 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable - N# ^' O# e7 a8 Z6 C) ~1 A
1 P& b# x. j U5 h. _1 `" a- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -* \! y. D/ d: \' C- s
5 i8 ^' i9 p9 \$ T TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market) x$ l9 e8 A( L! J
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
8 T0 t+ v; h8 ~1 Oquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
, R3 Z* v, S3 Rin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
2 A4 c$ w! c6 @5 }* |) K# Tprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
% ~) y! }4 z" z7 v# k9 H l, \more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,- y3 J! f8 {# e* |. V
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
|3 Z, Q: ?( ~8 O/ O3 pLePage Real Estate Services.
: A0 V) `" r% x+ {2 }; L! j9 ~& |/ W1 X
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters" a! i" c+ l/ V5 B% Z
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic5 w3 y5 s: z- G4 O- {7 a
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
0 v: y |. q$ ^# |' p4 esound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the8 X# a% i' t% L, Y% t
residential real estate sector.8 V4 D% a2 r$ M" h0 G9 `
7 A; c ]8 j- T9 [8 m" K
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
" I# m) C' K. N4 Ooccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
9 B* G; C2 Y" h4 |2 }year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562" @7 I0 h. P1 P3 ]3 g2 l
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
- d) t6 U( {$ O& \- J+ A(+13.2%).: {& q9 k6 l& Q- ~) @: F! y7 ]
4 `5 Z! d3 X" ]8 ^& P# ?, G- K "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth; j0 [; L# e0 }8 ^) }3 `
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
: D; D& t5 q9 i9 ?6 R+ Q! nfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are/ c$ s& `* L+ F8 P
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
6 M/ h; k, {- a" `1 A$ Ipresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
4 \* ?. M7 [ o: p( P" S9 X3 E/ i5 k"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We5 o4 P4 c4 q v/ Z) w7 s
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
4 f2 L4 C' u' i Fbalanced market."& t9 p; r" r2 f$ m b( B
0 a5 y! j* X1 s e/ p. Y- S2 G2 k
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,( n6 t/ ^9 n9 Z& a3 H# s6 H& k6 [
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
8 y* D% t# N, c; |% jto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued$ o ?4 ~0 g- s8 b1 Q' p$ u3 z- l
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
3 G1 }8 Q9 B# e" K, tenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
) U1 B* I1 M& m& N7 dmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record( X/ N: R1 H5 s1 ?/ i. h, E" y+ n, m
breaking price appreciations." ~. J- _9 n; Y6 y6 c
( _/ \4 g2 ~. q2 H D9 H, q Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding \. v+ u6 p4 H+ P K! F
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
u( ~- {; H" \* ?, Slargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
5 J# g5 Q4 c, u' L: ]. j; N
; T& h( C) w }3 P/ U In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
$ u- R3 P! q" [- }0 b3 `1 O1 Ieconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer G+ }# a" b: q0 \$ l: t1 L3 b
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
! U( L* M' S1 \+ fslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth." k# R0 \! b# V0 Y- p
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers. I1 G& l. g) M1 S! ^* h2 Z7 q
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of" u8 q1 \& @' T; N" ?6 e
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
* S6 u1 i: X1 J, p! s3 t- H4 m& s+ Y
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
1 b3 Q6 J" T% I4 e$ E3 n9 G% Imarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and- L- C) x' r; `* k' j# K/ U
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
4 `/ R. \: f* O( L7 Sare markedly different than those found in the United States.% T4 S8 Z; {0 k
, w7 q% R5 x3 I% n Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the9 ^0 { k. G& `! d+ a" P0 v! ]
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
: r9 D Z' S5 |* i% H7 @favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
$ |6 L* V) b, g3 u$ t# X# P, Q! E$ Qrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
& y" @0 `2 s9 ]' [ s4 G- v& faffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
1 V( a0 V0 V0 c+ ^6 w0 P8 y# G+ Adownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and; {/ L4 u& F9 U+ E8 P7 T5 q$ ]
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
$ Q; u; t) V _ C& C1 n5 a4 E' fmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment.", s$ l6 {- l9 _* N5 Y
5 {/ g+ G: }$ u0 f
<<
: t. z, l7 P( m3 |& y) } REGIONAL SUMMARIES( I4 I8 I z2 q* F4 a
>>& p# t% ?9 A3 V/ f
. ?0 Y! ]2 _) H" k7 [- d" L$ d Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
9 ]8 ?$ N$ k# y1 @1 S5 N: I0 _* GHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate; K: M6 p& J" w6 C! [$ g, u
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time2 P! |. d$ k' J: v) ?
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of- m1 V5 m$ b T5 \; G8 r3 X. E
renovations.
' u1 N) t1 t0 P( d$ e
. B1 `, o5 }/ }1 M9 | The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
9 V6 y! V5 J) a$ m" ]. }2 bincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation: M) H# @! W* u
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and7 {; f! f+ Q9 i" g9 L- j
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
- H; O, n( s7 N% H6 [
4 y/ x7 J- t& g' U% q; W4 ^ The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
9 G7 `# d9 r3 {5 uslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the5 l) X; R' u& ~* u5 ?
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
' P8 B9 [" t$ ~$ ]& G3 z4 \ u600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores/ C0 O, N( |, w9 H
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
1 C& m9 t$ t1 C6 v' uand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
" H' G0 |: g; J) {/ v, W; \' L E* K8 s0 Z6 u9 a
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
+ b+ W/ k- F$ o7 y8 }" q! C i: hconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their0 D+ h- y- w4 C3 g( Q9 P" F* @8 _& _
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
# Z9 w% U0 b6 Kwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian+ o$ B( s8 \% J* v5 ~
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing$ z* b# w8 x }+ q, K
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
( F+ z1 b- \' B' I0 O1 g& H: u1 P' H
, D: l9 r& j6 n4 n8 r1 C Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly) { E5 Y2 D4 {$ ^( Q, d( I0 Y
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
" [9 n& k% ^7 f! G" J, s, dpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,* o3 Z: g1 a! `# f. M
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
8 S7 E. V* M: _+ S+ vfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
( Q- A% G- q: v" G0 S1 G; E, Q- L0 _+ o5 F9 M5 A
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house' E. T# b( e9 B/ ~. z2 U
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
6 d7 F* l0 }3 A8 j; U$ Slevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
9 n3 O* K/ m# P9 Z; ~7 N4 zfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
8 F z: _6 V7 m6 P" H; Awhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
. P0 s; b9 D6 npressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before% c* H& j4 d$ k# p6 D _0 e% X
making a purchase.; U8 Y6 E, }5 g1 m7 t; q V q( p
0 t. [! E" I) r Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing$ N! }. b! y8 {9 Z# ^
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong4 n7 z4 {4 ]- g) Z) I
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
; t0 b. t% b. ]" |% i qcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting7 Q7 z. u2 i9 X: V) i
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
) S: W" ?. `# e+ Eamenities.8 d% V' J3 n8 ]. d) c
: f% _6 b6 @6 c% H) Z' Y3 z/ B The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels# _* D1 t0 a; L' ^. N" _
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
% i$ U: T7 e1 H) U- iacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
7 r/ ~+ t; D+ [% V; o+ {7 ncontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
# P" s# M3 Q! Bdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
1 C, V$ r, h! o9 E3 ^- Tresidence, rather than for investment.. c) F9 R6 I! ]; w3 C
# F1 o& ]7 K" U4 M9 Q# y8 ^ ~5 Z% d
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
2 }' I: }1 E6 R, }4 }. C5 v$ v: Ohouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted+ C, v2 o5 ]* Q2 W. P
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
( H% F/ @7 w- L8 D$ r0 i. C9 @confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization3 p7 I# Y+ E- V3 l" t7 y# Z
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
' a* K+ e; I- e) o6 I% S, c' Athe market.0 _; q. x1 ]6 b& z2 v# _" M) Q" m9 G: Z
$ z. M, P4 l+ y* R& w
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
: J/ j! K0 h1 c0 mJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In9 Q; I' n( Q& C, G$ B/ g
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring* C/ B$ [; H$ K( P9 \! r+ M
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due; m% N% N; f0 j0 \+ }/ Y
to the shortage of available inventory.. C# Q$ k# o/ ^. Q e; F8 D
( k% U0 }4 r8 s Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its4 V" i. u" H+ A
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
5 B I( S9 G Q7 ~ K2 N; M+ Zvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses( H3 S0 O9 W$ f. c# a
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
8 z: P& Y/ w K9 |5 b2 b1 ~9 G9 D9 b( a: K( m% |
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases. x( \& Z8 L* \% E- d3 q
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
! }: Y2 Q: D$ R; z- Yunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that; ]' \8 R2 [! H' }) E
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring5 N: s, Y5 B. H$ e I9 ]6 _( n% g, H
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer" e3 y" p2 X* W: Z! q$ h
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
4 m/ W1 x5 m E" d* h1 bbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.. A- x- ?+ Q$ O1 t8 x
, N8 U5 K$ l5 c2 T3 T
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
$ b: @, X' K* t& N! a4 Pas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton+ W g5 j- J$ l1 ?1 P
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,8 T* X+ A, Y p: m, R# P/ `! [
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
2 `: W7 c/ v% o" M {9 ~increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve( d- n! |) U- P4 E5 e. u9 y
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly. e t0 W: A, M3 x# t/ C
towards the end of 2006.
3 K: l/ f* ^/ n0 {6 y( _- Y! c8 X0 I! i. ?8 H' y, T; T
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of# L/ V0 s3 S- c0 H s2 z
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable7 u( ]% }4 O* j) {6 ]! y
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse! B2 }% \. u. c" Z, v* x. ^' t0 Y
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to% T- E3 X6 [; _
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added; {* g5 X" ] U2 ?. Q. k
pressure on tight inventory levels.4 Y8 A5 j% K4 Q' J( l" a
2 H; q7 v( ]6 t
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
+ o* ^% @. r" Z; hfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
M3 C# Q' s% _ A$ Winto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
1 c! E2 x# N( G, f7 h4 zwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
+ |1 ]3 C6 U7 o6 Lfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
3 V2 I" ~4 M1 ?. A8 z) }
7 X( v. U( {7 a <<
! M" N5 @! X& l Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006: O: p' T2 `1 W/ _6 x
; g8 W: r2 U4 A, y+ V* U
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; G9 b( [+ n+ [. A% u; Q% A' e3 r
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey; S8 I4 @7 t% N0 F! c! K1 T0 K5 r1 m q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ z2 c* c2 [4 w 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q34 B, k$ R+ z' x& n |! [
Market Average Average % Change Average Average3 U# K, R! W. f2 p! f4 t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* G4 J: M5 U* y; { i' G8 Z. b Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000' F0 T& z4 o& q/ s
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( z5 A0 S0 r Q1 { Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000. E" a* T1 k) V, b$ K2 L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 [( Y, \, g# O6 l- e: K7 { Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
" O! h" V# {2 @0 o, D -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% s6 {! @; j# h9 Z0 J N! R' _ Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
, w; h& d" M$ K -------------------------------------------------------------------------. {/ C4 Y3 Y. d8 _+ p
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333+ G: S' M) B9 J' W1 R+ ^ A# q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, h" A! q) B) t" i4 k! ~9 k. { Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
! K# }# `% t$ C5 X ?+ `2 U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Z3 n9 {% T, G1 N5 F* ^& x/ e Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185* r& R* k: {, I: D# E t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 N+ H0 q) R! g. T5 i0 Y$ p, p# K Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
4 S7 ]# J6 e: r, X5 K -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 w3 ]$ U0 n) v: o* y- r$ I
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
& Z4 v. Q `% `* z -------------------------------------------------------------------------: b% W: F$ z' e( m0 |0 K
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
" [' k K0 ~6 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------' t% ]2 w! p7 E2 Z; U" u
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
2 g+ x) h x* ]4 P; h& g -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 q2 Z3 h+ `% G& o; ^! T* m5 N Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
# b1 r3 T, _7 Q! W7 V -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) k, U& @& Y4 y c+ g6 K; U Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
1 L, g" ]! ?4 g V6 b% r2 _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ V v" {# a, k+ w
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500" X$ z$ E8 P1 J, a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. S ^- e/ ^3 g% r Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0006 d6 |5 G9 Y4 m' J/ f6 g9 ]+ L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) ^0 R6 v, X* ]/ }8 ]8 x6 n, k1 _ National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
( B0 b' M% q. o! \$ V8 [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 W0 f3 s6 w; `7 F$ \: W* j
- T! ]- Z! h+ y) p m% s& f -------------------------------------------------------------
; V/ {5 N0 H, x9 d Standard Condominium+ J% Q! O2 i3 d2 y6 o+ C0 G
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 P; Y7 r% n: Z8 C 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
) I) Y# L6 ^ j" w# k Market % Change Average Average % Change0 U" P7 C# h* m5 k
-------------------------------------------------------------1 P3 A" v7 R' z- A4 Q7 j
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
7 l+ f5 s/ W! D. `# @! b7 ] -------------------------------------------------------------
1 q5 K& d3 p2 \+ u2 O% e. }& u h) v Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%: `, d: `2 K/ J8 X7 c7 |! M5 n
-------------------------------------------------------------9 p0 B1 I) ^% g$ Q U# e3 @( u
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
$ Z `7 @* [+ D -------------------------------------------------------------9 w3 q# z' p' \) T8 B! ]) i
Saint John N/A - - N/A
/ P9 M* {0 i: Z# d4 Y" ` h' d# n -------------------------------------------------------------. r; }9 @5 X: A7 ^
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%8 Y2 v: @/ |; v, ]0 b
-------------------------------------------------------------9 Z; w- G% D1 M, X
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
; {* ]/ p6 W! Z8 O -------------------------------------------------------------+ q: E* J. ~0 B
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
! |* P: I3 B) M( T" j/ V% Y -------------------------------------------------------------3 f' |, f6 X2 K; U
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
# Y: y( u7 I. F9 k -------------------------------------------------------------
4 b' A0 ^3 y- U' t* v1 U D Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%$ J0 V$ c: M. W4 B9 v
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 i* ^4 M# W6 J2 e: X; u- V Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
) t* d( k9 b) Z9 ?6 L/ v -------------------------------------------------------------
. y; Y) C( z! l, L! Z5 J Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%9 `& M. [ k' b
-------------------------------------------------------------% ]( b( ?1 W- X* N6 l) |& {
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%- f' C1 r8 R0 s) i
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ W4 J* g" W# J( U$ v, b, [ Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
2 V+ v* N, `* V8 N. B -------------------------------------------------------------
) e1 l6 \4 G. w8 K" k# C Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3% B$ p+ r* c5 G" P# X& Y
-------------------------------------------------------------% G$ P; y5 v. z4 g5 {5 f
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%8 {: ` u! e" e
-------------------------------------------------------------! W, p8 z- Z4 |$ u4 I f" |, D
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
$ l" h/ t* x1 B* ~- a; P9 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------
0 a- B1 _ T& ~: z, Z, W' q+ k& i >>
6 V) T J! V7 x% c. S4 s/ v! G$ c) o, u8 f, b' @! ?- U O0 T
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
7 _* A3 R5 q$ t" G4 qin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
/ v) g) e; ?2 V4 s5 AJohn and Victoria.
+ u) ?4 O2 Y5 I2 f4 w, }- [- Y8 J2 F; Y/ z5 Q
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
e% O* e* L Z- \4 G' P% Wcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of: A* g7 J% [ D5 N8 \/ n
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
/ A0 U, L" j) H$ [references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price- }- H+ j0 \, R; Q
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
& k- } p) K( a$ Lacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
+ f) n5 ?$ E; d# _2 P7 `available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current2 `) I2 x. p u/ _' ~# h, j( v
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable6 V4 D9 [1 E; k3 p5 F
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on ^* N7 s# Y, d6 s* P
November 15, 2006.
- _5 s) L) Y8 M8 ] I8 l" I Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of; }' N( r& L. V4 ?+ a
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
1 d. k" ~7 q* D% j% P) o' zprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is" n1 M3 Z" _% x: `: ?1 |
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|