埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2339|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable + K2 j. \$ h* m3 E7 Q% m* j

( j2 q- b6 @- K  M: e- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -* R3 `% [3 }# F! e
7 Y1 ~  K* `4 L& G$ U
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market% U& N9 z2 @; J! [! _
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third3 O6 B# t& T2 |, {/ \
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
# t  `* u' j8 }in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit3 V+ ]0 d0 n' u, [. Y' |& v, ~& M3 v7 _  s
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
+ l2 X4 I/ D) t& qmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,. k0 q& m( f) g5 b5 A' f
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
9 z5 C, Z" W8 \) {$ _; e7 wLePage Real Estate Services.
  f  E4 X5 c" M8 s* w' u& U1 @
/ c$ I) o; d1 F: X9 g5 l- q    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
, B( P; C' r  ?9 z0 b8 eare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic, g" o( T5 [6 c: y6 n
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and5 \/ U9 S8 n; S- Q; @, R
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the* N: g! I" m) P: E
residential real estate sector.1 s2 B- M3 w! D& ^' Z8 n  V

9 }) s, y# j, n    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
1 V8 n5 @) p! O5 uoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%), Y7 o/ L/ v" Q$ u3 N
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5623 \& }6 g( v* K* G. k/ D
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
$ \' X1 m# G: J2 v(+13.2%).
- q: d, W, A9 C* v% H0 E3 ?( o( ~% _# h! b2 w6 n
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
6 _) a4 m: k: ]1 |  ~) Qduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the# e# a, m: n, X  L% q6 S
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are' x! O2 C  {# _, F: G
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper," Z+ O! S! S0 C9 |% Z4 g% d
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.2 V2 v; n8 [# h2 D3 n
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
% O1 B4 t0 f: U- Qwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy" x- N: I! ^4 p- D" y& X! A
balanced market."
6 {8 R2 F9 _5 y2 c+ T2 P5 S- z9 W7 H; d* s
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,8 A; P  `: H! x3 t9 C4 c0 i/ Q
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift8 Z8 A" t0 {* `: G* }
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued; V' Z" F* P7 U: z/ S
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core( |8 K0 m) M6 ]( R
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
0 _+ t/ b: R% U( a* j  D! H: Vmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record6 H% G2 W: e' y6 g; O  i
breaking price appreciations.
; w& T: w7 G# U/ N! @* n
% ~1 m2 M! M; o* Q    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
/ k' x; R. ^$ `- L9 S* aeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the1 N' }4 G  h5 E" i) Z8 o
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.* ^& u% G( I" t$ g8 U4 J8 h
3 K6 b1 m- I& B3 b3 i! q2 w8 M
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
# C$ g4 s' t! i' U, l/ K5 p1 neconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer7 b" ?: J- d$ w; T; B' E
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
3 Q- f. ~7 n# `  R/ p; Sslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.+ v* ?+ ]4 ]( L5 @' o: `
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers  k  ?( Y" ?6 o% W0 a
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of9 y  r$ B6 B- W4 N! Z; C5 [7 x
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
4 Y+ x0 J; l) K3 M4 R3 ]
9 W9 j) |  P0 I3 d9 B    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing" B. S/ a4 E# e; [
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and) [/ z- m7 }. V% Z. U5 @
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
2 }4 o: x) N4 @are markedly different than those found in the United States.- M% D: j1 x# t- M8 O+ J

  i( T7 S  ~8 j8 V" t    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the! o" v( _) }1 N0 r
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's6 [; t0 D' S9 P0 c- Q
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
. m7 A# S1 d5 G1 v) r) v' rrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general5 U2 |9 i, i- z* S8 B6 D  l
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
! ~, D8 _& P& Z: d+ a. Z9 Ndownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
1 ?* v/ s& e5 y' N1 L5 t/ Paggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
: G, i% X- ?" r, u: G+ Cmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."3 s3 g# e0 H% W+ @. S

1 K$ g0 I$ b2 P/ c; s8 Y    <<
1 M2 U- ?4 p6 ^) o4 ]                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES/ c3 Z+ P* l& e& U
    >>
  ^! R9 S5 i3 V3 ~
& G2 x$ r5 U2 ~. Y    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
6 n5 B4 F6 `9 X) L- yHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
) k9 W. ^: g* }& R# c5 s2 aof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
1 d7 K. \- z0 w$ d  t" E# ]" x  llooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
. O' ]1 l& S8 q! a' I0 ]! ]% Z+ krenovations.
5 J1 K) ~/ d( [8 ?/ b5 M0 r3 f0 {; s$ n) \' j
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight5 w/ i& ]5 Y9 ]( c
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation- I: O4 z5 u  p( L; V4 p
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
9 i5 `& P0 d2 X5 j/ b4 fSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.4 F3 [) K. E2 Y5 ^- n  F3 |
8 f1 r- A$ Z# Y; S
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
+ ]) B, D& I! Z( J" e* Oslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the3 J; \2 ~* Q' t; \
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new( o+ O; A/ _: f
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores8 k# a$ {# {6 V7 z
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes5 Z% `/ o( b( f' d$ W0 f8 r
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.) D4 _9 v4 Q: r6 X6 ]; c  S

+ o- P% v4 F/ Q' H' x8 e6 D    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
, t4 g* p7 f" cconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their. T. b) D/ p: O. o7 c4 i8 _  L& ]
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
% q5 x; b" _% [% B  P5 D1 [! r/ ewas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
) y$ B# s- v. f( s! p' adollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
% ?& C4 _! L) Z9 @" J" k4 dbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
% L' p9 p( t) o9 z- J
7 e6 j: \, m  i4 f7 ^; w; D$ b! a$ Z    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
% j% G: V1 a6 V0 b9 ]1 F+ o0 kamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
  I  g  S; y5 q* F2 kpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
+ x& V( `1 E/ ~4 w3 x3 i5 Has some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
  {2 I2 x1 y; mfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.5 E) W, c) U" Q3 j+ P" g" C9 L
9 ^( w; ^& x, I  _4 R
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house* k5 F: f* N+ ], _: |
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory/ l% v" T+ i: _
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
# H6 O$ t- }$ r8 _7 Sfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
2 O# @/ h) ~& N0 G  S- mwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
# G5 T( j/ a3 cpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
% H6 X" D4 o( j# b  kmaking a purchase.; s4 M4 r0 C4 W, M& U
+ ~/ R/ q+ w/ w+ ?" C4 ?
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing4 C( a. s% Y0 T0 C; ^2 ]' e- W  p
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
' M6 o/ g) T+ b: E4 W$ Z4 F1 U, Bconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
. q' P. B) a/ z$ _) Y& {) vcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting  Z/ E* t6 c6 Q4 q: m) d/ |
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
# ^! Q  d: P6 ]' E4 n) Gamenities.* F# ~" Y# T4 V6 Q3 t9 @1 L. {
1 ]! Y) ]$ |) P; C3 r
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels8 R! {4 O. t5 `( c: _0 G$ D, X
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
( K; I+ D$ C) p% f: dacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
0 I2 G6 y5 {: }4 e- v2 O+ pcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been0 D% I9 j# L* \# d
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
5 L, h* B& i6 }' {7 e6 n1 aresidence, rather than for investment.! k  b  X: P9 L' h

: g8 V5 y4 z9 z, A% \1 _- r    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
: H* K( P4 ?" X* ]7 u! bhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted6 Z8 ?/ W; _) A" ^! O7 N3 Z
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
' ?7 c" h6 ?* m8 Z" Mconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
6 M1 m) d; j: W6 p. {rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
# A# K; p: s' I3 D1 k. b! ythe market.
) Q8 m* V# F. ?
9 T" u; ?% F4 n8 L% D3 r) k    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
0 |$ a8 H% p; _! N0 D# YJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
0 R' _3 L3 H& M7 Y1 dAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
' @% U* k/ q6 Q$ l, I% f+ ~months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
1 y  D5 |% M0 O$ D* M/ C. wto the shortage of available inventory.9 s" S! P) G/ r$ j1 [2 }, d3 b

  G3 z5 j0 |7 y$ Z$ w, T4 z    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its1 ]- G  I9 \2 @/ I
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
. z2 R/ k! Z/ g3 P- T/ b1 t2 uvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
( V4 V- a' a8 K" v/ a) {struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.+ v" q  ~4 s; r4 s0 K

; I) ^. r2 G' q3 `& t+ t9 F    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
' A7 w2 k: C& q/ w/ yin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
5 e, C( y7 S2 X. o2 B" Hunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
9 ^$ y  d' p% Z) F6 K& x3 V8 @pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring1 P5 N8 `2 U9 j3 F" l
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer! [6 b6 H9 \) _+ M
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as$ Y1 J# L0 o) J3 [' L* d' N: j
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

$ N3 R$ m% n8 r, h" u: n2 O; m, V; _) w$ ?) W6 w- M
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter' m* x/ I% O5 c) b
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
4 [* U" @* o; e' s5 _remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,; A; }1 E& R& I: H% @1 D% K8 ?
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
! u! L. a6 _4 }1 wincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve, d6 Y+ T6 q1 B- v- P
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly9 B0 |/ L) |' R8 w- E! l* ^
towards the end of 2006.
   
" x+ @/ a% Q. l5 M/ E
/ F5 T2 x9 p: b+ ZWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of7 C5 F% n% Y" T
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable5 Q6 T9 p: Y- m% t; p
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse2 W, _. d0 e  R6 Y8 [4 t8 x, Y
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to% C7 D+ T+ B' P  T9 [: m1 V* a
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added8 @  X: J+ {/ d9 e, u' e6 `% x; y
pressure on tight inventory levels.
9 c/ j7 r! @/ i1 A5 B' [. i$ S# i3 V$ S1 ?" I- f* K1 s
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic4 b3 S7 Q5 Y: m9 \& X
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
/ \. I9 }1 R+ o4 ?into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
$ l% E; m( }! h+ H2 b) uwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
- Q9 q$ a4 x; U  x/ L: E: xfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
6 O& B" E% q. K3 N- X0 A. H9 O6 x5 s8 E5 r$ u- L6 c7 }
    <<" t% W' L6 e; l3 z6 w, T
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006) `7 t0 {! l8 F/ O! Y! ]

: m0 t. Z3 A# r- i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& j9 G9 L; M' }6 f
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
9 h  M  n! w- J0 j5 L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% `- t/ u6 \7 d5 K2 P
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q30 I5 L2 w% c1 }
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
  A" b  j) b. @3 I+ Y( |    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 ]) S7 r  _4 Q
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
: S+ t/ G  @2 V5 c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 B& _  G+ d# V
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000: j- q7 A  ~' ^' K) K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 O+ s! u4 o4 {2 u7 }4 z/ R. B
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
4 V& E" N% f% _: z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 {8 \) g; {1 ?1 O& \- |2 K, x    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -. j' o2 U* X4 C- P; m; H- _3 s
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 T# N" x" B! y7 S+ j    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333% ~! S, J# {' K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' S& `6 s  \3 b* L; H  W! h' y    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
$ l8 n, t. j0 D2 |8 _& R    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: K4 B3 P( k: q( I
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1851 C8 N0 `; Y9 f" z$ H
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 L& p( v. G1 K6 l
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
. ?1 A, Y% I7 B) C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 ]% u/ p+ e7 o1 y, c6 h. \    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7662 A7 o9 F& E( O# l8 o
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 S+ f# _, `! R    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707% g3 B/ ?0 N1 D( S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" k# o1 |( N2 g# C
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
5 L! L+ F% v$ p( k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' V# K- Q7 z! x3 _& N
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,3898 b' L" f- r, a5 ?- D" M6 y- d! N6 G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 k# ^# {7 _; E    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714* s( T/ U6 K* l, ?# G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. V; G2 y: Y" [2 ]7 f. V
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
0 M9 X# P& m2 r    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ j& ?# o1 ~6 v/ C3 q* w8 h$ R& o# y- m    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000+ K* k' Q6 d) v: n' X, P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 t/ O8 {) J+ T, f/ p* m
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
) u' p' ^6 S+ W/ u! _# A    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 G) p7 w/ H+ y" \0 k3 e

1 r1 w' @* V$ p4 o& e/ q    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 `. r# `6 ^& n, F- x# P8 h+ e; t5 g                               Standard Condominium5 r9 W4 e4 Z5 f  I5 r5 r5 L. {) C
    -------------------------------------------------------------% S3 A0 C% \( W# j
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo/ u* G# g  b' x3 [8 T
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change- h6 e# h" S3 j0 d: f
    -------------------------------------------------------------! q8 t: Z" [* j" _- V" s9 |
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
- y+ r0 q) X  l( j    -------------------------------------------------------------
; `. p. q# F" G1 E  K0 x# b5 C$ ~# k    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%$ q7 u2 |; ~, ]6 `5 @* I# X
    -------------------------------------------------------------. T5 `3 M4 \- C3 i) n5 Q# \' {: ?- o# @
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A2 w1 I4 h$ r, W
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# F) o/ Z! i+ |+ X+ R5 w( g$ K6 h    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A1 D5 _' G9 A9 S) s. r
    -------------------------------------------------------------
& A4 M# W9 r4 [  z) M8 K' g1 a. u* \    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
3 I( _6 h+ y* v. S3 l    -------------------------------------------------------------  U7 {2 b: A  U' i. @+ A" w% q$ l+ g: E
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
9 S8 {- w3 D; u    -------------------------------------------------------------
  G  n7 N6 m+ n# D) m    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
1 a( z* e" T4 \/ T& Y! d& Y2 M    -------------------------------------------------------------# z. @$ V: ?( _( p* }, b# D- D' s* |
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%7 y3 d- y9 h% Q1 k7 E5 B: |% _- f
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 R. C3 q, V' ?9 X/ _$ e    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%" G5 ~+ k/ b9 o) a% g
    -------------------------------------------------------------. A$ u% X# G0 H# f' V$ O/ W( j
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%# X& _. d  m  w8 D
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 [: @5 `4 j' x1 h( N5 _2 k    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%% `8 N* ~. j9 s7 @; J4 K
    -------------------------------------------------------------" @; n! J( p0 V4 s5 j! h& G% B
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
  ?* U% R: K* V, i    -------------------------------------------------------------
% A/ c0 t1 ]" V# S    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
4 g4 n4 b7 B0 `/ ?( q    -------------------------------------------------------------
; Z8 T1 k& P4 p    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%$ S. b4 F& H) ^  {6 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 ^& S* ?. O" q: A% {2 |2 a
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%. X6 g: Z6 e+ k* l
    -------------------------------------------------------------
! Q/ |' n( r. |( }1 `' M" J& Q* B    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%8 [: P4 j$ v4 {0 H6 e. l7 n0 F
    -------------------------------------------------------------- H7 s0 p4 O1 w0 C5 S$ u
    >>
: Z7 F6 z5 U% v9 C5 T6 |* I% M! \) D: l& h: B
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined' U7 R" _9 z' C" [
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint8 u' |3 z1 m/ [* c. ]
John and Victoria.
* {$ O& s, p9 E, {
- M  g9 L" z8 W    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most4 m! ]# S4 y" S$ J, g1 }& U
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
# U9 x( ~: e( ]% R( ^housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
. ]! J3 Q2 z! `$ s$ Lreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price7 a1 v) c2 {0 ^, n1 U, H. y$ [
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities4 e1 W! |& _& e  ~- ~
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
3 ?7 O$ a1 {& Z- Cavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current% f, e- u8 G" B$ b; v5 l7 _
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable* r3 ?3 Z5 n! a; m) K( V
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
1 q( h& Z/ \/ K* U( K+ o8 _# P4 INovember 15, 2006.( v( l" V' I  P/ C" S+ X
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of6 J" |, q# ~- F# i5 O2 g$ Q: y
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge" a. c+ q* b: R% i9 {7 F
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
8 N2 s' w3 ^9 k2 x7 `available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-11 05:00 , Processed in 0.325526 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表