 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 5 {3 V0 _7 W2 s5 g+ l- o( g
- Y+ ~7 Z) k2 ~; w# v& i- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
3 i. b1 Q8 Q" |8 P
) U; {% D2 e4 |3 y TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market1 w6 r# H' V0 Y8 w4 O% w; m
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third0 R# j. p6 X; |
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
. W+ c) t5 q* @3 _, ain the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit; v- k0 ~* [4 M. z9 N$ `
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
8 m6 m) W$ G* M, n* T9 v# Jmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
" S9 C8 @$ y% u1 mQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal' r0 B7 c& O3 y, N( M1 b
LePage Real Estate Services.; \& F& N; K1 {, p8 G9 { {
7 U% {# W, {5 P* x$ j' x
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
9 U5 \9 G8 s7 n7 X4 lare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic3 N) ^6 \; z9 i4 h \
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and8 {9 d+ `) _- j, J8 L3 u2 n
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the3 x' X5 K P5 W& ^
residential real estate sector.
% Y* C/ u9 R! F6 X( ?7 ], V2 `% K. |( d5 `+ _
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
9 X4 n _6 B: S7 E0 boccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
( M3 b3 U, H( G8 T9 p/ _year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5623 q2 y+ Q- B( ~2 P0 {
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380 h5 H2 V, [2 U, |5 u
(+13.2%).6 e) S8 j8 Z$ Q. y& n3 M* h
! L% Z# @) t6 d9 x "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
C0 P+ Y. Z4 ~$ w3 _during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the2 L% D8 ]. {* d# c9 x2 a: ]! V! o. w! N
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
! u4 J7 u; R- J. _. t5 V& `$ Opoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
5 n4 _$ r8 R4 F) C6 apresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.4 V L1 }: S4 p3 n% U) D* g
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We! m T) _; P! @: J
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy0 s+ R F H& N, l
balanced market."1 _6 o% R# ^' `4 y Y
, Z# C/ f7 K5 B
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,' X* v; w5 r/ w' L2 p5 W8 z4 m
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
) ?5 p' n6 F7 m: Zto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued a# {* m9 R$ N, y) M
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core4 q- R# v9 t; H% a# P' G
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,3 S# \% ^" G- F; v. D* C# U# v
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
. |% ?! l7 r( l0 x7 mbreaking price appreciations.
" O: |9 |, d7 v. @: X3 C& G& J6 P8 B! r* u2 N( ^
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding. I. h& S$ o8 A6 U; Z& |3 J0 e/ c# m
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the& |) d; J6 w! J7 [9 `; t# q8 ]8 S" g
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
* s3 L- ^: ~: y4 ]" s0 S$ r8 ~( T: G( ]* V& m
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid( F8 l' S$ E4 G" G/ w8 f
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer+ o& t. N1 z( Q* l, I6 m0 u1 b7 _
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
# p' e. ~: \5 b: N. M+ N/ Y) J! {, Dslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.9 { Y8 b2 K' \7 `& h/ a8 ]4 U1 m
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers) L& s4 \" g6 t; F+ F8 _
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
* p" P0 c& ^/ Yprice appreciation when compared with 2005., y A$ s& }6 C6 U8 r: A; n: h+ P
# e5 P( G2 Z4 u1 C: R9 \6 |8 c# I While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing( {2 Q/ ^' f: o: a2 A* A
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and) N5 q& @+ ]- a
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada$ y" ^3 J0 G2 L7 O
are markedly different than those found in the United States.4 ?, ^! j# S& f. P6 b! N; l
9 R/ f% h4 P3 A* K, r
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
' n2 d1 _ O+ P8 U, U! KAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's- N4 c; y c: V% O3 b U
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
- `. Q( W, d! \, C( `6 J( A% ]relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general) c- ~# U0 b" I5 |8 b% N
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the% G6 F2 P' W6 A% O& |+ M
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
4 m2 @, c9 }" d- G( ~# O! \8 X5 Laggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
- D" l; t3 i+ f' f4 P4 \mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."+ N3 F6 g5 q* u
0 W9 P4 F' `+ d: T$ `, D
<<. Z; q6 U2 |( L
REGIONAL SUMMARIES# k; v# g3 x ^( i
>>
9 v+ Y7 [ D. y) q/ n( F9 _2 E$ q( H2 K$ E5 d
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in# i" u# O9 T- o$ A/ l
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate& N$ O4 V' x* B# o* [+ E
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time: g$ G; q$ Y+ @' T1 k p
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
. Y3 @$ Z3 Z% v" `% |: Orenovations.
0 v- ^; G- ~- M! k8 S( z& z( _
$ q( `4 a$ S7 Y The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight$ I1 n9 `' h/ m4 Z% t* C
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation: O/ Y( ^' b' P! A* h
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and! V3 E' m3 y: E$ B5 t9 R
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.0 N1 m* w3 p9 ?+ H: _' D* P
; l2 K- L5 x$ t( z* g
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer( `) I! V) H: r
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the) f, w$ U7 g$ M0 T1 U
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
# \/ f1 h7 u( W* G. |600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
2 h' [& j4 Y! I+ ^to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
, W5 w2 N( i( h. zand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
H2 h4 R5 m! _. K1 @/ j( C
' G) e# o4 `8 k In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced c/ y, q( n8 O! w/ F5 j
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their1 H: z4 J4 Q) ?
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers% ]9 a Y5 _- h1 {# \* X
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian+ z9 {) r, z, K1 ^; k3 e: e
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing' { J9 g$ C5 b$ K! w
buyers with more options when looking for a home." E: _: d' Q% s0 r3 r
5 H" W1 ]+ I. Q& }4 I
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly6 e! o5 A, h& j5 c
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes J% W: h* J \ C
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
3 t: y: ^* F' B0 F/ ^as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last. g) i$ j( G9 H/ {& [
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
! S0 E% d( C% R' X9 J! S4 X9 _4 U4 D, [! x1 Q
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
$ A: o- t ^8 R8 kprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
8 `5 F* q: w: K. J. E9 o) Q. V" Llevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
8 X, E: n* q) `: `$ K+ \6 jfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,1 c6 s$ E: g, M
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
9 ?2 i! i2 J! K7 w8 h$ ppressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
/ [8 ^+ r% V1 c. e& Lmaking a purchase.! ^) C& O2 N9 L# F+ D, \6 v$ i
b/ B; C+ [9 j N% E( Q) n! J. N0 @
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing% g1 y' }2 k. g* D) e% I6 }
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong" k! {7 u5 o, E8 {/ w. E+ ^! t6 V6 X( x
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city7 U# V1 }' Q- J* h# s3 t. T, z; C
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
; a( D0 O$ S7 n. i4 b: Y) Wattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown7 F3 y4 J5 L' g0 k8 ]& m4 x# i
amenities.
5 M u$ Y1 ~& u. d/ Y, p% r" b3 S9 P, A8 B) `3 V
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
. u2 P: B7 B" D2 d N' x) uthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand" B" x* M r# x. Q9 \3 v
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has/ V* d' m2 O6 K8 D, \4 U. h
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
# z( w& ]; y0 s' x" \' odriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle% F+ i w4 Z- p6 C i& Z0 s' s/ [5 e. |
residence, rather than for investment.
1 U [5 Y; O3 \6 D* _3 p9 t0 o. o& y" i3 q q6 ?
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
* C3 E, j* L( S* |2 G5 Shouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
/ p2 t( M9 Y6 ^7 c! Y: c+ xin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer/ B. }. m2 T1 ?7 c0 w
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization* }* Z" B0 y: t! c' I! b6 J
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter1 k- Z G9 M* R( F9 G6 b6 G
the market.0 \: q# N! ~9 ~1 `' z) j) o
) w. o% c+ c6 B" B8 U7 h3 E+ b In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through( ^- W. ^# w7 P8 `8 r
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In, N& h+ z7 o/ k9 J6 y x
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring/ f3 L! x6 W, W+ j1 k
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due$ Q& k" E# I; A4 F+ d9 b
to the shortage of available inventory.
4 n7 o* v6 V2 U' J9 u
' H+ u5 R0 N c; F Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its& d4 }' C: P! {4 O& Q5 \# h
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains% e7 W p; V! W' d3 b+ u+ G4 i: ]
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses9 k; Y. ]- h$ Q4 A9 Q0 j
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
, y. X8 v, S& s/ e$ O- w+ f/ d7 }. s
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
, }: x, \+ K0 ]9 q8 @in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low7 \0 P- g! }5 k( o( H
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that6 T5 L( N9 x3 S$ `
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
0 b: x! _4 j- q% A3 kprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
- I; S7 r8 [ p2 \0 sseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as& [- s* W/ |) z6 E; J3 h
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.4 \) v6 V) W+ I/ w! L- d# h
1 V. `7 A: D, x. j) I( \ Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter0 Q* p; @9 O$ N) Y c6 B: g A
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
$ N: ~' J# B$ n9 Z6 uremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
0 T5 X5 [1 E0 u. c9 q: v( P5 u4 U9 lmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
' V- v- V: e# S; ?8 V& ]$ zincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve+ h9 M& f! L( V% N" M
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly- v" c2 ~2 ?5 I( h
towards the end of 2006.
& i" s& t: Y4 K: {+ n0 L! ^
) n+ N; m4 G0 d- j- H; ~* H* rWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
) N5 l+ K8 u0 Z- v8 ]7 ~inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
' y( U6 E: f4 _to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse' o7 ?1 K3 r- I! Y
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to/ C: z8 a( a) A: {: e
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
: m9 a+ ~( j3 c4 g) I5 w: rpressure on tight inventory levels.: `4 C' {) j T1 u* u& _
7 L0 S, Z9 m5 r" X Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic% y4 }6 p5 Q* X( `. a+ O# v
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
) y/ D6 l6 g. O7 _1 d: {. e- m einto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;. L. p" ?1 P3 S% j8 H
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching: N9 ]) V* j$ M6 D7 \
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.9 p7 Q6 D5 A7 E# e: s* y4 d4 \- s
& O1 V/ i7 z4 J) \ ^8 j3 y <<$ ]/ [3 \7 Q# A+ u/ T/ Q& E
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20060 e* c$ k7 |- w9 ?* n9 j
f# ^3 f. I3 @6 F( \+ }
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 H( p+ p+ g* o* X
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
- l/ }/ f8 `/ w -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 U4 g0 |. L$ r) A 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
x4 Q; a/ M) K; ^$ f0 C* g Market Average Average % Change Average Average* {* u3 D1 }. D4 p, o' i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" v5 j# ?; M7 q# `7 U
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
/ q- ^; f, h' {1 T -------------------------------------------------------------------------' F8 f" b ^" J! p1 @9 `: D
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
- O% g, W( m/ @/ l& m -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( X8 m' o: C' K# s9 o1 J8 R Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
3 t! v+ X, C8 `4 k) M. d2 o7 K -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& \' M- O+ v- ^ Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
/ L2 a" W% X1 U- Y4 |" h" Y( s* I -------------------------------------------------------------------------! d$ M( z: ]; X3 B- L7 h$ Y3 M5 p
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333" | k e8 ?4 D6 f. l" p% \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ @) b3 }+ v/ n( s, d6 Y$ E
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
# I6 l- t/ O* @ B& S3 J5 ^8 s -------------------------------------------------------------------------( M% _+ n# Q$ O% _; O; @: s* v
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1857 c2 o# I; I! z+ n
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. `' G, g1 m' b3 v m Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
, J* j; J" c" k9 u* N( J# t- ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ G/ O% s4 t! l \' g3 E, d
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
+ t2 E5 x6 P2 a. X1 Z6 E0 t -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 ?' Z" O' y. }6 t3 M- U Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707. |- v; M! c* G% w+ M# d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( z+ D) N+ Y& G- q4 G0 }8 y Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
) O) r$ Z3 n! m. \) D -------------------------------------------------------------------------% |, i! p" G; z9 H
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389. Y6 e2 `, ~6 S3 Y+ G5 k0 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& o# {9 Q- ]6 `' Q; p8 _
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714' v' f" n) H$ Q0 I- l9 n8 h, m! C
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' I+ _, }, b) C0 h) B5 L
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
1 i6 B2 M$ X: m- j, T5 o; ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ Q# x: Y: \, H! ~ Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
* H7 K) x# y, L- y7 @: n& N -------------------------------------------------------------------------, _9 ?8 G# \) r" o3 k
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
& G/ b P: S! j1 ^* T -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 e2 C5 O4 ]% C6 }; ]
; _1 g$ ]: K0 ^ I -------------------------------------------------------------7 N* n* g. \8 S( j) J
Standard Condominium/ o; B/ I/ K, e9 w& z
-------------------------------------------------------------8 I+ a: ]: a) X& U
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
& s1 g( H) r* W9 ~$ x, a+ ^ Market % Change Average Average % Change
" Y i/ z4 L0 X( I -------------------------------------------------------------" `1 [( S, ?' d
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
& i+ _! v% c& T9 Y4 } -------------------------------------------------------------
V: k+ \9 V* H" S7 X. m* D Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%5 G0 `; r8 Y0 c
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 @8 u8 w8 Q( C- J! [ Moncton 4.9% - - N/A' a* d, H3 z* H
-------------------------------------------------------------
. w4 ] v0 ?" n' j4 q* g5 {- ] Saint John N/A - - N/A
; Z, `, B) H: S -------------------------------------------------------------
; _; s" W. O& Q% o8 t$ q St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%: ~! Q% b) `, v4 ?2 q6 U, }4 [% F9 S: K
-------------------------------------------------------------
: l6 t( x* l- u q0 J Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%2 S# _. ~3 J, {- ]5 S- K
-------------------------------------------------------------
" U4 a {5 u6 y4 ^+ I2 f/ u Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
6 y2 V( o3 m. Y& ]' |& s0 c1 I! Y -------------------------------------------------------------* i1 x& B3 o, x" E! z/ U
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
6 B6 `4 g1 ^4 } -------------------------------------------------------------7 ~. ^1 [! ^" Y, N. j2 e
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%5 u7 O" `+ P$ S- p
-------------------------------------------------------------
+ a; N0 H/ N, r$ V Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
+ n, A; {" R1 K# ^/ u -------------------------------------------------------------* A5 F4 y/ r* ?) Q8 f6 J
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%5 F) ^* W3 R/ c9 K& Z
-------------------------------------------------------------
) I! ?8 f- Y" n2 P; H- i0 | Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%) }3 d# B8 v) |$ ?
-------------------------------------------------------------7 ?3 f) A9 X& T# }/ ^; _
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%) Q4 W* r% J8 G
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 `( q1 Z! q) J1 x% l5 G/ A2 x' n Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
Y7 X: N) G. T -------------------------------------------------------------6 T/ ~8 j: O: |- K. Z
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%2 k8 B9 H) _1 c2 @
-------------------------------------------------------------/ h4 Q5 N( p% C! A( h1 [
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
" z9 x' D0 ~" Z$ q( K, J1 T -------------------------------------------------------------
5 W; g7 d# z& S) _% z5 Y >>
3 w, O2 g3 M9 w
" Q! n) q6 o" |1 E4 Z/ ~ Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
7 r3 ~+ R5 y* vin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
. G4 K; Y% U) a) x! I' Z9 [John and Victoria.
0 Q& { A7 U& c& f2 s
# L' }- N0 O- t6 r ?( X The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
5 x! D+ o; u8 n% S# E" Vcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of# R" K/ o' R' P+ k% l
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
0 ?! o( v, u# T) D. treferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price2 s5 B8 e4 o# d& ~6 G* k0 ?: u
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
$ E7 z" ^6 [2 M- l; t! E) @across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is& e4 u( g4 ]& L3 d
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current. n8 T1 p$ z/ A' j9 Q+ z+ Q! `9 S. x
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable3 A- X' f. g& D. c a+ G5 a9 _
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
( T; M( X$ @' X& w; n. U/ XNovember 15, 2006.7 g% K8 T: v; A3 A8 U
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of* u2 x% q) Q& U( J# S
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge) t5 L, T+ z0 Q! i- D2 ]5 e1 C
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
- `) j# Q1 O/ _! S& c- M8 ^available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|