 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
0 G, c. f P. g# h! D! t) U
3 ]- e4 N5 S* k8 `- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
9 S2 b, \9 ^6 {( k/ Q# s; b) L$ p1 h' f' ]" u1 o {
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market$ l8 ~' ?% j0 m, D, i/ r# P
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
2 Z1 A ?9 b' Rquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic! n7 ~ x8 K. g) i( B7 j
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit" i8 i, m) K0 G' E/ F( e, m+ D
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and3 K( h! I6 r, c+ b! w9 I
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,3 v! e5 D, n: c A: C9 t
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
. [: O8 z" J- e6 w5 RLePage Real Estate Services., z! [- T$ ]* n6 Q5 Q
4 i( z* d* ?& L0 z; {
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
# w; Q; q2 Z7 H0 ware forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
$ C- K/ U& m& s: r7 H3 `conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and2 m1 M. C# y/ h! V% K, S0 B' i
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
2 t2 L$ `7 l$ M$ K" iresidential real estate sector., E3 a0 w% r, G. g8 u
. r5 j" E8 s; p, E8 V( t Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation3 @ t( B, N5 ?7 r% t
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)1 d0 Q# z- r0 u' d1 [' ]7 `
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562" H3 x2 k* M4 r8 [
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
. ]. w$ F0 E+ r(+13.2%).
1 Z4 j" u7 e. R: H2 f- U j% o
5 E* |$ K; f. o- T1 Y+ } "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth/ D L3 A9 I6 W
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the# u$ ]4 R7 D% r/ b. H1 p! F- T
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
( W: @. C. z6 t7 v7 Z3 H+ @poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,% R/ N b3 [% [/ C& K E
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.* U, M. x; Y7 b3 n
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We$ D7 e6 N6 m- n1 K+ ?
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy6 N' _0 ~& l' m
balanced market."" s+ J& ]8 ^6 J3 T
* w0 }) i% U M3 ?9 t% e! @
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,$ A( q! L* g7 i2 c- D: l
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift. ?( f% L. ]0 G" Y) g; u
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued( V9 N0 D% S" z/ M6 Y
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core8 ]! U( G7 g7 } }/ n0 ^8 B
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
/ z0 h2 O2 h' Xmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
0 k, t; I+ w7 M. y- g2 L" r5 z9 Wbreaking price appreciations.
" A( F2 E) s8 W o% l6 E
9 a4 u' f; B; k Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding- @* e; j) S; S4 c: o
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the, S+ T0 p( i2 @( b/ {, h. T
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.: n4 O) M' l' h- b2 B$ z9 A
% k$ W$ c& l3 p
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
* r; f3 w3 k- {% P6 r2 A5 xeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer4 ?# F) \" w- V) }. ^' M$ W/ ~
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off! L9 j& X4 r: P+ g6 O6 l" D! B
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
5 K+ X9 [: R& OIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
. V! F; S. c7 r8 d+ C2 j4 a' s W2 Ygreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
. O- o- R% z: w& Iprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
: p' @0 h6 w) x4 R: |' ~+ I1 ^
4 ?/ j2 T' U- K2 X/ u While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing U, ?/ d0 g; n0 P. M3 V
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
; B: [+ x9 H) F* J8 x! i( \$ X* Ffinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
: M' W. C K+ N: E7 `are markedly different than those found in the United States.
, W& a3 ~1 F7 v) d' I, M/ R0 \3 p7 i( Y% i8 g3 p, E, d: a0 V
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
: n; v( o* B5 ]& a+ a4 j5 r1 rAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's( g& D" ]( E2 ~- R7 S0 v
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the9 A6 _, h7 c% j' G2 W" h5 I
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
O5 c8 p& T8 Oaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the: Z. N. C0 d0 r* O* f
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
0 U, q0 b( ^$ haggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
$ y8 M0 i' z' ^. s6 i& ?7 S; G( Wmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
6 G& l/ b* h& b1 A( ~1 N" [
" N5 G }' u6 D+ r0 I3 X <<
* O& |6 l3 S5 f. K7 u REGIONAL SUMMARIES
7 l8 {* W9 B) ?9 D; T# f >>; Q3 K2 Y+ p8 d
' h0 G. K+ c3 G6 O' v# T0 l2 M6 t Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
3 w+ E7 `9 Y3 T" {8 ^- VHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
) r+ C( C1 a# O4 D4 C, ^of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time3 `$ l) w& y* n5 j7 h- P) D
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
+ P1 S d4 m% b Nrenovations.
8 r& L/ D9 Q) ~' r' E/ I
5 P+ L1 Z* r, Q8 k1 I( ` The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight" ^8 z$ V0 L& w2 D) f
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation' t. i) s! e V5 Q# D+ W. t6 @; T, G
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and" N8 i" } u, h' U. M2 p6 m4 z# q! q
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
+ W2 R) q5 T: o( ~- G/ Z8 @- A' o, T
* U8 a: ]2 b7 x9 d4 g# s The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
/ `" I5 G4 {6 ?1 j7 Z+ Nslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the0 \" h8 l1 {6 e/ S
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new5 |( e" K- ] Q, ~' e3 p' E
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores. S1 c5 K: F; Q) [) r/ }! J( i5 k
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes4 F& J# z/ j R. j0 Z
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
5 R) I7 y( O2 [7 y4 {4 R% \6 ?, I k! j
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced u. S) I2 E0 }6 Y& G, q
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
& G- R: X* S \% ]homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers0 V7 Q/ [$ E6 Q
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian p7 A1 |4 Q% G" p! C; I/ v/ X9 j0 C
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing1 [& ^3 v2 y' H5 N" t
buyers with more options when looking for a home.4 x. q- U8 m, z [
, Y+ v* u- U# U& b
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly& {3 w. w4 y! q' A. O' ^- @
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
6 f0 e' Z8 `3 ^, M! w% A+ ]priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,& x6 X: y& e9 y; Y0 f
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
0 ?& R; D$ k lfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.7 k8 _. h1 T S X9 Q
: n& i9 B# ~6 X/ G/ S( s4 H# c Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house4 v' Q+ @, Z' C
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
2 Z3 K3 z* D8 R2 i* \6 Hlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting4 m3 r6 N" v- O- A8 m- w0 e: B
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,3 |, w5 F7 Z, w. \; x2 \
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
0 n9 T9 F4 G; O9 Npressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before% ~# n5 l: k. D/ {, @& f
making a purchase.
3 ]% C4 c/ `0 L. y, d' q7 e* g7 S# x7 f" }" }. i
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
! ?2 F% E) \! C }6 ]; I; g9 mmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
, S: h7 r' A _ u. Yconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
. D2 P7 f! I% bcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting. ~" T; H- b( `, k" F j% r
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
8 q$ I" G8 `% W4 j' F* xamenities.
# j! R- A. c" \" L; B
5 X6 w: b# y( q; T( j The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels8 v' U- ^4 Z% I4 {' Q3 F9 X1 A( K
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
1 M1 P# @' D; h" `+ gacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has; D+ d( I& [3 ]7 ? y; o
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been7 J3 A: n5 Y6 i5 E0 \
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
; v2 t- X4 K. h6 c9 r: tresidence, rather than for investment.! i) P$ {9 m5 E7 f1 {
' D. N- Y7 k' F* { The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
& v4 _ J" [0 H5 Qhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted+ |/ T( M: z$ `
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
5 y0 e/ \- I+ ^* H- i8 V% @+ d0 nconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization3 Z5 x) O- l. q# X; P* J, |
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
. ~7 z& \: N! b9 kthe market.2 l6 E% ~" F; T' E1 \" ?
6 s5 P6 n, q, S, i* m
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through# L% S2 U6 V, Z1 ^: q
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In9 b& ?2 C9 ~7 f: Q' j9 `+ Y
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
% V0 |9 I) P- i! ymonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
. u! P9 @$ Y. G$ E, I. j7 fto the shortage of available inventory.
. e3 @! ^9 m& h# U, s2 d+ K
" h1 Q/ [* D" ? Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its& `0 M( G" v# ?1 U6 y9 z, K
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains T1 a0 {' T4 ?" M; D- \! g
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses9 _; {9 r9 w: b: }# t8 }
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.0 H4 p3 w2 B+ F F* o# z% s" [8 ^3 k
\6 W [/ W6 C; Z# f+ f
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
+ O- }0 L. |2 ~& ?4 T! jin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low3 i: \* m' d" f8 `4 J% h0 d
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
/ l% K) K- {+ Q. S- Gpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
; K" j' K2 m- Pprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
/ |+ Y. o, Q" U B4 k; M- {season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as8 I7 D, x6 j0 Q$ n& v. _0 z7 i; |
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.' D* D, o) m* t% E' p. e" i+ z* F: u9 a
2 v5 m/ }, t: P& f/ n$ l8 o
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter% }8 Q* a! d& V6 w& S9 u
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton$ \) F- h3 U5 o' j! B8 {1 H5 O
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
" {" i/ o" e6 F, ^$ S" i7 e) f3 kmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices8 H8 E3 k/ W2 O
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve$ v7 J) I+ ?) g) X: u$ v: i
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly/ b o. e% o. m( U# v: C
towards the end of 2006. 2 X# q4 p$ U- e" T2 X
1 N5 t6 ^" B! O) z7 m1 O3 n3 @1 r/ O3 p
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
) |1 {% g; Z5 D# Q& ]1 ^5 B2 W8 zinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
" D* v4 J- G9 A+ c$ F2 c7 I/ sto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
2 L5 f$ `, n. c( Y5 zgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to* A, Q8 i3 o8 |4 h* f
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
7 G* c; }$ {$ A | y- Apressure on tight inventory levels.
. i, j3 }, n; g5 R g; s3 T
+ _3 h8 E' ?8 C4 @# \& {1 r Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
( r% V! h* R! d9 V6 Dfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
$ F# {( W- ]) y Binto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;* p7 L' K$ a- q. l/ k
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching$ D) k7 Q: n9 W* C4 b, V3 T- \0 H
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
5 T( f& K$ i0 a5 Z( S; `2 F, W; W+ n2 [% h! ~* o
<<1 n0 Q6 e+ E7 f$ x O3 Z) u( f
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006+ d2 S* {7 K5 d# I8 s
) R) ~; Q. A* N
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# ?) k) `3 A* y8 I! z& d/ i
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey, v1 t+ i" V" C; v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 p2 u- z ]+ [" K3 }' @
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q33 {, B+ d0 P0 o
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
0 F2 {& T9 }7 y( c8 L -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 o0 o( }/ [, |1 g8 `8 z+ `
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
' k1 \7 _4 ^, u; x -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! Y! w$ B! s6 z7 r7 ]& N9 ~3 j) H Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
' v3 T' E( z* h0 ]5 q: @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% {% n5 q( x) S- i) d Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
4 s0 k H$ _1 g( s -------------------------------------------------------------------------& W1 o% }9 }; O+ D* M5 |" p+ P/ y: }
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
/ a( F4 o; p: D0 ~' r -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- s0 q' S" M0 X$ q St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333, q: i0 m. ]/ L# r4 q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; k+ @. j% @" ^0 P$ v. l1 g
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583$ Y/ ^& E2 V# A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# S* b! C/ g/ ]( N# C1 j. \- U Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185$ ^$ J5 U+ \' U+ Y+ F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# s( O$ |4 b. ^! Z, q Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250, n6 r- \2 Q/ V+ L2 d) _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, l; q! j- e' Y; C6 [! S Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766. }, T4 Q, s- Z2 L3 L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) q/ } T. d1 V- L, c
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707' }$ k5 ~2 Y) q2 H" s L. I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 @& e7 u+ B/ J8 h" z7 [5 e1 ?
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
/ M: I$ g9 ~9 w' |8 O1 n -------------------------------------------------------------------------. ^" x' I- \7 X1 X
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
$ M, _6 q, }' h( k ------------------------------------------------------------------------- K% Y+ t( f* x( B
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
d) {* b0 F" B; o" B -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, t7 z4 w! A" o: x: O; L6 q* t Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
7 A! x' q1 ^6 i) s. \' `# w0 i -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ y9 e/ |. Z) R' |( r
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
3 L- v; @ H9 v/ a, C6 @$ A0 Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 |9 o* J7 n9 |2 i! Y8 n7 E
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
5 Z3 W( Q8 T6 \1 ?, ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 v% e; S* I" X# ?
4 N, \8 T# K3 |/ g$ {6 F -------------------------------------------------------------9 u5 ]" G$ S2 C1 s
Standard Condominium3 g# D& T) R; Q R/ v$ [
-------------------------------------------------------------
! Q" o! ~1 I2 |9 ?2 w: k6 l- z 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
9 [; D8 Z% B% h. H$ [6 r8 v+ z Market % Change Average Average % Change' d( z0 S# b' ]8 M& X% B
-------------------------------------------------------------
Q. [* e% A3 N" C! E! |7 @: H Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
+ S8 ^: ~& r$ b( g, w/ v* J& ^ -------------------------------------------------------------
& w% t$ e2 N( V3 C `2 N( g$ P1 L: X Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%) d( k, l% x5 l5 q
-------------------------------------------------------------. I: m" C3 v- h* E6 p# M/ A4 W
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
. ~& ~% v& P8 k -------------------------------------------------------------
$ v& g) Y$ ]$ I9 z6 m Saint John N/A - - N/A
+ A" a% P, M. W7 W3 K -------------------------------------------------------------! @- Z7 Z& `3 r7 Y: s9 f
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
3 e! U0 E7 X" s E0 w1 ~- A -------------------------------------------------------------5 l* c; C) ~# G* j7 F
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%+ l3 {% p) [+ c$ h1 r2 ]! @1 s
-------------------------------------------------------------! c# `% i) A* `9 p( d; U+ r
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%# F3 s( x( c, M/ U. r! i3 }
-------------------------------------------------------------2 g: k: x" t3 K4 ]* r
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
: l2 e: U1 o( Z/ X6 x -------------------------------------------------------------
) R( q. K/ U, C: l5 t: n1 C Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
, M1 q/ |8 g* M& v -------------------------------------------------------------
, b/ M1 H& t0 I- ^( C9 Z Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
! M: j3 P+ y: P. I0 \8 }1 _ -------------------------------------------------------------! \, R; v& q" [
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%! U; ?/ X( p8 I: m4 \3 [
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ w& _5 U( s4 ?& C5 Y Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%: h ^; @" v+ s0 ]! D
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 O- @8 t6 D* D Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
/ m; C3 v' V7 m( A -------------------------------------------------------------6 J8 ~# c( D; k1 S
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%( r8 m/ V8 R/ N4 @% e/ y6 s, T: ?
-------------------------------------------------------------
. l" z; P2 Q6 g0 a h Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%5 d8 K% }$ L7 W" r8 H. n" J
-------------------------------------------------------------, f' F5 x/ a. Z2 Z4 E
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
, Y7 Q# W+ x" }! d) a9 e/ y -------------------------------------------------------------" M/ O( G1 w t
>>/ a' L! Z2 e/ g, a9 C
; E: H' @7 D C) O' U& V0 C Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined: d8 ^( l) L' E0 R4 @
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
6 e% q4 K# ]6 j5 U5 Z: Y* AJohn and Victoria.% q' Y5 t q. X: {* q3 b2 B; u
; k6 y! s5 x( k/ }7 p6 F The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most- @$ j5 R; e7 L5 ~5 r
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of" I! X0 g1 x, Z7 B/ }' ~7 X4 M1 V
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release O9 }$ p' \$ Z( T# r/ e8 Z
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
$ z- w k9 {% c9 xtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
% E$ U0 i; }# s& B9 ?across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
5 Z" c# b8 t# |# w0 javailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
: m; f; ?& m& f' e6 ^% x6 a. Ofigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
* y' l* G" t0 v5 _5 A2 D) b+ Zversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on1 R4 }# v& I% o. u9 S: ^% n
November 15, 2006.8 g, K" q. z' |/ Q, E
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
( Y; y9 E% d! s2 P: C" v: efair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge) a& F4 N- P- J/ d3 K1 [
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is* B9 l6 A4 y" d4 w3 ^; u4 H
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|