 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ! b& A, w" t$ g" r! X
6 i8 X' X+ J$ T& { w1 i( M
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -# }, X+ V. m$ G- Y& ?, h
- E' v# U/ s! k" X& o$ p
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market) X$ p% }) O3 {
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third X" p, y: m% i) d) i: ^( e' o
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic n% z$ i+ Q& g! f' \
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit, [ ^( g9 d( Z0 d6 V, \
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and" {: {! d3 x3 y$ S
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
' e5 J& o! @- lQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
4 }* a/ U( o- H, y) mLePage Real Estate Services.
0 `9 l5 {, L# S$ p- b
, x2 M5 a2 M* t _ Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters" s7 N/ T# w# q
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic* |/ O) t! D/ s" [& Y
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
, v2 H9 C7 N0 L4 C8 @6 |sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the, ~# {- C& X* M, ]( {! S' Z& `
residential real estate sector.
: ?% n, [4 H1 L, g* ?2 T& n, s+ r7 j/ _) }% M
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation7 B0 f$ u3 C7 j) y8 R9 r% g! e5 u
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)4 K2 J% p2 e2 V+ J9 O7 S9 x& l% O/ p
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562% p# s: h7 R2 d9 L. n5 d
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3802 W9 l% h6 n# l. C+ q6 |
(+13.2%).
1 ^6 f+ S2 c9 i, K' P
) \7 e! Q. O4 c "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
8 _( h }" X3 n8 iduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
, N9 C+ V) B( M- ?8 x( ^3 o+ ^ afrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are \: }$ w& W: r0 ]0 J
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
8 n0 I O! C+ |2 D& G4 Tpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.( W" ]) n. z$ [5 O
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
$ W# V& @! L1 N3 Lwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
1 m. @: @, e- g6 A. Q8 m0 u/ ubalanced market."
" p1 S3 o' F* R- d! B! D$ H- Z0 _% X4 C# O. f: p9 ]
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
/ i+ @! r1 S3 `* f/ b. @considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
* n, b+ _ T1 c4 ^: M3 j* ^to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued* I4 A# o8 O; Y, _7 x( Y1 U- e
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
. h" m$ L i7 ^1 J5 Oenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,! G1 w9 l* S1 Q
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record4 _- ]/ g0 b9 a- _1 I: W1 P2 ]) b
breaking price appreciations.6 r+ H& O; i2 z! b3 O
Y! P* m' m* \' \
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
: }2 X8 f' y) ceconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the5 p7 W0 b9 u% ~& k. G$ `
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
4 t" y9 c2 w3 K- L( x( Y# h
: f7 o' V Z9 X2 o2 s In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid7 }8 T9 T$ u( X
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer; s4 X& W' V# a0 w8 l
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off3 x: q* _8 V8 p9 s0 r
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.* K8 ~# k# {6 W! z0 a, o K) G$ m
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
, a. W' ]* {3 g: G' g. g8 g# E/ ~4 }greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
: I/ ^2 ~* F. m% ]6 k$ }8 y# l1 [6 Uprice appreciation when compared with 2005.. @4 M0 {. x& M2 ?' C/ h- s. I
& g% ?3 n5 D8 [) {' y While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
8 j/ g! n" }, lmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and; p+ `7 }- J8 l$ H7 k# T* K
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada* J! f; S* X5 _( l& ?" e+ K% s) k
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
4 D- q# ]8 T# p: p; z1 y# m. A( V1 K7 ^3 V
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the5 K: R1 l6 ~1 k7 n
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
# X2 ]: q- q& m& \favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the' o, ?+ b" k: j( Q4 M
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
! h' u( m5 g+ R0 |affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the7 K# n+ S3 I" h: X z( m4 u1 K9 c8 Z7 _; c
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and" k, Y, w! O& L. |# T4 l1 Z9 C
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization! n, O# i2 I0 N: ]8 w$ r
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment.", N* z1 h% j& t. k! m7 o& a
1 p f( N) A K" U- X9 c" J <</ a/ d& f0 g& `1 }! d1 {
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
& y5 J7 ^+ p3 m" i! M" X4 |& L >>
- _6 c( m/ n' k- A1 p3 f$ o9 s. I7 x; B: F) Y! J" ?8 P1 `
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in" s- |* b: ]( c- i% s5 T) t3 N8 a
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate; ^* `& I3 {/ k: e: b ^/ ]
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
& o) V7 b8 |0 k6 R1 |1 `- H* ylooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
' v7 ^& I: ^# zrenovations.
8 Q# H6 Z/ D/ S' b4 s6 K4 R, _ n6 y' B
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight8 ^: X% Y, o# ]7 v6 }# L
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation" Z: [9 ]" O& d3 D0 @1 d- {
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
% O' ?8 c/ t! u$ I( u( J" kSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.6 O8 ^1 P& @- r* C+ i7 ~) O0 Q
% l/ p' q. F' p" B g The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
8 p' {) ]) R. _7 w- ~6 C/ x3 Rslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the; s+ d( k$ k0 o( b' }7 J* k
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
1 u2 ^0 _% V6 }600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores. G# w, a8 i7 C E: M7 ]
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes/ [- O( K; S r
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
8 Q0 k' F. Z; e( c G
' m5 H! S. {( T5 i M4 v; u In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced; {; {. \& E/ o0 b( R" L
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their! V% F% A1 f5 x5 p8 L l- `
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers q/ E3 O/ f* B; S1 a
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian2 p2 d8 G; @( L7 N+ R7 c/ |9 R1 L, N
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing1 m; U: M, B& R# X9 o5 |% L
buyers with more options when looking for a home.# Z6 ~8 U- a+ t* A
7 I8 f6 v F1 D6 V& M: ^
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly5 {0 M2 r l, H
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
! E9 ?; R' [4 ~2 b4 g; hpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,- S: h/ ~! y+ p7 S
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last% n$ ~$ T; z. v0 b. q/ L$ q% \8 K
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
8 B, p0 Y3 I/ \! m3 v, w$ H8 G& O2 m I0 N7 {4 z+ T
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
. Z7 K( a; X! S% k2 K& d, Oprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory: m8 `, t9 l7 x' Z9 H
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting/ h, s+ s2 u1 Q2 _! M: z, d# [
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,+ Y. c. Z s1 u% e
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the+ }2 U2 H [" ^5 A0 Q
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
0 M, O/ p& u, @& b; p9 f: P8 p0 q. I; @making a purchase.3 x* g6 D: s& ]4 c
) T" ^ p, r0 i+ Y# [" a Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing0 K* m: n3 W2 W0 m8 L' A
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong$ E% c5 ~0 \9 e5 i; S
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city# ~$ D) V: c& ? ]6 s) r
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
' N0 L3 O% K: ?0 B Z* Aattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
5 B: ~0 I9 v' b! Hamenities.% h" g' @/ A: \4 ^! d$ T+ Z! ^
@( Z# z) ~0 v The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels: u0 I! t: v' W! ^) M1 j2 ]
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand8 o% ]& ?1 C, J4 ?( |. O
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
: r& n* T8 a8 ~) m; lcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
2 j( h$ N; w Udriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle9 a0 K9 L' F, J( ]$ M
residence, rather than for investment.4 R5 E4 C$ b" k
* Q* U7 B- u1 w d# W2 ^( l The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
& D7 |; M8 E& l/ U) i9 \house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
- Z% v; T" h* o$ y/ T: kin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
* ?! \& J& U. x; _& N3 vconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
" G' Q1 x$ I: ~8 u+ x/ J i4 yrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter( @" q1 {+ f! W1 K) y- H- }
the market.
$ n& s( u {% ` K* X
N# Q9 ]" l8 _/ ~- f4 B In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through- c) {8 |0 @+ \6 {4 s
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In, S% i/ n }8 G) Z
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring3 t$ x* Z- M- {5 v' _! @ i W
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
$ E |, d" [+ C) {( I# Wto the shortage of available inventory.+ R) ]+ L! @$ {
3 z# O, ~7 `( q5 K Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
, u5 a8 S0 o5 M7 m" y+ |, H, [5 n2 bmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
@- E; `) T, I5 @0 o# yvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
4 b) G# X9 }9 `; J4 h" t, E' K: Tstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.: f; c1 W9 c4 x
9 W4 p( W9 i! {" R/ x8 \" q, K Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases9 g! k" Z; Y9 x8 ^* V4 r
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low& v, O" L1 }% ?" ^5 m5 Q
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that7 d; v% f: U2 m/ f% f* l$ t6 R
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring3 O: p5 {, s$ Q3 ^
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
+ o4 C8 L0 m2 iseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as |* }' s& l8 a% p0 F7 L Z
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
! W6 c: g* g4 T) ?
! N( F7 ^ v( N& Z; u( X Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter2 `) q, I5 ]$ l. b! s! b
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
4 o4 q u1 ^4 premained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,8 ]1 S8 _* `/ G7 C& v
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
! o- M' w+ _/ h; s& Bincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve+ q9 v7 ?- b1 i$ B- G4 A$ q
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
4 I6 y0 x1 g' R \2 X& n1 V5 dtowards the end of 2006.
. i6 Q' y" W0 T' o0 o- P7 S8 U0 b# w! o7 P/ A+ q
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
. k( {/ A5 j/ W' S- v1 u! y) Pinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
% v ^* y6 `4 Z3 D+ A3 X- \, z, `$ dto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
2 W2 t! o, S) j. s; ^group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
% n' j0 h! `# J t$ _4 sforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
/ x' Y b6 C3 d: `0 W7 f# e5 a7 m5 j; xpressure on tight inventory levels.
9 g# P$ C7 Y9 E+ k3 i% A, l, u2 c! h6 H- a' y( O X
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
r8 q+ Y6 h7 Ifundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people: j1 ?( q4 t6 n. A) l* ^( e$ }1 j& M
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
1 c T4 R. f! v2 i) m4 Hwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
: ^9 h. {7 _, H: J; qfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
. _; w. A; L8 u! a+ Z, } M$ ]' E2 G! t" S" j
<<0 G0 {- p% d9 V& D" J
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006# {! t/ M: x: |
4 r( O! ~: ?. k8 M -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 N3 u/ x- r; |" E9 P3 e
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
" V* o* D/ A/ u1 q -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 N6 T8 |9 s& n: b" g
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
4 I$ P/ P2 V2 j" D6 Z8 H# q/ T Market Average Average % Change Average Average
1 e' O2 S3 M: p" G& S( T( A* o1 b1 Z ------------------------------------------------------------------------- E6 s1 j( [) H' v
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
( r v: z1 _8 I+ V# b8 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ R$ }' y4 A7 B9 T* r0 k$ U Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000: `5 D% v/ G8 n* l* q2 L' }+ g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! [1 d" Z8 y$ X/ j9 d7 F: O3 [0 v3 |
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0000 L$ j1 R- W6 g. @" ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 W- Z. f8 L1 j' {3 U Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -2 U) B+ q1 B8 @/ J! [" B! U6 X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 P. S2 P- l! Y% ^
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
/ H1 K" I" {, n" ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: G9 _( H, v$ H- ~) p( ?8 Z Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
; h \4 [: o. ?( V. e -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 U" U4 S+ v& m0 e7 @ Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
' |9 A# n2 m+ R* S -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. ~; A0 B7 j, g# O! \$ C5 d Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250* R' f" O( l7 b. H5 K" ~
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) p1 b) E, M* o1 K# l, ]& p
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766" F+ }: s/ [% z9 t. C6 A3 R. O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- l( K& K8 Y: y$ z. j" i Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
% W2 v3 u' j; C' `/ E* ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* A/ X2 k r4 y6 c! x4 x9 n" ?+ z Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5004 e* w$ T b/ r2 Z) i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) R9 n4 j' A; `# e( c* O9 J
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
, [6 f% H7 d" |# W, U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& g" w% \5 |6 r) j& e Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714$ B h' @# \* ?3 e2 O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 }* \9 b! M+ X( w
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
9 K, M; \0 C* i- R i -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 A2 S6 I+ h1 `+ s Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
: w7 \' U1 }( ^- k8 M -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 K; T# H, d, r% X
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860/ p. }4 H$ q( x: y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, A; o; T+ g3 O& f
8 s* Q2 Z9 }1 ^' b. l9 s -------------------------------------------------------------4 ^5 A. ?% p9 R3 Q U! h
Standard Condominium# I8 C5 D$ u+ f2 b
-------------------------------------------------------------
" t+ i/ G/ A& B) P% \2 L+ B 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
7 w: @5 w' G! P7 i; h5 i- O Market % Change Average Average % Change
f7 w4 R3 M [! y9 J6 W -------------------------------------------------------------/ f$ ^ h# E F- Y: J V
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
( Q- l- l% d) p( h2 E -------------------------------------------------------------
: }' ?, }+ \1 w Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%; y4 X' R8 v& w; a$ q# ~* a0 c
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 E$ y/ j/ R6 p Moncton 4.9% - - N/A+ I6 ]7 k) C: L/ @8 G
-------------------------------------------------------------# t* ~3 M" s. S/ b5 c- H4 r* m
Saint John N/A - - N/A. {. y3 U2 f5 X e3 C- M$ J
-------------------------------------------------------------' T. w* K" o0 K0 j# r0 o
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
, p1 F8 V5 h' ?! a0 }/ @ -------------------------------------------------------------1 A: l5 W, Z6 K
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%) ~& C% D' E/ \: b5 f
-------------------------------------------------------------& f6 C, w, _- x7 q- x
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
1 v# ^3 ^* i6 I -------------------------------------------------------------$ r; h$ L6 _" E) q7 |: e- q2 [
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
. K4 \/ u( K0 ?) S4 E i3 q9 } -------------------------------------------------------------2 d% p, \$ d \+ z% L" ?
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
% W- ?: \! g q+ w" o) F4 Z0 | ^ -------------------------------------------------------------
( Z9 x! \; [4 j+ N. t5 K Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
1 D6 Y, {& x0 D& `% k1 j2 x; D -------------------------------------------------------------
- Y. B+ |" f: X2 L' Q( ] Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
, w; {2 D ^7 y, t* S$ V& u; C -------------------------------------------------------------3 A) u6 m$ E/ n( j& A
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
) ^+ Z/ t/ f/ k. A8 d -------------------------------------------------------------
- M7 G8 A9 l: h, d7 M* g# P/ B1 l Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
% T: q2 n- ?9 o0 H) A- H' N -------------------------------------------------------------
% Q+ P; M4 F1 b; [0 O8 i. y Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
- X6 l: o& G, I- l -------------------------------------------------------------" q# O9 I3 u4 S1 u7 e
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
1 ?# k8 ^; m. f+ c1 ]: f! {" | -------------------------------------------------------------3 Q3 |% M, P* h% v
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%/ G8 |. g# [- A& H1 z2 d
-------------------------------------------------------------6 E* ?+ \, m4 D* [2 |3 [
>>: j: B8 T- l% u
2 d" `: x9 v6 w2 { Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined7 W: H8 l2 N" a' |, \ h, I
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint Y5 o; C- F! f& z/ r' K( w
John and Victoria.! T8 a) y9 M/ C Q, z/ u
/ C l$ U, ?1 D! d7 q. X( l9 E
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most: ?, [4 ?% X# d+ E* `. O8 ~$ u. p" @6 B
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
5 _8 g# g+ ~6 P" C d+ zhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release; L7 d2 b* {8 R2 H# G. K) E
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
; o- M* `( q/ U( O, V7 g* u) Gtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
' ?# }! t$ _- D, h& q1 y5 zacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is; D% J$ Z8 Y8 ~2 R' ~
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current, H- I( Y" f& K- p7 v
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
; c, t0 i* [% n- O! d! R% p6 s Cversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
! W7 ]# r" r8 gNovember 15, 2006.; }8 z. n/ Y2 ~
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of* `( R3 T. {- C$ X1 S
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
* g5 ?+ b; {9 R) C. vprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
& o7 x. z R; C8 f( Y3 `* eavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|