 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
/ G3 a/ U2 }( }# b. w. O' C" k( M4 M4 }/ u! P' m/ b0 i
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -5 I2 \7 \5 h$ v8 E2 ] H
* B; ]. Y* g2 N' J TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market" k _$ [2 t( J4 n% X3 ]8 c
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third3 B; m2 F' n4 l& I$ B, f
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic- H9 e% m7 o8 l
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
1 z. Y& }+ |/ yprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
6 W( M2 V- f" |& A7 Amore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,5 Z, o0 I# a" z" p+ c8 Y
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
! a1 F. w( j# V: u2 K+ sLePage Real Estate Services.
1 ^/ \+ n9 s+ G; ^2 J2 P* ?; k4 j/ l
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters$ s9 B" k9 o$ j( Y- ^; p6 m/ Y& r
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
7 U" g( C7 y& I2 S* `* Vconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and7 V8 O7 w5 G0 M( i) G0 U0 g" [) G/ T
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the2 m6 @, ]- B8 Q# @& H( B+ Z
residential real estate sector.
4 M% X$ M4 \* u. n6 `: D- j- m1 {( ~9 C* _; l$ y1 h, |+ L- s
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
- M/ t6 k9 k: P" w. n* I$ _& ?5 Woccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)& q9 ^2 z$ [6 X8 f, T0 S$ ^
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
9 z4 ~! q( { j9 W4 Y' s- a% m2 U(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380: V( J" E% N/ m" h" i! P
(+13.2%).
; C6 a3 p7 p. n3 Z: D
7 D" c2 M' D, f- g "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth+ T% V0 ?) T! l" Y( g
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the4 ~5 W( q" Y- `3 M0 @5 l
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
( [8 k, g% r% \: H. Opoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
; f# W. c1 t( }9 {0 d- a! Qpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
3 a" ]( L- C- y {"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
5 L7 l: m1 A0 {5 Wwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy8 j5 g- v5 }3 }$ ?* W, P/ d
balanced market."
6 R! o: q/ I; j# n- j0 e# n# O0 v+ \
- J" p+ h1 O- N Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,; A# B. J u. t7 A
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
. z/ [& h' F8 n" t4 hto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
8 i1 q2 d2 y5 G' Rthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
: i- w# ~9 y/ H9 Z2 Y) |energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
0 T# w0 g4 l0 e P9 Tmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record* P- j ^: Q# S2 ?; e- d
breaking price appreciations.
0 i' A F8 f( Y6 x3 Y% [2 V M& X% s$ e9 |' ?, S h% G
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
; _' Y7 e3 U/ S% ieconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the. a0 H% j$ W" C$ {- S9 I4 Z
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.7 ?4 l8 p! r7 Q0 B; y7 V
/ V5 p- S# ~% t, s7 z
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
0 i/ ?: y1 w! L) Teconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer# j% [. T$ b. u- ]
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
9 ^. i0 o3 r4 U, {; z9 v5 Z& {slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.! R) i( M" t; P5 D8 [
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers- w& I; l; o% D: f
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
$ Z9 q) d* Y2 s. J0 ]9 i, N- f2 mprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
# [9 x* O5 |0 H2 T i
% o \# z1 q0 D& b M- o4 O$ w# v While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
/ `* q' Q" d% y" N/ g; _! z# K' tmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and3 v+ o9 I V$ j. T. b5 a
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
/ s5 k7 J/ L6 w5 J( d4 S2 Oare markedly different than those found in the United States.
7 C- b! P# S* J1 D, u. h1 p& }5 R# J; }3 m
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
5 N/ b/ B9 y# y& iAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
M, b& z2 s" i% w ^favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
8 R0 }9 E& H4 S/ I8 q# vrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general9 S+ A5 E* r3 Y/ ?! z
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
; z* d$ z& D6 M) D3 M) R4 Udownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and( a4 g4 |4 W. A# O7 @, p
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization5 _' b8 z0 K" {( b/ w# P0 b
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
! N! t( M9 J* s
9 o4 @! H' |" n% T( H, E <<2 `% g8 L; z8 I& l/ A; [) P: j
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
, B/ I( p, @8 w c+ l >>
9 e t; c) k n3 r! i2 A( @$ y4 G1 J9 G$ O `/ ^& O+ a% ~7 g- v
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in2 M; y3 Q. m2 ` T3 n6 E
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
/ a) T. E- `( [) P0 h+ lof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
4 k" N' X, }9 v- L6 flooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
& F* K% F# c; y' G1 G0 vrenovations.6 i/ @. Y$ I- M+ ~6 m1 `+ l
6 x9 o. Q3 o" o. P0 x
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
1 m2 `0 C/ L9 g; n$ t9 pincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation- _0 ^( P x& I$ u
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
+ N7 c* ?. Z n* Q0 C+ ESeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.% s; v3 L. s9 q. X; z2 F
V5 v7 T+ l, `( b( V* `' w2 n
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer- {- S1 P5 _$ c; ^
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the8 @5 v: }6 @5 D* x* O8 r$ f
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new. F- u% n" B+ i& p
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
9 }9 D! s! b! s* ]9 _- Xto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
- P4 Y% B Q4 ]' S" F% land are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
& O, [" F/ c7 p; j- L$ ~8 T F3 T2 U% G& ^1 h3 U* n. O
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
, M/ m9 Q4 n% X, q; R1 dconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
: O6 L+ S" T9 H$ {) z+ b, S' Dhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers8 l Z3 Y% a2 C8 Q
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian7 }: b% R$ Y, M) n9 Y
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
4 V i& m& k+ y: T; rbuyers with more options when looking for a home.6 z/ r9 L/ D# j E
- s: F; P" n0 J I; k3 c$ C& D Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
2 S+ p7 G% ]0 E* q' j; a6 @9 hamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
) ?( Q! ~/ [2 ?# U6 U- lpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,5 U9 v @, ^, Z: D
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last+ [, |6 [' T8 y8 m3 N* Z% F
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
G" _1 `# h- _9 Z
2 q- S# |2 d1 T' k0 ^ Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
0 e7 S& L/ {5 a5 mprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
' E# O( ? V" q* L$ h/ dlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
9 L, J) m4 F6 l. L: H: r4 lfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,/ l/ S/ n8 _! i
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the( f, @ C. d L- x9 {: ^
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before3 k* s, ?+ ]3 F
making a purchase.
' W& ~8 {& z. R0 c
0 R0 S5 F5 a& t5 ?1 r8 B6 O. @ Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing4 o8 H2 P1 r/ l5 [. k( w
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong2 |' T' P: r0 |* f. O/ B
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
9 Z- f/ V1 s7 ccentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
0 q: [3 ?$ a5 C E/ S7 c: X4 Hattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown" d3 ~. r$ a" W% Z; L
amenities. }3 B& u) a, J( w6 C5 b
+ v1 G+ O4 [) ^+ i
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
- H1 w5 [1 W! |0 y4 Hthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
, Y0 T, c' O' p2 u" [" B5 O" dacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
3 C" y* n4 B. ?( [continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
9 q- `0 [- f1 L1 p4 P, v, z3 \driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
& P) v1 e2 D# i/ Sresidence, rather than for investment.
8 R& [: H1 S( g, r6 g5 }; u9 s M3 w. S! |" ]$ i, O
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as3 F6 s9 X+ k3 v: L% ~5 N
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
) ]; h2 F" Q% V. |* qin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer% p* ]! z; t' t8 A8 u
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
9 v+ _" R; }6 Q: n+ z% Crate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter5 `9 y4 D: u- s4 b5 A6 W
the market.
. i6 b/ J3 w/ j4 ?3 H( t6 u$ ?8 b3 ?1 t' V6 q% y( L1 U. a
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through# B9 {# \1 h" q8 ~- [3 I, d; G
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In$ x. m! [" K: z9 t( O
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring) `$ E/ P0 c# Z+ a; u( X8 K$ \
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due1 X: _" w3 t6 m8 V" E* W
to the shortage of available inventory.+ c+ s; O% t- B u8 s+ Q, B
6 p, W7 b8 F+ k3 B( p+ _- Y2 M& v
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its A P+ H' ?3 t4 J/ A! G! f+ @2 {- ?
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
) }9 Q6 y4 H/ l7 ~( e9 n" fvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses: j& D. M8 _' i
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
# o/ i1 I+ _ @' ~5 b1 @" ~# L! K; ^) g& i
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases) F* L4 ^0 u N2 I1 u
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low7 b0 B% u9 K* }) X J
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that# R2 U* u& M4 _8 [# o, y/ ]
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring! U3 l; o3 ~- v! @& Y+ F
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer+ O/ Q- W2 o$ w U
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as( d& a* @+ J- S" a. G& a
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
9 M3 @+ Z0 g4 v4 b/ ^8 v
7 G% N9 r A9 u2 b Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter# q" z+ M6 ?& N
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton- n) x S( [* v. [
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,, ^0 N, v8 u; j# x' y9 P9 k1 _
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices! m4 a3 T* k0 @ K. Z) ?
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
$ r; s4 N* b" K, s+ Uin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
. {% n) E0 t3 W6 {4 T) Btowards the end of 2006.
" Z2 i- F6 l1 i6 n6 [2 p+ G2 J- ^7 n) S% G T4 i9 `9 w
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
4 ]3 `( [; ]# Q1 o1 Oinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable1 I$ u! @( C3 u& C; |% R1 K; B
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse- n f! [) C7 N7 M2 j3 H
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to% b @( c! C! U/ p
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added, F, {, Y6 w/ j v
pressure on tight inventory levels.* l, R! r% K& H: z# x6 j" q2 n
8 b# f& ~/ x7 g Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
: R" b) s3 S' C _5 `# \ F" G( ?fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people% N7 N# J; ~# g3 d m
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
; P3 f" O4 m. w% C# q8 ], m: }6 Cwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching' \3 N1 a) X+ h
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
$ N, g- E$ `! {) h$ q+ e! _; y; h V" |) C N
<<& }. F# Q! Z# J
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
6 D. u9 Z/ q* T
) ~( r6 N5 b( ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 ?! }2 v' v- V3 B _ n) }% b
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
) C. i/ A- u& l' D& w -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" N$ F; o5 e( f7 u0 S 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
: W8 @9 N9 y! B& p Market Average Average % Change Average Average
; E" k6 X0 t! u* f% ^- O- } -------------------------------------------------------------------------" ^; P2 p4 o3 D1 L8 B- d7 q
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000; g6 ^4 U0 x. q9 D8 j5 O: t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 _$ j: x/ J+ s2 U Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
+ B* h4 q1 p" X3 S4 O -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- @$ k9 a( f7 }# y* H: C Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0008 R/ _9 w. L4 z7 H8 w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! {8 d5 b$ P+ ]& r
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
6 a" s R# ~ z( Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------" M( Q# u2 n6 [7 B
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
E: [8 @$ k- j -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ q3 O. W5 v/ W
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583; [. @. Q1 E9 O5 s
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; W4 _4 T6 I9 C1 F' V4 R
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
/ Q: }6 V/ W1 g/ f' ~8 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------* G" k2 z/ f' @8 O
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
( s2 c6 `2 i1 u6 S6 [, n& b6 S -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 h; j- F* `' h
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766$ S+ ~" c0 q* C& \$ `) i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 s3 l, N7 ^- E! l$ t- ?
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
$ J# i( L; _: i' v5 c+ |2 r -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 c- t1 M1 x5 Q* { Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
: p/ {4 h7 z- s I* F: Z3 }8 [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------* F2 i% U6 g2 W! E* w& Q: h
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
$ q; y' H) ?/ C e( x: `+ B: v -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 Y+ w5 L0 D+ W5 R7 g0 H, K# L Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714$ |; E( s3 S" X% e" K( A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! M$ C7 I, ^ M/ T/ N# T
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
5 e. A4 E% X3 E, T9 f -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 g" h1 q9 J! A7 {+ u/ W4 A& w
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
0 L9 t) ?6 I/ I# r -------------------------------------------------------------------------! P, P; h3 d1 Y: {' G6 B9 ~( ]
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860, ^6 M. C; F9 H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; e3 X1 X! L% n+ Y" m* [* t" s, w; `/ @+ q- N6 ^, T) P. x* J1 U3 E
-------------------------------------------------------------5 t& A. T6 z0 A4 G0 t
Standard Condominium
& _8 a4 L, l9 |) N0 h -------------------------------------------------------------
' i9 g& g1 \8 x u2 K 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo/ n# a+ |. a% m3 f4 \
Market % Change Average Average % Change! w; Y0 s U. h! W0 Y2 s* V, }
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ b; x( }" D I0 L5 w' { Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%8 G+ V4 e- G- Z$ `7 D+ c" J
-------------------------------------------------------------9 v# F( q0 K4 @" H8 G+ I, ]
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%" H ]) }" K5 y
-------------------------------------------------------------
. ]1 t. X7 i, @1 `2 v Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
( X3 ?, b) |9 k2 o0 N$ q4 C -------------------------------------------------------------( A! ~) m" L3 X3 Y3 f. B
Saint John N/A - - N/A
. s3 K, a6 E/ J+ k$ K! P, K -------------------------------------------------------------
; w9 A4 n. D M# p St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%: p8 v# Q0 T+ S+ n% R
-------------------------------------------------------------' h5 Q4 q: y$ B+ T/ O+ z
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
' q3 f3 ^) E& B1 O( X -------------------------------------------------------------
! |& `* s; S) ?. y Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%8 a" t% p7 z" ]) D
-------------------------------------------------------------
V3 L" z( v( S. Q' e( v Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1% x# E& ]; _9 l1 j: P, x
-------------------------------------------------------------
- W8 Z( ?+ W1 P3 j0 L: T1 V Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
. }5 }% L7 F% I1 ?" M8 T# M3 f -------------------------------------------------------------* A- w ` v6 a0 q/ J
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
- I% e7 V0 H- A( e -------------------------------------------------------------* j5 y0 o4 V t; V
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%* j4 ?: D$ N; t0 r% Q( w
-------------------------------------------------------------
- L6 n t, q& s+ Y8 ?$ L Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%2 d. c" U" ^3 K( Q D
-------------------------------------------------------------$ `4 f% n6 r( n* z% G U* g
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%5 K8 c$ J: h4 s* V$ F N3 @3 F' j
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 v) \, z. R$ ^7 n2 o Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
9 T- `' k( R/ t9 {: f: [/ r -------------------------------------------------------------% [/ z0 [6 \$ b1 H. I
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
4 ?6 }- C2 q( j3 R" D, a; n ------------------------------------------------------------- V5 Y; d; n: e* q; g- w
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%/ S4 d4 c- E) c" m% a7 q
-------------------------------------------------------------" ~# Y! S( s: f! S$ i( Z
>>
6 B! p4 L* R9 ]4 ^5 K6 J
4 H" ^/ x+ I; f, K8 K( ?* _ Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
5 i* d1 ?0 a0 q$ i5 jin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
5 T A8 u3 `! ?3 J4 X, i9 J" q2 ]John and Victoria.
2 R9 j4 l' q* W9 |( l
) D7 N* h- ^& p) a3 V The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most2 @$ h4 ^8 s/ y& n" r. \
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
7 y) K# }" ~) ?4 L3 f, Y7 A/ E, Dhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
7 d7 Z7 | L+ R. b$ j" t6 C+ |references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
) ]' m; E" w* ?2 ~7 @# ttrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
( E3 G- ?5 d) J/ q5 A9 d( Xacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
/ K. \+ @& l8 j% M g, havailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
" w# |/ B5 M. _7 u% g/ K8 }figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable2 k) T+ v2 h8 }+ @$ }" m3 t$ n
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on) ^$ c: @0 l6 b6 H/ f4 K
November 15, 2006.
6 D" c; h Y. Y; i Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
$ B+ P: t$ D4 Tfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge6 ?6 ]+ v# A8 ^
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
3 H/ a& J9 \& S, }1 w' M$ Vavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|