 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 8 r2 C+ z8 v# b( G Z
" |) v' I _- c$ C4 n2 g
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
9 S, N& [8 U( D$ ?# U) |. v [" L! n: ^! d" H5 Z( Y
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market/ x3 w! G0 A, @& ]
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
. S; Y) M9 L# v8 o$ e! z4 O5 aquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
. w4 I# f4 u) I2 `2 Oin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
. K& F) j- I. G* H$ yprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and z6 p; L, M+ T4 J5 N) r6 d
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario, H& ?+ \$ e) |" o0 w
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal' T! X9 a9 l& R+ h. }2 h
LePage Real Estate Services.! j- @2 _4 w+ v
1 ?& V( @1 Z! T: W2 M5 P1 N Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
$ a8 C3 b; C3 V" dare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
4 Y/ C" G( y+ n; b, e2 dconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and6 s% L( X* D" {! l' O
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
$ A% n+ _; g* M6 J! [6 Eresidential real estate sector.
& r. P* W- |& b/ ?; T3 I. W# j
1 Q( s, m, q5 O& o Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation6 m& U5 H* T1 s, }' l+ j
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)5 ^7 q% W" y W' V
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562- Q, ?# u+ o$ P
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380' Q; i) E4 t7 Z& K" e/ Q
(+13.2%).) F. F) Q# N4 Z$ C
' K/ r% y2 K2 t6 a, V) @
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth1 z* A D1 j$ z& s z! n
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
+ c4 u# O0 X6 M) d2 ~- l9 bfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are! w) x0 y' I8 X' x+ c& W6 A* {
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
; S8 `0 n* W: ]) [president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
" D+ e8 k" q; |9 n- v1 W( Q"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
2 t4 l( A/ G5 [) Q" jwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
) ^+ j* H0 h& V" U+ Kbalanced market."
* n4 b) z6 _; @. c. E1 R8 \# a" u1 D
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,) z7 M9 [2 `1 a) m8 i
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift% p; P! ?1 x9 M- O- r
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued; }5 U* b& ]5 I8 J. w5 c2 t
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core, x( S* F) p7 S) A7 V1 h
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
* |) L" c) @& J" cmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record4 B3 f" c8 M5 [# N# p- n
breaking price appreciations.+ d% k# Z7 o' C: n
# i4 F, {4 q; v c" L/ j0 C, R Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding2 B$ M. _/ N( t% }; e3 j* c+ @ a6 Y
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the( i) j6 A, Y2 b; n: ^- @
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
6 c0 K }3 F+ q/ i- H. q: `
6 p( ^" s5 q C* Y* K* _: }) }# f In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid% i( g- o1 e* F. o( W, W# ~) s
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer5 S) l; ]; g6 m. p- T! K
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off/ k* A+ R7 P8 [/ T8 Q/ B- n4 L8 S
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth., Y4 `* ]) T9 m
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers$ K8 @) [% o. J3 d2 z/ P. S2 Q; X
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
$ N7 x' b6 k0 e/ C" n7 m0 oprice appreciation when compared with 2005.2 W( {9 k! J1 ~4 m- X6 s
* d9 t& ?3 S( x% ]* [ While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
$ M; H, D" t% Y- Umarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
, I% t$ A+ b* L$ i7 ffinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
' ?3 u9 T R! v4 ?; R" k. Rare markedly different than those found in the United States.
- N+ o: D9 r) A& _8 J, }0 q0 \0 A' X; R8 t9 K R9 \
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the7 m( S6 W+ _& K3 s
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's* w; P" A6 p" _2 q' e
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
: M+ ^$ }3 u! K( J# v% X1 ?0 k' B5 z3 krelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general+ @7 N4 ^0 g& n- M g; j3 W
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the9 x' F1 Y2 d4 w% e: ?
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
5 n7 ]5 a) M6 q j% @8 A$ ]' F0 Caggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
4 s/ C; W! C* \% e6 X4 x8 @mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
& r. P" a( v; C6 w$ o' q0 V
+ y2 M' G/ t) e: ]# i <<- N. I3 e: L( ~ n
REGIONAL SUMMARIES+ G( Z* @8 i; M# j
>>
4 A; O4 ]7 D# ?2 q& G' g* ]0 o' |- b8 ]+ o
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
0 Z) ?0 Q6 i& g1 IHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate, L' G9 S( E3 W, k: c$ p
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time v$ Q4 c# J& @3 W$ a
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
- c( L$ w+ H5 C/ `+ }. a, k+ ^renovations.
" ]0 Q7 l3 L/ j& L+ t9 J8 C; {. c/ S- b. P
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight9 W( J6 u4 n; e4 L; S
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
; A- o# O' Q6 P- C1 l/ Xcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and: H9 [1 W3 N6 e+ @
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.* i( |7 `. P' ^: ?3 N o: H/ {+ [
/ {/ K% _/ W* d) [ The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer' J" H5 E" l! ?
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
- k3 l8 ^- q% a: |( squarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
0 x$ m6 _7 c5 a7 K4 u* Z600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
7 X4 ]. R7 [9 N/ A5 bto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
/ C+ K& r; D/ j/ M& I" qand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
6 N! {; n! m8 S
& k$ E$ d, `6 D7 a In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced9 e+ B7 o" J* n3 Y# K8 p' o
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
1 C% w; C7 q! a s- p/ V& whomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers4 B$ v. W% j, U% K' L1 v* r
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
& H9 |# ~3 f" D4 G w5 `& fdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
5 ]3 y9 Q. v; w9 c6 ^/ Vbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
1 z/ G+ c9 R+ [+ w& g" `" x) m( l4 o2 K
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly; b8 a O5 O! j, `7 \
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
. ^7 _* @4 S9 e; @0 ]priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,# y( S% J) \7 [% U- Y' D# E
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
7 D. ?$ Q% e& W& v) L5 Nfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
q2 z8 G5 V% C( p8 j4 _6 Z% v$ H% ^3 R6 W
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house# H+ w% ?8 m \7 l$ ^
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
8 a3 R: v4 m Clevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting; ?# ^' L# f U; A8 U" k1 n
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
# J" t$ b: G6 zwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the( O; i6 t+ F( V5 [% `: H3 d
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before" I3 f! z! ~# \, U q$ U Z6 o
making a purchase.
* o) [8 ?% Y1 Z- \2 d! S) o8 \# M3 [" Z: u
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing: W0 r. |, ]! V: D
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
; h. a; q6 D3 c! q0 econfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city# k$ y9 l8 n8 n. G
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
7 [: X1 y9 n: o; Vattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown1 m: g/ f' ?1 R' g, W' z- D) f+ E9 g
amenities.+ b7 J0 h7 b0 A1 L: t' Z- A' T4 e
9 u/ x- p8 f' r( d, `: N; d8 U7 |2 j
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
( l; ]1 a" K' M; O8 F- qthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
1 S! V" Y. u R( v& }5 Uacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has4 v9 | N+ d I; G+ O
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been# r% A# C" J/ q# G
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
, J9 q* t# S1 y3 G7 Qresidence, rather than for investment.
+ t/ b$ b, D% ~' `
1 n5 k( a f7 s' f6 @' i The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as$ w9 j% H( r) o2 V' Y- |4 f! ^
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted" C, X- f1 `2 S3 n3 K
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
5 I7 v# T/ e. d4 `7 rconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
# E/ V0 ^' h% Y5 h1 C7 Drate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter1 S* `( {8 z# T
the market.
0 t/ ^4 N* X6 o: n* c4 U# c2 K6 F* F; Z1 S$ I/ z4 [1 s. k, ?
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
3 ?/ c5 J' t P. @July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In+ C6 V% Y' X1 t2 M5 E
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring- n$ j3 N: V1 ~0 v0 f* r
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due' k, M' [, N' z0 F
to the shortage of available inventory.
+ p6 i+ p5 }2 p0 r" y3 u4 T' U% c9 z# w' g( S
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
& r6 `5 i5 u2 e+ emomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains7 K8 E1 K9 P( ]: C: m
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses. ~2 _; t: |5 k' c8 Z: y" R
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.( { Y. |( W' h' Q7 c
7 v0 O7 T1 \5 Z0 L6 r Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
$ r/ v5 @: u: u. W4 r+ Oin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low: j8 [/ r* u |$ P
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that3 l+ G* m( v. M! {4 a
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
: C! R- e' K5 `9 dprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer/ o }4 f1 Y2 Q8 u, @( W
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as: L, |0 T* [' j6 _
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.( n1 Q& }1 I/ m% R+ C* v9 X
& a1 \1 R8 M/ n6 _
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter9 @2 D& c- I; c# a
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton) L w/ E7 L ~7 v
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,9 a: o ~& }: {
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
2 g5 V2 q+ l# Pincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
' f; e/ f, v4 u$ Uin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly. A. x3 ], @( Q7 P9 Y# l: S
towards the end of 2006. ) e0 j6 \8 f' R- J2 _8 T, d7 t
; u" ]# T) k/ ^& w! D8 Q5 }
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
. T. K: O. `& Dinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable7 D9 v' ~# g+ S; @0 D
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse* t& Q# o& a* ]& X) O8 m! u7 y2 g5 K
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to0 v8 H& s, S0 \5 }: |
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
( t7 _6 x( A4 `pressure on tight inventory levels.
+ R. B& p3 p/ k5 ~: X8 Q" G. Y
- @" j1 t, D- W# h Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic6 }7 ]& ^) w5 M1 M' W
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people& z) U% @ j! [8 J
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
" @- O! r2 Y* B1 X9 Nwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching: \7 U: _8 h$ \
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.- m) H7 f. X1 L# N- _- ~
R; V- `: S* r+ }: e <<4 u# t# v( f% L- R/ P' L
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006! X" o+ W. K% B# |5 ?5 h
3 K% w/ F% P. k0 Q9 R1 `4 {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Y" [( m# _3 s
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
7 `. v% Q" Z2 c- ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------! z" G* k+ v9 F9 Z9 z
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3! s% Y% `# v3 y' L: w
Market Average Average % Change Average Average! ?. }4 j6 O' i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# g8 _( e# a S Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
7 ^/ k/ q) T( f6 \. h4 j -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ?" l$ S! M% v6 }
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000" i5 i# {: V+ m2 u2 l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Z! J- `/ f3 W- C* J
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
( u( [/ a& [ h -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" n" m( l4 x& o& i& {! [8 }8 K Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -. J, }( U0 R1 r& \ i4 {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 U' v) S+ ?2 R9 e" s2 @. R% R St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333. @1 m3 E H: \8 H
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! z+ }& k5 f5 j$ s
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
) c8 j! j( z2 l: [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ N) x1 N7 a- f# ]; Q6 }+ n Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
* e1 t9 x( k0 Z& k -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 V" V: L7 i! B! a: `& M/ e/ t& L Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
" S& A/ ]+ }2 O; F7 W -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- v! F4 f: `1 a8 J Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
4 I9 T3 J) v4 _" E2 m -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* ?" A( E! n$ Y Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7077 n) H" d. j8 l, g$ f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 K/ q/ l: f. U8 P" j Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5008 q; m h" e- B& \+ w% ^) v
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 b. z) J E7 W' M Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
4 X" Y2 X; m5 E3 U6 e5 c& S ------------------------------------------------------------------------- N5 R D" y. s* v6 ]1 U% T
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
& _. `7 S/ I: H ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; j0 d m* l1 x. Y P9 h- u# L Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
9 ]; G5 B# g5 l# x -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( b6 k5 |+ @8 f% _! d9 t Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
* Y. Y. ^# r! F+ H. T/ q2 s -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 ]* f- p7 ?8 _! \! ~. W6 p* w
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8604 M$ \0 r3 Q0 e& g- M l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ K9 m2 N3 S. @$ O
7 Y0 X6 U$ }" h/ u' a" }* N
-------------------------------------------------------------7 K# w9 Q+ k% D5 u( ?/ `8 z' r2 P6 V
Standard Condominium, k7 y! Q" J* z+ b' b
-------------------------------------------------------------( l) J2 @2 E4 g; S
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
) l7 {& e1 i/ {- ?- x) I Market % Change Average Average % Change% a$ s8 D1 ]4 g) H; u b6 e, @
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 r8 f, ^6 N7 H9 F8 r! a9 N Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%3 U$ g% J# E' _4 b3 U! b. _
-------------------------------------------------------------
% X$ @0 e5 q9 u/ a/ z Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%4 h8 A4 c7 Q% ~# c6 Q4 c- |
-------------------------------------------------------------' f- X- }4 t6 J6 W$ K# Q3 k% j" U
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A0 E. t+ x6 U1 a0 W, z( R6 w' J: p
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 @6 n& o8 \* i2 \+ A& N Saint John N/A - - N/A
$ s# a% v! N8 p& H) _+ `8 r -------------------------------------------------------------) A' q5 ]" y9 n3 T4 W6 _7 j& g
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%( E+ {2 d7 {" \$ u U+ F; l
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 T0 R* B& {3 f) u, h Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
* E% P2 S3 M9 } -------------------------------------------------------------
, B; n4 D7 W, R1 G- ~: B Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%1 u8 S' Z. [9 ?3 l6 g. l0 A
-------------------------------------------------------------& W3 g. X2 b2 [8 Q4 B7 ^! p8 L
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
8 a6 R/ Y; \- ?4 w) S ------------------------------------------------------------- S6 S7 |4 j F3 O- Q
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
; p9 j% _* o, N -------------------------------------------------------------
, L5 u1 k2 {9 j6 D @) T; w5 S Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%; o" @5 G% v& V4 A# U. K2 ?4 ~
-------------------------------------------------------------: l& K1 @. ^4 D& e! j1 b( s3 f& z
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%$ X6 j5 H: h9 J; A; Y! i& C( V
-------------------------------------------------------------
: E2 W) S Q4 c. b Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%9 X- S, l* \6 C& a* P
-------------------------------------------------------------3 J+ |7 |9 ^5 c6 [0 t( B
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
0 O4 o# x% t* ^5 |8 P; u -------------------------------------------------------------0 i0 ]: w) A% d& b+ b E
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
# p0 O0 F. j- Z5 O( n/ Z -------------------------------------------------------------" y4 u; |& |* ?( ^) I& b$ j; d
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
3 D8 d, z' k7 Q* u' ~ -------------------------------------------------------------
4 B i& m7 V: d: J National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
9 R! C* Z- e$ w -------------------------------------------------------------) C) @. A! S- _) F4 s% L6 }
>>
8 Y7 K# |( d1 K5 M6 X: G) m! J a$ S( q* P4 M4 e3 s, @/ T
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined" |1 ^; [- S7 ]9 J2 B
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
% _5 k& u. U5 j" g9 Z% W2 {7 lJohn and Victoria.
/ |3 |5 p3 J) `0 E* s6 D% @" F( O* o$ G' i7 {6 O/ x! S
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most0 Y# ?2 \# F* i8 c6 t) D- e9 o$ L+ o
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of$ d( ~ E5 D! u" w! l; Y% {( O
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
' B, ~6 P' G( ~; vreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price' @ m- \* P+ O. v: [/ X2 Z
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
5 p' J8 a5 G$ H! ^6 i, I( [8 F2 macross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is) X- D9 m# ^; B9 B V6 @
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current" ?6 B1 Y( C6 A6 W
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable. b. ~( v$ I3 Y8 q4 D# R3 W8 \9 {
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
, Z+ M# W [" v5 X1 V1 yNovember 15, 2006.
/ `1 ?" n- C- H! y% G Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of- n. y3 U6 u, Y7 D2 z, G
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge; k$ W1 Y. r! _9 P
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is2 U0 g0 A4 C; u+ d
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|