 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
6 }4 W4 o- W, ~$ _( J5 S7 K
) \3 Y( m- ~- x" F' a- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
8 y" t8 q# `0 t! w, u1 k- D
( W; K# v- j0 q% u1 W; g TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market$ ]# C; a* b% B
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third0 j3 X: w; P" Z d
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
1 D5 a" T" T. [' b& \% E8 d; |in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
# ]! w0 f1 p a1 _9 @+ A; Q2 lprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and. q4 S/ k: g) C8 t& O) y7 j9 y5 x3 W
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
- {5 x/ X( ?, v) _% h; o9 h# mQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal: w8 s ]# V- M8 c
LePage Real Estate Services. E. w4 V- b, S5 F
( X1 W3 }+ ]5 U& j
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
1 t& u a6 c* L4 m% Z8 Lare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic5 A% X5 f, j9 t { s
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and8 y; a& j: N2 }; N6 L5 K3 k, W
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
" w. d. w; f9 L# c0 ~residential real estate sector.
7 [% R" v1 c% B" { v( f+ P9 Y. v: N' |) c% {6 E' s; f
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
Q1 q& b; w: ^' d+ T# f! a$ I- Goccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%); \$ y! ^5 u r, d7 g& r# R. y- M. a
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5622 {& Z2 `1 T3 P1 n
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
# ?1 J4 n# v% t( \: x1 W/ o4 g% S(+13.2%).
3 V5 s) K( I+ a% N2 _( K( [9 n1 b$ u, r ^
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
7 v: P0 ^2 S& Zduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the1 M: ]0 w ?# y3 U \3 Y- S
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are1 c& q* }! S. b5 q1 h! f% L
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
4 _* B s+ u6 v2 ^2 V7 zpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services." P1 x; ]) Z: c* o; W
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We) U* J2 n% v# F" D: q) P- k
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
5 z# x' W m: g, O3 jbalanced market."
3 R: F5 _( i: v8 J. G& m" D1 ^/ b( I8 Y" e0 _" s, C6 n; @
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,2 Y. y: g) I0 n" J) g
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift) v$ F, w( k; L3 j! W2 A
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
2 a! B: I1 I6 S& H/ s- p3 [/ Uthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core0 }8 p9 s: u7 O1 `
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,- {2 O. b+ Z4 l/ G+ s: a
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record8 w6 j( F# y( ~2 t/ ]0 l) b
breaking price appreciations.
+ \- P' u% b) V. L9 b( p2 x# P t5 I8 D
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding3 L+ o) w' e$ I
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the8 a; l5 |- {! F" p4 p4 s( n
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
( x; R6 z5 W( V! J! L: ^, r( a# S( ?& _% S0 ` B: m
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
8 J' @+ C4 h i* w& meconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
9 m6 i& @# l9 w" s6 ]confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
( e9 ^+ k! p! R% y$ nslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
2 A8 o. W. w; y3 w2 v" ~9 JIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers( ?- m6 J) a' q( y
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
4 d) R* u% R# b9 y7 o' T tprice appreciation when compared with 2005.+ l. [; x) a3 }/ W7 ^0 v
; q7 K: Q: w' O9 V/ B
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing: P; Z7 B( l8 f9 _0 q
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
$ P! u- m% o0 ^$ R0 Ofinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
* ]# F& I' A( o8 [' r5 g5 dare markedly different than those found in the United States.+ E# H, M# d# }% u. t1 d
, h8 s( y6 p( \4 U! Q# W$ Z5 C Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the D. x* N0 {$ \
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's7 c! q. d5 m3 G/ i5 p/ ]
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
4 J; D( v$ E* d5 @# U9 Drelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
. L9 Y7 E: _# u) Y% a9 Raffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the, ]1 ?# k7 S# @9 O
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and7 `8 m0 U8 `$ u; M4 d9 Y: W9 I, u
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
& m& x, s1 U. pmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
/ E$ d5 w6 z# e3 N. j
# p/ T( ]( G/ N% e3 m$ v <<
( b3 P; R4 C% b REGIONAL SUMMARIES
' z" u: Q j' e3 O# s3 J >>
( U/ n. b; G0 U5 Z! m, [) M: P( c7 q# @9 V- @* A
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
' F. _ N: x$ W9 tHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
; p5 i+ C. m% N, u; g: sof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
6 D. p$ _$ J! f& R: @ u9 b3 \looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of* B% N* h/ e' H5 k/ @8 v6 [
renovations.1 i6 N% `8 N. R3 |6 J# Y
: t3 [3 f( z+ }1 N4 r) y" s
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight r6 `1 |- h3 _
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
' O& i% ^6 }! t& scompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and& Y' _3 y3 ]' ]5 G0 P( Z4 f% N
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.) o0 x1 I8 v5 |% L
) {7 ?# m+ r2 Z, F! l# M' `4 ^3 F5 a) u The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
2 Z& P$ ?" \6 |. b( M+ F% islowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
$ f. k$ G- [* P) T8 m0 K4 o- o |1 Qquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new* B% d, j h& E; o
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores2 i6 u3 M& s: ~) @8 U
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes; v- W3 D5 D, k- j
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.9 s3 Q, U/ Q# }4 g. [; E+ n5 b
! p5 B% n3 M U In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
/ x% k g( Z+ ^. r$ O4 Uconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
& G: R# W+ h1 \1 _homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers' a+ p& _: m- m+ E
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian7 d: i( p7 ?& P/ y! L. U
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
. N' e4 \* Y: a: \2 s6 s" k5 D! Gbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
' f, k, I, v# \: \) m
1 }& D7 H: s+ O" Y9 G l) G Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
) C. J! ^ |% Z7 T6 q) ^/ p. ~among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
9 q* }9 e f1 Z9 n2 U! K- `) ^6 xpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,5 A. ]) z. U C' \ \1 T( e* H5 W
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
8 d! h& e0 y0 o. W$ G1 l8 L; ~3 Cfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.( [) W8 D8 n4 z, p7 @
: ^, A( ~& v) C Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
" o; k C, o, u4 fprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory% H2 O% p, m& V* V, Z! F" Y% R
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
8 L1 A8 q9 _* Dfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,, J( e, r( r# B
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the U" X0 h4 D6 ?. _& F% \
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
( p4 f6 E& {8 T7 D1 ?) W. L/ r# ^/ xmaking a purchase.6 |% o. d5 b$ L3 H
; K3 L9 o/ Q6 p& I/ ?
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
/ _$ D' w$ O4 \- B- i) H( Fmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
5 ~9 A7 X- T& T) fconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
0 k+ X5 O/ ` O4 y1 E Icentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting) r" _6 j, V7 w$ o' r/ _
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
( B+ x2 b9 _3 w* |9 [7 ^# namenities.
; x B& W3 q- Z% R, x3 d+ y0 c) G- l; y
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
6 {& W; ~ P/ |5 Othroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand1 H8 k6 @; E* Q. ]0 w3 _3 N
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has) |- U0 }$ v/ K; h8 l& M2 g
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been4 Z/ t- _) v' D2 i" o
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle+ g% E2 e' H' d* ]
residence, rather than for investment.
. O9 E( f; K2 e) v* X
' d( J0 p0 ?. ?2 _( H The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as& g+ c/ H" y3 ?/ T9 S9 l
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
+ ?! s& |/ W, s$ E8 jin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer! Y1 J x) y" W; [7 f4 F
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization+ `$ i2 z& e Q; W
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter% f' [* w% |: ]; X
the market.
, s: X/ b2 X7 u$ v3 [$ b+ k+ t
# T8 |, a% ^( e) x' s6 T l In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through% ^" T: G* p4 w2 d) W3 z! L
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In4 \4 q8 G' W5 W/ x8 k3 O
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
' U6 `5 g, m7 e, r1 h4 qmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due, n1 w% Q3 N7 C% G% ~9 }& n
to the shortage of available inventory.
% O* B J! G' P) {+ ~
$ G5 T3 L4 ?3 T* ?4 J5 ~$ E Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
& [' V6 E4 i5 J" rmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains: ^: E9 k) g1 F' s( E# ^
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
4 U- R+ g a% E8 X- @struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
: F/ ^) b: Y& U, U" t$ X2 ~6 w3 i" @( }
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
9 X3 }$ {: ^, m5 din the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low+ f1 n+ D: B$ D1 [! y" z, d
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that2 N; m8 I: L: B: J7 [
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring0 z( s8 r5 S! [% a" |4 S1 @/ M
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
4 j6 L) Q2 Y' S& C. B; vseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
4 w5 D7 S. n: }8 {/ L4 vbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
t+ X8 G! o9 K& K* y3 }: w9 m3 i" t7 f: @% Y/ _9 E
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter/ ]% F$ O, L$ z
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
& R! o4 W4 R2 b2 p' Yremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
. Y- a# ?3 K6 v! T4 w5 Smaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
$ s; e% |9 K; `3 xincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve3 ]5 I% y7 e+ y+ Q& G' |8 C; t# @
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
2 I' J b& F+ f) j; Q5 Y5 Itowards the end of 2006. * p8 v2 E; z; a8 p+ D
' G% \( [: E( d6 B8 |
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of5 s; q- m! C8 Q9 }' P7 P. I
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
+ h& Z S k4 Kto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse4 O) N1 O5 L5 i, i
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to9 a8 ~! B6 l; Q5 ]8 {. z! t/ p
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added8 \7 n$ U4 `) T( _# q8 b& \& ?9 I
pressure on tight inventory levels.5 h/ r! {/ K+ v6 ~( D* p& g
* n) t% X' n9 k" S, z
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
! C" @% s9 B3 a9 X. T( \( p8 Cfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people7 o& h+ i- v0 E
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
* d& H, E P& f/ c% x0 E" g- p+ Nwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
* U* K; Z/ A; I$ z0 K5 Ifor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
7 P# J8 s- N) V: J; r" O
m' A2 ]+ O: S( c! N' c5 B2 H/ U <<' e; k( S, l9 d% U: G; M. ? P
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
& \' ^1 H. B7 Y; |# G0 [( Z/ M3 {$ ~# t5 Z7 ?9 n$ e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ l6 X; w* [$ J; T) q
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey2 E" j& U/ a8 d) l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- i. X; ?! `' @6 O4 c 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
# [% \; K x. h. Y4 a+ ^0 t Market Average Average % Change Average Average: _9 D U% K& U( C/ x9 ?. O" f% W
------------------------------------------------------------------------- s5 Y& f% C% i# }6 D1 s5 n& X
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
) h A7 ^# t- N2 n. P2 P, U -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ~' V* V, ? C; Y* q$ Y$ [
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0006 s! K* g0 g+ w3 g! ^, }6 o0 C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ \, t- [$ P+ c Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0006 Z5 ~4 m/ Z. X, J; C8 _( F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 L8 C7 y# O! K9 g/ a1 {3 E- C Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -7 G( L4 U0 ?* B. d3 I7 {7 }
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& l; V, f( d8 |2 P1 Q6 q St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3339 T, K" \! J% Z6 i
------------------------------------------------------------------------- y8 d; ?/ [0 \
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583. I; j( e% f/ E8 y/ `
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 c0 b' p6 y' y. k' {, A5 M1 i
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185# |, H0 ?; n4 M+ v6 d) N" L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 c6 t4 ^& y1 `* e Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
8 o2 S% Y( Z: ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ i$ _. C+ _8 V$ S* A& v, a4 J Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
" G$ J3 A0 j, U/ E9 l n4 ]6 ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ l' X! \ O0 V! a
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
: Z8 G; K1 J, S$ b" ^2 y -------------------------------------------------------------------------& p) Q6 q4 M7 q
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
) v2 m' v" {" L# r; j) n* U -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 a3 A! F5 L! Y6 u6 t% W
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3897 F& o3 Q3 x/ E
------------------------------------------------------------------------- i$ {1 f$ _3 P
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
5 t: _0 l9 C0 ?$ L -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ A) u6 n) I; |! j( H2 L7 e/ w
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
- W+ v& ], u; l& k" c; | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 M' K" Z& E! E+ S& y Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
4 s! z- \5 b8 x. y( \' W -------------------------------------------------------------------------( @! ~9 D9 ~& c6 L0 g9 X
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860; F* Z! I# U% W% F+ r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 R9 q( Z }1 T4 ^; z3 J
/ q. Z' Z1 t/ [/ x- w: V -------------------------------------------------------------
9 t; O2 _& }7 C: z# `. c; Z/ ` Standard Condominium* ?" p8 u) ~: I, R7 {+ J; e$ ~
-------------------------------------------------------------
& b, b2 J% j; i$ e 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo L! [5 a' k' z8 F. j; y& I
Market % Change Average Average % Change
# f ]0 n t' J" }% _7 E/ R* G9 c& T -------------------------------------------------------------
9 Q$ M9 b/ s: U$ q5 z6 o9 m Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%0 J; z9 c- {" Y0 k9 q
-------------------------------------------------------------
" S* p" H9 Q* B+ g' a3 w Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%) w1 K0 m, V# w, X, C# E# R+ D
-------------------------------------------------------------
% s% |3 i5 l* S- w' r: Z' c Moncton 4.9% - - N/A. f% Z% v. E% j4 A7 {! q+ L/ h
-------------------------------------------------------------! h+ O7 U& [- P
Saint John N/A - - N/A
6 I" y; A5 t! Y' n% N1 Z6 h6 m. u -------------------------------------------------------------
/ b6 [& |) I9 q# h, z, O, U St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
' L9 {4 F N. y5 u -------------------------------------------------------------
. f l- v+ ]# l+ H3 i Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
5 c% V- t/ }, K& A6 M -------------------------------------------------------------5 ], y6 F9 n" q2 o
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
9 R1 S) H/ b& r3 _. x/ y. _ -------------------------------------------------------------
6 F* J1 C x; a# G0 i9 G- p& h Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
/ b3 C. I/ m& r0 z9 l2 u) b1 R/ j -------------------------------------------------------------
: {) T3 K9 F* z Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
r2 x9 l6 F0 B- l5 e -------------------------------------------------------------
; U7 s" Y1 T8 D* D2 _! d" L Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
& N+ { j7 G+ j# ` -------------------------------------------------------------/ N+ Q8 P" i* q9 A# Z/ I9 ?/ `
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%9 _. G( @$ t( t% @% p$ U
-------------------------------------------------------------. d9 o* j# `% L7 `( Z' I
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%" ^9 ^- G. Z1 [' p. E2 ~( W
-------------------------------------------------------------/ K# n- f5 e6 u5 r3 V# D7 ~( ~
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
; [- y- i2 W3 d8 e3 v) D- E) H- R. l -------------------------------------------------------------
N% p" R) t, W8 Y1 s5 _0 n: R! F1 j' b& _ Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%0 w+ c' I0 q) {% U0 _3 l0 x; q
-------------------------------------------------------------& K" c( ~, Q2 }
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%4 o6 c- J3 D; W4 B/ Z
-------------------------------------------------------------4 v2 E. O9 ]1 x+ l4 s6 w
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
5 B3 a0 t( D u- J -------------------------------------------------------------
7 H, S' j! d! o: A( z) _ >>
0 Z! }' w/ A* z5 s7 x
9 F u$ g( \2 F5 ?8 w7 I Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
4 a- J6 |+ F0 H6 o- Cin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
: i2 q% K; }+ }+ dJohn and Victoria.
4 L7 v$ ^# C$ r2 o, p4 ]$ G* k
- q% W, L. J, d# G z. m: } The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most- Z/ t% f+ {/ Z; d) w( Z" W; t
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
; v! `( B- Q, U; ?* x1 _# N+ Rhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
/ j) T0 l/ o+ @% Freferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
# a' W- j. f; \. T/ Y2 Ltrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities5 g& a* h) ]8 G6 l3 m+ R" X
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
9 k: p. O6 D: w" A% xavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current0 r* w# k) C4 h" ?
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable, K" M# I9 [ L8 ?
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on: u0 ]2 }: o: J" `& w, O
November 15, 2006.
. F2 O: D3 k. k, b; X* v$ y Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of+ w Y* U3 S' v/ G) U$ d1 z& y0 e% }
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
' H6 Q) ?+ J ^3 ]# t3 q8 Yprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is1 z" I" \/ r( u( Y* K
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|