 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 5 S5 g C$ ^& T+ E& Z) E* ?
8 q) {7 H9 q4 L- s3 U$ X! A
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
R, j0 u& v$ @# L/ o- u* j( f
6 o, ?; B1 ]* o$ ?: E% J5 C1 v( n TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
1 n! w7 ]! R# Zexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third! `/ H7 x1 n, x: g; g x3 t. c9 [
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
: e' k/ U( r& Lin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
1 l$ O9 Y, w: ?+ k; V7 m+ ]price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and, _: B' o1 a" f. K
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,0 P* S7 u2 P0 B/ r6 Q
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
" f) ~# `$ ^2 z1 z& m. x" uLePage Real Estate Services.
" c+ V# B9 W3 v5 v5 g: s( L. k! g( W L
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
5 x/ I# T5 ^ a, v8 }& R) aare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
8 D/ X1 ]8 G0 H1 e+ rconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and* {- w+ l X7 [5 h1 j
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
7 q7 N# i9 ~- \; t/ E0 H$ n4 y/ ]residential real estate sector.
8 L( n, E" ^7 ^% ]
6 y2 E9 w; z% @3 c Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation% J3 b ]% P* h& y: }; t" f+ m
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
9 A6 ~( C* g* s' W; cyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562 ^, K) _) b3 y6 G3 d
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
9 ~. Y- F) }7 D) z; K0 O; w(+13.2%).2 ]3 [$ u7 s% I" p' v8 `3 u4 q
0 W4 B9 Y7 [- q& K/ N$ d
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth8 V) _; X5 f& e E
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
! p' ?6 t$ {2 d; Y2 k: Nfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
7 X/ }/ L( r, T) z: o7 \poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,# B; |* j0 G- I9 {( ?" s+ Z- i0 d' B
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
; D1 D8 C! Q$ s* ?( J/ q/ z \"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
4 k4 `$ v, j8 ~& q. ~welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
0 B& E: U m* B7 U+ zbalanced market."2 C6 l% l" M# y0 y L
1 t2 N$ e @. f2 y
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
F5 C& w* J, ]8 lconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift) n7 Z' X. G* U+ ?7 ]
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
* {1 P" h. w7 s2 Y3 `; Dthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core! Z3 D/ f0 K- g9 t, B' X+ o
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,- n d* u; V8 k7 w& R+ _
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
# g1 u- ?0 o8 K1 l _- b1 R& kbreaking price appreciations.: B3 u7 X b3 A* a D, `1 I- ~
: W1 q- f. X$ ?* o
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
1 S. i& I6 j5 u% Veconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the) c7 `1 |3 R/ g+ z# m' O* ^7 L% ~
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
$ Z# W: y- ~" B# V
2 ~; q$ H6 A$ E# d In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid9 f- x6 d. d: P) i
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
/ j$ w, H4 }6 z1 Z0 X. zconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off( J/ r& ~$ w5 T$ N5 N7 h9 r
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.* g! ^& Z. N7 d% o
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers7 ~5 U, t) F) W( u; b5 O
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
. G& ^: y/ e: V5 h( S8 a* ~price appreciation when compared with 2005.
8 e _* G3 b' T0 W4 s) V4 s( \
6 \* d+ @, W% m6 @/ M( | While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing7 s( A. j0 y+ M8 X( l2 Z
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and2 ?4 j1 z/ P% T# q& I0 s
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
; |: I( ]+ x2 [$ D; R2 Z" Xare markedly different than those found in the United States.; b( E- T5 ?" G, M/ T
5 i8 Y1 e' i/ W Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
- [, C9 {7 b/ x( p2 @American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
4 _2 g3 f; y. _favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the7 P& t1 w4 F2 L/ A5 A- R8 ]
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general% Z* i3 F* c/ A: t: h1 F
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
7 N1 @4 c3 ]# ?5 i/ fdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
( b4 e( O1 q5 ]- [" @1 _& z7 @aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
3 W9 k: F9 n+ [2 Nmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
, G# S8 F* D& {$ E/ I6 F( ], f7 z! s! j7 L$ M
<<
) i6 E v$ u, l: y1 `5 a- k REGIONAL SUMMARIES( a8 e$ x2 B9 n
>>
" }$ z/ Q9 v: m4 b
( M& [; @- ^$ X Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
" q% p& ~9 b9 DHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate8 ?& j4 \ w g
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
; N: D; m$ ^9 _- Dlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
- b4 c( ]4 L) R) {0 \7 _7 I) Qrenovations.
( i; ~% R# E( z/ R/ o
; |! A* L0 F" {7 e0 m4 \ The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight% U% {' k: `7 X; X+ T2 Z' S3 e
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
+ V, V5 d2 G- ?( w1 r; b1 }9 hcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and& _$ a" P6 V3 `( f7 u3 Z/ W3 [
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
( e; k6 `. v! ~+ w: c4 b7 \2 @" l; A$ {
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer$ H i- \7 O, g ~. n
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
9 u5 S- U' S2 G4 q. j5 S9 ]quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
2 k% a6 C, m# @# N8 q# C600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores k4 m8 d& ]9 X% n8 [
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
& {! p0 _- Q1 u& J% Dand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
7 X {; O( y1 ^' F
- ^; T! Z* [+ t% G" L+ F In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
: c: W. S, o' x* G' p+ {5 `conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
1 d5 l1 |: z0 b6 |+ uhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers$ o$ s0 [+ g2 ~! R$ H: ?, |& W2 k
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian3 s9 J7 q# i9 W {0 [0 o. \2 g
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
5 ~; Z2 M6 P4 m ]# C; {2 m0 `buyers with more options when looking for a home./ P& r3 a% F* x% W" \
! |! j. d2 p/ Z1 U Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
% V. F9 R( t$ u; w/ ?# C" Xamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
7 h5 j1 O% \7 G& d7 ?# Z) P% ^) Rpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,6 c& s$ P& h! y. h
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
2 F6 M9 R' f8 N4 W/ N |few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
. j9 U$ q' R I: `" a8 e, X; u0 k) X5 b0 U U: a+ U
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
[; _; N5 [1 M. S, F: x, {6 g% W' iprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
3 ]+ c h3 Q1 I% Llevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting% G, a1 d, @1 y7 @& U
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,$ {$ O5 a2 J$ b9 M
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
, h$ u1 [0 p7 dpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
0 O3 U$ ]/ w9 C8 ]$ Cmaking a purchase.) C7 E5 {0 V) a+ B8 U
: C A7 R3 v2 Z0 Y/ ]" a Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing; b: }0 Q8 V% L8 ~+ n
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong1 o* D D4 Y# l
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city7 D7 q6 t# P J, w
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting. {6 m- _, v0 i( q6 s" Z
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown1 s7 y7 `3 d% j( N" g8 h
amenities.
9 l2 j/ \: `1 V9 u/ f6 @/ L4 B7 O
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
- A) @$ n3 i: C9 Bthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand p9 M3 w0 Q; N9 Q
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has% X7 m$ ?. c- @( v/ X5 }# z
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
4 D( Z/ G) a8 P+ A) Mdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
% \9 `4 a( I s: }, P# z# c1 r zresidence, rather than for investment.
8 R# W1 v. C8 \2 O) o; s+ @
/ ?, T9 r- y4 ?0 _2 V The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as+ n1 N7 e& ]/ \9 R8 N: v' ?
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
. k/ A; p. X7 S1 d0 Gin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
[6 x0 b0 z* G: r5 [3 q6 Dconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
; B4 C3 K# [6 R& Rrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter: Y) C1 g! B6 V* }: l* o2 K) w
the market.
4 e& O- ~" i; R' o! q j2 v; @- W, j5 w$ ?; g g- ^ |+ H
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
4 T' T' c) g+ ~5 L( y4 DJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
. U3 `. [4 ?7 w+ e" h$ \August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring5 R3 R4 V3 O$ I+ P
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due' r; Z0 f' T1 j& C# p9 E8 D7 |$ b
to the shortage of available inventory.
! R/ e3 J e% \/ [8 C" ?6 l8 u' c; N" d% I
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
4 b6 _, z) R. L- n- E5 N2 ]# Emomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
- h0 F7 `+ _; _, ?9 ?vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses# u! R" t% ^2 R3 o, x* L
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.3 F5 c9 M" D! k7 S' j
- \. y* _1 h$ P, X( @
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
' v c9 C1 E- F5 w- z$ K, Min the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
, l: m- m8 @- ^0 zunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
& }# U) g, n/ s; m! p, bpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring7 V+ l* c8 F: `& [
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
; `5 v( N/ E* v' J% hseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
% F3 C. n! ?: b6 k& l9 Hbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
9 {3 A" G, b/ \4 J n% x8 e+ \$ G5 B5 ]+ m. i+ c& p
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
1 P6 b- V. W- P( [; Zas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
1 {9 N8 [5 d# T0 W9 d' Kremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,* |5 n6 ?/ m% f* H
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices& c8 F( J4 ^9 _
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve0 R* ?, J0 Q6 p% A# X1 x" d
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
* p+ T7 t8 V1 z+ {. stowards the end of 2006.
4 L$ r3 p7 s T1 C1 K1 ~, Z
; l3 a( S% a* {) u$ s9 D1 J/ ZWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of6 x; d1 u* I ]$ M( e- ~
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable v6 G9 K* }3 }8 P
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
0 b) @/ j3 r8 C" h4 B- Pgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
( U7 q; H$ {) |, z5 x2 q; `! \9 ?1 Aforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added% A+ V# [: U8 B6 E+ T8 G
pressure on tight inventory levels.
* i9 g4 e6 B; w F- X: W7 u0 F+ a7 y4 I8 v# z, t/ i
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic7 Y7 z. E2 \7 X4 ~- p. p
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
J& x) Z6 r9 O4 T ?into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
( m0 y+ b% X, U! e( Y- y; u- C6 }7 I8 @while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
" A+ f: w4 b/ a- ]; X+ yfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
: ^6 h" @5 b$ m9 U2 P' m! `% d6 E7 D' z$ u- l( _* e- K1 g7 c
<<
5 N. _; L+ o- Q. q; `% R: H# J Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
- w7 {+ I. @4 `- w7 I
, g4 P- f% E, q6 x$ F: |* g -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 G. e6 d; ]- h! b4 o
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey, ~/ R) v& P5 F- ^+ W; O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 `( K! H& ^- K' X# c
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
! h, ?/ k& K" b5 s! k8 z Market Average Average % Change Average Average
# y1 L$ \% b0 b% j B. o -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; `7 _5 p0 F' O# n9 A Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0008 N; @; }# i+ K1 A! P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( ~8 l# s+ l2 s: E! n Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000" y/ X7 @5 H D2 O! p$ ]1 T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 P/ h$ q5 n% [9 v
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
* w: q2 K3 t% S9 Z3 d9 d( }: i# ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------( z0 C* `3 q1 l+ c
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
8 W4 j4 w! v* k9 C( K -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 i9 G v4 z3 G8 F5 }6 W+ t
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
7 \6 i8 j) f7 K; M( O -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 h$ [' P& K+ I- T( W7 e& g$ e3 o
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583# t" Y! b& n6 A- r2 P& H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# Q% l0 J8 H( @! L
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185' n+ S' x0 t7 K+ D6 C- l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( u1 \5 d" _- d, y Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250' [& d4 p! p: \* j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ @. D8 [3 K$ [2 k. S$ K
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
$ P# O/ ^ _/ o9 j# b1 w. c -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 O5 ]- ]( F; t X7 |& e$ s% ` Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
% O. A( ]( D+ A. q& F -------------------------------------------------------------------------
S1 r. G9 {+ x, O0 t- I$ _ Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500- Q/ c3 |5 |8 ~ k
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 j3 B. S' `) ^; e; j% @6 U* ~) h7 w
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389- t/ {5 A( }* w+ O& W2 @# N/ ~1 d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 a% H/ L9 [! Y! m, `! | Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
# w5 y8 n3 B& e: g" {# y -------------------------------------------------------------------------- V5 H+ u# m( ?' B
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500' I% n3 v* E: J$ x, J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( w/ Q6 O- G1 E# c
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
# z( c6 R" a; y8 X3 {, F -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 q% j& y7 G, K: {8 \
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
) r4 @' k$ u/ U& ]- P3 e1 \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, f$ w" C' \9 m8 s/ G% s7 L' O4 }, k! c7 ?4 k* U
-------------------------------------------------------------
, }' o3 `7 V& V& [6 C: D Standard Condominium# I) G' K- @; t0 T) g
-------------------------------------------------------------
, ]* W$ J5 b9 l. ~/ L5 d 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
8 [. B9 N8 l) T# j Market % Change Average Average % Change7 |8 O; v! n' {6 ~
-------------------------------------------------------------3 M) E$ a* \: S4 U& o, D
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
' H& O' U6 ~- K7 H4 x -------------------------------------------------------------
' v" |# B- [' v8 _ Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%4 A( _8 w5 k4 k- r3 P
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 ? q: d$ O( }" Z; E6 W Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
y! U' v- o, u/ s' n! F -------------------------------------------------------------
6 U# T3 Q L. \( `; [ Saint John N/A - - N/A
4 F8 k$ l- T: b/ W -------------------------------------------------------------
{' n X, j/ k* l& f St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%7 q& l/ K" G7 G! w
-------------------------------------------------------------2 k( I1 I ^+ ^% H) [: M
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
1 Y- v4 W2 G; Z. S# [) w -------------------------------------------------------------
9 G) j8 x' M3 }' P+ v Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%' A9 z! T5 x; A, Z1 U
-------------------------------------------------------------
% D- A% I/ d* z- {4 k Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
0 }5 b( V r* I- I" p; B' a -------------------------------------------------------------% _1 |) b5 p" J0 U
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%" m( M5 M8 y5 M) V7 A: _# D' V
-------------------------------------------------------------
( {: ]7 d* u' I) |$ i; u7 y5 M Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
3 y/ }2 f C* d; _/ k& N5 e -------------------------------------------------------------8 n) o1 b; i, Y
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
/ U$ ?9 s1 u& p0 D: a/ f) j# c. o8 k -------------------------------------------------------------
$ v9 _. E$ {+ z Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%5 t8 K3 v7 u' @; j
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 |4 U/ {6 Z" p9 B3 ~5 L Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%3 G* l/ u$ l: H; q' G% p* X
-------------------------------------------------------------
. n4 k& t, U+ W& J8 W Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
9 l! c+ O5 V2 {( _& Z' m- e -------------------------------------------------------------
5 W$ [1 A' A2 |) ?" Z, C. Z4 l" \0 \ Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%" z( G; J% m" P- F1 s
-------------------------------------------------------------
- P1 {+ w7 o9 e+ z& ]) z National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
7 ~7 q( \ ^ a! E, m8 i4 i -------------------------------------------------------------
0 D5 E0 t/ _/ Y6 o& G2 H >>
1 [6 M0 p7 g: Q- T! s0 T- _, h* y7 T1 x
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
& c$ k/ O) N% l7 m4 c7 x% R& |* R4 Zin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint: \% ?" L9 p( H; `; q( m( } i
John and Victoria./ N& \# z f' k- G" @3 ?6 P5 o
7 H/ v& H* R3 p3 W. n9 r The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most7 D- X; T/ v" D z" y7 C+ L
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of+ @) V5 N0 `; ]' ?5 Z' V* z4 T
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release9 R5 G$ a9 {) V: E3 l( {/ W& d% q9 S
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price2 E4 ~- J* \ Y
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
$ h8 n- r; t3 N9 X6 G" {across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is# [% N( ~8 d" h: g# m
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
1 W& y9 U5 Q" [5 f' }' L1 C8 Kfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
; C$ M: `, _5 i- ~; z0 W- Y2 fversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on; a) C9 ]* O/ V2 l3 a \
November 15, 2006.
! B- j- z/ c$ G4 [' D7 w Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
/ n- f, F7 C* c0 j# k5 L, `* _- Vfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge4 L" d% b! V2 o# ^& A$ ~5 N
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
C8 \5 [4 k0 A$ k- @8 @8 a, n$ ~available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|