埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2266|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
2 v. l7 E8 j+ {) A& C6 s+ R/ a$ M  n6 S
0 B$ H+ ?9 @, N3 k, q- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -3 p9 S, I8 ~1 Q; ]

8 g- U  [) \8 X: j* c    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
( Y6 e# W+ g5 |* c; bexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third9 ]. r9 w* z2 Q# A2 A
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
: H3 k7 O2 P8 P0 R' G5 S' kin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit* o7 h" o& N% l( x+ L
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
  h2 s5 b7 i) y% m$ Vmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
2 \# v$ ~3 l, H+ I/ WQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
# @3 J- t$ }9 T2 M! [LePage Real Estate Services.
: y* r- h( e4 z5 A+ p- v  K5 t( e9 a* r( \0 ~* y) `4 y
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters4 g2 ^  L- @& k& R3 G  d# c
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic' I* W0 S6 E, C5 A/ ^' `& M* U" l/ A( Q
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
1 K4 G0 k0 `, y& x0 Wsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the  b7 E( O( M7 C) v7 K! o
residential real estate sector.4 {4 f4 k0 K, z

6 Z: E1 y; i+ @) r- z    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
6 Y& t( t( M; `/ @' l0 p; Woccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
% s# L7 G: \9 Dyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
" a' n" H4 k5 L( G1 W* S(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
; D2 s0 x! P5 {# o+ ^4 x(+13.2%).
1 d0 g# q5 V& U) |: p# Z+ E' P5 u0 r$ z9 B! j
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth* @& o4 _$ M" P, n# {1 E, M7 [6 a2 ~
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the% V( Z: ]  _/ s0 ^) f" y
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
2 e$ h/ `; i7 z: npoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,# x2 p1 J7 j- ?( t4 O, W4 Q
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.  M0 E+ G* y9 L5 G1 Z3 J9 m
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We; Z# J8 P: j) s  e+ x
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy# p* x: ~+ r* ?8 Z2 V
balanced market."
/ e. c& a7 m" O2 |$ j1 s& W! ~. M! V' Y: b" T
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
8 p) N& @6 w# e# jconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift* @8 h, |3 P  o: P3 v4 q
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued4 ]$ V4 m5 F" ?1 `" c6 y  G
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core* N9 P# B9 C, u2 u
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,1 p# n- R; P7 h7 k
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record7 Y- R$ B0 d4 W! j: H/ X' I
breaking price appreciations.8 T4 P9 ^( _. A+ `9 E# E
" u, m8 U. {/ ]; ?' t8 B! ^% i
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
2 ?" K+ ?% c7 ?% |; u$ i/ }9 beconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the9 a2 [9 x1 _; m- x  ]: u
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.3 y! b1 |9 e! r7 ~& k
- D& [, A, D1 G9 @9 \9 z
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid8 s) p) R2 j- [( C
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
$ e/ R2 Y4 n% G! M8 Q1 Z, a* dconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
  B7 \5 F* M- k! M$ ?9 b9 `* B7 C% zslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
+ G& \; V6 v: m( F, ], ?In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
; L6 {1 L1 s1 }5 \' dgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of, F. D9 l+ o8 T% {3 q
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
' v. `) |( i4 e6 w/ J3 P/ ~" b  F* N( k, S6 i, c
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing" h( j" X' }1 V( x! k) ^8 V9 \5 i, C
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
2 V  B( z. |3 wfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada* u6 _; B3 B& {
are markedly different than those found in the United States.- C! Z" t1 L+ U7 c
/ A1 I& U& H# o" `
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the( l; y4 f! X8 w4 S) h& j7 z
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
) Q& K6 K  b" a1 g; ^favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
# j; f, w: q$ Z+ s  N$ Frelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
% ~/ [- L- q+ i3 a( a, R. Raffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the: X1 G( n: E( ~" G4 G7 e# d
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
; v, N' \6 G/ l; s) {3 ]" iaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization  U0 v3 a6 C( I9 `
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."' w7 {8 \; C1 _* T

' b7 t) y% w1 y. F" A. B# g    <<
4 ^' d5 z1 `  @' c                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
: O$ Y' ?- x  P) w    >>
7 X% h% R% m" C; k3 R* Q
, a6 ^" P$ X( B# ?# u    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
  m& p3 J5 c/ bHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate# v+ A  u2 X- r6 z: h
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
5 Z! Z) D) m9 H3 i+ D+ o& Plooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of" |  k1 ~5 p/ z& m' S8 t1 |" [
renovations.
2 o$ O1 B  Y/ d7 q* e8 _% {
1 @( ~' ?7 x7 ]* V3 m    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
# O4 l1 D$ f) x5 [% nincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
3 |, q1 ~, ?  ^1 }. Y+ x/ rcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
+ m$ j( y5 d' J& U" Q  S1 ~" eSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
2 X+ x7 S% ]/ Z( a! g
' G4 |- ?- l6 d( g$ J7 K1 _3 h    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
& G4 m6 }2 K* nslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
! {' f' R, Q% A8 y3 x; W6 m! ]quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new6 H/ [; l1 g5 I5 R( F
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
$ |& j4 t) n! ~' @7 U6 [8 rto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes7 M: V& {' D7 \5 E' W5 N2 ?2 v- h
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.% Y7 p$ w' `4 X

% a/ f' p- a7 N$ D0 P6 w    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced; v# K% r- X( n% D* h+ K  q. [+ I- T
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
1 c' b! d4 L4 E8 @homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
/ ?0 w) D( E( k4 Ewas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
: F0 x  w) q( x4 S: r5 qdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
, q1 j" F; l1 v8 o- qbuyers with more options when looking for a home.3 H9 D, O$ B2 @8 f5 p
2 y- d, e; {- ]
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
4 ~- P& f8 D; ~: Y8 w* h9 Camong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes6 f( e/ R* _& e
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,& ]8 I2 h+ r: @2 O' q* E2 W: _
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last2 s: K7 k- ]. i, \1 b; M
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
9 R2 m5 B" H$ n) {5 Y+ O  K2 C$ E. n
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
3 V* Z8 {" o% |0 b% }prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
9 H6 w$ D% f& Mlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
% g+ d9 @" S" |. [6 H* cfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
8 F( Q4 g- O. u+ cwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
, S8 k4 M! T8 T6 Mpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before4 }; d6 g2 x- d/ @
making a purchase.
% D* U* Q. w3 J. Z1 a
3 T0 `, l# ?- U1 Q2 J/ s    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
! K9 v% F% I, m/ E  B+ xmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong8 D8 g9 d9 p" t9 |
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city0 F! u  x3 q- X7 f$ k5 X$ m
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting$ h5 U$ p: t! v* F4 q
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
1 L' H5 B: F% a. `. o& G- Famenities.5 m) Y6 ]5 G" J/ t0 ~- e' s

( i; m+ s& O0 l    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels* F/ c. }3 b/ |
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand8 W) T1 X& f% K/ f
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
1 k3 b1 E% L6 C. E( F5 x2 Wcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
$ p, m8 `! p5 A6 Hdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
' t; I* N& N5 L4 q  D, [# [residence, rather than for investment.7 x' |% {# H; e# ?  E1 A

4 X3 k2 E& j6 M* n9 ]/ {$ \    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
3 \1 r5 R7 y4 r, T6 qhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
$ X4 p' a8 @7 w5 w! ?in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer5 m3 H; I! L; I: x  V
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization$ r* T+ t( C2 p' ~& H& O
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
' y9 g5 x# _! X, Y3 U: Mthe market.
( w$ @- c- f6 n. L( h8 w' f2 p7 B4 E" x; K! k7 p
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
+ `0 n8 w. N3 N/ WJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In7 r  _+ t" \2 A7 W
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
. P* u2 P2 N9 U! bmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due: ~0 B9 a- M; h6 c
to the shortage of available inventory.2 d2 q0 ?' }# J/ J  O; d

: G& F+ q1 ~5 Q9 z' c: m- n    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its8 ^# N7 A/ ]( Q$ s
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains4 k3 V& b( ?3 O8 K1 S/ @. F
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
+ K1 {) g7 S9 d& Sstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.4 r3 z' i; E: N$ V: u! [

) \8 M3 j1 [/ }' g2 q9 C: Q7 x    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases* x+ W1 R) L2 _2 s
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low* ]: O% j+ M$ _: P$ J& a4 {6 S
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that/ J5 d/ Z& v6 d6 r8 p1 C
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring; y+ U5 G1 G) E: L+ i6 o
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer# B7 ]* C2 y% y/ T4 v! N
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
. ~* {1 R# z3 dbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
6 v! _' L1 i% E4 P

; L4 y; n2 J9 Y    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter1 h3 ^$ w, r+ ^+ {0 B0 ~
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton% J: B! a; w* D0 z
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
8 B8 \5 z1 j8 s* ?8 smaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices" d- c2 L' C" @9 N
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
. o0 t/ a$ j' ?3 k! Q4 ain the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly7 G( Z7 |2 b6 X: f) I, K
towards the end of 2006.
   
$ E4 P  F& N$ j- ?" \2 K( a, I0 E3 _# ]& {' Y
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of. _  n. q, `4 H5 P6 m, s  g
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
& s$ k4 A, E  n  `( W! I/ [9 W7 I* gto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
) J0 D( p* a3 g$ W8 m: }& tgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
. k0 y4 M  ]4 h4 W5 G3 kforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
0 c7 |' ~. A7 Upressure on tight inventory levels.7 y( U+ x0 k4 [4 n5 g% ~
9 o/ S. e, i9 R2 \4 D9 v% \
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic+ h7 F1 l- a+ q, R! {
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people/ c  [2 z2 v- P# U# O5 i
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;4 R' m  E8 G) y  x% D1 ]
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
7 g( e. P4 V7 zfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
+ x/ n1 A, [1 N0 s$ t& y
  _. v7 M( J$ E- b6 `3 [    <<
/ K8 b3 G3 m2 l      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
' ]* }3 d" ~7 W# H% r! o/ t+ g+ @' l7 [1 m! P% f2 J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ {  L/ C% G/ r+ {& D% A! q2 E
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
: ]( z1 M# N! O* j" V    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 ]+ n+ f. m5 ^! V0 L                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3, {! g5 R! y# H% \& T  H* b. G2 J8 E( G
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average/ f+ K2 }1 b" g- a
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) W9 g1 J4 q' t0 ^, Y
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
1 g4 R+ `8 x9 i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& c! E2 H, I  P6 F8 z4 h
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
8 D) _8 R, J; i: n1 N5 s7 e# L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, }8 j& g% ^. F/ o3 _    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000' s0 `1 G# e% g5 _3 ]* `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  b( z8 z/ g1 v; }3 v! I" O/ f    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -# b1 Z4 f; \* s/ q2 n( x$ p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ G# A( }! m0 \& p
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
( L" V4 k0 {, ]) P$ {/ X/ g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, t7 O% w$ c; b    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
% f) K8 v3 J% w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 u* i& }6 w; m* j# z) Q+ `4 E- M
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1851 d3 u" d: ~5 k5 H; s( I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 T: j1 `  T$ @+ u    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250( }) I6 O" k; s/ T5 n) r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" R* _- o+ ~. }3 M3 Q7 m  U. h
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766, l4 W* q( q( R/ L5 C$ s4 D1 p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- k& }( w+ z8 N7 b$ K7 z3 y0 B
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7077 P$ ~& o; H, Y) {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 V4 A+ p7 x7 G" E2 E% L    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5007 x3 |- x* U4 {3 G) [! m
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 A) {. b, ?) z% ?% `/ {5 Y( h    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
; o5 W% L: @; v1 {    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: N# s  I6 s- W    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714" {! [/ v2 y+ F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 u) c+ d- a0 [' F1 D# t    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
$ l% S! W9 a+ |3 A% g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& W: F+ H( X$ T9 m& v
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
% T( v" ^" I: L) v* P& F, {. ~, G* [    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 O' U1 o4 K; K3 J( z, t    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
% A$ E: o, b" ?/ s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 ~3 g" S2 l" f/ L& X9 U8 z! x% A7 a
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 s' G, ~7 Y4 B+ t0 Z6 y# v9 Z2 J/ Z1 u
                               Standard Condominium
2 x) @) G8 s1 D' ?' S    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 y/ r3 b- ?5 Z* [" Z/ V                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
* c7 y; |& ^, G. ~0 l# V! E    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change1 c6 t, e3 x- Z+ R3 d7 K
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 z( H2 Q5 y  k: |7 @! S0 c: H5 r    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%8 a7 `+ R) \' U' m3 N/ l
    -------------------------------------------------------------; E( a2 w+ h3 w0 P0 J- s' i
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%: j* J; y1 z6 S: p0 ^9 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 s7 c; w2 D5 a  W    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A5 p4 k+ ?& ~, v4 O" f
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& `! x2 _" J( v! h7 y    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
1 r  h4 _& ~% }/ V    -------------------------------------------------------------4 M/ b, F1 \" t3 J
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%& }4 }) L5 K, B  W3 O: f: q4 f" L
    -------------------------------------------------------------1 H# T& c7 w" U6 h
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
! G, @6 f$ O  w: h5 Q1 a5 F% n# C  N2 U    -------------------------------------------------------------3 ?7 [3 @4 R4 }: G+ m& a0 i5 e' W
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
1 w+ m$ x7 t8 G; h    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 |/ b# U: Q+ r+ ~3 _. Q    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%; R% @- b0 v) G% d4 d
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 R) g. \5 T8 b8 X
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
. y* u3 i( _5 c" R" X    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 ^# Z0 s6 P+ O* A; K) D, M! y    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
/ a$ }! b$ D9 ]9 u" k! R/ P    -------------------------------------------------------------
# X! U2 t( w0 I9 k5 i) Y    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%2 W* B' E$ Z. Z( x2 \+ W
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ z3 T$ y# Y6 X, S1 D
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
9 W0 u' ]# g) u; A! v    -------------------------------------------------------------
' v1 M3 t3 {. |* v/ p    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
& L* l7 \9 z5 O6 j/ Y    -------------------------------------------------------------0 u) x% O1 _. \( G
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
3 k+ A( A8 y3 W' R    -------------------------------------------------------------' n  q% L# \4 Y1 `3 \5 \7 Q
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%9 v# Z) d  [6 V- Y; ?2 J1 w
    -------------------------------------------------------------; [! U6 b6 d! V5 l# a& c* i
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
9 F% H: K6 o) T7 E' D    -------------------------------------------------------------8 L1 ]3 {" A8 M
    >>" o$ B4 E- k' O% M

% j6 F3 y( {% m, s, {9 J8 r, f    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined' K) |' x3 j9 X8 U. \. s; u# F
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint  c' U% \* C( C5 p$ e
John and Victoria.4 E, D$ E2 e; t" J' c: O1 L! l

) n  R* m6 C! g% ]/ c' F) O9 M    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most7 H0 c. I0 S9 a2 E2 r* w
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
, T- g8 b8 w9 e& G* whousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
: Z* L4 u+ v3 Ureferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
6 l2 F: h4 a. _  J7 l, s: Itrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities9 }- _1 t- j5 e1 `% l* ?* [; o1 P
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
# Y1 D9 v5 ?; ~available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
- R% y4 N) D( O# J- R7 }figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable! F/ l% c5 G9 b2 B$ @: S/ o/ k# F" r
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on. p. k: z5 X5 o* {  q& O8 }
November 15, 2006.
5 [5 H& F) j' r- M    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
) h7 e; m; H( G  }' lfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge! Z+ t9 D1 P* m9 p! v
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is: t6 }9 `" n- R' I. N. r
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-18 11:12 , Processed in 0.099974 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表