埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2353|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable + e# N; o: T; W5 l

* D+ T$ d/ X' H, |/ l$ n* E- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -3 q. w, l( A  o1 V8 H6 E9 t; i5 p
- a9 ?3 n' n& G
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market  [8 J7 ~: j' V6 j: u+ w
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third/ B" i& k  D9 h3 M; b$ O
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
: P3 f6 h" k! j2 Min the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit6 l$ v% A! N4 T3 `2 ~4 q0 E
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
) }- L* S1 n- T2 i6 _( Jmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
5 }2 j8 ]- \" w9 `Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal4 c# @( n' X: e5 y
LePage Real Estate Services.
; E# w- `; X; B3 y% L
3 L$ P, p- }4 E8 b; f( v3 |6 J    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
( k6 y' L) V/ p* Iare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
8 N- f: ^7 p. B5 |: y; k# qconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
8 K8 Q5 |1 m9 a. Dsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the* d7 S, J0 x7 h0 t) y! i
residential real estate sector.- ~6 }( X1 w6 X7 J* t+ _
+ |: q4 v% s) l  ]( Z
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation6 Y- A6 R* H( O" f" N. d
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)# q6 D) _8 L9 @' [, f0 U& v
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5625 j4 ]6 i/ o! C& \& h! C
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
5 [& y" `4 c6 I$ [. y# Y(+13.2%).
  d+ f5 {8 e; W7 G& h8 B$ q* {9 `" J: g. X/ F: z
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
6 k  q/ b3 t) `" N  u$ z# Kduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
0 T9 A7 [' F; E  J' @! u3 Pfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
- G. G+ W' I) v! m2 j9 ~poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,6 D6 E  H6 e8 t& F' w0 C: w
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.& U5 {+ p9 }9 Y8 F. V
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
% t9 e, `+ d+ ]" M- B/ d$ Awelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
4 x3 U* b, ?! e1 o9 R( j" ^balanced market."/ S" r3 G3 q2 N- d* ]7 ?% U6 F
$ P5 C! w  _( G) G! m9 w6 N: |9 q
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
( r; m- w/ {, o  G3 Jconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift- I9 v1 s& a0 Y, {, U8 j
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued' D- t1 {2 u7 {0 C
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core0 |/ `+ q* `+ I$ u3 [
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
4 B( D$ _4 j( w* X% |manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
" u0 U5 K8 n: v: v8 T' S8 Obreaking price appreciations.! k; d+ i9 j8 \" e  H; u6 {9 F

6 v3 Q) B( I# F8 E: h    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding7 p- m' v9 R: f4 d
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the. i7 |8 y' Q% x2 Q. s
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
1 t2 j3 }/ X5 N( M
. \# k1 @7 _3 O4 u% ~& Y    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
5 U+ w" W% ~5 `economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer9 \' u& [$ K! b" ~) K' J
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
) y. r5 Y. Y8 xslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.0 Z, O7 A) K* ~! R* J4 y2 M& N/ E. k
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
" O/ O9 W) f, h7 k6 K+ q8 j* Vgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
6 M0 t5 s" H# |/ L( oprice appreciation when compared with 2005.7 `- Z- Q$ g5 O. t3 ?/ _4 v

' p* L5 L0 R  S* o- {6 ~    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing  G- w1 W& r9 W& D$ o  m
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
$ M4 B- z3 Y" D: _- N% V( X; gfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
$ X: `& D0 l2 D/ B* j' i! X4 Nare markedly different than those found in the United States.
- J! l  }) D" h6 S) _- ^/ a& F, I& s1 n
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
6 H$ J2 ]1 q: a1 v5 `2 rAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
4 h5 v8 N% N3 v  Q7 mfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the9 E/ h! C7 S, S4 M6 ]; p: c: w
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general8 z# c9 ?( f8 I' K/ Y/ H
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
$ B* W) O& G/ g# R1 y& k0 Ldownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and/ o' f& L! f/ C& Y
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
& v/ d( X5 |* o7 Mmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."; V( |6 U$ D' N8 [! {, \
& W+ f  ^; {+ j6 {( f9 D; W
    <<1 F  i& `9 p, |# t1 b! t! [1 L
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES: s) f, z0 U6 S4 c6 b- M% n) b
    >>
1 h! _+ {, C9 S2 d1 m0 C
8 S! p1 O9 Z; w2 O' q3 s4 d    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in$ {8 Z& ?2 k, E6 h# y& a1 n
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate# X/ V6 ^0 W; S
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time) p. g" h; k2 T9 j9 d+ b2 r# |
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
( M! P, O1 z( c, ]% l8 zrenovations.1 {* z# e$ P( N; z0 r

- P! h# B9 K2 t, \    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
% d/ W3 c, |- G# y2 v9 m) p; F3 R& Aincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation) ]3 }7 P1 a- k, e7 R
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
$ b, k# K) C' p2 u* E7 W1 n2 |September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.$ O- Q2 M/ Y/ _  E% [: x+ E7 [

* p2 T9 g2 h7 t$ F7 J; b    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
' D5 z5 q: h: e, f( {slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the% q+ ]- D) y7 m2 O1 i, T7 a7 q
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
% n) a2 W* ~' n! T, M2 L# M7 W$ Z600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
+ m" V0 ?- E  |$ F  H7 {to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
, `1 Y8 @# l' A1 @and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
, P% r9 W! w- B6 d) m/ q4 q7 ^, [3 y9 d3 X
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
- t0 G; b' x, M! s' V# H% Dconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
1 `- Q8 r" _$ c& O% V1 vhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
5 b6 D* p% T( B6 ?, A- `+ ~1 I) _: swas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian" l" n$ }5 n4 ]
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing+ h! [3 m0 a0 J9 F1 a; v# n. r
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
# ]0 c) l+ d. b: H2 L8 [
. K, c" H1 p) e% [1 O! m    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
4 N/ ?& C1 U1 r+ ~) Vamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes. m* w: j0 d* J2 B# |) F4 B2 L' [
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
8 m6 T% H# @4 I6 X* D  y  {% n. i# Das some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
$ x$ j- B# I) e" V6 X: @few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
- f8 F# L. ?0 g' p1 j) z  n. [" u  b) [
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
) D" m( h7 H2 }( h* a- {prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
( u+ O4 I8 G7 a5 n, r5 M  rlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting/ H3 g- x2 g0 f+ g: T
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,) U1 r$ V( Q# H; {- H
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the0 m9 l8 ?. b# k% w0 c
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before- X; c* v' _7 _  l7 r/ V
making a purchase.) ?2 ?; p% W/ U! I
. s$ V$ T5 L9 x9 {2 Y0 D
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing# \" \" W1 v1 I- n
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong( Z/ i' I2 g. ^$ C
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
' p2 c1 C* e8 rcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting. a( i5 ?' R7 S; S0 J  z( w
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown0 @  F. [3 N4 J% [9 M
amenities.
: x- V4 I" ]% h( L' M, G$ J, G% I0 t( Q2 y1 i! J
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels) u+ `- q( W$ {# J+ E. t
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
/ r( t! w& _) b& @$ m4 Y: f6 oacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
6 p' J1 x( Q& v' c4 D8 r9 s6 k; ncontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
+ H. S' \7 }$ A4 N2 Q8 ndriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle2 d' ?* K: d* W  u
residence, rather than for investment.2 [, h* Q- a6 I4 I, Y1 H6 J1 H; e

: |) q& T2 @. z    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
1 w. y/ P0 \4 E' V+ F7 T& c, bhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
! I( H7 j4 [+ {2 c  t, R% Y+ }  C- Uin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer( P2 [! Q" v1 X. P  D8 `
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
7 v. i& D6 u! N+ R) trate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
- d! ^8 t& b- `6 l& B! Ethe market.
/ k$ x1 R/ f3 A3 V7 w. I- R, `- M- @' P; v% W
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through1 r# c3 c  Y" f2 n
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In) I, _/ f" b* R
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring8 O) L. [, D5 v
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
2 u4 i3 y$ ~! uto the shortage of available inventory.% O( r- c1 q+ S& P- I) o2 `$ e
2 t9 Q+ t/ e8 C# v# u
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its& I. h( |/ S" S& \
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains, O- q1 c. m3 Q0 H  p- U
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
  n' r/ C% P( h2 Fstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
5 E- R+ {& h) ^7 d6 O- e/ A  n: e0 d! H! Q. W  X
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
: f% y1 N- q7 m, \- }in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
& G8 L# h, l0 j5 A$ Z  @unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that/ D/ d  c: H0 O3 p
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring4 l  h; e& Z0 g) w" s
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer) ~2 X9 Z& Y. k: G% \& B
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as; C) [! X2 ]3 F  B; T
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
; ^' p2 K& a% y" K( x& G5 u
6 l  e+ I# Y5 D& f
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter9 Y/ i# k) j, N1 Q* ^, E
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton& \) F5 r0 W, U) M6 }0 ?& F
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,( r# S: S. H, F0 u
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices; D+ z* w8 d4 j
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
" ^- ?# w) ~9 N& Oin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly- ?# M& Q9 n1 S. v5 s
towards the end of 2006.
    2 N/ Y4 m( `& L) n6 [
+ M. F; I& Q+ h4 {% q+ V5 v
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of: H7 Q, z% Z# [/ {' u& J
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable( x5 @& j1 s; G; T) y
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse8 C" ]9 E6 q  y" R6 x
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
& C4 V% @) p/ @4 N$ T+ u, M7 P. xforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
: [2 s; Q+ _( ?, v: m5 Vpressure on tight inventory levels.
8 L4 r8 x; r% n5 b. a
' I' b4 l) s$ O    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
7 G3 _* S5 x$ k& c, V, @fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
8 O4 P3 @' w$ K1 ?into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
+ a3 |; w  `& b' c) s' v( o% Vwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
& ?5 [; V! j( `% j( c3 X( dfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.3 J$ G; z* _5 f% ]1 r& W) }7 J
1 _5 Z( m1 H0 ^- \" |
    <<
4 V7 d9 c3 f/ }8 e3 ~      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
& l7 f8 h4 p( H2 j# `
, F: b" o$ g4 ~/ b' U& f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# p' h6 ^, s2 A) Z% {
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
" f0 [# J" W" z1 K) c! y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 ~$ \  U6 H) h* a; V  d- s/ h
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3% A8 Z8 B9 L! {3 e5 O2 Y0 v
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
% O) ~; u7 H. m) G. _9 I    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! p% K( @2 m; @    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
5 I) E( n$ x* g) j; j9 ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 r- y" t$ I- ~, @0 w/ ~: Z    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
* x3 k1 R3 q4 F& D3 }) ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# W& q& J" N) n% r) {9 i; {
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0002 M* ~+ o# w3 A, Z8 c
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. `& J0 e4 `3 X0 F    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -" P1 f1 \% U$ G$ u1 j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% S% Q  ?) o0 j& R8 L$ I    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3336 o! L' d9 D0 [6 x
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ L* H5 y8 q8 T+ r
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
2 F% m+ C( _2 H$ r    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* N4 J/ H5 [5 Q+ [4 F$ Z
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185' y) b$ Z  Q* @) W" }  x( N: x% _
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |* H0 x1 W, ?) ~8 w- q
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
: q5 N. ^5 u/ B3 d" r% g5 x$ m    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ g' Z% `9 [# t. ~9 N    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766( i' S( f) N6 C$ n7 F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 f& X6 s1 A0 j$ r0 F* |( }
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
; a2 G) g4 K; F% ~( i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  G$ }6 P- Q9 p8 e0 H3 v
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
+ W, M" x5 A% H4 F+ {    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 R5 t$ g; q- L. S8 K- ?; i    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,3897 g' F( c5 t  Y' g9 @) {
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  a/ O1 }  x& O, j8 e    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7146 B4 @: c' Y8 e0 Q* G, I+ k
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 `! H9 V9 i8 W/ G; ~/ k" y- A7 J    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
" {7 t+ q1 B7 L" z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- G$ p% ]+ _  Q8 S/ M% b$ P2 a
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
) M/ m. n5 v: O! t' F5 a    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, x2 w+ V( Q7 b& p" R
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
: o; S1 R$ ]6 [' t4 Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ _0 {3 f" q$ }, f2 W3 j. h! m0 N. b8 O. P5 X- z6 k
    -------------------------------------------------------------0 C/ u8 ?' ]' X
                               Standard Condominium
) r0 C3 W0 G5 S3 A1 C) E: J    -------------------------------------------------------------! C0 }5 Y- M* D& w5 d' T7 _
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
( D1 }9 c( D" @# Z( _    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change+ F% {# L8 Z/ V- ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------
% N; n) ^! e- z; y& O9 V& Y) K. `/ w    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%8 V, r& c: `! F' ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' _3 N+ u; U" u6 ~    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%0 K6 c$ w5 e- O
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; Z) Y+ q- O! T    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A8 T, `) |( L7 `( `0 M, G* \, [
    -------------------------------------------------------------6 Z& r4 R7 `) @. [* N+ h6 ?/ ?
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A+ O: n% |8 f/ T
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( I0 g1 ~1 s) z  c    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
: L) O; x- A" m7 s    -------------------------------------------------------------+ I; a1 Z, }: `2 n( v8 L" o
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
0 H+ D' d$ n" p: v& c2 T    -------------------------------------------------------------
: f0 t" }' G7 Y2 G7 u+ Y8 S# Y    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
* a; }0 [: N! }    -------------------------------------------------------------0 o  @1 v' T3 ^& X
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%+ @* A6 d. [6 \5 n0 n3 ]. Y( z
    -------------------------------------------------------------  o: X9 P" `  [0 L. e% k  {8 N* K
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%0 \0 L9 \, ]( j8 W  t6 B
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 q5 K+ n  V. ]2 m6 T    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
$ Y1 @2 ~/ Z1 {' L    -------------------------------------------------------------/ x! d4 N1 W3 C" o
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
& P  d; f  H8 ^0 [& ]/ F    -------------------------------------------------------------' p, v0 T) U0 ]/ o0 Y
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
  Z4 c! |' Y' L( w3 [' k4 R# o  R    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ r6 ^) m; d% L" [    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
0 U( A' n3 `% y    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 U) _* d3 W2 Z) g* G% q  {( B    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%$ v) _8 |+ ?' W1 e& w
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; h0 ~- q6 \& l! F1 D2 a* k6 @    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%" w  J$ e1 M8 W2 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------0 e' u$ f6 c+ G: G8 S  F
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%- k& ?1 J( ]9 N$ s0 f5 h
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 c8 \9 E& R- G+ x' E; x    >>- z, C8 h, H5 j( h3 X- [

) |( N6 g8 L! G$ Y2 U0 X& W& z    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
/ r4 A& ^5 _; O. {5 q# }! P/ }in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint, l7 I: k, `, P3 X- R
John and Victoria.
% j& @- b. M+ f+ C- G& @' Q, |% {& Z; n: y4 F
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most5 e. Y) a3 j- r1 f0 Z3 @/ N
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
" o. j3 s, n& Z, V3 {housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release" t: i6 Q7 ^4 r* F3 U  p% L
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
/ C( B- {, \5 O! ~+ `trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities1 A8 _0 [$ c7 |) a" L6 [
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is3 k" y4 I( N9 j0 c
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
) O' y0 ?/ }: G7 ]3 ?6 Afigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable/ x) q1 R* ^: o1 m" x
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
6 e6 k- k* H' B' z1 ~5 Q( G9 NNovember 15, 2006.
6 w/ D! I4 _9 m    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of& H; x: O* @8 [' l+ j% I
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
  b/ ~7 B# x% B" Lprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
4 A9 ~7 k9 j; W# ^" u+ o( t0 Z1 Oavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-15 08:23 , Processed in 0.304776 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表