埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2305|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
' i3 r2 c, X- |+ W6 @" e' N4 F! y: q  [3 `7 s1 b
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -; }; ?) K# I! T" ]2 j: j

( r2 V) t0 V1 X* R. b    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market; i, B! Z# f) K1 P
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third# l0 e; r% e, @
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic: u4 h7 x, Y1 Y% v
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
( r* A7 O& D1 n, bprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
+ k* }$ q4 m- J) Q0 D8 P# zmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
, c" p+ [: O7 @( tQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
3 }, T6 E" D' ~1 c3 PLePage Real Estate Services.
, S$ Y* u# x& v2 V7 Q
' s2 D$ M/ o- ]8 |" k. H7 W    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
) }1 A6 y2 ]0 r9 g, g8 g/ dare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
3 J7 K; w% N* P0 \$ d0 f. ]conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
- A6 T# h7 H& gsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
3 g6 B: m, I2 c& cresidential real estate sector.3 C; d9 v: S( t" c9 E% \, @

9 _% I  n/ H0 D% L4 v, ~3 S    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
& Z: S6 T; S& \occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
" ?6 K; Y1 p. v/ M8 gyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5629 m% G, M- u. g  c! U, n. f
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
( u; O3 p( B: T: w. L(+13.2%).( w* q2 I( S! J; `: f
- _1 f* m0 Z7 d  I4 ?
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
. c/ `, g8 Y+ E4 z' Fduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
' L: W5 _' r5 W8 Jfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
# d3 v- x* g8 S# _# f3 o1 lpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,' T, N' l1 M, P
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.- ~$ Z% V% e2 s" M" b5 T( Q
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
5 @1 Q9 p3 h, zwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy7 f6 F+ k1 s5 d! D) q' X
balanced market."
# ~8 V$ {3 k$ {7 Z9 R
' R1 \- ?6 P4 y/ _$ u, t    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,5 _" |& s& k$ V2 c
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
$ j) I: y8 n1 H% ?$ @to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
* I: _* A+ s* n7 @# U8 othroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core; c0 s& b- e6 x: V% X" q  ?
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,# ~1 ^. z; Z# E" z6 N' i1 n1 y
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record* r+ o8 i* R3 j$ J' g# \2 O
breaking price appreciations.: B$ D% \5 K" B4 ]# `5 d, S

7 [3 W( {! u. `9 F" k, S; z5 s    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding: ?1 e& X8 A1 [0 k) I* Q3 B4 {
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the0 o! C; }  ~- y& H/ ^+ h
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.: r, e  Y) v4 O. U5 Z4 V1 R2 U

% T: H, a, J3 u, Z, [    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
+ v. F$ P3 L& I4 c% Y5 V( Aeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer) I& A2 h2 y/ A9 d
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
' k. X( ^# w: M# \: W: c* Qslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
3 T5 Z+ C  ?- [, aIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers* N* M5 U8 o/ C) W
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of5 V0 C8 n) b8 F+ X! S
price appreciation when compared with 2005.3 q, T3 x; ]/ F8 z2 ]" g* K

- [! t) |7 L0 N2 I+ R    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing$ b2 g' {0 Y0 _/ _
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
6 p$ A% `0 G! o( afinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
2 K* b+ U. x, C3 care markedly different than those found in the United States./ R& O4 G( M3 @, s  z
1 R, ]% K1 Z; U: ?- l( V
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
8 _+ _6 {2 J! }8 X4 R. wAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's& `" ^' l) z9 T8 u; w: K# \) W3 k
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the* R# V. d/ }, ~% \# ?
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
& g1 W0 `* l+ y3 H, |affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the. J# w$ P' {, @9 Z0 }; z
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and& h9 ]  B9 l2 C
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
8 x5 p( w5 }- P8 N0 Omortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
6 a; Z% |* S+ \0 P1 Z9 l' X2 N+ a# j" i& ~5 \: v1 E& O
    <<. M& i( Q/ p  a7 D' _4 V
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
; d  D2 `  K# X6 ?, T+ z' h, K    >>
5 q- U7 m: n! \
5 v! y+ j$ N# {* B: h7 n0 N4 h    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in8 r' h0 I* C" F
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate% K2 P- I5 Y( A$ Y- o
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time1 V: T8 x6 G5 S4 ?8 r7 q0 w# e) a
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
$ c, s* q# d/ {& H  E$ J- Q8 rrenovations.- p7 @0 D4 D$ {: K% X) [

& l8 g/ Q/ `# j! L2 p    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight! k) s4 N$ L4 ?8 B. J0 I2 @0 t
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation& I; `& ~9 F5 V! i9 t
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and$ l6 z8 p: E+ z; Z# ?
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.8 q% B( Y' ~3 y& N
8 H9 J$ h: I) z8 ~: p: }
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
; I! z. G5 p8 O6 u& oslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the- ?) Q4 M5 H3 Z6 i5 Z% J( g% c
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new# U: v9 [9 D) f9 N
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores+ @+ X7 o  I3 q  v
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
& l9 J2 _4 V/ O0 A# l5 b/ G7 j, Land are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
% E! P$ r% C4 Q7 O, j# I4 N- ?8 s
0 v2 B- i5 A# t! b  c    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
% j6 ]& J6 b+ qconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
8 a1 {8 Q/ p3 A7 s9 {homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers* v  N% u) o7 d( _3 r, i/ [, W7 {
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
8 c; u+ T! B# }dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
3 I8 w% O. }7 Z* P# n. Y) obuyers with more options when looking for a home.- r  r6 B5 \) `( v' F, p
0 X; G7 D' h- C3 l% s9 U3 \7 j  l
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
6 N& h: K0 R8 e( H2 x6 g+ ?0 k! samong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
$ I" s9 \  R8 s3 s9 Rpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,! t; ~3 T# W! k. i
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last* j" [- F8 H7 P) ^% I
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.9 E& ]( R9 b/ c1 n3 N, y
+ _8 n, p. k0 [  P5 f7 k  ?
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
! |4 |7 ]( k8 }8 iprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
: c- |: m/ g: R  e) q+ a/ Dlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
; E/ Q5 u( m4 T9 ~) R$ l! m' Ofirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,) }' i  h( R* p) c2 a% }, N
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
* C$ v+ ?7 w  Y" ^pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before3 f# ], [/ [8 ]. V2 N
making a purchase.
( J7 {" u- b) d* T
6 T* M9 c, Z* I4 _    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
; Y2 I; O+ S) Kmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong) X9 n- ~. B3 Y2 k, v: [$ l
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
9 @0 {% `# k- m& W% H* Vcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
$ I; W8 \( z$ f6 ]$ T0 [4 _attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown9 n0 S8 d+ [) m
amenities.% ~: M. i4 r& }4 }+ o! f, G% @
0 k$ E. m5 J8 Q
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
/ j: U4 l: V2 n4 F9 athroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand5 y6 p9 A2 i8 a) ^
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has. K9 Z; L8 y0 d! c7 q, Q
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been  H+ l! q1 n" Z# X3 K0 {) K
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle8 z' a* a2 e; `6 j0 E- h, U' C9 O
residence, rather than for investment.* I7 X& l/ @" j* K0 I6 X

0 J3 W; \! b: r: V    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as$ ?+ f4 M" C; O, \; U5 y
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
+ U7 Q& R4 |2 [/ x1 S0 Hin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
1 g7 [4 m8 q6 k$ `confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization, J$ U$ S0 S7 J5 D% R; G/ Q
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter9 h+ ?5 w6 s/ P! L* Z$ y( N
the market.
# k0 I2 C* }1 z6 s
/ G7 K8 \' g% E# P    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
# b# c4 i' H+ t' MJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
5 ]# K$ v; M7 z. G9 O8 ~5 W- O; bAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring( ]! \: F# w% ~: s
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
5 \! |' i8 n2 s$ D1 Y0 uto the shortage of available inventory.
# E2 C2 H# f/ a3 Q( Y  l' F- m0 o+ i
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
+ A. L$ j8 |+ u5 V$ j4 K3 jmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
: b5 H1 U, X1 g% K" u3 hvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses1 S7 G6 f& a+ @) ?  e
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
* m  n- F8 |; c/ y7 C9 @
7 z/ U- e' {2 t# d( j* [    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
" @) u" c: i0 J# p, ~9 ^& \7 fin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low1 P4 Y& \4 X+ {+ ~5 @3 o4 _/ x
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that- j, l( I$ Z9 R: e" F
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
  t3 z: M2 q5 E) \6 ^; M3 k: Pprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer0 y# ?- Q% p. d2 Y
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
4 X* T/ Z, d6 Y; ], x$ `  t5 f3 Zbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
: z6 T" r9 n. [: H2 n

' X7 `! c6 e& _$ O& Z    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
' R  b; C" N' Y& q: J! Ras activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
' F, N! j2 q. X1 Uremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
7 K. `& @5 L- jmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
+ A  q  C+ E; |increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
- U7 @+ F  Z* l% B9 ain the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
3 s, ~' ~- a" f% z9 |towards the end of 2006.
    ! W$ J8 _# S; T# I. B4 ~( {
; L& f% v. t6 ]  [# o' s% a
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
: q7 ]; l  t* |: |( V. R1 finventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
' V  C; t: \9 \% S. n& v+ jto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse$ Q+ l8 c" u) a4 X2 x
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
( j3 o8 i8 U5 E3 ^) n6 I* F+ ~foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added) V8 T: D+ r% Q) _4 _1 d- |0 s$ s" {
pressure on tight inventory levels.
+ k+ k6 m! A5 [8 u" v+ \/ o# p$ z2 I) B8 R* H6 W' S, k
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic$ r, y  }% V- ]# _( O) C
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
9 [3 }4 o$ {+ F1 U8 Uinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;! b3 j9 J3 ?9 @8 H
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
/ ]% H% T2 F8 s# i2 wfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace." [' i" w5 z5 Y( K% k( k& k6 X
3 m; K) a( ?1 H! V9 l  V% u, M3 Q
    <<1 Z$ R3 Y+ {/ n- D* {& K
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
1 n! g+ c3 x& k* v4 w1 t. l5 e0 k
+ a' ]8 [% {* _- w$ ~# F( t: ?) k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ U& u& }3 n( y. f
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey# n9 E- I  U, w& L
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; C" ?* _. E; A                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
0 L/ M/ t$ I1 ^) a+ x    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
6 |/ u) x% z! n5 e8 _2 B    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 Y3 w) N: d0 W) F. M
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000# o6 d$ Q( O5 g1 r3 U& v' A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) l& v  X; g0 H( w+ P& r
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000) y3 v) o9 |( R) p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; f1 D4 H4 y  G# L; q  o    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000- Q' p# W; T: a
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( S# C$ c  R; P
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
( i. J, w9 F7 u, k# Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 q3 W2 A( ]' Y( I* b; @* l5 N# v
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333
( {. n% Y/ e( u+ L& l4 {    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( L( f$ g* k1 E3 o" |    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,5834 l( W, u- T- H/ ^" c4 O1 ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; p) }6 g9 f& {; Z# }
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
) O2 t2 U/ O1 I    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; t0 D+ k  S" E. P9 E' F; d    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250: L- x: G' m  e1 L" F+ U1 L
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( g. O+ I2 O- [* [8 |3 ]8 F8 F' r
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
* e* t: M. Y: J8 U4 p    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 Z6 F) e7 G  O$ }4 F' a0 L    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7073 l$ H# b+ \8 V7 G- e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. B2 K# T" [4 X- s* t  t9 f5 Y    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
( A  ]* M1 U& p9 n# a5 L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ |% q0 g8 G' f# Z( M5 U    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,3899 p7 `  L  @& Y( T3 M& W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( b. P/ s0 |+ d  W4 f    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,7143 L* ^% ?4 t# T! N
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 M" r; P& j/ M% J% |  m    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5006 ?5 N- X5 [2 J0 S% z6 r3 P/ u
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 s. E3 E$ m# r+ e    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000/ `1 T9 R4 y; ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: X$ l8 y; Z4 Q$ }- i    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860$ ]% _3 Y$ i2 K; f4 ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 i% A6 ~2 P' A/ w: @

. @4 \5 x$ Y9 W5 }7 s    -------------------------------------------------------------/ M0 N( L# [  O* [6 |$ l  t, s
                               Standard Condominium
& z/ ^0 u; U8 c  N$ Z    -------------------------------------------------------------
- y) L5 ~" S' S                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo  w( S" s& _5 {
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
  [" D9 e% W/ _- |    -------------------------------------------------------------' m. z$ `% `2 D- i" G
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%/ N( z# P# A* _/ b! \
    -------------------------------------------------------------. l- Y5 o( p" f
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%0 }% O6 W# p( v+ d% U
    -------------------------------------------------------------, |2 u5 {5 Z: s
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A# O- _9 b: w" M* M  U
    -------------------------------------------------------------. V3 I6 ~4 _" F7 ^8 p0 g  V0 ~
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
- O1 X$ s: E5 r; |2 W    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 W; O! F4 A' [+ W8 f& v5 I0 j6 t    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%1 l" F$ _7 ~+ u4 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------; K9 X( h) Q  X( @' d/ E
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%8 o! h) k$ A# i+ R, @+ o; s
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, D) E; {4 ]' X9 A! @    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%$ U7 v$ B0 w1 x  v
    -------------------------------------------------------------  F4 C1 e6 d% h
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%" H+ L9 n3 d5 n$ |4 `6 m
    -------------------------------------------------------------6 T0 M- R( E/ J4 J5 z. `
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
) l6 Y9 C: k4 \8 Y: O8 w- e    -------------------------------------------------------------7 V* R" U$ W7 F: Z! U
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
. K) E- K# `$ E9 g: n    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 w' f% m( w; G$ ^& ?    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%5 @* k5 |. @. D
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" o1 B' L& T8 e# g& h- X7 b    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
- R, A" k' e+ ^    -------------------------------------------------------------
. s3 _0 I% n9 Q- f5 m4 S/ j    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%; t, E' p8 f! M2 B# i) B
    -------------------------------------------------------------
- S1 r2 J6 y4 t; [6 w    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
$ M! }" f4 U+ {& x5 T    -------------------------------------------------------------# N% _1 J. D9 Z" _* Z
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%+ I  r9 B( e; _2 w0 H8 V& w8 B
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: O7 t* x/ D7 J( K. u; O+ d+ u    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%6 E" s2 R! I2 C* E9 g
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; O- U$ b5 P( p5 p    >>
  D7 s1 E. H" r5 a6 S, x/ x
6 C/ o; @( A; H8 M8 x1 m0 ?2 i  ?    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
, Q2 z/ L8 D# m2 O. gin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint2 N* k+ e$ o. G/ {8 Z( Y. d
John and Victoria.6 g: o* i8 @1 n7 r& d: R. k

# @) k* c8 }/ D3 w% k% ^7 L    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
# {! B+ i3 [4 x% ycomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of- J5 V. ^! }% G: Q/ t$ B4 N! x
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
  \/ }* U  M- X) m' C9 wreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price; t& u7 `8 a: v" c- W* k
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities  c" I) J8 o2 K% o- W: b! t
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
* p  B8 [0 @$ d( h$ h0 Havailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current% I& d) o" B+ n) Y# Y
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable: E1 G, w/ W2 l
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on  S5 ~) l  {# e4 u
November 15, 2006.9 I) d+ }' N' `6 W. y% P- z) w8 h
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
, H$ `9 p# |  F* wfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge8 X/ j, e4 C2 e
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
- S$ o9 D7 |6 f0 Z& q7 w% {  lavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
理袁律师事务所
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-4-2 04:00 , Processed in 0.347376 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表