 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
# F: l, Q9 N0 t$ [2 Y$ \/ z' L: L/ T( H: h' h
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -6 y' l+ L) Y6 g# I
+ ~# X$ q% `% {3 {
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market: e& w/ g( J, A; |6 S
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
7 k1 H" v+ C- `/ w9 b8 `: j; equarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
2 w; w* |8 T- S; M1 k% Xin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
6 k( u+ j% Q" S# }! f9 }" \! Yprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
! K& r( V& w1 mmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
: X5 O5 A1 V! c( BQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal- u8 ~4 a" x W2 b+ X$ s
LePage Real Estate Services.
. q4 Q" d+ o; a& u9 h
; W" I8 t" A+ H& g% {" O Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters. h) V5 V6 E5 `" [1 z
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic$ p& g" P( i4 P7 I% P8 i. }* t- ]* g
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
+ o9 ?& M! n; f, }6 b# X, q5 b, u( ]' m5 tsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the! N) l$ h1 m/ J0 K! e1 @& k
residential real estate sector. P; I+ _' J7 {6 j: k9 H
! K9 K6 Y( l% c& S% H
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
- B* {% W* }( V( ^/ Doccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
% R- {9 M) ?: V' c+ n3 Qyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5625 N# }: ~) Q+ Q% Q2 l' I ~
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
% D7 k5 f8 L' N: J, Z6 P8 p(+13.2%).( F* a: x% Z1 i j& J8 u* K
% w) C- o5 r( _1 b g "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth8 A( @: T7 h* V3 ~! \
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
H6 k2 @. v: ~4 Ofrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are1 \1 m+ o! K i
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
- i7 Q+ {, A1 opresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
9 L2 O8 g2 i- n0 J7 q"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
. [9 F7 Y2 w# \' Xwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
6 I; D3 Z# w1 F# H$ ~1 Y# e/ c+ Zbalanced market."
* U7 ]4 \% x: u) H& S( O+ | y
6 v4 R/ s% @3 \; p Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices," O" ~* }2 S& Y# _ P
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift/ g4 C1 X, F8 V9 [
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued. u# a5 D4 T8 U9 j- h! B# |
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
! H/ j, p! ~7 ~1 p' ?# ]& i4 i4 F2 Cenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
) Y6 N& |9 t7 y: amanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record Y# P7 X' D( f3 o6 ?# i$ R
breaking price appreciations.' B4 o( H+ k0 _" x# B
2 w% D% U. V! ^2 u! p: B1 S: b Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding5 u, J8 b1 k& _" _* |, j- Q
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the4 y. L2 J- W6 V2 V0 O
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.9 H! O) f0 J; o/ J4 ?
, B6 K3 v8 X- H' r! V( c, H In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid# f% E# s( F5 J/ I4 f
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
4 o' H5 c) E v) b1 gconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off! [7 n! b# \$ f
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
; j. Y5 j' v; f8 S9 v9 d/ j' `+ CIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
- E: L$ v; Q* ?+ Y' Ggreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of: @) E- V7 d' U6 O& {3 c0 e! _
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
; J. ]; |' h0 b# P% E+ [. }
1 i, @) b% O0 g. ^: y) l While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
0 a3 T2 ?, ^( R. qmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
' F+ b" L" |& F; o+ y. i: A8 B7 [5 bfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
" y/ x5 U7 l# V& y! Y8 R; q' hare markedly different than those found in the United States.5 H1 B7 z5 b% o# E
( Z3 Q% j, i, A( B' G6 y4 T* t
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the8 ^: f8 s7 i* e$ a) ~4 q
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
1 i, s3 B1 J) q: {$ Rfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the1 _- }2 j1 A1 n. a. F
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general3 n6 i0 ^6 V7 D" W. v }2 u" [
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
' i' m9 L4 v& C5 Edownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and9 [7 A: @8 x5 c8 h. W' @
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization9 @6 d. G% ~$ @% m8 h
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment.") Y e. a, _2 R3 t! v# g% @
! f3 j; i' S3 b: r <<
, [# P) t, ^0 R1 o0 z" g REGIONAL SUMMARIES
5 j8 F- K9 o) `" r& Y' G! L >>
$ y( u/ P4 [* e+ e( Y" S# x' f/ E+ l" |/ z4 T& Y
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in; b3 G5 m3 T1 b7 V7 r
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate8 ?/ C" ^$ [1 B: |3 q
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time' i$ C) b# |* s( i
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of1 {8 ^* O+ [! X, V7 E
renovations.
* V. V) ?# a$ D6 W( _) i
V4 S; r0 X$ j$ c The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
' |, f3 |0 h6 Uincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation0 V( }( m5 i; l& z- l
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and6 [. u. n: x) t& e! \& f" F
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter. |$ M5 a; ~9 x! V: i4 l0 w, {1 s4 I
) @" h/ ^) q. l The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
1 ?3 J: T: \- Xslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the6 f" C- Q" }1 G) x- B/ W/ P
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
* v& j7 p" C0 g- b8 _4 c3 q600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
! |) ]9 Y6 A7 T; tto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes4 I! a8 l% j, }, U2 L" L. W
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options./ F6 t; d( \ N3 n+ o0 w% S5 `
6 o7 i5 i6 ^+ r! g7 J, v In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced% ` ~7 j, y! F- M ?7 v
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
' y+ i- l/ H& j0 ?- E7 c# Yhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers H6 B' ]* }5 x' Z3 N0 U
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian" a5 ^+ G8 { O' t+ b
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
$ G9 y% G, Q0 V5 A6 s/ pbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
' [# `6 o* R O& y* M! f. C8 V( c7 x2 w# Z* [
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly" U: e' g! y* U5 Y0 G: U q
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes5 I0 r: K1 F( L
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
P; R( l+ b4 F; K; ras some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last. L. q6 H# c3 y7 _" s, R! y
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.$ b+ J( \4 V1 s5 }, K: {* P) Y
3 W& G, D0 @+ Q7 R Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house. v$ e# ]& K% u! r
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
. ?) o9 h5 I1 s2 }, ]" D' ]levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting; A8 @$ X7 ]; q, H/ r6 l
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
) e6 Y, h3 k0 o+ D6 K3 O) S hwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
g9 l9 T! w9 b0 O3 c; kpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
3 K# a' f% V9 M, |+ r L8 X Xmaking a purchase.
- t! D0 e6 e Y6 ]+ F/ \+ Z q- w6 @) I1 D
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
+ V" O4 ^' l/ D3 A/ v+ Rmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong' s8 |1 ]% W$ |; m# C0 l4 p
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city$ b% n) p2 H- S9 D/ [3 @
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
2 @0 u G7 u1 A9 j$ H0 \attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown* s1 D, p) S) `5 P3 b0 @: |+ Z. `
amenities.- q8 y- Z4 h) d- R: b: a+ A
$ O+ h# E; W @1 U: E The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
& q" g a! A9 x* U+ ~/ [" ]' zthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
7 R5 a& S( a% Z0 p2 A' x! Qacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has! h w" i+ m3 S B& H, K
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
8 `( c9 X, x4 |5 `" A" |# Sdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
; ?% ^$ V# m& Z5 E q' G. O/ Dresidence, rather than for investment.' W9 C3 H8 f7 x
+ f# h$ V" s: E The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as/ ] A* ?. p4 l
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
1 f9 h" J3 V6 ain a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer% y: s3 A' |; E5 V C. L ~
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
4 h; v# O* _ G* y& t- O8 o0 _rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter, m2 _' o; P" X* f, Q0 Q
the market.1 z! s. D- T R: l# i3 S
, R$ x0 \' x2 x6 ?
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
+ d5 m" ]+ v; [) \+ v7 L/ x3 t3 rJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
, Z% |% v5 [ _, Q, fAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring% H5 I T( Y# x, I: X
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due' E, U5 I4 x# n, e# f
to the shortage of available inventory.
# r: }7 j; m% N# D. a
b" w: \. H: b Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
- ]9 u% C1 P( ^3 S6 P/ @9 bmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains& N& g2 j: w# c5 b6 y
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
/ Q' s. i" p4 S- o! q; `struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.4 q `+ {) | w* V9 C* x
0 k% h/ h: ? n: ]$ x3 ?1 Y
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
; F( b5 W5 {( u f- S, @( w7 Kin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low. k! [4 B+ G7 z6 \6 @: }4 X* o
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
' {5 S6 @ t( `$ ]! |* d+ }( \1 spressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
8 a/ k1 T4 y- Gprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer4 |9 x/ s$ |3 a2 U' K
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as2 ^+ G: H$ ~5 G9 F5 @
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
* b+ r y8 w& o) a- K x/ Y- y2 {( X1 Y8 D: `
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter5 R: L; C6 a; ?& A1 k* l( M* f
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton; R1 g" w7 e) s e' k8 n1 S
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
, c, z% n$ p( y* O6 c8 e fmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices# M2 l- Y! n3 p' k! ^0 {
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
2 I$ N) f/ i/ ~* w9 {; P9 ]# O0 K `* Iin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly% G! R* T& `# _
towards the end of 2006.
4 a: E+ ^# j# t# K- i+ t# R% A) ]7 ]
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
M C- {: M3 V6 ^8 A5 hinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
# m- R/ z3 U' nto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
* g: Q9 L& _# N& n" wgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to: A/ p' ^: n3 v- X j! L. w
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
+ {0 ~# e$ W+ ipressure on tight inventory levels.8 n0 W( A, z- \ ~5 U* k# d
8 E F M4 r8 H+ U! t
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic8 C, g2 N8 y1 q( ~- S: z
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
0 g# O% h) A' l% uinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;6 O- _- U$ c% Y0 M3 v& q( z4 B
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching3 r! A4 b& h, G
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
- N+ g l$ E; e3 {4 {- D) B4 ]2 C' K; a
<<- a. M1 h6 H# k
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
5 u `1 T7 |. i, X7 d
8 t/ H5 O# T9 u& R -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 u W) G" [* Q3 C" J. }
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
4 P" M" V6 c& h3 [* r -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Y! | [6 g3 J7 L: m 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q38 _" G- z# @8 q" T, I4 i
Market Average Average % Change Average Average o6 l' S2 y" G- C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------8 S& \4 h/ V [$ y
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
6 s) @- D6 h R) D5 H# ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- a' H& W/ c( a- i( F T* m
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000: l5 S$ a- l7 K: A/ ]% n1 g; W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ u) `% T# E( U Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
m0 ?3 ?% ]9 l Y" L+ e4 R -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 X; q! U& Q1 F- S
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -" i; x: d- [8 T/ \( S( S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% t2 @4 ]$ o4 b: B
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333" X3 I! }' d$ f' P6 t; A0 \1 A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* _+ a, Z2 n4 u, a7 P6 G# ^ Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
) d2 U6 g. n3 W5 [9 F -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 X- I$ F! J/ Q) \2 X+ |' C
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185- Z( s2 m5 W; [9 s! J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& ?' V; R3 G" q
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2509 Z& w! e, a5 ` U$ e+ w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. z% @2 U3 y7 z! ?$ `. V2 T1 n
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766" X& _1 {/ F+ H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 ]$ w' `" m7 K
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
3 j+ E9 _' {* @9 g -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ^4 @% l, ?9 Z7 P7 r Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
+ Q4 g+ o0 I( o5 q! o1 M9 [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 N2 r0 |. G9 e- W; J8 @) ], _
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389. O7 s; @6 {- y' T; N, {2 @7 K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 B' g9 s- c; ^/ `
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714& R! V# F( a$ n" V# U
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. g4 K+ X$ A* N/ F9 i" A
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5007 ^+ Q5 M1 n/ _- k% f- g. C6 g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. R1 r& l- ]* Y+ m, \8 |0 N7 C* e Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000% J2 T# j4 ^" V% C- T' f& r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 F, N; |5 x9 { National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860: ^* G8 p) W4 r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' o8 J; o6 T3 k4 P- _- q8 i7 V
; Y, P5 l9 |: ^- r2 K2 K! Y, [ -------------------------------------------------------------
& k" U4 @& U. \5 l$ u9 } Standard Condominium
( w3 b) l. }5 P ?# \( K( E8 | -------------------------------------------------------------
: O5 a8 a5 ~1 h 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo2 W* D7 D% i; l1 p! l
Market % Change Average Average % Change
. W8 f5 [2 w# T& c* A -------------------------------------------------------------
W2 i" V% d$ }& a! h Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
+ F6 U k: Q! I6 G) } A3 y+ h3 B -------------------------------------------------------------: p3 I& _4 a0 U
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
$ x. |/ E1 t1 K$ w$ H -------------------------------------------------------------
2 P* `% H3 G, \2 }6 a& C8 p( }( a/ | Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
5 ~2 a/ u. p6 j -------------------------------------------------------------, g, t: Z2 `% i
Saint John N/A - - N/A
. `0 r! h. m1 b/ j; G: E -------------------------------------------------------------
" o. K( g! F1 ~8 X- ]6 O7 Y St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%( ]# h! \- T3 d$ \; k: b4 g% O
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 D) E9 ]$ I; E Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%" D7 u' F7 @# I7 O
-------------------------------------------------------------
% Q |) S3 d; x9 B) q( G9 D Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%7 _, b' C: V8 S$ G" ?5 `% J
-------------------------------------------------------------+ W' e2 z' U# c8 T2 G
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
E. K7 ?8 a0 ]2 p/ t -------------------------------------------------------------- X- @& Y' A: G9 w
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%; o# ]/ x' p' i5 A/ h
------------------------------------------------------------- Y l$ m3 U( {. l) k8 j
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
" W. t* t: b0 _7 { L- e' e8 _ -------------------------------------------------------------# W& @& B$ J/ o" b% K
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%) a7 q2 L2 x" ?$ u
-------------------------------------------------------------
& x- u* V5 d Y; @7 i Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
% n- D; p) ^& c/ P' C2 F -------------------------------------------------------------/ o( V5 @* z5 K
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
, Q5 v0 Y; J% N' g -------------------------------------------------------------2 {% k2 i0 @/ y+ r- F( I( s
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
& ~7 e" \9 Q2 j( y9 H( ?: ` -------------------------------------------------------------
9 Q; t( s2 b" |( @# A7 d, T( E/ J6 R Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
9 R% O3 Q6 N9 Y -------------------------------------------------------------3 [/ n2 O& \5 O: j3 U4 m
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
8 |: K: n; m' q9 W* l0 O; b -------------------------------------------------------------
, l# U3 H' T: A >>
' z4 l/ t. L% L3 M& a( O/ X2 P# S) a5 I; Q' G' V* K6 B
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
* e, E \' V8 e( S/ ~. N3 s% ^' Vin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
" G3 a& \$ N) G$ N$ v) S6 k( j& PJohn and Victoria.
& G# D2 }8 [6 E5 k; \- @7 U3 Y' C' l% g4 i) F2 F% ?
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
' j/ a+ h1 P1 }$ q( W: G) fcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
7 C! W: E& n; y" lhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release. y" g7 c8 f8 o0 U( o
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price" u7 C/ m5 \7 d. \: J
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities) I- Y5 J8 {+ c3 D Y5 n
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
9 J' n+ h2 U0 i' H* \' F1 P2 o# W4 Lavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current x7 g+ x# q+ {; E0 o
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
4 I% X8 w% b8 R$ Dversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
$ {$ F' k6 ^( ?# h3 G& e" }November 15, 2006.( B- a) |' \& S& c
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
; |. I/ J. k% c- Nfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
$ {/ o3 M7 h5 W+ b8 k, l3 x! q+ yprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
- `' Y& E6 ^2 E, k) Pavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|