 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ' V% e7 g! a) k; L% l: m7 y) _" r
N1 S& x M, v& g
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
. I. h( L& ]# ~; X+ m4 I( |8 E* R8 G d% ?# i c9 w! I5 ^
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market6 e$ {" G' w" r, W( G& M+ `
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third) D6 R+ h' x# p9 _+ t" a
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic$ p( `2 t6 k9 {# V1 o/ G( ^
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit2 }* Z+ L. c6 y
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
3 i2 }) {1 u T- O- Pmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
7 B% p7 C. U8 v7 p5 v) y3 x- oQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
& \5 V8 b: Q9 s! WLePage Real Estate Services.* s* B+ d c' {* U5 O1 G5 _
/ @/ N7 v6 _; {) t$ E
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
& @/ \, r( O3 [6 |+ Rare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
' y+ g% D9 h4 }, H8 S8 b' Bconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and4 L2 b4 `8 X. D0 w9 q
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the+ I& d- W: B8 w- W2 m* J0 D- w
residential real estate sector." P5 Y+ ]) |9 n/ k5 T5 Z
" t- n' {, \* a; z5 w
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
~$ j+ j/ l4 x( z1 m/ r* @0 xoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
$ v$ @8 t8 |1 Ayear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562: n& ~9 i( r' `0 e4 L+ L, J
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
) s+ B5 T$ j! U5 t5 x2 L7 r* T! h4 G(+13.2%).0 p! @: x: X- I7 K" A+ J4 Y- J, ?
* ?! z1 z: R( L% Q
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth! t& p' |* T) l' C7 R' y
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the( I1 [' z3 ~2 r0 i9 I
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are4 Z( d N9 |& F. j4 z: ]
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
# P2 J, v1 E4 z! k# upresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
8 E' {, ` [+ k- v/ F. m"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We# F8 _2 v$ N, ?/ t
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
9 ^" t) U2 j8 i/ s* q8 [( ^0 Lbalanced market."
" y+ R* t+ o4 U" D/ n% q% t) O9 y, Q1 r- H
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices, s# g7 U/ t1 p+ U; U+ E7 V
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
* K/ z; ~& B; r' {# L' Dto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
% v0 k5 b3 x6 |4 J5 Rthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core5 E/ O0 H# }1 H# G' _
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
/ W' [2 O$ ~' ?manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record- x7 h- S% I |0 F
breaking price appreciations.% i( @. R- y* |) y7 m0 [
1 B; h" t$ J1 e; s; l9 k
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
: c8 a3 w1 B" e2 a0 H- qeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the, R! R q* w7 S1 w! w5 A- W
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.) I+ g8 Z7 n* c$ d3 {( ?+ ~0 @: e
9 y# R/ N- U( c5 i In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid9 V6 X3 |$ e, Q
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
! B8 O5 h! ~ i5 q- q9 @confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
( V5 s7 T, T% Z( @7 O9 tslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
0 S O% J5 P7 @' w3 oIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
! A* g ~6 i) _; Q r. `9 Lgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of* Y E9 d( L. V6 j* O4 V1 X
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
* s* G7 @, _! Q, w
$ l8 Z( v" l0 _- f$ t6 o9 } While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing& ~+ v6 W0 m0 E# [4 N4 h5 Y
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
2 i/ Z6 u- `- u, X9 z, Rfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
1 O% N) p9 e' ]4 G5 V4 k% O6 `( ?; Rare markedly different than those found in the United States.
1 K8 e% V$ `& O* |* d3 G5 e7 d- ^
5 y1 I: } i$ b7 x4 `9 j Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
( f( J' i. {* q$ @& l# RAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
8 L1 o8 A4 `6 p4 Hfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the; w& d' B) A- d! J7 F+ Z9 u G
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
/ m4 L! q& Z \8 maffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the% o, L- V* U6 G6 H! p [3 F
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
/ j. @5 }! C* yaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
6 u8 A" y% a% \+ ?mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
( w' W9 f7 t% L; }! G
& m0 x( z$ }6 f <<
; k+ h0 @7 R$ I/ e' n6 q( ~6 ^8 ] REGIONAL SUMMARIES
W, d! |" F# c2 h1 v; Y+ c r8 S >>6 ~, [& z6 S0 |! c6 s' T; m, x5 h% N
' U- y) b. Q+ g Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in! f) n8 D7 p' d' t
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate$ k* [( ~. B* S0 y7 M8 ?, Y
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
) ^" T" \" N% Rlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
; \+ X1 p. }3 t2 n: [5 hrenovations.) k9 z. i3 v% H. }
$ |9 ]2 x& @4 ?3 g' h# J7 Z, L
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight7 Y0 I e/ T! S1 e
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
: `+ @3 N) J5 _3 O# ycompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
7 ^* N( k. e) a5 BSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.2 z q5 j( e6 x H6 |
, `# _3 d: U3 }: F2 {9 z9 [
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
1 J/ k* K- e& g9 A* L+ vslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
, Z7 e; c! B$ Zquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new* U* ~ h2 `2 d H) }. S; n( b0 i
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores" w( q5 \9 S/ I) j' |& p
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
6 E1 G1 S% J+ Q/ I3 F ~and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.. i1 t- c. P v \5 W& Q+ J# j; @
/ @3 W2 A9 O# X In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
# q# y! c/ N: M9 x$ {$ Cconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
5 ~8 d+ g( L+ R+ u% k! u2 j8 Phomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers2 I0 s4 M$ Z# s9 Y u" F
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
5 U' s7 U9 ~8 ddollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing) b$ _* _9 N* \1 @6 Y
buyers with more options when looking for a home.; [1 _- n* D5 S4 _( r8 m! `, V
% W* }3 u+ q6 J* t8 i4 e- A7 n
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
9 w. ]2 Y$ `$ v+ Samong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
( z; B/ d3 Q6 L0 Q& o1 R: J% _7 gpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,2 H* l ]) K% |% I6 a
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last! E O* V* ? X+ \9 o/ [
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
0 Q: n& H& s4 X; I
& @* N3 C! e# M6 J! j$ Y9 G3 F Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
) C5 K* U$ q q. Q& N% lprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
Y+ L; E8 u/ a3 |" t3 q0 Slevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
& Y- R/ S% n8 k3 \first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
( c) _/ M& P) W9 @6 H/ Cwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the+ u. b" T( l; q3 q9 I9 ]
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
- f! K+ R* q4 Z$ r1 ^9 mmaking a purchase.
/ w8 A4 L, ~+ P% d6 H& A1 P9 n8 R( f9 {7 M1 c6 e9 j- h/ p, N
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing W) J4 E* x7 q4 n
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong N7 x+ n6 I e3 i5 p: @' V
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city0 d3 x. T. \( h
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
: I! d6 W; a, e" Cattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
2 Z& f& u7 W9 H# eamenities.7 r& e8 v1 G+ _& V+ n( `
1 ]- k2 N T1 ?! k The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels1 a( \( \) A* n, ]+ H
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand7 Q6 T$ T" N1 a9 q% `. I
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
& U9 Q2 q8 e1 m. Acontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
- P, a' ~/ O" ~5 Udriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
# K- Q8 m% y/ [6 x) k5 t2 q( sresidence, rather than for investment.) f* s6 ^! i( U# g
3 \/ u J5 z1 B& q* I6 U/ L: \ The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as" h; z. r1 J3 ]) t4 t: ]
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
' K- o3 p$ @5 I' zin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
- c$ s, z5 y3 v3 D+ j2 wconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization5 K8 _* S7 F5 [/ I
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter' E8 A, s+ t2 [: z$ F+ { i! x) w v
the market.
5 t( H3 K. S( ] q5 D1 {6 s/ B! y
- v/ t% w" Y# X In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
7 K, T# }% w9 N! a/ @July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
( p' r& }+ W8 q- d1 N. rAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring% O- B* c" |& G; W B
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due7 D6 K/ H) O% L( t
to the shortage of available inventory.
8 C3 ~( |9 t$ l- W* J2 H
" w" p1 d8 }6 |0 W Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
6 F4 [6 V7 c9 z, A3 K' Hmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains9 ^% k# I7 v9 X" G7 Y' }, M
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
0 y% K6 U" }; j2 Wstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
9 V/ {& m+ j5 W+ W# W5 R5 `6 J: y7 H% f/ m/ Q0 y3 d
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases& F3 R/ c9 z+ k! B
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low7 k, Z8 T6 }1 @" @( t3 n: ]
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
' r3 b& |+ A0 _7 gpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring+ f# b' C' _! e( k
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
9 [3 d7 w) X/ N5 \; h6 q8 P* Oseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as" w4 Y1 o5 h: \7 D
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
1 z" E, |9 v: c) D: \. e7 `' J. q0 v8 ?' ]
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
4 h _+ M7 v$ o) n5 i& Ras activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
1 @7 _$ A, J: h" e1 J: Tremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,0 n2 u" e7 y5 s
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
+ h% G( [$ C4 f0 z, oincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve( q8 P e% S. ]# n6 w5 K) r+ g- c
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly F4 }! ^2 C# Y8 j8 L" C
towards the end of 2006.
* A3 P4 f$ S1 U6 b4 {* c! E- K
& R( z) n, K9 z0 ~1 ?; VWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
) e1 n7 h5 w" f/ ]2 Iinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable8 v% ^( i' M( @' b! R3 b/ Y3 ]
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
# k" C# M4 |4 o) X' H: A) k+ fgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
' C9 e% v$ U) c/ t+ ~8 R' ^# [ xforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added8 L2 Z( S/ v8 d$ u! z0 D% L
pressure on tight inventory levels.
1 X: k$ V4 r3 M' R) A$ F1 Y8 C: I8 X) |! ^/ w6 e
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
: B1 G3 q9 @6 u- |6 lfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
( s+ G, w4 ?6 ?into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
- Z# M7 J" t( N* |. i5 Y$ ]while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
- H1 J9 P5 w2 P6 x' zfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.: P7 S+ w7 V5 {3 F5 L+ p" K3 _
@: v% E8 Y' U3 r9 m
<</ N$ v5 [& e2 d8 f: b
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20068 z' F6 p! f1 Z2 L# ^
$ e; `, B6 b+ }
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 Y" M% ?* R( x8 B Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
/ _' d+ I! B4 H9 Y1 o5 }+ z -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 J6 [. A- P( \( \
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
, \( P* _6 y; q6 ~$ G4 H Market Average Average % Change Average Average/ N6 {3 [6 A5 d: W4 @, K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! t5 R! k5 \- [ Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
+ B d& T1 p9 ^2 O* o0 K -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 c# w/ H0 J' {3 z8 w
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000) E0 Q& u+ y3 z) ?2 e: \# h9 l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 j" c7 k3 _5 @6 R. U+ f# M* Z- N Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
6 L6 S$ w, {) u9 w! \4 I -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, k6 g4 ]+ B& ]0 O7 v d Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -* ]3 b1 j; [0 `# d6 g( ?7 Z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 V5 s0 n8 W8 c& W% { St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
0 U; H% b* k( z- l -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 a; u+ M( q/ C* c. J
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
6 \. Z3 ^" {8 y t7 w* n) _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 C5 F+ F) Y; r& R
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
, d- v' J- w5 J/ A -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( y7 i$ \9 [- L% K! P- I6 B Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250 ~4 i+ |1 [5 g/ D; W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! `$ O5 x$ x. R x
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
6 ?! w/ _5 }6 r5 [& U: m) d. j$ q8 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- C7 o5 p# f% d6 b# u$ P. u Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707! H: r% }- A5 C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 ?% L3 z2 N% a( r Z9 X: R
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5005 c$ r; V* F: V3 M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( J& I' ?9 o9 ]; K2 @) v" ~* ~
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
K. x% a5 _& O* e7 _9 a -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ v% X/ S- |) a) b1 Z4 k' m Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714/ A' I" e7 W/ g* t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( n8 Q* v: `: g Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
( s/ d% @+ C3 q" m* q' k1 c -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 C& Q0 w$ k# ~" g4 j
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
: U- h+ x0 T- i' f) ^$ @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------( n. x. O6 j7 C& m% Z
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
( |* W- F& n1 n( C6 S" @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: V" K( ^$ I1 {' _. i- o6 A! j/ Q$ \% U+ K. J9 b, V, g {' {
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 c* u4 }3 e+ |0 J# k Standard Condominium
9 _. {5 m2 M* e7 t" @! x5 L: { -------------------------------------------------------------
! F E: \; s2 ?7 X. p: i/ B2 O 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo5 @* L& L/ B' y) }$ U5 X
Market % Change Average Average % Change
c, J( p- B [2 E9 R -------------------------------------------------------------
6 O9 {* _; E: \! o& i8 J R# }: y1 ? Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
9 X8 ~- Q& ^5 m5 y4 T -------------------------------------------------------------3 v& A8 ^" y. g7 }
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
% p- B9 M# p& C1 N" M9 G -------------------------------------------------------------: l b7 {* V* j2 u3 ]
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
~* }, w; @4 ?. | -------------------------------------------------------------
7 r- ?6 T/ \0 b! F Saint John N/A - - N/A, L( V- w5 K5 D1 E" D X6 `' D
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ j' ^5 v8 g! q3 U St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
: g/ @( I. g# u -------------------------------------------------------------6 y( W' h4 u1 j8 A% |* S" @9 [
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%% c. T/ n C& { B" v6 X" q9 e
-------------------------------------------------------------( R$ u. ~& M6 ~. b; G8 ~& q
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
A: U! U- M6 e1 l7 }1 C -------------------------------------------------------------+ i0 c# U1 X( b# d
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%% I W( m' M' t2 i% F
-------------------------------------------------------------5 D! k" F/ A. o6 c# c$ C( {
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
+ Y, J) R- o0 f5 [3 w+ V -------------------------------------------------------------% d' {* O! Y/ w" L9 N6 k" a( g, C
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
: m; ^& A& G* W4 Z6 r -------------------------------------------------------------
: j7 n) H$ g9 i) i; h6 s Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%' _9 Y5 l1 L6 N7 K8 W* R
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 [9 \) L5 `6 B+ w Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
% L7 C$ ^1 q( Y) C7 I -------------------------------------------------------------
$ T% T% o, Z. \8 @; P; N* G Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%# z' o. m! Q( U+ e6 h8 s% K
-------------------------------------------------------------3 W9 W4 F4 G [. M5 K
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%; ]8 X' ]! x' L
-------------------------------------------------------------" e( `! _( a3 M F8 V3 @/ F( E
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
" p2 R1 Z* a: V7 }6 F) h3 t3 o$ ~5 I; r -------------------------------------------------------------
! ]1 w9 Z3 k- V: V- s" l5 a National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
% h5 C, k, J4 Y8 Q5 {# L -------------------------------------------------------------' h) D& a u$ P4 ~0 i8 D5 \
>>/ R8 e' a* r6 `! T$ B9 j
6 u. \4 s3 ?2 R6 F0 A! h) j0 [
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
+ f1 R/ e; U# min the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint$ Q+ b' D, v6 _
John and Victoria.) q# j, B& F1 @+ [. j! v
& j, x! w/ F& l! D- j) k( L5 ]
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
& U/ d8 e; ]* h& y$ K! Hcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of$ I5 C: E. ~9 l+ u; U4 W
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
9 \) d; L: ~) H! K, P$ Oreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price0 n$ h7 \# w0 U% b4 f
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities$ K6 o: J' Y( h2 `/ `- M
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
9 f' l2 @. V7 j. O* e# Davailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
/ @4 Q5 u E& _) y w2 `6 wfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable; `; e- [% c; M1 r
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on2 Y2 b# v8 x# e& _9 s* j* W( I
November 15, 2006.
" ~7 j t5 [& Q& V$ Z Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
6 U; Y h4 G1 Q) Z0 s# ?6 k% mfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge: P- D5 H" w4 H: i
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is. [ U; @* L- d. O( V/ c
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|