 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
3 s1 w: w. i7 Z3 C5 E* @1 o1 B. C6 A% Q6 P
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
/ ^) ^& v# m2 D2 Q$ j% T" F" }2 h1 j7 c2 R5 T3 k, i" C$ z
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market' E4 |& z6 `1 L. f: F
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third5 s8 ~/ q \! Y* |2 m; r
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
' y/ @% f4 D3 n6 Tin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
, J4 y8 f9 S# v2 N1 sprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
% f# {0 M7 d9 l: d, |3 ]more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
- Q0 m5 y+ ~+ ?0 Q) jQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
, P: p" E; m% |0 `, MLePage Real Estate Services.# N: W2 D0 v% Q3 s; a
/ t d5 I3 j5 r* F1 ~) W- t+ l
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters- d. Z* m5 _6 G K
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
U) ]2 p+ M+ M* Sconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and/ @- B& |! a" @2 y) q3 R2 v& @
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the e( f8 U; s* l( U/ \( L2 R
residential real estate sector.
1 v+ k8 I% x& E1 n; J( ]2 j& O2 h- z- W0 Y$ j8 D4 {/ T
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation0 A4 |$ O6 P- {
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)5 d6 S9 e1 C8 A$ Q9 E% ?& \
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562+ d5 b- q6 L8 i9 d1 g- P9 t7 H% X
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
; l; ~$ ^9 i/ `' P2 o9 g% U4 ?(+13.2%).
' f/ A2 S1 I6 x: ]% d& i6 S; T+ @/ C* h% U7 T' U: J
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth" C# [# i& G1 p4 P, J
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
( W) \/ u9 {. [frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are: V3 ]: K6 z" T$ U
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
# F$ `! C9 K2 z' F6 O" ^- I& lpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.6 S/ l/ k7 _; K- O
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We8 g, p" }* M+ j# J5 c
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
7 I3 ]' f9 O* P3 _1 y! Ebalanced market."4 s1 P* J- K. D1 G3 M: D7 R; Z
9 i/ j; C' P. B0 Y' h5 H
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,6 D/ _5 N" q0 \. t8 `7 @4 R
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift2 J7 P- z' W3 ^) r9 Y. K( W0 f
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
3 X3 O5 E7 D' ]8 v; j y7 \throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core o) {* _5 r* g$ s6 B- t' l
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
) w5 ^5 i: _3 l$ E' @0 Kmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
" v; V8 ]. V6 ~, n' U8 gbreaking price appreciations.4 B& C3 l0 G9 n
. ?% K$ g3 S% P5 h% c" R0 r Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding( @: \0 w" a) ~' z, a7 x/ D7 f
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the) H8 M# b% D8 R
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
6 N$ p+ _, V! s# W+ L( D
% r; ]8 p! l! m# U3 {1 |9 L In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
5 o7 X% B+ h8 w! Z0 u. Keconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
8 T' F, A. u# F8 k4 sconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off" ]7 }2 M, B5 c
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.! h' i& [, }5 A3 j
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
W1 F7 s% O7 l1 X8 f# M/ ugreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
+ ?$ x$ K! Y& D: l) P* f! l% ~price appreciation when compared with 2005.
& `4 C: w2 I# t, _5 H3 w
( ^" f C/ i( J% R( G1 ^ While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
" E( |* n% a6 t2 {0 M Smarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
' d* L3 P2 n7 Q7 Xfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada2 X4 ^( N1 t' N& y/ |) y/ D4 [0 M
are markedly different than those found in the United States.9 `5 L) c1 J" a: r" O# L
! T3 i% Q% t- {1 g) I
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the& n; S5 x+ _+ p& O& z. E/ e
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
/ m( S6 E: u: R; Ffavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
( |& R( Y* z) q% j7 o; r0 xrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general2 m# U4 ?+ s/ S: h
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
- {, g- p7 T& s/ }( f! s0 D7 W0 ldownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and7 D6 G. y5 r5 T) T4 U. e
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
5 M M+ D; U7 X( ^2 Y/ qmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."* V+ p3 O' d& r
6 J8 \% _% Y0 F+ K% n3 n <<
{1 r" ^0 r( o" M REGIONAL SUMMARIES
+ e& p( z( T7 k% Q >>8 h( b. S# @% G
& T* J, k j/ H% V5 q$ L5 c- j Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
2 _7 }5 ^9 T; _0 }Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate9 A0 [5 {# w) V/ g( ?
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
3 t3 ~6 @1 W/ w1 f. Alooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
, k5 V: U7 A4 X( X' S' q2 mrenovations.
3 J: ?: c5 q1 X) b. a A n6 V6 R( i4 y
p% G) C, L8 Y+ _2 F( \ The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight& Q7 X A( n; u4 f) ]
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation1 C1 m% Y- g4 `. M( G
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and# ^- G5 \0 I$ U
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
. n0 ]6 m" V8 F' ? s- ?: T3 M4 h1 u2 {( h( h* b
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer6 H* ]* R- k) r* n. `. ?9 k
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the9 |" o, E9 Q9 D
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new+ x) v$ d( y9 G+ Y8 K" C
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores+ v: k: h5 `; z$ q2 E. ?/ Q
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes) W! p) u" M9 q
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.: S6 n+ @2 [! ] s4 e a8 O
' y( x- E/ @1 d$ i$ B; ^- X In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced* u. D n, r, u) V' j! k
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
/ @! ?; b& H# I/ U: ghomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers6 O! }! Y, T: \( ~* Y. l
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
) b# ` `. l+ I0 ]! ?dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing/ v3 B, y2 h. g8 u
buyers with more options when looking for a home.+ c' t: x4 u1 e& S5 Y+ ~) i
- t# S6 y, u k
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
9 H1 c4 U J7 Q; tamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
9 [1 |/ i+ j/ A5 _7 ppriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,( W3 s4 @. W" m2 S0 l6 H* d- N
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last# K/ s2 _/ j% b! Y2 ?3 ?2 T
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.: k- t! _8 e, Q: i4 l+ K7 B9 A v
; Q% X" F; n: I. q
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house* _! j2 l! o+ O+ ]; F7 Z0 C2 d4 t- Q
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory$ `" o& ~' G4 {5 S
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting+ \1 x0 S) l1 j: A; h
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
. A* K* B, P& t Y/ n* kwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
$ t: _3 i5 T$ P5 q% u! d2 `pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before- a" ^' c( l$ ~" r! Y, ^4 l/ N& o* s4 n0 N
making a purchase.
; w/ ~; c ^8 q/ z
# d6 P, y R3 e2 b Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
' O; Z, o9 P9 s3 A1 g7 h4 ^$ Q( Fmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
( Q1 ~- m5 q0 j- R/ E6 _confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
9 R# Q! |& d* [" A+ zcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
6 @" z$ n/ M% U7 m4 oattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
5 W0 Z% h! C8 S, ramenities.
8 Z7 G5 I7 T+ z7 Y1 T- F) ^7 z7 }9 N- v/ y/ P
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels* P# X B- H' X) L$ }
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand! @- d" n# c. @$ h& g: o
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
! g, {( k0 h9 I/ Acontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been- N9 g4 B/ h# c+ d3 c6 a9 ^: y
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
_8 }" G- i" _4 @& g3 rresidence, rather than for investment.
$ o5 j( ]& e h1 Z: k
9 L$ Y& }$ s$ {" ~2 l4 H8 A The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as% J! o5 i* W3 y
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted3 S) u$ B8 y0 l
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer$ ?9 f! \: ~! z; \& T
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
3 [4 U3 T3 Q3 [rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
H( N& S) x7 t- gthe market.! l1 B" B1 m; [7 I0 t- \% y) A5 Q
, Q! |8 } s9 c1 H) b' b In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
* o0 M0 j9 L1 _' c( I& VJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In7 Y" h6 c( m1 [( j T
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
5 V9 }+ y" G; u8 {. x( @months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
. A4 E4 V, |( _# |# xto the shortage of available inventory.
0 l1 A' a1 P, w1 t& l6 ^0 z
, O- {; C4 ^% V0 f8 L1 R Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
7 L' c- X6 t/ t9 U/ C S6 cmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains. `; J0 {% [+ a2 P/ t; F: Q
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses% V8 H* U) d2 R5 M: c
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.% L0 S0 z6 H+ i, Z. O
# D/ Z w4 d$ w: K2 q
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
r) @+ r9 T: b! n# win the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
# q2 j1 O+ C1 A. c" D- zunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that! w5 f1 S4 _: E1 O/ B) d9 A4 R3 s
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring- f( {0 g N- O# e; Z
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer* |0 a* O% K4 ]5 s$ a% a) a
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as9 J: e" {' H# f
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.$ P! s0 j; ?. e. L
& B) E) z- D3 p7 E) D, x
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter/ ^+ ~: { o+ L) e$ a! k. F
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton5 c6 N3 S( h3 l- E& Q l( v2 O9 o
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
1 Z1 v; _" Z( d: Emaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices4 T: h/ m1 M6 r8 K$ g2 Y9 c: d: H
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
$ l' i a0 i4 r4 b f0 C' V bin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
+ o0 X! D# g- Z$ n/ \# Qtowards the end of 2006.
( ^. @' F/ [7 B# v+ Q6 v( m( w- K8 X( c
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
; F5 n, t9 `- o: h1 Yinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable; ~4 y1 W1 H6 |% u4 Y5 n4 S3 L
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
+ q$ \5 Z$ |7 X8 f! y: fgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
' T7 d. `* W2 r* Y2 dforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
( h2 Z! j1 j4 Q& bpressure on tight inventory levels.
. k5 `& ~) h8 ?
, R& R! P0 Z: R Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic% X1 s+ P& W" g" l. W' }
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people, ]1 Z# |4 h: t$ u3 A$ e
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;6 _$ r, O9 K5 ^
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
% ~7 p$ K+ Y+ z' k( o6 J6 A9 _0 S4 Gfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
( F( n% ?! Y- `0 N9 ~( D' n9 x6 @3 E" ?. X4 t( |7 e
<<
" K: e6 @, G/ d2 {( S Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
+ m, V' N/ d$ p- ?. @+ f$ I U- C; o; v1 k: p% U r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ q& Q I6 F- h, \ Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey, i8 d5 W: B. q' X! \, k
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 q" L: O, V7 @
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3+ z. _4 _! {( F& p! g* K% b
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
; [ G0 y* e' j1 O) [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, x' M, i6 ?- o9 S, w0 v, N Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
9 T; O: g- `! S; f1 T -------------------------------------------------------------------------& U3 @, j: N$ ]4 x7 [6 L# K r
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000" Y9 L+ p. U/ l9 P1 g6 @% f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 [; ? z2 T5 U1 n: z/ T Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0008 |" e7 r8 \8 a6 Z8 o" R) c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; g. o, \; |4 [ Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
$ s- F' n% {% m$ z9 { -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" [: t- i+ I! Q( g2 t" {* z St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
2 Y+ I- w/ y b/ p( q4 N -------------------------------------------------------------------------' p& j5 j* h/ ]' q- ~: y& ^
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
& @, Q8 ?, T7 f: b. u -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ }& Z* E6 G0 }2 z: C( x Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185# I$ j$ X3 U1 Z2 k( g0 b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ n: Z4 ^# \; C* J w" m$ y: y
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
; P0 e: o* }2 K/ \# }0 } -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ g$ i) L' W( C& C" o Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7669 f" M' n6 @, J& @( j) [9 R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ x& P* M" J9 N1 X Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707+ n4 h+ Y) \1 {4 A& N9 P
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 v4 T+ V# o4 _3 Q Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
7 |/ u+ h; O( v. g7 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& V. b4 L: O8 {+ j+ Y3 h7 g Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389, b$ [! ~0 C9 b3 l, S% O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Z3 f- s0 L0 ?3 h Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
: R2 V8 K2 F4 R" t& Q" B3 }4 h" K+ Z -------------------------------------------------------------------------; G4 u4 V1 i- H* ]. r; c
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5004 i# p# u! u- n" c% b& t0 ^6 O$ c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
j/ {5 S( V U1 c Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
5 R0 v2 h( S! I" M -------------------------------------------------------------------------# o: m" c% G7 O% B* A
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8601 G" K1 h3 P, ?! S, J. R6 S3 p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* [3 k% W( j, \' r+ [% H8 k# C8 G1 P% m( F
-------------------------------------------------------------, }( x$ q L" K: w, Z% h
Standard Condominium& E4 M; j% v6 F, @" H
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 h" r& d* [0 P- @ 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
8 P) d2 k! ?! K Market % Change Average Average % Change W3 P; b, k8 X( B ~1 K0 z
-------------------------------------------------------------9 m$ p3 o6 Y& U2 \0 W& s
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
; c ^0 f' j- {3 A6 D/ Y* ? -------------------------------------------------------------- ]3 C- n4 H" K7 b* p1 k) j
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
. Z2 q1 a2 n' k% y% I5 [( u7 @ -------------------------------------------------------------7 l' {. u$ {4 K h/ H% `
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
2 Y w: C5 l. g& W8 V -------------------------------------------------------------* c. F' I7 ?. z8 N
Saint John N/A - - N/A
' @7 \+ g- [" l: ^ -------------------------------------------------------------1 I/ l5 R1 K7 l% ?
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
! x7 c' ~. x9 |) N& ?# o9 J -------------------------------------------------------------, f; L# \5 W0 e6 Y) N) E
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
; [5 S* V" O+ ^+ m6 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------
! @' W+ v* U- t$ F$ p4 a Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%/ D4 n' h; J% w4 t) V
-------------------------------------------------------------
& _/ w* x& [6 z8 N3 d+ t Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
4 c) V: ]1 a" E% d+ }9 `) Y -------------------------------------------------------------. `$ x# o) z( F7 W1 w7 F8 l
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%0 `3 ?3 d$ w$ E
-------------------------------------------------------------; D8 U% e7 G1 Y& ?* m+ J
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%" m* g, S4 o7 ?1 j+ a* [
-------------------------------------------------------------6 ~+ Q. a, o' O9 ^+ T% K( c. q
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
( n1 D# S7 I9 Q9 A3 J* n$ W -------------------------------------------------------------
! y" u8 R7 K% P Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
( \& i% Z. S/ T( k -------------------------------------------------------------$ ]. h; b% V2 ]5 O2 L
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
8 e8 V/ r6 ?9 p) K- f- W ------------------------------------------------------------- W/ E7 S+ v3 E, Z* m
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
4 W! z# Z# }) X y- j -------------------------------------------------------------0 N! W2 _. {% l0 g0 P
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%, |; p: f7 \, L" }
-------------------------------------------------------------
, \$ s" G: x- k3 ~; }8 F9 }6 E4 r National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
& B1 ^; ~; r4 `# T* t0 u -------------------------------------------------------------+ O s8 S I x( k8 q* `# }
>>
. W5 W" F) {; p# c, o0 p+ o6 D. ^" D/ O4 _8 A4 L
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined- f, O. Y" b) C& O4 |% C
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint, }+ Y/ S- {: k6 o7 b
John and Victoria.0 q6 @! i4 R/ B O: _9 u
. |; \% r: a6 U& A8 B The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most% W+ w- g" C" ?0 i& G8 z( P* J1 d, E
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
9 M" C8 U1 g0 n f5 x* c ihousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
1 k( \2 V0 W' D3 o/ i7 c7 U( Hreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
6 k4 A% @0 [. q7 a' s9 k5 e/ Xtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities3 a, D( M& x! o3 t2 u0 C
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
7 F: i2 d+ k2 [# ~- D' g) tavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current3 b$ Z4 X8 l! U
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable7 e4 |0 W8 u' }$ P, a% I5 W1 K
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
: K. M; `* F) {% ENovember 15, 2006.
* a' d9 m# h0 K& c: K) x# Z8 g' X Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of0 ^0 I2 X* X' C9 V* W
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
- [5 @8 v* ~& uprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is6 _) i/ g7 j* k1 s2 t) v0 n
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|