埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2454|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable . l' w3 }: t+ P3 V

, b9 H$ s; L* a7 |: A& h6 f0 t- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -$ R1 F2 \. E& |8 }

, ?9 g( X4 M( l7 Y6 ~    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market1 O' d4 l2 a* c( @/ @7 V) x
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third* P: M( j: M+ z1 T
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
- }1 p% }/ G4 o" a7 h. Uin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
/ ]2 w8 R, _6 q. i/ W. _' hprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and9 V( d* @: T* e% f( R, o
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
* g+ `+ N# O& E9 {. z& CQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
. ?8 Y' E9 T( W2 l8 Q0 F( L3 GLePage Real Estate Services.
# {) ?& M# S6 E: U& I, e" T- i2 Y  j
' W0 X  u, _& X- y3 M' Q" C    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters! e; T2 y: \1 G: m
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
3 U5 F! F; X  P& J, Q$ Q- ?conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and$ w- M% Y" h3 a( y. k
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
& h+ Y0 m* l* T' l1 z" _residential real estate sector.
% N9 j; B8 B/ @$ P! p) W- ?) t1 G0 n! _' o6 w" a8 o% K
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
5 |' p. ?, v3 Noccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)6 w" U3 k4 x* V2 P
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
4 a4 t8 C+ h, \(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
- g4 Y9 N/ g" Y! c6 \' f' z(+13.2%).
3 M% [" \/ h7 [+ V# |  ~. H: y
* l* _: q- p* g; M( b$ w1 u    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
0 l$ F( k0 \" V1 ?$ tduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the; h+ |9 _$ m/ w+ ^* b7 N3 |& L
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are5 y& A3 [5 n$ ?/ f7 D3 u
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
0 b" h& C0 R, s2 G) gpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
$ {$ o7 x% a- X" t- q"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We0 A4 ?; b6 u9 C
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
0 Q% [6 {+ Y( r7 r6 hbalanced market."$ J3 p' A8 L1 n8 q" Q7 A
9 \' S) |. m  J0 P+ f& [2 E
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
/ r- U0 j( U( J9 `4 O# x; Econsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
; e$ `' W/ \0 }& o* k; wto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued3 t  u' ]7 {$ f- [
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core4 @/ a. K2 V9 f+ I' Y3 q$ }# J+ k5 E
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration," @" }+ a( y/ s
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
0 b, ~, `' m7 A" v  obreaking price appreciations.
8 e! c& }- ^) [% ?% g
% o* \# g. ]5 i! E! O    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding( Y! U, v3 w! Q! |$ B3 n0 R% }
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
0 H3 ]' M9 M, q  Alargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
+ m6 [8 {! W2 n, U3 m: s2 H9 `: ?2 f# v, E: @: c  |4 Q
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid1 M/ J! z/ m: C0 o
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
" y% b, p: n) x$ M7 U! V5 Iconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off9 u; m1 g* S; A8 C. t  a
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
% @- [/ s/ G! F8 pIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers  v7 }# t5 v1 w6 \- U. U
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
# k4 ~" l# l6 J; F' C3 n/ T5 `; Xprice appreciation when compared with 2005." f( \2 f. X# h
% S+ G( U* H+ t3 D2 {7 o
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing9 ]7 q2 g3 ^4 k% }3 P( ~/ [
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and+ ^- S/ N& _; R4 `, l
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada( e5 V. J9 Y. L' f, L3 n
are markedly different than those found in the United States.. p$ l7 O' x* U/ Z) ?8 ^1 ^

! A' D# m5 L8 u& J9 S    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the3 |8 A% W% X6 f8 z% S  ]8 l/ I
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
" Z% B* o, Y9 e# Afavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the$ A& }# \3 S4 U4 _4 C
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general1 {! h- D# w. b9 i* W/ B7 o
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
6 Q/ ]1 R2 N& k; _0 `# ~8 L9 J) Q* D/ adownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
& B+ e: |/ T3 V' C. r" P4 U8 x* }aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization+ L- w( [% A4 ~% R1 K
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."$ H( l% c8 y+ ?, G5 v
8 |; q3 n+ z2 ^, D# ]5 D% A
    <<& `, ?3 a) z8 m
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
, d# j: ?0 E+ S    >>
+ D! O* q5 M7 V% N( m0 h* H5 M: l- M- f" {, T; w, |
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in0 S" I' F" F: }$ B4 [2 D) Y9 P
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
$ i- q: r1 k; @' O) Aof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
  o7 E0 `5 h1 z9 t. Zlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
# \, s) a  C% g/ crenovations.
: |, H9 m, x& E. x7 n2 n$ u* m) Y& j
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
: c0 I' F5 t$ H6 X  R4 hincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
$ h0 D+ ?" }& Q# G$ O. g/ icompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
) K3 {4 d1 ~$ Z- k% z( y8 b7 LSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
) t6 {( s! }" `# q$ Q4 w
  e% @4 a7 _8 z- G. k6 i+ S9 Z    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
5 m8 q5 e4 _1 Y" yslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
: k* f' X) [/ [7 [) Q. }+ B) v& Jquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new1 I* o- A/ q9 D% q
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores% Y# h+ Z* J7 h: l* q/ x9 Y0 r
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes& z, ^2 `( F* F9 N9 u& M; I
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.; g& F( W( i% [. X+ u% C  t8 f

# ~7 Y, l; ?, x* v( i* I( z    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced1 g  p8 h/ w2 S$ _+ d' K+ e
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
+ s2 e# F( Q: U& _homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers5 Z: Z' p: n; Z2 ]
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian' O, U+ ~- c# P3 a: L  Q
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing6 l' K. v2 F: N9 T+ n  l: \/ f
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
" E) |1 ?2 R+ M( D6 p) T/ O% _2 |5 [7 W$ g7 q: k
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
- W6 y- q% n1 S. r* L! t7 u0 t* [among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
  V7 }1 }; C; jpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
) {; P1 @2 U: l7 L2 W+ S8 L  H: vas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
! V* |' Q. t: r) P# ffew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
  w# b+ I3 }! b' h! K
8 r% E9 V1 q& w+ D: i( z1 x    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house1 e7 T" R0 z0 i5 q& [0 w+ _
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory* n% r) m3 t& ]
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting# r1 s: o% a( n
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
; g4 e) Z& ~  l! mwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the( s+ O- m' U/ v. ]$ h2 n5 f3 x
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before, Y  z! n4 @- `# H# j
making a purchase.2 ^0 V) w) u8 w9 B7 c1 Z, U" U

# S$ `: ]. M2 S- d  x    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
5 R6 w+ a+ z& Y+ Q1 {( imarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong0 ~4 e0 [+ }& W6 B
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
; N+ Y8 O7 B/ B7 f2 N' ~$ I. m( wcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting, h2 V% E1 a6 ?, p# K! S
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown5 u5 S: b% J. I
amenities.4 F" U0 U0 z5 X" I
! w/ r$ N! q% a& l, V
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels& e/ K! m' M" M8 t; H9 n9 C
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
5 R& T( O$ J  ^/ o7 \, kacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
$ c0 V( M6 `6 Xcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been" s- p8 c# I# d/ F8 ~! ~+ e2 n
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
1 O' c2 ~/ a0 L: X+ |7 mresidence, rather than for investment.) k) j( }4 s) r4 f; x9 w

  n( n& i/ A3 [( K    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as: u4 @) c3 [6 `4 H$ Z5 y  x3 m1 @+ D
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
8 c% k# V" O1 z2 {2 K0 Win a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer8 L9 j( o' L+ g& i  b
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization$ |# k7 O, ~* Z9 o. f# {4 H
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter8 j5 ]; W# F& i9 s5 |' f
the market.  `, N0 B- X  B

; Z6 x6 g* C- w6 h; Y/ L" ?    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
; @3 o5 T  ~% ZJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
; h5 ~/ X: D2 f7 y% N- iAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring: Y0 \, f% [5 k% j4 z: W
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
) W9 w" X0 a1 F7 M! nto the shortage of available inventory.; |# m1 n5 ~. C9 @! x  B

$ s6 F% t* j7 I# v& q    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its# s. M' r5 ?: D* h7 b
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains; q3 Y+ W# q% U1 b- |
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
* Q% M) S  ^. p: cstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.; o& `' D: s2 D  |$ j) D0 x9 {

2 \6 O6 P0 @- @% i/ T    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases- s/ C8 a5 [& L7 V; }5 r
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low# F( V3 J8 Y7 ^" b2 K
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that- ]2 L9 s8 k# V$ {" a% B- r7 |" N  n
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring6 K7 n+ K* \7 P2 y3 a* p
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
; }7 l' @) g* m- k: c+ n6 tseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as* ~; T9 U& G9 W+ D
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
9 E  J0 k+ c* D: }6 T4 i

3 H( P4 Y$ F4 I9 A# g. k    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter. }) K5 d+ K6 P1 o& g
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
- G& L! g8 U8 eremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
% [& ~9 `5 \$ _$ F3 |' qmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices* p: z4 L. _1 I6 }( W$ c
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
  f# R! M) c! D+ \in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly, [6 _& n% i! Q% k8 T
towards the end of 2006.
   
9 {$ w# \$ k' o
/ m! R$ ^. I# q  z. Q& X3 z; e( hWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
9 a9 R; j, C4 O5 A) q: i: Tinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
* b% Z1 o2 v7 ?; a- Gto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse: @& c, H6 r! d# [' ~- x# }3 s
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
! v7 N9 R. c3 J+ |. p! j3 `foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added: H* w. @- f' C$ X* S
pressure on tight inventory levels.
0 Q7 S# Q0 j+ G5 ~+ y2 `, ^  z7 @4 D1 _( v
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic, {% c( t) Q! Z: J  ]/ I6 s. S
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
7 \  {7 s! K4 Y9 _into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;  n2 D$ o! A; h7 o
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching6 t( v! |6 L7 M1 H  s$ I
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.1 z- ^  d: F& w) v

9 v/ [. \% Z1 [* X, ]* {    <<) E" R9 A) N8 Y8 q0 X5 Z9 ~
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006# c: u3 W0 ]- t0 M
1 ^+ K% e# }2 U2 y' C& b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. j+ b& s7 J* ^, s                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
1 N1 E; w  j% L; L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 v5 Q. [  T5 q. |6 k
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3" z/ U# k4 s- R1 a4 r  X
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
% v1 I* S$ q8 E& }) g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 l0 \' U, X. v# H' P* L  `! Y" Z    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
) l9 r- q) d' S+ O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, m5 C1 \; Y, y6 c
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000; y0 ?. U0 |0 b5 h
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 ?: P$ k& T6 p3 R' ?: l  Q/ }8 }8 Z
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
) r$ [3 Z0 G3 T9 w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; _5 }# ]& |" w3 Z) m    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
& p7 H5 K. c! t: [) z0 |& I8 S    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ R3 {; ]$ s4 b4 S
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
% J1 K) H3 s' G6 J8 i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: H! V; p3 j" c& A8 G
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5839 V; l$ c- b1 p; N4 S) _2 m
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 v2 w/ {7 @% O' f1 n, h    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1857 T. Y. a0 e* U; \
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 ]/ {. s: ]# p/ a7 J    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250) |- Y% c, V9 F0 d' E, H8 {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% E! i4 X- R* |
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
/ T" ~  S: P. N) R( J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% t% {& N( }3 I    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7076 c/ H' ^" }  o& U& c- c( T3 e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ a9 [* }  y2 j3 E6 u" a    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500, _8 H% q8 U! q; u3 `9 E
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% A. u7 q! z( f    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389, c0 u2 K. b/ k  G  z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 ~$ C: s5 R; A8 A- f2 v- K
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7142 ]1 [; Y& o" ^  B6 [3 A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 }# r; K. ^3 F6 q( R% w' B6 m8 }    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
9 N8 |/ V9 {* P$ _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 |8 L( e8 d; _4 P. J, D8 I
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000" d8 x& ^6 r4 f
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ _  B; x: b) X6 V/ P+ {2 e7 z    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860; L; C$ |5 |& N* d0 C; n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- i$ B) T" x+ G0 T0 w( c* [

! ?% x3 C5 r% b& F    -------------------------------------------------------------
, @, o! p9 y! m7 f3 [. Y) P" I& _                               Standard Condominium
7 U2 b/ J4 i  d7 L" g    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 [  f; P; _/ o                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
8 y, f  s* ?  x' _4 \3 o/ f) k    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
% u! m% a3 E3 b8 O    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 {- l$ \7 h/ T) O% F& p    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%  k% ^3 B2 \  G# j8 a2 ?5 h
    -------------------------------------------------------------
- i/ ~" Z3 Q/ r6 Q( d    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
% B8 \- r: B" i8 F4 I    -------------------------------------------------------------! ^* M7 n2 x, B6 d$ D
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
( H" i. [' C; B4 u+ T' v; B- R4 s" Q$ P    -------------------------------------------------------------  v) K8 Z7 z. _
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A& N6 `* ^/ H( I8 B' [
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 u$ |1 ], h1 _" Z" W
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%6 ~+ O* G7 f% X
    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 z" D; X8 j% y) x" p6 ^' _6 b- G    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%8 E9 G% o: X. B, d( W9 ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------# V) H0 |; \# m* h$ \
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
# Z& o2 k: a* c; t9 K" i7 i- V( `7 t  T    -------------------------------------------------------------+ P& f' r  M* N2 v
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
+ T9 u- L6 w  Y6 h3 K; t    -------------------------------------------------------------2 |* f, h1 x0 d: B
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%+ Y8 a& h6 s4 [& p
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 _# f7 x* v0 }: `. n
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%, l" P) S0 u8 A4 R/ }/ e; h3 x
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 a) W  x% B+ o+ S5 t& l% x3 r- C/ B    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%* R5 a: ~$ ]0 r9 @
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 N7 e* e3 A# `' F/ I8 Y( o' [    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
) L# S' W' z6 v# d4 H" c    -------------------------------------------------------------  L; N" Y3 g) l' g
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
( S/ I; H, J6 k: C* M  _7 B0 P    -------------------------------------------------------------. Q( S) N5 E  l7 [- V' t
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%* u& d5 l( j0 R* g3 B
    -------------------------------------------------------------& |; E4 G+ L7 @5 O, F( s
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
: @1 c6 y  [- `, v$ B4 l0 {    -------------------------------------------------------------; F% z7 `& I( b
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
% H( d: i4 T; f' G+ I    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ b, ?& H, C& c' P. e) S0 K; A' w4 a    >>0 H% G2 P6 A! F9 z) _$ S% D
8 Q8 d- R& s6 F* s3 y% ^5 b
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
% c. G$ w: }2 G/ t2 v. i9 @5 Pin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint/ r* O9 K1 z# q2 ^+ \
John and Victoria./ |3 o* s( b" F* Y

4 A0 S+ c1 l2 j) ^2 Y/ ?$ S* P$ ~    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
( Z. T1 r3 I. xcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of9 j: n4 J2 H' M$ l/ q! m2 k
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
' S6 \" o3 j. k" e$ J/ Yreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
) A; U  E. F5 M8 Vtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities! U7 Q: P; h1 p1 `' k' s
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
5 r5 \5 _- B6 T5 u4 Navailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current' y, `$ }1 ~& r6 `, T4 k# t" b
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
3 F, [. r4 H- A1 Mversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on5 D$ }! ^) M0 `3 ^" J/ M% t
November 15, 2006.4 a  t! s0 j. L) R  i
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of+ V9 h+ F+ |* y( t6 i. i
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
; W) y8 l. [: W2 V& k  Aprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
" k* ?) V, F9 C* K/ _available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-5-9 22:09 , Processed in 0.200232 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表