埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2102|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
/ v' Q- V! E2 y% H
# l$ }" e: E3 R; c2 T. `: G- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -. X8 U7 D' N; S: d3 h% C3 w

+ U* ?3 N) [' s    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market  u. D) b; F; h# }2 |
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third. c5 }) Q$ X) i0 U
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
  i4 y* M% t" C5 R4 kin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
3 b$ g" [' K" G3 t& q: {) ]4 gprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and- Y, ^  d# _0 y; B, c/ H
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,/ \& Z6 u( s+ r, R1 q
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal6 W( W/ s" Y5 }* _
LePage Real Estate Services.
- i+ W: V  z- [- W3 V2 m* m! g; |8 q- i8 X
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters2 A  b' h6 l9 L: C1 p( \9 z
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic: i9 j5 h( s2 ?: J
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
7 r" K) D) J0 G  |sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the( I, f! L, O3 }, L1 w5 k
residential real estate sector.- ~2 w) P# F3 w( Q7 k4 V

2 M# P7 r4 d# ~1 Y9 ~! k    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
# D/ ~4 U: ]) v+ R4 x! noccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
$ v8 y. u. H+ D0 I: ?! dyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
4 o. s! o, w. {* l. y8 K7 h/ w" u$ Z(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
1 L+ Y6 x" O, s& S) z/ p(+13.2%).
4 J; Y. s) O% B& F# g5 L' h! N# l
5 H9 |9 V( o1 F7 d3 `    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
; e1 Q4 k' B# K( Vduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the  d1 |2 v; ~3 @7 Q3 k+ ~. C
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
5 `  s7 L& g0 [6 `poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,8 i! ]5 F# }. |1 T4 R  s& P( k# r
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
# I9 ?2 {: H2 }4 }: k8 S% q"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
8 p0 T  K1 H: u8 @welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy- h7 J- r; @4 G3 O
balanced market."  D0 {: q/ W2 x! g; k

$ W3 m5 \: {9 ^3 r# @' N! S    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,& Z: r# \( Q& l, c+ m% E. Y( C. D
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift/ K) m3 g3 ~0 s. d
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
1 o* o3 |- [( G( U" cthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core, u. w7 i( Q, s. \
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,; f2 s8 L" K; \  ~- g1 ^. n
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
  g, S6 W1 X7 [breaking price appreciations.
# D" y/ J) B( F- c! q. b4 C( C# m' F+ v# [) K) L
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding% o. Q) L# J8 i4 f0 z+ A  \
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
8 ]/ Y7 u+ v; @8 u, @largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.# n4 k5 G' V# V& B( |: q
/ @, |5 m* d9 C. p/ ^% q! W& B5 W6 T
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
9 [4 r7 P' M/ i& X# e2 H" |& R" \8 keconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer0 e& s* }& a) D( d
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
/ F' W8 m0 X! x9 gslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth., t7 d7 @4 U5 T9 S/ W
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
1 K# B# I4 E+ u1 Hgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of  s1 y5 L8 N7 Z2 q3 m
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
  {7 k+ t1 s  q! K4 y$ m" ]2 Y: o0 e! \6 M* W! @2 o* x
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing4 o; k" X' d" e6 k; N
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
7 e9 E0 p4 o* B5 D, J! Jfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada- q1 ~+ r) u2 i' ~2 @
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
5 ~- n% g. B$ [% f- @! {, D: Q8 m
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
; {' J  A* e& Z9 p1 ^/ I# N1 U7 TAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
# P9 p: v) t. o; cfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
. }0 l; _7 _0 arelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general& T' e+ `& x$ B. s( ^+ Y: ~; o
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the" X/ j' E4 h) ~+ x
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
; |/ T& N" Q+ Caggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization, h7 [$ D. P! C0 f7 n5 i
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."" ^* Y' o$ A' V# P, r
: Y% ]6 O1 t7 Q9 z9 j, i; }+ ^5 z1 l: [
    <<2 E: ?; M6 ]$ |! o! R8 U
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
% @4 \, \8 X- B( A0 f    >>0 v' e# a1 Y) T  Y6 d; E3 h& F

, p* l3 y6 s) j7 P# V) D    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in$ `; e0 I7 e: p6 P1 x  ?( `
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
$ e" R6 c+ _2 G7 R9 Yof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
; `  P- r5 D3 M" Z% U2 llooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
/ j( M* J9 }7 Qrenovations." V$ U& S4 p& R; @) L5 T; [

7 D& Y$ Y7 A6 P    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight8 b1 G& F1 a9 h- Z1 S
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
, P1 x3 Y- Z6 n! ncompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
. b5 p: o3 Y; dSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter./ F, P8 J3 [$ [0 W$ Z" s/ X* ?9 T
) z4 r" k0 R) Z
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer* `* U' R& c* n) R
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the7 J. s- |! R8 y9 L$ s  M1 F) X& n# f
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new% q( j$ k; K8 f
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
! Q. i% c) E$ F4 O: Z8 O9 Gto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes$ I1 I8 O9 A  m: M3 @) W4 N
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.0 S' s) m  U! I
1 a( }5 b5 s$ q' P
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
: E3 Y( V# C( m+ i; @conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
4 Z6 d) i! a0 R1 q& ahomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
$ T7 ?7 x8 ^& g: c1 C" Bwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian' v' d3 d9 A' }7 I
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing( B: ^- R! }" [* }
buyers with more options when looking for a home.! H+ b* t- X. k2 p2 D
2 z. n6 E$ A/ o% P# {" g/ R
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
9 D) o, I, ~- H9 Xamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes' c9 E2 r0 [) _" m
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,; k4 G6 A: G$ i& W- W+ T
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
* k* H. P; k" h4 Kfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions." c  [1 O# K% N3 ^
# T! k( @9 U% v
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house! ~9 r& b) P% J. z
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory& t! R$ c3 O7 Q6 X4 x+ S% o4 x
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting! a7 T& m1 _0 y+ D' i  b  c
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,3 E& Z3 ?( S( s
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
1 Q" B  |( s7 I' c; M5 T) hpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before) ]$ j% y& M9 ^9 B1 |4 Z' m
making a purchase.! t; ^6 i2 [+ q  H* Y

8 d$ B% O! p% x1 s8 W( J    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing) \. k$ M+ S2 m, b: R7 Q6 G
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong' y( k, U9 ~( k& D" }
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
& S6 T. b5 y  Lcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
8 a; f) b! V  |: jattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown" W" J3 w) t/ h( Q, g6 ?
amenities.
. R$ z' Q- D7 a' P$ E8 ~: p  u& Z5 q1 N
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
- v1 y2 G' r) L9 I, i, xthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
( {; _! q+ s# d( gacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
7 W5 A# A5 G7 E+ j8 Ccontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been7 k4 K8 G( M3 p' e9 J1 ~& S
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle3 a+ O$ m4 x3 D
residence, rather than for investment.* P7 a5 V, w5 _& T+ _
! }) Q& R/ X+ h
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
; r2 X% d/ q& F& k" l! qhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
! K: k$ |! M. J" t; \9 X4 Lin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer! k( ^- L/ G: b
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization& B. V4 F- b+ L' E. F
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter" x# ~' x# C& T" z0 v8 ]
the market.
. p# u7 i" C5 Z6 g  }
+ k6 `: L! \: l" h" Z% g    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
- J- h6 V* e' A" E$ C: KJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
/ p: U, L8 s0 Z1 mAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
7 a; e- C( N1 Q# ^8 T6 pmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
3 \, X  G1 \' h0 ]2 y/ Tto the shortage of available inventory.# {) E( N9 r4 c" W3 ]! m

# T) V7 T% [& R    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
: L  Y* D& I0 F* smomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
2 `  M9 B: p7 \& D+ n' gvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
+ Q# S1 c" P5 c: c. P6 C$ z+ ?3 Astruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
6 D4 D/ l9 T5 y4 T( V
7 ?0 r/ _# E( V* q$ e% A" c    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases/ j: t! }  s' P" s: ?
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
. T5 F$ w# x' v5 r6 o" [  Dunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that% D* m7 E. r: D7 B
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
4 u3 T$ N' B( g; c& x5 M, H) Yprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
/ U6 ^& l4 g' y5 `season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as: m( z9 g- y8 f: J
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

4 h1 j0 i! N$ a* q* _# C# S
6 S4 |9 i" r3 v, }8 \5 h    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter% j7 D5 A9 M6 L# f* W& c
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
* o6 t. A: |, h5 g5 j* kremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
) w, A6 J# s/ \maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
) C4 {& _2 Z3 b: Bincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
) l+ n! q. Z" xin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
" s5 B% a/ p5 F8 L7 Mtowards the end of 2006.
    9 V! z+ y. |5 Q

- G7 h0 G0 k( ^( O5 Y! y" QWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of3 p& W( o3 N/ e6 m! F  d+ t1 b9 h
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable% D& Y9 c: s  F8 N% g2 A
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
3 D/ Z0 L$ M  x$ ]( L  P. Ggroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
  Y# x+ g5 D% ?% q$ Uforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added6 b8 h( s8 H7 o: E
pressure on tight inventory levels.
9 d7 M! @& D5 K3 \9 T! L& [
4 [; I# w# L: [  o7 @    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic: m# l: m& V9 \5 Y) K" U& C# p( o$ n
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
: H, @5 t# x7 b. L% {5 e# ginto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
% v( j$ S7 M% r$ E( m; Awhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
- j* @# t7 h) Q- x% Bfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
  M& l3 A  y) x. C* e4 l3 S1 y, L4 z9 \! ^) c; m
    <<5 F6 h" k4 u& w* J( x
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20068 [+ k9 p: }- c, q) m, i4 u
# o6 Z& b* V+ A& ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  ?, g2 w& g& q) Y4 h4 F                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
- L, y2 O/ i6 \; g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) X+ W3 Y* [. c) z6 G/ `' S4 p5 z
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
" S! S4 r  u8 j    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average- I' G: _7 O' F' o9 K% f
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 L' o& C) Y6 z
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000/ F  |8 z$ N- C7 N
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- f: z* n: C* x6 G0 k  x    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0001 D: C( L6 U0 c% v: ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. G; k6 t! g0 |
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000; ]4 h& _+ y% m% O0 a! @! v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 R: L( [$ ^: G& W* O( E    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
/ s+ ~# H6 J# P; w# C3 \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! x$ a9 ?2 Y! ~; ]5 A7 j1 A2 A
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
- I5 O- [; ]6 n/ h3 W6 g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, s% O+ @7 S& o5 C! x' f    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
! P/ V% o* _0 [) C; q% F. s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; {# b7 I9 ^. F4 X
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
* k/ T: J; j$ q5 E    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# V' a1 Y. f4 Z6 M% l    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250, Z8 Z+ Y, q' R/ v! g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) L0 n" P9 d9 g    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766' {, D. i7 b4 _. A1 S$ V% ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 a6 Q2 i. _# o, X! V
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707* M: W- h' o7 J# q7 P* |! y- d
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) l( ~9 M% y) _. z) f9 {. v$ G    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
, t5 q, {+ O8 g4 w  O. X+ g5 F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; m% ?  n: y; o1 i. @4 X
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
+ y. z2 N9 o6 b, c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& g- Q8 S3 o* L/ s) }
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7141 q: T) s& K$ v7 r9 t
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ A4 E- r- v+ N9 \; v& L    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
, k1 ?  ~+ ]! O/ K" w8 N" Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, B. ?/ T% |4 C4 T5 Q
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0007 b: T8 A1 j" J! I2 E9 T8 @8 p- ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" e9 a! d7 g( Y+ M& O
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
2 Q- L8 C; c: s2 f0 P! m    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ y  H& u1 `. [2 _* E" O' m% U. h- w5 y: C
    -------------------------------------------------------------. }* u; z% g6 b4 }* g" n. S
                               Standard Condominium6 ]& I; Q, W3 Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" n; N  o, p* t0 e. E7 L                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
1 U. O' e0 K$ t# P6 M5 ?; P" \  G    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change& W  |; q, N9 {1 U
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ i; g$ H0 l, [" o1 L% @. [    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
" w- G2 Y9 z- }5 ~% M7 V    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 ?1 R& x+ P+ l) V    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
, h  F8 M1 n  I    -------------------------------------------------------------
  m9 U  D& ]8 b; X" X* F    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
; y' f$ Y; z2 @: u( p: ]0 P    -------------------------------------------------------------
! q5 T: Q+ Z7 P4 B    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
2 i) d, w0 T1 s, A! Z" G    -------------------------------------------------------------7 O) m0 O7 f/ K3 B
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
2 ^+ M4 d' U" U, h+ b& T    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 n# j0 b- W! b- C    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%3 o/ ~  N! R/ i( L* o
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 A' y: N; K' e/ F    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%& c, i) ~  I% I0 ~* Q* ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------
* ]( S' l# c4 u% C, O  x: j1 w0 I    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
) p7 }! g* Y7 E: ]) d& Y& b    -------------------------------------------------------------% t5 D7 W% H: C% p* j
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
0 L1 W. `* z* n* c' ^5 V3 w* T    -------------------------------------------------------------
) E3 b% m6 {/ K$ D" J8 H3 h" d) o0 [" x    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
4 g8 _1 J. h. E/ l' @    -------------------------------------------------------------5 Y- U8 k# K# Y* ]# b' Z
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
" `8 l& J+ a/ R9 s    -------------------------------------------------------------0 Y- o7 \  a6 N& h# u( u* ~- N) z
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%! N! q) }# x9 u2 P6 ?% I9 ^* \
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; @6 Y) w7 H$ g3 A/ g    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%5 |( g# J  t# k. ?* t
    -------------------------------------------------------------
% q" e) x1 v9 D' ~3 H$ B. w    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
- R: Q/ A: A+ @+ ~% L    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 r) i; Z6 q4 W5 {  N0 D, P    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%& a" p) N" |5 Y& F
    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ E& X' O9 E. }    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%% b$ d7 y0 z1 ~( s
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ r1 s0 x& o% E- s( k& c# ]& `    >>
! _% m5 U+ C/ W5 X
3 ~( U* n2 O5 w" B! N    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
: z* i* Q& O# Kin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint! T, q) s& K; t6 w4 T; r/ t2 P
John and Victoria.
5 U; Z1 `9 j1 j' Q" E( x( C7 Z
# {1 d0 [5 s/ v9 Y    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
. R) s3 q3 H0 H+ k* o; V1 lcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of" I/ W& G3 z1 l  a
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
+ Q( [: i' H+ [  L! D! }$ [references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
- Y  y4 z- a9 Y8 N; y7 h2 Itrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
; k& w0 k6 i1 Bacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
0 f; l. H8 N. I' c% }# b8 Kavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current5 @5 s$ V2 `; V; W6 g
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable3 Q: |* a$ X) f8 @7 t+ V7 k
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
1 u1 C' x2 Q& x. m6 G0 |) ]0 mNovember 15, 2006.
- D$ ~* b0 J' h' ]; B    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of- ^" ?, h+ X2 B; o8 I+ ^5 ]" E
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge9 D' W0 Q! ~9 @) r$ G; J, n% c8 B, W
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is8 [, N7 P( V; G$ Z3 b: ?: [
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-26 04:16 , Processed in 0.196340 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表