埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2068|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 2 i) {( q: m0 w# _

- q4 G) Y* A1 ~4 @/ Q9 K& O2 I- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
* _: q2 k1 E0 a! x# u/ }  T8 t' ~" x% x* y
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market' C; }. Q4 k0 v- n- n
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
- g' w4 E! x) `  v* ^quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic# C( @; L7 W0 b9 C2 w) E
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit2 [' h  v' z2 H& F1 k
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and6 t7 X: R1 S! S
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,& ]& R$ D  i3 w' o$ Q7 e3 B$ |
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal. A& R1 g2 s" Y; Y8 g' [; U9 [
LePage Real Estate Services." y6 o" f, l  w
9 F5 P7 z  i3 p7 B% |* Z7 q
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
. z, T. I4 i9 Q/ mare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
4 r6 X' |! G/ s5 Iconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and! ^& U7 s# S0 _; j1 Q5 _; l) L, M
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
. b+ j* K& ]3 nresidential real estate sector.
" G. Q. H4 B1 q1 |
9 N) J7 f: i7 q; ^. O3 E) m    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation5 G% b, B9 B/ z8 p* U6 L
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
. M; j% W. H) v- n( M- E# S2 Uyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562) D/ Q+ g. R$ R; b2 U4 F# V! R# |, i/ c" r
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380& ^9 I' ?+ c7 @8 m% E! c6 ~. w2 h1 q6 O! N
(+13.2%).
8 Y8 a( E& I; q/ L7 M8 A. m
; P: m' J0 p  F) }' l2 i  o    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth2 J# O3 _+ K7 Z% x( Q3 N+ b
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the7 H$ X- @& A) x8 n
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
7 l3 A7 c) T. L) j9 Y" a/ l" Epoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
9 X6 g! n/ r0 l0 Qpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.. P! N% ~& ~, y, E
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
$ O6 [/ e9 p" L! B# E- r  fwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
  O# d" y- W8 m0 a( Rbalanced market."
7 y; S; s1 m7 b' E1 a. }( y9 b& a6 q  R7 r, `5 a1 i
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
  z- ~5 N+ \7 h8 g  O5 R5 [considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
& ^) J1 U9 W: e+ Uto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued; U5 ]2 v3 C  Z$ [( M& L
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
" {6 R  O- v2 V, ~energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
1 C7 ^- V8 Y  q$ Vmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record1 r; d1 c/ T: @; Z, N# v, ]) F
breaking price appreciations.& H* `% m. N: y

4 d  v  j9 P4 ]6 _( H    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding- g1 p$ v7 u% @8 V. p
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the" G. Q- B- C/ Y- n$ a" R. h5 k
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.: W) I2 C# P4 O- k4 F6 z  k& m

( h) k$ T1 P6 J7 ^    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
1 ^+ A# I3 g6 n. _( P* ]/ T. Xeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer4 |; O% U6 l" _. \" P
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
7 O' c0 C4 U* ^7 X7 z# xslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.4 K% E3 |7 ?, T$ E( ?
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
6 U4 z/ @6 Y) m' k2 e0 Tgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
) p+ U, Y. ]5 C: y% @0 Rprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
$ z6 U3 F) v  Z6 {. p5 `8 T! f7 ]0 n% t. d7 ~
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
- x  [  U# N8 x+ {4 Z; Umarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
# n7 }  z% O6 `financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada0 |, v/ A) o0 ^2 H# J5 |
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
' f$ Q! ~) l* g5 O  Q% x; q+ a& E
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the+ n9 E! D, Q/ S/ X7 B( o# c* V
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
" R. ^; b" q0 P+ N- e4 x& dfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
) q2 C5 i" i4 L$ t; P$ r- O" Hrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
. k3 R5 u* `8 _  Maffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
! s4 ~$ K; o, k5 O% i: a2 Kdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
8 ]9 r8 M" ?; H" c! m6 Eaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization( i/ x' Q6 x, L2 ?+ `/ t& Z
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
/ I$ y4 l  ]" L
2 z% l1 d- X1 Q* D+ @) N1 e    <<' d. P+ u# H9 `' a* a: A
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES6 o! l, {0 d; T' j/ A: r4 J
    >>
( B! d; P  b: T9 E) `2 E' I
+ B$ q% ~7 X3 Y0 t6 x    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in6 @4 C$ z9 \: p, O2 D& [
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
  A9 v5 G& z5 aof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
4 y# j  E& R: k! A/ Wlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
  ]2 @2 |  B- P6 zrenovations.
1 B$ f; `( _+ C& A. A; @1 i% J1 ~0 @+ v( C
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
+ G. v% G+ z4 Q; a4 Eincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation/ m: q& J- ^; r0 D) U2 X4 F* l7 a
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
/ @& [, ?& d" D1 ~3 k' }/ C1 qSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter./ e; e% Y# X9 K& }% P& H& r
; H2 ?) _- m' M  S6 z
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
5 m3 H4 C% o2 ]$ B8 mslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the* G3 Y& r; ~0 ?5 x% o* p
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
& N; E: m+ {, V( h: q600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
3 W5 V! ?: A1 Z, Xto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes) e. n( a. s9 m3 @% \9 |3 ~) d$ X
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.9 \$ @6 \0 @; V. W4 ~  m
7 [# i; K) E; j; |6 w) u
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
* O: b- r' e, E  \, n, p5 N. Yconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
) ~. Y5 ~! I- x; bhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers) n+ B+ c+ t/ {2 U
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
) K$ a5 ~" M$ Tdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
9 u0 Y" Y- {# z6 y: [buyers with more options when looking for a home.
5 u" |& j8 H0 J4 X' y
8 I$ C0 A4 P1 C    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
" G% P& u4 Q: W9 damong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes1 ^  T8 n, l  P
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,+ m- t8 `) j; c. k# V
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last! k- @# X7 }. i0 c; c
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.4 u* n& b% C% w; _7 |

  P# k- s3 M  f% d9 t    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
2 x1 _6 }/ j6 @6 N0 Q) k* e& M) uprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory) L# h& W& k# G8 T! V2 X8 x
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
  G) y" f% c- _first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
. [% W$ U# r  P$ T5 ]. uwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the1 K3 Z& W4 w7 q6 h' ?
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before$ Y: v4 H* P8 G( ?% O8 S% G  C7 i# ~
making a purchase.
8 E) Q; g0 w. n4 G  }1 E+ r+ q3 Y0 P- Q. Y
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
& M2 t/ F( k9 F$ E) v& a" lmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong- q$ ^/ m# {$ Z6 D4 @+ H' H
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
2 B( T) n7 U. M, @5 f' d% Rcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting1 b7 H& n  Y4 l  y4 r% z/ C
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown6 ^7 c4 ?1 T. g/ i
amenities.- m5 F. t6 N/ [: v; |+ X, ?7 l8 v

1 `- O4 t! N  E+ [* b2 B; h    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels6 B6 d1 s; A, Z  J9 A
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand  l$ p- e/ D5 u  _- S5 Y  J1 j
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
+ q5 ^* F, c' Rcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
+ |- o! b8 k; D- P) ^driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle; d. `  B# v3 _6 Q
residence, rather than for investment.
" u$ j* V2 L( i2 ^. V0 s8 B) {2 v. _
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as) j) r% j' p+ V$ Y+ t
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
8 Q7 G8 I+ z& M' ein a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
4 h5 h4 a" g8 Q! U  Econfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
* K) a# m& w- z% erate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
. P# Y. P' \) {1 G! ^; s( Mthe market.
9 ^, ]1 Q( h  Q$ @2 o+ r, C# r: o6 z7 @! u
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
: k! H. ]8 Z& w+ A- lJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
1 ?# S7 w9 b0 o+ B, k/ fAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring0 d; \, v  I+ N
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due( P6 L' H/ s) W* n& }8 j2 E$ O
to the shortage of available inventory.
3 q+ q1 _3 k& f
/ H* I8 c9 f8 G2 @" `' o    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
! T) _' f- u- z* w) @momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains# L% _  N5 A8 G) R* c5 y) X6 X. c2 J
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses( K8 T% y$ m" v8 j, \$ E
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.3 c- H% e3 E7 G0 N" s
& ~  m- r* c- M# ?
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
! g8 P3 L* l5 ^# ]& Win the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
% ^8 w) N: @( X. U& Munemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that; a' J, g/ M3 M# V; _, C
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
; p  k+ ?/ M: ^% R6 v, ?- rprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer' w6 G) v$ O8 [3 e5 i  w  n2 ^
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as6 ?3 h+ X1 M* f0 w% R9 U
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
4 F: R& q- f! c, y; ~
* D7 p. o) }/ o; Y! ?. ]3 h
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
) [# y$ k$ V0 P, Xas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
; F  m5 g7 }* B& u9 Cremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,( {: I5 n6 @" S6 d- p3 l5 Y
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
  h. w6 E. b6 F7 G- dincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
- @% F  X4 ]  y) b, C- M& U& \in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly2 g) C/ u" W2 |
towards the end of 2006.
   
& F2 z0 r2 ~4 i/ r' P: ~  W" h" |2 ~  ~
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of$ _5 T) I* S9 g  |! S
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
) C. D( R; w; Ato meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
0 L  t/ l4 O- b( u9 F# a3 z5 Fgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
: F+ O* ?1 C- ~foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added8 C$ e9 g/ Z( W" J5 c
pressure on tight inventory levels.
3 V# \, {9 X& p& A. s1 X& K5 f" k+ g4 G1 Q0 G* {& _
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
# m1 {8 o/ ?% O; r4 Ffundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
/ {" F& y" Q. o6 }2 s6 Xinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
* w" `" C- f: l/ V9 {; }while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
& a  Q5 ]4 X; |! L' ^3 ifor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.( _8 }. P. r  @

& h8 v1 U; F9 p8 t3 Z3 w$ W4 j* O7 i    <<2 R; g( v: l: P! L
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
, G% i' a9 z# ?
4 _/ F/ |) j4 d* G1 D/ Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& Q1 Z5 M+ s+ o* u0 e0 T5 ~' P
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
  j: y. E0 h/ H: j, V    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 t  {0 d7 d- u7 }
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3* m& s7 S! I, \. ?( K
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
# W1 H  ^4 f4 W) i+ f, i7 y( r" ?    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' |) o- m0 w0 t' z6 @. U8 y4 c# A
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
0 _$ u# z8 e3 e0 p+ c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# V+ s8 W" L7 s8 a9 b* s/ s) h
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
2 Y* ^- y, Y' ]5 G    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: h$ ^: G9 e9 b& M2 g% F  V
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000$ `' q% ]% H2 z$ O0 t3 ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 g$ `! Z. s1 d7 u* g
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -4 j# H; y# W5 F$ L! y. R& Z2 D% b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: h+ O2 Z. i( I3 E4 {8 v+ x- n    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
3 j& ^3 w% n- \: ?, W/ k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' q9 k3 ?' |' k. q% J
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
. ]# v+ ^( N8 r/ J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' ?; d, z  J! n, }2 P3 W4 p    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
2 w5 O, D7 @9 o8 t( M1 _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ L6 h7 D  N$ ]5 u  L/ U
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
! Y; m  b  s2 h8 O3 R, t% x" b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 V( u# D1 ^7 \7 \7 y( P$ w. P' i
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
4 Q0 z9 y6 J/ ^$ c: ?+ J! F7 b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 g# U$ H  D. g
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707" K& s+ }! b2 w0 d' ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! B1 {5 t1 t* p$ W9 N) ?- _8 [
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
. B" U9 E& d2 K( R* k6 ~% k$ V    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 l- c- R% f# O; h* s
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
* g. }( n2 K4 D' @6 {& Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  j' H+ v; @; N! l0 j0 w
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
% N4 G+ |6 Y) J. E) O* x4 v/ \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ |/ ^0 O& K% T4 c& N- ~    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
2 d; q7 l/ u. _2 S    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& |2 f9 T0 p3 T
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
; E$ F; P( V; c" U% P8 V    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 \) l, G  d& ~4 R5 o, G1 T% V* N
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8605 p- c- u) o: T9 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! {& s. O/ V% d( O2 L3 X+ @  E6 p! Y  \9 S' f& w0 b
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" W4 q1 }9 C/ z                               Standard Condominium
3 P' O) b( w5 ^% U* X. q7 G    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 Q6 Q' J; t' G( g  U$ T                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo) R2 A% p1 ]" l7 f% [" O
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
  R" I5 q9 I( O$ g8 N- n3 [3 s6 R! ]7 v    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 G9 l, Z& w; _" h# C    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
& z2 v) \  O. p; A    -------------------------------------------------------------7 L# E- \- B8 S" b1 V( X
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%+ J' l8 x/ w  k% e
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 v1 A/ Y2 q; w! P
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
' r5 k. _$ H( p2 N2 o    -------------------------------------------------------------/ s7 E2 b; P* c, D
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
  \$ I: b3 |2 K8 B    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 |6 P) ?6 k& w' v/ d    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%% {: J3 x: D! f4 }* A6 n0 g
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# C! d3 K4 A! J1 b6 \    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%; _  m& D: _! _' k2 N
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ P5 P4 p4 ?; z0 S    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
6 b9 O. o% t6 r    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 h9 z2 i; ^$ @" a4 F    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%0 l9 e2 a7 G  j4 N. _7 I: i
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 r' r" H1 ?+ r! Q    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%1 M+ R' P4 w7 E: j( c
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: h- f; L9 ^; t- x6 B# r# [    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
1 y# f( X) O' {7 ~; o    -------------------------------------------------------------$ o6 u5 s( o! p  [1 F1 W+ p0 w
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
* D  h: r- |% T; M$ F$ C    -------------------------------------------------------------0 K4 j( F: v5 \; C- C+ m3 V
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%6 w0 L6 J) p, e' Z( g. S3 I( R
    -------------------------------------------------------------& C" B" l$ N: Z" M, v
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%% C  y# F3 Y+ w6 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) `6 w  `6 C) k" Q) p    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%2 |* C4 q7 z4 a0 Q8 ^! a, [
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 ?$ a- x2 E1 q) X0 L+ H: v- l" b& M    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
- \8 w8 \- m: C" k* V$ N    -------------------------------------------------------------8 ?3 w/ N' t- g
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%' r: W: v5 C# y7 @6 e7 F9 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 g/ K. w7 W$ A1 x  P1 s1 V    >>
5 b; @; I+ @$ t* `; E: G/ k0 @2 Q3 |, K+ G+ q
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
" G$ {5 y% {/ }8 pin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint6 g  E6 r* e+ E* l$ U( @$ u  |
John and Victoria.  ?0 J+ K/ r# A( s& G3 [

9 Q  y4 k; h  x+ G* K% i3 s    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most! M( u$ n& d6 s8 H+ C8 Z
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
6 _- D! S2 _3 ]5 R6 a& T) `- x, Ehousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
, }# t6 a# w0 l5 _+ B: Z# z0 F/ Greferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
( G) M" p3 j/ O& f; E& n7 atrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities/ K. F, y! ]5 r/ X
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
- F* {8 t( @* }available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current0 e9 J, `. D+ F( ?3 _5 ~1 G4 b
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable* c. {  Z* |% k
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
9 g* B/ k" d# DNovember 15, 2006.
5 z" A, i3 F, b2 r$ }    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
# j+ |3 l0 A" E( ufair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge' G1 r0 m# `0 Q% d
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is- j# a0 T1 Z' b! a
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
大型搬家
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-1-12 01:50 , Processed in 0.084779 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表