 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
3 R9 r, G6 x# v) G9 I# a% u/ ~( a/ N8 D) D& i! Y: j) k
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -& y7 l* C4 U' H- U) V9 M
) @% c z0 T' H2 I, s' v4 H TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
5 ]- F3 o: F0 z4 U jexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third- N& ^3 I( @8 j
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic. x- a, G, {! r2 e- c" i
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit+ i* y2 m0 i- S9 Q5 F5 m! k; A6 j
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and2 \3 T6 z' t& [
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,5 `: X' m4 L$ O1 V7 w
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal/ U, E0 g) x+ X; X5 t b2 F1 ^
LePage Real Estate Services.
- `7 ?3 x! s5 r6 _3 p; G. h3 ^+ C8 p
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters1 p5 h5 A" J0 h0 L2 S0 _
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
! i( Q' R2 l0 o# W! { V4 ^: K8 m3 Tconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and9 ~) G6 y0 p ]/ M7 j: @1 D
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the0 b4 y1 I0 s3 ]) h5 G' z
residential real estate sector.' x% h5 s9 p4 c5 O
8 K: c- P5 z& t/ g# Z6 p( u* S% U( Q' E
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation' E3 w' p/ ?6 j5 a8 V" f
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%), D, c) {4 d/ L) o4 x/ |2 G" B
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5625 U4 V) B- n) Z# F! d
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
6 r' A: x- M8 v: ~$ D5 i( L(+13.2%).4 Q, W9 s3 @. }" K& H* f
/ {1 u* n2 s# [ s "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth& Z+ u2 k- W) O( d# G
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the: C. i. O3 h9 i2 p" u1 @, ?1 Z% r
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are. j4 O# @ E! A5 i5 A' c' U# P
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
. s/ `- c, N& J jpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services. }* o7 t7 m. P! s$ h! i9 G# a
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
' {$ d7 E5 n0 ^9 Y- p+ qwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy; l0 I( j6 ?: d) D$ Y7 n
balanced market."
2 _3 @' X/ N: q5 B7 \
+ T$ Q5 Q, R# [3 U$ o4 X- U: O% ` Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,9 x9 _9 C9 C1 C1 ?
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift: I8 J- H* N# F# ^! i* f4 j
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued3 j6 l- p7 H; i" M0 }
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
1 j8 y8 e+ |, a5 s8 }% wenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,: [' f2 c) z6 ]4 z9 v& r$ L
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
. F+ h" V3 t Cbreaking price appreciations.% r+ @4 ?4 \5 G9 B f0 A6 Z: h; B6 p
7 F* K, [' w" w- F* F9 ]# N/ k8 k Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
9 v( B0 H* L5 c; K7 `+ ueconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
9 L- T. p" Z# X( A; ~8 Zlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
! L# ` E7 r& m0 g8 i
: L3 \2 [, P$ c; f) K In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid6 u0 a+ i1 N/ j/ U( I9 t" G
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
( `2 i& Z$ ~7 @, t/ d& I% @" Sconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off2 v5 v. l V/ V/ n4 _; i6 V
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
2 f% Y5 X j6 M' C2 yIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
6 f$ T% h* D1 z1 Z5 H, w1 _greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
$ ~, E# `: Y; ]' s9 Oprice appreciation when compared with 2005.9 V1 w3 q: z/ ]
( ]1 D; Q: X* E4 O
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
( P7 Q3 r# D1 F1 F/ Amarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and& d# t0 p! r1 E
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
: p$ B8 |! L8 K) b( T6 Sare markedly different than those found in the United States.1 l6 t1 [/ V" k: _
8 E3 V% i- Q+ G. e1 U. x Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
7 `% L8 K( h& X* l2 A% N" F! H5 NAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's$ N0 {* }# W/ I, M
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
- `- y: M! P* Y8 D+ Vrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
7 A0 I# p% Y- H O- waffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
" D" r+ G9 e9 c. L) U( e& Idownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and) s3 P! ?2 ?* o' T5 i9 u
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
7 Y. }" u. R4 g5 Zmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
" ]; B( |% h7 S( R; A
, w4 z8 u1 ~% @4 A o' w3 h" I2 T <<
1 Z5 h/ ~# N* l# D+ N( b REGIONAL SUMMARIES \. {: D1 W5 u0 n3 l
>>
7 h, F9 @8 t4 t) y5 E# I3 Z; P" |. d. [0 K: f7 i* h& W- \
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
/ O$ x3 G7 A9 k7 c! @Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate& L( ?. z. J, H* K; ~' t
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time4 ~# {. B0 f. M+ h
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of& }( ~" m( N0 ~4 z3 m7 n; u
renovations.0 E" }) P1 B, p/ A8 s3 G+ R
, f; Z' J, @8 i% }' x
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
* o& \! z! ?% ~' M' M/ X/ i& q* aincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation& D; _9 w ]0 N' S6 x3 p4 K
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and2 q. Y: N3 c4 W3 P$ c
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
; d2 j1 K; G% A9 }3 t4 r6 f
* J/ C$ s: w; v6 j. T. }3 Y The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer3 s& B/ @ v1 C
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the& \8 {; _9 q! q3 f& E1 v% K
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
' Z0 ^! p6 z; E* I& t600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
/ g# R* Q( W! `8 J: V2 eto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes+ G2 W) e+ Z. i
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.& W: j# |: s6 Z8 t6 e. v
( ^* \6 T* R% c& c+ _ n$ U7 q In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
- E: r$ Y+ j! Z" L) Q# r" cconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their! x1 k1 J5 u/ M2 P
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers+ r/ t! |) x, D6 r6 Q( \: `& [
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
+ r% C T+ r& ?5 k! v% Ldollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
) k& O4 x+ e* E' }' H- U1 u+ {buyers with more options when looking for a home.# B3 _2 j5 _, x* r' P$ L1 V
7 E- b- _% R1 v4 ~( q8 W Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
3 n; [# b, z, q% Aamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
& D: l9 e9 F0 Y4 x) v" npriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,) B" m6 g- i. H2 J
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
$ ?7 T) M( A1 ~9 A3 ]1 _few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
1 l1 d5 e8 P* U' R" m( }
9 s( e- G* `) d5 M( t7 E Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house) K6 w9 |. h t" a0 a
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
5 G+ M4 Y9 U5 a8 t1 J) Vlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting6 \4 v+ B1 G7 U% K% ?+ j1 |
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,' D+ F8 A( Z( f8 y1 `( p/ ^0 E) `5 z
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
/ {. P9 e0 {/ H+ e6 l' ]pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before6 `2 m: U# R) C/ c
making a purchase.7 I" \1 n2 H0 r, M% H
, [# `, T, w# \+ u
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
0 ?9 F7 Z; k8 Q9 kmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong0 L- Z. j6 I2 c$ B* X: z8 ?5 s+ `* S
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city, a1 Y: x8 D5 y6 A& \2 K1 U2 Z
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
# A4 K) r$ |1 h3 A' vattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown6 P. ~4 j! o/ I& o
amenities.7 D2 D* B: n3 Z- {' K
/ F2 S$ e* W$ k: ^" \
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels B8 O2 b6 d% V& }& c9 T; c
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
: f$ O! P5 E) f' W4 f3 c! I; Nacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has1 q/ y! S; r/ S1 M
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
) T. M2 C& n% B; f8 adriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
# y. f5 I$ f1 h i5 e2 F- Uresidence, rather than for investment.' h' N1 m# Y$ V, F$ ]* r& m- b8 G
/ s1 Q* Z- }% t6 G The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as1 K5 L* [4 R( V. Y& ~1 j6 x- X5 f
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted C( A0 r; c3 O3 C4 s& T
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
! |: A! U3 Z: |* X9 a+ `7 _" gconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
* Y. Y8 X& W( P$ `! Wrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter$ G C- f& v% y) [/ M3 Y2 T- z
the market.0 ?% E: Z" N: H. j5 S- C
( z9 a+ S, @0 ]4 y In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
: @2 g0 x6 o, P/ m8 B% L: }+ C7 }# mJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In; Z" C$ Z7 z/ e" [! U$ [
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
/ _" A7 e- m$ Y9 D' gmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
* _, `6 h! |6 `+ R7 O* |5 Lto the shortage of available inventory." V" H3 h }; _& q' N1 N9 |
( l; \3 d& D1 h( C# r8 s
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its1 E7 \+ p/ g1 x- {
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
% V1 ^7 v# L @' @4 _vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
2 ]- o, c2 l/ d0 ^- Y5 estruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.& c7 P0 \" q) N! c
" R. d, L! J5 t7 e! ^
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases6 M9 P* ]7 N7 t! R/ n+ H
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low) |% A% C4 d; X3 U4 u& N* ^
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that( J3 [. ~+ N7 A3 a1 H
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring1 A! m$ K) `6 t9 `* h( H: T
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
6 z) Q( p5 U: U7 a- ]/ Lseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
) d# c/ L7 S& O6 m$ n0 n6 obuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.% L( M* U `. T' F
% R' v/ f4 n0 J3 o
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
5 h/ G8 Z+ H1 Jas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
4 P$ {8 F/ k: v: R: F, w% K7 T$ ?remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,' J8 Y, a' w' K5 \9 X2 B
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
$ o* q! O4 Z% `% {. Q# C2 ?7 Oincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
- ^: N( A3 q# U# d! n. n& b) s. fin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly& X0 F' S+ A: J! g+ I9 K4 j; l4 u4 E
towards the end of 2006. ! g o3 P# D+ T/ w9 g/ X j, w( H
7 }0 f5 B; ^8 e
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
# X4 D+ [ o! m$ u7 ainventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
- H' R" p2 `8 Nto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse2 {# R; [! Z" Z0 F+ W
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
, }( S ~( m( W' Rforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
' @* I! V- }2 e" cpressure on tight inventory levels./ P8 \& `& _! x7 F G3 r0 l
1 U. v i$ l, n3 y+ A" W0 H- m
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic4 X& _% M+ q1 `. \6 B( C8 U
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
; E% U1 U. @' z9 {3 u+ Vinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;9 t( \ A' W: L. Z2 }9 V
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching% r5 X/ x9 Y V. R" V/ \
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
S1 A% L7 i, Z2 V& b
+ m/ c2 Y# S# E8 H0 V <<
4 ]+ ~8 }2 h) V. W, ^ Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006, E4 v( C5 z6 N& q
5 g: [1 Q( \" N" d. j+ b B0 t -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 [, z4 O" S. Y' w
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
% c8 `3 [& V& p* s# l. T) y. J @9 K -------------------------------------------------------------------------& f: F2 M! l1 n5 y0 e3 P% S6 H
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q33 N& c/ x8 G: }/ k* K
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
' q% X4 N8 V, y5 j -------------------------------------------------------------------------. N* j) J. _$ d
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
7 l" G: a5 u7 s1 {: H( a3 M -------------------------------------------------------------------------, f! L- m# r. B" J8 k4 ^
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
: A! i$ K; \. b# W* y2 i! q -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 r5 s( @3 R1 D' l) n \6 b
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
" y4 h2 S, I2 d. c. l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 O: P; O4 x. k$ X% | Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -) x* j6 T/ u$ ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 x5 u3 [2 h/ o# U St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333/ i. j9 u$ ]7 [" r5 Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 \) _4 H Y' W
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
# a* s) M: P1 { -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 W$ U- c1 ]0 ]: u2 D3 ^, h+ w
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
7 ~+ x7 Q: \8 T' Y- f6 Z1 L7 w( V -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 E; d$ [3 u$ u& X Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250: c0 N% M9 O) G3 Z" W9 L( b' Z) ?4 c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ R" z% D+ E# H' C0 N
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7666 r% d; w0 D/ Z( ~# B; d5 c1 d. s
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
x8 c8 D2 ?: B+ r, U4 i# Q Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707. W+ @' {1 Z5 T8 C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 ], c4 G4 s1 a4 y% i% O* ~7 r
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
, y! S: F6 S8 }+ R -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 t, Q5 n0 _/ l
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389, f& X3 N* X9 c# D# W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ K, j- x# u" W; C4 c; E Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714: M* a) Z) l* C3 r+ R& F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) M0 A" E/ k2 a
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500; l$ K- H: A _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 ~. y1 L) s# S* l6 _* Q2 o Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
# l( N/ b( |& x" c) v4 u -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* }" O( J' f! T1 n6 f4 I# M+ ? National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
3 T1 f% N" E. d5 R! U: C -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 a$ R, l2 b3 T9 V/ h* M8 C+ X! r% F: T* l- q
-------------------------------------------------------------7 N# f4 C& z0 K: H' i ~
Standard Condominium
0 \# E c7 k- u8 E* R -------------------------------------------------------------
) [+ M, S. d- W; s/ m8 o 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo# Q% M3 m* x0 [! U7 G: U
Market % Change Average Average % Change
9 f4 [: Y5 i K# f) `* a( s4 T" \ -------------------------------------------------------------
, \0 ?" [! o. Q# X5 X: ^ Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
7 \9 ~# g0 a! ]/ s9 r7 s -------------------------------------------------------------
6 x( ~& `; V+ t) D8 n6 z& {3 O Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%- j- ~. v% P z/ u+ {- d
-------------------------------------------------------------
: w( C* E; \( l1 x: k7 T Moncton 4.9% - - N/A3 W, s, k$ }8 H" k) v
-------------------------------------------------------------1 D" D% m! L, `8 a& |2 @
Saint John N/A - - N/A
8 O/ j) s9 d) I -------------------------------------------------------------
% S) t f, w9 f; r/ H St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
8 A" ]% K* U! f( X4 W% U: e3 g -------------------------------------------------------------
: e, @1 X# C8 D4 m8 B$ M! V/ v Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
* d7 l: k$ X" e. ~6 Q8 S -------------------------------------------------------------
0 D& D S. Y0 z Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%6 Q3 h) R; c8 P( L2 ~- l
------------------------------------------------------------- o. D' i: ~0 K7 h2 S% @
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
0 t" a) b, s5 E* C- e -------------------------------------------------------------
; B9 b$ Y' E# h' O$ K& |6 Z1 I# Y9 s2 H3 c Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%& i7 |0 y. q( k
-------------------------------------------------------------
" L& L3 g/ \. k1 }% Y% D. s$ j Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
@$ J7 G% p S4 d) M -------------------------------------------------------------! V2 K k* B$ @& n. Y
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
/ ?$ x+ n) ~5 b# N6 T4 T5 f6 H2 B -------------------------------------------------------------
" ^8 R5 k" a/ @ Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
/ l* h& g/ q9 z1 [( b: c -------------------------------------------------------------. w% k& a- b/ X" W& J9 r
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4% ~- Q; D% l! A9 ~5 v
-------------------------------------------------------------* \; r- A, b$ o! e% p* z+ k7 Z
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
4 O3 e* w/ K1 T+ V8 P' r2 ] -------------------------------------------------------------
8 e5 }: V: L* ? G/ w' c Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
( C/ X% X3 J/ R( B -------------------------------------------------------------
5 J4 G5 F2 \, Y& x9 v ` National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%* n5 j5 F; c+ ^4 H( g
-------------------------------------------------------------
' C$ s' q' Y, Y >>
+ C& @$ v* `% e, m0 Q
! w) H$ S5 D" p Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
/ D( H) H1 Q5 Y# C6 K% f. sin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint0 r5 X5 l1 Y, _, W5 @
John and Victoria.' Q* s* c$ }+ s! t
9 f) }$ Q' |2 J' Y% D( V9 u# B The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most l n# Z! k+ d. u! ~- g
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
& G u* n) [& shousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release! _$ S1 D) R( o* L
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price+ |- C, i, j: ^, U6 `6 {
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
. H: R9 C; R4 S, N4 t6 Racross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is$ h& T' F6 W' P3 |2 n+ P& l
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
6 e; u, e7 Z7 i- J- lfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable+ ^, q' @. u2 U, M
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
9 n ]( `1 ]9 UNovember 15, 2006.& M0 Z! t: o' F" D# P) R
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of; B& ~; k7 t: j/ I6 y3 v9 k3 F
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
- b! o% K( z" ^ j' T% ~provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
( ~. J6 n9 U* a8 Uavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|