 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable $ i; E) _8 \: N9 n+ N) G
+ Z' ^9 S% r. J) p1 ]5 m) R0 d
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
5 f8 q; ^) [% A# w
. J& Z: h! a- r. b TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
6 J& |, w7 w; `" [9 n- c4 ?exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
8 Y. G! a8 d6 K. J R6 l/ y5 a9 oquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
* P( h, r* I" [ b% L: Q& T0 cin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit6 S2 h$ L# Q' ]
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
! F8 n: n2 i( B2 v0 ~+ Hmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario," T; D$ u6 Q; P3 h- E' S
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal% r- {8 _$ ?- ^: L
LePage Real Estate Services., l& V9 @8 l+ G$ Y* h6 H
, H5 `8 z, C& ~& M Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters5 T, i/ c# a! j
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
7 _3 d: `% x% g* sconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and1 f" a$ H5 w" ]1 m
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
5 A" U# D& B; `! y/ W4 J1 ~$ b8 Mresidential real estate sector.4 M }$ s2 E- v( {: m( b1 Z
2 ]& \( j1 }4 Q! d6 V' I8 d9 Y Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
8 @. r& {# E! @5 W/ ^occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)' i2 A- J, r$ v9 j4 D1 o# C
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
/ u+ |; R$ A3 l$ m9 ?(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380$ K2 S0 t& J( B6 ^
(+13.2%).
1 x5 D) y+ _* S- K, `' c; |+ ?3 K/ i# p, C0 B) v7 k; d: a- J
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth% {) x! F7 O3 ]( q1 o1 ?" J
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the* h! z* E4 }) E; B
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
6 I; v# s( R/ f) H |) tpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
/ a% l, K1 t. ~$ V- \% } a/ [president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
( A4 {2 J, @. {3 Q" `3 p"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We7 O. _8 `& j% Y
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
8 v2 u+ S2 L. Abalanced market."
# m, d( A2 h( t) | R* n8 q ~
+ `$ q5 p, g( c) t& J Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,0 A0 W+ r8 p8 z* P' T! y
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift- @) z# b7 y$ g# x$ j: v7 h% @
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued- U+ o) ?) U t" L, w( d* O! O
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core$ c6 r1 l0 C7 m5 X5 b, \* g9 u
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
; G4 i1 e) l) n2 ]2 f+ amanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
+ n8 N" l6 ]8 Y- h2 o8 `+ D* obreaking price appreciations.1 @2 `4 q6 M8 P& P0 j _# [8 S
1 N# {( t1 }/ a& ^4 i# w Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
, q8 I- V1 y' h& ~9 v# ?economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the- u; h9 S0 f6 P! g8 {8 \
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
! [7 H4 J: L1 g; U3 R( k H9 B. w& b; ?( U9 L& a
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid' t9 g \& |/ m/ N" `. N* j, h$ J
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
* O; [% a6 ~' v5 r' O+ T7 F# Mconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
! i2 G; g$ u6 _/ oslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.- T, X) `0 R+ d v2 U
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers. H# _4 _2 t8 Y/ H& e9 J* j
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
) C0 ^1 {0 L* K1 \' q1 T9 O2 f( Xprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
7 f2 s7 k3 _# U) m- K \, I
* d' Z2 a, p! f3 m* o8 F+ R While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing# ^: }. E# ?' q, x* u: G
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and; M) C! [4 F X. p0 u: y# e
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada3 R/ X5 X1 P' `$ W3 R& _" g( q' k
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
% z ]$ d( t2 a. [! f
2 z# K u8 a+ r$ ~5 @ Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
+ Z2 `& P9 l1 I3 c2 U# W' S( }American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
9 y- g+ k0 E' S+ @3 qfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the0 K, M" a7 m. z6 l2 y% ~( b
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
, e b( {6 E8 l I6 `+ q2 daffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the. z% d. |5 G3 B& L. z" l) L
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
( U' w0 g! \$ [3 uaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization6 W }/ M9 S9 G% r
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."0 x1 x; d$ o* @ c/ u7 B
1 |6 ~8 y& T' t
<<
. _( k0 X) k' D9 _7 b, I4 c REGIONAL SUMMARIES* A6 b J. |2 C1 `
>>
( S6 x* G- }2 U3 H1 ]! M$ l! O, o& Y5 m. F- }0 H# R
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
2 R; p7 j# X3 p& E: r( eHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate! q3 A2 R2 Q0 D1 x7 R
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
' a( @; L6 @" X4 llooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of \: ?; K6 l2 d: m& F3 u: M- y
renovations.# |/ |% x7 r5 E1 Z; m
k4 D/ u: Z+ q7 ?' {4 y! s- j The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight( L" j1 E& P& h" q
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
" E7 M! V, V* acompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and* F# t. M2 f' Q& a" C8 f1 ]
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.! E. z) y8 ?7 S8 D+ F h
" b! D0 s. J# {$ ~, F
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
X* \; N( B2 s& V2 Z% Bslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
b; z# q. q& U: `" _& }1 B) z5 @quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new! f7 [: o5 n0 F# U
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
( k8 r3 ^, C4 P! V% a8 pto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
' d& g" Y! n+ [* \7 {and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.& k$ B1 a. ~ q) [+ r. m
3 S5 h# V& i5 o7 h) D3 c
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
: K: R3 J' b& n5 t( xconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their, K6 R# i3 u6 p7 v8 p
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
3 }" F5 ^" D; f" ewas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
. m9 \( I' ~, J$ V( Idollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
( i2 Y& ^3 f( @! l9 S2 lbuyers with more options when looking for a home.) F( w. l ^, L: |8 |4 |- S h
, c: |, {. i6 x( W- r. o: v Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
1 @% ]! k) {5 t5 B+ xamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes. c6 o |1 |4 Z6 |# y7 @$ h
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,$ m' U; R6 e, O( I" T, g7 j
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last6 \: q4 n* N+ z& ^2 ?' W9 P
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
8 T0 q/ ^) H2 |% O! E4 ]
- m1 d3 Q) l" \7 Y' A$ u4 G Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house# M# @/ v7 k0 s) A. j
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
0 [0 S& _# C U: d) a7 q# n8 Tlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting; u- p$ K% w! `+ k" R! {& `
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,- {/ E$ K4 k: R5 M, e
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the4 M4 Q) _6 w/ j/ s6 Q7 D. H
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
% ^; K; T% j+ q: I4 Fmaking a purchase.& u0 k) \( u) |" C7 i J
) D) S; X5 g9 R8 b& h3 T' o Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
6 v. _5 X6 }; V8 T2 r+ y$ B' imarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
5 y) L' l8 [/ ]% k* k3 A+ Nconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city* {7 `$ T$ X1 l+ a& q9 ]
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting4 s* _4 h A( ?; e. K) m# B) M
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
' t1 L8 r1 ?& L" Iamenities.
" R, T) _6 {5 ]8 Q! c! j# x& q* Z; X- V: X1 P
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
& ?) m2 S5 _5 r i7 G. r; G: Ithroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand$ `3 i2 j8 s7 X- Z6 B. X) Z$ M. Z4 D/ ^
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has! M r& }& L: d8 O
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
; k% H7 f( x4 g- L# u; Rdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle/ R: X7 a4 d/ ]- T/ q
residence, rather than for investment. c! q' y8 _/ m- {' Y5 a
# y2 B8 R( @" r+ ^5 l1 h/ w
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
: A& O* y6 i1 T9 ]- W9 ?* ohouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
. p! c* c( {" v' }$ N, e) W' gin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
, x& p5 h0 L+ Tconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization7 I' c% F* q: c/ Q) [( I" a' Q
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter" y& \7 M8 t7 f" [
the market.
) _! }; H$ a" m9 v7 [" ` @8 h, z+ ?% A5 z% w0 x6 u
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
$ q5 ^; G/ L# g- r0 ] U6 R4 nJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
& C) e9 W0 X) U) [1 BAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring3 x( i5 J* g1 q2 B5 ?
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due" U0 f4 S; U |4 Y, A$ ?- B
to the shortage of available inventory.
" q2 n% f+ Z* I r7 g
0 @2 m8 j5 i2 v$ @2 f Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its0 z) z" W3 o0 t3 V6 f
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
4 a8 ^% Y6 v: c _( mvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
: ~9 ~+ l, k( g; V" W9 x5 i" h& e! ostruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.6 ?4 E _5 R5 s' e0 L
5 s {7 b: w. o9 x, L$ ]
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
8 R0 [0 K$ Z( R6 Vin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
9 V8 c, ~+ T) nunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that/ u6 J2 }$ t; d5 d+ y z1 w
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
& F/ v/ E7 B4 Z+ Bprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
; Z% H, F; v" S: k% m, P* y0 g0 qseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
4 t$ _2 V2 C# B7 r* O/ Nbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
" z L% M% O, w. u7 ^+ f
* c# y% ?8 m7 ^& _( x& d/ r Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter% J0 A* @3 ?% B7 E
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton" Q1 v8 [& b7 y# S/ x; @! S
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
: \# {* i1 W# Q0 Y0 Y2 b3 Imaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
/ u2 z6 i& x) ^& B3 v( Z8 O0 Vincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve. s( D% V3 W0 W- {* n
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
" @; P% U; Y3 y6 ] V. ?! Rtowards the end of 2006. 5 Y- r0 X3 G) \1 T+ x
* R/ L, [9 P' M# P& a$ K
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of) E' ~% |( N4 a1 n% o" y* X. r
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable$ {2 |8 X+ A/ _
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
$ l5 k* s1 c; n. ^2 V, Ogroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
* Z% C" ^0 H7 S" q0 Y4 h3 A! a/ zforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added' ]0 F; z2 ~( Y7 o1 g' R- `
pressure on tight inventory levels.
0 c5 P' g$ C/ ^- K2 t' @
$ v$ O9 u8 _+ A% z& k4 }+ @' E. P/ a Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic8 M1 _, m3 u- W2 t
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people2 C& y9 d" `# ?4 {3 P
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
+ f- X3 k. Y B8 E. j3 R3 B0 w& V. n$ Mwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching6 p/ M5 l2 \2 _2 W6 G
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
/ {$ p; J- i8 G' X8 _0 N
5 T2 w; S# d8 ~% N! {, G; C <<1 M Z1 j) i7 P0 `* R0 K: U
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006, g$ v9 Z2 m) n3 R3 m: u
, l9 S( a7 s# j5 Q/ c -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 v3 A1 |4 y% C( S- s8 a* ~ Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
# G' g! L, a- _$ k5 S5 l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; M- w6 L3 i6 y) g8 V1 A 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
. d' u- {# R3 H9 E Market Average Average % Change Average Average
9 V+ H; w$ [7 y' |" z -------------------------------------------------------------------------) U, I/ |( w* s+ ~! V
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000* M3 r, P. O& S8 T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 H' P1 T, R0 w Q" k% c! M) Z: _ Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000+ o) F" ?' x0 J: M6 ^5 x8 ~; ?% a0 Y2 X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, | d! a P8 j2 o
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
( @% B) ]3 {7 |3 t3 d7 y, H! b -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ Q0 u) [! k/ z" j& w/ [
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -3 T8 \2 o0 ]$ m$ l) U( w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& l4 i3 z8 C2 `/ j, g3 x. M St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
Y$ P7 F0 d$ H: z: h$ X: H/ }7 \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------* j2 @3 b3 [7 {2 k6 B9 J4 U
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5833 d# d# t+ ?; b! p8 p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 o6 f+ m( k5 Z% A
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185- T* R, T8 ^1 t6 V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 F, L ~' N5 }3 _9 [5 \
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
6 c7 ~8 q/ F, ^* L3 _# m) l -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ ]! E) e* B+ X9 q8 h" z1 A
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
& \& q3 j5 b; ?' { -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& s" W- k2 _# z0 Q# S Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707' K* U$ V- z9 {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( w J+ R7 i' G5 y Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
* i/ C) N& a8 h M- K1 [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 [" k+ f5 O7 D7 r( K: H0 v
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3890 v! g ] j B5 r# _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) b; B8 O" ]" u( F Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
. n' _( ^) w: \) E. D7 H -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, ~/ @ f8 W. N Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5005 P9 b9 S; k; ^6 q, l, n. G$ W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 {: _3 k- U4 o/ @% K Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0005 H, S6 }; \& t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
`& \* M/ e( B National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
/ |. F8 N' d7 l+ c. Q6 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" D6 a: N9 k% t
6 G! C% P5 Z$ F; u0 \$ r. ` -------------------------------------------------------------$ B0 T, e# T: ^9 ]
Standard Condominium
9 |! m3 e2 V% ]# T9 \1 t6 k -------------------------------------------------------------2 w0 p0 Z) J z9 s9 V% I+ S
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
7 G: G1 l4 y" t2 A: q3 T Market % Change Average Average % Change J! J# r, y7 B$ w
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ Z! V: j( H5 H& Z7 E% p Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
. ?1 ]" z9 `. e9 V' J -------------------------------------------------------------
6 S& V: v* K( u7 X/ i4 Y Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
7 L+ J' w+ G% k5 S/ L9 P -------------------------------------------------------------
/ E! k* j# M& a3 | D% I/ U Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
4 _" W# j7 x n" T( B -------------------------------------------------------------: T* l1 |1 k9 J3 a* M3 S2 ^
Saint John N/A - - N/A/ D, x6 s7 o* u
-------------------------------------------------------------
K0 r% O# w; V) `5 o& a St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%" r$ N8 v" k2 H7 W6 x# Q6 K; D$ c
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 Y7 K! g; q4 ]2 o Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%0 [5 K- L, ]- C' `& F
-------------------------------------------------------------. i h: y( g+ B
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%% V% |& q1 a2 w2 S% a
-------------------------------------------------------------
' `! x# F$ b/ G. E' i# \ Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%" Y! Z' V" o, F7 h1 Z
-------------------------------------------------------------6 m0 A2 D2 D8 V, B6 F8 j' E
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%9 f$ W3 T7 |* D7 p
------------------------------------------------------------- M( @) o/ C& N7 s9 a% E* r
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
6 t$ T$ L) n4 M' W -------------------------------------------------------------' g9 \1 r8 o5 m* K* W
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
3 u. x* Y' ~. L$ a -------------------------------------------------------------- p( o, K" H9 t
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
* S% R! D9 y6 P6 E* K' @ -------------------------------------------------------------) {' _/ C% o: U7 G
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
" x9 u& s) j# J5 G" s6 B -------------------------------------------------------------
7 ^1 M: ~* L' c& K4 F Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%( X+ Z. U0 A( b5 R
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 q. c$ T3 t+ W# G4 b4 ^3 b& J Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1% p) X/ r5 ?9 j$ q f
-------------------------------------------------------------5 t" G" P# z" M6 y' G7 y W6 j0 [
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%" I; v- p f# {4 i5 i. r& |
-------------------------------------------------------------# y: B& t8 y8 j( K8 @, Z
>>9 R3 Q1 M% F t
+ k/ H, S' m# F$ y2 G Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined' k! Z w. n5 h& S& a* e4 }
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint1 j: V; Y8 E5 z' ?9 I- k4 n
John and Victoria.& l; r% R8 c' {9 q& y+ ~+ K- Q
- Q& w) d0 o9 y+ q) q
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
" K" q6 k8 Y6 Dcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
5 I( K. O, ]+ ?, Ohousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
! m# n) O& y+ treferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
7 R# L3 I- U' H9 N5 qtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities2 x, K5 U: ~* G6 F3 D+ d
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
, y& B: a9 G' \$ X& H. [available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
; A. \- i9 t3 p! }6 Gfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
$ l8 l: n3 l) D- U8 jversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on1 |8 j* w) o7 Z
November 15, 2006.8 }/ q1 \/ w K& L% z& k& J
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of2 X2 I( I- z4 C2 Q6 V, X; ~* j6 l
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
' j% Q8 X* X9 x U1 v) O1 I* aprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is9 N+ b. ` U0 z- r3 Z8 q3 P4 K
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|