埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2001|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
" J8 r" Q$ T# P# j* G
1 m" F. g/ J* W3 O' R" i/ S- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
. r& K3 ~- m1 z  z
( u0 J+ v; `# }% l3 i6 @    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market8 Q# r. C# K$ \. C8 y$ R
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third; w& S: g/ R- X/ s: |6 r
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
4 }3 b  [5 L7 ]# J1 r/ hin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit  Y! P: n+ w' p: z9 z: B/ _$ k
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
& j/ G1 v6 G" B. W& [# E2 Umore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
* s' \0 m$ P1 I+ h$ _# CQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal0 F' y" m+ l5 m& t
LePage Real Estate Services./ o* u6 ^# S) B' F) ^

5 z5 V( f! Q% T+ P. ^    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
* W3 Y% Q: S9 ~- e" y4 K3 ^! jare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic" c( Z0 ~: V. ?* l( [
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and; n: r# k# a8 H: E1 z
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
% n: F* r( \: z3 s4 l0 a8 Yresidential real estate sector.
# s7 C( Z; I; r9 J& C' t. w5 h$ ^) C$ `7 l
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
5 Q7 d4 T9 e, s8 Z% c+ f" ~2 Noccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)( G. f* W4 v: G
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5620 s4 E, J  ?+ v" n) ^
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
$ s* x8 F+ t/ m  W" I2 g(+13.2%).
" r+ Z1 T; x0 ^: ]6 c. b! r( c+ T2 a0 P5 m+ c. O' X/ ^: |
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth5 C; z* e8 {) m& t* p, M+ ~- S
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the/ U! c6 ?0 q% k( w
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
5 o6 b' I/ ?  y5 zpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
+ Z! N; ~9 }& h8 Y& b4 spresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
  M) `' Z! M& P"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We1 N' K- ]; j' P6 U% j" h
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
6 P3 y0 E5 Q7 _* v; N" y( |balanced market."7 B/ p- j- e7 \- A9 c  {
$ M. \( l, Q" C* x& L+ ?$ L
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,, K3 h/ q' n4 _  C7 }9 [
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
9 ~: Y6 j' _1 W, \0 D8 \5 \7 Wto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued* p8 A" U" V- f) g% Y3 p
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core( \7 n( B9 N! E, A7 p/ ]/ O% ]
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
1 g* G& r2 }3 e# f9 Mmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
) a! ~) p0 u2 x  l1 Wbreaking price appreciations.- J, C& y' {7 G* ^8 O
: {) @- ~7 j; ^7 v& O+ x5 r1 t
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
1 Z% e- {* }( C9 f  y( Aeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
$ t( j  S0 o# C- a, O9 j6 m: y& M/ Jlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
; H" u. j! q  V7 v7 ~" Q
3 Z: w: ~; i! |* T. {. [$ ?1 m  K    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
/ |4 l8 b( U4 L: e; Y+ B. M& Qeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer# i9 m2 b( L+ j5 u
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off$ h7 }7 n! X. O/ o: Z$ K
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.3 X' w: P& B+ @2 w: ]; h# E
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers0 d0 n' Z* J, S; r  |9 G
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
" M6 G+ Y: D! z+ j) E' k/ l) z% @/ yprice appreciation when compared with 2005.& G+ r0 Z% Q# j* W) K

2 N( ]( l! {, @& ^* X) x$ Y; S    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing/ B% }) W/ W1 u; P- R) @! Y
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and" n' h, S; T9 Z4 A% x
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
: t: @8 y% |: M+ J  Care markedly different than those found in the United States.
. I- Y7 S- ^& i( w5 h. s, b) s$ S0 @  S
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
! i3 c! ]1 h% ~, f! M, d7 w" i1 M: OAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
0 S8 I, j8 I: ?& C' w! u2 Zfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the* b, Q, a$ @0 K. V# d" f
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general9 q( S, z4 |' s8 _5 B7 i* k8 d
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
. U, f# @: u1 r/ N; H& zdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
3 D3 c5 T, h5 a0 X" Maggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
" x) @( q" T* G5 y  emortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."4 d* \, l1 J# E6 M: x
' e3 x# m, H1 t1 B
    <<
% J$ ~- x- C* ?) }) L4 \- S                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
) O& R: b5 \7 e2 r+ A, `# l1 Y7 A    >>
; b4 b" O+ K7 f( f7 }  n* O+ e* B
+ o- ^$ v9 H0 n" R. k/ f    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in( g9 C* k1 Z  d& Z/ p$ b6 I6 ]
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate! c% t* `% l; n8 ?2 P' p
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time4 d) W( t- A- E+ C  ?1 V
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of% M2 ^, O7 b' z
renovations.
+ r; P/ R1 c- G3 P2 Q* k8 Q! _  F$ p  t
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
9 t& U- j5 c: @. j; Xincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
( T& A$ a( `+ o$ H3 dcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and* O7 c, F. B! w
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
/ Q/ W  _* `; F* o
+ a( b: g8 Z% A0 F    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer+ Z0 f; A7 Z& t* g
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
: H$ {% S& z% d+ c8 P7 ^4 c$ zquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
* Q4 a$ e1 Q; ~2 A3 W600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores5 y# X$ y) M0 T* {
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes+ ^+ V, w+ w' n$ P  w9 v+ F9 O; }( x
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
! p1 r7 u# i! A) `: ~) D" Z% _$ t, O; ]$ L
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
3 Z) R5 S# h' M9 Jconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their: }( [4 I% f+ z( Z0 S$ [
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers" V, I* K! d4 I
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian& u! y; G* r! @1 ?% c1 ?7 c
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing& d2 Q; E/ ^0 _
buyers with more options when looking for a home.. G1 S9 V0 {/ J4 Q% @
5 W5 G+ x4 L$ U) ~: v/ ]
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly0 r9 k! N+ Q# J
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
' ?$ l4 I) A- z* I- h; _2 Ipriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,0 {$ S) f  n1 z+ \) ^6 [
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
, A2 V& ^* V% w/ |+ T  W& Pfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
7 j( Z2 i7 I$ Q9 O7 E; P8 @- j" o- A/ @; ?; @7 D$ ]# Y
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house; R2 X1 E) |. S3 E
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory, I, i2 O1 ~& e( A7 D
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
2 b, z) |1 U; @' |" x  mfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,) F2 I% i. w# Y) v) Y- b
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
9 ^- H, Z* R& E4 ^3 V$ Apressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before  E4 G. F: n2 v+ v
making a purchase.! H+ i- Z$ n* P. p. [6 e# U

# r- P* s3 z8 P7 ~    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing1 n+ a3 B+ X2 k6 Q. g' {  u
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong2 `; s" m0 G3 [3 W
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city; o/ Z; g/ B! N
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
% R0 h) _& {& E3 t! kattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
6 P* Y" X" G1 K4 n* o. i: Yamenities.0 |/ s4 h( g- @. [& r

4 m& U; b, v0 o7 H5 l& h    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
5 B# o& Y) d& y6 P! {% F4 t) _throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
9 A4 H0 }3 N- facross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
' P2 w' D7 }% n% o$ ocontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been# d! e' I% d1 j/ c- q2 `, Q
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
" O+ Z' B" }0 R6 X( |  aresidence, rather than for investment.
6 h. ]; n; b3 U7 j" v" _
5 n: G# J5 h# f5 s    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
1 K5 O* y# ?$ O* Ahouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted! d% L- A7 T' C% x
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer  _- P4 m  {! u& ?
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
7 b- `; G4 ]2 [4 y* F$ `rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter" C  K- b6 W4 S; \: t1 V1 D7 s
the market.) X4 M( y3 s+ s5 s& C+ O
! L" U; s3 e: h4 a( L; E; H) v+ m
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
9 e; A4 c' x$ UJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In* F7 z% y5 U; X8 s( |6 ]0 L
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring1 s# x+ g- W9 |; s& r' _
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
0 _# M( B( z7 U# l5 @to the shortage of available inventory.) o2 t$ ?  `' p- Y9 v# G, D3 e
7 A) S) `3 q( z5 {2 R; \# `
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
/ W9 K8 l& V! r5 c  o! Q0 _momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
6 \# Y7 o$ @4 f! _5 gvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses. s3 y; l# v( b
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.* ^3 B+ M, V1 ~9 |& M6 u

. c( J7 W8 R+ q% `    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases; @2 |+ `4 G$ x
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low8 K3 r  ~$ o+ q
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that+ S& P1 O+ n9 {0 o% a5 S
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
5 e- `9 k' Q) ~. ?7 p! u6 [prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer: M( |# H1 y0 r/ @9 N
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
/ y# l* R. W3 V; f/ cbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

2 n) v4 X) ^7 d6 m+ H! f- R" d8 f& ?* w) x# z
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter* R' K' a$ y' A) b1 B
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton9 I1 u& t5 w- W9 I. Q9 ?. g
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,) V' w5 h1 K8 C( E( e" Z8 H$ Y6 N
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
: F! H3 ~1 w, q4 Gincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve9 S- F3 t$ X( m
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
9 A0 D3 N2 B/ B) Ptowards the end of 2006.
   
2 ~% w' z) d, e6 D# E# w' ~: @( M  u
* |8 `( p$ ]; c* |) GWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of5 g" B$ K" k0 e
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable4 O" f5 f* L) s4 p0 E- Q3 Q
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse+ z/ `% O5 i1 ^! w4 e3 h
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
" q! B! n" l2 I5 k; G) _7 cforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added) c- `% l5 C. T  Y/ y9 j9 i( F6 N
pressure on tight inventory levels.
( t" o; v: ?0 L: V1 U
2 Q3 w2 N, x, @' h3 _2 b+ d    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
  \2 I" k! P% [3 x9 A% s8 ]fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people) d" w  }: B4 e9 K
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;3 A/ }" ~9 Y7 h( B3 P
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching9 L0 D9 i- }, l
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.9 r+ x* n8 |7 I7 Y
8 z, o4 a# K& n! r
    <<! K' Y( f% H* m- u1 u! C  R
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006. g  b: ^9 _. Z4 k5 Y& _; a

, S# }; L( s$ j* k8 a0 ~" @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  q! r% w7 ?$ i' w* ~! }) {                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
2 D9 x+ L$ q& B% {4 h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# c+ h7 I7 `7 F' m
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
! O( v# c- Y$ Y: j, a' j    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
7 [7 Z5 X" \6 U' ]2 H- a4 ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( g- [5 y2 x5 h# {. `  h& Z    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
: R" k# d) {+ g% z: B8 C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 r2 j* `$ |# q, J
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000* G6 m0 `2 f2 j1 e# n5 l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  _7 W6 F' N5 f3 u  L
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
# Z9 ~! {5 {9 i0 D    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; x9 R5 @  l1 L2 |  E# H    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
8 ]: T! o# O) ~' s' X5 [& r    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' B1 X4 ]5 s' F6 ]    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
6 S; b1 [2 W6 @" T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  }& P# K& ^5 C- p: X! \    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
) `! d+ l9 l* G  l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; B8 v! v8 {1 X2 {. O    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185) G/ P* u2 c" R8 Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 U& m/ V9 |3 t/ i& b0 G
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250  o. w% y- s& S* o6 P& a
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 t3 V  b2 ]: u: ^+ F. G  B    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7663 q9 L9 X* x# C; [0 f  _
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ T, F! @3 P0 ~, |: j7 _
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707" w0 U$ `" R+ C8 c' V) C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 d6 C0 a/ A% L' D2 l( \4 V
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500" r. ~5 Q+ w' l9 z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 C6 `* N7 B' B; N) u2 O8 F( f    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
( E& B& p+ i; {, Q( I$ n# q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ k0 c9 l& s0 I1 j% H# }    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
; a/ [( ]: Z/ |6 E* [! m' B5 p# `    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* D" E7 }" q" [/ ]8 Q& o6 V5 a# a0 C
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
+ s+ l1 r# W- L/ Z7 D( t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# B# K+ A/ ^  h& {6 W    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000" c; H* j6 J5 p8 @5 P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) ^! Z! j) Y* [: w  C% w
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8601 r& B+ M& P; V" i8 m
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ {. y: c- W% a. B" X# G# n9 g! M# A3 O$ v
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 R8 z* t- R! _6 `% `* N0 f
                               Standard Condominium( R, C/ }: O: `
    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ P' L) }. E6 R) A$ _. v                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
4 n% C2 d+ x% ]# Q5 I3 K    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
4 [3 J& W" _$ E5 p! d  u7 B    -------------------------------------------------------------* U2 s# `& S5 ?% o, `& @! i
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%. ^" z! z' J, Y5 c. N
    -------------------------------------------------------------
% m$ Q8 ~! b' C6 E, @" {* D    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
$ w, _* ^/ p, H" |6 v5 F2 U! |% D    -------------------------------------------------------------$ I8 S! _/ X+ P! H9 y" C$ M
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A0 M% W1 v9 K: z0 g- r
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 f3 b: z6 A* m7 L; H: f. [    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A; h6 m; q# K- k( r  x" L2 f
    -------------------------------------------------------------: F: `, D! ~+ H8 G+ T$ d0 ]6 U! {) b, T
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%' t; q2 Z4 a& l5 k- R8 Z3 v# \
    -------------------------------------------------------------7 k5 N9 ^2 s8 E& F
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
, O4 p" y7 V- x, p( K, F- ]0 k    -------------------------------------------------------------" `1 }+ ~+ r6 }2 |
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
0 D1 \) E# M$ y3 ^9 H    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 a+ \9 x1 Y, D8 W5 ^8 a    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
" [0 u( x$ ~: X. Y, I& ^    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 p0 t9 F- t# ]/ C: F+ G    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
; @3 }$ E  A4 W; I4 l7 M    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 R) J/ v* G( ], V+ r    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%. i- \) y# I$ s; O& [$ f  b4 v
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 B$ X- s4 O  \2 n    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%' c4 [4 t, j( Q. W  ?: Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------. {9 `$ x6 S9 c# u" ]: @
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%  A0 [: E' p+ s  ~2 |' O0 l
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) O% d/ ~3 a% V* S0 y. i# E3 E" N    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%5 w) a- l. K- M% ?" B
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# {$ p) p, [+ J0 l7 O7 |: a    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
5 H4 _+ @+ w( w" ]# ?  E    -------------------------------------------------------------* w5 ?5 e0 c$ N0 F" J; i" q
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
: G) V* l3 w) x: U: E    -------------------------------------------------------------
* |- b3 f5 B2 S2 R    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%1 t: b  }$ u7 n! c* n: b3 r# [* K
    -------------------------------------------------------------
% U3 _+ D/ O& Q4 J4 Q    >>
) H% S4 h' N* T7 q5 {1 g
6 f# I6 I0 _/ i5 F    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined8 I) O- \  S' d( T  D+ `
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
1 q. u1 W' U  f; Z) W5 V' X, JJohn and Victoria.
8 ?2 w. q/ @; K( _! r4 f. P4 c6 t! w' F: @( h5 X' e7 T
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most! O% t( C( ^& X3 ?9 {# {
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
  p9 w6 a' |& M+ O+ |* ihousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release! }1 ], ~$ c" A. r) ^
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price7 T5 y3 [* P. M0 t
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities: ^: H  R( D) b( g
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is. \: |+ s6 a" D2 k
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current" z6 o$ f, H" x
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable/ s5 U& m: C' T6 o8 O
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
/ Y3 x5 p  K9 ~- r9 WNovember 15, 2006.2 V9 {4 H. P6 @' R* S
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of0 ?3 R' e' m" N) U; p; ]1 z5 w
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
) v' F3 s; e5 a  l  U. D# zprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is4 X  s& B7 V% D  X5 I( u+ e
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-8 10:05 , Processed in 0.189276 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表