 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
- c/ |- s5 F9 l5 g+ p) ^- ~) _4 t$ U! D
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
0 G( q: s8 ^( x- D. \& ^9 Q" w# s' z9 b. u& a2 B5 R
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
; e' _' H1 a5 j! C( M, e$ l hexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
; m( p; C4 t% X6 ]: equarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
& k# {4 X; p1 ]# ]! `in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
0 {- E; x7 L6 `2 z( s# _( H3 }price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
0 g0 A9 c: Z/ h6 T9 wmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
% o3 n/ u5 }; ~' aQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal& |8 r: } Z0 \( s! k
LePage Real Estate Services.0 y( w+ s Z" t' l) Q d
3 z5 U- }4 A1 F' Z( ~
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
9 t2 R0 o' F) a, sare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic" V B5 i* }9 e" `$ G0 Q# e
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and' e' r. S+ v/ |. b# E
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the" D/ Q9 O: @9 x4 p- F8 a% i
residential real estate sector.
" c7 x# o# k$ Q7 ] D0 i
. x$ |! l7 ?. r8 a Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation7 v) |' n4 d& n1 B0 u& ^
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
) }& Z$ d) R# L n, V+ Fyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
$ Y+ C) a- ~, C0 J" u(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380, t. H( I0 j' V5 C
(+13.2%).
+ B1 f- _' ]6 U, |; V
, v0 V @: S X# _) w+ y" m7 W "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth/ k/ u# ^: U5 G, `2 ~( u0 E$ {# B
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the2 W6 b* N& s* [5 ]
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
& C. K, F, U$ h2 m+ lpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
0 n0 f/ n9 m3 V5 S# i+ zpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.' o% ]0 S* v- P6 o; e3 f/ V
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
$ J5 o2 f8 H: W9 ]9 Awelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
' b, @0 x7 _+ R' I) r' T6 u6 A4 w7 |balanced market."
( _8 L8 |% J* P7 ?, s" o/ V
; n$ Z6 [2 J5 L+ d: [. d p Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,* c& k. x' L6 }) x* _9 u! O
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
; R- L7 d% O* l7 m! Kto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued% b/ E3 I' Z3 S% Y0 ~" j* c" X1 S. z4 |
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
+ e9 m. V' M9 X( X1 J9 [/ cenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,- k$ P5 E7 t, L1 J- f+ M
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
) }9 \4 o" A. Q3 e% u& a8 B5 P' P! ibreaking price appreciations.- b; |9 A1 g8 r; E: D4 y+ p
' K6 J5 X, S: S" U3 _/ ] Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
, X! c e1 P4 geconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
/ p# R% N: R v$ nlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed./ o1 n! {5 U7 [
. O7 q- C2 y1 F7 d g
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid% \5 W2 h- j. }. \
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer. |9 {- j3 L0 S! q5 l0 A0 q; S% ]! O
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off6 ]! U* Y; o8 v. n* n% R
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
, X1 F; z/ g- v& B, ]In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers2 S1 Q; n V& m; S7 e$ @9 d
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
, Z# R. c5 ^# V5 A. F' |price appreciation when compared with 2005.- |( p( q# A0 |4 D9 R7 c* a; R
4 m& t7 P* t8 r- `; F
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing, {; ^& Z' `. j& B
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and; ]5 T1 U* |3 z7 z+ i5 W8 M4 a* ~: v
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
. ^7 J* M- Z& ^are markedly different than those found in the United States.
/ d* Y5 d8 f9 D5 M* S" Z) f6 \* }$ ~& y, }
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
7 G2 r$ ~8 y9 V* w# y5 k3 b; T4 eAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
" v( L* \! L( c+ L* p) Dfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the. `. O B7 I4 |" V: U+ ]
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general" T1 Z& W8 u% d* h
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the, ~/ r, i. v' i+ z% m3 e& [* }0 k
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
# G: d1 r4 i. a7 B4 P" f8 u R) laggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization8 G: ^$ L/ }& X$ v$ ~8 I
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."- U2 X d \( t3 d8 ?
* V8 `4 R7 _. {( W& X: a. S' z' [
<<3 ^& T6 P3 o5 N4 j, c6 P& z
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
7 U* z: k' \3 b( Z2 f) u >>
& t( j4 B3 j- h8 f# b- ]
& j' Y9 G; C4 J7 s Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
1 X/ N, v* m- M) ~$ J* }Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
* w# P4 w1 d, F5 y1 e+ _7 sof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
: J( A* w* l* I2 d6 Vlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
: r2 G- X" @0 g% crenovations.
! g* Y' _/ i( u3 w
6 n% Y ` \. J; ` The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight. ^6 ]3 X/ g% V; l: @
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
9 _: B* b! H% X; O( I+ e- \+ Kcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
( h3 k7 v/ B. O( dSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.& e! s6 p B. N g
' i& {' z! v q The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer/ x* a( E B- U8 ?! S1 e
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
) S; K% ~3 D f0 q1 Oquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
: j: g1 a/ J+ F& h a- c# U( E# z600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
" l* n$ C! O5 Jto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
2 ~2 V/ x4 {, ?% A ? D+ Band are instead opting for more affordable housing options.5 q1 L1 |- _/ z
6 b8 x& H4 m/ J
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
- V9 O+ @) k: [+ Y" w6 Nconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their0 b7 \$ O$ q; @) n* k
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers5 F- _6 e( B1 m
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
$ [3 u7 f$ p' K2 H4 V9 {dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing4 ?2 e$ V8 ~/ p. C3 e& _, r! y J
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
# l2 P. I; a- h9 O; g& b% w
, t% a% y3 V: j+ w1 H6 a1 \ Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
# s( I# P' [( A. t1 Samong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes8 V! o& L, ?0 l, y8 d% ]6 _1 B; M
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,$ B G0 ]7 f# F* R+ j0 D
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last1 V% t' b' [. p1 S+ G c' P
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
* j& i% i- _/ q* o
/ P, e- C% Y. R0 C/ E7 ^. h Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
3 `& ?7 c6 T* j: yprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory; \5 ]' Z# [ K
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
& ^" X1 t2 J! u1 g3 Z0 Xfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,! I- N, F. ]1 D
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the, F9 x$ k5 l E0 K, E$ y% s
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
: {& f4 C& \. Y3 rmaking a purchase.9 q3 R* O+ \+ @9 i: C1 s( T, ?
' q) H! l* a/ ?# \1 d Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing$ A6 x8 ?- c0 [% Q( R; M3 Q& v
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
* I5 A3 | a7 E% y, Z( Jconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
& _. ]$ N+ Z! i& |. s: zcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
i% z: G# b0 W; O9 {attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
+ G0 n" h% g, U' samenities.
& r8 W8 \, H# E" R4 m9 z9 O# v! ?9 o' a) T, X3 H8 ~6 ?0 B
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels7 o! g# Y$ W+ I. B, O
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
4 g6 d% n+ Z( b. D$ wacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has) ?' L" N: M! t# |3 b
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
) ^% k1 O; b& F% R# H: }$ g* E$ F/ Ndriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
( q4 O" V x0 J% V3 D+ Cresidence, rather than for investment.5 L$ C8 y0 P1 T; p6 G( S9 v7 H, M
0 t+ M; A7 ^8 A4 w. h4 P: J% M3 v
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
4 ]* M5 O* q% v% b6 S7 R) Shouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted; r% Q; p; W! P- I7 M% I# C
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer( s- ?/ f/ a0 {# K8 V
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
% L; F, D# i3 p( trate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
4 {" O% f, ]3 F q- t7 }+ sthe market.) _! n6 n( J# V" F5 c; F8 t
7 o, T: |, i7 b% Y( m* V4 D In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through3 ]' Q* |) A; t, A+ L
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
# h( C6 Y! a9 ]4 C8 ^$ o! q7 yAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
" ?! K: ]; N$ n; omonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due- B6 B, c+ b+ W8 w, C
to the shortage of available inventory.. n) c* C" l, m+ ?
0 F$ o/ ]$ A; U W$ C; o
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
8 N0 G2 c8 `5 E$ k, Zmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains1 v' T9 c& j* q* `' C& j3 w
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
5 B: J6 Z+ b" D9 G- \- [: b7 R' z2 Hstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.9 z" z b/ Z* M! |4 ~, O: i c9 X( G
) K$ H6 N/ O* u7 L4 c1 t( J
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases7 n7 r# n! O9 `. @* D0 u
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low2 s: p7 N* T# u; k- {
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
% x2 e7 i% @+ c+ x- o4 ppressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring4 y, ~4 F: U q6 `2 }. E c. k
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
; @1 V7 M- ^$ y% U+ vseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
3 b0 _4 {' \" F1 b' Dbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
0 F+ j* Z1 x+ d n# B% m/ I' ~2 r% ], Y+ ^. g
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
1 a5 E! m9 M" p( I. h4 Was activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton* N2 N* M _+ q
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
% K; B$ Q3 q0 i/ U; z4 X. ]maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
4 q! e. C, B, {- _- ?7 I7 Q4 V* i$ lincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
* K- P# W2 u) r5 I$ Jin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
" G. F9 n9 F' Q+ ^% utowards the end of 2006. / C5 q" f8 ]: @8 L' w- x6 X( \
0 i6 t# {, e' HWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
, r7 K9 W7 O- H5 ~7 Binventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
! T- `; e8 M& [6 U. i3 v- O0 w+ Pto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse# ?3 w- I$ ^0 O' x3 J, Y
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to3 n1 \9 y- F$ Z4 O5 K; s v5 Y/ Q
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added A1 v# R' w: b# F; t$ m+ X
pressure on tight inventory levels.# I! Q! p5 V4 g! b; ^8 }6 K/ ^
8 P, U5 y& |# \1 @) [+ | I+ ]
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic s2 ^9 o: M+ P6 g
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
$ O. u9 _, W+ Jinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;2 J& f; q7 x9 R
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
: X0 C3 }' `# P. v1 U2 q& {for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
: }6 F, Z* o' M' c6 d: {
0 _" n! O' N* q' N1 i5 }) ?% | <<9 y+ G: `& ]1 y/ D# O3 {* }4 m
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
" Q# f8 B: Q. y/ F! K
1 X- k. f% u* a" |9 P: r1 E6 U -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 p5 b: u$ B! |& A' |
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
8 ]% K4 S+ L3 a8 L+ ]% a g -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" C$ O$ X# Z+ j8 b& U# T# Y! Z! F0 m$ r 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
. @% d: `. F( ~9 M% D" B; D6 X Market Average Average % Change Average Average) w8 h f c/ J7 X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( P2 F4 }: e* d$ f0 N
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0007 e# e, y# S+ J( B$ D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ a) h) z( C0 p! \# z! l0 Q9 t
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
H& Y9 h9 z+ T7 v9 T; s# K9 O -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 J7 B5 e6 N6 } Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0006 @1 A& o2 U2 L! b, `, e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. w9 l! n9 {; c$ j* o! {1 r Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
, o7 F1 d% K5 ?: h -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 n2 L1 |$ d# V y! i% ` St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
; P/ n* m& B8 e. Z2 g7 ]8 t% `3 I: u -------------------------------------------------------------------------! u+ l) M. f# W3 M; h* W, \
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5831 d2 z% q5 I/ {* L! h. O- g4 }
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& X5 @. c4 F: _" w1 C: C
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
! O* @# H5 }, F1 G -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 t% F6 c6 g) c1 V Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250* I0 ?' o ~, Q' }' c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------0 W; F1 @2 v* I5 T# d: x# ^8 @
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766: V1 |2 A" w+ d& F- y. r; [: s* r
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! `' D1 m+ j$ p& a9 X Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
2 s0 {( M' E% z& i3 y7 d -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 ^. I8 L2 h. [3 k, E. I& g Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
5 E3 n1 g. G4 X7 J2 g; Q$ S -------------------------------------------------------------------------' U: U$ o G/ P! l1 H
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389* c/ m# a5 {: i2 s9 f: O+ o Z/ L2 m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 y7 c z0 S- G0 W- l
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714* y# R5 }' u2 F- ^' ]; N4 F0 \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" `7 p, _/ U, e* ]
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500+ G* s+ i. j4 L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; c b$ Y9 n8 p$ p; |: t Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0008 j" A% @& _0 m n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ b: D3 D, c& s2 @0 `! O8 O
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860! Y% s; E" H' X6 S' }) y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" O( |- l7 j$ ]% z4 [6 `1 k: ~8 |* x4 g v) X3 m
-------------------------------------------------------------" \: L J3 n- j6 q8 ]
Standard Condominium4 y8 j* K M& \6 Q
-------------------------------------------------------------* B" g; B/ N. N, i3 c( ]
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo+ A. {1 L' R- ~1 f( r! V! }6 `
Market % Change Average Average % Change
# \' ]8 w& m# F! W5 J2 [4 l -------------------------------------------------------------
+ N) i0 ?2 {+ V% S( e1 g4 g) ` Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%! E w. N0 {# j1 M2 S/ k
-------------------------------------------------------------, f% x3 |, D7 j& Q) ], R1 C
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%9 C- S3 m% ~" D! A5 g
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 {2 b% I1 t; V1 t Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
$ m7 _" S- H; T3 @* m -------------------------------------------------------------
6 y5 a7 N/ E( _3 F8 J4 ~ Saint John N/A - - N/A
4 r' B& O# I& I. p8 Z -------------------------------------------------------------
3 Z7 o6 r' @: a1 n St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
8 D _. c* k E. p! t1 b$ f G -------------------------------------------------------------, i C6 j! U+ P }% k9 o
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
# s4 A. o: w1 P0 W+ d/ o; } -------------------------------------------------------------
# g) M2 E' L5 d/ X Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%# ~4 g/ m7 }5 p7 N$ a3 v' b/ Y, ?
-------------------------------------------------------------; b4 O6 w w: k' m
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
. n9 J) E: F% D6 s4 x4 f2 M -------------------------------------------------------------
3 \' u& e# m! } Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
, e% \1 ~0 e0 _# c+ }1 I. [ -------------------------------------------------------------3 g1 U/ D1 i8 Y0 f. i6 S C
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%% g& Z) R; Z7 \
-------------------------------------------------------------
) G' P! `! l$ o: j: j( C" _$ n6 g. ` Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2% ]1 u) r& l; @! h1 |4 G# a
-------------------------------------------------------------% C' o V! d( G4 C
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
8 F+ Z2 T9 V1 z0 i- A+ D4 p% m -------------------------------------------------------------% a* G; m* A I( F/ j
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%# I; j4 T% Z1 |: t5 Y3 h
-------------------------------------------------------------& ~6 d' y5 I8 q) _8 ^/ E
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%9 z& Y. ? C) a! V
-------------------------------------------------------------
, {2 H: s8 z% o+ }% l; U x Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
3 N Q# S" c* z+ }0 r" Q -------------------------------------------------------------
: A( R3 K- I" k/ G8 O; o National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%: o+ a6 ~! x+ a1 q+ Q8 _$ u
-------------------------------------------------------------
. c; _8 U3 K( @ >>9 s. {0 T3 g2 A3 _) F
& Y" k0 R. Z+ l. Q% r Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
. {; ^. G& }% H f8 n) a. P8 Z1 B- lin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint. ]7 j7 m2 J$ z! D' G
John and Victoria.
1 Y" y6 q; M$ p- [# R3 ]* h, @9 m0 L$ K8 I' G. w$ v: r+ S
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most& E. K) a; J" b/ s: i3 c! j
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of/ i2 `6 C- y- {# V$ E5 a! @9 S# G0 {
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
1 I8 L; v$ R' K& _" Y8 Areferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price5 _' `8 | H7 Y6 b
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities4 C1 |( j0 v+ s( B9 e! a2 S
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
$ D8 n: J/ P' c" Lavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current9 _( H6 Z, P$ { V
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable4 [* Y9 b$ }, y0 r) u1 I
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on! R" n& B1 c6 F1 @! d
November 15, 2006.
8 n0 L+ J: f4 i, L; q- f3 I Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of6 c8 M7 l4 t, f$ r! A% @/ h2 v* J
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
- N+ ^* f5 B1 P# ~" p/ h2 J1 Hprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is% I( W2 a. ^( A' W; \ f# \
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|