 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable . {6 j4 p p- D! H. k, }
) M' U# v, C. U1 W- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -' X6 f# ~. x( n( h+ P+ h8 f0 h) X6 C
, j" \2 P$ n2 G! r/ J TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
- y& f8 {( m8 v7 }exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
5 H; G! p3 N: G H2 bquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
" H* V/ j- |" Nin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
0 A: K) U6 @% Iprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
6 g$ y4 E+ i/ x9 k# R: t7 n8 V- o4 Qmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
5 k8 ~) d7 K& y' q) C7 BQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
+ U% \) h5 W, n0 e" e! qLePage Real Estate Services.
# ~+ M7 ]$ W ] l( K7 X+ T+ r
) R- `2 I9 Z) \0 Q/ | Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters/ |, H2 W+ O9 q+ v( c
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
5 E9 P+ \4 t3 a# {0 J: v) |conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and% k7 P* E. T6 S$ j
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the0 _5 x* s: S( K" O/ ^* W
residential real estate sector.7 F I$ t8 B4 ?/ R/ g2 S! A9 Z! g
$ z. B7 P$ s$ S+ B0 f$ G- }- U0 B Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
$ a, u8 {9 b) Z4 Q6 doccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)0 g7 r0 @& s5 b0 }+ p6 G x
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
# M& `* Z0 m; L* \7 j# s; b: z5 p7 O! l) D(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3806 C6 | e/ L- A ^' E
(+13.2%).* Q- j; P0 M/ E c, T/ ]& b
% Z$ G7 F' E6 N) H "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth" F0 G4 x3 F1 s7 n
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
6 B- `5 \: ?' |; x7 Afrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are( \/ E* M8 ]( ], V$ n# `4 G
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,! b8 H; o$ F% U7 g c
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
( Y l6 h/ D% ]: h; b6 R"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
, m. B* g L& t6 E# t* Bwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy9 S/ F+ v, ~0 N! B) S8 C
balanced market."
8 |7 p) w7 Z/ ~& K4 f0 H4 s) G8 z$ v" s/ M: ?8 c
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
+ W9 f: d p# y! Q; rconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift# r+ ~3 M5 j% p0 v
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued7 @9 t' @: W4 M4 C* i8 E
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core: T6 ^" N7 Z! \# V& G( j1 [
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
! l* g( _6 e( K1 smanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
4 g0 W3 u5 n" \; l7 }, obreaking price appreciations.+ f/ W3 ~3 @% f3 }/ K6 R
$ R& ~, W3 E9 I' e3 {0 E( f. ^ Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
( K; @, Q7 K& e* Ieconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the& x4 ^! s0 l7 O6 b, w
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
+ ]+ l5 v# V6 N: S6 Y% }
3 @: q! h! O9 y& J$ k In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid9 i; N4 ^6 h- F0 Y; L
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
{6 F. d {- O1 mconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
8 G. Q! z1 J3 }4 fslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
9 c, u( B6 I# a# s% D$ c$ B8 ]In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers8 @0 L* C; B, p; P, _
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
% c% a$ a% j8 \2 `: qprice appreciation when compared with 2005.: F+ O w+ H) t0 F9 N- ?
6 A" L( J ~: V9 m( Z While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
% m! ^' k' h! Y1 rmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and5 f6 Z# @8 l6 m }2 e6 o
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada, K* D" D/ f% e; S4 ^. m
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
, r* \2 f6 w4 l0 C' S2 a. n: G2 X; V8 A+ U1 T
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the$ v) n1 ^2 m, X8 h& ?& @' Q0 i( `
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's% f/ M) `- D) v8 r# J6 `
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the& h& L4 E( M: c! G3 S V
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general' I& X3 M: e2 {6 I
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
% y6 Q" A1 J! y1 G+ e* vdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
. A5 L# I7 n0 `4 ?( ]" vaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
+ c3 ^0 |2 n" G2 v' M+ X% N+ Hmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
5 R! J/ q7 p) b0 O
2 a8 i# a( e; C6 N3 F" K( E2 Z6 n <<% i* d: @* _1 j' A
REGIONAL SUMMARIES- ]1 S4 {" p( s9 ^8 M
>>
. f, c: ]" S$ Y9 S& ?8 x7 ?0 H. g U9 i% `% f
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in0 U% B, ~, _# T6 L- {1 B/ m
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate! P1 F R; ^- ~ i
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time# h1 ]9 o4 L/ b" w! Y; `5 R4 `: B
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
8 ]% X9 `7 O5 u. d" ~renovations.1 }& g+ J! M) U I! |, p
0 z; J: V! \5 m9 h: w% C The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
1 D% m, \6 M% E6 s$ I; H- _increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation/ E0 |6 t# s1 o0 u# A8 `) |) ]
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and/ \1 N- v5 |. k: T" e( K% ~
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
4 L3 |% R$ w4 S; H6 Y, Z- p) f2 e1 L. a* x+ F
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
6 a! b" N% u4 R3 ?, U0 [slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the4 r6 E2 L" H$ q* z( S4 r
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
8 [' `8 e0 g& v' ?5 Z+ Z8 h600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
4 a) E: q' U$ L& V: `( Ato the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
5 h/ X% @; n tand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
$ w7 g: @1 B0 E. \5 }2 q$ ~8 m$ h* C; }8 W
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced+ w+ ~& T F. m+ u* Z4 g
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
2 a v! Q9 L% ^. Z' s4 ]" yhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
4 C x6 e7 q: b, \* @, F; Zwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
1 a/ L( z% N! G' J# Zdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing. W" D9 B/ \/ N, a7 P' E
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
3 {9 V0 j1 u% i7 L
, N f) \+ U- a6 w Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
: P, g1 Q' d) y5 d& f/ |/ zamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
8 L' z3 |$ @, [9 v3 h. f+ p0 Dpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,1 c( ~- ^' _$ L* q; k
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last9 o- o2 d2 s* L7 P: h$ f
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions." [( V0 [0 j5 N" d* p, } ~
/ Y2 r m6 W" `) V Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house9 Y" T z2 m& j8 F; X
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
3 n; k$ D* G& |+ M7 e9 g7 f- q3 Ylevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
+ E: R# _) i2 E1 y. |8 b/ Tfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,& G' m+ R3 U# C0 I" e( `
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the+ l7 o1 m! x8 A
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before, p: L6 I( f0 g: s0 q9 D3 ]) ~) f
making a purchase.
& C- [ A2 o+ V- b# b$ R; i8 Q/ w+ h) I; _% A# _
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
! F" w* c A5 Cmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong8 d: G* J& j$ O4 S( Q
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city/ D) h! X% m/ \& M4 Q
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting, o4 @! C$ m) B7 b) U# i) C; Q/ m
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
. [* [9 f" x. ?$ n4 Xamenities.6 R( m' c" A2 [; y3 A
: A8 H9 [: [6 \0 n* H The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels& O1 g9 n) r8 i
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
$ e2 B5 X1 |: W, @across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
9 P8 `/ X: E; d/ A: o; Bcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been: V, M- f. h8 Z9 j
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
0 [, H- ?1 a- B& y$ S' _residence, rather than for investment.1 m) p" r" `5 R4 b
6 d4 ?6 t0 U. Y/ f. a; m$ H+ g
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
9 V) S% u! V/ D/ T e3 O# W8 ahouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted% x; k2 D3 d3 N' ~- H% n$ t
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer) y9 L: i `$ r) }' X" f
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization. t; u! e5 Q C) k
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter* B9 @5 `* _2 {5 ^6 W P! j9 U. t8 e
the market.
* Z" u9 C2 a7 ^* _3 z0 s
# i: _3 t% ]3 n+ k* M% h4 F In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through3 Z J, I" P3 G% b# O
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
# C9 |' ~( Z M6 `3 ` `August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
2 c2 r! K7 V8 Z- A+ K5 d! a% e% t! Rmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due) }6 {+ H4 h* f" q. @4 Y7 X/ v
to the shortage of available inventory.
8 M# m8 a9 j5 Z1 X* Z
4 S5 V& ]! \, C* W4 l Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its# Z) e" q: |: h& [1 Y; \! V
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains8 K# _) [5 b; e1 f
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses9 n$ Y* M+ M q, f. g+ A
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
+ U% V, \9 G4 D: \2 S; \. p$ T" e$ R* d3 v3 X5 A
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
: Y( t2 E+ `. ~+ ~- Z8 d- w5 K6 N$ nin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
# [; J! M4 G5 Dunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that' q: l$ _ f Y
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring2 w, O7 @6 S, D
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer( x* i; t$ X2 {4 f; y5 E+ S7 z
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as- y* X% K/ F/ ?! k) u1 ^& x
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.+ Y& M. @; g+ e" R, ?
4 i6 `8 h! ^/ x2 D8 R( P
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter* {" q. }+ q4 t X
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton" g# r( P' d+ ~3 ]2 H7 [
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
& s* M7 q" m* e: Amaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
/ a3 o/ U+ O5 s- }/ e8 v8 m: x! P: Sincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve7 q) Z5 T# J, u4 c* G/ ~6 ~
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly; J( P6 p0 \% r- ]: _2 E, X; w
towards the end of 2006. & _5 D3 `4 n9 M- M
$ R4 h$ O/ x! s7 W' y5 L2 j) G, NWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of: @ Z( ]5 P! r. B4 k u' S: g
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
& M" h+ A# C- Hto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse( D$ \' T9 \* B5 W/ v
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to3 D" l% h0 S, ~+ n9 v4 c9 S
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
$ l/ H$ ]: D' i+ M& ^) @5 J' [pressure on tight inventory levels.. C: \! H$ \; [/ _
4 Q$ Z4 ? Z1 B c Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic& C1 K0 i( j9 D @: o2 [
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people0 H, w- t% v1 y4 v9 T2 b
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;0 C9 W) h) x. G
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
/ S% R+ ~1 R! K3 f( b) i4 Z$ Vfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.$ b& X! H$ I! f
" I. t% s! {' u( U: P8 ]! b <<& f% r Y4 L1 Z, D7 Q0 V: k% K
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
, T: d; u O, m) u- T; J3 S3 C2 o& s+ L( j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- {0 B( b, z/ `2 |7 D+ t
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey2 ~% p) Q% \3 q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' Y/ u) n6 L, l' x" \/ x 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3& k, X8 t2 [, o" y$ O
Market Average Average % Change Average Average$ G' i; E$ w2 ^5 M- j, N' ] ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; v+ z( G8 j: i Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0007 E2 j( ^* V7 z n5 e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 [5 w7 }# G' Q% r$ W
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0008 B7 m: V$ D% x1 ~) A; |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" }; u3 E* O4 k. z Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
) g& ^; i- v5 c# S6 e0 z9 u1 g, ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------( H% f& x9 k. D# n9 y5 R5 D
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
5 ^+ W- X. s( P7 P$ M -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- N3 E* m& y8 f& u# \ St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
* O" N5 g$ g* m* Y* t$ m ------------------------------------------------------------------------- N3 p6 T$ k( y5 g
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
8 e5 G! ]2 ^; O2 A -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# c: v3 Y' b5 a* S$ Q. I) T. ` Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
2 l+ Z" s: z7 a3 W; W4 I -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 o0 M I: t6 V' M1 Y# q) P# ] Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250; @3 Q) s' e6 F( v6 _8 Z8 d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! d2 i# z6 C( z5 p* A0 U Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766+ _7 S: q) t/ u3 r- ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. a! V1 x) d0 i& s4 @; a Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707' X) B- ~5 n) o# b: v$ n' Q' L6 x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) G |$ N) K/ m0 L p) Q Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5003 I/ `2 ~ \' ~8 i4 L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# Z) w& i2 U# L+ [1 c
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389" m; k9 g. Z" _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 o# a" ~8 |+ G4 Q+ \. K8 M( ~
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
# Y8 I5 { ~9 i( I$ w -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. z$ q& B$ W5 W! P: t7 q+ d Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
7 q/ _8 O0 M1 H! `# E3 { -------------------------------------------------------------------------& s" W" e2 _0 P, l. @& n9 I
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0006 K8 [2 n0 |3 v3 x9 s
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ u' q J# {8 x8 Q) l( ] National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860) ]3 y$ b \2 L y a1 g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& m, J/ f( k4 y# G5 H9 F, J
; h/ M6 d; w* ^) D8 g
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ S* q& A: o7 r( I) s5 }+ g Standard Condominium; a* }; N+ J3 e5 Z3 g& v
-------------------------------------------------------------
' u. t# ?2 `7 H 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo! ]9 f2 v; A* C4 r/ a: X" [
Market % Change Average Average % Change
- s: u' |# F. i1 F- z2 o, v9 X -------------------------------------------------------------5 T$ Z3 W5 K+ e; Z3 Q# I
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
1 }$ l* s# M5 y0 [2 r -------------------------------------------------------------' m, l3 a4 e+ P; Z* g, Y
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
6 Y* r8 c1 x- e3 D -------------------------------------------------------------
* w0 n0 b7 O3 {# y, v0 @ Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
" @4 W' Y4 m1 H8 F- x -------------------------------------------------------------
# {) I) N1 x( n7 H- n Saint John N/A - - N/A
1 T" Z# F$ w( V- }/ E -------------------------------------------------------------
9 u6 k/ R/ r; ]& i% }8 w# N St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
9 e( P7 |0 A1 n& t -------------------------------------------------------------, W% k3 ?& F1 T" A+ r+ \4 ^. R
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%* g ]( R9 R; a/ A$ t6 P: ]; @
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ g0 D" I8 r4 M9 j2 _ Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
+ n# G1 g, m: d7 W* N+ ] -------------------------------------------------------------5 Z7 h, u8 W5 B) y f, Y
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
7 d7 D. W$ N$ V) P -------------------------------------------------------------
) b8 b$ h9 H1 B4 M* a' S' ~ Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
* | z. l m4 B1 ]+ s; r2 M; i -------------------------------------------------------------
; h, W, x, R* z1 t* I+ e) m- g+ q Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
) h5 h9 X2 X( ?% Y -------------------------------------------------------------( r* y, ~# R8 Y& X. v7 Y3 p7 D q4 @( \
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%' m3 i- J9 \) `% J) ]
-------------------------------------------------------------; C3 J6 Q% ~, U" B9 \* O
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
9 s: Q0 }" \& ^2 Y3 F; T5 B: j -------------------------------------------------------------2 r6 t4 C$ a3 c$ ]; m$ Z; q. p
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%; S* Q s2 }& v
-------------------------------------------------------------
! Q, o. h* s6 f+ s, e! D Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
) t7 l$ f+ Q, u+ ~9 r -------------------------------------------------------------
+ Q2 I8 I9 R6 W4 g9 C2 x Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
% f; i' S1 V8 f: B0 V -------------------------------------------------------------
- A, L% C# e y: n! [ National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
& S* `/ G% O9 m8 C7 ] -------------------------------------------------------------
3 o# I. C, n1 P6 {6 y& l >>& C& o ]; q; Z
( p' ^, a: ~# G, B3 J% J, e
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
# z0 Y4 G B) a5 A1 D9 @/ fin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint o' k$ v; Y2 }$ b. g
John and Victoria.1 R: j8 e: q. u3 v
. j) C2 H; u$ _, {/ _
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
( W" L% Q! P# ` xcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
1 u! D+ ~9 S6 J6 z, t2 Thousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release* C# [1 `4 n9 m* v: \
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
# s8 d1 V6 g6 T5 S/ ktrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
7 Z! Z; E2 P2 w* D8 ~$ j. jacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
6 W5 j* X& I; E5 {8 davailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
. B8 v) X9 k! |8 o3 Wfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable8 c1 t9 H# }9 s, E$ p" j
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
l# ~' }, I9 }) M9 cNovember 15, 2006." Y% s9 {! X. _& ]! W
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of& w" {2 H$ y- \+ g$ N7 N
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge2 j" F& L7 g* V: k7 n
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
% V+ }! G$ a5 } ~available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|