 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
* S, H3 E. a6 @! s3 B7 ^7 U |& L& \. y, R' n
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
& j( f' N3 s! V+ B; K+ V
% S+ I5 K) y& {3 M TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
; [5 Z) U. b; eexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third3 }: `* V% J$ `8 R$ n& S7 q
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic4 c" R% l' {1 ~$ M& y
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit$ Y3 u& ?' y# e) Z7 E
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and8 G- s3 C" `& `6 ?, C/ ^4 Q
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,( u9 j" }+ u) }: p: B) q6 d" y
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal+ Q9 l4 {" R9 V# f6 g& E' `
LePage Real Estate Services.$ S+ t- G) i& j4 O6 b9 ^
' k1 f0 d. c/ d
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
( Y' {9 x3 T( j3 X+ I) oare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
* }; C# [ ~) j" A3 V# G; h# E3 |conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
3 q/ Z$ }; {- ~5 A; bsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
' z# F4 e, H: j. o) |6 Rresidential real estate sector.
: {0 u+ E u- X! h5 m8 B- s% X/ Z; G# f7 }- l* W* o1 z, b* N
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
1 V4 }2 s) ?5 F% M4 N. Qoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
7 c% Y8 n8 ^ t. t% @year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562" x0 X; |: T2 `9 l! P
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3802 n, F# k; L0 Q. G5 k1 v
(+13.2%).
: L& l$ r/ O0 |; [5 G* a1 W( l) n: B0 C' l" D2 ?- g6 |
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth$ Q( e: X+ R- f8 p$ h
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
, G5 H$ ~+ j$ i' Z* O3 H4 Y, W$ |1 v8 `frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are+ A p8 S& h/ g- v5 Z# X
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper," }4 }1 J; u1 W+ U# b: X/ D. P" Z6 `) m
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.3 O: j3 n0 Y" \, z! r4 {& m* B% X
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
5 `- m, P' |8 P$ j3 Q! v' Z# t% lwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy2 p! ^3 _) Q9 t* W$ V2 v; p
balanced market."" B3 L Y3 l8 ?6 X: h
3 V6 S! H9 u0 c8 v+ T( ? Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
( {- ~, y% j; d: s$ z8 Fconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
& Z# ^* B. }3 s3 s+ `% k7 M; o3 Ato balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued% r: l; Y) D7 u1 C( Z
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core5 n! T2 L3 p9 r+ ^9 S/ `0 b/ {! l5 Z
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
4 M2 h+ _' f9 p6 ]: Y$ `: Mmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
$ a* i' u8 ~6 h3 ~% H0 V6 Nbreaking price appreciations.2 ~7 S- @- [2 }" D+ }: Q
3 p9 K/ {; p- F. M! G
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
; E9 t$ R1 l0 I* Aeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
; ~' I X' ?+ U2 h( llargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
8 V) I+ k6 ~3 l l0 x' Z/ p9 A% E; O; ^8 R5 g
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid$ ^0 p. t/ ?8 A' i
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
" k e' j# I7 s* H+ x% o9 ^confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
( [# f x8 ]1 f/ u) `slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
/ i5 N N* \7 O# F1 FIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers: m4 ^0 ]% D0 X! f! G
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of! k: v! `# H5 k- [, f: f! x
price appreciation when compared with 2005.- B) r' [: B2 d% k( T
0 J/ k; E" x4 ?7 [" E' b6 v5 Y: o( x While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing3 a+ g: ^: m8 i5 G' p5 j6 T2 w/ K
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
: n: k, o. e$ [4 X& {7 S# w1 Nfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
7 E7 K# f+ m' v0 z$ `# Lare markedly different than those found in the United States.5 }- r7 y+ w7 x# q
" d7 v2 ]! z3 d* R. @! _1 c+ [' c& _
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the3 ^" u. l- l; m, h$ h9 S
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's2 i4 L: b/ V) ]) `2 i. Y' R
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the5 ^; L: e9 P' c9 ~7 W: ?
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
: W! ?$ C7 @4 A0 caffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the+ w4 W2 R1 T& a* m4 x! g
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and. h: [9 h/ w R0 H
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
7 u) F* D% |9 o0 E `mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."# _/ ]& V" f, p- k: o
! d1 w M2 c/ e' t5 k% r <<# i1 Y+ g4 \/ _) a( b
REGIONAL SUMMARIES* w8 N3 B7 O" H9 I5 @4 h
>>
: d$ B8 u$ M# v) }7 V$ J ~, V" d) i0 ?- _
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in0 r* Q/ I" x5 ~8 p" `+ t
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate: D: z6 x: ^& T# ?1 u
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
: a0 O/ {) E* r& llooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of% O; C/ m0 L2 Q* J) ?5 r& }/ J% g, ?$ O
renovations.3 S/ q6 K4 M, \. Q, Q& V3 o$ p$ C2 @
. e' \/ @/ _8 g& o
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
! ?% \2 |6 H- u; Oincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation0 M/ I. W% _: N" c& V; l+ Y3 p3 @
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and- t& @2 E) V2 b4 Z
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter., o9 u3 c0 ]8 X: f/ U5 Q
; E% }# z( {0 p n# v6 c$ ` The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer& A1 D" B' w2 A, d- P8 l' [3 R" p
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the/ _; J/ u2 q1 h6 K0 }0 b
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new; N" T. I- L" `) Q( O. \7 V3 Y
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores$ }( k8 |7 D8 W q6 t% G
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
0 m, `; K: r( k% x0 C. eand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.% P) G3 R5 n6 d. _/ y& C; E
' a4 |! p6 w$ M
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced' [/ N) H0 a- b
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
! [( r; |: ]7 `/ h6 W1 o, Mhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
' C2 N9 \. {; y2 E( s+ P# _3 W/ G/ Qwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian+ ]2 O3 `$ R' Y! D6 f8 t7 {. V% D! _
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing3 d' v; ~& ?2 s! ~
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
1 M3 t! @' @- X* ~
0 V2 X" G9 t# g9 h6 A9 l* k Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly& @! s8 T# Z, R$ z7 `; ^
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
# P2 S9 k# G# H/ h6 h9 {$ w S+ R9 fpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
9 D% E+ P2 z3 I! |% o9 bas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last& V! Y' _6 ^7 ~$ F6 m
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.0 R# i7 y; A4 ? Q7 W2 c7 r
* g: S9 P& f, i5 [; P5 _5 ?
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
: h+ L3 r6 `% E( Q' y; t9 b4 iprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory% A" I. p! U/ s6 R; H2 ?# g% n
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
% c4 p" Q8 _- kfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1, v2 A! G, J$ k; [, N o* X
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
$ y, B& v9 M% `* g0 b( N/ Fpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
7 C F- D4 u" a$ G/ omaking a purchase.
8 E7 x" K/ Y. g( z! d( F( u c5 t9 T3 Y+ b7 e$ M0 \5 f
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing+ {2 E; X( P5 l" A
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong. u4 `5 o$ I' |
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
M, e/ n' A0 a. g0 }centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
8 g; r& e* d- m/ ~attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
0 D8 c; s6 _4 U$ K! {amenities.
6 J) L, q0 |& h w) w: p- `, v1 \& n: ~
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels/ X N3 z# }# d, `$ a
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand$ ?1 l+ h1 O8 m4 c
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has6 e, L% Q( W1 G
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been7 `; W7 o; d" f
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle. ]- k2 m3 l ?, r% Z
residence, rather than for investment.4 F: [% e- Q0 E; A# }' z- D
& G2 Q d. i# d! e9 Q. v! j
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as" v( M8 t0 H9 l
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted, I) v8 @7 T9 P) y8 L3 K4 o
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
/ ~6 R8 R; }& @6 vconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization8 X+ K+ b7 D5 j+ J9 t7 C
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter9 G: E& E9 }, F( ]2 n) n
the market.
( Z) E, D4 q( }
6 b4 e3 l4 G/ J6 Y" d* s In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
" ?, M4 K/ h# K+ a# ?& ]July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
2 X" P; ]! j; X; T0 X UAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring5 d0 r: ^+ ?' I3 q9 N8 S
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
u) p. o+ p* d4 sto the shortage of available inventory.
( { l) h5 U2 M9 k @/ \8 l# _: x" Q! R# B
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its" r, W* `1 Z9 E
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
5 m1 c; k# b7 ?& H4 Lvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
% Y- W* x* |0 q' Ustruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.( Q$ ]! y+ n3 b: S
& j+ Q/ E9 o4 S7 A
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases5 t, w0 |2 [1 t' {3 k& B% Z
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
6 _8 s9 C" m# R, f1 [. `unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that' A9 g y5 n5 m: K/ H9 W" X6 n
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
t: k- ?. L% ^( x4 Q+ Nprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer7 F3 Q: q9 z: S
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
7 j* C% I0 Z% u& wbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity./ L1 C: V; B9 s C. C$ s
/ A( Y8 T) _- x8 i5 I- c) G7 y Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
* ~1 W3 _" r9 y/ R e2 Las activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
& w s( V% c5 Z$ ^( _" C) P* wremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,# F6 w+ C2 Q q
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
v C/ W2 [: q$ sincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve% I4 `1 U" r5 V4 _# A* D! L
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
) l- m2 T/ b, O4 K5 f4 U1 R) ?! Htowards the end of 2006.
' }$ q$ \- k6 W
1 h# G% J7 U& b9 R+ P; G8 LWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
( I/ T8 Y( ~- Q. c: y$ O Dinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
$ Z1 F; Y3 I# a' Fto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
5 ?: U( o# d k0 |9 i' Bgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to% O" j# ]% M X. K( @- U5 ]
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added* [" m+ A* i9 C# H3 p) k6 q9 v
pressure on tight inventory levels.+ V& i- i6 b% ?3 r/ R/ }
: {% P# @6 U1 Y5 N
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic6 u) E; |. {2 `: w" H* R
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
/ K {2 h* H8 Z+ Yinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;5 r/ y A( I5 Y2 R$ {
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching* F6 b% Y/ m3 T0 }/ [" Z
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
8 `5 h3 `& O* ~; c3 t ~2 [5 L
5 j6 t, t$ _+ L8 P8 I5 _ <<
4 l1 ~/ B: `' b. ^/ f Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
- W/ y& W' ^1 H& V: D6 o% r$ A: g2 c1 X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* \% i0 G) F6 A0 T
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey7 V; Z' t. _, ~5 ?/ d& Q2 i: l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 V2 c" \- A7 R7 t; U
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q30 `- w; e2 t0 b) ?
Market Average Average % Change Average Average* i; `3 D* L9 D1 u1 \ T1 I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ U( g) k+ _- |! w, o0 |( w* W
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0005 \' S+ h; k$ w, ^. i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------3 k# {: g+ ]9 D7 s0 V0 ?& }. o7 p
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000; C8 |& Z8 V! {# {8 D. k
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ m: ~2 i' s# G% |# t) Y. u
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
4 i0 N. O# F2 [4 T: ~/ Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------: b0 W* L0 {! z* W
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -! U# O3 s) r! r: d( O! N2 O& q$ k
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% @! L& I; w7 y# h4 b7 G St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3336 m9 ]; J0 p4 ~0 @$ y9 X2 u) U
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 L" Q8 h% ~. R' M2 y* A Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583. U# o: F1 Y& Z9 i: ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ U2 T, X$ t z) @' C5 y Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1856 L# m1 [! R! F) a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( r! I3 @" I* L4 x7 M
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
# W9 f* g' m2 X2 c& N' L& y- v -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 `4 s2 i( ^% I8 F2 ] Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766& P" E7 T6 Z3 R* u3 ]( f7 T; ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ S& y7 T0 y( F: ~
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
& d$ _7 g, f9 K! e& X& D1 ?% S -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ L) P9 A; X F Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500/ f P# o# A; M7 O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 o6 S; W; e/ ]: r: E1 q: P: q1 V Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
# n, X5 W+ P m8 [& @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 }( v8 u8 U" L3 n3 T/ i* K* L Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
. }) _) _; n m4 H: ?0 v -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 y" b3 W2 I' Y8 C n- ?8 Q
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500 i" q. J7 B. {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% E! Q7 j2 M8 n# l$ X4 y6 d( l& _ Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000$ k8 K6 }( G( W# I* w4 p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% B1 {8 D# p$ h* z5 D National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
! L6 |0 Q5 H5 n* u* n. f: S) ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* l; v( q) _+ f% U9 p, O" R' j7 _, w( t' L& u
-------------------------------------------------------------2 k5 p' @! I g( d
Standard Condominium
" G# I* r6 b0 n0 a -------------------------------------------------------------% O& O, E5 @3 W. _" @
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo2 O1 H9 Q1 a) V7 i" |8 |" s
Market % Change Average Average % Change
. X6 r( w5 [& ` -------------------------------------------------------------' H3 N$ Z. |- h8 i) ]4 ]1 |
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
" U: K. F( T' n( q' \ -------------------------------------------------------------
/ { R) s; B) w* w1 [7 N9 g: w: V Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
* n$ N4 K+ |$ P5 B7 w0 c) D9 k2 v -------------------------------------------------------------
& f+ W# p) @, h8 v8 c: W" @ Moncton 4.9% - - N/A8 ? j# C( Y+ Z% U; r9 V( k
-------------------------------------------------------------
- c2 z! a9 F9 W1 C2 U0 I! w Saint John N/A - - N/A, g r* x: v7 b8 p
-------------------------------------------------------------) x+ N3 ]; s/ H R N
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%' y7 Y; J- A6 V0 O
-------------------------------------------------------------
& r; Z4 k1 J, u$ ]9 ? Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%* T+ e; j$ e0 }( B4 |
-------------------------------------------------------------
. m0 c" S% i9 w% T' E' L* t Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
% D8 G3 U; O# B/ X -------------------------------------------------------------
- v8 D0 P0 \# S0 |9 W. n Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%* r I9 W5 c Q5 Q
-------------------------------------------------------------/ Q. u, j q7 u8 [* O! ^' K
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%2 p4 a- ^/ Y4 q) H6 u9 I* J
-------------------------------------------------------------
: Q/ E, l" g) _ e6 `& h! b- O Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%9 t* A' w( g- P* P
-------------------------------------------------------------# \$ j A/ l. W1 y0 u9 m
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%( p, B. X* Y! w% t, d" o# D
-------------------------------------------------------------# D* B1 q' ~9 }/ v
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%& Z' D3 Z' K5 Y2 N5 e# T
-------------------------------------------------------------, J+ ~7 z) I) L8 E6 H
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%, H5 v, w% T: ^. u& n4 _7 P
-------------------------------------------------------------. s/ x% Y6 Q% z9 K) x# ^
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
' |, V, I* _5 S/ a0 N -------------------------------------------------------------
( ^% ?+ k2 @+ _- I, ? Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%3 |+ A( ^6 r+ A8 J/ g3 g( a
------------------------------------------------------------- G' y/ U! d3 ?' p9 d. \
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%6 {1 [: p$ I" g u M2 P/ m2 A$ d
-------------------------------------------------------------
# E) t( ?( g$ o* R. ]3 ~; ] >>- x: d# b! f/ J9 c' M% D0 d0 n
) R; D3 g, t: m
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
1 w+ f1 f. \+ l7 H7 |in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
" ]- c: b7 t Y: g8 `John and Victoria.
: I5 ?; G. z4 f7 o5 o# _
* c v! ~" U: B6 I7 h0 f The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most' k. D" l' \8 a8 {/ y: K3 Q
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
4 m; z. c8 s) A8 M# chousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release; e6 C) a1 d) X- H* x
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
# [/ M1 j& q' I- _3 `0 p& vtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities& F& g+ U/ k% n) o+ o
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is# J# Y. o$ @6 n3 ?6 j
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current) w$ {9 n! F5 s0 C
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable0 y& q! A3 m: f, E) U- a
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on* G9 _# ^# c3 I) B9 W
November 15, 2006.
& l% K# j* h2 |0 Z4 o% S4 \ Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of" |3 n* n$ i. S) W
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge8 X; P. m1 a" X) g( D, Q1 R
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
& I1 l0 `- F" m; z% Z# davailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|