 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
Q5 `7 t! @5 N& m. r( f! l) m: d; k% C; k# T c+ T! h% h
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -( a/ v, i1 d- ^9 o
% E- k+ A0 h2 [/ c9 i$ M1 Y3 p TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
7 N9 N H$ j, t/ N% ?exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
' [- G5 F9 K6 xquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic& W( Q) a% _7 l3 Q2 G& d
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit; U' W" `2 a6 s) O
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
1 _, m( p0 w7 H, e6 mmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
8 Y0 z. p# J1 N0 h$ h) _4 V. a" pQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal& S! Y/ i: g+ j! k
LePage Real Estate Services.
- N2 K0 _) A9 Q5 l0 o
5 g6 t0 T, q5 L5 i# J Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters( d5 d8 _. C h1 Q
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic$ U/ N2 B' ?" @2 n
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
! R9 Y1 \, _$ P4 V" z1 ksound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
* z0 z, W4 y c3 F* \residential real estate sector.3 c) t+ K i+ w I1 l
% Y4 T5 u' g7 J/ g( x
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
( o! W2 t( w# J5 P0 O+ moccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%). W4 K& c. e, ]5 B
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5623 q5 y& A' m0 s2 e( u/ f% Z( o
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
' J, v; y7 ~2 q* X1 X(+13.2%).6 u H" x0 y% _
% H- a0 P' j) K" B5 k
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth) }7 i2 H3 w+ S
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the2 G4 a: H9 x! t
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are( ^( | O o6 r: h6 |/ i' I
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,1 s W7 B9 n! ~% f/ a; E, _; c& u
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
8 D8 {7 r. ?8 R) j"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
& {. b$ j1 m# e/ N+ |welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy, f/ c4 A. V8 M0 A3 p
balanced market."' I) l3 E: @1 X! c2 C
' b0 a: P9 w) a) X- o
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
+ I. o8 p' }5 o* D- l0 Jconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
5 c* x, [8 n5 Cto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
/ g c9 ^% H0 J: |throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
' y3 D! I9 L' M$ renergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
; Y: r8 `) o' H' T+ _, imanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record' e9 u* ]8 Q' i
breaking price appreciations.
! t4 `2 j4 P6 C! V2 o0 f l9 M/ q( V# u5 I* H6 S* S
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding* Y# V! j# i1 G+ c0 r J1 q
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
; M" W! _) u* h! @largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
! N2 O) j% T5 W$ {4 A0 K8 K( u5 Y8 x, W/ @/ _' ~+ h0 Z' X) y
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
* Z) W, X3 k! R4 n" `8 Yeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer: j; a- ^! Q; u$ \9 [. @6 w* h
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
5 e: Y5 Z- F& ?& G. T. o, U8 Hslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.8 R, o( \* Y) M+ R+ X
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
% L" P5 @ K# ~5 qgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of; \. Z' ]/ j+ |5 M1 G" P
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
: T" y; s- f/ [% x3 z, A2 M$ e" v0 y9 j D$ i7 D, |/ p
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing y, j ~* h e
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
: a9 I# C7 V, ^financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
0 y8 \2 P' l2 h% p0 Nare markedly different than those found in the United States.
) j) A/ F4 X5 H8 [; H
% f3 i! k; L* _ l4 Z8 I# a Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
9 d% B* f2 W+ n/ E1 ]7 c, D" SAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's3 c4 Y) c* U+ M. D2 a# T
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
: P- K* U$ T6 }; O: |/ Wrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
5 K& v, c0 X* u% R5 B/ L" kaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
2 P. j* q2 O: B% c* F( Y7 L; Q. Q3 _downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
3 A* ]6 Q+ b; T* p5 aaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
& X s% f# ~# y, j0 {mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
( ~3 Q, L) q5 T4 ~9 t4 |
! S5 W) \& O. N8 g1 I( w+ G <<
, X2 K: M' T8 c+ a) j2 w REGIONAL SUMMARIES1 K! v1 L( K- M" D* G& r! b9 e
>>0 Y p5 i5 P( ?5 q! i
* T2 x' F2 |8 @$ V Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
* x) ]* e5 ^( t3 S: AHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate! Q3 N4 t8 }5 L& r
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time6 u- O8 f! _8 O; I8 Z" |! T+ C
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of, o* k. ~& c9 e* c
renovations.0 h/ Y. Q0 _% W& R9 f- y2 L Q1 c: A
8 F1 Q; T8 e5 U0 g' [
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
3 @! X+ S7 T$ x8 fincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
, i2 U" G% a2 j9 E$ J2 W! B: qcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
. s4 `5 U5 J: @September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter., v, u4 G' O. `& q {5 S: X+ v8 S
) H$ q9 `! Y! u% V2 A2 |- G: k7 X
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer! p' A$ T. } g; a& S4 W! [
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
7 R5 G% n5 D: x1 @! p( iquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new' y+ K$ U' B( `: ?: j
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
" W" D; H9 t7 i* Y4 Q* `to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes+ e4 E/ }7 g" H/ S9 K/ R/ v% n# l
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
; r5 k0 t, [& `8 M( N4 U
( ^9 s# {4 u1 Q6 F/ ]5 I In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
2 P; ] R H4 r1 _3 I* Hconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their; `1 A/ H. H/ n+ R9 \
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
; i: f7 F; O4 O& Swas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian- S* ]( U3 G8 C+ P: L3 n
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
' z0 Z4 }. H( O$ E/ H: v) Y# p. ~/ vbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
2 p# ~3 s( Q' q" V+ ^. H5 \2 G# d8 D- C. s+ e+ U
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly0 H$ o6 Q' y% Q5 L0 y; d! f
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes& p9 } Q# k J7 M. v/ y3 z
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
7 a. ?' x" R' h/ J( Oas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last6 s# {# R+ s9 ?4 n' z. o" a2 A
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.7 E: r p0 h2 m, V! R( a
, [/ Z, O. d2 R# f+ K Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
% j9 {& w+ h; s" Lprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory' e7 T0 H2 L; n1 ~
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting" n( C* N; p3 q$ m# Q
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1, C) I9 R" L! ]% ]6 F
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the$ r/ i4 I0 w9 ?- m3 `& p) u
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
. t# p. v, U! n, vmaking a purchase.5 t, |& L% d' f; z, S8 k* R
2 m# ~' _* B, j% A; C6 q# | w4 z5 A! |
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
# t: C$ R ?* {# ?' ^5 }markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
1 V% X* l& S: a, R) c/ C/ rconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city( W2 d+ \) H: U' M" B
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting8 t! N) u$ S& W9 P
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown) e, N, Z8 o7 \9 k1 r- c
amenities.4 K) L3 d* {/ d/ r# \
?: [0 Z! H( S, J The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels* ~* ?. }+ [) ~2 P) @
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
! M# G7 M5 C1 p7 T7 Oacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
- i# q _6 A6 C/ ]& `) \continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
5 x3 K$ T% L+ \4 `8 z4 O c. \driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
* _) J6 f6 E ]- U/ e- W: P# C$ @residence, rather than for investment.
7 [3 ]9 ]8 n3 S/ ]2 _2 a7 g0 C! Y, a( D9 Z- t* A Q) q& t( ^
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as2 O, ? h. z; P0 X
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted0 g7 X7 W" _2 `" D/ D8 S+ N! K+ b
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
* H% Q/ O3 q$ jconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization+ a/ _; X- _/ @5 d& E+ E: H
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter) \6 r2 D# N! j! n0 |4 Z: U1 _8 h+ c
the market.
+ y! K; X& T6 G( @* s" E. X2 _8 o
/ q# D* [3 d$ {7 k) j+ M H In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through; [* G- [' M7 k8 O3 ~& p2 E
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
C' c) @' C5 uAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring9 u$ m; a4 y4 r4 s8 n! }% ~
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due# Y6 B, ]" K& Y
to the shortage of available inventory.
* P u# q1 A& a% Z& [0 i3 i) D7 f) ^1 ^. w$ k7 a3 _2 s
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
% w$ ]% H' o, A& k, Y/ L4 umomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains. x1 f7 s# {- |7 S) |
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
- P) Q* C9 h" j: V3 V" Qstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
% r6 f! [ q* T; D# x8 u0 E) J% O# x- |+ C9 U! o& L `' i/ n; O
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases+ c7 m- q# W1 E" f6 O0 y
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low$ `9 n; l9 t, D( s* Y6 e% Z
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that: B4 O- F/ A+ D, m' }$ ?5 c: J
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring) ?- Z3 J, t4 \+ U1 o8 `
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
! G3 i( z: h/ n* L/ Q: _season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
8 v) h* G7 c6 D/ a- c7 W4 z: Hbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.1 x9 P; m O( V8 m
6 A% w2 {( p# w C# u Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter# H; E4 Q, D; ], k4 v
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton, h* t. @ f' }9 N
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
1 M; S9 u1 p1 u) I4 L' F7 Lmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices; ~- e8 l( Q& ~2 U9 ^+ |
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
6 h0 b9 J' K! j2 n9 c1 min the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly0 p7 z& d6 p# f% s7 t3 d0 w
towards the end of 2006. ( i0 J" }" D4 }0 Q, h' v9 n: u& u, l2 I
- Z1 W* j# k3 k2 G, ZWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
i+ q4 i/ F% Y0 T. z# linventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable4 R8 V9 E! G) w! l
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
8 P9 o. h. H/ D0 ?group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to+ [' }) u% y$ K5 }) n& f
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added* `. J- c; n; ?% k
pressure on tight inventory levels.
, Z/ U' r* }5 J$ [9 k5 l. k. H/ ^, k O r7 t K' L2 m$ H
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
& k" m! o" w) H" \& L! Ffundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
/ [0 z- ~5 {7 ninto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
6 \4 E Q1 i+ b% }while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
& ?& c% f6 u1 q9 Vfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.# l8 Y$ A4 L. t v8 H% I" l0 |
/ _! c4 G& \) _; F* }/ j4 w <<7 `. e. C5 `$ H" ~9 u
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
. M- Y1 y2 r+ h- w. n. Y# ?' J+ z0 G& E0 H( Y/ |6 l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" E9 ?/ G$ W, B6 C8 m4 r
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey% B- \* `, m6 T6 O# Q6 Z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. h4 ~9 V! n6 \/ O/ Z* {" @
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
+ H9 Z( c9 V' q& v Market Average Average % Change Average Average
- O1 J6 Q" U9 @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* p! Z. X+ w$ V b9 q: C5 @ Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
( l! Z' w' ^7 J& z( c: v u -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* M2 j9 S. I& @6 B$ I Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000: ^: a, ^* d3 o# Q0 m2 l. R/ o3 S+ M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( h. O7 i$ B, ]& e5 X9 L0 U Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000 u9 j5 H2 S3 m; C D) o$ T1 r5 j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" c, N% E' ~8 K( K( |
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -. F B9 T1 j( ~2 `& q% l6 \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: R( Q* d0 ]* n1 t" k
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333& J# N' g% A7 u0 |2 N+ t% P) B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! S: S) v& w6 O
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
& b* b( h9 R, F$ p& l+ M -------------------------------------------------------------------------& m4 G. a7 T0 t1 }. v6 V! T' X
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1852 o/ g+ i- ^2 h* E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ b$ T" L! ]& j. F; V. Z2 l5 z
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250* s7 F1 q# d9 s. i2 k4 ]0 z' C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ T/ E7 T6 @( C8 u$ R1 r Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
7 p" U4 m6 U9 O' r0 _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 e: d! v: N# f9 M' L$ p/ R2 I3 @
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
6 K8 V% c7 y& a! F- Z9 t -------------------------------------------------------------------------. m# i1 M7 W9 V! c4 O/ V# N
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500: A6 c; o6 z& `( X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; o. z g$ e$ @- g Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
) A1 Z/ Q) H& n/ Y3 }$ e -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; Q, N1 j. V2 g& x, k9 M+ ` Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
$ L9 E' w' u, n& r7 c4 S# t1 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' g! N& m# C' b4 r% d0 H/ ] Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
& I1 n3 e# W8 t1 Z1 X4 _7 ]: @1 w -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Y6 t, T; v+ P3 f0 Q ~0 k! S Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0000 x+ E9 \% `- G7 a' X& D* ]- K: i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 C2 o+ U( G+ E( b" E% v8 e National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8606 c/ r8 {2 S$ u+ `; s, Q! A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' H5 z- l6 P" B+ E' w
, j+ O. c% T' F: t k -------------------------------------------------------------
0 w. k, j8 T0 G/ l0 j. f# g Standard Condominium
3 K7 X L; W4 ^% M# Z* h -------------------------------------------------------------
7 @$ \9 ]/ s$ g: f 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo2 G" d4 P( A+ Q% ~* c. `" T- {
Market % Change Average Average % Change- L0 n& G6 g4 H, M L. \6 a: s' ]3 j1 z
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 k* O7 R( x* t1 H+ x6 t2 G+ | Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%( K8 Z5 @- c1 }/ O; ?; P: m) d, J
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 Z! l' z; V( A6 S0 b8 Q Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
0 }& @( O6 A# @5 G$ R, x8 N! ]" f -------------------------------------------------------------+ E" `1 B; B) \4 J5 u4 e4 U
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
) d* R" v. J( b! r -------------------------------------------------------------
" I. l$ i+ E* o Saint John N/A - - N/A3 f8 e$ J) h. \; V0 K7 s0 g
-------------------------------------------------------------" q7 S2 u3 Q+ c7 ]
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
7 J# Z2 b6 T+ o7 ]$ f- k -------------------------------------------------------------. W/ x6 b/ j+ b) w; n) h% h8 j! t& c
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%+ z2 l; q5 k- u0 L9 {
-------------------------------------------------------------
; P8 v5 f0 c% N# _/ O. V S( O Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
+ G5 }" e A6 F3 c( A( C0 y -------------------------------------------------------------
0 j7 }4 X4 N2 J6 w$ l! o Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%5 g+ W: S7 k. O% l- ^
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 r: j- t# h' |. J" H0 k Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
: R8 h' ]1 j6 h -------------------------------------------------------------2 L3 H c3 B7 h, W/ ~& D
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%+ F1 D9 W! \. p" w. ^; |9 S
-------------------------------------------------------------, @8 K, c5 ^, t" H- ^
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
5 b& O) P9 o4 p& {" _! a0 J# I) ~- l, W+ [ -------------------------------------------------------------8 T. m3 h! b. B) Z+ `( h
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
5 U- X% ]! g, x7 d; C -------------------------------------------------------------
$ _9 ?! k' e" ~6 E Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%9 Y5 \+ Z7 p# o8 q% L
-------------------------------------------------------------
; J+ W& Z7 E* n' c+ C+ P Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%7 }% p; w4 ~5 m) P
-------------------------------------------------------------
% W7 ]. e0 C4 `- T$ y0 `4 I1 w Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
5 V& n$ ^6 s& U4 b/ d -------------------------------------------------------------
: W( c; ?6 t7 y5 ~( j7 c National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
" r0 I7 B/ `' \( Q, r8 T M -------------------------------------------------------------" m& C: m3 k0 J( w
>>
3 Z1 x5 E1 A: N& y! P9 U% W. t( z
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
9 U5 M! S& h- p& J3 e. x) e3 Lin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint& T- m s& b) Z u4 V+ f
John and Victoria.
; A+ [" y9 n/ P) R" @+ `
' J) k8 q* [8 ` The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
. K H& Y: n4 j6 F+ kcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of ]/ ?7 F4 w, [1 H8 q+ g
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release @9 ]5 K( ^" O6 m5 v- b( ]4 a
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
1 d; F+ \: I& b3 S' F; `# Ttrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities$ E1 h o9 x6 A" X7 w4 y8 V
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is7 u3 E- i* b5 F @$ L0 e
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current; h H4 ?$ X* p& S4 r
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable% P8 s# n; s5 P% d. [/ O% O+ t
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
0 r* S) V: \& |/ O1 {; hNovember 15, 2006.
( A. n9 Y* b6 T1 V, B8 C ~ Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
5 p+ g1 C2 b5 r8 O1 b* B- X+ j- ^fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge0 E7 [& p0 _1 E- T! J/ N. {3 Z& v
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
" ^( O2 ?/ A) p# P/ Javailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|