 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ' o7 \1 d' c! h' J
- `% P! f5 I& Q. K1 H: A- A
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
. z/ O- _0 g$ l3 |3 h/ F' O4 i1 P3 S7 [2 W; d$ d+ M
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market" r) `3 T. r( Y+ X$ @ ?3 [5 d; a! ~
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third( v& @+ h- @' F/ H
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic- Z: ?2 P: _% [
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
' n3 ~5 r9 ^, h5 t g* [/ Jprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
5 W- ]( T# E; s" cmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,8 g2 M+ o% b) W/ l/ y6 R
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal9 R: M5 p1 ~- f4 J8 p8 s, p% S
LePage Real Estate Services.
% r1 p* O U# r- ^' X& M: K! l0 t, T! E; k6 W
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
7 H0 O1 E1 G4 l& o2 s) h Yare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
3 x. h3 {" z2 `: W6 J" kconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
8 M+ B1 \' ?' h3 A4 u2 f: bsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the% q+ l8 e1 x( R. q( T6 [( n
residential real estate sector.
& J9 V( o, f5 t4 N( A% F! G/ P. f3 ?8 P$ v' b! V
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation7 w& J0 W+ B- c6 B! ?" Y0 x# f7 o2 u
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)8 ?. N, u9 R, ^5 S- U2 p
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5627 X" y. c9 n3 X9 C& l; C+ a; O
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
( z. c f) ]# m6 C# k(+13.2%).
# h% x- u! H: x" q! W" l: L! X9 b
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
% k" v x" b9 Y- J4 hduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
; A5 @6 }' }4 x$ `, {+ L9 Jfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
" h* c# P+ a+ [- k3 U. `2 Lpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
' O* `/ b2 Z) q. @4 X3 Z0 S4 ipresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
: Z& i8 d+ Y$ Y0 D8 i"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
9 D+ ~- h2 S% q" Q+ j: Y7 m0 Kwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
! O2 T0 l9 ~ ?7 j ?' M0 Obalanced market."
. B! I, t$ ? q# x9 g! l3 j( q2 W9 j/ s# k4 Z* r# r; C5 f& y
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
Y7 i1 n; f+ H: dconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
# d0 j" R! e) G2 tto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued* C& R& t$ J3 t% h: D# g4 |. J
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
5 c2 ^9 w: [& ?; s( ]7 Oenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
' Y6 [9 T3 L+ K1 b. U0 R- O5 |manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record& U7 Q( }& {- o1 }4 s9 J. Q
breaking price appreciations.4 W0 `1 X$ o( ?/ r \% A
8 y: _; w( g, U# ^2 B Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding n1 \6 U1 h, `, w
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
5 L$ S0 {0 t& g, o- b4 w; b [% W# s qlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.! v+ _. D: F; \: |5 I
+ e5 W3 G$ ^$ y0 t7 W& o0 \$ d# Y In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
) Q# e# O5 Q" c) {8 leconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
9 _/ e: t7 h8 }confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off; [; ^( o, U4 n9 V
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.7 o; ~ J, l$ b) h5 L
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers4 Z) K R1 V, E# O5 z
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
+ }- }+ d, N- b% D; P e# `price appreciation when compared with 2005.# E7 c2 n% N: T6 f) _5 C
1 [( I6 h' G% B" O. V T) J3 f3 ` While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing) ~6 A8 L4 r. I b6 M% l- c
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and) R3 C" E$ G; R, q# D ^
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada2 `- ~5 ?, n: ~7 l! A' y% T. x% C9 {
are markedly different than those found in the United States.2 k. r# d" t* Z3 |/ ~4 m# b2 y/ T
( F9 n% \$ Y. ?: Z9 G M
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
3 ]8 q, [- [3 B5 N, _ _) U& VAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
4 K" ^7 N0 c ?favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
; L: D: w+ x. T' N* O5 Z8 xrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
$ j# K6 A9 k' q, I- s8 faffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the* G) M: R D2 e: o
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
/ |0 D. J' f. Q" Y2 j' \aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
. e, \8 Y) l2 [5 N( a2 omortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."$ N, {* s8 u- u; z
}; _- x% f1 a H5 D
<<
% J9 M. } ^2 l/ Y) S0 w! l& z8 I REGIONAL SUMMARIES
9 z! x, k- Z" E$ } >>+ @# `1 h, _* Q( Y6 f4 E
7 c" u4 }: ^. p) u- } Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
0 U G$ p3 v3 AHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
1 U0 O s' _' ]1 p# S& F2 Aof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
7 G! D+ d* E- L, y8 Llooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
, W- R: H: k: Arenovations.
+ H l- ~; Y2 C3 r3 j5 {5 n
+ z7 K$ i/ o. L i; W- G8 H: m The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
1 E9 e9 ~. K+ v3 [8 b4 Rincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation- B. B( j3 |+ n" C- H
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
& @% p; U/ @* [1 t+ lSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.' s/ L; U+ i9 ?: X! {5 s" U' x( i
. i' G) [ R( T# t1 i4 c
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
% s3 V! f: h8 B9 z6 ^$ L* `slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
x2 {) _4 J, N; A: I) ]quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new/ I& f+ N. j2 |! J) `- l& I: k
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores+ K5 k7 @/ \8 |0 ^
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
6 Q/ J! Z1 v5 u/ q5 i$ i1 Yand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.6 F: |/ Q/ Y+ H% l; U( u
2 T7 _9 o+ l$ R6 ^# m s/ b4 g In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
8 j5 f- i2 P3 Y% P* n; k- O! F& kconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
6 Y: c. v( E2 Qhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
$ |' E8 s# K; @0 V0 T6 O V. Dwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
8 `0 l, r7 c. } kdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
) d/ A/ G( s j- D$ C* Ibuyers with more options when looking for a home.
. {: T+ v# r& L0 p7 h, C+ L7 f: h& }" w4 w2 n# @( f# l
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly. g; M0 E9 J: U" a
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
& `+ Q+ Z3 r* D9 n5 \priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
. j# P1 g% o$ `as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last* J# f/ s0 q, c! ]( c9 O
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
2 A$ J8 J( u; v$ d4 K2 n0 O4 q* B! w# z0 y/ o' D: B
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house# R' _$ y0 d% Z# N) M/ L6 L! @
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory0 z$ ~" p p& C4 i/ ]# K$ ~
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting( Z! s) A5 ?$ K) m" q* ^1 _
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,! Y& I7 G' m3 s, v& z: ?
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the q6 |# r* K/ c4 Z2 B; X$ ?
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
7 a; I! D. }4 @! I7 I* {making a purchase.: ? P" r+ w9 w, e
! f' a; S2 z( O# q' x& Z
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
' K$ ?# ]* y3 e/ v8 C7 Y# D, k2 L9 nmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
$ H I: J, h( i2 L+ ]) ^confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
3 ]1 ` M5 P" O7 }centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
" S' S& g2 u% r* _/ R. eattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown3 Z! p0 r1 K' b$ w9 ?* E. B9 @" {
amenities.8 [* [- f% ~5 ]& Q$ W m
9 c% g- W5 k& i The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels- ]) u% Q, |' L0 D+ |$ m; Y
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand& H0 v9 I2 u; L* h' P
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
* N+ T. I* {; A" y1 T4 W* acontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
, {( l5 A) X( ^7 z) }driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle0 M, _9 S, M( [: Z8 W' L2 C3 d
residence, rather than for investment.' B" Z# h; P8 V$ k. [$ B" f; d$ q
* f/ G5 r- f9 J* x) C
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
- B( C. G! O+ ?" yhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted% {, {; `5 q" G$ {7 v
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
2 ?+ V' w3 v# q [! g& Y0 n, c3 kconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization" M+ A6 @" [) p* u _
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
- H7 H. ?8 N: c9 a) n# {the market.
+ C9 T0 a4 q- y- m; M, ~: j
$ j. U) k6 I* t( @/ X' O In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through+ n9 n+ g* p. h( O. @" j4 L% {2 K
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In8 ~# a- a1 ?$ x! e+ {
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
8 `" k1 g% w$ }: B; ~" V& }0 Hmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due5 ?7 `2 C* L1 j! U( {3 u
to the shortage of available inventory.
8 z, g* K Z2 J" ?/ q5 n+ H, g7 Y( z% x. W+ v
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
% {; D/ C! d' t3 ?2 Rmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
7 Y+ K. j ~( B: t3 _. ], |vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
* y, X$ S4 M1 I. d0 w( Ystruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.9 A, q! R7 b ?. G# M
& b7 k$ S- c, [; p Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
: [7 A% t+ C9 ?- ^in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
: |& ?# Q) ~! Uunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that# Y# F8 C7 t6 `# D2 z# g# l
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
8 T1 X; ?0 R, A$ B) r; Tprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
1 \! o- n+ K" J$ tseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
0 s. t2 _- |8 \% u' l2 lbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.. m# ]# D3 j" c3 V5 ]6 T# n* A# Q
6 t0 z, a; i8 W) r
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter4 z; L5 b, ]9 O+ \1 E
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton1 b/ [; `1 S" {4 t+ R
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
- h) Y4 u& X: Q! v/ u* v s+ w+ q; pmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
1 a& B$ }5 H# u1 X0 ]increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve) ^& ~( q4 y, a7 M: S
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
8 U* q- b( s) B# c2 t9 btowards the end of 2006. # Z& S4 L d; y' n- o( l
# W& \$ o' W+ Y. u4 r, L: l' }2 A
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
8 N9 m; H; m4 _inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
' u% f5 R, u* ato meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse' l! f" A: d G' h
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to3 m1 y0 E( e* D& D r6 U
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
6 @6 v# Q5 A: g) h/ _: Npressure on tight inventory levels.& O0 }0 p8 l) V
' s& o& p- p" B' l7 P( O# _6 B
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
9 A5 J/ y0 E- ^. j2 T8 ]9 |1 Tfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people# P0 P, w: i2 @9 [+ G( J
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
( Y+ k: }1 S) Lwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching1 i) r. s, Z1 U# `1 a( O$ _
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
2 c- [7 E7 g0 w
1 N* ]# G3 {. s2 N# h& A$ t0 o << f9 v, \3 C% W/ {. z) \$ a% I
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006' l: n8 B8 X6 s/ q4 k6 L* M9 U
& S- @7 h# `" b/ D& V. l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 b( c+ W& s+ U% f Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
8 V2 _# y4 A$ P" }3 R -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 q# H1 W6 L8 k% m: ~* Q+ ?3 k
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
4 H2 I; \/ M- V/ M$ h' w Market Average Average % Change Average Average
; T/ n) r$ w6 `5 G4 i" J -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ c! q4 j- Q" V1 Q7 W! {9 g& S* m Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
- M* c) o- T* V" f -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 c: ]6 E; m: _- \& v* ?7 z
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
) c9 S" m! M) H& h7 H% m' W1 j -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 w! s" E; F' Z/ b- O, f' n
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000( J: U& G$ h# A9 C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& q/ d! `+ w7 h4 l& A" b Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -) w3 p0 {4 v" g: U- w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ ]" }6 B3 h" R0 Q St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
9 i2 h; N1 V/ I. Z z& L6 G* H5 R -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 p4 e; s/ p; H* H" f% B Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
. Y0 e* b* o9 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------& N& Q3 J2 C8 E' Q( Z' m W
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
# ^0 s# i9 {- C( @% P -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 H9 @: ~) E$ N0 s8 y1 N+ q Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2505 B2 a: d j( p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' H2 s6 v" N( W0 m( C
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7662 K% b5 r0 n" U8 j$ G6 j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 M8 ]+ D. X2 i# n; ~: o Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
" a: L4 ?0 _, s2 {8 y -------------------------------------------------------------------------( h8 j6 `' p1 q k' H
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5001 I3 n4 O9 p+ w' X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 V- d: i5 _: ]) s6 z
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
4 v2 N, F# e3 A! `( p) l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 x; a Z/ ~4 j5 l- T( X3 I8 j Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714+ I+ V$ |- o1 d8 J; n/ W6 _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, w$ k1 W/ p) c; {% ~0 a( q6 r Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500" ]- I/ k4 ^% P8 W9 M$ y! o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- n7 p; z$ l% u/ ~/ z
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
+ F9 m0 _3 X8 m: M -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 ]* N! \/ C, Y( [
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8605 F1 a8 D& |# \3 V) J0 Y# H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ }0 r9 ~( x* D- d! R
6 @7 K4 \+ k2 h- W9 l0 O -------------------------------------------------------------
; [0 I% x; b5 W' N Standard Condominium) a8 H B5 B+ X
-------------------------------------------------------------$ |3 g& W6 R* f+ u0 ~0 y+ e v& z
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo+ w" }/ R9 y% t: I5 ^
Market % Change Average Average % Change
! j2 t" N% z/ \0 P -------------------------------------------------------------
4 U* i- q$ g8 Y/ Q6 a Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
$ p6 a0 E% x' C2 Z, F( w; w -------------------------------------------------------------% j1 N% S4 H& U) ^+ E
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
" i0 D( ^% ]4 [* e( P -------------------------------------------------------------
# m, I; e+ l a1 A$ L F7 { Moncton 4.9% - - N/A2 E9 J1 n; r8 r/ V; [$ O5 R
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ ?$ Z* c2 j {8 y2 D Saint John N/A - - N/A) Y* R4 h; S' ^2 w0 N; r( o: J, ]* ^
-------------------------------------------------------------6 r2 X5 b! w; `2 m9 `, J6 E/ ^' a
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
; P$ L$ Q9 R3 Z+ | -------------------------------------------------------------
& P O0 V5 _5 d; j* Z; R$ i Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%& d# L% ^5 ]4 r" n( K7 X
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 J: Y0 L! |3 F6 }9 w# g1 M! ` Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8% [( h8 R9 u, W* h7 N; ]$ z
-------------------------------------------------------------. c+ _! w9 G0 G( t7 t
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%+ c! m1 R$ ^3 A- ~- H
-------------------------------------------------------------4 k8 a3 x @& ~) i8 _% I
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%" }0 ?$ T- @: T( j
-------------------------------------------------------------
! F6 M/ @4 ^" ~) E Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
L3 X" v. ~% `! r2 k -------------------------------------------------------------
, x/ ^$ U @" I* j0 s7 g- S& t- E; O Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%0 S# Q( H' L9 R" i( U
-------------------------------------------------------------* L! ~7 w1 ?0 h" r0 r
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
! Z; c& k" n0 N -------------------------------------------------------------
$ T1 `; A- @4 V Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%& ?* L5 G. Q2 `: f V% l
-------------------------------------------------------------" J" w/ c! j0 ?2 m
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
% y- `# @8 N+ q/ R6 p3 e -------------------------------------------------------------9 g4 H- _7 S& ^ B$ Q8 P5 w
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
9 a- l6 j: G' S. P# c0 Q7 { -------------------------------------------------------------
* R: _2 k1 T8 N National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
2 l4 r6 k. {7 `+ u- q -------------------------------------------------------------9 ?" \, Z( V4 a; I M8 ~
>>
! V, T6 \9 {( g" N! f* O9 s7 A, {5 M2 S8 f% M. f6 A
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined2 y3 ~ u4 D$ ~: k( |0 O
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
( b$ }6 \8 Q; r# `, A1 zJohn and Victoria.) x! O7 }- v6 p* D# Z
8 B& u6 H& r/ v3 G% o1 s
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
( |* d O l. B+ ~4 Jcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of& }: o: q: k3 ^( m7 |' p4 n: Q3 p
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
% ~$ a& q$ X/ qreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
, K3 N2 l$ y+ o! rtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
" ~2 X& f; e$ |' i1 m. g1 sacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
+ b, l, }8 B* S9 g. R ?- s* V, yavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current0 G' Q0 @1 o; @6 K3 O3 O5 \9 j
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable, |0 G1 w6 x* i6 R
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on5 }- o4 @: u) f
November 15, 2006.1 r' D! i- |( }3 Y$ W, _
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of% S- _$ t! l6 C+ Z0 `
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
; `' u, W- F' H7 _. g3 P9 z& H2 vprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is( p+ G' w( x. q, K. F2 g! N
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|