埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2084|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
* S, H3 E. a6 @! s3 B7 ^7 U  |& L& \. y, R' n
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
& j( f' N3 s! V+ B; K+ V
% S+ I5 K) y& {3 M    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
; [5 Z) U. b; eexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third3 }: `* V% J$ `8 R$ n& S7 q
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic4 c" R% l' {1 ~$ M& y
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit$ Y3 u& ?' y# e) Z7 E
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and8 G- s3 C" `& `6 ?, C/ ^4 Q
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,( u9 j" }+ u) }: p: B) q6 d" y
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal+ Q9 l4 {" R9 V# f6 g& E' `
LePage Real Estate Services.$ S+ t- G) i& j4 O6 b9 ^
' k1 f0 d. c/ d
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
( Y' {9 x3 T( j3 X+ I) oare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
* }; C# [  ~) j" A3 V# G; h# E3 |conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
3 q/ Z$ }; {- ~5 A; bsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
' z# F4 e, H: j. o) |6 Rresidential real estate sector.
: {0 u+ E  u- X! h5 m8 B- s% X/ Z; G# f7 }- l* W* o1 z, b* N
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
1 V4 }2 s) ?5 F% M4 N. Qoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
7 c% Y8 n8 ^  t. t% @year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562" x0 X; |: T2 `9 l! P
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3802 n, F# k; L0 Q. G5 k1 v
(+13.2%).
: L& l$ r/ O0 |; [5 G* a1 W( l) n: B0 C' l" D2 ?- g6 |
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth$ Q( e: X+ R- f8 p$ h
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
, G5 H$ ~+ j$ i' Z* O3 H4 Y, W$ |1 v8 `frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are+ A  p8 S& h/ g- v5 Z# X
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper," }4 }1 J; u1 W+ U# b: X/ D. P" Z6 `) m
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.3 O: j3 n0 Y" \, z! r4 {& m* B% X
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
5 `- m, P' |8 P$ j3 Q! v' Z# t% lwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy2 p! ^3 _) Q9 t* W$ V2 v; p
balanced market."" B3 L  Y3 l8 ?6 X: h

3 V6 S! H9 u0 c8 v+ T( ?    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
( {- ~, y% j; d: s$ z8 Fconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
& Z# ^* B. }3 s3 s+ `% k7 M; o3 Ato balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued% r: l; Y) D7 u1 C( Z
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core5 n! T2 L3 p9 r+ ^9 S/ `0 b/ {! l5 Z
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
4 M2 h+ _' f9 p6 ]: Y$ `: Mmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
$ a* i' u8 ~6 h3 ~% H0 V6 Nbreaking price appreciations.2 ~7 S- @- [2 }" D+ }: Q
3 p9 K/ {; p- F. M! G
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
; E9 t$ R1 l0 I* Aeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
; ~' I  X' ?+ U2 h( llargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
8 V) I+ k6 ~3 l  l0 x' Z/ p9 A% E; O; ^8 R5 g
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid$ ^0 p. t/ ?8 A' i
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
" k  e' j# I7 s* H+ x% o9 ^confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
( [# f  x8 ]1 f/ u) `slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
/ i5 N  N* \7 O# F1 FIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers: m4 ^0 ]% D0 X! f! G
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of! k: v! `# H5 k- [, f: f! x
price appreciation when compared with 2005.- B) r' [: B2 d% k( T

0 J/ k; E" x4 ?7 [" E' b6 v5 Y: o( x    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing3 a+ g: ^: m8 i5 G' p5 j6 T2 w/ K
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
: n: k, o. e$ [4 X& {7 S# w1 Nfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
7 E7 K# f+ m' v0 z$ `# Lare markedly different than those found in the United States.5 }- r7 y+ w7 x# q
" d7 v2 ]! z3 d* R. @! _1 c+ [' c& _
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the3 ^" u. l- l; m, h$ h9 S
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's2 i4 L: b/ V) ]) `2 i. Y' R
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the5 ^; L: e9 P' c9 ~7 W: ?
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
: W! ?$ C7 @4 A0 caffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the+ w4 W2 R1 T& a* m4 x! g
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and. h: [9 h/ w  R0 H
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
7 u) F* D% |9 o0 E  `mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."# _/ ]& V" f, p- k: o

! d1 w  M2 c/ e' t5 k% r    <<# i1 Y+ g4 \/ _) a( b
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES* w8 N3 B7 O" H9 I5 @4 h
    >>
: d$ B8 u$ M# v) }7 V$ J  ~, V" d) i0 ?- _
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in0 r* Q/ I" x5 ~8 p" `+ t
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate: D: z6 x: ^& T# ?1 u
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
: a0 O/ {) E* r& llooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of% O; C/ m0 L2 Q* J) ?5 r& }/ J% g, ?$ O
renovations.3 S/ q6 K4 M, \. Q, Q& V3 o$ p$ C2 @
. e' \/ @/ _8 g& o
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
! ?% \2 |6 H- u; Oincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation0 M/ I. W% _: N" c& V; l+ Y3 p3 @
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and- t& @2 E) V2 b4 Z
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter., o9 u3 c0 ]8 X: f/ U5 Q

; E% }# z( {0 p  n# v6 c$ `    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer& A1 D" B' w2 A, d- P8 l' [3 R" p
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the/ _; J/ u2 q1 h6 K0 }0 b
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new; N" T. I- L" `) Q( O. \7 V3 Y
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores$ }( k8 |7 D8 W  q6 t% G
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
0 m, `; K: r( k% x0 C. eand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.% P) G3 R5 n6 d. _/ y& C; E
' a4 |! p6 w$ M
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced' [/ N) H0 a- b
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
! [( r; |: ]7 `/ h6 W1 o, Mhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
' C2 N9 \. {; y2 E( s+ P# _3 W/ G/ Qwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian+ ]2 O3 `$ R' Y! D6 f8 t7 {. V% D! _
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing3 d' v; ~& ?2 s! ~
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
1 M3 t! @' @- X* ~
0 V2 X" G9 t# g9 h6 A9 l* k    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly& @! s8 T# Z, R$ z7 `; ^
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
# P2 S9 k# G# H/ h6 h9 {$ w  S+ R9 fpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
9 D% E+ P2 z3 I! |% o9 bas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last& V! Y' _6 ^7 ~$ F6 m
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.0 R# i7 y; A4 ?  Q7 W2 c7 r
* g: S9 P& f, i5 [; P5 _5 ?
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
: h+ L3 r6 `% E( Q' y; t9 b4 iprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory% A" I. p! U/ s6 R; H2 ?# g% n
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
% c4 p" Q8 _- kfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,  v2 A! G, J$ k; [, N  o* X
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
$ y, B& v9 M% `* g0 b( N/ Fpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
7 C  F- D4 u" a$ G/ omaking a purchase.
8 E7 x" K/ Y. g( z! d( F( u  c5 t9 T3 Y+ b7 e$ M0 \5 f
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing+ {2 E; X( P5 l" A
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong. u4 `5 o$ I' |
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
  M, e/ n' A0 a. g0 }centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
8 g; r& e* d- m/ ~attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
0 D8 c; s6 _4 U$ K! {amenities.
6 J) L, q0 |& h  w) w: p- `, v1 \& n: ~
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels/ X  N3 z# }# d, `$ a
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand$ ?1 l+ h1 O8 m4 c
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has6 e, L% Q( W1 G
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been7 `; W7 o; d" f
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle. ]- k2 m3 l  ?, r% Z
residence, rather than for investment.4 F: [% e- Q0 E; A# }' z- D
& G2 Q  d. i# d! e9 Q. v! j
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as" v( M8 t0 H9 l
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted, I) v8 @7 T9 P) y8 L3 K4 o
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
/ ~6 R8 R; }& @6 vconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization8 X+ K+ b7 D5 j+ J9 t7 C
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter9 G: E& E9 }, F( ]2 n) n
the market.
( Z) E, D4 q( }
6 b4 e3 l4 G/ J6 Y" d* s    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
" ?, M4 K/ h# K+ a# ?& ]July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
2 X" P; ]! j; X; T0 X  UAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring5 d0 r: ^+ ?' I3 q9 N8 S
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
  u) p. o+ p* d4 sto the shortage of available inventory.
( {  l) h5 U2 M9 k  @/ \8 l# _: x" Q! R# B
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its" r, W* `1 Z9 E
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
5 m1 c; k# b7 ?& H4 Lvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
% Y- W* x* |0 q' Ustruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.( Q$ ]! y+ n3 b: S
& j+ Q/ E9 o4 S7 A
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases5 t, w0 |2 [1 t' {3 k& B% Z
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
6 _8 s9 C" m# R, f1 [. `unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that' A9 g  y5 n5 m: K/ H9 W" X6 n
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
  t: k- ?. L% ^( x4 Q+ Nprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer7 F3 Q: q9 z: S
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
7 j* C% I0 Z% u& wbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
/ L1 C: V; B9 s  C. C$ s

/ A( Y8 T) _- x8 i5 I- c) G7 y    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
* ~1 W3 _" r9 y/ R  e2 Las activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
& w  s( V% c5 Z$ ^( _" C) P* wremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,# F6 w+ C2 Q  q
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
  v  C/ W2 [: q$ sincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve% I4 `1 U" r5 V4 _# A* D! L
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
) l- m2 T/ b, O4 K5 f4 U1 R) ?! Htowards the end of 2006.
   
' }$ q$ \- k6 W
1 h# G% J7 U& b9 R+ P; G8 LWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
( I/ T8 Y( ~- Q. c: y$ O  Dinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
$ Z1 F; Y3 I# a' Fto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
5 ?: U( o# d  k0 |9 i' Bgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to% O" j# ]% M  X. K( @- U5 ]
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added* [" m+ A* i9 C# H3 p) k6 q9 v
pressure on tight inventory levels.+ V& i- i6 b% ?3 r/ R/ }
: {% P# @6 U1 Y5 N
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic6 u) E; |. {2 `: w" H* R
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
/ K  {2 h* H8 Z+ Yinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;5 r/ y  A( I5 Y2 R$ {
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching* F6 b% Y/ m3 T0 }/ [" Z
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
8 `5 h3 `& O* ~; c3 t  ~2 [5 L
5 j6 t, t$ _+ L8 P8 I5 _    <<
4 l1 ~/ B: `' b. ^/ f      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
- W/ y& W' ^1 H& V: D6 o% r$ A: g2 c1 X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* \% i0 G) F6 A0 T
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey7 V; Z' t. _, ~5 ?/ d& Q2 i: l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 V2 c" \- A7 R7 t; U
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q30 `- w; e2 t0 b) ?
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average* i; `3 D* L9 D1 u1 \  T1 I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ U( g) k+ _- |! w, o0 |( w* W
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0005 \' S+ h; k$ w, ^. i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 k# {: g+ ]9 D7 s0 V0 ?& }. o7 p
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000; C8 |& Z8 V! {# {8 D. k
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ m: ~2 i' s# G% |# t) Y. u
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
4 i0 N. O# F2 [4 T: ~/ Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: b0 W* L0 {! z* W
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -! U# O3 s) r! r: d( O! N2 O& q$ k
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% @! L& I; w7 y# h4 b7 G    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3336 m9 ]; J0 p4 ~0 @$ y9 X2 u) U
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 L" Q8 h% ~. R' M2 y* A    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583. U# o: F1 Y& Z9 i: ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ U2 T, X$ t  z) @' C5 y    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1856 L# m1 [! R! F) a
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( r! I3 @" I* L4 x7 M
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
# W9 f* g' m2 X2 c& N' L& y- v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 `4 s2 i( ^% I8 F2 ]    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766& P" E7 T6 Z3 R* u3 ]( f7 T; ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ S& y7 T0 y( F: ~
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
& d$ _7 g, f9 K! e& X& D1 ?% S    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ L) P9 A; X  F    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500/ f  P# o# A; M7 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 o6 S; W; e/ ]: r: E1 q: P: q1 V    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
# n, X5 W+ P  m8 [& @    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 }( v8 u8 U" L3 n3 T/ i* K* L    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
. }) _) _; n  m4 H: ?0 v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 y" b3 W2 I' Y8 C  n- ?8 Q
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500  i" q. J7 B. {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% E! Q7 j2 M8 n# l$ X4 y6 d( l& _    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000$ k8 K6 }( G( W# I* w4 p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% B1 {8 D# p$ h* z5 D    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
! L6 |0 Q5 H5 n* u* n. f: S) `    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* l; v( q) _+ f% U9 p, O" R' j7 _, w( t' L& u
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 k5 p' @! I  g( d
                               Standard Condominium
" G# I* r6 b0 n0 a    -------------------------------------------------------------% O& O, E5 @3 W. _" @
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo2 O1 H9 Q1 a) V7 i" |8 |" s
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
. X6 r( w5 [& `    -------------------------------------------------------------' H3 N$ Z. |- h8 i) ]4 ]1 |
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
" U: K. F( T' n( q' \    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ {  R) s; B) w* w1 [7 N9 g: w: V    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
* n$ N4 K+ |$ P5 B7 w0 c) D9 k2 v    -------------------------------------------------------------
& f+ W# p) @, h8 v8 c: W" @    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A8 ?  j# C( Y+ Z% U; r9 V( k
    -------------------------------------------------------------
- c2 z! a9 F9 W1 C2 U0 I! w    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A, g  r* x: v7 b8 p
    -------------------------------------------------------------) x+ N3 ]; s/ H  R  N
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%' y7 Y; J- A6 V0 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& r; Z4 k1 J, u$ ]9 ?    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%* T+ e; j$ e0 }( B4 |
    -------------------------------------------------------------
. m0 c" S% i9 w% T' E' L* t    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
% D8 G3 U; O# B/ X    -------------------------------------------------------------
- v8 D0 P0 \# S0 |9 W. n    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%* r  I9 W5 c  Q5 Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ Q. u, j  q7 u8 [* O! ^' K
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%2 p4 a- ^/ Y4 q) H6 u9 I* J
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: Q/ E, l" g) _  e6 `& h! b- O    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%9 t* A' w( g- P* P
    -------------------------------------------------------------# \$ j  A/ l. W1 y0 u9 m
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%( p, B. X* Y! w% t, d" o# D
    -------------------------------------------------------------# D* B1 q' ~9 }/ v
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%& Z' D3 Z' K5 Y2 N5 e# T
    -------------------------------------------------------------, J+ ~7 z) I) L8 E6 H
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%, H5 v, w% T: ^. u& n4 _7 P
    -------------------------------------------------------------. s/ x% Y6 Q% z9 K) x# ^
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
' |, V, I* _5 S/ a0 N    -------------------------------------------------------------
( ^% ?+ k2 @+ _- I, ?    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%3 |+ A( ^6 r+ A8 J/ g3 g( a
    -------------------------------------------------------------  G' y/ U! d3 ?' p9 d. \
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%6 {1 [: p$ I" g  u  M2 P/ m2 A$ d
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# E) t( ?( g$ o* R. ]3 ~; ]    >>- x: d# b! f/ J9 c' M% D0 d0 n
) R; D3 g, t: m
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
1 w+ f1 f. \+ l7 H7 |in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
" ]- c: b7 t  Y: g8 `John and Victoria.
: I5 ?; G. z4 f7 o5 o# _
* c  v! ~" U: B6 I7 h0 f    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most' k. D" l' \8 a8 {/ y: K3 Q
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
4 m; z. c8 s) A8 M# chousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release; e6 C) a1 d) X- H* x
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
# [/ M1 j& q' I- _3 `0 p& vtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities& F& g+ U/ k% n) o+ o
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is# J# Y. o$ @6 n3 ?6 j
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current) w$ {9 n! F5 s0 C
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable0 y& q! A3 m: f, E) U- a
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on* G9 _# ^# c3 I) B9 W
November 15, 2006.
& l% K# j* h2 |0 Z4 o% S4 \    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of" |3 n* n$ i. S) W
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge8 X; P. m1 a" X) g( D, Q1 R
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
& I1 l0 `- F" m; z% Z# davailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-18 17:16 , Processed in 0.138861 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表