 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
- m! t4 _/ b7 f0 _4 \
" p7 R! Z" p* b2 z5 @+ F* F- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -1 L5 x& O+ S1 W9 _' n
% Y5 w+ Z1 v& Z" `1 X* o; u t. f, ? TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
e0 v& I& c" Oexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
E+ S+ j7 x0 Y, T8 i8 Wquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
, E& h% F& L4 P5 i% Tin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit- p5 l: p7 y$ |! b* v4 D
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
6 u8 {, p8 S- z8 I* `, p2 N, q# M" s+ Emore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
+ h: j0 ]4 Q& `, Q3 J) d$ rQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal1 H, P$ B5 o- b+ a l/ N4 B
LePage Real Estate Services.
' D8 E% Z( E. ]$ [# r0 H! U {, S/ z) T2 J
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
; K1 A3 h) I! D6 Ware forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
3 ]% R) t0 w$ \/ B& Mconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and+ g+ V6 i' |& h! z/ w0 n# v
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
( u K W& ?" S5 {! F, o0 |1 y- fresidential real estate sector.% G' U/ _5 n+ ^% m6 c( F+ |. e
n3 o0 m0 R4 h
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
5 R; I9 U4 `& boccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
( u4 @+ ]' ]8 g a: M* \year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5622 w, O4 o$ h B8 f' N" t9 C: ]
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380& r: m: Q! d) X( \2 H3 H; p* Q$ _
(+13.2%).; B3 j% `- }6 f! P& a5 I
$ @& W$ G' {% B* N" [" @
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
/ O# C1 s0 Z0 I. b" r& L( [0 H; oduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
; i3 F o+ H+ ]3 X, _$ ^frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
4 b5 |* R5 m2 |. Spoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
; u! U" A8 S" I1 e& H) ppresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.# G' H9 v* z+ x0 A3 H$ }5 t
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
# U0 |9 s6 a8 Y5 v; A! g. Mwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy* R1 i. u' _% O0 d' l! U
balanced market."; T! [; M$ z" x
4 P1 x, j5 ?5 E9 j. W3 S* S0 A- X
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,1 N! Z/ F0 |( w" [9 @8 @* e
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift% G& y$ {6 Y7 @3 ?" p
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
' ^% @) \! c: l/ u- | Sthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core" U0 ^3 J" G: M* v3 G) G/ j4 }
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
! \- b) G' m4 x3 }manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record G6 o" }. _9 ~) [) Q9 g
breaking price appreciations.
# g+ Q! n, c* G. w/ }
: i k0 u8 r: x% Y! X" C$ Z4 ^4 t9 h Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding5 {& x/ l- H# A* ]9 E
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
) ^- q/ }' A2 j5 I! c- hlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
( d9 e1 B% ]& _- @- O" N" K
) R" {- S- f/ k: T3 P In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
$ L7 J# T$ D4 r9 a+ Leconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer {- \# v& C7 Y+ l
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
6 V% o* i4 L v* a- z# Z( x% |: d7 dslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
( S2 F6 Y) q7 f6 m, N1 |( LIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
6 m) H% M1 ]. mgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of% `9 z5 @ ?* q6 @3 Q# j+ m
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
. B1 p1 x" j! M {7 f9 G2 e: n5 v `( W
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
# K3 m! ?' g6 D& D! _. fmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
0 Q; N; |) p) P2 Wfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
$ { s* u6 U B1 i7 k0 i& ]are markedly different than those found in the United States.4 B5 f' _/ l0 M* Y& }' \
" G/ r' T2 @+ J2 X. |& B
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
2 t# C% `) J7 w3 d8 lAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
# F" Y% m" T0 Q: mfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
/ J3 u) ^+ W' x+ crelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general# [9 p0 ~1 H7 M
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
. l0 L- C1 d7 M/ P& z8 e8 m: jdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
% j4 N' Z0 h" f3 ]( y% ^aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
' Z% u: u. O! q9 r0 ^4 a& pmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."4 t" K0 i4 ^; Z- {% t/ S" Z
9 V4 r" C3 K3 V6 d
<<
2 I' L2 W% R+ \- Y3 f REGIONAL SUMMARIES
& _: H3 S0 T4 m* z) Z >>
$ i% x- _, v5 {" |: }+ {" y* \8 q7 m5 X% Y. Y5 ^2 A& [
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
3 `/ X+ i9 r) w* ]3 r0 l/ H) qHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
; M( e/ r. p y! _' f7 Bof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
2 n; T0 |% L( X4 g+ l6 vlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of" b! r* M% T# i
renovations.8 z' a; `4 x; t; N: X0 w& a) R
2 H( v0 d7 |4 z0 J3 k7 A% e. n5 D5 I
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
$ J) h7 ~7 H8 f* U- T/ oincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
& i5 M" |% ]* ~2 n3 ?- ? R( Wcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
) p! T6 _- t/ l9 A8 P, TSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
j/ Q0 ?8 S- O% L
# I/ o& u, w$ u' P& A# p) |5 N3 F+ @ The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer* b% t6 r0 m3 T' s. f; b) Z
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
' {9 F, `5 q% x) Aquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
" B* ~/ Q1 o7 K/ m& q$ Z600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores$ k u( m4 ~' u9 q7 ~1 c1 Z
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes* i: R0 U- `% q r
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.! h$ ]. e; [5 K3 H
8 P+ c/ U6 E @: }( d( Y; h
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
1 ~" f- ?8 y6 a; L5 K7 Iconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their m8 n6 {! W2 ?7 P" A! m6 G, v/ @
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
5 L0 m+ I* K! rwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
: Q9 ` i7 i" s$ M4 s jdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
+ C- `& z# v2 l! E1 M" Bbuyers with more options when looking for a home., V5 U7 ^5 _: ^
2 t9 E, z2 Z5 b' k) B) G( n% H
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly2 M1 q5 a# V5 J# x. ]4 \% K
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes }( c/ V0 G' d' x6 @
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,& s/ R8 P; a* n2 C2 n& a; C% [, O
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last* M" y1 Q% p- S3 a3 ^. V. H
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
0 w6 f( z u, T: W
8 p2 a8 C( [% q$ W8 @9 p Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house4 L; w G7 @/ O* x
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory' B5 l5 F1 W4 d; j1 f' l6 z4 [
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting: e4 o+ a$ h4 f
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
# m1 z1 w; v- G, Q: Y1 qwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the, K. u, g6 {4 s9 Z, _
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before+ ~& g. G4 q% m$ K
making a purchase.( d) J5 N- a4 z
! R- q8 P6 H6 J9 ^: X# @$ z6 H Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing) D6 H) _3 {+ |: \2 h
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
$ Y: G4 Y# p: [* X/ Y/ w! Uconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
" \: s! p" e( R" pcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
5 ~# a3 |' d2 i; H+ d# K) u; Tattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown' Z/ R& _ m2 F9 L! ?: j$ w; X
amenities.
, ^( G# p, T+ c1 i- U8 B5 u9 p2 i( u$ \; B( [ }, m
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels+ s0 D* H4 z+ J" {; u$ \
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand' s) H# @8 }8 n" {
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has) L- e6 I+ F; o: O, n2 j
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
: r5 O) Z% N1 S$ ` k' Mdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle" B0 T0 w, @/ J% n( R/ L0 K
residence, rather than for investment.
% _/ m7 q1 G! z
$ ~$ a6 b; v9 v4 v8 E( ` The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
( a+ A- Z7 t( x& Z$ U0 M( Phouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
0 E; D% |5 M8 P2 s8 M7 q) Win a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
4 m$ L" L$ V- V) x1 Vconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
8 L. x( o& O3 Prate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
7 B0 m- Z, _% @6 T1 P) [the market.. e2 |* g& b& L' ~6 J! _
; B7 c+ c+ e7 T2 L! F
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
& x5 V O; Q0 ~6 {9 E# ?July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In, a u, z4 Q( y H7 U( k' p+ U5 c
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
1 ^) [+ A% ^1 P6 |; y* o# Zmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due1 v* ~/ I1 h5 _$ L$ P' X3 Z- K' K
to the shortage of available inventory.3 \) j0 `5 J$ l6 ~ W- S
0 m; b+ |2 n! D* J, ]: _+ c% E/ N
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
f! X7 B' ]0 c t5 |momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
: R, K/ ~( d1 {3 xvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
5 D4 {. x8 g2 s+ z7 gstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.1 I0 V' B! |, X" W5 ^
/ O/ ~: z0 M. y. r, E B3 i; A Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
, ~- a2 i3 P7 }" S$ P0 hin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low0 {8 B* [+ W2 r9 h
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that* K0 `/ A$ e% r6 \( t8 L$ A
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
9 F' B: {. s$ Z# y! R. aprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
* J( O) f, I3 v- i$ xseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as" M& ^2 O$ Z" o5 H+ p, k
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
. k1 a2 d) b$ r- G; H
% e' j* O: l, O F( }' F% r& q. \ Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter& O6 R& e' w9 h- ^) ~
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton8 X; W( L' y& g+ }1 c# |
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,* j; p2 \" l; o/ }+ c1 ` I
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
2 l, J0 u5 ~4 f0 C' L9 J! d2 ~. V# h# Oincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
! y) L! J" U6 ~in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
6 R" V8 i! W. G( dtowards the end of 2006.
+ x [' S% y: V5 B% u2 D! s
" K! { R- p" n! T9 [6 tWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
# L" |/ { G( |/ minventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable1 ?6 V$ O" k* ^5 Z( N, [
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse1 A) {8 k0 K7 S9 j
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to U! C" ? b( s3 a) q3 f" t
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added' Z: X9 E" h9 m" V
pressure on tight inventory levels.
; _; i! q, ^3 ^+ n6 |0 S# P( b- R# {* p. m$ i
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
/ V; |9 |! J2 R' D0 rfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people: v1 w1 K, ^2 s4 Z1 B# h8 C9 b1 m
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
, P0 ?$ G: \" _& @/ Ewhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching) W) ] o( }% l, r( V. l
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.8 L2 d( L( t) j) }* c) Q. [( f
) z) S% r. p$ _$ ^3 C v! W" v <<
& g. j6 R$ D+ I! V2 u Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
^$ _& {) V/ ^1 }4 u( b# }0 r/ P5 B) ]6 W& s: |4 E5 ^+ k
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' t- F# Z3 q' L* G. h" x, C
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
' L/ n5 J. {! I& O1 t5 g, c* q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! d& A" c U8 z1 B' E) \# ]. n. c- h 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3! o2 X2 W( k, A# G
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
" O# K3 K" l& C1 V* L# @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ R0 a* k7 i) s) v4 w0 y5 g Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
* a! t! P5 v# v5 o -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ [9 s1 [, `5 ^ c3 S
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
: I |1 Q* g7 [4 u -------------------------------------------------------------------------% q1 x' q E+ J
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000) ?' N) J8 P2 k9 f5 @& T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 p7 x9 \2 S5 \/ c- L" @
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -0 V, G; Y& m. z8 ^( _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' h; t/ F; l5 X8 T, e8 K" U/ F. \ St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333 _: @, X' h! \+ d# v6 W: i- b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 n2 H0 j$ r9 S% O# c Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
- ^, @: A/ C5 l$ R7 R -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 }2 |3 q0 ]. p# F6 c, r G Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1854 p( m. L7 K: {8 U
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) P" z$ P3 u0 v; _6 s
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
! L0 v4 v' E/ R- Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------" t4 Y- u. S8 ^& w- m
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
4 `5 e& |3 N8 C, U1 Y0 K7 T" S' Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ q1 O* a8 C: D; ?1 h
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707# F: F& d0 ?6 F3 p z3 T1 y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ z5 B( r" ?0 F* N& c" x Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
- ]* o: I r1 ]; Z5 e2 Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 t! s. S- N j Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
6 I$ G1 N2 ?: R -------------------------------------------------------------------------% N. b! \6 Y( [. x" B
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714* M% ?4 @' I' K1 Z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- {5 {- B2 w# e5 U7 S7 Y0 |
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
7 @# m9 u+ d2 D1 F) l ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------# V; s* g2 d+ r3 J0 v$ U
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0001 o* e2 Z" V0 a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 L; Y9 ~+ i; r- Z2 a& h0 j National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8602 v, G7 G" C; D( M- y {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ I7 D0 d* W2 y. @: [
0 f) ~ f5 t1 x+ P# j, w* P
-------------------------------------------------------------
q, N$ _* T# ]" p3 B2 q Standard Condominium) i8 y, a1 a- D# A5 `& ?
------------------------------------------------------------- x `, g5 b9 R" J' B
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
- K% H0 ?* H8 ^" H+ ~ Market % Change Average Average % Change3 W! {5 T% J; ~4 A t8 J" w
-------------------------------------------------------------7 w: m# z F: t
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
/ Q1 W3 Z! @2 N% W! l -------------------------------------------------------------6 ]& {6 b. b5 @. B8 V, F5 {
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
! ?, E# @' R- X2 r# g5 D2 ]7 P/ [ -------------------------------------------------------------
; F5 l- G' j! N2 c7 a1 \7 t Moncton 4.9% - - N/A; u7 ?# T- N: c$ M9 w3 B, C) t
-------------------------------------------------------------
1 {1 N' i G: L& h7 d6 h0 s2 s) J# q Saint John N/A - - N/A2 Y0 J/ B& [) i& ~9 s9 G
-------------------------------------------------------------
% a8 @! y, g: d: v* |* t St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
) i8 e% o! F8 D6 \! M( W -------------------------------------------------------------1 f* H. @' ?2 ]7 n# K! h1 j
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%5 E* }' p+ c# X' i) Q( h
-------------------------------------------------------------
& V8 `( u5 X8 m M Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%5 w1 m2 F% i, x
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 K: e6 e5 x* R% y Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%$ z i6 J5 U0 y* r# f J" b& h' `0 n1 R
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ d" }1 @: F. u Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%* R0 q4 K% [3 v
-------------------------------------------------------------
; S5 G3 E8 c, f4 n$ _ Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%& Q) G) G H( k, H7 s3 A+ V* R- S" u
-------------------------------------------------------------# e; d$ }# L( M: Y, [% w2 S6 t
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%$ W# R5 F- u( @
-------------------------------------------------------------: H+ a( x( ]% ]" _& s* q0 h
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%# E; n& b" x$ C0 f
-------------------------------------------------------------2 ~9 [1 F' Y }. L
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%' n2 s! B3 \" q9 ^8 Z
-------------------------------------------------------------
* l' A+ ^) X w) Y Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%: u5 Y9 B1 a- Z K
-------------------------------------------------------------% l$ V+ @6 w0 u8 n2 n
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%( ]4 Y$ q: t- `# K& l
-------------------------------------------------------------# ?! K( U2 N, x" Z2 [0 W) a
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%! D6 t) T2 l4 A7 d, m; u4 B
-------------------------------------------------------------' f% R( r; J2 i1 [
>>& ~9 j& F0 k6 `. f( D3 w
e- j9 c4 c. A& ?; _+ h) o$ x9 W Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined2 A6 I+ Q/ d) T- ^+ t0 F, {$ d
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
/ n# B- y% n2 I4 TJohn and Victoria.
2 D# I! x7 f3 K
& d" O" J* F/ V! [' a" I The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most* q- }/ s1 M$ ? |5 j; E* s9 O, J7 a9 R
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
+ [! k) \4 c& W3 ^$ G7 d3 h+ rhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release% k. ^1 u- v' b4 G+ m
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price% B' Y) @$ l- I
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities! s8 |% a) Q+ C
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
4 n% x- h* |$ o+ S, Mavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current% ]9 O/ Z( `6 C8 `! A2 n: u, I
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable3 h, k, Y$ N* \
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on/ [4 g2 R( j7 `0 A; q* m" o
November 15, 2006.
; Q2 m. N* ?3 `$ @7 S- g Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
, g& ?# h! ~% _fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
+ R/ [) ?& R& o/ Pprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
5 C' _$ a' u# M3 x) V) |available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|