 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
0 ]6 ~1 y6 C, I: ~) t
" W+ N# z2 h- ~0 M! G- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
# e9 l' W/ S$ O% E6 h) n$ Y& r/ v: U7 A* ]0 |4 M" O0 z( L5 p
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market7 [: a. H; L% e6 E, D- I
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third' Y$ {6 y- n$ v+ S8 ~+ M$ H& ~
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic2 r! l$ _. ~1 Q. X
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit6 y- K3 r, ~ K+ |8 k K
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and `% R) I' W( {4 z2 }
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,) C% s4 A T. O
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal5 A* ^6 l( z9 y6 B3 d) c
LePage Real Estate Services.
/ ~- W* b$ V( H# G) p6 |7 \0 ]! P& H9 S9 J# H4 k) l$ t7 c
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters- J& n: ~: i, F; @ s4 g
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic+ T6 Z9 y& {' m
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and/ T8 ^8 w2 e9 o7 i& X
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the. ]7 ]/ t, N& F# @
residential real estate sector.: Z8 E5 x7 ~. M9 T" V7 z
6 g @: O, b5 D1 _5 R
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation, x7 t: ]- x7 |2 p" |2 R4 k
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
' k, Z. C8 K5 D) K0 vyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562/ L1 N! Q8 f# j& }
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
5 E' L$ N3 ^" ~. I( \" t(+13.2%).
' y6 }7 F4 M1 A' l) @. D- |; e. Z; T1 v- w0 |
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth2 i/ P- m8 O) _' T5 Y
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the! f/ W0 W" h$ \% N
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are, T2 |6 a+ A# K0 y( I: E
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
7 E% i* Q) ~& ?president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.. r/ Z, ~3 v) G1 C$ K0 ~
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
2 n. s" G- c( f! x ~welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy q! D, h0 r+ N( d
balanced market."
+ h: y* }! ]3 S7 c: k/ w9 G
# @6 h% r. T2 w+ e8 B( [ Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
7 z4 J' _5 c8 C. gconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
$ ?/ i, q1 _( {; l- C( K( @to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued0 i# F" Y) k, }% \8 G% F4 j
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
* X& Y6 h8 Q5 J9 fenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,; j; n& S/ G; ~
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record' J- [- f1 z' N1 o/ s8 ^; L# f# p5 N
breaking price appreciations.
. ? u, A; v/ q$ n m9 H8 S3 D0 S. L9 g( ?
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding1 _ {! G$ B; l6 O' u K; k
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
# G" m) Z6 d/ t& n. A( E: S8 ulargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.9 J2 n* ~ M- b3 E. I
6 E! L- y3 {( `0 E+ w In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
* l9 ~6 q$ y: D0 ?- h" Neconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
7 v5 s8 ?. G% h$ D( Z( ?+ K1 jconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
3 A X! X9 S6 l% G6 K+ Oslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
, B+ m- _* W+ d# m) LIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
( b" ]$ Y; Q1 P( A- T* `5 g" M/ e8 t! fgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of+ a3 O @3 b; c0 N7 R
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
- l0 v0 w& S7 g8 I
. R# R; B, z$ D While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
" v: W! [+ O; U- B, \1 |market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and& g/ Y O k6 L$ Q; [2 \- J* L
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
1 S$ T0 h9 q" z7 A0 h- |# Lare markedly different than those found in the United States.
" N5 O5 K+ d" O% C9 S8 g I- O$ ~7 Q$ c5 I% R
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the7 {1 U( ]/ F9 \$ w" p
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's4 m- ? V! d, x/ a: F1 P: X8 i8 G* f
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
* W) h/ v+ B: w, ?relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
' S; Y; u+ ]% c1 `1 e7 N' U+ paffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
% Y' p& I# t4 b- Q# L, a Mdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
6 _! Z5 b" N3 |# Oaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
# T) x! n% E9 `- R0 tmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment.", E+ t+ |0 r' F$ y( B! n) |) d
8 x& w+ c. W7 k: P3 Y' l
<<
0 \2 L0 S# r4 s6 c! V% ` REGIONAL SUMMARIES
5 T& m( r* e1 E >>4 ]- ]! Z' S* g2 P) M
$ N- C& a; Y. \; i7 I' P$ B9 T. j! k
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in* ^3 o/ U( Y0 y+ U! h' d; F( l) _
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
5 D: ^3 C# `: {, m4 G& w& W* O' }of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time" Q8 ?( N1 a& r2 ?" U
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of! S. ^/ i: ]2 s8 t9 ~6 D: B
renovations.9 N' ?( `' x% G. u
/ T1 D/ m, c+ V# M. M7 k The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
1 ?/ k) O, |3 X% R9 m% C9 |3 ~7 h5 l9 Kincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
/ z$ _: h3 W8 m$ f: V$ l; gcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and0 {- k- [% o1 X
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter./ N+ U& R$ K V
4 i# E, P0 Z3 j The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer8 l. @$ O$ U2 a. n2 w7 {
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
1 C7 }+ g0 Z* [ z% F. Q$ r* wquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
) j. f8 c4 D* G600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores4 E* a3 [6 c2 }
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
$ x, c3 L! l K' Oand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.# y8 M) w, E, |. p! y
) h% }$ \. ] L& E- ^8 c In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced) h- n) s/ E) F7 t# O, I
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their( Y6 j$ _; V$ j, x
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
+ A8 U* U& @8 }; nwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian1 m; `$ E2 Q- Y8 k7 E% z! R) L5 q
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing" `% t6 i; `, c1 ^* I1 v$ {8 [* n
buyers with more options when looking for a home.- e. G5 e% ~, W8 Z1 h
% b/ r% E s( S2 Q" {% i8 Y! K1 z
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly: m0 {5 _' y& _. w% b
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
; ~$ d6 c( e* C! h6 o2 [. Mpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,7 z! C u6 C$ Y8 B" u% r& ~
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
) K- X8 Z; o$ t! @6 Ffew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
* ^0 ^$ ^) A2 D' ~
6 t- K) V0 r9 c: T- l* o Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house8 D) T& D. q4 O' j" `
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory. M; g4 {& o8 w' I) @6 ^9 c- s
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting& u0 i G* U9 c& H; [6 I2 L8 ^
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,! q- X4 P- {/ l" M1 U; x
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the0 U4 G" g$ X4 v J& K; j( G$ d- l+ J
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before$ h. S6 B3 m1 i
making a purchase.+ J5 m1 L" T7 h: j! ]
$ b$ t* s3 z7 t) J8 F, V
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing9 U/ D8 I6 N4 X
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong+ {6 d2 j1 x0 j" o, W
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
9 p+ ~# |/ T! d. ^. e' Ycentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting: J" R$ \6 l3 F6 W G) q. A/ G
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
3 y. a* U( Z) Q6 D2 camenities.8 g. d: p& k `' |
. x3 p, l1 v: ]2 E7 I The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
9 J& ?) H% B K& b+ R0 a6 Sthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
! }* z8 t' d8 z1 C% e9 U" ~across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has. Q2 s, P) y7 N4 I3 z
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been( F; T4 K0 m& L) f) D& }
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle; a3 x( P6 {4 ]+ s1 y- E2 l
residence, rather than for investment.
: L3 O+ K9 p+ C/ y3 e: B* l
, `" J) q3 i* R# B) \ The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
) r& x" A% A8 P0 K0 b1 Chouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
. a8 Y/ l/ B/ ?in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
3 n2 ] o1 L9 c2 q4 Uconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization- G9 t# z9 \; s( E( S
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
/ M( y3 x- T+ B9 ^$ \0 N: h* Lthe market.) f4 i# r. u4 c* E
0 F' F7 y, L! p! V In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through5 C& s! X7 t; f- ^: [
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
! A9 z) l. | `) U0 u+ H& NAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
) O6 V; M3 \! M$ ~- A4 Dmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
$ ~& B# w& K$ bto the shortage of available inventory.
! l" o% M% I) r" f
1 d" p& u% i r) W# I Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
0 I4 U5 p1 W' qmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains% S" D% ^" ?* [( ?
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses( J3 Q6 l D" M0 e( G) f
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.0 H. [- k' ]% f: z4 ^
6 {. S8 X. p& d1 E5 T4 k
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
6 ^$ Q( _) W3 u3 y4 Nin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
" k$ g! ]+ B) d" ~/ D; `unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
6 \' i8 _' `# ]. P- D$ w! Npressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
5 H: v. S c# w5 P6 Uprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer! B I: d5 J) ?% W4 n; x" z- F
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as: a8 a1 V* [6 S! ]; |
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.5 K8 Z J& ]0 K7 l4 s; V
S& W% f- p8 [9 I, y Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
! y$ y1 W+ i- P6 pas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
1 p" u D, ~1 S% ^9 z3 U) G: b8 Rremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
% p! B0 G: |, `/ Cmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
$ v7 D" B f; E1 P* zincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve0 z9 Q! K) t$ Q3 l
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
" K2 ?3 h* D* n. J. d8 X4 s* ktowards the end of 2006. ) v A( N! g! i% n# K, y5 T) c) H
0 F" ]0 m" P5 U# gWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
) D6 n0 W7 g' y! t( E) S% P' s4 {inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable3 X1 r3 P+ ], g4 d
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
( e; M6 ] D! ?+ j- bgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
* p& o0 N. l$ ]' }6 Q% @2 _9 Fforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
" R: C' H- k7 Y# G, c: @7 Rpressure on tight inventory levels., \5 P. U, x9 ]( _% t9 p8 b7 e
+ B0 j6 w# m* a, q4 L) T# j Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
5 A" x* \* X8 @! I% a1 v. rfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people6 I6 M! I8 p& K& f+ s, O$ {
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;' o6 U" O2 O! G- v( o+ ]
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching* s/ L) x% ?" q$ n5 `8 x
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.! C5 A A% v; p+ F; Y
# Y U @; j: M' f, e! ` <<
: K9 H# d% [9 |9 `5 ~ Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
) k: t( \8 e! Q8 w4 p9 m6 t# b1 B
, @4 v1 w6 l& n: ^( x" ~0 I -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 P! F$ [, S+ c8 s5 C' i& M
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey' `4 ?" @2 ]5 W' L/ z3 y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, j5 [. C( z* |. H k# R" g
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
9 g7 Z, F' y1 B0 X# K! b& X Market Average Average % Change Average Average, E* B) i' n# ^2 I4 u& ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& I9 U; D/ B& D
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
8 b9 r. t( h( y$ U& } -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 D( [3 o9 {8 w! n+ S# M3 |, c3 _
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
9 a( u7 A; |8 ?7 Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 z8 l1 j# j0 U; C! J) E. J Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
5 Z: ^( C$ O* ^) t2 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------; z$ i: b. C. _5 a
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -: U$ Q+ f% z- ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% r" r; I* f& a1 f" j- E; T3 m
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3339 s" L; f% d, G/ \+ y1 Y3 \1 q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" W* ~/ Y5 r% l. N- H; C
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5831 k, j0 `8 y$ ~% n# V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( T) F( T& [. s- n Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
( @8 r! p' k3 u; t* C) G! ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------* y, v) _/ S0 b
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2505 s- [2 j4 |2 ^: l# A) i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 f' y$ p+ x4 O, @& ~& s, L Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766: w6 C* o. E- l" g, Y8 d' E5 f# r
------------------------------------------------------------------------- `8 k o: P! V, h
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707* f3 L4 S$ Y1 S- H a4 G7 }# t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 y/ Y8 Q! t$ U Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500, A3 D% S# y, _) t, c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 H" o3 S- m: a/ T3 l2 h Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
' T! T3 ^. D8 x9 y, _* ^+ ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ b7 e5 N' `2 V X" O
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714% i: N9 V! F. S& v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 t, ]* B9 ^) ^+ s, f Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
' e# n2 p( q- a j3 F -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 f3 o& ]! p" g& |& Z+ k+ V Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
4 i* |) s u- \/ R4 R) U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% o6 y" u% T0 B National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8609 T) t9 q& C" d0 h4 m: w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% [1 B. |2 a# p$ R# s( K3 S# _
# g8 c0 o1 L! d2 T# n8 i) I# t2 @
-------------------------------------------------------------
; f3 d) t$ x- Y6 p) A Standard Condominium
$ J$ s) _6 j8 J* @1 H( T+ {. v, c8 J -------------------------------------------------------------
- Q- C2 z+ @- e# J, D6 R" o$ o/ r5 ? 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo4 u# y* d+ v; |% M# D3 F1 K3 T' u
Market % Change Average Average % Change4 {+ d5 t" J9 i( N
-------------------------------------------------------------
" f" u. }9 G/ Z Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
0 V- k1 g/ h* G/ M: ]+ C. ? -------------------------------------------------------------
' X3 W M2 \3 B( o0 D) [" C% V Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
$ R% M7 ]/ g6 k% I/ k: n -------------------------------------------------------------: g1 L, a0 Q+ t! l. W% v' y7 w
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
2 g3 t s, n( D; \) B -------------------------------------------------------------
U$ d$ I5 f( V( F/ L* i Saint John N/A - - N/A7 \+ Z \4 d. U5 E' D
-------------------------------------------------------------
) Q/ n) O/ g( \1 z. l/ m, @: U* P St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%" O- q" C- s+ q
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 L' g- ?/ Z. V8 {( M1 t Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
! k5 Q; g. O. g& F0 v! q -------------------------------------------------------------
! e3 ?$ y# o, r/ o1 R Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
# z2 b6 h @3 O8 e -------------------------------------------------------------3 P- ]8 l2 ^8 O G7 d0 d H" r5 K. F
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
9 {9 N6 C( F2 M6 I -------------------------------------------------------------
+ f5 b. ]6 L2 }8 R& A Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
+ q" v. P' t4 W) P8 v6 N3 u! L -------------------------------------------------------------: b3 N- i u6 S6 u
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%' n8 H( r( A5 d/ ~* W3 Q2 W
-------------------------------------------------------------' C( C0 O9 q% L9 e/ ]
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
2 ]4 c* l4 w) d; ~; v -------------------------------------------------------------
; O6 v+ I$ M) @1 L! W Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
* e1 {3 z6 O3 d; o, ~5 K -------------------------------------------------------------
0 g* ]7 d7 f# ~5 F* z g$ | Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
$ J4 s0 h* J( n7 C; P -------------------------------------------------------------6 S4 I7 y& j0 \6 p
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%: @8 {5 t P; ]: |
-------------------------------------------------------------0 `2 P# o0 k9 i* d) P
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%, M2 ^9 v2 P- E6 l: X( J& R
-------------------------------------------------------------/ w; z- S, }% N- \2 ~& g) i
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2% `( n+ m' Y" v/ U' E
-------------------------------------------------------------3 F7 F% H( o% D6 t( _. ?3 L
>>( Q; i+ M- Z6 R% e9 N; }) A
! U1 b: Z }4 y Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined5 `" m2 Z8 V1 J, F3 o. {1 W2 B
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint2 I/ t7 V- `- X" ~: u% i/ f
John and Victoria.
" P$ Y7 C1 h+ @( o" L
2 L9 \$ A% P1 P9 M$ @. R1 n The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most# A+ B) L2 L; }2 y) F2 `! A7 J
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of1 E4 T& R$ b. q8 k
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release2 |# s7 e3 V/ C7 J
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price" z; ]' {) y: k
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
% g2 k! ^, U& q3 D/ Iacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
: e) ^4 E2 |- _% j9 M6 yavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current$ Y/ K7 S9 | P6 B8 ?
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable( S. }* j& s2 f4 X# x: d
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on: ^; F% q' O% `
November 15, 2006.- b' {0 b* Z2 N, h" ]% S. F! f
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
% h+ [# v( _$ U7 Q4 ^fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge, {& c+ l( k6 q- j- G
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is- @8 F6 j# L, y$ J Q/ w
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|