 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ' D; V2 K! M3 V+ ~# }/ V2 f
! J9 V. |0 l7 W4 d2 B1 X3 ^- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -* F* b% p1 F, f% F$ q0 {
3 T( s2 k) {- p4 c4 T" n+ n# ]3 m
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
4 c8 K7 Y# G9 B. r+ O4 Lexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third# P, G+ f2 n, ?$ p
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic- ^# @' J" M# q) k) P' A; f4 S7 |9 L
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
. _0 y: s# g( T4 `8 n7 e! {price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and# E8 U0 T3 h! C9 P/ X6 P6 ~
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
9 e4 s) W" o" a1 TQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal4 j4 p' z! {9 t: M/ X/ N3 C& {
LePage Real Estate Services. W7 [ A( c$ P% v
8 o. K" W( h0 L6 z9 P9 S: M9 l0 n Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters+ E t0 A4 }* { F' G u- T
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic8 O+ V, S7 i: g- J( t2 w' w0 _; h
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and9 s+ h `6 d( i. d- `5 E# n
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
% D7 j* S8 z8 e- d+ U F( mresidential real estate sector.0 z- w! G: t3 h: L" j4 r: Z
/ n7 \: j; g/ g! L+ S6 j v U
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation3 V6 m/ h$ O# z: Z
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
( `4 r% G1 V1 ~& U7 R& z0 v1 t& Iyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
, |2 V5 M% H1 w% [$ i! {* u2 o(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3802 `& W. [( U+ l* n7 ~1 T0 {
(+13.2%).% o% a0 D; U7 k2 @$ R, |5 x# R
`2 q/ t, ?5 E% H1 L' k% S h
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth3 @5 S3 X1 u+ l/ m- m8 C
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the, F" n' c" `& r9 S0 b( `
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are) O% i6 J7 Z7 G8 k
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
- J5 X4 G% G1 Z V' Z# dpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
$ @4 Q! Y9 z% M, u( F6 n6 h$ J"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
3 p& ?& j7 l9 Nwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy$ ^' l2 {5 g, G H3 ?/ }' f
balanced market."
3 v5 D: {2 f! g% j7 d6 l8 P4 c( v7 R& ]1 H, m$ p/ D* X
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
$ |/ \5 S, r# L0 {8 oconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift5 w w- W9 a3 o5 C; x ^' G- s
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
( J+ e, w$ |- a: o' t# y4 W9 e2 Pthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
2 s! r6 B6 t7 E5 kenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,3 c+ V7 Y u3 Z) f
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record. T5 ]: T4 \" P) [. o2 t, y
breaking price appreciations.
+ h7 M0 l% Z6 Z; G, _. }: y
) S4 `, Y. r3 W9 d* P+ K6 B, ? Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding, b) _: F! J/ E! T, @5 q1 W9 K9 o# E
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
2 E+ B) ?/ z( R9 `* _largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
1 O, Q9 V& N* o; g
+ r: F" [6 y% v+ @$ c In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
" M0 f) ^2 \6 D" V& [1 _economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
I! |! v; t6 p5 k1 Rconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
' T1 ]9 ?, [8 v2 s% ?( f$ M, |slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
( n3 [1 d7 s. c, i; @0 d/ tIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers1 ]% O8 c2 ~; \; }5 P2 S: g+ E7 ~8 l
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of9 n y# p2 E: C' C+ H: r u
price appreciation when compared with 2005." f: T- `# q- y8 S
$ p. T# p9 a' p8 E7 I While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing# u. Y+ o! I$ s/ P" c* F* s$ q
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and3 ?7 C3 N# Q3 C5 H" r4 p& q
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
- {2 T% t% m% \5 {are markedly different than those found in the United States.
4 h; o$ q9 n1 ~& e/ a q2 W |$ a3 c- v1 k
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
3 N1 a8 n. J0 r c0 VAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's# i, ^" a% O; O6 a& L
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
8 H# G+ Q- f$ S r, brelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general, T }# u* p, q8 Y) a
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the& `/ G) b* C- z8 P% N
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and4 S& f7 P5 M* C9 k( @8 d E5 u
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization+ j1 y( b; d7 A. p; y) Z( S5 a( M
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
, }' J8 |3 z h* {
. C+ V* e5 Y i: D <<
2 L8 R" Y1 z6 m/ n9 q REGIONAL SUMMARIES
+ ~' p2 Z' h" G1 p >>
5 e2 m. I( O1 J U% V! {4 U6 }3 ?1 q8 R1 B& [- d4 G
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in3 Z6 N2 N6 D1 E: c
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate! I5 _$ g) t$ Q+ [ k- c3 Q$ C
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
$ w4 l, J4 S2 e1 P/ W+ Y, ~looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of5 P1 j9 c/ I/ b
renovations.
, `/ g+ {% j" D( _3 B$ I. G$ j( G! W0 {7 R f6 P
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
0 V. Y9 |9 @! z% N+ w- Nincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation* B K7 }4 c; Y( u
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and3 h3 s: y% d/ h: T" M+ Y
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.% ^! L2 J9 I! U) A
: p* X+ p* ?" u! ]0 y s" e
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer+ B; i) M1 T% z- r8 ?
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the2 z% t0 _1 R) W. |
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new/ S5 ^+ z, z' Z6 E, z7 S+ O
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores9 w/ \9 X! U3 B2 s0 j
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
. c' c; m d+ u5 B8 |/ w+ B- tand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.) y. Z7 b) O6 g
9 U4 F: u$ A' p4 ? In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced V |+ Q C3 n5 K3 P6 e
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
/ N; T4 q# ~$ \- ohomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
0 W% j$ c' _4 J; h) O. ywas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
- T0 r, L: I( @- y1 Q2 rdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
1 U: i; q+ Z* Sbuyers with more options when looking for a home.) W$ @0 D2 a+ p6 S! ^
D& ~! h8 l$ T! L) v/ Z Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
' s/ T5 }9 g0 m5 Tamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes$ V- O' `: k; y# o9 w2 G# W% Y8 E
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
- ~- l7 W3 B5 G; n6 k3 }as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
# U& f" t4 y8 q z: M6 E6 [5 \8 q6 E% b9 yfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
# W4 ?, f- K8 m e( i5 O: ^
& g8 R* s8 q5 |1 m6 Z Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
6 O1 }* I8 @1 K$ sprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
% j+ u0 G* N' l) a4 m' L Y1 {' ylevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting* W2 `3 C& ^! `( X& z4 f0 O+ ]" B2 T
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
3 A/ N- r J% Z% A ^2 `8 S8 v4 fwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
, o" q v s2 x" x& N, ^# epressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before- ~" @0 f3 U" I1 e+ b) u5 X
making a purchase.; t) n5 Y$ K9 s( W, T
* x5 i% @# \" W, z+ k; t3 v1 S4 G; X
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing3 Q! x4 a& B% \* a8 G" o
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong! w, j/ Q: I8 t. b$ x5 O# u7 D
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
8 O* F4 @5 a8 a/ `4 \7 o* j! ~0 {centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
+ C. Z# U- H$ R0 hattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
9 J3 d* I* U+ E% f0 a* Vamenities.
- }9 W9 U8 q. U
# L; o8 w* n/ t4 c% G9 p The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
& W7 z C/ t+ _( I+ @% t- Uthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
4 y& J, z1 w4 N- y% Facross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has& x3 V; m7 w( R' ^
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been+ w+ w' F N* {, L Y
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
6 B" v0 b8 F" fresidence, rather than for investment.( N/ O i: d1 c7 z b
% |0 q. D6 T- F5 Q0 d$ b( `9 U
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
/ P7 a5 b& |! |$ Lhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted( k* y D0 g) a4 n7 D! A
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
8 n. N$ d. C- z8 f# ?1 a8 Iconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization6 b; R; H7 z$ ?5 a' M# k
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
+ X% z0 J$ S8 [7 r6 \. jthe market." _7 Q2 c, m t
# e! H2 ], @" H% B9 \# M In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
* e/ s* t% E9 j SJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
# Z( q' Q } S2 JAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring7 H4 Y9 _# w/ @, c
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
# b7 P# N! d! O% e' `" Ato the shortage of available inventory.. f1 e0 E1 q9 P. s8 R
7 ~8 P4 \) I, g& s$ m8 m" C Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its! g6 R$ q; {: Y/ }- ]
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains7 f# s3 n2 B# U* a4 B' p) \4 g# H; g
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
8 r( X& J/ N% t/ W+ Y& A9 L" j# Vstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
9 |9 M( B* r* b# [$ p5 G# E
6 |& w9 Z) [) V8 P3 Q u. O5 S Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases, U3 ]9 F1 u6 I' W: y+ t/ i& o
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low* X9 J5 t* y- y/ K& r6 T P% _
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
5 \! J2 ], H+ L+ p6 ]" dpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring# M1 M2 S) s4 m% X) T
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer+ W2 T/ W! q1 f: g& D* }
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
/ Y; t$ p3 ~/ B! tbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.! q$ l# M6 @% _8 C( d+ `* ?
, u0 x }" w2 a; ]1 a+ T Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter0 X5 i! V+ U$ ^( p
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
( l' U# V5 i2 C' ?, oremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
D9 y8 D7 O/ I1 t B% L5 x2 Fmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices% O: g0 `- N% r) ^! @- Y' d
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve. {1 k3 O: @( a2 T: I
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
! s# a) x6 Y0 c" z5 u+ r9 o( m3 jtowards the end of 2006.
8 d! \" k: W8 K' l2 B! I
7 J9 g) h# v$ VWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of( b: y: k- w7 l7 {! v7 t/ ^& S
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable6 l% C$ ^! ^- K0 v, h
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse* D! m+ M' E- {4 }0 K8 k
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to3 P, n; K) {; o0 @8 a! h: g8 \; P
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added k' i# b3 G) Q2 [; N6 D/ u( w
pressure on tight inventory levels.3 T1 f7 {- y( g
- Q% h$ j: b3 x: f) G6 J Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic1 q5 _, M1 t' B# t/ {6 _
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people1 T. x u6 P1 Z" L; c
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;7 O( ~7 w2 V! H
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching% `8 ]2 a, [3 {
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
1 i7 R4 s2 @ L: R9 M7 ]# |% J8 n7 D# _1 q$ l
<<0 Q9 G- U- T$ s9 E Z* G# ]8 K
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20069 M/ {" F7 @# K6 l- x1 n9 m/ I
5 Y# I3 F% y+ e -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 E% [$ ^# }/ R( b; } Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
8 h. S3 i k% h& H -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 n$ d; d$ j% y! _- Y
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q39 ]. e2 A0 ^6 o9 G
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
3 z' z, }+ q0 H% M3 P5 @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------* s% O& |( p' c
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
* Q2 {. h2 q) B1 W1 I- `+ z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Q# K- j/ ~- s, M' U$ }% q Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
5 R5 y- o1 {) y0 Q, k/ q7 O+ E [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------; m8 l: p/ a( s6 \
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0005 L0 ~5 c. d! l! ~: w' Y, [
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( ~& X4 g. D9 @" M4 S. F
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
, `( s2 U5 I: @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 Y" u0 D f# S j0 r4 M2 {
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
# W* x# Y" @6 d5 c: ?, f7 Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' V9 f4 l4 }) V Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
4 P* A# p, \* ?+ _( k2 m -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 B6 C! G2 f, f% a Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
2 g8 \3 v# P6 {9 X/ r3 T6 v9 g -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( D, t5 W. }% H% b# H0 w/ F Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2509 |* e* I1 x0 Y& F. d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 L, g* @8 e6 y- O( [ Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
# g6 {& ~8 r( Z$ f) `4 v. U -------------------------------------------------------------------------: h2 v4 X" O7 _# Y
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
. j8 c) }) q* R3 l f/ v3 ]: E -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ i& d% R$ q' _1 R1 I Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500. s# t( y6 y9 |) M3 A5 W" a, I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 I7 h( q6 u+ F( ]. r0 J+ h
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389) f% D2 ]# B2 q* O7 I3 D; x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' v2 R2 _) _2 u8 d; u" Q5 U; g' E
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714! |5 i6 Q: y, S' l" D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ @- j. \( t4 }: T0 T: b. G, [ Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
- |. H1 u' u" ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% u7 V8 H9 _- S, b6 [- X Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
1 X+ Y' W7 W. T/ ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ a+ Q5 L4 Z: d1 A) B National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860 I. I3 ~; } ]* {2 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! M/ m f5 N# X5 o3 Z
) v$ U2 y5 F3 C% l1 c. R' R: S
-------------------------------------------------------------8 {- i7 K. h1 Q9 O- K
Standard Condominium( E) a! }% K+ p1 h- D. y! y5 P
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 h/ o8 O/ C4 A0 S. \* h) d+ o% r" a 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
* e' n Y, g% Y; O" ` Market % Change Average Average % Change
' ~9 L& [. X8 f& g5 g+ ]% ] -------------------------------------------------------------0 d( j7 K4 f( y! M) v
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
% r C2 F3 e Y4 Q -------------------------------------------------------------
& v: b! ~, q1 C: v Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%- h1 s, A7 {' ? M( N7 Z
-------------------------------------------------------------9 @! Y& {0 j9 ^: g$ O0 ], D2 X
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
# Z0 _6 |8 l# @: b" k" Z -------------------------------------------------------------2 H/ W9 d0 q; t
Saint John N/A - - N/A
$ e9 s# `! L9 J3 L8 C -------------------------------------------------------------4 Z$ c8 y L) d4 F } i
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
0 b: r7 ?( r7 Y% F# Z' ^ -------------------------------------------------------------7 h7 j z0 h- y- B6 A: I3 _8 Y" u
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
' a; g. F: F/ O: d! v" z# o -------------------------------------------------------------# [# Z( \8 x% T: d: S7 u* P
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%7 H: t5 N6 e) b' ~! A2 N0 c- X
-------------------------------------------------------------# e" @) A5 O, b( z. L0 W4 @* G
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%$ _# C8 ~9 K q
-------------------------------------------------------------
. W5 d+ @8 \% S Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
" Q; [3 E E, x9 x5 q$ w9 y -------------------------------------------------------------
- C/ H0 j; y/ n: ^ Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%, _' n$ p; E; a+ m
-------------------------------------------------------------
) W+ x5 M% y& t: z Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%0 [2 q; P0 e. K- K
-------------------------------------------------------------4 E8 O, x; i7 k$ b" W. q# _
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8% J# g0 `8 V7 p& F: W) v
-------------------------------------------------------------
, S0 g9 \4 S5 i Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%0 ~/ N- u( e* _5 {! D) [
-------------------------------------------------------------$ }2 [9 E. K8 v
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
9 I8 u8 W6 o% K9 _ -------------------------------------------------------------! c! T) d3 c5 L+ z
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
# p; C- x( S9 Q: j: p$ X+ d -------------------------------------------------------------
V3 k3 A9 J0 J( R( B National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
3 z: R: t! z& F$ Y7 L; H -------------------------------------------------------------
C3 V. S/ Y$ g6 m >>- X6 H$ L I) R( h" F% V$ o
1 P( D% L7 W5 F0 C Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
- E0 R. g, Y# }in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
8 O @" J j, d( q: @John and Victoria.
! @& L0 \/ \4 m% n* J0 f0 w& ~) U0 j; h- m/ T2 {
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
0 F- p2 y# k7 x* `% |& acomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
. r, w3 c+ f8 c! rhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
3 v3 J' _5 {3 greferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price1 Z- s T3 r) V4 r0 @* O8 P2 \
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
7 q0 |! G- r5 {) F2 ~1 Y2 D: m- vacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
& p4 P/ P. c- C, L6 F5 H, k7 Kavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current. h7 \" r0 d- W6 X- ~. @4 n- ]& {
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable/ ]$ L, ?$ V5 N
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on, W- y0 C5 q @
November 15, 2006.; t: n; g0 v" H8 p6 [3 Z
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
" o3 P7 Z+ m+ n' bfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge% H- U7 u) t. L" y( X# W" h- [
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
# b. x9 z) R8 U0 Y* ]available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|