 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
0 W: ?% m1 K0 e3 w8 m9 ~# j2 C1 ~9 ]* t2 [0 W
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
' E9 Y7 _# c. F+ L w7 X" d2 d0 T% Z
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market4 B9 |8 _ }& n& X4 B* Z9 v. P
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third4 F2 y" y- v, K* y* @, r. C, T# a
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic) L. R: @$ g0 N& S7 y! ]
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit) k3 f- R- \1 X( y6 G9 g4 {9 T
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and$ U2 m h2 W; O7 G
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,( p1 ?8 V9 r3 L% D- ]
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal1 M/ L+ C7 ?$ N. l. U \! \
LePage Real Estate Services.' [1 }# W) ~( V+ F* {/ H! x5 g
- f* ^7 n, t0 z9 r Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
$ U! d* b1 Q& e1 b) m2 N% P* gare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic: i* r& h) t4 G0 D0 V& O) @$ z1 H
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
0 s9 H5 ?( {$ p7 X7 j2 F1 ssound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
1 g! ~) B) k0 b3 Q$ \residential real estate sector.
/ s8 m% E- C/ @0 P7 H
% Z+ Q* D% y* m4 ~ Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
: @8 @' W/ g: o/ P; Uoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)6 c& o' E1 A% ?8 G! n
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
0 i0 r! |/ a. x" Z(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
0 a( O& x. A; h% u& b4 H' `(+13.2%).% ?8 `6 o- d( D
5 z( e' T2 g6 }/ | "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
1 F1 y1 u/ q: s( L* Z' k* Kduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the( @4 v3 q' Y! ]; b$ m8 L
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
3 F1 ^# L9 k' L: {" Q' ]# e" Spoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
& L) s! x$ H! W" P: Y2 u( F+ Xpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.% W, u5 a6 e& b
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
, ^$ P h4 U) v! c' B9 Twelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy2 l2 ]3 S2 k) }6 B7 t
balanced market."
+ T9 S1 [; k" V
- ]2 a' Y$ v# R8 j6 t- T Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,' H0 ]% ^" S+ h% d* A# b1 ~
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
9 q& K0 J( z2 V& z0 m" ito balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
& |) {: Q7 |0 Z) G! }throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core2 V$ ^; [) @/ G9 U
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration," L; y, v' q! k1 A Z4 C ^% Y# j) |# A
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
8 O7 d/ x4 N: I4 x9 C# ]breaking price appreciations.
. r: T) t7 E. [1 Z/ r4 O* n( n |' N: {1 K( y6 l) g& I
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding. e2 O" v/ F. V2 ]! d$ a/ V4 b
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the; \ K* ~9 Q8 }% Q y
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.' Z" d0 K, h' x( u' N
& K: u ?* d9 D
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid# C* h. e$ Q$ b$ S& h
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
( D2 g* s! z* V6 }confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off1 w9 T' t$ ]/ Z
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
/ C3 E+ E% ^$ e& WIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers$ O# J$ W& A& u
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of! L& E! N. C' I" o0 S' {
price appreciation when compared with 2005./ l1 l# [) p$ y# n5 d1 Q4 M
4 }4 k! l2 ]. { c0 c" s+ W While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing" u' v5 B5 w1 x% w1 e! \8 Z: g
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
* w4 r+ d3 S9 a7 w0 e4 a3 Kfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
5 [/ ~$ p: j i2 Ware markedly different than those found in the United States./ I1 F+ k9 O7 P8 @8 e" E5 A0 ]
( ^4 V( S& [# I( b8 v/ l" W3 F Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
1 w( w% G" A5 X* y0 ~American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
2 K7 W$ R8 I4 `* m; pfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
8 w ?) I' D; W. r- i! a1 ~' ^relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
^" h3 F+ j- Zaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
) \! k6 r+ R, p; W, Y( ~downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
4 C* ?. U* J9 d- M6 x1 z' Taggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
. x' D3 f5 Q1 o: L A+ hmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment." |+ m6 `) a- j' r. x& R
+ n) y# a" p' h3 V <<
( q7 Z6 K# C" m/ i4 F+ i9 C REGIONAL SUMMARIES
" o$ W) M% ]- t+ v* B9 A5 ~ >>1 w- N; h+ G; X: R
5 m; a1 g) p: |
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
5 c9 ]. r- g0 p8 Z' aHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate9 k/ G# p! C2 g# V- _" g
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time$ L: ?. W F. j9 y2 h* R
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of4 {7 }0 L4 G; T3 P/ Y
renovations.) y0 S/ m) J' q5 j/ T
1 i4 A! H" t8 W- Y The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight+ W3 S1 u. g0 u! p
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
9 U s6 I6 j5 ~compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
3 I0 ^5 B" c5 g/ R4 u* e' |5 Y1 ~September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.$ [+ _9 L3 ^6 c& L
9 N" t* Z8 [/ o; p
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer, G$ Z- _! q, z. ]: Y& X
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
# ~0 X1 G! m& p* @; i: E m: s5 Kquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new/ q" p7 H5 y& y
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores6 o' L1 y& {0 v Z6 D' A+ z
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
J. B8 m' I" x* \5 W& eand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.9 ]0 g4 D/ w1 T
" g+ i8 f) D0 E2 D- n- g7 H
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced k3 [- J+ P8 F4 H! P
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
/ B, `& G v& Y+ Thomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers% v/ f3 K$ X7 U- {9 n( V6 L
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian$ H+ @, f( U' V4 D% U; m
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing. t2 f- F1 K7 W/ E0 L c
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
2 H" p, \3 n3 Q6 Y7 V u
. ~9 x( ~, ~& C! ]0 f- I% {' v Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
& u \( |: N# T. U% W4 w$ Uamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
5 `7 r& o5 ^' N: Gpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,* B x2 r0 _, j3 c8 v- k
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last9 N- B* l& T6 F" o! G5 G
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
9 R. v( e/ l+ J0 B5 V% ?
& ?0 k" k0 f! [+ k0 v& E, ?( _ Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
" ~9 R A6 X' M/ kprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
8 ~) A$ G( a/ R4 a2 k4 jlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting5 N: L! g/ g* m' c6 n! j& x ?; g& V
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
* Z! A1 Q! D7 x$ Awhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the9 n4 C7 i7 p# b+ ]/ `$ h
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before5 n" @( Y5 x2 [, _' l: j4 X# d" M. m% s
making a purchase.
1 e8 @% n/ g* u* n- K- O a5 e9 Z- T1 A6 X( F% }' r. R# v6 ~
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
, j# F! E" z# A# b6 Wmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
9 X ]" U( V" e5 ?7 W! a' Cconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city+ ]3 G# }! t* u2 }
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting* z0 `7 ^! V) b r8 |( L
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown& O- T/ C* y8 ? I
amenities.5 Q: V7 k/ s$ m5 V4 E$ b/ j5 m
6 G6 S( k" A* L, h/ t
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels, Y( {% o l4 s) o1 I
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand+ T& A) f4 {1 r2 N
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
% T. [/ @# D& R2 R+ ]continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
' j4 N2 M) v/ ?5 t$ u% Ldriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle1 D5 ]4 w+ a& w9 |: [2 l; f
residence, rather than for investment.8 l8 p# N) f5 X; }, a$ s
. Y8 A$ i' l' K# `2 N4 n The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
+ u8 z9 i& D) W6 F" {2 D% bhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
- G& {( x O8 F/ ?% f9 g5 }# }in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
9 D6 E8 l0 M8 n! c: L: u& |6 tconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
6 z7 p. n4 V- N) |rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
/ D2 g' l2 X9 h* X8 }the market.7 t) \; `" E3 A- P! d4 i+ J) c
' K" I) O$ a0 R; s# L8 J In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
. N* ]" A6 Y; f, I3 r- EJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In$ `2 z% E, c4 Q) b X8 Q: U
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
6 T6 y& t7 z. ~1 `) U. A6 fmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
4 {: o# M$ z; k" @/ k* |+ Dto the shortage of available inventory.
* i9 ~6 w, _! G( u: N) N( h+ `; h; L1 o) n7 ]
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its5 A' R. O3 y" o* n/ n3 x. W7 m
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains0 k! A2 } W: [
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses* P3 S. {+ ^* }, r
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
0 o0 R, K& @, }; M5 @- }, l4 m' _. g
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
/ V% u2 d7 Y8 t3 m m7 d5 Din the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
7 q |% v) g1 Z/ T0 uunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
7 p1 m" p j, ^4 Qpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
- C1 ?' U! e V6 i2 Nprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer/ m. E. ?7 h/ y/ t; G. ?# Z+ z
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as% \. B" R8 M1 ~ U6 f% P8 x; E
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.1 Q9 l7 W4 ^3 j
3 ~* E9 g/ m5 g+ l8 {1 ? Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter7 Z9 t, v& f6 X7 @+ W
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
9 ?$ \: E5 P4 [' aremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,0 D1 s/ K9 ^3 I2 g0 H+ w
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices. J$ O0 N) t5 u9 l8 O( F
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve3 \4 h& @: ~# h
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly2 w; K& R5 b5 i, y
towards the end of 2006.
6 T( `% g) x' t( S) c) T
0 Z* V, v9 h5 u4 @+ }; WWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of- ?2 U% Z1 W' a$ {; [9 Z
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable; N- \2 ~2 h/ E9 O5 g
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse$ E: }% U' t7 _3 n4 H4 t$ u
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
& H. {% |8 l+ z$ O/ lforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
5 M3 [" V) O2 @ y! F9 wpressure on tight inventory levels.
- _# e, B& c% T$ b9 E+ I! G4 l: j! Q( F& E" I; x* D) B6 h
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
4 h2 ?: B* D* J6 D) Afundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people1 Y% q$ `* \: R) S7 N
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
: V# b! Z" x S2 |- m! xwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching2 Y0 s6 U; Y* f$ x
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.* H3 S; X5 i5 [
; a6 \/ c2 ]$ h# t# J% `! k& y <<" M1 n6 C$ @/ A
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006' V- d- T8 p& f0 a. \9 I
: G. e$ E: ^" U$ D# B. z. D/ Y/ e -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 q# J9 g. T- g
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
9 |7 l0 V& L1 M, w -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" w! }# u) r% i 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q37 h) j1 o, z: c. }
Market Average Average % Change Average Average5 o9 v9 S1 E8 |* ~9 F! B3 g. r5 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ c8 g! e5 k4 u" Y# {0 w- U+ C. d: v Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
! L# n+ y( ]/ A5 m; b8 x: ?! C -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 ^) m+ i1 k8 c; W4 o
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
& i7 V: Z4 Q/ m: C -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 p& W6 t; C7 O3 C" ? Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
( R% G1 z p( ]! A( Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) Y p2 w" R8 P: z/ _% c/ Y1 ` Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -# X$ H( v$ b; {+ `2 d2 z+ p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: t4 V0 x) C( I, A6 R( } St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
) k0 E- u! U ~/ E. r ------------------------------------------------------------------------- P$ p4 k( T9 N( ]# P) q- f/ l
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583; d+ R9 X! f" a; `. }2 ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( D i# }/ {0 g6 P8 f4 k3 I2 E3 l Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
/ ]9 E0 [& S1 N4 T: Z- N( x -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% k+ K1 w5 E% Q9 g& r9 c Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250& [! o; I0 \/ b7 ]5 @) C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 |' e; B t9 R A Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
* g! ^# a: j# j; j, C9 y; B1 U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! y/ f" }& M: N9 E7 @# J2 D Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7076 u+ @5 H: [ i- I! D5 ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------* }# h& \8 c2 p, w7 ]. D! `0 [& _" u
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
# @) N* ?7 F7 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------- n5 z6 ~6 w# R$ V1 t) Q0 e# L e
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389- z! |8 w) F% p. p5 ?& P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 t3 P4 P- O9 s7 { Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
( k/ k) T R! s; {7 y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) s4 N8 F2 }& R2 a$ R& r& x Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500& C7 H, S8 e; Z2 o0 I9 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) q3 n; f; g4 I6 \
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000" [! c& h$ Q+ ?) L" U
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# L: f& ]& Z6 `( U) y2 w$ M1 S
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
' }+ X8 w- I" S8 R -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 K: A- R6 p* Z$ m
- V1 d+ ^( v+ w -------------------------------------------------------------
/ E" y" c8 I2 F* f0 q- x Standard Condominium
9 F% _$ R8 H$ `9 k" O0 ^ -------------------------------------------------------------
. p }2 A8 X, X6 q 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
& i+ I( F/ L6 u9 V Market % Change Average Average % Change
1 l+ o9 O# x0 `& G1 F6 k z -------------------------------------------------------------1 @9 n# l3 G" Y% E
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%* \* j- c L% U
-------------------------------------------------------------
. O' | [" i" l/ m1 A' Y' p6 @4 T Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%3 [4 B2 M; v6 p& y- b
-------------------------------------------------------------
' Z7 P( G/ |2 E! _. ^, O Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
, k- |8 u( x7 z9 o& h, R: R -------------------------------------------------------------
0 s+ k" M) i. t7 ~5 B* k* c Saint John N/A - - N/A
! u% A1 p2 ~1 B: O$ g5 f -------------------------------------------------------------4 c. N2 i& x8 j% m; ^8 M* d0 i6 G, R
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
+ X& e9 Y2 f4 P$ Y q U -------------------------------------------------------------+ ^ S7 o, E+ {0 p
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%7 H# d: [3 _) @" l
-------------------------------------------------------------% u( ?2 y7 j# h) h& t
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%' w6 j2 n7 l9 Q6 c
-------------------------------------------------------------; w% z1 F+ i( H, J) l' D+ ]
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%" K: |" Y+ C) d; |8 _
-------------------------------------------------------------
, W+ o7 C' k* ~' I& Y! t0 H Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%% B4 d5 C8 s" S0 o) `- x
-------------------------------------------------------------
! e8 C7 E# ?# f. O Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
8 z& s5 A) O* A) T4 V -------------------------------------------------------------
1 m1 B" l# j1 V8 }* y Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%' o8 h* N2 |) {) ~. t N o" v. t
-------------------------------------------------------------: r* _8 m; f5 W# U& ?. I5 H; o& D
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
( g* j1 H9 z! q' t8 I -------------------------------------------------------------
) ~* Z+ R" n7 v& n) p2 t g Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
8 R8 I9 F' |" f+ } -------------------------------------------------------------
3 `& s' A' \% l { Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
. c) V& }! a; p6 D( }1 w -------------------------------------------------------------. K3 V k% T3 {8 p2 m' m7 q
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%6 @( _! O2 O6 G N: N0 |
-------------------------------------------------------------2 Z( a' ]- C5 t. P4 U$ Q
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%7 P4 R! i& H& H, |( O5 p8 i
-------------------------------------------------------------5 Y$ u. S' _7 v* x. @% \* U8 K E
>>
* R, n6 w' F* M$ s
* j' T0 }$ m6 v, l Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined+ G$ H- _* h1 C% [8 o$ P! P
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
' b1 l% M) M- m' lJohn and Victoria.# y9 A9 ]/ g8 z; q7 H1 H' v! l' s- ^
$ Q$ z3 I. i* p3 o8 R& ^+ L2 n+ F& K
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most3 B4 a3 V4 k+ r Q' N4 Y5 v. c
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of& E; W) ?; `! }/ x8 r, c2 j
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release; E- V2 o3 d; B: z' k
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
( i) C0 K) R$ g& F7 @# { ttrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
* E8 U F3 I8 m& @$ z# l+ [! eacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
. O+ O N, {- P0 K5 O# }available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
; n4 _4 ^2 y; d* t1 mfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
, m/ ~+ k9 ]) W- O+ f8 V$ gversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on) }/ c$ h: X7 c
November 15, 2006.
8 g1 g+ q, P, ^3 T2 a/ s; X1 q2 a Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of* i- s+ u' ^2 j$ b s
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
. I6 h+ R5 G- x& wprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is0 j1 S3 J! H' `" p$ [: ^' n
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|