 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable : u( ~5 y5 g; t. r8 ]3 T
5 y# C4 z; H. S) N% [- ?- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
- W: f( v; B; S5 K+ O9 y4 R2 W
$ Q1 {- t) T# ] ] TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market; ?, Y0 Q" L" ]1 w' `- A, j
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third) A( b8 Q" n- K6 W; p) j, w3 A' q+ j
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic; J+ r' k- L* ~) w: Q& T
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
9 H6 a" T% k' `! @/ Cprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
1 F1 G+ G* _ ^more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,0 G$ c( S6 d( \9 w( W
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
$ O% d! `3 J# @ U0 V j" a# R7 ULePage Real Estate Services.
3 j& q' s E$ W% B" w" G* c" u' L' H+ U" F7 k- ^1 u
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters# T+ i( k3 T4 Z8 v k& x1 r
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic9 y D. v& x% V; f' u% G u
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
& ~' i' [. ^3 k1 ^ i; hsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
- {$ \# v+ ?, @* l- \2 Hresidential real estate sector." l& R3 I/ z/ ]
2 e- B4 d& V6 }% ?, \3 b2 m: b0 |
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
8 D, D& D: p" Soccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
8 V; a I! b/ \. e! r( I" lyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562( {7 u- e: `0 M' g! F' \& Q
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380+ {, Y$ e* }4 O9 E! J# p* q
(+13.2%).
- m, J9 V1 \. }+ a/ E9 w$ K* N. K, z/ U+ z# x
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
& d7 K' W* z, Y$ ] R% ]* ~during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the; z: W) h/ P& y% X+ i
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are G( W! M) Q+ p' @( v5 u& S
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,; ~% {4 J9 T& L8 v! x0 L8 j
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
: {5 |) h5 O: t5 M1 W1 E" F"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We0 ^9 }# s) X$ v2 G) ]; F x
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy& P7 @, L% {9 \* h8 I& }8 b0 y" a
balanced market."
$ O0 {5 F% W' F, V
" E5 B* S, O* H) H1 H* @4 Z Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices, O6 E6 \5 T: F1 \" Z J
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
$ U" ]4 F; M4 \1 V) Cto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
3 o/ e5 z2 C& K& a& H) [, Rthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core- K5 D# C& ?! u& p
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
6 T1 x' c! P" x" b3 R4 w: ^manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
6 W1 h; B! P! q3 P3 T% x5 K! _% Rbreaking price appreciations.; u- _& T7 H3 i6 j6 R0 T, K- b& j
0 N0 y- l4 N% C3 D9 q6 z
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
3 z! u& W- w' I3 C, Leconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
4 U9 N# ]+ x" u( ]3 |largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed. q; z; t! Z, |: J& y
- Q$ D( o3 i/ a* a) C6 E2 B
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid1 D. w3 H7 x& W, i A0 o9 g3 V2 {( ?
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
, [% e/ Z) E# u2 U! Cconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off9 c8 P3 L+ ~% C/ U/ X8 T
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
% v- l% V: X, K. J1 iIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
* W- B( \1 t# w' A8 ]greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of, o8 n# a- d! @
price appreciation when compared with 2005.0 B% A1 z, Q& }4 K0 z7 p
& N6 Z! W; L3 U6 G p While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing+ n# ~- L* T% N" C7 O7 @- u6 x
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
, D: i. Y a% ^: rfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
8 _% J2 x, C+ R1 aare markedly different than those found in the United States.
) z' R& {4 U m$ T- n
! Y/ r/ m+ O+ S* Y V! a* \8 a' N Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the' f- ?* D, u! w) R# T
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
/ u; [1 \5 R! d. k# `& pfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
6 r; u: e( f7 }1 D3 w, u9 Trelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
$ t& y( `' g8 Vaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
* k& N2 q+ S0 j( v# W' Jdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and5 a6 ?* {( b' |/ a$ d. T: q' {
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
: [0 I0 W( d0 t, Zmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment." j4 [* S8 f' `; W; [) K: c
' d: ~- \7 z) x8 S: x0 x6 P2 E <<
& B' g+ u# D6 d* O# y REGIONAL SUMMARIES. ]2 ~% s% Y) k. h" A
>>
0 i1 Z; P. i* o O. t% [
% F- @( q9 r: O Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
7 x1 z* o2 T- G, L8 lHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate$ J) ` c( g" {- ]: m" S
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time2 G: l( U# x$ }
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
: ~: O l* c+ p r; z4 `renovations.; M: o9 v5 f- V( ^& H9 E
% S3 Z: j2 M& n4 s$ s2 V' o: E
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
0 y& ~8 I9 d% r9 Yincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
/ u' x7 }0 B* wcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and0 S: K; @! c2 w) [, a+ X* Z
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
0 u) P3 S8 a3 v! }" ?3 \1 y1 y( v1 [; A g0 a* f+ ?- D" W
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer1 B6 }+ J+ O p( Y, g- ]
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the9 ?% d# P2 C3 M% E
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
! |2 Q3 } q h& d600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores% ^1 n6 C& m X& v6 c4 |, {
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
1 e/ t; U4 j/ v+ {* Zand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
% V1 t) t' F4 g& s4 `4 W; L# L/ q5 D
` c# C5 J( c& Z1 c In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
) W: E6 P9 C9 t) r) E0 ^conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
. [2 R( U e# j; p4 d! mhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
& S8 ]9 M0 y2 {0 |# K [# xwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
' X3 ?9 n) |. }6 D7 X1 j5 qdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing; X# ^7 B- s5 T- p: _. q& }
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
5 s: g, c0 Y% Y4 }4 W
- {3 @& [, ~5 g5 U Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly$ W- I" R" O7 {; E" B
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
! }& o2 @# i. U5 S0 @# ipriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005, x2 c' N4 x1 b3 c+ s
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last8 ]% S$ m; j; Z$ Z9 u
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions., N5 p6 ?( P9 Q# Y# W* U
0 t: f6 B- w8 D" W1 e0 L1 G u
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
9 t& w0 I! }. {, ]& [$ Pprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory; }) N( {9 g0 d* F
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
' g% j* q+ }" |% v# Lfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
. @& d; o( e# @2 e7 Fwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
! j% G+ i$ e V" tpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
" g+ H) Z8 x$ q' lmaking a purchase.
4 V7 n' ?4 S/ E5 s) D) [0 }; f7 u$ n2 ?* ^
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing$ o0 }5 A: L6 ~) Y. J
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
; j, _ s0 T) N' C8 v$ d* K" x- Aconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
" n. J# E7 o( B, x& Ncentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
9 E# j& I7 a9 g. lattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
! a, P1 z9 {, p- uamenities.
+ T; L( [7 j6 @2 v+ b# `
/ r+ D- K+ C* c The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels% ^6 V8 |2 D0 _/ c
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand& J: E6 ]' P9 U8 b0 E9 v1 b; d) K3 U
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
( g( P' g. L# y# G& e% |continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
) i/ T, ]' d" F$ |driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
4 m8 E8 S5 b& I0 \residence, rather than for investment.
' ^: w2 E- X- S/ U! J; F* |: l5 U' S5 i* v
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
, o8 d: B: r P4 `house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted$ A& m& i! F+ P) Q* C
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer* Y3 _& C! G) C; C V
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
6 F Y% @/ E$ j4 W, drate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
. B/ g; @! O$ D3 D5 ?" y rthe market./ k. b) X- n; I/ e; \7 U
9 j3 F$ \. Y9 s In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
9 Y% b. {6 |/ e, l: s/ y4 nJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In* z( {/ t, u- `5 s
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
% _/ U' Z6 T1 q# n& Q1 s: cmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due7 g3 m6 i( m4 M8 k" D5 x
to the shortage of available inventory.
) L( ^9 A4 Z+ t
% l! k$ w- r% k/ D. U Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
' N* \9 H7 u. A. r+ ?2 l2 Vmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains+ b2 G4 j C/ {7 a6 R' Y0 u; E. _# f
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
5 B9 L. F+ `; O; ?7 }' U$ Gstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.# w- t- T K6 T" E
$ G) Z2 V& [! t" I+ ^ Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases2 o7 C* `- j! T4 B" U. s9 t1 R
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
. F0 r" U% E8 R' i6 Hunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that% L( C2 g1 E5 H: x; {% c3 D
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
! R* x+ Z4 M( f2 b. Q" r: G' m, sprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
: w7 p& g5 }# t3 i& Eseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as, q4 M, @8 |& F6 I
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
/ ~+ V, G7 [5 d( P
. m$ h' A$ q$ \' E" c$ s8 Q3 o9 I+ @& q Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
* i' Y/ G9 N' b: P2 ras activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton! F* g) S: ]' B: ~4 p( ^
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
- s& ]" w' `: g$ T# F7 Fmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
% s# Q( w# Q1 @, a* c2 q0 vincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve& Y5 M3 J* `- N
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly2 e" v2 A5 m& N
towards the end of 2006. 4 S+ _5 r3 c) O
" s! ~2 T4 o( n/ V
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of H" q. B0 s& s" t( f" J$ i
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable5 x0 G2 x& _# J0 D- \: G& l7 Y
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
1 G+ {- m% J/ ] X( j$ r/ jgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
8 N- I1 [, ~' u, N$ a. Qforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added3 [1 I8 ~3 ~7 d; q: ~) c" A: }" V
pressure on tight inventory levels.
) w/ `" G* S+ `* m) {8 B+ W% I; a& C. `" m
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
$ ~* i5 ]9 E* \0 [fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
8 b: H/ T+ M2 T. {. i7 I8 Ainto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;7 L# t; u; z' M# D7 r$ M
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
. _7 U5 \' y2 F1 q; a' yfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace., s$ d* X M$ \/ h, i, {( V! o
3 \, x& x# X" a2 t9 U
<<
2 V. b# _9 h C) L6 [ Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006" C0 R5 {7 D5 }2 L% L
a7 I( {0 H2 I9 _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 D2 n2 i$ r6 M) u O: x0 |* L4 r- O
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey# |- \' v5 ]' ]% _ I
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 @4 D0 D& N0 G7 o5 B: K# @6 [+ y 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
, S0 o9 ]% ]9 F7 F0 e6 U- b: z Market Average Average % Change Average Average7 x1 O! [ ~6 S H+ b& o, u
------------------------------------------------------------------------- `' i, [( m2 |
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
4 S1 ~8 ^/ G4 V0 ]3 v -------------------------------------------------------------------------' i+ z6 C- t/ j; V D/ A
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
9 U& |# K- m4 U5 c0 q -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 {% ~& ^) |1 l
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0000 ~9 J; r# H! b2 u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 O+ f* Z1 w) ]0 j( W Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -+ x: z0 w$ U4 i9 l& }9 G* N X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ o! k) P$ H9 l: b3 T0 R8 {
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
" a9 y& P" B8 t& S/ G2 ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 _/ `8 y9 ~7 ~ Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5831 A; S" {5 W$ j
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; o% ?+ i2 Z# p! u
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
9 X6 }9 a; [+ _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 T: @, v) S( [* L3 G$ [7 Z; m Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
7 I1 e- w% |# {# [( G -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 I- A6 d; D' B9 }# ~ d
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
( [" j; `* o* `% F7 J -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 a) y% T! |# F* Y7 k. f Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
2 a1 W9 v! \% R -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 N( \0 @, P' q Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500$ ]( c: o- f7 a7 x1 {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 \: h- x7 J" w# c Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389% c' x* F1 l. o$ C1 c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, F, c' c% ~" k5 Z, E. p. [+ I3 F
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
4 H+ h# Z* A, K+ v9 { -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 w; J+ c1 `% q Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5007 |0 B: F+ t2 h' j% W: ?8 R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 D f5 j5 s' \6 s0 A
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0000 Z9 v* l% y5 a9 q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: K% Z0 g% H @6 D+ ]- Z National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860' z; c. d; Y" e, E9 ^2 A2 I c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) N! w: M# `: f/ q0 Q, w
+ ^9 ]% Z: V' D7 W5 X
-------------------------------------------------------------
( ^& z" Q' m- J! A" c Standard Condominium
! n+ R1 Z6 o8 J( ]) r -------------------------------------------------------------$ g* p9 [5 |- }; N- k8 L
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo; f9 M( z* Z1 s0 C5 O# ^( L6 k0 W
Market % Change Average Average % Change% g4 G( @; z% `; G% M. K
-------------------------------------------------------------) B5 \' x/ M9 T6 O$ W4 l" D' Q& o
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%9 k r5 {5 k8 d6 ~! ^4 G! ?
-------------------------------------------------------------
" d- ~5 p5 f. l# a) c Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
$ z; j3 { r, g/ `% [ -------------------------------------------------------------, {$ { F S# M% u7 L
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A5 d( N4 S, }, F' w0 W2 M- Z
-------------------------------------------------------------5 v$ O- n7 b: d
Saint John N/A - - N/A1 S- e( z# H* n6 u
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 m- G1 Y) `) @ St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
; o- s Q7 t: `& Q8 a& p2 o -------------------------------------------------------------* i; @0 c3 m0 D
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%3 z+ K1 m5 Z% b5 W" F. w
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 C! P# L2 G& R4 V$ O7 z1 ]- P, _ Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
& k8 m" t- D7 J8 L -------------------------------------------------------------
- g2 L! u. B f$ R. J* A. N Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
& z' b( B8 o) w2 z ^; A -------------------------------------------------------------8 U! o# r4 e$ w2 [5 V. X" G
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
) f' J& Z! n9 q$ | -------------------------------------------------------------1 [; c4 ^1 {/ _* r: f
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%% \* i- v4 J, v
-------------------------------------------------------------* G: i1 ?/ f% i
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%* k4 W) F% H% H( b
-------------------------------------------------------------
* i. F% _: [; q# e( @/ B Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
! ]7 o" k" d; `% t! N2 { -------------------------------------------------------------5 X+ g4 U, g, E R3 g1 E, ~: A
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
& q6 o1 g" i0 t* H) P# r7 u$ Z: o -------------------------------------------------------------
$ [9 \7 F9 { A& y) v( [+ E7 n Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
+ P6 B8 f, I$ ~" G6 E, u9 ~0 c ------------------------------------------------------------- W% ]- h; a( R7 I
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%5 _7 W3 S5 o0 Z; { f; D
-------------------------------------------------------------
, E. S4 ?& `/ l# H& S National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
, P: U7 k2 ^) q, u: @/ s+ q# R -------------------------------------------------------------9 T; ?* X2 y' P' a* d, t: j' W
>>, C1 Z9 ~" q! P+ G* W
* A6 ~; [ Y& d$ L8 f- E) S Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined8 X' I/ }$ u# h& O
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
% s/ Z! E* B4 W p; `: o9 bJohn and Victoria.3 L- G6 D" c( }" p, n5 j3 {
) R; V" [3 R4 H9 W5 m" V; B
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
7 n9 i7 r& `9 ?8 [5 ccomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of, i Y: r, }5 E
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release1 Q, L/ L6 Z2 h; u
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
8 o" q8 k r' Q9 {- @5 M7 Btrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
/ c' e! `. t6 y5 q" o pacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
' Q4 X/ k# c" V7 ?6 ^& ~" h" X; j, Davailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current Y& y' z+ X% a3 }
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable8 b6 L* S6 u9 ~ w
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
, \4 e1 l, ] l1 f2 Z @November 15, 2006.
" q- G) d6 Q4 L3 W/ ?. {8 V9 p" c Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of1 x" O) h* K H! x8 \/ A
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
1 k2 W: l H. uprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is! ]% C* u! @+ w; w5 v
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|