 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
; C, O, S3 N4 I5 M9 y7 M& w( | T+ Y6 A' E! k7 B$ p! ]+ s% e
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
2 C* s5 _& o0 K4 q
& u$ P* Q! D E: p TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market7 }% `! o6 V+ A8 F9 g5 y9 _
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third/ T; i" K$ z2 o! A% I; D: Y8 n. m
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
2 x2 i* o+ k2 N1 [! R9 C- X; a, min the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit6 V# v: J( J: E6 e5 @/ v7 L* s
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
8 h8 J" B* d0 Z5 o( zmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
1 F }; p& f" m- I8 vQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
5 `0 z1 Z J/ S5 E( GLePage Real Estate Services.
8 O r/ _+ f& r! A6 X! j: i/ t: J
4 c! O0 g$ ]$ |" n1 Q j2 ^ Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters( E8 \; p0 J; `' r7 {$ T
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic8 q2 R, q S( P8 N2 v
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
' V" D( j) Z o4 `, t/ hsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the3 v+ z7 y5 p6 _- Y, T- K
residential real estate sector.
4 E, N3 [) g% L9 s! E( l! `% H8 _# K; A( N0 U3 t
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation+ V5 \. M$ z% J/ D
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%): V; z1 N( ?% G
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562# _% \# ~' p1 [. }
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
3 h0 _1 Y! B" R- z1 P) v: d(+13.2%).5 d& r2 _5 N( R( m3 h
: p3 i/ d' q1 d3 P# X, ^. w6 A2 ~
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth; r8 L% w5 I) m) {$ G
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
. B* v6 A& ?# s3 `; ]5 Gfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are8 U7 e# t( q" y5 A7 t
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
% w. a3 U) B' O/ Y. n: R2 Wpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.( v, S# M) R$ V, o0 z& h
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
3 A: s8 B6 S" {) S' ~welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
9 ]/ P: ?" Q; Y& a: i4 I" ?balanced market."
* V) S( U+ ~: z$ |5 A) J6 W n9 B: E2 Y- z6 q4 @( V4 p9 D
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,- w& t- w! X3 |: F. j" F) |9 y
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift# P q- X- Y6 c& i l- H, w5 `
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued4 ~4 O) e, i! b+ J; Y. @ n- b
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core6 i. F$ w+ ]3 @" R7 q
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,% }9 q/ [# M4 n! d3 C
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record& U( U% F4 G+ D) D' r: ]8 Y
breaking price appreciations.
) f- v3 ]- o1 F* H
+ K/ H0 b: b" J3 n Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
. _; ^1 s# y }4 `0 `8 B# y9 Aeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
7 D$ @4 M# u) ?3 Y+ Tlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.' t* i$ f1 s" O
" @7 c3 |8 s+ x. ^: o& g9 ~ E
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
: {- m { E v3 d. b! Zeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer/ x8 Q5 d3 |2 W, y$ H: l
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off9 `' Z4 B: I2 b6 g8 i1 `) C- z
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
3 L4 Z* S. ]- e9 E9 }+ Y; g4 t2 }/ K- IIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers; P7 ^; w% Z5 J8 e
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
9 X% E: E! r! c" Pprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
: o5 ?% q; A: I3 ~* Q' n* {2 j3 r l: G! u& n* X v2 j7 s' m- m
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
p! [7 }1 ?+ `: y7 ymarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
& k' a, u/ o6 z6 m( Gfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada- _, W' M7 |5 b* M
are markedly different than those found in the United States.+ o9 N' d5 }) |$ @+ A, E+ h
5 H# @% y! m/ w* W7 m7 t c# X. ~1 X
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the4 D! L o/ X8 A, V+ _
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's- D9 N, L- |! d
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
& ~/ @ H' \/ hrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general% s* E. o5 N2 T, S/ B B1 d9 e
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
9 a- h# i! B- ~. n7 z2 vdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and k% w E* W- D% C1 [! _) w
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
" ]3 m' v; o# _; p3 h/ c# Q7 I0 Emortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."* w3 `# Z( X' n y& ?
9 y7 t$ d& Z# W" ?
<<
/ R# v( v( D" }# W" b REGIONAL SUMMARIES
: C7 r/ l7 v$ e >>& X+ O0 d6 {/ `$ K
% f" `: C- v1 ~
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
; ^; n' e% Z0 I" S$ b. UHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate6 @* T6 ^0 Z8 [! ^$ t7 @
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
5 D+ N' D ]$ F' z0 qlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of1 t. L- _& F1 |
renovations.; D# s [- l+ |2 Y' p
: S* |# w% Q9 ]' X5 L
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight: _; w4 e7 b6 t
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
) x0 x- X1 ]- e$ ^: @compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
% h2 z- z! j: `' }/ g5 a% H: b" S9 ZSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.: D4 |# a7 p0 t
1 K4 u+ p. ]& d T r7 {2 j The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer7 A: l5 S, z Q% Q! `
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
1 W' s3 H0 n* p Q% [quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
* k# i& q5 E+ w |600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores& h9 B' J9 r1 J+ o
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
J; h: v9 O" p- D* f8 s% u- Dand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
2 m" ~. V, Q) ?" W0 k, Q* J
/ [; u% |( @! z2 P, E In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
: f1 @4 M7 N# |5 ?6 g- ]conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their" \& U8 G M: c
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
5 G j, r! _, q, } L$ Q7 ewas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
0 W# A! D3 D6 g& q" E; c! pdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
3 N5 m/ U* u! ubuyers with more options when looking for a home.
# U( c7 |" R) N' E" X2 N7 H5 s/ }6 G
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly/ y: D3 G1 g* J; i3 T9 j
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
( l% w6 t4 w; [% i& Epriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
( r* M) W# i$ C. c* cas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
/ m4 t( P$ t, R/ R* _1 sfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
c$ M; S- _, P' p* M h' r* q
, y+ C5 o& x: @9 V# k% ] Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
1 e9 {3 S$ y4 E; c: D+ ~- @prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
6 G4 M, B- Z/ c) |& Q Q: o4 dlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting- q% N: w/ Q8 \' w% X
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,2 y# a6 k0 i8 u+ _
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
% ~, _4 V6 Z% wpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before0 D( u) x$ f1 _8 V! l# N! F
making a purchase., L* C7 g' `6 o X- u+ Q
( D- z9 W0 s! s( T, Q0 E
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing9 d( ?1 e/ b& S& F$ I4 t- G
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong9 S9 S: w' c: W
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city ]& N. n2 z% u; V% A' y j
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting6 p7 d* [4 K% C, K+ n" L/ Z2 W% _
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
* J& g9 W3 ?0 \. s+ Kamenities.
- ?9 o, `- J4 N, l6 N
. T1 S. B: ?$ M3 F( i$ o& k The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels) D3 H' m6 S9 |0 W8 a6 a( }
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand E1 E% Q# F8 s* k T( G
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
) b. Q" A; }& r. ^. }continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
+ t7 K2 ?) v& D( Bdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
8 d+ R4 W. S K% Q0 M: L7 M N( z+ zresidence, rather than for investment.
9 A1 @* V' |, q) X' P$ C3 @* x) k. Q! J+ a* G
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as. v$ T+ \ P6 E! E
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted- c% u7 B7 x9 R) d; w
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
3 T* c: b3 }; M7 Z. T3 kconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
: }+ @; C: n6 m+ D grate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
0 k6 l$ d( w! H5 Qthe market.
# g7 O( ^$ u. h! ]; A: d8 |
: d7 U _# [1 d& i; x( ~ In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
6 g( f/ y* [% u6 h4 \& W2 y/ J8 gJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
# {+ X/ T$ ~; G8 f2 u# P( w8 Z3 F; cAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring$ B0 ]$ P4 E, Q& Y4 V% f( V6 Z9 Q
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due1 s I/ `/ c% d
to the shortage of available inventory.
0 Q3 H0 t9 ]( g
2 a6 Z6 P" S6 @0 _' g, d8 \/ N Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its* a( d$ h( Z' Y
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains7 I: Z P. o' Y
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses* S5 r3 K9 _0 B# t7 F* `
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
: a3 D) |) J1 a+ K5 A7 |, S$ J$ b8 w7 m. T7 M; f: M9 Z; F
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases( R* l+ w% b- ^. S0 }& r
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low: k' h$ R# x& q" W6 V
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that# K3 w4 {7 |+ K
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
L0 c8 s1 t* G. g( F/ Vprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer8 K( d2 U3 | l. S
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as: g0 w+ `7 {: [1 C. y! ?* X2 M
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity., X* `& g3 N4 |
) k8 {' |8 G) ^, N' H Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
" r- _) `8 s, w! C4 was activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
s+ A) G/ S$ B% E1 A0 t; g& Nremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
( e3 C$ K4 `6 N6 b7 j. Q4 Bmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices4 l4 c; k/ Q4 e* I4 j% W8 A
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve4 ]' A& }' F5 i n" \. X* Y
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
- j: L# R3 }9 ktowards the end of 2006.
) t/ n, k! n& n- V6 H" q/ q. D
: D; r2 {* Z! }1 x% BWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of' ~8 h% f& L# U
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
# J7 {6 h, O7 Q2 R& A" m+ ?to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
. O$ |" G9 \" X* s' ?group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
( {( R1 e, T3 Wforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added9 \& ]2 i3 Z, b+ e# |+ W' m. U
pressure on tight inventory levels.. w- G% J0 }+ I. N ~6 d) I
3 q3 @/ \ `, B& K/ }3 D
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic9 G- R, s% c9 c, q- O) t' L
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
$ A% T3 w5 h3 m9 w& a+ [* ^4 f5 Dinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;6 k! Q: { Z% B! C: j
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching# I |' O4 f9 ]/ G4 a% L9 W
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
1 V2 W) K- z& x w6 B
n: A* S0 }7 g7 k. j <<. Z! _1 }* w( V% @
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20069 Y2 Y! t* A- d. M8 V8 {3 y% f
. b$ |9 H8 a& L/ Y( e5 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------: p$ _: ^5 q5 J8 f$ c1 I: g) T
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey$ n$ f1 m9 r& r+ M6 O# S+ M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( {+ c3 X* R( H" X9 Q! H 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
R5 f6 f E, r O: z Market Average Average % Change Average Average
. W& m+ e# M5 {: _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 n0 K+ a8 \& I1 Q7 \+ z Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000+ |4 |. _) d/ V8 p/ b$ H4 ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 {0 _2 I/ s/ v9 I' \$ i
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
! Q# A1 U' D% r& T! I# v0 b% E9 `: j -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 u' M4 G8 ~2 G+ }# I$ o Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000' b! H0 c( i9 C* N+ }. K. B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 [9 b4 z+ v- l
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -0 q9 ~" h8 B, ^" R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ n/ z" Z# \" Q/ ^# X* N
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
2 B" \/ T4 B% m' c1 @# ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 p9 [+ O+ ^2 Q; g- I, a5 w: F( ?! b Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
o! K" D2 e( p# o5 f! C7 ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ z" q0 |; z+ \. u9 @ { Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
" T6 ]6 ]6 b6 `, `9 U7 M -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 H: P# D8 {* U: C4 ] Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250- K) _( T! E, t* N: A+ t1 D! B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' l1 f- s; P& c) ]+ \1 g
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766& F+ T$ Q- B* m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 @- i3 Y+ b/ d7 M0 t Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7074 d; y1 i* v! j! n; f; [: i- ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( l# X' ^2 E0 b/ d9 e1 N3 o
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
( h$ X/ g/ T$ q$ I; E( ]" r -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ T; L x# J; N Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
& u( @6 h" n$ U# Q* T% T -------------------------------------------------------------------------: f- O# L! e8 B6 l% ~6 K) m/ x. r
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714/ H1 V7 E+ E* r3 C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 o; w4 ` ?( C! A Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
- O/ w6 `5 p& Q0 V* U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. g1 }1 k2 t- W Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000: j9 K7 ^. {- f# ?0 Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! ` l8 n0 i6 ^1 `$ @
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860 F9 g5 g% ?! I) h. Z' {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, h7 w8 U; V) z, O Z. E8 s+ g6 y* z+ H' D. O# U/ Z+ G
-------------------------------------------------------------. @" g3 l% q H
Standard Condominium
7 C2 L/ n8 o6 s; Q/ D {6 p6 r, ^ -------------------------------------------------------------$ T+ {! i8 T' n t
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo2 `& _1 R4 q9 A9 \6 y( g& m) C3 G
Market % Change Average Average % Change- l! s1 }6 C2 c, q
-------------------------------------------------------------3 W9 Y4 @% g8 K5 W. I o8 F
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
, I7 g) F# z6 ], B G+ F9 I -------------------------------------------------------------# ~/ h+ J2 `, ]: m1 j2 }6 V
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
- U$ `" i. Y9 o5 D -------------------------------------------------------------
D/ C4 q7 i9 l6 p6 X1 r Moncton 4.9% - - N/A5 o# U& G* C, j& \
-------------------------------------------------------------
" j8 E& d: V( _0 Q5 k, G' z Saint John N/A - - N/A
6 e" [6 u8 Q# G8 a ------------------------------------------------------------- n; h8 _; E* ?% Y1 a4 b
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
) x2 U4 a e t -------------------------------------------------------------
, {; U9 j8 W. n( s7 [! P9 { Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
5 D" W3 u% r9 P* R3 e5 p -------------------------------------------------------------
3 e7 e* f1 ], x0 r/ a Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%# r5 }" w. `, o& B0 @" n" X! p }
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 h1 ~+ n- l& b# E0 K- V) g# i/ L Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
6 M0 o' j" b9 D/ `$ i -------------------------------------------------------------
$ B; O/ R. n5 w6 X0 u Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
6 b6 v2 e* g; G" V k: Z) F) u -------------------------------------------------------------0 \ `. r9 t- }
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
# X, d% g+ n0 M+ E- ]5 u! }+ N -------------------------------------------------------------; O' s, s7 ?) z$ w- S6 S
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
$ a: }/ T3 ?1 J8 ]1 @ -------------------------------------------------------------
8 N1 e7 X! h' t Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
# e) i- H7 v% \# ?5 X2 ] -------------------------------------------------------------
1 M* j- x, ^+ x" o2 J" C Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
: K$ R5 P; U! V% Z7 o3 W: z9 O/ v0 ^# P -------------------------------------------------------------) `! B# Y* g& Y3 |& \/ m9 d
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%: C$ K; y) S8 t
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 `' \- a2 s' h Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
: Y: z) a. W+ P8 k5 o( R. W -------------------------------------------------------------& E* I- \" }4 I! C0 n: v
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
) J; M1 i6 Z7 m Y0 c -------------------------------------------------------------7 h- W7 Z; |% X3 [6 a: U3 a
>>
8 F/ ^+ d# f( e( Y, i( O' J; p2 A+ X8 ]' v3 B O
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
, y8 Z& K1 ]: Ein the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
; |; ]7 w: K/ Z* m0 ]: aJohn and Victoria.0 i1 J9 L, l# z4 [
( t8 T; O# B1 e The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
- z2 ~6 l0 h8 o7 ?0 h$ w& [comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
7 Z8 m2 `# V# Ehousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release5 b9 ]# k: t' D% z
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price/ a D# p7 l4 x4 L2 C6 h7 P7 M& @
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
' _( ^5 f/ E& A1 R% L. w% O" k/ zacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is- X( f9 |( t, H2 H6 |0 p
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current7 V8 O9 C8 _' Q8 {$ h, s, [
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
5 q G" K' {* R- O1 V4 n/ Nversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on/ G+ J' Q# m; p2 C' ]1 \8 U
November 15, 2006.6 m. d9 q7 t1 K8 b
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of& [+ s# P, r$ V' i4 T. \
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
+ u, L, V' P0 u" m% sprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is1 J2 v6 Z+ e9 _; n
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|