 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable * }& w" f" n9 q1 Y9 o! |
, @1 w. g8 d6 R4 e- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -5 P* n' f, V. \2 C' d
s: x" K+ l, v( S" R TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market- C9 k' B8 o _( s
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
% g6 G: X7 p& k9 s: Zquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
$ |0 i y& L$ r3 k+ @* E! \4 p8 Qin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
" X4 ~( Q, W! R Kprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
; G+ ^: e- V7 V& amore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
0 E; X! }9 l- `! r4 p, J5 UQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal5 f7 u* C0 w+ }$ f
LePage Real Estate Services.- F" O( ?8 @; h0 J4 b9 T
( b, `' n8 G/ e4 ? Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
7 ^$ ~6 s. t9 ]6 Pare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic2 j$ I3 B0 a: m9 \* x4 E% Q& W0 p
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and6 e) t( y, u6 Q
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
P% o! `! }, M4 y, o2 n* \residential real estate sector.5 x$ Q# T4 c% Q% Z2 e0 l5 a& A2 R
+ B; f: Z. E% Q/ P b6 }! }7 E Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation1 m7 i; f6 q7 E: v3 C4 w. ^& j
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
# u( W' X' X7 I* Q! `/ pyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
x; t1 U1 d( X4 }# @0 l8 v3 x% o(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
$ m2 Y* d: @) U4 Z; x(+13.2%).( |% _3 {5 _, S/ t |
2 h q7 A- n& R+ h "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth8 ?5 _* F# h3 v1 l8 A, y) z
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the5 P, h @( k: H# R6 a4 A
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
* u, N% ~0 ~$ hpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
0 D# b3 U/ g+ a( X6 s9 R/ p2 Gpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.( I; I" W3 N) }6 M; Y
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
4 D5 Y% G( A7 Y. T1 P1 u. Ywelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
2 o5 q% o- Y" t4 `4 ]% Q5 e9 n- C+ lbalanced market."1 \- T% F* D. \: B
1 |9 a( _+ M5 T4 A
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,! m5 o+ c/ J9 K4 N( h0 f
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
' Y' L8 U1 j9 F, ^# G1 Mto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued: |' m2 V+ g1 k. @/ }
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core; z# S( @9 l9 \- ?2 S: U6 R& a" Q9 b
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,. U$ I1 |+ r: A
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record4 N9 e& ^* g0 ]0 D4 k
breaking price appreciations./ m5 O0 Y8 {0 a: D6 s6 e
: i' u& T5 q- B7 n
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding. W e$ a. B8 Z, U/ J3 F
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
1 D$ ^3 F, d Y8 }7 Z, t! Blargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.5 u. K5 J5 e) B8 u! }& o
2 E6 J" H. ?4 |1 s; ` In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
, h+ W# r [* D3 Feconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer( ?+ Y9 n: G% e3 c( }, @* G
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
0 u {( s9 t3 o$ K% D" U% Hslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.4 v8 r4 I! z( z% _* c
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
0 } N; R5 {1 `6 q2 Tgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
6 g" I/ u9 q1 g/ k* tprice appreciation when compared with 2005.% {5 P7 @/ L# ~
; p9 c a! B* j8 H
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
) Q6 ^+ o5 \! wmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and9 u4 {- B9 G& [- J* l, G6 g9 j& i
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
: T9 i* J2 e' y3 [+ k1 X, s6 Fare markedly different than those found in the United States.
2 h: N9 F2 H, _8 w3 i v( C& Z5 m+ T8 _. z/ c* @
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the3 G, d) G j0 ^6 Q) M3 f
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's9 H/ s7 W/ h& Z$ M6 L/ n! B; ]
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the. O5 ]7 K: J' K: k, z8 Q' n8 [
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general6 A+ F% V* N2 n4 r3 B
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
2 @+ @3 K. w0 f2 I" G. ~downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and" w* K6 P7 w0 ~+ S
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
. m! Z$ b- w, i# Amortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."9 {5 q0 z2 A/ G7 L! x' }( y5 G
: Y( j" f) M$ R( }. Z
<<
G0 S- y: ^; F9 N* f REGIONAL SUMMARIES9 }- X9 O* }- N
>>6 p! ?1 S, h9 ]1 E
* y3 N+ L7 S# L2 D5 A& J
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
a& @; U& b1 u4 I# l; ^Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate% L0 C, E3 Q; ?! u" ]
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time a$ E& R1 O! h6 X2 Q! \
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of! B; @1 _1 o( j0 f9 W6 H M
renovations.! b, D% j2 _* l& O, M* B+ k. C6 _
+ n: P9 d) Q$ o1 p) T5 ?( k- S
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
* z2 s2 O$ I% s5 q# eincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation: p6 [- u* ~% N1 d, z; x2 r
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
% O- r; ?6 Y( Y0 j) RSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.. X8 q5 a R# A2 q
* Z: [) o" ^, T6 A' d K
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer. t: u$ m, C4 h( C7 y
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the( { b0 y- S* R7 U* l* f
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
0 G# Y( O7 P/ e7 X( _600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
2 M5 H/ Y% W; Ito the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
+ U6 ~6 w* a0 |+ x/ `and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.2 R7 K. ]- o3 F* f( Y0 ^1 H$ U+ D G
5 r9 x. X0 \# j C
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
2 c+ g( K) X4 K7 @conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their: F3 U I) t. g/ i: i' H6 K
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
5 u$ n' P( t/ y: Uwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
" i1 a' Y) i% i( y2 n3 Adollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
. k: B8 u( H" @' ibuyers with more options when looking for a home.
! I0 R7 {# H7 U
3 v6 S9 y1 R5 {% b; x) ]! M Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly! t, B9 i& A% m
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes) p5 ]. |4 n" G. r, a8 w9 V9 F
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
$ u) g! \, v' q3 nas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
' N4 c- }/ a ~$ z! Rfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
( |: r& H5 w0 H( K' p, M
0 C( T( [4 p% B8 G) Q Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house. K5 ~. V' J( ]$ }; w* K/ `. q" M
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
2 v \, P/ q0 H! Mlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting; p' w" Y& Z m8 q3 X- g( Q
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
, D* s& B* c3 @when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
4 f, M! i4 [9 U2 D0 h% ^: Opressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
6 }% Z* T p2 ^' Wmaking a purchase.
1 n! l! A, `, n) U+ l# f" a* {: f0 y6 Q9 ?
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing% m2 E7 y) \! u7 U, g- A* m! W5 j
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong& P' [; d6 i0 `$ N. c! ~+ g$ Q: x! v
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
3 d6 ~: @) v$ ?4 ?" gcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
. s4 C ?& a7 G7 }attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown- l& {1 z9 i9 r! J
amenities.# _4 |& j+ X1 C0 A$ [0 z
/ P" A+ s$ C5 |$ h2 h; w2 r( G The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels* N. E, l$ w# _, n' K/ p6 o
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
( h* o1 X/ r$ i& c, G, p J# ?* G" g; T! Qacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has" N7 N1 U0 B+ ?- h. q0 l* t! x' t
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been7 B+ M( O1 z- ?3 m5 I
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle0 I4 B* ~$ n9 z0 `/ T/ D
residence, rather than for investment.
( _! z5 v. O. t% f. o# p) d; ^6 w3 x9 S/ H
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
8 o' W: c! O7 `8 e0 ^& thouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
/ @* W6 E2 a: x+ G: V+ L* Uin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
6 R7 z, F4 r2 p3 [% d0 g+ pconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization% y& E4 B# P" e5 S$ @' d! g/ g
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
3 j) w' G' k; c- k! b9 E. rthe market.
5 Z9 W0 s. b" Z0 k& q/ @( L! Q4 h# I$ {
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
7 m& m [9 t4 a0 f+ ZJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In2 q+ G: l6 G, `: S
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
0 f ~7 L3 w( Y+ }3 w" Bmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due; \- \; S; D: w. R: V; F0 r4 Y
to the shortage of available inventory.: L2 w Y4 i* s3 o
2 [* D( u9 }8 M- o5 L- o) |$ C
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its9 H& T, V9 h; R- \& x
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains. {4 ~: W5 V: T% ^! O- i9 ^
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses0 e) }4 H% O; B8 @) u. O
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.1 B1 I( p" B% y5 F
6 g" Q- g7 f" S$ A* S2 _ K i5 I Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases* Y7 M: u! x) X" r l3 O" ^
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low( j" l" `. y0 d
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
, q- m% @# O$ {' n# j9 G8 tpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring2 X1 Q4 P( o+ s4 v
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer2 G0 v4 _% ?, u4 t# g) K4 K
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as& B6 C3 T$ a- b o. K
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
2 F4 G v0 Z/ s0 J; s$ K1 V
! q" q# i0 H5 G6 X2 }7 R5 S H Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
& N, E u$ ~# r# Fas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
! @8 B! c# ^1 v3 A1 j' ]- wremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,8 g& `7 e: k2 P
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices. a& t, {( K3 ]+ e2 A
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve! F9 [. F& w* u# r* Z2 l, N# Z9 Z
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
3 u8 v" j% U9 M4 Z5 ^0 n+ l. ytowards the end of 2006. + j/ h9 @1 l( a( w+ o3 l/ m
9 v, @2 a% u1 y- eWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
& N. R( d. J% ?inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
, t w6 F3 z9 R; a' ?: }! Qto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse1 m7 y0 P w4 H" R: [+ G
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
^; n+ a- c8 h0 q, X! dforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
3 ]1 c ^ j; g2 spressure on tight inventory levels.' F/ `& C8 t4 r: G3 C
' I: {6 S& Q/ ?: b- c Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic M8 O( O( [0 }+ {8 {" |$ f |
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
( ^+ g8 Q% y0 z2 o5 Iinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
! e' @! ~4 r- ?, S9 s, Z+ Swhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
& Q5 W/ M3 V' @ Pfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.3 ^ A; Z7 B6 E. z W& s
5 ^$ q% S# J4 _0 N <<
, `6 \. r& C9 B Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
. Z* r5 K# x7 x5 ~$ \. H! ?
5 h! d# l1 c" E$ X, v/ \9 a -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 |9 I! ^. j( b) E/ Z0 N Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
. u6 r- r1 r7 K. x1 I! K -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 g/ }; C4 r! k 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
2 ~8 Y) a; w/ m4 U/ ?4 Y- a Market Average Average % Change Average Average
0 Z! }# J& u8 v9 y4 M -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( W3 \" O1 H' d0 D3 K& Y2 M- H Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
Y! c) \3 P( C$ N( h5 r -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- F9 F4 m7 M5 }$ C2 p J; h. a8 p Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
O' T# u7 J! N/ E" e -------------------------------------------------------------------------" v" F% @+ R& h6 L- G0 W# F
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0007 U- {- ]8 s9 s( A; ^3 F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. n! i8 ]# O+ B; R Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -. M5 W" N* [% |$ u- v; b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 O$ v+ R" }9 |5 E' _; X St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333, Q/ n: L- @9 j3 t% R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; V6 P9 p! Q# w2 ~3 J% O
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583, F9 s+ Y5 e2 e+ ?5 f/ W. C, @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 [5 O) Q+ V* d2 [* q- J Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
. N4 c( ?# _ D -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 S9 E9 R0 C8 e Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
. e2 Q8 r" f0 y' {9 T) I -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 |( O0 Q$ B( b/ T; [
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
3 w$ Z7 U+ a. ~. m4 o* \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
@ Z( I0 X+ |7 {% _. W: K Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7075 P( l. z% S, |. a ], w" b }
------------------------------------------------------------------------- u% | K: C; ?( Z. F2 ]
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5009 U( {; P# o s- E2 z6 s% d
------------------------------------------------------------------------- N# j7 ~ o! r% D3 r
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
: x' z% m. P$ K) ]8 ]; U -------------------------------------------------------------------------: s" g0 ^( o$ N0 k0 d0 B
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
# C$ A3 |/ \/ B9 T -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 g+ K* H6 b1 V; M
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500 c1 U" ~! S8 \4 S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" w8 Z; W, P. g0 b
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
: J8 m& H% O- X# M/ E -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 Z/ f& \1 I; T; O+ M' f National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
+ k. C+ i6 e3 S -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ k" w. _! k% H; u$ h* J! L) A' ?
4 X9 E, R) k" Y" ~) w: B -------------------------------------------------------------* P2 k; N6 Q" J% A9 ~3 }
Standard Condominium7 b# q& h/ c$ M2 y4 K# W
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ I: L* c( E" Y# d' W, b 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo) T% C5 g( W- ]7 C0 W* P
Market % Change Average Average % Change5 r) R$ t9 y# [# P; B' `5 T
-------------------------------------------------------------1 D# x h' l- _* K3 o
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
6 ~! ?( Z) `1 P; r -------------------------------------------------------------% b2 M1 h3 D# K% Q+ }: [" E6 I5 N
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%6 d/ I5 K5 }/ W; R- t0 D
-------------------------------------------------------------+ B' K- R" q0 R7 ^
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A& [ L m4 O, v/ O( o
-------------------------------------------------------------3 A8 U7 _2 c. j6 q( p. G
Saint John N/A - - N/A
5 Q/ C. i V6 O -------------------------------------------------------------
% Z$ o- R6 N" C: X+ I. v& \ St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%' w1 ^* B3 ]7 W, T# e/ l, I
-------------------------------------------------------------: C- C( K. k0 A) Y/ G) d' }; e
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%- z1 B/ q# z; W3 l
-------------------------------------------------------------6 N7 j z/ j2 w) Q$ I" F
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%4 h/ ^, t% S. l: i
-------------------------------------------------------------- E- m( u+ ?; I+ z1 e# Z
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%' J" \; J* D( Y+ b5 a
-------------------------------------------------------------
% c' T( n H7 I9 @2 ~ Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8% h4 c _2 a P5 C6 d! o& t
-------------------------------------------------------------3 x; y; P* @9 D9 d/ @8 |# i! w m
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%. `6 z% I/ v k" w
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ ^6 V6 a& C) E: H. p$ R1 r Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%$ K4 D% \* s5 C- b6 q9 ?' h/ r, ?
-------------------------------------------------------------& ~- P2 C7 P! K b% o
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%& F3 [! d# h/ x1 f$ Q) N- @
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 _. v. K( @( l9 k- R) i Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
! H3 A- N+ @/ E5 K' t$ `* d0 K -------------------------------------------------------------: u3 k* R5 Z5 f' E# i8 U9 U
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
+ x7 \4 c3 F" T$ `8 P* }6 M -------------------------------------------------------------
3 M) U2 i* k7 J# R/ {7 x Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%0 J1 g. W1 G5 x/ V
-------------------------------------------------------------8 n5 X9 ?4 b! }6 H% E
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
' c% Y, @- r/ B5 E -------------------------------------------------------------
( L3 T5 W4 }; m/ I% ]: R" J$ S6 N2 c >>
D; B3 C1 @, z( R& J! [) `) w6 F% b* |4 C: `7 @+ G) A/ J
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
9 y# `7 u5 { i1 E% O& gin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
. t/ s3 l5 }+ Y- T/ GJohn and Victoria.
C9 T. A9 G; ~& S7 T0 H3 r% T6 s) p0 H. y1 g
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most6 K2 a4 X M. c- P5 h* Z# @4 i- ^
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of: ^# c! p* `5 h
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release( X* m4 a8 n9 M4 k/ y
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
8 V6 _( I! L7 F( I$ O3 I$ X9 p) W0 wtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities/ R2 z9 Y# s) w' t
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
* Q, ~3 @0 u. ravailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current) u9 ~4 A' H( n: u; H
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
9 h9 Y# R+ g& A- c4 O. B) Eversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on/ V3 k4 W9 S6 Z' l: R" j
November 15, 2006.
7 t& ^3 e( @' v( \: X" `2 G! d Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
" @/ ~" ]5 T, b# J1 n& `* }fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
9 f1 I+ \# c @, P! mprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
4 w' [* G% }# m/ i# Yavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|