 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 5 H' q2 P1 P3 J& Z2 }7 W2 C
! N; n% ^6 [9 ?+ n- g9 f
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
/ D! _9 k/ y4 r& ^; O/ ]7 T' a% V) n7 m, X' T$ E3 n* n
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
/ q& [2 N- U8 G4 q7 }exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
1 F9 K% _: k' E6 Qquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
- V1 C5 Z" Y% J" b. f z1 b% W' }9 _3 hin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit: G6 P' d1 f+ F& s* ]) G
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
2 X) c' m# ^, a2 qmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
8 ^' M5 x4 i9 Q/ G, J" mQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal" Z4 X n, f( ?! L& a: N
LePage Real Estate Services.# y' k& o% [3 {5 O* \. `7 |
: T/ q, W! d8 G9 @0 Z T/ z Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters6 X9 d2 @; C0 Z
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic! K+ y, ^( j6 x0 q8 X
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and4 r @; S1 c) j0 W( z
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the9 s- I. [+ C; `5 q% \
residential real estate sector., R4 z& ]6 C V
5 j8 J6 E9 m7 {- Y0 R$ a( X, _% t
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
& ]2 C: F# V5 ]: Eoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
0 }/ Z4 l/ U# t8 jyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5623 A1 o+ Y- r7 x: z
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
% y9 j6 K. b" V: g' _" d(+13.2%).
/ i" ?% q5 m" t& ~, M8 q% i; n* s! O1 {* u% P: l
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
/ |+ `& Y, D, U/ d& `during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
; V* W5 D3 h( X, f, jfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are @' Z+ x) i4 O. |- R) L" H+ D( ~9 S
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
, o5 u2 U( p- [7 C% M2 y* Mpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
1 e; r& z3 G9 V3 K- }* g"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
& C: G: l! t( b/ P; Q& Wwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy \% Y7 `9 M) f- S. K* l/ j
balanced market."2 J) j, z/ }# C# U8 Z8 k) [
~: R, ^6 u& y) V$ [ Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,. S& \. a( a5 v& a j& ^# g
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift* B) v0 D6 T( A+ [: ~ L' Z
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
, s. Z8 e4 m6 J6 b, A* y/ Dthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
3 D& [) g9 |, u3 p& q1 cenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
# w2 I" B* P; l0 Dmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
6 T8 c2 E& M* Hbreaking price appreciations.& _% D9 k9 _( s& L; Z
0 d* U3 s+ P4 ]* V, w6 a3 @ Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding5 d$ E2 n# v! j- N; q0 g
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the2 R1 Z H3 ]" E8 ?' F( q4 q, T
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
$ d& p$ K$ l2 k5 I F* T
' i$ N; q0 x5 [& K In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
/ J9 u% \% @2 D: p9 ^3 }economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer: u8 b4 t/ C* B, ]6 r0 I
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
$ E1 ]# H9 u5 A/ J+ X: Aslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth." Q+ r5 i% Y7 S7 G5 `' i
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers3 j) G/ N4 }) \
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
) G6 v- I1 I1 ]+ a9 } p- wprice appreciation when compared with 2005.. | r' K1 W1 i' `7 w
& e$ I/ Z2 z! l, t1 Y0 r
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
) d6 i- @& x7 k; i/ Qmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and% o; ?* R, k1 |- t
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada. j, s' H0 U# v6 L0 \& @1 B6 _% ~
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
/ G& y8 i8 y- E: U' B4 R' r/ K' D8 I" z4 B2 l# ~
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the8 W! m& h! w/ ~( m* N
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
; c( g) a3 z" c3 yfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the! b. z9 V5 u3 x
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
# S- K( [6 f1 M7 P) Eaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the2 o7 |, L/ _. o
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
; y. D( H5 Z! E! ?: q( d; ~: K2 caggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
9 g2 f3 `- Q. smortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
, e0 i2 {) L, i! ^0 Q3 L- w8 {/ K0 s+ U4 ], j* [+ ]' e4 w
<<
4 b2 h2 L( d- p: a1 D: `- v Y REGIONAL SUMMARIES5 Q7 u' q: Q, c, }
>>7 b3 c& D( }9 l- ]8 j
) w5 j @! u1 D+ e9 U! E. R
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in; `5 y5 x W- `' o! x: G" k
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
0 z' K9 u g1 n" sof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time l: u; k- D" ?4 T
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
1 j5 H0 K8 j1 l$ M* zrenovations.3 R7 h" F3 Z1 h0 j# ?* S
$ |3 n! d% F( ^0 P: y( C0 V' ` The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
# h u+ X& ~: x+ C9 u+ @increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation8 X8 X& y1 r, K9 q3 @+ O% b- `
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
7 W- C- ~4 [( y* k" C# S$ P& ^3 m3 [September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
$ \# i- ]9 ?! L1 _' K
' x* ?: d7 ]0 e/ _# ^0 E The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer3 g8 f& N5 F; }' o* q7 q; h
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the# o7 h4 V, I Q: w/ ?8 X3 z
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
: Y* P& f- \! A2 v: _! b! [600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores( y3 c: H' u: L3 J
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
& k6 {+ L! N% V* yand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
/ ?2 ~# a9 K3 W; ?: c$ A/ P, y7 O7 e0 A; W
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced) I6 p$ t" M6 P7 C0 \, R& D: O
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
5 d. v9 Q9 L6 a# Khomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers) `3 w2 B& r8 F3 M% F6 W
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian: i# o- _/ g9 ]. E
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing" i9 Y' y D# [5 S1 |5 I! v$ T* s0 X
buyers with more options when looking for a home.' `7 z$ E2 l+ \4 t1 D
0 f( u: z( X$ |- E- g* E! x3 c
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly% B" G! W. S1 g Y
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes4 }4 ?4 i6 K9 |
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,$ Z' b- _/ s) J$ U) M+ }$ k) R# I5 W1 y
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last$ y, b# R5 l/ G! h1 T! {- r
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions., X0 a3 `1 Z, D+ H' L
e. b1 }, w6 n2 \. a" S
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house* W( A" w- O* R8 C3 V* e2 O. B
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
. b, d1 Z' f' x9 p! ~' o& K7 {) `* tlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting8 J* o. n+ M, @1 v, F. Z4 U: {+ s; b
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
6 l- n2 E) w- q, W$ awhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the+ [! X* K& j/ h. L% S( h. t
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before' ?' r2 l% i2 K
making a purchase.
! [0 t/ {! _1 ]' }! C Y
+ z! j6 Y! n; l9 `' V Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
# \ m7 e( D8 Z9 ]1 p9 vmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong4 j$ U/ X! L* Q6 D4 c$ M$ S
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city' |4 X( |1 z2 O
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting9 E! f2 P& d; N& V
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown: {" Y; V5 {/ T3 b: c
amenities.# g+ l* b7 U, Q/ K
$ O( T1 t( c5 ]! h8 m/ i The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
. H' {3 i( Z$ a6 f2 [6 cthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
) A$ |3 X1 I9 i1 q Z3 [5 E2 ~across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
9 ~7 g8 N( a4 wcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
. F Q8 ?+ |3 K/ Tdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle& y' h) f7 f5 E" k) ], p2 l
residence, rather than for investment.
. u. k" |+ d4 _& B6 n1 R% o# F) V& x3 r4 l: s
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
" _% \- U `! j1 d- z7 Vhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
6 h8 R/ b0 R- S% c, p5 ^in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
) j9 v* b$ D2 f; ]confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization; a6 ?, g `$ t" v
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter; w# W5 z3 I6 T
the market.$ ~/ i4 T: I+ h! _
+ d* i8 n2 R/ j3 B In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through' a7 T l, Z6 T
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In0 y: B$ P" I& j- X
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring+ N2 S/ X( e* ?' A# ^
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
$ N6 @- h; Z$ M8 Zto the shortage of available inventory.
4 N0 R% q" K: O
( ^, i- r# r7 z7 {' c) j Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its) E0 L0 o5 w: o) }/ {, k
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains( l6 |4 [- n% [" ~3 o* _* j
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
' q" v3 J$ ]7 `; L! X; Z$ rstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province. ]- s; N2 p: X6 h6 [6 f% q
t) N: U: Q& r$ [, k j1 E Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
: u( S# k# D B( Bin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
% `2 c2 O" U. M, y0 M) kunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that |# W- u" H; D) ` @) {
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring/ Y4 N; i0 ?: l S ?- w6 T
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
% c& ?; n+ d; f$ h9 m" Jseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as: q& C6 h& f8 `" r* r" J4 M7 V
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.5 H, c: `6 i$ w
$ I0 b8 N5 ?* j/ K, Q7 ]
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter( p$ [4 h, V( O% }/ c& H
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton( }6 n2 F. X( H
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,, g0 Q: J& E/ U* d3 v+ Z7 D
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
$ V0 Z' O; l# F+ ?increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
; M) |- y* m; t" H M9 Pin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
; W1 u: P5 j. k, S: z$ Ytowards the end of 2006. ' K9 R! }9 o& r
" K4 h: P3 G2 c9 M! yWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of2 V5 u- R" o6 O1 v
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable: r! w N' ^: d* J! |) f
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse3 M8 H% E) q2 H
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to+ B- u5 C& k3 X1 y4 h5 l1 c2 ?
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
7 |% }% ]! |* ^5 Wpressure on tight inventory levels.
& ^* U" P0 Z* O9 O( k! ]4 t: n! e
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
. d" ]8 Y- M! ?: ~fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
9 f7 T$ V# U/ m; P0 L' a% l8 Winto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
8 [/ [* B: H+ I% L* v( Fwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
~1 S5 Z3 t, hfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
, P. J; ^4 c' ]- d" ~# }! d: m9 c& n6 m4 {, f) H& P
<<
& H: B0 d# o, ^$ @# q |' O% O0 q Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
( ]& r7 T) K' ?6 [9 I
1 Y7 u9 p$ z, `9 o -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 }! h8 m- b( N1 p! C Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey$ D5 E4 u4 J. X/ D2 \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 Z% U# x8 a" h% r. a# ?
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3/ P" X2 q* s" Q8 X; x0 c( {
Market Average Average % Change Average Average% @0 U% a- \ _6 L) D8 z. f
------------------------------------------------------------------------- u- \/ y+ F2 @1 h! h7 |6 j8 m
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
! U& j' J* s' J- U0 @/ _" k7 } -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# J1 G7 J* w$ w6 L' G7 y) v Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
2 v$ U4 j% e& \) H- y& n1 Y4 w6 _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 R1 t- w# u1 a
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
+ A w4 b/ o1 \& L4 ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------' N: l% G# L. ]$ ]& e* V# x3 y
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
7 r7 _1 [, s! N- a( \, G! C. j ------------------------------------------------------------------------- R4 d4 W: [. t/ @, E+ P- ` x; k9 d
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333" k" _3 T: K. F f( O8 t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- v& C, d7 C: _7 ~7 a
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583" W$ U" _+ ~. y. ]- g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 s+ ^2 ]4 v% k2 g# I6 e* g
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
7 A4 k9 P5 W6 ?' z& N. M -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ b' u. v9 a; G9 W7 u
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
2 Y& M) w: a% R! @3 i; m2 s -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; ~" m( {5 g* ]7 j+ n0 I8 ]; t Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
! i) a: O9 R% e: M- G -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( I. D- b y B Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
$ p8 [( T4 m3 V0 p0 t -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& ^% z8 Z; @8 e; K2 j+ R$ L) H Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500 J- G7 O0 T- j- T( Y8 w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! l, r. j+ A* K# F Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
1 K: g! K# @/ M# H$ A& r& G -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" Y8 @) h" C; J Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
' j4 ~6 l3 i* z2 c# K2 G2 e% l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' x6 y, t1 L/ h7 E Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500& i' N4 }. e1 f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& y8 J+ Y. p4 d; X
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000' W% d5 k) n' f+ u# m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# _/ U' Q2 `- _0 w& i
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8606 h0 r9 Z; |* C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( b/ r, U) R' F/ Q# K
h* I4 E; N. X, D# n -------------------------------------------------------------
5 O; ~- E; R1 q, E" J; | Standard Condominium
2 c* F- C" I' ` -------------------------------------------------------------
3 Q. s4 g' o8 s( l' P8 t! X# q 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo% f. Q) v: \% G. ]' P
Market % Change Average Average % Change
% q" l! R5 E- u1 Y8 S; w& Q! [; G -------------------------------------------------------------
" c; U n2 J) |5 d/ C2 ^: U+ q Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
4 K2 a9 g* G" t7 Z" u) q7 { -------------------------------------------------------------
" x" z; b% r: O Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%, J A! R. t2 q
-------------------------------------------------------------
" m, G8 p& k" V I Moncton 4.9% - - N/A9 Q: E' x. M N# v: `. B. y! k; L
------------------------------------------------------------- y0 Q+ t. m* X% v) p. `! P4 F# _
Saint John N/A - - N/A
% x% _7 i8 r$ J, Z: o -------------------------------------------------------------( K# q$ P# e4 e4 P D! o
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%2 U8 Y. Z% f& V- {
-------------------------------------------------------------
& H5 X; {" m& p5 I Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%. J, H, k& G3 A+ k1 p& I
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ Q, f8 e, h) z Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%6 |" `' S, D3 I& |7 i+ [
-------------------------------------------------------------* k' x* M! G3 G1 o$ ~
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%( x. I1 z$ x# O% I
-------------------------------------------------------------, R3 k' {* O- D9 z4 ~5 h! G( v
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
: z6 q% M) r; W* n -------------------------------------------------------------
# H8 M0 I6 n5 r5 M4 ^$ o' z/ L Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%" u& r& x% n5 ~2 E5 d' ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 w& A( _2 v6 c& t Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%! Q0 c" @" ~/ N( v* ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
# c ]! J9 P8 y* l' N; W/ T Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
- x, A. @6 O! [- I6 G5 A -------------------------------------------------------------
1 d* t0 b4 Q/ e& w) ]# R* o, Z Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
. ], K8 w2 ^6 A s -------------------------------------------------------------0 r( k$ t$ s. l5 o
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%0 H' |. S9 _, T8 L
-------------------------------------------------------------
, }* B: Q( V/ a* \% D5 C Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
0 y& B2 D: T2 b) t, Y. o W -------------------------------------------------------------
( t- M- A8 [8 i% V' G. {, L& M3 p National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%" ?# m. u$ X, r) K: n: @& L
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 X: O5 p/ }+ v6 ` >>
3 L$ n6 t: y4 R) A4 ?& ~- K
( z5 {9 [" H& R8 K- h Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined0 Z8 ?# j% J4 ?+ ^
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint4 [$ z- S# b" r4 S, F) |1 B/ w
John and Victoria.
: i$ w! u0 ?6 z5 b: {& R
/ [5 T- M7 A. G" ~- g4 @ The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most3 X) D: s) i% A& ~
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
( n6 r3 k2 Q5 j' h& A% c5 Z* }3 N; i& khousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release9 ?; ~- C# i6 w7 | X; K
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price2 ~' n2 v- y& D) n0 e
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
; H1 j; o/ a: |across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is5 ] l+ T5 n, w/ T- o
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current4 e1 k, H. y- v7 o/ C j
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable6 P4 ]5 P; @6 r: k' f, n" Z6 C
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on" C* f, T8 l/ `6 Q
November 15, 2006.
& P5 Y9 V0 W# D4 O# _, a Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of! c+ S6 s4 y* i1 r3 ^
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge, S, Q% |' }/ X8 C8 B5 H4 K. v
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
# [' C2 J' _7 ^$ _, f2 R4 v; gavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|