 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
8 J2 L& e3 l6 m& ]* H( z* ~
& N' u" s. k& f; l- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -, p& I0 C) P, A6 `/ b( J
$ V/ F) A/ ?. w2 z0 Q4 l ? TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market6 V3 G3 K# y; H$ E7 P2 f+ w
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
) C8 z$ [/ |4 g! W' ]quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
Y- p7 ]: I% s2 }" |in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit' @3 I* \8 i3 v6 D0 H! i3 [: }" P: ~
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and: w w6 s. n- U1 d+ L4 O
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
. U/ L5 n% K( CQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
* ] J: Q8 d W! k) e. Z% r8 {LePage Real Estate Services.
+ {5 D/ s- _# q" U J
( r, c7 y F2 j$ o9 v- p; m! S Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
. R# P" O; p7 y- Ware forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
. _4 d2 T+ u2 aconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
j: T) |8 Y# q, ^3 m7 L' usound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
, R y, p, W( I% ?residential real estate sector., j- m% k% S$ a$ Y
# e/ t( W3 o% G5 A Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation+ z% t; D' w9 ]* R9 M1 k! G
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)* i, S: ]2 y: \- z7 m! h0 X3 c
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5625 }; g0 b( e8 d( P( @5 {# y0 r
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3804 u% K6 y; ^- [: j- b; w
(+13.2%).
. ^( j0 V5 j7 _4 |# p, e' z$ l0 c2 Z2 f" y% f' i1 d8 B4 P6 L L
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth( G5 I- Z4 t4 s5 j
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the9 A- E) e9 ?% |$ ~" R \' v
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
2 n8 q. X( [" L& Cpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
- R- N! T2 P3 b0 r8 P# L9 ?( ]1 d9 Lpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
& m0 o* g ^& I& y"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
( N/ t( J" k6 u* q0 K1 g* lwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy. T) _- x6 [1 E: S5 j
balanced market."
c4 J+ l: C# _% d$ v3 h
0 V- P' c5 c! m0 L0 L% O, ^' G2 d Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
U1 i3 D1 w/ }/ }; ]) Zconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift" C- |4 y, d p, ~: w: ] |
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued1 Y9 h" y$ a& y1 ~; \ k3 A
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core0 J8 y9 H" {7 W9 a0 k; D' V( e
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,3 P4 c4 n7 U2 R4 O
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record6 M" t0 h" c: a( h
breaking price appreciations.
' H6 e. w# P. `3 ]7 x- O2 d: F4 V$ a7 }( L2 }
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding' O* ^. o% D2 ~2 Y
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the4 E8 Z- N( v+ J8 j
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
3 b8 }7 C7 ~8 `9 K5 u
7 A: s8 s) `& a& Z6 L/ A5 C$ L7 ~ In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
# v! Y0 j5 W1 e! q. weconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
% l% {/ p' d0 z% s( D' Nconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off! L8 A8 p1 k6 b
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
6 f7 y! ?" }3 C+ X0 M# ]" a: hIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers2 ]9 S* Z" U7 o9 L. W: B1 o
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
+ t- _2 K% h" kprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
1 y4 V0 J5 @7 [$ r" @
8 T. K7 \1 X: z While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing5 }" A* t7 R, V
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and+ _, ]. J! a. c' G; L: p5 w: d
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
0 ]. G5 l3 E" n# B8 k. g j! Ware markedly different than those found in the United States.
0 o0 S2 g' m; O4 B4 B; q9 Q- g, G# m6 V( j: \ v5 ^. {
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the( Y4 o5 X+ f7 D+ z6 E* l
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
0 i8 D4 V1 I: L; x8 Afavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
( }& \' B+ ]4 D% w# g crelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
0 s. N& _+ G* ~- jaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
" x% h ] `4 R; C' |- \downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
2 V( \$ [+ _/ O# P9 z- Kaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization. K& ~3 Q5 t& Z$ \! u3 W
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."# F$ E# Q4 l2 D, e7 ?1 q5 C2 {
5 d5 F2 `% \( o- r5 `( O& Z- c2 d+ t <<
- T2 e) E/ s6 P& }2 |, e/ i REGIONAL SUMMARIES5 t0 V3 `+ C; z
>>
8 g* z: o, S/ I9 S" M+ _( M
* F3 j/ _; r' i& ]/ c$ L Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in# T2 Z) H; \9 _% k) j
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate' x4 n( D9 f9 x
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time8 l; m" l* A# o5 ^
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of- _ `2 I- {# k+ J6 D" w
renovations.1 a+ b( l7 [% k0 p$ G, U# O
: H( p- i5 G. { The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight5 A. p% Z2 Z. d5 ^% Q( z
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
6 l" d1 Y' T/ e; Q0 |+ g7 Fcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and/ K; M1 Y! X+ i# v5 C8 O- G
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.$ Z+ V+ @! c! g, N9 Y
/ F: Z# s- S" R1 g, }
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer/ p! m$ X, n0 |1 Y O( _) r* n
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
* H2 Z4 p" l5 G! o# G' Y: v7 |2 Uquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
& D. v3 M7 x+ {" p1 z; ]$ S% h! [600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores! V# b" {" w0 @- V$ g
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes7 y/ a3 l% A ~6 E/ A+ `
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.9 l' ^$ O5 ~& Q8 e
( ]* n; v9 \8 }. Q- h9 v In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
! o r) o0 F' `- [conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their( k0 e: f" l' K, m) I7 ^8 \3 T5 q
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
, B$ l- I0 x( m7 e) U3 awas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
. I$ w; i' g6 @dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
- f/ Z/ D7 ]9 e7 h5 \buyers with more options when looking for a home.
+ {' y) F0 R0 t g: s
& v- C5 O/ |/ Z2 A Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
; Z* E2 h+ Z; }3 pamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
+ s k8 _- _" l3 Cpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,+ s9 W6 o7 u: R' r
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
3 {8 ?. H0 t" J9 Ifew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.6 D O4 |( ^5 E* C. g
+ h2 u( n$ l0 Q6 ]/ i# f: E
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house ` Q/ y) j" ^
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory( G0 o9 Q6 B, R# [( T
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting( P( Q* P& C7 _6 ?! d- ~# c
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,6 a- t/ \. j* l* v, T+ M
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
; p! Q7 R, i( t# e- opressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before* h' _7 p& Z; u/ D: N
making a purchase.! ^4 K3 }# S) V6 g" R8 n* d0 K
4 p3 Z9 @* O5 k3 Q
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing6 Z7 F, A: N3 L- h' W# Q8 t9 C
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong1 Z) v$ ]9 L* n) l+ s, B
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
: @1 F; F B' W* e" q: ?6 Xcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
% Q8 X) b# f! x% U+ F0 w# ~- m8 Hattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown" i/ i1 V3 ]$ s, L3 w' J
amenities.
5 t- e8 u& O& n& E4 w" M
! M* z7 O5 h$ a U The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels H! z% q m+ [; l9 }/ x% C
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand" @* o# G' T1 d7 Y
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
4 b+ Z* ~2 I; r& E# gcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
+ ]$ X& m7 p% Q V: F Xdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle1 O$ m) K; h8 }
residence, rather than for investment.
. W% J% C% l8 W3 b1 W) X7 f" Z( \
1 ?& y0 ?$ b/ \7 [. ?" r; R The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
' U7 U4 A, \1 f7 q+ rhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted% {8 K; P A1 @4 U8 v
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
( `; k% N3 _# P5 e( ~confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization) k% s4 t- Z/ z* U4 u p. V
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter$ ]" |1 \+ \1 l* T
the market.
}" I8 `& v7 Y9 @- m9 e( {/ j6 G( Z: f$ J; e
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
: r4 E0 T; G9 TJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In& v; L" C5 y6 a0 \' Q; L
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
# V! j; q4 p5 z( gmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
" c8 T# N+ H; r( ^6 Uto the shortage of available inventory.* b) a* K3 F. Y. Q' H
6 s. G0 X8 }+ T7 \ Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
) l4 U2 _& |% Z1 N, ^; v( D4 Qmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
; V1 {" N: _) Z7 Zvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
$ }( ^& s7 _/ j" t+ X; ^* E! x4 kstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
' O \ p. O: N* B8 L6 S( r$ c: A+ d" v# h- u
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases6 D7 t$ n8 K7 l* |' q
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
9 t3 \# L* W( hunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that' C! q! v+ n+ R M
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring7 Q2 g' Z# A5 k, \6 ^! Q# C
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer2 O: d/ `( z' }( r$ }
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
" T- p. r% i6 B! B$ L0 V. u, @buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
d5 x( D4 t# X/ L i# Y- g0 K" X" v: C: u/ d/ K% i
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter' Q6 U1 a# U5 ~9 T
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton& G, w4 Y3 z) W- d" D! p
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
$ e2 U, g( K' n/ @8 k4 gmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
* C6 @2 A$ Y% q9 {8 T) pincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve* A9 G( J+ \ Z( c0 Y) e( F+ Y
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
! X& |/ c0 `9 T5 dtowards the end of 2006. 1 T7 S9 P. H5 ]
0 P- O8 f/ P/ E3 {' ]% {1 c/ {While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of" e2 |3 k* X1 c. X# h
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable1 }6 x8 q0 h# P) A+ s
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
% W3 p( G o# u2 h6 Y: mgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
# I/ C3 @* @7 ^0 U' `5 i$ ?- ?foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added/ l' G7 y3 w' ]; D' \
pressure on tight inventory levels.9 x' ?/ u7 S6 z" G# V
6 `% G) F, e- y' s2 F
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
1 X/ @# N& l3 z* K, dfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
6 ?; {! W6 s/ F1 `3 K0 ]% {$ Finto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
7 \ `2 U w( `; g, o9 Dwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching; n5 d8 o# G' g6 l2 P, }6 U! x
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
$ @- m: _ l; r- h; S1 Y( y& l! e9 Y: H! I$ {0 q
<<4 g1 k( P3 q; [
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20060 \- w+ i2 O( M
7 z+ x' K5 u& N* Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* Z& N- q% o/ Y" R
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
P; O9 A; G+ l! C -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* U! P3 {9 B) V2 ^: `6 Z4 a$ N 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
( `& ^) R: Z# F" N8 [3 X) R Market Average Average % Change Average Average& }1 M! w) a+ L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" O$ R( G( Y4 _! S Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000! f0 @2 G. ~0 y2 a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 i6 J6 J9 z. [1 C1 e E& `
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
% Y* u5 i6 Y+ z/ r -------------------------------------------------------------------------# [. M4 w, P8 h" [$ A6 L
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
8 b) B/ j- X% W* q* L1 F -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 ]% ]) `3 p& Y! k, @
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
# h4 g# G& d1 l5 j -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* X: F2 I5 r' z" j0 D4 i St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
3 `' R( }5 y5 I -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ n# l; W' l$ a
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5839 g7 W" L7 Z- L# D9 J% B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 M9 {' t# V6 c, O* Y& g/ I
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185. J; e% W2 ?6 J) x) x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) g, Q4 [7 M4 V4 k Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250: v3 s/ ` t$ A. M( {% r- U' M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! V3 U, W$ B$ {1 i7 j/ Q; x
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766% B" n3 H; C5 u0 \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------3 r3 l1 h6 E6 e! A6 |3 _( Z
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
8 d8 ]8 f- `9 R8 R- V9 s -------------------------------------------------------------------------* v6 k2 ^4 @- {4 b
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500+ X, K6 b( U( L0 t! _5 Z: B& _, X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 N& ^5 |% h! O V+ v3 W6 S Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3896 O$ E5 W. ?; _ z) L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 q4 V u; x/ l5 \
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714! i( f2 g9 X. o3 V: {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 k. s% U3 [' q Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5008 ^3 n& m) ? ^# l" \2 b( w( x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 q5 @# ^- S% p% B3 M* S/ I& A Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000$ ?! d) [* n. V' y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# D! N" K6 ]( k* s* Z! ^, W National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8606 ?% W% k7 c5 W5 P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 T1 P# w8 `3 k/ t" P
# Y) [) ]/ E/ D- V, s4 F3 g -------------------------------------------------------------9 r% |# r; J$ n O2 t' {
Standard Condominium6 m V% `0 Q' n1 i
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ e9 A4 a5 S& Y* H# V: w2 U 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo. d& x: ~& Q& _ q/ a/ C$ f% k1 U
Market % Change Average Average % Change; v2 p/ ], n* r. D7 |* i0 y
-------------------------------------------------------------
' `0 d+ `8 }( B2 S6 ] Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
. z. }9 f& t% y- a g0 G- J# V1 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------
8 \1 B* h3 G4 |7 r+ K0 ^# D Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
" v3 o8 v! j2 p! l b( \ -------------------------------------------------------------& `& \8 I& O ~+ h8 i
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
; Z& e! J! X. l -------------------------------------------------------------
6 _/ y$ U/ [/ r$ s1 |: g Saint John N/A - - N/A
' J/ U$ h: P8 w: M8 d" x8 k -------------------------------------------------------------
2 P# M- o4 y \8 }- c3 I St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%- L8 t e- a J. E
-------------------------------------------------------------0 N2 X2 c: c! g! w7 Z
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
r2 V7 k7 m( a ]" @ -------------------------------------------------------------$ N, y0 z) P. U* |$ T
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%3 P+ }% \% J9 v6 I
-------------------------------------------------------------; P4 [4 I1 g& K
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
: ]/ ]/ u+ R! a5 B -------------------------------------------------------------
+ Y8 |8 W4 w9 e1 R Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%" U/ _/ y1 I' X8 V
-------------------------------------------------------------0 E4 M- f! V3 G% N }, S
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
3 B$ e+ ?9 V+ i) n/ o k3 b( i -------------------------------------------------------------6 i! } M8 ~/ O: {+ j2 L
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%& z% E1 ]. Y& j6 f3 `( \
-------------------------------------------------------------* ^4 x7 k( v( g( P: {; V
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%4 I" q5 v* A& ]: D/ ~* n
-------------------------------------------------------------
, K! T; l ]8 g' R7 o J Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
' [- ^+ `7 f3 S+ ] -------------------------------------------------------------2 m2 t" L% J$ M! r/ J
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%' Q" M3 `( u. w
-------------------------------------------------------------6 ]4 o' f5 T. w% @8 Y# _% j
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
0 I- S* w v4 L4 E -------------------------------------------------------------8 o0 v; }. Q: p9 v. m) [8 d2 j
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%' p+ M5 B$ G) b8 G# W0 k) ]
-------------------------------------------------------------$ E, _( Q6 T" L; x) d) q; e
>>
& L7 |$ A8 C x3 V; j" m c
/ B7 L2 u( k! M& e: q8 L7 l Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined* Q$ D: E8 ]3 ^
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint8 ~3 r6 c! F! s N# R6 L2 ]
John and Victoria.& |, c! k% \8 F
% v( w, B9 F+ h The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
2 n. I. Q* Y3 V- Wcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of! i; V; W$ i+ k# T% k0 L1 h; B7 I
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release1 q( [7 ]% d, W ~- ]
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price" G9 m& q4 B; Z. u" }( @
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities. v, V. ~+ u7 G; b
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is: S1 n7 C* [- j/ \+ p# L0 [
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current$ [% h) y+ X! B T/ S2 x3 ^2 Z
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
3 m! V3 d+ y( K9 t) @2 A+ cversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on) T( P2 C& W9 k$ D. F0 y1 L1 ?
November 15, 2006.
& X5 m. o5 A$ G3 j$ u& L" I3 { Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of1 a) R' ~4 c5 t- Z& ]; a4 Z
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
! {6 A7 ^- ^* {" Uprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is0 J5 ]7 }5 g/ ~5 |* B: b
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|
狗仔卡
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
显身卡