 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
7 |& x5 N, H v$ c0 `* w% ~& ]1 {: t8 r! P# h3 {& C
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
$ e- C: A3 j( n, x! H6 [( L0 n- F0 n8 C! p) a4 }
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
) `. r! n% {! f9 w* p) Wexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
3 Y ^/ O$ g& N* O/ Oquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
- s. z1 x7 M2 C, k; L% {in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
8 k& h |/ R+ F3 {7 u6 oprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and4 g) m) A& j: c' c
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
' O `* ^7 v$ j; I( o; s" a* x( _Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
7 j/ |: }; T9 V0 N0 s! d1 h; BLePage Real Estate Services.
2 ~3 x/ Z, j0 }6 y/ ~4 `5 O# L: `, H: v7 _8 G% K! G
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
' ~1 v3 |! [+ f; Y* b7 p8 N: Dare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic5 D) f, R& u: q$ o' I- y6 ^
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and! \! W, G! O" G# {5 J* y4 U
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the9 L! u0 X8 V( X9 |
residential real estate sector.
; X/ D) z( x) u# Q3 B9 U3 I* y1 ~5 h# ^
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
# y) ?- M8 y2 Moccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
6 K0 J7 h% Y, I( a% M' Lyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5622 v& a' `2 M1 S/ u8 Y! C
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
% Q) m3 `) j4 F(+13.2%).
% F2 o1 \/ h# k) d6 M/ b `, F5 _- q" ?, N+ @
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth# P, z$ v! Q+ D! X1 j0 N% ]! [1 |
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the7 z1 W4 u7 u3 U0 l A" c
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
# R) P; W. \: Q8 Dpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
0 d) m' _4 E4 h3 |president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
0 ~) K4 X S1 b* q0 J"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
/ R# e7 t( h! X" Ewelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy& n6 `3 o# y- p* z- f! S$ U# E3 }
balanced market."# B9 z. D- a4 ^9 W6 R
' `, s6 [2 ~# B! L4 ` Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
9 d- M5 ^# I$ ^considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift" u9 z8 \' x- e4 _
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued- ^* Z) g3 z Q9 X: Q
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
+ X) k4 E$ L A$ _8 Q0 v, menergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,' e6 y6 Z5 q. Y; p z
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record8 v. K; a% f3 r7 v' C, T8 Q
breaking price appreciations., j/ R" k* ~+ `5 I, l4 I
! k$ p& H' e( l' o! K8 N+ D Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding. o% K# V5 O* t! m1 Z1 f/ [9 _* o
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the! [* J) \5 H$ E; n
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
6 ]( v" L; F( y# u, b
* H* S2 g1 E) I/ n( r: D$ l/ a% n4 j0 V In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
/ h0 k- r% L! Qeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer4 n" @, t; c4 r, |5 j2 o# J5 S
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
. O7 I6 _: }3 {1 |0 _4 V) Y/ X& rslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.% a$ D7 [8 }$ t1 D* _ M; `
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
% S4 V5 o5 z# a" Y5 I( E0 ]greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of" l5 t: b" G. Y, X- B6 G) O
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
- H5 w( u9 @" ^1 w
2 N( l9 O9 K: U B" V While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
7 |! n: R2 c Z* M \# z, B0 ~market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and" Z- u: T6 y* |* M9 N+ e# p
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
9 h; S1 o7 Z7 r) Vare markedly different than those found in the United States.9 d" l$ b' A. l$ S
. A( r0 L+ t% y! \. N
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the6 }) Q1 b2 R& N# i" H2 k
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
& k( g5 c8 u. ~$ |% ~favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
6 ], J/ S! P' k. Lrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general- i ~* N2 @3 ?
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the2 u: r7 c, l2 o- Z/ i' |8 f0 H
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and0 @" d$ [" ]6 P' ^
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization, I; d/ `; N( ~' K- y, s: @
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
/ B$ ?7 N$ r+ l/ r( o2 z' u! c4 k8 }. }! f6 g
<<
7 ?8 w" m; R. S) b' v6 v0 G REGIONAL SUMMARIES
) } d6 m+ p7 `. Y) r: E >> Y( H+ C. v* x+ {/ L
8 b2 z+ h: b3 o% F7 J4 r Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
0 F& x! \* w$ d; aHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
9 Z: W. D% A8 Y6 Rof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
# e# V5 p$ M, a7 v) S* Xlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
! H3 [; l7 x+ D1 E! |renovations.
- S0 T8 |$ Z4 }/ `; J% A8 x
/ A8 R0 @9 ]8 ] f9 @ The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
: @. }! r* {8 I/ G' j; f2 G+ Sincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
0 D6 F" |8 T' \5 mcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
* e. Q0 F% ~8 E7 ~' k/ ]0 I- p5 aSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
( H1 p# N0 {$ g, H$ M6 y7 a: K+ [% G3 |* \3 @
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer- Q; R+ X# v, {8 o
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the7 R4 ~5 }+ |; a4 v
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new; T1 p" T. a* I+ i. f
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
^: A& w" K+ G! W/ n" T0 Nto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes7 q" D8 }8 _: p4 g5 K
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
& [% K9 T- u* h) V; k v4 y* }0 J7 y7 V P% ]* i' ~2 G, C7 i
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced8 W- d$ Z J) u
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their ?4 U& j2 f6 F
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers. L. C8 F; D8 X2 J- c8 @6 u
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian; d. X( x2 N! Z8 n0 l
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing* Y, I4 _; C& V" n. M6 ?4 k
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
. j% s3 D4 G5 z" {8 O( @
5 z# p* `* o8 m7 B3 r Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly( B# P& P4 A4 @. h+ l8 {! g
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes. q: w# F( U+ y$ O
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,( V5 V% D( ]( p R. Y" B2 C/ h9 q
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
' F3 G; ^$ W N9 Wfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
# A2 P! e, _; K8 W" @: S' o
: p& }/ E: i! t% Y% N+ Z Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house+ Z; ~' t9 r3 Z. l2 ~
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory+ v% d# R; |% @' m' r) m( e8 h
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
6 n6 U6 j# A5 }5 x. xfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
* W" P. H5 h/ J& c* e6 x- M) @6 }* awhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
- |- W. |$ M. g0 ~ spressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before- n7 Y/ c6 d& |6 X1 M9 d. n
making a purchase.
( n' n' v; Q4 P) a. d
- F# {2 j7 \7 X' V' o1 a6 g Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing- p- f) V, |; ]0 a/ S& E+ r
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
p" Y+ l% _1 Dconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city$ D* Y( M @3 y
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting {: l# v( ]6 p6 O5 I
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown7 l2 _0 u) q6 ]
amenities.
/ M. C2 w0 X! E4 {, d8 O M# Y$ V
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
5 W; ]. Q, c) Q$ V5 Gthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
: g: y" ?' Y7 S( d0 Vacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
4 k2 [; k. S1 ?( g' B5 A/ Acontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been$ S. ], i6 Y1 b5 A! N3 W
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle1 q6 I) v$ k7 O# M
residence, rather than for investment.
z% M' K d5 q4 K* d' n9 F) o
& M) \4 U$ C7 F1 y* {2 i" V The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
7 q: T5 w) g) b. w b/ ?+ ahouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
* v+ T2 y, k; F2 o! B- f8 pin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer1 J- p4 L9 h9 k5 d0 M% v$ {
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization, c( S! c! h/ M5 \* [
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter+ T$ G0 `3 {* w% J4 c, M$ W0 s* k
the market.& ?; u- x" Z3 k8 D
7 A* q3 j& s, v
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through) [ {0 Q L+ H# w+ A v& L
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In5 O" M# Q' y$ O' b4 Y% _
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring7 w" }, D& F! F$ \
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
4 d6 z3 Q/ i1 e7 R5 @to the shortage of available inventory.7 C/ T* U# \* h! }+ T4 ?/ w
$ T( E2 m) s5 [: X
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
" F! V- P1 F3 l5 p& J% i* o" Wmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains$ c/ G* v% O, J+ L4 t4 M
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses0 U/ Y: [- ?( [& x: _: R' [
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.5 Y; |" q8 f3 b$ u( l
# c ^# L. b9 A# D/ D7 h
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases% p+ w6 i1 a3 z8 U; N1 l
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
$ X& w2 h5 e0 U2 R$ hunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that& I9 V" D$ o: q6 j
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring6 D. M, y' M) ]: \' W
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer/ c1 r. h' N" g1 C# Q. z
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
* v# y _; i. e/ c8 @buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
+ ]3 m; U& [" U! C8 F3 p/ [
9 d# M# V# j) H* ?. T! B8 Y4 V* R Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter( U5 y5 F5 J* m/ Y7 Q- Z) \& v
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton E% h9 b) j0 r
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,2 [5 A2 O& }" Q; @: L/ @) |# H
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices- Q+ c# \/ h v7 c- T
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve% E# D) K' m8 D7 c# U- I4 n8 Z
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
9 {4 E8 b# q x& r$ r9 _5 q7 |towards the end of 2006.
7 m; R" K) i" i1 c) z( Y3 k) e7 q
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
# T5 Q9 B6 h; Y6 o! Pinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable/ n: n A0 ^! Y! {+ w/ \0 P
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
* S5 D3 Z3 b0 @( pgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
/ W6 j( [# X, X* x2 Hforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
) [- v8 ~* T z" u- g0 j# npressure on tight inventory levels.
% I6 |7 L) r6 Z& ~! ^6 a
/ v. k& Y8 y& l$ J4 O Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
, R; K; T5 y3 V9 |, s7 Yfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people1 K5 t a( h) m1 O! s* U+ C
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases; R r( J. A( I/ R
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching# ]4 v! V- Q: n# f) e/ v: `3 M
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
4 R1 h$ e( N# p _% ]8 a) _4 j+ j+ \/ x! o3 D, Q! u9 H
<<
e- m6 O! x2 A+ a; Z Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006, f6 n, ]- ~: G. N! ^5 p8 a
) c/ f1 U$ X% N, q$ E6 W9 F( c+ H -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 N: l& ~% J1 O0 [3 G Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
{0 D/ [ w: u& @( J -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; r4 ~8 K! _" f3 t( p* s6 C. N 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
" P- T$ Y- J( N6 f: x" A! a Market Average Average % Change Average Average
+ _# @! u4 B; V% S9 n8 z( }5 Z( f1 v -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 `0 t- V/ F& H Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0007 t5 h3 Q M. H& z6 X/ E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 J$ X1 p$ D( s0 A Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
6 [3 X4 O6 X- G0 G) r- M6 i& _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ B; u5 E) ^7 N \0 V* e+ y7 } Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0008 p$ t8 ~' q* R7 _2 u& g" O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 `. P) r6 J/ T8 x; X
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
! c0 r9 a2 t3 r2 p2 m6 s6 o6 a -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 a; W& s7 Q6 S; }3 r! M
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
: J& x' V$ [4 |% s6 \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------; S1 Z0 b$ W8 a5 \" b% L
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583- N) t0 C5 U$ Y/ ]/ {4 S5 t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 F7 w( i P( ~+ |/ e
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
7 u4 w3 u3 H! Y% q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 u9 ~# D. H& D9 y- O Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
$ U& z) }* Z$ K% }# F/ f. o! X -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) T1 c0 y5 x& R+ L; j) n3 k% S" } Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766& n }; I3 w* Z, s! }9 ]. G% _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* G2 h. H: k5 B+ k0 x Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707+ R! s7 E% e# b, J' i/ g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ H! e! b* o* D2 j" @
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500$ B, ~& T/ \: W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 ^; k' h, Z- g3 }
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
4 `" W/ G# M% h- u: n! U5 L8 z. i ------------------------------------------------------------------------- N) W$ {8 m3 g; @! _
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
- D0 Q4 H3 q% O y. j+ ^1 V; _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 }* i* X7 |- P _
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
6 [! E" b v4 m4 _5 I! A: s6 a -------------------------------------------------------------------------
x p1 N; V4 H' N' z9 U Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000& [7 N4 L+ ]0 Q, W$ q y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' h& u/ Q2 c- ^( b National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
' `% @5 E1 S. P* b' n- D, g; `8 A -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 ]$ Y2 Z( x3 Q f* {! _
! d6 z4 F# _3 z0 G b -------------------------------------------------------------
6 ]. r, a% d; G1 l: F$ N* N Standard Condominium8 W i5 b. s+ k1 X* s- x* j# j( U; I
-------------------------------------------------------------
* _ A! p0 O7 |/ h e 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo; O, R: x, G6 e! {7 v- w% B3 W
Market % Change Average Average % Change
5 a6 b/ e: t8 j0 ]7 } -------------------------------------------------------------3 j# h) z* ^3 c% u$ p) R* S5 A
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
" e8 C A9 l- r% W \5 S -------------------------------------------------------------
/ |, |5 U8 k; |0 H/ t9 K Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%: ]; ~* m. n1 D0 E
-------------------------------------------------------------/ d, m9 ]' d$ z! i
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
' u% m7 w, [' o( ~2 E' w -------------------------------------------------------------
% b' ~8 b0 `* q, _! W1 e& c: R7 ?/ V! P Saint John N/A - - N/A8 d9 Y# U0 x; c6 @, Z' A
-------------------------------------------------------------! M+ s9 q* I9 l' o
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
) |. b% K$ P2 O H -------------------------------------------------------------
* A- v# B) ]% b. t# R% c1 F7 { Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%. X9 ]9 K( B9 a+ J
-------------------------------------------------------------
# u v' E7 H3 l/ U" c Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%# Q/ N3 Y% _8 V
-------------------------------------------------------------9 w. I, B4 b% m5 }* {5 _5 _
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
/ b5 v, o! A! X! x -------------------------------------------------------------
1 N" `! l0 v2 v$ a0 p Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
8 d8 Y/ P* O* Q x8 ~, o. l -------------------------------------------------------------
% s1 N( z* f8 ~ w Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%& |* A/ u. x& g; }. @/ w; a, g6 I
-------------------------------------------------------------
# m4 ~# U8 o: c" D/ } Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
* s/ R" E. X) }7 m; A0 x( _ -------------------------------------------------------------! o0 D/ Z! z0 Z' d
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
) Q' L$ w; U+ h! V. q# C -------------------------------------------------------------
' X& K; Z9 g' _" V# Y/ b Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
1 m6 v. @8 v' E# N, E -------------------------------------------------------------
0 s( E' U; A3 g6 c; P1 o7 V- D* t9 X1 z Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
. I; s2 c& i- {1 t5 V6 I -------------------------------------------------------------& r7 t1 w0 V4 d' B& w
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
7 ]; ~; L3 u `+ G" t7 J" y; S -------------------------------------------------------------& a# B3 B$ b5 ]7 \. p
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%' I& ~+ ]$ r3 \8 d1 V. N" z
-------------------------------------------------------------0 t2 j' N, w Q
>>
" Z# Z4 {5 T$ D+ y8 r8 w0 {6 Q9 |% p
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
+ ]$ x$ X2 |; d( @5 H! g$ a2 y9 gin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint2 j8 q* B2 C/ k; Z1 p, X
John and Victoria.' E. C4 g" S+ o' A
3 A: t0 C3 z. ~) \& T8 f7 J
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most9 k+ |& c' |+ j# U, ^5 ?
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of- k6 ~3 D1 A* s5 Z# a. l
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release. b2 Q. {" V8 ]' [; }; {
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price% p# D0 A! T8 S; K" \1 N+ v# L
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities5 P; H- d2 n6 m
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
( u& d: _: P3 z, Y* ^+ uavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current: x2 y+ _, k2 }
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable* K: v3 \0 E2 L: p2 Q. p
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on. A. r# Z9 q# e1 B5 y! |& K' B. L
November 15, 2006.. ^( C3 k2 c" }4 ~ K3 H
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
$ @7 Y+ b, Y2 [$ b) v( ]* Zfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
* U, g/ _2 F' [$ o: Hprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
* ] m; j% s4 Q5 {' m4 Javailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|