埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2005|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
9 M1 r3 Q: x; f0 F# N/ _
9 O, u+ z  q$ `1 y6 o7 k' b3 n- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
* o& i3 O& q1 D4 E& K% h) s5 L
! Z  g& ^! H' U5 I. K3 r1 P    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
1 @/ Y( D; z$ ^" g+ Vexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third1 H' i) l6 \8 y- `7 m) t' P% o
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic- x9 m+ X' U" f  q
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
9 _5 D. O) p. J" M, |price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
, O/ @) _, b. n( `( Tmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,  K5 c/ i. K- o6 x1 [1 H5 j( v
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
: g+ V2 O, s; z$ u0 R/ R% N# ~LePage Real Estate Services.
. _$ l8 D/ o1 H" Y
+ O. y8 y! o: V8 J7 W$ j    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
6 S9 Y& W6 ~9 R. z* g/ [are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic7 g" q1 P, l$ p
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
0 w) W) c' C  C7 Isound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the- w4 E2 ~% Y6 u, E. o
residential real estate sector.
" Q# c# J3 _' s( q9 t. M# T
& U- n  C' B: {7 c    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
/ y* Y5 j* c/ y/ @occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)3 z5 Y9 y( K2 L, S7 k6 f
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562" H6 f& A) x/ x( @5 C
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
4 u0 _$ s. _/ a( u8 M3 V(+13.2%).
: W5 m. N: ~6 S; n+ C& e$ `' ?# E% E7 x2 @" q9 ]
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth  g% j& v) f) [0 {' G
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
( f! }+ Y4 T, p0 i- Y3 Z: Vfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
# C3 m7 @  t9 p: @poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,% r$ C# m1 z( ^( p
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
% B% h3 c; {1 `"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
& d; i6 ~8 j3 F9 o9 o. W+ v5 R0 pwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy) _" D2 v+ L/ k! h+ b) b
balanced market."0 ?4 t3 Z% ?# P

  D9 f+ }4 o( ]    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,; `3 W; {" l' D, l) \
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift0 J6 M( D& v% D/ }* O8 F' G
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
: u! _! }  I7 f' ]1 cthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core3 l% ~. O  K$ @+ G7 F
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,9 }: T7 h  a& b7 ^
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
; J( Z2 C1 S* B( qbreaking price appreciations.( n. d5 b) o, @  Y
* _* s, @6 A: h0 R/ L
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
9 e' `+ V+ v* k! S3 d4 N8 O( peconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
5 E' U7 H) ~4 y* Klargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.5 i* P# K% ~& _6 t1 N
) X8 q; R  \% I
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
: o+ P6 B6 W6 j0 i+ p7 neconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
7 f5 K  [' |  i3 iconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off  D8 G' C1 G6 I0 w: T5 V& y' q4 c
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
/ b" U+ I( @/ Z! \8 C9 UIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers$ x+ T  Q1 E1 m" f
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of) Z% c. L! ~0 r7 M4 v
price appreciation when compared with 2005.$ l; `8 R1 F3 b  V" u
1 Y/ H( Q8 d  |: h! s+ C
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing9 k: F5 y  Z7 \$ g5 W( U
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and" w# Z! T- b3 T; n% x: L
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
: x# {+ J) o$ ]are markedly different than those found in the United States.4 j% E. p; R, Q2 ~  P) W7 L

, z6 D4 M# l( m    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the- q, C8 m" ^! b) H
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
( m8 ^5 \# J' {% X/ V7 xfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
3 q8 M) \- X, e9 H& X! Yrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
; P& W' F+ ]# laffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the' c6 ]. M* ?% K+ A; r2 V
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
$ D2 T1 R- V6 ~aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization1 C1 R2 O# [  W
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
3 t' e- T" M$ ]* G  R- N& {2 _; ?, ]% g$ x  z
    <<; S. f# x  Z; h/ n. X
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
4 N) c/ L# V7 h) b1 u+ ^) o    >>7 _% g0 T+ ]; D" D

6 d* X# r0 r* n6 Q" J& [( S( u3 y    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in; _: K5 U2 u  s- V& {
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate9 N8 M: V. A9 g% T
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time9 n3 d6 k. E/ z4 K3 Q
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of2 g% v' |9 c  h) O* X  r* p
renovations./ @. e' v2 K. I8 ~

$ S: l1 I" z1 c/ a' C1 a    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
' [0 s, \: g4 Pincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation  p- `% q& l% n: b  n
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and& o( d3 m# L0 N' h4 P) G. b- M
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.! S2 A9 b8 i7 p) D0 [

+ x& g: D( g/ k. ?9 y; q    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
* ~; b" {% }7 `& H' _slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the6 k% r3 g4 h5 J( B8 e; a) c; r1 J3 _
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new9 H+ n  W5 W- c$ q5 ^& l& A: z
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
, {  j# d* J7 X  uto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
  f) ^# N3 K+ y* d. Band are instead opting for more affordable housing options.( Z8 k' n, ~# w# `* @" O; d5 |

8 Y0 ?7 j: R3 `8 B, P' t- Q) O    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
: u+ s" ~& p0 F7 nconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
8 U4 Z8 k/ o! z9 Yhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
5 S3 r1 O" j4 Gwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
7 p, o5 a+ M- `0 j0 ldollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing0 J0 p3 o6 I1 S4 A
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
& B$ t3 l$ n8 j4 K0 ]. a) b) b- F$ E- O" O
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly6 K: _& j8 j- J7 Z. w* W  k$ B) V
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
, p. m) r, G+ u, m* e0 gpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
' ]/ M" n2 b# J) y8 ras some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last- I. v; `# i9 v9 S& `0 {
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
! L4 L1 S9 b- f7 @1 @( ~/ L" \- r+ B/ H: W( |
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
+ D7 \4 M1 n( t, T4 W/ ~prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
& O9 ^& b; S+ l: w, s8 Glevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting/ a3 |4 r% o( M6 N
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,2 j, Y2 f, e8 q, l' q7 J+ g
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
7 b" z+ I5 n- X3 ^4 v, ^3 J2 Rpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
# }3 }+ b7 A/ u1 ^6 \6 Amaking a purchase.
, Y. }0 ?) N, d& O5 p, i, w+ L
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing6 V3 K  i1 N0 \- _; g$ y
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong5 A! h- f& w2 l7 h9 q# I, m
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city7 _! D1 X0 Z" |1 S
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting8 W: m; ?( U; C) W
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown' e; s" `' f" y3 J8 E7 d; o
amenities.
/ E' @- ^7 X! ?' f
- q& F6 e4 B% N) n) N7 v  t  t5 @1 w    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
. U  O) F. k# J3 Jthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand) o! C$ r" v; f  L, S' |' e4 a4 l
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has7 U' O4 k3 I0 `4 R. L: g3 ?, I9 S- @
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been: K5 }' s1 c* G5 d+ C
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
, m: q% @0 j- x# }2 _residence, rather than for investment.
. t6 F) {4 |  S% E1 `. e( T  U$ [5 b
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as3 m. k3 Z- y: ^4 }# W
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted6 Z5 _3 b4 b' [& {6 q
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
' X% G5 a- l1 J# N  cconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
. P8 Q$ z# `# E- T8 z- h* y8 Erate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter# i/ k3 C3 T- J! {2 A9 B: c$ W
the market.6 V+ x. m6 K5 I

2 F( b; u7 x0 Z  F6 R/ z( X    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
& k5 P3 Q9 r& V1 vJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In. ]- [: a3 U" W0 I% s
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
, {( u. K3 ?" Zmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
; R6 V: S6 \1 H. Yto the shortage of available inventory.
! }: w7 Z! N) F' U' n) _9 E4 g
: R# W* _+ v& y  w    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
9 h  E! r; P* H& y# `' bmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
7 J  |0 u1 a" C- j% D% W& O- Avibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses9 |+ l9 I6 [/ K: X( g* f% e; P
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.! p" h8 Y7 l4 F8 V! j, V& i
  @+ k! W2 }2 [7 Z
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases; j. {9 }- a8 d# X  ^( X# w$ A+ b
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
8 _' ^3 L. q  K' U' Ounemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
/ k7 y/ K& \3 V! Jpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring: O9 E0 m6 t& k% {  G) |
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer( k. y' J/ v- U/ Y
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as& N$ p1 T. E" B$ M" S
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
- P( p, d1 O9 x. h
3 r& j* N1 y+ F/ ^4 p! P
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
" w0 `$ G8 L, h$ A7 C1 o& Pas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton% y" s* S3 ]1 P3 P1 n9 b! ]* X) Y' q
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,8 {. n  h& Y6 a. k  b% ^$ N$ n
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices4 o6 T6 I0 M1 S" ~# E! Z0 q2 E4 o0 o
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
) y1 K( q7 V+ k, j* Z: yin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
4 E) H" _6 |- ]' x; C' htowards the end of 2006.
   
8 e4 X: E6 `9 n8 G8 G- Y! z2 {8 E' T" `
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
( o" D8 `' w- `( I+ B1 Xinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable% G0 W" i5 }8 I7 D
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse% s1 V7 a( q9 V9 y, w
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to( @, H6 L% w% E1 J# Z2 {+ f: `
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
- \+ Z! k0 y, `7 i5 B9 \* v8 hpressure on tight inventory levels.
% V9 i( G  c. I$ H( E" u% }4 w* ?+ f: G8 e: A2 h" _* V
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic% c) i4 X6 e6 H$ Q: [5 ]
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
5 ^, F' X; Y+ X- W* R0 hinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;. O/ G. b2 N7 @4 P6 g3 ~
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching1 q# A, X7 ?% [1 x* j, L0 P& z2 O
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
! ^3 P" u) u% [8 Y- P3 K7 _. \  M( M$ c
    <<
/ E6 H0 M+ S- R3 h" q. D      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20062 S7 g" r1 ]- S8 ^
0 u; p4 E8 w' B/ F( F% V
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------% ^5 V# h% e4 r$ E1 l& _9 g9 b
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
) D1 d" t5 L6 J% R, j4 o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- a* c' A8 P/ ^" i. c; L8 u* J
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
0 P- J: y2 O! K5 L    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average* W3 O3 ]. M. T' h
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 S& P2 T3 l. }5 z
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
  T4 x- v7 I9 r- @' W& ~8 r    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ C1 c% \' u1 s! N3 g0 m* _    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
9 Q6 \0 ~; o. Y9 x    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- n1 {, k$ w* Q1 m
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000/ W& |, W4 w# q: i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. h4 \2 V' \. e/ p/ G    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -" p4 P8 {3 Z  G' x7 q( _5 o
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& {1 r0 ]. o% _# T: c
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333, F5 y2 _  Z. H* }
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 @$ a/ c0 ]: X- D8 \    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
! k0 h; Q: g) Z# b- N* U    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 u7 p( R6 N0 E9 {
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
* l( y, U, ]" D6 t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: \5 ~# ]+ R, m6 Z6 ~$ s
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250# h% m, u  ?5 f9 a
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ v4 U+ X2 e2 q    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
2 G* i* N1 \! M* X% `, d9 \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  b+ @; R/ ?% J, i  z) M0 I+ @5 K
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707  Z, M3 c# y$ r! A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 I  V6 [9 K: e# M2 o
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
- m$ Q( O9 G& [- g( [0 O/ K    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! V# [5 ~+ S7 `! q    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
* Y! x% E9 o& ~2 e+ ]1 Q% l( N  C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 N7 n. Z# V4 ~: w
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714$ ]; V3 o( d! j1 K" S* J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- J$ y2 U4 G- [6 W
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
  d" D0 o( Y0 Z+ W: a; q/ U+ }) ?- `    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 a6 G8 C$ t0 l9 t
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
! d. ~- Q9 @4 J% ^4 t7 N" _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 o4 @% Q% l- X/ W
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860* y, c1 k; d# }7 N  ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 ?1 P0 O) l  n5 p9 m$ J
5 Y- T6 |2 o" N+ f. L% ?' O( |
    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 z: [. f4 X! M  _                               Standard Condominium
. e1 u1 q  B8 N7 d5 ^    -------------------------------------------------------------
" P: T" J8 v! x9 B' N" }. B! }8 M                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo5 N- A* g3 ^1 A" U1 Z
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change; i& L1 o4 {4 R; Y7 b
    -------------------------------------------------------------
* y! }: o  z; k$ |: h" d    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%. @' D0 x3 v- `1 w( p& D
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 f2 d* }1 ^8 u    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%, N7 U) X2 E0 f7 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 w3 ^! B1 ^1 ~0 z- S) F
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A4 i  t# G1 Z; G4 D
    -------------------------------------------------------------% ^7 q6 y1 o2 G! P; u8 {. s
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
& D/ E" x- F4 [7 {6 p% T    -------------------------------------------------------------/ K5 L9 O: ]/ r* h- Z9 G
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%' ]- F& s( T2 e8 D9 c. ~9 E0 p
    -------------------------------------------------------------* {3 g1 c/ z, v6 ?
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
6 I) d( r. I/ ]5 w* V; b    -------------------------------------------------------------, x0 i5 u1 Z( V( D/ s0 s
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
2 Y3 f, B0 f8 j3 b    -------------------------------------------------------------
- @8 w6 L/ G9 V    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%6 W8 @# c3 I$ [' n& U5 ?  ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 v  Q  R4 v" \2 B" R! x3 i4 J
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
% n  w& x9 T$ @. ~9 L    -------------------------------------------------------------8 F  Q; ]7 Q$ Y' W) r+ |
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
9 Q. O' g% B6 |/ D$ ^    -------------------------------------------------------------) O6 @" L& A. [& F
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%' p' I, a7 Z! x; o: _( f4 F
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 X1 G) |) S# c5 V
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
+ F+ D, Z" z- A    -------------------------------------------------------------
: f& b9 `$ q" b) J    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%) R- |: H1 ~$ N0 K0 x& k
    -------------------------------------------------------------" _, k. g$ }7 G3 p9 j' T
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%9 f& a. |2 k  |
    -------------------------------------------------------------' E, j% V# G0 u6 q% v  [0 h
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%* l( ^2 z0 A4 ^4 k  n. K4 P
    -------------------------------------------------------------# m# k" T! \# E: k; M; o" a
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%1 M; N$ S! a+ w  q
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 T; z$ ?1 M1 i( y  e    >>
/ g5 D% Q- o" a! B* [
5 F! A2 ]! W5 e    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
/ `3 Q* Z/ t! oin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
+ d' c6 {2 u7 l8 P9 cJohn and Victoria.5 Q4 o. x1 s. z) _
/ Z  Y0 D/ k+ L3 ]0 _0 j
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
& I: C$ g4 K1 H- w% T# R  I8 Mcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
1 Z7 Q* Y+ M+ J7 r: O" Uhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
5 A/ T4 I2 v/ {" t5 i3 i5 Nreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price; h# ?6 m6 u* K9 C  k
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
/ _# y8 N- g% m; N" l& c. r5 Racross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
3 R6 j; f% h) }! ~/ Aavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
, W5 u+ u0 i# J7 Ufigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
* Q9 s  x, ^! E, }- u3 Gversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on) Q0 ]5 n: y; m! G8 I1 ]1 Y0 j
November 15, 2006.
. o- z' `0 h  Q    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of7 R/ r9 r& A% G7 A
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
* M1 Q$ j3 t8 v8 Tprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is) Q( `8 m- x" q7 _! I6 V* r  F
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-9 21:16 , Processed in 0.126314 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表