 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
; g& m4 Y+ B+ ~( \- u4 x
; Z+ I) M1 r% J( i- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -. ~! h0 s9 ~" _/ }5 i
$ B) z: V5 g! ~, Y8 e
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market, H G4 B5 W% p1 q3 ]' x8 S
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third( i' h8 {, _+ b9 L
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
' ?) S& G6 U" v. K+ f/ M/ }in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit3 B% s2 _7 @$ j3 s; C, ~4 j0 I+ O
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
2 D; P8 f1 T* p1 ]( Q, Y4 }7 H1 vmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
2 B! [% B) ^# ~/ P2 oQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal* n4 U3 c5 Z$ z u1 D
LePage Real Estate Services.9 _0 D9 d- N& G) G
" I$ D' ?9 @" S9 e5 e2 p
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters" g# y' d. K# H
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
" s6 f" o2 _: D) F: Y4 G0 ?( B0 Gconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and; M" U9 w6 C( x- {! T0 T( Q3 [
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the) V1 N2 E3 s' L! L7 {; V1 B. M
residential real estate sector.
% R2 [/ E3 s$ a2 {/ Z& g" X6 C
& a: e/ I1 N# l* k+ Z3 ^9 j& | Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
$ x6 T8 b: _9 Aoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)7 D/ |& }; V1 H3 E# \
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
$ ?. [0 |5 |# a; D6 \! g" X(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380* n/ W: n; x. B% t
(+13.2%).
* o6 F) p1 F9 D; j% W Y) k+ E+ q& z9 o8 I' s8 ^0 X
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
6 {- o$ V) \4 \: G) L, V6 ]9 gduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
. ?) w) c& m- K/ C& D8 } ^frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
- E( l' Y# _, _# s) wpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,4 A$ ]8 {* s) j3 u
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
8 D% n- E4 p3 D. S) ?4 a"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
! y2 D8 F5 \. X4 f' P3 x) ?. a$ x+ Gwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy, m s7 A b/ P2 v/ c4 l3 X
balanced market."
9 ^, j( s: L: f+ s% [! J6 f& v% Y3 Z% H, ]* J
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
$ E8 h- Z: T6 H' Pconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift: a" `$ S: }( d3 A
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
; S1 a+ l( V0 b6 W; H! ]throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
$ P) z, V1 P4 E1 K. Q: A' n) {energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,6 J: p6 |) Y* `4 b
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
& ` _; W# F( }7 Q0 H4 bbreaking price appreciations.
# R, ^3 B2 c* M* U P- ~0 e% \9 ~9 r2 B) M9 z, n i0 K* A4 w
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding4 G$ f, S, p: t B* G
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the, u# f+ g. l- I* b' _1 m% V% D& B3 Y
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
& k; J: ^5 H% U* U2 [" X8 I5 b0 Z H
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid/ H9 q( C( T9 {$ o6 l0 J* V8 I
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
# m. D4 G* m) Nconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
$ |- _* j8 d5 k2 |; E3 T% islightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
" X! B: r, x. b' GIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
4 C8 k/ K" @5 r M5 Rgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
% _1 e% E% d" @% W* rprice appreciation when compared with 2005.0 c+ E$ m3 b* A
! c" P& ^0 h/ o/ ?2 t9 W7 m( G While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing% a1 e" _ F( L; z7 ?
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and9 m$ }9 V' {# p5 B
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada2 u# E1 m5 I" u% a8 b3 y3 |7 O
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
3 y( f5 m& R0 Y$ U$ ^) p4 Z6 {5 r3 ]
1 R0 R6 i* ~1 v) B9 H' u2 n+ d. Z Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
: e0 ]) @* e* V, b) }$ C kAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's3 b: k. ~, j3 [3 Z, I/ _; e
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
3 z/ x( U! U5 ]: k7 lrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general, H; U1 B( A3 K/ R+ D3 D0 P
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the- |. Z+ r- D1 t% k: j6 ^2 E
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
' R! z) T% X# F% m$ paggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
+ _6 u% k5 J) z: J+ I: J: E c8 F7 \mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
1 g$ k! i1 W2 T! l6 I) N+ N) {' F ~0 e4 S; D2 T2 } z
<<
. z% F* d7 V) n ]2 p# y REGIONAL SUMMARIES! a0 X8 V* w; A( @5 ^: i
>>" K3 b5 C/ j1 }. S1 b
# v. ^4 x J! H% B8 m Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
! ?+ e# C4 U* u r" J4 a4 qHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
) M8 Q$ S( n6 `! Rof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
6 `8 }# H8 W/ k7 z5 K Llooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of0 ^. F0 f" a' s+ k- b* @
renovations.9 L2 T0 r! z& S5 Q( F7 z
' n$ o! |8 X6 K& q# Y+ B The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight5 R' s# |3 F$ n( `& W: Q- ~
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation" k0 G3 o; C2 M6 f
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
3 i. F$ L7 `# K. PSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
& c" L( W( g8 c, x( f' ^9 O$ [. i( b3 W3 p4 J0 _0 {
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
& }% b5 C3 ^9 A) R) L3 P6 ~slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the: @0 z$ d1 J) @( b2 v( V6 n
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
# E: l+ o. c+ {) d- { [! }1 A0 K600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
. ^$ T# L& i0 t- Qto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes; F9 ~# H$ R$ S2 U( a4 j0 B$ a
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
# h; A: z' c: }6 |
/ \# r% `. m. c* R( b5 ?1 U# B In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
% V) w# i h- qconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
" ?6 p* L0 q- ^homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers: r+ N7 K: |; K
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian0 r' ^" a6 | b1 p5 L
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing% q8 K) x B5 w4 y" P3 {4 G. a3 `
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
) Y0 u8 {# C2 r; c) K( w
0 P) d- n2 ?5 z: @- S2 G' w) U Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly+ _) }. W k0 ?& I3 F" S
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
5 G a% f* j2 y2 p* qpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
@1 y1 n1 @# v" Las some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last) l* h; p+ Z/ X5 c7 j
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
4 d! O+ x( v- ]/ C: V# L! p7 B. C4 a8 |) K7 ]5 T
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
5 o; Z: ~; j/ c6 Zprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory: \' g: L# |& M& Q4 j
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
5 v5 w$ e* H' ^$ A1 r+ jfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
6 ]1 ]+ R- n$ l% @% |- E xwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
# _; F, _7 y! w) v! |; ]pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
: F- C# W \4 m6 I9 ^5 }making a purchase.' j8 u( e% h5 y$ O2 p$ Y- o
8 | C$ B' `6 j: n Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing3 r. `/ N# J+ P# B0 x) Z
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
# @6 `3 f3 s- Y; c3 v1 S# f- O9 H# econfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
( _% r# C7 ` W5 J0 l, lcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
( t& m3 G' q0 ^) L7 F$ f7 \: _attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown* W, v# J9 d* @0 s0 A H! E
amenities.
# Z3 c1 R3 e, D& ^8 _
5 m) G% ^& a0 z O7 L The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels4 K; o/ p: q! L+ D9 X) r+ A
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand6 y, E+ E! X& |% }
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
; g% F6 f- F1 ]; g7 `continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
# v8 ]+ o$ \) d5 L$ rdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle, R, w; Q5 @# C
residence, rather than for investment. u. i8 P' w9 ^, c( _! v2 z- C/ U% Z
! q' O5 n" Z, E7 h' A! @3 I9 o The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as: @# E# J: y( F) G
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted0 X' q6 V& |& B8 l; a3 P
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
7 r$ i& N1 s2 {% K* ~' h( dconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization0 S- w- @4 w$ ]
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
4 C4 A( R: Q% V+ N: M* n; nthe market.# e+ }+ o6 Z. R1 M
$ V8 c8 P6 v& m9 ^& @ In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
B- w& [' f, k0 P8 w. f2 ZJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
* _( w2 b2 |, o8 V+ F! r4 MAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
: m @# s2 R8 @months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
0 a, R8 N3 w0 B8 E7 g6 R- yto the shortage of available inventory.
. J% z& J7 V |. N5 x
( }$ x9 S- e3 l3 F Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its( g; _. y3 _9 s( O
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains4 R, T- x6 F, C L
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses, j: H! [$ _4 r4 t- w* s0 ?
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.7 `/ _3 i+ P2 l
4 v- }) h# `, @/ W% N* n* s8 a
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases. v% `1 y- p# u9 p9 K. V1 L
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low# a' S* _3 l, ~4 T
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that" J$ G: k S' P6 p6 q
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring" h5 x% c" w! v- F9 g% }
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
- @2 J2 e5 n; O Tseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as/ x- b G6 H, O( I7 c9 d+ P1 s3 d
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
8 t1 q0 V7 Z; \) H N7 h% A
- _8 _# W4 ]0 ?$ f7 }* Y# Q( ~ Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter8 ?+ T+ \3 k3 O( C. |# C ]3 \8 ^
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
2 Z$ ^# o6 J) gremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,+ T: y, U N9 k' X/ `# F' s
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices F# ?4 A4 ^4 }+ a
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve- M0 _ |) e3 d G5 f+ |
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly2 ]8 E0 J$ Y" F6 x3 N+ I
towards the end of 2006. 0 ^0 O$ t' z. z
, T# [, N! J) T! p( c
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
( {3 Y- o2 z' D) _3 ~0 linventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable% ^7 @$ A) Z( B+ A6 P" V: D
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse7 C& @' `8 x. ?7 S" N/ t
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to: r H D+ H z" E* N) J2 T
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
! M& j* I: j4 c9 o7 A- tpressure on tight inventory levels.
, O* e% n4 A0 O& M3 w6 s- {; l+ `. q, S+ L2 g
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
* j! _ n/ n' Z; g sfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
; j4 R3 S% ?4 V$ ointo the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;, C8 J$ [! Z: S( a ?* r
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
( a; y1 c9 D X0 M9 hfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
$ z% ]" L9 ?! L; u) a& J* v9 q; l+ a( O
<<- }4 M2 c. A, ~+ I
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20064 \1 r- T7 y% T2 z- J$ Z
# U u/ {4 w' Q" g5 x1 a G% @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, k' s1 D1 I2 W/ `0 n Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey% C. j. D8 u& L$ E9 w4 a, c7 M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) X' h* D9 {5 @ N# j4 C$ f 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3, g* G0 p" W! E1 C0 k
Market Average Average % Change Average Average* J5 X- y. i3 U- v9 C4 V
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 ~0 ^, C# n& H
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000 p6 y1 r8 e: u7 d% e; `% ~
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 b$ g) t1 N k- q
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
5 K$ n, ^2 h/ u; n2 f; S) t: { -------------------------------------------------------------------------+ V9 H8 U0 O3 K) c6 Q D
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000% J6 B3 O0 E5 i! G, X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 e+ d1 s& H: T/ n& M Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -! N+ J- j5 [" n& o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ ^0 b4 A2 d, O7 T St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333% u) H/ U2 c! a9 N1 ?5 s& i( a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' p0 Y4 I) i$ F Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
6 h+ F \4 M) t6 z/ n/ S2 y, F -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& ]! w* T6 ?) i- L Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
1 m; p1 Q; J9 }5 u( o" o -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 m" c5 m/ y6 T- Y% _
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
, Q; Z- e, s# `- g -------------------------------------------------------------------------# U4 b5 k: q/ i c
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
+ z9 Y0 I2 J+ X* { -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ \; G. a0 i/ |6 m. o- a( O Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7074 S8 b3 m' T- M; j, ^3 ?9 ?7 Q4 X
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" t& e r8 j2 ~ f& Z
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500( ?1 m- O5 R# F. Q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ Q. W4 A! p6 g; U3 x( J
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
+ S9 n1 ~: e# A9 Q [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------6 c0 Q s" y }! t; q1 g
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714' [5 k7 a1 T1 h+ z, D. v. N' E' {9 W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
H) _4 c8 Y/ ^2 w' h% b: }. C Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
6 _; \+ c1 ~/ u/ B0 e2 ]1 Z9 ~/ s -------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 f/ u7 |* ~ p% ] C( C Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
- @8 A; t0 @$ h5 B* @ C9 J* Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ p6 g% i& I4 B+ u& U# {
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
f! ~8 C$ }# n6 L9 n8 o; f* y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 c6 s/ u% M& i9 w' i8 Y
& n }; T& T0 ~2 {" a -------------------------------------------------------------5 S+ Q2 h% }2 w5 s& j, z6 E0 B
Standard Condominium
9 ~, X- m p0 d) K- W# J. p -------------------------------------------------------------
) r; w! a. u7 y/ J4 \; { 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
& l2 _: _# s9 J. W% j5 F, H Market % Change Average Average % Change1 g5 Q$ N N4 A- f' A1 r
-------------------------------------------------------------2 {. [* Z& `- S3 l6 Q( T7 S: X2 e
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
: ?+ z) T0 S( j9 s! r -------------------------------------------------------------
; V: H7 Y0 T% z0 S* f. J% t7 Q Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
% L8 H" t0 m" U* z4 Y" N1 ?, x% L4 Z -------------------------------------------------------------
) h/ H! j' |2 Y6 G+ J! n Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
: d z% e- l) c$ U -------------------------------------------------------------# N8 L' A3 f* `. R
Saint John N/A - - N/A
4 C4 I) B$ w$ f- }9 ] -------------------------------------------------------------
* T" ~" i3 T, X; X$ ]9 |: V St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
1 i$ R) t% \/ L! v1 E% h -------------------------------------------------------------4 n/ [; P, z: X% c( H9 T
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
6 h+ W: o1 g- W8 ?& H6 N4 F9 Y -------------------------------------------------------------$ U- _8 j2 j/ L
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
, H) B' z( \- n# r3 g& K& m -------------------------------------------------------------
- G/ T, t! _( ?) q& Z) ?+ c Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
, a0 Q/ f- j* y+ \ -------------------------------------------------------------5 F/ H1 @* f7 x$ @* p$ l. Q
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
# `. ?& _* I+ y- y' R. H -------------------------------------------------------------. n) k+ B2 e% O6 A6 z" h5 ~$ A
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%* D3 y4 p+ Y8 q5 ~
-------------------------------------------------------------
" t2 Y9 K$ h/ g: G( {7 k1 I* b' N Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%- _$ ~, h7 V n: e7 @( a
-------------------------------------------------------------# {) [3 c6 n0 q' W4 E7 l* v9 E
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
" h" ]& k' h# p! X5 B: c* L+ w2 I -------------------------------------------------------------" A3 M2 @$ b" W. M# i' W
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%; Z/ X" f6 F& |3 e$ s6 I1 e' _
-------------------------------------------------------------
# i& m2 k7 i+ u$ v Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
4 Y y6 a& T$ r. A# P -------------------------------------------------------------
# @9 S- \: {+ v8 _3 m( }9 b H Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%1 i8 f' t7 }; _# v9 V2 ~
-------------------------------------------------------------4 N; Y% X& s! W( k/ m# s( C# \% d
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%7 Z5 x, G( z5 w$ R+ B, o
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 W0 s: p$ W5 j% [. ] >>
% |: i# R4 h1 n* i* r
1 Q5 L& u6 j1 j1 Y2 N% H Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
$ B* i) j& o# p) }8 [% H4 m' x1 Din the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
- n5 r( g6 v+ V0 zJohn and Victoria.
$ S: s4 i# h/ m0 y$ G' d9 B; p( |5 e) i7 N
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
, N' B0 v* r: Z0 t) a' v( `comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of6 e, a: ~# X1 ]6 V
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release8 f9 X9 c; W3 Q5 `$ H
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
' \1 }! ^/ K V' ntrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
* A) `8 X% p- zacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
% {4 {7 o; Y2 A8 ~" Navailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current$ E! v5 k8 m i
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
! @! z& E& s8 U8 sversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on% l j) S: o0 ]! k+ I1 p7 `
November 15, 2006.% t, U# ^4 P7 l9 y# v
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of, [+ X/ O4 @# T* C+ c
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge3 d9 Q7 Q% s# L- D& E4 F
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
. w. f( N2 N/ e8 _. ravailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|