 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
, i1 U! @: y9 U0 _
, C* e! B4 _* a+ Y; p4 l- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -" K" s/ g' J1 u* x1 M
5 U2 M& G5 K, i# Y) j& G
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
0 q( C: K1 {6 [1 _6 H hexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third* ~) E9 V5 M% s, W& q
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
1 t5 B A4 Z; n1 v I3 Z* A+ Min the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
0 H: v1 a7 ]1 }0 y! h4 P) Eprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and0 X# B- q6 r( V
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
' A8 D$ z) R8 s6 R3 @. G8 Q* R3 ZQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal' ~# h1 I- R% ]" \$ {: f
LePage Real Estate Services.
+ F+ k D& \3 y7 ?9 Z# M* e0 ]1 s6 N, B) ^; D: R
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters: ?+ E+ }3 f4 w+ @, N( v E3 v
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic- D8 y1 `& A1 ~
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and* n. |& S: G- _' g& f
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
/ ^* c( C8 n" z1 vresidential real estate sector.
0 g! x; u6 w K4 g: {" Z$ L R1 s5 L, w% t
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
) I% L/ C5 m- @! joccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%), d2 y& I3 Y, T. s! }% k
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5620 Q! ~3 {$ J% Q: X& g$ T8 B" J
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
4 w# @; w, y( A6 c' z7 G(+13.2%).
+ e) f0 g; q/ S! {8 N% A) ~
1 d& o/ s- q9 y( z) ` "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth" B0 s, n$ y+ k( F, u: B0 E
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the& y3 c' t9 j+ n9 n# c( f8 _
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are+ P r* R* Q4 |; I$ N# |# {5 Q
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
* N) H5 R' k+ [% J9 C7 |president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
. w/ [6 g6 k7 v) @* i T( ]"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
5 f# q/ N' T$ r3 Z% K2 x' Swelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy* Z6 ?* p, M$ i7 i) `
balanced market."
; m* H( K5 x1 Q; E! K# l/ q
2 |7 O5 |- J7 w! l5 U- c; L Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
" V3 U& Q, ^7 v7 O% F) yconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift, O+ D: }4 o6 ^& j$ j8 k6 J8 R" T/ _
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
% U ?* e+ k0 o! y: Dthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core# k1 @: u3 c6 L- q
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,: s* X. N4 a. `7 O
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record4 w, n4 }+ ^ o' k) p5 ]
breaking price appreciations.
% }/ k: g" E, H, T) g) ?
0 F* c7 B! N2 X# H! a A0 i Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding1 ?* C# I7 z# ]
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the9 w" k# `, b% O ~
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed. b9 t) ~" f9 x: q. }
7 k, U2 k% K: ?+ J
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
- M$ x7 c( r# J% q! Jeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer# |& Q& f5 @8 b+ R- I$ Z$ e
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
; K7 \3 K# t5 S7 fslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
c/ @2 `. Z9 bIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
6 Q( ^' V, x& r, t$ Ggreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of, t- A$ l. ~% ~& o
price appreciation when compared with 2005.6 P3 v. c1 _( m) q/ n
$ e' f& n3 ^ T% a
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
5 U( [$ ^+ u) smarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and& ]+ _. e( t: p
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada' `1 l7 P; N% |
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
# r4 f! ^ f% d- ]. p4 y# l% w& _
9 {: b0 y( \0 r0 B+ p Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
* e6 v! j. {# H# j. @8 {American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
4 a) e- `/ i8 n0 afavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the$ m: z- U( ?9 @2 H2 y
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general4 f; t8 V( t& W) ^
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
: s# q% {, y5 G" w& |downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and% v; J& w/ ]2 L$ y' H
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
8 x. l' l, X! s* i0 emortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
) U$ m: x1 ^# [4 l0 p( w' z' Q8 ^% h" b8 L( `" F4 n# f, [
<<+ u5 s2 z8 P, }; q
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
; B, n- I9 ^) C3 t2 m >>1 o8 J3 s2 j. X% H
% F5 F0 _/ F l4 r" J1 V) a Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in% h. y) `: O% @2 I5 k3 e
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
8 i0 |1 n( |/ q. q- tof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
8 `3 L! x7 g6 m1 c1 s, h8 r$ Mlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of( T( |: r* f. E; j5 z* f t' C" J
renovations.
+ K5 g @ {% @5 W5 ^7 P
5 f# c4 c" @: Q, o The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight, s7 X `3 E- v
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
+ L/ W2 C* J7 icompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and( r2 E7 A; @) L* H* E* y
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.; E" `4 F0 O1 R2 i
3 g6 H+ {/ k$ L6 u" y4 K, m
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
# G* r: B" P% |/ ^1 m/ eslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
) x0 n! {9 V: X# f% Pquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new& d: i$ s& u' _# l: A" u
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores. U! K. m( z+ J' ^
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes K- D1 d$ E& d7 s y# F, A
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
' ~. ~) o' b1 H0 c2 Q4 A$ o/ {( V+ E; B4 Q$ D$ f0 i3 b# M" `" [9 ^( k3 m
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
# v0 L) `: N L1 H$ lconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their: `3 z. j' X/ ]# A! ?4 D
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
/ N' a9 w4 m( |was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian ^ X* E4 ?% x( w" @. ~+ F- a
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing! q1 N% j. X$ ]
buyers with more options when looking for a home." K7 W8 j x. g% k, f+ t
' Y$ [0 b+ J% @7 O9 g
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly3 _0 P5 P3 s6 d7 q7 Q* X
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes+ y! e t7 b8 ?, D+ {; F+ u* G3 p1 I/ F
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,' d, w: |. `+ R6 U8 w* e
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last) V1 S) p8 t# \. Z$ g
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.5 R( B$ h4 m; ?" y5 t5 j! f: p# W
# R. \" @' @- K: U' p
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
/ ^0 M* x" y( Z3 \( Bprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory) Z9 O$ W0 }! f" Y+ K* o* x6 X3 n
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting* S7 A* Y& o/ b- K/ g
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
. d, P9 w' ]6 N) F% V: a, Ewhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
- Q# f( T* ]% E# H3 a6 J$ @0 e- Npressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before# Z* w2 K, @1 V
making a purchase., L) e; i# t. b9 e
' {9 V4 D' N, m) Q' v1 `/ p# Q
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing+ a" g% W$ l/ u0 Y0 S; R
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong9 B4 H1 R! q% }4 E9 C& @% i* u
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
+ |& H8 E7 b' B$ x5 `$ L! \/ g! j, M& xcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
0 L: Z$ R, P; ~$ m8 zattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
& F# f1 M/ W) j, t- c8 `amenities.4 ~, ~5 V. z0 t- d
5 t, Q, Y6 ]2 w f M( ?! J' L The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels4 W* U4 f) Q/ ~- K
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
/ O1 Z* {/ X# Wacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has1 j1 d4 L P, W& ~8 k7 _, y( L
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
' b2 B, W, r+ J7 l8 w+ p) Kdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle. c7 M) N, w; _3 {7 ?+ v
residence, rather than for investment.
' i w8 N/ d. Z* Z- Z0 \) {- ~; ?5 z! F
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
X* F1 g7 l6 M4 m& f8 \. ]/ i% ?house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
1 d7 \% f9 F5 i }4 p3 uin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
- x. E$ H q# }5 T% Nconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
; {. T+ d9 m; zrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
, J5 ]8 ]3 R# ^the market.
4 n1 l* w' Z# n5 P
. o9 R" a% y7 \& q" K In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through- _* J8 Y$ x; U' V8 D; {
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
( l3 Z* u, ?* ]6 g3 x$ T C3 zAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
. C" g6 v+ I5 |7 n/ S) ?8 p; lmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
+ F( y- [8 f: D3 ^" E) H+ Wto the shortage of available inventory.
9 Z* A, k o6 o. h/ }1 { ?; {
$ w6 M# u- k3 U. x1 \/ C+ X2 a( U Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
( Y1 U0 U5 \/ a# k4 I) imomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
" `5 e: I9 I- d5 M9 _vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses p6 k2 w6 P; X$ o2 {5 }. U. b9 }/ o
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
4 K" j% A6 r) t# ]5 s9 Y
. l" d9 |- \. x# O7 M9 C. B! c7 _ Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
- ^: F/ g1 w3 hin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
# F& G- z% p! V/ Gunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
- Q$ d' \5 x* K; Npressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring" c: d: P/ I- F
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer9 t$ k- M* k4 E0 W# J$ d* e t6 P
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as4 h2 ]( k( a4 C6 `9 C
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.! k$ o2 b( O D6 ?( U3 A6 a2 N
/ q$ ]) I! l6 S" m
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter1 i# i0 p( D% X, e5 j* q
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
- X+ A. i& K6 F/ r8 k& O# o0 i9 ]1 Qremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,, m! A) M8 f }# q- S
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices" F& J2 J! n3 C5 u6 {( V- l1 \
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve7 _/ }0 m6 e0 G! m3 i- Z
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
1 x5 N! B) y% |) O* Ctowards the end of 2006.
# [; r. E, \7 u% @) N2 c/ @3 f4 O0 ]3 p/ J
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of* A0 p* m" z! E
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable2 u m6 T8 }! {
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
$ c) X. o c/ x- q: q; Fgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to# _ Q- O) U) f% Z9 S& R# {6 l
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added% B+ x$ @: P* T; P
pressure on tight inventory levels.
! I0 T2 x, A, O8 n; |
4 G6 N8 J! n) B% P6 I9 k Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic% ?. m0 u2 C6 S* s: a- s
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people4 {4 e. u3 M) Z; T. I5 n
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
5 X! L1 y! c/ l+ \. p7 ^+ Iwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
0 p4 [# ]* \, D- q1 E- xfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
) @6 t6 N8 i4 R: J: n- ?
7 _, h. ]8 h2 X& g( g" Y- |1 M <<
. r, R3 J( k. X! J. u+ ? Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006( S% O* I3 N, f8 R1 h1 ~
6 e7 x+ t. E+ n @. A. H- K# l( p. ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ]$ R D! s& A Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey K1 {0 ~ k% J0 o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ _3 j8 Q2 m$ L, L R; H3 k. t
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 n1 j- C( G" r& v
Market Average Average % Change Average Average3 ~% s: f. P h; f# g9 H( i% Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 J5 h- b# d! C' C2 S3 ? H5 m Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
/ N; t1 h' o' F- x+ l# ~, g% [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" x3 v2 \& {' f- x- y' }4 H Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
2 L4 o G/ ~- ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. z1 ^2 C1 H3 T; N: O' Z Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000& [( r9 g4 }! \" |1 S! f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ h3 B1 M( X1 h: v$ P# y8 c
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
8 k2 |# i0 M3 [: \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; i+ ]9 W3 ]9 i+ \ St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
8 V5 Y. s. U S" W9 ~; {3 T -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 \! R: A; ]& k* G j8 b
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583, r8 M3 W. h- V) t) I) P5 F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 U# D) A' {% Q& Z# t3 z Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1858 l! D* `5 K$ a% o0 ]; W o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! s4 z, s* D% @. ~% K* c
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2508 i9 H( E" I, z* h- T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ b. A+ M: |7 a" s; ]# e" }
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
# J! f" I' G( { -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 _2 b. |# N' p, ^
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
" B8 | [/ h) q8 Z ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ^/ E& q" o+ s6 v
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
0 \4 c* J% _9 |* e -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, b* C( U* V: U0 j5 ]& u Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3899 G5 L& K4 h& a# u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- ]& k/ Y. V" s) X/ ~; \: u' v p
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
5 H& q |4 n1 A+ N -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 U* |# `# s& N, X3 ]' R" F
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
/ Q1 l b# A2 S/ q' X# ~" c -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' w1 E; T$ J! h& {/ ^3 } Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000) f- D( M9 j$ w# }- @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; S4 d2 _# u& P: } \3 b
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
- W5 ^& ~$ P1 u) O4 K$ O -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 p5 n( `8 K: |- T
x* W# W5 K9 t% H) B -------------------------------------------------------------0 o$ A& E# c9 ]+ _
Standard Condominium
# d4 q- I5 d, i) U6 V6 c) \8 O -------------------------------------------------------------" D' a0 j$ y7 F5 F: b
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
D5 A. a1 {9 i' b Market % Change Average Average % Change
2 U* ~7 \% A# x, M; t -------------------------------------------------------------
6 \0 `# c4 x# { Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
* P' A2 A% ~. W* H! C -------------------------------------------------------------1 N F! T. I% _
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%) [) e" e [0 I6 F
-------------------------------------------------------------
& G! V5 X5 Z# Z* c$ Z+ _: E- a Moncton 4.9% - - N/A& g5 S* M9 t Q2 X) w T$ c
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 y8 K6 u* X1 D- j, k5 m6 i5 ^ Saint John N/A - - N/A
$ s$ V$ ? J1 {- Z% c -------------------------------------------------------------
/ a, C! Q+ A! ] St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
2 S3 r4 A+ \- B/ O" g# T -------------------------------------------------------------
+ h9 C. X6 [9 k% u Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4% o/ ^9 m% A% w( b A/ i! V
-------------------------------------------------------------
* ~! q7 r6 T; f Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%4 K- D( B- T9 l
-------------------------------------------------------------' o7 W. \3 ~8 e: i
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
' k% j/ y. h" Y$ Z2 @: h& w6 P4 ] -------------------------------------------------------------+ I* H3 d+ U5 n$ ^5 P5 ?: \, D
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%* O9 k. |) ?& B0 _! F' ~
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 d) K% ~3 N# d$ j& L( k1 G+ G) _ Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
$ Q2 m2 r, u* s/ A: b; h -------------------------------------------------------------
& B% E0 C1 W% v& z Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%' O) _, G+ l* f4 _
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ s( \: v" m D+ ?) t( x# u4 n& I Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
6 U' V( o, q: ^, T7 A -------------------------------------------------------------3 T( F( N0 `; G+ z+ a0 |$ x
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%5 E$ {" n4 N$ D& x3 j
-------------------------------------------------------------. K0 _) F! O9 p% ^' G- @
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
L% X% z4 D( q# V: S -------------------------------------------------------------2 P1 U, B3 A( o
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%( y( D! H8 b3 V& u0 G/ }; |
-------------------------------------------------------------& y- Y0 g, C! V. N; O$ P
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%% s3 \6 C+ b- V
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 ~0 ? b6 b- T >>
0 Y4 C. U* M* G$ Y- o: u5 q5 x0 g$ B
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
; y1 ]# s" M' K" O, L& Yin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
R0 U# E8 F$ m$ k$ ?* ]6 N# cJohn and Victoria.
6 Z4 O* W" h0 ]6 W3 E1 [& m& K0 t# B2 a: C$ M6 s3 n9 Y
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most5 Q# O2 D2 T! N- H% Z; }
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of& t' J! F- X" X9 |' k5 `+ y
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
: a' u, R, c8 [& S* Wreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
9 e( h* v/ e* m4 r2 ttrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities J8 S0 q7 h& g4 q" v2 J4 N" a
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is8 D. H# \7 ]( F, c5 v
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current2 q3 A% I0 l. Q- n% @1 q2 f8 N
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
* W/ d- p$ ^3 v3 d8 F5 Nversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
& s& j# M) H+ {/ G9 @! oNovember 15, 2006.5 H# W5 J6 w+ |& W4 Q) N
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
% I% C5 x, x# V5 Z' \0 g. Nfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge* d9 k6 s p# D) I: m1 C) k p
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
. U+ t. r. V- R4 |/ R1 _8 X4 I1 T* }available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|