 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 3 z) P' Q% W) u2 [9 m% d) e
. J% v0 }1 M2 e& F+ p+ u
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -) x6 t% U# ^) Z1 ^ c
3 K+ y$ H ?+ [2 ~9 O2 g4 R TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market0 x4 U- n5 f$ D) c6 V
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third# f5 ?6 W, ]/ D8 p
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic+ N0 B5 z# u# T3 m+ P' W* h" \
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
$ p: T3 b3 d( Y aprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
& i) J0 I8 r* z9 c* ? o1 _more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
$ g- n, @+ O4 F" R5 h qQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal' n3 M- t- x' H
LePage Real Estate Services.
% Z4 `& d g6 D- c* B* f
: Y* c$ o/ R6 v' C Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters$ ~0 ]' `: C4 W1 f
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
" G0 ]6 L; N: U7 U* j& jconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and6 k- ^6 A( D/ M0 e5 v! T' |
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the4 `# `/ g3 M5 ~; e/ G1 ]7 {+ |. z
residential real estate sector.! c% f9 Q1 F# I z& [& n9 P& c
- S% @. M) N2 W3 u
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation- Y: D, |+ r8 I7 U
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)' E+ I+ G7 Y4 ^7 _- s9 @. H$ a% _
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
X4 g$ Q7 f1 z) `9 r# X; w(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
# N6 u8 p9 v. H7 c* Y3 K$ _(+13.2%).
8 [& {* ] t" R7 l( x9 t) U+ |+ V3 d4 b0 K6 J. X; B5 B- i8 i" C
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
6 ]: ^7 m: q: F$ J0 X, Rduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the5 i2 n Z' G+ e9 T
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
W% D N2 Z$ u: Bpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
% B' u# z; e d. ]( a! u" r3 xpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.) `! |5 I# u3 R# T
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
; u) |* S h* Y' B1 Vwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy% I* T4 V1 O8 S5 A8 S
balanced market.": B6 W1 g9 |" J% T: f6 n' |' n' E
8 m7 j9 s" Z- ?' o9 C Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
' q* I; _" }& {/ ]% E4 ]( `# ?considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
3 Z, C3 m y' p' ], vto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
. C* ?7 K' {3 F* N! z& E2 xthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core0 j3 s6 n7 {. N5 }! C$ D- w/ v) ]
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
# D; ?9 s6 Y# ~* a$ Ymanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record& A& F0 t3 }" E3 h7 z
breaking price appreciations.4 P+ @8 q% ~0 H, I4 r- ]5 A
1 r# C$ N. {4 L t8 m' t1 R
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding3 K* o$ I8 J+ {2 L
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
, W5 f0 p, ~* z; @& X! Vlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
6 W% q8 `2 B( {; Y, Z2 p: q" n% S$ J3 }) j
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
$ e) Z+ A2 e% |& `economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer: h. u1 l7 p/ Z3 v5 K
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
6 _) P; m) v- yslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
9 R; N! Z9 ~: j+ Q% OIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
6 ]1 H6 w* o- `5 L! hgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
4 r9 H! b2 o2 Tprice appreciation when compared with 2005.. x" a$ D+ Z! ?3 L0 J* c$ {( G
# K5 i9 Q2 E$ _
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
, R. {4 |! T3 Fmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
& {) t$ ~0 ~4 i0 M ufinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada" e% i3 B; S w4 J: j/ x, V
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
9 X. d& K2 J8 {, B2 V
0 U" w* U! r( ?1 ~ Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
$ X9 L. _! Q$ C, nAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
5 g" J: o3 a9 X k% A7 Z) }$ R' l: mfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the8 r* C7 S9 p! m+ q& ^
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
% {# F& v; }" l- t& C- R' P) baffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
* H+ c e" R: {downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and& S! w* ? p: n4 D$ C
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization2 J- i) x9 T8 U) f8 B Y1 O1 u
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
+ A/ z+ e( Q1 e3 ]; A) w; R& n5 p$ O6 w9 b9 ~
<<
9 a% i) _1 S; S7 K REGIONAL SUMMARIES P9 W( U& v* V- @
>>, C" C( ^ Y% U; L2 Z( ?4 Y' e
* z8 u" b b. W/ h Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in0 w, q* S/ T3 z: P+ i( G! L
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
* A8 s) s# T; Uof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time3 k- K5 C& ]6 P
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of( U: R& S7 X8 |' e3 J) {7 d
renovations.
w: @/ I' H& x) N1 g9 ]8 r, z3 u7 j4 m, {
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight. p$ g& |: R0 r# B5 O4 M# W
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
O" O9 I$ d( g0 Q5 b6 m$ ]* [ Tcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and( k2 Y$ |! [" C" Y0 K* ^
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.9 n% P$ |' @+ v& G2 F' G
( W! k9 E8 m$ Z1 D0 Y3 P+ ~, X The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
1 f! ?) e5 J7 Gslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the3 N+ U' f+ w/ r, y
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new0 v5 s* [0 P( h, L0 B
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores' Q% ?5 G6 e6 ]" a3 m
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
. o, X i! y! N) \and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.4 L3 S7 y$ C, t( _
! @7 D5 C8 k3 K5 h
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
8 Z; E& d4 h) wconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their2 [1 s: e# z6 j. I/ U( x) j2 p
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers. Q E: d. S9 a. E$ m( S
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
: T; ^; ?. ] [. X+ ~- h% qdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
; \1 ? q6 S& n. X- U' rbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
* p4 b! O Z" `& \* m1 J- T" C2 {7 p0 }
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
0 h) s) }0 V2 B) ^, `% Lamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
0 R/ y, M" i6 ^: f6 }# A6 z$ cpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
+ q) }5 w3 q! [as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
) y7 ?0 s) q: A* Q1 Y8 N+ ?( Sfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.3 i, O' _, k& A1 u
3 s' Y" U3 o, c) E
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house+ K% O' r4 G+ {
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory( A8 p" I% h* P1 f
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting. [) I2 h9 X" J# e8 X
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,- b( ^1 X _ M# S
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the: _6 o6 k5 ] ~ V5 s6 `3 X
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before) q5 g& ~2 V5 E! G0 R( V
making a purchase.
/ z/ g1 m: x' E) Q: s ]3 F! c
* w7 `3 S+ \ W; H Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing, n& |. U& P" s
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
7 B7 c% z G) @. t# G: Zconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
( W' L9 t% y- Y3 v5 ]7 m( ~1 rcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
4 d9 [$ X- \$ i# Zattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
9 [$ J* Z7 [$ K, j! z6 ?amenities.0 u; B2 ~8 o4 V" W1 D: S/ E
0 Z7 N! k7 G5 U+ J, K. x+ Z
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
' O% U9 Y4 A2 V9 k3 g: Rthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
1 S3 t; p# @& B6 O, [across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has# l" P* Q; {' [; M& e' G3 Q
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
+ V+ ^. s q; E( s/ gdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
! \. }7 O/ c4 q% _7 M7 _# ~% Zresidence, rather than for investment.& {; R# u2 X6 u9 k8 r" H
; y6 s# u0 y% @, L8 ?! C4 T# F' T The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
: F; `: t* Y* e: Q7 v- Uhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
) P1 `, ~9 d e/ Y& u9 m4 f6 `! cin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
9 X9 M! [8 z4 c0 gconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
2 a5 b% F/ |3 p/ q7 u8 nrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
6 G3 ?, J, ^# x Lthe market.
% B" ?0 u' C9 i1 ~
) ?) W6 ?6 u9 t( ]4 v In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through# b; [% l9 t8 Z5 c$ |- Q+ g
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
$ H3 {6 P9 F- g, U3 o t: u4 bAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring" O+ G- ?% i. y3 j
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due- F6 k$ U7 S' ]2 [
to the shortage of available inventory.
4 g* m, L4 C' O- R" L- h7 ?, I, P0 b( g- Z* T) j+ h7 a, Y; [
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
5 G H4 i3 t, b9 Y C8 z/ Q' dmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
8 N) g& ^$ q7 Z; A, W2 Z/ Nvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
3 q* [# G% P" Fstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.2 K' ?3 n+ D1 j3 E
" [* _% Z1 {/ m W9 e4 ~3 T Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases+ Z) t q$ W3 R9 d+ A* F- H5 w
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low, K" B2 `; M$ [" b
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that1 @7 L( q/ W5 N7 u& w8 m
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring9 D; K( Y$ e) F( r3 ?: @" u S' ?
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer. R- z, d7 Z3 G
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as/ k3 y& V3 R) Y! i- X( ^
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.1 y) h# V# d, m
5 ^, M2 d" m7 d$ S+ ~+ z/ u% A6 G0 j Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter; V" N% o6 P/ q; V3 R; \, m
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
1 b1 ~0 h) P( C1 S* ~6 o6 ?remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
! \' Q7 \3 p* Kmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
: {4 F8 s7 y; `! D' }3 a( c/ B* Yincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
" ~) ?$ a/ I/ T0 ein the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
* O, f+ F9 z5 F- }towards the end of 2006. : ?' ~- y4 _4 H0 I# r( s: D
& z& a1 h9 h% g1 t) t
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of7 ~, `7 m. I; e
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
# j& A6 d! t9 h1 w5 D% Kto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
5 A# U7 i l& ~, d5 mgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
- T4 h5 {: `$ g( ?foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added. E% }: o: D; c* j
pressure on tight inventory levels.
" n5 u( ^+ \1 P% j2 |8 c
( [# s6 k" w8 q3 e4 e Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
! G0 p- \6 l" v$ G7 [fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
; k$ g# h( k) `into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;' ?8 {# N; o( M* e' f
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
# [8 @' a, b0 |- Pfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.+ B: i" |6 ]/ C r' d+ z5 ]2 y8 v
% |+ h E; B: K6 u, B ?5 N
<<
3 H1 Z& p1 M& X$ c2 x' g Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
# k7 ?& L5 s2 h! k
% g Q$ t. n* I, q7 F: v3 j -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 |9 T# J- O. G( M! h. L' l' i
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey d- j6 v: a2 K/ w" \
------------------------------------------------------------------------- d- _% Z5 p7 U5 }# D0 p1 v! _. r. T
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3$ J# I9 `1 l! q
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
- e% p6 y9 X+ e% G! \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------' v1 m1 \2 O; K3 p4 s
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000( ~% s2 x: u- x5 x& `, I' `
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 X- {9 ]$ Y; B0 q. g* s. I Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000+ l0 z2 `* i$ J2 I. Z! x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 o2 e2 Q" w1 ?+ r) N5 W3 G* l Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0000 C; m) S# n9 {0 c+ j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* Y; T- M8 s( A! e P
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
7 ]3 }5 n2 L; Y3 `( y5 ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% T- a l( o' s3 z' d% p& O; ~ St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3337 n$ F/ q* Q' `5 u, G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( w9 ^; ^! d) F. \7 M3 o Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
' \( |9 `$ l9 o+ B6 s3 c4 \5 B6 \/ _ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- H9 H3 s- b" L0 ]
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1858 p& Q% w5 G9 R- w9 x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- o: Z% J- q, H2 w3 X, K! w4 u9 T7 @ Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
- ], P* r9 {3 H9 A -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 _0 I7 O# t! g+ B1 {+ ?- P
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7661 _; v, r+ V, }; b" b* p. n& G% Z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' f a) L0 i; |7 [' Z5 ` Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
% c0 j) z, t9 W/ y/ x ------------------------------------------------------------------------- d3 {6 d0 w! m
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
1 O. K \+ x( N# B/ |- a6 M, a, ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 T; c0 a2 E2 s9 ^2 }& e' S Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389( |. n: G" m/ u* Q7 P- |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* c3 C/ J' r5 D9 e* J- H Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714" j! `! {, v' _0 O4 t1 u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! g: q' x9 f, @. O& I- @
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5006 [2 B) P# M5 x8 s( X5 X @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 X- u% M6 s( G! Z- U; a Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
1 f4 Z3 Z+ U7 g7 V1 {( a -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- `7 ~) d5 [. l3 y. C( m National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
' A- X4 B. H J7 x7 Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( U9 Y8 {0 W% ]' [) K* B; L+ n
+ p6 X: _ \7 z% r0 d( g9 C! P -------------------------------------------------------------
8 V* ]& ~9 r8 M. V0 M0 g Standard Condominium
7 r2 g4 U" ^. S# r$ _ -------------------------------------------------------------
; D+ F# M5 }9 O: Q# N 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
5 T0 e* U2 U- _0 {0 u* L0 _ Market % Change Average Average % Change0 x4 X1 P9 }) ]* x& W, W# Y
-------------------------------------------------------------# ~* L' t; Z# X( C
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%" C1 }, q; ?5 x, T8 O% c
-------------------------------------------------------------* ?; i1 k0 x7 i' c9 e
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%6 T; f. f5 r+ a& j+ q9 C! \7 e" p; O
-------------------------------------------------------------3 x3 _ N. x ^' A$ c% r+ x
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
# Z5 ]% K k: A) A5 s' [ -------------------------------------------------------------' R' B; `1 y* d% T) N
Saint John N/A - - N/A
: \4 q6 y- v5 C) A% t+ t- T -------------------------------------------------------------; x, |8 w) E; b+ N, Y
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%' o: ^2 o3 T: Z' b5 }$ q
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 N3 v. R- M( d. _% q Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
) E& c+ e8 ^, S9 }! Q: K9 q -------------------------------------------------------------- t) n' t% ?6 f4 h1 Y+ r
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%5 _, N2 L$ a+ v5 I2 o# e
-------------------------------------------------------------
' ]9 @% X: K: [+ ?0 @/ V9 N Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%% D" |/ {, }) I& v5 y9 D
-------------------------------------------------------------
@) @' {! |3 m Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%9 S. ?- N- r( K# r2 L* z- H% u
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 ?: @: Z& g2 B8 K: | Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
1 o v) Y( x3 _) T2 G. r -------------------------------------------------------------
: i: D5 [8 D& ? Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%! R* a, @! N6 X6 e( c7 H; J9 R
-------------------------------------------------------------! C& ?4 A1 V3 Z6 X+ Z
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%' f1 X+ s9 J# d
-------------------------------------------------------------# F! k- E+ \: [
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
- ^2 I( k$ _' ~; [. Y/ j. s0 b, w( ` -------------------------------------------------------------
' [0 q" ?: g3 P1 p; ?0 i: | Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
# l3 u) K; H4 Z. p- i; m0 A7 z -------------------------------------------------------------/ S) L/ a! O0 z
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
- q$ b, N" I9 `: v/ R& s/ E -------------------------------------------------------------
; m2 C( P, d, h# Y$ p" ~, w' r National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%7 P$ c# L: ~5 O- k7 ]% b$ E# h* k
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 _8 W6 e4 N. n) [ >>
3 |( f! N) o9 Y" l0 S
% O7 W/ [* r9 r3 S& _ Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined3 S y& x% |2 z9 m( d; D7 @
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
. B- b3 v3 s) s; HJohn and Victoria.
' I6 h' l6 |$ A, @/ S, w$ K# m% G* ^, u4 u; {! V$ d5 y2 y
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
: w7 [9 J0 Q# Q8 i) lcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of( p6 X8 o' b4 S
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
( W% E% N/ b+ m1 c0 M, l1 Yreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price0 {& u" L! s t4 V0 ]! U/ M0 f
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
6 D! Z \; ~* n2 Y# w. bacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is" \7 z1 F+ Q1 ?( G. w, n/ t' i. h
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
/ W1 n1 s' M2 e: s# Sfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable7 Z) N. O2 v) f' f- f! F
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on: Z! o$ P: v+ B
November 15, 2006.
' S+ |+ R' c8 m6 f5 a( w2 ]$ I( j2 V8 O Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of. j3 S" k$ l* r' l
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge, V& E8 g* c8 c; L% @2 x
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is# u" m$ h8 h }. w: c- T5 Z1 Q% F5 g% W
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|