 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 1 Z8 q, B3 X- t4 G$ q0 {
' R# y4 G; S$ t- L. R: Q- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -6 I/ _3 q$ L7 O; b- f; ^: M
/ s$ u2 v) g* e TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market( Y! [7 C4 j% B% v2 }/ i) L
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
+ i( Q. Z* e+ V6 v) Q0 l, cquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic( H2 E6 y5 G: F- K
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit8 |& x( |! c$ [, C0 M- g
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and k f! H$ m" v; L) E
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,0 d1 d- S: m9 |; U" i. P. B2 z# l5 @
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
/ k+ W2 ^" e4 Y+ H. n+ l, O+ G& KLePage Real Estate Services.
: b n5 `6 \& i
* P! Q% x, x8 r2 G6 ? Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
0 N9 T: j) k5 I# D( Z Xare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic7 V! a ~! I+ u0 I9 U3 T! v: `
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and3 n3 t% V* g. p/ r
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
( a+ I% u5 Y0 i, s5 F+ Presidential real estate sector.6 e$ x8 S- ]; h; l
! P) m! W+ q/ v2 t$ b Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation. y9 g5 ~& \4 m5 x) k4 o8 S& M8 W
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
8 B6 N! _% H/ l3 h1 G; ]" zyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
" W6 ^( a6 M5 _1 E% H' d- ]- ^(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
. c3 F" v2 R" z- v% k" f(+13.2%)." v5 {9 z0 _# @& ?5 V
; K9 B# P, m5 \ T
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
8 c6 J( } `" w# bduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the$ n% h9 b6 \2 F) r- `
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are) I r. z$ l4 z4 |* y- E
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
$ P6 P+ d( X1 t8 S4 Upresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
( m E* @+ Z. Q0 P9 I" v"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
4 i) `1 @ C5 ~3 S& P4 Y' o& gwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy0 ]- `' Q; |1 K/ f: Y: {
balanced market."
7 Z& N. Z7 G& Y9 A/ k. k. w- m0 H7 i+ }4 m
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
6 `0 S: `& _7 g: _. ?# l. Yconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
2 [& W! I! U" ^2 hto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued7 r: J9 V/ U# `; Y% e
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core8 R. }; F( L) M
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
. b6 d; l( M3 S amanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
2 }2 W C _$ D# }: Fbreaking price appreciations.
% v! x4 l5 V% t" M) Y* W: e4 t0 @& j) W
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
5 p4 Y3 o+ e& n* v3 x# W" reconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
$ H E- u4 l1 k2 vlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.7 p3 E* m6 i6 h- [* G8 X3 V
4 m* n/ k8 w0 B+ [& I" v6 O! |
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
% \+ W# U6 A) C+ x& X: Zeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer9 f' x$ U2 Q7 U7 Z" h( E+ }* [
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off: a2 B6 n. o. O1 D/ z
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.9 j# I1 F7 p6 ^: Q4 t, [
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers; A2 l" \# p% n+ x4 w0 f |% y
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
, t6 l c6 |; v* m6 kprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
2 j+ a; n7 h" Z# D. b4 ]; V) S% J6 K! {' }
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
2 l! K9 a3 q" X' |$ Vmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
+ Q. H' i7 r& {- f# Hfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
5 Q3 h* y6 Q ^! r1 v& Xare markedly different than those found in the United States.
& g; G) F7 [* V6 q; s, h0 _
- I" y9 @: h4 n8 T& M' Y Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
3 r4 ?0 K" c/ M/ |2 EAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
/ E5 ?, z5 \8 @ jfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
" G& w* m7 v; P/ hrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
: l# C* w" d5 b! Faffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
& v2 r9 c+ M* \: v/ t/ D* B: W$ ddownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
" U- Q$ [: {' t) Z8 Raggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
( {. ~8 {3 [2 D( E3 V& Nmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."" S o" e, k. x9 p7 f* ?
/ i3 T9 ^& V9 U1 x% E7 w( i <<# U0 ?8 |' L6 b3 t
REGIONAL SUMMARIES, ]- D2 ~! a( S) G, [+ k9 `
>>
$ B! ^& }+ a6 c W) ]; {
" e' g9 z) F, i) f- m3 B r e Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in- g5 u, l& j) @
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
/ }' p0 t8 f" w5 y8 l: m5 z) dof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time4 U; J2 P# N) ^( L6 ^7 c
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of: O) {5 L9 N( }$ l
renovations.
3 O$ C' D, u" M# E( {" I# M' D! `
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
$ l; n& t! c5 o) w- gincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
" L# b+ k" ~8 L7 Vcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and2 O2 ?' C4 y+ Q; R, \# [
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
) W; q3 l s( y; \3 ]- n5 }1 B2 s2 d" J, W/ |( E, Z
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer$ ?. r/ B4 z9 |
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the5 ^7 U3 ^; i' K. Z/ F1 e/ _
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
% U; X, A! i% s) Z600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores- g, R, ]. U( ~8 M8 I; B6 K8 }* O+ t
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
9 @ [$ u2 I, E: p8 D* Q4 _6 sand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
( [! t8 Y/ Q4 |0 ]
- y+ v- n% U9 b; h In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
' b" w: {+ o$ Y4 H# @- o. {conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their" p$ a1 _9 H: t* }0 z: b
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers6 i8 R, ~- w9 v+ _ D: Y6 ?
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
) R5 S% l* }+ _( u0 o& fdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
0 s/ c/ F5 h' Z( v3 I2 |, G/ tbuyers with more options when looking for a home.. H" f1 q# D; x2 r f' j( q p
+ u( X9 i4 g6 W. u9 }1 v
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly. Z+ f* m7 E* h4 U
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes _% d' s D D3 H0 R3 U
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,+ G/ J" R4 x) j B
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
( m3 K1 U2 ?$ d& t3 Gfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.' H. g- e- F' z
8 B& x' r, O( n6 j4 I# o. X Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
& [; V6 a& n. G# l1 s1 y* Hprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory+ l/ J- \# K; x" Y2 L& F
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
% Y7 ~7 P4 p6 f9 }; ^first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,) Z3 p; Z$ q/ A% m4 m
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the, h7 t* E* @7 A4 [0 n, X$ }" W
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before" u* x+ u( @. |8 e8 S- D+ X
making a purchase.
6 Z- r& X. Z. F3 C& g5 }
; _. A* u0 \7 r1 j% s Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
1 Y, U- q/ O1 w) Kmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong5 K3 d }7 A# R" I% k
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
" i/ y* t7 _, h+ M% dcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting! p% ^) V$ }" A! @) P
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
3 i1 }9 u" N/ samenities.
+ T0 f, S7 W: b7 ]/ @* o' u
4 h" Y- D$ w# e! v1 u- a. Q( A The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels, z: u X/ _' r/ b" D. F# `
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
4 X- D$ `! z/ M$ Cacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
# i$ X$ S* F; T8 W/ T# v8 Econtinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been$ T/ f0 t/ [( L/ A9 ?
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle: {/ b% p7 C! j/ D6 _ v
residence, rather than for investment.& j. k: b/ ~- O% G
+ E# Z1 D7 V3 u ?* G1 v: p The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as% d8 ^) @8 x2 k' j. C4 _% c
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted; ~" c& M* i% M" {/ X" \7 F4 W6 X I
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
' p' j! j: b) C L* c8 }! {confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization3 E2 \% n* F/ f5 m* i- O
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter6 n- |: W; `7 L2 T* P9 j
the market.
# W9 d7 A8 i/ B% e J" z
7 l6 f% K2 s! O( \2 Y b- X4 i In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through) N+ u/ F- {! [ e/ p/ E
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
7 x9 x' e4 M% L2 F! o) {, B& {August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring' L2 s( i8 E1 t5 e) ^
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
! I2 M U! s) w( B, f( C) o% \. rto the shortage of available inventory.) H& f f) ?, Q p4 O( M7 t% ]
& @+ S, j% ~/ z* \; Y Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
: h) j% h$ Y# }- }# Tmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains4 q4 g5 D' t P( V, K, D
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
& M8 a0 I0 o6 S4 I. E+ }" astruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
0 F% z7 U4 f; I3 L6 ?% k
; ^0 g/ o" A! g) c: q7 n Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
E. l# G; ]- ~1 j: @- sin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low$ C- c; I3 K! O( f' p
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
- U: J( |% _7 N3 `7 v" {pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring9 P2 M* Y+ z2 v* X8 V# }
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer3 L Q' e e* i/ m0 q
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as* \8 c# `/ e5 E- T/ e" p7 q3 f
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
% t% ^7 t8 |% V! } K% {
, Q$ I4 C2 Q: F6 }2 A7 d7 y6 C4 o Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter2 u9 a7 ]0 w2 i
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
6 J* I& D5 m& t/ Aremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
8 M) d8 j' U6 amaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
5 N. i# T1 |& v- {: e7 zincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve6 g# I7 k; F: |+ a, k4 R1 J
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly! L9 L: A8 Y0 `* [; j0 e
towards the end of 2006. 0 C& K, v; ?$ B# f4 h5 E5 @
4 X3 Y5 {, s" yWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
3 `- G8 J/ u3 q( Y' |5 |; L3 Qinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
# S0 {9 p5 N T! D4 O2 Sto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse1 R, H+ f# g6 M8 y8 v
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to4 _( f2 o+ ?3 J8 R
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
8 J9 C% l: D6 S) lpressure on tight inventory levels.
7 A0 {+ |2 u+ @2 f' t$ P. w4 ~& \1 [! w# o8 m6 j9 ]
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
1 E& J. Y$ y( E0 g" w gfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
3 ?" ]4 G# H3 @8 ?, _& z, \- M( J& pinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
7 Q. `* O+ k }5 C$ _while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching- [$ M M I1 d; z# D' f$ ]
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.' o! P. f! }' g( x/ |0 C8 h, e5 ~
5 M, s' f: Y+ W3 u1 l6 X) K
<<; p8 J, o1 S$ o
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
) Q( u* [, n( V( S5 [- P8 q. ~" E6 z! }! f) `, k% ?# \7 R0 y" R! }
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ ]2 P6 A0 @1 K5 @! h& n$ G) O4 F Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
6 T( X2 \/ q" k+ {/ Z1 f' A -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 _; j j$ a' Q; D( P0 D 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
; \0 e5 i0 [: x/ _2 S* ` Market Average Average % Change Average Average
7 `0 g* K% P# H6 @+ D -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ c( S$ ~: v8 q; ~0 l* n Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0004 a7 K0 k& ]$ g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 a% t3 a% D) _/ |8 ~% a9 Y Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
1 p& x+ S, q+ o5 H `1 X6 G. _" Z, y/ @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
y4 ~6 g9 E. H, L6 r; U1 G Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
4 y% v# D7 J0 {) }3 H( h8 d -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( j" r6 p2 [' b; r6 _: _ Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -% _- k# { P9 N: G0 g7 s. V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 g+ Z/ X+ Z4 j& Y! H- Z! c
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
2 F% Y$ U Q4 A2 K -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) [+ ^# z" w5 S% o" u Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
: a% G0 ^0 v6 X% z7 e, v -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 T4 i5 s) E3 P; ^% Y" v
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
1 w* H: F! a! T8 l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& w! ]; J3 T6 m* R% r Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250- R+ a6 Y5 I; y7 ?' m L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 b. y7 w; F v) B) R* L W* G
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766, \# C' b7 D2 h1 V, A4 n8 ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 T# s/ F2 j `6 @
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707: m- U) i% `7 I: r1 n% D7 v) n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 y, g/ Y! |/ |" z. o1 i0 c
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
0 e( b$ i( R' ]. i3 M0 S2 j9 G -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Z" x- M5 t" Y, t; s3 G Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
, P' z6 @: Y8 g( I( j r -------------------------------------------------------------------------( i+ }+ C j# l) _( R. |
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
6 e1 H0 l9 B3 A0 Q E" f) G -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ m+ Q- Q* a9 I6 f4 T# ~ Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
2 j" x, @0 g9 R, C+ Z& \0 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------" V7 M- w8 A! ?# L$ c! ~
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000 G k9 P! ]) j6 t" |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) p$ B$ Q, X% ^ O4 ]3 [& l9 C
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8605 ^ _- Q6 {# V. {' t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( g% Q' @/ p" B: O1 H; t [1 a* G' L) v: b' }6 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------7 h F H6 V' h- D6 m F2 S
Standard Condominium/ Z: U; K9 j" v5 s
-------------------------------------------------------------2 W+ Q5 G. l) C, t' N% F0 Z$ V. M: ?
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo8 `/ t9 U% F1 a# v; D, l; [ \
Market % Change Average Average % Change
0 D ?+ K- U# Q+ h2 V8 | -------------------------------------------------------------6 |& C4 v5 f0 }
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%" n7 X" `, L9 y( G8 t
-------------------------------------------------------------( e2 b9 i* X* y' o( ~5 `; j- O Y' B
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%3 {) J! @. n5 l, q
-------------------------------------------------------------3 b6 X; M `* H8 E6 G
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A% Y/ F! L: ^9 f- F& C
-------------------------------------------------------------* [) D# Q) T! d; u# o% M0 f
Saint John N/A - - N/A
' ]% S' l% X! K* y2 w+ @3 z -------------------------------------------------------------& ?* @0 K0 p" `: n: V- Y/ c7 d
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%8 j3 d4 D& l: Q. G$ K* K
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 ~( a+ c' V* ]4 I Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
, P9 ] p7 K& S( `1 j, G -------------------------------------------------------------3 l- Z$ |. c8 P8 |- W, Z" R
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%2 \+ V5 U- Z' P( F% ~0 I3 ]
-------------------------------------------------------------* z1 E; y3 @! A7 h# N
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%9 w1 H$ J( y( ^. B, Z Q0 O! @
------------------------------------------------------------- o9 O- \9 R3 |( v' L4 L
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
% w' @2 z" t, q -------------------------------------------------------------3 V) W6 p) t [( A% S5 D
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%. H1 H1 b# c2 t# K- W7 n! A5 X
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 {9 O3 L7 B. ^ Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
$ w9 B2 q! j' Q+ t0 {6 l -------------------------------------------------------------# s9 d; g+ e5 Q) f3 u( J3 S9 {
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%) d f8 Q6 }) z t4 K8 O
-------------------------------------------------------------/ [1 |; Z1 f m5 x+ t
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
3 _1 I- e2 ~7 ^4 k5 L8 X/ o1 ^ -------------------------------------------------------------& |4 W. O% h Q( n6 ?
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%' _6 Z6 \" d, [
-------------------------------------------------------------7 d3 y( u9 e1 R, W2 l3 {( z* E
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%2 Q4 J+ A8 ?8 B9 u2 Z6 E
------------------------------------------------------------- e- T4 n, s% Z- w$ F9 M7 x
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%# U( F+ ?6 |) u# P6 T
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 E/ U) P1 u8 [% J >>
' Q7 V9 ~, G/ A" @& \1 m; ]
) I( M0 \! c. x2 s x8 k. P1 i ^ Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
$ L' p8 ?2 A4 }3 D5 j% win the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
; C1 ~0 @3 x! {8 H+ yJohn and Victoria.4 b. C, ~" E' T1 P
8 n) b# m- q) P1 R7 m! g2 Y Y
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most7 @1 I$ f1 G% T+ [0 a
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of! \5 t* ]/ g9 s
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release6 y! Z c6 ^! U+ S) m, v" @: m
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price) o' d. R0 ~8 k8 V( A
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
% C0 ` _- @: ^: C3 N; b/ qacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
. ~, g. S- @! y) o2 N3 G$ x. m1 xavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current1 C3 b; z' L/ j* N' q8 R
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
, G& \; [; X" b2 ^( J8 _version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
2 D' \/ X2 d& e: r$ Z* d! x6 GNovember 15, 2006.; B% N1 f5 g( s/ e& B7 }& }0 ~- G
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
" W! s: ]3 e( t6 u, P7 x7 T$ }fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge; E0 o2 o' e' M8 g$ S
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
( @" m& F: C7 N9 H7 m5 ?available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|