埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2014|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 8 \; H; S" Z- B8 S
  d4 N+ F. @) L
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
/ N6 |. K, M; o
$ k8 x9 `" b' H7 a    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
* C0 d+ W; m  ~9 D8 H. Fexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
6 K, y0 q0 q) a8 B2 }' X! ~quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic$ t! L) \. ^0 m) A  X  r
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
% A8 v+ ^/ U3 h) |9 \price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
  K' z: L" E- U$ f2 ymore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,6 P3 e; x- }8 q, f- p) f2 T
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
7 t: e) O% e2 e& r: xLePage Real Estate Services.6 h  v; `1 u/ y: a( ^3 s6 w6 t
5 f8 E4 f6 [( t, k$ w. Q9 @3 Z
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters0 F; W" N( x# R: w+ l. }
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
) @5 L8 ]% M$ Y; a2 ]9 \+ ?5 Cconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
# D  K9 W8 o+ ^, B+ G" Hsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the4 ~. y  q$ [: G
residential real estate sector.
( ]/ F& ~% k" ~# m' Q0 k) `
; _" ]: M+ |) j" j+ w    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
6 @. V) Q# N# t* P' coccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)4 y$ z. n% r8 t9 H/ O
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
2 Y9 P, `! W6 X(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
) q" O/ h) a( q: q1 }  d" Y(+13.2%)." X' p/ `' p* [' Z4 r
, `" Q$ J2 C: [, [3 N
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth5 k( f) Y' j1 H2 j+ {/ [5 j
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the/ h6 s+ [/ V# {1 |
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
6 |/ E: u2 C; G8 W* ypoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,$ j, \1 p8 l3 F
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
7 u+ G, s: j$ S"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
, ~* N8 H1 ^# K7 [! h' V# n# k9 wwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy) U! g  A9 Z7 E: i; X' l
balanced market."
! z; c3 g+ h! i5 [( s" Z6 X0 u& k! g2 y8 s; |& l
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,- f0 I7 k! X9 `8 R8 K, g. v9 |
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
, M( u- O! D$ T8 Qto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
' `: o. k( O) W- tthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
: _7 I) M8 d2 V# menergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,6 o2 i. _: Y5 b; k
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
" W4 X+ y- U' C4 s, B7 Z7 Mbreaking price appreciations.
. Z2 |- |( q# l- x! ~- l/ r% _
# ~! |5 A9 |( C4 J. p    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding; j4 E$ Q" b2 k: Q1 p$ B
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the4 Q1 \5 u! y" B5 V
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.' {$ q, [' `+ N) h' q3 A
/ l0 u0 J7 i0 @1 B9 N; C1 E) l  Y
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid' z4 p/ f4 A0 B$ r
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer  o* p0 d3 V% g; _0 P
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off8 m; Z% W6 _- M* H) Y: U' R
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
. K: `9 c! h& o2 W8 Y' p& g& \0 GIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
/ T8 ~# ^) I) N) s3 g! z: xgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
$ k  B1 O9 [# l& Xprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
% f/ p! N5 D3 e. @$ O0 W- A# a, k# ]2 X5 a6 H/ D; {
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
% T  x5 G9 D& O- Imarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and- B- X8 `& k: u! X4 o
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
/ w9 Q( N* K! |are markedly different than those found in the United States.0 C7 n+ \/ m' Y. `% g( N  ^* K
& v( y7 W6 l* O5 w
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the( {9 t6 x  M) T9 c
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's) f& t6 O1 z. l. Y0 u
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
7 D( G! ~, ?/ grelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general: e7 V- ]0 T  B8 P, q" `! W6 u
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
: r+ H2 p8 r. idownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and  B& W1 c7 g' U7 [# B/ i( N
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
9 w& s2 u! S3 Z  pmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
, k; Y3 p- }2 k4 a; [% }
/ Q+ ?+ D1 e! K. \: W$ e    <<
0 F! {* c4 l; `' d/ M6 l  I0 n                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
6 d3 F5 u& N% y6 t3 `/ d) G$ B    >>
% m1 c9 ?9 n7 d( @" ?2 K* @' S( i4 d
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in, r) G6 o4 N  H. C3 q/ q
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate) a$ p: ^' W7 t& K
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time4 Q" k- L5 W( U9 n
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
0 s2 P. v" H& e! n; l$ ~& _' E$ xrenovations.
- P7 p$ y" [  _. |+ r, ?
2 B: F6 }2 G  i0 J5 o9 F$ W    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight3 |+ M: A/ r' G% y4 ]0 _
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation8 K1 p3 Q" t. Z2 {3 }
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
$ L1 {" Y/ a/ j+ {4 ^September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.' H7 R+ O: H5 ?* J, B
8 O$ e& c# x8 o' F
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
: X6 Z5 P. E& p9 wslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the# ?3 j9 j2 z5 l
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
! B" X# n2 {) J" c0 A: f600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores' Z, E- J4 ^% r( e& j
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
; ~7 s9 @1 H/ Band are instead opting for more affordable housing options." J8 }! H( w2 ^: p$ H# d
5 z: c3 C5 m5 F: ^: `% m
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
7 q& x$ z5 H. f, R7 S8 `5 Q5 f* b8 B. uconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their3 J8 R# y% p% N1 U% O# ^
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers# J9 D( Z) L0 {- O' X$ S; ~/ `; E
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
- W- A' U  k5 B3 ]; D+ w0 ~* Kdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing' t( u0 q9 R) E" ?6 O$ Z' W
buyers with more options when looking for a home.. }0 F' n9 B# F7 k. D
. L! A& s' f8 g: C
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly. r5 g: x) i% N2 N& u
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes" O( E$ t3 s( K9 s
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
7 @# x  q/ P/ ~) mas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last/ Q2 X: z: T, e. g3 @% v
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.0 G+ ~4 F% g/ V5 ]* I( \! e
0 d5 U, R* r/ g' s3 {; O
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
/ d+ d9 s' C; m0 I( b& o, O2 y1 k, f% _prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
0 R8 i& j4 _6 u1 [5 C% [levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
0 ^6 i3 Q% J- Y/ X( y& o, @first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,# i4 o! J  r  S
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the' C: _, s& f! f! `7 {0 E4 Y
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
" c9 I5 }& J3 n5 ]making a purchase.9 ?4 v5 k4 X7 x) O4 c

# ~# n$ O! K6 ]$ Z3 Q0 D3 i    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing$ s  X( W0 ~4 a- m7 c1 k  g
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong. d, k  B0 `' x( l# W+ c# u5 {" `
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
5 U( V5 ~; f3 m4 z6 \! gcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting1 z  V' m0 V) f7 C( b1 K$ s3 n
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
. S! e0 B2 e2 B1 ~% Vamenities.! ]9 u' D* z# z- i

8 D3 I3 }4 z: f" q    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
- q2 i* I& a/ h( T- m! M) Fthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand7 m0 K0 s8 {+ Q/ n/ p' D
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has5 ?6 @1 T- W1 H6 P$ [- K  E
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been' F* F8 r4 W3 }+ a8 Y  |
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle$ i9 b8 y& Q7 ]8 ^* j0 J
residence, rather than for investment.
$ ~/ Y7 v$ U+ a! {- v
9 E4 _, f3 p& a" r/ [7 z    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as! E  M* J; B0 ?; k
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted- `; h. T: ^0 ?  a* k
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer6 y( s: t( X/ J$ Q
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
* _. a9 B1 k( Hrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter& Z; s/ O; r3 l1 V" Y' h0 q
the market.
9 g6 E8 q+ t, p# S( t- V
' H8 v. p) W+ T% i" k. s; L2 _8 h    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through! M! C. o5 \+ E* V$ X' ?
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
8 I5 b# S, ^/ \4 @August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
5 l1 P# J7 K$ p8 F9 `months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due5 R6 B2 k: H7 G6 c% d
to the shortage of available inventory.
' J3 [* O4 h6 i- E& J% G* `2 S" w- r9 y3 b4 T% X; y8 {% s/ X, U. }
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its& g% [) q  V% [, m( w
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains! y% w+ R' k/ ^0 z0 F$ P
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
; T0 z  s, u' y, A) p1 F& m3 z, kstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.; \- a- a7 F/ P) }

/ W- @" [$ q: c8 c% u/ P    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
7 V2 |; y% N# @: [/ o$ W' w9 xin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
1 q, U: ]% i2 K/ M4 [unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that3 ~* Q: D  D  y$ k4 R, ~
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring6 Q' p7 e+ u6 O; ]
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
. a' k' C4 N5 \  T( Q# Jseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as& d- e( D9 r+ c2 K; W) z0 d1 e
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

5 I3 e4 Q& L% E4 ~5 h( b: P- [  W/ g2 A; r( |; \1 B) T
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter" Q+ }/ E8 z- i3 y  t
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
/ r8 ^  O6 _6 M1 u* w) ^; X1 Jremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
) A9 }1 p/ Q7 w  V  ?maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices2 c2 q* H, ]3 t" k; J( \7 o. Q# I" O
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
/ Z5 w, O" c5 }; C4 K2 f& nin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
5 I7 T' J7 n0 atowards the end of 2006.
    ( v8 X3 ]5 T% u1 M  E( |7 J9 D
" v9 B# M, B7 Z
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
6 R  \9 K9 |& L" S0 z" p6 g- Kinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable8 O& B3 k) B# e' M3 J# {
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
7 p* Z% z( r. J; ?4 Agroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
; y2 f! G6 V9 C' d2 Gforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
: U; P8 y! }( q+ X; j, ?6 Bpressure on tight inventory levels.1 s0 |0 ?. h4 o9 @. p. l9 d
6 D2 `5 m' M" ^' ~- v7 i0 Q% `
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
- o5 @7 @  H3 @fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people* f7 v" Y8 Q  A+ U$ I# h3 H
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
4 |: u* d- R% E- \) m, F. N0 zwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
* N1 i0 o1 _) L! f3 T; ufor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.2 e2 }) f& E. f
& n  c" m. o7 F9 V/ I
    <<
2 w% s  o$ Z5 a- i6 d7 \0 \      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006: Q9 ^: F. M; \  Z  W, \; _+ t

1 a1 Y. D5 j0 |' |    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, L, m4 k& _9 E4 k" ^                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
+ j( a% X8 D1 X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" o" d2 O( W" Y% F  u' J                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
! C6 ~3 v5 U8 ^0 e2 {    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average, g4 a0 Z0 p' X3 [2 @
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" W* G" p% \( D& A3 C( H; H    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0006 f8 L7 I! l! `7 [% t
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, q: j* _- S# n& r
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
; {3 u( Z6 s4 C! \$ Y* r4 O2 n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 Q6 J& a. z5 l, W4 k
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0007 A- O& n  T! [& S. F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  ~- B( S3 w$ |$ A5 [! ^6 [( k# E
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -7 t5 n& [4 e; N8 Q% O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( f1 P7 [) i  x& ^5 y    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333. L3 R# s: J, g: m7 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! A( l5 p/ W$ s( C# E- w. n/ c
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5836 V$ K0 ~! g5 R; A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. Y' r+ {4 H+ ~2 v' G" {
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
1 R' K/ Y0 _' l# ?7 ~3 u$ R& ~0 A    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ~1 \& I' J  W4 W& U" ^2 ~
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2507 e4 T  h( p- F, h5 `0 @+ a- ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 z4 y. J* W. c, C; i. H" F/ [9 A/ x8 ]
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766: h; z5 {0 h5 ^, w9 W/ N( [
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 ^0 g7 S) _* n( r, B+ _/ Y
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
! {( b! [8 N* E, k4 k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 H1 N2 c+ x1 r# Y0 [    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500+ E/ a+ z1 J6 \3 w0 @+ ^( ^$ c
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( G) x( {: ]7 y. B* h
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
  ?) s1 q9 x4 a    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! L8 G* {: G+ g, B, {, k    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
9 V" R5 }! G. x$ F4 Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, \' I# x9 i' w& S
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
1 D9 l: c1 P! d2 o: f, l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, r' j8 x' s. U: n9 [    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000, z  ]6 n: E, m! U) E, `: c+ G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 d0 v+ {+ t+ u2 E! C6 t    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
6 W0 B0 p+ U$ n4 ~, m    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 M7 d# x& U& x0 Q" j. C

" t; d6 t2 w, @' Z+ T+ N0 Q" r    -------------------------------------------------------------0 m5 P) p  e0 D. L# I" p" t
                               Standard Condominium
! G' ~9 `6 y- ^& b# f5 ~' A0 V    -------------------------------------------------------------6 V( P3 d# f: U
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
& r6 q* m$ s2 z    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change/ Z: b4 i  v; j8 a; S
    -------------------------------------------------------------) p# Y5 F( z- r3 ~
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
! {" C0 w' v$ B4 P    -------------------------------------------------------------
) D( O" t7 B& r7 N0 Q    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
( _- k. M' Q1 Y2 u. T5 _% r  i, `    -------------------------------------------------------------
  _* ~% Y5 ^* V. v( d- n    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
3 L8 s  f: ^6 x2 a6 a4 s; z    -------------------------------------------------------------% w  l# J& w) j4 o4 F; s# t2 F
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A: H/ U# g* @" K+ u: K
    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 R4 @- |/ c; E2 H( ]0 z5 y    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
3 ]4 A$ B. ?  W; p+ |5 F% v$ o4 q    -------------------------------------------------------------
) H$ h2 M- k/ V  T( ^    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%' O$ d8 l# l: v. h) t9 @1 r3 s
    -------------------------------------------------------------  `( A; C- c3 P# @9 s( x
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
" f3 y1 s. g" e& B- @+ J    -------------------------------------------------------------
( q2 W# D4 A' a! B4 z% s    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%  r  t& Z  r! s7 x8 d  ?( E/ Q( }/ M
    -------------------------------------------------------------# e7 r4 r/ U3 w) X1 q% k
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
# }2 g/ k+ L+ m/ J) {    -------------------------------------------------------------  G  C0 T- ^  `2 J6 W1 C( U
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%# z; ~: z! R8 k1 L( d) W3 ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------
* J" f0 n- q4 V- r    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
9 N6 g- U: `/ ~# v( ]    -------------------------------------------------------------1 s8 w6 I* J2 p
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
+ r' z: Y2 Z0 a5 f- y+ `    -------------------------------------------------------------
& N; t. T6 O* X) R1 w    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
( c" K# P# K( E* e$ u    -------------------------------------------------------------
) Q# ~- d! X1 D4 k$ a. Y    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
8 V( h' ?- q. E    -------------------------------------------------------------6 N# t1 j; |' l, o2 U
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
: W4 \0 s5 `) ^0 j' o    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ C1 {1 Y, B7 q    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%) D' U0 X- Q/ M" D
    -------------------------------------------------------------& z4 p: T8 I/ r0 z& }
    >>& K' v& [5 N% }3 F/ n

$ z! Y6 G3 E" q2 Y2 r    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
; A. Z# Q1 D6 K6 T9 E+ F" gin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint3 p$ X2 s7 D8 b: A4 O0 _
John and Victoria.+ z, U1 x, _8 c" [
4 n8 k5 _  X3 y$ b! s6 T% p
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
8 T# b: j) r" x" Bcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
0 W' `* Q% W2 i7 ^3 r$ vhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
  B. x# A# J. O+ Nreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price$ G1 l$ z& G+ D( v. u" R$ d9 i: H- |
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities0 D) h1 W; }' m0 b
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
) }& H5 U, s# t3 F5 l1 F9 lavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current0 G3 b% Z" _' u2 [3 I+ u4 A1 G
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
# z0 y9 n1 i8 \2 ?" w& \) Iversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
8 P  ~" o# i' G. tNovember 15, 2006.3 P) ]  W: g; {* |+ S) R: O2 a
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of- b* o9 A5 [4 Y8 u
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
) E9 W  a0 ^' M5 j" N1 _provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
; \9 y/ c8 h* W& _8 Z! v0 C) Eavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-12 18:35 , Processed in 0.153699 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表