埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2090|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
5 L# T& J/ c/ l. d& ^; c; C' A- [& Z% d9 s6 c. t3 l
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
2 o% K/ o' ~: V' U5 R! u( H7 z3 Y  a& \/ I' Z- E
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
  z: a% Z2 V2 p; Yexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
- N# M' R0 U0 z5 P8 F9 k9 [, Vquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
' H( s3 i" [3 o- rin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit$ I7 {, {7 W+ ]% }' `
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and7 X: G, n) E6 X3 U; }) K
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
3 [0 _% `! m! kQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal1 ^$ y! |: o2 r2 `8 ]4 C0 a1 `! c( Q; h
LePage Real Estate Services.7 g" G1 G. M. G

; F- G" [6 W* k9 x" T0 W7 G, d    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters' w$ @' g  G+ t0 C4 F6 ?
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic. l4 R5 Y8 D7 f6 q$ f
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and! F% z( c- o, {& b; O1 \
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the4 T+ o+ F: S( S2 b$ }- `' l
residential real estate sector.
2 }1 J7 `, x% S; e7 N( S! _, l
+ N: @- L& I3 P/ O  S  ?    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation6 `, R! d* _* ~2 m  Q: |
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
4 C$ _) p8 t& L* iyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
9 q3 r/ c5 T4 E/ c, S3 U0 D# H(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380, s& ^9 ?: w- m% [
(+13.2%).6 V$ [" ?' q* Z+ h

. t9 W" j% [# q2 [    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
( X3 u6 A/ E; ^. G' wduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
7 n' E9 i% ^5 ~! k1 d6 \) Rfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are( w- Q+ Q. [- r9 q
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,1 e! G. D" T7 K) Z
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services., Z! A) k7 U  S- p" A
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We1 i3 D/ B2 P. E* y
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy6 p6 `& ~' `0 ]+ P9 V2 C; }" \5 l
balanced market."- t* n* H' |& d" r+ w, g
. }& C: f7 K6 ^. @3 i4 g# h+ w6 ^
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
. L+ O2 f2 t9 [" _0 d* M7 Kconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
6 ~+ O- x" O4 H7 F: c* M2 @, Sto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
( j/ K9 \. g* |  p4 @* M. \throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core3 M7 L+ X0 J# l  ]9 Q% p
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,! ]1 y/ L4 ~8 f4 A& r+ s5 k
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record  t1 L2 G( h5 i! u2 K8 I7 N
breaking price appreciations./ S% Q4 t5 R3 b) L4 F5 d

. F& q! A; Y( f! }3 y3 Q    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
9 e2 `) E) I) v6 Ceconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
- M, F- d4 h6 g; U8 K+ p/ j* Qlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
% Z. V" }" B9 A) I' K* c( r/ a3 |& x$ V1 P9 b1 x
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid4 x( G- Q. w# B3 r  |$ c  f0 h
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
$ v7 W2 x' Z; p3 H) ^confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off* y( U0 E, F0 |& m
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
& P6 T6 `% D3 R* xIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
) K% p! _! y) R1 e& l# ngreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of: k) Q* O* x6 T0 I
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
! Z; @$ B$ V8 ^; I6 l- a# e5 Y9 i
8 Z2 I6 {1 M, P. w% G  C: c; F! j    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
* @8 \. b; X2 |: S' L+ Tmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
0 ~) r7 N: R* ?financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada2 ]- T3 q6 U' C1 r: P# ]
are markedly different than those found in the United States.; v6 K8 |& I2 k5 e3 p; d
5 l/ f5 J8 J! R; l* F7 @
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the+ @5 l! m7 a( K/ T" \  R6 U" w- z
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's, A  q9 q7 C5 r2 u' s7 F4 W
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the% t+ J% n+ ?% {3 S, ~$ A" x. w
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general& w: ^' m) e1 I; V' l' R
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the& r( V$ E5 j8 i3 ~& p  R
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
( V  h" u+ [. w) D2 gaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
$ k+ }  ~8 F: \9 ^5 R: M3 X3 jmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."- k9 t* Q. B9 V2 l* B0 H9 @0 d
5 E8 O( E2 a. E3 p  }9 u
    <<$ `1 B* m) \9 U* K" r% V) O$ M
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
/ q3 ]( r0 [/ _/ t    >>
2 H' ~9 S  R$ m+ G
( P2 F3 O, j+ x& W+ F% `* y% B    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in) v/ |  ^  @% L  Z
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
" b  f  K& M3 G& k& |of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
! `0 m' h1 _) d4 Z3 `9 plooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of( R  r7 X; G7 o6 R7 t! _7 l& \( a
renovations.
6 o1 e7 P+ e! J6 i+ u* G; {( j7 d# C- S$ W  W) E, r
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
' v) |; ?6 |( H) Aincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
! ~6 `7 i/ y1 `7 Pcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
6 m) J! Z- d8 s) p6 Y7 ?September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
& Z) b1 v3 S. G2 S" q( u% ]2 }
' e+ m+ C) f* n0 o4 i    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer5 g4 z, {/ \4 j" ^3 a; h
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
, S# n3 U3 g1 }. zquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new, l( M) J& @* {0 X
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
6 n& E# J9 G2 X+ s9 Cto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
0 v+ G+ N% l8 x3 U6 D! ?  yand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.1 Q  y% x* x# p9 F5 F! I
2 d; S/ C8 `9 Q5 [$ T% Z+ j. f' @
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
1 C7 q$ I6 w5 r0 a, W2 }8 Wconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
3 z( A# E/ d9 m. thomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
- \9 O. i) K( V$ c" ^1 nwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian' G! p5 k# S, J4 G; p/ e! O. m
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
* C, t4 u% r, m3 a7 v3 D% ?buyers with more options when looking for a home.
. ~- _7 O, v" I2 z7 I: e& y( g2 M4 n& o; d
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly5 i% a" W3 ^/ J9 r: k' P( x
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
5 G- v+ A, T% T& ]priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,4 s6 V. U9 G0 G& z! j
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
/ U4 j7 _; O9 ]. Z* g5 O! tfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
) K$ M8 I7 c  o; E, `. q9 t
% ]( d* {- ]( p0 H( e" x, J2 y/ ]    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house" Z5 E6 I, n4 n' P& S
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory% e: e, K0 K# o) G
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting& v6 V" z, L9 u- ?9 O* ^' e6 K: w
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
' a  q  l1 `% J! H& Dwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the+ u5 D% b6 F) T  e6 V! P
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before) e& X  X* s: d! g4 c) M
making a purchase.
1 X5 X9 Z- N  m: ?/ f' {6 |( F+ R5 V3 x. T" s7 I
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
1 e0 d/ m; z+ w( |, b, f8 L9 Emarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
) N& q% C0 Q0 \+ \  t  mconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city6 p" I; F/ a/ S
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
$ R$ G6 ?* ~% e# `" oattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown& @7 C* L# B$ P- f) A9 F
amenities.
, p  Z+ q# h& i: F: C8 J+ {! k6 B
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
1 l7 `( j8 n- v, Zthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand) N0 {  I: j* G, [1 A$ e
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has6 E/ w- Y% `, c; j1 b9 _8 Q
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
( d- j2 y/ m/ k; J+ a6 rdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle" ]) X4 p) \2 T( B% Q2 B( T' E
residence, rather than for investment.
9 c, W' _$ H2 x; ?* |7 z1 @: [0 {' g# Y
- d( |8 p! e% u) R5 a' s* k    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as) n; h& L' K; e- s
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted$ U) j* k- d* J' l7 P& G$ i) _- b' J
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer8 t# T  j" R, M: \8 o
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization! P7 |8 Z/ h- D# o) S9 Y
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter1 k( D! y% S9 `) Q2 E
the market.7 O) c) x) H$ ?8 g2 {
: ?0 z: G+ v; @+ [
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
4 `4 z2 b, v* ?/ e" }3 F. X) VJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
9 N8 p/ B3 K9 E2 K" ^: g) m7 l# I3 QAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring9 F) p' G8 l* S; A1 h) P
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
7 R) o+ z4 J! G' G( `3 Y2 Eto the shortage of available inventory.; z+ K* j3 }, u' y
; Q% E. W  d6 `- H- o
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
% J8 X0 Z# j6 N1 c2 S# @. Y. umomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains5 H& x) o/ A3 d! @: b3 p9 p. l
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
( i: ?; [# X1 W* Q4 kstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.6 a" a) Y2 l# s- T; ]5 ]' F5 u
/ B. X3 N! F9 b- K9 u( X
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
& Q3 C: @. R: D1 ~) vin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low* N& m  [- r1 J4 x, e! V
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
3 I4 s( n# L: b# n6 h3 dpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
# y  X1 d& _* ?0 S: @6 cprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
  {$ M, b; \" }- ?" dseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
: W/ e' P6 r& S  e" y8 ^buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

+ u4 i* K. ^" N1 U5 c& N$ e
7 I& u( f& x, m. d    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter% N/ K) Q0 R7 f+ ^. T; r- G
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton- h. p0 S& v* l% Z& X  F
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
2 [$ I9 l9 e* h( g; S" zmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices( f5 A) C! n( |/ y: l7 S$ K& x
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve6 G% U4 D: M. H  s
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly- Q( a+ k+ p# ^3 R/ `( t' \
towards the end of 2006.
    $ Y9 h) \; U) O5 n4 f% E5 T% p9 P

6 N& _) `$ R9 ~" A0 L! R: Y5 V/ lWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
) d: L" `' k+ einventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
- t8 {. ?" n6 t  j/ E7 y9 F, tto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse7 J7 h! C& w/ d' t
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to" w! C) E/ T6 X
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added4 E) g. K4 S9 p* v! Q( ^6 q
pressure on tight inventory levels.
: Z" o& x- ]3 k2 V
0 Q1 f  h8 }6 \$ V4 J8 b- l    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic& }% X9 b/ O" T; `/ n! i
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
% ?4 O0 q3 Y1 r+ d# m+ r( Hinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;8 d1 L0 s7 ^0 n' I2 q
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
' |! H) C' `: y+ @' \! wfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
6 ]( R/ @, C' s) {: }
5 R! F7 _9 G7 G. K9 `    <<
  A$ H0 O' u$ Y* h, G/ u. `      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006* X1 E1 i+ s" R, P8 }) x; d+ [* M2 X2 I
/ ^* `0 n- _1 E& Q$ p) ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( x% t; _, _/ U! @) q                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey% r$ v" l( \- U$ Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ N. I- ^: F8 K- Y                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3' u7 X1 j" \6 l
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
& I3 t6 Y5 ?( a" {    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 r6 j6 g3 U5 E3 s4 b8 U, s' i
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0003 X: Q6 q$ {6 i8 A! [$ {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 E5 m# a( T) y6 U( n2 T5 |    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0004 M* b8 f1 V4 V. L
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 C. r9 F1 {$ x    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
5 @& C# n5 F5 H  `  i% h3 c: F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; R+ A. t" G, D) L$ a    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
, Q0 x, i: W! h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% k  t" y1 {5 _) E) i$ d    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333. P. Y0 ~% U/ {8 d! X7 i: A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 R$ r  ^. Y+ p( @" @
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583; z6 ?' x2 R' _8 B# r! [
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 Y' d9 G/ X1 }4 c& @' h7 e
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
& o: y( O. S3 G# r" \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 T) B( z$ b( X" p$ n! N; ?
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2501 c/ Z/ r) f* k  S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- a* m) `0 R" \3 f( @. {7 V+ a
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7660 j& }/ _) K7 E* c0 R% B2 L
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' z7 q* G' `! X5 e
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7077 c) @. c3 t4 O# P; a' B0 f; S0 b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 U  x8 b7 ]8 N! v. P' O
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
# d6 T% ], L" ~: k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 S5 q( P8 e% D0 V! s/ N+ `" d/ ^- T" y0 N    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389- M0 _& I; m. t; ?9 c
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, n- ?6 z# Y" y( ^    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714( n- O" w/ C7 A* u8 F' v# @! I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ U& t! {" Z6 b0 r) t
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5009 i7 A' f2 [: {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ s3 h4 k8 g' F0 N9 ?$ q8 Y1 I+ u    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
! ^5 F2 U6 V- V6 `5 \& i/ G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& ]% d- `  u0 u    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8603 [- W, o" z0 g1 W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 y8 W$ k. h% N0 {7 E4 ?5 R

( B. P4 S. F4 t$ m3 Y6 d    -------------------------------------------------------------4 o5 N$ L2 d6 t0 p) {7 s. w* @
                               Standard Condominium* A6 x/ S1 a9 M- @4 N; G3 Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 h2 K9 j( z' T# d5 l8 d( [4 J6 _. k
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo2 N, j1 {5 _* t9 d0 j
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
  r1 H- K3 f  H    -------------------------------------------------------------2 z4 l+ a/ w7 ~8 p( P6 I# @+ u3 k; e4 J
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
6 v4 h( n* B4 S7 u! p" f    -------------------------------------------------------------* F4 E, ~; V4 S$ K9 {" Z) q8 w
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
4 }% z9 ]8 g2 c; H$ A5 J* I    -------------------------------------------------------------
  J9 b( k) E2 D8 g0 Y4 L5 d    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
0 T0 e/ n( l  ^! m" V% r& r' q% b0 S    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 e' ~) h% G" C    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
5 E: U) o8 c/ F6 }, x, {0 Z7 ]    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 g6 u  p3 |- N( u- X    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%# W* X1 P! p+ X
    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ f$ z% H7 r8 g# q- u/ n    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
" f2 g( s. Z" d( N    -------------------------------------------------------------( |# i% ]( l( k$ {
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
, b3 T. p; R, G& I    -------------------------------------------------------------: G9 b' Q( I3 ~9 z1 W5 L7 n0 c
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%( v' ^& V  m1 d5 M+ |3 w9 y4 M
    -------------------------------------------------------------! ]9 k; u* \3 v' A: n1 b- w
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
, r* \; g& ]" {0 p: @; W# J    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 ]7 y, g6 u* W, J& w$ r& q    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
8 g: a0 j; m  M$ Q9 D" ]# ?" {# D    -------------------------------------------------------------- R2 J( }/ C1 v4 ?% Z
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%7 Y1 o( b9 v+ m, D$ K  Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  M6 _! b$ S5 s8 D    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%5 @0 p8 ]9 |/ p$ U1 [$ F8 \
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, k) c" L& J, _5 w% z6 H( `/ A    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
! v) D5 Q7 d; T* m& E5 y    -------------------------------------------------------------
' L9 a$ K2 S6 c( B$ U5 r/ P8 r    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
- r$ U5 L: Z$ p8 o$ b6 N    -------------------------------------------------------------% m+ n7 c7 g# [6 W) H
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%7 S2 k4 ^' U7 ?/ L: d  I7 u( e
    -------------------------------------------------------------  s0 H5 m. a& `  F  j  i
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
* Z$ W, E$ V9 z' O% R    -------------------------------------------------------------. r& c. s3 ^8 ]) ]( Y
    >>
! l% _- Z4 W9 }4 g" k- _( m+ ^
0 a6 [( w4 N8 k    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined( H3 M8 U4 f. s5 p# ]( u% S
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
0 K1 p6 y+ L: M$ Q" W) B% @7 B/ \! ~John and Victoria.) l% L& ]; \0 e0 j4 `# U

* _! x2 a, \" @' D; S    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most, _+ w) E0 ~9 W8 A# A
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of6 J+ b! H) E6 f% F1 D; m3 T, M
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
1 c9 t5 C  a- d+ F& n5 D/ K% Creferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price" M" E1 n6 ?7 n* X% d! q0 b! P
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
8 q9 Z$ `4 H7 O* P" c6 i/ u3 iacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is! O+ ]1 i+ j0 M/ B( |3 c
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current! ]4 x: R/ b9 o$ Q/ V
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable* [, x4 n& \$ E; v4 e
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
$ A* |" {- R. `1 ~  |November 15, 2006.
& p: k1 M1 G7 e/ f/ ]- g! P    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of9 Y/ N* n- d2 J4 I/ K  E' z
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
  D1 ]6 Q& J* E- d5 P7 e# {( qprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is9 R/ U# e7 f6 x
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-21 07:18 , Processed in 0.075685 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表