 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
6 D( w) B& l E1 X8 l7 `5 N. w; A
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -; `5 S- t. v f
M; X8 m4 C1 O4 j2 O
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market* J# r& ? ~% W
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
) Q; g8 |8 v- Pquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic8 c" U% H. G4 _9 h
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit* `! z/ U, h$ S* k6 L7 s
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and/ S/ y2 D' K/ T0 ^3 h
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
! ?: O2 Y$ @, N4 _$ d. bQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal2 n# v: E2 l+ t$ ?- }; T3 W% e
LePage Real Estate Services.
' q) H1 Z6 c; H0 p+ k; s2 X, N. c$ ? y4 z8 l
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
i. U" I) ]7 m( d7 B1 `are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic7 }* N3 s' x- e1 [2 B
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
$ a# t# i& ?) ?& i! i$ vsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the" z5 [5 q( g4 u
residential real estate sector.) n* D6 F0 H: @1 C
0 ^! |0 B$ a @1 {/ [2 b2 `* \ Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation3 L! F9 Y1 e. f
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
& @/ T" h. C6 E* \% eyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5628 X# f+ p) o0 _ P
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3803 N8 m: |2 Q# v" A8 _
(+13.2%).
6 p+ r/ y+ o' Y" R$ y \$ P5 F2 y' `; ~3 ^. o) h$ e, L. j% @
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth" Q) x4 {6 g; O! g* Y
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
/ g; h; v& k8 m$ {- S, _8 nfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are1 W4 f" B) q5 H7 B& ~3 n% W
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
' h9 R4 C; v$ u) s# W6 npresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.9 l: y( Y4 c/ D) N% g
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We+ t; I: e r4 P+ I: \
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
2 v4 K6 I# K _" J" a/ C2 i* kbalanced market."/ h+ J% n% F3 j1 W& I
' ]* E/ u0 C: q1 }% H, T3 p
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
+ k; \: @: h. C6 C1 Tconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift1 V- |: l- o A" R6 X* `, N
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued$ Z8 x! L# o/ U: Q# O- D \
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core1 @0 ^+ Q2 Z% `- ~7 F
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,2 }, J) Z1 u! X' b! L( f6 d
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
/ B8 }5 f, A0 H$ H* n/ S) t; Ubreaking price appreciations." R/ G& h8 y( ~& c9 k( _7 C& E7 ~
1 z K [ g: ~. Y+ f Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding4 H! |( O1 v5 t) ~: b, e
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
, K) J0 {$ ~# U& `largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
, C; J, E! j5 i" P q; Z- P
; o/ @! N( D! E9 H: a: k In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid0 k1 V$ r( `5 s" I( \
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
; S+ K J+ Y$ g8 @$ L6 J. Iconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
4 `- g3 y8 D8 m# M' N( y# m+ l- O9 s& Cslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.- h$ o2 x7 h" g; S7 n
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
, ` t7 f5 D( Bgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of3 X5 Y; S- x7 G+ V9 B5 Z1 r; Z
price appreciation when compared with 2005." H* |; @* B) ?# V
/ V5 B5 V# |7 k' ~/ H- D While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
$ A! h$ A; f7 n/ u' B6 dmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and) W$ x! x( X. P& a `( ^2 K( W
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada, z% M" ]/ U/ v0 [: S5 K
are markedly different than those found in the United States.' Q& G: {# G1 v# f- L3 L6 a
4 @3 t6 t5 s. M1 Q! |
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the9 F) ?- B) P: p1 o% V
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
, f! m$ O/ ~: m/ D1 ]- kfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the. P' S' J" j) c5 G/ z; A6 K4 C
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
. S1 i! G4 D: Y- m# l; \affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the( O% ^" k& k5 T% X
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
! }* W6 l8 ]- \. Uaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization0 z7 g& Q$ Y, h1 V! q" s% ^
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
6 X* b% d5 K: G2 j! `7 h. k3 ]! a: V% X& \8 Z
<<
: R) `6 v X# q' O. x( u9 u REGIONAL SUMMARIES
8 B4 _2 I% k& C >>
% u- T# F8 F' I1 M. j0 @
. P! m* O3 I9 l- W Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
L# b" n/ [0 a1 J, x! G6 Y& [Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate) E. T6 \7 _0 J
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time6 z& b* `/ G( M
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
6 {. Q- T% l- e5 B* xrenovations.' X$ A0 c) K) |' s) X* C+ K) {2 L. R' |! }
+ e% e. s" n" z, x% H. ?' O8 r
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight7 D$ @' h- o. M5 W3 z
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
. M% R% X* S- {9 q5 F7 l9 Rcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and }$ T3 w/ o% c( T# K+ R0 Q
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
7 y: u% J i7 R% [4 B7 U: K3 ^4 O
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
8 j' `* g) m" R1 Nslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the: r- Q# {9 m# H/ L# H6 K
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new& T s8 o( |! `# _7 z/ ? M
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores8 W5 b4 d% }0 B! Y) x: c4 t( x5 n6 E
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes( P8 ]+ t+ r& }% I
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
4 R7 ^$ X3 G6 O v! N0 \3 _! V
: C& Z" f" Y% i* r, W In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced' r% C7 v" N( }! E& R
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
, L e$ m6 t ]$ N( j Q$ jhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers# N5 z+ J/ ~! b2 j1 n$ y
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
m5 ~' f# ]$ b1 @& W/ Ddollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
: u' f! a2 e/ Tbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
5 Q4 B3 G4 ^! ^- H j
/ X! j! z# E+ I1 c. ^0 |( U( g. L Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly D, r2 J) s4 K( _
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes' k6 e4 Z( z4 C9 U0 [% o2 o5 ?. f
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
9 P. F' l' C: {as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last- l1 g' q' j$ R& _% D
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
) d7 `' r# ?2 ~- A$ w3 J i! B
8 S$ K4 Z) w4 v Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house% s& f; c( q3 ] ]8 l& h
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
2 l6 T6 o8 T5 b0 v. Y& plevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
7 U" i O1 B; z9 ]4 Q( g6 y+ vfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,1 P9 g h3 ~& ?% v
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
" A. p+ [* b/ c4 v% |pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before T: w4 v) e% @; t8 p8 ]- N7 h
making a purchase.
2 `' ?; }" D& z: i3 G$ i
. V* h7 i( d G/ D: ~ Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing; D" |7 l$ A/ k6 ?) `3 ~- v, v
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong0 W, ^; Y: y: ~, B8 a. v
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city H, r" ?9 g1 F% Q; n
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting" O# p T/ ?% w9 ?0 Z
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown- l7 `0 ^, t1 M/ x5 |5 ]
amenities.+ _4 r5 a7 R2 B4 x
( T3 l# H' n% A8 L. t+ [& O The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels; s' l' c& }0 D1 H: H! k8 v
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
) y/ ~9 B6 L, Q- \% Wacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
* c5 Q9 x, G; x2 E) q8 n7 t- H- Lcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been q7 M; ^0 O4 k% @+ A2 y
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle9 Q% _9 |6 q5 i4 | H
residence, rather than for investment.& m) l) r3 ^, V3 @. U3 p- F
E- D* ]" g. K. V The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
. V& d) W/ n! ]3 i* bhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted0 W. e$ P3 b& E7 k+ ~6 F& U! c
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer n5 U/ i' f! D! {( q" e! s$ O
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization+ W0 q N2 X2 @$ N/ J7 I
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
& ~- S% e4 M8 s/ a" w8 p4 Pthe market.
$ L) i# v! e7 y! g/ X4 e
8 w( Q, c" a/ u In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
: C2 m/ I& |, [# d2 t$ BJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In" C e& w! l- v- o/ Q
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
7 r J) a/ c- S. ~6 ymonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due; |. D n' `9 }0 ~- [1 w
to the shortage of available inventory.5 o# m' Y" y/ w4 s" z V. x3 P
# B3 S% Q% }- z) K& l( i7 {
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
" K$ m8 ]4 f# }9 o2 Q1 Pmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
& X3 `9 i9 k! [- rvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
4 @4 D, e# T) {5 ~/ L& fstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province." X5 `/ S8 l i$ h% i
i: ~9 x& M7 Q1 x/ Y
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases+ O+ D) X) v+ @4 N- G* V
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low! v, `# c6 s' w- S3 ]$ E
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
0 N5 n( a# H6 G% r. lpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
: w* c) d' f$ b1 r$ m8 b7 R0 Z# Zprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
! e# t' k/ g; i# [. Vseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as4 a) n! ]# e: B( H# d1 l
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
' v) f9 E& d! U6 d. Q! F8 K$ x# K3 ?
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
9 Q+ |' V o) r% b! J6 |: @+ Fas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton" l0 q3 ^; \$ ?3 W2 [7 ?- {
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,+ Y: y, ]+ y% k8 z
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices. c$ _ y" Y! K; o# a/ E
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve* a' d, Q1 w* I2 R9 L% P" a
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
" F0 [' ~) s ]) Q% w1 Btowards the end of 2006.
/ Q( H X7 _4 g2 N1 x0 L2 I' e1 E" L0 B& `9 j
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
& S7 P: }0 j9 r @0 D: kinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
& \/ W& V! B' a! h/ Zto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
( Q' J/ u- W) d5 T, D$ ^group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
- y$ ]- j1 `* a! j& G; Pforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added* ^* e: ]& _+ [, Z% y5 o; U" w
pressure on tight inventory levels.9 N5 T0 }% N4 e: `8 i) l5 {6 o5 w+ D5 `
^2 s: s, R8 D
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic+ r6 ], n. b5 g. r
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
$ X/ b& H( y( ginto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
) q( k' y" w1 s, b! e4 O( F/ Jwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
4 Z- R7 s- F$ s/ ~for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
, p9 s- b5 a3 T# _* J& V2 u
' M( u7 ]; L$ W; V) ~& ]( o# \ <</ O7 R' T7 Z5 K5 ^! j
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
$ K9 j- K, L. L1 U' t/ s B+ t' G, [' e* N! N5 _6 c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 G8 |# X* [/ m: K8 w! r6 ~6 ~% z+ | Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey) N2 q' p8 k* f: R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& K: N+ w" S& @3 U/ }5 p2 r& J
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
& C; [, @+ H$ Z! w Market Average Average % Change Average Average6 {, T/ P/ @- ?* P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 h( j8 M: X2 Q: s
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
% v, R; Z* i# V7 i: b -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ z, F& n0 ]1 P5 Q2 o+ D Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
( V5 j) S+ J5 i( Y1 J# f* M -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: q. W$ k+ H2 O4 w( z" V Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000% f( C" Q1 T9 x9 g8 J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Z! B# V- x# F) q Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
) z4 a1 y8 L2 }/ J, d( v) N/ Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------& r. P' ~- v- o4 ^
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
, I1 m7 X" n6 {6 G* `( U -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 v, n H& C% o9 K! t( x4 q4 A
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
& T: B" ^% W0 u: @# q9 s; D# u -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! y9 R' A2 i3 p, Z9 Z$ p& T Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185& B8 M1 f7 |6 } |% O4 {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ p1 N2 D# f2 i: u6 [ Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
) x; K# \) A- @7 k' C -------------------------------------------------------------------------* r7 o# E& L: I4 c! ~6 G
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7660 f# R' T& q1 |/ T! P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 [+ C& [1 _6 }5 p; f: f! W2 L Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7072 N# t0 k, x0 H( d- H% s% Q6 j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 @+ ?1 P8 I5 P- X+ w. e) K) p
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500: u. P) d/ ?) T( S% u: `; g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' q7 ^# c+ i( l; ~1 f2 S4 J Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
! M) o" X8 o+ T' _/ ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 _7 s* [& n# z! d4 [ Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
1 `7 M8 G/ P# s) T& P$ p/ T: I; c -------------------------------------------------------------------------# }% t: C7 A4 e" V
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5006 ?3 P/ T8 }: s5 S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 y' }2 F0 _6 H4 ? Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
; \" e, e C6 \ ~2 ?* e! x9 v) M -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 `; r0 D0 ~( t- Q
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
9 ]( v, j! t, L7 b% n: p -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 K8 l8 j. b/ A0 E( K+ \3 V' b k& J6 |6 E& M9 }- u/ `8 G
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 d5 m( K, L/ Q3 w+ b, p) Z. ` Standard Condominium7 X8 n4 e/ a1 p* e
-------------------------------------------------------------
* ^& O( @+ {' K! }4 j; Q 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo7 ~4 h( G8 S& O6 W2 w6 {1 d, @
Market % Change Average Average % Change& ] R" W+ m3 k2 N* r0 I
-------------------------------------------------------------( c- k, D1 r7 l, g; Z
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
+ J$ m( ^ ?4 C9 ~( `$ S -------------------------------------------------------------; ~; i0 r# g! g! v* f( W
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
# S6 ~: i5 @2 `) p' L! o+ R: C/ a8 r -------------------------------------------------------------
8 C7 p2 _1 H# M2 k$ M$ L Moncton 4.9% - - N/A: ^+ V" U ?* o: |8 v: D
-------------------------------------------------------------, S% L& M. S# H2 M+ F8 Q5 p% y) w
Saint John N/A - - N/A
, @% ^& `# m, z6 I$ H8 ^ U7 m. p, W- S -------------------------------------------------------------; l4 d; g( U9 @2 g5 w1 |
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
" _7 ?. a H% F) z2 G( {' S2 X -------------------------------------------------------------
1 G- f8 s! N+ [$ M0 u Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%: h2 N% j1 V/ x3 l' d
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 |# Z5 W' M* R, u8 g- A2 q Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
' k* F/ Z; M1 K* Z" r, Q -------------------------------------------------------------
* j& m2 `+ b/ G3 B' I/ I Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
" C8 }5 ]. h- r& a -------------------------------------------------------------
9 p9 ~% m& z9 p Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%0 W( o M6 J9 C6 s
-------------------------------------------------------------' z* i/ K$ ^2 B# d) B! a* c/ n
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
5 m3 [- P& W3 T; p9 a3 @# t -------------------------------------------------------------$ f# Z3 s/ ]8 h6 L" ~* U
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%! ^! j& p/ J8 M+ h( I7 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 j6 D0 b6 r" f% z5 Z2 `! i Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
, M; h0 A. p" q( h q4 D -------------------------------------------------------------! [( w9 ~* A7 W/ d; ~$ V
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%* @* U* |6 _ q$ `/ I+ A3 `
-------------------------------------------------------------8 z* ], m( a; g9 Q1 b
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
: B) Q1 j7 @% U% {1 g# z -------------------------------------------------------------
* g+ I$ e4 A: m Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1% B& n; Y4 N# M/ k5 m
-------------------------------------------------------------/ V' F( ^8 W% }, k: G7 j5 c; T; G
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
/ m$ x) N! `! O -------------------------------------------------------------' |& e7 R# A( v( y1 ^$ P5 i: Y
>>
# E, [) b$ C) \( |% Y9 `0 H W
- S4 p7 O8 |4 r Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined) X. n. M6 R, z; J5 {- p5 L5 m
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint( A0 Z, ^& v8 d4 y9 k
John and Victoria.
( j9 x1 b8 p! f$ d2 t ]! C5 { |2 ?" l, \' s+ y. i
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most% Z' K; P7 p( l6 g- B% n" U$ u
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
) s" }2 w1 |0 G/ zhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release, M( q4 s$ S- K+ ? K( {
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
; o! o2 ^2 I: l! \trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities: y% F* a0 U2 C$ l# Z& E3 e& Y, K- {
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
# H# P& r9 n _7 }* Eavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
1 m7 [; [) v. V# x/ [figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
1 I/ o. |3 p& |% Tversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on* H5 s1 Q/ w! ]! Y: B% z) u
November 15, 2006.
9 A" |1 ^. V8 s Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of9 M4 S6 a2 S2 u: g& N
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge ^; q# h+ Q, M. U
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
. e+ v$ h2 I$ Y( M% j! m5 Xavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|
狗仔卡
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
显身卡