埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2736|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 9 Z+ ]7 f$ |% t( t, X0 E' x0 H9 F8 d
  S5 ?# G6 p3 \6 M6 ?% V6 v
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
( ]+ D0 }. V/ P0 Y: j; @: K, S0 `% i: r: ~' d, C/ P. [) I
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
* i; e( L  i$ D$ `! ?+ cexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third5 Z  F! D$ G: Y% u- n
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
" `+ b4 j; {" N% m& N+ O% `, G8 Din the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit0 l5 b! t1 j' y9 Y5 Z# Z
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
! ]0 I% Z: k' k' k7 Xmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,+ v- j6 ~2 k3 d* t
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal+ R1 K; w( \7 A8 U# u3 v
LePage Real Estate Services.* m7 H4 N8 \: h# }( Z4 r3 \* S
7 q4 B/ y9 l8 M2 J+ W
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
! \2 g1 A1 L2 v6 {! }are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
5 ?0 }8 P0 j* g# v# ^! u0 B) oconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and: k  A1 o" D. Y) V, m# K
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the- ?* q5 w: J/ m
residential real estate sector.4 @. |! Z8 q/ Q) B6 E2 G

. \6 l% P1 l  S3 [% m/ C    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
1 M7 m: B' d) M8 }0 h2 O. C! k: Loccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
) x& v2 y& ]4 }0 U: Q  C& jyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5624 b; l$ l, ^! j1 @7 |' M9 k
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380/ ]5 ]1 D* E! B" b- J
(+13.2%).1 m: q5 C' k; \+ w( X2 u
% i- s( @3 m4 [: z( N8 K
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
  z  k% B, B0 M2 V* x. L; ~during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
9 r9 D8 f$ F, s+ z: T, Efrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are+ q  t( b; T% K6 }
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,; V0 r' P  l9 ~& h& D* I
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.( l( D' r1 c! s% o  x- K
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We" v! a+ n$ R" F% S* j4 t. e. g1 J
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
4 z4 Z+ Y+ T8 g0 `balanced market."
0 D' @) L7 \! U, Y5 R7 n; Z
* l. E6 \) Q/ R3 Y( h( t" }    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
7 A( x( B6 m! t. Econsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
) m! f# [* O0 n5 h4 c  a( jto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued" X& K; R) N. z8 p& _- h3 F
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core4 V$ m% }  \, C# Z# n
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
  x' f9 N9 g. p6 }2 k8 lmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record- W  t5 E3 [9 A) i9 k
breaking price appreciations.
' f! }" A5 U' z
. x% F1 q8 W; B6 [    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
4 I5 w) L% d( aeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the+ Y$ r  p4 ?6 p; z
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.% K# |# j) n/ V" Z; D

( @5 H1 l& P  J) u    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid) E" w0 N+ G; j0 b+ Y
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
1 ], `" Z0 k: b, _confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off" w8 p( ?! M8 h+ [# B  h& x
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
) X2 h& [, i- k6 m( {In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers4 R1 @. B8 v# {- o: Z
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
  G) e- u& i% Jprice appreciation when compared with 2005." N2 b' q+ C" C! K5 _* A
0 ?, G  U( G7 i% F
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing7 B1 n+ f' l+ s5 }1 l
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and9 e/ I) c  a' N9 A  ?+ K; Z
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
/ a5 _. r3 J) W! C' E" u; P" Oare markedly different than those found in the United States.8 _% Z+ i( S0 Q4 ~
) E% q, u6 b7 h
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the/ X$ k$ h% }" [8 C2 v0 p
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
3 i5 B$ n* C/ Zfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
7 q& o) C  _0 Irelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general. @- U& U0 K1 k: V8 P. q$ Z
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
! k, U  e: i/ k$ @* ~5 c2 kdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and8 u# V, a' Z3 Y" g0 g1 Z
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization6 d  z' h- ?; o% [
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
% B- S4 l& b6 k9 p& O5 l+ l* ]
' E; B+ ^. w. E+ j/ z# m- [    <<9 |9 g# E2 y& J; E( C
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES# q% n( ?% z) x
    >>0 A' P$ l( S3 Q5 v9 m

1 L  s8 L+ a% \/ V- x8 ~    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
1 C8 f# Y$ ~1 Q; N( fHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate0 _' y5 T% ]  P8 I9 Q  X' B+ Q
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time* S. ]% @1 u% W* h# i% v
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of1 `) A: Y4 k2 k3 q. A
renovations./ L2 ^4 F" K; N% w! ?! h+ |

3 U. Q1 x7 p9 S! L( R    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
0 Y5 C8 s& \3 y/ W1 L, [5 w# N+ ?0 |increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation% N3 L# O9 f8 z3 e* ^+ O' I6 @
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
3 T; T  w5 H7 a1 oSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
$ L4 @6 n1 |  p2 x
) j$ C* \, X3 Y* b1 y% _) P    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer' r7 a& ]' M+ x- u* G, D
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
; b) q% S: }/ F$ m8 w: b1 Vquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
% _- v' F) `1 @) q( [/ ~( w& ^& [600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores4 Y9 X% v) y$ ]! E5 B, Y
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
7 j: u! \0 \7 ]8 ?! ?' s& A% aand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.( N4 i- d' z4 f* x0 C9 y- f

* X+ m, w$ P- k  |    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced% [: X1 P: C# C. |3 d/ `
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
& g; \! _- r7 lhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers8 v  Q% o, F. [3 `1 a& y- S/ i- L
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian9 G, U( n# T& d% A# T$ Y: G
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing' c) |$ d4 c5 K) B8 V* g3 E& p/ n1 w
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
4 A* d% B$ y/ r$ c1 f8 ^; |3 f: ^' M
" E, C* f, P% i    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
: e; x% W" E; |# f( Aamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes$ j; z/ U" a' T8 h
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
4 V) c0 k( K% t& _9 t' jas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last* @( d; ?" L/ v
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions." n3 k$ v' @; c& {" G' i3 B* J2 H# A

1 E0 t" n# D: }+ W! K9 |! I    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
  m$ ?6 t5 ~* k: Wprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
6 {6 v* s* x9 ^/ S: c6 Llevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting/ i' ?: E; u: Q$ ~$ @  b0 i
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
8 f* Q, N; A+ a1 w9 z: ~; R6 Fwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
0 h3 g; ?  I8 `+ epressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
" h3 i1 ?# C4 E# T- \* emaking a purchase.( b5 P- T  g* q" @
# P& p$ m) G& `' V* B( ?
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
' B" ], c  E: L" M+ Z5 A! rmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
) G$ V5 ~* @7 U, B% n& o2 e6 pconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city8 {9 d' I% G9 F$ e) V9 }
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
5 \% X& L3 Y  Z8 u" ?attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown# T; _: h" j8 c# }6 O
amenities.3 l1 O6 G; K% x1 H% X
9 T1 o9 [; t1 O  K& U
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
: v+ a) F: ^% y4 `$ O6 {throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand' @: z  Z, a* w2 p" {4 R
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
/ `, P1 z2 D  Vcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
: b0 {8 ?# \8 d+ e7 h/ sdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
5 T+ i) s3 |5 j" I/ J) ^; L9 u6 {: Nresidence, rather than for investment.
; K  j9 J5 h; z' R) |  E* H" [* r% r4 u: s9 _$ H+ v8 {
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
" s4 T1 e2 ~! k8 W4 h/ v6 nhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
* \: r" _+ ~) U. J3 `in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
) M! c& _: R- B7 o7 e$ @+ Aconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization* q, C6 o( v# P! \: Y/ K+ Z  T
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
% U$ [& v9 q2 f! kthe market.% p' U2 }' y" z/ H

/ m$ a9 D! N* w! \  {0 p7 C    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
. ]( c( S1 P+ K% U& h/ E& PJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
2 t1 e0 l& a1 {August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring, w. a. |2 P/ X8 ~
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due; {; W5 m0 e$ k4 j: X& t
to the shortage of available inventory.% S5 x8 W: w& @7 E! I' h& c
/ i! P. k3 t' }/ v# Y
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its! D: K3 \8 s( ]9 B
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains# J/ a& V. n  O
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
" |( K- k8 I3 d# y$ estruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
2 Z+ S& w2 P% }. |7 l& M& [2 c# C3 U1 R& G" z& \
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases% ~! v; O6 u. ~6 e/ v, F, R) Z& W9 k
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
3 l) E' z9 n$ J& nunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that& P1 @6 v0 v5 b: m/ G( S! s
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring( {) Z7 w! d, I# W6 q* q( Y0 |
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer9 `  ?% _& B2 W" `6 Z
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as. c9 C( y+ p9 X
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
! G4 @! K+ J# q# E
7 J" o: N8 Z+ ~3 G/ Q% e& u1 t
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
2 _2 `0 m2 J( A1 N% E; e) v+ Das activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
4 v/ B- _0 n: Y+ e; ?* Jremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
, n0 ]3 d# u/ v' B. L/ cmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
# f- ]9 C0 o  {: G- fincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve* }8 r; ^( r, G3 d. [; {
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
: I4 j6 h; h2 n$ M/ f! g8 Q9 ttowards the end of 2006.
    ; l0 G& ^: \! Z' u- o7 d9 |

9 z; _4 k( O9 J( dWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
# w3 x5 I( _; X$ Z. D; ~! a' Ninventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
) w3 l8 {* q9 J( k: V4 \to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
$ }& X) ~4 i$ f) Z  A( @% r% Z# Xgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to# o% H0 z5 L1 H" `
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
9 s3 a+ N1 N$ |' |7 q6 ~* |$ R3 Cpressure on tight inventory levels.5 L( F6 x& K0 r; i$ I7 C
* _1 S9 Z! i, L+ H
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic, M  k$ V; M" O4 c$ m) L( r; ?8 r
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
3 K: z* `# _3 a! f5 ainto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;9 b; I& k9 d) T1 }! R
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
3 P  n# C0 N5 c! p! Qfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
6 n7 U0 s% f$ m8 Z" N- z+ r
# g: @' }0 u+ V$ n+ i' S    <<
: I4 |2 ]( V7 L) @- n; e* j" v0 n      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006' ]  t1 f% L$ y# W
) _: y& o) F, A5 w2 g. c* Z7 ~! P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 }9 @1 X: O+ I! }7 E                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
/ ]' y" s6 K8 y. ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ O" J+ T) p$ d/ }
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
$ n) h) _# |$ L+ z  E: Q: Z" u    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
' i) D$ z' d: K9 I: t9 D; Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ?, q) ^9 X8 q+ i9 p. e' a    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000. H" k& j! o3 e" S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 y# T9 O' r' z2 s: p$ h    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
7 {1 y) U3 K2 @. g; Y0 [! f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! b, F$ i6 g$ z# [
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
" k, }% n  Q) k* p) Y4 O1 e# ~* t. T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) x4 u  f9 t$ k1 ]9 k; {% A! \
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -; a. e2 T: E2 v" h+ o5 J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# x$ e& ]1 T, x1 x
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
0 }, i3 i% D! H4 O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' `/ n( ~; }7 ^' y- B) s7 s' u: N# p* d
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5831 r1 h( t7 x9 z" ~- L" t8 O- T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- e+ F. d/ v8 s' l3 W
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
% u1 O# ]$ i/ \" q# J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. F; Q0 R% v3 W2 A
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250$ E: S3 H0 j, Q+ }  c4 S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 A; g2 C; l+ K0 V5 J( ~
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
/ N! H3 ~# Q" q8 d; H    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& y6 d* _6 T7 j& |( r' ]( _% [% x( ?" M
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
3 t8 l- g1 j6 ]' c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ ^1 H" [# I, [5 F2 D2 T3 K    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
1 w4 i6 C! s7 S1 f2 @7 E$ @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ a3 @2 L8 r/ Q4 `5 d) t- n! e    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389; u7 q3 t9 m, \3 X& b- e1 ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 K3 _- F+ L+ c0 q
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
5 j7 Q5 Y9 q5 M: Q% F0 I    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# ?- s9 f: h- Q    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500% B& l  X- z! w( A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: Z( h& J$ ]* M* N# H# z$ E) O7 f
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
6 J, t1 t- z4 i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% P" \5 ~  O( W/ A$ f) B# u    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
6 U* N6 V$ y/ D. H0 P( j1 u    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' j; r% A$ N) c$ u7 j: k0 E9 M' o6 E0 h- P5 C
    -------------------------------------------------------------
. K4 T% L4 W) q                               Standard Condominium& [+ H# {' b4 `) q
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& D+ l7 b1 m8 s8 L5 L! A                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
  h" g5 Y# N8 M0 o: R    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change% v* l7 ~  q2 }- z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 e$ L" F5 T) ^( [6 ?8 P' i    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
( u2 w' x% H! S$ ^5 d' c& M    -------------------------------------------------------------; d0 ~. @) r1 S
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
: r/ g5 ?4 l- r) j    -------------------------------------------------------------# B+ \! p' k9 Q
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
" }+ }6 |9 j+ v5 N$ R    -------------------------------------------------------------( n" |9 M& ]6 G, w: N$ s
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
3 _1 N6 A8 w% C- d, y    -------------------------------------------------------------1 H( v: {! @# E0 R3 F- y* h
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%" q0 o+ L+ x4 N$ J% m* b+ Y, Q: T
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" T/ _. r2 [6 L. m    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
2 y/ Y3 v6 S6 o, a- X    -------------------------------------------------------------9 v$ C" b8 {: Z7 u  m' m. d
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%/ a% C7 y8 p( C3 R0 r3 n
    -------------------------------------------------------------( d  N$ ?. r6 _
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%; }, R5 ^9 K9 {; c! Q  D& o
    -------------------------------------------------------------6 Q* F! Y6 `/ t% y5 M- x' S0 ?
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
& i* y& W9 ]# [+ `    -------------------------------------------------------------
" H% S4 p% J/ T1 P- c4 H- ^5 x    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%+ D. d$ D2 z- o$ g! ?9 M" }! b
    -------------------------------------------------------------; l2 d6 j& t& T, M. @- h
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
' r: j7 m8 S) L9 Q3 c3 o- I4 a    -------------------------------------------------------------8 Z* |  o5 G6 ~- K1 Y7 e7 @
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
/ F. C; }5 k$ I! D3 V: y    -------------------------------------------------------------
! B9 I* j; s& @    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%; U) c, e, f. N2 u( s# W
    -------------------------------------------------------------" a/ ]% k" U& k( Y* Y  H
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%& Q6 q8 M- p% i' `
    -------------------------------------------------------------# M; u& M: K" ~. h9 |' b
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
$ z) S5 y' d# Q- N3 }* X    -------------------------------------------------------------% r0 ~7 A  x. r% r
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%/ t/ h( f! `! w. `  {- m% A( g
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 Q, J& F2 P, f" H    >>  Y# [. ?) X: B" W" `) o0 F4 w
- ^+ a" l0 d  _
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
: P7 P4 R  v5 W  r" iin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
* b1 b; Z0 T, O( f2 o. dJohn and Victoria.
1 ]' i8 O7 M7 T+ w, H5 r
2 ~) |0 f: I& K; L    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most8 r% P8 G& K$ I" N
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
- K& y2 }! j# y/ @6 T% {: Z" L3 Uhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release8 h9 ^; U' `# X$ k! r  K( K
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price' @8 O0 \& r( t, L% K* a# k
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
' q5 S2 ~, k9 s' x$ d$ Q" E! c1 Sacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
3 E. u& r# J( v" s! W! uavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current/ J6 \' F( B, H* ~2 h
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
! B7 d# D' p1 N6 ?1 G( t/ D: Eversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
' `: |, b- ~6 b! j1 D- yNovember 15, 2006.
- T6 {# c( N4 y    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of# D$ m6 [$ p6 {, ~
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
: W: L5 r) z9 l: d' A6 O1 ]1 w& N* Sprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
  j8 h1 f9 H+ |# O* T+ ]available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-10-5 02:40 , Processed in 0.068569 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表