埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2124|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
  U8 x8 f" E" c- {& q: B1 b# Q/ D' J, b8 Q
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -2 |/ B9 J2 Q* w( X

$ ?9 Z" V* j2 L- g1 C, V    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market5 d4 @, D0 i( @1 h* |
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third+ u; i& P2 i% j7 B4 Y& m0 o
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic5 C8 f% @9 N: D# @
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit7 [. H% h: ^4 u. E7 t5 L  ~% Y' l
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
6 c1 c% {4 T3 I$ x0 U' G- Smore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,9 t1 V2 M: A- q: e. O- c9 H
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal. }; y$ w) l+ ?+ _5 k+ _) r2 G$ w
LePage Real Estate Services.
+ y. o* B; _9 v: J" r. t) b; C+ E! V9 B. V3 C
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters+ J+ t+ y4 m4 j
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic% G8 X, G. L4 j: B$ I; P
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and  w9 c% I* P$ ~9 r' M, z
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the( d3 |% x; W* f9 z
residential real estate sector.
: T, V& j+ n- X9 j6 k7 S. A0 e& A3 q- Z9 \5 i- t, E
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation) [; {) r7 d2 X* Z7 U: L
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)0 D( f9 a+ f- `9 P/ u
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
: \8 ^  x" o+ M6 @4 F( E7 ~) n(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
9 G6 I8 q3 z; M(+13.2%).
1 t2 X" o: I1 P. x  Y- M
6 ?. x1 c, b/ }5 p. \    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
; ~/ F/ o( E# ]9 p" c; c! A' T* [during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the. w, a$ i2 X9 o2 b( O1 S' Y" B
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
6 Z, L5 w7 N1 Y; C& npoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
, m) {0 k6 V5 s8 U1 zpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.. M7 o9 H, h: x9 @% m. E2 D; V
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We/ X" V/ ~5 k0 n8 R5 M0 i7 f9 s4 R
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy. T6 s" }# R& `7 T" j( S
balanced market."
/ ^8 b/ F$ a$ [8 n, {0 [- L: X2 \6 B) R" U
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
* b! M2 V) p8 U& |* jconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift. N, Z# v% C0 H" K* w/ `
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued: a4 j* Z* N: w( ~4 }! f% G
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core5 s4 Z  h. \; S& u1 v" n
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
6 N6 M1 {+ s- p# c; N9 X4 Smanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
1 `# I# e0 j' d# j# Xbreaking price appreciations.
( G' s5 p9 K4 n2 t7 m4 y; i' j9 y- Z9 v4 b) A
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
% ~3 F! S% v7 @; D4 `" Ieconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
# d1 ]! a' u8 v2 ~) o) qlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.1 o! l( ?& i6 r; ?
) [5 e1 Z9 Z! w4 }
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
" [8 x7 U1 e8 g+ reconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
8 Z- K) t4 I: b( x' yconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
7 o5 ?$ B7 w; p# E( tslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
* u3 t# L# f0 C1 d0 z; `In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
& X: ?" a/ M! B! M+ r: S/ {3 Cgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
  l9 o- B% O2 u/ _7 {price appreciation when compared with 2005.$ @2 B9 \* R* ]" d: v

3 a3 [* z" ?! Q: q; b6 A    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing6 w! J3 X# R5 T8 @0 l
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and$ B9 X& C+ S/ H/ K. d6 y6 R# C/ `
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada- J( \9 A" ^- u
are markedly different than those found in the United States.6 b7 I3 p6 s) F. `2 C+ K2 h

, F" t: P- o, c8 T0 d8 j4 i    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the5 Q) R/ |# l+ B- H% l" d1 N
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's3 c! ?* {0 G; O% o
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
6 a$ j7 m: V9 xrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general3 Q3 i) `) ]5 c% B# \/ a1 H! p6 H: m
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
* v- V; W# d3 G4 K, [# tdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
2 l: g1 B* {) k% K$ A+ h3 saggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
- [7 I% l% M! G: v3 x" q8 _mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
# h4 u8 f8 h) y
& A) W) G, E3 z2 z) B2 L    <<
: y  C8 I& U  H                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
9 W( s. R5 e" q, g" L2 X4 D    >>" M3 g, C7 N, B
& D% y& _! X( A7 I+ n4 L; g
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in5 ?& D( U3 e6 g7 Y' ?
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate; M  s) Y8 f  J/ R" Z
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time1 G5 o8 D  N: v6 c) n4 ^
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
7 M( V: O5 N4 ^* ?renovations.
8 b8 _2 C' w3 e9 {9 P! S  o% `) N% S& g6 T7 R5 B2 b
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight, L* l% j* z& D# z5 c  Q
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation' G* m" u' L& {+ d
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
1 O) f( ]. i" ]* h" y  A2 r) R5 \, ISeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.6 [5 X" Q% v! j. Y2 D3 C

2 P, [4 C- F4 k' J. e& y    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
7 [% F/ k. k+ j: W3 E, V' Q4 Gslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
+ V- Z" e# N; b0 R; Bquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
5 K. M/ o0 g, v' b& p8 ~* T# |600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
) ?8 S( |9 z) v) hto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes9 \7 L) y" `9 s0 Q+ V
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
$ H$ X; f5 h9 K! ]7 A4 ^! h% x+ h* f& l8 q, f3 Z- }
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced+ ~) E1 [8 |2 E( |( a
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their+ G6 Z0 z; y2 i3 f
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers, w9 K4 P9 C3 R5 `2 c1 N3 B
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
, A& Q1 Z" z8 v% R" \' L1 ddollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing- q( j. Y( R  v3 O5 o
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
1 S8 k5 a% f: p2 d) E1 }5 \9 h) T
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
) A6 e2 K7 v" D  W3 H5 o' ~; a8 k( zamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes; k* n& p# X  ?! b8 }9 N
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
. }3 z* p8 u% S) F* ^as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
+ G5 T9 g" S5 B. p- P0 Q. D, Pfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.8 P: G7 F5 s1 v, s1 h; _9 t0 J

3 Y! ]4 j& F/ o( Z& I8 i- G" v    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house8 X; k8 r- n9 D5 i% R1 u
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory& Y: |7 }$ V" r& A& K" U& z
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting$ v) S2 i0 u9 o+ y# c: k
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,* _6 U! t, R. D. F) R( d
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
2 x* ]! N( L! U! k$ ppressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
! v$ N# I. u0 C1 ?1 |5 A9 \making a purchase.% w5 o9 W) `7 k( b; y/ D

- h7 ?! n6 a5 l( `$ }    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
9 Z: ^" ]' V2 S; Bmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong0 q) m3 o: y1 }$ v
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city. B; S! D. `, I4 k' W
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
, w( A8 @! J" M* @! x+ {attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown9 J$ [* X3 x" A* _; d* q* x
amenities.
0 d" `7 i" g7 |% i+ L- g) r/ c8 @" {2 R6 K
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels5 Q; R# }9 C/ s6 Z& }1 R) k
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
6 z- T0 L) d& P$ pacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
, f+ P8 Z9 m, `: kcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been4 _0 w8 {- H' [6 D4 k5 M
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
8 s1 W7 q; P' p' M$ s" Sresidence, rather than for investment.
1 D: |/ a& E% y" C0 x3 x  z6 y' w1 [. P3 _, I9 V
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
- y8 }" d* b, c7 Q/ H# ^; Zhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted) J+ P( g$ a" C+ H* s
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
2 R# Y2 E6 D3 V: P6 r5 Fconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization) J8 B( t+ p2 f& [5 B. M
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter# C* y4 H# q0 {7 M) H! q
the market./ D) U( y8 c2 L; L; z' P

& U, Z- P- C. q8 Q! }    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
1 {5 M2 ?; q4 tJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
* S: ^2 O7 r8 ?8 N: g- j2 a6 B& K: o9 YAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring! G2 ^* U  Q7 K+ H0 Y+ Y
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
' {' w" \. p, @. c5 c) yto the shortage of available inventory.7 a9 G9 t# G6 v

! o, {: l5 |& w* o1 y4 u: L) l) i    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
7 T$ p' |$ j8 c& Omomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
/ c, f  G: |* F4 R+ fvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses" ?: U: f! v8 Y/ L7 h  X3 D& z
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
& A. w4 \1 P8 ^" b& x
! ~6 \- L! q( w  L6 M% {( Q0 l    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
( W8 R6 L' L9 v9 }8 A( ?in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
; H$ ?8 k4 _- vunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that+ i7 e5 ]/ N+ d, f9 G$ O
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring; w- `. j" ~( {* d; C# O
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer& J9 f' z% B5 ]+ z/ c
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as; Z# B! u' x! U6 P( ^/ g2 M
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

' ~+ X$ N4 C4 A6 o- R5 x# K  ^: J/ ?& a6 G# R
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
/ t' q$ U  q1 X0 K1 r: Qas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton* R9 t% N; ]$ ]3 _9 Z
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,3 \! ~0 P: e; ]9 v: D
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices( e9 q) L# G  s% Z' F
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve- M* {2 T% ^; V, o$ f
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
3 W7 J* c. j- Z8 ~0 S! Htowards the end of 2006.
    % x5 N  J! l' F' u5 I1 q0 X. n
2 e1 T1 b  R+ l& j! x1 ~( \
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of8 A0 h- T1 d5 w# J1 ~( c
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
% j2 m! y/ P$ b4 l; P9 ~5 I6 ito meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse, t1 ?9 g; t$ R3 b: F3 W) h
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
3 Z1 ?: J/ R, A' L6 sforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added) S& t6 i2 U3 Q' m5 C7 ?
pressure on tight inventory levels." R# }* H$ Y# y4 W

2 V3 u; J: D; O7 ~) D$ ?7 j8 `    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
3 B* x) T4 r( _2 G0 p/ F; Cfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people8 p( R8 H7 c2 l! i: m
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;! ^7 L0 c7 N6 \! }/ C8 o. M
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching, ]# R5 D2 B; c5 R# D: ?
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
# s1 J1 N9 r& H$ D( q% v8 h  i, p& d: T9 H/ k5 Z/ F
    <<! y/ U4 g; k9 L
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20061 v! i% G1 G. B: f, P' ^2 V
. Y8 V, }% O4 d. Q8 _. E" M
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& l: V. d  u& `3 `$ `0 f. {% h
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
8 g( P& j( z- O8 e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; ^# ]) D0 S3 p+ P4 [% g. v* l- D                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
6 V4 u1 p0 V" ~9 T& ]    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
( M! D% M% e% {3 _: N& n* W$ ?    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ F; `2 @2 l4 t$ S1 B0 b+ y7 L
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0009 {! u) A0 k6 M, G- B  F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" c& z9 `- G7 Y2 ^" Q
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000. G; k. @2 b7 e5 K- j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ s4 d+ _4 i" X$ G
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0005 z# s3 d" ]& ]+ Y: e. [
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ n9 h9 V& C- J% [" U    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
0 e3 [" F& P  ]9 s9 N: ~& y7 J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. D6 _# |7 S1 Q7 a' e  K3 M& x. A
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
0 D& Y. ]4 T  o7 @' D4 X& |    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 v, g" z5 v  G1 b! }6 N6 u    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5831 d. d7 Z8 K+ U- _6 W2 y' p: u
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 I% Y+ U: D) V& S% J0 `! q9 I
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
" ]( v5 ]: s- B$ Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( f: I' d  I( `" y3 D) O+ e
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250' }* N  g' F1 L! ^& v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 a$ ]2 F. N1 Z9 E: ?/ B    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
  n0 H9 v, x. `6 v1 j% V" f- |" x    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' v: D8 I2 l  T* n) Y
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
, q( {- d4 B. ?1 c, c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 s) P5 Y( X: j2 J* n$ M
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500  x2 ~& A% B, l3 J2 c
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) }% H0 ^7 y3 p2 H& v    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
9 i2 m, b7 V1 \- C6 s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* n* K3 o* j3 e# ^    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
$ v- r) B3 ?, s% Z2 j# x# o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 ]" q& p$ x+ X2 D4 \: M" E" s    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5004 R2 H/ `: u, [3 y# v5 C6 v0 K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 J+ i+ n1 M, H  N0 G/ Y
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
  y7 I! V3 A" Q" O" k( ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 g: [! u+ h3 C2 T" f  D# _. W
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
; R5 c( u8 v( F" W5 F) n/ D  e( Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( e4 B4 Q( ^1 \5 D
# w0 t: C0 O9 n9 A  V    -------------------------------------------------------------
- Y! N) z0 H" X1 v# R                               Standard Condominium
& C1 S) K' s: Z9 H: P    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 T( G8 f7 ]3 G' w& d- v                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo5 }/ O  {: O0 P+ @1 H
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change: O, C! X8 o# y5 E; s1 q6 v. s
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 b% H1 q/ g( g8 t, M    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
+ G& u, D9 ]0 s. E- d) n$ u. r$ O    -------------------------------------------------------------' ^3 D) l) ^5 y1 V2 k6 q& G
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
% }8 |" A4 v7 V, h5 Y9 }* ^$ E4 g    -------------------------------------------------------------. ^* G1 }' y+ T
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A* R6 T$ B4 a7 `; r: j
    -------------------------------------------------------------5 V: d! c9 o  q# _+ C7 @
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
) m4 `: ^9 z" k    -------------------------------------------------------------
- t' l2 m; T! c  ?) i$ Z    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%& E( u, `8 B, h8 z
    -------------------------------------------------------------! c  b" Q% Y/ i3 @- D" d2 u" P
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%1 Q9 E& j3 w  Q1 Z8 Z: X
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  r3 m- H) g; @1 v4 g0 H6 k" o/ D    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%6 ~% \) s! ^; P2 A
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ k& ^4 a# |: }" T. F& v5 p, Z( k5 i5 ^. f
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%- b8 |) f& R; F# U0 {
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  T! _+ t3 G2 F    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%8 m* h) N& [* K8 m+ p
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' k8 a3 x% r8 P/ O9 [$ f8 q* A    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
" S* d7 p3 I0 \2 j, v3 N1 x    -------------------------------------------------------------. y( P, u5 G' {4 [
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%8 v, E, y% q" }' J2 g
    -------------------------------------------------------------: z* }5 C- e5 V- Z
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%3 T& f9 v5 Z. n+ ?' r" l6 \  E6 u
    -------------------------------------------------------------( U" E. r+ Z5 A
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
6 s% S; s) ~+ g' s* B2 t    -------------------------------------------------------------8 G' F7 s7 a- e- P" o+ N. y% ~! i0 V. p
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
: f9 K& Z7 n# D  m6 M9 L7 \0 }    -------------------------------------------------------------
. h( x( b5 D* D4 w    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
! S1 k& [. [2 i! h/ j. k- R    -------------------------------------------------------------8 m/ Q9 V0 F- ]+ x6 ?4 l
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
. k8 J, Q3 T5 v# S  k1 Y: n    -------------------------------------------------------------
' n3 i3 Q! Y- x& |  u    >>
. X. L9 s+ e" g5 O& J8 u8 Z" Z- M/ K" Q5 R% v. W
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
, p3 R( B6 p" k5 l" `; W9 F; j  `in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
. X+ R% A5 u1 j, E! X5 WJohn and Victoria.
3 Y4 `4 p+ \) k# w& q5 D, F
* ]  j. a) w6 W9 s    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most& R  K1 u5 P* L: T/ l! ?
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of# G2 H* Q+ W# T  Z3 f2 ?
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release0 @; w. `5 j, ~+ |' h4 \8 A
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price$ w. J1 I/ y- {7 I* V# M/ x
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
: A( w- l" f4 wacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is) U& y* V: T4 L5 `
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
4 |* u% _9 b2 }$ T, v5 cfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
$ }7 x' P" ^7 ~' W, C# uversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on  V' z! a. ?' J
November 15, 2006.
- x5 [8 R* d3 b    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
' a$ E0 x) ]- w! ^fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge: l; V1 S7 {7 `: D6 B) L
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
2 c8 R+ w: K# T- I9 y3 ^: Yavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-1 20:27 , Processed in 0.063783 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表