埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2184|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 3 z) P' Q% W) u2 [9 m% d) e
. J% v0 }1 M2 e& F+ p+ u
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -) x6 t% U# ^) Z1 ^  c

3 K+ y$ H  ?+ [2 ~9 O2 g4 R    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market0 x4 U- n5 f$ D) c6 V
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third# f5 ?6 W, ]/ D8 p
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic+ N0 B5 z# u# T3 m+ P' W* h" \
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
$ p: T3 b3 d( Y  aprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
& i) J0 I8 r* z9 c* ?  o1 _more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
$ g- n, @+ O4 F" R5 h  qQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal' n3 M- t- x' H
LePage Real Estate Services.
% Z4 `& d  g6 D- c* B* f
: Y* c$ o/ R6 v' C    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters$ ~0 ]' `: C4 W1 f
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
" G0 ]6 L; N: U7 U* j& jconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and6 k- ^6 A( D/ M0 e5 v! T' |
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the4 `# `/ g3 M5 ~; e/ G1 ]7 {+ |. z
residential real estate sector.! c% f9 Q1 F# I  z& [& n9 P& c
- S% @. M) N2 W3 u
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation- Y: D, |+ r8 I7 U
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)' E+ I+ G7 Y4 ^7 _- s9 @. H$ a% _
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
  X4 g$ Q7 f1 z) `9 r# X; w(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
# N6 u8 p9 v. H7 c* Y3 K$ _(+13.2%).
8 [& {* ]  t" R7 l( x9 t) U+ |+ V3 d4 b0 K6 J. X; B5 B- i8 i" C
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
6 ]: ^7 m: q: F$ J0 X, Rduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the5 i2 n  Z' G+ e9 T
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
  W% D  N2 Z$ u: Bpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
% B' u# z; e  d. ]( a! u" r3 xpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.) `! |5 I# u3 R# T
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
; u) |* S  h* Y' B1 Vwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy% I* T4 V1 O8 S5 A8 S
balanced market.": B6 W1 g9 |" J% T: f6 n' |' n' E

8 m7 j9 s" Z- ?' o9 C    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
' q* I; _" }& {/ ]% E4 ]( `# ?considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
3 Z, C3 m  y' p' ], vto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
. C* ?7 K' {3 F* N! z& E2 xthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core0 j3 s6 n7 {. N5 }! C$ D- w/ v) ]
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
# D; ?9 s6 Y# ~* a$ Ymanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record& A& F0 t3 }" E3 h7 z
breaking price appreciations.4 P+ @8 q% ~0 H, I4 r- ]5 A
1 r# C$ N. {4 L  t8 m' t1 R
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding3 K* o$ I8 J+ {2 L
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
, W5 f0 p, ~* z; @& X! Vlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
6 W% q8 `2 B( {; Y, Z2 p: q" n% S$ J3 }) j
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
$ e) Z+ A2 e% |& `economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer: h. u1 l7 p/ Z3 v5 K
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
6 _) P; m) v- yslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
9 R; N! Z9 ~: j+ Q% OIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
6 ]1 H6 w* o- `5 L! hgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
4 r9 H! b2 o2 Tprice appreciation when compared with 2005.. x" a$ D+ Z! ?3 L0 J* c$ {( G
# K5 i9 Q2 E$ _
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
, R. {4 |! T3 Fmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
& {) t$ ~0 ~4 i0 M  ufinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada" e% i3 B; S  w4 J: j/ x, V
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
9 X. d& K2 J8 {, B2 V
0 U" w* U! r( ?1 ~    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
$ X9 L. _! Q$ C, nAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
5 g" J: o3 a9 X  k% A7 Z) }$ R' l: mfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the8 r* C7 S9 p! m+ q& ^
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
% {# F& v; }" l- t& C- R' P) baffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
* H+ c  e" R: {downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and& S! w* ?  p: n4 D$ C
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization2 J- i) x9 T8 U) f8 B  Y1 O1 u
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
+ A/ z+ e( Q1 e3 ]; A) w; R& n5 p$ O6 w9 b9 ~
    <<
9 a% i) _1 S; S7 K                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES  P9 W( U& v* V- @
    >>, C" C( ^  Y% U; L2 Z( ?4 Y' e

* z8 u" b  b. W/ h    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in0 w, q* S/ T3 z: P+ i( G! L
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
* A8 s) s# T; Uof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time3 k- K5 C& ]6 P
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of( U: R& S7 X8 |' e3 J) {7 d
renovations.
  w: @/ I' H& x) N1 g9 ]8 r, z3 u7 j4 m, {
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight. p$ g& |: R0 r# B5 O4 M# W
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
  O" O9 I$ d( g0 Q5 b6 m$ ]* [  Tcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and( k2 Y$ |! [" C" Y0 K* ^
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.9 n% P$ |' @+ v& G2 F' G

( W! k9 E8 m$ Z1 D0 Y3 P+ ~, X    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
1 f! ?) e5 J7 Gslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the3 N+ U' f+ w/ r, y
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new0 v5 s* [0 P( h, L0 B
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores' Q% ?5 G6 e6 ]" a3 m
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
. o, X  i! y! N) \and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.4 L3 S7 y$ C, t( _
! @7 D5 C8 k3 K5 h
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
8 Z; E& d4 h) wconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their2 [1 s: e# z6 j. I/ U( x) j2 p
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers. Q  E: d. S9 a. E$ m( S
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
: T; ^; ?. ]  [. X+ ~- h% qdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
; \1 ?  q6 S& n. X- U' rbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
* p4 b! O  Z" `& \* m1 J- T" C2 {7 p0 }
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
0 h) s) }0 V2 B) ^, `% Lamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
0 R/ y, M" i6 ^: f6 }# A6 z$ cpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
+ q) }5 w3 q! [as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
) y7 ?0 s) q: A* Q1 Y8 N+ ?( Sfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.3 i, O' _, k& A1 u
3 s' Y" U3 o, c) E
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house+ K% O' r4 G+ {
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory( A8 p" I% h* P1 f
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting. [) I2 h9 X" J# e8 X
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,- b( ^1 X  _  M# S
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the: _6 o6 k5 ]  ~  V5 s6 `3 X
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before) q5 g& ~2 V5 E! G0 R( V
making a purchase.
/ z/ g1 m: x' E) Q: s  ]3 F! c
* w7 `3 S+ \  W; H    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing, n& |. U& P" s
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
7 B7 c% z  G) @. t# G: Zconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
( W' L9 t% y- Y3 v5 ]7 m( ~1 rcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
4 d9 [$ X- \$ i# Zattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
9 [$ J* Z7 [$ K, j! z6 ?amenities.0 u; B2 ~8 o4 V" W1 D: S/ E
0 Z7 N! k7 G5 U+ J, K. x+ Z
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
' O% U9 Y4 A2 V9 k3 g: Rthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
1 S3 t; p# @& B6 O, [across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has# l" P* Q; {' [; M& e' G3 Q
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
+ V+ ^. s  q; E( s/ gdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
! \. }7 O/ c4 q% _7 M7 _# ~% Zresidence, rather than for investment.& {; R# u2 X6 u9 k8 r" H

; y6 s# u0 y% @, L8 ?! C4 T# F' T    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
: F; `: t* Y* e: Q7 v- Uhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
) P1 `, ~9 d  e/ Y& u9 m4 f6 `! cin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
9 X9 M! [8 z4 c0 gconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
2 a5 b% F/ |3 p/ q7 u8 nrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
6 G3 ?, J, ^# x  Lthe market.
% B" ?0 u' C9 i1 ~
) ?) W6 ?6 u9 t( ]4 v    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through# b; [% l9 t8 Z5 c$ |- Q+ g
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
$ H3 {6 P9 F- g, U3 o  t: u4 bAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring" O+ G- ?% i. y3 j
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due- F6 k$ U7 S' ]2 [
to the shortage of available inventory.
4 g* m, L4 C' O- R" L- h7 ?, I, P0 b( g- Z* T) j+ h7 a, Y; [
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
5 G  H4 i3 t, b9 Y  C8 z/ Q' dmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
8 N) g& ^$ q7 Z; A, W2 Z/ Nvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
3 q* [# G% P" Fstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.2 K' ?3 n+ D1 j3 E

" [* _% Z1 {/ m  W9 e4 ~3 T    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases+ Z) t  q$ W3 R9 d+ A* F- H5 w
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low, K" B2 `; M$ [" b
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that1 @7 L( q/ W5 N7 u& w8 m
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring9 D; K( Y$ e) F( r3 ?: @" u  S' ?
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer. R- z, d7 Z3 G
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as/ k3 y& V3 R) Y! i- X( ^
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
1 y) h# V# d, m

5 ^, M2 d" m7 d$ S+ ~+ z/ u% A6 G0 j    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter; V" N% o6 P/ q; V3 R; \, m
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
1 b1 ~0 h) P( C1 S* ~6 o6 ?remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
! \' Q7 \3 p* Kmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
: {4 F8 s7 y; `! D' }3 a( c/ B* Yincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
" ~) ?$ a/ I/ T0 ein the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
* O, f+ F9 z5 F- }towards the end of 2006.
    : ?' ~- y4 _4 H0 I# r( s: D
& z& a1 h9 h% g1 t) t
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of7 ~, `7 m. I; e
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
# j& A6 d! t9 h1 w5 D% Kto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
5 A# U7 i  l& ~, d5 mgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
- T4 h5 {: `$ g( ?foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added. E% }: o: D; c* j
pressure on tight inventory levels.
" n5 u( ^+ \1 P% j2 |8 c
( [# s6 k" w8 q3 e4 e    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
! G0 p- \6 l" v$ G7 [fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
; k$ g# h( k) `into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;' ?8 {# N; o( M* e' f
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
# [8 @' a, b0 |- Pfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.+ B: i" |6 ]/ C  r' d+ z5 ]2 y8 v
% |+ h  E; B: K6 u, B  ?5 N
    <<
3 H1 Z& p1 M& X$ c2 x' g      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
# k7 ?& L5 s2 h! k
% g  Q$ t. n* I, q7 F: v3 j    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 |9 T# J- O. G( M! h. L' l' i
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey  d- j6 v: a2 K/ w" \
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  d- _% Z5 p7 U5 }# D0 p1 v! _. r. T
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3$ J# I9 `1 l! q
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
- e% p6 y9 X+ e% G! \    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' v1 m1 \2 O; K3 p4 s
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000( ~% s2 x: u- x5 x& `, I' `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 X- {9 ]$ Y; B0 q. g* s. I    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000+ l0 z2 `* i$ J2 I. Z! x
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 o2 e2 Q" w1 ?+ r) N5 W3 G* l    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0000 C; m) S# n9 {0 c+ j
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* Y; T- M8 s( A! e  P
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
7 ]3 }5 n2 L; Y3 `( y5 ?    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% T- a  l( o' s3 z' d% p& O; ~    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3337 n$ F/ q* Q' `5 u, G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( w9 ^; ^! d) F. \7 M3 o    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
' \( |9 `$ l9 o+ B6 s3 c4 \5 B6 \/ _    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  H9 H3 s- b" L0 ]
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,1858 p& Q% w5 G9 R- w9 x
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- o: Z% J- q, H2 w3 X, K! w4 u9 T7 @    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
- ], P* r9 {3 H9 A    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 _0 I7 O# t! g+ B1 {+ ?- P
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,7661 _; v, r+ V, }; b" b* p. n& G% Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' f  a) L0 i; |7 [' Z5 `    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
% c0 j) z, t9 W/ y/ x    -------------------------------------------------------------------------  d3 {6 d0 w! m
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
1 O. K  \+ x( N# B/ |- a6 M, a, ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 T; c0 a2 E2 s9 ^2 }& e' S    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389( |. n: G" m/ u* Q7 P- |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* c3 C/ J' r5 D9 e* J- H    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714" j! `! {, v' _0 O4 t1 u
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------! g: q' x9 f, @. O& I- @
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5006 [2 B) P# M5 x8 s( X5 X  @
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 X- u% M6 s( G! Z- U; a    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
1 f4 Z3 Z+ U7 g7 V1 {( a    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- `7 ~) d5 [. l3 y. C( m    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
' A- X4 B. H  J7 x7 Y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( U9 Y8 {0 W% ]' [) K* B; L+ n
+ p6 X: _  \7 z% r0 d( g9 C! P    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 V* ]& ~9 r8 M. V0 M0 g                               Standard Condominium
7 r2 g4 U" ^. S# r$ _    -------------------------------------------------------------
; D+ F# M5 }9 O: Q# N                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
5 T0 e* U2 U- _0 {0 u* L0 _    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change0 x4 X1 P9 }) ]* x& W, W# Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------# ~* L' t; Z# X( C
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%" C1 }, q; ?5 x, T8 O% c
    -------------------------------------------------------------* ?; i1 k0 x7 i' c9 e
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%6 T; f. f5 r+ a& j+ q9 C! \7 e" p; O
    -------------------------------------------------------------3 x3 _  N. x  ^' A$ c% r+ x
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
# Z5 ]% K  k: A) A5 s' [    -------------------------------------------------------------' R' B; `1 y* d% T) N
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
: \4 q6 y- v5 C) A% t+ t- T    -------------------------------------------------------------; x, |8 w) E; b+ N, Y
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%' o: ^2 o3 T: Z' b5 }$ q
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 N3 v. R- M( d. _% q    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
) E& c+ e8 ^, S9 }! Q: K9 q    -------------------------------------------------------------- t) n' t% ?6 f4 h1 Y+ r
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%5 _, N2 L$ a+ v5 I2 o# e
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' ]9 @% X: K: [+ ?0 @/ V9 N    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%% D" |/ {, }) I& v5 y9 D
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  @) @' {! |3 m    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%9 S. ?- N- r( K# r2 L* z- H% u
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 ?: @: Z& g2 B8 K: |    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
1 o  v) Y( x3 _) T2 G. r    -------------------------------------------------------------
: i: D5 [8 D& ?    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%! R* a, @! N6 X6 e( c7 H; J9 R
    -------------------------------------------------------------! C& ?4 A1 V3 Z6 X+ Z
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%' f1 X+ s9 J# d
    -------------------------------------------------------------# F! k- E+ \: [
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
- ^2 I( k$ _' ~; [. Y/ j. s0 b, w( `    -------------------------------------------------------------
' [0 q" ?: g3 P1 p; ?0 i: |    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
# l3 u) K; H4 Z. p- i; m0 A7 z    -------------------------------------------------------------/ S) L/ a! O0 z
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
- q$ b, N" I9 `: v/ R& s/ E    -------------------------------------------------------------
; m2 C( P, d, h# Y$ p" ~, w' r    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%7 P$ c# L: ~5 O- k7 ]% b$ E# h* k
    -------------------------------------------------------------
4 _8 W6 e4 N. n) [    >>
3 |( f! N) o9 Y" l0 S
% O7 W/ [* r9 r3 S& _    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined3 S  y& x% |2 z9 m( d; D7 @
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
. B- b3 v3 s) s; HJohn and Victoria.
' I6 h' l6 |$ A, @/ S, w$ K# m% G* ^, u4 u; {! V$ d5 y2 y
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
: w7 [9 J0 Q# Q8 i) lcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of( p6 X8 o' b4 S
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
( W% E% N/ b+ m1 c0 M, l1 Yreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price0 {& u" L! s  t4 V0 ]! U/ M0 f
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
6 D! Z  \; ~* n2 Y# w. bacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is" \7 z1 F+ Q1 ?( G. w, n/ t' i. h
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
/ W1 n1 s' M2 e: s# Sfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable7 Z) N. O2 v) f' f- f! F
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on: Z! o$ P: v+ B
November 15, 2006.
' S+ |+ R' c8 m6 f5 a( w2 ]$ I( j2 V8 O    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of. j3 S" k$ l* r' l
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge, V& E8 g* c8 c; L% @2 x
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is# u" m$ h8 h  }. w: c- T5 Z1 Q% F5 g% W
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-18 00:37 , Processed in 0.180496 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表