 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
! }) f/ s- ^6 b0 J, z9 ]* {, F& ?: ~7 T5 z! P3 Y
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -+ h3 X" i- `8 f- _9 L- c
; z ~+ k* ?: w5 ]$ H( D* k TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
L& v: p( v' s5 q7 S( Vexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third! L2 C; {# c9 S( g1 h9 C$ C0 H
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
& y: J! B7 d$ T7 D0 ^ g- ?in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit/ ?9 [* n4 v7 Q/ P
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
8 C' B/ G. a [6 Qmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
+ ~4 a4 [2 I; x- J+ R: j' O) y- qQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal2 w: h' x( s# {" k3 \9 V5 J
LePage Real Estate Services.' J2 |6 b0 n. y# ?: i& C. k
& b8 Y& X w9 x, }" {. P: E Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
9 F9 W! i9 c" j9 xare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
; W6 _8 o0 W0 i+ A* z4 ~% ~3 econditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and: Z( U3 Q& u& C/ U" c' T2 Q5 T
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
# ?# q2 C3 K$ Zresidential real estate sector.% ^( p8 s0 o0 p- d( y
: Z# }; P$ i1 ~! [/ q. }6 E
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation" h( m! O# s) v6 A1 c9 j( R
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
" |9 @) Q% g1 `# Hyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
/ k/ ]) P# B3 ?(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
0 T0 O/ J3 U5 {8 w% W* Z( j( `3 _(+13.2%).
; T, Q2 O# [# g X# H5 w
3 m. t3 \2 R1 @/ ^7 x& b4 z "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth: d* b9 P, w5 P6 j9 k) `8 {
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the% ~" {% B- r+ C1 f$ q
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
( U5 Q- A! J: Z; z4 B" A3 Q" @poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,9 ?! X0 R# S7 @; g& P9 Z- e
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
# \* t6 Q& N5 A( x4 c"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We2 z6 N) F6 r: Y* `! L
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
8 M. O1 R3 K b2 Z+ ~balanced market."' P+ H, \8 R+ S
: b1 q9 b4 ~; h( |
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
: }( s/ d0 ]) {% }4 F; p- Jconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift/ ^- c- Y* [1 ^3 s8 Z/ A3 j) J# w
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
$ c4 v; v$ v8 ], Q" \throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core+ h# y2 Q. B: z+ I5 Y8 E
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
+ A- M; J( `& K; }manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
( Y: f+ p. N: Q) @3 }breaking price appreciations.
. u& W% E/ y) \4 x; B' \: ?& m6 G+ X% E, z- ?2 `% T! d* a
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding0 G* a) a# C2 C0 g. m8 R; U- U
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the' k9 K4 g- V0 ?5 {# X4 n
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
0 a* T* `2 G& r6 B0 ?
" u( x% R: r% [9 D, a1 E. F In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
8 m) v# P+ x1 U. S5 yeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer1 ^3 s! `( v N0 x
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off% c# k. @2 V$ B
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.9 O+ F& b: t* Z
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
7 R2 ]+ Q2 _1 d- _greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of+ Y- x1 e0 b4 W8 {" Q$ y
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
9 q! ^- D/ M/ ?7 b3 u. X3 a+ L d1 l& U* V% \( I* C" K: }8 m9 f' _
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing+ ?1 d/ _9 A) U' c& ^# g
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and$ v( ]3 H% ^" F4 u4 z
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
+ D( c; E2 W6 B! F3 ware markedly different than those found in the United States.
2 q# X! N# `: D/ A( X+ L+ n
1 d: G9 |0 X+ d Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the+ k7 d5 K( }+ ^) k _
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's% I( B0 @5 K$ l: G( F; R5 t5 O
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the6 u0 W v5 }5 Q. E; U' t! i @
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
, e4 [( r7 A* x( K+ Faffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
; X1 [! h- O/ \, Y& L& @( xdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and: x: p6 o* O$ D8 |' A) w
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization4 w8 Y1 J: M" Q |5 I" ?: A
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."4 D9 P9 Y: h' L S/ D
: L# Y' o9 Y+ j p N <<
! S% {# e8 ~5 u: \8 x- x/ T REGIONAL SUMMARIES
! ~0 R9 R7 P1 h9 |5 T0 s >>
6 r5 R7 ]- t& @9 G! V- _6 A3 c) o0 c& S7 U4 _* {( h5 V$ ]
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in4 N0 Z. N- F: B4 l _4 N
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate b7 P$ C6 B5 Y+ R @: C' N/ L+ f
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time; [0 V3 e) \4 J0 J0 L
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of G1 p9 _0 ~& k
renovations., T2 I# Z3 m O* e: u! M$ N7 r
+ Q# c( {1 q9 K K1 a The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight# q/ D1 ]5 @& }4 V1 w
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation7 X& {4 B4 D Q3 y6 J* @% N
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
$ i$ v h; g' V, n& jSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
+ j( G+ v$ P2 L1 F) t8 ?
) k6 B) K4 E. P: t The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer1 g& ]5 U8 a- K9 a: ^4 i( J: j+ M
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
7 k2 h1 E) j; p) N2 }quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new' r" F" D9 k5 O/ T, b
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores# D" [* |: h# b
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes7 _/ A9 h+ x- m) ?# A
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.9 ~" ~( K! [" e* V1 E( U" b
. [! i- e+ B4 y& l s In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
* I& P3 R! x4 \0 b' {: z( C4 |' dconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
4 z7 M8 U2 j! I0 T" A, z) B7 T9 h3 Ghomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers2 h5 q; Q- M* N. ]8 Q/ |; ]
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian+ W$ L. J, H5 w
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
. J. T! U) z5 {+ ?buyers with more options when looking for a home.* b& H4 ~: j- w
9 M! d' E6 t* G ~5 w Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly4 @: q% t- t5 G4 E s2 p* a3 N; x
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
: ?6 D% }0 P- b1 Y; N" Rpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
9 }2 \) Q6 ]; o! M& ]2 |; n. pas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last7 E; [' w% o- i2 z7 q
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions." O/ V. T& p) R- c; } m$ e
: g F+ A9 B, J3 w( i Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house3 F1 i# n3 I* o9 r
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory7 X( P: G1 G7 x# m; k1 @8 P/ E
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
6 K9 E9 I( o' @% w# j) Q: |; q3 Pfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,# G; v1 R H z/ n' [! `
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
1 n. W, ?1 A3 w1 L+ ]pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before! z$ A/ g! F8 t r2 ?) ?: M; G
making a purchase.5 Y- X$ s. e$ ]& x: m& V
+ |% I. j0 T' C P3 e8 C: K
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
$ I4 s8 \( C- }: u7 T' Rmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
& l9 i4 g; k. |& w1 hconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city/ E. N; O$ y( N. m
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
+ o/ ?" F; a( s4 s. k$ H2 Oattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown: T8 m( W* {5 c) N
amenities.
( F( \7 F' y, O& |5 [5 c+ Z6 p& z* K7 [1 t4 u3 ]( l5 n1 b- l5 _* G
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
; f% R9 H$ H% hthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
# e$ C A* W9 Q/ Q T7 R- yacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has( h( Y3 w0 ?8 w* v8 `8 s
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been" s7 \$ K/ f- t! p. a* l
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
+ {: i3 n# v( S" R9 H* S1 c3 ~residence, rather than for investment.4 x6 f) g/ V' Z: u2 w0 v3 H
' [1 F3 c/ |* [; d$ j" i t8 }
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as) S/ a- c: n. X9 ]$ ]$ V; t
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
O" v6 G) f" bin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
4 \" Q- ?0 V" C: Z7 {3 mconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
! V! p q& T8 o" `8 F# grate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter8 e& \+ @- f; h5 B
the market.& }8 r) S9 c! z: a/ Z; |$ L9 I
T0 X0 Z7 q B
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
5 j A( }' p9 Z& [& ^July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
+ z9 F8 J# y% C; TAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
r4 m3 h9 N. A4 p K, Z3 i1 qmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due! G/ M5 `& i6 _9 ]5 x6 m" A5 K
to the shortage of available inventory.
1 k' l5 R$ w1 A( B B+ Y# U
: {/ v$ A& w. U, H- @! K! Z; e Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
7 s6 J2 I; x- o9 C1 Omomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains- q, q# k" x6 a
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
. k- i) U0 V; t p( \4 U- Astruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.. a) D; w0 f$ s9 X8 L2 m. l
2 K! O7 g8 d+ k! @# K/ [9 r
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases) F3 G$ u) }; f: r! K8 F/ K' J
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low8 U/ S0 j1 _ R6 W: \$ m/ l
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
$ S) H1 G" m. cpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
. j) G. z! N# m# n7 I' qprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer) z w+ y5 L( O, t# j7 e" n8 y
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
9 m" T/ u9 |6 A2 P- H4 X0 Fbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.$ l( T! f2 M# e1 H
* |2 j i% M2 @0 Y! e) A5 W Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
8 [0 l8 ?3 E& \1 H/ \as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
2 R( e1 p% Y0 @$ v9 z) cremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
8 n5 u: m8 e% H( H fmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
$ @4 B! I3 G0 Rincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
, Y0 `" C' u" p. o; _; min the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly; O6 ]2 _8 S0 ]5 S& q$ h( O; I" }
towards the end of 2006. $ o6 S3 m- S* J
^. W1 N, M. _8 i4 g* F2 MWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of" l' H( h* C) _9 L
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable! K- K* W# a3 i- k7 a
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
4 K+ q( U1 H- ]- r6 y& G) qgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to% z5 X6 f; E- A& _
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added) K# A) d2 R. o3 w3 ?
pressure on tight inventory levels.! `2 h/ O8 c6 t
- \$ y& e1 D3 Y( a" j+ C
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic6 x3 o+ x. f' C/ c3 _
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
4 V! v8 W( t' ^0 |( q9 i* Rinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;4 |3 t7 L) Q1 r. E; Z: M7 i
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
+ @5 N& O' x/ z4 o& `, L I) o$ Sfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.# ]( C1 _5 ?% u2 ]4 }
! Y# R3 I$ \) F6 S
<<
3 d2 V4 y+ F, M, ?0 t Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
9 ^5 m& W2 \; N& A4 c+ S# x% B2 B0 M+ ?/ m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 y2 w$ n, t' |3 s9 @) }
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey4 p$ [3 q+ {2 y9 f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 \4 R9 g0 s% E) \; M1 S% R0 g2 A) N 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
3 n' O2 P# V3 |5 |4 { Market Average Average % Change Average Average( \+ x1 x, K1 Q- e) s" k- b( v% a) t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, p. G1 x* x0 ]$ |4 K5 x' V Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0000 B; l! @, @" q6 o$ r7 W6 \8 c$ O4 q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) W' Q! i3 e) B2 _
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000* l, e0 r/ T( G/ w' k9 p( }
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 D; B% E# q x, E2 x+ | Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
3 M V4 U, j: e* v -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ j- o4 ~/ B" f) X+ |7 I Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -9 s6 @7 h3 ~; ]0 q/ l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 `+ [7 U2 _& a- F. E
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333% J9 x/ g% I+ N1 q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( D" w% i2 d8 y8 v, f! N/ P6 P Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
2 H; f2 K6 X5 D4 e$ E3 ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: @; Q3 F- {" u9 h, A& i% | Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1859 n, D/ X3 v4 |+ L% \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 L9 d% A6 q3 g/ o Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250' O) w$ ?3 c: b, y! [% t' F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& I3 y# x$ ^# m+ `0 S% J% @$ J
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
: h% U4 I3 u. R, L$ H -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' z$ W; \ f: C: f9 M: @2 D) A Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707) p, z" h- I! Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ }+ Z# J* ~" E: W
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
) n s( t* R9 b' q2 x8 G: X -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 A; Y4 W$ c# V( i) O" r
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
1 ]& \3 ^0 J" ^, ~9 v -------------------------------------------------------------------------
`2 B+ M; W1 u' v Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714+ n5 h* c) v$ i; x$ J* g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( ?+ w# E7 ]( a& b
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500& ^, r; A# a% o2 Y6 M0 [4 Y0 q6 w: @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 P5 ^$ M$ w7 k Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0007 q3 X' w% n% c: A" z# R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 C5 `5 Z7 Y8 w National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8608 H2 [% y+ `$ ?7 ]/ o8 b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ p4 ?3 U* w. P' `
0 }5 C ^# s9 F" [1 e; i -------------------------------------------------------------0 Y. z( r* @, m5 d+ n
Standard Condominium
/ @4 A5 H( `; A; R* l. N7 X& o5 j -------------------------------------------------------------
: A! O4 l h- g& G6 D( c+ l9 _ 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
( Q; Y: H; z6 | Market % Change Average Average % Change
P1 R# A- }. s5 M" R' T -------------------------------------------------------------, s0 r* z+ F- m- h% z% P' \
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%- u( @+ S3 W/ B6 e
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 t* C/ x' S# Q1 `' ^" b Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%3 f v; K$ C% C( d2 F; O! d( F
-------------------------------------------------------------: p/ j. L* |* \! v4 y
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
* U+ p w0 o3 O: N7 X' H4 [ -------------------------------------------------------------
* q A* s. d2 P c0 |0 }: H A! f Saint John N/A - - N/A2 f# s; b1 R% g
-------------------------------------------------------------
& m3 B# e" B4 G5 ~ D! r St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
$ W4 B9 F6 P5 c h' R; u+ e- R -------------------------------------------------------------6 X2 f* }2 P' l" ~
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
3 _$ F0 y# u. O7 A -------------------------------------------------------------
! `6 R* X+ B. v; U* l! ~3 x' e Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%. G J2 n9 b4 B2 g
-------------------------------------------------------------8 H% r3 f/ ~4 {6 l/ s: S! Z. ]
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%' P0 w* a4 {6 O2 _; b
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 d, z F! T3 y t% e Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
" l6 I! Q1 G1 a -------------------------------------------------------------6 _4 Q& F6 M6 Q8 g3 ?
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
) t+ Z" y# ?5 }$ H5 m1 d0 m -------------------------------------------------------------; a- H) v1 B' [/ j: h0 f; O
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%* b8 f0 c" c& a) |5 i! H
-------------------------------------------------------------9 ?) n: i% ?, B1 G
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%& d# n. R# X1 {) C0 B' t4 |: U( E
-------------------------------------------------------------
* R/ I0 Q+ _( k# B0 B Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
7 }+ Q3 ]* P8 k+ i; y. B -------------------------------------------------------------
' S8 L E1 U6 H$ C5 [* Y Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%0 ?0 j! w; v U
-------------------------------------------------------------
. G3 N* S5 L& @+ N4 U Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%8 E9 r. B/ z: Z) C1 @# [
-------------------------------------------------------------3 X$ W( c. Z7 R; s% o( H5 D
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%! t# G9 _# G. [5 b: W2 S0 [* U* r' u
-------------------------------------------------------------
" ~; ~7 ]: `* ^+ A3 w" d2 y% k) p/ ] >>
$ Y: ]3 o3 N" I/ M) g/ J, o* }0 h9 x# B, B; H& |1 `
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
' J: b, I0 N- w! Jin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint: Q, O8 m/ W0 i: ^
John and Victoria.
/ J( K& D: [6 e. l) Z
. c0 j. ?6 K2 h8 G5 ~0 {/ B/ \ The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
7 S3 x* x& W- J* a1 F) I; Rcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of1 z0 e. |" {* w8 K* d$ k
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release( v" H8 g, I" i+ n' A+ R' Q
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
: l# F* `, o6 q$ w, N0 q$ @- N+ [8 jtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities. [: G) Y/ Q+ T( C4 M8 X
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
5 ^/ _. { ?4 q) _* ^available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current, s. d: d9 ~$ T, k
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable7 x1 \+ k: c! z. Y' I# L/ M6 b
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
3 M: k) r5 W- V) x; F8 ~7 u, a5 M( zNovember 15, 2006.2 S8 F6 D9 c1 d5 k
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of; D3 v4 n! ]. Z: C& i
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge6 S. n5 k. b) a9 x
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is4 J& M. A& a J3 `% G3 C9 i+ J
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|