 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
: [9 c- U# a" l
3 w/ F7 ~1 @( P. }% [/ Q- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -0 f- h6 g5 z/ h4 a% ?
# J* T9 i0 ~0 P1 m4 z! ]
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
3 ]5 D g% B) `" W6 N2 W! Q2 hexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third: m& |; v+ @, W- U
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic: K) C$ [' u) J$ j
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
3 J8 C' ^7 U1 g$ D8 {price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and& j1 ~# V/ I3 J/ z
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,, z2 |( e+ o1 d, u# d
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal; `# \- n& Y" e8 N
LePage Real Estate Services.1 ^/ k6 V! e- _5 k! X. Y" B
; f, |2 f- s! \% b% M; n3 b Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
, [5 o* I! O6 @( Z6 d, Y1 Dare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
: F1 d. B) D2 p4 ~- `conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
9 n/ S) o, u' Z. e1 Asound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the1 t, H3 o# ~/ U$ r3 o
residential real estate sector.$ y3 h( N. _' {! K" ?
' x! U1 \7 Z# n+ s
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
' ]* b6 \* N \% Joccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)6 B. ]1 C& y$ R! ]
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
" l9 A, ]7 ]7 x! W(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
+ |7 n* ?: s- _& l8 c" T$ ~- N(+13.2%).. o' ?7 y# ]! m. y
4 p* _ I0 n! P; x: c
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
7 r- ^" T1 f+ l# o3 B" \. ~' K3 Hduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
! \% x0 g6 U8 g% W& d0 Mfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
9 c; d$ H$ A; Dpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
2 n4 V" V7 F$ N2 I! X" mpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
% S7 d9 c9 G, D0 |' ["Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We3 u. [& c [( x1 ~) ]
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy* W, \0 v9 Z7 k! F& y3 y' ]( z* h
balanced market."
- ]( S6 [) k; h3 ]: l7 O M5 z1 N0 J' a
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
$ R# Q! N% ?5 t: {; bconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
9 r9 l4 |! S% q9 k* a, oto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued0 u7 x8 W, M f4 M2 z
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core+ B1 t* o" s9 ^: J K
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
5 }+ ^ J0 X' k: f( r: X4 ~0 B1 Wmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record2 k# J" H4 L8 w2 d0 b2 [" |& S& ~
breaking price appreciations.1 y4 T4 c$ r, _! {! p, @: K
) M! d: u5 w/ f3 p! o* Q8 H e- }! ` Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding3 \5 c* ?% T! k: j! [% Z
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the: Q( G4 c6 E( s/ L! J3 G; g! t# x
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
2 Y+ {3 L" H) Y; h5 e/ `) J% c0 E2 a4 }' Y+ @+ g
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
3 l) @% w* x) p ~! F9 Jeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
5 y- h" u& O9 T6 i4 G# }" n% Hconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
' F( [0 e* b1 t' y. M9 e# wslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
9 P$ @( H( U! N! ?In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
2 z0 k0 d9 K; i1 C# Mgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
! \7 b. }( _3 L7 j L1 l* Y6 wprice appreciation when compared with 2005.3 R B7 c9 T% e# z6 E
# w1 p J6 C% k6 C/ Z' F% K( z2 e% U K
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
) R. r- Y `8 C+ {$ [0 F- W A$ hmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and1 V( ? W8 g8 `2 t* ?+ @
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
4 W% J! x2 t% M m* o, Qare markedly different than those found in the United States.8 {: N4 I. x- F# M' e
7 T! ]/ y1 j4 h R: K Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
7 ~& {0 I1 c' Q* n2 nAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's, f$ \0 H3 M7 n' m& L: X) S! J
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
( l9 ^) m& b, z1 Srelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general" N: q5 `1 |$ v, J. _% p
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the5 W( k. l+ w" h+ y& I' S
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and1 y* V$ h( @# g6 r
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
1 {8 T- Z8 Y% j4 jmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
5 r/ C' x' k }& c! |9 Z4 u4 J) r
<<2 P7 ^. e0 k" |" M# l% @. B9 \
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
1 w* F# X5 W- N0 j; V6 n# y4 t' J >>7 Q: A& N$ H8 r! g& C
/ S7 ?! N! M2 g: _) h8 P Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in+ Q& L+ p; E4 ]9 Q" u/ o
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
4 C' \( A/ z* j8 H( i0 ?of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time2 U9 ]" F" [8 N( l, Q
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of5 y( o1 o- }3 }' O5 A1 a c; E
renovations.
% M. \* g( U( r6 q$ s* ^* a" y- i9 ]2 n5 W: n
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
2 f& W! m& u! y2 z6 mincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation7 i9 R0 o+ x3 o& U5 L$ O/ d# [+ s+ A; i
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
( L: b2 n. r) B$ m# i' ~September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.* W# b% N" O, b; J; x1 t
6 U' g" [# t+ B& l8 M
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
" f n1 m o" J7 s: Pslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the) C' z" G/ W* ] G5 u
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new$ @* I( O" l9 S1 l) G
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores- v3 K, Y- @; w& d9 U# w
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
1 T9 N4 V: p0 V' Yand are instead opting for more affordable housing options." r9 M6 H* B' S# f
( m2 R2 F( I- Q8 J
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced9 [9 }) z7 B+ R5 k
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
9 b# _, P. f: m+ k' ~homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers# ]# n! K( B% W- T+ n# j& `
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian C+ E8 s9 {$ x, @1 X4 J( U
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing$ ~! K: D% K" |8 k, F' ^
buyers with more options when looking for a home.0 Y% }3 C8 a$ r; O$ c
% z# ]6 E0 @' P( m a# \( m
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
1 h* J! D; l9 ]# Bamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes" n9 k6 p( K: U% o3 L5 G
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
: M) G |- b6 [7 M/ f2 ~as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
, g" i0 k, x! t$ Sfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
9 Z3 I& ^0 c8 {8 G: u- C
$ N( D8 E( d/ H; ~5 \0 R& I Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
9 n7 ?! S& S3 n$ i0 V) ]prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
* m- Y" G0 R }levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting' l) _; g. s! @* k( v7 @5 `
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,! j# a+ X8 a+ {4 F6 `4 v; D7 e
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
9 A: v+ y$ @2 E+ S3 Z7 S% x0 n$ {pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
* N; E/ R5 {" z& }: t6 [making a purchase.
6 G! ~8 z5 ~/ K. S- E6 {
& T" y; m6 c( \: t7 u# n$ L Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing+ Z& F5 n+ s8 Y7 T) e6 l
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong7 C4 Z* p2 a* y- v4 b
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
8 n/ v# H6 h4 b2 Y8 d5 K+ Dcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting9 U" `% E$ |; R
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown( g3 Q; [, ]% D) L8 `
amenities.# O# R5 ]* i- |
! G. H: z* `' T% k The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels5 M# T+ L1 g% A8 B" V4 ^+ b
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
1 [6 ^& X) g, {+ d: w* a$ J- W" macross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
" d# J. } S6 X5 j1 Rcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
/ x3 ?$ h) Z' |) S9 kdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
" H2 O. i1 T m( Z0 xresidence, rather than for investment.
a$ d2 \( t" ?# h! }% F6 `2 r
+ Z" u9 r7 ^) \! y The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
/ k2 a2 l+ }; H% ~7 I8 A8 V# Ihouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
7 z; E3 ?' y1 n m1 n, p) c, i% qin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
9 M6 p& ?& u3 m, Y0 V* B4 Xconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization0 w% I% G+ z" {! o' ]
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter' e x+ P0 {. X8 X
the market.
, l# ]* j, \( i+ Q+ i5 Q0 }& m7 ]7 [0 s- H5 Z- `2 j! J
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
" M/ ^# l- p8 zJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In# p0 q! W/ v+ C* C
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
7 F/ @% _* w. b4 t, d% a fmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due% f1 Q/ {$ g* P3 J1 L1 G3 ]
to the shortage of available inventory.
. M: L8 p8 M- g( G, J) A( r0 f9 s' I. A6 e" L% z
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its8 E4 P- ~! a- g( D v/ V3 {
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains% q1 u! p3 c! o+ N
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses- x* i X. f3 T% p! [) C- A
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.' d: X. }% g5 ^) Z" E' G' C" L
& g2 j1 n* n- Y Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases! q0 O+ q( J( x! d R: ~
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
/ b0 s$ @$ }. Sunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
; L5 b9 I% R$ ]4 q( M/ |1 w$ u+ Jpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring! X" _! h) S* P. m4 _7 s& |
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer2 W3 s: M& p t( T7 D+ `( s# m) p
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
1 e' k7 e1 D8 m" Y- d+ S) ^! G. Cbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
7 F0 d5 q2 O! L) }* F' I: P/ V' r# l3 f6 p9 ?
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter/ _7 m' F r) `' x& |$ e
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton3 X8 M6 `/ J9 ]+ T+ d, p6 e
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
5 o3 I) `7 ?. Y2 ?1 H4 o: ]" Qmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
( |8 Y ]/ R8 P" G- Lincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve' [2 M3 l: H9 Z# o. `) \
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
- V% P) Y: b1 E# T, ltowards the end of 2006.
$ W7 Y, |+ h& y$ J# @! O/ S5 p1 H% P
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of+ ~; H8 A- t- ^% R0 F6 r/ k$ l
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable: K" U2 |! h/ l* M8 U# D! l
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse1 h1 ?( p; ?5 [
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to0 @7 o/ V; K: [4 y- {6 s6 b* |
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added; h- }; h1 X+ ]* v; e# R" g- Z
pressure on tight inventory levels.
0 S3 h( R5 X6 ]. ?9 f# n c4 q. z2 R: N9 L
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic$ Z' f2 e0 ?4 i( f/ Y: P% Y
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people5 Z$ K( M- ^* E! m0 P
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
9 R3 X2 E; J% N' i" T( a/ d* @# Xwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching4 ~; B: F* d4 Y, t9 @
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
7 K) V% m* k h# i, g" h3 w, E" P
<< n2 p! I, r) L% }
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006" }$ |( i% W8 l" \# A' N( T3 {" K
" k) c& ?7 ?3 q+ l' L3 G7 d) k -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' X# t7 v; P: V8 @' X Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
1 A# T$ f8 C1 Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 v) Q/ R% I) I9 k
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
# l1 E4 T. ]3 w0 D" L; p Market Average Average % Change Average Average% Q7 n- A3 ]! g* y( c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 ^3 G" p8 |! G# d$ {* q5 V
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000# G. p2 s; s* a+ y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 a5 B5 C! j$ D5 w; `# m) x Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
/ M+ F& K* `# x' S -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! P) N' o; Z$ h( o/ W Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
6 b3 B) N9 N, j6 z/ u+ h, V -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; u% Z& R3 C9 `6 ]/ H, R Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -% \$ r0 m1 Y, j8 K, O+ n5 ?0 j# b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) U3 l0 Q1 b" |' c. X St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3332 l0 w' K2 y4 J1 R# U& e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ d$ `8 p& _0 f
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583/ k+ b8 L4 _3 S4 V( r* Y$ @' R: ], @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% a4 W0 w; D/ j Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
# K+ y1 Q% B. q. g8 ]1 l -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ f+ j: U1 K) ?1 M/ D
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
) s$ y+ W7 S" j; B1 O, S) @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------) S6 ^6 Z2 `7 Q* ^ T
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766. ~, v( u d# v5 Y) O# f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------3 H L# c& v" t4 s' m- b5 C8 l4 {
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707. I" O# L, ^( d% u7 f7 x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 A2 F* l* V/ r2 C, W Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500$ n5 R$ E- I3 Z6 M6 c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" G/ ~+ h0 `7 I2 }. R6 v% ] q
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389% ^: L& |& q0 O- n1 d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: s9 K- b% `( n0 B
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7145 z' O& p& n' o) k1 V2 |4 |) p* }
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, S O, ~$ v: W* m. `7 u: c
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
# ?; W/ R8 [9 \( c; v) \/ y L -------------------------------------------------------------------------
U7 l6 Y5 o% L Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0005 q8 D, i) b: X. Q( T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' k' c2 O9 F% R) f( J0 ^( T National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860# ~% ]5 u2 C ~' Z* m+ t* T% U
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# W3 H! Y3 z+ e1 q0 _( \
! o' M1 D( E. R2 X. P2 A -------------------------------------------------------------$ O5 Q+ U' C6 C& K) K( D
Standard Condominium" f5 e: o `* O# h b. N
-------------------------------------------------------------4 p* S+ l- Q6 k+ }' E' W4 R8 n
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
( s! X# w: X) H% v Market % Change Average Average % Change% g! p& a3 O" }
-------------------------------------------------------------% V. R# M" k, ~
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
/ `6 v3 v, j0 L% Q6 P S8 s) W8 d3 | -------------------------------------------------------------3 s3 ]( u5 F9 K# Q' x) |* D- m4 @
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%, M9 J% b I: Y2 _ F3 A
-------------------------------------------------------------' ~% `& u% P$ j; I
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
+ x- F. M9 U! q S3 R -------------------------------------------------------------2 ^6 ?1 e p9 F) R: w
Saint John N/A - - N/A
( y- B, b5 v7 f' D# a- u3 c -------------------------------------------------------------
; K& x! o' F. W. O0 K* @ St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
1 ?! g$ v+ d B: P! c% _ -------------------------------------------------------------
* l4 j8 k9 ]$ U Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%/ p2 w4 Z, S1 B* ^
-------------------------------------------------------------/ k Q8 A1 Y) d! P& u
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
# f4 L8 h& B* C: o/ r& O+ V -------------------------------------------------------------
0 l4 K* j. @, p2 ?* g! K" y Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%. x% P2 t2 S' A4 o
-------------------------------------------------------------5 r/ ^: J8 L2 w, }
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
9 D' [0 i8 }6 ~% P- g -------------------------------------------------------------+ z+ i) R7 b7 F& g( I; @7 S8 v
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
0 ?# C, _7 R4 e L -------------------------------------------------------------! {' F, s8 d4 m' x
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
! u. Q5 e3 M- z9 k' X -------------------------------------------------------------+ x9 f% n. n2 L
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%: G4 G7 w0 ~0 ~. J! T
-------------------------------------------------------------
( z* ?2 @$ Q' N, W9 J* c Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
* {0 ~ T! z3 i( M( J# [ -------------------------------------------------------------
# I. @! f" |0 e Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
. E4 f- }9 u$ K+ L+ j -------------------------------------------------------------
) ]+ ]! {. {" n) }+ \6 w Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
& ^+ p7 O3 M+ r7 w% }8 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------
- {! C q8 x3 W |$ \ National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
# b1 ?) s' ^' ]# h -------------------------------------------------------------& `" x% C0 q! a
>>
1 a2 @0 K+ _0 ~- e# J5 j* z" Q, r( u
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
, B3 D. B, ^. }* c* D# U3 uin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
2 F+ y/ `* H' F( C2 V3 b& W2 uJohn and Victoria.8 a$ `# x$ i. j& h. g
. h$ a6 Q1 O: d9 v' L" H The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
i; w8 H8 \6 Wcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of3 \% \) C* s8 ]. }5 K2 ]
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
U2 m% w' i1 S* W$ s! b2 @references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price1 ?0 M( j* v/ Q: [# W
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
- m: }& k7 D1 P% e4 tacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is' w3 B( g t) u8 o* U
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current0 F+ i0 j3 t/ b( K1 E: F
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
8 _1 [/ w! ~# jversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on, L, i7 l7 D- Y2 T7 b4 s. ~
November 15, 2006.( l* w- Z( d N s/ c9 z+ s
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
) s) o+ K1 n4 E; nfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge. Y& b W# a4 a8 W- |" ^
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is7 K3 C4 ]0 |' d* X3 q8 m
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|