埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2239|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
* Q# K3 r5 F8 @3 x* z' {: z$ V3 d' }1 _0 ?$ @4 @
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
6 k) p: N' ?' b, s5 [* W# O
/ y! r1 g1 a3 X8 z- o    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
! z+ L9 w9 ?% {! u: _exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
( q9 m5 {8 X$ Z/ d6 i( A) Lquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
- H4 _5 P4 i! E4 N) kin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
  D& f5 n( F! J- j4 ~0 x( u. Sprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
  ]5 x6 @5 A9 H; [8 Pmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,* I+ y  b% i1 x/ D+ r
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal' }* P( ?6 B- E; [4 Y, d
LePage Real Estate Services.1 W2 [; b- @) d5 B/ d3 O6 j
1 K! W! n) p  |: ?! n
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
4 m- x% h0 ~: {7 L5 bare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic7 f1 A; P; D. q$ \
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and# e! O# _6 d# U  {
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
1 w' v) L6 J2 t1 c: X2 d3 yresidential real estate sector.
" Y% ?! M8 W" r/ L; O& i3 s1 a! [" x! B, C; X% N
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation3 z( q1 j& Y/ [( e
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)+ X1 x( I' u4 s$ B. f8 F( B0 g
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5620 _$ @* E, Y3 o+ B, r
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3806 P0 ?$ ?/ M/ ^+ l
(+13.2%).8 Q$ B- c1 X- j2 ^& O) J

9 `4 y1 D# k% O  y% U  O2 Q9 o+ }    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
! e9 N% Z+ U+ F+ yduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the3 S, n3 c# @/ |: L- }+ s
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
# V, t# e' `4 qpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,3 a, ?) b! {8 M  Q; w4 N" M
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
% o5 d9 H' B( G1 `"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We- @8 A1 e$ T+ W$ |' ?
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy- T$ i9 j( N# k  e" {; l# D
balanced market."
6 {+ w4 O' m' c8 ^! l7 e2 ]  ]6 S
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,# P* F% X- n. @
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
! G# s. A' u/ z, F7 H4 Zto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
: o) i+ G- a' J8 U. x2 U% Y( \throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core! g4 S* I6 B/ e# R
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
6 j1 c/ b: {% Q! g, d# s4 l4 kmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
( Z; I% N4 ^! S1 A! w' t3 Sbreaking price appreciations.9 x6 s2 q* |1 L, `4 a5 |( n; s) a: u% Z

9 a% f" V; q: e2 T, r: z    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
( n: R+ p! F( G0 h2 t7 L! B$ Yeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the& ?& ^+ P: {" ~1 k
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
& v( e- @1 w4 w9 Y9 W9 X+ f# d/ t7 s' {6 ^9 J) E& l7 E1 ]9 ~8 T
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
& @6 [+ W: R2 J  a6 [: Ueconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
& F% Y0 L  Z4 s+ Y8 Z( r$ w; B8 oconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
% s2 s5 I' ?* b, G! X) wslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
$ a$ T2 z' A0 M8 p# Z9 d( b0 M/ T7 PIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
4 Y: N  M! ?* s, G- H8 {5 kgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
* I8 Y5 E# \' M, l# b% T6 w  Cprice appreciation when compared with 2005.- B0 _5 |. y% o! F1 y& ^8 q4 N1 l& Y
3 W/ x5 Z4 S2 S3 `% R
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
6 L! B7 Q% |4 U+ Rmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and& R# [- K+ a- d* U. X
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada  r4 q! H8 E. V: |3 }+ P; ]
are markedly different than those found in the United States.. C- N& n( [* g/ M+ F
% H7 i7 ~% l3 f! z. ~' z
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
# ^& }1 M2 B" c: E. OAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's' n% q2 g; Y* D7 Z' J! R6 J! Q% |
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
; l( x$ Z2 v! jrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
% _7 s) f9 j* daffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the; O) s6 P0 F( |- s  {; @
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
+ _; L" ?' ^: d  K! t2 H1 D8 Raggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization: K! [! h% t" n- E
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."" [' }7 a6 ?, m

3 `" R) s' F3 `    <<
0 C/ ]5 e( g/ f. Q4 L                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES$ B( J: c4 p, O  ^0 C" k
    >>
  Z6 F1 c- f9 O( F# O0 P* \  B$ q9 U9 g: A6 R1 H# b
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in! p6 B. O; Z! W! R
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate9 s7 b/ w& t8 O. H5 h2 t
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time2 k, G% B9 [  L8 J4 j& k+ `
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of# u; i: U6 j/ Q5 c2 X7 k
renovations.  A+ r* L7 T/ G# c- H

2 P- U0 Y7 }0 I) n3 M    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight7 _, e; a8 y* l& G3 l
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation9 I8 P  I5 b+ B# B5 l
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
8 y. v0 l# u! Q1 d: s& S* iSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.: J& T; D* q; j* V
" J) R" t& k% G" r/ U$ z' {
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
( f% ^! O# M% gslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the. m) S' S! n0 E! J0 ]9 S
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new0 q1 \; Y$ V% n6 n5 Y* r9 l
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores2 a" f+ M6 e* B. \6 V% [' f
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes% ?7 z1 }! @* u
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
- d: r2 y2 y: r( L6 S! X( c. G9 K4 O# N# |/ l  _% X
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
1 L  `9 O  @! @+ W+ H$ iconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their! B6 o2 q3 s7 @8 ~0 a. H: `' l
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers$ b3 d7 m6 m+ U8 N0 ^
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
' T- f7 H* D. bdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
& k& v; x1 \. ^: W5 @# }9 Rbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
/ P' E+ S7 {8 {: i# E- s6 R  c+ F# ]
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
! l7 G" u; X, G3 damong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes9 J/ u  ?( B  j
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,. l6 k) s; N/ O& u: d' g8 v! ]
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
1 E  f; M' g& t& W# zfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
* j6 x+ h" f+ L4 f5 F; h
+ H1 t$ s5 J; |5 o    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
2 t; m" u# s  Y" Jprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
- d" L8 }& T; Y/ }levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting- e& v" K# I/ |
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
* t0 ]: [: o7 r, U/ b1 _8 Jwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the0 S/ w% x3 t4 x5 O  p) H# j
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before6 d- n, _8 X9 \- g" \1 p1 j3 Q
making a purchase.4 d9 I) }0 O+ P6 D- H6 d2 A
3 ]  w3 a$ l1 E% i8 M9 s
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing  v4 Y. p# K: J9 d" ~7 B
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong: T7 o$ ^1 c: O3 t' {& S; j
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city4 J: j8 q) z. J. H! u! t
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
) p% }# f7 R9 p+ ?  @% \) Cattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown0 y% ^* Q) l$ n7 w5 K$ w
amenities.
1 U3 x- n+ U* `5 y& G  a$ D. s- r( m- z) U3 [
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
. a3 U1 H: v+ z3 C0 M/ n+ Tthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand  `/ V- `: V: n
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has$ b2 h- \0 F) E) r, U
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
8 ?. m, o# p$ p" l* |driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
- Y1 x% Q/ D) K" J. k3 Bresidence, rather than for investment.
) F# `  M8 B& Z; L# i9 f% r, E  ~$ V& F4 A& U! `* W2 z
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as$ Y) D) E4 W9 T; @/ M7 s: z
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
* U# i% S; R* f1 vin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer- U( i0 T6 |- Z$ @( x
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
+ ~" j& g+ f/ n7 _* X) k3 grate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
+ w6 m  N, c' s. Nthe market.
: s4 R) I/ ]- `+ W+ t: F8 j
  B, T/ _6 h) y9 N  p2 h    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
9 n  D1 v8 F4 ]July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In4 p5 H9 s$ h" q5 g! V& m( C. b
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
! A2 T' J5 U# l1 _  T  Lmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due8 g0 E& \% F/ ?: [1 Q* h
to the shortage of available inventory.; m* L3 K+ ?0 h- m

2 o# {  l$ \- L# }% S    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its; X5 t' s, P. f7 [8 f( W8 x( n
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains8 r6 P" V5 M: Z7 F9 I. D/ n
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
( o* m+ I" R" l' ]) a3 i) H# p6 Wstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
( m  P) @" L$ |8 s7 m' I
( N6 P) }$ R7 z. M/ I0 M    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
. x9 J8 W$ _/ a* Qin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low& m9 a) v: u! l3 q
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
. ^9 m6 E8 n7 @% g, n, Mpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
1 P( z# r8 Q  R/ Iprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer; v; g/ j# z: i0 [: }
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as' L: C8 D  F- q+ h+ Q2 w7 T
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
% ?3 d, N: D$ O

$ H3 ]  H) W9 \    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter* P: n; W2 Y) u5 \
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton, K# e# x: ]' p
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,/ E' ^5 r; L( C3 N; q/ G6 ~* D
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices: F! {1 K& |6 x8 M4 G7 T  y& r
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve, \5 h; k/ ?8 ~
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
# ^4 b" b8 w: b9 N3 itowards the end of 2006.
   
/ O/ o6 s2 M# r! R0 N* s) s* D" j1 L2 y) O
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of0 e. \1 r$ V9 C( I( n
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable, Q, p8 F/ w4 g5 q
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
6 {; S; }3 `' h6 `9 z0 N* ?group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
, W# s1 f) u$ e. H: N, U- bforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added# c# h: M& T0 ]3 A+ a9 d  e
pressure on tight inventory levels.; z1 G+ J" c! m8 J) \% x5 j, f7 ^
: h: i2 [+ i. Q2 M! l5 a" x
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic! O; _; N& H# A& r
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people8 V$ W' E2 p  y( P0 U4 E6 X
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
0 |4 F2 F+ w2 m* e" B  q/ w4 j6 vwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching7 Y7 ~; m% R! @" v  `; m
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.# A' j/ s& _7 T8 q- A+ r
/ ^! O. W7 ~1 @
    <<
; V4 M. c% I& }! ^/ |& Q% }      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
* M- E8 a4 W0 ?+ j5 v/ m5 c
, ?  P- x/ M2 J6 ^+ Q4 P0 c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 o7 p2 Q' W/ F- t& V9 e' _
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
% c" S" ?4 [7 c+ B1 Q  r    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 k, ^  [- b) j' f& y- A8 T0 l                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
7 w! R1 h3 v- T" l6 \2 k5 S* x    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
  r- o5 q% z9 x6 v  z$ M    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) W% V5 n: g" B) W& m
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
" Y, i* }% j/ W0 ?$ S$ L6 l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 @2 `- {" u0 n
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
7 v0 ]( h. Q# Q$ o' U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ k# f$ B; T: K    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
/ ?7 M5 @& c/ |# ~    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 r+ f& S" f7 ?  E4 l    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
; F; u  ^3 U/ y! |. e/ A" f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. u+ S  l3 i+ Q7 r    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333+ A+ H! q: F; I  s$ H- V
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* b8 s- f. J/ [7 R6 L
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583" I0 _, R% D& K' F1 ?  y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( w- l6 a3 Q/ g. {0 [
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
9 R! T! o4 ~9 J+ d* M' G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 X, e9 R& q" T
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250/ c; U( G1 m( K- b" }
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ y. {# f8 \+ g+ i2 ~2 {( @
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
& ?$ m: m; U- j( A2 X! f* X6 x    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 K( m/ [1 \* d: D
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
  `: h! ^, o8 D* C3 ~8 q% H( M    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 V* P5 u& g0 \( f( P
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
$ ~% C+ r$ i3 L9 U8 O. E    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ p( {. A) S, M1 f    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389/ |# b0 [7 _2 @0 r1 O2 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 M: B: `5 M" _, i0 s/ @. i* _
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
% |3 Q4 x+ x; H) p. B( d9 o8 V! j& P! R    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, z" h# V' B+ O& _+ B2 i
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
( y# P, s/ j# @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( [' u" H& B  I% \* ]* w3 P    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
* j0 _& Q$ Y5 H  ^* Y0 }( Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 x1 Z' R% S+ o  u4 [    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
5 x1 E! T) e! |6 S+ z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 x+ L4 v# }* c6 d7 u

' L) |$ b# y- a0 E9 p2 y    -------------------------------------------------------------# I& F9 v% _$ i3 t. [" ~% f
                               Standard Condominium! o2 E' ~; g' n$ f7 l! o
    -------------------------------------------------------------
. n) w' ]" V1 `/ K/ h" F                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
5 G) T% Y1 k; a1 H    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change* O. O! x& x; B
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& D; P2 i: e1 n6 k: f    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%0 [4 y7 h2 A! T2 O: a& M
    -------------------------------------------------------------: s4 d' |3 d) l1 Q* ^7 L% t" v4 P
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%7 @/ A; \7 `6 i% ]4 x
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& B2 U5 k7 R* m2 c6 r, g5 M    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
/ i! M( v* L, c0 S* V    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 Y1 G: b) L9 q8 E+ e    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
7 \7 f6 e# K, n0 Q' W5 Z) T+ r    -------------------------------------------------------------" D# q3 `" P# r$ v9 m: ]
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
( ~# N! b! k' l: u1 l1 K/ s# ^    -------------------------------------------------------------5 ~; f" M1 H+ ?4 ?0 s5 _/ g4 s
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
( a8 ?" U7 d5 X! |    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 o4 v8 a. r% ~5 Y" E    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%$ S6 n8 \8 \/ C+ z# p* v6 ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------# T5 m2 [# L# {( X+ y
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%* F' p1 Z( R( R1 i! E$ H
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ v0 a7 a1 Q  L  X6 k  M7 R
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
. T) ]! X* x4 R    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 F0 Q2 `/ v$ D    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%: A7 M# B1 P9 z3 f8 H8 a
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( n6 V  N; K7 G7 }8 N0 F    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
+ i% `7 ?  i/ I3 {1 p& s    -------------------------------------------------------------
& U2 s7 ~5 v0 A    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%. m6 [) J! J4 T0 D( [+ g1 }
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 `4 Y5 z" W' Q4 H  V  e$ U4 M: s
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
& O9 y, b: v6 a, n. y( G    -------------------------------------------------------------; f. \3 _7 I$ W) V
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
0 i9 _- n4 P: T8 l6 S  `( {2 m    -------------------------------------------------------------" i9 \1 h# d5 d) O& v, b5 s
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%9 E9 ]# r3 e* ~( d) C2 F" w
    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ E) j% F: R6 Q7 |4 t' V. X    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%7 X2 s% r) e3 d+ {6 w
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 v4 |; R1 C7 ?3 X    >>0 ^9 Y; X" a9 O0 U" u% A( n: g! b
+ m' ]  K7 k; u$ {' u! n& _3 |, W8 i
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
& n* n2 h$ j- x1 yin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
' ~1 F3 [5 O1 f  g; TJohn and Victoria.
' c3 e0 j0 v# x( \) ?$ B2 c9 h% B, S5 ~3 y7 V: f2 ^1 g
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
, x5 A5 j9 e5 C0 \& l+ p+ _comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of0 k0 i3 o8 U2 `" X& s
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
2 n8 f% X2 e2 A2 |/ t4 G$ ureferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price9 A1 n2 _& N$ G& P
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities8 J( E3 W2 n0 O9 ^3 ~
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
& ^2 O* T9 T- q; v7 z( Ravailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
) N7 S# k9 L* }. C2 `2 _4 rfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
- u/ o) y" a0 Z9 @version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on* d- }. k+ [2 f8 |; _8 B# S$ h. w
November 15, 2006.
2 ^3 @8 w6 M: y  v5 F    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
! K# w  x7 G+ D4 P; Afair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
, W1 m0 R0 a0 L. i: `8 Z( Y8 Uprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is+ P# q8 y) Y, `
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-11 11:32 , Processed in 0.068566 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表