埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2157|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 7 R- O: f1 R: _9 v
! I# p3 Y6 `& G( M( [3 a
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
: O0 W+ p/ P' F6 }% \% X7 `' _" p1 x5 X
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
* }, N" Z% H7 @exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third  S$ p$ o( o6 d1 f+ s
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
$ K9 r6 A: F' ~; U5 k: din the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit5 ^8 \0 M( ]' P2 Z" f
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
5 a4 y# _, ^. d% G. v' ~' Rmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,% g# w! v% N# O: p  S6 ]* t
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
  P% t0 [% r7 {  y+ S) Z/ [1 z# }8 ^LePage Real Estate Services.0 f6 R* p6 o8 J" U' a+ Q

& L0 n0 m3 j- v! v  ]. p6 y: Z3 M+ H    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters2 ~% g  A' b1 f) y5 F6 y2 c; J/ R. x  w
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
4 Q& v' X* h5 m5 P' b2 ?conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
0 _7 R. Q8 A  P8 nsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
2 ~0 s% I+ J5 _3 k* c0 hresidential real estate sector.  p6 @/ }3 w' ?$ p& v
" i/ i; ~* Z- B, a
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation; |- p! p, A* b9 l! l1 m2 K
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)5 F) U- R7 v* G) G
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
+ W& u% x: V2 u(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380( p* f! c, d& L2 T) H4 C
(+13.2%).2 ~" P/ p9 d* z7 K: M" O  r
' d( t! [( }* ^; n
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
. A, G! k  a0 ]7 kduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
; K! |( u9 e0 g1 ^3 Pfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are$ A, r: {  }& v; p" [' V9 P' V" e
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
. h9 E; ?5 y* Hpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.5 e% Q+ l/ Q( Q& N
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
% o: ?  L% m, C4 Y1 p1 w& Bwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
1 L: g! H) D6 m& x  l) L# nbalanced market."
2 i# T3 X7 H$ B3 j5 |9 [+ A  o5 ]& T+ Y. X6 j! g
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,4 W) X9 U/ f) M& J
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift7 H$ B5 h# f, N" R) X
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued' R7 }: R2 I% M2 ~& W
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core. Q; i5 [+ q6 m/ |
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,0 ~/ h; W/ L, B
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record- p* Q/ I# Y- @3 d4 w* f
breaking price appreciations.
, Q" i* l$ ?! p9 `3 ?. e/ g) J  q. t* ?5 ]" }+ R' k
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding0 g  \) t2 P5 b# N1 }( e+ t+ ~
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
* G8 y3 ]* ~: ~- [& m5 Y7 ~- P5 L4 Rlargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.2 L! r' R6 R3 h/ S5 k
$ f/ p6 \; A2 W0 V' I( W! {; [
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid) q% Q/ s: ]9 A. @, }$ D* k
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
4 D7 g# e& r+ J( Vconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
  f' J  h  h( I7 }& B$ _slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
0 }5 Q: P, L6 ^! ], a* DIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
) y% F' Y' O& [, r8 Zgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
- J5 i. F$ z! A* N1 xprice appreciation when compared with 2005.8 t. e, D: e+ S6 Q

( d+ L3 N+ D' [* C. o    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing! L4 ]& _; }* Y( S5 c4 R: s# N
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and, C9 i6 C* g3 D+ X
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada2 e: n( ?4 G8 X" l3 B# l2 }& m
are markedly different than those found in the United States.% _, x# E* c3 N: x+ }8 [
5 y8 n5 f+ K* E; F
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
" b1 X. Z( G( W6 ~American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
7 k- ~- M, V, x1 }+ Q9 V* Ufavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
0 F1 @1 Y& r3 I; H2 nrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
& \1 t0 O& v" t4 y. Daffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the1 b$ y1 ]+ U- J' H8 h: c3 i8 U
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
4 j" ?8 n: [7 M% D" `aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
  x& u) U( n' x9 W: E3 Q! }mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
% ], Y& ?8 Z* f, o: f0 g2 [7 ~6 J, V6 }& R' p3 v3 }
    <<4 z) L$ W7 K( \# G7 y
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
. A0 ^" j8 F( v, _! H. M    >>; J) |* S7 G  b
, b) v: S5 `$ B( J5 V  d
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in/ k1 {( z6 T6 O" C
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
) j( _: x, j5 g4 V5 x' M! d. Kof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
* x8 Z' T- s- V1 G( f+ P! w( a$ Plooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of. |8 g4 L, k; c$ ~8 A3 v) d- g
renovations.
# j3 t3 w5 e, r8 s
5 q6 e7 p1 W7 J4 O' z    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
5 n7 b, ~, q( v9 a( K: @' E0 mincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation7 d- G* v4 u9 e$ H# j
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
3 T- K# O# K) s8 kSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
" m( h, @3 o- x; ]
3 u, A" ]$ L" }5 x* s* x/ U    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer6 K9 }+ w1 Z8 i; @, @/ J+ G
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the! O3 V+ U+ Y! x
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new; m" B$ Y4 w$ f. p7 s5 o& X
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
0 c9 S: O8 n3 @# ato the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
$ D1 n7 f+ P! [& y8 vand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.9 W; ?- A; C4 [1 s. G4 n7 r, [

0 b8 D/ c2 A! v    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced1 O# R2 E- k8 G1 x6 z2 N
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their( \2 [0 T/ k1 Z, Z
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
$ s2 z" y' {/ W" i8 o: Z$ i6 h) Uwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
! }) b4 {( j# `+ Z0 R( i1 gdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing, Y2 P2 v2 J  [5 r0 J2 v* w! P7 ~
buyers with more options when looking for a home.7 n5 r, \/ O7 @6 i) G
. J2 t  s3 Y. ?1 B* n
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
$ z# Z% g' f5 ?4 ^/ T6 K% y9 Oamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes4 Z$ W8 Z: n. d) H2 m: G7 y
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,9 ?- {' h5 Z+ V# L( W7 t/ k
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
+ w- u% }" k/ `  E3 I( S. o6 }* {few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.& q4 q. l" B9 Y  s$ t* @

& ]8 z9 U6 D6 _) _% X    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
6 Y+ g) n! q0 Z7 f) \/ a* Oprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
8 P, j5 y) _  m: e: B" Ulevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting9 {2 d4 P+ B/ {* h* P
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
6 \2 D, d0 J( _when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the( G- ~6 b3 W6 D  y' {
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
+ z( R) X' g9 X/ m8 T# V( M+ ?$ mmaking a purchase.4 j! `, f9 N- r+ u6 O

2 }" b6 W+ T0 T7 ~. @7 \    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing" x6 w+ h0 ?" W& q, Y1 n' k2 `
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
8 x: {+ n0 A  Y' lconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city3 m- b7 o3 \5 d+ m
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting/ s2 T& n6 k( E3 T
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown) k% F$ ?6 r" Z
amenities.
$ o# F3 A) X! b( l3 M! c8 V
" h) d' T; G6 Q# X) X    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels# L3 p0 R9 V2 G) r* A; w" R
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
' O0 l, F8 j4 h3 S7 ~across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
3 J4 N0 D% c1 w/ ^continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
) r" o1 B& z7 `* H, C' k  Zdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle4 h( p  A2 X- h  p* a5 N9 ]
residence, rather than for investment.# w! r* Y. l; D/ K* `  V' w7 T7 K

5 V" }& S1 N( s    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
: p# k$ _- Q3 A  ehouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted! z9 H' A, b, c% k% b7 \" L0 \- O
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer' O, u$ I* o) _- f2 v% r/ f) B+ ~
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization8 ]; s1 |; E( B8 _; V, P+ A
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
/ m$ \2 ]* ?# B0 P5 R2 L0 Tthe market.
: n# \5 ?: v+ n! |( G' L) f1 w- [* u+ t$ x" \- ~" e7 @# X
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through3 F7 }$ H" ~* L5 ^8 U
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
/ W0 v0 y3 l) `( D& |August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring1 Y. H# }7 F# D7 G! C7 @
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due  N% F8 \, q9 p# k0 F3 \
to the shortage of available inventory.
" l" G- V; ^/ t/ ?" r* s0 C' r$ N
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
- |, X) \9 k- P! I6 ]momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains6 b8 l7 g. n! H
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses+ Q$ u! s9 ^2 D1 f8 f$ \3 d4 ~- f, r
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
7 @9 o7 Y5 L. O+ y" F3 G" s
2 V/ @2 o! F' `) `: |7 w( I- N    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
$ o1 D- ?' \! q/ N. W" Y- S. j! |in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
# _9 p1 x3 h, z: _unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
  d* V1 D' I0 g8 Rpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
6 L! }9 g1 q: f, B& \* X, p" {prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
2 m- \$ k$ M" k4 G2 {# U! M/ d; P5 s" Tseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as' y) J1 w, I8 P0 I: |& o7 K8 Z
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
6 m  }5 x3 {8 g6 h
5 l+ G$ l. }3 B0 _
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter2 }0 c% A2 r- i
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton6 f2 h* Y" P* S' G
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,5 N/ o/ f/ p' P! N! l. ^
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
& C' ~1 U+ _! Y# q$ Hincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
; S! ~2 B1 a1 v9 p/ W7 pin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
: {7 S) @& k3 x0 ctowards the end of 2006.
   
4 y) @) b9 l) G9 u9 v; k/ k# J0 i- P- g  F- H5 g
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
& R- v0 _2 _! Y/ einventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
* [  E+ c1 p% L/ G  P6 o/ n& m$ ]  h8 gto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
, j- e  P+ D- a( J1 Rgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
; f* C9 H, `8 H% T- fforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
( A! z4 L/ c6 H% n* c( ]) @; A# ypressure on tight inventory levels.  G1 u! \5 ]7 I; B2 x: W3 F

" {& @. s4 k: z! A    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
' a) a, d5 ~" ]7 k$ O4 x  yfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
! Z+ m( G$ w7 u8 {4 B  ^9 ?6 Vinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
9 v: _1 m5 k2 f, x0 P+ f& }while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching, z* ~0 I/ m3 Z: R: C5 @
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.% [) V9 V- S, r3 I* x3 O
2 g7 ^( j6 `8 r2 e1 g* G
    <<
! |) \+ M6 U6 b" @      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
) W6 o9 |9 t$ }" B# m1 R
4 K1 z; p, o* m    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 S  T! u# V* P7 Z                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
4 c1 y7 T6 e0 z1 l( _. H: k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& u& D& j( j' X5 r& d
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
; v# ~& m; H- f$ ?( X    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average+ Q1 d" d! e9 k: ^
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, `4 j% ?9 a% c4 Y1 D# M! s  y
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
5 P. q% u- k6 D' |% x; Y8 h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 v- o5 n  T, ]+ ?% x    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
4 s% p9 C# E5 x# V5 v9 g% X2 ~( L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------& O3 O" S) W# ^6 i& f
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000: R. Z5 [# N* a% [; V
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, R; \9 O0 s% G; R
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -% J( G- W- Z% g4 ~# S# w+ K. i: ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* s0 X1 ]0 ?9 a) m5 t    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333/ R( k, Q) l0 f5 h+ {) e6 o2 e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 g! z) R: E1 @1 C
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
" }! }; R- B% b& r+ R$ W    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ `9 Z. F( z2 |& d- z: B/ Z    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185( Q# p8 g2 ~$ ~& y) U& ^8 C* b8 r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( p) p% J0 O) x$ j0 \    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
% Y" X3 P! U  i0 Z: ~  ?: ?2 y1 z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 Y: Y" b' z' C4 L& P# g3 ~3 o
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766  J7 ?6 P4 [* V( _( m9 N* \
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 i8 a2 ^1 Y$ }' m
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7079 G' b% S% D# C# P$ f
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* @( d, l& H3 ]    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500* X) [7 k$ R( ^4 ]5 U% q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 |3 \$ |0 q* [# t$ w
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
* l- O  g' A+ D( y- w  L* v4 w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 a, c* L5 m! {3 s& f! F( Y' S
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
- _" p: q) J  f! S  o( U5 [. b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ X# W' W! Y9 ~$ x* z    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5009 L" n+ S& a, r
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; p$ S' ~" P& k) F% C    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
+ ^$ a" F, W) z2 |, y7 a    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) b+ u4 p0 Z8 U9 i+ P( M) [1 }
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,8607 k* U) c- x4 p
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; {) f5 c( w, j" k* {9 D

" R# |3 ~9 Q" I& Y! d* J: c4 ~    -------------------------------------------------------------1 ^2 S% k+ l& A. I8 j) ]9 i
                               Standard Condominium
- G  A8 `$ P; u7 S! C    -------------------------------------------------------------! y, g2 Y3 N: F: [4 L& Y" N
                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo! V. K, R8 J/ X1 p0 |( _
    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change3 T6 m: P2 |4 t" G1 D: F* u: b/ r) u
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" _* y9 j, ^4 F+ ~# L5 `    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%3 q' y' d+ S8 e
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 b' f) y( \9 B' J$ o
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%0 V4 b+ i9 ]* R# Y3 N# V
    -------------------------------------------------------------  G2 K0 M2 H% K8 R/ ]( ~) o
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
' X( o- W" v9 g: x7 x    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 K0 ~- d9 r, Q4 ^5 X    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
/ U5 F8 {; i' ?5 K# j" z: u( E2 d    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 I0 ?$ h5 }" r0 H) o) a    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%2 H2 B6 R+ p! Z* D2 p9 \  D9 r
    -------------------------------------------------------------2 @; y/ W( h- e5 X7 {( C  H2 d
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
2 d: g- z8 }$ c    -------------------------------------------------------------5 h5 S8 X8 u" ~
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
- C. l9 `* T4 R" M  ?- c/ }9 g    -------------------------------------------------------------
% [6 n: _' |! r9 J6 U    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%5 K9 P8 D6 t% Y' ~/ p' a; P
    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ L! b5 W3 \3 i9 }/ R/ a    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%' O8 f( n0 S7 V  O: `" M5 N' X
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# b2 a7 }# O5 h# ]7 [    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%" n1 Q  l8 |& L
    -------------------------------------------------------------
% I8 ~: j5 ~0 Z    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%) b6 R: m, y9 i+ m$ t8 n3 Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------
* n$ R8 v+ t7 q. Q+ e    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
( W& Z1 `6 C9 t0 Y6 [3 t    -------------------------------------------------------------$ Z% G+ [2 m' m1 _& _8 M: w- u
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
3 ]$ v; t: X2 p8 N; R& [5 d" Y    -------------------------------------------------------------7 z! q# ~1 \- q- M. _
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%) e& @# y- G  r3 m. H3 c- f! y
    -------------------------------------------------------------# D, @" e7 E$ x) Q3 ]
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%  E+ c0 C! j% p6 @
    -------------------------------------------------------------& @, J8 X+ m0 |9 y
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
2 s' {! K/ [+ Z  Y  w9 _( p- v5 [    -------------------------------------------------------------+ A4 m* \! @) X5 Q" k2 G
    >>* g4 Q! x4 u8 S1 K
/ x- s, S8 u8 ?; N( W- y- w
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined4 f- L% R2 @9 P% J1 C& j
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint3 J8 k4 P+ L; F8 x4 N) v* w- q$ h- ^
John and Victoria.
; o1 x% e' f3 @% L, j$ B3 D  p: n) H" k- z6 c% q$ i
    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most. o5 F+ y6 \6 R5 W) p
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
  M4 @7 x1 x" Zhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
: `; S2 c6 [% _  J: \) Freferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
" t) p' P" d: b/ M( I1 w7 K: itrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities* s7 x) M9 v! q( j
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
! @' a: U9 i! z+ [  I. n1 javailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current% a5 e  v& m6 T4 P/ k
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable1 j  e4 ?; b8 k2 H" T; I
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
+ U2 d- x' P% o7 f7 w/ U6 sNovember 15, 2006., z0 ~6 ^9 W( W( K1 [/ q
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
) ?* F. n/ p) J% W: @" ]; |. Xfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge4 x* _0 |: X7 {- J  o, w
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
. n) a9 K  D  g; r* K) e9 u  `- F3 {4 Savailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
大型搬家
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-12 10:27 , Processed in 0.150797 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表