埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2119|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 6 |, ~3 w  |/ b1 M  V* |. U
) j$ J! C& W7 j1 K" }
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -6 ]1 V4 Y" }5 |. D2 H3 E2 l

: @! X% T5 C5 H% U4 i( i1 N    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
; [/ v" Z0 E; O* |exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
- N4 d4 S, a. oquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
2 a1 ^; D, K5 i- n6 C5 w. pin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit. C) J5 d9 H5 G# V3 \
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and' X5 R& }$ a3 B
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
/ }5 i! a! o' I( h0 z( l, V! _Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
8 w1 l1 m: N& [! p! d+ F9 l* XLePage Real Estate Services.
  d5 C+ \2 H+ O7 q0 K
  z: |& l7 A, k% G4 {# L; e    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters+ ]8 D1 U" b0 p! \. S/ i, z( u# c
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
5 Y" a, o$ O/ m3 [! F' a" @conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and1 N' Z2 U/ i/ [6 ^
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
) R) c3 U& u" f/ ]1 Q' C1 }! W, @7 Wresidential real estate sector.
7 I- C0 q( y) y+ F* {/ p& w0 K7 G
9 @  s( ?$ k# ~) x    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
3 ~: w" C0 ^5 L& D* K/ Xoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
9 `1 T- f1 c. H' xyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562+ i7 O- Z: F, q, c* X
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
0 f: {" o4 V6 }(+13.2%).
% |, W$ t0 N1 y3 M6 l$ P, t- B  \7 {% w& \, H4 q
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
. Q2 t' E4 i9 s  x- _! ~3 S  w, dduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the9 ^: o0 Z6 J  J! `5 `! c8 l6 b% ^
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
! R7 J% C- P) R2 X% C4 Ppoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
: u) ~9 X( h) D% c/ g& Cpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.: T' _0 y4 V. t- }# m
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
4 x/ f4 T- e6 pwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy/ `/ T2 v* H( s2 O
balanced market."& {5 A  \# K. c0 p0 ]

4 o2 N5 j, q/ U; C    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,+ |* e. k5 b8 ]9 R" N9 N, I: E
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift9 e1 J" v6 c3 ?8 N. y/ E, q, I( E
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
  ^' c6 j8 C) e) T1 z2 ythroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core" J5 _7 f0 e- m
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
  e& a1 F# S. m. x$ y" Kmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record' {9 r2 }, B4 J8 r
breaking price appreciations.3 V% m- x& {, z/ @9 g& a

* g2 H  x, X2 v+ ?& ^( Y: R; n    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
$ F8 b5 V8 K1 D" F2 g) w3 {7 Beconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
5 |! j/ O. _& X9 N8 `largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
9 O9 ]) U8 K, A1 a" x: }- \* [" U# T4 c0 a/ Y
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
3 v0 u" x# I4 V/ n, t) @economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
/ N8 f2 B/ ~3 [* ]; x3 G8 w- O" qconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
/ B' n. y' s+ F0 @slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
( r' A) Y: h* X7 i  R9 WIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers5 B% k9 W7 }8 ~5 {$ h- B/ j6 G
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
& v( F# f9 p* o0 H+ @4 v- |price appreciation when compared with 2005.6 Y8 d( Q' c4 l# o6 f$ ~8 Z3 M& ?
4 K7 D+ @) |: L
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing- G; Q) E$ E$ z6 X
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and, e9 l* s* [( y; l
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
7 W" ~+ w, X6 L/ {4 k% p8 _are markedly different than those found in the United States.; ?+ V  s3 Q9 E; }

. T$ r' N3 k7 d3 t3 r3 I    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the+ `$ P0 V2 ^4 K
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's. _. l: d/ N9 V! z2 L* e7 ]
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the: ]6 y# w3 h7 t9 {; _/ C$ s) p  h. K
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general+ g6 u$ f  L7 u  |
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the. X% t7 }! B- h# C' n( \0 A; N$ R
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
" h+ H6 a, C, laggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization; z* O+ [- v" g, M7 C) f
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."+ }5 x8 G6 D0 R( ]" [# k" O$ o& J+ _

1 V( w- P; c2 ?' C    <<
( Z4 j5 l% r2 n% W, o0 h1 o: W( R                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES, g# V& ^# }0 n9 q
    >>+ G6 n% X2 G; j  \5 Z5 [6 y$ |
8 l' ~5 v" G) @$ b2 }, z2 |
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in) j7 R( m$ c$ z: F4 V
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate# V$ l, b# Z0 |: B7 n* V2 f7 ~
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
6 T9 [/ {; v# Zlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of3 R, c. {1 ^8 D0 A2 U& N
renovations.+ w1 D4 y2 d6 d

5 V$ [" X/ c0 Y! y    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
, U  r* B& D2 {1 Z6 {0 V& o- w6 Kincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
3 f. V5 x# }" A$ scompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
; B: L0 E6 V9 L. s% hSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.( J$ n1 B8 u' y( X

/ ?  ?6 z5 r% e4 h    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer8 d# N8 J" l1 L7 N
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
' y" p$ y+ ?( v& j+ oquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new+ c, }- ~0 a& M% n2 ~+ f
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores) c. @7 ~$ C+ e! G
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes/ j" q" }* c. v: d
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.* L- L6 [6 B+ J/ g* T$ }

0 u2 v: w3 |0 V8 J  T    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
% o' T/ G6 j  g' e# gconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their3 D2 {& m0 |% V
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
8 H# ^+ o* A! E1 M4 ~was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian! S8 U" `# K+ C& A$ Q' H
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing( Z0 ?1 G9 U( K6 }
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
" h1 i# `& Q# u( U/ `0 t( k/ q6 [' `3 u: U4 F- Z9 J
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly' }( z4 \" q1 P" ~% S
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
8 O, M% x8 A6 f& Npriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
7 {5 w  p. R2 I) f# Aas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last2 V% a# a) K/ R. O& Z: G% j  y
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.3 Z* F8 l. K% I9 i3 R# \

: o% k* L8 L8 [7 D# A% v' I. Z" j    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
; b% H$ m! K6 q; S2 m. G' Z4 H' Fprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
. X+ |7 [! B) o, xlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting6 N1 x; ?2 n; y! r& r) k& }
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,0 j) X  s& \2 n& a* r) `. k
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
  l$ ~5 [! U" H( F2 E/ M8 B% Ppressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
2 ~7 y0 w& P" smaking a purchase.
9 Z* K+ f+ _. [0 G, g
" _: u+ Y! ~2 F# L$ g' z( M    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing( l1 J( P5 i! t+ g7 ~' z
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong: d# G4 e9 o9 G/ K* J4 O
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city' @/ ]7 E6 x% ?* i3 z- K
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
. _9 b4 U6 F; A( _  _3 m! {0 \: mattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
! {" H7 |  h( X5 ramenities.
* C& p+ ]$ r' k# r4 ?8 P, W) ^* b  g) \! D2 m$ C
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
; y: c' X$ O* F, ?) Y& o: j( I5 Uthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
& Y' X- v' e  @* a, Racross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
. ?+ ]! R; R1 U8 I: o1 [continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
3 q& x! L8 k2 d( e- a2 Ndriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle4 s4 f* H/ Y6 f* W; M
residence, rather than for investment.
; w- b) C* _6 w4 x) F' j
6 ]5 Q: e$ s5 x/ `, K: S) m+ V    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
6 c+ d1 I- c* S* Y# F; m+ D! Ihouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted6 f+ M9 |- ^0 P( B6 l1 q$ p) A, i
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
( l7 J8 \% e- d0 U7 Y; s& t8 xconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization! J3 Y4 U) j4 v
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
% V) ?( Q* P7 z! j5 t+ c& x7 Pthe market.
6 V( P; t8 n4 J4 p( a5 V' g3 c2 g  K9 @* @5 A: d1 u' k8 D, U: w
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through% t, l9 i7 [( I2 u9 X
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
7 k" J; E' [; ?# p* L+ R0 S8 oAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
! G% [: K  m6 U7 O! mmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
1 S, \% o5 I! Y. ?6 tto the shortage of available inventory., d1 c2 w. P) R) T& |2 D2 d

3 n2 [! v6 ^5 W8 `3 K+ }9 t. Z/ b    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
  l9 B, B( u; E3 N: Z: G. o+ U8 Cmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains' a: {; ~/ H' u# _1 Z1 s' n. l
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
( M& o3 R  Z6 p" q7 Rstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.! m+ ^6 V4 s3 `% N
, M$ m$ g+ _7 I1 N+ X( B3 K" o3 A
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
. n$ I0 P/ f+ ?0 b- V/ ^in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low; Z  O: P" Q" G" ^2 p
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that  T! \2 A; t3 D; g+ c
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
4 U+ E* l3 x: T1 m8 Xprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer' _) Q' v- i- N# I8 }1 A
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
8 Y6 B* f1 k; k( c/ Nbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

( Z$ Q. H& P$ H. _2 r$ H! h1 J7 f, T4 \: l9 `, I- R
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter- U; T( E) U- b* H( w0 E8 I
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton6 l, i9 N. }0 ~' F
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,  U3 L# \1 l" O- V+ S, K1 F+ ]. ~- _
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices; o5 G9 G+ x# t* I  l
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve( G$ F7 `2 Z  u. Z. R( z" g
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
  k6 o6 ?6 u0 ?- ~, W2 Z8 }towards the end of 2006.
    ; v* p0 e. X$ e2 k. T8 f* o
: [4 f) @9 @7 s: h) ?9 J- z
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of5 Z, h. h+ q( S
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable) V# k# U3 g& o( m* C0 ]" T
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse1 a0 \0 t* h; `9 |0 z* r
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to6 a) C3 ~2 a6 y3 r
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added3 {# Q' R$ ]4 {3 I% n
pressure on tight inventory levels.
. S8 b" N/ O+ p, z
, J/ _7 \1 }! ^. J    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
( L% r0 v" x9 k" x4 z/ x2 sfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
* H$ J! p# y5 B: B0 @% zinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
; @0 E$ a* V; y4 y5 i! d/ d* ?while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching/ c9 v6 h. b: H5 A# P
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.- x. C& v6 r8 V
- V1 E8 G. L- m7 q/ x+ M7 g( E
    <<. f( v4 M' J3 h7 l
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
6 l. d! Y; I& @& U& ]4 M# K* a4 C/ y- p3 }1 x
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 C& d+ {* q) q                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey6 G) x7 m) Y. C2 u/ x7 ?! [
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 h3 `. B/ ^" T1 \# G7 ]! b                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
# f& q" ~9 w( C, T( }" I7 R    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
; C* ?% s+ X$ k% s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 ?4 l5 ]! a) g. o: v% l; X" r
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
9 d) B; h* D. z6 z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 E+ L0 P8 J. d% g2 O
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000* b) {3 ?( a* f! x# c+ C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 r6 F2 C  V' l' q2 d8 z" ^
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000. F; b( E; ]+ H: e* Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 H/ `* k/ ]& h$ A% ^! T7 W    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -5 F/ a$ |) V3 {9 |, A9 K4 l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, ?' m% @# ]. M. I; L. {/ V& \7 Y: e
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333# g* T3 ]3 r% I. h
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* e7 a+ B3 Z& x! D* Y3 d2 R* p
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583, B( a/ q. H3 s1 t* w6 L* ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 m. M5 W2 N) p, j0 g: m4 E' W
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
3 c7 k6 x" E  d. b6 I" n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ h& ?  @" o4 b7 s. X4 b/ p    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
8 e# w) |5 t& E, f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 a. v  H$ y) B1 ?5 u    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766$ g' I' `  |) N7 B% o; @
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" L9 ?, _: c% c% `/ G
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7077 Z: e5 p3 R8 j4 I1 X8 ~2 F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 l2 d& L4 L# h' O9 T    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
# S$ }$ c/ q  _) R/ N% u    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% B, S, y( O( Q8 }3 j, g    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389) n: M. y, Y. p+ I1 R& Y+ I+ |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. y; J. t* S  A4 J7 |7 Z5 j6 W9 E" l% S    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714. x6 l1 C0 `" V+ _* J2 r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ R2 L2 P  v, g3 d$ R# _& _: J  \9 @    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5002 q& C+ Q/ v6 C" _
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* m* L8 H+ d, u+ W) o& U9 S    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
. f" G. u. ~  R. x' E) H6 h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 X% G2 R: k! x1 A
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
- Q- Y4 {2 _. j# \# F* |    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& k4 f( J3 S( C; n" N
( _- k/ T4 X1 Z" I
    -------------------------------------------------------------- ]% c; e8 c3 C# H0 G
                               Standard Condominium
& R' a, a. Q' Z6 `6 ?$ W# |    -------------------------------------------------------------8 k1 R9 a* R4 R& [, M" M* _
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
3 L+ @3 f3 E. z( W0 N; f. ^, O    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change# S! T2 Q5 g" {' v+ F% C9 `
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' v. ?8 n) y+ C' ^: l# z    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%" b: O" o( s5 w8 Z1 D
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& V+ S" T/ W2 S" @/ [    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
8 a' k. U* Y9 l. |1 x    -------------------------------------------------------------
. P6 B# _$ u! {% u1 E    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A3 o' E5 C5 A" O: m4 Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 J1 b% y; h" h; d- u1 ^1 W    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A# N+ v# b0 X  R% y  x  f# k
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: M; f  L; n/ M. A$ x$ |' ?1 v    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
0 m$ U# K7 w' Z& R2 a    -------------------------------------------------------------
  z7 z: e% ]/ q# Y* U1 d: s    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
8 Z. n4 i9 x$ P5 o% `2 s  R; i    -------------------------------------------------------------2 Y# u5 f/ x$ r  x% N6 p
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
* _4 l: s5 ]# s0 e0 P4 b9 z& O    -------------------------------------------------------------% N1 y1 u& a1 @. W) q( I% o$ S
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%. ]7 A: E+ p% U5 I5 s; L
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 ^5 j: W3 P2 T' C( x7 p    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%8 L5 n7 `' |- i3 T- q6 T) a2 t8 V
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ F/ S, P  q- r( B- M
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
& c3 p! y) a, d3 D3 h    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ ^: Z$ h6 }6 G- X* h6 v    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
4 t) H3 ^/ |. \! U7 }    -------------------------------------------------------------
. S! `" e5 V# k7 q' [* h) D    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
0 x& b! t# ~& Y- ]    -------------------------------------------------------------! z) ?! ?9 G* ~$ n; n
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%7 m: i1 S# }( S2 X. M( G6 X8 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------  |4 i# @" |* S
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%  a: ^# G1 Z0 [. g
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ y, o% I; W4 ?+ @4 l( T    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%# @) \: ]) ^8 Z) C  @  v3 Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------: b! `: i6 R) G  b" U9 p3 ?
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
0 `" r" U; a# R) }) D    -------------------------------------------------------------1 u, f+ q* v5 a
    >>  }- f0 I& R" _! W2 O+ @% r" k

) }3 z5 e# n2 K, E) R- P    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined/ l& ^8 v" V2 `+ T+ Q
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
  q4 G& w1 [$ [John and Victoria.
7 }8 g6 n( d  {7 S  t+ R! R8 J$ \3 ]% x
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most0 Y0 B) ?" M# V( L
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of' N  g/ N  T8 p
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release  I  d, h- W0 U9 K
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price5 T( E# I7 [- e- l6 E
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities) K4 S+ \; z' `! O/ q% h, T* A* {
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
: }6 u0 j& G# D  p1 ^available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current! K) }, I1 C6 P, \9 L  z2 s
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
& q: w8 I' H$ dversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on6 p% e  n7 ~& V
November 15, 2006.' c+ C! h/ C0 J3 E6 j+ J
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of( g; }& B1 W3 Z$ r3 x
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge, X& Y+ Y" k+ v: B4 T; S
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is: e4 R+ w" u' k5 K* U" m# M
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-31 00:05 , Processed in 0.150753 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表