 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ( g7 Z( [- r/ E
) g: d8 f% W" W/ f* `+ m- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -/ n, X" o% h4 P$ `% W
) n/ f6 {: y+ n5 k K: W
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market" V" y8 ?/ ]+ d- |) P5 W- H, h7 T
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
5 u; Q1 C' k- E: e9 T. f0 r( B6 Gquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
3 F( C8 Q4 p( p r3 D5 |7 Kin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit: m4 \# P& P. k/ B n$ p0 }
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and4 t8 t8 M) @+ j4 g
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
0 {7 q) y4 h! b5 S$ [( YQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal# ?8 U+ \+ {! z6 A6 T
LePage Real Estate Services.+ W+ f; R9 F2 u/ Z7 ?) O$ n; G* F
5 ]- ?4 ~2 b8 A" B# A0 p3 f. b. M Z
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
0 L" T+ b9 K% ]; Oare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic( }' T. k* e) M
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and3 M; z0 U% m2 D
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the! L8 o% ], ^- U1 T
residential real estate sector.4 t: i+ Q9 i' m7 _" G k
8 ^/ H: Z+ F$ V0 o% |6 j
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation' ^+ q- M: M, Z9 M9 L
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
( @ H5 ~ d. v2 ?; xyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5620 z2 _* N* p( C* L. S5 q
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380) v$ _! u4 B m0 v$ `
(+13.2%).
9 Z4 U' j1 E4 K# u9 G) f& m6 {
1 R! O6 b8 t% O& `. _+ j* [ "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth+ p6 |- `7 O3 L
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
5 ?6 k& J. N5 A" ?. f! Y0 ifrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are3 {1 N6 y; k9 M7 Q% q
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
4 ~5 Y$ v% p" W) o- xpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
4 F9 f7 p, S+ `"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We! e# B& D/ u8 b/ V4 C
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
! P9 A4 b: `$ k/ c* kbalanced market."+ w \! T3 x) Z3 m; G3 _( ?+ ?
U& n/ a( a4 s/ @
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
1 l, N- n9 R" Y( \9 Tconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
, X9 j" M! @7 w8 t8 vto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
: {9 F7 `" a( m Uthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core' U4 D3 v' A0 m
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,& W+ A* A' V3 [0 W) {% s' `: d
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
! B, A, G% P6 x* Q6 m% Y. e( B8 @breaking price appreciations.
2 @5 }( s. u2 N/ {1 Z4 m% Y: g/ G6 T: ~$ t; Y; _0 Z8 l+ J" {
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding# v) p6 @9 E) e# ^/ g
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
$ d$ Z7 P( w; d; _6 y" \largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.7 z# i( S ?* C) H
; [ R/ k6 |& P C. w* s* Y In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
. V; T5 }" M# Q: Ueconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
1 Z$ p7 A/ W1 m5 g9 ?confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
0 ~% A, g0 L3 R; l) c) m7 |slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.' P j4 O/ ^$ S% U2 j0 Y8 j
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
5 t6 a- f% `1 W( W" i6 O& Mgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of6 O2 U4 w; A; R5 @ x9 ^
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
" V. D7 {3 i! P9 U4 j
; L! I9 @4 F4 e; O. R \) a While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
) O/ Y" M" P7 F' P, X1 fmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and3 e6 o8 ]( b @7 S* U ?) J9 K6 S% X
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada: ^/ u1 Y" P1 w4 @
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
4 J1 c3 y+ L" N9 R1 G* S' n5 X) `7 t- g8 x/ ]4 F+ b1 ?: o0 p
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the6 |) F1 V4 L6 v K( D. q
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
" F+ `7 e C3 C* Cfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the% u6 V; r' z7 F, }: A7 A9 A/ [
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
+ t% T6 W* l3 ^# X( \+ b* l) Aaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
9 F- r8 e$ R$ m8 W- v* N# d. Rdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and% \; [/ y' q* d k
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization! r6 m) Z& o: c) a E7 Y; F% u* b5 N
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
+ Y) w" e b7 s/ d6 ]) n7 u& T; u! l5 W/ s
<</ U. C; a+ Q- r6 ]
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
" s' f9 c8 }# n+ x >>0 C$ o; L8 B" X% K$ l* p0 B
, @+ e6 G! {. W+ @3 j6 V; w) g Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in, G) E( s6 S g
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
$ h% o, A! T. s6 g( Pof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time* k. m( `' z* O' C
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of( Y$ `1 E* t" P2 y
renovations.' }+ F r5 ?* @5 Q" |; p% Y5 D
& B0 H6 E' v( p7 }+ Q The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
, {6 }0 M. D* z. e6 u2 V$ \- tincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation0 `* _1 I! S1 J
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
' s p" p9 G# KSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.% Y% j% q! d6 j
/ s& F! Q; w* f! A9 p# ]
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer, `2 V8 c9 b8 o* q2 q* b
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the& S/ s( S+ M+ ^3 x
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new* w+ R9 y2 P) H
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
2 B& u2 ?. G. r# l6 \" Vto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
5 x1 J+ |+ a' B9 a6 iand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
0 t3 r: J) o u0 F M% G. T
. K' P( I* d; }; j In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
- J. }0 b* j0 F& }% ^1 Z: Z9 A/ Sconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
z) m. N, C8 e' r7 B0 O: ~homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers- Q8 C. M/ ?! L! i1 I
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
6 \- b% J3 {# N0 d) M5 B' m1 c- cdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing) N9 Y& K5 D- m! ]. |5 Q4 R
buyers with more options when looking for a home.7 G2 w6 t, ?' Z( M+ R- y
& Z# E. G& a+ z3 E$ N! d! [ Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
6 ~, s* V# v2 V( t! R7 a* c2 N) Uamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes: U% S5 E$ I& B" \6 m* X8 b
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,) G& t% p( F) j: X
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
. E7 L; h% }9 N6 {& K& _: cfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.4 C. V8 J' p1 W* Z Y( m
+ S. P) f9 m# G, U+ K6 ]2 Z Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
# j% V# d) f5 u3 x' r; S. {prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory4 e! B& V% G) t f3 T
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
5 K6 B9 z; k# |. M/ j3 yfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
" Z9 G1 l; Y) @, ]& Iwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
- X1 Y& s @$ r7 d- K$ Spressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
- V/ o6 o$ |4 V8 Rmaking a purchase.
% @5 k9 U: n5 @- A
% d. Z+ U* g. d! [ Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
5 ]& ]! U! f6 wmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong$ ^' U/ }5 Q* U9 ?; Y; \
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
% x5 d6 X, C9 r: c9 g- r) pcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting$ }0 T/ Q. q7 N. U& @2 x# m6 k4 J
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown) t% d5 X5 `! x9 M/ x$ s
amenities.1 X M& Y1 o' P2 N. T8 y, W1 c
' c. l5 n# w) o The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels* P" A5 u6 X+ w7 ]
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand# t0 P4 }* G& ]: d, x
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has6 U! H+ t) s% B" g) @ X; D
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
" p& @* u: c6 q( Z& [- d, t. h, jdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle. A* }6 i7 p4 @4 a
residence, rather than for investment.7 W7 {/ R6 I. K% k- v) Q0 b) A
1 T! T0 Y8 b* e( f) v- Z3 ]9 l" N The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
2 ?% _9 j6 P3 u( Vhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted9 Y1 T* k2 S& q$ X: A7 m
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer6 J+ g! [& U- w s
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
, X0 l1 |( ^, u6 srate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter# Z8 i4 F( L7 @/ |4 E2 O
the market.
( m( j0 q- @( Z W
S$ \/ |, J9 M0 I" H7 D0 x4 v In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
- @/ {+ w8 ~; O4 ~9 J4 ^9 o8 MJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In) m" e5 {/ \8 v6 ^9 a2 m% d
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
2 o! c9 B! V8 `' zmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
n; |9 m& g. {6 k, p# @, @to the shortage of available inventory.
# @1 h/ j6 t. T. S* q% T$ S
1 a4 v" [. R( R Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its/ {- T/ p. y* V: N, p3 @4 Q% |
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
( H2 O- N/ ]8 P# evibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
7 w) A" |; q$ N( _0 p* R, B' t; Istruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
5 ?( Y4 o# m; I+ f
" e8 N5 ]& }5 ]! I% ^& N! ~( O Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases6 A: |6 k5 e) G( s
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
) t6 n# i/ z; W Q7 Kunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
3 b @5 ]3 p8 I0 |* ~+ r( npressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring9 w& m5 x. O3 E. f0 P5 @+ g
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer8 p: q' q4 I" |3 F+ c/ b; Y
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
5 c3 p6 G/ f9 T2 i$ Y" L! S4 ^buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
8 L; |1 }* F3 i
M, c, {1 f- E/ o, {$ @3 m Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter9 i, Q2 C& W% L) h0 i
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
0 k2 o5 |- x premained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
4 C2 x. \6 K2 V2 F1 umaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices; b$ t! ?& Q% [* m8 Y' C0 h' C
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve6 p" @' \/ O {5 ?
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly# G6 N8 S" J. o( x9 G% |3 ?, m* u
towards the end of 2006. 9 x* U' o( M# G. m5 T4 B8 z( A9 A& R
3 u1 c* i& g; g+ ~$ V
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
$ v* n. J2 y, q `' s+ Ginventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
7 q4 ?6 u& Y6 y; X9 Fto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse1 p. y+ |/ }. t
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to8 ~: t* C; Z" V2 k
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added8 u! \6 c- j; H. [2 b- N0 z
pressure on tight inventory levels.! _. P+ f n( `. E, l5 S+ L- K+ N
# h6 [8 G# e/ G6 k! X
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
+ G# H7 x! F+ Z9 X+ Hfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
) U8 N3 ^$ S. T" dinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
( u J/ t5 U/ {: x" vwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
! k) J1 q: M$ o) yfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.. \( I }# B+ T, t/ P8 D7 B
7 w5 _6 k5 {6 [/ R7 `$ q- G- T
<<
' z1 v% z j1 h+ @# t- I& Q Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
* T% n7 q+ G6 p* E6 [2 [& E, }8 x9 a' J; ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" U- e- q. o7 U9 e% j Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
/ c) M7 U) S, a! o) R. U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 Z% H( @, X; \& n 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q32 E x: I' B2 }6 O: @
Market Average Average % Change Average Average8 b; |' X, C( G0 y K4 f
------------------------------------------------------------------------- H: ~ y* v# A5 b W" x
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000" f y" @# C7 t. \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' P+ s2 l+ _; @& r% P: M Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
) ]1 F: @( W v5 }0 h, d -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. w, t9 L S7 Y x& D2 H1 c Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000# o9 C( B9 ?/ Q; w" Y. C/ t: p5 ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! P, S; F" v; D" W R
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
! N8 {( B9 v/ H0 ^% p- I! h -------------------------------------------------------------------------' C' M M9 O/ B: W; K& P* w
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
2 } Q& Y) u! m0 c3 f% y0 D -------------------------------------------------------------------------% q! |: ~- j* @% _
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5830 [; h6 k% H+ T: |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------5 a" U+ [: g) f5 E
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185: U0 c8 w4 X7 r! H4 m* J8 x
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 W( D1 I7 ~' ]$ ?
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2502 X7 g7 N8 N8 x4 ~; l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. j" }8 U& [- v; ~
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766& o4 R9 {2 |& E8 W. c& I( w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 Q( E/ X, N9 o9 Y
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
8 \+ j2 i7 Z+ Q# z0 c4 n* n: R -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" s1 u0 K* |$ P, u5 q" ^1 Q4 f Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,5007 M# h2 m1 W, V# s
------------------------------------------------------------------------- D3 K; r! ?. B/ f$ S! \. W% n* x
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
7 b7 s9 z! ^3 S% V+ P- { -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 @& {- P! D" ^$ F" T' P' P! w
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714% o; _; k& p w8 w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* x" z: I5 I0 m* N5 Y# j Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500& m& X9 k3 Z4 y, |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 o/ h9 R Z; ? Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000, M0 k; k3 U6 Q @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: u- p A: u; @2 S3 m4 X& H
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860, F' G- @# T) U% W2 H2 h6 d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------% n0 V: I0 L. u
* R- K8 p' d$ r9 A -------------------------------------------------------------
8 C) Z1 t4 p4 E7 ` Standard Condominium; d& Q H9 e4 Z) R8 {6 T8 @
-------------------------------------------------------------
* n* v: H. {9 v$ w9 X [ 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
: S9 F! W* q4 L6 K; K0 U5 j Market % Change Average Average % Change3 D# D( t% ] `: a( [7 F& ^
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 ?/ B+ t1 q' I6 F; E" o: k: J Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%0 O3 [+ A$ B" s' U3 i! {& P
-------------------------------------------------------------# X0 T+ H, N0 K9 r) ]" D
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%" _% q, S# \4 O! g
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 F e9 S D- e1 }( _; s* j Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
, C5 p# R: C3 w; o, V8 r1 x, z -------------------------------------------------------------: e6 H1 l" E( d& i6 H, B! @* ?
Saint John N/A - - N/A e7 @, W! @5 ^, i7 r4 d5 Q+ J
-------------------------------------------------------------
( g' p( {8 W( p" r$ L* j St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%% G H4 d1 ?) \9 Z
-------------------------------------------------------------7 Q; L, A) G4 o/ H; Z; \$ o
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
4 F& E" {! Z1 [& i -------------------------------------------------------------
1 @& W+ f( }" B4 M Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
# p- U; b. d9 y -------------------------------------------------------------# L) N! q4 i- h: X
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
" g( u$ B! s. K' a* S x. A -------------------------------------------------------------3 _! Y0 p( v. q
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
2 L2 J0 l! F1 a9 e; y) M3 X4 t -------------------------------------------------------------
8 g* l8 T* L! C4 j: ~7 E+ g0 A Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
( U+ @; Y9 R! L, a; f- R -------------------------------------------------------------
9 i/ M8 x* y5 R7 W# i Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
8 X, N r* P* ?/ ^% |7 d8 O -------------------------------------------------------------
- z- Z. I7 j# o2 n Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%9 N @2 @( y* Y( _( [
-------------------------------------------------------------- M0 b: Y4 a: v; b" i& b9 S( R/ g
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%8 B* }' A9 W4 x2 j3 j9 @
-------------------------------------------------------------. H2 z( e X* s& g3 T
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%" B0 s$ l$ Z% a8 E. Q( B
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 X J# b0 L$ K; w0 V+ T7 O; I Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%4 [ T n' X+ J r6 b9 R9 Q& u
-------------------------------------------------------------5 ^/ o* i+ j+ O7 W4 P2 R% ^' I
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%% H' O4 ~6 }8 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------
% g+ [% `* A% @8 H& h# o6 B >>
; q! c: H6 c2 e2 ?
! T& x8 |2 w$ j0 O. r6 \4 G# r, s1 ] Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
( J6 ~. [0 i: V4 G# Z) V) m+ n4 [1 oin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
$ t3 p$ B: y- N1 i& Z% O$ bJohn and Victoria.$ h- ^4 ` q+ k0 [" H
" P# T# [: ^! W! W The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most: w9 U: _: W+ F& s, e
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
, X! n5 f" `7 l: G7 N& }7 Z. Jhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release1 J8 i# x' V/ b. S
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price0 Y# G1 @8 T' C7 P) b
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
/ [, V. h- F9 L E- P/ e1 sacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is* ?4 z9 Q; ^; S/ F- j+ x
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current# O; r9 c E. b" ^
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
8 x u; k }$ X$ i) A* ~2 W& {version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
7 t+ }' d: Z/ X( r. HNovember 15, 2006.) {2 a Q) G; o1 r( T
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
* g# ]8 g/ x3 Sfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge* J. Z/ V$ K4 y5 L% W
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
% t( Z1 S0 {1 h$ i. g' P: K' E0 qavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|