data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46cc7/46cc7843dcd58e9bae48cacaee679869d2063cf4" alt="" 鲜花( 0) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9abd3/9abd3077a7da08d1377ac4cbf7cf07f291cdee3f" alt="" 鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
7 L0 S" _# x( x: K* z) h; _
/ R7 ~ h4 a; b# y- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
8 U1 V [! Z* {4 S4 Q/ H c1 j. w( _" R; o0 j- t4 h& b% Q/ ?
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market# X; X, I! H9 u6 u7 s
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third; y$ G7 Q5 i3 [4 P$ a, P
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic5 Y0 `- R# A" j
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit9 ^( @" d! W, u
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and3 H$ {3 l, a, O
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
& c3 q; i) ?. t2 p; s# f; BQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
! g! f% e7 d2 f% WLePage Real Estate Services.$ F/ y/ q5 z1 u+ b- T0 c
4 f- S( l0 n) u3 K Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
- }. P7 e& ]. _/ Z. Gare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
( u: [% T# {3 q8 n: R# @conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
* H1 P( |% {2 q5 R$ bsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the0 ~8 m5 ]1 v& o+ u6 f( M4 v
residential real estate sector.5 j% E+ J2 M; A- ^
( \9 a; y. |! M, P- W( c3 a
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
% i# ?! H: A* m9 W! P& ]& `3 Joccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
7 N) X' L3 H/ T. ~5 e% h( ~year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
+ y8 p# ~ S% A(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
+ N3 [* L! e# ^1 O(+13.2%).
6 S; k3 @8 k1 k
6 O- H0 ^0 F- x "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
+ A. Z `* c* i" w" z) Vduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the" T8 G( [( F1 r$ ]' i( ?
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
) z) F" `. M/ W) }+ Xpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper," M' ?: p0 E2 `% r$ Y W' ~* g
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.3 V4 @- i2 v8 f2 n
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
, m6 V5 b* ~8 f; ^2 fwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
8 f2 m! ~6 Y7 y( Abalanced market."
5 l9 u; O, [/ x/ h( S5 K% L4 G
( c8 w3 w2 f2 d5 T Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
. r( D9 S8 w1 e, X, E6 l! Econsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift X" y* F+ B; O" P# S5 x. F5 a( D$ ^
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued7 O E {' z8 h1 s) u+ A$ U
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core! D& J7 l4 W( x9 Z3 `
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,6 v6 a: w+ F2 B: a* H3 H: L" Q
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record6 l0 K- s4 U D/ H3 _
breaking price appreciations.
) o9 p* n8 Y* e& q
" A4 m6 s1 L- }2 Q6 ~- w Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding# b: L0 @% I5 J/ c
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the6 Q8 |8 l3 p. x( i/ R" c( {( e
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.' k) F1 J4 D5 o' h3 t
: E* _7 A* _* A% x! I2 h# D In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
& e5 i3 U! D X" F" v+ {economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer; J' d2 X5 Z8 z$ s
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off2 O( ~* U& r1 |& x& E! X
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
% H! n, j! b1 K! v+ r* F% RIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers* ?" B; d5 A* a% P1 K; g# e
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
& {/ G! p f) L) l# ^% iprice appreciation when compared with 2005.5 @' n1 y) ?0 z% H3 a
Z0 r n8 N+ h* t- M* X6 N
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
# |5 n) z6 u& m" l$ _% xmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and5 d$ c7 B. X' g* d& j+ ^) N
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada, x7 y k/ v' P" i9 p9 |
are markedly different than those found in the United States.1 }2 ?1 K0 k, r
" D# w: S/ Y% ?5 y! q# y3 i
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the" P* _" E) c9 L/ i; p& z
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's: G/ g* W3 j, v, I6 Z
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the0 T' i$ J5 Z/ Y! @! |
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
( m: a5 C# z( \# ^$ u& [9 d, o6 faffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
' s' C) q: b! Cdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
; u0 J3 w- |- p' naggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
2 w! p/ v/ d- I3 A1 S! ~& c: Vmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
; x5 n5 ]+ Z" y8 y8 ]7 B, q/ c u
/ q& H# h- r6 I, u3 V9 [ <<
& |& ^3 Y, Q5 m& X REGIONAL SUMMARIES0 R" E: x% ]9 |& O3 t- Q: Z% H
>>) f# U1 O$ b* M! _8 |6 {
; N8 n+ [0 h. |3 g Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
! J6 u* J+ X0 s1 PHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
& s1 ~( H( A7 w7 Yof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time) U* w6 C5 Q/ U) d! j
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of6 [7 [) j+ z5 V( a
renovations.: [, R; \2 J" v, L* E! n7 E2 a' H
0 M9 X! q( H2 ?1 W( u, g. N
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
' d' C; }% q6 S o8 Aincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation' _: a$ | p* h
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
5 v/ [/ e( r5 K9 s! [% t! e1 Y+ w& f2 |September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
3 O7 D$ L+ [0 A0 |$ O7 v" x& w7 I; ^! w( K* h
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
; p. G3 L- f8 pslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the/ r& U8 g* n, W
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new, Y( K' Z1 q0 n, v* l& B2 E: ^$ p6 l" _
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
- i3 G9 `/ `! T& z( Jto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
8 ]" e; V! _- k' Q: N( s: X( ]8 pand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
+ `3 R1 ]2 A0 y* |5 K
B5 C. x+ p7 W9 `! x$ b In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced' Y! ]' ~! e) c9 g. g! A! @
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
+ G( z/ H) m+ K( ihomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers3 x# z% x7 y- y9 }' o1 V* J
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian) c( U. F4 ?; h( D
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
" Q4 G. ?1 h: E' J7 w1 v9 `buyers with more options when looking for a home.* D6 h- I0 }2 v0 x n6 t
0 I* D4 [. Q4 ] u
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly' c7 b4 K2 o, j* K3 c* y& @6 O5 y! D3 g
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes. t- |8 ? W: _9 q8 e
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
$ {% V, Q/ F& k; Y7 n3 o1 O: Qas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
7 b$ Y" Q ~# O: K3 Tfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
% u4 {! Z" d( T! P' b7 e( ~3 [
. h% U( e* p! D4 d0 g/ y Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
. s3 L& c+ _: t2 q$ T) Rprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
1 [6 b$ p0 V5 n T olevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
0 X, E6 P8 ~' X7 z- M! X; W" ~& mfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1," `- @3 G1 }( u; b% W7 s S
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the% U! W0 F {8 A9 S
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
7 }& R" `3 [! }& lmaking a purchase.
" y6 }! _8 k* C3 ?: O( o6 i0 X! v3 p# X8 L4 K! p$ l) J
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing5 F6 n3 Z3 _5 c
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong4 D# f4 F; H3 b
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
2 [! S- ?1 }4 k1 ^0 G1 Mcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
4 w# j* r8 U% P/ M6 X8 E; cattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown' ^; ^9 r; }, ~: S5 R
amenities.! F9 t, a0 {3 Z
" q3 `2 r: R3 D* d The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
% G6 ?- s( z7 `throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
' T$ L& w7 @( O% macross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
* ?5 n+ M# S8 L1 _continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been* o# S' D2 i! O, g9 ?/ Y% O
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle. T0 h+ Q. [! F8 E7 ~6 U, ^4 D% x
residence, rather than for investment.# Q0 V* K6 O1 N/ l
' R. t: L: E7 U$ u1 @ The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
! K6 p( V: a- H+ v; ^house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted3 I/ j: O, e) `% c
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer$ h8 P. ^) d8 G; t( t
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization3 c9 M$ g! B& r
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter$ X; d: e2 N8 B1 g
the market.( w0 @ h- R( @3 j1 D) S" u
m; ^! D# z R- D/ ?# @9 V1 Y, z( w In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
% b: I3 ^5 ^8 pJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
& V3 y, g0 ~6 P/ S0 QAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring2 D' k& a: I" t/ B3 ?8 i. ~1 |
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
6 Z1 k+ J9 G2 _! G+ |4 D2 Q" Tto the shortage of available inventory.8 p r/ d9 `2 y8 n
1 H( `+ m0 V8 G Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its; `; r' v; w% z* k$ b M% w
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains/ ?. T5 U# N8 `6 P4 j
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses9 I, Z) D- i$ V
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.8 f* f: m. m0 P4 h: `& E
* T) o6 i8 M* S E5 v0 p- @
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases. p5 y/ Q6 L, u6 ?6 F7 O! ~0 I8 Q
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
+ G3 g' y, {; A3 Z# Z( H' Funemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that0 O6 T; e* B& p. h; K
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
0 k/ v9 k4 `. J" M$ `. Eprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer* N% r' l% B0 m7 T* j) }
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as8 P; o/ r4 Y2 v
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
$ D: Q& X9 u7 K5 C2 i
% D( G6 E4 ^# e# B7 r) x Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter, `1 J9 C. o0 t/ R! z. n
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton' }/ h; ^7 |6 D0 h* D
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,: r: O2 }! R( p- L" b5 z5 N8 T
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices& ]7 V' c V4 W# I
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve- f) n& Y2 n' l4 H& T# {
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly- f" P/ t D8 s/ x
towards the end of 2006.
' x8 |1 H6 i& ~- t+ H5 j8 l
# |( o* X( g' H( l) A# ?" }While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
. ~/ j2 R- V' @7 V B" Jinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable' _7 r& x% R1 `: x' ?8 A4 L
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse0 B) Y9 a* p: y' r0 F
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
- R4 C- k) ]! {foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added$ {: g! r5 t q) V8 N( Y2 ?9 Y9 K( T
pressure on tight inventory levels.- O2 ` [9 g' t( s& m4 x
, Y* u6 w4 C j, l Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
6 k) b( o% o& i5 s, m1 jfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people+ t8 w$ l) B) @+ P) n; @0 y
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;& t( X# v2 w' R% g# c5 e; b" _
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching% H! u% y* I& q+ U
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
* M' q: c! k: b4 F E# u
8 ^9 V0 u5 I4 h, O; T <<
) C3 b' F1 m* ^$ f: v+ v' Q Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006% @ [; T- N2 B; a
8 L4 E; {9 h/ q# g0 R. u1 W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; b* x# C" a) j/ @2 b/ {/ y- S' a% A2 s
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
8 h6 `6 Y( @& q -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 ]* M3 G$ ^" A. t9 F
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q30 y1 Q# \+ N) M+ V
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
/ J$ h) P. ]' U -------------------------------------------------------------------------, F% \) s& F6 `. P, I {
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
# \9 B3 @% ^/ y7 O1 N -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 A3 k2 U+ ~9 `; U4 v
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,0005 D! y7 ~# O- I4 d% Y) L1 C q* g% p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' t3 q8 G# Q: \ Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0007 I4 T. \4 y! j7 }0 i f8 [
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: o: M8 S1 M0 v+ Z! K, @ Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
Y8 W4 U: h, f2 E$ F -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 b H1 G% ], [
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
: F8 C1 f8 F2 L% _! B -------------------------------------------------------------------------; i* G* ?1 E! c! z7 w) @3 F# t
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
! s6 P0 K* V8 v( E -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 \) O A# m; F0 m! _8 N
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
" g7 G6 _! n, @0 f4 d -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 A! r9 b D q' C7 g3 Q5 I
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250+ U+ m. S: Z2 U1 H! {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' x9 O% Y' W! j! j6 u
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7664 v5 R' b) F& T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' [5 M3 [+ Z x/ j' Z) P- m& _" T
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
- {6 ~1 Z$ x2 l+ L( l1 C( [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Z2 f G1 r! |; I& F7 h, ?
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5005 C/ v( v9 b( n) c1 T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 z7 M& y# R; z2 b; b# w
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
5 e4 j* G5 x, `( v% y -------------------------------------------------------------------------( D% H; l" c ?9 V: [, C, Q
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7144 A; W2 \3 Z* l" W" h8 c# g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 S) _1 ?; h F" E' e Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500+ p2 y ]9 w( a4 `/ H/ G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 |) r5 I5 R, x Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000/ b1 V* p' I/ D6 x( N* d) g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* u4 L( b* M) m3 a7 j9 ?+ W" w7 @
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
4 B$ U6 B1 J! U0 V -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 J5 b7 s! N" d' h% C! [# P1 ^9 |! L
6 m8 |( p: N: s" I9 o -------------------------------------------------------------1 I3 O7 Y. I( u x0 T; N$ {
Standard Condominium
, R' f: O! U! b -------------------------------------------------------------
+ L- ]/ x& |+ x# m3 n( d' `. Y 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo6 C* {1 S& K1 G) X
Market % Change Average Average % Change
3 H; }* ]6 ^- G# } -------------------------------------------------------------
" D' d8 E* M3 P0 S" s& e# r8 w Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
, h7 K' U& e) M6 F; z/ l1 V. T! i -------------------------------------------------------------
9 {$ U, Z" r9 \/ Q; e7 l! Q/ _ Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%% o* j* L6 s9 f$ f* G) V. R8 H
-------------------------------------------------------------6 k' ~0 r% l2 U8 T, Z
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
) r. k3 k' H8 a& I$ @0 ? -------------------------------------------------------------$ c# H/ y3 s: D$ c
Saint John N/A - - N/A
" r" D( E: J' Z! j! L; p4 A1 } -------------------------------------------------------------* U7 t, y( s/ R- I( x( s5 E
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
p# y, U) E1 z, M# q -------------------------------------------------------------
T2 }4 {" E2 l1 G Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
& Q- m, o5 k# a9 U- ] -------------------------------------------------------------* r0 b0 f) B) c5 M7 R
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%! m4 k% S9 p5 z& S3 W# \
-------------------------------------------------------------4 M& Y C) M* y& I1 t) s
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
" K2 y2 \2 Z& ~* u -------------------------------------------------------------
+ |: O6 X$ `5 ?; {& Z( J Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%" _* \: T+ G; v2 [* D
-------------------------------------------------------------; o w6 S9 L1 P2 \( k0 `
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
* S a1 l$ C6 G+ c5 ^* N4 y -------------------------------------------------------------2 |6 u; a$ a& l: F% Z; d+ O
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
- ]4 m X7 U$ t6 S -------------------------------------------------------------
2 A3 V/ W! k( L' [# a; R- s4 e Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
( ?4 i$ r* [2 i0 ?* W* e: l6 N: ` -------------------------------------------------------------$ T3 ^: T& ]+ o }! L* _
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
7 Z" O; Z6 K' v; _% |5 O% f -------------------------------------------------------------
1 |; h' o+ Y9 G5 b# O: q8 M Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%4 n" K0 f4 @9 A% ?8 N2 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------" g3 {3 a$ ]1 Z+ J' z/ f' {" B
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
/ m" g8 t5 p% { -------------------------------------------------------------
' q9 x+ t, Q6 Y5 [0 B6 q, E( J National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2% @' g. B5 E# _/ { C9 |/ S7 J9 Z
-------------------------------------------------------------. R* }- U. p( i, K0 c5 `
>>
2 t* Z3 ^9 j! x) @$ X/ f$ Y+ V' B) |
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined t7 d' R+ k: @. b2 E
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
- W8 D; ~% k$ s9 k0 J+ n6 Y: yJohn and Victoria.& L+ ~6 j; q$ t5 k& T
$ z& h5 e9 q7 P L$ ?
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
/ l* N* E% Z. h* K, Kcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of [" t: B5 i! G6 F: x h+ Q( [4 `. w4 \
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release& X- }4 r4 a& R( [. A" o
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price& m* W D, \7 y4 {1 q; X
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
- ?! W! I6 b1 P! A' n( Y( vacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
, i) @6 t0 I' uavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
5 a. O! a0 m' _4 z9 Bfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
# i( |; t8 W0 Z+ L' j! W/ Hversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
0 {0 w: [6 b( i- @$ ?! Z3 j6 DNovember 15, 2006.: o* D2 F2 [6 w- n
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of* a- `4 [2 C6 t5 ~ J
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge7 w/ Y, U7 B# v+ S
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is/ r/ C! Y* x Z3 t4 o8 G
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|