埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1885|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
0 x. q: h5 A- q, E9 O" L4 W8 S+ _6 ?) K' z4 O! ^
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -# }3 v5 b2 Y6 U2 e2 j$ C& Y

/ g  c. E+ ~7 Z6 `1 D) S; b# _    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
! W' V& K' p6 eexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
+ ]& L# ~% P/ W# Y; Y7 ]. V* A) Qquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
0 ]3 M3 R0 d* r6 W5 t2 z  o- Tin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit3 t+ L6 M/ a) b$ B1 S
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and1 ?( p+ \! m8 |6 }4 {4 E5 q8 l
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
0 v4 ^$ d- U  {3 dQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
. o# k2 }7 ^3 ?+ Y  Q  K; tLePage Real Estate Services.
0 M" }2 x1 T9 B
) _$ l% }- g0 e4 M, }3 _8 \    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
( t) ~% e/ s( p/ \+ G+ @- uare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic! X0 }3 D$ {9 k  ]
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and' u; P* B; s& V. l
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
5 Z; ~: |' }- c$ D. nresidential real estate sector.! N  ?# _  \- ], b0 W

# m- [% b0 ^% f% L* a8 L    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation) [" Q; o3 C. ?( {
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
2 d8 Y" @( b+ [year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
. e) h6 D7 l9 o- ~; L, a" [! _(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380" D) c1 M  X$ V) y# _4 G  H3 C
(+13.2%).: b. @" F1 ]4 u
( j1 D2 W- P2 L. b
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
: d0 b/ Z6 V* E! z% dduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the; j+ K* t( `+ `- X2 a) v# l" q
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are+ e+ e. H  x* J. a! z0 Z: m
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
) D' `5 f6 r4 Y: Mpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.6 y7 }. F5 S  A* p. t# v, S
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We% ^) M9 G. ]9 |3 }
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
9 ?: r* n4 B1 c7 [2 p7 cbalanced market."
0 {4 Q2 z" b4 Y9 O% W' L9 S/ G; ^/ g, N1 U. O6 U) b6 q' H" o1 y
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,* T( S; \0 _- s5 {+ T
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
: o' E+ r8 r4 S0 S9 z; zto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
- l" l$ R$ h4 d4 }0 }/ jthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
( }' a' ?) n$ L4 wenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
1 C5 i  A5 t: l6 O, ^6 O2 a; {6 rmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
9 X% t% t' T% X% u" M0 y, abreaking price appreciations.& I7 n# x3 f! j4 j0 J1 v# d8 b& U

  x4 N8 l% l% v0 e: H1 m    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding4 c- W- E6 C6 b2 C+ u
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the% n2 \( n2 t8 d: o
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
7 \9 ]6 k6 g# ?, C: r8 H5 u1 \
; g$ m; \$ G/ O; f( g' a    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
9 w0 G1 n, z" z: J! r) Zeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer+ v; X; O& k, J! p3 H8 v+ i
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
0 Y6 P6 K7 ^; X$ s! J% |0 a1 v* L/ {1 _! o. Rslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
* Y) k  ]6 `% U# uIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
) A6 H7 Q" I, C, R5 \greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of! G6 I6 n+ e  H7 N! z
price appreciation when compared with 2005.: k' G3 S) x# P  K4 t. M

$ L1 p9 [' Y2 n- _% J5 J    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
2 X# y9 H( x" O/ A* S3 I8 {' vmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
( d5 j- I. I2 s$ l0 J& s; _financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada3 B: I% A# h9 r3 T: B) n
are markedly different than those found in the United States.$ p3 I5 h" [8 H2 n! M3 {8 h
: u' q& l* z. Q+ c  P
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
2 t8 S3 ?, l; R  U: w5 g7 jAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
- N# G8 B; J: ~favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
6 c5 k8 |1 R  x0 Wrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
$ y) h9 u7 V& N3 ^affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the# N( N4 l% `- @; Y
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and& ?* I9 o' N7 O, M# ]
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
0 [; u9 U/ s$ U+ J& b( q( jmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
9 H% U! j2 i  J1 @4 |4 C7 _9 [' v# [. j5 |
    <<
$ R6 X! E$ D; C9 z* h                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES/ W, v# K" i5 D) d1 I6 ?# _0 c) h- V
    >>
0 z" A( `% \: P; B% y' B' @" ]% x$ `9 U( g. s
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in: z. R+ x5 w6 ~, {9 t
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
* o4 R3 u- [3 B/ a/ ]) u2 z! @3 Qof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time5 `* x; v+ |6 q$ ?, Q0 r; r. O, `4 W5 N
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of2 ?: ]4 [, f  V
renovations.' G; v3 W/ r) N1 }, s; |

0 r: m5 y  v* o5 g2 q    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight4 E# B2 ]: A' _- O3 Z" Y' s' s
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
1 b% y- j# ]; h. {) i- pcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and, a! T( b7 F% S, v* B9 ]( P. \
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.2 O! U3 l$ X5 X; h+ N, t3 [

7 x+ ~5 i* m- c) X+ X6 L+ o    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
6 j! {8 R, @' ~7 O2 q. eslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
1 b: V3 z& ^' T% |+ b8 jquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
6 y8 U1 K; ?* m600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
) \9 G" E% y4 a4 E" f. k& ito the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes- v2 V* W9 c' D9 h( Q6 a" W( U  f
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.% d9 J0 _8 B7 O" `1 _6 V
5 g+ t' B% n3 D. ]
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
2 V1 ~, X* q8 S0 ?% w) L" x1 T+ Lconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their" M, \* c4 b2 N. A: b
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers' [! K' u, d2 @0 ~, |  E' Q% @# T
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
1 a" |: U! ]! W  T& Qdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
/ ~4 l" t4 s- rbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
# k& T* Q) D7 S- k& [; c4 S9 k# w/ e/ Y$ e
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly& H4 M8 c4 [0 T. M5 t& t
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
+ N! T: y1 A4 M/ L0 u4 `priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,1 I2 h+ @8 _# t; o) s$ m, Y6 U
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
2 {# D9 q9 m, a: V6 }) e* {few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.% O% d1 S1 c7 a( h4 U" F9 H

: q1 c. a7 q/ Z3 o0 y! g' s    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
! c2 C% y. I! J! e- P4 ]prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory% k: Y8 q# V: ?/ Y" E+ d
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting7 v4 B8 }! h( i
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,3 u7 G+ H2 P9 p8 T& k
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
' m0 @: O* j" r  {, ppressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
5 N7 \% E' {. L# F( Imaking a purchase.$ E& \5 h) x" A* m/ E

- ?4 x: j7 J" \" v    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing# R. M/ v# r( K
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
# o: |1 e9 C6 O! |1 ^confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city' V- r9 ^( |4 c$ J$ f/ z/ n+ b; n
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting9 ]3 M( D% Q! h3 `* r6 T
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown  ]6 h! S+ Z/ |; O" D+ G! H
amenities.
' X$ M" l% f, ?- ~
5 q$ d% l7 E' F, h; |, f    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
" S' f0 V1 R" |; I% Z4 S' tthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand6 }  i8 b4 L' G* B! n/ c
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
7 v' ^, P! z: s6 mcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been- V6 h# ]0 Z) x
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle$ o# [2 A9 S, Q
residence, rather than for investment.! ?; ^* K3 j) v# v. C5 O3 C) A
' w  v3 [  c& G, a
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
# t3 V1 N# g+ H+ @4 o( Phouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted$ U9 j; ^* V" u7 Y) u5 x
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
0 I& v/ u8 m# L1 }. G0 tconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
+ W7 @4 v3 O5 @* w  Srate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter) {$ W( d) l# E8 {: ~
the market.% Y: u" i1 p8 q% I. A8 b( c

+ t0 ]- i0 f' A. q3 q9 F    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
- E0 u7 Z* \* M& sJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In0 D  \* d& {$ B+ O- F. V) s
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
% ?8 k9 N9 I1 bmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due5 l0 S: x5 E2 H" z2 o0 \* E" z- P
to the shortage of available inventory." J3 R. J% n5 q9 k1 ?1 u. z

" j( d$ v1 z; l2 C7 a    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its( W4 B0 y1 P: P& T  M- s. [
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains! ~) K1 d' a  \& Y
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses, r! H: V' L) z8 p/ I
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
7 @" U. G/ H, p! A% H" q( Q# G, `1 A6 a1 ]9 ^" f9 ?' L1 I
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
8 f4 m! i& i8 o0 P9 sin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
8 N' w7 g% c7 D2 U2 F& y1 m; d. }unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that! U/ s" O9 I2 b
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring+ i, e7 a6 W# J& q
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer+ K" d# M- M. @! q
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as* B" s5 X+ X  ?- f8 i+ \
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
. U- z$ g. X5 l# ]3 k4 \. Q) u! n- f2 x, ]
, a) S8 ~/ [$ w- h
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
' D( @: ?4 K( z( _  @as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton3 y8 J+ W+ D+ e' Y
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,. ]/ o! _% ]* g4 w
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices- `; r; F+ k) C
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
! w0 ~# Z2 w* m( ]. R, ?" Rin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly. K: z& x; u: g
towards the end of 2006.
   
7 m0 t5 a  b! q$ B$ J5 O. B' e
2 }7 m2 [. P* VWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
: C6 b) {. J' G, Jinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
% O+ G% I% b/ \2 f0 s, {to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse4 W" ]8 x) g  i' h: W- m
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to, M- t, C/ r+ b7 @  j7 _) Z1 \
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added- H  D1 K( R& M5 x# c7 X5 L& i& v
pressure on tight inventory levels.9 X% T( x% O$ u: J# Q" h5 ]
5 K6 u+ O, {  t/ S1 u! }/ U2 }
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
, K2 d/ P2 I/ w/ U3 yfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people: [' Y. P( d1 Z+ ]% V' H+ B
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
! j' e! E! u' j" t- rwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching6 U; q8 x5 V, f% z) V; l1 N
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.- y. ]/ t" j# E: o3 q% r2 N/ m
5 ?6 k. F1 h7 E- s
    <<
; V* B2 K$ h( w* e+ n  W1 o      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
$ v5 M7 |  q! |6 \8 ?: \# x7 L: V  s/ o4 l7 h, a6 y4 B# r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, B9 L. I7 y. J% w* W
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey* _6 p# I# K* r1 E- @1 \: [+ w+ c
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! |( R+ |3 x! V& R
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
3 S* a& u+ a$ u2 @' N; e    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
* ^7 j- j. q) H* p" ?. Z! F: i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 e& y: E; ]  ?$ Y& W    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
- l* K( u' N7 Y! \8 x* P    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' d6 d3 O' S" i- X2 J
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000( Z5 D0 U0 s3 N7 H2 A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 I. M& T4 G0 T5 t9 k# |
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000% l3 u& ?8 h9 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* t1 Z& ^& R) c  m! X( f  ]
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -2 {* ^: d' e+ Y$ ~- }& g& b" B$ P6 P5 ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 u  |4 H% O: Y  p
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333/ S6 u+ h4 L" B$ a: ]) V2 O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  `. Y6 ^9 {- C* H8 P, z4 l) B
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
# z; R+ q% o, n$ X+ D4 Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' J) l6 G& f5 ~    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185% D: K8 ?1 M3 }
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* e& E- c( w# l# W* J    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
5 S8 x, i9 w8 q6 t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, @* j7 u7 d4 V' Z8 h7 i    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
) M# m% Q# F) l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* F) O4 D2 |& F! H+ D* V0 a2 [
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707+ b: l! C& h& @2 X2 N+ `2 U: Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Z: t. W& L8 G" x. D    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500$ p  C; M9 {0 u/ P$ Q" J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 c2 J' F; O; i7 J, u, D
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
5 W% F8 W2 i0 ~, J+ O4 A$ D9 P    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) u3 g; e: l' l$ \+ y    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
) `' }( K8 l3 ?, @* S3 M    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 u$ U1 m' k# X. L  ]    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500) A5 z0 H, Y5 a6 q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% _$ Y8 N! g, O& @$ _3 v, q    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000$ e& ^- O" |& ]" I6 n
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! U0 ^" j) _( B! [% k3 d3 F2 l
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
" S* w* X$ p* k. }, J    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 u1 c: D7 w  Z2 T- @  o8 C
- V+ L+ s6 B  q* g6 l+ f2 q0 b    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ [, N5 B4 z) ?( p2 n" v% j                               Standard Condominium
1 p3 G# m: e( V' Y! ?8 Y) l6 E    -------------------------------------------------------------
# X0 F5 T/ b) x+ k( g3 _                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
& [: s3 ~% p' F- ?; Q' W    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change4 l1 D1 J4 `1 N8 q
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: v9 i& Z1 f, Q) M8 M4 Y9 ~& c' V3 ^    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%. M7 U& _2 Q- j
    -------------------------------------------------------------+ i" I2 A5 U, }: }& }- A
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
0 _. h5 `( _) `$ D% w' P5 D# Q    -------------------------------------------------------------* R) _/ I8 _$ U3 Y$ q" |7 L0 r
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
# i8 s% _9 ]- L8 T    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ B: a7 K$ L6 l    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A6 G% _3 r" e1 Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 K3 M( J$ [  Q. y" O; Y5 H" S
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%5 A% n+ k- u  Y" K
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; n+ _% G6 o  F0 c' L$ m    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
9 |: G: a. A- _. ]( @1 h" j    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 q$ r+ n. _8 _( z9 [, y    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%& Z" R/ J7 p% o3 V
    -------------------------------------------------------------6 F; s! r0 v; I  i# Z. r! _3 D$ x( b
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
" U! p. i4 i6 P* |0 y0 d    -------------------------------------------------------------. Z- M  y! {* O0 b
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%8 Z* I3 I& B# p: `
    -------------------------------------------------------------
. m* ]$ g' d3 W& |    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
" K' a$ q8 l7 x" k- Y3 ~) f) r    -------------------------------------------------------------1 q) A# Y0 M6 N% y
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%6 f, E6 ^* P# a
    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 y1 ?1 \9 x# K& u. k    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
7 a3 C9 f3 ]. K8 A) G, A6 ]    -------------------------------------------------------------
! q5 N9 o3 ?4 D( G    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%2 c0 Y' a3 }* @$ p
    -------------------------------------------------------------" d* n7 f: N3 o5 c4 P4 B- `8 q
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%/ S4 J+ H0 F6 k1 K# {' k
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ Z: J" J7 u, t% l3 E5 X
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
4 ^1 H/ @1 u( Y. T    -------------------------------------------------------------
  Z) F8 K! d2 o& \    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
. v! _8 G1 C1 s- Q; f2 W5 ?    -------------------------------------------------------------
/ R; t6 }7 m- W9 R) z6 y    >>
! h& \* o/ A5 @' P0 l' K
) R9 n& }9 E& ~) Z9 R7 Y7 b    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined# O# {) `7 o0 e# b
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
) T; K$ d2 @" J. ]2 f& J! MJohn and Victoria.5 Q( k9 q( `+ G3 R
. }/ w3 Y6 C0 C3 a
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
4 ]! C& b+ S8 p! ~  ^comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
" c+ N) A) K3 T0 w/ }) W8 ~8 C9 ?housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
# c, q# V, W" r8 Oreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
, R7 ]; t4 t& F- d$ F5 }trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
& U( @/ f8 R) q! C: f6 A) ?across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is" I) B8 {( l/ E& ?2 F* }
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current2 z& C0 L7 z! A7 z+ S( m1 M
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable6 f* R( z) x  |( ^
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
2 X0 n7 d0 x- f/ |' zNovember 15, 2006.
5 P3 Z3 x* X9 h+ R2 W+ }    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
" N" Q$ ^+ O* D! gfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
  [1 F! A& h9 K2 s, _2 F5 Fprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is' s' D/ r0 Z9 u3 o5 i! a- f
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-9-16 20:16 , Processed in 0.224391 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表