 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 0 l- T+ U% z- r# V
! u8 M1 Z! D9 o, O( w# p/ I
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -& [. ?6 x8 L7 C( |" c, g
8 s5 s5 ^3 g4 o. f( G
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
- o3 q& J7 L _! _/ |8 Dexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
/ t8 a' \( W/ iquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
( i) S$ @+ ]4 X9 b; T0 [1 o! k: C; P* fin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit6 n% }5 }# h7 P' i5 b
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and. X6 L' I- {1 G" n- i$ U
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
3 ?1 S5 C' H+ F9 Z2 ~0 G- vQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal& a n0 V1 f+ z! z7 f+ I
LePage Real Estate Services.8 Q- s( m. l9 ^' M% |! u& d0 Y5 `
0 u0 _7 S7 W( D Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters+ v1 ~, L7 ]8 ^7 C: z* j
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic0 V N: W, t! B( A
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and* z0 p1 J4 _* l1 X- ^! E$ J0 j
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the7 N h: h; A. F. n+ K/ ]! j" B
residential real estate sector.6 h$ Z. k0 Z& D' [' o+ Y" M) R
; r/ T0 E7 [5 L' | Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation! d. E6 I, {" f _' F
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)' u$ U! o) c% i. o" D
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562+ b4 k+ A% u* c5 J( @! Z k9 O- G
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380' o6 @/ G/ D: e6 A: x" {% i F, d
(+13.2%). g3 N/ z- M, H- ?+ g
2 _5 d. v! K! |( d "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth( R9 ]8 A, N( ] N
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the! { N7 }3 l& ^0 f. ~6 O/ x
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
8 B( F3 r8 a$ `. {/ C9 Kpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
6 R$ e- f- _' X# N ^9 z% X0 r2 ~$ gpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.$ F7 A& | ~- r) w7 e3 g- Y
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
% q( q; r6 K' r) [! g* I5 Wwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy# i$ p+ V6 U, @: ~ w- o9 {
balanced market.") D0 v% v# Y( M3 W/ b1 I
- y2 s) I; T9 ]- P" m Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,: ^7 W5 h2 d4 c2 k* S* C2 Z
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
* D1 V1 m. ]. ?6 Eto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued$ o: N$ R8 T9 m+ j" `
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core8 k% F, C# e% [, q U
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,; X6 k9 S/ \8 @/ S: A. \
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record; b/ C% A, p1 N; _7 H3 C! R1 ?4 j
breaking price appreciations.
4 J: O7 j8 Z3 `6 f# ^
9 l @3 `- Z5 L0 e4 R Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
4 p- V! q2 c6 I* Q/ meconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the; [( p* D8 U* }( |/ U
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
7 p. F9 g! J2 j, s9 w- p
: r- `+ t" h) E' U# U6 z In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
# D: h: q% ]( S- A qeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
+ R Y- W! k$ Hconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
+ p& z, A! C* C1 n+ z" Y# mslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.: P7 i. Q+ q' r% Q
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers! w* Y+ D4 V0 y# H& M
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
# G" @+ U% Y6 s1 K. j7 T$ h0 dprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
9 c0 x$ C6 X/ z* W
; F4 o% z. H9 u5 c While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing H* O4 f/ N# H) ?) W
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
6 q8 h( y$ n& P* c. y/ cfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
+ B( D' ^6 t0 E6 x' N8 n' Care markedly different than those found in the United States. {$ \/ G _- v. p
+ S+ A$ M" z! |$ j+ d* m Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
/ c$ G# a( ]; r4 T& H5 @! ]* W% RAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's+ m7 i! m4 h5 I) g
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the3 n' {2 g6 M) j+ ?. G" F; _
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
+ S" K0 P7 ~( S4 m4 h( Waffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
7 ?$ y9 Y6 Q" L0 T7 ?7 n8 ~downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and: l2 e/ o" I& L$ H/ U1 |# _
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
) a' F2 r+ r0 V+ \. Qmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."6 n% p* V" \4 W* X9 o
* @. ~9 Z( \; Y' \/ O+ y8 p <<, t- M4 c7 R" Z- O* E& b7 e
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
3 D% W4 g. {4 B8 F c$ J >>
9 s% q2 I9 k+ |1 d7 n3 H
7 `5 U2 i* v) N) l Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
) Y/ ]3 T3 m9 N! n! BHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
1 ~, X8 T; ~# V$ Oof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time$ t# x7 R( ~2 t, N/ ?# w' S) Y/ P
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of) e) X6 o/ D4 L2 j
renovations.5 c4 ~$ m, H% o
1 v& Q7 y+ l$ j The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
8 k; q/ K* s- ~$ ^2 R: rincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation$ f9 G+ D6 m6 }# [
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
5 `3 ~, @8 M* J1 FSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
' P. J$ b/ s# Y3 {5 h
% f* A4 Q8 u' l0 c* j The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
3 \' N0 b5 c; @: r9 Cslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the, p$ h4 h3 H, A3 x5 R
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new8 u/ `* j) A0 e! ?# F0 P' e
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores; z5 i# y( _# v$ E6 Z- a
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
' o7 P3 D; E5 d' c; b0 R% I7 Iand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
5 B# ~' ^% [, q2 \# E
# ^8 I! F* s6 j f5 F/ F7 r; t- E In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
# M! L2 G Z+ z8 d" ?- \conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
5 [5 ?4 u1 B$ G$ T% khomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers3 N$ Z) G) g% O; {. A: J
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
5 Q1 ]6 x- ]# Y2 }& L4 e. rdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
* C' H( P. \2 O$ y( e* X# zbuyers with more options when looking for a home.; h. s: g9 Z& e5 d+ T$ L3 M5 h
! B0 Y9 h0 @- _4 n! l: T Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
0 ?. f# l. w. R' F7 E* N: R% Gamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes ]# N' |9 }, H L
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
T% w9 X) @- s @as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
d, B! N9 ]; ?8 Efew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.9 G, {4 Z3 j2 t4 c
) ^ R1 E5 G" B9 h% j7 N9 q
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house$ _7 F6 o. }8 j% A
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
1 I+ `8 {& u; ]8 w0 ]levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting) _9 d& r! g7 r% I
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
# _( O+ L; l* uwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the, ^2 k4 a: @% ]& O/ M
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before& m% Y3 b/ v8 K
making a purchase.
+ |5 Y7 w# X, g O
/ e/ q+ ^1 t3 K0 ?* e: H Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
. r/ L& t2 |8 p7 E5 K+ Y) G6 x- U1 emarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
" W ^ I1 W: U$ t/ nconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city, P% |* O$ }. o: W
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
& f9 g' J- |; Battention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
6 z3 a3 I/ J, namenities.
2 f, Z- ]; \. z$ R2 ]
; x) |' `) N$ [4 N+ G2 L" b The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels# {3 L# \7 Q ^0 j% h
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand$ {0 I4 E+ J+ H6 C* N
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has. k" c" D3 [5 R5 F3 A- T: I# r
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
6 D8 R7 Y$ z1 z! l$ `6 kdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle$ k( [. y+ Z7 t2 D K
residence, rather than for investment.
# M4 k6 }" V& o& M; P$ M
/ M# J9 a6 O1 ~0 N The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as' e+ \7 U' _+ ]5 g3 P
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
8 B A4 O/ ~( e7 n9 oin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
+ ?1 d7 r5 L1 M* K! Pconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
- g$ q4 \0 k- z1 V3 brate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter" ]5 ^# [" j1 z) C# j# O3 |( e/ K
the market.
2 C, D$ e5 K \7 l
( ?3 @' u! E0 v7 g% G4 n In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through4 H) w" {; p( T/ U4 \
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In& j; L: A8 E+ c7 O5 h( U% p
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring" S' s' D; S" y5 m. H
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
. O6 H! \9 x; ^; s o8 S" wto the shortage of available inventory.! I0 [1 c4 |2 u0 t; V5 p6 f# I: L
[2 `2 q, H' C9 u7 S Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its- r" z) w; T6 j9 A5 W4 u" b h
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
2 \" A; D. v; d; C6 G* L7 _8 U: L) c5 svibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
6 D* N/ Z# f4 c; {1 s4 Ustruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
g0 A' k% k, l2 o4 ^& O3 s% v7 u3 N: [4 ~
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
# b9 q+ q! i- z% D0 Bin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
" X' O2 {1 j" r3 N Ounemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
, ^: D N* r5 s8 G3 @pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring4 w# p9 a. p( P3 Q2 z* ?5 @
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
* R* w1 ~- }& `season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
0 h5 ?4 Z i% f" y! D8 q E9 mbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.% N2 b( V n- T
$ s. N; H4 q8 }7 E; B* J3 v8 i; Q% Z/ {
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
8 J8 ^1 C. c/ Y0 z4 y5 Gas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
% W: w% Z' o+ K; d# t2 T" L# Y6 G7 ^3 Cremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
" O& `8 K; C0 s; f0 G6 F+ S& zmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices7 n" W9 Q8 M% m) d! R. W: I- d# a
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve6 d8 d) t# o% R6 d* @
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
5 @; _2 F) U: x- Qtowards the end of 2006. * |- U. E* K* {+ u3 T; ^
7 r6 ~6 l4 F0 R, n; B% \/ B0 a
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of7 u+ b% W/ x0 W
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable! f) {, }, D7 P- E4 U5 Q- q( ^) d
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
: t* a& Y3 B# m# qgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
0 M, Y6 a- d2 Nforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added8 L, h1 r X& ~" t, P: _$ `
pressure on tight inventory levels.7 ], t" f2 t6 K$ Z9 e
) x) C8 _. ?. V, E6 ?5 ]
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic' u& g8 y7 O% b6 K
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
, ?) O5 [* M5 N( X. r# k( C+ a2 Hinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;8 ~. k f; ?, H6 ~
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching/ U3 F; X6 H4 \, `
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
" H, v6 x& L% G9 H9 f- h6 u2 v$ P1 O" p6 x: g- I
<<- Z) q, R# t4 E1 {% O/ |
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
5 l- j5 w, W2 t% P' y7 n; h4 ^9 M" q. |6 G4 O1 v5 M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& V% v0 x! b* {2 |
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
) u- |4 g5 s$ q4 J' F -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 t, L$ t1 K& N% f. V- F1 L) i6 \
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
2 J) o5 G, [8 u2 u Market Average Average % Change Average Average
% o# }6 Y* l- X [ c* l. b$ P -------------------------------------------------------------------------% a8 a6 y$ Q4 k' g8 ]% l7 C
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0000 m/ x) j/ t* r* N( R) q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% P$ ?5 H# F2 p, z
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
2 Y. ?0 R/ b' k% y3 A: _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------" ]5 s1 Q3 a. G- e( O. h0 ?
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
6 V! w# J/ ?& o9 N ?; L& R -------------------------------------------------------------------------( w$ M( n: e3 I' ]5 z
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -# [ s( L( A: r* l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* U2 w& Y9 |: s: k4 Z, m; z St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333! J- }' {# y9 d/ Q' m1 g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ {- p$ R# ]* N# C Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583: N% r$ m* u4 A0 ]6 J `
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Z2 |/ S ^' V! O" E8 b% c/ ]
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185 B' M1 ?) O: O" U' D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 ]* H. y S7 p/ b5 Y4 E
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
4 e9 w9 Q, d- ], s -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ v8 n B6 P0 _& m& _5 E
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7668 `. ~# X0 V/ ^4 y; [7 X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' \( Q. x6 |% W+ G6 [) j5 G Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
* P6 i+ u7 W/ ~* _6 j6 c! |, l# F -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 s. S) U+ @2 u: Q
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
8 i* [5 \' [9 D$ ~) c/ v7 i4 U -------------------------------------------------------------------------% o5 z$ E' q( x! B( W, h
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
6 [' u- u- b3 v8 Y) E -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 _7 t9 \' d9 e7 A$ x K6 a( F, X5 _8 y Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
8 @/ l. ~, F, _" g0 ^8 r3 u6 W' A -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 {; O! _( t# [
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
+ R9 ^# g, D/ j2 p5 ^ -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ K4 `9 G( ^; G z
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
" `$ T3 r/ a9 } -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* {8 c" |( b) Z: H National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
- z: I" h8 e* X& m5 t+ [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 K& y: C% M& Z
& v0 p% x( g3 y -------------------------------------------------------------
/ O3 R7 X; b% s* b Standard Condominium
: t9 U0 L6 @( F" j6 W -------------------------------------------------------------0 w# p4 r9 f. ^5 [8 [ w& Z% Z
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
3 b( ]% ]( D, f' z8 i8 i5 ?/ E Market % Change Average Average % Change" R% h E' w8 w7 X) [& ?7 H# ~: Q
-------------------------------------------------------------
* N% [' I6 z! F! G7 { Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%" @# @ A/ ^' r9 @' D9 \: i$ H
-------------------------------------------------------------
: f! U0 O, h/ i4 ?' U4 t; Y. n Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%( ]$ H+ H) ?1 d7 N
-------------------------------------------------------------: ?, \! `6 ]6 B! O1 _9 a8 G
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
5 K" M" X1 d* d' o* c -------------------------------------------------------------. B$ V; t7 A- c5 I% k) j4 J
Saint John N/A - - N/A
1 L" S; E* A# }" G -------------------------------------------------------------1 U: z0 s. l+ K# L' K6 r
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
+ o, |" @9 t' E# _ -------------------------------------------------------------
# K4 A# U0 ?- A5 G2 A! J. X Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%# E: M/ a, K- [$ s# i8 s/ a
-------------------------------------------------------------
& A: P, b# X( ~; H. n9 Q; A9 N* n Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8% \0 X+ S! T' H" A8 i" f
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 o: J$ q9 n# F3 a( D Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%6 N8 W( n4 B. [( Y6 f( Z
-------------------------------------------------------------5 }" t$ {" B: c1 l
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
, t7 R6 k# t5 |0 r -------------------------------------------------------------' S+ }4 i; f- o f. t
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
) H: Z8 W* Z+ B/ j8 r* ?, w3 g -------------------------------------------------------------5 {6 B- {$ Q2 O
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%* U4 v) v' J& J
-------------------------------------------------------------0 o( z7 {7 u* a; p
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
- ~. g8 d7 e! @: _; |/ U -------------------------------------------------------------
9 R0 q! F* |# I' T% \; i Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%9 i& W4 f2 d3 j
-------------------------------------------------------------1 ^! |6 M+ _( K! S
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
* n1 r9 _4 G: S -------------------------------------------------------------
! J Z* U: i$ f7 _8 u Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
+ ]4 ?5 Q3 }9 q: s4 U) P# H' P" \+ j -------------------------------------------------------------
1 Z2 T3 @( F9 L National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
6 l4 n; [+ A, {1 h+ _ -------------------------------------------------------------
, C3 g+ g- n: z9 V >>9 c2 R9 E* @8 l' K& }+ s+ a. ?( D( n
% n$ h4 z, u6 X Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined+ {% U% }" h" l! v
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
, D6 P9 N( u# z: n) LJohn and Victoria.
' H! t: ?: a2 N5 v
, _5 R1 V; S* i# Q& g( ^ The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
9 t% H2 W4 ]: R j( o/ G3 J9 t- Icomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
* S; N9 H/ k) }) H) ]housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release) I9 E! d, i4 T$ t( B$ [- I- V
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
! k# T/ D+ k! W6 g! t9 |! h5 Jtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
4 m# m/ h3 N* {across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is% w0 T1 ~0 d) \1 M C/ m8 ]9 D* R* t
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current" @" u; O; `0 X6 a
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
" \! L5 [/ X$ s# H7 W% `4 iversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on1 X- e4 _ l/ L5 {
November 15, 2006.
3 m7 c, ]; K c5 d) n& l% z7 W! e2 u Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of! ]" l, T8 I5 P6 R4 x) M6 E
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge+ p M$ H7 p$ z7 E) s
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is3 E3 e: w; `+ _9 Z0 D# E0 e8 K6 ?
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|