 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable * v9 r3 e* E% @5 K) @/ H5 Z
$ `- b+ [8 u9 b) m& G7 `- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -; |, S L: i9 f# b' b1 f
* w1 f* D6 k- z5 T( }( d
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
) O, {2 ]) y: E; O1 J5 ]% ?exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third& ?& R' V7 J/ v$ f; t, s% b9 j
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic1 A( u9 A9 r+ p: B# \8 g% Q3 A
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit8 E+ A- k9 P# ^. g% \' T3 u9 Q1 z
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
% Z9 t% l& u* C8 w$ ]! S2 R; kmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,$ M6 r' Z) c; L" N0 o
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal9 S5 @4 C5 }: [0 y! |' Q0 b2 o. C
LePage Real Estate Services." ]3 |6 `9 S% C
5 w' l" K% w! n' } Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
, t7 Y3 Q& S0 t8 `$ ~are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
9 v, L! B& j% u# d1 S* Oconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
- `; @5 Y0 p, k) t5 osound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
. D$ Q8 k5 h" u' e( }residential real estate sector.' o: u+ M- f3 M
5 M( T$ {7 L. ?, W [: F6 ?
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation% x, |) F$ T# |7 \( ]! l, D4 J
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)6 a6 h" k) G, B8 J/ m a
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
# t$ C, N' |3 K1 ]: }) G+ d8 t( e(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3802 @, S( S: u- l$ \' j1 x
(+13.2%).
5 a5 _5 H+ X! E+ ^- `! @4 ?) c, V. i. k+ P
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
1 _( \0 j( K' iduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the) J4 y4 x; y8 ^9 G/ l/ u/ n8 _
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
" m0 i, I- W w7 x1 ~/ gpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
: R; b) a7 q+ @: |# k7 X1 ] {) apresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.$ c: E3 ~5 y3 a: _+ n- N$ o
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
! S' V) ~, _% ]% T( `6 `9 `# wwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
$ t) d0 b) R& V" l s9 a7 g3 abalanced market."
2 Q8 t: O. K8 B1 i- @. P( Q1 J: W9 L3 f/ L* C$ Q. g& y; q% W8 x
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,4 B$ G# ^0 ] V* A( s6 X/ M
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift5 n6 m& [7 N! f7 A; G' ~( r/ E
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
- V8 Q b* w1 d$ Y9 ~0 m0 H: Pthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
* j/ c2 w" E* P: J7 R! ^, cenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
c- T* _) {0 e9 j% mmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
9 {) ^: T* w( f: y" J2 U Ebreaking price appreciations.
, M! b( ?* U( A, Z9 Y0 q- ^/ Z. L. S) h8 Q# a
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
* m5 Q' T2 j( I' C% h- peconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the# C, q$ ~! Y1 R
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.! ^! b4 X$ {- W3 R) O
1 ~- d: j% X2 c8 z$ g In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid$ l1 \: f- J5 b3 d/ r
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer4 B4 Y+ j" s8 ^# x
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off8 U& x# \; i- A3 r, n: F
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
4 A" }. Q) i; k! t6 \In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers( ]: ?! y; Y9 b& V0 z
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
" _- K+ M' f, c" a) U4 Nprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
8 z* u' _, x- U- z, Q5 j0 Y4 o7 c5 Q$ j! e
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing! B. B4 |) W6 c8 Q) r5 {/ H* X
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and Q9 O3 J5 x0 S! P) g' u4 l
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada7 s( X( k& t4 u" l- }1 p
are markedly different than those found in the United States.5 J- C5 H" t: `& [
1 j9 b& E( W7 ?
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
5 s& ]& R$ G" l& [/ X) a1 wAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's7 m8 a# Z! [3 B& O+ g, y3 x9 s& U
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the% ^3 X+ I3 M2 ?# e! q) V7 {
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
, E5 R, p- `" R$ A5 M% G: oaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the2 z0 |4 U+ C, _$ a3 k1 C$ d
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
/ d1 M8 j3 d7 Y+ N. Saggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization0 e- s' O$ e) K* H0 `
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."7 A4 e. ^" D5 D/ m6 ]
. ~, [$ J0 `5 s/ W! c' ]) E2 ?
<<
# _ t4 @+ z9 O5 ^4 g REGIONAL SUMMARIES% C' S& X& }9 W. B+ @; k
>>" W/ X! m5 v2 ?3 b, \+ a. Q( Y, w
5 \; d* a; s) \4 u5 h, d& ]
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in* g9 z- @: b- r: t) @7 }# N; X
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate: M f( \' ]) ~. o
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time! H n/ i& S6 v i% ~
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
3 o$ q9 E+ ?) A6 S0 Drenovations.
. i: h7 }" s+ k/ M) U( @
& \$ g; s0 c$ M$ ?2 ? The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
5 [" J$ J/ U2 r5 m& Wincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation; b# `- Y1 }! D7 ~- Q
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
: u2 ~+ h! I) X9 v" uSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
: r& f' @6 G$ i/ x- w
5 c7 {7 B) a5 d The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
& f0 H: D; F2 K, _slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
* ?# Z' \0 Q- {* w2 b3 _" }5 kquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
8 |$ f' ]% F4 I/ B; k600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
% B2 Z M- H; G+ r8 o( Oto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
& M; b+ M0 w0 V2 Z5 \( @2 kand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
! J1 G- Z; E) T9 P# y& Y/ z$ V4 V- _; }. v) f3 t
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
6 y/ B% r! }# G8 C) Aconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
) _, _- E9 W: V7 b% q& f6 X) chomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers' C8 q4 b6 e- m, i1 e
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
: I) I9 W" z$ W8 t( j3 kdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing0 x% i6 l: ]; `3 I
buyers with more options when looking for a home.( a: V( R4 `% V; u) M
$ o5 J3 H; r1 k! E8 K+ H
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly- q& l8 J" l$ [7 t5 `) X F
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes9 r) R3 I2 j$ U% _' z) B `* U |
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
v- v4 e$ k9 T0 d* }as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last$ }4 o4 o5 {% N" _
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
! t, @% v$ \& _2 E* K' {- ]4 T2 j4 |5 }1 b4 |
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house1 W5 K( [. L C
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
! j. |/ i, g# q/ ~0 D" y0 Plevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting' A8 z( a$ O% f: B9 U& Y
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
9 S6 b) m- ]- s3 M3 A8 }when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the% u+ T( s+ b# k* g4 H
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before3 e: U, C1 ?8 W$ ^
making a purchase.+ b/ m- B$ c$ E" q5 r
, n* i$ F1 D3 r) w" u
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing& v+ @3 T6 f7 U- B* C& h/ u
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong4 y3 w$ U' E) z0 f, w
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city. M8 ~+ J, D4 r* T8 v$ f! X
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
$ @7 s& R# L, [attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
. n* m e, b/ camenities.
$ X" S1 V$ X2 I5 r, b* \1 @0 ~, N8 ^' [+ T& v6 [4 s8 ?
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels$ n3 J3 _' P# F
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand7 ]# \% y7 w" A) ^+ O2 X5 g4 D
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
4 P0 |$ O# ?. s8 {continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been1 b- w- L1 d6 Y7 |! E% z
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
/ w: o6 D5 e, f' @1 A+ V" gresidence, rather than for investment.
0 j9 E9 y! ]. ?% r+ u
5 m8 O8 x6 V/ {! W {3 } The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
$ i2 F* N5 ~! `9 X- ~house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
+ j2 C5 Q- r0 K& q( zin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer4 m) j( ~, S7 q0 {
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization" Q7 ~2 L$ L: A2 Y/ |% k7 H$ Q
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter+ h u6 C: _7 `+ V
the market.5 j, x- Y6 v, K9 w# _1 b% {. n
' J! ?# h2 ~8 o6 K5 R In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
% Y$ j# v8 a& kJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In. x( S# J& Y( }3 H3 X, V
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
4 M+ Z( |1 |+ `1 N8 [# dmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
- V% n; B. \" O$ Y8 t; Jto the shortage of available inventory.3 M* A- ~9 T1 P+ |* Z
: d" {" w5 s2 S, {0 H' l/ s
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
- E |; [; s$ g H( E* D+ hmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
7 S# q! t& }- F; dvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses7 S. I! D5 w5 {" E( U0 m- I
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province. M/ g" m. t t, G$ [9 W7 X
9 Z- g& k4 ^* ^' C Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases+ Q+ z, b7 x* t& l/ G1 f* O) m
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
0 P0 Z4 s C2 Funemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that2 F t$ r7 V" `, |( m
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
! n; I" L9 u f6 Aprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
' S' K4 j" {) ^/ y( Q V9 }3 [, Qseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
2 G4 k% u. ^& S( l# Kbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
. S: G( n8 N4 l, P% @! a) b1 D& Z' [/ y# ^2 A) x& B4 d
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter3 n: @9 C- z0 ^6 \4 G ]# ~
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
6 g! ^+ F1 E) E* R) `+ tremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
" ^& \" u' O7 W fmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices7 d1 R, P/ q' U+ s( m
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
& _. [0 K5 ]! M9 pin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
- ?5 d# `# s% i! B" o' Z/ i1 t& dtowards the end of 2006.
* [9 Y- G p. e3 f6 `
* ^6 i6 e& X* i% d* i aWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of* Y" _8 r( j7 T0 h; _/ T o
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
2 c1 k" E. l1 \' _0 {8 U3 gto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
$ z5 b- i5 O- p2 M vgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
! d3 d8 F" E5 Zforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
# U" o( [/ m' U; N- r; i' H! `. Vpressure on tight inventory levels.
; x$ D" D+ _/ l$ r: S9 ]
( d" w: O# k+ s z+ ` Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic5 |, u- j. b( z2 |6 @. a
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
: Z: \2 L; A+ U& b8 X0 minto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;( p4 s) h0 w. |3 O8 Z
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
% ?" z5 m- l/ K6 bfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
5 u: ^" N/ f% u% A3 ?4 H1 p. A4 N V8 Q; k9 {! f
<<" l- k5 K+ Q4 D
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20065 G+ d" \/ b+ o3 s
8 I- ?. f# Y3 p% Y7 m -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 B$ `$ h: Z0 p9 l
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey8 `% L: | j6 n/ i1 \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ [/ ]( W3 E( S, j! ]5 m! ?# W 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3% G3 k" v. |0 L) s+ v2 |! D7 s+ C
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
; S1 d# o3 G# D' t4 F -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 M7 H9 G$ {- H5 r
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
& S8 q6 [6 n/ [1 p -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# c9 t5 V5 u( x+ m4 k Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
! l5 s# h% h1 Z/ |) R1 Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 F5 c) j( U# C' C6 K3 V Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
3 H; x% p* `1 b7 Q0 ~9 W -------------------------------------------------------------------------. |% U+ F8 u% X; Q
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -" Z5 r$ x# _: S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& `1 B$ B' ^, G2 d" y* t0 a3 Q St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333, T i# P% ]9 A" |9 m. m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ U0 x3 U) w. u( C! s$ i' B" A$ T5 R3 |
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583/ F) ]5 o8 \ _3 E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 f. j4 S; p. g* g0 Q* P+ r- f
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185) \7 W/ z2 E8 u) A/ \3 w+ o) b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 P: i/ A" M3 ?6 k% o Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250/ \0 O$ r- z2 p3 _: l( G$ G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- L9 w) N1 u1 `) L- f7 Y
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766$ u8 L5 c4 v9 x, ?. c$ J# Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 e2 E, D( s# M9 Z8 f( n {
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
/ ~5 p* f: m* Q6 Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 V7 l6 |7 |( h \ Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500. M9 @3 E; z; c0 m% u: z) d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 g T+ B$ E7 q0 H* [ Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
3 W7 H: B+ E0 u5 t& k -------------------------------------------------------------------------" j# r7 ^0 {( d. W
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
5 @3 n; D6 X' \ u1 ]5 r -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* L4 Q. a$ R' L1 @, U Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
# _" |7 L8 s' [! F -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 c6 _) c* X5 z) t4 ?) { Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000+ h, j0 P3 }8 o0 e& _0 S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" t; h5 ^+ A+ m( o' U& c
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
, a5 n# i: ~5 @1 y7 |' E, K8 l -------------------------------------------------------------------------' }% R! g5 P4 @1 t6 j
4 }1 N9 V7 B7 U" c# W -------------------------------------------------------------# A( ^, A: t6 [" ]) Z& u! Y
Standard Condominium+ d. V# z3 j2 q
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 }$ n( q J5 R4 e! v) L: y 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
" }5 S; N, r0 h2 F3 { Market % Change Average Average % Change
! v3 E, j# [$ \$ i7 e/ l3 w% T -------------------------------------------------------------1 H; j4 q: w# h! U
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%6 j# P0 A4 U |; s; W
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ ^' ?4 G R5 v3 F! J9 p Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
: b; {* ~% w0 @, ?3 [ -------------------------------------------------------------
: u% r4 H' @) P! n Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
; T" K+ j" T6 V6 ?+ m -------------------------------------------------------------
8 i4 b/ ]' l7 g# N9 Y4 S" I Saint John N/A - - N/A1 x/ W7 o) e# J9 W% M; N" R' K
-------------------------------------------------------------+ k& h# g, H! k9 Q: m9 k% A
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
M; J5 n2 ^% f- b -------------------------------------------------------------
" Z6 F5 P9 C7 e: e& n3 n Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
# a" N+ B5 V+ i; A" C/ \: K' ` -------------------------------------------------------------! t3 L1 A2 \% J4 ]/ J, D& @
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
6 `/ b. P# k; }" A- L% E -------------------------------------------------------------
% z9 ~; ?6 v m& k! O Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
1 j. e0 e6 c0 i* R. g. M -------------------------------------------------------------
; F! a, H- \# t( _4 ] Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%3 {/ y$ [7 H2 x
-------------------------------------------------------------! H9 y$ q8 |) P6 l0 d
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%7 y- i! T7 [; y _8 u6 A
-------------------------------------------------------------% ~8 i+ u- y; z0 a2 M" s5 j; ~
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
7 F+ I9 ]" F3 l/ f# \1 D1 N1 S -------------------------------------------------------------' `. u9 o& M7 X" U- r
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
0 I- _$ J0 f+ m* j" z7 X -------------------------------------------------------------
8 `* {- a9 M, d! X Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%; u$ ~' l' F8 h! p
-------------------------------------------------------------5 p. O( j& o. q: Z, a- j- U4 \
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
, I& ^$ F3 Y; b+ \. ? -------------------------------------------------------------; I+ U1 S! t7 g( `$ G. H
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%# n8 [0 u! ^9 e4 x4 Q1 z
-------------------------------------------------------------
# X2 J# H/ c3 X ]" v National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%+ C/ t$ h( Y$ i( X; l4 _) e3 A
-------------------------------------------------------------
: v4 U, ?. Z: d7 H >>! A& e; B7 Y5 S! L, [1 ?8 M8 k
3 K7 y1 o* k' U* t: k9 Y
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
% l* j" W$ R2 y' ?2 o- Q7 pin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
2 f1 v* L* s+ V7 I, T7 A5 lJohn and Victoria.1 q( \- E, t% {0 m; z6 T \8 J4 |- w+ T
4 m$ v% H& ^/ W. L: e9 j The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
) w1 e4 Q! i' g8 e V7 v( zcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of; E0 r$ C) [1 g, h0 n% ~5 k
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
- r; S& X$ f4 }$ Kreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price7 O' _; j. `9 w1 \* |) B1 U m
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities- k2 W$ b* f- d/ T6 {8 R2 i' O1 E) I( A
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
8 ^( A$ a4 o5 m- K2 D( o1 [; @/ z; z1 ?available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current! A/ F) L1 F- Z2 L
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
, V6 w5 L* }) u q; \: \, gversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on* t' y6 Q* F4 p/ \4 ^7 f O# J
November 15, 2006.
* A0 J: I& P3 @( B4 H* M9 y7 d1 Z Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
% y5 ^+ ]8 R0 f' Vfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
9 I5 o# A- W, }3 o gprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
9 ~6 O6 ^9 \+ T0 Pavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|