 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
( h4 x. |2 `. v( Y( \+ Z! o0 y6 q
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
Y. W2 k$ d7 d' ]7 A# |2 H9 x* u, Y# @4 r6 ~& z+ J3 J7 n
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
/ k# P& k( |% ~$ h5 } s! ^exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
5 H2 r) p4 `. l/ }! Iquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic5 D; Q4 d3 d6 O/ v) S, d
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
- u4 `; K5 R& L) M' v. F5 l( aprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and* c3 O# e4 R8 r, U) t
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
: h- O, W9 f& vQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal' j8 K) Q& V. e$ j
LePage Real Estate Services./ }# U t1 V# k8 E! d. \; r: t8 y
2 i( X; s9 a8 f9 k* r: r& \ Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
" [8 ^; c" @* F- d0 F4 z+ \are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic. G' ^9 y, \0 p0 k
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and8 k0 v& T; P: P8 k
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
% u7 M; J8 E/ z2 Zresidential real estate sector.$ [* \8 x" ?8 a- q1 C) b V, h& j
. ~$ _. f; t7 U+ `% p; x y+ |, l Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation+ ~, x2 _% Q' w
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)' K+ S' K$ g1 k2 B3 ~' N
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562, P8 j2 R w) Q+ a- i2 x
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3805 j i% ]$ l/ b [! l
(+13.2%).
% u! H N$ d8 F( X/ e1 E
6 O+ s$ L. t2 A& T W, [ "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
7 Y0 ^) ]$ n3 h6 ^* i; s; Q: ?during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
6 t+ g. t: p( k7 `/ Y1 \frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
/ h2 v3 |; O: Y/ t. M" l1 ypoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,' l. K: K4 N, u& y
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.* d) Z# Q% v; w$ s9 ~; }
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We8 Z, L, ?. n2 [# _6 E
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
" u+ k4 a: f: }balanced market."
k6 Z1 b& J# M9 L! K/ a- }) [% N# \6 T# F) {, C5 f, A
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,+ _, B; v( Y8 \3 V7 }
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
5 n; O' a% Y! ~5 o- y0 \to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued( m2 ~0 V. S0 N* {4 i; q
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
$ g. v' u. @7 Denergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,% E! L( d2 T, }* s O( }. S0 |
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record3 p) K* ?; t/ v+ x% V
breaking price appreciations.5 m0 K1 l) h6 e6 P$ `7 N
5 |& q. e. d* b3 L) N Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
5 J# ]4 ~+ O: |/ C9 E7 d2 [6 Deconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the) M q8 M) a( D P) z, g! Y! w
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
( n: `2 \( i/ o% b
+ A9 }0 z" l5 @+ U& B9 T In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid) R/ I; L6 i2 E0 u/ {- D. ?' |' l& f2 [
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
4 O& Q* T, A- _ o. d1 V0 F/ ]& Dconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
5 v) E, y5 T1 m6 X) o1 sslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.5 {9 S9 o% A# \) w
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers- I' A1 x0 @ h; A; s6 P- S, k8 g
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
@1 X: h/ p( ^( X2 g- W9 iprice appreciation when compared with 2005.& b! J9 R8 a2 X3 k! @& u9 q
6 H8 y' n& u# R While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
1 a6 q8 ?$ c" D' Rmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
( M: h+ ~8 d9 f& P2 k, }% [financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada. `# i, L1 |2 _ M4 E+ j
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
- f, x. t& ]. e* {- h/ ^4 }' @6 f- ^! d! J( A5 Y& a+ W
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
3 |2 N: F# K ?# X5 _American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's& x N( f7 M! C* n
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the6 e9 g1 x. r; M, c5 p
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
& ^' W4 O1 @, I/ R, ]& Faffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
! f; m& h% m+ O% j) hdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and0 J3 t+ E! {. J3 @$ S
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
( J& f9 @; J- x; Wmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."# Q( j- j5 o: A3 f
3 }$ R" O0 s) O! J/ Y* Y
<<
, B0 L, h1 ^0 T+ m. m REGIONAL SUMMARIES
, B! W6 l) C! ^( f/ ?/ h) P >>
! y' _* N+ n6 r1 B; R4 n0 B% E! v
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in0 k& X. z; W% d. v+ ~
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
9 W6 i4 v3 \+ Z! T2 _of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
4 S7 \7 S( Q" o* Slooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
: j4 M/ r+ I) R5 [; T) brenovations./ T1 k M2 g$ ?5 o9 h: j
, K( }% V0 p" u% b/ p7 K The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
! M# _; S4 a5 T; t( R- v/ N- _increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
' t4 f, U+ Q0 z7 Gcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
) h6 Y" i8 ~! C2 W$ D& F `September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
" S z4 e9 K+ Y( e+ G9 c, O. z$ c3 |& Z
3 y/ ?. D# F6 G, c+ m! j- K The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
* ?* _/ v3 h* L0 k& F; Qslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
& j& t; U" O$ G9 W' E$ I4 p1 k/ I8 Z# [quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new# D. s6 L0 w& [# S/ O( `
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
9 {% a3 K0 v5 p# Vto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
; O; K- N& |. }* M3 H4 K( k- Dand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.' w, o8 x0 S, Q
7 m. z" E6 t- q, k0 W$ d
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced7 ^& }" L, E5 w8 b
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their) f" r; _$ |! I4 y& D
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers0 m- @$ s3 ]- A5 a) { B O
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
! }9 u8 Y( `+ _$ Y: e+ y; H( M1 r1 ydollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing9 d8 p% W5 K- p9 R
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
; N: j9 p; u! k" E' K9 r6 F# \# g% ?( s. y0 h
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly% W1 {) p; Z4 m t
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
6 e- t/ K7 e0 R. ~# `' \priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,8 X; {$ v0 i/ C! n+ K7 c
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
& y. r7 Q9 D. h4 A) u rfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions., V/ ^6 V4 Q* h3 W3 N+ d8 q$ p
! L+ [- O$ |6 y% \3 s- y/ Z
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
/ j2 V. ]! ], p3 {' uprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory$ y) E; V! P! u" }7 f g' R
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
; k# @; C# r+ u: O) k3 j. H, nfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
/ l7 q6 z1 ~8 i* _4 e# ^when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
, A; K/ _& b7 Y' _) _pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before7 H* T" C9 m( O5 {- C* X9 \
making a purchase.
) i1 t: e, z, D$ T- y( G7 f+ T5 s9 A$ r5 c
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing& x% y- a# i" b* _! }" [
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong$ V; o; h7 p( O
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
8 R _$ w8 }. B0 L5 Zcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting9 W2 w5 \, f3 V9 [4 L$ X3 C2 n( T
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
* s( j0 A' d; ~4 ramenities., E% p6 K' F1 l+ v7 ~% n% U( G
9 U& w3 t0 W# L& O9 B# |7 S6 D The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels( h* u+ v. ], I% V' z" q
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand* b/ G- T/ ~/ f! s7 I
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
) j2 f4 `; v5 k# h6 L, K( i& Tcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
" R0 [% S7 J8 d; vdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
* i B' d; J8 N# m/ aresidence, rather than for investment. w2 b1 V8 p& m4 Y; L$ Y
! C' b6 J7 n( `5 w The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as6 w: t" o1 u! ^* ?
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted9 b: ]+ u4 G0 K- n4 p/ {
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
/ ]: _& Q6 s0 a5 o; z8 R! Aconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization, ^, q2 k' w+ U/ ]
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
. X8 m: W6 p- Mthe market.. z0 f, n! t$ w0 \$ `3 Q( H
`! {& q% c: z
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through- h" @: z1 p7 f# |
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In6 @3 Y6 ?. M& Y2 t- o1 s) | i
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring( }: T. C$ N4 r0 N2 r" J( |
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
( \1 N" ^7 x; f# Y! W- N* Kto the shortage of available inventory.
2 c8 Y2 U1 s9 S) W7 _
1 F2 @% A; `8 f/ t+ \* T& `& I* }; a Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its2 M2 X" [% h, w' X: V: N( k! l
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
/ D7 V) X2 X. E3 n: O+ ?vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
! ? y4 U1 V. {* j$ ]struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
& h, B/ P* J( `7 I) L9 e n: L% d ^4 w* v$ ^7 b3 m0 Q( {" B
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases3 `: P( T: e3 i$ E3 R* S/ T" g
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low5 {) _" M* ] Z$ b3 Q: Q4 s5 K+ @
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
1 l' H9 G p* upressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
* q* g7 h7 P* J: m: z; T; E* d0 t" cprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer6 Q2 ?+ Q6 t: Y
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as+ v* U9 G/ m7 M/ _' m: g
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
1 @+ W! X" S( w L/ K8 X4 o2 M& q0 w1 ] i
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
' N" M& ?4 n. p3 Tas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton* L! Q$ T% l" P
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
& O7 s5 v/ a9 B* Ymaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
& b2 s/ ~* C) Y, A: ]increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve1 B. `7 G3 p2 o. V1 w+ { J
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
) q; y3 @2 x A S$ M8 [9 Jtowards the end of 2006.
5 S; z8 Z/ V2 P* [
% x# @* L- y% ?! D, a2 pWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
% ^. q3 i; H" Q3 e: M9 Finventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
3 m/ F. O) V& `/ Wto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse/ Q, Z6 S; l: A% T
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
8 A* ?# I& X# _; w) |% wforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
: C" n2 S& W1 u0 q npressure on tight inventory levels.6 k; O8 a( j* f6 D
: I; d# G9 ^0 S2 F
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
6 F& M6 Z9 W R8 k# \fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people/ F" F V* E' f
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;3 w- z8 \" M9 a, |9 Q2 C
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
4 j& v7 F, S. nfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
) a+ S8 @# J" E+ K/ Z! }8 d! s8 D( c% n2 X
<</ J$ ?) M1 c1 Y: z2 o
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
" z+ T. K$ F1 V3 \' A p3 L% h" E7 M4 G% X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 l. z7 h8 r" d& K4 [# I" W Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
6 b3 N+ \: P% Z3 O$ \" u -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 a0 a- o- \, _ J7 W8 |7 u* z
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q31 R: [6 Z" ?4 ]* V( J8 l
Market Average Average % Change Average Average& J, _6 B+ b% K7 l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* k1 y/ x' z$ d' t2 Q6 R+ t" ` Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0005 @& d# W5 f- w9 Z% G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. L+ X' P) a! [ Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000( P, F F! @# ^* s/ L% c. A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 W$ r7 r- _, I6 P2 z7 D8 O! s Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000. a( R& L; Q& Q+ V0 }" y3 w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ Z1 h/ f8 y/ `( T- B$ u! {
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
X3 @: F& g( d# _5 S -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 d/ m. |" u) L8 q" z! Y( j St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333- w/ `$ _7 {- u4 y8 d! R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& U' m; G d! e, w; ?3 J* d Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
5 Z5 ~9 H) E' Q2 V" i) T9 p -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 ] P! O8 g* i Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
5 k6 J$ y1 A8 T+ F$ f -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- C) k1 @7 }% Y! s Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250! t4 e% m3 V7 f1 G* y& i) Z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& z' _$ ^/ d1 P' D. |
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
, |9 E2 ~9 y3 L) e3 x9 F( s -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 j# v( l3 S- V7 R. ~# ^6 ^
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
" U, o8 I' Z9 o# s6 @, B -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# x, ~5 n( B: O( p2 y/ F2 ]# x Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
0 t1 t9 n, z+ G6 I# J -------------------------------------------------------------------------. o3 {9 Y" c" E/ \ K) t3 G
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
2 _; _1 C& X: P -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 O1 L) N0 h' c6 M0 |/ T
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
& G( d; H! j8 i* l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 S! H$ X4 S3 J- E6 {% r8 G Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500 i* _ q- n2 W9 [. X+ {7 v. ?! l1 F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, j) m* l: i1 ]$ C1 q) K# L Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
" a- S7 z, I5 `; j2 E* x f -------------------------------------------------------------------------. a* m2 \% }$ E
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
) _. r! ?( R$ C" V( z2 O -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 H2 C- \( f t
# Y: P4 F! c: n6 m, n -------------------------------------------------------------
: x; |! x S! ], G8 B5 C" ?+ Z Standard Condominium1 u+ M+ A0 @$ H3 L7 d
-------------------------------------------------------------
! D3 {7 Q) ~: u, ?% Z0 ? 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
* X, Y- `3 X0 D, u2 y3 J0 M Market % Change Average Average % Change# z6 G- A, t: w
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 L; Q# p: A$ N9 G/ |* f' l/ [ Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%& j9 y5 M( m' a
------------------------------------------------------------- L! g3 T8 ~" W: T- a$ P: O
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
2 [- G$ A" J2 S r -------------------------------------------------------------
& G- z, n, V0 [% M0 h- N Moncton 4.9% - - N/A9 g( Y' [9 ~3 {! p8 t% q
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 \0 Y' y, z8 \" c Saint John N/A - - N/A0 g0 K, x5 H4 t# U
-------------------------------------------------------------$ I1 U+ Y z9 k1 r, C/ p
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%' ^; A, e" E' o" r9 n- O
-------------------------------------------------------------4 Q) C$ j, A' h$ w5 c5 a& X
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
- h& M8 n. T( k -------------------------------------------------------------
6 ^7 E( c1 S4 W( C Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
8 Y6 P7 I; M0 y# a7 F6 t. f -------------------------------------------------------------
* M$ f: i( n0 x# x: ~, R+ S! g Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
2 M1 C( B0 w n0 t0 r -------------------------------------------------------------
" `" T) T& u4 ^8 g Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
0 p- z* }3 \3 S0 D6 y6 @ -------------------------------------------------------------6 o5 v% e' g, G1 ]5 v& O
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
c( y6 p4 S6 J4 d$ e1 x7 c/ l -------------------------------------------------------------1 h3 V8 f: S9 {+ C. ?& Q
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
5 r8 a- g( P+ q! e4 [2 P+ p -------------------------------------------------------------& s$ N+ M' D; V% C. _
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8% _+ W% x) k; K$ l
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 ^3 o8 I1 Q8 [8 S5 O) _8 U$ b Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
8 ?3 q7 D; w; I! o+ U8 T0 Z+ e- e -------------------------------------------------------------6 w8 i% |7 P& T* o, E. s
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%* l. S0 Y# M7 w2 r, z
-------------------------------------------------------------9 B, L5 ^; d7 e) {6 W. W
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
, {, ~$ K, ~% a -------------------------------------------------------------$ ^% p. G+ V9 i1 `
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2% K/ u, m3 m$ Q4 N' o
-------------------------------------------------------------
; M0 k( V1 F, Q' f6 i >>( X: H4 m4 T) V3 t5 k& h
4 i8 ]. T$ P3 | Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
1 h7 K% ]0 } Kin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint' E, `5 U( t. ], Y; J
John and Victoria.2 P+ j9 T1 |* e% `* q; n
e( m& a2 f! |7 U# D- C1 } The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most# c; K6 |1 }$ G9 q
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of5 F! H3 K# b# B, z2 h: d; j s
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release) ^% ?2 B% v' m+ r! [( L0 d6 v
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price( s' U; o( ?+ P
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities: P+ {0 Y$ m1 D
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is) J g' \& P7 n) R- B& Z
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current5 ^( Z( A/ Y$ f6 J
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
" T) T& M+ _. Oversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
& o. o7 R, L$ T) w! mNovember 15, 2006.3 x1 }1 P& M- ~2 p
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
+ u9 d- o1 ~6 m5 Jfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge! G7 `7 t7 `5 D* h, }
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is7 N b) W% ~9 P1 h
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|