 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 9 Z+ ]7 f$ |% t( t, X0 E' x0 H9 F8 d
S5 ?# G6 p3 \6 M6 ?% V6 v
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
( ]+ D0 }. V/ P0 Y: j; @: K, S0 `% i: r: ~' d, C/ P. [) I
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
* i; e( L i$ D$ `! ?+ cexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third5 Z F! D$ G: Y% u- n
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
" `+ b4 j; {" N% m& N+ O% `, G8 Din the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit0 l5 b! t1 j' y9 Y5 Z# Z
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
! ]0 I% Z: k' k' k7 Xmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,+ v- j6 ~2 k3 d* t
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal+ R1 K; w( \7 A8 U# u3 v
LePage Real Estate Services.* m7 H4 N8 \: h# }( Z4 r3 \* S
7 q4 B/ y9 l8 M2 J+ W
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
! \2 g1 A1 L2 v6 {! }are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
5 ?0 }8 P0 j* g# v# ^! u0 B) oconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and: k A1 o" D. Y) V, m# K
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the- ?* q5 w: J/ m
residential real estate sector.4 @. |! Z8 q/ Q) B6 E2 G
. \6 l% P1 l S3 [% m/ C Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
1 M7 m: B' d) M8 }0 h2 O. C! k: Loccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
) x& v2 y& ]4 }0 U: Q C& jyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5624 b; l$ l, ^! j1 @7 |' M9 k
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380/ ]5 ]1 D* E! B" b- J
(+13.2%).1 m: q5 C' k; \+ w( X2 u
% i- s( @3 m4 [: z( N8 K
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
z k% B, B0 M2 V* x. L; ~during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
9 r9 D8 f$ F, s+ z: T, Efrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are+ q t( b; T% K6 }
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,; V0 r' P l9 ~& h& D* I
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.( l( D' r1 c! s% o x- K
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We" v! a+ n$ R" F% S* j4 t. e. g1 J
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
4 z4 Z+ Y+ T8 g0 `balanced market."
0 D' @) L7 \! U, Y5 R7 n; Z
* l. E6 \) Q/ R3 Y( h( t" } Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
7 A( x( B6 m! t. Econsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
) m! f# [* O0 n5 h4 c a( jto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued" X& K; R) N. z8 p& _- h3 F
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core4 V$ m% } \, C# Z# n
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
x' f9 N9 g. p6 }2 k8 lmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record- W t5 E3 [9 A) i9 k
breaking price appreciations.
' f! }" A5 U' z
. x% F1 q8 W; B6 [ Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
4 I5 w) L% d( aeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the+ Y$ r p4 ?6 p; z
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.% K# |# j) n/ V" Z; D
( @5 H1 l& P J) u In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid) E" w0 N+ G; j0 b+ Y
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
1 ], `" Z0 k: b, _confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off" w8 p( ?! M8 h+ [# B h& x
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
) X2 h& [, i- k6 m( {In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers4 R1 @. B8 v# {- o: Z
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
G) e- u& i% Jprice appreciation when compared with 2005." N2 b' q+ C" C! K5 _* A
0 ?, G U( G7 i% F
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing7 B1 n+ f' l+ s5 }1 l
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and9 e/ I) c a' N9 A ?+ K; Z
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
/ a5 _. r3 J) W! C' E" u; P" Oare markedly different than those found in the United States.8 _% Z+ i( S0 Q4 ~
) E% q, u6 b7 h
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the/ X$ k$ h% }" [8 C2 v0 p
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
3 i5 B$ n* C/ Zfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
7 q& o) C _0 Irelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general. @- U& U0 K1 k: V8 P. q$ Z
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
! k, U e: i/ k$ @* ~5 c2 kdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and8 u# V, a' Z3 Y" g0 g1 Z
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization6 d z' h- ?; o% [
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
% B- S4 l& b6 k9 p& O5 l+ l* ]
' E; B+ ^. w. E+ j/ z# m- [ <<9 |9 g# E2 y& J; E( C
REGIONAL SUMMARIES# q% n( ?% z) x
>>0 A' P$ l( S3 Q5 v9 m
1 L s8 L+ a% \/ V- x8 ~ Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
1 C8 f# Y$ ~1 Q; N( fHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate0 _' y5 T% ] P8 I9 Q X' B+ Q
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time* S. ]% @1 u% W* h# i% v
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of1 `) A: Y4 k2 k3 q. A
renovations./ L2 ^4 F" K; N% w! ?! h+ |
3 U. Q1 x7 p9 S! L( R The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
0 Y5 C8 s& \3 y/ W1 L, [5 w# N+ ?0 |increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation% N3 L# O9 f8 z3 e* ^+ O' I6 @
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
3 T; T w5 H7 a1 oSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
$ L4 @6 n1 | p2 x
) j$ C* \, X3 Y* b1 y% _) P The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer' r7 a& ]' M+ x- u* G, D
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
; b) q% S: }/ F$ m8 w: b1 Vquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
% _- v' F) `1 @) q( [/ ~( w& ^& [600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores4 Y9 X% v) y$ ]! E5 B, Y
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
7 j: u! \0 \7 ]8 ?! ?' s& A% aand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.( N4 i- d' z4 f* x0 C9 y- f
* X+ m, w$ P- k | In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced% [: X1 P: C# C. |3 d/ `
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
& g; \! _- r7 lhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers8 v Q% o, F. [3 `1 a& y- S/ i- L
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian9 G, U( n# T& d% A# T$ Y: G
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing' c) |$ d4 c5 K) B8 V* g3 E& p/ n1 w
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
4 A* d% B$ y/ r$ c1 f8 ^; |3 f: ^' M
" E, C* f, P% i Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
: e; x% W" E; |# f( Aamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes$ j; z/ U" a' T8 h
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
4 V) c0 k( K% t& _9 t' jas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last* @( d; ?" L/ v
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions." n3 k$ v' @; c& {" G' i3 B* J2 H# A
1 E0 t" n# D: }+ W! K9 |! I Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
m$ ?6 t5 ~* k: Wprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
6 {6 v* s* x9 ^/ S: c6 Llevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting/ i' ?: E; u: Q$ ~$ @ b0 i
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
8 f* Q, N; A+ a1 w9 z: ~; R6 Fwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
0 h3 g; ? I8 `+ epressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
" h3 i1 ?# C4 E# T- \* emaking a purchase.( b5 P- T g* q" @
# P& p$ m) G& `' V* B( ?
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
' B" ], c E: L" M+ Z5 A! rmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
) G$ V5 ~* @7 U, B% n& o2 e6 pconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city8 {9 d' I% G9 F$ e) V9 }
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
5 \% X& L3 Y Z8 u" ?attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown# T; _: h" j8 c# }6 O
amenities.3 l1 O6 G; K% x1 H% X
9 T1 o9 [; t1 O K& U
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
: v+ a) F: ^% y4 `$ O6 {throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand' @: z Z, a* w2 p" {4 R
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
/ `, P1 z2 D Vcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
: b0 {8 ?# \8 d+ e7 h/ sdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
5 T+ i) s3 |5 j" I/ J) ^; L9 u6 {: Nresidence, rather than for investment.
; K j9 J5 h; z' R) | E* H" [* r% r4 u: s9 _$ H+ v8 {
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
" s4 T1 e2 ~! k8 W4 h/ v6 nhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
* \: r" _+ ~) U. J3 `in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
) M! c& _: R- B7 o7 e$ @+ Aconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization* q, C6 o( v# P! \: Y/ K+ Z T
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
% U$ [& v9 q2 f! kthe market.% p' U2 }' y" z/ H
/ m$ a9 D! N* w! \ {0 p7 C In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
. ]( c( S1 P+ K% U& h/ E& PJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
2 t1 e0 l& a1 {August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring, w. a. |2 P/ X8 ~
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due; {; W5 m0 e$ k4 j: X& t
to the shortage of available inventory.% S5 x8 W: w& @7 E! I' h& c
/ i! P. k3 t' }/ v# Y
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its! D: K3 \8 s( ]9 B
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains# J/ a& V. n O
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
" |( K- k8 I3 d# y$ estruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
2 Z+ S& w2 P% }. |7 l& M& [2 c# C3 U1 R& G" z& \
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases% ~! v; O6 u. ~6 e/ v, F, R) Z& W9 k
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
3 l) E' z9 n$ J& nunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that& P1 @6 v0 v5 b: m/ G( S! s
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring( {) Z7 w! d, I# W6 q* q( Y0 |
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer9 ` ?% _& B2 W" `6 Z
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as. c9 C( y+ p9 X
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.! G4 @! K+ J# q# E
7 J" o: N8 Z+ ~3 G/ Q% e& u1 t
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
2 _2 `0 m2 J( A1 N% E; e) v+ Das activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
4 v/ B- _0 n: Y+ e; ?* Jremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
, n0 ]3 d# u/ v' B. L/ cmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
# f- ]9 C0 o {: G- fincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve* }8 r; ^( r, G3 d. [; {
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
: I4 j6 h; h2 n$ M/ f! g8 Q9 ttowards the end of 2006. ; l0 G& ^: \! Z' u- o7 d9 |
9 z; _4 k( O9 J( dWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
# w3 x5 I( _; X$ Z. D; ~! a' Ninventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
) w3 l8 {* q9 J( k: V4 \to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
$ }& X) ~4 i$ f) Z A( @% r% Z# Xgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to# o% H0 z5 L1 H" `
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
9 s3 a+ N1 N$ |' |7 q6 ~* |$ R3 Cpressure on tight inventory levels.5 L( F6 x& K0 r; i$ I7 C
* _1 S9 Z! i, L+ H
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic, M k$ V; M" O4 c$ m) L( r; ?8 r
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
3 K: z* `# _3 a! f5 ainto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;9 b; I& k9 d) T1 }! R
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
3 P n# C0 N5 c! p! Qfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
6 n7 U0 s% f$ m8 Z" N- z+ r
# g: @' }0 u+ V$ n+ i' S <<
: I4 |2 ]( V7 L) @- n; e* j" v0 n Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006' ] t1 f% L$ y# W
) _: y& o) F, A5 w2 g. c* Z7 ~! P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 }9 @1 X: O+ I! }7 E Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
/ ]' y" s6 K8 y. ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ O" J+ T) p$ d/ }
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
$ n) h) _# |$ L+ z E: Q: Z" u Market Average Average % Change Average Average
' i) D$ z' d: K9 I: t9 D; Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% ?, q) ^9 X8 q+ i9 p. e' a Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000. H" k& j! o3 e" S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 y# T9 O' r' z2 s: p$ h Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
7 {1 y) U3 K2 @. g; Y0 [! f -------------------------------------------------------------------------! b, F$ i6 g$ z# [
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
" k, }% n Q) k* p) Y4 O1 e# ~* t. T -------------------------------------------------------------------------) x4 u f9 t$ k1 ]9 k; {% A! \
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -; a. e2 T: E2 v" h+ o5 J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# x$ e& ]1 T, x1 x
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
0 }, i3 i% D! H4 O -------------------------------------------------------------------------' `/ n( ~; }7 ^' y- B) s7 s' u: N# p* d
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5831 r1 h( t7 x9 z" ~- L" t8 O- T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- e+ F. d/ v8 s' l3 W
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
% u1 O# ]$ i/ \" q# J -------------------------------------------------------------------------. F; Q0 R% v3 W2 A
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250$ E: S3 H0 j, Q+ } c4 S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 A; g2 C; l+ K0 V5 J( ~
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
/ N! H3 ~# Q" q8 d; H -------------------------------------------------------------------------& y6 d* _6 T7 j& |( r' ]( _% [% x( ?" M
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
3 t8 l- g1 j6 ]' c -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ ^1 H" [# I, [5 F2 D2 T3 K Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
1 w4 i6 C! s7 S1 f2 @7 E$ @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ a3 @2 L8 r/ Q4 `5 d) t- n! e Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389; u7 q3 t9 m, \3 X& b- e1 ~
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 K3 _- F+ L+ c0 q
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
5 j7 Q5 Y9 q5 M: Q% F0 I -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# ?- s9 f: h- Q Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500% B& l X- z! w( A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: Z( h& J$ ]* M* N# H# z$ E) O7 f
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
6 J, t1 t- z4 i -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% P" \5 ~ O( W/ A$ f) B# u National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
6 U* N6 V$ y/ D. H0 P( j1 u -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' j; r% A$ N) c$ u7 j: k0 E9 M' o6 E0 h- P5 C
-------------------------------------------------------------
. K4 T% L4 W) q Standard Condominium& [+ H# {' b4 `) q
-------------------------------------------------------------
& D+ l7 b1 m8 s8 L5 L! A 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
h" g5 Y# N8 M0 o: R Market % Change Average Average % Change% v* l7 ~ q2 }- z
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 e$ L" F5 T) ^( [6 ?8 P' i Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
( u2 w' x% H! S$ ^5 d' c& M -------------------------------------------------------------; d0 ~. @) r1 S
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
: r/ g5 ?4 l- r) j -------------------------------------------------------------# B+ \! p' k9 Q
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
" }+ }6 |9 j+ v5 N$ R -------------------------------------------------------------( n" |9 M& ]6 G, w: N$ s
Saint John N/A - - N/A
3 _1 N6 A8 w% C- d, y -------------------------------------------------------------1 H( v: {! @# E0 R3 F- y* h
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%" q0 o+ L+ x4 N$ J% m* b+ Y, Q: T
-------------------------------------------------------------
" T/ _. r2 [6 L. m Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
2 y/ Y3 v6 S6 o, a- X -------------------------------------------------------------9 v$ C" b8 {: Z7 u m' m. d
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%/ a% C7 y8 p( C3 R0 r3 n
-------------------------------------------------------------( d N$ ?. r6 _
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%; }, R5 ^9 K9 {; c! Q D& o
-------------------------------------------------------------6 Q* F! Y6 `/ t% y5 M- x' S0 ?
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
& i* y& W9 ]# [+ ` -------------------------------------------------------------
" H% S4 p% J/ T1 P- c4 H- ^5 x Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%+ D. d$ D2 z- o$ g! ?9 M" }! b
-------------------------------------------------------------; l2 d6 j& t& T, M. @- h
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
' r: j7 m8 S) L9 Q3 c3 o- I4 a -------------------------------------------------------------8 Z* | o5 G6 ~- K1 Y7 e7 @
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
/ F. C; }5 k$ I! D3 V: y -------------------------------------------------------------
! B9 I* j; s& @ Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%; U) c, e, f. N2 u( s# W
-------------------------------------------------------------" a/ ]% k" U& k( Y* Y H
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%& Q6 q8 M- p% i' `
-------------------------------------------------------------# M; u& M: K" ~. h9 |' b
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
$ z) S5 y' d# Q- N3 }* X -------------------------------------------------------------% r0 ~7 A x. r% r
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%/ t/ h( f! `! w. ` {- m% A( g
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 Q, J& F2 P, f" H >> Y# [. ?) X: B" W" `) o0 F4 w
- ^+ a" l0 d _
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
: P7 P4 R v5 W r" iin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
* b1 b; Z0 T, O( f2 o. dJohn and Victoria.
1 ]' i8 O7 M7 T+ w, H5 r
2 ~) |0 f: I& K; L The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most8 r% P8 G& K$ I" N
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
- K& y2 }! j# y/ @6 T% {: Z" L3 Uhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release8 h9 ^; U' `# X$ k! r K( K
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price' @8 O0 \& r( t, L% K* a# k
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
' q5 S2 ~, k9 s' x$ d$ Q" E! c1 Sacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
3 E. u& r# J( v" s! W! uavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current/ J6 \' F( B, H* ~2 h
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
! B7 d# D' p1 N6 ?1 G( t/ D: Eversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
' `: |, b- ~6 b! j1 D- yNovember 15, 2006.
- T6 {# c( N4 y Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of# D$ m6 [$ p6 {, ~
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
: W: L5 r) z9 l: d' A6 O1 ]1 w& N* Sprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
j8 h1 f9 H+ |# O* T+ ]available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|