埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2456|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable / ^: Z* a3 w7 z& f

" A4 H1 d) L, T8 g5 c- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
; C2 _9 D/ U& v( P+ ^7 x+ q& I. e% n4 `# F5 h4 t$ a& H
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market% H7 [2 b! U. i( S) [1 }1 C
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
( r! L" N' }$ A0 Hquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
0 w' q; _, J' C1 @( S( [. W& P; w1 Iin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
4 m. U1 t. F( x$ o. L" Gprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and# O* \5 a7 Q; D
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,5 ?: E+ |, J8 N  p, H# ~
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
+ S* e( `9 t4 }6 n& JLePage Real Estate Services.. D7 ?7 M- [7 z

3 N& }% a. Y/ c2 m* b3 K. [6 d    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters! M  U' F$ t- a+ K- G
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic8 g: E1 `+ Q+ Y  t- }% X! O
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
. \$ e, O& h* B+ B$ Fsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the) q. |4 M; s) T+ z4 q7 r+ i+ U
residential real estate sector.
. c# W- q  b) o* f1 _
: R% ~2 A6 [0 G    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation0 r# S) J1 _- @  b
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)8 p& i: L3 [. Y* E# n4 K( m1 ]
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5622 f( v9 _9 G. h  g7 ~
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
( v' p, O7 Y2 H9 W- C1 v(+13.2%).
! D: k. a9 l* _6 Z
! v5 u$ ^9 c( I/ _" R1 b    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
0 p* g1 x7 I7 X7 {9 u2 H( Bduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
( l6 Z  M% V; zfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
: r; Q; f* {( P6 Upoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
- A" b; ~" |% Z1 K- u8 u; hpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
4 ^- i$ U) [; R4 p' o3 n1 \"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
6 C0 T4 j+ D, {0 B9 }1 U3 G1 G; ywelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy; L# Q& o& d! }. M' b0 h# d( e
balanced market."
. n% O. {. w+ s
- o$ [% q- ?+ k7 P' T2 g! q7 ~    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
/ x# i" c* t2 S; G  p, \considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
# P* [7 t7 [; l  ^4 y) [to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
6 m; ?1 D. T! l- B2 xthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
6 W7 C, L, r" e- j, Denergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,# C, M/ M: T. q- K
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
6 D% I1 @8 Z9 V0 L. i( @( Xbreaking price appreciations.
3 y0 K; r$ j9 n8 ?: [# A+ u) e" D. t
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
6 ?) C1 \3 B; \$ b% Yeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
: f2 y6 P) k/ k. hlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
) l' @2 v- C! o2 N. ~% D! k; l( t  w5 d+ z7 f' d  w0 |
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid3 s' y, n# U# L: p$ N+ [5 }  e* f7 X% I
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
+ ^) h4 R. P- [0 }3 xconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off8 @5 b# @( L# W! }# W
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.( z! Y3 U2 [# x8 j8 Z
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers6 b9 {( y2 m1 s4 z, x9 N! m
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
7 W. O' @' ?/ ~: {* ^' x: kprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
1 m  }* E1 W, \) A: L; ?$ m; D  W/ L/ E- d  R8 A
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing0 ]: Z) _1 N. F) j5 G
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
3 p/ s1 O* R7 k' l: N; j- tfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
9 m4 B, K+ [" ?2 n$ yare markedly different than those found in the United States.
+ P- n  W6 _* G* f9 f8 P
) s, a/ H# S" J; N    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the& E; O! o" L& P: ^6 l  ]
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
& [  `. ~; z% yfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
- x- l+ g+ d) Trelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
  Z+ K4 R' V& e4 a: S- X7 o/ aaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
% [/ Y+ g# B* A9 bdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
, [( j6 }1 ^3 c/ ~aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization9 @& [3 b; l7 A6 g/ u/ c4 s/ C, t3 P  F
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
/ v+ R" |3 |6 K, N$ v
* b* e' H0 o8 [- n6 o5 c0 C    <<
3 z. Q/ ~8 ]6 L* w; [                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
  k" \, c% e$ V" {, W    >>
9 q- ~- |) q- V+ E8 {3 A
; R# q- E4 X: b% k5 D3 }    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
- k5 @3 _% B: D; cHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
6 n% f+ u, T$ t" `9 d- Sof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time1 M/ V/ J$ B- h& y! t
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
: E7 @# V3 k8 B$ B: G: a+ Erenovations.6 K- I/ r5 y0 W: `2 u
% D* N( |2 o# d1 v& I7 y
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
" k' c0 Q% r# c. o6 Jincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
2 [) d( C. x/ N. T+ u8 i# Y& B, acompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
* s2 u. H" @6 I% ?- W8 N6 A- rSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
8 j+ U7 A1 ]3 k% f! c' e" d# z$ U9 ?  h/ p/ n/ Q) t* u: j" u% n+ I8 J
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer* A! r3 ~/ K  Q# T5 [4 J
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
/ |, |7 T. O8 P9 A" I/ cquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
7 p7 n6 I" j- N0 W+ {' ~600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores/ ~1 v" T; _9 p) D. P
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes4 v" N* }9 [7 e0 U
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.- O& ^" w; L/ j( h
7 A' e9 Q1 Y% e) b) L5 Z
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced: U% s% C; P, J* b0 I1 {( [
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their7 j( }6 i/ [+ {- C% g6 s) X0 z
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers& ]# w' _% t/ A( m, S
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian& i5 `! j6 V0 L+ h. _% s& P( w
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
; C1 h4 [- V* J% fbuyers with more options when looking for a home.0 T3 i6 d* ~( e$ Q& C

: E6 ^$ g7 P, S    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly1 U) g% r$ E& t% Z
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes; d" ~4 p4 J8 @4 X. i; X9 P
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
+ X9 B/ J3 n4 f5 e9 ~3 L: pas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
/ P! B) ]- s1 u% h' @7 l, xfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.; O- G" N9 S) U8 U0 [* U
* H" s: @7 E5 l3 s6 p  X" Y
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house  w+ I5 w8 @( ]3 z1 h
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
$ g6 S5 P$ u' U! b* ?/ e) Q! plevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
7 O  Q4 ]1 V" K; ]first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
% M( l( s' V7 }% _. M4 xwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the; Y$ E3 P8 o0 V, j& S
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before& `, ?; L' S& W6 m4 q# R
making a purchase.
3 S% I9 [3 I, L9 J: ^: [# J5 p; n2 z/ T6 v7 G0 [1 k
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
9 E0 E9 c6 J" mmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong; l  r$ J5 _& B
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
* e9 R; [0 b5 P6 c7 r; mcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting4 Z1 z0 N: P& g% x) ?9 K  O9 Y
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
7 y2 o2 i6 Y7 a* D5 D* Hamenities.
! i1 e$ `: Z% l# d$ d; v4 m4 p4 s: F& S5 T" P3 _" b. C; ?4 D; e( I
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
/ G( x; I1 {7 y7 ]( Sthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand5 C" S( g2 j, P+ P. \: P
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has7 Z& f0 B6 z8 b5 y" x+ K" _! a
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
7 j/ Y/ g. I. F1 O; f7 e6 vdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle5 c! M3 ]4 l" Z& K+ S- l: [$ Q2 e
residence, rather than for investment.& ]5 t9 ^" h4 F+ O! ]
4 ?% E. ?( y( U$ I# b( W
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
* I: [: Q1 N. ]4 X! Ehouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted) r7 }' ~: ~( i  g( P
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer3 n7 b% U7 B6 d2 f2 Z) x
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization% b! ]* E; I: U8 X' v& v) S8 [
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter2 C2 g. g; ^  ^, w  X( N& t
the market.; l# g" C' I5 P$ w& i

4 d, g5 S5 l( \0 H& q6 F5 G    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
2 j/ ^# G6 N3 v% Y6 @. zJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In1 X" n' Z0 R% l! _) M; c* _, r0 R
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring: S. e9 P5 A% h
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due3 @+ [2 |; F- Q$ t
to the shortage of available inventory.) E! P+ r2 \. Q7 A
: g+ p: |! C+ a4 f3 ^  w9 w$ S$ b
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
5 g9 W' Z7 L+ k8 a; F% k+ `momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
7 o8 q+ f0 h# O# G2 \. _# a# w: bvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses" o: v% m) j/ d- y" @1 O1 |
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
3 b3 Q& o, \- o
6 D/ u- S# d$ D) ^6 c8 _    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases0 V8 P% s- A% U: L" y
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low  W+ K" B; G# @2 ~% P
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that4 a1 W  x( w3 e3 f
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
' q5 e' I8 J. K  @2 jprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
3 z! u) F# N1 @season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
- {" q. f( i+ G  ^" Xbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
, v4 ^) m; `# d0 F6 t

8 t9 C, w# \" M, N    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter3 h3 V( v6 N$ a+ X
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton# Y; g7 X1 j. p$ O% x& Q
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
: ?* Z5 m5 Q* L1 vmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
6 V# x4 M0 e) R$ Y- Gincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
5 @& {% m( s# u% \) v7 win the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
3 j/ g  q7 D' Y. K* _towards the end of 2006.
    $ N' a) y8 l' R4 K  f/ w' C

" w: W9 K" j. }% w; W  Q" |While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
( V! y( V& t* ^) |& \inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable; z0 C* j# x  U6 f  |
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
9 _! a0 V$ V5 N/ R2 mgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
( z" ^1 j6 }; w2 [% l2 jforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added. j. k, t6 @  z3 y5 X9 A* V
pressure on tight inventory levels.( v. `, i4 t0 [, J
1 s! q( F: F8 L
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic2 o! W# @3 {$ F/ t! m& q" r
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people- v: R- x4 S9 c# ]5 V
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
/ M* x6 S0 O; M/ U2 K1 _; y# Pwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
; [, y5 m( [; m& ~8 I6 ^5 Wfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
1 S& H" z! }; w9 j6 k9 e1 t
6 T3 \0 z, {! d3 `    <<
# }( z( [6 k$ d      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
) d1 \# ]' p9 h+ J; N5 T  F; B: e0 r% M" C' M# w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: E3 f  A# }4 s' N
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey$ h/ F( V7 |/ ?7 c7 M2 n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% P5 `; D. i0 L! n! ]                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q39 Q1 I/ Y+ W/ Z- [# |
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average$ P4 Q2 b: c3 ~7 x
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" e: s, q4 z* I
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
* x9 d4 F9 ]2 ?4 Z" x$ s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& }9 S. c- z9 T! Y# v0 I    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000& \( |( b5 _9 I; ^4 G( a
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 X0 N0 v2 [3 @    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0005 H) k8 \5 g! ]/ {& e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 Z: A5 n% K, m
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
/ @) |9 r9 Q; c" d    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ F/ Z3 S3 K2 n
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
& p7 F/ F( a. X2 y) q  v" w% M    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, G8 f+ o( W; u! E# S# m) E! U    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583! b9 h% h, L  ]; g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 [8 m' @( S) Z" e    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185( x7 I8 q# Z+ V3 Y) ~. Y3 z4 D2 w+ |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Q* E; Q* e% J0 ?' B* }8 O- O. Z$ s    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
0 h; f' S0 z- f4 d# ?    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 B9 ]& {9 h, v/ q
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
  L0 H7 A/ a9 t( Z$ X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* s2 Y) u) I8 p9 _2 _
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7075 P" k0 {/ X1 A& J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 e/ P+ D. j& q& J: q, L    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
* S# p! Y& Y+ Y4 v- M8 e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: R' u- v' l& D- S8 c9 F
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,3896 q5 r8 \) R" Z  H/ [" b6 z3 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( b( @/ \# u: p1 E8 V9 V& K+ c7 O
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7142 j0 O; F; T# u, h. N
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 |& C* w: C% o    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500* r. j; D- s3 a# v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 ~5 d) r8 ~9 ?: n5 n
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
/ N' c9 x) t" R. N# M9 C; I    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: h3 t& @; }1 k
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
3 \6 ?7 G, f" {! y  E4 D    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; Q' w4 G, S% {$ S/ w9 l

* F6 k# x, Z3 m: e    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 s3 h) f$ Q. @2 W                               Standard Condominium
. ^2 |! b  h& P' h5 t5 W, i) ^    -------------------------------------------------------------: y  x, a" L: ~/ }
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
1 i, z+ u& O. P4 k1 k7 J    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change& |7 V+ b# A, `0 ]9 K
    -------------------------------------------------------------: p% x6 `3 G& S
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%' U. `* ]; Y7 D8 g5 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 y# G5 N) |) d6 G5 S$ f    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%7 ^4 j; v: @& S7 O9 K
    -------------------------------------------------------------* ^: l, g3 Y- A. Y. x) O
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
: g5 r3 _/ u1 ]/ g, _# |# k    -------------------------------------------------------------4 g4 r3 [& i" B3 K
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A/ _  n- [$ {2 _. Y; X
    -------------------------------------------------------------
- z% N6 _8 |6 j/ Q% n! u" E    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
3 i% P; i  F+ B' V" T) h" a    -------------------------------------------------------------' M$ ?# n6 r, T( {( z8 P
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
6 P0 Y% B, S4 b+ L) c/ O" C7 u% K    -------------------------------------------------------------# e$ Q1 i9 P' B8 |1 S1 B+ u: u
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
5 h2 |7 ~( }' A! s    -------------------------------------------------------------" w* d2 Q3 m  v. j) O# Y
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
( O$ H5 W, X" l% R; p/ g    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 y9 D, ]8 }7 Q$ |  e3 l    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
. T( d6 s, Y5 ]    -------------------------------------------------------------& H; b# v. t4 X7 M' h; V. t. @
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
0 ~0 B4 D8 ~: A2 I: N    -------------------------------------------------------------
* h  H& a4 m: O; ^$ F4 @4 q    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
; u$ _7 y8 A7 w3 k    -------------------------------------------------------------0 W' S" o/ V- |3 f% m. e% J, N
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
" p8 A- H, C. j% Y9 `# a    -------------------------------------------------------------
# _0 X% Y* u6 r4 _# I; ~, }2 d    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
* G# f( V- d7 S. p' c    -------------------------------------------------------------3 V& Y7 U  t; t1 |/ I" J
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
6 g' ~5 O3 A: |    -------------------------------------------------------------/ N; E/ u+ M: F5 d, i" o
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%( U7 N, q' K! @+ [; h
    -------------------------------------------------------------& ^# G8 P/ q1 _. J5 m1 `5 a( Q
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
. \" I. V7 `& d4 L, e1 N" M    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 f$ V, n# v9 ]: m, T$ N# G8 S    >>/ [% _0 D) r' c, U/ D6 E* n0 {

1 x( n( A, u0 [' J8 P3 i- A. h    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined/ l- ?) x" Q+ W9 }' G" [4 B
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint' `6 K* W7 n( O
John and Victoria.5 [4 B. i7 A' T/ r
- U* H2 j9 O: o+ I  q3 \
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most9 X8 j. Q' |8 a
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
9 F" ~& s, `1 e/ }! Whousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release3 _, V$ ?/ R$ W& E. ~3 t
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
1 U, o! y! \) U4 [trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities$ x9 l9 @; J. e
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is+ B! F" j& n: b7 C# E) z0 |
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
. i9 M' u  [8 K' Bfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
5 q4 o9 Y9 E" y! h1 ]( Oversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
2 R$ J4 b: Q3 pNovember 15, 2006.
4 n% o7 q, w+ N) D( w& k! v    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
6 V9 E0 i5 @5 v8 P7 H1 efair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge- j  F# y2 V! x- _7 F
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
9 t7 U3 J9 f4 w* oavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-5-10 04:36 , Processed in 0.090723 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表