埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2457|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 0 W7 l$ c3 h1 C+ T* d" L
8 g. Z( V8 K) E. ]
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -& ^1 x9 w5 ]2 D
+ q! R2 D$ z/ X) ^( j8 f7 i
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
# p5 [% X. a' Z3 q$ o/ B( _exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third" b& x( m  j+ A- |+ {0 a
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic* P: ~: }4 \5 B% {9 q' f  N
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
- G, T$ d9 C' k! N7 K* qprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
5 e2 b  Q7 x! V& ]more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,- M+ f( k. U* j1 C/ x/ ]& e
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal. Q) j( h# v" Q4 ?8 p
LePage Real Estate Services.4 @: p: x0 q8 t: ^' t
+ M% L5 V& r: N5 Z5 }
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
% v: t, Y. g5 K1 U/ I  _are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
" m% g6 i+ ^4 E$ N- v6 Hconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
, n% p/ v( s- U9 V! ^sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
, [, w8 _, ^/ h3 I" Aresidential real estate sector.
( b7 E7 _, ^3 U0 ]( K% v6 |" T. E: s1 I
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation( D" H0 H: d% E6 y# N- I. Q
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
4 a- b4 L; s% b+ w/ Vyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
' W  t) F9 j0 D(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380" G! t& f8 f& H0 a+ G
(+13.2%)., q% h" t9 q2 t" }: w% E( m+ x

* x  T9 q1 a5 j4 U5 q    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth1 E% J, q: ]- q; H  j7 l/ p  t8 j  X2 y
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
  o2 N: H2 l1 e; P# E6 tfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are' L4 g5 W2 @$ a7 p% ^' E
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,: f' x3 u6 q2 f4 {# D2 H' D
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
  B$ c7 R& W5 s8 K7 c- @% R$ `' W"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We5 P2 g% _; x6 `0 K0 f0 N6 J2 w
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy) m4 c5 f" o/ |6 g" d- w
balanced market."5 I/ R, i9 |& i8 H5 W3 u

, {4 \% ?2 R  w) q1 g    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
- y" b9 B4 e) k0 _considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
& q4 R' D/ w" p3 j% h( `8 Eto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued% I! ?7 F" V# F$ ^& n( B
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core2 @/ d1 ]5 L; [/ [
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
. Y  v) K* F2 g( y9 D6 Wmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
- e% r5 d5 P. A; L! A8 nbreaking price appreciations.- N$ }4 [) c" |2 O1 L7 `
- n+ G# V" g: F- P) j2 Y
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding7 g8 E6 S; l8 V3 y, @
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
  \! S+ ^7 N3 i; A- x8 wlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.% n! ], }0 e: D
# k4 t% y3 Y" x9 {: ~5 B$ `
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
" k2 O2 [# U3 F: a" ueconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer* H, _  A( V1 W0 y) `
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off$ a/ e8 x- ], A& |5 A# d
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
$ u1 C# v' m% Z$ x* XIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
6 e6 F* b. Q' l8 c5 @5 {5 Egreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of: S# F& F, ~0 |2 _) K
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
) {5 E, w: k7 u8 ^1 m, A/ W" D1 T, M2 c! Y1 r
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing+ O0 b. l+ `' G/ X$ m7 r- A1 V
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and. L8 ~; ?( S0 n' r, ~# \
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
  ^/ F, A  d* m4 h" Q) Bare markedly different than those found in the United States.
* D! g3 |& Q9 @. o) L! z- }: j. m- c0 O' E- b) m; _
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the% N; l9 u- n- [) F  F
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
2 V- E& O7 G" w7 e, t  Q" hfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the& Z& V1 b7 G- V& k2 o, Q
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general- L- w# @- o6 i4 ~
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
: c. |  t  Z* Z" m+ T* k/ Edownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and9 b* i, Y0 z6 U
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
5 b& ^; t* g" ?  cmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
6 {7 b, Q0 ?4 Q
: ^9 O! n6 Y+ p( S/ M3 v* C    <<+ R" I- w0 g: t, X6 O- W
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES7 r; Z$ {& j, g, [& f- r9 F  w
    >>7 b7 X0 v1 P4 s" D

  c3 p6 X& ?2 u    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
( M- n) X$ F3 |6 oHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate/ }3 ^  L6 ^$ o" f8 X3 g
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time( S0 ?$ e) P# p
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
" [7 D" ^' n/ q$ E$ R# Orenovations.
( `: G0 }& ^$ E2 ?& |/ P
7 c" }9 E, X) O2 X. w- z+ U    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
3 M# h: h( {8 k3 Vincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation) J+ g4 Z8 J7 n- W5 B
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and, N3 q( u2 O4 i% `4 z4 ~" i
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.& J9 b2 Y' j9 A4 r7 V; S: q; j
6 M1 Y9 N, o' V0 R
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer$ C$ m* I% E: o* Z$ V
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
) k) s7 e: a# ?' Iquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
- N) b9 H* Z) s600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
6 @- Y& @0 @5 A6 Z4 i; A% ito the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes7 M0 a7 v8 }4 g' U
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.2 E& Z9 N. r5 l6 w& }, T. V

! p  p, k  y0 w. Z9 o    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced5 }; _( U% i) Q; H& D, m
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their( g% e! @& c6 J5 o4 K$ @1 x
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
/ E+ T% L0 V$ [* W" Jwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
* K$ I) X& `  o) Q: odollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
0 K: h7 ^" A% [buyers with more options when looking for a home.  w1 m- E0 z8 G- c' O
: K6 y7 B6 d2 e3 P7 }" w
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly8 b5 C& N7 |8 r
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes! ]& ^0 O+ J4 j# e- K& P
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,! M9 x$ U7 M# C& ?0 Z- C6 v' e
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
( P8 z: }) V) L0 }' N6 R# rfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
6 V! i& H& y1 M$ L& o3 g+ T) A* j
8 F' y4 X( N, `    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house  H* E6 I# [6 b. _( P
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory/ Q9 C6 e- t0 w# @3 d6 R
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
' d4 t- w- E* F% `  qfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
& c; E  Y: A& Zwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the5 A. L5 r; x0 K( A; R0 o+ X7 x
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
1 k7 p! C* B  z% l8 `5 _" X! ~% `making a purchase.
! y) m+ R% d8 u- L! \0 R# ~& m* C7 l$ Z" b$ c+ c! v+ e' u
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing! T/ F( R2 @- v
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong* ~. D5 i* C1 m" K3 j0 m
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city: X0 `: |9 v3 _( g
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
! Z. J. ]; W! @+ ]2 T" l  Q+ Z7 t' nattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
, z7 D1 B9 |" {0 v+ ^amenities.
) z" z; Y1 L1 T1 o/ e0 D& L0 i  T/ u, F* G  P
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels+ g! F  b6 t8 G: s" X: B
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
# `2 t& s; _& q3 t( macross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has' _- y7 _! O+ |: s* B7 @" _
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
9 J; I' r6 S' Z, p+ n/ z7 Pdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle/ T8 u  b3 A5 J
residence, rather than for investment." I" T* u' M" i$ U/ f

! E* j) x0 C- n9 M1 X+ p5 i: a    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as& O3 N  r1 m: x. X2 C
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
' z0 T" y0 \! p7 yin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer* P) \# U. }' k5 R; a) t2 t
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
. \+ \* l% A' t8 ?; Srate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter0 ~' g4 I7 u% R( e, n& b
the market.
" t. P# E) @* ~1 `) p) f
9 A; T" G' V7 W6 ^7 Z( J3 |    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through' \8 T& B% R6 e4 w# g
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
# M+ q; j' o& ?  C5 xAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
9 {* z  [) q. O* k( ^' umonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due; t3 d" F% a5 S
to the shortage of available inventory.) }+ M' b) ?8 X% q1 @. `: |+ W3 {
: j; B: y: g8 [
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its$ ?9 A, c0 V% l
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains* ]$ {" ^  g2 T% j( M
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses5 G# f: h" j- T# g+ ?1 l) C
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
; T7 U% v5 t' O, B" ]
# M( K) j  x+ c0 S! I    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
, x% f; O+ T1 |& A& Q& Tin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low/ u" u- `( s# a% e8 R
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
8 n" ]. f/ B- ~- Npressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring7 t+ F* `+ Q5 w: M
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer0 T& B; m; O0 M
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as/ F7 w7 q+ o% ^, R  z6 ?- ^
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
* c, d6 N; g9 P. b+ I3 G. z6 v) g

& |$ v, M" W1 Y' l    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter& _8 z# t; |' I" t# _4 J
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton( e7 v/ w, c! K$ s7 N; G* h. ~
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
5 i2 I9 F/ k" r3 p0 ~maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
+ I& _! O) z. e  w8 Eincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve' z# c) ^9 S; o. H3 @
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly$ B" Z6 `# W. X2 j/ G. V- f$ ~9 K
towards the end of 2006.
    ; Z3 d7 s  s' J4 [6 Y* M# @1 X0 Q

8 e( [) y( h: P! H- DWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
, b' {7 V3 y+ ?# C3 B# w* j7 U  Rinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable. g. l7 P3 `+ X" |9 g
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
' k! ?5 g3 t- V6 Fgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to4 z5 x! s) B& ?5 ^- L
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added+ O' h0 b9 [0 l& l
pressure on tight inventory levels.8 B  F8 h# F7 j0 j3 s
7 S& Q7 U& K7 m; r) X
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic: o& T; M9 a* Z- I1 M9 [
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
" n4 S; |5 l; T8 y7 zinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
, C! t: J; J8 ~9 Qwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
/ h7 O1 F* I1 x$ k. Vfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
; v+ s' S8 n0 p& o# j* B- ^+ ]' j/ x+ ~" @6 N
    <<
6 i& s" \7 \8 _; u, a      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006" ]+ h1 s0 c- Q

* Y6 Z6 a( G& i2 v* Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: d% X+ M3 w/ w/ K# n" ?
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey7 F! j( l" Q6 A% V* z* N9 W+ `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& ]; l* f% f3 w/ D1 q                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
3 A* V* `* x: C$ f: G1 d( u    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average" P3 K$ r% i" n2 y- K4 A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# c$ m7 L2 g5 M4 @
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
: [3 T* l5 b" J8 ~3 E    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- k" t- @9 }' ~: v' \; b# o    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
* P) ~8 h( y0 }1 e: F+ V% N* P2 E    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( U( B& o- ^8 L' V! ~  M. F    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
5 f# q! K) ~! c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( [& l. ^( c) d9 L/ R    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
) R6 N5 w4 C, L. i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 }) H, A( X% s6 `( U" _    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
. i1 E+ T4 n* @: C# h9 F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 i6 g% D3 R3 W% J    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
3 m8 d& V, }2 }- E+ [- T    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& J$ {6 Z% Q" P
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
, `1 v4 c2 N; D0 t7 h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" _. O* N6 W& Z    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2502 Q) j  s) r( D, B* a
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- G" Y1 F! M' c2 Z5 [
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766% F) u% P3 ~& k  U& m5 a0 f  f
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: ?0 X0 l/ V# h& e7 M
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
( K/ P+ O  T- m# J7 _) N3 A" X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% X! G+ y& Y0 s/ w& \2 T* E    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500$ k  J# T) {$ L! K2 e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 v1 d3 ]( g& V  C- b/ K    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389" ?0 z& P# _7 `" s8 q6 x
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 u" T5 @1 S4 N0 J    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
& C; X4 n4 |  [- {+ s% L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# B$ x1 }" V( K    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
) b& ^8 {( X5 a7 E* P    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- W  h' I; M& `4 S
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
6 n, ^7 I; \2 ]" I& x( \) X, i2 G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% q* n. ^; V: e& S# Y, c    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
, M0 I1 C% D" x$ [4 [1 X& ~. `! f3 k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ v% Y) C( H% v; I" H6 E
# A/ X! Y( T3 Q! Q5 |% x
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 C2 f6 [8 v, }+ t2 ~2 O. ?
                               Standard Condominium
# p& V7 ^2 ~) Q- z' C2 \* Y! d; @    -------------------------------------------------------------
) r- ^$ Q6 L1 `& _                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo' k3 c4 [4 o' H4 z3 a: P3 j  ~& [
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change* D3 _3 d. O" a, o- ]8 h
    -------------------------------------------------------------& n* p4 M# j6 h+ U3 C$ Q
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
. A8 N& P% w9 b    -------------------------------------------------------------
. v9 y# q* [, g) a4 C4 I) V    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
' G+ h; `+ D* l& T, {2 I  L    -------------------------------------------------------------
% k; V' G, _6 L7 h6 J" z) `) P    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
7 i5 V4 [- e1 N6 W7 N    -------------------------------------------------------------' Z5 f4 I1 l0 o" h& w0 y) `
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
5 ~2 v  K* E1 C5 a, F    -------------------------------------------------------------
& g' \& \5 f! z) \    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
. d8 ?& N9 |1 b; {; r. n1 Z3 M: h# ?    -------------------------------------------------------------: w' Z4 Z. x1 g+ i* F
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
( i5 D- ^2 r8 }( V& F    -------------------------------------------------------------4 U& E% c5 q4 N, _+ _7 T2 h$ z9 D
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%0 S$ O0 D1 ~5 P# k8 D
    -------------------------------------------------------------: J- I) |- w! z' S* |; N- M5 m
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%4 C# W, m; Y; z+ {% s) k: C3 V
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 x, L. y4 c& [5 v: c( f
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%1 S1 s$ I! t  a+ e2 W
    -------------------------------------------------------------% K8 p  r5 J( Y/ W
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%2 p. B4 w9 `0 s' v
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 D2 D' j, e! H# L" w9 }
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%; E# E( B" j! T. D. A% h
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 d  R' p, ]9 X; E% i
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
6 H/ C2 q' G  K    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ ~3 l- s. c2 }9 \0 m. g+ ~    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%3 [: Y6 }3 u* K
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 R1 [7 X% F* q9 B7 s# b; l! \    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%4 r. N; V# D9 i* M) Z2 E9 W' u4 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; ]. o" K$ f+ @/ v    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%4 z7 r5 o: u9 D  ?& s6 q& P
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: [2 e% z9 _0 b% l1 _: o    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
8 N: z2 |& E1 {& D5 K- }* J( M    -------------------------------------------------------------
* @' g1 R3 m5 D$ ?# e    >>
5 C" S  O/ f* {, I
5 M. i5 Y8 ]: r/ z    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined) I0 ?# [6 y  @( r
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint# S' R2 y# a. K- m2 V6 Y- @" s0 B* a4 m% H
John and Victoria.
) I: t$ e' F0 D% L5 c. S$ u
% i' N! n1 K# ^0 g, E& e) }/ W    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most8 w+ C$ u( P' X' N
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of2 i$ o; e! d' M
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
* u# M$ E: a: ]9 greferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price. L; i- {- z* c& S" s
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
/ a* w! D( m- v" I% ?) G6 i# wacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
' S8 Y( E* @* Q$ p% a  Navailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
3 F/ B0 ^* I" r& M2 w  A6 e# _( [figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable3 P* J& o9 e/ t% b7 _5 r3 E! B( b
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
! F% ~" }# P( lNovember 15, 2006.: z: z0 c2 X% N
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of; f) _& T; U* a0 L. g5 Y
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge* y& ]# k# N/ X* i  @
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is/ x* I) V! F4 m- `
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-5-10 17:59 , Processed in 0.204100 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表