埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2015|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ) S# E7 V( h2 t4 I, E
4 \1 L9 ]  c) y: F1 j
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -( N+ W9 R. c- i$ |; f* b
5 g/ _0 _" I6 T/ y- G. b
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market& @& \+ {! [, e1 q0 i* m( J5 z
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third+ {2 ~7 m) l' k) V# o( V
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic$ a5 i% C& u1 M: X
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit1 ]! d/ c- |" |" y
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
+ A$ G- R4 s7 G3 H, G. Dmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,. x) \# ]0 z3 F/ E
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal9 P& R1 N6 ]( a2 e( Q/ ^( P+ O' b
LePage Real Estate Services.. ^& @$ R  ]+ P2 H, ~+ ?
  n/ @. w3 r( I2 ?% V$ k4 R$ `
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
' ^+ V3 O/ b8 J4 z: }) r2 J" K; nare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic; b( X2 w0 }& m4 [
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and6 {, ?" ]7 |1 n) X
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the1 b! ~2 ~8 s" j
residential real estate sector.1 M- w9 s/ S; |

+ l$ r) i2 F7 A, t  w; ^    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation+ n- f3 C0 t8 ]. h
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)2 K  ^2 l+ w( _" R
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562( R6 p* G0 ]2 E8 Y7 t9 d( U5 a
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
! L% f9 g% i3 E9 [  x9 f(+13.2%).
5 B. O/ r0 i" J: x4 w2 x# ?# s4 J6 m$ C( }0 o, S3 ]9 u
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth% c) t- p5 T5 C5 @" x7 B$ ~7 b, B
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
7 s5 y  H; ]3 G/ ?8 j* a& efrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are" G: T7 V! C& V  G3 g7 p
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,) W: h7 K' @/ l% y0 k: S
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.- ]6 ~9 P5 H1 Y/ I' V
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
% P3 {  S3 }5 }" W  Dwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
  a3 T8 V' o. q! M7 l( @: H( C/ {balanced market."* J/ @; v, ^7 L1 K; c$ {7 D

5 B/ ?; m0 m  y; W8 K    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
( N6 F: ?3 i" c5 Y4 uconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift1 t& v) n* M; r2 W' w
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
9 f& S4 G4 F# l4 _" J3 l/ qthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core- s4 W+ ~: V! q: z+ z" O
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
. B6 R8 i0 w# Y7 ?6 imanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
* P9 M$ _. E/ P, [# y+ Nbreaking price appreciations.
4 z+ n* f' j/ z! t# w+ e: a  R/ @: [* d7 e: o/ H
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
+ L0 [. z* Q# C8 \6 f! E. Neconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the) J- ?( i* c  d6 g! _' b
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
& W/ n# ^3 l5 A3 S7 i; U7 \9 Q8 }9 Y7 v- q. |8 g" ^9 G
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
8 F, H% f. E( Peconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer- ~7 S4 h+ I4 @. ]5 M; y
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
$ a2 U) I" `+ y( Yslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.# r; B6 B; u& l) M
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
+ |7 U4 x: M8 P8 N9 fgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of- H! G; ?$ d& O$ A
price appreciation when compared with 2005.7 Y$ t0 z" o3 z
/ G# g5 S7 |1 |8 |. L, L
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing$ d5 p& I7 o, t/ A0 y
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and3 J5 ~4 V) V5 `9 B; A: |& a& i+ n& y
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada3 n. Q8 U4 s3 \, q) y
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
' X: P6 ]' q! P1 n) x4 S% I& h7 t, i4 r
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the' Z! Q7 v/ j5 p, u+ p
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
6 B( u3 f+ j6 lfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
. C2 t' d% C4 v. lrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
$ c& j' T3 S5 k( m& @affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
4 H; m# U( G, o0 mdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
; d! n  P' \$ @" S: I& iaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization7 l. C1 O! E( m! F
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
9 B6 m, K: i5 c. i. ~1 |! O% Q
2 q! M! s7 W& R8 ?* p& ~    <<0 R" n9 g3 n' P/ d/ b
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
" L2 T1 [6 C9 N  O  z    >>
. \( N* i. J( ?- b/ Y( A: U' O$ y2 F9 ^- w6 T1 @( B: }/ Q
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
; I* E1 m+ u- H1 h" \1 ZHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate, u& U) {( L0 P% t4 k9 c$ ]
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
) Q. D0 g9 V3 Alooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
- \- ^: g3 x( J# n3 E7 Prenovations.
: c% [7 e. N7 ~! L  t+ `2 h9 H! @' o( w- W, @1 N+ l0 I
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
8 m7 U( p! K5 _( Bincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
* }9 v2 o. q; }' r8 \3 o: rcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
4 l: s) v1 Z2 F: Z! KSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
. r- v, G+ }# n+ I& e' a! k1 B: U4 Q9 B' ?& U5 m: L
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
" W$ v  S4 \% a+ gslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the& s- g* v' X; s4 U
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
- n0 w$ O2 M" r  T7 k600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores8 C) B" B- ?+ F" s6 G: j, @
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
6 |; \% S/ z5 m& x1 D  Nand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
3 B0 |% V4 A) {* t! @3 d* ^3 \: K1 Z+ c" o# `; Q
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
$ M6 D4 _5 P0 `% ^conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
# t8 p5 M  {: p7 ghomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
; Y$ n  \% L/ V2 h. t) M7 Ewas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
2 m- D# c$ f# L, R) x1 e( s# R# ?' Y7 B, Sdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
+ X; P$ v+ Z% V& ?5 G% _  u3 {buyers with more options when looking for a home.
$ `  z: B* N0 F3 R# y3 a6 C& I! Y( S+ P5 d  W3 y, ?& S
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
3 f* v  A2 h# o0 Pamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
* g* O+ @5 z- C6 I4 W' n4 cpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,0 B- O% X. b: }" r7 K" M' O/ Y
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
1 {( S5 ~" E- ~1 B- ]  c& tfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.0 T9 |6 L' U3 G* i9 X

2 ?3 h& q3 s# B; p  d& D    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
1 u: }1 c& w: O* a2 @) cprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
2 W7 z: m1 P& A0 f. _levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting4 m- H% f$ g! r5 [8 `  E; b
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,8 L0 E6 ?$ D3 b) T4 V0 s7 [/ K
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
! u- Z$ _3 n- {; fpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before8 u8 X5 P& Y% C. q% _6 J( x, ]' {
making a purchase.& r9 n5 w$ ?6 M7 \& T

, O4 n# I, [% i2 p- K' m    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
5 i+ V/ b) F; d  l  [4 v- g. q0 }, Omarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong2 [" {- o8 O  {# o. p; J
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city/ _% G1 ^% f) {
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting( e; G' _& x/ A% p5 j) C& @
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown- `' F5 W4 ?1 r3 g$ `
amenities.
& p" _5 [* y. m% d1 n
0 d3 z& J$ ~) H1 v' ^5 H* L: q& n    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
) @0 D5 L" a3 A1 \  G2 i2 Tthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
9 d, ?. }$ y+ }! e* d0 y/ Macross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has/ l$ [) \( _; R
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been7 r0 _/ \" t1 [
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
% s9 S. u2 P( {$ \. ^4 g# r9 Eresidence, rather than for investment.1 {2 ^. V) Q2 [) A

( {; b" u2 L# b  ~2 L, r    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
0 x* Z2 ?$ F2 K5 ^( ~/ n% ?house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
" z* W0 N( s: w0 c' x( n& \' ?in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
  M1 @; g/ Y& M4 m( kconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization2 B9 P. p: e% y$ _' T; \
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter/ ~6 q+ R8 P5 U( Q& p+ T+ F
the market.
- x8 @1 |  s3 _+ M- k) f- _+ w8 T
) C# i* D; \) X    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
+ K9 F1 T; O* a% jJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In# J5 j2 d% Q5 N
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring5 m1 w! g0 K# L) O: L4 ]6 X
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due9 g* W* L4 s+ B$ `( Q! S" o
to the shortage of available inventory.
+ k" \( g: y1 u) h
% X  N0 I# w1 [# A  j: c    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
, d9 q+ Z% `7 W" a9 ^3 W5 b) o: Bmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains8 r4 p; S8 a& x7 ~8 ]; W3 a* H7 W
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses9 b- S+ u  W- o8 B
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
! c; F/ s6 z4 q! j$ t1 ^+ G$ f3 k; A& J% o$ x' o
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
/ E+ H& Y5 g5 W4 `' e, Lin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low/ H( o+ a$ z3 a/ ?  A2 c
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
2 X# q2 W- j5 Q4 J1 D4 C+ C1 Lpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring( r# h; c; {7 H1 E6 }" j9 F# ^
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
! `9 R4 T* Y; D5 oseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
# U: t  X( g. ebuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
1 e8 ~) k% z0 W: Z5 Z2 e3 P( ^% T
% L. s& I0 X8 R8 V% B8 I- j
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
- {" f+ @0 F- Z- q* _as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton! Z' K/ L9 g0 y! g
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,6 |0 ]# I0 `% H# i8 G
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
6 z4 I) u' ]5 d1 |increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve. V) Y7 Y" g7 g
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly5 Q! R) Y' x2 G( V
towards the end of 2006.
   
* s" e1 n! d: r: h8 }- Y# d: w% J9 U+ u% q/ g. A1 j4 O
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of! `+ K* ~, g' _  [9 a
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
. W; H' J0 ^  n& R* Q) ]to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse2 [8 ?" |2 [1 U& c2 z& y) J* ^
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
8 F' y! `* r: x0 R2 C' c1 A# Eforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
7 a3 E  N0 S7 k8 [( E0 m- Wpressure on tight inventory levels.1 k7 ~- g% U0 b  O5 E4 l
9 S, g3 R/ v0 W% b$ }$ j2 V9 ^8 b
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic. A% A3 F  Z* A9 ?
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
/ o3 p% Q/ `; t- O- J" Z) I4 Binto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;9 `9 i5 s# q+ X7 s) Z' J- r9 K
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
& Y2 f9 h0 _; Z" a2 p7 ^for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
* j+ r; c3 G2 M' o
6 w, N! V4 @3 |% h( D$ h' \; Y6 ~    <<  [6 c; M, g+ o3 l/ z# Q* F
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20061 o4 G- l: E/ h& T0 X; t

' v/ [0 j, D4 K3 U8 X  ^; e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 y; x  F! Q# M
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
. f( b# _- c5 g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; Z7 x8 v) z" ]5 o% _; t% R& c% O                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
/ [$ T/ x/ |2 K- X: J    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average! m7 f' Q% g( o( G8 y' ~& Y- }$ w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% M# s; b2 E7 g  R1 E0 ~/ d
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000+ n4 g; a4 G( |0 v( L5 S- i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 l5 M8 _& q* K7 b& [% O8 |- |3 z' n
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000- r! f* e4 F- }! u. \" C0 S: m4 h& ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 M, i, [: W# B' a
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
% q/ |* }6 e0 u% a    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, x) Y" t- V2 @+ }  h
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
* K& ?3 F6 E) p- o9 A% u/ G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' L! J$ J( e# n7 r5 E$ g% g! Z$ k    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333+ H- b/ `( J+ J+ X, v$ C' I4 \! t
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) G5 U3 `& x- @* Q9 t
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
9 `4 [: E8 R9 w; ?* E7 N. ]& c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ B0 q7 L* S4 m3 l! F" {. i- |    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1857 m# h+ ]* [5 f& p6 Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) ?* E1 \- D8 d: B
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
5 ~& z" }5 u/ J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- @5 {) n6 V+ N    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
  F1 n* T( m! J% e+ E' y3 ^" S    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ^. S8 U5 @" j) ^; {( `    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707' l7 ~3 s  e. E5 [7 u
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  u8 Y: u! V: ?# q
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500- ?9 B$ G1 I+ ?! L- c+ M
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) C) e! ~# V+ }  ~3 K# D    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
) x0 r4 G0 r* i2 Q  e; V; i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( J% I- V1 x+ f+ X- [    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
( J0 M9 \* _/ Y4 E0 @( e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 K/ S4 V  V1 ]
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
# L4 H; {" p* x! a) E7 k1 ~    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 j2 _: b. ?4 `0 ?# g  s
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000$ p3 y0 h1 l5 T' ]2 B- ?, H
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. ~/ C" I- {1 K/ {; _    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
# d3 m. w" ?3 L4 u& R& v; K" {  M    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) f( a0 A! s2 K  n+ X# o

2 ?! I+ Q! [. V' J# Y; A& S# W/ M    -------------------------------------------------------------. u# n: V) B5 v' [
                               Standard Condominium
4 h- I$ h  s& o0 x! _' }    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 c. }, I# B: x" A  g( x, g4 y1 ]7 U* P                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo0 s+ O* M+ d* |  t  c0 _) K
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
+ F( @8 F; ]0 [! W' r  \2 Q  U    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 Y( t( V/ w* o* P  O* t3 r/ [8 P" l    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%" A( c- g, p1 R! k- m
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 @  J( j( V( g7 {- n( U2 ^) N- i1 W    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
5 V# H1 t  k/ ]    -------------------------------------------------------------
. Q, p! i2 n! P+ y7 H( W& Q    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
5 ^; {2 V- T% C4 r    -------------------------------------------------------------, a& @1 Z; y- q5 p+ B' i
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
/ o  B( F; ?4 ~    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 u6 X. l9 {$ s3 H, h+ K    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
8 s5 r. h1 ^. S/ G8 x    -------------------------------------------------------------
. g  q: T/ B5 G    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
. p* G8 {' k1 |) N    -------------------------------------------------------------/ }/ {/ I# e& k( }8 L& u
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%( v  r& t0 k0 l8 e
    -------------------------------------------------------------  X; ]( r. ~2 O
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%' M, `6 V7 c5 G* o
    -------------------------------------------------------------5 Y, c! e$ B9 e  f. `
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%9 [' S8 o' g0 l6 x5 I
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 ^' n' c6 c7 F0 S# Q    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
/ J1 ^* _$ O' y! A7 j    -------------------------------------------------------------- h- N  d9 ?/ Z' U4 W
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
2 \8 H1 i4 k3 o7 k8 I1 k    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ E5 O6 j5 s! O- s* u! q( y    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
- A1 o* L, y7 \+ M; C    -------------------------------------------------------------. G3 n, _* Q4 K, u( m
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
3 _, b3 G& ^' l# `  Z; |0 o    -------------------------------------------------------------
; p5 Z: r; {9 Z% X    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
0 r0 I. L- H/ U4 l    -------------------------------------------------------------
) {, O9 y4 g* O; n6 E! l9 k3 _9 s) l) h    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%1 v! L6 |6 q2 P, b* _; Z$ W
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 I$ ]4 [1 o  u( T) t    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%8 d. @6 h1 S9 ?% n
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ q. b& \! ?1 t, _9 Q7 L7 ~% z
    >>) e8 T+ B) R8 {4 ?9 {0 F/ K8 F
& o; A" t8 _4 h. r6 ~: S
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined/ a5 d* R6 b2 d3 ~+ i
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
5 l( E; t$ o) NJohn and Victoria.! Z  T; `8 `! p) z8 H5 ~" A
: x, u/ m0 @6 [# ?
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
! ?$ B% v. n8 ]' ?: }comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
  q8 O$ y9 w9 X2 I, _& F% E" c7 D$ Fhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
& R% H  N3 B# Z: E; m& E0 sreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price" _/ s2 Z; X. |* _& G( e
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities9 }7 U* b! x2 p- n6 q6 E
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
9 t) O" A; D3 X( c: davailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current* @$ ?7 |! ^0 {/ Y
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
8 [( O4 L0 [' w+ {8 Y) dversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
- I( F! N: J6 gNovember 15, 2006.
. C/ D0 @2 w# l- k* |2 k4 x    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of: {+ h3 Q, K" {4 ?7 Z
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
! c$ o; B0 z3 P- R: |4 _provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
, k+ C$ d8 y, savailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-13 04:21 , Processed in 0.103883 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表