埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2011|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
, X8 K# Y: L  Y) j% s3 L' ~; _! h! l' Q3 J) Y2 y4 {7 W
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -) `6 a1 W( G; A! C& [) `& w3 J; k" n( o

! |9 z% F  E. o    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market7 \# R. \/ n$ t3 k! {
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third9 }5 R# c  i; X% r; `4 k
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic1 `+ t# O: L/ A# n
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
+ A4 k% @- B/ n& L. qprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
4 M. u# f8 [! |9 J* U# _more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,3 P" ?: Z* n4 r( B- }6 u" B2 ]# D
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
2 R; X9 T2 _3 I, `0 C5 HLePage Real Estate Services.6 ^$ ~6 a7 M2 d4 i5 N# K! n

  \* m* w6 H( P3 N" h    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters" H! w$ ]( `2 H4 H
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic- Y. l5 F, w, w3 |% W- p& N8 [
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
8 F/ J7 U" ~' l; V! e6 k9 C# Psound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the+ D/ F9 W8 c; G: W
residential real estate sector.
5 e0 B- d! G" A* L$ M/ s: k' q- z+ @# m% q* Z0 t
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation! c8 _: @8 V* r* W; a. F
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)" N: r% J! }4 [: F
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562( G" Y& I' H' O! H" h
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3809 O5 l, i& W8 S+ E& C
(+13.2%).
4 a7 g3 P2 V- g+ e5 [9 y! H0 a7 g* I$ z
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
1 g# ]6 E0 B4 E! K2 M/ s  Lduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
: e) b& v) T0 p' [frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are5 y3 g8 m& R  D
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
6 Q2 P2 m: M. d$ H0 k9 k$ u) @president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
( D) r  t; L. L' z8 @"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
1 q8 Q, b: Y. P3 e( F, ^! fwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
$ n; L$ ~2 a9 Q! W3 `3 _balanced market."0 t9 I" K3 E- a7 I2 x; o. i9 `3 Z
# a  n0 {! e8 M# |
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,, Q% d* O! F* @( _. s/ P
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
0 i* n" W$ G4 u, N5 Uto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
9 Y. ]' U. x+ b4 r; c' kthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
* f7 q. ~% B. _! A9 J$ `# w( Yenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
3 [' \! D' g& s: _8 J5 Bmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
# C) P3 }: k: w$ C3 N' l" nbreaking price appreciations.2 r$ A. z* R4 r% m' l- \

2 e3 x% h, |2 B- l  _9 d    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding3 e6 \- D" S% j) I3 X& _# u3 e
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
- A( u; m6 g8 ]; y  Slargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
" D3 P0 V2 m/ k- X- d3 o* Q( Q! N6 o" r* q. k1 }) R
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid: |  z% o! e  g! O
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
; r' Y3 Y9 d9 q6 V' Qconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off% W- z1 w! ~- Z$ f9 W4 G- H
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
2 u- q8 h, V, m- t! c; F. O. y6 v& zIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers5 S  Y  W8 B" M; r) H  U
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of5 L, I( d, Z9 C* X
price appreciation when compared with 2005.- S# o1 s5 L# c# ~" r

0 R( D+ g( B  O    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing+ p! D1 ]; n$ a- a9 L
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and  v& [9 d+ T9 w4 T5 O$ S: Q
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada9 s8 G' _$ m( k" D$ ]% l
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
  q/ K4 q0 z7 t
9 {4 D& I+ r0 Y+ m    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the7 B( f- b# m$ l1 c& \" m" ~. S
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
& z4 t7 \; u6 _  V+ B7 bfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
7 y7 ~4 B# Z8 {; Q8 U, Qrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general, _' B+ e4 x# d& n2 n0 D
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
1 E0 N! O9 J# @9 D5 rdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
5 }, a! B' H6 Yaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
0 G# X$ H" u4 k  z3 g# X  rmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
+ ?% T' |. n# I- r# t5 @( _: g/ Y6 Z3 B7 N4 m
    <<5 ^& g0 ~) r8 [1 ^) m
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
2 K" P, t( B' i& m4 q9 J3 n+ ], r    >>! Y9 X, Z& Y- g7 R8 e) [  ^' _
% ~" L2 R  l: R# D
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
+ {& b6 e* r6 b4 R' aHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
9 \  |- s( \" k( j4 D3 F, jof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time2 U- p2 n% t$ c# e) G) w
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
! c, J, s8 ?) ?. `6 E6 g& c4 Orenovations.
! Y! ~( \# p" y* f# |& e, o% H- ~1 Q4 W, M" o
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight4 b6 e/ F& O7 W4 e! V4 o
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
% G2 s* N9 i; K" v# ucompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
. H; \$ O" S% x9 }& ~+ u7 }6 ISeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.5 s7 N7 _8 {0 p6 R) c2 e
0 |# D+ `1 u( i2 {* u" \! x
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer& g- k3 s, v9 M& @' D- k- C
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the$ U6 {& y# O+ p. X+ L) V
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
, N7 m. Q% ^& e7 }600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores) E9 a+ u1 }! K2 H9 g* Y6 v1 k
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes+ b; `0 p* W# ~
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
6 S4 m$ M9 g8 l2 x5 D0 }/ e0 w
- x, b% o3 ]2 V, p$ q- t    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced) f9 A' D5 R' N5 a( V. ~6 X( R) c0 V
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
5 J' C/ ?4 I- Whomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
6 o. g1 E' u, p# J% \5 o2 Wwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian$ \" Y- y3 ^# b# ]2 E
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing/ Q4 Y$ B- I( }9 U
buyers with more options when looking for a home." b2 M3 g9 B( T  D1 t

$ W1 ^" N" b2 k' T8 i    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
2 o: W3 r; G: J, Eamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
8 ?# K$ V4 {2 |! p; X$ _/ Npriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,9 _' \" H9 k, M( q' X% M
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
6 O( Q4 @# P7 d$ L3 ?few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.& l, m; g( T- n/ g
# H6 S( ]2 M- M
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
# W2 W+ z( A5 Q9 b) V- j* R/ t( ^prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory# M- b- n( Q2 @% }2 x
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
5 `2 F, B" _" ]1 D5 T5 |first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,0 m% W- P8 g# d- v( M
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
/ I3 K7 W- v# ypressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before+ d+ ^0 K0 @$ |: p
making a purchase., X, O0 j  G% ?  m5 }) G, e/ G
. n4 n$ h% t# f. T7 V, n% {
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing' f& ~: \  d$ K5 n; e3 U8 V
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
* n4 x# v1 r" n8 Yconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
# |3 o$ B( `1 jcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
+ C+ Y5 ]4 @! g/ Mattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown# P% [* _! n- L+ K5 d' A& V" ~
amenities.
" @5 D% c. W. v/ m2 W# Y
3 \; Q* t/ ~6 j6 o* c    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
) _, L9 n7 ~1 q$ Z! V% a% {. j+ d, dthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
4 V4 ]+ `6 {; N& [2 c; {3 l% {across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
& Z- o* ?3 K" V( {) p- gcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been: q5 l8 f1 }. J8 c: V7 D- Y
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
' o' P( s: m0 |" q+ Lresidence, rather than for investment.% B1 s. N, E: a6 _8 R/ o4 a9 a- G
" t$ C3 Y, b1 q3 P
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as2 p3 [3 k+ ?: u$ r9 s
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted8 E7 `- J$ i- o" x
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer: Y: f/ y, P& i' w8 B; V& ]7 n
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
/ K! r% s- S* {/ S7 O! ^" wrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter, f3 r$ R5 O* \# m7 _. m9 C
the market.5 m( R5 b5 \8 G) j$ }

; t8 T8 `5 n- q( G    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
8 Z6 G$ l8 ~0 BJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
3 U% m" G7 U0 ]( f+ rAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring" w$ g1 ^5 l2 _9 y2 j  X5 B
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due) y1 l( |% W' T+ D+ g0 W9 x6 s
to the shortage of available inventory.$ I( ^% h- n3 _9 P) d0 Q, o# U
8 c3 R; h' D2 d
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
& ^4 Z; i. H# @% |2 d9 p" Gmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains/ \  D8 o) t( j. b
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses9 Y' E8 j' [$ U! O) C% D4 ]5 d3 j
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.& l9 v  O* E* ~3 J3 d" U

3 x, a* {' L$ Z& w7 b% m    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases% F4 }6 j8 ^. v8 t
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
% a8 C% t- K6 ~4 y6 A0 N* G& H6 H* Munemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that% G/ X2 n; K0 ]. ~3 ~4 S
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
) g- l: `5 }0 t+ Kprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer7 ^1 L3 n4 a% w) v# l; p/ \
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
3 w1 `  m& i  i3 O' m4 ]. ^buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
" t" a) Q( V0 w3 e

: a) H- A. }  P" t    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter( Y: h2 [4 C# M; M
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton8 {6 F; s6 p: Z8 S* j- ]
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,* k) K# ~/ M1 B0 g& E: _
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices' l2 Q$ ~, D$ _9 v" R1 G/ f' f1 Z
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
: y3 t  E9 ]5 ^' a# sin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly, e. }+ i5 M2 i( M
towards the end of 2006.
   
0 ^) K, h4 f, m5 n5 E: ^
. V- ?2 }0 M( ]- LWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
; o$ Z: i. f. r# Oinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable9 O$ N( P: R+ O5 t
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse8 R9 c  [7 W) Y6 D" |! ^
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
" @' V  c! Y7 \9 |- R5 nforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
3 l9 }1 Z6 R4 w/ qpressure on tight inventory levels.+ T0 D2 y8 X8 e4 u; ~. p
( d& ]& ~: `4 S' ~
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
4 C5 J( n8 w6 L  O- h0 y8 Xfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
# {7 Z, K0 z. jinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;8 k8 o! o' I% l2 r5 t8 Z6 k
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
0 N  N6 j' n3 ^. C+ E8 afor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.  _; [+ R) M+ j' \+ h0 S

4 i! k0 u; b. w# z$ D6 j    <<
9 ]0 I: ]; I; x      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006! n6 d5 q& ?4 D$ t

: G) Y' S5 o! \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 e, j+ g2 z  w$ u+ V! O& n
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey, _- f7 @- q/ \4 J1 w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 v8 b. \+ ]0 L2 l# F9 w% D                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
2 \: I, w) @# Z    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
; N+ Q& L* P" Y3 y/ _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 ^+ j0 ]$ `. w2 {    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000( a% n+ p1 x7 c+ w9 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 t5 E$ t  c9 |. t
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
  G/ g- @' S: d    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( t* J- M" u" g    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0002 Q7 _' F" ^7 T8 D: A) i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 C9 T( I& T$ ~- ^  d. p4 ]    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
( c% p& ^  t, y! X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  _0 M0 G" _/ X$ Y8 j5 \- U
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3336 b; W6 ]+ B6 [2 g$ `2 v/ I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& D2 O- d0 c7 _" b' t    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583. z! W1 J/ q3 n' l/ A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ E0 J6 n% Y2 q+ O' u" Q
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185" |% [" U/ x, r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ @. R& m  [! W3 S) m) C    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
% j5 A$ H- d: R    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' o: D  H' h7 ]4 V- m* v
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766: t8 O- C2 q& L
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) b( Z" w/ C4 k' D    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
' \! l" f8 W' H5 R8 w8 r  I1 t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 K6 J3 z. s6 P0 |2 n, x# c
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5008 O3 y3 {7 s( C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* D, j8 r. ]7 W0 e7 N5 p
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389. }' [0 v- a/ c/ G; e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 }  O( r& @4 _( f1 S, ~9 t- ]  y' W
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
7 P6 P9 v2 z( M$ k! Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  S! H) w. ^: J+ P" a  Z
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
( \7 G4 n6 e( A' B# D! t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" ?5 x) R0 `+ G    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
' c! ^+ }# V7 F* K, y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" W  W7 o! w6 w% y/ y
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
6 g/ Q/ w( m$ F2 K) F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) k9 H/ l. k7 ?- z8 Z3 Q

  g* [6 f  U6 r. y+ w    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 _4 j+ W- @6 o" \; j                               Standard Condominium
0 m6 ~; s% ?9 _) }' h& T    -------------------------------------------------------------, [! S+ B8 l: h/ P- ?) R
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
+ C$ ~& E2 z' q' K! q: F    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
. j  e  e- A' O/ y1 N    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 c1 j2 X9 T# L. K8 Z9 \' B    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%2 Y1 W8 x2 V3 N0 l2 Q0 Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------; G- L. _" d9 J2 k6 h. e( y9 T- G
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%6 ^0 y, F1 M/ n9 n( \4 D) d. P
    -------------------------------------------------------------( R) {  E4 ~6 K9 y" Q; F0 _
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A3 ^7 N6 D! P3 F' ^4 h8 f8 X
    -------------------------------------------------------------: l  A. ]& z+ Y
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
0 k1 H) R3 [5 H  Y1 E; {    -------------------------------------------------------------. @0 ~5 O+ A* ]: c2 c
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
( ^6 c4 i" M* O& ], Q, t% y    -------------------------------------------------------------( V* `4 z" y5 }5 J) L
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
% r/ B3 v; {# V( p    -------------------------------------------------------------7 P) g; }! ^$ P6 C' ]3 c2 O* m" n& U
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%* e" m  J5 C* a' v/ M) J, X, F* [
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ P5 H- O; L3 s& n! {' z
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%1 v: X) l* a. z: _% g1 M' a
    -------------------------------------------------------------
! X% |$ \5 W% `+ v7 d    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
- r$ r0 q$ U) C& ?+ B2 _; R7 Q    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ n% m6 f* a% V1 p0 v! F    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%2 ?$ z  a- T, m% }
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 x% P+ Y4 i/ S2 C+ n! H  l3 @3 F; O
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%% f" a- S3 Y% S: [" s* }8 M
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ |4 _; e( S8 A; F6 |3 q/ Z: P
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
& y+ A; o0 j7 B9 z3 p4 b    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 B3 j1 e) Y9 Z' K9 n. v    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
' P2 `( u: j. K  l    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ E( S2 f# N+ t    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
9 W- J7 i8 s9 V* L1 k% ~    -------------------------------------------------------------' o. @+ F" o- w0 v3 Q2 m
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%* ^5 a+ \; q3 a9 R+ q; U# ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 A  W  V) n! M' Z+ O1 ^    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
5 \8 L& \" d5 R9 }    -------------------------------------------------------------; b8 h1 i. c; r. b3 Q
    >>
' w1 A/ ]* R, ~0 A$ {7 i: j3 O7 W2 u5 I. G% R7 D
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined. v- |! X1 B& }0 z7 h0 ?' {& t
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint  j3 z  ~& X# I) k
John and Victoria.
2 b1 L7 C/ E2 L9 x
% t2 _' d2 `: _' p# p0 ^0 \    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most( n" R  d8 y3 k( ]6 b
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of3 d$ P( N6 _+ o% k2 Z
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release$ O1 J8 x+ ?7 X* f
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price% {3 V( e5 V2 a
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
0 X( z- s6 C$ S7 B. s" h% Bacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is) }, ~: Z3 L, I& i
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current; N" [( O" k1 X+ O! R
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
- m! P6 z3 k: ~5 C8 kversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
3 i  P+ B3 n) y5 z* d4 }( \, uNovember 15, 2006.' G" x! [- {/ C' m
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of6 y4 [5 g: v# @6 J, P
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge/ [7 k$ Y) W& ~4 @! A
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is2 V! G& t9 {" Q; C
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-11 16:57 , Processed in 0.092311 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表