埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2440|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable : c6 X$ r5 p8 N  K; G/ V& p4 V$ K% |+ ?

, u+ b$ \8 B* G( o0 j" S" d- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
9 t2 l  A- W* f" R. {9 `$ w/ [9 H+ N
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
/ G; C1 R) z/ a1 d# o% Kexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
$ h9 I( m$ E0 \; K- w8 @8 fquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
  C- a! B4 W0 H+ C( K+ [in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit7 }, _/ ]( p- T5 E5 j
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and7 K5 c& T" Z# m" ^2 [  ]
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,8 }, I. Y! g8 Q6 ~
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal0 v/ K1 q! K; [+ I6 D5 T, T4 ~
LePage Real Estate Services.& {: n6 t0 A. p
  v) K( M- h( X  }0 W
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
0 N& q7 D  ^- O* e7 zare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
+ P+ q, U  \+ i& l5 i& Gconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and) c4 u- I  |/ M
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the& L8 W! Z: G, F
residential real estate sector.
/ l3 W" M8 |1 H& f/ c. }( s
  U+ \/ b5 Z7 t9 z% A    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
% y1 Y) b$ j6 x. P8 b1 L# Hoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)# [, Z& [# C. ^1 p$ K) h5 E2 @
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5623 W" F) I4 D0 j1 E/ ]1 @7 ^+ C
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380! b8 K: B0 n6 p; P! X
(+13.2%).
% q( b  k4 G" N0 m1 ?# [6 N" H0 y3 B2 Z  M* H$ f
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth/ y8 k5 }  F  X
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
' r! q. T$ |5 v; r& N: i+ hfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are. _) a. _, x8 z5 O& Y4 m
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
, _# G7 \' V6 s7 Y4 F+ D0 cpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.  S$ e! t: c& w5 H. s* s6 E
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
) ]; U0 t8 X0 B1 @4 Twelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
( F' L! h9 B! `5 w  Q5 ~2 M5 o3 f2 a  ybalanced market."
1 Z" H8 o/ k- C1 y  \1 w% @3 f" v( h0 R3 z8 {# X
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
5 i! i3 ]1 X4 w& T7 v% L' xconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift. z0 g$ F8 M8 t9 @) O" \1 X
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
! W0 y  ^& c5 u1 b  jthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
& p# b  ], n# Senergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
7 p- h6 {4 B4 |  {6 v9 w# d8 T5 ?# \* Bmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
" |+ f! O3 }$ w% S+ L0 Lbreaking price appreciations.
3 z- H3 }4 ~7 L) F9 B# e
, z1 ?8 G; A+ u# i4 A) }    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding9 {4 w! T1 I8 x+ e5 O. ?/ z
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the' W- `5 Z& j' n& ?
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
$ R5 m: h/ \2 L: u8 ]
. E; t8 W, V6 o1 h' u) j6 E, A( c    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid% N1 Y9 W% x/ c7 T3 q
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
+ T' m0 U; r" Y- c4 I- s0 P( U2 Econfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off  b5 l% w, s, y; S- c  _* d
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
7 G* N/ J2 Z* }. OIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers- Z# ~; ~1 b! b) r2 p3 |2 r
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
4 x+ K* M/ r" A: ^3 eprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
7 \  }  {% e: A" J( t& u9 H2 }) I' _: i* S
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing) n8 M- E6 F2 Q) a# t
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and5 H* a$ O! o$ U4 V+ V
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
* s! y3 K0 `# Gare markedly different than those found in the United States.
) [- Z' Z! A0 ~" E5 q7 Y, t4 [% J, x6 @: H" P3 B+ Y& x- q
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the* N) P! y& z* f  l; a5 Q7 G$ Y
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
: J) ~: L, V3 [1 R3 ]favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the: l* B' ]1 a& L3 n+ U
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
! O- h# g/ ~( c; ^; @3 P  |affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the7 a- W) @) s8 e# x
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
7 P0 P0 [+ U7 t7 Saggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
4 Q7 L& f4 Y/ |/ |' hmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."* a. j* T* O' X  H" E! ]

0 V7 ^9 ^. p% H    <<! n" l5 f3 U! M9 V/ l
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
0 `# Y" A/ e- L& `+ h    >>
' H! F1 B( H  w- R( ^
2 t8 |% b3 y* {9 F! C& e3 C" u( d5 U    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in* V2 P  j' t& i0 o$ g& s6 v- o
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate, L- e+ T3 i4 k3 p1 m" U
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
* l2 C2 T& q( r7 ~0 A' Ilooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of# o5 T& W# L1 ^8 Z, J$ U$ V5 P8 v
renovations.3 H: M* u. \& r: G
  {2 z* b7 G4 {- Z0 o8 L9 w
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight' C" v( X- j  A8 X- Q+ j
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
: t: x! J8 }; c: u% qcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and. x7 ]) c5 T( {5 L7 e! `+ U+ n
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
& \7 y5 J  o3 O7 i' y/ Q9 w. V$ }" |; M8 I  I& F: Q1 x
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
/ W: C4 z! p: L4 o+ V/ a9 z+ Kslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the4 g" a& B( p; c+ F. p, J% r4 I" `
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new; u" T% c6 u, g! }9 k% T8 m7 O  N
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores2 c' ]; o. u0 `3 c" k- g
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes. Z  W. _$ d# ~+ K  d  e5 R
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.: N; k1 [* v" A! F* r9 l9 B# D

* Y/ V8 F( U6 |: s# K% b    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
8 q4 K! E" w8 {/ \" }6 r7 O, Nconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
) @% R8 k4 N% ?( E; x$ y2 Ghomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers( v. }7 P7 c% ]( a
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian, ?) b& V2 q/ m
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
0 ]% A. o" Y2 |, s3 w0 i% r% [  z& xbuyers with more options when looking for a home.; b4 ?- j" M( y9 e

! o6 Y4 u" v9 v  x    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
+ _+ n  [2 ?% _% F# u" X, Iamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
" U% z8 \' l/ ~. a% x7 Vpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
, Y2 `% Z3 |/ D% |as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
3 E7 \8 m; |6 r" ]8 Jfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
! b; O+ a0 [1 @; ~) k( U+ c6 c. ]+ z& B
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house/ S6 Z8 [2 d  q+ l( `5 Z1 j* S
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory+ C! u( k  f# z$ B; M
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
' L4 Z- _0 r. Y. E( q0 \$ Pfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,( h& V  J" l3 }" B
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the( r* I- k1 Q, b9 _2 h
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before" ]# o4 z. R# v. R% J
making a purchase.: V+ C) J) G9 s2 R
8 k; d0 B+ C8 U8 w0 m5 L* J/ f( `
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
- h( p, Y' a4 J: Y4 j" N) K6 ^markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
% S2 ^! x2 O0 w7 p+ w5 h$ a- qconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city0 ^+ S; C. m4 W2 Y/ o
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting% D: G2 Q9 _' {& ^" [0 f+ U
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
& d6 K8 ]/ q/ Qamenities.9 b9 Z* q' p& d8 B# m
0 t- U. m# m/ L' U
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels& P6 M. Y3 s1 u- _/ @) ]9 |! O
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand& w& L( V5 c9 q1 H( a# W5 T
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
! k0 m( M: Z5 ^0 Pcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been# H2 g3 @& J: B$ S) Z  U7 w
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
* J- A; C0 e8 a' Qresidence, rather than for investment.
& J2 s; A5 f# |; D# {1 r0 w, H8 S3 z7 }; Q
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
8 w- A7 V& Q7 W# w- f# whouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
2 {; X2 E1 f+ x" i8 ]in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer5 y9 y- g2 ^( C
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
2 U( J4 }- T7 Lrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
/ ^3 S: S9 f* i! \the market.
: M# |2 Y$ f7 F9 y2 {6 X* b# R
2 {# E  Q8 t! b; D    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
% p$ ^" ^) Z& f: v# L7 r7 RJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
. x0 I9 L/ A) p/ [4 E5 mAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring8 B: Z! G8 y" p% s
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
+ v4 E0 D* }  n7 T. Z2 Fto the shortage of available inventory.1 {. C0 W  L; Q9 n8 c0 q
* n1 g! F9 t" H5 `
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its  F( I% {( C% F2 x4 x
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
. U. z0 G" ~: Q; l! Y. }vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
* Y1 C. _& o1 Z* k( hstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
! E7 O& ]; H& {2 K
7 U# i% l% }: t4 b" @    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
" c/ D7 F9 X  tin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
4 y1 `& v) k% W3 U3 K2 I9 o# nunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
2 Q4 d1 |& {) s5 }8 [pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
1 ]9 C; O) r- s! o; aprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
8 a* O8 l9 E# C' jseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
0 ?& g" L' R1 x) ]- _, hbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
) W9 [6 ]/ C" G% S) @
9 m* ~( l7 b! s3 M
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
0 t$ }2 ]8 z) zas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton' |/ B9 R6 o. c
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
9 q! I  M& O& o3 ~/ s8 p% Z& Rmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices/ [) y5 a' F$ @! P
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve, V0 W6 [" B" F% l& j* L1 ?7 D
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
3 ~# E+ K% Z. u0 L) q. D9 `% xtowards the end of 2006.
    $ B! I7 n- s, w2 [  I8 C

1 R( ]7 A* N6 c$ s6 x# d; z, OWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
2 D) P9 Z6 z1 }; hinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable/ Z/ J( \9 `/ }
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse( V. G4 @; _  e! s9 A2 W
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
7 m- E* B3 N3 lforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
% [: F! f  V# Y( I- H( r9 mpressure on tight inventory levels.
+ M/ [, f& s3 b5 A9 y  {
7 Z3 k: b( ^; ^' I* ^    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic! O& S/ ]# O8 I
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people: T5 E8 p1 E& q( v8 N* x
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
, N( q9 R# l) s( G7 M8 Cwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
! G; _8 \% q: j; }/ ~) q- mfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
! y. j- V6 k/ D6 k2 t+ b+ `1 q  n8 r' \" n' K
    <<
$ H8 e0 c+ t' w( n, I2 \& ]8 X      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006: r8 r4 s9 T' u" s

) J5 ?% b8 X/ _5 t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 V6 a! d* y% s* L: U( h                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
1 A" {0 e: U" [    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 ~; H" o+ Z' A" T, W                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3& z. ?' s3 l) J: a+ }" ^+ m9 S9 S4 ~
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
3 D5 S6 e# r, K- N% u/ I, \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, N6 ^7 _* {9 ?! ~0 w    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000) ?* {9 e$ f9 L$ s( i/ ^& W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 q; ]7 h; X2 |- z. s, F8 p  T% ]
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000, C- }: D4 V" r: K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# n0 J% z, [+ L4 e) ]    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000" _0 u3 c$ ?" `# q3 g# W8 {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Y0 Q+ k: }# r5 ^    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -* E+ k% r8 k/ @+ ^* }0 J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; Q2 o, D/ g9 D
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333" ?6 ^/ \; y, I1 t7 [0 t
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  m" X6 Z$ p- N* t5 O- u! h8 Y
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
3 }4 k9 @/ ]# b) Y6 U+ r2 i8 n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ \) D* i1 `4 w6 D1 A
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
8 c# h( C) ], b0 D! U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 E' |% q1 R- f    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
7 a( x* p8 K1 D* b: V3 \1 V    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ Z1 @" E5 I9 l) {    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
  K# e. @* _9 u  W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( N& t- L5 A# ^& G/ u0 ^% g    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
5 @- {& H" ~7 W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 N3 y: s3 i2 Y- G' J    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500: l6 G: r6 t5 I; P4 V$ k. H( }' k
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" P7 f  H) j! Y% f4 v    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389: `5 T# }1 \2 Z. }- \" i6 s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  Y8 m9 ^# I& T6 B
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714. Q* ^* O- T/ ]6 I1 v" `1 l5 d1 h
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! q" h4 R+ q' n
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500+ |' j7 x4 n. K2 t2 p6 Y# F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% d1 r+ P0 ]% u$ \* I, e    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000' J" [5 p6 w4 h0 E/ h! \7 X3 r4 e. N$ R+ P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* x) i" e# c$ J5 C3 U    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860! y; [% @, }; x
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 Q1 c4 g. C8 _1 N2 d
$ ^7 z, ?$ @* V) Q    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ r0 h& o' u8 c2 @+ E7 k                               Standard Condominium
) Q* E0 E7 T% g( J8 s6 g    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 H2 O% h! m3 }. f7 [$ K                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
' G& M/ ?" e; K) U5 A8 Z2 G    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
; e& r3 c* N, R  O& b+ h* o; a; t    -------------------------------------------------------------
% @9 l6 V0 b; M6 c/ |    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%" ]( j. P2 v4 S# C
    -------------------------------------------------------------- L7 l3 u6 G# I; T' L
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
# i  R/ ]; v5 s5 ^; R% t    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 _; G2 B& C$ J% E# B7 K    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A% i9 c# e2 c8 `  B
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ D$ F8 j0 h# U: r! R$ H, e; v! q
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A  }8 ]& w$ V, V5 ]* D# X
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 H3 E7 o% X& c: I
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
- @. E( V4 }; y6 T. i    -------------------------------------------------------------( j  {  S: h% w# T4 U
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
2 _+ Z; m( L8 r' U5 k8 ]    -------------------------------------------------------------
( A' B7 c5 S7 y7 y) D    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%  k- O5 q% ^  q, W5 [$ L- `: }1 i2 P
    -------------------------------------------------------------' E9 G6 N2 n+ F; s/ q' f9 O* b
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
$ C# o; ?% C. b  b, k$ t/ e    -------------------------------------------------------------
# T0 M9 r# b3 j3 x% M    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%" D) I. o  [7 F- m: r
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 x9 H$ t2 ?" [0 Y  b" c
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
! c! E( L8 e$ y1 c8 z  Z" D" R4 H    -------------------------------------------------------------! |8 V6 ~) q. e( M1 u
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
2 W; A1 G  Z4 n; R    -------------------------------------------------------------( d8 n3 L3 f! u; T& n$ j. _) w" M7 m
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%5 q3 }: ]4 ]3 ~, U$ n4 k
    -------------------------------------------------------------) G) H8 s5 P) Z; Y7 x# q
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%, d7 D- E4 i5 N5 {5 j7 M( F
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  Z' j4 z6 X& Z    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%# |/ b4 ^2 G8 \& \6 x# Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------* c$ F( L) T+ I) H: A
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
9 F; e- j3 q+ A. j    -------------------------------------------------------------7 f) b. E, V& w) w
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%. M, |  r% Q& d
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  n4 y* L/ {0 r1 x/ V. O+ b- U    >>
% u: G0 F4 ]2 W9 r% Q( I3 z, A# r- `8 Q
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined4 ^: i6 N! s. i- P) `* K
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
$ ?  ], ~: P0 E8 m1 }8 DJohn and Victoria.9 @5 q! n5 u) B9 Q" e

3 z; V, f* [/ U; }  u5 h    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most8 J, {' q1 d, y2 @+ d! n' ~
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
! A' q5 M3 Z- O! m0 lhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
+ `: `  g$ ?& w6 v& U9 B9 Sreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
5 e; ~& L0 Z% ftrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities6 k1 b( ?5 k5 t" [$ t$ B# ]
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is" V; j0 k. d1 O
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
+ R, Z$ t* L& e% g% `figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable5 M' m' j% `% |. a, I  z; [
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
0 N! F$ \8 Q  m6 J; ~3 zNovember 15, 2006.
1 L: D7 r, v/ f$ b2 M0 d( I+ x# E3 w    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
0 r" S4 ^9 A5 G7 S) U9 t$ U8 e" \fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
/ j6 L7 y: @* Kprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
/ q" e' i% |' h, i2 D3 H% N  Lavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-5-6 07:17 , Processed in 0.164956 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表