 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable * F6 B% v7 K, O% r, n, W, @
$ l0 z; X( O; n8 N2 y6 F, o, [7 y9 C& B
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
" {9 N L& ]/ ~9 P+ h0 K
5 j8 U' J/ f# J- H TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
7 W/ m5 ^/ r0 X9 Dexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third2 h( m$ [- C3 X
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
7 m1 J7 h5 u; x& Jin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
1 ^5 ?. |, a2 D$ fprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and& ]0 k7 J: j3 X! b# p
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
- \2 T5 ~1 G4 R, L5 C* n0 vQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
) k/ `! W k6 v* }. ~7 h$ `" bLePage Real Estate Services.6 a- i, T3 X. }6 _
0 n. V+ q; A6 P7 v9 M3 I! ]
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters' m, Z5 i8 w8 B" O+ K
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic% ]2 i1 I! b: i& S. R
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
$ d# m" D, O+ [4 \$ }sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the; h0 k: [1 T8 W% q3 f: ^
residential real estate sector.
9 v+ I( Z1 a/ C. i) q+ [6 Q$ _& n, [6 f) k' i
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
( h5 ]9 r ` x( N" Zoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)+ G, Y% u) V( s, Q0 v
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
7 ]9 F* J4 Q, W( @! L(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
8 T( t+ c" ~7 Y- F5 q9 Y(+13.2%).: G" A# Z* \ x+ s9 F; W
9 G9 w% B M2 C% C2 H "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
# D$ k/ }4 `" @+ L5 c3 F' Sduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
6 j; k A6 _7 K4 E' `" Yfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
/ o& N0 y- c* j: Ypoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,( Q( A! F7 X5 ?4 N/ O8 k) H9 j
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
! b+ U' o3 x6 ~& X1 p"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We5 S( b6 L9 B# @+ I+ p
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
. i. B) |: P/ v) ?0 O8 zbalanced market."
( K2 W. E" i8 r9 l0 L7 O2 H+ f/ u8 s* N1 o7 z$ O e
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
# h0 V {. `1 G4 [3 ^: l3 pconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift7 k( \( e8 p9 { v2 w+ g" a
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued# V0 X6 K9 Z0 S5 o, z
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core! [' D" _7 i. i8 ?; i3 c5 H
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
/ F. d% x3 U7 dmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record0 Y6 e! Z2 _) W$ k' t/ O5 Z
breaking price appreciations.& ?; ?3 h8 F* v8 B
! i5 p- Q( E) d8 W4 @" J6 U# j Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
. Z& C7 c; L% S W9 v2 N2 Jeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
# I' j; W7 t% a$ n" l7 z8 V: wlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.& x) |- y* x `4 w+ [
; c/ A) W3 P" G6 N \) u i% z/ j* L In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid- ~/ i2 x6 a/ x1 s7 O P
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
, H0 s: y7 M* ^8 |$ {: }" m1 zconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off2 @# b! H: j3 r/ d4 E- x
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
/ O+ ?2 J4 S) b6 q4 ]! {+ ]0 oIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
2 y9 ~5 i7 i* [/ {* c3 rgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
( \) t( J. ~# o+ d2 Y7 Kprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
8 f1 ^9 u( w: X: `$ l. i
8 i, s7 f5 i0 }3 h" z, T9 G+ w While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
! H0 W. P" F3 @8 K, Omarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and; w0 L. U% j- a- a
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
2 z& _. S3 F7 pare markedly different than those found in the United States.
; B9 w8 b( b5 X( |
% d! w' V& @6 ] Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the K, n( b6 p3 E8 X/ x+ t% t! e
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
# R- ?5 r" g/ @favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the# K) E" }: f' t: \! R
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general8 s: p9 N. z7 D ~* H# K7 U6 M
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
7 f" x( M$ Z$ T1 d) c# M1 H1 hdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and+ N% q) w+ G& y* K4 ?) P
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization# D/ k8 V" U& C2 e3 L# o! p O+ ]
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
S ?: F9 y0 X; s) a
6 Q2 z/ H0 T- Q( L& d <<
* I6 W6 c9 B! c0 b/ w; X REGIONAL SUMMARIES
" A( E. F C6 h* d >>
3 G1 [6 z5 Y( c1 K1 }5 c$ i" Y: j. {: P
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in4 ?! O* K# E1 w0 i& f: ]
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate! t* h: ` v% _2 I+ ^* `
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
5 c- k3 v6 R; U! _* tlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of6 N2 A3 S" T# j7 n- F- @ w
renovations.7 J4 ~$ M9 `: q/ w( H# E0 h u8 [
# O9 g' b' X6 R8 u) n The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight4 j$ v+ R" b& {6 E3 H0 x. t# b3 @
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation7 h( l8 ^1 L+ T% v4 P
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
% @. G) l) \: v+ LSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.8 j$ q; _5 O4 E0 s' ?
) Z6 R: c$ _( N# a' @. ] The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
1 f/ z: Z( |* c' {) M* Cslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the1 f+ S. u2 \1 l1 l" H' A, ~
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new. u7 z% x$ ?5 ?
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
( D& y; N6 ~ vto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
: Q- H; f6 O7 B, A* i! d$ ?and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
] z; K* t: ?3 d1 W1 {) f1 n- V$ `1 q# k5 z" O3 G
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced7 y$ L. Z: H! v/ j5 N1 J+ J
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their' K( K9 y. Z' X L5 v
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
: f6 Y) G) O# S: l; x) V3 Ywas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
8 ]! e3 \* t2 F: e1 vdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing9 s" V7 u x# M8 [; f/ Z
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
9 ~4 e) R# Y% ]4 e" D3 L: _: ?
) f! G* T! _/ g* b Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly: M* A+ | R, S4 N# ~1 l% X
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
3 f; D8 g' B2 e, `0 L+ {priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,% K8 H2 M5 Y* a$ J# P
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
: l+ `8 I: n( W! T* I `few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.* K: u3 o2 u, h8 T% c2 ?
( {+ ]4 q3 G' F* l Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house. `6 I/ F/ m2 X6 E5 I$ v
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
8 c( @ x5 q s$ n3 B0 K9 a Xlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting5 ~- q6 Q' X( R/ s. B' J; S* L
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,+ I4 {& B0 S7 I% q
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the# O* m& p2 M1 f
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before: F) W& a4 c6 l$ l3 I' Z& f
making a purchase.6 m2 w9 Z% S& P8 \. V; N
: u: Q8 I1 f% r1 n( f; U, U. g
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
5 L! y. R( b0 n: V8 Bmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong) Y% k, N% [* q
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
8 ] {! {' d1 ^/ K. C7 i: _centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
) u% v$ ~- ^* X/ Z- Battention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
/ r4 N7 u p! u% M* t+ Qamenities.
# @4 [1 c" J4 e6 q% j$ h
9 P4 ~9 d! D3 ^/ U8 Y: u The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
3 b2 Q; u/ @" K1 `$ Fthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand9 C8 V, n" z: j/ c6 @1 Y a) E
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
3 e% b+ T% d# k3 M# |continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been3 r/ A. ?. B1 D! Z6 D7 D
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
6 Y" f( O5 B! k f" g$ I+ R: Nresidence, rather than for investment.
/ s. S3 J- W$ s( k
5 W1 t4 G) D2 z* l" _ The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
' O9 y+ {3 i. w- ] f" C" ihouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
( g0 M5 ?' h; C/ k) F6 y) bin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer/ z# {/ h3 A. q7 G+ R1 ^
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
_1 T& `! [8 \( c% y$ |& _rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter6 |' r" G, a/ |
the market.
7 l, P" b3 [* ~9 t, v& ~! C
, N+ t/ [0 Y, s6 R5 S2 |0 A In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through5 d: H6 l2 }/ Y4 R
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
$ j# S% m. |( D3 q+ V4 }! z5 k! o3 M' cAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring. ?% `; N/ h; W7 {3 |% u- t
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
( }1 B& X4 F0 Uto the shortage of available inventory.$ y3 u d. E# R. Z f% N
: P$ h3 d5 C" }" ]
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
! y% p* N- K" t9 ^- U3 pmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
" T0 V3 i) j2 c( [- l z |vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses$ l# H9 ?" u3 V* ~& J
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
+ g: q: Q, T% b- V/ j; N$ K8 Z* g+ I8 l
3 p e n; t$ R# R Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases& J- t8 s3 a: @, }2 m9 o
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
% x9 E' y* v. d- Punemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that" j- ]( z% d/ J% P4 Q! M
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
, g" L: r0 g7 d! Vprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer3 u/ }( d* ]/ R: F* ^. r
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as$ d9 @' G6 V% ~4 x- q9 N; R
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.5 C+ M7 B0 s8 n X" U6 f9 J: G) R
* A1 T5 X, z- v Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter3 l- f( H7 U0 d, {* k$ _/ D4 ^$ V% z1 p
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
, E" L. P+ z& Yremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,& M* a, F. M, D B; J! {* v. ?
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
9 P4 [# o* s% [+ B, L0 W& ]increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve6 J. U! B0 D( F7 ~5 a4 `
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly. p7 g4 _8 J: s, b" C
towards the end of 2006. ( j+ p9 O& `1 J" N. G7 y
9 L% x+ T; a8 L9 J- Q$ A7 ]
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of( v( |6 d3 ?/ ]8 v5 Z
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
$ }, ^/ h( Y5 b" {to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
! y6 _2 o }/ V6 Sgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
, C0 _1 C( Z; wforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added! I4 P& w0 G# F/ X$ o0 A
pressure on tight inventory levels.- z# n) F6 [0 X- g2 }
" H/ N4 h" Z. k9 j, E3 [% s Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic* D" U5 i' W8 l3 {0 v; D
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
! H3 U$ |; Q# Sinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
2 }0 z# x o# \: Z( L1 cwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching* R- h- W3 ]' [& ^; M7 j& M0 K; ~
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.; Z) ?& u. }+ x; {4 n5 A4 |( `" |
" ^# Z: Y M. L <<
6 f* e i0 ?( ~( [; w* Q8 x; R5 Z+ ~ Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
% f |0 R* s7 x. H9 g4 r& J# B3 U( Q a% }9 `! v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ u5 h& W( m9 m ]0 W9 c Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey# B( m" o9 D; \2 C6 G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 c0 W) I- z& g# }3 f# X
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
4 B/ e! O" v N( t. q. r Market Average Average % Change Average Average
: N2 f6 M3 p+ ?2 Y0 Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------# A3 I5 g# T: l, i \
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000) i) `/ V* p! j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' S) y/ | B4 N' B
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000- W0 T: D# f1 U# Z% M9 A- z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; ~4 |/ f* |" p0 f- F" U Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
* h2 `( {, Y# @' u* c7 B! T -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 O# J2 B3 K0 [- b4 ?2 y( H
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
# _$ F* v$ v1 N& w -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. B! }( ~, G0 o% E8 k St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333+ G6 V9 g S+ }( D* G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ g4 [' ^) z. A! w7 G Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
% e6 w& j0 f5 y( F9 ] z4 X7 d -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 ]! h! g) f; z" Y! p Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1850 a) K& b+ ]6 ?0 G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ o, }6 ^( i, o# u Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250" f6 X# U2 a+ ^% \- L1 C4 B. _& h q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 w4 m0 ^, e- T Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766' g, s/ Q2 ]& L2 h; ]2 v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 b {" W% N! Q Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
6 g1 O) V2 J2 F( G$ l -------------------------------------------------------------------------! E0 l$ ^* @ i
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
9 b) p+ u/ [4 E' w( y' z% _5 D$ K -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 ]& J7 r/ A# c, q, u3 I' U Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
H# }+ {, n) @0 D- B1 P! c/ G -------------------------------------------------------------------------: p( Z2 B5 _6 E3 x& j$ P0 f" X* l
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7147 H5 v! e6 I# G/ p x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* e g% k3 N. d7 V Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
. o6 X6 v) p5 a8 }: }* u -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, f: h* \: ]2 L g3 f& L# q8 _1 D- W Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0008 ~+ V4 {" s, N0 p1 E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" b0 _3 m. x; T8 r" d% e National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
2 i. w) J( l0 Z1 ^" h -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' ?1 n& Y3 w3 e* o/ Q, X1 D
* I0 O6 r" z5 G5 j# I -------------------------------------------------------------
8 G- \7 V' Y: J) x9 T9 F Standard Condominium
$ y) d! e2 B+ g3 ^3 k -------------------------------------------------------------, @3 b; Q' e9 s6 T2 `9 |
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
5 u- Q6 i' T' R1 | Market % Change Average Average % Change0 D# J8 {5 x) a ^3 K
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ Z3 q; q Z8 ^, i, X1 { Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
; U, ~3 H* }# \ I5 t+ \) i- n/ o1 ? -------------------------------------------------------------& b( m4 X) E1 O/ T9 J* I! l1 }" a
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
6 A! r9 ~! m' s! q: k( F% d# t -------------------------------------------------------------. M# P8 W6 C' z
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A$ ?) s9 t; R5 {1 L) o) E
-------------------------------------------------------------
! m) {1 E/ y: e: F7 B Saint John N/A - - N/A# q- ]2 a" }. L! Y% a5 f2 N+ ]$ M
-------------------------------------------------------------
% d' E- G* u G% S1 R St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
; L2 B' o/ Y' B1 L7 d6 w' N -------------------------------------------------------------
; i" y+ H) s6 ]! p Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%7 i& v( V; a3 b4 s0 L- i, S2 m6 A
-------------------------------------------------------------8 T# S! u6 f/ r8 F
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
# t- X3 T4 a6 \, _* p5 _ -------------------------------------------------------------1 U g/ n4 C! ?6 J7 P) {9 ^/ ?
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
1 \5 r: O' f0 X -------------------------------------------------------------
& }% m* i% H: b* U9 U; Z Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
* Q- B) k$ r8 W) _ V. M -------------------------------------------------------------" F" x4 z) d$ p4 c) s. O
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%. \ `' D1 S/ `3 ~' B0 f
-------------------------------------------------------------0 K: j, s/ `* B }7 n) b* A
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%9 [) a6 h' V }. [2 `
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 p% a9 i9 j4 |8 o. s* K Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%! x7 [0 x4 \; L! G% t$ Q' F
-------------------------------------------------------------
; Y" m6 ?# }; p* a2 c2 u Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
! j5 q `' |' c6 X$ T9 Z -------------------------------------------------------------
' M) f: I) S% [3 u3 C1 F Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
$ v; R! I1 S9 v5 |: ? -------------------------------------------------------------2 t: }0 u+ h7 O+ ?
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
6 M! v- g' M9 }0 ] -------------------------------------------------------------4 g4 K9 W- g2 i! \
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%: u' l& C. y' `$ R T6 Q1 O
-------------------------------------------------------------
' g' h4 ?1 h% ?' [8 O >>
( v$ B+ { v7 I$ i1 K. Y( l
3 H+ n5 \$ x3 A' L; n' A Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined% @% L" f- T! w+ W8 ~
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
2 {. a/ L0 I+ cJohn and Victoria.% ?1 H# w. @& V" k
: W \- W: Z( l$ h4 Y+ a( r: i6 ^
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most) X: L7 u0 K9 [0 s
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
9 H' H/ j' c" n( T; dhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release) F* t8 t! b0 m5 P
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price4 Z7 p: h& |6 d2 [6 c' y+ ?2 Y5 h
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities8 f; s+ E" o& n, ^
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is6 H! O8 C% Q$ X
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
% Z1 Q8 M9 v& v6 y' [figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
g4 q2 n) R3 p# Fversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
8 u3 a/ [9 X/ R& l" {& YNovember 15, 2006.
- n5 u, y( |* c* ?+ x Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of/ }) O8 k4 X( R5 Q% g7 d
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge. W% ~; y* `& ^$ t
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is" }$ c9 Q" }0 x: m. C( o' u7 m
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|