 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
1 G* [ }: g" E: ^; f" A" y/ o8 }9 g, k& V5 c2 J9 [9 ^
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -) R- O! y$ l8 h3 r$ M# T
* P b5 ^5 S: k
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
+ y+ a5 g4 B, V R' jexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
# e2 Q5 c, @$ B& k/ j! Rquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
6 A) \7 d6 n* D. Xin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
* ^) x; R$ r( P# ?: {4 [price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
5 V; Q( l; l9 f' H8 e0 jmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
e7 P; }% B& }+ O1 j/ oQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
, z7 A$ X8 t5 \: f" ULePage Real Estate Services.9 J4 S; Y) l. ^* l: r& q
. \! |0 I: g n! H0 S6 O: N
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
5 m# f/ @6 v; G1 yare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic, `; K% i5 C1 c; Y+ e; Q3 F
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
/ D( Y& d* Q) h5 }$ k3 Ssound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
$ O4 r$ Y8 \1 L$ V7 z% Vresidential real estate sector.
* M5 O2 m# c, q* T% W- E
6 l: S2 k+ J) }$ S. V; p Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
2 e& x' i; {4 {" R3 B; _, uoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
" f8 P0 R. W2 P1 K" i6 e5 C. yyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
0 V& E+ s% q2 r* ^(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3804 x8 M# A/ x0 X" v( `% N( ?" T8 S
(+13.2%).9 b8 v8 k& |6 O) _' f& B
: n. @4 l: H& k
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
7 |8 L) w- F6 e$ [during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the# Y0 x& {/ @7 e4 C5 s& l
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are6 D* ~' J: M* O! `2 h8 j% m
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
6 @1 \ f0 V. G1 |% Y% ^president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.9 K; ~! t* b$ K+ s% l8 F4 F
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
7 Q( n+ o3 _/ {1 _, j3 X( Pwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
) t# j0 I5 K$ ?$ b# L0 Gbalanced market."
4 C9 M# b2 P0 F8 t, Z" [' @4 |" u, M7 S$ n7 Y6 Q0 H @
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
3 W5 S& O8 `- S5 S% n& \& |considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
; q, y( @1 w8 Lto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
7 X P1 b' E* h; ]6 sthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core; G3 ?6 O& {; w U, }7 K, [
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,8 a7 V R& Y* b& l9 K, r
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
5 i) H: `. \1 r. o4 ^% C- kbreaking price appreciations.% U6 ?( ^* [# ]& Q. u) L$ ?( z
# F* L" J' n& ~" } Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding0 S9 p( q0 T& O3 [0 j8 O
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
$ g# T; B! p' t6 ulargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
0 U8 A8 D3 H* s4 m4 s/ ~/ M+ G {/ q/ Y, F8 w
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
" G/ k9 E) k! J/ Keconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
" S8 K0 O J' b) F9 w" N# S' kconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
" \, j4 y! D4 |8 }6 D7 ]slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.% @9 q. u6 Q* Y
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
, E( t7 [$ x0 b Kgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
( Q0 w: e0 U" D v8 Dprice appreciation when compared with 2005.* ~0 B$ ]( `/ d4 y; D& F
! Z& s: M) [1 {! \" y
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing0 x6 d6 G! [; }4 Z
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and7 R6 v0 o; B0 N: @5 `& C
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
: j. r$ O+ C! T# k( ]( }! aare markedly different than those found in the United States./ Z- r- R+ x o& B; h* @
, }2 Y2 C% M; K( D
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the+ d8 [5 L/ s, |) L! W$ U
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's4 p# s# K9 {4 D1 y& _
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
) q- p$ a4 \3 w* {relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
: m: }! C* ?6 j) X" u, N iaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the$ [0 `& C% x) m' N6 D9 g ~) [" D6 ?- N
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
/ u6 e0 S2 Y* G2 u, V( kaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization) t" D/ F: b, p9 E. T4 F- O
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."- U( Y' W) g$ K! v/ Z4 m* i
: t; S, x% S, _9 |0 Y3 W <<0 X: w7 R8 a, E( o! ?
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
" B! Z1 |' W! @6 j9 h @ >>: v! X: F+ k" V$ I
+ Z9 _1 R2 d7 D; O Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
, e) M+ R) j. \3 dHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
% s' k0 L# W# Q0 \of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
- n. k2 g, \, P: nlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of8 \, a3 U+ O; ^3 p7 ~
renovations.9 q( I/ Z4 `1 T3 {5 u! R
, `1 z# \% w& R7 I) N2 B$ P! E The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight6 b; w: R) D4 ]/ y' N
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation. m+ x3 d8 B! E
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
& L2 ]6 e& i8 a& o0 V& R9 |, J9 ~September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.( P7 e5 ~3 M* a, x! \. k5 Z' K
% D! I5 E+ z$ D7 ? The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer3 X! |, l# Y; Z$ g+ r# x3 A' i$ N$ E
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the7 ]7 l9 c& f+ V, S
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
7 M o1 P% w' a( `, Q7 n- |600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores) W4 @ B) E' f$ g/ E
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes1 U) O x1 t5 \: X& W* h. n
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
+ A @* p- e) M4 w& i- M' O8 r6 h! K" f& _9 l3 Z4 ^& ?# Q- }0 N
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
) o0 M+ G7 P. s0 x% x& A% {conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
# X2 C1 J9 B; U6 g) ]homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers9 a, w5 Z' ~2 W- g3 j
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
% J4 Q1 A! Q I: N; ~' mdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing2 x, X( P! g8 ~8 Y* p# C( |
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
( b! U& R' C3 j3 m. F* r2 L$ }
( x- t3 b& h) m, d7 q Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
2 ?# c0 V' ?2 A6 Q4 y6 v) S: Yamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes: u" N5 t* g) g* \# r0 D
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
# O* v/ @8 m9 D$ U: l$ b9 Yas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last: @- A" M, S8 Z7 C
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.4 G# \& `5 w2 x- e
: T1 V F' r+ ^& Z+ R, j h
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
! x% X) v* t. g4 p4 `/ w `prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory7 ^8 i( l6 n$ x' f
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting0 B! X! S8 V# E2 ~; z# i5 B3 g. |0 W5 G; h
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
! l" w' k9 e9 Z) V2 xwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
: z- @7 L; M6 C: c6 l* {. M0 }: jpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
* }: e3 o* U6 f9 R& c, J Xmaking a purchase.
) U6 [: \$ ?1 Z( j5 ]+ X) W
( D1 L z9 f/ ~+ T& i4 }" A Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
; M5 J5 o- H; B2 ~/ @- m6 Emarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong' y1 j& u; @4 S0 Q
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city! H5 G8 l5 o% J7 e5 i
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
" m2 j4 M X. [4 |' O4 qattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown; Y" t% N& `5 n
amenities.
; N6 |9 R: H+ O5 r6 D# h! ]2 [; P% \$ a* |1 Y
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels0 E/ `; {) q, P
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand6 x' V5 x1 [. d! K
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
* ?! R5 a) R* V0 Y. z7 P7 \6 lcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been. v5 L2 q' W" T) H( b# _, t' s
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
G; D1 n) N+ \6 v( d, x3 O$ V1 Qresidence, rather than for investment.& h+ w: `& D+ L# ]4 [0 P4 m
; b4 Q9 Y0 }. e6 B; o+ Y" T. _0 }" h
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as6 X* s( D" J" H4 E/ ^/ ?
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
5 V+ u! H" P, j. [; e: e. Sin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
' g( h& o4 p4 r9 R q7 D5 y% Xconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization; W/ }) |) } b2 B7 L" a. N
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter0 J, o* l# n F" B+ E) B
the market.
5 @4 F; f' x; t0 M- m* X7 V: x3 ~. h$ B2 d7 }5 k: N
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
0 K( \1 L& s& ?3 h" w8 eJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
( Y; R+ z9 w( M5 uAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
- f( o. y+ Y! k" cmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
" V' F; h& e+ H! nto the shortage of available inventory.
' H5 X& }) e Q, Q0 C: } V* x. C$ T' R. H9 t" O, H# g
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
" Q, E! z1 H1 V: t7 y! Dmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains- n' j. | {# a$ P
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
- x5 g3 U0 C* X( hstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
) K0 s1 a. I, D, C( K0 C; w9 F/ P6 R
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
K* m2 P5 t W; o( Lin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
" W- \& \3 @ L( p% Uunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that+ _# P) f* M$ j2 a: u3 n
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
! ?) f: S/ u6 b% v, {prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer$ u3 t% |6 O. d+ @* V5 i
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
. H- |0 D" s2 j0 [buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
+ d' R& \. e6 }2 t
; U, m% u& M% X; O% ^, M, F( } Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
" Z3 D" w$ {3 l( @# O; r! las activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
9 P% J' T$ v* aremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
# q8 U; o) J& b2 t0 n2 K$ f: j* cmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
. O, g! T+ Z8 h$ lincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
; g6 \' a: C# m. }; F- O9 l6 C: J( qin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly4 {! f; `1 B: q) ]$ q, h
towards the end of 2006.
. L5 V( `* |4 [8 j
# d! t, b0 y& f, E; _- _While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
7 B; L3 @7 E) E$ r3 C3 qinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
6 w- h! R7 i0 H. q+ s( E: lto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse/ j. a2 R4 ^' f6 X2 U# p+ q, a
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to3 ^! u$ Z/ i* L1 h9 h4 u+ `
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added1 {/ F% d/ l4 u# D% ^
pressure on tight inventory levels.# l( N& k" V# x# c7 V6 u
+ D' \. o! w. O/ K8 R) r" u& A6 m
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
% ]% y, z# l- bfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people+ V* W. l+ ~0 Y$ Q
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
3 w$ Y/ Q8 K* j3 c3 F! F5 J+ Mwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching7 o( @1 F w+ J0 B1 R4 |, l# \" I
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
: X5 O+ X6 N* E
( M$ Z- d3 D5 ] <<
; ?' U9 ^. c3 w. Y* L0 B! C Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20066 P" Z2 M4 q4 L* ~
% j7 R; ^5 B* _3 p; H- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) z0 j x! u, Q Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
9 `: N) R/ t# h. C4 Y1 @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ u* ^; _3 M8 v 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3$ u' [/ C( u4 E9 A- Z3 }$ l- ] }* j
Market Average Average % Change Average Average7 e/ R4 {" j1 E8 `* Y& A# `
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 U7 _+ @9 i4 B! _7 \& l4 _
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000% t) \% ?4 `# S. t- C6 D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 Q; j q2 j+ B) ?8 x9 T Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000& j% s3 `& w- t! B: }3 g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 o7 S# c# ~- J) V- t! i, w0 T
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
: s8 b3 Z5 r. n1 J -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* p. N3 p! h. ?0 C$ ?* R Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -' q& w$ m% x! Y0 W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 b& E4 G. V- _' R' a% h% L8 ]
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
- k; O ]0 }+ y) @6 G: T* T -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 A) d/ a. f P1 |7 R( T
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
4 Y" U% [; K! t' @/ E8 h0 T -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 W, B0 `0 l4 u6 Q( g
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
5 _5 u7 y$ P6 v5 L8 k -------------------------------------------------------------------------! D/ X0 i! M' i! u
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250) j( {' Q6 D% L' ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! ~7 p5 h: G) F
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766- E, f2 Q% @# d5 |+ d! n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! |' ~/ ^% O& Y
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
+ C1 d/ T/ M& g* `3 l -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 W* I( [' I' E6 W
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500( q: H- F0 j9 l6 b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 p+ F) N2 e7 @' [- S9 N$ s' V% W
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389$ {9 ~: p0 w+ e# {# p# `. R) M. @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 o0 Z; ~6 W# Z: U8 a
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
/ q% x5 G C) T/ [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 M' Q7 }6 ^4 ]" y) j* h+ Z! F Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500& Q4 g, K; _- e" Z" ~
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 I [$ V0 h' Z5 Q; q! N) m6 W
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000$ w/ `0 Y) ~6 @3 Y% ^3 x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: F/ _- e9 q7 f. S# L# a' Z National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
& }: G N+ A# h# h* O- A: v, f -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 Z0 b9 _) s+ i5 b! M
. z" a4 T' q4 o) t1 N4 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------: x% [' f2 q8 U( @2 b9 [) a
Standard Condominium
. H( s& k2 W* ~1 b! A/ a -------------------------------------------------------------
; L' u' l" o, R; U 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo$ l' `& b. o7 \ i' E) e* n$ U
Market % Change Average Average % Change
( @! f3 |) U" l -------------------------------------------------------------
4 Y( Q. D- S& e Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
, F( X3 B& Y2 j/ X -------------------------------------------------------------
9 D4 z, f0 `! F5 e' }. c Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
& |5 U6 S8 h* h' i3 q -------------------------------------------------------------
+ V; e" Y1 _1 {8 [, w# [/ p Moncton 4.9% - - N/A" y0 B3 V" Z; ]% b4 q! b) b2 Z
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ W; {' I7 o5 [4 C; X# ]8 L Saint John N/A - - N/A
G2 J7 X$ B4 b: C% w2 ] ]' [- h0 o -------------------------------------------------------------
2 Y+ t" o' k. r( J4 ]% F St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
4 v( F1 k" f/ _) f% F( H1 N -------------------------------------------------------------5 s. {$ [ I) l% Z4 d9 M
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%4 ~0 D$ q& l5 b/ j
-------------------------------------------------------------. ?) h9 ^) G5 R0 n4 k3 o: ~8 B2 |
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%4 ~$ ]1 P; m' h0 @: s% C
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 \- c3 [. {! u. y3 `+ E+ N2 x- ] Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
% h" d& n- ~) b) x -------------------------------------------------------------
1 H# P1 Y6 l( N& d8 z3 m2 W Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
; c8 R4 e4 o+ C! z -------------------------------------------------------------
. Z% k- C6 }3 |& a1 @& x. u9 E Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
! R. y; f' R# ^% A8 R -------------------------------------------------------------
7 g5 T0 O; M- m9 s Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
( A- ?7 w0 J" ]$ \& R' _ -------------------------------------------------------------
( u, Y( Z4 {9 O: Q Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%& T% l' K h7 ^+ ^; o$ w
-------------------------------------------------------------
" x) c3 t% B9 S( d4 r$ B9 a' ]& \5 x Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%& X. E7 K* d$ y, M* T# C+ S& i
-------------------------------------------------------------
" E: \* s. @; s U8 E- V Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
) S1 ?1 }% H6 O/ o& o0 G -------------------------------------------------------------
) [& U I6 M/ O# J Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
# o2 l! n a; y6 } -------------------------------------------------------------# F. }4 J- h* o4 H
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%: P% x' G0 }- T, e" z: ^+ v2 r
-------------------------------------------------------------- T( O& l; ^' X
>>
6 ]! w0 B) a9 p& C( u; a; [# x% Q* B d7 q" f1 w( h6 ?
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
& Y$ V4 c- K0 J, w8 cin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint9 W7 M8 L# A. C# D/ B# R
John and Victoria.
5 R) X4 L; l" B+ z" o
0 x+ Q2 T$ _5 \ The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
2 B2 q0 O _+ `3 zcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
i! s$ ^: b, }- l. @/ Khousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release, S; `# p$ ^: ]9 d! [8 r2 ]
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
) } z$ L3 T! I/ o k) s; n& `( {trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities9 {7 u1 E W1 [+ {) W9 G. h# h
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
* U% a" T) Q! K% C$ k0 kavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
9 t$ r- K ]6 Y# u5 Y, f7 vfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable, Q; e: M# k+ Y) m. v
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on& q& r' y; |) E- [1 j1 w
November 15, 2006.
9 e$ \' j$ F9 ^6 |9 M3 t, O Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of, J' w0 l' H' y4 V
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge2 C) X( X( I) O# P2 y" m- M) g( s* N
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
( q, n V! f% I& c! j# L; r! ^available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|