埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2069|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
0 d# l& |' R1 ?8 K- _3 w' Z# m( f
7 w8 [; B) E  Y2 {9 Y7 s( Y- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -# M& q/ D/ i: [. _) z* N5 A

+ V* p3 N3 Y; t0 k, ]" v9 b6 ?    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market3 R2 W( Z* h0 ^" u5 g
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
) ^& k3 n! w2 t6 R1 F3 F1 \4 ?quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic# r9 D' O5 K/ u. c! P7 V2 |, C! u
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit4 e2 m5 l5 C0 j) Q& A
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and. A& t- w9 v& {4 X
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,$ d1 p) s) n0 X/ q6 c% h) V
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
1 A& P8 f/ v. d& NLePage Real Estate Services.
8 L% w$ ^- G8 C3 r/ x6 m5 v% x. O  Y
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
7 r3 f9 B* R& s' Nare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic  Y! e! [; ?9 t" P! t7 U7 S
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and0 Q2 y6 T) s( `( I. V4 @! d
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
2 g' @; S1 Z2 Z+ s" ~; v: bresidential real estate sector." [2 F$ r4 N& T: P6 L* }- A

# M! l( t6 a1 q! v    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation9 e$ [' }5 l; S6 q7 x+ e* Y
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
" F3 l/ w; }$ ?  F8 Tyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5622 F! ^# i, e$ u* ^2 z' V
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3801 [2 S0 o# W$ h2 A; [# }8 L4 W2 P
(+13.2%).
6 b& z* s9 g) q7 G- @( |, a  K, U) c& y1 n. m
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth3 r0 @- O7 J* F' w$ g2 v
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
6 b7 }% Z7 J1 ~  H6 g% hfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are( M. Z5 ?7 T1 g2 |  k/ c; t8 L
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
: [: F* t' L" ppresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.4 R( o: K7 c+ @& ^6 P6 z6 }
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We8 m' V7 a3 k" u/ z( i3 Z# M
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
6 \( P4 @' L- O8 b& w- cbalanced market."8 V( J+ f. Z8 {4 @

2 I4 ]& N# C' D( i9 y    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
6 C. G( r) \: f# uconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift5 ^2 W0 v; y/ C! t3 b
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued# h( e# y: Z3 s
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
6 b+ p4 F7 c, G5 S+ J4 qenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,, U9 r( k( ?# E* j! b2 s
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
  @( P( }5 u7 P( ibreaking price appreciations.$ v. m* |( k- u* v
+ K" P+ o1 c( g! q
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
3 V2 M* _- ?$ _1 v$ n' U% Beconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the* E3 X. B9 l8 x
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
9 i8 a4 u+ F; d2 p1 z* {/ T! a+ D
& ?1 V  ^: Q# Y. M+ g- Q6 x& o    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
$ R3 S( b8 H+ Seconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
( t3 o( j7 @3 g! [5 _" j8 _4 U  hconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off) {. C" i. E2 Z1 Q
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.6 p' e. o, w# C/ H5 z! m
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers0 V% k0 d; z  @( y
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of- F8 S' D- n% Q- r3 {4 _
price appreciation when compared with 2005.7 i+ U/ `7 D: `$ \+ ?- O

9 E% m) z6 y% Z- T4 }4 k    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
' k6 B6 w( y1 O* f( B# Cmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and2 k4 [3 a7 t; p# B5 \
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
2 S5 S) I1 i' ]; B! O% Uare markedly different than those found in the United States.
. d$ B( i8 z: m* H9 \) s+ ?& Z8 g8 K# w4 _7 q) P" M- F
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
( |- ]* V; w* H4 h# I7 ^0 sAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's+ n+ b0 q% T& N: h& j
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
) A8 U# y/ E+ J$ d, ?' W  V: _/ orelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general2 q3 R1 B8 U2 O0 w4 X
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the8 t# f" s# I* P8 P6 J1 Q4 t2 l& ]8 h
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
0 K1 U8 @. M1 S" a9 zaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
0 |8 x9 ]& g) d: Omortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."' `. r7 g( f% t; x) r& s9 {
, \/ _5 p/ i% a$ _
    <<2 s9 _3 h7 _* s6 a, R
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
' b3 o" \/ u' j1 A. Q/ V    >>
1 G9 W/ }  y$ w& L
9 a& b0 L3 A% |5 [4 S/ a! O    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in' y" i7 y$ w4 F+ X
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate! `! ~0 M- Q) e9 ^( `0 h0 {
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
% j5 h* B7 t. O# k" P7 O* n# Ulooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
. r: |2 d* D  U- }0 U! ^' C7 [renovations.# ?# d0 H, O% _5 c
; S2 N, \2 z! |1 r
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
9 B) w% C9 y/ \/ i& h; J3 zincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation! Z# f( M5 _. H3 h9 B' ?0 w- {
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and7 r2 y- E) P/ e. b% Q
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
/ o0 K/ h9 U% v3 o% \( x/ {, q1 @. S6 @8 r4 T/ S3 M) q
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer$ Z" C" [9 L) v
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
" f, j, g% B1 v/ f) a' rquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
- ^2 G6 W$ ^' P600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores; @3 Z  K; m8 S
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
& s: q) W7 {4 a; X# Pand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
1 u! R- L! R6 g5 P0 d0 H5 ]1 |" M$ H6 [
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
- d" F4 v0 }, Qconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their8 i6 x. l# c5 e" C* B" _
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
, ?! B6 w% T: v$ c" U% ^' L: V: Kwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian& ]5 \, L8 |1 _/ o* l$ v
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
4 q0 m* \' n. y9 Z4 B# b6 i' o: Ebuyers with more options when looking for a home.
: K' i6 z, X2 C/ Z" f3 R) y* m
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
8 n1 U2 T$ l$ A2 K. yamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes% ~+ n  s- M' e) }
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,& |4 v9 M* W; M8 |. D/ d) R9 `
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last8 d# H1 J1 R: P- `7 b
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.! p% o- f4 h3 H9 ~- F3 P

( n/ N5 Y# T& W7 K    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house2 r# E. q( S* q! ]3 C* q7 c# _
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory% N! o' A! N6 ], s; {" B
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
. ^8 s& M/ P2 q: afirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
8 M- i3 b& f" }$ L% \* Wwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
) d5 ^/ Q* l4 V$ X4 ^* v; Opressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
: A; e) V) _- R5 u# h- r; Z# Fmaking a purchase./ C; p4 G8 @" m2 @
1 H) j) @) G1 J2 M( ^2 `
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing5 p3 {/ R9 p3 H" ~* [/ F
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong% ?& ]& A$ o6 M; ~
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
3 d/ K) s. d  H( U3 z. M0 D- ]& Wcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting3 ^& i1 S1 T" V
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
+ }' c4 D/ k% z! m6 }) yamenities., c5 A6 ?( j# Q5 a( {- [
9 n) D  z8 F: v
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
) [2 z0 Z' L0 h4 E! ?# Z+ `# I/ Cthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand( |( r/ u2 S# L8 g2 H
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has9 G. b9 ?" m, b0 S
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
6 A# z: v" U* L9 L7 ]driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle' {$ p5 \# R" G
residence, rather than for investment.
1 A: U9 m4 }' s! k3 @  i: B- s5 j# f8 L. T  Y+ a
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
7 W" T5 \9 d+ hhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted9 L: @/ l# d( H9 l. G! T0 H- N
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
+ ~% }# s( E. G% T% aconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization+ r; G: L' }5 M3 O, m  t2 T
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
; P8 i. Z& @! p9 V0 [  ^* Pthe market.
6 q5 f  s3 {- H/ j' P2 y- }% p
: x. M6 J' q5 }1 M* @( h/ N- g( w/ A2 ]  {    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
9 |/ O+ K# [  Z# zJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
8 f% s- M& ?" j5 f+ l& i6 iAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring: ?% U& g3 {* D2 ^$ O6 n4 G2 T6 A; y
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due/ y/ A& h: _) k8 d1 W8 q7 w/ d
to the shortage of available inventory.
+ `: B$ Y7 `7 p! u4 `* o2 s7 I$ d3 C0 `% I7 V) A2 W5 L/ @! A, }8 C" M
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its; m& m2 Y: `/ _4 `
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains! Y6 U/ s+ p4 v/ Y6 B! R' @0 j0 e
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses0 |+ }% y0 Y: C6 R4 b3 _
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
! f3 ^/ P+ ]  |# l4 ^6 i
6 n+ @% f3 u3 _8 a$ d    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
3 N: M/ s  J  x8 Z5 y/ F5 Kin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
+ _8 w; U& ~8 S# dunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that. c( k. g6 [7 ]
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
* y) X- _9 P/ c, k4 K2 jprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
. y/ m, O: I/ d  Hseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
* D6 ^' p- _0 E' sbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
$ }& c/ @% q: k+ m2 r
6 e7 ?" x# o  G+ a' [7 k/ K
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter7 p) b( U5 ~* L& k
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
5 q, B! M; S- ~: x4 ^: aremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
, e" x+ j4 h2 z: \& Dmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
0 l1 z/ @6 P4 J. N5 }; }increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve1 j( {. j5 {+ X# ]; x9 t& k
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
3 ?' Q. K# h! F* `* S' G6 Stowards the end of 2006.
    7 ^. ]3 ~$ K6 P
9 F  q& N/ r* b& F7 U. q& @  @
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
; f5 J' `2 m6 h; n( S9 p( ~( {inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable; h5 o7 J% W+ ?' N1 J, U9 J8 r; x
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
* A; |# L3 o, b6 y: @, C8 Agroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
2 t( ^2 d- q' U$ W3 p9 S; K/ mforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
- ~/ I$ x* b" B/ ^' Kpressure on tight inventory levels., \  Y: \+ h! N" w- N! u8 |

! L; Y1 K- \3 x" j7 ]    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
: ]7 @( t( X9 z, Y9 o3 Afundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people2 U5 R/ ^: d8 n  `
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
; N. ~" Q; H7 V* m3 v* pwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching& N2 K5 s; `8 y0 P
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.0 d0 b% ?" c; ?; X
6 g5 Y8 _: ~) o- G
    <<& i% x3 p! N/ l4 x6 `& q: h* q
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006! ?) _3 `& \3 m* I. a
7 ?: L" s, a+ |# u" W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 q! W- k6 J5 s8 G+ K0 z
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
" p/ T6 [2 ~4 }7 i2 i) ~% r4 t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ u2 ^: a" q; L; a1 d3 G) G0 k
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q35 Z: y4 y& K$ V, i; y. ^
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
. Q' O2 C/ K: F0 o: f$ V! b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 F3 }0 q5 V8 v5 z( U
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000/ \. v4 `; {( B2 e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! [* E8 O1 \  u7 i    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
" [, F& R$ A# C8 I' h3 r* s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ S* y" F5 T4 j& }! x5 f! f
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000$ m6 v( {! `9 b+ E& U+ r+ f
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ K. K& J( U$ d& ~& V  O! U. b    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
+ b* ~6 d1 y7 h( v( y- `  Q2 x7 ~    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% `* n- K( K5 z    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
3 X$ n7 w1 H* n' X- y0 e+ h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ w+ Z4 u1 }: F6 Y6 A) j1 [    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
. \: b1 Z& S" Q# {- t5 K    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 w1 P/ _; i+ L5 J
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185! R7 B5 i5 M! G2 I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# H- O; v) P! W3 t# G    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250) z6 p$ ^' q8 Z/ Z% K8 T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 l9 {$ j; \' W# q    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766$ W3 O. Z; V0 k5 {6 z: E6 W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 E0 X% ^8 E. ], R/ |    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
! m* P) l# T" _" B1 J% x8 d7 _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 j8 C+ l" \5 x+ b3 v; m! D    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
8 a' Q& b. o2 h) Z0 F/ U  c# s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 t3 F: i& Q, `7 y& y    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
' T+ M) D9 ~; P5 ^; ~    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( M7 e8 D  s% _1 B9 ~
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7143 Y( m3 P* s0 M' N) g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! \* R5 a/ U: p) ]5 U6 w( g
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
# W+ q7 D; S) z6 ^3 K/ ^, M5 `    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ T# A" C% \7 H" f2 V    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
. A+ V9 D9 i: Y% l+ y$ w) G1 R% f: q5 i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ J! A2 o6 n- n$ h+ p
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860( ~7 I4 g6 Q, u8 ^7 T+ S. U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) o# {/ z2 w' t% y

, u" ~( K1 O: y7 c( i; N- n* N    -------------------------------------------------------------- O; X1 Z4 `) E$ q
                               Standard Condominium
: \% ]! A8 M/ i1 v5 k- }- k    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 E0 P4 p' W: ~! v6 M/ ]$ ]                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo1 N0 g! C" K, A" Q( c# e& H# {8 Q
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change: @/ G' R0 x+ M. k, |
    -------------------------------------------------------------0 V5 ^8 C2 A! K; d% z
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%  N! L$ B6 a# R' m
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 H! s; a9 k8 Y, N& E
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%9 q% K% b& L* u* N) j
    -------------------------------------------------------------
* Y' g  z% _+ v    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
0 j! p; N, P% ^, i9 g    -------------------------------------------------------------& Z2 ~; ~& ?! l5 R5 }
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A: W( o; c+ y! a' i& f: \9 i2 m& ^. f
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 b, @5 n( O! |    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%, M- H/ p0 J; J" p* }% n
    -------------------------------------------------------------# E! B8 Z5 f5 Z. G; `- g* O
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%4 A: }* A5 d* c/ _& }  K7 @
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 O1 R; S4 @2 l+ d) ^* l3 h    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
' ]0 D* C( `- |) a2 a0 v    -------------------------------------------------------------
, I- s7 Q' e' Y; v8 S    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%! ^, G% u' C2 l0 ^& R& ?0 k
    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 h7 u# P2 w$ U( r7 {    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
& k# G3 T/ c  E+ P% a+ [- f    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ q( E, F9 q- o- k; U0 b' J    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
! L; ]+ K; Y3 \  T    -------------------------------------------------------------/ I. _, P9 ^2 o5 v
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%3 s# t! f* |# g; M- o
    -------------------------------------------------------------
% V5 ]1 t7 f+ ~    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
: Y: M" g+ B  I: }+ D2 O4 |, E' B    -------------------------------------------------------------
# D% B. b" q9 A    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
; o: F; m0 g% O    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 O9 D9 D& T: t$ T6 r    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
4 x' `( U7 ^5 q2 d    -------------------------------------------------------------& L5 y* A7 T" E1 i1 ^1 Z
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%+ h0 |9 o- A; w8 R. S# g% B9 l: j6 `
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 l- F; G; a$ x    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%1 k0 q) A/ f  G- E6 [: a
    -------------------------------------------------------------  g, ]7 X( E4 I0 u1 a* G& ^
    >>
/ ~% O$ m4 v- @9 [8 M2 X, c$ N  K: o/ `% f7 Z
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined/ g4 A3 v+ Z" I' l5 W! B
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint. y# q9 C* }2 N! J8 n, C; N1 y
John and Victoria.
% q# G" e6 U) s4 c
# Y( O# ~. g5 D$ U& {) g0 c    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
5 d. _; |0 b' Y# w( x/ Pcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of7 g3 Z4 s$ x# j4 S
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
6 s3 J- l0 N* vreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
$ K$ F+ y$ n' O9 K* y: t4 R5 jtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities1 |3 f; r  P3 n0 D
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is  ]& h6 Y" b, Q. A* o6 Q  O3 ^
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current$ G  k! h6 @6 A5 P9 e
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable7 k, V1 Z" D1 x$ F' s  k
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on( a6 M% E( f% b* U* D
November 15, 2006.
, T& K* M) N" o# z* K7 D    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
- o/ j9 q8 v, |& _8 r6 ]3 Lfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge) l0 G$ n, b. ]: \. G9 W# n
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
9 D: E2 M& Z0 {available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-12 18:22 , Processed in 0.127611 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表