埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2366|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
" C5 `0 x* T1 d. K
" c7 x. N1 N/ D% J2 N- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -" M% h* P" r9 @, f

& J0 \/ ?2 T( G- d6 i    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
; \6 a* J9 ~# d* ^6 p& Gexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
4 {8 y$ [, m1 u1 lquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
  g7 I$ i$ e, W/ k. x$ Xin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit# K4 z6 [: d8 U8 F
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and" p% m: v8 h6 F+ x9 J; W
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,: ]8 [2 Z) r1 m" k6 _) y
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal: K7 `; u/ v5 y! v5 a
LePage Real Estate Services., r0 X7 T$ ~6 i
7 \* e$ i# R# i4 t' E/ f6 U
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters* q3 s  P0 ~' L
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic' K) w- e2 G1 u
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
3 r; N, L* S3 bsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
  g+ v6 v8 y1 O# A( p, Fresidential real estate sector.! [" X* i% B5 {& g) A; `  \

/ |  M2 P# |' p    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
  I( ]/ R7 c4 c0 h. X) k2 ~7 yoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
1 o# S' i1 m' p" y+ S0 fyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
- [& u# T% y1 h# }$ `2 V$ O(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
- f4 C0 g* c6 E6 q6 b(+13.2%).
% `  l! O! A, R# w
! S, z5 q9 {  A. h" `1 v    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth" {9 v7 o, d. @  V
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
  M2 Q$ \$ M7 w, ^* C" ]frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are( K4 m& Q7 j. V; f5 O
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,7 r2 P- \  E5 [: d6 i
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.3 I. d4 d% w6 K& `9 H& ?8 Q
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We, Z" r5 i' M: _
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
( v, q% v$ V' e! _, Xbalanced market."
0 K7 [9 h; g  h( ]* D
) l. _: h. @9 f    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,% M# Y6 W% m- g8 }" j9 X0 {4 @
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift+ z5 q) U3 w, U! T8 b* d0 p
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued0 @( {3 \0 s4 J1 a4 V+ z6 |$ t, k
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
; x9 ~# |8 [" Y  W7 z6 Zenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,8 J/ W- K4 d5 X% Z
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
4 Q; l8 @9 u+ n2 K& ]; Ebreaking price appreciations.4 [+ ^8 S4 D4 f- [

/ L) i2 l2 [- A& J& y    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding( e6 p: m* P* w+ d) ?  X
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
, {3 e8 }/ T& mlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
6 G( B# _! \! Y* b- G* B* B
  v( ^1 n9 i% l( C5 y& x+ a    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
9 \# v! v8 M# d" I% K. A" weconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer' f! ?9 A7 F- c  S9 @: W5 j
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
8 ?5 Z3 l6 y" B, d6 _& c% Tslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
/ W6 b7 X3 h+ s# \: w8 [In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers+ k! \4 P8 z6 V( F9 T
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
/ w* B5 w3 W& Q9 mprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
% u- I# _5 H' j$ F
% d) }7 n1 k- f! W/ p; X    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
) [$ ~" X* }$ [' h) `9 f8 imarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
0 j: x$ h" h# }, S; zfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada* l1 E# C& Q) g' ]- K- i; Z' E
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
  r: n, ?3 f3 V  p2 t) V: [
( n+ {1 w; z% Q2 j: z5 y    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
, E- U2 W- g! w0 Q* zAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's5 C  s. O" j( \) `( ~
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the* ]; L* Q2 W& H
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general' h7 R$ d6 q- n- d" g- y
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the) Z9 O: s1 g2 p8 J; u; r
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and8 i, S& \% K( p$ z& ^  p
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
$ P3 G2 _- W& z6 A. vmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
; A! N: u/ h* ^2 r  T; W. v3 j3 J$ ~8 U% C. ]0 C# {
    <<
5 m# u+ _* c/ z; N1 t+ Y                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
  Y: s. R" m. F) G) W1 _1 y: j    >>. M, V6 t- S: g) d  S0 @& [
, ]/ {! o4 q4 x) Q& r( @3 D( I- \
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
' R  W  d! q) O2 [Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate- U3 ~: Y$ c+ }9 L( o3 I
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time/ V9 z- `9 k4 y& f
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of+ b/ K2 V7 J# O3 }$ b/ ~7 I# D
renovations.4 \" q1 d/ ^' ~" d% a! V. Q" s

( G  V9 f1 q1 e  {/ H4 x9 D9 O    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight* i2 \4 _3 R1 y7 d; Y2 Y
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation( p2 z* a4 H6 |6 `
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
% ]* J0 U% J/ J/ S: RSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.% f$ |1 X$ z9 h# X) T
, S2 {! L: i5 Z9 [1 L) ~6 C# o1 W
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer% s* ~% R' e& l$ y  g
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
6 R1 W4 z; A; O1 L. X: Lquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
- u3 }7 k1 A  r  f$ J600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
9 E1 m! c1 M8 B, X6 W9 I9 d( xto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes% y3 b3 L( I1 H
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.- K! C& x# [. e) d# z+ ~5 B
# n) C) r* G( p  Q$ a' [( }
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced6 l$ Z( Z  I( t6 v4 C; F9 L3 ?3 J
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their9 S+ X5 c: A" B% h
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
' w$ A/ N$ _8 ^: V, w, v2 W2 [  |was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian1 k' J3 A6 @, h! {8 r' h9 f# B4 n( A
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
. M* n, U6 i. j  u) i" @* l' tbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
6 H9 @0 q  }1 i& B0 J; h
% B6 `* B6 R- {" F4 o* M    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
; d$ a3 R3 x) Z: p3 Lamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes3 E, t# U3 [/ U, v+ K
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,1 ?# A) v3 V2 _  Y$ \
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
1 a+ A( n$ \* F% C* X# _few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.6 |$ A/ p  ?8 l8 @8 ~- V
# L) j7 G3 z. k; G" N4 ~( O& K
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house6 ^, j/ C5 [/ J3 W% i9 \
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory$ Z5 }+ J' q% G# d; p
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
4 b# G/ D6 K4 Z8 m( Dfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,1 t, v5 y, o2 X/ P" h
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
, J" _) Z/ U! W/ m; y% ipressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before. D5 \: Z$ R. j) k' p
making a purchase.
0 S5 L4 y& l' k( r( ?+ |! O# \1 B) g+ \9 _6 [) h% k. y
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing  f6 N" R$ C) g  _/ |
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
8 y& g1 t  N- f# T/ k% Cconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city5 @  {2 k" C) R2 g5 T" Z1 W6 \; t
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
: D" P1 Q& x4 S: Nattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown/ V( ?% q" f7 _: J
amenities.
' E) ^. Q& P& _* p
, p! E5 P+ x% D; B! d+ x    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
: T( L0 t  K% z1 sthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
1 o) b( k* u' X6 q8 dacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has9 p+ G: d+ G8 }& l1 `1 H
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been/ A3 `+ }5 }, q, h
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
  o9 F: d  b- F& m. O: R& f$ Tresidence, rather than for investment.
1 B9 a  N6 H- ~7 Y  r  F) z- P  }; h/ ]' X4 u5 A' l( Y
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as# H* ^3 b3 W3 E( b+ y8 }( ?
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
, f  R$ `1 h# M: R& f! G/ N/ B2 Rin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
; X  i2 ^# Y$ ?5 O! Rconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
9 b. |* a" D0 o( D: Z* B3 q" |& M# Prate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
# ~# K( O/ w2 l4 V/ u* ~the market.
; Z& {. v! X# L
/ G, D) C; M5 E$ G    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
0 l( Z$ l. ^" O4 I# w2 v9 @9 Z2 oJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In$ E, A$ O) W* ]* q( C3 C2 J
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring4 k1 j5 @- z% o* Z. W% n5 a1 o
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due! B; v' ^% l% m/ X! Q1 \
to the shortage of available inventory.5 k4 ?7 I- y3 Z1 _3 h; _

$ L+ [+ `1 e+ G/ B& G# C& e    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
! x) C0 t" l  }2 r/ b, _1 P1 jmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
; i0 a3 O. N! Z9 V2 V" Z- O6 [* g& mvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
' M& j2 |+ g: ?+ Q! o6 R6 gstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
: Y/ B( j# u  J8 t: m$ b# [9 Q5 S  \  O  `; N# p% q4 c- [% w: Z9 ~
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
* [' B/ C$ x0 X. E; a* y; _# }2 N. win the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
) v; Q7 i1 g% [+ o. [7 w* Y/ Zunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
- D" e1 C, [& A0 j  opressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
! b& \" I: o5 x) F) V* O' lprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
. ]1 E& M; g9 s8 B5 E3 jseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
5 v: @% R/ }! Kbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
+ A: E" u8 x* Z+ H
. w+ d; h. G9 C. @
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
* k5 D8 A& `1 K2 x6 ~) E6 c+ bas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
+ ^' k- h; i; n  m- u0 ^1 lremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
( N7 O. u: z9 T$ H8 Dmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices2 @3 f0 S, X* i
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve$ X; Z+ f" _  d8 I- H* l
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly) C' f! B/ \6 Y! E# d' F1 I
towards the end of 2006.
    $ H) i6 Q9 H; s0 X
$ G7 h. E7 s$ [
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of* D/ y# r- [* E5 L  C
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
' ~& t6 K% F1 h2 I2 V$ B7 U# I: lto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse: \0 A& K, R! W" K+ b4 }; n# z
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
8 S$ Y3 E* Q0 @& G3 N; c+ Zforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
) y  o3 q5 J( Z4 D4 n+ u  D# ^  Ppressure on tight inventory levels.
. C3 }3 X4 T- Q3 z5 q0 i6 I5 ~
' Q$ k, d& p3 d6 a5 u: Q    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic; z* N( n9 u8 Z( `: J  n$ r' Q
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
1 ^: ]6 O+ {# L8 |3 Rinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
. i; e8 V4 Y0 b0 B7 V; R7 q# T* ~while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching5 N1 }& Z/ O- O2 N
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.$ \, O& L/ V0 R: m( g1 P. ]/ @
9 h- y5 R$ g; D! c: m( e8 k
    <<
: @$ R$ C2 L! ~6 X4 H; r      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006* Y- O+ P0 e9 }0 z0 r1 @* e

" [& G/ j, M5 ~8 v1 [    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 @: c3 C% Z9 N# N" P3 K! T( n2 G2 E9 J
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey9 S7 u; K6 k% Z5 G8 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ o$ H3 I. c& D" f; |1 o  g3 r
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q38 _9 Y  U4 N4 U
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average$ p7 G8 }$ H* j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: ~7 Q5 O+ x3 M    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,0006 J8 E% a2 f' w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. K2 k6 _3 \2 ?; j1 x( L    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
! k* W& R% ?. M8 B5 `' n( e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* A9 `( @2 j) ]9 P" e0 K    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
1 W  ?( K7 b+ P  w/ X    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% R1 J3 e* q  k( t; `# H1 H    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
4 T0 i% U0 [/ O8 l; K) a    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' y9 e8 W- l* F& N  ~
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333& S! G! ~6 A5 b# j) D/ [
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 ~. N0 Q2 f" {7 n
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
0 V" p$ C% O5 ^1 F) q2 x) L  z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: x4 @3 F  Z# V    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
' v$ C8 O7 a( R    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 K2 T( X- k" k' j6 f) [3 p: h    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250. s* D, {2 C! i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 B2 o/ ~% r( S% E
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7665 a+ K0 g5 z' t. u" Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) R& V/ _7 W) J) s9 i4 `$ ?8 |    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
. ?& I6 K! u% O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ?1 e* M% y6 t& d% c7 r    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
5 I( b$ \/ t5 m5 v( I    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 B6 N1 ?1 ?7 l' {3 r. y    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
5 }7 G1 v5 m+ t+ g+ u    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ H1 t* a  K/ s) r
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714: h0 }  X- m0 R& v5 C' H' q: T
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- w" C: X, K6 b6 M4 `4 g1 N
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500/ V( X$ f- M& [) K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" @' a6 m+ M+ L' F2 c: Y# d
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
) E5 Y0 u# N& d! y( w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ p) i2 Z) g& X" ^    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
% [! g: }  a1 Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; I: k4 N. b6 L# D- H) g* Y, \
$ ]$ M6 q9 D: i8 W+ z* `    -------------------------------------------------------------% N# ~/ Q& T' q8 B! d8 g( n
                               Standard Condominium# Y: O$ y+ `* y0 g3 C
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, g; f2 K6 n4 o* }! d4 {7 L2 D4 x                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo, g2 i( q; Y% w
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
8 g( G8 Z) ?2 n    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 e0 x+ p" `0 x* g7 p7 H    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
' z- H+ S- M4 R2 b% r    -------------------------------------------------------------2 h: k5 {- d4 m6 Q( g
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
9 e3 |6 j" r; G; |    -------------------------------------------------------------" ^6 ]( F8 I1 h2 _% b* y3 ~6 i
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
$ E3 _* V/ b& Y  Q# ?% |( h    -------------------------------------------------------------
" ]4 f) y5 _) G2 C: v    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A: K! e& F" f, ?& y8 ^7 M
    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 Z# i, V, a3 J6 T2 \, P  |    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
( @# D1 H+ _9 a% o    -------------------------------------------------------------3 l# w' f% I9 }2 ?5 V6 l& @+ f
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%0 M8 g: \' @5 j* Z" V3 Z. X5 L- s
    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 I" Y& h) l& j  V7 _" h" C) P5 s    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%$ N. k; R; g+ S4 B# c5 Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 c9 Y9 I& w( Y" l/ o  [7 }    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
: K3 Z. h4 p  q% Q/ V2 \. E6 i    -------------------------------------------------------------
* P) c/ z3 E) i( }  O* Q0 b! Q, @    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
! Z8 e- g% G2 r; \    -------------------------------------------------------------
% e* X3 R- B$ ?4 I6 T- b1 V- U; f    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%, Q( R  s6 ~, ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------) T; g) L) |, x; {9 F4 T
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%. k& K. a1 D6 x: B0 m& Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------) l0 A" u; P, T
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%2 V) o& N) _# i" l1 n
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) X3 H- Q3 O( w) ?. ?5 M/ L% \    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%1 k- ^/ B6 L5 Q; u* a3 j
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: l2 c. L7 ^- [' K    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
1 R7 {& b+ O9 u5 g% z1 f    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 t9 ]6 j8 I0 v' |1 m# {7 A1 ?    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%' o9 Z- r7 X6 p( O/ I- N0 K% W
    -------------------------------------------------------------  y) e/ w1 Z0 L# q* l1 A
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
; |/ _7 a  ]0 ]. ^2 e# W3 D/ |7 E    -------------------------------------------------------------
- q* G% n8 p( W9 c% L    >>1 ]: {. ?# x, \$ q

( \. c4 r0 w# k6 y! K% [    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined4 _' z" j* }- l
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
( d; p$ R3 [, @John and Victoria.
# D7 Z+ W$ r  U$ w$ M* ]1 j4 q1 Y/ H& G8 C# z, j
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
+ `7 l9 V' o/ g/ d) }9 pcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of8 ~4 F! N0 _0 c7 N7 g
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
& l0 I. }4 c/ ?7 _& Q- B" Y0 n7 W8 Zreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
) w# F, E+ u1 g5 J8 e) ttrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
* j, a; x! K# Oacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
- d5 U; l/ a0 _5 t6 ^7 X' |' l1 kavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
2 ]* U+ c2 e% A# v; Wfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
% q: [6 |& }" x& z: s. Dversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
! d& y( p. p$ |+ Z' u3 P# j( {' @November 15, 2006.. X7 o. ]: Z0 S
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
6 H, ~+ q( C3 ~) Rfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge6 ?; d( \  ], z. s2 R3 M6 s6 ?
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is. d" E  i# ]; e7 ~2 d0 C4 b( Z! b
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-17 21:49 , Processed in 0.113174 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表