 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable # e0 T4 H+ z2 T; G3 I) \
5 o2 m0 x/ f! |1 ^. `: B- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -+ f+ S* g+ F1 F8 D! ~9 {
$ ^! X7 [+ K r; ^2 P( l3 F: G; P5 C TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
" l# p: Z- @, l0 I/ K" X$ Yexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third9 n- @# E5 ]( ^3 A( D1 @+ r1 A/ A0 L
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic- _4 [ q1 @0 f5 p/ k
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
% ~0 w z3 d4 @price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and. y. a W" Y2 l4 _* c/ C
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,/ O3 r! R1 w/ e' q: n# p" ^, t
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal/ T! o% l5 ?4 X
LePage Real Estate Services.
0 S- m" w% A. d+ ]: H% Y& o, {9 n
1 ?1 w. N" o: A( C" M Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
# c6 f1 C% ~! _7 ^( [' aare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
7 q' @4 D' d2 l$ r# Kconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
2 g8 U# q6 W4 ]& Y" w- s% e7 D6 Vsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
/ b6 Q7 _8 Y4 | N& m- U, r) u; K# Rresidential real estate sector.
; q3 l2 ]1 p7 ~9 l4 a$ H I! K
U# [% S. n6 u! r. f3 ^" E Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation1 B) y/ f: e) k( u. A; Z! h' H
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)$ Z# g1 `* n; ~* V
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
& G' @3 c* g. a7 _: ]( D7 p+ f6 @(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3802 C7 \. o/ C% d" f
(+13.2%).- m# V8 w5 R4 N
& X- }& g: _' ?- b. C0 c5 A "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
% j% G2 b. K9 N& W6 aduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the! F+ D- o1 _, I% k9 r
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are9 r6 J! {8 J; } b3 Z
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,# u8 P) O* K) ~% p+ ?) h% ^7 q
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.; ]/ u3 A7 P4 j& I: h: }
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We6 Z' b W E9 ~# l, J
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
" n& a! F$ R0 ]balanced market."
( u, n. d* i {, \
# G7 u9 T1 `- [& c4 b7 o+ N Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
" |+ M7 V9 n2 Hconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift2 \) r" n% H7 g# B/ H R9 d
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
* H3 T r7 _: p8 e, A: p- othroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
) J5 b; U1 j3 F* Ienergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,. \% b$ S- N1 C. h
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record: g& |3 s4 c1 j
breaking price appreciations.* h( Q: F J! b8 _; j7 C8 @ U
6 S/ x* p; g* G4 a( J( _
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
5 |) U l& j* m) geconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the" J# D5 c( @8 T/ H7 n( k0 Z* j& Q
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
$ C1 ^+ V! U+ R% ^2 z
7 _: ?' E) d0 D* f: I In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid9 s* f, ~0 b, o$ f- H& C Z
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer! ^. j) K; b/ O; U" ~
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
! \. F2 s: e2 G' o, v% |* n- sslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
/ f& P+ O9 { JIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
. h% e' G+ V I; c% ygreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
+ M% M: }; L0 J9 i( c, ]price appreciation when compared with 2005.0 u2 Y x2 }; g# X+ C
2 {$ I: n+ @! D) j
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
, X, R" o7 D8 i! Q8 tmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and/ i- {% J1 X# }6 X6 _+ U8 J
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
( s1 @- J0 r2 ?6 E/ p" ?4 Uare markedly different than those found in the United States.
" c* w ~5 M7 r
; T3 t* l' S6 p( [ Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the; c1 l. ~& l7 @) V: b
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's" m$ W+ Q$ y2 [. k, X, f# t M7 E
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the8 l6 j' \3 u R8 g
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
0 r3 I. `$ @. C3 A) R$ Qaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the4 ]+ h/ j- \; w1 f* m
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
; `. [, l$ _5 e3 waggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization: L; B4 Z6 |8 X, t7 e c/ ]5 d1 ^
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."3 c' i+ A: [' _
: u2 z/ O/ f; F& `7 Q6 \0 z6 } <<
0 n2 a4 o7 m" r5 i) r. X9 V REGIONAL SUMMARIES
6 }7 l% j# F2 h8 g" E% n >>, D# ?% j8 H$ d( i$ I+ H
8 `' ]( @2 j: _4 o; D' o
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
/ K- s; J; u2 f5 ^7 Y$ VHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate$ t3 u* y8 I! ?, C* _8 F, i
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
( f1 Z3 m" Q; A4 Alooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
# m, @/ Q' I4 u8 K, k0 @1 ?renovations.5 |. T+ i1 s# y) I- z# ~' }. _/ o
4 j7 ~5 X1 M. p H- C& G z% \( A
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
& N3 Z6 H$ T# V; e+ n( x! Z7 `increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation9 ~# \( j& e" \ c* Z& H: Q
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and- k; i! i7 p& j6 s4 P: }0 c
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
# _6 v; T5 y* Z; \1 J+ m
) h2 e/ _5 L$ L, Q+ h: w The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer0 \: N& l! F; `& q% n% f
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
9 [- P6 _* u4 Y& g/ Q/ c$ f! J% yquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
2 g4 R. i( v% {, r/ o8 Z- E9 p600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
# q. Q: O8 W8 L, j, s1 N' Pto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
1 s# B5 r: y0 Zand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
8 K3 h: O5 Z/ i7 k- @ H% ], n6 Q: Z( k3 G, h
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced" G$ Q- x/ N% d, R& D5 Q
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
0 A+ M; ~: q+ M# Zhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
. ~8 s7 |& Q: T& E$ |) H. Pwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian' I f( m$ E$ n+ w; }1 E ^4 B+ \
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
# V! V" c% l H; b+ _+ d' Pbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
( ?5 i( t* S) G0 ~- V. \& W( m! ]" f* _$ `% X) {7 B, u- G
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
9 @9 k" f6 _ h3 hamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
& Z) j4 D# R* N& g l" @( m: o* wpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
C/ ^% X- W' k9 O2 cas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last k H0 V2 R0 F
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.; N, f ]- l! d; T- K* ~5 P {
$ F k0 B6 F3 v% i Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house0 V- I( m5 I$ X8 L
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
# t+ e8 [ M9 ]( [levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting9 o, ?0 V4 m1 | U+ M% k
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,9 X3 T; x2 @5 N$ Z |
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the8 e" @* c9 r( e1 n
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
% q/ u0 r% ~: ?) O! N8 Y5 {" Cmaking a purchase.
6 g6 b2 c+ W$ r* D9 w, _& e, Q: ~: H5 x6 O/ W% u! N# l
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing& R6 k4 P) M o! p% W7 O
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong: g/ V8 D3 v- u: z0 a3 U6 S
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
) w0 x0 N# g; {5 f) A% Dcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
t5 w2 U' L0 b5 k) \attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
7 y' I' N: u1 d% qamenities.+ \# Y8 Z* M9 Q! j$ L& w; f2 |
& s2 |+ q. E* ? The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
. x4 k9 Y3 [- B v( T2 Wthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
B: V! I8 D- x, x7 r/ o& [across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has# T4 D6 ^, x# q9 c Y
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been9 l+ i+ |8 W0 _; b. c
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
. S: n# T4 I! O `+ ]" Tresidence, rather than for investment." J' T ] u7 |9 Z8 y
* A; N, I) R2 \' o7 I1 J The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as2 F+ X" c0 q7 n7 B5 P4 r
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted8 D+ Z# @" V, d! s! _9 |( M& @
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
]+ h1 Y* _; W# m% [confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
! t9 s' s" u. P- z+ Erate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
& b; K2 z9 T/ \8 }* Ethe market.8 b: e# P! }( k) Q& I
$ {' B5 O) O a+ h- Y; v$ h- I
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through. B( o3 f3 O: |/ }* i
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In, |9 U q* k y# a, G8 a* E
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
- z8 N+ g) M0 _6 Z7 O+ W* W+ N8 {months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
# R2 ?1 T. @5 z9 Z: i; Pto the shortage of available inventory.
& X: p' f+ g# M8 k& M8 x$ S. r+ V7 ^$ Y1 P6 g1 i8 w8 [
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its9 \" _ E2 }# j
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
8 Q7 ?. d7 u. I) Ovibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
h$ p! a' U @struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
# V6 I/ W O6 O- ?/ g6 x& c) n( w( `* [1 A8 B
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases: ]5 R( v: a L( ~
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low- ^! n/ _$ b2 q$ g8 d; s% j2 t
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that1 f. `/ z Y4 }" R. V# O* }1 R1 q
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring; H* l9 ?" K- R
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
G1 ?& k' ?1 y* T [6 yseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as' `& C- _+ Q' E3 Y! s. @/ | S3 |
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.; S: b1 d' A3 e
, {4 w- t5 Y5 }1 _0 N7 q2 a6 ` Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
1 V: u# v( O* q9 `1 jas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton, S4 g% ^+ R: {& f0 g7 N' E: V$ Z
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
2 E" D5 `( O4 n2 mmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices* Z8 n3 I0 l4 B- H1 K: s" W
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve) ]; Y$ X4 W% a1 i. ?
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly+ L+ b' ?9 N4 S8 }
towards the end of 2006. 1 E4 I2 y& A! b' o- l) A4 _
S& Q) A9 T/ ~ ]: O( u; ^) fWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
5 V, u2 i# A; t) ~) b+ Hinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
1 s: M% O0 |: e \/ Y, Q- Yto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
. _4 ^ W; W, w! e+ K4 m7 c- z2 Z1 F6 ogroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to) V7 S# v' n3 m# o
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added D: }1 R6 k q4 m O1 q
pressure on tight inventory levels." p% E! _0 u) |& W# T
7 G/ V% i. U+ H Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic. q8 i8 E5 L+ s
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people6 ?* v8 ]2 Y. ~+ y5 N/ P1 b
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
3 \) w6 q& t6 C' Ywhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
: f& m+ a- g( F( v: efor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.4 m) Q4 P6 K2 r. p% W" @
5 A& }7 n; u9 x; b <<
5 L! t1 Y O `" A4 W* D. p Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006) x4 a3 H [1 Y* C) }! Q6 Q
1 F* `, W$ c/ I' p* Y: X, o( C1 o( M" u -------------------------------------------------------------------------! j& c3 f3 i7 K6 g
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
+ [4 v& B& E$ T e2 E( A) w9 R4 t -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# }0 |) f3 y+ Z7 d& E 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q30 l( R, _8 d: g; Q7 S3 f; u( s8 u
Market Average Average % Change Average Average( L: v5 X2 C) g& \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* O% I. _" I- m! M7 r) u Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
+ \& A# h0 o. j. ]( U -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 K+ G( V. w( @* |9 W4 i; s! |
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
8 b' |$ ?) \* C -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* j( {2 d; v2 D" |3 G# W4 z/ h( X Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
" ]! _& U6 ~- |& Q/ _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 j; ?) R J" ^$ T2 } Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -3 _4 H8 o+ P4 ~7 V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: E' l' |; D0 u& U
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
/ N9 O4 y0 x6 j) C/ T/ ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 j: n- x: M! D# N# ~. Q Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583; ~4 k/ A. C4 V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% j5 g: Z0 X4 B. X% |' G
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1850 b- _2 L: n* k3 H8 {& }
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) @: W7 }6 D) K6 t' o m
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
" U. P, x4 C1 ~/ o) O -------------------------------------------------------------------------; J+ X* u% `( Y# g, ]4 V
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
' E8 K: H) ]* ]2 Q( i, | -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 M( J" K4 t3 e+ K* J* H; E# V( c
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
- ]; }5 z; y5 N -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: H# v; X% L& P0 e& ~' t Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500: Q! a5 r+ y# V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! c3 J4 z% M# j* P* @6 L/ B4 n Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389% T' v5 I& P5 S7 \, B$ B# l y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ r$ d4 U; S0 I( R3 O
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
8 E& `0 y9 J$ N -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 }- \' B) {; g Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
9 h* E7 i) G/ ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& k! m2 |/ X0 x5 z. ~' ]* B Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000. P d ?$ d, V8 P! y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 h, i6 W. ]( n5 \9 P; D9 G8 B' Q
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
" M( \1 j5 Q ~3 z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 y" t# l0 P4 Y' P' n4 V9 S5 W0 b' ]' V4 G; ~ c1 b
-------------------------------------------------------------
# q8 M) @5 K9 x" `6 k! B* w# m Standard Condominium
( Q& K! |% Y4 R* d1 O -------------------------------------------------------------
/ [3 P0 q- A% |$ C 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo8 P# a& _5 l/ t9 M; k- |5 k6 x% S
Market % Change Average Average % Change; N) Z( J, Y) r9 u8 N
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ _5 r8 _/ v) E s, N Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
6 q& k6 }( C$ @" W; _ -------------------------------------------------------------0 J. z: @+ f, r1 ~( i2 Z6 @
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
' x' \, d! v# Y; { -------------------------------------------------------------4 A3 g8 I: x+ x- g( E( Q
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A( l4 v& l% G* B& T( s9 }
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 A$ r6 i/ |, I Saint John N/A - - N/A M% |; s% x, D( k* `8 ?$ o2 G( E
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ _8 R* ^( n1 z8 Y( U9 ]8 e St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%! Z8 {. [4 p% N2 M: o
-------------------------------------------------------------
& Y; F6 B# W8 [' c) A0 E) p Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
7 w; o' g2 b& i4 d) d -------------------------------------------------------------6 F/ p0 T! `, K& `8 W6 ^
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
D6 A: l* c1 r1 }$ Q -------------------------------------------------------------
' ]9 h7 ~ ~& O# M: L Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
& `% `5 P/ @ K# f) o( Z -------------------------------------------------------------. [; Y( S) q) V! |8 |
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
; _& u5 E) F: q# a7 x -------------------------------------------------------------
: G' ~; D7 }: h" ` Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
" H' M! a+ U9 r, | -------------------------------------------------------------
( O0 c4 `! k! j! n5 r' o3 O; U Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%3 _6 O$ e5 u7 C! G
-------------------------------------------------------------
# ]8 E9 j" A0 A1 z Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%$ m" K* L$ }6 K! W' D
-------------------------------------------------------------
; I4 d" g7 J1 f. [( [/ p& E; K1 C Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%5 y5 ?& U& S$ `3 H! P/ V
-------------------------------------------------------------( x5 X1 h8 H2 M x( `7 s5 @" R
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
$ g7 `# s7 D( C! \% }. x$ F -------------------------------------------------------------
) I! r6 T% P+ T$ }" r, D: g- s* \ Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
7 |* t3 [( J' k! l9 C% c -------------------------------------------------------------6 v1 W* p6 h z1 x0 q
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%- ^7 ?+ z A b+ F, W
-------------------------------------------------------------3 V* u4 P# \$ G& L9 j
>>
" t. e* e9 }! x, k. X% N& X _' _4 T4 g+ E; Y( y9 I
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined. ~! t$ q- @$ B, J- u
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
) q$ N! b! d$ _3 l# G7 _ ` j( L* R' {John and Victoria.% q( j: s' w' Q6 j8 H4 @+ z' L
! p! V }& b/ p9 B; P. r y( r: m
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
' E7 A% O9 H* q7 }$ Z Scomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of6 X& c2 I1 X& T# I# Y h
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
0 p4 N$ f7 m, R, {% }8 e* q, ?+ H9 Breferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
( r; S( p9 \5 B* z: |# G; e& otrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
/ { ~+ m) F' y7 Gacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is5 `8 z8 _# B, g: {, z
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current2 w- s/ }0 S3 w) w' Z1 W- ^
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
! U! l0 Z/ Q2 lversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on; D! r# x0 h' Z) Y0 m
November 15, 2006.
6 n% g- O3 N4 p6 a2 D Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of: K6 r0 ]2 L0 z) d! G
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
3 H6 j9 e6 f8 g7 J; T' nprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is% o; p: r0 W2 q5 Y+ a% Y
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|