 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
4 S1 }$ e" a% k0 { E2 j, {0 K, l7 n0 g6 @0 n
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -5 k" S+ G' J5 F! M9 Z U- o& r
0 }0 F" n1 E, L' L# [" u3 Q
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
7 A3 h. b8 }5 c6 j7 eexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
% d9 o t+ {/ R1 m( E$ z& B: t; \7 dquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic4 B+ |6 k7 d; h7 i) u, Q' N" d7 ^
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
; U( z% k/ J" T' k# M3 |/ pprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
* u @* I/ M3 R: P. z) emore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,7 E( o% c+ o# v
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal3 L) p6 I' P! D* s3 x
LePage Real Estate Services.
3 n7 n% W0 Q O8 b& N2 p- B% u& W/ K7 D0 k) q' q- i' c
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
- z1 K& G6 i+ g: Yare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
1 u) u5 S3 c7 `; U! n: H. Kconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
9 [ l% A" W4 x$ nsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the. i" v/ {8 |) u Z! }! B
residential real estate sector.
& ?( X$ l. L$ Q& g* t% J5 S( |9 g" j& d
9 h r L# O q$ a1 n7 w Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
( v6 T+ v/ A" d3 aoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)" b7 R8 }: }; |1 _4 ~% u' n
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
, ?1 R* X$ C- _4 L/ w& g: H% v(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
! g' Z; [$ Q/ g: t(+13.2%).3 N7 N$ p5 S5 u# z: D
a/ X J! r# J: q% ^" K "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth1 G7 o* r# I8 |* X7 I
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the+ k ?6 m8 i* X+ r
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
: K: }$ a+ E' o- A* J0 Cpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,* Q2 {9 ^- g- I" z4 l& s1 R4 V
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services./ E& A3 V7 k9 m4 x* V
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
2 X' U8 j8 j' K8 l1 F; P+ m! w' f3 kwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy. l0 w6 z. n" b4 U5 M$ H8 A' g
balanced market."- X, \" k" C( Q5 ?
4 t4 J1 U* h5 l. ?
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,$ E' Y- S: C( K& c
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift) B7 {5 P0 Q6 Z7 y* e
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued4 N6 e& I$ r& @$ a3 r9 `. ~3 u
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
* ?6 E0 A2 I- c7 G( }3 R8 oenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
& k0 k0 V8 _: h4 C* {5 xmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
9 u; _/ h. ]; v& D" Y9 m- `breaking price appreciations.
2 T, y, z8 |) L+ ?. G' O9 K$ C1 a
7 r0 A! h# S7 ~! D! c' D Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding; e( f4 n, k* S1 Y0 J9 ^3 F
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
7 F% z; p/ h* jlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed./ C* j4 n3 j* y. h( l3 M
% y7 @/ B: \+ G6 b
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
3 S! K7 c5 z) L; \2 C) z1 Ieconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer! E( E* w, Y) @0 p' x2 P+ Y+ E
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
4 l# o, ` E3 C6 xslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
, d0 E/ A% N- |6 T u4 kIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
* }1 Z6 c! M( lgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
A) g' }2 E5 P) _5 a' v: U yprice appreciation when compared with 2005.& p+ h3 y" B6 k0 X" ^6 X. }# ]
2 i9 \' z3 H5 W( T( W While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing( N& M0 J& s. `6 \
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and8 U% w/ b3 U; P6 V
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
8 c! A* P6 C: U% N6 H' |% Eare markedly different than those found in the United States.
/ k& c- D" K7 V
& v; t$ K) r" X Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
8 u N3 [% P7 v1 R7 }, v# oAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's7 x4 A8 A3 r/ |3 @, I3 a& c
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
3 h5 d; J6 z# P& a/ D1 rrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general$ L1 J4 m s1 T0 v% s1 k! n! h9 O+ j
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
* E0 d" s: @8 A" s. ndownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and+ x; D2 m" ]$ U4 H/ i
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
* f6 Z/ n) N G |' H8 \) Rmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."% p2 X( K5 q5 K8 V
0 Z8 t/ u4 r' ^# }* g0 z
<<
, S9 A; d$ p6 j0 [ REGIONAL SUMMARIES, l$ \1 _: H' Z4 h$ C! T9 s! s$ Q3 q
>>
# _8 J, _1 ]; R5 P R$ [4 }5 e7 k
& U0 l" x+ D8 G9 O0 T4 R Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in$ a& W9 W: \, q6 h, F
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate: d+ a! B/ q6 f$ ^) [$ ^0 V
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time9 m% v5 `8 s: e; ?1 H) j
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of, R% J$ {3 Z* @ R/ N2 t
renovations.* d' {6 u; E# k9 i" @
# z% [ _) k( b0 Q4 |8 g2 M0 O The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight" n0 ?7 \' e# R3 h& B# Z
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation* z8 ?+ p2 G9 G( p8 h7 V! N$ K
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
% S$ U/ w! M% u! QSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.9 g( V0 t% X8 ~% Q) l4 l( l) s1 q
h7 p$ v" Q( R: H: N( Z, l, {4 i
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
, l7 `* T6 j. m2 ]4 C: Fslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
9 J7 }5 C3 r+ v2 e7 cquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
& `% J5 r3 y% T" g600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores* p0 g1 V7 u9 m) @5 K% ~/ O
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes8 b! Q' L5 e# d7 k5 z: B5 ~! t
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
/ `# s& c3 Z* C# _3 E8 ?: R7 f& s+ Z2 H3 K
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced+ o7 P5 ?; k, d q
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
1 l2 k ~+ @8 ~homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers% u$ x$ q0 j5 X# t+ C/ x! T
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian3 S- Y, H& {6 B
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing, T' \5 }3 l, M/ H
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
8 y+ `1 D# }% F8 r# Z+ n
+ c: w4 m1 H6 o; H% ]" ]( d% q Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
8 j% ~6 { K& O0 }+ Camong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
& E Y: c3 |* p- E6 V5 A8 {' m# u1 W7 M7 Dpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
! N5 Q( |& x% p2 g* ias some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last8 d& t$ Q* O! [$ R1 [9 d9 G
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.# s3 C H z5 O" w& y
& q9 ~' V1 R5 F
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house; x0 l, |8 h3 |! F) e
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory2 b7 P" d7 U. e; a
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting% E! \, O5 P# U' b0 F+ B2 I- F. Z
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
( M7 P0 N, S6 Y& a1 Mwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
1 R" h3 E) p% d$ `pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
: W3 G/ ~( U: I" R* R) a: Cmaking a purchase.$ G, U2 D1 O" g4 N" N
: t* i5 A3 c& K) I/ e
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
8 u7 {# @$ M) b+ ?0 Dmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong7 A$ P! M9 V: e( Y
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city, ]3 y& f7 Z2 j4 M( k1 B
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
( z2 H5 u4 \# f8 E* ~: d+ X2 lattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown2 a5 S- ?4 t; u/ z( h
amenities.
" v2 T1 J& j9 {7 Y6 B/ @6 M9 a( g5 x0 f/ B+ t
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
# \/ u! h# N, f8 P) zthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
& C8 j# {' ~! U! Q' y% a6 L+ bacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
7 L! S' f9 P0 b1 ^9 Pcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
$ X. k! y5 P( U, {" i) `driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle. c5 z& p- `- I) C1 \2 r+ }& \
residence, rather than for investment.( ^) i) v5 k5 i2 Y0 l& Y9 u" n
7 m2 B. h- Z: t' c9 T. z The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as% N: u) Z- }" @4 S6 I/ C9 L
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted M& z, o& E$ K* T
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
' T+ n6 L, Z. M. |/ ?9 y2 O& Hconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
+ e& w/ P: {% N0 Y6 z! Xrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter* m8 f' K; x3 ]7 A) U- a' C
the market.2 J" c+ S4 I1 {
3 Y* ]6 o, j" q& L0 E& r$ J
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through M. j# e& k6 j* f- v
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In4 ]) }/ }0 b2 c& K
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring8 K) T% u9 P: D2 f" W
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
0 o0 ?% h/ ?- `$ U; l- r$ B* bto the shortage of available inventory., B$ L5 t1 i# s3 U# a2 q
2 i0 `6 |. |( r/ Z- S Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
0 v- N, e3 K7 V" Q* `9 Kmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
% W+ M& g4 }9 ~, Z2 Avibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
0 [8 j" {* e( Lstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
4 R" E6 S+ D" k4 W1 X; _5 Y7 t- R! Q* u# |; ~# t
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
; H; G9 r8 ?6 u; ~& T, d2 u& }in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
( ]) f8 Z$ C4 l" M& A8 hunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
: T/ E5 Y) f, f6 F. X$ n% Fpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
# Q8 \8 ~* X( U$ N* l4 x% bprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
. }0 l# s* [( C7 oseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as% {8 { A! [/ v P% b! x4 P3 P X
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
1 p' c0 H0 v2 b7 Z, E' e% t7 Z0 `2 J
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
) O2 q% t. z5 \1 k7 was activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton0 E }' B2 R2 V4 N
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
7 D% \2 h* X1 d: K+ F- s8 f$ emaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
8 q4 q/ g- S' G+ w- e# c7 J1 g* rincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve9 ]: |9 F3 `5 A; o0 m
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
& O9 u3 I8 ?8 stowards the end of 2006. ' [" D; R% J! M
f( `$ v' Y! Y4 p
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of- ~) t& ~4 c" d1 _
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable7 z7 l& i Q! R; n k3 Q0 z
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
5 ?4 a9 {+ u4 V4 l$ X/ sgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to$ w9 z4 J% G4 y4 X
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
. M2 W5 r- y8 C" T5 T2 t/ c" mpressure on tight inventory levels.
% A9 [# {- y i0 o3 H4 n' x7 K
" ]7 l s' p& Z. v- w/ E F: N Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
+ i) H2 p6 S! I# Efundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
" f- C2 \7 N" Pinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;+ x F9 |4 z* c6 _
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
& @2 {% C" a4 l% Y, r6 }for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.1 K2 M2 [7 k0 z
- t7 f0 l: P, U7 ^; ^+ ~8 R8 y. h <<
9 A* ~" C& e: z. D: R7 C: B0 V/ h% A" _ Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006- E4 e: `1 d, T% }9 I- A/ Y7 u$ C! z
+ W# w6 K! c" o _' }1 q! {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 h1 [. K* ^6 O9 {& s7 q1 e3 | Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
( F- y }# L4 a9 ~0 F% Z+ V# y& A -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) I/ T2 U& ]1 d' L/ Z 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3; y2 v3 q. @% z* T! _6 t
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
) W5 L6 O5 p5 {) ?$ W: \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------* e6 M' `* a4 H i8 r! N+ S
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0000 w2 d! ~& |' G/ w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, Z; Z! f* R" M Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0005 V. y* X, X, w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 J" k: z7 ^; h4 N5 C" Y Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
* G7 ~" E6 S1 R3 D/ C" W5 @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ d |: Q4 W+ D) G4 f
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -+ e* ~2 o' ^7 @9 D/ e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ [. g. G3 N" a3 d0 s St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3338 c5 u$ N3 ^. d C% Z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 _2 z0 g- E, |# J# F# X
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
; B, M- R, U, f0 |6 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) h# C" D. L. t- } c" T: B Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
! z2 F! \# W4 {8 z t3 @$ S ------------------------------------------------------------------------- S7 p4 a0 e4 i; x: j% L" _
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250' Q; c# l. [4 T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 P4 @+ i! S( b2 @9 N4 K. X
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
* Q5 d$ G3 W3 J1 k0 m6 C2 i -------------------------------------------------------------------------" M& `+ W0 g' |/ f( l
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
+ l& _8 E1 I( x3 Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: j- `2 P. B: g2 t Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5000 ~% U: B) h& o9 z; l3 j. q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Z7 T& R5 e( k9 g! B% e* L Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389+ f8 T" F8 O, Z6 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" ^% @+ w+ q7 r& Z/ j
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
& Q; z2 t4 a3 T9 P/ L -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 [# B0 |2 e" r( B* V3 f Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
. Q- g# e" W; h' I, G -------------------------------------------------------------------------" w6 Q+ q5 k+ m2 V d+ _# c& M6 |* K. e
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
9 y) T9 t2 g, ~. v2 z -------------------------------------------------------------------------, m$ M, G4 i3 {& K, f* e( R
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
2 E; ]8 z. G: Y1 v -------------------------------------------------------------------------- B7 S1 x& V5 a- f6 c
3 t" M4 a3 L- m* [2 o -------------------------------------------------------------
* {7 ~8 A2 j" \. c3 h) m" R Standard Condominium+ e R0 G" }% Q2 J
-------------------------------------------------------------1 f! P& C) |, W5 Z
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
8 B( v% l& N8 F; B/ N/ Z1 V Market % Change Average Average % Change) B5 _0 v, t, V1 p9 G+ W! _
-------------------------------------------------------------; h+ X1 I( `; M$ g- |
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
; {5 V3 \& \$ p; x# m9 W$ G -------------------------------------------------------------- z7 s: X8 s5 k; p0 ^9 a
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0% t% p5 A3 Z6 ?8 J5 L* F/ S
-------------------------------------------------------------, H! d7 I( h2 y( k- a# Z
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
2 j1 I5 v7 \2 d- B3 f1 @ -------------------------------------------------------------: V8 W0 R1 i0 t/ d
Saint John N/A - - N/A9 X2 g3 e, A1 R. p7 V
-------------------------------------------------------------
! p% m! A# p0 y$ D s St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
* t! b( a! Z N/ g( V -------------------------------------------------------------6 p4 ^% z4 p% S$ S
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%5 `5 x( }2 g+ p
-------------------------------------------------------------, ?0 V( A5 K- s* n- @1 U, d
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
- r. e, ?0 Q* W -------------------------------------------------------------% O7 `! O% U. G. z- o& d
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
2 H/ K: Z# u9 b( _' c2 a -------------------------------------------------------------1 d' k+ v( l' F
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%& K9 h$ M* U( S( N& c! z2 c9 i6 }
-------------------------------------------------------------4 h4 I4 s- L) h" |- S! N) I
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%1 y( }- N+ c1 Q( c; {, z; `: ?
-------------------------------------------------------------
@7 F6 J. a% m" L* ` Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
4 s! C. u$ @% i2 z4 p- ]/ T8 R7 D -------------------------------------------------------------3 r6 a4 b, i6 V$ ~
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
3 {3 ]- N/ b8 B' o: m5 [7 L1 b -------------------------------------------------------------
0 i' U: x1 v$ v# T' i2 L Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
. u% ?- {8 i! v: {" n8 b3 H -------------------------------------------------------------% c9 ^) a- T ]
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%3 X/ z, u; {7 Z& _# K1 Q& ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 i) r' F" p" w8 Z# V f Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
. y$ V4 @- p# N m2 D3 B -------------------------------------------------------------
' d3 b+ l4 P0 V: F2 V National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
3 ]& t: ]! u% N8 B -------------------------------------------------------------5 A) i; F' c0 k! \
>>7 \0 R% G5 A! V. J! X+ c
# |. e n- r1 l' b0 _ Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
5 G! }' ~( ~9 Z5 S2 C, u7 cin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint3 e3 v0 C& W) ~2 W* y
John and Victoria.% u! _: f* W) v& A2 ^. }
5 n V0 I8 C$ D5 e The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
3 u, M& ]8 v( Z( ucomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of9 O9 b4 k5 d% L) a# h5 A
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release. r p/ I# a# h- |: a7 D6 [' E
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price7 c+ d% Q5 w+ a/ Y( @: M; [
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
1 m6 N5 S9 J5 ` i$ O- U, Aacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
. n2 G1 _5 g: ]7 D; D$ o* h# Pavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
0 y/ l5 c# b! c. L) _# X) nfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
0 M& }) { l" Q" tversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on) Y- V2 i* i ` I% x$ x
November 15, 2006.
6 ~+ y1 s* [+ e, {! j4 C: E9 C Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
: ^, [' p- O) o x) [, {fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge# Y/ b& M# t5 t; B: K, t
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
. e, p$ C! T+ H3 [6 a- Bavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|