 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
8 v2 W/ `6 b& t, ?0 u. ]2 c5 e) r7 `+ M3 p1 X0 p- N$ L% T
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -: p9 g# B4 l }" N1 v7 X6 n
; w. h# E6 C1 |
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
1 Z9 y3 @9 T9 m e0 c6 F& o. Oexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third3 f; ^2 e2 D5 T% P- J0 g3 o# E5 L
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
) M) I! N# N, @, m% oin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit0 T: U0 p9 l1 ?' i* E$ \- w M
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
. t ~1 L1 @& Z# j, Gmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
% ^- v) B& H% }8 g* @0 a3 zQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal. T5 L/ d1 d) T
LePage Real Estate Services.7 F( b% H) O$ Z5 P
* i) Z$ n2 C) R) y% L
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters1 ]: u. M- T4 d* |) q& ~, W
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic0 X" r# M- w8 z* @
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and) l; Y: @9 [' e4 I, I
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the( j# y% g+ Z7 t$ {. ~+ A/ L% o% G
residential real estate sector.; _2 H7 i* o1 [: R
) g' l) d& [# k
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
. X7 D4 _* K3 l) h( Z2 R) voccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
! b$ }) P) [7 K1 o! b$ v6 Eyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5624 N X9 G0 @& ~5 E; q8 w
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380- Z% z( r$ L) K: C. J6 h
(+13.2%).
/ T* _$ } Y) Z. l% d) x4 j$ X- n+ @; ^, f1 G$ T) E
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth0 P1 S S5 Z/ m4 H; l
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
9 i: [9 X5 @& Q4 k6 i! x7 ufrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
1 n$ }, Z% W: x8 J* Xpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
% L b$ C3 M" p1 X( G4 @president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
; I5 l1 n1 W1 R8 V# y& D! X"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
" P+ i+ j& V" jwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
% o( A/ n3 B" l g9 bbalanced market."
* t+ l' i/ D3 V9 H1 F" r) w+ j8 S( c- q1 a9 M6 f
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
5 ~, N1 E( m: Gconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift* I5 L2 n; G& _1 E
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
! U/ H. D6 ]- {6 D0 C# x5 ythroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
9 K5 x8 `/ o: N" u1 p$ genergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
! R7 C% i% [- H! amanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record7 M( b% N$ B- B
breaking price appreciations.) l2 A& j, C6 X7 w @! i
6 x" t( G; l- m Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding! h: H. s5 _# }0 K% C! f1 U0 v
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the. j2 D4 ?) |5 [0 D0 L
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed. e. N. ~0 j4 A
( _6 r4 c, U# `, d: y In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid, _" A( T5 B. {+ i' x+ q% ?
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
* T1 j; {. d( lconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off9 P. b6 C9 L3 o5 \
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.5 `! n# j/ L: h
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
, ~) o% w" [- a0 X4 `, m! U% Ogreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of2 J* a" F- {; o* j
price appreciation when compared with 2005.' l4 q8 w0 D3 h
5 S0 w! f+ m A+ ]0 W) @
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing5 E0 ]' D' a# R+ f0 H, L# m
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and. \$ o5 d2 D4 Z5 O" D4 i9 V% H
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada1 _. q7 n( O( Y
are markedly different than those found in the United States.- m5 S! B A2 D! U
$ `& L: L' G5 G4 a9 p2 s: C Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the2 }+ {3 ~# \. _' P. p
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
2 N' X1 V( R! e& Lfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the( |! [% S M1 S+ [" H
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general$ N- t8 H, l$ _
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
0 l, H- y+ \& @$ x8 p; k( b4 d _downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
! m! K" B0 r/ @$ Faggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization2 {, ?5 F7 O( M' |) G, z( h- F
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."1 P" Y0 j3 U8 f+ P7 k
# W6 o- e& X9 _0 E b) J; n u" G( V9 R/ n
<<! {( B6 v/ e3 \3 ^9 T( z( n
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
% {+ y1 m S# T+ [( N) L' o >>1 ]' ^4 l T# `' d
( W, y8 ?: c7 L4 w4 r) Z% ~# c Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in h" O5 g) x: P. \% a. C1 C
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate( |. v* a8 {+ Z; y4 w( s& U
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time& B9 R9 K3 k4 n. ]1 Q7 {
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of% r ]: T, {% m: D7 S: k2 u
renovations.. D' q' `, L: t7 D+ F3 d/ V
3 D3 ]0 p# w( f1 |8 W The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
; E8 M5 v' y) _' \' `, ]increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation! `- V7 m# w' V+ s4 p0 D
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
1 c: D3 b/ F, G: C$ m* ?; w$ hSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.& x+ h. C+ k+ H5 U' s; S
1 L" O0 l" h- b! R- \2 k, H; p* Y, e
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
2 i- E/ ]$ J( ?5 D5 i ]slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
& ^0 h! [. X% k: squarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
" H7 u$ T, O: I! w" p600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores) t q- W1 U; r) _! f; o
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
9 n! ~: J$ w: ~: nand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.; @: p3 D- T0 r
" u1 F1 F. ?; `) O& A
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
, G' o& u( S% k* fconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their& b2 o3 o: \# q% `0 y
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers8 j, b% a$ I' y. ?5 I
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
# k4 v2 z/ G3 t' N: ddollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing- l8 q, G3 A! \: R) R
buyers with more options when looking for a home.0 q3 T8 ^) x/ r1 m
) K n: C& b- r: b' E
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly" N- |! {/ u& T( x3 K- @( a
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
( {- ]; y6 D) o, vpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
0 K8 B4 M9 ]2 t" @& n+ S5 Pas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last; G- m; p. |0 B6 }
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
+ H" {' p6 v( L3 X- ^3 j
% e u' G0 U, T' g Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house0 w7 \. T" j) Q0 c" M6 r: u3 m
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
2 H' \; x7 \; [- blevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting3 Q% v5 i7 E- V% V% z2 v
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,( |( |: k, O* V1 u
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
0 B0 |) {" T; tpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
$ r& M) D1 ~1 z. w) v3 kmaking a purchase.6 v1 X c/ H; {3 `
! F! d$ S0 Z1 n8 H% C2 Q Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
6 D1 D7 v' s0 m' C. w, S1 Emarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong; I' Q' F6 g) L4 E: j1 L2 O1 U! O
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
5 t3 w/ t/ K/ fcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting6 k: d& e; ~+ d: K7 f6 T2 |- G* n
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
% X. p# R1 R" a; m+ w, i( C Vamenities.
l: w9 @' n. ~1 V& x+ M8 A
: e, ]! ?4 ?. b3 R; S n) w5 F The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
5 ]2 E) U( u$ g) Z8 sthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
) ]# U9 ^" r) y" p; c) o# `$ r- kacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
* r2 i6 V( `* K: e( Acontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been* y1 ^; Z7 [4 [5 k* ?
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
1 }- D% w9 G, j' Yresidence, rather than for investment.
. G2 c0 s }: T$ W: f/ c& _" i
' [' D: S/ e' M. Y: ` The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as( o) j$ U+ v" V4 U/ u) J
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
* [, j9 u( K; P8 ^/ A S/ y$ lin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
' o" G( b" F1 d O, nconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
U3 U$ W3 o$ h# G# d& p+ K+ r, e( Hrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
Z% F, D9 }$ F! K% e" xthe market.
( [& U. A' p& n8 V5 C' [
0 b3 d0 S' l; O In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through3 n% P4 p9 h; v( b4 H
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In2 F* |# P, u1 l$ \4 u H
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring# \$ R: W* g, p' v/ ~ i, D g
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
$ S& w e$ L L. Qto the shortage of available inventory.
+ ?' Y8 `( b8 c5 L0 |) G4 ?
; H! X6 ~2 |0 I; F( C, y$ X Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
9 @; M7 y3 C& x. H( W- E p" \+ Smomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains2 h0 ?: b; W9 j
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
9 b$ ^+ T9 o* C! W4 I0 }struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
: T1 ?- `4 l1 j$ N2 _! K
8 |" L. W+ Z. T$ p Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases, p; f- c3 K$ B( W9 G4 M
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low4 ^& a5 |% H! l
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
+ ?" T0 c% D) e. n% C) m. h. C z% ]8 opressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring( G4 |4 s7 a6 `4 P! R) l% i) }
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
* c' h, d9 }* g4 Z$ sseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as. J6 K( {, h3 U0 Z4 ~" ?
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
* k0 `7 W0 k( y. x+ i+ v% l$ \$ V7 u: H) u- A
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter( p6 w% t/ s p. Y9 [6 J5 Q
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton) t: N% M6 U) P+ J. c+ Q+ E
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,) X9 {$ y g1 C' z
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
* u3 g7 ?/ ]% Qincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve4 G0 {2 \8 e' m% X: d Y
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
; ?5 d* e" f% C6 x0 K% Btowards the end of 2006. * O* F6 f7 z( ^' r+ I! u' I
. {% g! O9 r4 bWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
8 R( [, D+ |! [$ n5 Tinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable3 X# \& |0 }) }1 _4 G8 P: L
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
" Q5 q: s g# Pgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to5 J/ z& Q W5 m$ q' m
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added' g# d3 S: y4 Q& \4 X+ R
pressure on tight inventory levels.
' [# S: N' [& b0 p2 T4 f. @5 l) a% c6 U% w# f
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic5 a7 ]/ P3 w4 E$ ~
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
; K8 }8 p: e7 E% e+ |0 Minto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;" T: D; Y* M% P% l
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching) ^8 R4 r7 P, S. V$ g" P' `. ]$ q
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.) J! j: ]$ T8 C# |( S# x
$ k: b$ z4 E( ~* s7 ` `" w. ? <<
* r: q' M; o& ^7 v Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20067 R5 N, j( k; `. y) x; K
% |3 }& p! `9 u8 X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( U, {; d) P2 D% R( m, X8 y
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey$ A' P6 D- B! }# u# D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------3 p5 ~* y2 d' E2 U& D$ n
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
; T. R) C* q3 W9 | Market Average Average % Change Average Average
3 J. H1 ?2 ?: U% W0 M% g -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q' P( ?4 G5 l# |) b Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
- g# z; B5 \1 O# [" O8 C' d -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 X5 R$ x) x! k
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
+ M; k$ [3 n& r/ ^( Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) b6 c+ `3 O2 V% Q3 | I Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
* X. \# J! ~( g0 |$ |% D+ O -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' p$ l- k1 B& ^ Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
# y% s# ~ r5 r/ t8 h) N E -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. T( h8 @% n' P3 Y8 U St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
( P9 h* C% L" u9 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" _7 w' m. Z4 t) T$ c' U8 [ Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
0 g. ^9 Q# O, k; t, }! t+ D! ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 c$ R0 |4 S% b1 Z* ]" o% I! x2 [0 e4 j
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185/ s+ N i* r7 s6 q5 h- x, d) t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 ~) X% a4 u# b! g$ E* [$ W$ p* N0 m Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250# ]4 f# b' |% b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ _$ A" s9 L9 d% h- T+ u5 s Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7666 P v$ N' v& I5 x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, m. n3 f' R+ m
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
& q% c9 C9 a! i -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 a( b/ h7 c% {/ Z. B4 y
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
! U+ _/ Q, k7 r& _$ [' r J3 G8 c3 o -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 A, z3 G. a, I& `8 p# @ Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
- K' [/ k- L1 o6 g* q* m -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ u- L1 a1 k% ]9 n
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7146 `& @* L4 A. l# I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 n! J5 Q& ^/ r( u/ ~ e
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
% V) L/ L1 T+ ^. x1 ]; A2 r l. y( j) B -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; ^6 g y9 _6 W Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000# ~$ M) a6 |8 o* ~* g! B2 z1 ?" X' ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, e. b. B/ y, w National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860+ E3 c* i! S9 H* `& S! M6 ^- e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# c! q. C" W! `) Z& k9 E0 d: i1 C3 H; s& q+ G: D J) ]! {7 E) M
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 V, \# u, Y6 w( J9 @& O V1 U Standard Condominium- i3 g9 n. b+ }9 G; P
-------------------------------------------------------------# @! f* p7 e4 g
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo6 c% Y9 b4 w4 A! r `6 T" E' ]( ~
Market % Change Average Average % Change
! c+ i6 n0 q( D0 i, a7 f; Z -------------------------------------------------------------/ R4 I, p1 j1 m! ]% h
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%2 g. y" ^+ P/ }4 l b: ~# j
-------------------------------------------------------------0 T" D/ m# d+ d0 B. b% B5 s$ ]7 m
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
; X$ L E0 s' g; O1 p -------------------------------------------------------------# \/ a2 K/ m) H, u
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A1 g! t; Y4 |$ f# Z0 n
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 K( s/ ?- b5 |1 z Saint John N/A - - N/A/ ^1 p' t) r& k7 i( y' w; T, J
-------------------------------------------------------------1 v" P6 e) U0 M3 c ]) c
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%5 x; j+ E, M+ q( Y- j
-------------------------------------------------------------: q7 y! z0 T# F% t8 I
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
( k: d( ?0 S4 Z4 K/ B8 D5 Y -------------------------------------------------------------) J, H; w, b( P/ q8 d- s) I) n
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%- C. }+ K3 G* ~
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 I3 t( z/ S X n9 P$ C( P Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%3 R) P" E& ~% l9 h
-------------------------------------------------------------
; \! ?6 A( ?& a/ S" P' g Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%+ y9 A. i. _+ n$ Y; y1 p
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 p9 n; f5 U/ S8 v. M+ X Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0% J- K6 n# O0 O9 E' i
-------------------------------------------------------------, j- Y% [& v" s$ g, u
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
7 d8 o( q; h! `' \. @- ~8 |" r1 U -------------------------------------------------------------' g; C. v$ J2 A8 c4 a" i9 U
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%2 J8 j3 Q) J8 Q0 X
-------------------------------------------------------------6 F( ^0 O7 z) \ o: E
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
) l* b/ k' o& J2 m0 i4 Q -------------------------------------------------------------* b* q. O; k- Y+ t2 I
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
% u8 e& `( ]4 ]# x& o( v -------------------------------------------------------------$ h+ j0 ^# r% @& c
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
3 {. L: s, q) C3 ]6 c3 | -------------------------------------------------------------
% F: e$ t H; n3 w National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%; f: g1 O( {8 q
-------------------------------------------------------------1 u% l9 ^* V$ q- s1 d: T O2 R+ O
>>1 D7 Q4 u' V( f( w/ e) W; p6 l
1 g: z. Y! n1 S' f, { Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined" i, x% A" F% m: ?( ]) c O9 r" J
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint! D$ K4 s7 {" n9 L _8 N
John and Victoria.
& r; ^ S- W) e/ m! s8 p6 `
8 A# Q: x: o9 y9 W$ ^( t x! _& C The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most0 G7 e4 E, U0 x7 d
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of* D+ z. B! s+ C
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
$ s( D; |( c m6 M) b2 creferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price# ^9 o( l: h, G, j! g
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
5 n9 h) c- @; _% Uacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is. M* G" T3 y8 D4 r' i
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
" b) h: K& f5 E& t6 Yfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
! p7 W6 Z; F4 O: ^, K4 cversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on4 R4 v4 J4 S7 p# i& n' z1 e- H
November 15, 2006.( m4 K1 u0 N# I2 ~ F
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of3 Z* W0 q0 K, s0 B' m- y5 {4 o
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge% A4 \3 p1 y! y! Y0 R- Y
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is& y2 |0 n3 J j. K, L8 W( g8 f
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|