 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ; x5 _9 i2 ^% [+ ~/ A- ^- `
/ W' W) X# E% ~- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -9 W6 Q7 D ~$ i" W2 W4 _
5 u! D) N$ ~9 [
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market( a: W) n: w' L/ i3 W: b/ ^# ]0 ?
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
* X e7 J6 c# \; O; `quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic7 D- x0 X- I% F: \5 ^0 V0 \1 X7 R
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
% W9 l, ~7 M* Q. e7 z( Rprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and/ }3 S9 F7 S) e5 R
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,$ Y$ _! W* R4 E$ K3 S, _3 N/ c
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
3 T n5 V: e/ K9 g; q0 r/ |LePage Real Estate Services.) M$ P6 c7 m8 q
9 q, l% U+ d m) \, E Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
, \6 {( q0 G Z: pare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic6 z# v1 I, M0 z1 H& }7 k# z
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
7 e) q3 Y6 w e' l* r. esound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
$ a* m& U* Q3 y0 i! g! I8 Gresidential real estate sector.6 {% u$ }' W, O0 m3 z4 s/ l
1 I" n5 Y. H/ `, I) T W4 D Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation* @# r! w) N, ?; p7 P' j, y
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
- G) i+ I; d' ~5 P8 ~8 U8 t0 gyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562! w8 d6 P" x1 R7 A# z
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3804 Y- A4 y) K2 P, V1 l
(+13.2%).: G5 Y0 {+ V; ^' y" j
& y, f% w. b! C( [* L, F5 t "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
: Q; N& h4 p. i& L. K' zduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
, u$ l w/ @" p& Mfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
0 B' O D% i4 u* V# P a0 `: Dpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,& ~3 K) ?$ ?; R$ j# b% u+ Y
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
1 Q, c8 A& O4 r"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
8 y, P# _" e! X! Hwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy" u+ Q( m" l2 B- e
balanced market."
0 @; H- s7 M5 G {6 ^$ d; G; P: m
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
1 C9 B. i- |4 {/ B' jconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
- Q, n. c C" n' `6 \1 P! Mto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
6 u$ a) |+ M! K) j/ x4 ~throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
1 W* h. x0 V9 A5 }" ~' Nenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
3 W) b+ c) J8 N: \7 d" r# ]manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record) h: h0 _$ w5 Z- r' A" U0 k
breaking price appreciations.: A+ D# l! U& [$ l9 f( k( @+ }) N2 [
% [: k% a/ f7 O+ G
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding2 @2 i: {) e) g
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
; Z) w+ ^8 U- dlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.& o& U8 r6 d, D- _6 n% N
; k* ]5 x9 c; Q In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid+ N) ~! ~7 R6 |3 x
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer, W( [: p5 k m
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
4 N) b0 e7 V! F7 G0 ?- Nslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
0 V6 H# b! |- p1 CIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers% S; |3 c% N& `+ [& B
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of6 H& P% Y2 ?' K( N6 w8 D# o
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
: B7 _( f6 t# F) P. q. h: d, s; q* R2 a9 |
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing4 ^4 ^; P2 D2 D x; _# Q$ I
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and$ K2 i2 O# ^, R: h+ p7 C& F
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada e7 M/ T# n6 m0 e
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
' t L! d3 L" o1 ~& X: {( W- J. R9 r5 c- `5 ]! Y, V2 r
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the$ n2 M- z8 v! a. W
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
7 G3 V% ]% J# I( Afavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
/ t+ w: o6 H$ p1 orelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general% z( s8 ?, |! g7 R
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
+ K7 E, O( [& C a0 z0 S3 `7 K$ }downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
3 ]5 H* G$ O, v& u l' {aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
1 w; K/ x% r$ T2 X# xmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment.": J8 Z3 U( ~, k/ q/ y7 ~+ j
9 ~, h( B9 M5 Y' L. Q1 f' x8 N <<
( L% n4 `4 @7 Q. g REGIONAL SUMMARIES$ h3 t3 n1 A2 F6 P7 Q1 f5 R$ \* T
>>
3 W' g: p2 e" G5 n5 a7 \
8 F" k. Y d# ~: m- y) j4 A Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
2 g, k1 }9 h% j* Y' X# xHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
& p/ ~1 Y1 Q, T7 E$ vof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time2 @2 _6 U& |5 B1 U
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of2 B6 F0 V- A6 K7 ~6 z: ^
renovations.
0 q" r" V6 k: I1 Y0 v' i; \% ]3 j
3 S% o) l- i6 L4 a) A The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight. p7 O' ^9 Z- |. {
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
4 I. u+ B! A; N$ ~! l% ?compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and! V1 b; U: j0 S9 H0 B7 {
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
" _6 T- h: m9 L
) Y5 W1 H' z: N The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
- t- p d' p6 Wslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the5 s6 ~, w! R( i. V" }( n
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new2 H+ b/ ], Q6 ^$ p/ z; v5 h2 A* \5 X, G
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
1 i; s$ A/ f/ Pto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes. F3 ^' z/ I) X L) f) Y
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
8 H) t4 `& ^* F, j. [
. q% ^4 [& L( \+ a' i( L! U! F# X In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
3 l+ i. d8 w/ d( t3 Cconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their# D$ i1 u# a; ?1 k' b5 [1 G
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers5 g# o/ C7 i3 \$ @6 U2 Q# r( G
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian& {( |6 i+ {2 M
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
5 g3 [, _* z" k7 Q! U2 Ybuyers with more options when looking for a home.& b2 Z5 b9 j' Q* q) Z, v
; |1 `3 _ M Y
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
# Z; z* _. O, xamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes, r" S6 g' V7 [1 A; N6 P. a' t( ?5 r3 i
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
. z* J7 h9 H6 b# i0 Z. [, [: `, Sas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last9 H0 q- O9 W9 K& o$ m
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
1 g# D- u O/ h( G( `8 T2 A; [
4 s2 ]. F( [( g- t2 h& l Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
F8 E4 e; d6 Z8 {3 }prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
8 ~" u, R! l# T; `! R' W. V% Ilevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting: k( C* c# Y: e7 S3 ^
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
0 R6 N$ `& s1 J9 uwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the. m3 X( A$ K- c* y: ?8 O
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
% k& K/ d$ W/ d- k5 x- n; vmaking a purchase.! p* V' ]5 z) E1 B* e1 D# x% T
. ]$ E1 }) l6 j3 F Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing3 `3 Q$ t. p. a- ?
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong. S8 q" }& O5 C
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
8 D' |* w" {5 i& Wcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting/ ]( y$ l1 A. h& y9 S
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown: b9 r# Z" ?0 z6 _8 V& e7 V
amenities.
# w# X) m8 i0 h+ O$ v5 |
5 m: k1 O2 u$ ^) l The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
8 X* d1 A$ X- |$ F- H# m$ u# c: Ythroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
i: ^- v9 w% F+ p r" k- kacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has7 d* O8 I% r/ z) y7 o
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
2 n# d$ q. F3 N" H6 O0 \2 y. z6 Ydriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
! e0 h4 J- q& t; _- c5 I7 g6 v1 {6 X, aresidence, rather than for investment.
% L2 p$ M! Z- j D H! S2 D0 b3 O9 H1 N2 X5 }5 r/ `! f2 a: e' f- Q2 M0 p
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
$ M& K1 P% O' T/ S! h" |6 Thouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted) U# c1 B" _ W* @ B" O
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer3 l" H# a/ [( V% c/ V
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization1 J6 K0 ~2 P! \3 ^
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter% O" l0 v/ E% v7 G5 y- h
the market.
& D8 x0 |' N4 C8 F1 c7 Y
+ F% a b5 C0 I: A$ ^- G In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through& p4 S+ I7 x* ~; s4 ~. e
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In. w N3 N4 ~ X1 ^
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring7 a- L+ k, `& h0 W/ h3 y4 F. O
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due. p( |5 s$ \' H% P4 s* K, U4 g1 x
to the shortage of available inventory.
! e4 _) }4 F$ E) k( k2 [
2 U+ h6 r* M6 u. X4 A# X2 V Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its2 {0 N) M/ w% f* I
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains3 j/ D/ u: T. E4 k/ W" t
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses# r% w, j. ^7 u5 H7 @* c
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.' a" `3 b) R" D# h& ]) }! X
9 l# H/ _# `, ~0 q
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases5 V% K8 n4 B2 C6 e
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low) O' y; F! Z5 {( S$ B
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that$ X2 D8 A8 f" U; E' Z. o7 \' W
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
* e, n2 v+ {7 U: Qprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
1 n0 {! j* [) h& X0 I& v* ?7 eseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
" Z: l1 e5 R! Q3 C* E! ibuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
" y- }2 v7 Y7 B# T4 Q
3 P$ F+ J" e0 Y) S& N( | Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter( l5 Q( ]7 Z m4 w# X/ I. X
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton' d0 ^" b% L- `: A9 ?
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
! T) o- Z% \4 l# h- |( N% n8 r' tmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices8 O' P# ]) U9 ]
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
' h/ s: N ~- iin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
( w: y8 H2 }( p k& ftowards the end of 2006. " T7 N& k5 B& W {! q' o
7 s2 l4 \ P: c) @5 x8 L# KWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
+ `3 a, T1 `7 i V! einventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable; i; h6 i: V- M
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse& R6 _% Y7 g8 t) g3 q9 A
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to! a; E% _/ V" t! u, Y. z% i
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added/ b2 @( `) R' Z. u; G
pressure on tight inventory levels./ S* L* k1 ?; e, ?
) F1 D/ f. `( d3 G' n" E Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
; }- @, k; W$ Y& |& L+ `fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people$ d( K G5 `) m% f" e, P$ o" n
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;+ \) E: h2 T1 s* p6 `" p; v
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching+ K: D- w1 P$ u
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.4 T( |0 i* |. d) P, Q1 L
) {6 ~. T3 d- [( x
<<) v! u! m" y( Q9 k1 G7 J7 c
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
8 I( Y" I+ k1 m/ a! s" B
5 O5 H5 \. O: B" ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------% Q; m1 m6 k" k6 n, M. R
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey* k+ \3 E1 [. ^& u) O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Q/ k8 ^1 T5 J) ^' B {
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
; m8 Z# |8 |$ ^8 h" |! c! w Market Average Average % Change Average Average
8 k' a8 s8 E! y! a -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 l: F {, C) N+ G4 _- {. Q, G Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0009 \! u1 {6 V- r4 x" p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( |/ K" s- D7 {9 u6 k! G& |' Y
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
1 _- h# W' r _7 a t -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 l9 @: `0 L/ j& ~: ? j b. p
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
5 g9 E! c7 l2 p -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 z3 p7 y8 i( V @, ]3 m' \$ _ Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
0 |0 w6 ^' r% \" n7 O" s- t -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 z' i5 T5 ?- x" L$ ] St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3333 t- p" z( V8 ?, Z+ x/ a1 M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* S' e% F/ C S) \7 k Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583# C8 i' J: I1 {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% d2 S( ^# r" Z1 N5 z Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185+ ~1 j( ^- J5 @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' h& [2 O1 Y4 ]+ ^5 U) n: V- @ Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2506 P, r5 q3 j0 \/ C, a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! e& ~8 ?/ L* {, S) e' Y
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766; W% \3 V2 C) c0 O, @" G
------------------------------------------------------------------------- [' X9 ~" S% _
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707; P9 `* g I( w9 A7 u3 q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( S3 H1 N Z' [/ z% s7 s: [
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500" Y+ u9 x: T( ]) e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- d. l1 f: ^ V0 A. H Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
; ?7 r3 a3 g0 e9 s -------------------------------------------------------------------------. t$ l8 C" ~5 d0 M+ e
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
2 D0 G' F& t* m8 Y8 D2 }: T -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 d+ u; a& b/ d/ h' C Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5005 t$ [4 D9 P* L2 g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 P- O: O: T+ ]# m4 `, q
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
/ k8 W# s- x6 Q: C# R( |$ _+ h -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% w3 a& `6 w$ ~' k+ f+ s+ h) h National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
: I8 G! S" l3 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------( ?" J+ [ s. u! ~0 O( ~, A, }
* E; u0 N+ b1 [# E. X3 l' v; ~3 C -------------------------------------------------------------/ ]0 Q. M8 y" x- f& M, S1 |
Standard Condominium2 S0 ^2 \; G) I( f, [
-------------------------------------------------------------5 L' V( g0 k& c; K& n
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
9 U6 x+ [1 W# w0 M% J( d. x Market % Change Average Average % Change
4 c/ U8 {9 {& f1 b' P( ]+ u" p -------------------------------------------------------------
- N% @( K1 Z: {" t' \" l Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
, e5 e x: Z+ r) m -------------------------------------------------------------' @: E+ v5 |+ ^# U% D4 S
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%7 y2 Z D$ B T) e8 y6 a
-------------------------------------------------------------1 A0 V" Y. u' g5 T# z2 g1 P
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A$ f$ X! L. k* `. t1 F
-------------------------------------------------------------0 p* m% V# ^8 J `" D2 x$ B* X$ L5 ^1 Z
Saint John N/A - - N/A
6 T8 F" B3 e: ]6 x -------------------------------------------------------------+ J: ~ E. g) M1 K8 T
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%9 _* M& `( a) b% I
-------------------------------------------------------------8 E, H+ l( v5 n# @
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%' W0 T3 _/ g! W; t) g( B v. c
-------------------------------------------------------------0 Q( M4 @$ ^$ B: L @
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
$ l$ x& t5 @* b: g4 V" W -------------------------------------------------------------
4 w9 \ f6 n; C Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
; h& P9 K3 N+ }7 N -------------------------------------------------------------
7 G: `2 t5 ^& t& l. H Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
) Z; N7 c- |5 @+ C" d6 B/ [ -------------------------------------------------------------
' H$ k) z+ F" r* O3 L- [5 W Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
: L8 U) [8 Q! K: O# u: A% j -------------------------------------------------------------
) A: ?" e$ P1 s& R" O( g$ a Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%% k" F9 A5 t8 _: d |
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 V9 ?* I. i. U% T5 O" o5 H Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
2 _. \, c5 z2 I3 w" [ -------------------------------------------------------------% }* o0 s1 H% G( g
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
2 ^2 F9 c2 T( e4 l# k( [ -------------------------------------------------------------
$ @8 ~: K) T! a8 _; T Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
" i" l. X4 l' `! i& l -------------------------------------------------------------& @! _/ m# z4 k5 j6 u y u
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
) j; s. d0 F* Q0 p9 Q' Q -------------------------------------------------------------/ {) ?, A5 j+ a6 J; Y9 N
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%( Q8 T8 `5 J0 O" m
-------------------------------------------------------------, R5 E( V9 l" E: \! n, e
>>
& l: h! N2 A# B; I: K( K, @+ W/ U
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined/ {: h/ [0 \- N9 T" L% ~
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
; q9 _6 t \5 u3 P& \: Y; iJohn and Victoria.
0 p% t% Q) C Q3 z! u
5 R" Y' {" E# \# F( X The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most# M* {$ C p* S* Z
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
0 Q$ s/ `, K: n+ Yhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release; N" l3 c, j3 w7 g) U
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price" ^; o4 ^' M* h1 P
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities0 u' L) w5 d% Z L( [
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is$ v, x) D. Q, Q4 i3 c2 }3 W3 N
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
; u" ?- ]' t8 ]' _9 p* H afigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
5 c: `8 j* Q5 F0 J1 Jversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on! b, p/ B" d* G' B
November 15, 2006.4 D- E( o2 D2 z8 R3 `
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
* x, L) } [7 \5 j) d: L* ffair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
3 O( `8 O2 [1 o3 L' g% f: E+ _$ bprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
6 t# K0 Q5 A3 W# navailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|