埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2319|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
+ `4 q* ?' T7 H' z6 s9 R# P% A& `  d6 O0 R0 {
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -9 w0 D0 r9 X+ l4 |0 N

/ M6 E/ g! O9 c2 ^3 a    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
1 D  c" B  f/ ?exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third  I$ l4 L6 l* d  Q
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic% P7 X: W; i5 Z
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit) S% ^. D/ e0 e2 E1 E$ w
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
6 e5 E; i  y: u$ x6 ~: cmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,3 l: r" i7 v# h" d% G' T
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal+ Z, ~  ^( t+ ~: `, L7 `" q: G/ j
LePage Real Estate Services.
4 e- ?6 o( W/ N2 D1 I0 ~
4 m- x6 i. V% f! V" b5 S9 k( ]    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
& z+ W" a  u# v7 N, dare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
  [, j8 U3 C- W2 r- m  W' Econditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
# r) z. e- x- `) b# S% dsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the4 w; b$ p9 E' k/ \+ _- `
residential real estate sector.; {" {/ d7 @8 E
  R( l: G, c+ G8 J3 H
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
: a. e$ ?$ h/ J$ i$ Foccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)1 K5 x$ @; a5 G( s% X! U2 j
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
3 ^5 ]. ~% e) ^(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
1 y8 \! e5 W3 j(+13.2%).0 x% Z; {' j3 x2 s. w

+ e+ D( ]0 Q, P  U. V    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
& M0 p7 h2 Q; jduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
% |" Q. n8 f/ G1 L0 B" R9 Ufrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
+ Q. N; o4 b  @  }poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
* ^5 }" L' H9 u- P) h- \: T* gpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
3 B" q! d, v# a/ ~8 ?"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
# F* H7 G5 n' Owelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
  D) p9 M# P2 r7 i! T6 ~7 {balanced market."
9 `* H0 k4 S$ m% j; p" T1 s
, T+ ]* Q, p6 v! u( |+ f/ g1 G    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,2 e  K" r/ K" h) l: W6 v
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
4 H" f0 G8 s, m. s& Q( e! P  H3 Gto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued7 t' u& X% _5 x
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core# U  f. L: m! d5 d2 J/ L/ t
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
( b* i9 a% k4 _) t7 B7 b5 jmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record! U* p1 P6 d2 ?7 i- V* a
breaking price appreciations.
: p5 l+ _' s! h0 T: P: v: \9 Q' [  y; l9 ~" T' G4 r; o% K9 I: i
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
$ ]+ W& T/ B4 W% peconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the0 l$ n# @- _9 d5 o5 ?% m4 s
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.6 V  ?# B2 m' P

& E2 F- M. R2 C" O' l, E4 [    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
0 u# f+ I! ^$ P8 t8 `) Y7 geconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer6 f, f$ J" Q3 b$ \4 Z
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off3 g7 }7 u$ s  K, r
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.1 T$ ^% Q! `/ L+ V1 R
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers1 m3 f5 V1 [# r* ?6 N
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of+ S$ Z4 @8 {) ]- @" _
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
! H. X) ~/ P6 h6 c
0 U8 c; n) Y! x( p    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing+ Y$ Y/ \1 S) G0 v! p
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and: r5 O5 E9 `9 y% J8 P
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
- Z2 b9 n, U: w; ~' `, u' Gare markedly different than those found in the United States." d% G- `7 x0 L# p- R- @( q& d
  Y. x! F! J6 Q) q- H
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
+ Z! g% F6 q* I% WAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
+ m4 J4 s9 |4 |% P, M! bfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the5 s- J' [% A% \) F- {* l0 U  @; {: s
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
5 n; {: s! v7 f8 F: M- t& iaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the4 j  e, ]7 O2 a8 J/ s6 Z5 v
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and# ~7 Q- V$ M( Y
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization+ U  P% T- c" Q! O" T
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
- t1 G+ [' V8 H( U2 o4 F
) K4 u, f6 V- t" _7 Q  F    <<+ `7 D! K+ e* N  B" K5 p
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES0 E6 T/ M9 a+ p1 C
    >>
5 p, \3 v2 z0 M6 H1 K, p: F" T4 c2 R  s
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in7 p& t: f! a6 `. E% X0 N
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
5 b; g6 O! P  N; b; uof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
, O" w0 [; u7 Alooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
" x+ g& A8 F" W. Krenovations.
9 A" q9 T0 _1 j3 Q: |3 X
* }/ \* X2 L7 ^$ c! x6 e( U    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight/ {0 A  T$ e/ [. B* z6 y5 ^6 `- V
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
* }2 G; P7 a- D6 E& D* h1 ^( Dcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and" I5 R% |$ C4 Z1 a
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
6 y6 |4 u1 b. @) R  W/ F' L4 x5 O/ |' K8 ?8 e
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
- w* a0 e' l  Q$ b6 ]slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the' ^5 z6 i$ o/ j, G, B4 a. @
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
) r" S$ q3 ~2 J7 T/ z  H* e600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
, Z. H; K7 ?+ p# `4 v9 Wto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
, d' I7 |) s$ i6 gand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.1 e" @* m  ?9 M4 [( ^9 P2 G

( l  F* `* D5 s! N    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
. L8 g! R( `. l4 `conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
/ z9 a& b; J5 }' C/ G1 x. ]homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers. j9 Y( Q! L6 s8 X
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian. Z* B* f% k4 h) z! ?
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
  U% e! G# P" b  A" t1 T) Abuyers with more options when looking for a home.9 R  \$ m6 ?6 E1 r, j) i3 x

* P- \- Y- ~  M    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
1 H  r' g: |/ o5 Namong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes  B5 W4 }* P/ I' |
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
! X) _. M4 K6 t9 Ias some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
! g* P" ^, O7 H6 T9 `: ?% Jfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.! @0 q: J% |" |
5 O' G  J3 K% q; p% b4 H# r
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house( V& T: i  V) r- D
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory0 j$ ], X. f( h9 }1 \, G, W
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting5 c) b; p, N2 [% b
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,8 z% `) @+ O; G2 [7 ^
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the5 w; i0 f1 E* W9 s2 W
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
& l; x% V6 T6 s/ q/ O# Kmaking a purchase.' f1 q0 O4 P; t# f

( m+ D: B- E! x1 z    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
# n, c) A+ J$ o! @5 imarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
0 u7 g( K+ _! p7 I! n0 lconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
) ]7 k0 g+ M; |. O% ^8 d. bcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting. s3 b( w& ^0 o) Z( q6 ?
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown' n, M5 c) j; W- d; L
amenities.; W: `: e# t$ t( S/ U: e

8 ]$ N( v6 c% f5 o! D: N. {    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
4 r% K* Z1 @: C# qthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
! [. T' f# s* @/ Kacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
/ y& L5 D$ E' U/ qcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
0 l: ?6 p* t9 i+ h, I" k& Xdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
- x  ~+ z+ q% l6 c5 Z8 P* D3 e6 yresidence, rather than for investment.: I9 [* U2 ?: k8 O7 t8 N! y5 W
8 ~8 U  q0 H- d) K/ V- B
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as, _; F8 t* y. j
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
, A- D" x, G8 c7 S9 {# v/ J+ ]& ~in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer: t' M. k  }2 L; E0 I6 n: q" L) V( j
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization" J# W( O& F( D2 ~- h5 O
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
0 T0 C3 Q" [: x0 u1 hthe market.
( ]! C# B2 t! N4 y* }2 @, s- ^4 L3 \# }$ g2 Q2 n- a9 L
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
1 d/ T+ `& }/ j* V7 P# L& x. LJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In$ K6 T! g! g0 o' Q: ^0 B  ^
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
: Y9 U$ N5 k2 z6 r9 w5 [months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due" P, f" |3 {; S; S+ u2 [
to the shortage of available inventory.
6 t$ `" T/ Q" q; c( [7 [0 ~1 A6 J6 |. a  i1 a0 ?; Q
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
. D1 l7 R% G8 V4 B& hmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
- }& N! z, l" wvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
# v2 i# Y$ L4 Nstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.! \$ g) J9 J9 H, g  o/ r' X6 C5 `
) Y& Q5 ^& A  s, n$ {3 m. }
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases+ A! a5 K( I% A: L+ C
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
6 H. b( v' |8 B% P& funemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
: |! q/ c- B3 `8 I/ [pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
0 x% d; `$ }. Q8 e& o6 Q4 vprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
: t+ y* ?' m. K$ xseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
! v5 F* j4 `1 Y! p  ]buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

4 ^3 W( n  ~8 x6 d5 ]3 w: r) m8 ?0 R. ^
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
* |3 ?$ _2 M! [/ F, a  c. s9 fas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton6 ^+ I9 R9 N2 r; l* l# |
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
, ~* [2 K; v! J, ?maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
* g1 b3 G. g3 q7 t2 Fincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve+ L. ~& ]3 l; v9 H! M
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly9 e1 ]( Q6 A0 ^+ b# y
towards the end of 2006.
    / _. M% H. u3 i" d3 W  G

2 D$ _, h6 L+ r" \, }$ K8 VWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of. w: n9 ], z: I
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
: ^6 |3 d: d) d3 T4 c2 yto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse7 y+ F7 V% g3 B3 f% `5 G
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
' B3 x1 A2 w2 T1 S( n: ?( q8 oforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added: a3 {: n5 W& o! D
pressure on tight inventory levels., i3 Q# D1 V' r  G- M+ i8 W3 A
- y9 p3 q& C/ \. @# S' {/ B
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic  G: _9 V( L! }# \; o
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people! M2 N0 W8 p& }
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;1 [" x8 ?* _4 P  {8 o6 x
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
8 Z# T! Y+ o5 Y0 E  G( Y: Vfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace./ |$ P% x& u! G. W
  o' [( i" f6 g# a& w: q
    <<- m; r" ^# w8 ~" [, M
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20064 l( D2 D, A8 G7 d( \. f( Y

; {) O, ~' [- e/ k1 \. G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 R  T. [3 B( P! R2 u6 _
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
- j+ u. C" h, G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% U$ G1 ^+ u  [3 C4 V9 W  ]& [
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
# ~' [! F9 z3 O% b# i& ?    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average- Y$ V/ K4 J- _% m& B
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 {; Q% D& p- u1 N    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0008 u& H6 z" s0 H
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. s. ~- }2 [6 l# |- k/ S: E, S: F
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
% O$ t1 E  ?% ]9 s2 |4 ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 Q4 A% S% M* U$ b" Y& {& Z+ {    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
; p7 }/ Q7 k# X+ f1 x    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ P$ z% b( _8 w# m- s0 m) S  t/ ^    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -# Y- z* l- u" c1 n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% n5 _4 R, N4 ?( {* k! K    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
* |0 }! f9 q& C% {; t$ N    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% n  B- [/ F+ ?+ o8 r6 d
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
  A$ S, v/ [5 j# {    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 I8 g  Z8 @9 S8 n; g* p; M    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1852 b  o/ b2 i* L3 A5 v: a! ~$ \8 `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  `; h4 |7 l: {( Y    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
' w$ M4 M# U3 b  \6 [7 k% Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 \8 c2 E2 x6 L7 m( @4 j    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
9 w+ h% c- u4 p: R- k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! p; w' L5 F$ |5 q/ }! L
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
$ M6 w+ O* I" P! A    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 z* ^, L0 V3 M1 w' ^
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
2 T  Q3 ]5 B- K& f7 Z0 w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 F; p& C* N9 O& w9 P+ R7 P& ^
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,3896 q* s/ Q" |6 j' d1 P9 ?  M% S) s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: g( `6 h. ]- e+ _/ b' `5 L
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7142 I2 d9 @8 j9 C+ j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: q1 O$ K$ h5 c3 p/ H5 H. Q$ z- i    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
: V# f5 e3 N1 w! Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- B8 _' L! \7 ?& S. U& [    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0006 y; J  B; b8 s  {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 b  T( h3 h' |
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860% P( `3 S2 R/ \% B8 H% J5 E2 V
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" a3 C3 {; S5 l# G$ B1 P; I7 x/ K8 \$ S+ J. s3 D6 T6 M
    -------------------------------------------------------------" q5 g" |; ]$ G, n# r1 V4 H; {
                               Standard Condominium8 C5 l3 y5 J" r+ ^1 K
    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 o) ~! ?9 k4 U' i1 ~, w8 f                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo7 j9 r. }4 |9 L" y4 P
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
; w& |" L) |: e9 w    -------------------------------------------------------------8 c* R0 f- E" A# C7 l$ l1 e
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
) N0 C- h; w- h" P* D! v    -------------------------------------------------------------: w& S5 \- d# P& O! ?
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%. O! i0 Q: b+ }; |$ h
    -------------------------------------------------------------' {# @1 `% f$ M) L
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A" z. _, Z) }5 E" f) f
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ _$ W1 O: F. U3 C1 A
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
7 M& K6 c' K+ q" Z    -------------------------------------------------------------7 B9 B2 D0 ~6 F! O- ]4 U* T3 G
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
+ d" _' b* [) s/ E    -------------------------------------------------------------: z) y0 ?2 q: e
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
0 l* d, u0 k3 m" v) a% T( t    -------------------------------------------------------------0 u% `1 P0 W$ i1 w1 h. Q
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
% v% k+ g: g, P* n" C7 ~( u: ?, }    -------------------------------------------------------------( {4 u8 ^+ P- W3 r9 V
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
: |: K+ D( A. T+ Y. ^    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ i# c/ i/ a) J9 e! t) c# ~: P    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
% O% H8 X2 c8 t* C0 K7 C    -------------------------------------------------------------, |" z2 x! U/ Z+ Z( `
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
* N0 [, v, M0 U# q. G/ V2 ^    -------------------------------------------------------------
, k; q+ I; {# a$ e  r* G) o    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%* C* f0 _$ S5 Y# A0 x9 X4 o: ~2 I
    -------------------------------------------------------------* m- g+ I: e0 t# ]# V- y! q3 m" E
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%  [) s4 P, F* M( b) [1 V
    -------------------------------------------------------------; @. T$ Q# O& A; B5 ?1 {8 l
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
% y# F* \1 `& ]' X, c2 i% Q& I    -------------------------------------------------------------
. b/ k6 |7 Y5 A. s    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
) J. B- R6 E+ c/ h    -------------------------------------------------------------( |8 K5 F' ?3 E2 n7 [. x5 O9 Y
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
" O2 c$ ]9 W! p    -------------------------------------------------------------
( ~4 T. }7 X" G7 |; g/ D" K9 X    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
1 U% r8 [0 z! Y" C* y# h: }    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 f7 Z. |: Q) I# q4 d& J& [    >>
- B, o  R+ n+ i1 }+ E1 ?; \0 g1 z8 k* C* i) L! ?* F) l
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined; U& e5 H( `6 m" t& ^5 `. W
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
; k$ d0 ?8 _+ L1 s, C: c* V* g) X# FJohn and Victoria.
& }8 [9 q( p/ k+ f% i
% f4 J6 q* u( B) n, w7 z7 q7 z: p    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most" W% A% ~# d* H; Q8 A! N/ B% m+ _( I8 _
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of& r9 D4 @8 o+ n; Q, R2 @7 _- p
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release8 g& Z, L7 N# g3 |
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price1 W1 ?! d9 v% U# S8 ]
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
4 Y+ K  m: k. R- @+ q, Uacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is. U! W8 `$ R, {9 k5 y
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
& V$ f; v7 [6 m; m4 E, }1 i8 u: Dfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
7 W+ R" K: X" o1 Oversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on: z+ |9 n4 O* W% |1 f5 N/ ~, Q
November 15, 2006.
* Q" y: r' G2 t( x# h3 n* I    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of  m/ b  l6 r6 I: x5 S+ C
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
% M6 Q1 D; H8 _. m, O! v; Cprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
" ~; N6 Y: D. Kavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-5 07:12 , Processed in 0.236520 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表