埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2087|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
3 U! |: L% o7 Q8 d" r& k
$ z% F0 E4 z6 e, ]1 k! m  T- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -; Q+ o9 c8 M3 m  V6 B3 }" S. Q
: U# O& Q# u" U
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
2 \, P9 ]+ J6 J/ v$ Y6 gexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third" Z+ C/ a0 y4 z- z2 T
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
, o5 W' M" T5 [$ l9 @6 hin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
  N9 r) A, \( t# ~4 r. e: b( G: Xprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
5 V% U7 v8 J$ q9 S7 nmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
+ _# w5 n6 `; ?( M5 {8 m7 AQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
9 l5 N$ X; J/ h, |4 L3 j! cLePage Real Estate Services.
4 ~" F+ U! z( }4 C" A* G' Y/ l3 c7 }4 n5 b5 ^8 P: M3 u
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
! @( U) ?, Z$ X( S2 u& I0 D2 z- Dare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic4 I2 @% O$ S. P) B" s+ u
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
+ j" b5 m" C" [6 ]: q( osound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the1 ~( n6 i' N* s# z5 \
residential real estate sector.- h5 F& v/ [5 ?, x/ |9 r4 \. r/ j

* K& G% S: m# Z    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation% L. g# _2 j* k& \
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)* z% M7 A  W) j- R. d1 C  H
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
7 q3 W+ K. n% \2 H( ~4 Q(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3800 [. Z3 k  Q- U6 G/ N( h" L% k
(+13.2%).  s& }: J  \  b1 C

; g5 Q4 \+ h# w/ U' M# f4 i' |% g    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth" L0 R. ^& a( ?; ]  _- I
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
8 S4 ~4 }$ u/ T9 sfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are8 X, s0 P6 N) {# [
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,$ ]. _% K- d) e0 l3 Q# ~( V9 ?4 f. t
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.& R8 _3 i! {5 c. f1 n- p
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We6 B' g; q1 }- b, s; |% e+ k
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
6 C2 s. q; @8 S8 t5 D, e; u' gbalanced market."
& b7 H+ ]! J8 c4 |1 l2 Q6 h+ Q$ e+ k& W  d5 K7 M% T( r% D" Z7 g2 w
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,& y/ }. c6 F0 Y
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift; f/ A4 y+ X  A# ~2 z
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
  q/ @. t) G) i3 ~4 a( nthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core2 G+ t1 p- a0 ~; \$ |) @" B
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration," x6 N/ L+ T: g' L9 o
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
& k- p, [6 }6 |% d0 {9 t5 S$ N8 D; qbreaking price appreciations.) q6 u0 ^) |0 M  i1 y
& X8 z7 `( S# {* a
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding+ J" C4 ~2 M" w0 I
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the: N- l/ b4 \: {; X- f, p. r# ^
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
2 ]+ l* U0 |% v8 `) F* k! l; L3 X! {4 y  k+ c$ t
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
, q8 k  Z; x6 l" r0 F0 Neconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
" y/ v1 ?8 n* n- L4 b/ bconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off9 n/ v( y1 {$ v
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
2 c2 a" w; W" f1 ~3 E, ~1 i$ XIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers/ W/ Y' ^  l2 h8 \4 H
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of& i: T3 B' w$ J
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
% m, A( S: v% v
1 c2 J) T- e1 I! Q! Z    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing" h# v( }: d; V. Q2 y* q- v2 j
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
2 ?+ {! H5 a. r" ^8 p- pfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
3 j$ e! |0 V( [are markedly different than those found in the United States.4 o( P% |! e* Z1 F5 q: T8 G
9 h1 O8 S0 D" {" ^
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
0 X5 V6 L' t2 M  J/ qAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's) G* f1 i/ c  y  s. F! s+ W$ W! q0 R
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
6 w3 [1 }! z0 e# p5 a' ]relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general7 j! g2 Y, s0 K1 Y2 i' Y
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
& X3 n" \+ k/ Z" }downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
7 }. x( {. P6 o+ [2 v7 e+ kaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization/ w) _/ V/ ?  ?' S, [# Q' G
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
1 X$ N3 b+ X6 K2 V6 x- O& J4 [$ M' \9 l4 m
    <<# ]9 P8 Q+ j" b5 e" I
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES4 b1 W  f3 |( v, W& U
    >>
1 J- d0 v$ w1 R2 [$ K+ v* {3 ?0 _( d
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
$ v4 U; t" A$ H8 K- T! cHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
! C! j+ Z% i  @7 U7 {3 sof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
2 z% q$ V; ~# elooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
- v* r% `' A' }( Orenovations.
7 C' ^& u; t& c; W6 `' ?% X& X  w5 f7 {/ N2 l
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight- d+ @+ E2 C6 ]1 Z
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation; n0 `7 |+ T8 Z; G+ E
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and) G/ ?; r5 g9 X
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
% V6 p5 D6 {1 `- n5 L* j' {1 }1 h% |& @% w1 Y% [
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer# O$ o7 P! L9 T9 J: D1 }( W
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the, p7 G+ h; S; u+ R  q) u
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new; Q  [8 X# D! P( z5 I
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
1 ?. U" n0 d: j  I& T9 Nto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
& H' u7 K7 i8 kand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.4 M& E9 V3 E7 T7 v3 ~
+ P# @6 s6 y1 b0 `8 {1 y
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
% q; P" [3 \1 U. dconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their& @  \, {2 ~2 o6 s* J
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
! A; I: x0 n6 }" U, ]' O/ P: bwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
- d+ K; R9 E' n  s( z5 Sdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
9 k3 t% h0 o8 e( Rbuyers with more options when looking for a home.6 H' O7 Q1 C" l0 c1 B9 Q" o& E, R
6 [2 S7 s! J0 \5 O
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
4 N! w7 a4 C9 g) z. R7 E. D7 Qamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes& r  c: _: Q2 s5 m* j; Y' q1 P
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,! \+ c1 q7 m7 I! B
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last9 j  X/ m. o  @5 q# C, H
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.* b( J% s) U3 v% t5 [

4 G" ^% M, u+ n# |/ j3 A& M    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
; }% ~) b+ ^$ @% `4 D7 D# Nprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory4 L$ s% {$ ^2 D0 i- P
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting* Y) \% I: b) @, ?" Y
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,0 u, S0 j. T; K; D1 [1 X* b
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
( J9 b4 B4 r- s! {pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before$ p. n7 M+ U5 M( U
making a purchase.
$ O- Q) x: H# B0 J9 V) Y5 p" ^& y8 \  u' b, j  G/ @
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing2 b4 M7 ~1 I+ H/ `$ m8 s
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
8 V& L6 t3 {, J" Tconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city; q. ?5 {% Y" ?. O" p
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
' _2 W, @! a7 rattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown' s1 b/ c0 q8 g/ ~3 [
amenities.; _# c* U- @/ O

/ L3 K, {# g; R0 i/ B( [% m    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
: j2 B+ n* A! l2 R4 T' R9 E3 n4 Q$ fthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
8 b  v6 L8 @1 f! f# C9 e7 kacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has/ L$ C! a* \' c: g
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
& h3 a5 }: g: E( w+ W9 }driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle' P& r, W$ x5 a7 ^$ e
residence, rather than for investment.1 H  N3 t0 m7 {  w4 I# `  J2 w
! J+ c7 p3 O7 h
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as; Q/ ~8 H7 @  [0 `" {7 F2 S) ~
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted+ x2 b* {& u! L7 H% ~, w
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
# R% g( T, R% w' d% cconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization$ i4 \4 @4 d' l, D% p9 l5 \  O0 k
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
2 {6 _) ~! @2 Z2 @the market.0 j" c1 U  M; G; X' x9 }

7 O. \) V4 v; y    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through* T. j; G' x. i% v6 v, l2 C+ g7 ^' u
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In. l6 c' A8 }( c& l8 V7 l
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring; L- V7 u. [/ k5 b+ m. c" N8 k
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due" z3 Z: P" Q  k
to the shortage of available inventory.5 \, O3 v9 b9 D5 i3 o4 B) Z6 x

* ^' \# X) |0 x, a    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its9 H  s9 _9 j1 I! ?% U2 [! T$ o$ B. @
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains  S  f; Z  G5 s0 d2 p5 X7 q
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
: c, b/ V& D' q, Jstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province." m- u- n2 ]& E& m# H: T

- w  z- X3 Q- y+ O. d! ^    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases8 Q0 Z0 t- v6 `
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
& \: O* ~# S, R) |unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that8 n. R6 B* f5 D3 b9 v9 Q% j- D7 ?
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring7 x! t! [. E5 g, P# P- \; ~
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer. z3 B! a- e( I/ P
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
& I9 m( k- [  x: V6 ibuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
- j/ Q0 Q% ]7 l: {2 @
+ G2 m- ]  ]' }& F- ~" c; G& C+ [
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
3 d' T4 c* J9 @0 ]1 O( {/ das activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
5 V# N' x, R' ?# X( z/ }, |( vremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
! W, ^$ m& K% H$ E# `8 P, K' Rmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
" D3 }6 C( s# Rincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
4 t4 V/ P  q; x+ oin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly! g4 X5 _' _, N: `3 t: F
towards the end of 2006.
    , r& ]! M' \0 x5 [

1 k. F6 Z) G/ k. i& p" qWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of: a" t& A& i+ F' g' b2 Z. i
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
6 U6 q$ [& S- vto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
0 M4 D+ [& u" J7 [9 t0 T) ^6 Ggroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to+ E5 |+ M4 x. i
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
& L5 I- Y: i, o7 a% A' }pressure on tight inventory levels.
% p/ q9 _" ~3 j  n* L$ `" R$ y& B0 t
9 N; y" n- f( r! q    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
* b/ e! i& h; y' ?- qfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
/ m1 G$ V3 `' a% Y" I" a9 Hinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;; F/ i: M0 \3 ?: D7 E
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching. u" T' K; j/ c4 {; ^: |% r) }. W
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.3 n2 f3 d1 G7 g; q- _
- N1 V5 q1 ^8 M3 d& `+ k, G/ x
    <<
+ y- D- Z9 z$ J/ y      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20066 W2 h' z% c' J" K) _+ o
% {6 N6 \, Z  p7 G1 ?% y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ x' f7 x0 I0 ?4 f                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey4 j0 y' Q3 [8 A: D0 C2 {6 m
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  W/ c* B! S$ m& {; f1 P9 }                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3* P1 W6 i* Y  C
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average! {) h& G( Q7 X! h6 B; G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ p5 @1 j# ~3 u& C
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000' c/ b7 c6 `& E6 z" C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ?# f7 V# W% Q4 U    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
# }2 Z0 L* `. q% \" O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& G5 S% F- m. m5 ]9 }" Z4 x    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
2 Y2 z2 G) D: a" k& h4 F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 w/ h  U* q5 Z1 U7 p. _    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -7 e0 Y+ z- r9 m( G" C8 Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  h7 p' ?4 Z7 D. V
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333  Y  q# A! ^4 @5 @, h. b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& a0 k. C1 f" L6 @' ~+ x4 d3 h
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583/ f  E: |, ^: N/ e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ D: K& c" n# l/ ^5 J    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185/ {# o. n3 L2 l& f4 ], C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 o, a$ [2 m& }  _4 z
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
7 Y4 o' N; i1 Z! ]; t/ m    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) A) A" Z+ H$ ?8 j2 m# m    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766( x* D. y% m2 n2 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 m: J+ t! S& s
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707; q) ]2 A& L" E% U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 K; I, k$ |" Q1 a1 M. g+ `7 M
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5003 r$ D0 p" N# j0 B. I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 e8 l$ F# `2 i2 ~7 r) o4 x8 U2 y; C6 _
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389( x' d8 q* q" x1 R/ }4 J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 E- q5 N8 U* G' x9 p* a
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
; }" b- }& Y# }- p7 Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; z* j$ m: {4 p
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500$ I) J  J8 x' b9 M/ f
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 ?) t5 b: c6 ^% |' _; K. |: x' @# a    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000- k& n- s. h  ~) y% _
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& e( e) i0 c$ p' W
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860/ G& [$ i5 a' ]! Z" C4 C/ n8 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# G. g9 l4 O2 J- T. B+ B3 z; J
5 c1 [+ \* e7 a3 z& [, [3 B    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ [' J0 O4 Q! X8 B) p                               Standard Condominium
8 x3 ]9 n0 n, S% Z    -------------------------------------------------------------
% ?' Z, _/ p' g! A- \                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
# [  j' i* n7 q# {' R6 o    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change2 k0 ]8 i$ V' A4 [7 B) F
    -------------------------------------------------------------& U7 g1 Z, T1 R
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
8 [" Q& J! D% d/ R/ q, F% h; i4 R    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ G- {& s6 g+ P5 o9 r) \    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
* l! d9 U% ~: {/ j% ~/ A. Y% A    -------------------------------------------------------------
" D( J5 ~" N/ i; D6 Y    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A2 h1 U4 e+ a+ H: j) c# b! ~1 N% P
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 [& G7 L- S6 |$ Y6 W    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A8 E9 G& I4 U3 J( |! T5 P
    -------------------------------------------------------------  ?% }; ^2 g$ k& E
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
; l' R$ x4 o: [    -------------------------------------------------------------
: E5 L7 w! }# w* U& m5 H, e    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%; W' j9 d7 R! l3 i9 H+ `, Z" Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 Y1 I" Y* K+ [* @    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
/ _6 ~' }2 l% S" Q: z7 G  C4 }    -------------------------------------------------------------
% z2 a4 f: x( G) h+ x- r    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%! h% ?6 ^' R) F) q4 A( w8 C4 W
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 e0 r! N$ `( \+ D: i1 G
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
4 o+ J/ u: s3 X% J* ~/ h    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ Z6 v+ D* |- x3 s5 T# Z) ]    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
9 o( U" U- Z3 t9 x. m. s1 b    -------------------------------------------------------------
( K- R+ r# x& T* ]& d    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
% g* i+ A9 v: A% K/ T    -------------------------------------------------------------2 T7 V2 i9 n$ y4 K1 G7 P3 w
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%% B6 U- @/ P: S1 x5 f5 o3 J, r
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& o& I# D. ~4 s- [    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%- p9 V, j; h( M4 d0 Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: P2 t+ o. i' T' N. ^! [- Z" U4 v    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%# X" ?; I4 ~) E! F7 W1 R$ o
    -------------------------------------------------------------) d6 E/ V, P# X5 B$ n
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%4 r  {6 m8 [! a+ B' r+ {6 r
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 u8 d6 W9 P7 G* E  M. {3 l    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
, \- l/ ^. A# {. L    -------------------------------------------------------------/ F& u+ v. L& e! s5 z5 n! l4 g7 m
    >>- I1 `* D& u! ]' q* u" n

3 D( g0 y# \3 ]% u    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined; U, d0 v% L7 x
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint0 R4 y" e  Z$ O
John and Victoria./ S# ]0 t+ e) {; x5 s. s

0 D" J# t* C* i, |    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most1 e9 y$ v) e$ y3 J( @: p* O
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of/ k6 D* T; h6 v/ \  L3 J$ V
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
  K, B& G4 S( J- r5 W! N% {references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price6 \( |  s# _& y" h
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
1 N0 b0 {9 N: [. u* M$ _/ z# t' Kacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
* N1 Z& p: ~9 T! Y* Q; gavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
8 X& {! [% S9 i) d* }: cfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable9 n7 b  s1 V8 }: B1 T' [3 l0 a
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on- W* p0 S6 {, q$ U6 b0 U6 Z6 G. a
November 15, 2006.% n) o. K5 Z* Q/ P) \: m
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
; L8 x  t0 D# r6 I6 vfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge0 l: _7 r8 ?% \( s' o
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
2 p5 t1 V6 X; Q$ g6 zavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-19 21:19 , Processed in 0.173684 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表