 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable + l6 q) T, Z1 t/ P! K
: ^% h: w9 @7 Q2 D7 A' P$ k
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
_' U$ H$ H- W
2 L9 `3 g" \7 y- J7 h: \ TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market& t' G w8 F$ J6 @" E+ {
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third8 [' e& [& E. r7 j* }
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic0 u8 X& a. z* O
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit. x% [" P, b: }4 G$ A0 Q
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and5 P% d [6 w' n$ S( A3 u" h, W
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,% X4 E$ @, x2 Q! E
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal- o+ Z$ H5 U; i' r! I
LePage Real Estate Services.
% Y) H" r- r! k/ |. Q+ ^$ ?' Q7 e: M7 w0 \
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters7 D W$ A0 q3 N& R% d# h5 ^
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic+ o4 f8 {: y. b! M8 k/ N1 v# D/ G
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and" @/ k$ O: H, {' l
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
# d% ?2 ~6 {: k9 b; D5 b7 J( sresidential real estate sector.% u: J' m' ]' \
% K2 h- p; {- j/ C b* t Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation0 B+ s+ T4 e0 x" M
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%): b* ^$ [: \5 y: r8 t! h n
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562+ Z7 ]# x; L% p% c/ V2 c! H7 L
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380" L3 ^- d- R- ]& A& } W5 E
(+13.2%).) G) q1 {" Z2 J5 o7 F5 L# W% U6 n
/ a/ Z/ f; W( @7 I1 r
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth0 a+ H t s1 H' b& t) E1 y3 Y/ Z
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the) x/ P- ]: o8 N
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are9 Z9 A9 h% E) ]
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,3 m, o, F& ~' z
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services. @" F+ {: @2 V$ W% `+ X
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
7 s" m5 n! \" i! @. T2 qwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy& \; Z2 m% f* J! L
balanced market."
" M, V8 _5 }! C+ b4 U9 u- J5 l# g* _5 k9 R+ e
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
7 C# ~8 [- w) b3 w1 N- j, }considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
3 g s& \9 H9 Eto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
, B* O( E# V' xthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core' K) A" U* C! [( ~: F5 g4 `2 e# Q
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
7 N# M0 Y( R7 E6 W" w! t! Kmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record* V8 ]. \7 b' `) K
breaking price appreciations.
9 a: a8 k1 m" V2 ]) i8 M
# J0 N4 v% ~# o7 M Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
) s' G9 N" @) d! _" ]1 d3 v; ceconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
$ l8 y# }- p I* t. a* Olargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.; h& j5 h* |4 o+ R( X$ @; O
1 K7 l3 ]/ P& ?: D9 R In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
. j3 X6 c1 F6 q$ eeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer8 i. F& J* y+ ^4 P
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
( I8 d1 \* r: {slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.! W: n. x' F5 _6 Y/ w& V
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
9 `! B1 ^8 W5 Q( G9 fgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
! M3 l" V9 ^% M h$ A# g' @( c1 Pprice appreciation when compared with 2005.6 c4 E: v8 p( V- u4 S6 t' H! ]
+ n# D6 _% N* X7 L, ~8 m: j While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing5 L6 A$ E7 U: Z3 @% q. j
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and- N( I. w( z1 N' k$ x( h
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
t4 {. t1 y3 |4 z9 Mare markedly different than those found in the United States.( _6 a/ K# X; e" D) l- X) s
5 _% l" _ S& p% n Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
Z* ~# v9 w) q- CAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
5 g' u: b/ U% @# Y( \favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
/ T- O M# ~6 G) a7 V5 d, i7 ?( f% `relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general5 [6 |4 ?' {* k5 h$ O) H
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the9 v1 G/ W9 I- Q" l1 U# h" t5 y% e, g
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
4 l. R( _: _; R2 b, Z) S, Paggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization" p9 _% t4 j% H! }; _9 K
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment." B; t( Q4 o5 w
+ [6 r$ Z5 |6 f1 |3 H; |: R
<<
\) f1 H _, ^4 C- r& c REGIONAL SUMMARIES+ ?0 r% z% E7 j' o" u0 k# }
>>
8 ^9 t9 S& Q, i; w4 H. e# B
: a( U, w4 W% E& O% R5 u Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in6 V7 g6 T. r$ b$ j- i
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate' Y( m. c+ N) [ ] f; e( J
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time) W7 m" d J6 e
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
$ {8 x$ |( X( F$ P* }( [& urenovations.
+ f% S3 t0 F. M: z6 T* ` g+ j! j, x# P; X0 B/ j- n
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
' n: ^! q; Z4 h8 T& {increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation. W; g& U' a' J+ a: D3 m& m
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
6 ~, W0 A+ ]' K/ ^7 c. xSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
$ N6 l& ^6 a O; }; ~: A4 f* ~: E: G* s4 U/ Q; L: ~3 c5 E
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer" W6 ~- K! C9 n1 v2 W- P
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
% i; s3 t+ o& n8 ^4 R3 dquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
% k( e0 {/ _9 L* ]600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
' }: o8 u7 }6 S- qto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes: @6 \% G7 w6 Z
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.# z* T/ U+ ]0 O; H& o0 Z
8 B4 [2 F( C: m8 M
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced9 V% q V2 q; t. l) l
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their! K' A; v, r/ ^! L4 H. V: N1 w( G
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
( {! C4 l9 e8 v7 zwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian$ T6 b2 o8 c) B% N8 q
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
" h6 d3 M) f5 A) _6 ebuyers with more options when looking for a home.
' ]" O, Q" B# k( q9 U* P% O$ @3 U9 Q; y* F: ]- g
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
6 C' C: m3 b ]7 ?among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes! D" w' a( `" B: t
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,# C4 `5 b; ^% W/ D* _
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last, r5 a1 z$ }; i3 S1 G$ A- y* r
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
, _3 ^% i; ], a* {! a5 q
5 k p7 }7 g( x Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house; N- E! q* ]1 V1 O* n R
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory% K' P' Y- Z7 u
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting. G: d2 f u7 n
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
, H8 B6 v" h' {when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the2 x& ^5 T/ z8 D" s( F
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
1 @7 ^) M4 t) H( ymaking a purchase.9 E: G: ~1 X+ Y7 Z
0 } S5 S' |6 u# o Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing; Q2 h! M1 S" H" W6 e& \
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
% p! e; K! ?3 z, S+ ?! ?' {! qconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city9 p8 W8 _; B9 }$ v: K
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
: O" U( u' U# M) s5 g) N4 Zattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
. L# k! j# Z3 O y6 ]; {; ~: d7 vamenities.
# `# _3 e/ e; [
0 M. x$ F) I8 y1 B6 U( V The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels$ B: r9 J* |+ t1 t3 x
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand% h# O* X% j) ?! K
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has, x) U) R7 o8 K. Y2 F t5 X+ L
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
. r1 k0 Y0 @. e7 q7 Kdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle- M8 i- l# C; c' l( p* T! i$ o# s
residence, rather than for investment.8 a7 _1 J* v$ Q6 N. i7 ?8 o8 R5 B* Q
0 A0 p7 `& ~! O% g
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as9 O( E. U% q% n$ N6 M
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted9 G" q9 g. o) \' E& Z% _ o
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer( c( {( j3 J# s& I- a% V
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization2 `! {7 `9 E- i! ~; @
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
\: }7 i" ^1 O( m4 O! bthe market. J: t/ d1 z4 p; b. q$ l
$ B- m2 \! s! l$ m; p4 U: K9 U In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
: t# o1 m- g* }$ d; ?% h( d( pJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
: u d/ z& B- |8 `$ |August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring; W# k% k; A& C& Q
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due$ h6 `! s8 T5 w
to the shortage of available inventory.
9 V% A3 l3 k* K" X
, ?& M3 O# j% v9 F( v, j Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its* N$ ?. N5 a+ l# c' K" O+ l
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
/ a" y9 y9 D' \0 U# xvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses* z9 }9 T9 @, V* L9 ~5 _" ^, _
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.4 `6 a1 ?. x- S4 T$ Y
5 C+ i8 J/ ?" Y- N$ U) h3 E1 l Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases; z; {) V7 v) ?/ _& z
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
3 J0 A% P) D& ~unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
' F. W* d; i4 fpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
8 F0 ]: i7 h7 g0 {6 w, e5 |prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer( v. L+ b, A; e6 P
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
; E9 N3 e7 ~$ P: H0 L+ h3 [, Rbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
! p' x+ H; o! C+ X8 z1 l
3 G+ G1 M1 F% W Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
8 B; w$ [2 R$ B% kas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton: ~) w2 [0 x: {; A; `
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,- G( `; @, X4 g6 ^4 g
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
7 V7 ]9 c& L) |* Zincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
$ U) I* U4 P0 m2 ]$ |$ ~0 B: Zin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly6 e( `6 Y( a7 J4 i
towards the end of 2006. " i: `$ n/ u; F, k+ k
6 Z3 ^' U6 a% U# RWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of( F6 I5 U' x8 U1 [2 q; o1 E
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable* B% |' C) v- f3 a& o/ Z8 `8 Q4 C6 J
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse) v' ]) x( ~9 D: i' r, @+ W' [
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
1 R& ?; ?! p5 E3 \: sforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
8 o- E1 O/ j8 X7 I( Bpressure on tight inventory levels.3 Z( H! B; _* a/ ]0 q# v! o
( J7 Y a! C# \
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic( r5 c2 a5 T5 D: n9 y
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
+ ^" }; x: e8 R) {, V0 {into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;& j* B# d. u, R/ J' X
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching. C; r# c; F6 v9 ~; {5 }9 H
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.0 S7 |+ h, I8 F
6 }- J4 R! x( t( A. n/ q <<
7 h. }2 x+ I+ p+ V$ c' w& Y" u Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20066 l5 P; h& O B: U+ Y5 V+ n. { I
" c) a! U+ N& k; K1 `" m -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 e8 z0 X, ]7 G Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
: I7 b$ P b! A -------------------------------------------------------------------------. X* `& K: g5 X% F7 W
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3; r- d9 t7 p. K, L
Market Average Average % Change Average Average- t, g7 ^' H6 N! T' ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- p. \( W, T2 R1 e7 | Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0000 _! j& h" e: ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 ]$ ~. j$ o- ]5 `+ u/ Y Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
0 J2 @1 y6 n4 w0 l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# M; L% F; i, d% A Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000' z. L5 H$ `1 S" f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: g( x9 |5 q& o/ f" ` Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -. M$ M7 k7 _; r0 j2 _8 P- x) q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* l# q% S3 x; r: x% |8 ~- i
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3334 z/ {4 P4 p/ m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 {1 `9 q5 n+ ^ Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5832 s1 q! {) @1 Z7 E, K9 k
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( G; ?9 z, T! o2 G# p3 k Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185& k2 v+ ^6 J' M K x& C2 u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 F, T' O$ d7 Q, j Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
# c$ W1 j' ]6 p( k% r -------------------------------------------------------------------------' i+ P8 g# F9 \# h6 m0 M
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766* m K" [0 X/ C7 a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 T2 k0 U# G! f P; r) ^ ?
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707: Q" o1 b! _ B8 P; k% [2 G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& W0 L6 s e7 h4 D2 `
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500, i f6 v7 m { E& G7 N; d( F. e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* L! H8 I. m/ s/ F7 A- ?. y
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
8 U6 N. D) e% b% m0 Q9 P -------------------------------------------------------------------------# E" S' S6 ?* [' ~
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
1 ]6 s; U: R- s8 I5 [$ ^. U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ V; a1 ]) \: Q0 S# g Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
' e- j* c# {' }+ z -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 `3 u7 H! `9 t6 z
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
2 f8 O0 X9 q' D* g9 g1 u -------------------------------------------------------------------------. A- l* J4 `( b. K6 Z. v' e0 c/ n
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860. a" N4 s7 V8 N5 i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 h& {$ Y4 `! d; o S8 j0 i, o$ ^6 s0 Z% G- E/ V6 E$ C3 b. u
-------------------------------------------------------------) d, S" F$ A0 w: p
Standard Condominium
' c, E/ j* ]0 U' Q -------------------------------------------------------------1 [ z* j1 p. ]3 u
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo7 p1 V! [& V8 D8 O
Market % Change Average Average % Change9 q' b2 M$ w* ]4 m. i
-------------------------------------------------------------: ~8 O2 D, M0 w2 B. ?
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
# T* j& d& q- Z# n$ y- O -------------------------------------------------------------
7 s; r" }3 _ m9 z" \! F1 V Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
% x' V1 X p, }7 q3 l4 J -------------------------------------------------------------9 }$ n M. i6 M3 ~; K# R0 g5 _2 M
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A5 r8 z# t' N4 `2 ~. Q
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ F4 r4 ?7 \. n1 i Saint John N/A - - N/A
3 L1 {* j& i" _1 X8 q6 m -------------------------------------------------------------
; U7 G, o' \9 C- c4 H St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
. H! g- N8 G5 F! p* o: w -------------------------------------------------------------
, n0 O+ L+ j2 `" b$ P0 }2 d Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%: b+ H% k/ m0 L: Q- F+ `8 {
-------------------------------------------------------------# }$ i. ]& m) r5 q B6 m- g: E
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
5 I8 J% C" z6 f% D -------------------------------------------------------------3 g3 j0 G' n7 U4 P3 y' Z) f2 G$ ?5 Q
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
& p8 `. R8 |& |9 M- W' V0 O8 z -------------------------------------------------------------
) F3 P7 f$ i5 H( J$ K3 `0 G Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
" ]3 U" F7 {& R- T1 p -------------------------------------------------------------
' r$ D; [7 n4 H, N( f Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
9 c0 T+ f" s) a5 X -------------------------------------------------------------9 g( J! h4 q( s8 r
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%4 L# T- O- i1 _. C, W
-------------------------------------------------------------4 G9 d0 D- ]- x5 A P0 v
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
- v8 ^& ]% G8 `) e -------------------------------------------------------------/ V+ A. Q) i* W' [7 O' X! z0 o
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%; E. [2 W) [( c+ G: U/ `
-------------------------------------------------------------1 P$ L6 ~; r4 H- ^. h
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
! W/ U1 k' G+ b, y# O1 g -------------------------------------------------------------3 Z' I6 G ~5 z9 _" G
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%& e: C r9 x6 T5 }3 Y- O
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 V- T" ~7 i' j' m National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
! T6 \7 ]! v$ X |6 l1 [. k -------------------------------------------------------------& `0 t* h: a$ b" M1 u
>> s/ S: B P* U/ S, K$ i
9 [# z! w q6 G9 W& S" ^ Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined. Y0 X, h5 D& Y* }6 U* k" k0 }
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
0 R0 u2 |3 X# p/ n! JJohn and Victoria./ J! g4 s' V1 t$ `/ v1 I0 j5 a
- C: B' J( A. v$ P) _" y7 P1 p The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most. m/ o. b0 h7 S s7 b x# J1 c
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
: B- |& J' N ^8 y( _housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
: k- G/ t; E" b& kreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
2 c4 X" X& a0 q, c: O9 L2 f5 itrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
& K* p2 T9 }/ a1 q. ^; y$ ?* |" Vacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is* r) t6 O8 i* F/ \% v# h
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
( K- C* N& h& zfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
8 O4 x: E: I% Y& L' Rversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
6 _& e2 }# ^ m, v% @7 KNovember 15, 2006.
7 U" I3 ]8 w+ u0 l" t/ D0 X Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
% w" ~8 a% m" }3 Q! Ifair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
+ s n+ ~" I) F' D: Yprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
! S3 r, |* j5 @+ H v* [available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|