 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
5 S6 P/ I5 A/ T
7 Z+ }! L* F p4 l2 G; Q% X- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -/ P/ d# P' m0 h" ]! |5 h+ z6 m9 k
7 [; y2 ^5 [' j; ?! F4 L+ {6 m9 b TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
" |- b" F8 Z! M: F, @exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
( l0 D7 i0 o& Squarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
% \7 h/ p* k7 N' O* f) gin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
2 v* T! S% I2 S! m) Pprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
2 f$ }6 M3 i% |! u) R# mmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,% K |% \3 k+ F2 H; p
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal5 \5 H1 {3 F, O' |* D7 L' ?
LePage Real Estate Services.
0 Z' `0 ^& E1 ^5 ^0 f, q9 G9 t: h) q, f3 r0 Q) o5 C8 k8 C. j# r
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
. A5 P* v# K) }8 P( h: ]- v. d" e3 nare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
( T& {: J' R7 o/ }conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and1 n3 k) R7 K3 A4 o
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
* h, w7 n u! bresidential real estate sector.
* o. C. Y; l2 H' J8 P x6 a" z
: _: O3 m% F+ C6 s) p8 Z8 b# ^0 n Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
7 T; r" I) ^5 o J1 eoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)1 d( q q8 ^! `
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5624 e* `2 U7 f9 z' J- s
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380+ m0 U/ S) O" y
(+13.2%).) ?8 k- I8 N$ S% L: n
8 {1 O- j; B4 S6 K6 ]2 P# J- l
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
- A: q0 i0 Z+ W1 G8 I" ?9 {4 e. uduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the9 R# [# ], p* U; u: H
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
5 x2 H% i! G: k7 ^, U# l: M( ]poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
8 J2 H( x3 J) Spresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
' z9 V' Y0 {# ]8 z" K"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
; M. C: S/ r( k* `: `welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
& k: v7 l+ E5 i- Nbalanced market."
2 B& f' q( u8 ^- Q- p$ l
3 g/ O) n- m9 Z n' Z) e4 l$ v Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
2 c+ w( H6 F& I- u; z H* g& @considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
( T: s* w1 c# A" L$ O2 a" s5 Ito balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
! V' d2 O* V8 m1 c1 }throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
+ S8 I2 O5 m) x( H- xenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
, J4 f% c! x/ lmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record! m8 S. ]" E6 x- A% f
breaking price appreciations.
. a$ G: A9 R' I- A4 S! I
# Z# s/ L( {( [" N( A3 c Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding |, D8 O9 X/ c! a3 s5 M8 z$ E
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the( z% T8 Y' z$ N
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.0 ?1 U1 t' E$ M3 T+ i
( `5 S; w! W+ O7 _% D8 X9 @' q In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
& Q. Y6 C3 s7 leconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer( z& p( S, I" Y6 b+ A2 n- E! l
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off6 \9 i4 f; d6 b2 i o4 f. j+ z8 p
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth., F8 P4 @9 R/ e# G- m9 C4 Y
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers4 I# J4 {& E9 O- @! z' G* A
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of5 m. o2 @: J7 V2 v9 |7 f" }
price appreciation when compared with 2005.6 u6 A0 q- x: X# U# h) b
: t* ^% {6 a Y- n' p While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing" [( t" i3 f& C3 l' S2 |4 g
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and! h: I+ s, J5 W/ L0 _' K
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
4 ]3 R9 m# f e8 F+ w9 E4 mare markedly different than those found in the United States.7 h" _* [1 _! _) z: O1 G! o
9 z. s2 L( T3 Q, h' o8 [ Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
) ~! |3 |9 M$ VAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's( n$ c- F, I; v3 @
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
$ K1 \; d" R% U& H# _2 q) v" Yrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general7 y+ i2 v4 t ~# c' u9 }0 D$ w/ U
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the2 B/ z1 Q( ^ Q2 S$ Q! H* x& p
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
2 s3 Y, J# v; m, m6 ~, B$ Zaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization( R8 y* i! N }! Q+ F8 C
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
) m9 J D1 e' H: y; B* s' C( u4 v/ x9 z1 A2 }, X
<<
6 o4 `- l( S; @$ \ REGIONAL SUMMARIES& a% E& H, @# o8 _
>>' X. T4 \. `/ }+ {8 c
, V2 w7 N2 E$ E
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in8 w" u! y9 f: @, P! A
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate) S1 p# H7 I+ d% @; U8 w
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
$ H: L* i0 p! d) W- G$ q# Z1 U- }5 rlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of( L( |0 G. j7 q- ]8 e. R; h. _
renovations.4 I/ u r! q! o
8 S, B, D* ?& J, L l
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
3 L" K3 a# a' X2 }1 L6 zincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
* e/ `2 O8 T9 w% rcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
5 |0 ]" q2 g1 s# \ r aSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
4 A& d4 U3 b% g3 a# h! L7 Z4 H1 o3 o) E
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
- I$ ~' U9 U3 c" q9 R, R. Oslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
* k5 Y c/ L5 b# m! ?quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new+ O9 T4 c1 L5 p1 d3 {
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores8 N; H3 f0 d- f6 _4 I
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes/ o5 a! a- H5 g! p u5 u- p
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
% G" f4 H `( \# [6 y6 {/ w, i: b9 P% |. m+ N# } Q* c" v, a- C
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced2 p, R% P8 x3 p0 Q! r3 Q
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their: o9 D5 `+ Z g
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
! Q, I9 P* x! A* Zwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian8 G* c$ i# T, P% S9 F' W+ n
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing F# v* S' X/ Z8 c; ` C
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
/ L- R7 `% ~ t% q; ?4 k0 X, y0 R4 R3 P' ~# s0 m
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
# P3 l$ \: V/ D. G6 Namong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes$ u) P; L6 r* Y, m$ a
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,) @$ q E' g3 C! V" P' p# J( C
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
6 z O, p# a$ z1 A: A' g/ G# Lfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.0 Y m+ M6 B% q* `/ U1 j
! V2 F' P2 f- z; y4 I1 T$ T
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house4 S( G @! [- a1 a
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
- u% M$ Z' z- C3 h: R7 w1 M( Vlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting2 ?1 f0 v, J& j7 m0 q5 _, z; _
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,7 v7 K+ i6 d! s- [/ w
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
" x; Y- c2 ~2 } v- Rpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
8 ^: E- {" C0 E4 e# ^: H! M% o1 Xmaking a purchase.! o( M* M }/ R- h+ V% \2 a- E
" I3 K9 |/ o5 u$ J4 R
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
% q1 v+ Z1 k3 u( p1 Xmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
1 v& g. j6 E# i2 W" z( j" wconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
$ {; A+ J" \% g3 p' M( tcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting9 f) t( f/ f3 M: r& H1 d2 F" c
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
& V, S4 z: W w: m3 ^amenities.
1 m6 F" s5 a7 G; W0 c% R7 _" a: U! I9 v
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels' v2 D* X$ T Q7 G4 x- |" N1 L
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand: v' w- _, R$ f, _3 s" k
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has# m+ Y3 v# ?' X
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been2 @2 b' B& O& B8 O# u1 q6 F6 e
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle' B* { s- C7 j$ z" U0 h
residence, rather than for investment.
/ v/ ?# _0 ?2 ] A/ Q" u9 v$ b) n& L; G3 W
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
+ A8 B& H& k3 x+ W7 ?( n% chouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted& H) ]0 c. M3 O# D8 S" O
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
7 Q- V" s: w6 l1 h6 r& wconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
4 j' e: o/ Z- Q7 k, v( brate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
0 _9 b3 |, d" f% H/ f/ H: D3 ]the market.
0 l/ k5 @, L, o8 B8 y) s* u
- v7 k" V1 _$ W% h- d In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through# E8 n* s* _( J# q, p+ m
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In) v3 C0 U% N2 W' |, r9 P1 l
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
: ^) V. ~' V- g, p# |2 Hmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
3 ^' z {! Y( d" m R& n2 Y2 e9 xto the shortage of available inventory.
. i7 V+ w. c8 n g# D ?. f+ w' `8 E/ b% L0 S
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its5 ^ y# _$ ~9 q
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
3 l% x( J% G% {( d& Q. q, d- Z( Avibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
) L& V2 f$ \4 Z5 l$ qstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
6 J# e' y# ?) M! r# ^. Y9 e
1 \# w( X5 R1 Q, Q; ? Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases' ?- N) H- E: k+ O- k
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
) r6 A8 q$ X: k& ?/ Yunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that/ s* ^1 m3 E9 j0 P9 O8 u& G
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring; Q, U$ N; H( X8 m
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer) L: B" v8 {6 t8 c, l
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
- U* X5 \5 C6 Fbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
1 Z3 ~8 K. \+ A, ~
( n8 I! |! k; c Y Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
, j d! G4 Q1 j5 n7 Jas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton' v- X$ I2 V3 R6 M! A
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
1 l7 u5 p% Y+ b. {" W1 L, lmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
8 b4 g7 o; L5 r. a/ gincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve. i& E$ Q& u) B/ V0 v
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly) n( G' A7 K( d8 E* H, B
towards the end of 2006. ; c, A9 |/ y3 p* f; W& t$ K, @
6 C/ e+ u% M3 v8 n) X eWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
) P! X7 H, k& Ninventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
% y5 M! a5 ?3 W6 a# Zto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse& B/ r0 K; q. @- V4 b; p$ D
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
. U6 T H" `5 b- Xforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
* q1 \& d3 X1 c1 g8 Bpressure on tight inventory levels.7 ]7 V' ]9 Z" w: ?. j1 |
% u f2 m( f$ e: r% z e) U3 O! ]
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic2 S1 m% ~, O5 X, g2 a' d
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people# ~, o3 T/ C3 H E
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;, M C; V! O/ W& x, G q, j! K
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
5 T u6 U/ |/ Kfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.0 m0 O% Q0 }6 i0 s: ]
8 ^& N4 Q" u) v4 |
<<. R7 D0 o! }8 W* M7 \' x
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
5 A/ c: o9 l3 I6 T1 f+ D
0 D) W' U& P8 p -------------------------------------------------------------------------, n6 v/ y4 l2 D
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
0 k' w2 l0 G- q -------------------------------------------------------------------------% q: q, \- c6 l
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
0 `9 h0 W+ Q9 z8 A Market Average Average % Change Average Average
& i! v3 G! W# d+ R6 T- W% |" w -------------------------------------------------------------------------. T: O ~0 F! v, I6 P4 W
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,0004 O0 K- m+ M& |3 w B- d; {" V* L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. r! s) ? F7 }! m* t d; g
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000# K% \: Q, a: F. `* e- o0 O7 j% ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; D: v1 `# i; a Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000. u% b% B$ h5 z0 V q( _
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# x6 H5 `& M: y' \; |' o
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
, Y8 r# q- w' Q' H3 I, }" N% ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, C* ^/ j" e; o4 s8 v( q( P St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3333 v! [1 w; v- E& G1 b) ?( [
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' C+ s* n" w6 i; A0 {8 N, a Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
' M2 A: p& _( ~& X- T -------------------------------------------------------------------------
@/ J/ c% t) j4 v/ C Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185) Z/ w3 h7 Z, U5 X% T6 f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) M7 t( w) c& a4 @5 q) k4 I, |' @
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
$ u7 o4 g& ^6 f -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 [1 p5 U% |* d, B" Y7 ~# ~ Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
0 A/ w8 J! l) a- O" E+ ~+ Y7 d# @% w -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 r4 s2 n8 s7 I( d4 A2 D Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
@* v' } C. {8 t4 ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------- M9 S1 r& z* g! f4 G
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500! f. I, f4 K5 g* T% k& Y, L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: J2 i: }$ G. T0 `8 v) L2 q* J/ x$ x Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389+ g$ k. {" E" ~& b/ y& g* T8 k
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! Y8 ]2 k5 D1 L6 z8 O Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
9 W( j* a0 n# Q; B6 r( n -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" ]; Q; M5 y/ U% w Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
7 q1 i$ I. E( T f$ D e- R& p ------------------------------------------------------------------------- @- I. V# K. Q9 b
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0005 A; w( `0 A E0 E: _6 o9 D' `
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& k$ r; @# U8 Y6 p National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860! Q, M( O1 J6 A! b: D( N6 a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------, ]6 F, T) i2 [3 J
$ U E6 Q4 b. P! v
-------------------------------------------------------------$ L- a0 B4 |* V/ {8 _/ k% \
Standard Condominium9 g, S1 t* S8 I3 }) n) N; }
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 l( h( U* R: r& t9 \2 j 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo0 m: X7 o! q( |9 J- V* a
Market % Change Average Average % Change
8 n% F2 N* K" b+ I9 c* l; h -------------------------------------------------------------
! i! \; ~" ?, n! n" B, w) l Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%4 n, k2 Q! C* S1 C5 C7 h7 S
-------------------------------------------------------------
* K" v0 E5 K. F& ] Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
* D# X" [* O+ r9 h5 t* F -------------------------------------------------------------
( t% s0 M% F. @7 ~) V Moncton 4.9% - - N/A- T' C4 L2 }0 ]7 u! C; h6 P
-------------------------------------------------------------. J, E' h7 V$ J7 X2 \
Saint John N/A - - N/A& F) n) S0 Z( D. [2 G9 w7 p
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 }9 q) \2 U6 ^& } St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
6 V, E: t/ s/ C$ L -------------------------------------------------------------+ T M2 J/ r% @/ }2 u
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%9 Q0 S0 S! }0 p0 M/ {+ w0 ?; ?* p
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 G$ x; [& r, r8 L$ A/ D% A$ e Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
+ Q1 ]. ~) z2 N. E! j1 } -------------------------------------------------------------
) M0 q* d( q+ I Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%. x2 O$ L+ ]$ T' \2 i
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 m- D( ]' m. C3 ?3 r Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%5 w. s9 v/ y( b+ D9 }. j- U
-------------------------------------------------------------
: Y; I" o' I( V. {- { Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
7 N& e- H- U4 A8 H# D -------------------------------------------------------------
" e1 D& F# Q3 J/ i- o5 t Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%' g P5 G# r4 o) b+ s5 |
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 l, [8 M4 C o2 K. S p Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
; X7 p6 y7 i _ -------------------------------------------------------------+ t4 ~0 K/ r; q8 u% b' \) Q, M
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%& y& G/ u% D3 ?+ f
-------------------------------------------------------------
, n b& q" j" X; @3 \. n Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
# G1 V5 c* j6 }/ M -------------------------------------------------------------
0 H" I4 `7 t# n. o1 _ Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%: k8 k% t, a; n' N v; r
-------------------------------------------------------------$ X( ]8 f6 _; V0 K$ Z4 y7 e
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%& s4 S9 S/ s5 s+ g/ P
-------------------------------------------------------------" v, u: i u S# u* ]6 ]2 F# B$ r
>>. u2 t* g( ?+ c0 }2 i
% Y- @' }6 @; o4 a+ }/ S
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined, t! v' x* M; M0 x
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
) B# G$ x& E( d: vJohn and Victoria.
6 r9 E7 |8 h, [. I( O) ]) ?1 o m* k( V) A4 Y$ i
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
5 |* {( h+ d5 X. V( P; \; { p( \2 Qcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of/ Y$ L8 Q$ @7 _9 w. V5 m6 H* o* h
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release5 K- k0 f) a% @, P" I$ G
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price. L5 T. T( s0 G/ f
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
0 H# k& u* `/ F! Hacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is+ W- Q( M: c5 M4 |
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
/ V8 A6 m, n; R% `figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable% l5 C* r# y5 X
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
- j3 f+ \4 @+ F/ H' c3 L _0 ENovember 15, 2006.
! u" D- G* j* b Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of- M$ P a# m) j1 D# V" Y) d) E) ^
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
. z9 M/ z$ ]' c7 v9 _+ ~4 sprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
) ?2 [1 `6 W; i/ b3 q$ xavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|