埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1982|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
; a# T) }8 @% l1 s2 \  k- y% `- B0 p. l
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
0 }7 @3 t3 j" ?4 U1 f1 y7 t& c. x1 ~- j$ A
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
; Z8 H0 d) J% wexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
* r. {$ z  n7 D' uquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic: G0 ~! P* b% t
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
% }, J% r2 m! J9 h) H" Tprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
( B3 Y+ H2 O. i: Umore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
7 h5 H* B& ~/ W) GQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal+ Y8 k& \, `; S* f  X
LePage Real Estate Services.
5 [% G2 ^! k7 E9 b5 t3 H5 A8 z  E. |
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
" |$ E1 d+ l. `( B, S2 Mare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
( V# Q7 @: Y6 `$ o2 e7 M& hconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
7 \/ E) }$ E/ I' A) t2 C/ s/ Tsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the7 y0 }; R  {: i% z* r- ~3 Z
residential real estate sector.
2 N3 k6 X4 r+ a8 V/ F1 [
* u8 ]6 x& r6 `# G, B    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
. j- s* M) W) hoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
+ b$ `, k# p3 c( e: H6 ?; Y% pyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
$ c/ |* I& h+ N( A% v  c$ d& T(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
' T* J1 y- n& y: `( }( U7 }# M(+13.2%).9 G. Y* D1 l& L0 \/ R  T, U
$ r) W$ S; n- x8 n
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
+ e. m6 M3 a% Z, {+ r. Gduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
' ]: u: Q* Z: Rfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
5 R8 V& Z0 R* J8 d2 `poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
4 ?% ?  @$ ~0 C. D6 L" t: ~president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services." I+ i7 c+ T. x: }
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We/ P6 _0 J* b6 d4 x1 A. l7 v8 O0 h
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
% o& w: o2 z2 d+ |- n$ T# Zbalanced market."' L% g' x2 Z9 L+ I" |( b
; v6 W% m+ H/ S; a( Q6 v
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
* C! r8 t. _. \2 U* Cconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift) C- g5 e' q" E0 K& }0 r  h4 I
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued$ b! w9 {! [" d
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core( y7 p; J+ j$ A4 c. p
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
. p( U, \  q. d# [$ ~manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record) }$ J1 e- B/ |0 g
breaking price appreciations.% ^2 ]% u: N. \" e

/ V/ a+ a$ v3 p- @1 a8 r2 h    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
- c5 l9 w9 O4 ]5 p) c" X+ ?economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the. K3 f2 ~0 w  k, d3 G% b( d* e
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.* H( f. D* f# d  B' p" I" L
+ b" M) e# O" ~
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid! f5 D# w7 y. R5 t
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer3 c. ?) s9 f' }- ^% T
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
1 F3 I3 }( y- N" S% m. H( fslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
- [7 T" W- v/ p+ J' m! F( yIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
0 h! d- P& j8 Egreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of$ g# ?* e# v5 K. K
price appreciation when compared with 2005.- }/ \' S' n) e! C$ W

. Y/ s; |8 J  b! y    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing; J0 q+ s/ l1 F
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and# l# Z( D8 v" }6 B: n
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
5 L& S* X8 \, b: _" z: L% Kare markedly different than those found in the United States.: m5 {5 l2 o4 e( w; l; `* H" M
( r7 w- _+ e7 m+ ^! z5 t' w9 ?( z2 S0 f
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the) X7 m5 W; S! R7 G* K
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's: p: `! k- T6 S3 g* r8 h+ v' m
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the8 X% \7 t3 ]" f% n9 f
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
! i7 b9 l# `, s' [2 ]: l% aaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
, D5 S9 b1 D3 t8 M! I: |downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and  e, e* w$ @& u9 o( U& I" N5 K
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization1 S0 k0 ]9 `6 B! `% e
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."' X7 t. \; g: K# w( E5 ~" Y/ E) m

4 u( g& I, R- K0 K0 f    <<+ F0 T+ H( V' p7 I
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES) }; G- S( e* o
    >>. @$ q) \% b# k1 i+ n% O
8 C4 u' O1 w; [! {9 r
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
7 ~+ b4 J0 d0 t8 p- _8 ~Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate3 Z3 r3 u% M: |: M
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time  H9 p! U& M: c/ f4 B9 W: S: h( d0 Z
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
) Z: d- \9 b2 w5 A/ Z( ]renovations.. I6 f' S! E( ^3 N$ ~

) c: q, V# c. M    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
9 ]- t5 c2 z, v& lincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation- r. O* s; ~+ b" ?1 _% u8 c: U: M7 [1 l
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and# A6 T; b' v6 ?4 u% Y7 |
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
; P" ^* a+ A# H. w( K. M7 A0 n+ z$ C' L' Q
% q" G' S* a! J5 l& o    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
* ?# J5 C# D  H% I3 t& A5 _/ ?slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the8 g$ S) D0 _( X
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
4 N! D' n+ C/ |5 M  x9 V2 h600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores: {9 k1 |1 h% F: K3 ~, B* c, Q
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes0 t: b  k3 U5 ^4 b- d* d
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
9 G9 o* T. g0 P  m+ y: b5 g! \& r! F1 Z
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced- @/ y; L0 w; Z. v2 B  ]
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
% h4 p9 X& D4 d8 G0 p5 {0 _: k' U$ Whomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers0 C8 R( {. N; ]; F& j
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
2 p  l* c+ A8 M) ?dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing4 x, r5 V. m5 U& N. o
buyers with more options when looking for a home.0 O* J6 [9 X1 g9 P

! u* c& K# c  t1 i    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly& }3 Y; ?& |/ x/ z7 L
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes9 k6 l6 H% b9 Y* w. k
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
. |6 L& F/ s: K" M+ p* ?5 D5 l4 Mas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last# @7 N1 [; o% i: x' p8 Q7 F
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
& v, n& \% {% T( j0 I  w$ A5 A4 L) n) ~3 R) W5 e2 B- v
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house" U. G& }" S+ e4 Z8 U* C, \- q8 `: }
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory- w0 Z8 ^# m0 R  a, _: W
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting/ i0 G; x- K, S) T. K* B$ f+ d# N
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
8 i- f3 S4 u1 ?4 h1 |2 twhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the% E( J0 B" x! w- {/ v, Y- F
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
3 n% i7 k" l, k$ i* R  x7 zmaking a purchase.
, i" c) {4 h3 R4 k
. |# Q. x* {3 |0 Y" M) ?, N- V+ }7 g    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing, F3 w! I. {+ A, X9 J
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
- ]/ w$ M$ z% p- Iconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city! h8 \( e" l6 A; M3 Q6 f
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
4 Q5 v3 R7 h* E7 F& C8 p4 kattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown+ N# l/ ^/ R% j8 |3 I% I1 n
amenities.& o5 l* \4 |4 Z4 g0 u
' C2 \. K! f5 O- {; r' \7 }
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels5 }/ _+ h9 R" T9 K+ V2 `8 |8 N
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand$ [( z7 f5 q; e  z
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
. r3 t' V9 m) Z: ccontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
1 e. q2 _5 k7 h; Ddriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle" Q. m! [8 ]/ J% i/ E
residence, rather than for investment.
6 W9 U# U- c' x: @! p* c. f1 B3 D2 v6 T
8 c9 A7 f$ Y. T    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as4 B" X4 l- Y1 z: h) J7 U, }& ^
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
. h3 t. l& q) r8 N& Fin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer1 Y/ a) U1 [8 ^2 T% }! g; R
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization. L% A/ r2 g- B
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter5 s5 C. h# G. [" s2 g- u
the market.
3 ~1 l( C. V( f, k# c& {7 B0 P7 o; e  t
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through8 K8 I( K& X+ o7 L& {2 C  W
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
! d. D0 s+ t! W/ RAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring$ ^" _4 K3 ~, M; ?) J# n6 A
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due. q% D6 l( @  d/ ^4 E$ {
to the shortage of available inventory.& A' A! C  M& m3 l$ a7 J7 [

: g8 }1 j! ?% P0 o* n    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its* L; P- m* p( D
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
) S4 {, o2 I4 h$ D3 `2 i  avibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses9 g' s4 _2 I: h: C+ W
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
5 B; e1 J5 j( [# m0 ]* _
4 l# s+ |1 N) \8 e    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
9 r! X- \+ {% P% \1 I  Xin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low9 i$ |- Y7 |! s. X4 j2 \& M& _
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
! c7 o  a, R7 D6 y7 E% L7 \pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
& T. R: k! R4 }7 s- wprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer# s( d5 c  \- ?; l: V
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as: ]4 s5 p. h% Z" B
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

& n" U# I1 d; m9 K' ^0 r4 ]8 V/ D" b. R/ S( b5 u5 i
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
, z9 j4 X: v: \+ Uas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
# C% }* ^+ y# J* @4 Xremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,3 E; D" e: M; @9 T' Y6 O! l
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices% B# s$ t& g* e; h5 m8 g
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
  X) h( K4 V) t$ Q+ p# ?; T4 hin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly7 W/ E& e' i7 O- Y& n
towards the end of 2006.
    $ F# `4 q) c, A) d" \
" |+ d' y$ M" {6 b5 j* s: T
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of; R. m7 z! W9 D% Y" _
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable. b- M+ G2 c, w( o! y+ ?/ s  U( `7 F
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse7 c1 }$ z8 C) Z1 l. P
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to5 I3 C* W+ f  D( D
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
8 P- h( q3 i3 z& l  Q) @9 upressure on tight inventory levels.& e4 t2 v3 w  K# B; L2 m6 s' X3 G

' \$ ^$ g6 u- @; V: g) n    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic) _8 H2 w# i+ f, A
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people6 Z1 m7 i1 `( \5 y) |1 K$ G% z
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;0 N+ d; c& x, E
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
: E7 P& ~4 c) w8 G# v) P0 qfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
9 X* q( f. O9 h2 M# R9 ?
# C. o! }) u% P( G    <<
8 {3 T8 G* E% m, }      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006! `: F7 o- k9 T) k
- N* y3 Y9 ]# E, b/ u/ x
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% H; w. R1 X: J0 ?5 f8 R! B5 B* D
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
+ v$ o, e: M! p* E! d& ]' d1 ^0 s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: Y- a1 o2 C$ ?0 p
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q36 N) f8 i& P" @& |  i
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
$ Q& z/ {& ~) u; z% z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" R4 f7 [; @; ]    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
4 V( U% @* H' A( c" I6 b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- a. x1 l1 U- K) _* N; `0 m
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0003 t0 `( c, G7 K) J1 ~2 y& b* l" F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. J( c0 u- a0 {. `    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0002 F2 }% _, {, j- X/ G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" a* l- k* h8 E# r) F1 D0 ~( a" M4 D    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -1 ?4 b9 [, f1 L+ r4 X! C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 m" H' c- B: L( r- h
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
. j. `  A: f; `0 ~* A* f8 p, a    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% @6 v, n" Q* S( k9 R
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583; w8 @. P: ]- S" k$ k" e8 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) {) i  F; h! d( r1 Y
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185' @9 Q/ O+ S# a  j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: J% R. ?$ d! |/ p
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
& I4 L; X" Z) [) u* k1 s9 z  a! |    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 g5 M8 _8 Y+ I4 u0 f: d    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766  c1 _! n  ~1 r4 O" t
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' V4 M1 B( T% t, {- h# A
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
/ O; X1 K0 [$ _1 O% E2 f2 D5 g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 h+ P' G% m' q0 ^5 `/ _6 ?
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
4 I5 g6 d% i2 b% _. `    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 y9 A! F% O0 W6 u    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389# x8 I: N& \2 _
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 A( {5 p* B" r! r5 O/ ~. C9 A    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
1 {. m1 `6 O' j$ R3 {9 N. Y4 q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 o9 \, n, S  D7 \' l% n* d    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
  L, C. a. ^; ]' }    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 N1 F3 O! i  L' b5 @
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000! |3 R# M* W- A) t4 o# p% U( p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; |$ e9 u9 F3 P  v    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860' F; q; I- V" \4 a8 }" U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 c1 K. g% \3 T& A4 Q1 y: o9 p% P. u' `
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 B6 h. S# m- C  L) }$ p
                               Standard Condominium# n$ O7 [( @# u: l
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ g: P8 O8 `. W
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
+ V$ H; N1 w& y- I% d    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
' j9 L; O& f; K/ T    -------------------------------------------------------------' |- m) ~7 g! {1 ^- W
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%! L, ~& s5 w& f: R
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 `0 }# x% |: D5 Y- e' r/ |
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%. ]# T) A- v. _- N" N' M9 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' w" w% E  Z+ i2 y( B+ w    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
  M4 `' ]/ A- m; ^    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 R; [0 w/ X( G" X. t4 r6 u( f    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
1 w0 ^: t! l5 S7 H1 a    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 U% W$ q, G$ y  _2 T! M: f) J. G    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%9 Z$ ~# p4 u4 D; H2 c
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 B; H- J: y. _( w; i    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
4 v* [8 g' F, |3 c3 l* N/ p    -------------------------------------------------------------! l; K0 j  E3 {- a/ C% d7 H( Z2 Y
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
9 K$ |' j3 M. u7 ^    -------------------------------------------------------------6 N3 G) m' m. N( ?7 z( P5 A
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
9 ]- p2 |3 {; @# S) D, f    -------------------------------------------------------------* |2 g; B7 A& W3 n
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%! o, m" {- \( d' z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 |( g$ n4 K) `% }# F- Y8 U) Q    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
, `9 @" |7 Y2 U& k; l    -------------------------------------------------------------
: J+ s$ D# E; O: Q5 S    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%8 t& `7 `8 A; y; J5 n' p' Z3 p
    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 j1 u6 |) J4 c2 m    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
2 {, t: d" p- B    -------------------------------------------------------------; @6 ?- I4 ]" b, R6 z* F
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
9 ^* M7 [) D+ @2 j6 H    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ o: E4 H( w$ y5 P    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
/ D0 ]4 u# R3 Q* s( w    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 F" P! C( D6 \2 `0 U8 B8 D! h$ o' W    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%% s! C+ ]: G0 W' ^( I
    -------------------------------------------------------------
% {5 H/ l* r, v: Q& x. A0 D    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
* `* F! k: \3 S  U' |; M! e4 O    -------------------------------------------------------------8 o/ g* o/ P" j& \
    >>
: G" i4 F, f# T5 D0 V1 Q- f, x  b$ J9 ~6 G7 R3 H' x" i% R
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined( |  T' E* \8 ?0 v: x7 N2 n: ?+ }- j8 H5 Q
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint7 d$ r! k# F+ E/ C# W
John and Victoria.+ p" t* O' \4 m( g/ n% y
" r0 P9 Y* Z- i! P; ]: o8 D7 \
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most( Q( W3 M- y9 X
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
4 ?( ~5 y3 u" ^  t% T: ahousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release/ r9 q" n: R$ P# S0 Y
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
, e/ L0 v3 e& R- vtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities8 x! \' Q0 y1 i$ h; N
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is0 P9 S% c) p4 Z/ g* N
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current% |5 N6 G7 G- w+ ?* Z
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
* G3 @( @$ a7 S1 Eversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on: {4 B3 E% t* U, t
November 15, 2006.
+ _1 [" e# h7 E; |* E    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of" Y. w$ `* @2 J5 M* t
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
+ ~% D* s8 ]4 V& fprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is2 t" h4 X3 X1 A
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-3 04:01 , Processed in 0.136828 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表