埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1979|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
3 d; ~* N: G. l
0 b7 A, k  K8 m$ v, ^: s- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -$ \4 O4 Q; Q* E7 A2 }
5 l- S3 f. B8 s1 e# x' n: G8 ^7 }% o" i
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market9 ~$ }( n# {2 G
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third! D% x# J. p2 c0 R% P( A
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
' n# K4 k+ N9 |' pin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
3 r" z. F$ r1 N7 l5 Y: v0 Vprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
& W6 ^$ b+ H8 R- b  Lmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
1 I9 Z* k: j  ?. T  iQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
" g+ h( k4 x6 y9 }LePage Real Estate Services.. R1 X9 t7 r: `) |. I, P- h

) O6 x' J0 Q8 @' T    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
. D2 E' D/ I$ A0 x* R2 x8 z  j6 Kare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic0 {; N/ Q3 t/ m  X# w0 v
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
2 Q1 t' I) ~: |! |, ^sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the9 W  X! A" v( l. k, ^+ e! k  R% C
residential real estate sector." }2 J* B/ ?! [9 ]' q: j" Z
2 P% u/ J6 v7 u  c1 U# H1 R' T
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation' x4 o/ S, W! K  `* I* Q. H
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
; K5 o/ `- T6 H( b' Y/ s% A& Tyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562+ U6 e+ z' p# x5 f' P% ?2 R* B
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380. J& e$ M3 {# E* ]# G
(+13.2%).* Z9 J/ |, T) E- m

7 e" ^: D7 t# ~! s  f! f8 H5 u    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth: [* q# E2 E8 a
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the4 n# w2 W. U) t4 n0 F- v4 y) z
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are9 v. ~4 i! @8 g9 X  ^9 F
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
" j- s! F. W+ |1 j6 B6 Tpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
8 g6 e$ r7 A# ]' m+ {"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We& ]$ `% L- I; ]/ x* Y- A; y
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
; v: M; y- ]) \. k8 gbalanced market."
9 n, N. T6 K2 ?
$ G; A/ ^; R+ P: H    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
8 D9 L* O8 e6 ~  \" K9 ?: _considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
" J0 p' e8 K1 W( {8 R8 i" Uto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
' G1 H* q& E# ?% |/ Hthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core: `# i  Y  R$ A% g
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
- A  t6 S2 m7 L* smanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record: a, w. ]3 g1 [
breaking price appreciations.' S+ Z6 U7 r/ G" c% E

! @. S* T2 ~4 O( k    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
1 R( J- Y* D1 y2 p: X& d6 g* L/ {economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the3 _: N& D: e8 A3 u) `
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.. l! S! L' U/ o8 C: y

/ E9 n4 |6 T6 B    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
3 t$ S) E6 ?5 @7 leconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer. v, b  v5 T: E8 }3 O
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
- \, [7 b9 Z0 [& Islightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
  ^% J4 e. \! f5 O4 B/ bIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers: a- i. I2 i; R! M- C
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
$ a$ ~4 G: i) r: v# Eprice appreciation when compared with 2005.8 [! Y0 B9 D9 c0 H+ a4 w. K& C
( T8 w8 `6 V3 @  o
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
5 |, W- H1 A) g: g  J6 J- ?) D  Omarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
1 ?: m9 \6 d3 z: Vfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
' I; n# W" j  n+ G1 N1 j/ Iare markedly different than those found in the United States.& H! V" X1 f! x9 I, i% J9 I: Y
( ^8 r4 j; ?! O4 ~  z( ]6 x
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
2 @' ^9 `5 _, \8 H7 m5 pAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's! ^# O. a: }6 R& T$ g
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
. H; K" K4 h0 l7 f; k, G/ ~9 C( nrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
- ]# v. L% v& O) A) B3 H4 r4 U2 Uaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
9 W5 J( E' P! I1 ?- Q2 I- Ndownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
! }* \4 S# u) ?) ?# Taggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
3 Y2 w; n5 c, `  n$ O( a6 k3 O$ X2 E( kmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."7 A  f- {4 }) p: v: N1 O2 Q

. f( I, U- B( \$ c. K    <</ P& W2 o& M# _) h
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
+ W. }! J1 P) r& y! o    >>9 w4 J. [% _' T5 ~

4 d$ X' i# {7 _; `% z3 Z    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
  @8 F; i& W2 [% D' SHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
: u$ Y2 [" }9 `9 [of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
& f% ^  p# v* z" B6 ~9 f0 nlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of7 f$ q( }- a7 r+ k
renovations.7 Z  s7 V! A& Q# J

3 f/ _/ U. a( f! d# h7 Z; k    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight8 V. ^4 U, O8 Q( ]# C
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation! W7 {: k* B- s0 [
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and' w- ?. \% b: s2 t: x- }
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.8 h. U! u  w& _: `

" M3 ~! h. O8 ]) v3 r$ m# A2 N) H" y    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer% \; r9 f8 W. Q. H
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
5 w3 |# t' h3 U! [quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
, @7 V8 X( f( K* B* K5 O- p! o, a+ X2 m600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores7 W! ^. O% o$ u
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes0 [( C9 Y) R. ^+ ~, x6 x) [
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.* _2 i- f; Q& {9 k+ S2 _% d
6 W6 r1 I  c2 |5 t
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
8 `6 Q% C# W  h7 T/ kconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their: W" s  ]5 ?2 B( r& n3 b1 n* l
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
" V/ u& m# Q* h) }6 B/ nwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian3 H# Z! n5 d5 [9 P
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
* x3 q: V* }6 w* ]; Fbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
  `$ }* v& t9 ]' t
! \/ ]8 Z/ g8 m6 ~; g% g    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
1 r3 @: }- _( B4 P& U! Kamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes% u& N  m  @$ @5 s& F
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,8 F" g5 G, i) e7 G9 c1 N
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last3 K8 l+ D" o! T3 p( Q. h' {
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
* ?2 }9 j7 Y! J9 |" M
* d6 V* T! J9 e* Z    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house2 ?4 M+ g; R. V5 P& w
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory8 _  M2 N9 T+ I. a/ [( K
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting3 B; \8 U6 c) c4 c; r: j9 b% S
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
- K7 L4 o. M( J) [when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
' s6 u  ~: o5 k/ O" F2 V  rpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before+ {/ y' a5 x2 D! Z( d  Y; y1 @
making a purchase.
) ]9 n9 f, s! v( J! s
, n# i( k- y! g7 o    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
5 j- K0 `$ M$ smarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
8 [8 R, H6 \3 }3 ~& `confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city! i+ ^- S' o$ [; \+ [
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting) A: x3 [* Q) E: ^% _; t
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown! R; q! u+ _& y+ l7 j( u# t
amenities.1 d. |$ U8 @4 I4 ]9 w
& }0 q; q& E  I5 l- @9 j
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
6 f3 {* D# p* G8 gthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand% W' t6 q% r& t! r, z
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
, F* ^0 Z. U9 g" @8 s- Gcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
% L1 W6 A  V; X& Ydriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle$ U/ e6 [2 q4 }! X
residence, rather than for investment.
' t& W# e4 E4 N7 g5 f( r/ J( J+ M  W$ M" A7 I/ \# y
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as6 Q5 k) W" P8 {5 _% d! N
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted) E, K+ \: j4 c, h2 }
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer& V7 `4 f; }5 c) {3 w9 V
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
. y7 ?: d, R+ I$ H1 l( Qrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter) E: d4 B. I& P0 S
the market.0 c0 c, q0 V6 @( J2 O

( x2 v$ o$ }+ V" a7 M* r' \    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through2 f7 d# }' k$ a5 h
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In8 R& n: s8 D' V/ t5 a7 [( n. q9 q% B
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
$ J; `- d: }8 A8 i7 Hmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
3 b( t5 }. E. @& Z% N2 K$ `to the shortage of available inventory.% J7 ~7 @1 j6 [' q& t; u, [" _9 d% y

6 y6 t' A; d6 X# t+ g; K9 |    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
& N- C4 ~* P& N) n- J8 q$ {momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
. q* g. g  ?  |2 [/ }! f1 Z+ Svibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses$ j) J8 W5 J; a' c" \
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.& M. o7 F6 O$ ~8 O+ v% c
/ K# P8 i3 b/ o- g) L9 I
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases& P* A6 `- J7 v9 O
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low. H* q4 o0 U+ H  B( p( V8 c
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
/ ]0 V/ [9 y& F. J( g" `8 y) Lpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring( B2 r: Q+ p/ S7 s& A  }: L
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
5 Q8 B, b0 l* h" g: R' G* {season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
6 p$ @; |. B. r: N8 ?" W% Y) \: jbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
' K+ V7 \, Q8 E( h% Q1 ~( I0 q

) ?" o0 B2 P9 F& _8 I  n0 _    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
# D" L) C7 n; vas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton* p0 o0 Z2 y' C9 f/ d8 l# w
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,: F% o6 O$ R- u8 `, m
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
5 }, a, ?- N! Z. v! Rincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve" I1 i7 W+ w/ N
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
2 x* [0 {0 Y: J! U' I& dtowards the end of 2006.
    ; k" f% Q2 D; i. q. O: B9 J: h7 M0 k
- P* |$ b7 \' R
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of1 |5 Y7 L+ @/ c; I2 _: [+ q
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
* o4 `5 |4 o  w" ~to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
3 w# L. T. z- p9 d! e1 J6 f5 Igroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
  h5 G2 s" c0 {. {4 p9 qforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
" C$ z" I; Y. ~pressure on tight inventory levels.
( F/ C+ [3 g* ]. I  {. q2 h) |9 t" R
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic6 W5 \1 @% e) H. M) i- ]6 K
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people) M+ x/ s% t9 z  @4 s' _
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;# _7 H' v5 Y5 L( C- }+ D' G8 A
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching, f, z, o& s; N6 r7 P% `( ]
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.# G! M5 @/ R- V% f) e4 N

, `' {$ o8 ?; r% C( N    <<
2 c) R& J2 p. \6 V' G: k      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006/ H5 J6 \$ Z: u& V2 @
/ x0 f& r  i: |1 K7 G6 a+ h
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) b6 R* i7 K" j4 ^                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey7 g+ t  C' x- `! H1 W9 t3 T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) l" w  z+ e( \6 W- X/ O4 k                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
! t% c0 G, v8 S& ]2 u# w4 i# ^    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
* z# `# i7 A' r8 W5 m9 h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! ~5 {/ e. T' P6 o6 R; n" z    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0009 B1 g( W/ P2 t  G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" x0 |8 L) V) ~' w5 m6 c    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
' h5 J) I/ s: I2 ~    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- T5 B6 ?" T. \! S; |
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
, o$ T6 N% a) T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! l$ y7 X0 H/ U- N9 p' K4 f    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -, T' a. d; ?! v/ ]3 f6 e! r# H
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" O+ n' l5 b# G& X
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333* @' L1 J0 x$ K& K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 p1 i$ N- x& Q
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583, P& B* T, ]; F: |3 w+ ]3 n1 ^% s4 \
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; Z( o8 u3 Q9 F" U
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
9 n: b) k  u* R/ s2 A    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. S, N% R. i2 v2 o
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
3 Z0 R- ?" w  M( _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 r" K4 [7 F/ F2 a- X; U
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
% L0 X6 I5 Z. ?" a  {    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 Y) n0 \: @  \  B, l% L    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707+ K+ [3 I) `8 M/ s, T$ J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- b5 G# L% Y/ w- e2 [/ S
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5006 e  \; u* U( z/ Z& ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, C# H, R5 \: b9 d
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389* N8 Y! c3 G$ v! }8 {2 N
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" k/ @! T% S& O    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714% [+ ?( Y- F* l8 R" m& |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. \2 t, B" M6 [! L# t9 f    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500( R; u6 B9 w( O1 n9 P3 N+ M3 m4 W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" ^8 A( [8 E6 K3 D" y" M
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
( R5 ?, _5 K3 m% p! S* s$ g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% N3 R; d  [! Z    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
( W) A' u) Y0 r    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: m, ~3 V. n) R$ Q( R0 }  c) d  J2 m, f) ?6 r
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 Q4 l3 G  ~- j% p
                               Standard Condominium( V0 j6 E. m1 d' t8 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------. K, o1 B0 W* Y5 z/ U3 B% b. M8 R
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo0 E( q5 p0 b9 a; ~
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change" E. H/ x1 O/ v/ {) S& p) J/ z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 d9 d1 t' d( t* j3 S4 p; v    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%6 c' m1 ^% X! k. C4 Y! J
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ p- @  W/ A- p/ S) G  v/ U
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%$ Y7 h: ?9 O+ D8 d
    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ k1 I4 i- @% X$ f0 Z+ X. R    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A2 `8 b# h4 w) A4 ~4 b' l$ W
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# X& R+ H& N8 I    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A4 p7 r! I( v7 a! r, C9 l" [5 k$ d# Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 x9 B' L2 F+ ?6 H( C; P5 k% `0 \: z: n    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%# j1 w* ~+ d  \$ V
    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ F- G) P& X  s+ w9 x    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
. n) B: D6 z; f# I# ]% q5 M    -------------------------------------------------------------. X+ |7 M9 H# a+ u+ [( @; K
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
* D6 d( Z$ ?4 p) [5 s    -------------------------------------------------------------$ J* n; }* e4 {" t5 ^
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
, `8 w' r5 D% j0 `    -------------------------------------------------------------# t/ Z$ I6 ]1 k( m5 H  {% F
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%4 w/ }2 m7 Q: |
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  }6 U8 h" A: Y, c3 Z: ?    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
8 m6 @/ s9 N! t$ i% w0 z    -------------------------------------------------------------* F2 T; n  a" m  Y  y! A
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
: D. S* ^$ k; H; d8 i2 b: T    -------------------------------------------------------------8 g% @( W. d% N- o
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
. ?9 H, a# C  A" ?    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 Q  h# X# a5 L8 o    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%9 Y; I$ q9 _( n6 D7 g5 H' |
    -------------------------------------------------------------% j  [. ^) o; d8 ?; m
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%. X0 w3 ^1 [. T# ~; D! N. y- K
    -------------------------------------------------------------% H7 E7 m! v! s1 g. @( h
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
# T4 v( A3 d9 M: V) v7 x: v- n2 ^    -------------------------------------------------------------& p4 l, m2 f. N
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%8 s2 ^9 ?% u9 U0 T8 J) |. o7 d
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( Q' w- Z7 _! @2 p( X8 k+ q: Y    >>" C$ x0 K1 a, m0 \4 m: A

' n! G/ K( Q! R* F    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
& ^8 ?9 N% j; P. J' L. B3 lin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint6 o: q% E! H" u( M0 z; q* T/ u: y5 z
John and Victoria.
( t: [3 P# f' {7 K
6 t2 q- U& t3 h# @- E. q, G    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most0 |# z2 k# F% x) Y4 L7 Y0 ~
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of- i9 @9 _& y9 n
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
4 F; \- v# F- A3 v- l, N" D$ E$ Kreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
& J+ Q7 T5 [5 Z' T2 w: o, `% ltrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities" z& D9 ~- N  G4 l8 B8 X
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
( [% }+ h( n0 Y0 javailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current$ V5 W& K& _8 f8 q
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
! ^  S7 z  x9 U8 A. y- wversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on' l, {% x2 X3 @1 x3 R- U" w5 |6 x
November 15, 2006.
% ]5 X* x) Z3 z! {- w    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
# Y. [! Y* f0 N4 Rfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
, {. G1 p/ @( v3 q" U' Z* cprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is9 B% Y$ U* t& i* `/ K+ Q; o+ g" H
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-2 05:45 , Processed in 0.179849 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表