q3 ato balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
2 Y$ R1 t7 ^# g  v& lthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core% k' S; I7 t2 T6 Z
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
' F- E" I9 j, Qmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
$ F3 U, p# R* w! zbreaking price appreciations.
# e( ?/ |- y5 M) ~+ |4 Z' |# i' x6 Z1 N8 }2 \# k' @- |+ m1 P
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding7 R3 z# E- Z: r: @! d0 [1 H
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
% u* r' Q& g. [largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
: _/ H3 O% @6 ~6 E; |: H. I# ^: |/ p6 n, S
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
8 I! |& x$ I* c+ w+ Neconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
  V, N; H) c" [* {  fconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
8 z' m4 g& y8 |slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.) M' }* ]; v7 b- C8 G  F
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers5 ?5 I# b+ o. ~5 D7 L: H& A: ]
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
. O7 Z( d9 o1 k7 i* b* Mprice appreciation when compared with 2005.3 f/ x5 Y0 H3 u  r/ G# \
* c3 G* o0 x0 I; P
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
& q' G" y& N2 }, G8 Y; O+ X! Bmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
- i' V2 [" S  q& J5 `* ^. z; Cfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada( l$ A  j* @. F+ [  C# [' ~* U( W
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
; g, @) H3 f, u$ G) I0 B. ]  g# v/ X- F( p! p
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
" G# t2 ]$ @6 @1 [* i3 T& P; yAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's7 L8 y% O: Z( k) h6 x: l
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the. c$ ~$ }9 f' r, [
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general: n9 j: F  y4 ~' x$ s9 w6 W# s) Y
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
1 i2 |# m5 _/ P! {3 x& r$ R* `downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
  N, w+ ]) y' T1 N( Faggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization6 r' W% o, x) F/ R4 p
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
% B( I$ n/ w/ q* j6 b
, b% ^6 o( G: [    <<
3 b* J4 _4 ?* X; q; c3 I! O                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
: ]. W- s, g, n) `! e    >>
4 B. t  s$ J. q7 ?9 ~3 h% m3 b8 q4 M/ n
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
( D8 C% e" c5 G3 mHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
' b! f  |1 V' g. K4 B4 Sof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time, a& f: e) ^) e/ U  k+ M
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
4 T* U. i! f. l( C8 yrenovations.6 v  X3 g/ c0 J2 N

0 X1 ?7 f, `# ?8 F    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight- Z! e5 y, D1 F; s+ ]2 A2 y+ W% O0 q
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation0 f. r$ H' |# V- H& }! j# t
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
- d. F/ p# f4 pSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.6 u/ C( Y) Q0 A% W
6 S; t5 h/ O6 r$ \0 m
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer/ `9 L3 G( L5 z7 s# P
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
+ r' t* y$ y9 u3 squarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
) g6 Y( F6 h5 Z600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores) X: V' q- p, t
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes5 ?2 f7 h) q4 m
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
$ N1 A* k4 ]5 A$ f
) n5 e1 H1 f* W    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced& q/ |0 {1 P1 {3 x& R" F1 U! q
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their, ?! S! J6 j+ r- A  X" U
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers% c" `4 [6 p* M. k$ u. A/ v- [  J
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
; c, w5 `" Z' i% p' D( G( cdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
) t. b; M1 I# G" t% _) P# Qbuyers with more options when looking for a home.1 ]! N; S1 Z- w- i# M& k

& h7 d. D* N2 H- c) L1 W6 H  z. i    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly  y" ~. X- ?" B( ~  K
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes0 T7 T: ]5 V7 M* s3 }) }5 |
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
* Y0 Z. Q. ~/ x5 C0 K* f/ u( {" xas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last7 g+ m7 S; B! y- I" k0 S& |
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
+ h$ o; U+ H' N/ f" }' F3 \& c8 U2 N: r6 ?  n2 o3 i
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house& U5 [+ e8 B+ B& b4 p# k* D
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory2 n1 R/ K6 f' i3 N# Y; R5 e2 C
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting* U( o) a0 z; c; m; ~
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,8 t& D! q1 Y8 e) g: L1 D
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
3 }- B0 c& r6 p# U9 l; Kpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
2 q! O: J* v6 i) nmaking a purchase.2 \; b2 N/ I0 U, H
( d2 _4 l3 K; \
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
& x, x- I* |  Y' I5 o, p! G$ @4 }8 b' mmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong( q% P$ q- L. g5 G3 h6 l
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city/ z& b- V& J5 V2 U1 o
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
% ~: g) v( ~' [attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown" o" O" T$ C- x( I. p
amenities.
' H6 ?: ~  b: e# V+ m6 j9 ?3 u' u# F
/ ?) Z! d4 z( q! V0 A% X    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
, ?, |& z& J8 B" U! Xthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
8 {$ N2 _' B# u) E; j  E! aacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has$ M, ^( M0 n( C9 P# _
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
5 f8 l8 k) l. V: O, I+ Bdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle$ N4 i( i0 m2 E1 ]& h
residence, rather than for investment.7 \! V0 t; t4 ]1 P6 n9 Z

3 B7 w; w) z* Z: g$ M# p; G    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as0 n$ S- {$ s' v" n  @# s% i
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted2 C) @* v! R4 v( R$ p2 r6 Z
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer: q; U, b7 ]! |0 d9 `
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
2 }. }7 h3 g. L# brate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
5 o; {3 d9 {" J3 rthe market.# s' h6 V7 H" K
4 k# i4 W/ P2 E% z1 N
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
5 _4 k  X; K  ]- K3 h2 ~9 `( y# V8 uJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In; d5 i, i+ p% u: E/ N* a
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
- j8 \+ c5 F# }4 H" Smonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
5 i+ K* |: F2 F- ?/ i+ J8 b( ]$ V: wto the shortage of available inventory.( m9 ?( h$ b. S1 D# E' \

* j1 B' n; v& E9 l    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its. U1 ~, B' n7 Y& R0 a' W
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains! Z/ }) `: Z3 H) u
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
+ P/ p7 Z3 |' }3 @- {* x/ r6 ostruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.5 V) r6 f7 L  H' m- X
, T5 s7 q& o2 L* i7 x: \' k6 b
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
; p: R; c" S- d1 S) vin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
7 v9 q9 B8 \* Y6 a" dunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that3 v* M; O! I* Z4 N/ C  ^
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring1 @8 z* R6 L5 v: ]* i8 n
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer+ @- ]6 m7 H- p; T2 p* H# x
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as' T' R' h% N3 j
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
) f5 k8 F) z  F  F/ e4 F) i( A& L

6 Q) v! J8 Q7 u- _    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
( w, T3 |) y% P( ]0 A5 uas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton# {4 k  s1 v4 v
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,4 d/ t. J) G4 |
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
. Z0 u4 ~! I/ S/ Sincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve( G5 _: d) {' }. {
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly* Y: K; A" b/ u: L- H+ H. ?
towards the end of 2006.
    1 d. h& H6 O; _/ E7 t/ b8 E& W

. q9 r7 E+ Q0 b+ @' h7 j: W0 lWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of% Y. d( C1 x( a6 u
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable7 S7 ?/ @# {4 j4 ^" m' n
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse3 }& C% g+ Q8 m4 ?' {1 E9 U- D
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to4 c' D: O7 }( @
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added; M  `/ A4 W  G% S" D
pressure on tight inventory levels.
1 J; d8 c4 W1 n# r" }8 n
, L& H3 o7 O9 k' O    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
) L. P  X5 ]5 x9 G  A9 hfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people1 Y6 q$ w0 o9 _# E# o0 w
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;1 V) w' v* M8 }. r
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
" \  r7 D8 @. A( ^7 r# z, _  jfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
3 S* f2 b; I' R8 `. P2 K2 C2 J& h+ E+ ]$ g3 I& l
    <<+ X7 K) t( q% U2 [# [: _
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
( B$ x8 z, a8 H. {* O  c
, {8 g7 v/ z( }1 p, u    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* w0 [% S+ N7 o" \
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey. ?/ D( O' V4 u# l( o
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 j/ E( [. }7 J                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
" @. s5 L5 J# e& i    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average* t& t7 L9 P7 V
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; t5 c. i! N' i9 p0 i6 n  ?, a/ @
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0005 H. m$ ~% Y, v9 I( x
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) `# K- P& s  Y    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000) v$ a( ]8 ?, _; a3 F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" N& [% i# t( v- e( z3 a    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000/ f  p7 v5 k4 A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 m8 v0 O0 U4 v( ?1 N+ s    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -9 C0 V) A; s) I% w: [
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 ^8 E- F# B# v/ s9 u9 V1 v, N
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
4 m2 r' e% i% ^* ~! f, J8 T! k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Q8 k: }. a; }( V0 k    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583& t. z* i0 m" s; o; k" K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 x9 A, F/ p' M4 P2 ?
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
7 z$ \; j& k1 i8 ^2 D# Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 [. E, ?  ^8 H" K+ r    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250) B  J5 y8 e8 m
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" n  S' s( X3 r6 N1 z/ E, g* c
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7668 g& R0 I: M0 }* L
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! \. u0 V  _8 O) F. Z# `
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
4 F5 Q; a$ E& d8 @7 u    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; j) G7 y3 e0 C
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
  P" p, q2 ^( t9 O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; t" Z0 _% _" X6 H' ?4 P
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
! @* f# @2 R) d0 {" K; N; d    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ U" N2 u  A6 |& o1 H  I3 b! x* i    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714  N- q  W# _5 P, {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: L. y& m, a. Q. b3 s3 }7 Z' z' C
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
! i4 @. R$ l1 I( I8 W' U+ @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) ]& w9 R2 ~* d' I( o    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0009 g# K) l: Y) l7 u- c1 f4 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 C7 S1 A- ~! y) ~7 U/ Z    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
. {7 U+ q/ m- ~. U9 p5 [    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ p% _0 q* S# F8 v. P  D+ `# Z, s0 N) E. a$ u! h
    -------------------------------------------------------------
% V% Z0 k5 h# t' r0 b: p9 `                               Standard Condominium3 q" T+ i; ~. M7 n: ^, k
    -------------------------------------------------------------7 e/ V. t& D2 |. Z, ]8 i' l
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo  y. [/ o: a5 U' b( ]1 D0 G0 }
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change! z; _7 \; b% Z, ]+ R: k
    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ x! A( B% D( t    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
; Y$ R5 h' _: d4 p1 `) S    -------------------------------------------------------------( ?: w9 B" x7 E6 C1 W6 P9 M
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
0 U4 s# X! ^3 [- g4 ~3 I    -------------------------------------------------------------9 k' M  j: ]0 y; u; y/ X
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
5 y/ f& ]4 R$ V% m* ]    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 V; `4 P% R) z- _4 Z  b  u    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
- d3 a1 p# C' }: ~    -------------------------------------------------------------! {8 Y4 J2 p* }& ?4 l
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%* |' Q) V4 K" U4 z& }7 d# ~/ c* s
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) T  G9 x0 s& G& c    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%- W$ i5 W' I9 b7 Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------  n+ _3 `# h, W5 A0 h
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
: {5 r  l& l/ _    -------------------------------------------------------------" u& ~8 }7 ]/ H/ K* ~
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
5 v) ]% f  D3 Z    -------------------------------------------------------------+ X" \4 h, ~( ~% w
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
3 K! a# w. A" z1 {# g    -------------------------------------------------------------5 \* W" A& M( L9 c
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%  C% U1 {4 d" k/ e
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' I6 Q4 l* a' J3 f    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%& A. v# t! ~7 C, {/ Z# G
    -------------------------------------------------------------! @- ?! J! W) L/ U
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%& c; h2 x3 w. @' f
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( D% }4 t+ h4 a& ~0 ~* i0 d: w( n    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%- Z- h; ^, P/ {$ G
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) z) x6 e& }, r: V$ d" l& M3 ?" d    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
2 n9 i3 p9 x4 J- t/ j    -------------------------------------------------------------
" `& R9 @0 O+ H5 v    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%/ L& k; Z' B# N7 |4 C( ~+ {$ M
    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 f- c( E9 ?# d    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
# L  a2 w* W4 q    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 F! I5 t  N" B8 f3 ~8 `( v6 q& }    >>6 P4 t6 q  R/ l, B9 O) t( e

& r) ?6 r5 i8 |. y" i5 \7 Y4 F    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined7 ?, a$ n1 ?+ S, R: `8 R. v
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint" p! B0 {, H3 Y$ h  p1 R& P
John and Victoria.; ~5 r/ }7 n2 }0 g: W1 ?
3 V  c6 p9 Z+ c% D
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
# e+ `, I/ g: E6 Y4 p6 p! \comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
4 f$ J/ a( Z; s- X& _: @5 Khousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
2 \+ m; G. C6 M( G1 nreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
2 t' o7 T' C4 t9 s" Strends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
8 L1 R/ w7 l0 i  {2 Aacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is/ t2 q( m, I/ Q7 b1 d" v4 J
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current: i# c. d2 {% X3 F5 \/ i% k: f; }
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
0 S- c/ Q; J: ^version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on# H5 v% x! ~) ]' a7 a
November 15, 2006.
: T' ]% l/ j  o) v; s$ l    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
* P- J  G& w7 t$ Cfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge8 n& K0 K) B/ a
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
8 G- g/ K9 E$ I4 mavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-5 20:07 , Processed in 0.182439 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表