埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2430|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
' D; n' |# i& G# `8 Q
9 p$ \* z/ a* y# o- y, K) s' ]. n- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -% w: i) N; E% H! u' q3 M

3 n. {" U( j; f    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
5 V+ s1 J# X8 L4 U$ q( texhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third% \  m3 p- K' `, E# ]
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic8 ^- b6 o  A# a& y7 e1 f) O- R
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit' c! J# Y; q! h% w* a3 D$ e( O6 g3 i
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and2 z" x1 B3 @1 d) k
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
6 c& F1 L: b. m6 j- `# T$ y# SQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal; q) K0 x4 J0 {( @- G
LePage Real Estate Services.
) k3 ]3 n/ ^! Y) F# g& o5 s0 \8 _+ S% e  s8 _& Q. H
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
4 g1 b6 V6 `" c5 ]are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
7 a. x$ I0 E: o* N( v" q, K: yconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
0 Y! P5 j" |# K! tsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the6 i$ u  I0 p7 J3 u2 W0 Q4 x
residential real estate sector.
/ E6 y0 J' a' }  M# w+ P9 G, C: Q6 _1 |/ ]1 J# s5 U
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
; H8 s5 b- O/ H' ^occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
2 u5 b5 Y6 ]7 h" x3 g3 ayear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
. F! l, p& N" A, H(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380# |; [7 }1 E9 k- E
(+13.2%).1 p$ X$ Q1 k4 r9 B0 v, o

( X0 S: ~7 j' ]8 M0 {) c+ m    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
  b' Y* e- p( o, Q) [# n8 |4 q, D8 iduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the( U; z! N* W- A( W9 J
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
/ x, u6 E( [+ F/ h4 c) Dpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
/ G, p9 q  J- P4 Ypresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.8 X* a4 e/ k0 }2 J- x
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
0 ]: d' x) A/ uwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy. k( g; Y4 h: Q2 i' R* @
balanced market."
/ v& d( x2 O' Q9 L: B6 C
: b2 A4 z5 \1 b' O) C% y  o. N1 S    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
3 V0 V6 a; @8 {: c$ a" J* _considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift( e8 w& c2 ^! ~# w
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
3 U0 a4 M3 Q% z$ K8 nthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
- x6 w# ~; g, u6 b1 ienergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,- Q# H6 c+ Q/ \  i2 h2 p) U2 j
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
+ {$ k- {# e6 n: ]9 W- w/ \9 o( n7 cbreaking price appreciations.+ I6 u# b& B% L$ M7 w7 O

1 B7 p! }4 K( ~! n    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding3 g* c( ?/ w3 Z/ ?" U) e  i5 R+ E
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
! y9 t0 Z1 Q( k6 b4 _largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
& J! {: A6 l: B
/ X( L* ^1 D; a. L; ^1 [2 F3 M& ~& H    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid, a( ^; d! o8 J6 E' g/ F
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer, L1 h" l& \, g2 W) x, y0 S
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off: V& t; j, ?3 W
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
" B6 C# _+ k" w4 e& FIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
, F$ ?, W5 G- @/ y" J2 I3 Ngreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
* \+ E4 I" T7 N+ A' oprice appreciation when compared with 2005." g* [. p' K7 g  T3 E1 c

) P4 l8 g2 A1 p: o    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
7 k" |/ u5 s- [- j+ P0 Kmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
8 Y7 v. Q2 `* bfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
. N; z6 J2 _5 h6 v. }2 kare markedly different than those found in the United States.
2 K2 R3 H/ Y: i2 C; v: ^: a! v2 g1 a' [9 i3 H2 x
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the5 Y8 X6 Z" p! A' f. q$ g) j
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's9 g; l" Y. x- [" z6 X! a
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
' J, N. {5 O; @3 Z+ r" Irelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general; W4 O. w& A7 X' q$ v
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the4 i5 {' c4 R/ b; N( p- M4 }
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and. c* E- c+ X% h
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
' o( Z4 k( s6 K1 Mmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
! X& ^3 M0 |4 C9 p  m9 P
) W+ R! m2 @" U: h% ^3 D5 m+ \    <<- Z! D' e% r( \
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
! j+ q3 h1 N) \$ h6 K; ?' C3 I    >>
7 P- w) t- m! z3 N9 T! v* ~5 B3 R/ f: q% S  _* J' r% ]& _/ _3 x! q' b
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
; A( Y( w  ^8 d' J: k1 c9 iHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
  }& r' u9 K  z: jof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
6 c; h2 K- S9 w( d: W; i8 ^looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
' X5 h  v( g, }& v' a( w; irenovations.5 ~0 L* _9 I5 P" W0 t2 M
' [" l! _* S( o& y
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
  H4 Q, D% L- |" A- t8 vincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation& M' s! ], x% `5 a+ d8 e
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
- G( W6 ]# _( p6 x7 C; c; F9 D8 l2 vSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.: Y- d/ k3 a. Z; |4 M/ T1 u* p

) V2 p: @+ b* B$ R% h) M    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
3 n. L( Q9 Y/ U6 b3 N) [% `slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
; ^" U+ `9 ^; A8 F) L% Oquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
/ n# ]  q7 o; m3 o# [+ T600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
8 L) c2 M; K! |/ n& E% g- gto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes2 p) W$ l" Z4 F2 \, _: i" D; I" J6 E
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options." e; ~7 Q5 y, f
7 h& g& }7 j: }3 w, J* Q' W: F. s
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced# U4 }( ~7 ]! R: B3 u: H
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their, f" U# z  I! Z% {' ?# }
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
9 j& B* u/ |$ ~3 o. ywas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
' @- U% I& c- a2 Mdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing+ e, d6 }! f% x, F' t+ N% E5 z% ^
buyers with more options when looking for a home.  `6 @& @% v: J7 h' T# q+ o3 r. h" C6 O

( Y5 ]) F4 U* K! Y5 c, f    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
( a& {! L. O9 T) {/ Tamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
9 R8 i- g, T& `* wpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
2 w7 d: I+ T! zas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
2 @8 d  q: m. w7 P6 ^. \: Tfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.$ J# I$ j) K& o; ^, Z  o4 @

& q! j8 i- B% I2 P    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
3 I. {8 A6 c+ Nprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory5 C) o5 [. l+ y' B5 O" ^
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
! e, Q- q! T' W4 n# z5 y$ A& @first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,# _% p- z# o! F; G* l7 v3 b4 X
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
. x9 M6 a7 ~* a3 A" s. C. l- K* upressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before6 c+ X; N' u2 A4 q4 D
making a purchase.
7 R# b, V% g( h4 O+ g8 c
! L# r+ v' q( p' m* |4 T' [    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing8 i" d- y7 q0 B& u9 w! e; o6 ^8 P' \
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong/ M8 |& f% k0 K
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
: b: A5 Z' `7 [9 d! ^, V7 O/ G: U; {centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
; G3 w0 N% }$ P+ W  I3 M- e: Oattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown& Q+ \( ?/ W" a0 E# S
amenities.
! N; b" j, P3 D$ X/ v0 `5 f( J4 |9 f4 v8 Y" Q+ }( z) a# N
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
0 i. ?; E& r8 }% S3 T2 ithroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand; i! Q8 Z! n! p: i
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has$ b6 F: {: k6 G4 ^4 b& V
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
. l; N2 F' k( l' \2 w. G4 T4 o8 bdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
. q/ C$ J6 F0 b! H. \residence, rather than for investment.
' l# ?& C$ ]6 S. e, O" T) q: L# D1 h6 Y" e- R$ _
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
9 v; E; L- x) o* Ihouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
2 L6 I& f% Z+ l9 n# a; ein a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
' H+ p- R6 Q% K- t6 a* u/ Mconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
, M1 Q' h, v2 X/ Wrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter' \* [- q* O0 i
the market.- R3 \4 Q' w9 B1 x! v! ~

4 C# q. t5 f$ w+ O5 q4 P+ ?    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
& O& w# x) c2 K2 O& O) @July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
* {0 a' I, p" r# e& V7 t/ |7 @1 J% VAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring- H& {7 A  X) D
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
! F1 Q  s" ^9 b6 ]$ Lto the shortage of available inventory.! B- g3 h% e: d& u; G5 W, I6 D

( m7 w% ?( C6 i1 a3 e  H) C    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its; T5 H) N. b' L* r
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
7 }; v/ A: i: b1 A- s3 dvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses8 I% H+ z- B4 Y4 u4 \; T8 [
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
0 n9 C) h) ]- h' g+ h4 o7 a1 b) v
: R4 `$ z9 j5 R9 C    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases% d! r! @$ K! X1 G( X9 z1 d
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low4 T& G$ ?( @2 g9 |
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that7 J2 w  R# f4 [; m, Z- @( H6 X
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring" Z( H6 h' R7 x, c$ W( d5 [4 ?
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer* l! ?, \- E' t
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
' m6 G$ R) m8 ^/ cbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
: G* Z7 ?  @7 v: G3 H
) F% n& i( H1 |( n8 J+ Q
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
8 Q% f' ]" o# c' ]7 ~" Aas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
2 P4 g. U2 d4 e: ~0 ]remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,* E9 E. Y& s" ^4 Q  T+ N
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices" q# v, e8 D+ \7 [6 r; P
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
" U, R9 Y  f6 Tin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly- r/ u8 I4 ]% m$ Y
towards the end of 2006.
    4 g4 @1 J" H4 |2 |& h

0 n" o0 x* f+ s5 T/ J- d/ |While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
; ^7 N; k0 |; H" }inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
+ L8 J& W5 P; E1 V2 d. d6 Vto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse" Z4 m" ^  L4 |  C" Q' ?) _& i
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to: A: [- i. D6 K# Y* x6 F* p/ R2 \
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added1 P9 u  [' p6 J/ @: d* G6 T
pressure on tight inventory levels.
  _0 _( X2 p5 d8 s4 l, w( o& Z6 \* r2 ]6 G( w2 k0 s) a- X5 C
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic; F3 k/ C) Z5 g; b6 t
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
3 k* C; P6 e: A" B* s% finto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
& p& g6 T2 }( r; k! A( cwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching: ^! r7 F: I& [1 V, V% p
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
3 A& E+ B3 s) w2 H
) ~" v/ N4 e" A& K( v    <<
  p4 C$ N  o7 X7 K      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20067 H' J* ~7 k3 q7 A! y0 Z/ W6 l; O
4 j9 Q  O% a" w' q0 p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 O/ ]. c& y+ I
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
- ?0 ?) s4 U9 |; s. H" h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- P0 u! r- x0 _  Q6 {$ v4 W, w1 j                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
* r( t  ?' w7 C( k0 E. y3 c    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average2 l$ P$ o$ J( w+ w$ E) k7 v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 O. _' r$ C& g0 D' a) h
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
# H3 _. D* p; R9 F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 [+ ~. @, E$ u$ d+ q: k    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
2 ]6 U1 V: |' {: W2 O3 }2 n7 r    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; `$ N/ @$ T5 B) ?: _) d    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
! s5 @# u- K; t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 y" p5 c' r  T% y    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -0 R5 t5 L7 U- B  |/ _9 g+ `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' ^1 L: ^, q3 ?, a1 s9 H( v
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
9 S, H% f; P* w5 W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! z/ n4 W. O4 _2 [5 @    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583% J, {# w- E% M# }. n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- T7 Y8 f1 i' e" x# |$ \
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1855 N" B$ ?; ~; u8 M; N
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: x8 T* p8 L* ^8 c- y
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
- O, N) e$ y' K$ w/ [    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* _9 G- S9 Q# r. b    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7667 Z1 f- V6 c7 f. |+ Y( ?" D) ~( ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, H* a" Z2 K& T) w' ]
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7074 e8 i% K& z# H$ Q0 W. k( e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  M# R5 B0 {8 E' t' q. Q
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,5006 [6 n% R6 a% N/ c1 k( v6 u$ r  j- X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 q  z; M  t0 |. {5 x' J/ b) z4 o) Z
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
, F' d$ k- }! B/ }5 _+ ]    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# V* k! n9 {% V4 e) ]: y2 v    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714  _  e. \$ g7 h' f* O0 s5 z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) \. ?0 U; ?5 M- \/ A    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500/ Q) U9 j# z6 f3 d* m! W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 j8 E2 s+ S) S5 b* \% K
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
0 C0 @$ P8 i" T$ O* ?$ \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" L  ~$ q5 _: E) U& Z/ W    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
! l% ~+ L" k7 k' H. J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ~; X% v) h9 H# a9 l+ j
* e, f. d; F9 X' e: H2 _& T  S
    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 u* W7 |. q9 u# e' i                               Standard Condominium! Z0 @8 R& ?* R8 F4 Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------
. P$ G9 H7 U. o( X( _) C- r                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo% a4 a' A6 ?7 w" _* G" H) j( L3 ]
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change8 s) h- G! o/ k" z% U
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 i8 g6 h- ]" S( m    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
6 {  J6 O4 b5 x+ j4 g! n" [    -------------------------------------------------------------" g' H* l' b3 c) G+ F6 c- J, d2 f9 T
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%+ L3 G4 w# D. {3 |9 b" r' l
    -------------------------------------------------------------( g) U+ M$ `+ m  y9 }/ i
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A2 x+ X: t; \/ H" e2 W
    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 F4 {: K& D/ l    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A3 V( F, G6 `8 q
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 |$ K3 d& b3 k4 G) v; e    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
' x- X5 k( S) ?0 j0 Q    -------------------------------------------------------------9 H5 ~5 C$ Q; M* Q1 O
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
7 M: `- O4 [- \6 j0 t: y& x    -------------------------------------------------------------
, P" i2 b$ V; L9 |    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
2 E/ ]7 X. o/ f    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 y5 |( s3 M6 i' k    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%0 f2 e6 d& C+ w4 x& w0 b
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ @6 J, B! u" ]& g+ t
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%$ g) {# W$ B8 W5 Y0 F# U8 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------* y" I% K2 D* G7 l/ _' f! ]
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%( W  r# h- g6 u4 E. T6 o
    -------------------------------------------------------------! b: x+ n6 D3 a! ]  l: n$ m  K0 s
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
* B0 |- e6 R. o, P    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 ~, h0 H( \- p1 P    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%- i5 K9 f' |% z8 }" r) A% U
    -------------------------------------------------------------& I! _( f1 e" A% q. J4 X
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
' j( f% a' J5 c  o# R, Y. r4 S: [    -------------------------------------------------------------5 \2 q& Q% Y) S. n9 ]6 B7 ?
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%8 g5 c, ]! I( o5 `
    -------------------------------------------------------------; p" X1 [; \; I% K' P3 @* f
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
. x: z& g. E: r) `0 ~0 G. c3 a2 P    -------------------------------------------------------------
! Z. z# W% k0 r0 O' v  G    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%: {- x$ h* ]3 d- v; |  J
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" ?. U' n% d7 k2 d/ Q5 z- |8 u    >>
4 l8 h9 j1 T2 O
7 L1 I0 t! \0 Z/ c' a$ s& h. ~    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
; N( |7 i  a  q5 T. t" N: hin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
; \3 f: t2 |: l" B8 BJohn and Victoria.7 [/ ]# u* n5 y. W

- v* i( B1 a1 J9 H& p2 {    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
* I2 |1 I- f6 R' ecomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
- U; i$ [% S+ C/ B! S- L# Khousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
: ~( v) _7 c/ N' L- y1 }9 v# D% preferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
; z5 G& b4 l( X* A; t/ n7 k: [trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
% s. j- t- s& y  R, {) }4 Wacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
$ |% G) Y+ G/ u' pavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current  T, c- H+ J; S0 z
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
9 Z- h! D# m! }  L8 ]version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
5 T4 D) f" b$ W# n$ P- O6 ?0 Z9 SNovember 15, 2006.
; A0 r1 U1 y7 b7 K# h- o' s    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of; I! H! M* y. `5 y4 b6 t( A- R
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge7 h) ]/ c0 {: L
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
/ Y$ x" m& a5 K: s  ^, r1 O. l5 m7 {available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-5-3 17:36 , Processed in 0.066698 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表