埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1743|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 1 x% v; @, d; @3 u4 |" {) G

4 g* y2 y  |& _& ~# A; D/ \- j8 I, I- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -0 S) ~/ D- p4 K1 I# g: B# x9 |5 [
0 J+ H2 U6 V1 M+ Z" h  E# ?
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
, {# Q) O7 V7 p; L3 \: A% v- jexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
" j: I# q5 R8 l; a0 Q+ qquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic( t" M2 G! o4 ^: d
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit. V0 ^' {1 A" O( j5 f* h7 o4 V4 w: k
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and* m1 j: @; D' ]& r6 m- U
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
+ _. N2 c# q- x. ZQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
. Q# t5 b; b1 h* ALePage Real Estate Services.: O+ F9 A8 s( _8 G- \, X
7 E3 G4 e4 _7 J, s6 M
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
) o3 Y, Z2 {: \2 F! o! ?: vare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
& I1 Q5 ]% n+ r1 L# @conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
2 x, v* m- z  F: N2 N! lsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the& f5 O& f* z% @; ^4 Z+ w1 i
residential real estate sector.
7 W+ H9 Z  i4 p/ i0 }6 s0 B. `( N0 N: t0 B5 D5 o
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
0 @9 v! n9 m, p3 l, h& Yoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
- |" H6 f# `! B2 \year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5624 N9 ]) X* _: ~! Z
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380. Q) ~' ?+ W$ \6 t+ W
(+13.2%).& T' L: g& S; X8 x, g- g

* {, v) I; p, x* E; a# d# y    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
. W: U4 a' X# {4 z' d1 ]2 kduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the7 L& B  W/ P' x: s; Z7 B5 k
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are' l6 _0 e4 D5 c- B0 B% V3 f
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,' o4 k$ P* e4 j& f' r4 X3 p9 s
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
/ }) @1 K& w- n% p( a, p"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We8 ]) v/ [3 D; G2 f# m/ }: D: v# \
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
- k$ G7 G3 M: Obalanced market."0 c" t) \. w4 ~

; W, y7 z- w5 a0 Q  y4 s4 E( |: a. G    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
) M) C& i2 P! C6 hconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift0 ]0 G% x7 P+ D" z2 y- J2 s# p5 _
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
2 c$ q3 x0 K- B) l" q: O0 E$ [throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core% `2 ~/ ~. X. x. V
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,5 r4 {, F/ ^$ j# s( q, i: }
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
1 ^$ E! S0 c: _) C* ~: abreaking price appreciations.  A# R) P1 O9 b: z8 d

+ U2 F5 z' ?( ?" O" K& v9 k  W    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding- M/ U" g5 R* y4 X! w8 J9 P* k
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the8 Q1 J7 X- y" Z- u1 Q! G) c0 I
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.( Z% z7 z5 o/ K1 s4 m
2 f6 @* |' I9 N' J
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid2 L/ K& V8 a' b0 Q' z' }
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
( t9 g2 v) @6 E% ?( y# A9 z3 G4 ]confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off; D5 ]5 }% i4 K3 A' n8 g: W
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth., E1 H  P( _  w& ?+ b" _0 i6 u4 x
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
- K$ K: K2 D* N6 @6 pgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of5 Y* B! U8 x; {' k+ b; _: J
price appreciation when compared with 2005.( I* }/ F# i' u) E1 X* e

) s" o5 [+ {8 e' Z2 W    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing" P5 h2 C% b% V9 d$ W/ y. i. w$ {
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and( |4 ]" Q. K% \: T1 F, ?, F
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
& A. p% n/ F! G( Vare markedly different than those found in the United States., F& O( w6 B7 r& x4 |; z

9 b# ^5 z7 a5 W    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
4 |  I2 Z8 g# l2 w: @American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
9 w: y' Z* V+ T1 |9 M7 @favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
! y1 A' b1 ~! H3 c) Mrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
2 H( J  \9 ~* F- e0 p# `- ~$ Gaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the4 @! |9 ]+ P! ~+ W
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and" V( ?+ `$ @2 l  _+ p0 R
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
! j# I  _! Y9 h3 k" qmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."# [  _4 j) P4 `4 W6 Z
) @% A' _+ E: e! k% |5 v4 @
    <<
2 O" k; z+ C9 s$ {                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES* V% @% E: F1 m& ~
    >>- Q# h1 a. k; c: B* m( Y4 k. [9 Z' g

, Z. o3 G6 W, t8 r, j8 _/ N    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in/ h, \% s7 Q# I& U, I5 s6 F# g
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate$ {/ G0 e( ^# F8 m5 w8 j8 [/ m. u
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time/ v% F$ S6 [4 k0 ?
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
. x  e1 o& y1 m5 k. ~1 B- erenovations.
, r$ R/ n2 l3 N) D
; t( t" |- j- o7 ]    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight1 P, b1 V, C! C1 u# G! E) Z
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation! t: B& Z  {1 \0 r* N
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and9 V( e/ b4 m, C& }
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
8 Q; T& f  |% A* g- ~! ]& ^) ]  Y! ?! V; G2 y) [+ H
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer# ~# Q' m4 K" E5 I+ U  o' `
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
) L% g% H7 u- g# k$ r1 ?8 Hquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new* \1 ?# K7 w5 |
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
4 e! c1 s) f- V5 M/ ~to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
/ [/ X8 k# ~# J; d8 nand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
1 ^6 r7 \2 B) h% _$ Q$ h# c# J* z
2 s; v% |/ ~0 q- G8 p    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
' \: ~& _( D4 g9 u' ?( oconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
0 v  M8 O* W/ ]- M: x* I  ahomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers8 ?. w2 w/ _; Z  Y# c' R5 T
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
6 `5 V+ \( V0 ydollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing% h* _2 v' L8 x; a7 J/ z9 ~# x  G
buyers with more options when looking for a home.4 S/ ^+ s6 r& e* ?, U3 t. p
- \( C" c8 w- m2 \5 F' c
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly, h' O; j: z8 n! m
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes) }" x+ `$ D' `( M- ?& E* z* F
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
! T0 V* h$ ?$ a0 n: Z# Las some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last+ l( m/ h9 r; I- u( F: B3 i
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.5 x1 {9 q& y; @  c( E- ^

7 ]8 q0 n, R9 E) c, g    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
2 Q, K8 r0 b$ J! ?, J& _  b1 D4 k% Nprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory4 e8 Q6 T9 \, Y8 }- G7 P
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
/ @5 L4 D/ n2 c" n* xfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,- W& i- M7 U( `2 @2 B- M
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the2 Y" L/ n- I9 N" b. ^) z
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before) o3 D& [1 S4 t! ~
making a purchase.
& `8 p6 L; I. q. T, b
' {/ y! T& ~' P( g% u" [; T! O    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
8 L! Y7 e, Z# X% n: o2 \- p, J3 Nmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
. @2 v: Q. C9 _6 aconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city) ]5 ^/ v5 K6 T% `" l
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
1 d+ h1 u. d6 u1 qattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
6 w5 b+ u- T% q/ O1 M$ bamenities.
) A& j6 D! N% s! M
) E  p& R% W/ g) b    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels1 {* A8 W1 S$ f" Z0 H
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand2 u  f/ |2 C! D1 F0 q6 Q2 \4 W
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has' n( n4 ~/ A! Y
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been  Y/ w* i; {- E5 X
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle. _; b! v3 \$ ?: l9 E
residence, rather than for investment.
/ N7 Q* M" Y8 T% ?& L# w: h7 a0 K- e. |8 V5 B) w
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
; U2 k4 @6 ~8 r6 u4 w. N2 p) `house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted5 L0 Q8 g# b* x. a2 L
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
  W" z+ l# a% ^% W& B& \: Z0 {confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
4 a) P% i& }0 l! Mrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
* j+ ~! V, o" a/ S, s) rthe market.) l: r& y; x$ t, V
8 S% Z" ^$ u. X5 U2 h1 K
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through# I7 ?: {9 o) a4 n/ P: s
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
" R: U6 g3 N' ~1 I* NAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
5 G" [, A4 {' F3 M6 K. umonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due1 s3 ?6 ^) ?( T, s' [  }
to the shortage of available inventory.0 u8 c  D/ |# ^- u4 {
9 E5 k9 D8 v. A  S8 N5 I
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
, @5 P( V) m/ z" Z3 smomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
4 [. M8 n+ }1 pvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses- K* ?) N) W/ |  R
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
, o9 P) h' O% j: P" C- N, |" S* Y9 H& Z* k4 l6 k1 x- k
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases5 s3 }; [8 f. S" P
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
+ h: }' R2 z6 A/ N) Xunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
* |5 Y% x+ j3 t' S6 z6 h& ^pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring" d! v& O: ?$ s6 ]# @. z
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
  _0 k/ Q( ^4 J: M! ]season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as8 T8 F3 B: a/ R$ J5 o% q) [
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
) g0 @3 K4 G- r! C
$ y; U. E2 C5 H
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter5 ~1 i; C, Y4 v
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton" r- g0 c9 V, e) i2 f
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
+ O8 h) f4 k& q2 o$ {. f# M9 ~& m: dmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
1 n' [7 T* m4 A; w% ?( v# K8 T9 Jincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
4 g) H9 S0 W5 G+ Zin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly2 @+ ]) w5 \# P' w( ~
towards the end of 2006.
    . q! m# P( ^  x- w8 M3 m, X
3 e; Q4 t8 ?. E3 a1 n# K8 o
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
7 p' B9 y* z- b6 @( Ainventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable* k6 p$ H5 C1 G
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse' U# u2 [! x; L& B
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to$ C5 _! x4 G5 K2 y1 j$ ?+ b5 V8 e
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added) H9 m9 l5 y* S( Y
pressure on tight inventory levels.4 p  {3 Y5 M4 @

: d- w: A. E- g6 Q9 _1 e    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
: p- ~! ?1 J8 t: T% {fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
, M4 W8 `8 j2 }! k4 K$ Jinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
) O) L0 M5 B+ J- V" r4 |2 pwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
4 m4 j# u8 S: E8 Rfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.' R8 c% V1 g" B
; o0 x6 T- ~5 X: A" h& r
    <<
% [% H2 n  I9 f" Z6 Q% r# v      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
5 s9 i) F$ N3 N/ P9 F8 g8 k: \( g; U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! p% [  T1 B! ]" |* Q1 d                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
- T- p+ C& C! I7 d    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ c7 d2 w0 Y2 F
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
, \/ P0 t$ [4 q8 U1 a    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
5 d; N4 {) s4 E8 k; M; G! d- p4 Y9 x    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' ^  r+ [; y4 ]' V
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0007 D. b: E: R5 L  W; b: R) E
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. F  n& E) d2 y! r    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
. d4 v: b% i( X& P* e0 l/ I    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* q# y  v4 w4 I    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
# S2 P8 a# S$ K5 ^1 }% F: D    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 W9 G4 I# Q6 x' N6 e
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -( L1 ?& s; A: |& k; f( L
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: j3 b6 I# E# ]; k! @4 g
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
% a5 j8 u6 |/ }. K. k: s" K    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  x! Y" h/ K9 B+ V" y( L
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
7 r0 L" E4 n4 Q* X' E& `8 j    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 j8 A) f6 m, l
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185) d2 Q: \; v( r4 A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ S2 y7 x8 E. k7 |6 o+ T; Y: j9 _
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2508 U. P5 S: D# A  R
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 r8 C1 w5 i( ^+ O    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
  }7 }, f4 _1 O: n& q1 `    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 }) ~% \$ B8 l    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
6 m/ n) J' o! s# k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 V- ]1 ?" Q8 J! {/ c, _
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500, {! V# B1 G7 F; b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& @1 ]3 `3 ^5 v6 \6 R+ L3 i3 r$ g* l
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
& }: t, \/ Z& p    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( X# T1 x3 v" w. g" s: c
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714$ x1 C& i% e# X; Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 F4 s* M' F" {. _    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
3 c6 V6 Q  ], m" l9 \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 k0 H4 V% I9 u) U    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
& T- d$ q$ l4 |3 Y# F! x# H    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  _; p1 b- O  F7 h2 s1 n# e4 B    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8609 I7 W( y8 Y7 \% {& g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& q8 A) W/ B" L+ h
+ k* Q1 L7 C3 G    -------------------------------------------------------------
% `- I$ i6 n: u! K2 p$ S1 U                               Standard Condominium
0 H5 Z/ G+ y$ r  u  l( Q    -------------------------------------------------------------4 d) \5 K' L+ F- I( V. y
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo) ^/ b8 x: k6 d. X
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
3 ?( h9 U; F6 K) w& e8 v    -------------------------------------------------------------- H6 E8 ]% ?9 R- S' V5 z
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%# }8 C4 a0 h5 p, K
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 l( `( o) t* C! k    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%0 K+ k  j/ T3 V( P, b
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ `  X" |/ q+ y+ z7 L    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A- O4 M0 X8 ^3 C8 p3 i! x  E
    -------------------------------------------------------------, E3 e5 K9 i" @! P$ |
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
- m, [) m* b% }. J1 p" `    -------------------------------------------------------------
' _6 B' L: f! J! h5 s( l/ Y! C) z* J    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%, f2 f! T' H+ B$ L
    -------------------------------------------------------------) \7 k. U! |' i1 i# I* y6 A7 _, B
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
, X4 n5 ]0 M/ w    -------------------------------------------------------------6 ~$ q* j$ c  e! y& X. E4 P
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%9 q5 _& ~( m/ N+ z: l/ A
    -------------------------------------------------------------" V+ F1 S' [& o) W& ]4 [
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
+ Q* P' d, u& B    -------------------------------------------------------------4 k# _+ I1 G/ \% P1 Q$ G
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%* D9 V( Z1 [1 j) G% P
    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ n0 L6 w& q0 P1 \    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%3 ^; T- }* j$ f7 H% z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ B$ c9 B8 c! O  ]* w# i    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%* R: z7 }( E+ Y0 _* ?7 C% a8 _
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, q6 T1 t% p# O4 O; P    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
! ~+ h, X1 A7 d" _- K    -------------------------------------------------------------
! G4 O- j2 ?; `- ~# T" r* ~    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
6 i; A. @) ?/ g0 N6 g& y    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ ]6 l+ L# T- j" E" S: `    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%1 l9 [$ N. a$ }( Q9 D7 v
    -------------------------------------------------------------
! c( h0 G8 `* c+ k, ?. X: r( h    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%: i  {0 I% Y# l; U  r( H  B0 [$ Q$ a
    -------------------------------------------------------------7 Q- d  v- c$ D
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
9 W2 X. o: U8 f- h0 }    -------------------------------------------------------------9 S, g# S6 s  n4 u% ?/ \) Q; f
    >>0 n. R! r# y7 a- f( h' L' t
5 M) X" S' q4 Z( M3 V0 G
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
" C6 F' A, u% n9 l3 d' }: Z+ E; Bin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint$ A4 g) [, _1 j6 T- Q2 l; `5 I) Y
John and Victoria.
8 x0 D1 N  B. X$ |
. g: p; e& s% R, F    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most/ r, C6 _) Z- W* i0 G
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of3 U! A6 \& L* B5 c& D, u
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release0 Q% ?2 v( j( G6 ?
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price6 K- P0 l8 F; V* I5 C7 |; ~  T
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
- `5 @2 E/ j7 `. A. L$ gacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
: o# D) {# D2 Q, eavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
9 B% k- A# U' V( i  `figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable+ K7 J( u: G9 `; a2 x
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on9 z/ k8 w) k% l. ]0 ]! f' M1 d& J
November 15, 2006.
# M' H/ S% ^7 m) X  p    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of. {. x  e2 ~' u6 f6 L: a4 P' ^' {
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
+ S% i3 }; r+ Oprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
: @- ~! s3 m* a% t" i. `7 z7 `available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2024-9-28 00:08 , Processed in 0.140320 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表