 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
% f5 L4 x5 e4 V5 T! l- r2 [5 F# B; K9 ?
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -- @7 N" v: m6 f7 J
; U( ~' j& ]- y
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
& I* z0 x( k, M; ~# O+ vexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
6 V' j" i& C" P4 Z6 n, U% cquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic4 G, l0 `" O J
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit# R! f! ?1 q4 d% K& M
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and0 s8 l) Y) r/ f+ t& \( P
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
# T# g! ~, t v H$ `. N Z/ hQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
5 j- k5 M0 c2 ?! s9 q3 L ULePage Real Estate Services.& |. ?( c, X+ W7 K5 `2 d" G+ S" I
a- @# d0 R! A/ l Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters3 H0 M+ ^' }% J+ s$ {4 y( T6 _$ S
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic2 u: ?2 P- j+ j4 J/ f% @2 y
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and8 P' W/ f. k- g; G
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
0 O, I+ @) `+ Q. F$ rresidential real estate sector.5 A7 E2 m# y, D* Q$ m
/ E& ?: C7 N' C8 `% e- D
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation7 v; D% L$ ?; v9 M! Z! {% [3 }
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)- N, ?5 e2 q5 ~ ^0 F. R1 `
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
% E0 F# N& I$ O) g L(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
3 v: q' q% R3 D. Q5 j(+13.2%).
0 b) W9 R2 C; `2 A% w
; ?7 y, H$ S$ |, d T# b "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
: ^: b+ w3 O" sduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
1 {" U. M$ W* z7 B0 f. P& d' d1 [frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are& n; t9 ^8 r, r
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,4 ~* p" v0 J+ G l
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
8 e6 U8 v8 @7 r, ]"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We; x* V: x" V) b5 W/ N" S- v/ G( T
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
" W, F! z3 h/ o5 q: rbalanced market."1 k, I1 L# x+ B; @5 |( R' A
* E! K. f! j, w' h3 B- ` ^ Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,: i/ X3 a4 @- O/ @$ H
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
" w; W5 }* U5 E( u) h8 ito balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued" H6 `; F2 @" q& |
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core% a+ v, _7 y( d/ @& H
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,1 p; x" z+ T7 K) q7 v
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record6 c$ F! r8 o. P) X7 B) a6 d4 G
breaking price appreciations.
" v7 t8 S% ?7 `. j: G+ [* w5 k5 i/ `7 [2 }, |" Y! I( \: n, U" O
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding) l( W4 g5 |1 {% D
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
: A1 O+ P7 k" E/ plargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.( _/ I' O" K1 r
8 D1 V8 t$ o9 A( V' z In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
5 k, E2 C: k# T# K% @- j( Ieconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer& A9 Y& \* F( s j
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off* r4 g) X S$ P: ]; ~. [1 s6 z
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
0 i3 B/ N$ F% z. \9 `In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
; `, P: j- n" c* c) ggreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
; e' t h; t2 y" D/ N" iprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
, j f% h' ~( o, Q* r
" a: j- z; f+ `* Q9 U4 u: P$ G While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing8 [" W0 _7 D; A* |
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
) c/ [% ]( y8 Y: i* h: dfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
1 X, {+ L4 i$ [+ O& i& q# zare markedly different than those found in the United States.
' B$ [" }! K, k; b
- e7 S, ~7 q0 h% z Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the2 z$ e4 X1 H6 z' n7 R6 f
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's3 y+ r) [+ x2 ]% D/ @! ^' F6 C
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the" [1 k3 x( `# h5 V/ [' O, `
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
x# n) p3 z6 Caffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the; {- e* \* O- ]+ k1 X- N$ e6 B
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and; w7 e! g1 U* t% e% z- P( c- [
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization+ r# G) L% ]% c. N( i" i
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."7 W* S u8 _/ _" T5 `& z$ @7 L' U
. m$ [7 g7 y; q* H0 C3 i( O <<
" i' `. D: ]6 J3 f REGIONAL SUMMARIES* ^) U* L( N: b3 i, w5 `
>>+ T) r# z7 P9 N" h2 R; j
! Z" O4 L- \8 G2 _( j2 C
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
9 W0 |( \$ q: f7 D% ?6 U2 BHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
: b& w. \% h$ K$ mof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
& S2 j: T# S) zlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
6 e( c% ]) w9 L, [5 E0 prenovations.* h& N& u# A/ n. s _
) ^" O* C2 h* M. R& H( t! M+ ^+ Y5 n
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
0 d9 n2 t- }% ~1 O2 ^2 Wincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation' g) c$ X1 v; j: I
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and* k* `& @& `, f- l' ?. n
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.9 g4 K8 \; g8 n
$ k) w1 I+ \ g$ I) ]4 W The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
E8 [+ C9 j9 k( I; Cslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
) w3 g3 c2 G, H0 R/ [$ k; {/ U. wquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new/ N# m5 L6 |" k* a5 T
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
2 X, l6 a5 \) w/ J9 S8 g$ ?0 kto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
0 j% Z H" v% u* P/ Oand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.# @- V; w2 i }+ Q' f N
M" O2 m& U9 I# A6 ` In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
! T, H* R0 \% K: v, ^9 t# Hconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
5 {# G5 H% K) x9 _homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
0 B; @+ |/ `3 V+ S2 ?& uwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
& h2 h( T4 z) ~0 @: k4 Zdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing4 G3 Z' n! q6 Y9 E
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
: |; r6 u- W5 s* U/ E" n
' D/ w" K8 m% { x& Z) E Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly: g) A2 c0 H6 V% }, [6 n4 b7 R
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes: @+ X% B3 I# P% [1 p. N# s
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,7 r3 R, W+ j" P1 G1 z' ~- t. U8 B
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
: A' V% P) k$ M: \) Y, @$ s9 Vfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
4 ~$ f2 ]6 r3 T$ W4 S3 l, A! X# G5 @# _4 @3 w
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house7 a% X# \; I- Y' V
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
- i. J/ [6 C& _7 X9 M6 W' B6 olevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
4 X0 H6 J) Z/ g5 efirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,0 A* f: {$ `/ |& @" u
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the# k& ~3 Q" s4 B* t1 E
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before6 ?6 ^) K+ |' T1 L
making a purchase." h; e4 ~7 W+ c$ a b' D: J# u
( r. w( R7 T E. x, G
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing8 \0 v8 t3 H( r4 G" x, g
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
& J! `! }% N9 e* B$ _) qconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city3 T) U' ?/ r; |" T; f3 J) B
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting9 s0 Z1 v2 M3 w( q
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
/ C( A' v7 M% M5 C/ aamenities., Z8 u/ Z# l5 T" u" o: Y
. Z& @# T9 i4 e9 U. t; _& D" J% }
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels% ?/ r& b# @- K/ {; i* W' w
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand( g) `+ D. F0 u K/ ~: A' H
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
. K' w( m- T: s6 ^5 `continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
( L' K6 S1 ~1 S! Y3 Qdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle+ G3 i( R) P: n% ?( A& q- Z1 k& X2 Q
residence, rather than for investment.8 Y5 t0 A3 t1 m$ h8 @" }
3 Q( `" n! M8 v5 M) i+ n3 T7 e1 U The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
/ C' m1 [" O: [9 z4 y: S& z9 bhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted) R8 L B6 C/ A5 _! {0 j6 f4 B
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer1 ^/ x- ~" f# d' W6 w! y
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
! C. D# L$ F5 L. E' N3 }rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter1 d+ ]% R( f& z7 v/ D$ g! \! f( N$ J
the market.% p6 `4 L0 y) U: @
+ Q- Z" y1 s w6 p In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
5 d. k( {+ J! O/ V, q/ ZJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In" b/ }4 D: u- B* [# T9 g
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
$ }$ v. @- Y4 w# J G# q) B/ p: _" `months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
- { f/ W% H6 K# ~. ?to the shortage of available inventory.2 J+ C1 Y, Q4 T+ Q- W& I
9 W' @9 W8 L( j
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its2 U' Z: A/ `0 W9 O! P$ l
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains2 i' f, |5 Z5 b' P0 T5 f- k
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
4 q6 T% g$ k8 {, m$ N( T: Ustruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
& m8 ~- a& l; W0 b2 A- {. g" d: B$ ^4 [8 Z$ N7 Z2 Q# Y7 a
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases$ h5 L4 E0 `) P, b. _
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
, k( }" _& D' a+ `8 |+ yunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
' H& X, c* r' ypressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
: E4 _- `- t: pprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
/ U! @" M6 t$ S& V" Hseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as, e* R! W! {4 s+ ]1 z
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.' A. d" O) I: r6 c
/ Y1 E, \& f6 Z6 m1 b
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
6 h9 f% g# J" kas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
7 G* b) |' l) p, M% c' Dremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,4 F! Z; q7 z" w/ v" g8 ?
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
' C7 `/ P- ?. j; {increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve* u! P z$ C- U. d( Y; n5 F
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly# u, R$ P' P) U' t' ]
towards the end of 2006. 1 r* H; O& J4 S2 r* a
8 K) N3 z2 U# X# IWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
% d4 P& |1 U! a9 d1 q* _inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable/ G/ r- P9 b5 g. D: G( I
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
5 k* o* G; D: Bgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
# m% X5 `5 M' ~foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
7 `" L7 ~6 K; Q6 o% B8 @pressure on tight inventory levels.- V: r. E7 M3 f* W4 r) U5 T! `( _
. Z' K8 Y& ^8 a. ^- W& I/ T& N Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic# l8 I" E/ M5 N; D8 J5 N5 h: q
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people% v5 g6 n' ]% s- h; d. R
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;" N6 x5 F3 D( E0 S* i# A8 E* E
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
: D y/ O# R4 [8 Efor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.8 b" S' Z. J$ R4 V- s' d
4 h S1 t' A4 `- e9 ~8 C7 G; g
<<
+ p& |& ?9 F* @- ^ Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
+ g" E, G" I, |
& T" u1 n9 }8 w7 _& w: v -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& D6 z( E* g* _ Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey) ~ O' r7 \' `% ~
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. U( Y9 J7 h8 C; W* G; T/ s7 G C 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
7 e. B- j/ U' Y, d2 B Market Average Average % Change Average Average
) _) `7 K) \* S9 c* P; I -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- |* S- d6 O6 F+ [4 j/ u: a Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
/ J" b2 {* \" K. q5 [+ d' \ -------------------------------------------------------------------------* a1 k3 m2 r$ U; |9 b. h. l
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000& w6 `9 s3 c0 r' R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 @5 R, }8 e) w* _' B. [: N
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000" N5 f3 a8 q! Q/ O. K7 C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ R. `3 { M( _8 _9 D9 D; g Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
( M( f! D: I* T* w -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 x4 |# T" ?/ N% C; W
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3338 R8 E7 M( M" G. F* A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: W( p: k1 u8 L+ G8 ]
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5832 A. Q4 h5 `% Z7 [# Z, V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: N+ y( F; J, h+ A7 P* s
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185* N: D- {! O' f5 c5 t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' W5 o! ~; C/ x' G4 L8 W r Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
3 c/ Y) `4 M+ z. r -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 v1 ?4 y; e& I0 c" L" e
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
5 |4 y( f8 c# s0 [ M* i, U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( t' l9 T4 [3 o; v Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7074 u7 e) R4 {: E1 J! [2 i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( U. m* t$ H8 p3 f1 u$ L
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5005 k) w; s9 B' c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# e# [4 m3 p+ Q Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389. X% Z4 j$ U* C& G/ w! m( L: {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 Q# A% V* g2 c9 X4 e% t: f! _
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
- j' C( u6 q6 `: P# V- q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
{8 W7 d. Z; J. V3 ^ Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5001 ]# Q: v+ u% x: B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; k9 a/ `" p- F! S# K
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
. A3 L; p, k+ D) W- q' j -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 v! A3 k; A \4 v National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
0 S; j% \ W6 I- ^3 e8 ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------) R+ F4 h" t$ s! a9 s7 A) O
' Q& W8 S, S5 b! [5 n; \$ p! O- H -------------------------------------------------------------
0 |" \0 G1 A6 o1 ^2 K- X+ { Standard Condominium
9 r, u% Q$ @; g- Y. X# s: u -------------------------------------------------------------
, C: _; ^1 i# c 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo) I, |. w" p, n$ J Z- y& s+ H8 a
Market % Change Average Average % Change- z- L. v8 e$ u
-------------------------------------------------------------7 r0 ^% f; ~# x( A
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
4 L U F: \( D! z- M -------------------------------------------------------------2 [ i0 A& N* `& k8 _" ]
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
. H* Y( E$ z5 g0 C% F+ c -------------------------------------------------------------
* q) q& f/ e& b& w6 L Moncton 4.9% - - N/A' \* b3 V( Q) b! m
-------------------------------------------------------------2 t: L0 \0 H& h3 S# m
Saint John N/A - - N/A
' y+ z$ ]; |7 S: B: Q- G/ P -------------------------------------------------------------
8 x5 L8 O' ^% R5 h' z4 \ St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%- g$ C% t: N. ~5 l% o% s4 j4 h; j! I0 l& m
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 B$ t* g/ o/ l- \, c Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
' V. n b' R3 \& e2 H -------------------------------------------------------------/ u n7 y! L& D2 r- `
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
0 h- X, A% {* {. H, F -------------------------------------------------------------, D' D9 \4 t2 P" }7 ?! N2 K
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%6 i: ^' N- @. `
-------------------------------------------------------------+ E; B. K. d7 L; J& W' ]
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%2 h6 O, N: Q5 y* i
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 b' d3 d4 a5 i9 V" N+ ?6 e h Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
8 t1 s, x, T1 j# b4 u* ?9 L -------------------------------------------------------------
! C. o# {5 z3 g6 [6 Q& _3 _3 X; w. Q Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%. ~9 S: v" \0 D4 J; |4 O9 T
-------------------------------------------------------------4 _& j1 A7 N6 U8 y7 f
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
' \ e$ m0 g1 V. y" E' u6 ?6 j -------------------------------------------------------------7 ?: y% Y, P$ A. z" I0 R4 ]
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%) B! X H& C! }* ^% A
-------------------------------------------------------------
* x r% F& b: H1 B Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%& ]0 n1 T# O. Y: e
-------------------------------------------------------------* ?2 J- m% |, m( e! E5 V
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
! M0 I9 t+ t: J -------------------------------------------------------------" ?, G6 z( v0 S' w$ B
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
9 X: g5 a+ Z3 ^. f- E3 ~- \ -------------------------------------------------------------( d; T& N, g- s, y9 U U0 Z2 {
>>
3 @8 ~9 O6 T0 z8 x; z3 B- F D
# O# u! [# T/ l' _ Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
! S9 y5 R. } h3 H1 `! U: k3 Kin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint$ B* ^, U' D2 G5 @) s
John and Victoria.: b/ B! S$ |2 T j; V9 G
# g) d5 T$ P- H) b- z3 r4 Z9 V3 U
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
9 }) E1 |, s* e$ j& \' ycomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
. I5 S3 _/ ]: |7 S; U# mhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release5 z% P, P' q+ d4 q4 P: {
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price' T' @3 |1 M. X& g% i+ g
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities# |. X: L7 u9 _, s
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is- m* v: G: u+ H+ U3 H
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
8 M8 C5 O2 C7 ^ n0 gfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
7 [+ ?- ?" T, Aversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
8 L, Z" k7 M% w: A9 `November 15, 2006.
; ]9 l' W" v7 o1 S/ [- h, x Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
3 R' {2 L. p# N7 k9 Z* ]& j kfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge! ?' [0 U# B- S" i
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
: f! V3 u/ e$ q% K! n" X5 Xavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|