埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1964|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
* i4 Q/ r2 p8 `6 p* ~) a4 f9 O6 y1 T2 ?( X3 B2 @
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
2 _/ {6 r+ v' W+ x/ t7 q; o$ N; X3 }/ R8 E* Q/ t* e- e) ~
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market( K5 [2 w; }% f" u0 y6 v
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third$ K4 {/ j8 J9 ?
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
9 X0 u& ?3 w* H. h+ ^: Z: |( Q2 m* ^in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit* j$ F* Q/ u" N3 ^& Y7 B
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
7 L  R4 U6 F; m& L, Hmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
& C- V) m0 v) F" \, z( hQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal, C4 K2 ^* L5 V0 Z1 t
LePage Real Estate Services.
% ~: k+ T, F+ h& E4 h; E
2 D  [4 Z& ]+ V3 ?" b( N; S0 e5 @    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
8 U, e  B5 A; ~  E4 I4 C: k' s. Vare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
; O: \# J4 x" k6 Q$ Pconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and3 N, R% X/ N% q. \5 s$ ^
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the$ o+ [" ]# T$ C
residential real estate sector.
3 A  s7 L1 ?  B" X. k3 M  E! g8 X! x& I' e4 d
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation9 y) X( R: r# _
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)) B  _7 {# V+ F/ ~0 e8 B6 a6 f7 S
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
. o3 g% q% V9 M" t% ^& ^- k6 W(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380; Z# }0 B% C  D1 c" t3 z# l1 ^
(+13.2%).7 _: h) c+ ^# }, M; a3 Z, }3 [

( l7 P* r! v4 n. d    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth8 u( X, d- Z, z* M# R
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
, q" d5 Q" }3 t$ c/ C/ H( }frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are* [2 b% t9 w& @5 n- P
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
( a  V  R! {6 T/ Npresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.8 Y, x( x; ]5 R, ~2 E
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
) {9 Y% G' ^; g/ Ewelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
2 l: k/ i# n# r" v+ Rbalanced market."
, r; p) y, N: t5 \2 R& K) R
: s% N/ n  q) N    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
# s# j" P& o# d& O; D  ~considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift5 B5 l- ^+ K) y% C& @" G
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued  Z) o$ a) z6 O( b6 m/ S4 U' p
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core6 M7 q# x: s; @! b
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
) c9 A) [# _$ s5 I% l( o( M. A$ ?manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
) o% S  K, B/ R  u. h' w' V! Lbreaking price appreciations.: }6 p! l3 B9 {3 h

4 i4 Z! S; m, F0 I/ }    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding/ F4 F* D2 d8 n7 p% j/ w0 P8 V. y
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the1 X2 R  ]# ^' K" \8 y3 s3 q1 \
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
( E  \( @' I- X7 u6 K5 R
; E( e' i) X- T8 u' J    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid5 C0 z, \0 {/ |+ D
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer/ Y0 x  t  }+ a) [
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off6 j. |2 f6 A' _, w% x: F! k
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.2 m" ^& ^+ n, f5 F7 m
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
7 `& x5 Z' a7 k: Y. g( ], C0 ?' m8 ugreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
+ u1 @7 g; ~' B% Q# S9 \6 V' ^price appreciation when compared with 2005.  a4 B0 l- v& q' ]3 O: k' g

2 ~0 _. ~0 T" E/ f  _    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing- o4 w' A6 q2 l6 _
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and3 T  b8 a  f* S9 g8 z
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
: g+ r* c5 L' S7 Tare markedly different than those found in the United States.
1 A0 C+ e2 A( F* p. G5 C
( T) k( G' ^" j    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
; Y$ _* g( _& _2 G% L& H1 F3 _American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
- T0 ^0 T; T$ `" I7 B% gfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
+ ~& T6 o( s# O; wrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
! U  V: H( T! P9 v0 r' `1 haffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
# y1 k, o% |0 F- ^8 ^8 tdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
: X" l' l! _& _aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization* [* W( I- J- X1 w+ U4 O% Y
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
8 G4 Z( ~0 f, c) O% o( y! k! W& o  b2 V8 |3 y
    <<& A& i3 e3 M& L7 \# j8 B) K" e; P
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
, S* r3 a: i5 l1 s1 t: U    >>
! |2 m4 G) Y2 G5 w7 T0 r' _0 i# h
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in0 j2 F5 W( z$ }; H% L0 A! ~. j' W6 C' d
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate4 s& F2 v) w/ G- ~, \$ a9 F- s
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time0 Z5 g2 Z" Q+ C- N
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of7 W; S% N9 I# @) ?5 H
renovations.
& T' H/ O" r# k- g; t/ }- A! T9 {$ c+ t# d( A: P! e7 |
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight2 C7 c. }7 |# K- @
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation. J0 U+ i- Z9 t4 z8 i! z: \  z
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and4 ^# T$ A7 S; C* B
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
' b; |* k$ [- I" s8 l7 ~& q. r; E; ^0 i4 Z
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
& h: C* ?( j( @" _slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the) S2 v5 Y7 Q* B# l1 K9 |% c1 R, u
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
- S, E0 b/ ]* H4 y' g9 L* ~9 e* @600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
5 Q! k6 h- s5 _! f  Qto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes$ x* K5 N7 a' L/ v: p9 G+ d3 }
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
6 _* q: R' w6 m! G& J* `* a" e* R" f% D
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
. h! F: I1 R3 V0 |8 k6 s/ R% Lconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
' m' E6 I! t  V( [0 E6 Khomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
5 Z* S, ]- \; J$ w& Y. G0 k" Q( rwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian; p# x. z7 p+ h  _
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
4 u& n, `# L9 E3 o; X! Abuyers with more options when looking for a home.
3 C0 A3 L# ]7 a- A& L9 V  K# x& f
! G& S0 g+ K$ U9 Z1 @6 h    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
  f( G/ m/ [# O# Z+ r& q+ samong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes$ `* v5 c; K8 {( t& B4 b$ ]
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,* p, W. a, X2 o1 \
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last8 u( n" a. Y( v8 b( t
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.# s' z3 w& c1 ]2 {: Y' R* a& j2 ?

6 Y9 ^. C6 k: ]) w    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
3 X7 m& [5 Y1 g8 T$ c, Wprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory, {% e1 Y$ R7 q
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting/ a; T! ]. T! ~
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
( W7 Q$ ~9 C0 ~: qwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
+ F. a$ w  T* N- n5 Xpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before4 G6 X- h+ Y( `: Z7 @/ D% ~; x
making a purchase.
& Y( j5 S  H: p4 B5 n! f2 `: c, M% Q# |; ~7 V  A
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
* v' F- {& ^% W2 p" Nmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
6 A5 l! R& a& P% e$ {( dconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city4 S+ `- l' I  \
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting8 D: t4 {- b5 y7 A. A# F, r
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
$ D# _8 p4 z3 N( `- d" Damenities.% h7 v* R8 s( J2 o: i

# C  h7 k+ V: H3 x; M    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
3 e/ ]: ^9 p9 d$ [' Fthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
; f* a) q; J. @; x. @  F0 sacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
: ~/ U* {  J! M" S* Tcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been; f. L; o4 |1 F, n! b: w$ w+ J% `4 \" X9 e
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle8 v" G/ S' H, ]" \
residence, rather than for investment.) A: C7 q0 ~9 y5 k' ?% \
  b% A& V" q( }3 S+ x0 B! u
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as  b4 i' Z% M+ s/ [+ i
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
8 L' E' ]0 _1 Ein a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
1 W+ L& u! Z- iconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization1 v9 V- Y; N0 w( x! D6 ]/ `
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
1 I* n: R+ |/ y% ?the market.
4 E& `1 f; k. }9 H; {/ d( x
- X6 {( d& a% B& p2 c! ~    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through  t  e/ P* q" A, D1 w$ {) D
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
6 i2 c- v  q' Y5 TAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring2 f1 h9 t" p( Q, @4 {/ O
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
, E6 d2 R, t+ cto the shortage of available inventory.
" u0 l. `# z# y, Y$ X" _) O2 S4 y
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
; a! Z  J$ T" q  rmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains+ f: |: N$ ?0 [3 g9 K9 F
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
& G2 C% C3 z* z/ h6 w  i+ n' ~struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
; q) T  X) Z, D* _! `6 b
) l" [3 U) n1 z& T0 X4 f" n    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
- v9 |8 U6 c' [% Y0 iin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low5 ^' \/ ?; A9 i* f& S/ e$ g
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
" Z) s) U6 m' W3 x' t. v) apressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring( Z0 F% x3 Z3 ?
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
( N! A- S% c: G+ u0 Fseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as2 j% R6 l6 R: L8 f; B- w
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
* E" Y5 {* H7 @$ L

' ?8 a! I# ]8 e: E$ q' b    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter9 K: T9 r/ \! }2 R1 K. s/ A6 [
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton- t5 A% o# M' O; p4 q
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,( H7 c/ k5 ~2 S' w- {# x( V. u
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices! z0 [( ^# X% z. h. p3 ^; l# |, e
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve. J; C, I, |% f' C
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
7 _( R3 F" K1 h5 ^' Q& o/ }towards the end of 2006.
   
3 J0 O: W$ s& i8 P0 }3 j- |5 [/ H6 G* x+ P, a: \( B% D( m5 _2 S9 @8 n
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of" I* s& X) `4 G- k
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable, |/ ]) V" ~: z
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse( }" x; E5 A" p9 X! }
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
) w* v5 |7 t9 Z  ~+ \foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
, s; M6 k7 n+ u: Wpressure on tight inventory levels.7 I; ]! I6 Y& n5 a& P; w; B
% w: l# y& d* N, Q
    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic( G6 q% n8 d; t' [
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
/ W7 ?" S% ?" N. v; E+ c1 Iinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;) P1 {/ z* E- M! T
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching- ?; {: C& q- O0 ^
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.7 B! S; B5 X& }4 K7 j; v

4 G8 b5 N% L& U0 B7 f; y. F    <<9 A: J( h3 ?. N# f4 x
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
2 X) i. m4 L1 A$ A; ~2 p" j1 Q0 x* ~' `, m
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ U- b7 o9 P4 X. y  \6 |; O
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey
/ u/ f" y6 }! K, q/ l    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, \% d/ t8 V' B# a2 H
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3, T  n! w- L7 ]$ k
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average0 B8 W4 n: ^6 y5 k
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. f1 x. J+ |! E, p- L& R  Q3 e6 P5 Y    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000$ q: v1 Y( Z9 r# w
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# E! ]3 E8 r6 l& b
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
2 P) k+ B; j5 e6 S" o) F) x2 E    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. ~; u' L9 y4 A- R  b6 E0 o3 i    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,0001 R# s# q9 ]5 O4 W- K
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ v, f6 |& k+ B' E: ]
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
/ ^! R, v# X8 q( H! h* d. i* y. O    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' }' x* h6 \3 `4 g+ u    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,3330 Y( b) d6 K. F- T- q4 j; h
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; A5 O8 N' v! S: h0 i
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583
7 E0 p" N' k) m5 V' T2 l$ m: C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------: a2 M9 }; G: Y  z4 f! v- @6 p' X
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185& [, K- q: O3 ]% p+ `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; B3 e9 o* G, Q2 ~6 d
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
; {) v7 y7 n" e0 @* R0 l' L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 V' l; n( T" f% _5 |( s, |    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
2 k2 {; S# X- ?6 n# ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 f0 v7 s! M% K7 K* ^8 \
    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707/ K' F3 {* _! O2 A4 G0 k! Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' e& ]$ [% y; L" k
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
  x2 G! N6 d' p6 s0 k    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 i3 U4 x7 C) w
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
8 \' e& h6 K+ n5 t& Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& P( z+ \+ f/ r+ x  r; n    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
( Y3 `/ x2 u9 ?    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( T' n$ T3 n( @! ]# G! e
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500. b+ @0 ~, n- J! T4 b$ ~1 `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) ^8 z  a5 o/ x    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
* ?  J% L2 j& \% C    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  e9 p  V  D3 B* [" G8 r9 u4 C& z    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
* h( W! K4 D% P, a8 e    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# W, _! X. e" ^' u/ J+ k! P5 C/ a- ?& A9 I  b0 }  A
    -------------------------------------------------------------5 X( Y% b0 J, p! {
                               Standard Condominium4 Q( ^# A+ T, f* l
    -------------------------------------------------------------
* E# H* F9 \" _- K3 W( n                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
* a; H9 K8 @6 N. T! I    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
8 o$ v8 ]8 V. ]7 v8 m) T: E6 ]    -------------------------------------------------------------' x' c$ X; Y" t9 ], ~
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%. @) s8 W8 U7 n4 {+ u7 T2 a' f
    -------------------------------------------------------------
) I  _- Q& d; a4 j' Y    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%1 |1 Y4 ~' y1 r' D& V
    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 `5 L: u3 J+ ~8 w) n& \    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
# n- ^! V1 f9 F6 j$ B2 l* c4 N. z    -------------------------------------------------------------
, G" \* R4 f% p4 U    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A/ e8 R2 W. P+ l+ P
    -------------------------------------------------------------
2 g9 M( P6 s; _0 |% M: W    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%5 k+ f. J3 m# c2 b4 K* N0 ]
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 I: ~/ w7 T- r1 W3 {) T0 Z    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
: Y. `1 |8 k+ i    -------------------------------------------------------------# b6 t. j% S( ~; u' g5 R' ?9 L
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
# s9 V+ U; Q( D: g    -------------------------------------------------------------- ]% M$ \; x' S7 N
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%$ M& L+ z2 W/ e; x  F0 k
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 `! R" q6 c2 ^% d
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
" _' `7 {( `- J$ ]: f( i6 w1 I    -------------------------------------------------------------
" I7 M, [' }# ^& f1 n    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%2 M/ I! Y. C$ `( O) f0 V
    -------------------------------------------------------------9 p% s3 P2 r3 n/ L6 w% i
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%& p+ `* r- {8 K) X* N2 s
    -------------------------------------------------------------5 t2 u, Z' C3 [
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
  P4 U# \4 C% L8 ]2 _    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 I# m. n) d4 ^2 O    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%& C4 z! v  s4 `" E- W) J( J3 x
    -------------------------------------------------------------6 `  L) Q/ o; T& ]$ W# J( [, N
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
& N! ]# _, t/ E# g7 Q3 t    -------------------------------------------------------------
- l# S* C% R( M! k9 s6 A% q    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%' X* x) s0 Y5 M# K
    -------------------------------------------------------------- ]+ M6 W$ ?' P' A, G
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
3 D  D  W1 Z1 I  i- Y; n$ |    -------------------------------------------------------------$ L/ K! C7 T+ c" G( E! ^( \
    >>
/ W5 w* N. S/ G" W( L4 y% }. c% g, C/ ]" j7 t
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
) t! r. I) i- F8 L" {9 D" F3 uin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint# F7 c( f7 u  r- u- {
John and Victoria.. q! g! l$ h, c* F6 L1 e

. k2 S1 [5 X+ l+ j    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
: S6 x1 U6 O  j2 j  P- s% `comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
2 j5 P9 S! S/ s; q0 K/ Uhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
0 g+ K  _3 ~2 R: R3 freferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price  A/ B! `3 \8 i9 e0 d
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
4 f6 m  L+ D' E3 p. tacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
5 j7 p& }# H$ t' Q$ n2 m3 xavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current! G- [2 k6 J& ?6 G. v5 X8 D
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable5 D. z; o1 Z/ w4 A
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
; H7 O" V- A7 E/ SNovember 15, 2006.9 [5 E) o( J# \% T9 ]# C
    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of! T& p$ g7 ~1 w7 z- {$ Y
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
% ?( \3 o/ d+ ^1 Mprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
2 T- E7 ~" {$ W& }available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-11-26 05:07 , Processed in 0.077829 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表