 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable " J+ X/ l: P3 s2 F |6 t
. ~. P- m0 f. B3 B- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -# x# K, o( t; X0 B% j- c' t% y
+ T, L1 E4 @. D4 [. U# |
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
; e& o0 H: o5 j7 x' ?# f4 i- Uexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third% i/ y$ g$ L/ v6 ]* x0 T
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic! l* q; x& }( ?1 q7 ?
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
; D2 y8 g/ F% n3 x( tprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and7 [$ @$ ^, P" u& r9 x5 `
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,0 ~, w( v3 Z& |" s# J+ M
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal% n) \! O6 v* e2 H! `" v
LePage Real Estate Services.8 s* t+ k5 ?4 `$ N0 f
5 A( j2 v$ L7 H Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters/ K- W; X( G1 I" S' U ]) ~7 I7 g* ?
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic4 F, G, B/ g4 L7 Q$ `9 r
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and- A/ y/ S/ V/ V: f8 ~# C
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the2 l1 [* G) t) D" w& t; I+ J
residential real estate sector.* j+ {/ b; x6 x
: @4 l- H# U# Q. p Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation* g4 N8 t; W! q) @0 e
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)( D9 l6 L- b4 j D7 p6 P
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
1 E& o- m, R" D; [(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
- m- a) a! M' q U+ S o(+13.2%).
! v% J3 g5 `4 |% P9 }! j7 {( J
4 A8 y% K9 \& d "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth: x, g5 y& y! ]5 b# | a3 H6 k
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the% E1 V- @0 J+ L. Z8 Y4 j
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
0 n6 n( ?; C- T6 H/ b# }3 ^poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
, f4 }7 h u" Q! G3 E* {1 c& Lpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
; Y; I" {0 ?9 g* r: E8 W+ P1 K"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We5 k- \% c5 O1 h( S& E
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
( Y) V0 f0 o! p. Gbalanced market."! }$ D! I) j: x+ A- I) Z8 \& G% m. L
$ X' ?1 C2 x. ?" L" ]
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
0 X2 b* Z3 N! y% uconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift8 {! {1 v( ]8 G, O9 R" Y& o
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
+ ]5 w" G9 }$ ethroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
4 L4 Y; ]7 ]( o. k0 g/ D# Renergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
. ]+ r: J8 Q4 B3 @" V( b% fmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record+ r3 }' Q1 r+ _ L9 {& ~& _
breaking price appreciations.! H; V y. _6 O1 P7 y7 m
* H4 @4 f4 [6 T1 x6 p' p Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
" k: A4 Y9 N2 k; Jeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the e# ~! Q e2 }+ ^; W* G; ^3 w
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
5 D3 s, O! S! V! [8 ]; r4 L; y, b6 f& q# h4 E* T' U
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
. q2 T8 J$ V2 m! y z0 [, R9 @economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
9 M% F! n2 m B1 v7 }& @confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off( b5 [& Y5 W4 V; l" J. c' k" @" U1 i
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
3 ]6 N5 |* H0 H. ~In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers/ K# |9 S5 ^! O2 n T8 }1 p. V
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of4 H( `8 ~) Q3 n. h, m: G# M
price appreciation when compared with 2005., O* Q1 Q6 O" Y1 g8 B
: h3 r+ w' _/ b) i" k
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
, b) B6 g+ P- v. g9 @* z% m4 ~6 w8 Zmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
; n' U3 _& M* z) Z$ }financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada2 x( }/ X( \7 O, {( w- h
are markedly different than those found in the United States.0 ?& d* ^3 Q2 @, i: l1 d9 o
" ^3 R8 J6 t# `2 ~' G
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
; L0 Q& ` w( S- J0 }American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's3 _ a/ t! r) P& k
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the4 D2 b( W. z' {/ Z
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
* X& E8 \ O. ?" V- K, i- aaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
* G: v) R1 t4 a0 [downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
! Y) k1 c% z v" }/ t% c* Y0 `- caggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization% i! ^2 i2 |' X) s
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
% q$ l/ X$ e0 T! }0 P/ V) M( M& w' Y8 B$ M
<<
4 G' e- e6 s3 m d7 N REGIONAL SUMMARIES7 c, L# l8 b8 a2 e" r$ i
>>
. O- j2 d: H& W
9 U3 w7 W# U/ b/ K7 k/ p Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in7 n2 }% x% S$ p. P7 h3 n& ^! w2 U1 N3 ]
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
! V+ E' U% `4 Tof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time M$ O2 c8 ^/ x# V2 V' ?2 `* `
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of, {# g6 ~4 U1 Q% x
renovations.
4 A0 B$ s' [5 w7 f3 E# w O1 {4 L
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
% w3 W% T+ Z0 P( qincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation, m) e2 W' n% X" X% Y; `
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
' `% U! z6 j0 f$ o. Y$ ySeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
8 j8 ~8 r( i A- ~1 [5 s/ i. j/ M4 N9 F: A7 n z
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
1 U' K6 }$ d4 p+ K' wslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
. n, _0 z& C9 x3 ^* l: ^quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
+ c! {! K' B8 g: m( B- \600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
& V, \/ \7 G9 p+ n3 d" D7 xto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes- I" E+ J+ B( c' Y5 y
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.; ^' b7 N M7 J3 m0 W4 u
4 ?" V2 X$ `" R9 x8 S6 I2 f1 T0 ?
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
' g0 f: |7 _: ?$ _( s* X$ l/ hconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their- O" ]) Y _3 w% H- t4 N7 q
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
' j1 `" s* l* awas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian( ^' m2 c9 W, f1 l
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
: f; F: S: s6 z- ~( K$ O xbuyers with more options when looking for a home.0 Z7 g: ~' Z& t( \
8 b% e# e: Z: q0 p1 o2 |
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly: a g( {' g7 {9 ]
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
3 d1 V8 v. }: Gpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,. I, ]6 c( C7 Q4 ]/ L
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last4 X! W) A3 B! F9 z" S* M/ f( N$ Z
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.- [1 O& Z7 |1 R! F4 ^
, k# _8 C' W z3 R9 r7 p
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house0 v& [8 j+ N1 Z- @$ r" q
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory& I8 @+ b- d+ j ?1 W
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
. N: S$ T( L6 m1 [. ]# c) Rfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,9 s T/ m) |1 l, x+ m/ i) P- s" N, @
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the i2 ?* U3 m4 [# j1 b
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before p3 k- [5 d n; h$ G
making a purchase.% [$ j$ Q# R4 Z5 V b; k% P
- C9 V9 ?/ z2 L4 t4 ~ Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing9 a2 c* s% \! T" O! G4 t" O
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
* r" r# W- _9 sconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city4 |& ~4 U& V; t |% h
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
2 t, \8 _6 j. b5 V+ f+ P, cattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
7 a' k1 ] S9 ~amenities.
; P ]! c+ e! U+ c) T# K W
% q- \. g+ z" W$ U1 u+ A The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels) p( s) l8 V- L4 B q
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
1 v3 N+ ?2 j0 `( g. \% A' xacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has9 Z2 ^: s9 J; w2 A
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been8 z5 _- B8 o, T/ }
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
9 B- N. q; c3 x, R, t! Kresidence, rather than for investment.& J* {: n7 O* \/ X
5 k5 Q# B! ^0 K
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as! m/ e$ u5 Y0 @# \. o
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
- X+ G- B$ Y9 k. X: j+ {# din a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer1 _' y+ N6 D3 [1 O. A& I" X( E
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization& \2 |) ?; ?! _2 c& E
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter4 r: }3 i) M* }
the market./ `* l1 {2 W$ c
; |( l/ p! b8 [7 c9 Z
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
! h# `0 Q; n' h/ H3 o, M3 H. WJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In) J' M6 q/ s5 {7 K, Z% a( Z+ y
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
1 C: ~7 R/ j- g$ l$ ?9 ~7 N9 ]months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
0 N4 g. j2 ^. D6 S+ f8 }to the shortage of available inventory.
8 N2 }8 K$ n7 V
' _* Y0 ]( D# N, P8 I& b9 m Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
' P) g/ c3 k) _5 [' F: c# Gmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
! ]$ o6 E5 p& N2 d( w& h) Mvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses. H$ o3 g/ f. ?8 S
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
5 `1 F7 S( C1 `6 W9 a/ \6 N6 x6 z5 _# _( _% J- e" O
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases7 o, X3 u( [( u( o" G# Z
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low; B# A/ p# f) `* W. ~
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
* X4 y, z" j+ e% ~9 t Q/ v$ i5 `pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
9 c+ ~ ~5 Z6 f' kprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
+ Y2 y3 y! x2 H( Pseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
# ?% f. N' J0 U5 r% i. L- S/ abuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
8 f* }) k6 i% v$ M6 [! {0 N3 P* c" c3 @5 \. z0 i
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
1 y4 s- i8 |4 Oas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
' |* l- S6 X: a3 Xremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
K6 c0 G0 e4 Jmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
8 }7 J+ H$ F) Q7 {+ H! M9 dincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
~4 T! h, q: c$ K; s0 P5 P; kin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly$ \, t/ `" Q3 F6 f: f' S2 m
towards the end of 2006.
8 n, g! S7 J# G" _: o2 |
1 g% ?: j$ W, GWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of I% E2 u. O. b: _* ]1 ]
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable* w% L9 {: Z" W. B* w
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse1 r" U* Q: g8 D# F7 ~
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to: r1 w# O. v/ P+ g2 e Z$ C
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added \9 E0 J$ F/ ~* {( K& I
pressure on tight inventory levels.% y# D- J8 D6 w
' _$ j: U0 N3 J( A) s6 s
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic3 H+ B3 _+ ^- R' M h, O( B
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
0 l3 y8 F9 X: S) l4 X% dinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
4 h& R' d2 o5 @- w/ f4 `3 \+ \while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching' s$ a" Y0 J7 l
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
4 x- }$ G; |2 I
0 N8 x6 f" H1 ^9 f$ X5 G <<
6 j2 Y8 V! T3 M: n Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
, M8 w1 p ~+ v1 Q, _" S' S! }+ O% S- G5 z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# C: ~, V2 {+ D' b( O [3 O: r
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey+ a. {1 h2 C/ C' {$ M* R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' m: Q! P- [) Y, V2 \2 o) B8 g8 p 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
3 M; e0 I( |+ V e1 J. {5 C& K( [ Market Average Average % Change Average Average
4 E* u; P& W6 R" ?9 }: j9 L2 B+ u -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 y4 k1 r' [8 @/ a( O1 y5 X1 e: A
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0000 |- _$ [" ^$ N: E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ @, J4 {8 a* r1 U: F
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
1 H% ^' _* }2 v# X' ]; U6 `( ?9 E -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ c! i! D7 ^3 z* M; h Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
: R( z! C' \/ \0 } -------------------------------------------------------------------------- G* }1 e/ Y6 k$ L2 W/ h- h1 l
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -4 M ]0 ?" R F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* k, h2 q; J+ v8 z
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333: |; S( B7 J2 `0 b; l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, d5 T9 D# S$ p) f5 Y5 O
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5835 |9 }- I: V. u5 m6 w$ h! a6 J2 K# L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) }3 `; n* A. e. r
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
2 Z$ P1 r9 A# M& U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% r2 r; [% u( L5 s Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250; L4 g2 W/ t* _0 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 z7 U' a- J1 z4 w; ~4 _7 q+ T6 h5 n Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
$ T) j5 y$ z" V+ n5 j/ o -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 r8 o V. H1 g" Y: f. Y! ?# G Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707: ]5 i4 G% x' X% W% \% T) z7 y1 B) w8 a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 E- d) Y0 b- }# R% l7 u Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500, P' O' G1 W F, ~
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 S5 p5 g5 _# \* W' J0 l* W% e Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389/ C) g* D: _7 D3 Y/ u+ y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% A5 I9 j# h6 v8 Q Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714/ G. O" _* Y$ Z ?3 }5 w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 p1 O: h7 X( F Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
( x* s9 c* t% D8 r. S( b0 R -------------------------------------------------------------------------; @! ?5 V8 j( g8 i
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
7 e* G8 Q6 ~6 P9 d, M+ {$ j -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 m" A& e+ z8 O6 w( H
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
6 B' X4 J6 m Q4 {5 M$ D6 g -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, T1 b1 b& H( _* W/ d5 q$ ~$ F& v* G4 @3 p6 B$ f* k
-------------------------------------------------------------& p4 q8 P6 ?& h. e" j# i. H
Standard Condominium
; S: R- l Q: V' E- i% P -------------------------------------------------------------) o8 P4 ]" Z' `' W( L( s6 I
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
: H5 I! s& C9 q6 j Market % Change Average Average % Change
1 T1 U& C6 D9 Q0 J& c) U; d -------------------------------------------------------------" a; \) A6 P( R" g3 z8 _, T6 |
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
) [; Z' _: @( I% D& W" G3 j0 B -------------------------------------------------------------
! n6 O* q* S3 z! C9 l% f7 b4 m/ p Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
& A: w' A; x& E: c -------------------------------------------------------------% G4 Z: K2 J, I: J" U
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
% @! J/ C. @* \- q/ y$ {) b' z( G" N -------------------------------------------------------------
$ [1 S6 \$ H, O9 s Saint John N/A - - N/A. C8 K9 L k; R) A) U% J
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 x0 U" r. M0 |/ a) A8 D St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%! ^8 m# x- n% |* V
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 G7 l; o1 y) \5 z2 X' j$ d Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%; h& Z0 z3 M+ r! k: }. d/ {+ L
-------------------------------------------------------------& ^: d* t- i* |, B. \
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
. a6 E4 y! O4 `% q; g8 i' T -------------------------------------------------------------/ R& [$ P7 V' L9 [3 @
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%# Q$ L) z2 l% q" d+ a/ c
-------------------------------------------------------------4 o$ F! \. k( ~0 v% Y
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
: N3 ?" E1 \! J: E7 {4 I3 \$ A -------------------------------------------------------------
( q% c, }. ?7 z$ q7 x8 @$ z, u) n+ { Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%5 M' ?. V# D7 `) k; R
-------------------------------------------------------------5 L8 Z9 ]- E7 ], ^2 F0 p
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
! q5 S2 w% q! z. C! A) M8 b -------------------------------------------------------------* K! J* T5 j$ x' N
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
; @/ h# ?- r1 k4 G4 d/ k: s; Q* p ------------------------------------------------------------- R# I, \4 C2 H5 Z
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
# }; N; i/ ^ l3 n- p; R/ Q' D+ I8 _ -------------------------------------------------------------
/ A5 r+ f9 J( _ Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%+ r: `1 h; E; O* i$ u( H5 A5 m
-------------------------------------------------------------, g1 q& Y2 y: c, K) U. W# W) j
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
6 w) S- W o! S3 D- t -------------------------------------------------------------
$ R) |5 B) J ~. x; ~* S$ E National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%- o3 h4 I6 i$ y
-------------------------------------------------------------, J3 W. t$ K0 N3 Y8 h& a6 ` M
>>
. ~0 K- n9 ^4 P# @- }; h6 m' N. @1 r4 l
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined" F5 a1 |- @ P9 S. q3 k7 }1 \
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
0 [8 Q' S3 C* t1 zJohn and Victoria.4 m/ o! B) t* a, }% q' k
8 A& X0 C' ?% v
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
: e5 l9 ^9 u5 }comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of e6 d; k- Z: P3 Y, s
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
/ T! ?, q+ O; ?# G9 @3 e0 mreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price# e: q( x0 L- X* L4 W+ |. h1 W( v; X
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities: F3 I! S1 E5 P6 h/ H
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is n5 U' z6 e1 z/ n
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current% I; D' }) L- y
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable2 z% J6 \8 V2 C' \8 F; }+ q% y5 N
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on2 D$ e/ a" K; M
November 15, 2006.: ]' F, G- N& V- @2 f
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
. A, a7 t, U) L% |1 dfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge8 j; `) z# m. V! I0 P
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
2 o8 w; e+ j( [7 p U, ~' e4 m0 J1 e/ H. |available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|