埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2185|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
5 K' k! w! H! v
5 @0 d, I3 W* g' _9 Z- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
& @4 b- }  u( V) }0 g8 ^6 \. l  ~- i. s  H! _0 M# f3 H
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market  K# a7 ~: V" I- G+ F! N6 K
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third  Q6 ^: [' s( q0 P* ~5 D9 N+ R
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
4 }+ w7 Q; |- z: c  c# ~, @: iin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit# q1 C1 w' ]8 o" E6 a
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
5 f- ^7 a4 x3 Dmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
" s2 Q, r2 @  c0 R3 ^" pQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal1 Q0 t6 B4 H  |( Q. `
LePage Real Estate Services.' Q4 e* ~6 Q: F+ T

& Y' q/ v  r9 a6 P3 K" `    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters) X4 U* W- \6 j2 v4 ]
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic, q# f& ^+ w7 u: v7 I
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and, O7 o5 H7 f. K8 x9 v
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
6 W5 k/ |' s- A! ^( u/ D  presidential real estate sector.8 P& ]" Q; O. }, T2 Q

5 G; F0 m  D4 i/ c3 F' V    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation5 g7 M! Q! }# h5 d! [, Y
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)1 T  v+ |2 t/ X. R6 I7 \, i
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562- [' {' x4 N- `
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
5 V$ v& S* j" x3 j: y& \$ J5 z(+13.2%)., P5 G+ v* p* C- `9 U/ h" k8 w

5 o! Y! d3 `; o( t8 A* U, }/ ^    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
3 g4 ?2 m6 o, p8 H( c9 kduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
9 Z- K) ^0 @: M; hfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are6 [5 h: s! L$ Z- h% }+ ~+ m6 O
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
* M4 l/ g, x! `* \7 Gpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.2 S9 A7 Y& r0 E
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We- Z" T; w3 b1 A6 v
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
2 h8 W# O0 Q0 T" @- Q  D" Vbalanced market."& t5 L' v' U6 j) ]& H* O0 k3 ^% o% P

( Z! {4 i+ Z: W' C    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,: z+ A0 @4 V: l5 t0 r2 R
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
, u% Z8 ?( A6 m& R$ `, d4 Zto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
: U. i# m7 ^* Bthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core% q, f8 K  x* n" Q; ]$ p. ?
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
: z6 G& E: e' o5 X8 |8 Pmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record' y# @5 o: V4 W6 N- n
breaking price appreciations.2 c; G9 M1 h7 h8 f

, L# I0 Q. M. a; ?    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding9 m3 P& y# [& |( |5 x
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the" f8 _; p" F. Z+ |$ ^  W$ U. ~* N% j4 j
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.7 N, R6 ~- E5 \( @. m

5 s+ e8 E. @1 d) J, Q1 s! q    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid# P/ |( F/ r' D4 o, l) i: ~/ V
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
! J" w' c$ F6 W* \/ lconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off9 P! K9 }" e/ U1 Q. N- v; k( G
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.9 y% ~- T# @8 N4 w% U' s; g8 s
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers' b( G2 t. W- z( N' ?' {
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
) c" I9 {7 w& hprice appreciation when compared with 2005., E4 Y0 n0 Z" N+ R5 D% G  t

) c5 k0 b1 d- X; |7 k    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
+ o% \( N5 {1 c3 v) g: b0 P0 t. Pmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
4 M+ A' _5 h0 \financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada) u- y  W# B1 i0 Q( k
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
5 m/ S0 O, s* V+ ^) s7 P/ x, ]+ r( R, L; s. ?" H; {( E; r* |0 I
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
# _" z6 B" R5 o2 W+ A- J9 o+ D2 hAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
/ E# [' D5 l- ~/ [  a- wfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
1 _  W9 V& Z% ?4 ?( k1 _, [relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
9 N3 U& N8 K* `% Z6 q( I5 m( J1 Y- j# ]affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
0 Q) b8 d" H# Q6 q2 |/ Jdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
7 a! O) F) r5 p+ uaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization; h8 I* ?3 V+ `+ |% C. K2 \* }
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."! g! ]: G4 H. T8 ]0 s- T

% x1 f% o: F5 u# c( ~: d    <<) D+ `- |2 l9 B5 F
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
( J" u7 f3 q2 i7 \    >>3 |$ l% j6 ~" X2 ~* {' Y2 \9 `0 e
1 S; f- O2 |* b
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
) Z$ X" m) _. J7 Z5 eHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate- P' v" D# n% N1 L" y
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time5 b1 l: u' p4 \9 G) M9 V! Q
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of) r( w" K9 @; F0 C( H, F
renovations.
. O' C' r6 Y7 j# A
$ o8 W, \6 n6 J! K, a! M2 B    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight! f. ?! B7 s2 b9 U$ v* c
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation2 [& ^4 i! r. z% S8 G# j3 @
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
: K( u# _$ o/ CSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.# d: h8 l$ i. z2 V
' y+ F" S& `5 R
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
5 n4 |: x+ ^4 m% B/ qslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
2 z: T4 m% K7 o  P8 Q6 Vquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
2 f! X& Q) J. O9 ]: b) k* E600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
. Y+ T/ C/ v9 R. Bto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes* b' N4 Q. t' G$ y7 Q
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.  R" `* n& t& W( @2 Y3 M
+ _" E, Y1 Y# n- [' Q6 ^4 D. C# \
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
: q2 b. g5 {) }  lconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
8 z8 l! P! d6 @homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
6 X% L, ~2 O5 `was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
) t1 q) v' b# S! Odollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing% T2 d+ T# A; @
buyers with more options when looking for a home.8 @' ?3 ]# c. D
" u% _6 Y6 O9 B$ w/ e
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
* M( c" T7 K, o: s/ p( jamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
1 n" _- U! z: @3 u: r) J5 d* Ypriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
: p# a: z& k% d$ n; e2 E. C# X/ fas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last, a& e6 D. g* L9 m
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
# K! `4 K: L  A+ U
8 o8 K  a3 F2 T5 U    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house5 U2 \9 |3 ^& v2 \/ i9 y' ~7 y
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
( |$ e- L$ Y; l  d- P5 Flevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
6 V5 V& K% |0 v8 u2 J, G0 x" nfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,& l  B# ?6 H! G5 m
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the' ~: o) I  C3 i1 [" u
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
; Z( y  V- T& O3 Z! h& T+ A9 a% Zmaking a purchase.4 A1 V; ^- u. v6 h
5 M9 r3 u; J' D+ k5 y$ r, |7 S
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing% {+ T3 f* Q5 f: U3 l) p
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
) {7 d6 c* Z9 k. \9 ^- L6 Sconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
# T. U: }5 L; M/ icentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting+ h  T. n# G! K" A% [
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown# @7 q. G: x) b- C3 D7 W% q) U% }: R
amenities.
' K3 h  A( ^* _4 }3 `. ^% H3 Y3 r$ ?# m$ H" |; z) ?! w! D
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels5 T% A0 t1 `* c
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand5 j; q1 o+ c6 B5 _4 A. s8 S$ Y
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has* m& V; {$ q: X+ _1 G
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
0 C% j6 E4 V: A4 K: w# e% m$ mdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle) q7 f* h) o8 N8 w- W
residence, rather than for investment.6 O* E; \  B% L* r1 y$ r% |
; |. ]) B0 u( w4 L/ U" w2 M
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
1 e) \  G; n2 z2 w' U+ _8 _7 H9 nhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
: U5 ?. k- `3 n8 a8 V( sin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer8 A# A+ a* g- I% x
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
: \, }" p7 J$ A( @2 }2 Crate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
  G: r+ i$ L0 X5 X4 T9 wthe market.$ Z  h  m+ O' v% m0 o$ |
2 v' Y; E3 U* C) Q" J4 w
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
, j9 [3 U  x2 f4 x4 H4 P# oJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In( T4 S* m% W* o7 m9 e) ?
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
6 `; P3 P8 ^3 Vmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
( X/ b, P' E6 C8 N: cto the shortage of available inventory.* ]9 X' w5 U6 ]9 G$ A2 t2 g" H
8 Q# `* C" {8 a" ?2 Y4 @
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
8 g2 I. G! B) \5 mmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains- W9 O+ u' f: [3 {2 h
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses/ p- @- {/ n# [7 i( F+ k$ X
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
! a0 F6 J3 D. X
# F! z  r4 B+ m    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
4 c1 O* |! u! \3 M0 A1 Q4 L8 Q" Rin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
! F$ d; Z0 |# j7 Uunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
9 ?8 z: p/ e0 P* u# c% hpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
1 e+ E& C, O6 b$ S. Z$ t' }prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
6 u9 x; N. C4 @8 T# W4 K5 Sseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
% S" f  _' M1 l- H! }+ c1 l% |buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

7 A/ D2 ^0 ^. x2 g; V+ w2 K- C+ {# B0 U* z$ u1 X/ }0 `( `
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
& U( q3 l$ u2 V: H8 j/ }' qas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
' e( L2 y* J3 Y  `7 E2 F3 |9 oremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
5 h9 N5 U1 I5 l& L, A  Gmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
5 u* H+ o+ q7 v) ~* nincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
4 P3 G& }% X8 \7 o8 ~  O' _in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly4 Y2 U2 u/ s$ j8 }
towards the end of 2006.
   
0 V4 a2 T' n2 x7 C: E  O+ {0 G$ G3 i# L
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of2 o: \- o  V$ I/ h4 R6 f
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable( a* g) j# W- N& m+ C4 ?9 P% Y8 h0 Q
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
* m' D/ H9 T( k2 W1 Vgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to1 B6 p" u; B1 q" X5 l& m' J
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
. m) b- p( E$ v, R  y& L3 `7 ppressure on tight inventory levels.4 z" J9 P: E+ ?. C7 ]$ o4 X

/ x2 h1 j( o: }! o, W" Z  C* ?# P, X    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
6 [' ]/ m. s( s' V3 K4 ufundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
, s6 X7 b% L. a8 x0 ainto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
1 E7 \; d- Q! n( }- r* _, twhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
* U. Q0 f3 a7 pfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
, o4 h, U1 G0 v# u4 F! z, m  x( x6 y2 b5 u( Q. Y* a
    <<; D( R+ l0 [  H
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
) p$ M& G& v6 K7 ?; f" c3 P
9 f! h% |0 P+ s$ _: c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ g0 }, m" c% @                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey5 K' R, r! K$ j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& w% e% M2 y6 ^8 M  D! f3 F, i                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
! Y2 o' f2 b! d    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
' f: Q0 W2 \* o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" h, Z2 l( {2 w( r) e6 Z+ W9 {    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
& ?' @; O, Q2 e' ]2 e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; @! g( c# E& p+ i, @5 o" _    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000, x8 M/ O+ R) y9 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* j) _" [- {- P6 Q    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0005 F, M' X5 @7 a$ \2 z! @  W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( P+ [0 S8 ]+ R) F- A
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -( G2 Q1 s9 v: v! H
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 J3 \0 Z0 J+ W0 p7 E    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333+ G# \& U2 ^$ v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; o5 E; k9 |, ]( z( @4 J    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5838 W4 ^( ~! q8 g0 @6 a
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" S* y) W8 R% X# {
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
. E" n& A- U! u% k& c    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 R1 ?1 f& E+ V- G% j+ F% m
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
! S7 Y; }% Z1 b$ R# S; i' [% l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 @; I+ S+ [9 z( G1 ~
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
1 j5 P' M3 T9 G1 l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, u4 q" z1 P$ N$ V- D1 }    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707) Y. v% P" N8 @+ G9 J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 j4 q' U2 i! p! c. S    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500! D, e' F! ~2 g5 j. k$ C
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ z3 \$ T. T4 T9 I/ i! e' I5 W    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389: H* B! [: r! {: I, O8 }2 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# y* e; H8 i' T( H; g2 R
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
0 V7 v; M% P1 v( _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" Q/ X+ J5 H4 F8 S+ U% R- s    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
/ L* \5 @* r. t' d2 Z% D# ^: M    -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ^2 }, L* Z' Y+ j- k) k
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
% ~" F: |) `* ]+ _: {    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 l- d! _! _0 c    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
9 {" I# x7 m) Y! I9 Z6 w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 u+ r0 P4 R$ P! N+ m+ B( V) o

* K+ y$ l  J2 c& O% N( |    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 i6 J. V! s! A$ ^                               Standard Condominium7 B' Z1 S; k& e
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 M! Z/ e# _7 f# F" F                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
/ R+ Y5 K& g+ S    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
2 X( k- x* U5 V6 b( d  A$ q    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ V% \2 d7 r0 q$ ~; J* h" L* A% }# y    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%& b5 L$ M' D. Z" q6 }% n
    -------------------------------------------------------------5 a5 d& [) |& Q8 D
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%% C+ S( q" M1 F3 B7 p. @
    -------------------------------------------------------------
9 Q( |0 F5 u- G+ M3 J    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
. y5 @( F% Z+ Q8 k9 ?    -------------------------------------------------------------. z# t+ N9 H' H  m+ w" ]6 e
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A; |9 M, Q( Q1 O* P9 _5 m3 V; z( x9 I
    -------------------------------------------------------------& }* Q( ]! Q. Z- y* J
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%2 e3 v  A2 {/ X& U
    -------------------------------------------------------------0 R6 u1 Y. p/ ~7 {; u$ r- h; ?4 L
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
3 G# x, D, y) H; W& k    -------------------------------------------------------------! W' G! Z) r& }/ z
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%5 h! K: }3 F  t5 B
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 D7 }8 }. t/ k2 h! L$ C$ a0 f
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
5 }$ c8 d' N  x9 l) B    -------------------------------------------------------------
. W, M/ K* P  V2 @$ _' O    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
( ]4 l. o5 t+ q+ u% I6 F    -------------------------------------------------------------
* q9 ~# G* o0 e# f* [9 {    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
+ _% R% v, ^. }1 U8 t5 W# y    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ }) [. ]" r) }' s. \2 C    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%; Z5 u4 z) C! r7 e" Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------* u8 z. n. n# P
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%% p4 S" _: I$ K2 w5 V1 C  W
    -------------------------------------------------------------: S) H3 I. Q1 l* g
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
$ Q9 u6 f7 L4 h3 K    -------------------------------------------------------------4 e# S1 i: t4 N# K4 E- {( j- L& K
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%/ Y0 D, P& }5 u
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 K- E+ E" D/ N
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%  L: u3 U, o& h
    -------------------------------------------------------------, P; Z" s4 f7 G+ S% `, y% C: o5 G$ N) S
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%9 O& _/ w, [, w; [# l
    -------------------------------------------------------------% u5 s6 x3 T6 A" ~! s. {
    >>5 }6 F# q6 Y' {/ m
- I% P& U: N$ ~$ {+ @. E
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
# [# U8 O* F) T( B: U& oin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
$ Z1 j8 _: L( [& n& l2 ~5 q; G" OJohn and Victoria.  M$ {  o( ]! h
' b3 I5 K' l0 v, v
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
: Q8 W9 D$ L% k& @comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of7 M( S7 p- A; f1 s  i6 F
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release0 R2 c" ~. }4 r. T
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price$ o8 {/ T, C6 K  ~7 O+ q  Z
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
( p% P$ N2 q$ @- L: @# @% _9 Vacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
/ j; S) q5 L4 ~: j4 l6 s2 javailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current5 h" p+ M8 a3 Q# k0 K" b! q! i
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
$ D& J4 F! x- t' |version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
( `* U7 G! u8 _$ g$ _November 15, 2006.4 Z# o0 ~, D5 d" |# t& M
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
4 @* I! L3 [3 [2 |3 `8 x1 @fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge6 R: j: K3 J- @+ r/ C" N5 o
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is9 s2 ^+ E' L8 c7 A. m! X
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-18 12:37 , Processed in 0.160484 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表