 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 7 `3 A# a3 E3 w @- ]+ H4 I
' v' O+ G% \$ c+ X2 ]- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -4 f; j, {0 s8 P" u. ]
) L+ o& H: v- T0 k- Q
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market# J+ N1 H5 Y$ `& S3 ~5 g7 ?
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
. L4 O% W5 {$ g- C% tquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic" o5 u! {4 }$ ]% \4 h- Q1 H
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit- V9 K% D( C) H5 ?! o2 K
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
- S" p* o! Z" Q+ h- k3 w9 }more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
" |2 X; X! ]7 T7 q. }4 RQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
- Y% y6 d2 z# I/ p6 S# ?% |" aLePage Real Estate Services.
( @. a) k" ] v* I2 ?) X2 ]2 G" V
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters N( `' ~. p; n+ z& Y7 v2 N
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
( P& T7 Q7 x; L9 @conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and& g/ K" T9 _. n- k( Q( S
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the+ `. x% a" p N! t( q
residential real estate sector.
1 Y- Q' q* U" f$ [, H& X8 a
$ D1 q+ c$ N8 r$ g Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
" o1 j8 b0 |$ { \% @ L3 eoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)0 }5 D9 ?+ q4 J+ _( W: {& w8 h
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
4 r( I( r0 ~+ K) N5 k. [(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
" ~ _4 k7 N o: r2 C% g(+13.2%).
1 X- ^2 n$ H, P! {2 t1 Q8 z4 Z' ~2 a
% k# u: j1 {0 s8 L3 D8 Q5 S) r2 d "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
: U9 m" `7 C4 }. w* P2 U. Mduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
; i: t; {, }8 w# R ifrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
7 ?1 g3 H0 y" P) H7 E& i6 u+ Zpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper," M/ d- O, s% O; a: r
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.7 ` f& Z+ n; V1 `5 R
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
6 t/ K% b! H% j; {$ Dwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
, C% ?. j( {9 z. p# R2 m0 Pbalanced market."
2 V' ^" f4 R1 r% z
9 r8 F" K7 U4 l3 u! X! W+ f/ f Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
4 N" L4 ?6 Q8 g; m Wconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift. h$ k( l- M1 |3 z
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued% `) k3 C$ D' n3 e" z( M* [3 U
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core$ x6 C3 \8 V1 j, Z
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
$ C( J8 _- F% a7 T" p+ F$ r2 }0 fmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
' g/ m( x+ N3 x' @breaking price appreciations.
/ e2 t3 x& ]4 S% A7 h2 v
+ A: I% h' T: n& P; Q. D6 T1 p Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding9 y/ A- f5 J+ Z z4 H, D' B. o
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the: ~- [: }) T E( I0 y
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
\" V6 n1 E4 j: h2 E
F) g* x: ]: M In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
0 c7 I' f4 H ueconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
n- K6 O& _/ p3 v8 K3 c econfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
" w4 ^' F g5 |0 \: jslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
2 b3 i/ k. I8 P" sIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
0 t5 `; Z" Q$ A1 r1 lgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
; M n: e2 S6 g9 l- I. S. H ~5 n6 Cprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
' p6 c$ S$ b" G: c2 T/ ~4 k/ ^2 j4 `5 i- i* H+ a$ \# V
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing6 T9 x% r5 f' k5 O- H* I
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
6 E. L; _% |0 b; ^financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
* j6 e. N* a$ a. j) D. Rare markedly different than those found in the United States.
7 x5 `; @+ Z9 E7 F; ?1 E5 v% |. H
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
. [" W0 D8 v3 ?American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's5 E3 u+ h9 L5 h
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the7 d5 J( y2 T3 Q" U# F
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
/ h7 d+ M- C1 a4 ?; D# taffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the6 Q; W. k3 ~, A! ^8 V) p G( Q
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
9 Q+ t) U2 Y3 {aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization. t" g/ D2 p+ c6 o' B
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
: z6 C! P" Z* \6 e& }1 H) T# @1 Q$ ]* Z; V/ y# L
<<
2 R2 S4 [, {( r0 k8 | REGIONAL SUMMARIES! c& a) s" I; g3 r
>>) O! S, a/ _: l
: h! r/ F# \! [% \
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in9 I. m8 Q8 M+ W; J8 r$ l
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate6 b- P! S' J' D# B, x
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
' X3 {+ k$ W3 Y5 X$ blooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of7 o' F. u6 C1 s9 `9 v
renovations.
; F' @& e- Q; N! A( H
' t+ k; h& D: n4 [8 {: n! s The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
, P3 M8 J( A, i* C9 E/ @1 pincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
6 m2 B1 F9 v) k4 Mcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
5 c! o: ~ ^% jSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.( t( M& T/ B3 `: R, j
( s/ |, L. I/ X9 g8 y& D- O: T
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer% m0 Z8 q! r; Y/ _- ^: Y
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
" M4 M6 x! r- z- k0 fquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new6 p, @/ ?1 i" i, h2 O5 ?. o
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
& F" l; ?: b" @ r9 _to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
$ p( \% ]' g) q; w) ?- vand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
8 c* X/ z% e& g+ Y4 O2 J# u- I5 L
8 J8 n1 |2 Q3 P In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
( g6 ^" ^; K' H$ a) Rconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their% }5 a5 I% Q7 I! _, V2 q
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers- W D* }( W* q# t5 I* W
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian# e5 K; m$ g4 h# a
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
7 n1 W( g1 `* ?+ p9 ~1 u! Ubuyers with more options when looking for a home.
: q+ C" h2 z' }9 I6 r% O7 {$ l7 m. Z
: i; y" \; r9 R* i- ?+ h Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
# Y3 a0 ~- h% p' `! bamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes, ]% \* }9 g. h
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
M- G9 m( h' _( P& i# ^/ N# bas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last* T1 T" X4 [: H0 B* g% X
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
8 }& ~7 c+ w4 ]. O6 v
! B; X/ g% m N7 D' I3 Q8 d* s Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house' }" H! l# n$ O8 ]! v
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory! [3 |- [, m4 G/ D+ q; u
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting- u2 y5 o8 d. ~& h) @- f) r: u
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
$ ^% k( W3 L# Kwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
' |1 C& `( T, J! g" ypressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
5 h4 y6 c& [: R( u% P3 C5 Pmaking a purchase.
& g% }& R1 E$ V) v5 K
: ?) I4 _; O' d2 A2 C0 h4 m Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
7 M! S! m% J; Y% |markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
: y1 [- J" n4 x# Jconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city5 @6 E: c# \" M6 F$ Z8 ]
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
; w& v/ j, P/ l2 p4 p! N5 _4 tattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
; r0 F7 v @8 \- B& ~6 t' q2 ^9 \amenities.
& G. h e9 `8 G: K. |6 N% Y# T; v" _7 N
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
2 y' U) n6 l! Lthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
: o' U: c0 p5 H" O$ Q- Wacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has5 b. x1 V F3 l; ?
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
% }. e! v0 ]' v8 `, w6 f3 _: _: Odriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle' h$ ]8 q/ Q$ m0 ]8 Y1 i0 |
residence, rather than for investment.
5 @+ B8 F5 [ _; |( I% s+ |- l- j U
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as8 P' z @ R! e S: e
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted2 K% y! O- }- ]$ x% E1 t
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer) }6 {3 A: ]. m
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
) n1 @0 r* l1 I9 d1 U$ Wrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
9 d- @) x+ C2 g7 gthe market.
) o4 t! l) Z( v. I* P! {/ \% P2 ^' H+ P
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through; j- `( @8 s( Z4 ~$ P( X
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
; `4 ^* A5 W- X9 P, UAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
6 i- b/ E V1 d" i& U5 a+ ^+ rmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due% G n, r( F1 l* M6 _& x
to the shortage of available inventory.2 g$ I+ {: o0 F9 W1 Z; y/ ~& O# f
" r% `" X) v. j+ C0 e
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
5 \; s& C4 U' y5 f: |9 j5 ^/ Imomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
: P/ j; M' q) [. h! ?" |vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
2 x6 H: }& M( v( M1 W2 [, Ystruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.$ N0 `, J3 V; K" ~% l& L
! o1 _7 W" W9 l: A
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases K* t2 k4 I5 `5 D/ F/ a, g" ~
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
& `; C& D9 C. d2 F6 Uunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that9 M# a: s% p, o# m
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
9 O6 V# s0 V3 }% _9 h, X/ Wprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer- {9 R" B: N8 r
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as: [, F4 e! v4 {
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
( R" P7 V1 q& A( p9 p: f! ?7 G {% n" S+ z
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter) w1 L: e8 T W4 z
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
; N/ r8 p$ p# v0 Gremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,0 ^3 \0 t8 w M0 p
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
; i. M' _+ f* T* y Aincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve* Q3 O4 _6 F" B: J8 L
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly4 r& Q8 h2 m/ i
towards the end of 2006. $ @" g% l, m, B+ \# l
4 S, Q& L2 T ?5 d
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of& g& U5 U, b6 d2 i( o$ |" U4 r
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
6 O0 ?/ Z! ?* T1 H9 U1 R& V5 D, kto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
( w, e4 t8 a/ C4 D7 t; Ggroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to: g1 G, p3 B! \! e
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added" c& o w# Z/ T' w8 p
pressure on tight inventory levels.. N4 k1 w5 @7 d+ \5 x9 S
# g) b N, n6 V" ?& U Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic' o2 N4 \- W$ c3 I& z
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
' @! x6 f, ~. M- M( x" rinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;4 w2 n( j. R9 j4 k' S+ K9 i) [
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
5 U U0 F4 L7 I2 gfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
8 c. X5 z0 l! \0 [( d' Q: F: j( `0 }" s3 n3 N6 s8 e
<<
4 [# i O; g2 T( ~+ b* D Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006: Y, V2 M! K) t# {2 ^0 ~
( ^& k: l' b I$ P" r. ?% p8 r, h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ o5 q- [' F5 q u/ y9 O; t
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey) M0 e. [" C4 A, Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( a1 s. q- F4 {$ F Z0 Z 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
$ r5 ^7 @; Z' M( z3 C Market Average Average % Change Average Average
( A3 _# w0 w+ f/ L% R" w" ~/ p; _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ f, R" j- L$ E, ^% o& \
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
! |* \7 `7 T. ?! O7 w$ `( z& i6 T( M; w -------------------------------------------------------------------------, ?: |2 W" \/ u' h; V
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000. |) X. c* ^+ K4 T* K3 B G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Q, R7 d' W* _: v+ y% ` Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000/ G" ]( a& t) ?$ p, z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 |6 W9 X7 o2 m
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
. Z$ ]! V- I' P+ x4 W% r3 G -------------------------------------------------------------------------* [+ P1 T5 {& {& T3 z; S) ^
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
/ R" |' x6 V5 h( V& c l -------------------------------------------------------------------------! ~ l$ p3 P- b8 I' e+ Y) X6 M( p
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
+ z9 i2 E4 O) F' q5 d9 J -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& y1 _6 }, Z- b Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
9 i# n* w8 \* p5 ?5 g -------------------------------------------------------------------------( K8 q; B: n4 z, g G6 _) u& g
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2507 f g/ J, t( e0 s
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 d/ t& {3 F' U; h Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766' `9 h' ?& r& n) E/ J+ s m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 }! p: n8 V1 k
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7075 l/ h' d+ C" h/ Z$ s" X3 b% e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ {8 F5 z* `3 I. q$ K( E: P+ U5 E6 h
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
2 g3 A9 R0 {7 h& ?8 ?/ u, Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: U' R( z) ^$ S Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
& V# I; C# t. Q" K9 _1 |, N) H5 J -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ D; t7 f7 a! N. U' j* x
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
6 o# t( D5 S7 C! n( ]3 |0 c -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! I1 B% @+ W* k6 I Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500: X7 P' @# W# D3 S4 b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 [) l- g9 W& l7 J
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0004 k+ M; t) S" _; u) {8 W. w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ F4 g1 x3 ?) ~4 r4 e
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
+ t: z2 p; n! A- e( z& w* U# l -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ H. _( q# H0 ], O
) C) T" \) \# [7 l -------------------------------------------------------------
0 p7 i5 w) t& A" u1 A Standard Condominium: L, B8 `& T8 z* J4 Z$ L. G
-------------------------------------------------------------. P L- }5 t$ `7 L3 H) s; B
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo4 D6 [% z; l5 h8 Q
Market % Change Average Average % Change X. W7 q! D8 y' n
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 b, K3 M: z1 c5 x/ q7 H Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
' `. W9 I# s! s -------------------------------------------------------------8 d; e8 t- e# ~4 P! `4 j! _
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%8 Q; p; h* n* ^0 ]1 `4 v, k/ \
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 J- v$ |: ~$ N, L- P4 o% d Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
0 Q! m* i3 N( g -------------------------------------------------------------* `) @. B& }& d1 N( t% P2 B; e
Saint John N/A - - N/A' ?- X' C$ M0 i! e! d7 r9 H
-------------------------------------------------------------
! T' N( t! b. Q/ G+ f: r5 k; o1 a St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%( A c# N) s0 \6 C
-------------------------------------------------------------
H$ D. s8 z- j$ }# t1 w Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
0 ^' m, c: F7 }3 Y -------------------------------------------------------------
- o ~4 q9 u$ M, g) L9 y# A Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
3 J9 A& P. R/ z$ i: O9 X8 a$ f8 | -------------------------------------------------------------
/ Q$ J' w9 D/ u5 A( c+ z, ~ Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%6 {; t+ d3 K/ a
-------------------------------------------------------------
& J1 ^, Y1 J2 r, g% N" E, w Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%9 a, k; Y+ Y/ M/ A6 f/ {4 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------& ]" l( C2 D8 K& `% J
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%( m( w% Y+ j% \0 A# s, b( B$ f
-------------------------------------------------------------# M, V; i, ?' ?3 R$ A7 [+ U
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
* r4 x1 v, g- f X -------------------------------------------------------------
" `+ i1 a$ J c Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
: [9 _; j' T- [9 u; V2 W -------------------------------------------------------------
% l2 ?7 h4 z+ {. A' K+ N( a Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%) ?' a# r+ k, e1 Y- b4 I' o! M
-------------------------------------------------------------+ V L5 z, Q4 z( Z
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%( r( K. q: G% h: V
-------------------------------------------------------------
# x+ ~6 b" L- W2 ] Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%$ O/ R; T2 `# @1 \) @' z
-------------------------------------------------------------
; R1 L1 R) Q* } National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
5 s# {% l* y! z1 R7 k -------------------------------------------------------------
4 @5 L) n8 _2 K! A" t( g >> m, x" n6 K' _- a2 n9 L
! t2 w ~" a) a. B Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined1 I" l$ U( L+ U" o, V
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint" i) Z' F: v3 H) y2 x( g; O
John and Victoria.
! S m) @, e9 X" B& D$ M6 o U! @3 e3 B q4 t `6 Y. I
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
7 U1 P/ Q$ |' d, J) m3 @+ N: Pcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of( U: y: w+ m8 j$ u; O
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
2 q: w' i" ^; q' B( q+ k& mreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
4 ]3 E5 h) a, d" Dtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities' h q/ ~2 C8 x' n3 d
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is7 X6 ?: T& J k. d
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
" `; F# M& F2 c1 pfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable8 G" T4 i/ k7 G0 g7 I
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
. |) @5 Q9 J) O+ ^November 15, 2006.# i1 w9 v7 A2 T0 F& `' M5 Y
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
8 ^, R0 f0 {5 I, H7 k | gfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge* t" q1 x" E2 K: r% s! Q3 j
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is3 v9 C, M# [, L. r
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|