埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2050|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
4 e5 i8 E; e, J# a
) n9 n. i9 b) \( ~4 C- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
5 Q4 q7 H" d7 h& j/ J. O
9 w) g/ ]" R0 T. @4 C3 ?    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market5 M( x% `6 M2 s7 b4 |/ }
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
% _3 v* q. b8 X- D0 D0 M- @  l- Tquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic/ E7 ]$ [+ ?& h3 d2 {  z
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit1 {; L' Z' e; O- V/ W2 X. v
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and; o# e( N- z6 l" a# H- j4 \, t
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
& I+ p+ K/ s5 R3 t) x+ n& K# R1 K% t0 ZQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal" T  J7 o1 {% Q1 h* C; \
LePage Real Estate Services.
. C! U3 i+ i! [3 ^) u& [% X( E7 o3 x
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
4 A' D2 J0 v* Q, z% jare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic2 N- K) }( l1 D- W
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and) D. w- {8 P7 o& l  J3 d  D
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the2 ~, f+ O* W4 Z1 }' Q) {
residential real estate sector.
3 \1 k7 Q* U9 Z! n' u, Q# E: A: e$ P: Y
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation: J( T! _& x2 B
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
2 O& P( @1 x+ J7 \( Z+ N# Myear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
5 ?% j$ U2 s: f& j/ i9 q( {(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
" M9 u9 W: i" {, M2 V(+13.2%).: n9 q' @0 b+ K9 i' \) \

; l% H! ^$ f% I- A    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
( Z: q- I1 p/ X! z" D3 |" t2 Kduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
0 ~, {6 S" ?$ T  _  G+ W1 @frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
" k0 }7 h3 o& {$ Wpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,) m+ b1 }# E5 ^5 N; a
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.6 [  ], w, a# T- Q* L
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
7 A' O- }% E" n4 D9 uwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy- L- Z$ j+ D8 C9 [
balanced market."' Y$ U# I( n, m) A6 D9 {8 @
& g0 q. n5 `4 |9 p3 N( j' @# h: t" D" I1 `
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
- x/ a2 e6 y8 G( d$ P' E/ ~considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
' d4 Y) f: J2 r7 L2 hto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
3 |* @* B5 i3 ^% ]throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
& e4 }: S( a0 j& @energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
) |$ q, l/ @3 M) M/ d0 xmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record2 l# A, i0 m2 D& V$ N# O  G$ O* G
breaking price appreciations.% I. p( V# i2 b& P8 ?

8 Y5 R5 T& x- D$ S: v% a9 p# Z    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
& N2 T8 I) w3 t2 E+ p; Eeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
. N( `' x2 _0 s+ v% L$ {largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.. @7 _$ T3 p5 S

7 f* A- @$ Z# k+ o    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid$ Q0 s& p& l: ?6 i; E
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer2 V4 j  W$ o7 |( p8 A4 _
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
7 Y" y, M- r& w( }) Y6 @3 jslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
0 S* [/ V& k% fIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers5 o; \% C# z) K$ a
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
& O5 [: o! ?1 p4 I5 Fprice appreciation when compared with 2005., Z8 A! w) M" A9 d
" |2 z3 z! Y: J7 I( y$ r
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
3 T) c! @5 F. ^: Lmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
! b) i5 {8 L# U- C& @9 gfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
0 V* z6 K7 T7 nare markedly different than those found in the United States.2 c. \$ T. r0 c; c* W

; O. d7 G, o& f( d- i7 G6 ?    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
& I3 Z: {, |9 b+ `# m/ RAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's6 R% y, u% Z" B- a+ u% u( _
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
8 {# h8 [4 ]1 n1 d5 x; R- Hrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general8 ]$ i, a5 c. b& `4 ^( [! M
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
* Z( Y) h4 h3 X2 `+ Ldownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
# \/ @9 G; d! q8 l8 b7 raggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization2 K5 B0 \$ G8 \8 ^' w
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."# |; F) G. U2 R/ H- I5 R1 w, H3 \
6 s: V7 T' D, C: T0 P1 N
    <<
6 u* I! U; Y+ M) K2 Z( I: ~8 e                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
3 R, c4 F" t% I, w7 p    >>+ y2 m6 W; l2 L: \

/ S- @. |7 ^: o5 r2 S( I  ?8 a' b    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
6 ]: ]1 I- R5 h6 U5 P" |: y1 R  GHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
% D5 g) m; [% R0 h: Fof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
3 ^# X" z2 Q9 d) T+ \: Jlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
( ~; P% e" n8 g. _, x5 Irenovations.
) Z" E# K( o' Q& @5 t3 |. S
' c0 }3 h% ~$ q9 I' i/ h    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
2 {6 n% H5 |0 Q+ O4 B4 dincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
( o. E* M. D9 E3 G7 D; n3 h& z# Scompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and3 p) a* {, z% D: A& R  q; P
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.5 i! K) I/ y* z/ N+ `
* n0 y, I. d  p4 f
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
. P! N3 _0 ^! ~- y5 H7 ?slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
! K/ ~' p! s  l: c0 }3 l# Z' V; g) xquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
. B' ^  ]  c9 T4 `7 r600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores" v) r- g6 M; X- z
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes! K. p5 o5 @4 ^
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
' w+ `9 i; B# e$ i
! Q# _, d6 G. l; H    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced! [( v2 I  \) q1 G" U
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their) C- T9 c4 {2 b8 o
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
  r& P+ [) ]8 jwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
/ w* c% f3 H4 hdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing! L" p0 d' U! j6 j2 h7 y
buyers with more options when looking for a home.) f6 f0 a' n" Z& F4 S" l
9 i' I3 N" ^6 `5 R
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly4 Y1 o6 Z4 X1 T# Y  ?9 v
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes5 c7 q+ x3 g) S
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
& R8 @& t0 g+ m0 r/ ~3 ^as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
8 G1 w' f/ ^1 t; zfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
1 r- E5 q) h2 X+ {8 J  L
0 G6 P. P; |9 S/ J    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
+ O2 c4 r! {$ Y- ]& O+ tprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory( b- ?& T* g) q% z' x
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
9 W/ n* I- _- j$ ^/ Efirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
0 }; r( K) I$ {) Mwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
- |4 G2 w* L- I! jpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before- q& t4 ]& @* k7 O' ]5 W
making a purchase.2 |  {6 U: h$ x+ l# L2 B
5 d9 V8 Q  R: M
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
% i% O) y6 U: p# zmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
7 v& b: K8 b2 g' F: ~! W5 \! L0 pconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
* f2 u* W1 Q# L% K6 ~! Rcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting( A$ }, z7 q2 ]. c
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
. P7 o9 A. c- n# Vamenities.
2 W1 k  I' q: v* j( t% Z4 ~0 D8 y9 t- w+ l/ c% H
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels2 [2 @3 I! Y) w* r5 a
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
6 J* Z$ i, I5 t: J' E- M6 `1 dacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has" _( ?! m. z6 m- ?' m
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
1 S& B* Y0 l3 Bdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle; J" y2 G2 e6 `
residence, rather than for investment.: {" c6 l0 }, E( w& L$ b( Q" F( w
7 w3 B* K$ y2 ]5 \4 o9 g
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
/ H" H! d0 }" s. Y9 {( khouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
) Y% H/ I3 u9 C8 |# ]" Xin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
6 G' F. u: u& F! Q7 _- Vconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization# b2 i1 ]0 k2 K1 ?; h* ]; ?
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter' r' d: L9 a4 X2 \7 _
the market.
/ l7 N! J5 h0 n9 l$ c
2 Y, W1 n+ z) l$ R    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
: Y' G& }0 S# b; j# ?7 `4 rJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
+ P4 p5 X, m( G, l5 M6 m9 [2 sAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
$ q6 q" O  W- s# V. I8 }; t3 Amonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due% H* t' b3 T) x1 {5 T, r
to the shortage of available inventory.0 F: \; e# W5 r
) q% m- [0 U( M' b: i& d
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its9 I- E" ?6 ]) p% w
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
4 z2 C% x0 z: rvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses/ `9 E& J, m9 s% X% i7 l
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
$ E9 j% V' V/ i1 \2 {$ a$ M; |# v* q! E$ B  ^! c7 b
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
" v1 M# r- P$ ?: U5 [$ ]in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
; i' \1 t( l6 Q2 y$ L3 h, N. |0 junemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that. z# a& O- ^% X: P
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
2 Z# d2 ?  {1 y9 ?prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer; G! _! T7 i. [& i3 @: K' u
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as- i9 Q! U- l5 ]3 e* H5 @
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
# D. ]8 t- M9 o

+ a& G4 W+ q/ k! X. s7 D+ f    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
2 L$ V2 Z$ H7 D% w: b/ Z5 e# has activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton/ a  |+ W! ]. W
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
8 Y6 A/ f! v5 G5 h8 Amaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
; ?2 c0 k, o$ r8 r- }5 F) Y* N; Iincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve7 W  t, Q. L4 _0 }  ]8 r! }" T; c# y
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
/ i; H, s; J# htowards the end of 2006.
    $ h# g/ c: ^/ s$ E7 `, S8 ^
9 T( ?. X; c+ O+ V
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
3 k( `; c0 w1 P: w* L4 ]1 Hinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable6 f* W& S% e, }7 z! d$ t
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse. o/ i7 V8 C& T
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
) E8 n$ x3 @5 _0 f% D' q4 ^" x. }foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
- Q0 L/ |% d! e$ l2 _pressure on tight inventory levels.; Z1 b/ m/ f2 V' B# W# _$ H# D9 |

$ B+ s: a/ C2 U8 l9 r1 Z    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic8 }+ F* F' J$ ^5 t8 }/ n" ?3 H
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people- n6 x) k/ n+ w) i2 b( u
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;3 `8 D* O4 i% v# i$ d! q# t
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
6 R6 D' @' I  Z$ _. ?for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.5 a+ |5 @9 Z  v! i

0 |9 ^) Q: y9 S    <<7 O4 y3 Q9 K- m$ o& }9 S
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
, w7 {( o+ }" Q+ ?- Y1 Q6 @
' b' `% \# T  p9 e1 E    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) e' V5 _9 |1 V, ^: W
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
% {7 y6 f6 T% f- p    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 k3 m5 q, w5 v; ^$ h2 }                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3( K" ~: c% {4 X9 J
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average  k- V" j! Z4 L) v3 |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' {6 X  R' X: @    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
: ]7 F* h' h% c% u/ _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ @- c! _% P! j) M
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
9 L  L/ ^' y: z) S) H$ O0 Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 q+ p& r3 |$ e$ h+ x. e    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
! W' c' P2 O9 h1 H4 e* D* V/ L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ f) l; ~; \$ ]" W7 o
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
7 D# [* s, ^* l: o6 z* F1 h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  i/ Z! U* D* q    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3335 a" C; q' @) M* S% |; X+ q$ C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 h) U, X8 b" ^/ g4 c+ W- T) P# w    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5835 {0 o- N1 r* K4 p) C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 O3 E2 H0 e% Y# _& [
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185. l, D' \1 V# p; ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; u( ?" ]! b/ u2 d' H) H& \
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2503 Q8 b/ z- t# w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! ]; D% t0 D& K2 q) t
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
/ w4 N' D- l$ O; z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) u+ R' V. r- r
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
4 Z4 b+ R! }# D" H7 h  F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- r0 f9 b* L, y+ _& Q. }# T    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500; E4 ]9 l& K3 `2 n% K6 ^1 |, B$ ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 ?) V- o$ y2 d' Q
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
( [5 d' C8 ]1 ^* o: B9 Y) h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 p; u' Y; L7 m3 e8 ~; N- p5 p    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714) e) c5 u3 [" b$ h
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  W6 O8 X3 V; B9 I+ }    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500% b3 [& F3 ?9 \# r) q. l7 d: G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) `; r* H0 b5 n$ T9 I! U) s
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0007 R* N( q9 J9 S, |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 b0 T" i: }% V* {+ I& q- a- l+ c9 r
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
# g! A9 G, U9 F  ]( [) _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ k" O% Y- O: C* J5 S: T4 ]1 G2 X9 w0 L
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 E# T/ \$ a) @. }1 P* X# N& l
                               Standard Condominium
- h8 U* G# `( N    -------------------------------------------------------------% b" Z1 k; S/ q1 P$ l, k
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
+ D4 s; S# m. G    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change* }! k3 V! f4 R5 v. x% }: Z6 C
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 l9 e- a- B9 O, W% e7 \    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%! i# V6 ?" W4 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( [  |; ~* `$ y" H& N    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%; y% D7 E. _& V9 e
    -------------------------------------------------------------. D5 R3 Q- i& @: b1 t
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
$ U% t( z+ U/ a9 R    -------------------------------------------------------------
. }) B  x/ g' v7 }4 f9 D7 B    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
5 J5 {' ~; _' R% C3 E    -------------------------------------------------------------, g4 P5 W# {  A/ x. D& O: d
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
" q" D$ v! L/ Y* S1 ~4 X    -------------------------------------------------------------$ ~3 f1 z; ~) `' _4 t( B
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
% M+ ]- O4 }9 k    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ N0 `) c3 {$ K# k# ^    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%) x( X6 M8 B8 c( R0 J
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ g, `3 }. C' L5 y, }& a. P    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
7 z) A. S' p& z, _/ z7 D1 J. F% q/ B    -------------------------------------------------------------' g! A4 x/ t7 O' ~; [" v4 q1 }' ~
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
1 I% H; [; F  y    -------------------------------------------------------------( |" o+ d$ z+ C
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%) o& J! n: G8 [+ i& z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 t+ J# Q, D( x% k    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
& W/ D# ^, n* z  ]; F" u    -------------------------------------------------------------" `! Z: a4 b5 C2 F# J( r
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%- H3 f# }" H  t( p
    -------------------------------------------------------------8 q7 s$ f6 p2 X+ B$ [/ }8 v8 z
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%; x+ {* Q- B: v% |3 o
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" i  U5 C0 ]# c  i$ ^8 M3 S    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
0 ]' }1 ]8 Q( O. {4 o    -------------------------------------------------------------% ^, z" E$ V) S5 J$ p. V# D
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%8 b" ~" E6 o" _* j$ X2 w: L
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 S% n$ ^# Y0 Q$ S# k6 s, E& H    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%) b  Y+ f# N! B% l( Y0 T
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: x3 ]( U1 _* t3 o6 N- p% e0 Y/ C    >>
. k. P$ b$ X, p& N: }$ @
. }# H% Q5 ^3 Y2 s# r    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
! Z$ H  y. R4 J4 ]in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint4 l0 l/ o8 Y/ D( N  W' G; @
John and Victoria.
3 i; e0 I# Z$ u* l5 j( s9 _4 C$ h& Q5 n
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most9 Z7 G, y7 [0 ~
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of; D: ]$ q! W  g- {  ]
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
9 C; s" G, d; X- `references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price5 f$ {" A  _% W. t
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
8 p% `' r; V7 K' jacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
+ Y% _* s* b2 ~/ ]* `+ s9 [/ o$ navailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current4 T* r9 b1 m$ s
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
2 O2 {) Q- N# `5 }5 Y( I1 \version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
' l' ]8 E; {+ b- y5 uNovember 15, 2006.5 ~+ D% n3 A3 ^2 Q
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
7 g4 z% h) A  j4 f6 p3 L, efair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge* ]: k6 K2 @; {6 o
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is3 T5 k" i5 N1 Y4 J- s3 m6 T
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-26 02:05 , Processed in 0.148102 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表