 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 2 K7 x; Y X- @6 M; d: h
5 C V9 z8 `! j. U1 P V- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
. k7 F6 k0 R! `* h0 r" \7 x, J- y$ O3 }) E% s2 ~% I; Z
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market2 Q' G, _7 G$ z& f
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third( {$ H T& Y/ I+ E
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
1 Z5 {+ p- i% z$ ^in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
* a+ d4 W: C$ X* P9 P5 Uprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
$ i, L% D' e: p+ l- \1 z" i5 pmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario, A% _, m% l3 B& X! f2 q
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal! B, k. Y6 R1 V( Z" y3 Z$ t3 j
LePage Real Estate Services.
i7 u3 N5 u( |$ `0 T) G1 h" H# O% ~) ]9 N8 [+ n2 g
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters1 z0 z: G; n( d) T* d- }2 o
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic& D6 r6 Y( s/ `+ J' Q5 ]/ J$ o
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and6 U7 Y% x! O* P c. V
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
4 k4 e, { Y6 u( k. fresidential real estate sector./ r+ G5 p W* ]; p
( s/ b1 p. w9 q5 ]% R$ W; B Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation2 N4 f/ ?) a, }1 K
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
1 C; c" w) @& \& k- Jyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562& Q: a9 g4 v7 o5 T( c! X
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
" H' e C; C( x(+13.2%).% H1 C9 Y1 o; |+ _: ^; i% K
- E- |# s$ c' {0 J! J "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth; B) H$ s( Z, ^8 N$ {, K
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
' w# @# I/ \5 E0 Ufrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
1 L6 u: F5 s3 C6 ~, r/ fpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
/ i& e5 e H7 w5 Mpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
1 z" u. I( f% [% J9 n"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We4 T# ~" S! d" A" a+ B( F
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
% |3 w6 K( ], v- Z/ p. Wbalanced market."
, U. _7 ?5 {* n0 x7 c( A5 ^: }1 \4 g0 t6 g
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
( R0 R; d0 Y ~considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift+ }6 T. k, k/ ~ i/ f, \0 b
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued' r* P$ e5 S) c5 }. ^
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
; F# ]1 O a9 t/ k aenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
+ r" n1 {2 f" H0 a6 Z3 l4 gmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
) Q+ a4 e! g) h o7 u' ?+ H4 Cbreaking price appreciations.
; Y* Z# u8 h: s6 d- z3 a+ g4 e4 X+ k/ `0 f' n4 d: B. r8 U
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
& J& \% s/ h% Z6 F9 J7 j! Z6 deconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
& U' Y G* ]; b0 O% n t" Wlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.+ b' A+ J4 @& G4 P# n
4 P$ k8 t* f/ o7 }
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid& D5 y2 k; ?% ^0 U ~' d1 h7 |
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer1 U+ ?4 U" H' K% g6 V; I. S
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
. ]6 t, ?7 m+ N7 h# S+ n! Nslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
J4 v8 Y2 V7 a4 n- G' P' |; _In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers, Y& u/ w$ S0 Z6 n5 L! A a* ?
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
* c, I5 `- Z( E/ fprice appreciation when compared with 2005., E& T, r1 ]6 W' ^$ Y# g7 \' h/ q
9 n) R" H& x* }3 N- {/ V1 G
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
7 S& n4 E7 ?. Y) e1 Y( ~market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and4 X4 ]0 p: ?5 v8 E
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
4 t; O1 X, H% a. q' J) v, X1 {( ?0 Fare markedly different than those found in the United States.0 T+ F4 h+ P7 c% k" T0 e8 Z
i0 z- N- _: y# _9 a) r Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the V. N) j. g! X6 o7 a/ g! j
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's3 L2 f% @, G+ @2 B1 H
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the) p" I* ^# O- {4 q/ u- b! H1 q; q
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general& R0 L6 h, a7 m! V! ^. v
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
8 w% K" N$ m, x( ndownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
) V: b. x; p# o( ~* J* Maggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
" ?' V4 N3 u# Amortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."0 [! C! ^7 b7 R: ~$ v
$ L3 P7 v9 y. J& l" T( j <<
" _. e+ j. L6 ^5 I! r REGIONAL SUMMARIES
8 |: i2 e- i" \ N( U >>
' o" m* K: \/ p3 ^* f$ D- B3 R2 L( N' x4 H' @4 \
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in" X* U; n! s% [9 _
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
$ F: H! M5 z$ iof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time' {3 H3 W5 U" U
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of# n3 E6 I" R# `( K( K) \6 _/ B3 B
renovations.
, n5 `' Y1 {9 X) s8 H0 N" b' F0 M" |# \% ]9 f8 \
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
2 W K7 Q& [* ?, Z3 _increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
* [- R' W$ _3 E# _5 b7 n# U4 rcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and2 ]' w# t6 f2 b+ ~9 d
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.& l) ^4 z0 A& n3 K) A
: o F' X! L6 @" x! s/ Q9 D1 z+ M The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
. d6 o# r' Z- B" C$ Kslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the/ l2 w% q0 F0 W; }
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
. a* D# t+ k9 M5 H" J600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores9 _5 N! W" c, n7 D5 L2 t. r; V
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes# u: J# N! p* x4 X% Q! o
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.8 y0 m5 c8 V$ k% m: J5 r
# K2 M3 N( \0 f. {/ k( b! b
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
9 k& N# a; I4 ~ p2 U* w7 Econditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
& A) K9 C+ M' w/ p4 }homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
6 |( ?; C$ `$ m7 {was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
, W8 \8 ?; ?& d0 I( i. l/ X2 g2 Jdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing2 |9 j! k% O' t5 b: d! r
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
0 N7 k- Q, t6 c2 b! t. I& o. k" N( c
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly9 _% \ C4 X" a' u. z6 O+ n
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes0 Y+ w/ l+ Q6 y! T l& |! _
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,- I8 N6 U" q! _' J, h7 n% x/ Q, T
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
: g+ c4 n' p% ]8 }- R& L4 H7 Wfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
; Z" z5 Z* J! N: u" R" Z% Z+ g+ |) O0 o. e ?
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house* D$ K R; |8 m; I" @% h/ o
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
. ]* p2 N6 z( t$ Jlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting/ ^6 y$ \, K$ s
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
7 S) m. m7 w8 Xwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the& R- A7 V* x3 b ^6 u
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
# Q I; O( W0 @( s6 a! A3 O! wmaking a purchase.' W- d4 R+ L7 K+ u8 @& Z
3 i$ p# s3 R4 Q' x: h4 z& O Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing0 M: o1 _9 i7 w8 \
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong( e' c8 |4 P# M9 P4 g! b! \; \
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
) u1 Z" Q; O) m0 Z* Y" `7 D& Wcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting2 i7 Z8 E2 ]- o& m/ c& L
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown" T1 T9 n4 i# W, m- M% U3 [
amenities.8 l1 J: T9 a3 G# {- V
, n# D- Z6 O& K! q4 w
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels! W. [) d' S! i( k4 \
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
9 |6 g. F0 }# c& f1 _, Aacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
8 ~1 W" I S5 o0 a4 `( y$ Gcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been) [; O4 o" q6 h8 T x7 N" K
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle3 @ f/ |. p/ g( M- V- G
residence, rather than for investment.% E; m' L/ G; Y) t4 b% y
& \' {% q Z5 ]2 M" p% Y The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
5 w0 [+ P4 T% U( ~8 Q+ O( a# Lhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
! D& Z8 O! p, v A8 [, O! Min a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer9 V, P* P) B# @( P1 Y5 J: U
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
+ S. o$ x/ t- C6 L' z& |rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter2 D; H7 B' o6 T6 V1 {
the market.
- q6 @& l+ U1 |3 G9 o$ ^. N! K
( w) S" i5 P1 s. ~ In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
9 H2 q# a! {' w7 l$ _( ZJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In: e( {+ G7 U+ E s/ ^0 f, ?3 P
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
9 E. d; [5 X4 ~months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due0 |& L8 C. r8 R9 D* S8 C6 R
to the shortage of available inventory.% j0 t# {# H/ p
6 k+ V7 }5 ^6 ?7 ^9 |
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
( h; P( Q6 m+ N |% d4 ~8 u/ n! `$ omomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains) b# h# L# r# r: q6 e
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses4 I+ j8 L- F* s
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
" X5 Z7 v+ _+ ]% N# r( `2 E0 O
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases$ k: O& L* v; y, Y# Z
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
/ r& H# {, d9 gunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
# L# }$ p- d# e1 E0 F* Apressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
/ w( S5 E/ D4 r3 Vprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer- ]6 F" V# Y) o$ b& I/ G' y
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as0 T2 e1 M" V0 m. v
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
/ D E3 J- g# H+ K' O1 A) T2 N# N, ~' v, S$ P! c
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
' ]& x' k* c q [as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton$ A4 r" {+ N" s, y* }/ I
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
2 _* Z4 ~3 r; v5 n% |8 Vmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
9 \) e D+ F; D! _# y9 O1 h2 xincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve$ |+ B9 Y6 ^- a! W4 K
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly) z# r: P4 w& c X" \9 E& T
towards the end of 2006.
# e6 v8 @7 J: v8 b/ ^! E0 |$ Y5 ]% [$ f1 |- o6 Z' _: C" K
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of9 f. E k; W9 n A
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable4 ~6 p# N1 s) S1 g# E# {# ?( K
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
% u1 j5 ]2 n6 M! ]# I* g& tgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
' e* H9 L- W5 |- R/ L. n3 sforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
U( K+ n$ t9 @5 y$ }9 Xpressure on tight inventory levels.
9 N; D2 u& K5 `3 q6 ?' V5 B
& ^8 Z. P$ ?! s1 s& x" E3 ] Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
( X" W" }# _+ L& i: |fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
$ o0 l, `4 d5 p0 {" y3 c# Ninto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
, E( k) D4 v! ^2 \+ `% H( a7 jwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
% m. {& b- Z$ D3 i3 m. L! \1 bfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
+ T1 q7 M3 j- j2 r- b$ _- D; z; L. L+ |
<<2 x$ w% ~5 Q, C% n7 u- H
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
' @& @5 E' I; L
4 N7 D- V3 `9 @9 y/ q9 E" d -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 V+ l, y$ r* O+ o0 R Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
9 X9 k0 o1 P- w$ R; O) d) K, B -------------------------------------------------------------------------& B2 _+ x8 N! I' e
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
`0 Z8 i# _2 [3 s- g& z Market Average Average % Change Average Average g' Y+ A; X4 c7 Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 X* E" ]3 f, S. l6 i: O6 _ } V Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000; d4 C# A N: V t7 H: H% s+ R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 Q z0 ~, ?" E6 t
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000 j4 O7 M% E' X# e8 l/ ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 f$ K5 h9 h6 i% u
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000/ e! p! X1 [' [( ]- ~9 a, Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 d3 w2 _7 L! u- r! r9 u$ o: z
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
& q) V$ O) L( N" N! r& r. x -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 Q/ W- u3 P9 p! \9 P1 \
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
7 }+ K9 i0 w3 U+ G9 q/ U* T3 y9 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. e8 B0 z6 }" t2 x Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
R% S3 U+ v. ^: F8 Z0 a+ M -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 i& q$ h- m* X# `
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185, W( {! `$ ^/ A% H) ?$ I1 W1 }1 W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( ]4 h5 g3 ]8 U/ g, N9 w6 B2 t4 G
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2506 }8 v- Q9 n6 X4 M1 B: n; S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 s5 R$ r7 m9 p8 a
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
* D |# R. t5 Z1 ^ j -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 C, L! l$ g$ w
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
/ F9 m' s8 I A# s) {& p -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 n' j' V. b0 W" M; v; L& Y3 p
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
! i h: m$ d3 W1 u" c9 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 \ T+ n b% M
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
9 k- T8 H0 B8 { -------------------------------------------------------------------------
{& D6 ~+ Y$ Z1 A% a6 c: k: l* o. p Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
5 Q9 L' S5 X( Q0 q( H6 b -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 E2 W1 E) v' r0 a8 G
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500( E# Y5 q- m9 w6 K I1 R Z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 ]+ H$ x, _1 u( E6 s! P Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000; D U( I' j# Z' G R/ v9 H2 q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, x1 V3 G8 E- P4 F National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8601 Y- z `, n7 t! F0 S- k8 |0 ^6 C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ B1 h1 X7 U4 T& J" c/ u8 u9 |3 Y% r$ j1 _
-------------------------------------------------------------
, t+ W4 G/ B# r5 m P Standard Condominium- ^! P0 V8 l/ D' n. ^$ z! t+ d
-------------------------------------------------------------
" ^8 k! G) B; e$ M 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
$ c, w. T* M7 F* [: D z Market % Change Average Average % Change& T& h' T6 t$ W2 R
-------------------------------------------------------------+ E4 l" m g* I! M4 V# e! L4 m
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
1 N0 E% ~4 Y, h6 l% Z. X -------------------------------------------------------------* P& A6 S4 T. V: \. f
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%1 d+ v+ b# f/ h! B) A% J3 _
-------------------------------------------------------------$ [+ D+ y7 R3 e0 q2 i" k* B
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
R. { F. ]4 @$ ~) P/ H- | -------------------------------------------------------------. ]* Z& F! y6 R8 p
Saint John N/A - - N/A
7 I% w; R6 u. b4 Y) y% J- b; E' F/ P -------------------------------------------------------------
L0 k. V& Y$ N" @! N1 g St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%, O/ o" x9 ~5 w1 S. b8 T% w3 m
-------------------------------------------------------------/ \) W# }7 h! R) g( }
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
3 x9 _# Y9 D4 A1 f) ? -------------------------------------------------------------
! |# [, |3 C& R$ c) [3 i: u Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%% H, `) x4 s1 @+ S8 ^
-------------------------------------------------------------
# L6 j W5 }8 L1 X( E Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
# P# A# d4 Q. {/ Y" k0 x1 D& s" t -------------------------------------------------------------
* v9 z) t E1 S/ h) B0 E& T8 i Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%, I# L7 z" H. X# J
------------------------------------------------------------- Q C5 g! P5 c% [% ?* ]9 c
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%' L2 p# {% H4 w( K! n- ^
-------------------------------------------------------------% D9 b* y9 r# B* M8 @
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%& a6 i4 G& ]( G' Q5 T
-------------------------------------------------------------/ V8 g; R( u1 Z
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
6 }0 }6 e( K: }/ ]4 l -------------------------------------------------------------8 ~* o$ x5 S7 y9 i3 z
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
; t9 \" g' Y4 o -------------------------------------------------------------
" C& [/ H5 s3 k9 y Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%: D4 m* x D8 W4 m8 M
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 v( q ^4 o4 S# j! e3 | Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%- W: ~, B8 V' t1 j- |# B! C, `
-------------------------------------------------------------" s0 B% Q/ x# t" A. ?0 q
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%4 \0 O5 M' h; x4 ]
-------------------------------------------------------------
- ~6 G: s! O7 s* O# c) C+ e% v. v >>+ K5 R3 X! R. u
" L7 k) R- e. M8 X n( a" v
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
3 t( q. F& o4 bin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint; \& a* O: Q5 i' }. S. }
John and Victoria.
5 X3 U- e! |. b% D h! v) Y! R) U3 F
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
# r# k1 s# N- N$ o( }" Ccomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
' |4 n: a K0 d9 Nhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
- P' T% s( H3 k) n: k$ x- G2 J# Vreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
- v5 T4 ?- D. g/ T' {: Dtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
' o. J3 z5 }" s5 jacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
4 B1 j- ^% A/ {0 \8 f* p3 Z& gavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
- `" X, V* {3 y/ A9 R- ffigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable% {8 n# i& X9 _
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on: O0 ]+ i6 a+ t' P+ K7 c
November 15, 2006.
( z3 ^% h1 M( g, } Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
3 |3 I5 V: J: N5 ~fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
7 t" Z1 P6 x3 x+ ?4 S4 s1 f3 iprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
0 g* p$ ^5 c% Kavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|