埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2135|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
# w. w6 F7 b/ @3 `* ~8 P( w! z8 g
. z9 F3 W3 |1 {# o- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
# a2 v+ @3 J5 \/ E
7 h6 I1 O* {* N' p5 w5 M3 `    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
! X& G0 J2 j& F$ v; A+ b% I0 Nexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
4 M9 B' Z( y6 P: Z) b& b5 hquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
; K" I0 `# i/ n- Din the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit. C: w  Y. S8 z' A" b
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and! s8 Z  x- Z0 k6 c
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,6 d, {, z& K6 Z4 i* I4 J
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
5 ?: f' Q, f1 a# d1 `) s! Z- zLePage Real Estate Services.
1 t, b+ r6 [/ ?9 M  A
5 E! W# @: w; {2 A  t8 [0 ?" F" ~- g    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters. `: F7 r  m4 z
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
! L1 k2 S" i1 f; ~conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
  s) _: C, \/ [6 K- {1 csound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
4 v& w0 a5 C0 Gresidential real estate sector.
3 L3 k* r4 W, y0 y2 e: B3 n$ }* X8 N
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation9 F% ~* l0 Q) M7 \
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)9 `+ a$ i& U! `/ v8 B9 O4 m  f
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562- }  U! x# Y3 F3 @' Z) K3 O
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
  F) v! T! T0 Y& K. Y: |7 J' S(+13.2%).
: n0 G& T: z6 \6 ~. T* O5 x5 {. R6 c( u0 {8 F9 b2 M7 c4 |0 w" `
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
/ u4 J* T$ y5 s+ M; ~0 [# Z8 g# T7 Uduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
1 B! `3 N0 h/ y# ]frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
, {2 N/ x  S9 Mpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,; g) P, f  Y  d8 R* p' w
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.0 Q* o' X( b8 f. e/ ^, I
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We% @& o( J: W0 P7 k( z- D
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy& j5 ?2 s* f0 B& l# l" Q
balanced market."
- Z! k9 Q7 h4 z- q( F9 f% {5 C
/ G9 J3 {7 Y- M! o5 v    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
7 Y$ ]  z- z+ U7 D* c5 C+ Econsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift3 [9 x9 h. D' m& e" F/ M# s* _
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
% U! P& l9 u+ N) ythroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
9 ^/ I8 @  h  m1 R; s" penergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,) b( k# t4 s# q3 F4 x7 G6 J) {
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
* J# R& x4 b4 U$ g3 O$ z! jbreaking price appreciations.
& ^5 O& }/ e8 \  y1 h
5 c, ~: O  _* w' J6 `* e4 D+ ~* W    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
9 C' Z% N: i) N: \6 K- v: Reconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
5 `& w' F1 E" Q- T1 Llargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.6 C3 U- W& J! ~- P' H* ~
# r8 K, H, a1 b9 `2 \- |5 w4 M- v
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid( m2 t7 c4 H1 _6 ]- R1 x3 k# B# I) E
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
$ ~" w1 y4 W1 rconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off& M# K  Z7 U7 r- E3 _+ T# f
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
6 V; c) L" w- v1 g9 |, I6 I# xIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers& j) c4 L1 l2 v2 I% p$ B
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of6 [+ S" A9 ?% x0 z! _/ ^
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
0 Q+ @; x; |* ~7 w; w
7 I4 S! l4 V$ X0 f- I$ v; M. a  F    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
3 ~3 ^% q& Q+ J# @9 ?market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and( Y" \6 T' m1 V- s. }  @( R
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada* V5 s# \( z9 z# k
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
6 g0 Q1 g5 b) \' A# B( W* C. S* }$ O# ?% X. g1 Q
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the1 h5 o8 E  y/ k, }- ~2 Q
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's# }  H) m1 I% `: I2 \  j4 M8 u# ?* i
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
) i7 V. C5 t% X6 n5 ?4 |% C4 S2 I. ]relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
' a+ j* i! H. baffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the9 F5 D) p5 w, z$ n
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
9 N4 |) l+ {# T: Y( v( i* Uaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization6 B( h5 [6 ]/ O- k; M
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
3 W& C8 f2 Y( f/ U# r
- ~# R2 p. p' k2 m1 S    <<
  C$ M7 n+ U& }- p                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
; p1 P# T$ M2 G" e3 v- Q8 W" s8 I    >>/ l6 i" t7 k; p: z/ S9 X0 M
" B! j. v3 x8 g
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
1 s/ x% {: m( L9 [! H3 B. w( Y: KHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate* g7 ~) z" O0 R2 Y
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
8 U4 w+ ^: `  J' ]2 ulooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of! _! E* ^. s1 ^
renovations.# a1 a* n2 D, l3 `+ o' |
9 ^6 @2 X* J4 ~! f- s" Q' I, L
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
' n1 d2 L- w7 R2 a: Uincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
4 Q- x4 }2 o3 Z* |compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and8 ?& @. G* ]. U" Z
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.) k0 Z3 w: M6 F: v0 I8 k
4 U! e& ^5 r0 n1 }
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
7 }1 c" E3 c6 y8 S2 _6 nslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
# J: o* t; j0 oquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
, E5 R7 i$ L1 j600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores) h5 w* Z- n& m" {$ s
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
& \9 z4 [) {' B2 c+ H5 T) }and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
% j: n; \& |& s( D+ y: i- _/ Y4 x$ [- W+ y5 ?
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced7 C: q  J6 s! C. U
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their) T; s0 j: d9 e* c5 J7 O, }3 }# Y
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers$ v8 g# e4 H  i8 L9 h
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian3 {2 B" f% W8 e* _) S& \: I) u
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing2 U) l( u8 w. B% P
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
7 l, g. O3 g8 a( n, Q; ?+ w
* T0 j; Q; T0 Z7 Q# o& Y  ^2 x    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
' Z" P# Y( }( g1 \( q1 _+ i) Mamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
: Z% \6 o) O( ~8 W3 v. M; f# Npriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
- }' d: v/ ^+ r" _9 Eas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last* P" `9 `  D  ]& ~( n
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.- G' M' w% M; V1 n& J& ^

0 U$ f, i( Z4 n! Q- I$ O    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
# @9 _. T$ A- T: c, }prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory+ C% Z* }/ M& ^4 O7 D5 V7 r: M, Q
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting2 Z$ p9 e2 J9 ~" z2 @3 ~# t5 {
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
2 {7 [0 e$ C" p0 v. gwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
  _, o# k& x# y/ W# S: Apressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
% X* I8 H8 A% [% w) hmaking a purchase.
9 z0 B, A' ~' }) ]" n0 I2 X7 s" D( B# e5 g5 m. p
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing2 I& b. @+ r- T+ U2 J& ]
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong' R2 r2 R$ x, _% X; V
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
- c" {5 K, H7 O. `% Hcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
2 ?5 l4 O7 i) c# ?- Y# `9 eattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown$ s0 [; u: A3 K( C9 B- m
amenities.
. x2 e, @9 D- O; D! h
1 n1 G0 \5 w+ |4 W' Q6 Q    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels/ \6 w& X( Q2 `% G9 x
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand( n7 S. P: b, C' b2 G. x- y- z3 D
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
$ q* @, N/ b% k" D3 S+ |continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been: A2 L1 w0 i, o6 d' T
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
8 r' v6 O% P, n5 N2 I- U1 Bresidence, rather than for investment.
2 P; V1 [" I! O2 }: D9 y* l. U8 \* I% L8 {
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
- E7 R0 R+ W! |( \: l# p0 ihouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted. a# H" b8 {5 {- b3 F2 V1 z
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer5 j/ o# ^. x' E
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization2 x0 Y" d* T5 O: |2 s1 M
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter; e+ |, p# Y% z8 z9 n* ~' h
the market.' ?" h) V' E1 i3 S# T4 x

) g' N% ?1 b" ~. c, K& ~- X    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through* T* K8 ?" _( M; i* U- |
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
9 r+ H7 A4 k: i( ~! |August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring5 o; p9 K  _' h1 o% E
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due$ J( _0 l, m0 d2 }9 V% _  ^
to the shortage of available inventory.
+ `' j" D- [8 x. V1 q* q! _7 {: [5 T  m; o8 X  w5 u5 X1 }* d
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its. c5 W9 _" u8 I) c1 w& B
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
1 B- ~( m1 F, U3 H! E0 Gvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
9 M+ w! g9 f. estruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
9 }9 r- V3 e1 H6 u/ m8 n) t! o# d- _7 u! e6 _
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
) Z  a8 ^- I3 d0 ]9 d  L5 o! C/ lin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low7 v/ l7 `. Z, v$ P- L) A
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that) f) W0 R7 X. S( N: t* o
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring* h" ^( P# U7 r2 f
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer( K; A. x* _. `  J: E5 K
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as" H/ g( S" C* b- g1 D4 }& F
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
2 z# Y9 s7 W2 y. c+ E2 B) E
3 r- W8 Z1 [  k4 f, [" U4 I% U( W
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
, g% i% {- w; ^  J0 A3 G1 j8 vas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
( f, h- n9 N7 f+ q8 c- J* bremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,3 M9 ?+ O) v& \' ^! C
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
3 e  f( x1 K( L) l) ]/ [increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve1 N( E2 \, u, U* t+ X
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
$ t" N' o* W& o- ?. X0 r8 E' q' Q2 Ztowards the end of 2006.
    $ H9 Z( u& h+ ?0 {; @  d% h; g& {
$ q7 w2 Z! v% {1 V6 T
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of. M3 W' T, H4 q0 {
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable$ Y2 R$ l# z! d# Y6 F$ h
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse- \! L' j6 x8 s" ?
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
2 p! J3 K0 B* ?7 n4 Dforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added2 w8 V: n8 z+ _3 F  M
pressure on tight inventory levels.9 Q% Q- w  w3 R! w& @) `5 f
: [  i# H- ^- N
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
# O8 Q* Y! S& F( `- Q* a- F" |fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people; }6 d+ a) N# G2 Y1 k( a
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
% q4 {5 R5 z% ?while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching' R' L! v- E* c" R5 I6 v0 X+ ^1 b
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.% c: E3 S1 K  g% O
6 l; _( j: o8 `* a1 a) I
    <<: \! g4 U5 @* F8 y. G+ k
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
+ |6 }* R* ^" x+ ]# l" U* c5 D
4 A- ^# ^0 o& A3 \4 p2 j    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 ]9 q5 P9 F$ f. h0 L" y. K                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
5 W& Y5 f& \' t1 x( y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ V: b! N8 ?* C! c6 _9 S  h, M; K
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
- P9 m9 c& b/ l5 A; N; Q, |, |# s    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
0 L& o& `) _3 m# a. |    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, d/ k  x1 X; i& ?' ^4 C: L* Y" {    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
+ a6 W' B2 t/ F( w) `    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# {2 Q: \3 N# p- f; E$ `* Z    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
1 P4 ]. H4 e: ]) c* B# k9 y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) V1 \" K8 ~7 k# J
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000, ?" `: A1 S, h# ?0 @" V5 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ a  |* `, s0 z) n    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -3 J' [6 Z+ z- ^; F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! P1 H  S: T0 R4 ?    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
+ C* x8 ?1 Z) i; I9 r3 J$ `    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 p* o4 W; I5 z, t5 G6 V$ s    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583- A" j7 _$ c8 P- ^! q% X2 T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% }. P9 M' z' w& T; z* e    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185% }0 S( D7 q+ L% e6 H% q6 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  D2 [( x' u2 V
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
! K' o- o0 {  |; Y1 L7 {    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& G9 F" V- |$ O    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
$ Z2 x9 j# ]  D0 a2 e" j6 z3 a    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& e2 h7 ?: J& O    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
9 _$ c% z& R( c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- _" O6 r/ j" N6 u4 m' Q. L9 e7 U  g5 S
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500' B" \% Q9 q. d9 r% ^$ F$ S* K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, s! m( \: m6 W1 c, `
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
7 W0 `& b0 k* r1 q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 F3 {/ R! Z4 W$ J# R    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
( ?8 _; ^  j8 r# u  q4 A7 |4 g2 a1 E    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ V3 j* P  G' k( R' R    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5000 C+ T* }; F% D3 _6 I" D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  I# e3 p- J$ K/ I- G    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000  M( o6 m. f! p( [2 h' Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! v! E$ ^7 C: z1 k  L
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860" f6 x1 k# S* a1 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 H9 c% \4 t. g# K3 g+ i
7 E. x2 {/ b% y+ T    -------------------------------------------------------------9 S; S1 H* L" W' \4 V+ [7 i5 Z
                               Standard Condominium( o4 O2 R% L  h: R$ H2 w
    -------------------------------------------------------------
- ]7 i8 ^; A0 [9 C. V  z                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo! h. I& @; D: H- ]
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change9 `* ?$ n7 S( i
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, j- z/ B8 p; M    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%2 f$ v( a: X6 U7 T
    -------------------------------------------------------------0 e; |3 x6 ~" a  \4 ?7 r5 n( o
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
: f) u( X0 j: P0 T" c1 j" W    -------------------------------------------------------------$ l- a' o7 w4 A; f1 R! U! F  P7 z
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A; ]- N4 }# Z3 W' d3 `* Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 o8 Z% m' S- Q2 q, c! K
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
2 @: O7 L# F7 m2 z( J    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ I, Z* }1 H7 ?    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
9 t" d- Q1 V0 F, g  v8 @' z    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 A, l" F, O% j    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%" ]  T- ?2 t8 t
    -------------------------------------------------------------
% [$ e$ ], l' ?( k/ ?    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
. X3 m# j2 N4 F# d* y4 ?    -------------------------------------------------------------
  h) n4 ]8 [1 K$ y0 n( b1 d    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%; {" U* M; m- l) v" ]" x
    -------------------------------------------------------------
- H* M7 T% n7 J$ Q) s3 @" H    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
3 M8 }& l) {" Z0 m8 U    -------------------------------------------------------------
( u+ B7 z) i) i4 ~    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%. ?, b2 J. Z4 Z8 w0 U* a
    -------------------------------------------------------------% t0 ~3 }5 e. o; K9 ]
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%# y4 \+ H, e' o( W0 z3 Q3 x( [: J
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" A* c# a3 H2 F/ w5 p" W    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%3 ^8 j. _6 n0 V- f* b5 C
    -------------------------------------------------------------
* B" f& B9 r4 _2 O& Q    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
" S  N0 h0 ?# V* R2 J  r. r0 B    -------------------------------------------------------------2 D0 j  S5 |: ^
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%& G  M7 d* h" i$ ^7 E* p3 a; U  Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------
! I1 B- D! d& G4 q) i( v    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%! `+ L5 J- G* A0 n8 h7 Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' ?+ W) r$ G$ \- x    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%  g# d% f4 C4 o( s: V- a/ s
    -------------------------------------------------------------7 x: F  z" I% g7 |2 ?+ L/ V
    >>
' A% H# z, O2 X+ c$ ~7 }4 ~/ o8 L  x4 l1 ^; a6 l+ O- E
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined3 T6 R6 N# g* q4 h- u( \8 @
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
3 \0 a. {* q8 xJohn and Victoria.
2 u) k) p: b0 |$ z) G3 Z; X
7 X( _9 o8 H  a% R% K    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most: s4 ]- M! t7 [! h# q& m
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of/ ?7 A# `, i. B$ Y
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
* A- C+ L7 D# vreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
7 h$ P+ W% V( y) W# j& dtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
3 ~( u4 p1 F" k* J% o8 }across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is. w4 n; ~, w# E* C
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
" x! f( F9 t7 B* Hfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable* l* `" J+ q7 H% Z; U6 `3 B
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
5 J8 D( b# a3 ~" T$ c, PNovember 15, 2006.
" Z2 z' {' J$ j; f) ]    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of* ~1 A' V0 _  h$ H% K3 {3 {
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
, `6 B/ r  L" d7 a" r- k( \) ~provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
, K) _2 i: \  o! }available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-5 14:42 , Processed in 0.333748 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表