 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable + T. Z% S& K; {" w# v# j i
3 R. K) L, }0 u: u9 R! B. {
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -9 h' k* J0 f) c/ _7 E
: t" X% }) U3 R% F3 Z. l& @' q TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
. I5 k+ E. ?1 Z( Oexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
( p0 v" }: s2 T# O. _4 lquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
: v$ x& f2 c; {2 s, g( |+ Jin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
$ o g1 J3 f# d6 u5 rprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and( h) w5 Z5 X1 U
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
" m9 H% x! W4 e9 X' jQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal% C0 P2 t% d+ j0 r- r
LePage Real Estate Services.! @# v: Q% l$ g) ?5 E7 p( J+ l
7 ]7 B# b& y9 H- ~" E9 S4 `9 z4 _
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters8 L3 N$ T d; X& Q& _
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
- ]) C O H/ w: r* S' n( | y }conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
3 g. l8 t9 A9 Z' ?) i1 @1 i# osound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
+ e# }6 @ ?* s$ [& }) xresidential real estate sector.
, v+ i" g0 H% f4 I2 k; D7 n" u2 Y/ q- {2 G/ D) e' m# I( S
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation! s0 d# K/ s# L5 o$ D' X
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)) `) }1 v9 c$ C; S/ b: P9 C5 ?/ Z
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562. `0 x# k$ |0 V. t7 m
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
2 s% M- N( W) S(+13.2%).
) ^5 D% s, G# s# l6 o
/ [9 p6 y/ n7 j. P "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth T, u3 ~9 D; V. ^
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the) ^% c# P' p/ s5 A& d
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are; x! |; U# `& d4 Q
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,$ q' t, H# V) U/ ?( E
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
! Q7 ]& v) Y0 z4 O"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
" T0 Y. @. x3 D5 ]" Nwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy D/ ~- i% L6 V$ E4 T2 e
balanced market."
+ ?, T$ i Z# r( l {6 c0 c# J# y, d' D, \1 d* _" }
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
4 O, n7 x0 X ?, Hconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
4 Q6 x: S {" S& kto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued' a1 B& u6 W {- z. Y O/ B4 P
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core1 x1 c7 O$ P' N+ H' O: d' v7 P
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,& Y$ a5 C4 N% B. l* W. s, |
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
+ O3 f. G D4 x% Z, y- v! U' b8 {8 Cbreaking price appreciations.# H% a+ ]6 {7 o2 p( H2 |/ k
/ _6 B, v1 v& ^ Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding2 y" i) j; }& O* C3 c- t' L
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
0 c$ w3 |. i3 s/ {- Ilargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
, F |! q2 [' R5 |# K3 W* j8 B0 ?+ [$ V5 u* ]
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
1 r% N2 ]; k/ u' leconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
* G7 j& U' a' `3 o. Kconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off% o# B2 t' ^& l1 G% U" T4 G2 a) o( C( j
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
9 v7 y; Z2 ?& \; |1 Y0 P% yIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
$ \5 `8 x1 R2 ugreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
! W- i( n8 i- Sprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
' |5 S8 l3 ?0 o9 l4 v, a) ?3 q) s) Z7 l# k7 U! Y: g/ u
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
9 O' y3 W0 U" K. Q5 amarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and9 ^+ {0 s+ ]7 R
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada% W1 ^. r8 O/ l; @5 |% H
are markedly different than those found in the United States.3 Y8 A6 T8 N9 l
) `6 m; L& u" q4 c Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
" G1 v, C( j' f! G& JAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
- X X9 Q. l, j( s6 R: Afavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the2 p6 p2 H3 B2 K% v7 x1 W4 K/ A
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
6 l5 `! R, ]( P; C1 S3 ~4 Laffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
- X0 l4 L& l. s2 L8 z* Z+ ^+ k; P2 x% {downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
9 e& x! x" j- f7 ~3 i! Caggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
( R$ c# C0 X/ Z/ H, m; o' x9 m# _mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
5 e- c" X' i' \
2 F: `& R: w& T2 p# l <<! `8 g% n" F3 r$ u$ S
REGIONAL SUMMARIES* j1 f3 C# d* x/ X) w- X
>>
, r. r. ]6 o1 h+ z) X% H9 D- z4 s2 h5 j! k# R, m7 \0 _
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
5 k. \7 r2 N8 U& H( SHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
* d% }' R5 W/ y' `% y1 _0 _& H7 H1 _1 @of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
& m" a' p L6 U9 `looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of. E+ q# a5 B. d8 V9 z
renovations.; A( O1 p% N0 }
! y0 u: ?6 X1 J6 R( a% P
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight6 ^& S; p- ^4 H! B: g
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation) n# y0 c: z1 s5 ~$ z& r
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
: ?& T4 |4 z$ h0 B" u0 D1 |4 B# d- e( `September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.% W9 B/ I: L3 q# I0 w
& W% v- ^, p# v8 L The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer3 ?( \3 d, L7 b' t
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
7 J" l9 R) P6 Z; _quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new
6 \/ w+ s7 D& `+ w) y600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores ^- n& l; L1 s3 g$ x4 G+ ^$ T
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
/ ?& h/ L2 g' \6 Q' G1 H uand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
: q& K. |" q5 R K% c, f$ q' ^4 N2 Y% w& }3 T
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced/ k+ w I- F1 f! P3 i
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their5 R# F! {- Q/ U8 ^
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
- l2 g& |1 c2 j. f/ C% ~5 dwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
2 Z+ p! b% |0 O# @7 \% x/ Vdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
# @* v- V* L- v8 p" qbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
4 @, ^6 e* z8 Y$ `
$ I8 z( v2 o- E6 t N% N Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly8 W. ~- R( C1 D2 V' z) e
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
) c; C1 x( \- R d# \2 S- Rpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
: X1 J5 D2 ^$ @ a% z$ L7 R- U$ Qas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last( U& C* }' ~6 J5 d1 ?4 o
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
3 S g9 y- o) ?3 y0 e& V9 H; E. F$ Q
( I: J$ e0 i) p1 i9 v8 B! w Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
; S' L: ~1 t; J' Oprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory. ^& A0 Z' V' |
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting! |2 U' `6 m5 F
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
2 k$ e! u! Z( W: Dwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the5 \" n$ X2 ^( z
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before. L: i$ R( r1 U9 u/ H3 T
making a purchase.
: K) q$ N9 F% g9 e: Y) T1 }6 p- R% Y- F# }
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing. z$ A4 F* d7 b2 Y! F" K; B
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
% Q; N+ q2 S u* x# A/ g! c+ xconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
$ A+ D' n0 b j# O% L3 Xcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
[( L& p3 _! f' F( V% ~attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
9 x% c4 Z8 i) S( ?. aamenities.( \- Q. i3 U+ r. Y2 x6 E" g2 w
: v* V9 I" y) S! y8 G The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
, n9 f7 x4 A9 Q: x# kthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
0 s4 R+ H1 I* yacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
% P7 ~& _# ^; U ^7 Ucontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
0 U, c+ [ v( ^4 x4 i) x% Kdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
" d3 Z! X/ R- X2 rresidence, rather than for investment.
, ]: q+ z; e( k. |1 ~& K9 h
0 `7 E* R4 G, A, d- I4 W: n/ I% r The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as) ~+ h/ V0 u3 j' e: b& K
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
! x- ?: u8 [! tin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
) ^( L1 C% H! Z- Fconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
$ m8 m' t. D- J0 m0 a/ g9 L+ mrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
7 l, ^: I, I5 k: C% Zthe market.+ o% l* r) e6 [
% Z9 s6 @2 g' o$ I' z+ s6 n
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through1 W: f% J; e' Y
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
; T# F* }, J7 j2 @August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
5 g/ @$ P; W: B9 T! ~& U7 a+ y4 kmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
% K+ \: c8 c* h" h+ ^to the shortage of available inventory.' M4 ]) J9 [; m) }/ H
1 V4 z; [" ~+ Q
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
: ?+ }6 G' d7 g0 i! L9 H: Amomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains; c+ E5 W( \/ i
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses: |" n/ ]1 v4 ? ]) J' V
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.8 G% @0 n. t8 G; `( _
3 M$ c. b, x4 x, g+ m5 n6 I+ M! ]- O Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases; C) p( k+ E; |8 H K% o9 x
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low* r% m( \0 b% U
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
. N6 _* H# j) h& y" ppressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
: G5 _# `! {' M- ~prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer8 t" y% T( i; M6 T. E0 K( q
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
} R s! A6 l3 N Ubuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
' m) Q& X C# Z( R. C
7 e. o; i4 {6 i5 G& [8 X. I6 j/ p Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter8 |$ y% A+ l- K4 K( ]
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton1 V2 k7 Y/ D/ f2 i2 b; i) W
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
( o- \( x+ M# G- N* l. j+ l' ^maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices' `2 ~; J: e: Q5 g5 ^
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
m5 `& h$ Q! x ~' Qin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
9 f0 E" O4 w0 i; T& Htowards the end of 2006. : v! c6 F$ ? d
( F! H* Q/ v O7 Y5 iWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
4 R) z3 U3 J8 Uinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable& ]* Z. x4 m9 p
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
* K( j& p3 ~1 w; j6 c8 y/ `7 Tgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to; Z( l2 [( M2 W9 a8 O
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
- F* Q) d M9 }6 zpressure on tight inventory levels.
2 G; W3 n6 ]. c* y+ N6 S) }
% M- E6 ?* K6 \+ D* v4 {- y# o Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic( h$ [6 R' V: @2 M; M+ V% m3 _1 Q
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
) \1 M1 l% ~7 j J+ [: s6 I+ finto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;3 P' i3 O. `9 x u: a1 w) U% w" n/ Q* R
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching: U" m3 h5 i% Y
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
$ E3 z; J7 B- z7 |- ?8 P7 U; N: }$ w: ~$ H
<</ Q8 \9 M5 V- g7 A; [$ r( `/ ?: i, f
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20066 B' `' a! m/ {2 j: H3 q, G) m/ M
. M7 y1 T D$ ^+ |2 L( \: p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. z/ q4 |+ m! K W. k% ?; t3 Y7 ` Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey! `1 |/ W* g) m2 j4 U) u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- w/ l; `- \- u) N" D: R$ I" J, W
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3* V0 g G: Z8 h* N6 t E* @8 Z
Market Average Average % Change Average Average; f/ r' `) ^1 ~1 A4 a* h3 G0 \
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ E' j4 v6 f9 p C; B0 V
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000. A. ^+ y/ o7 ?. h u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 p: c- c9 l+ [$ n9 B$ s Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
" q& g( \/ k) @ -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; p# [- Y/ r' ^. F# X, n Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0001 P: s5 z4 K v9 @. A8 J' g/ ^* {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 u. V# C6 ]6 w( t' [ Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -) I1 }( P( |7 P7 P! f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% p2 U5 F0 V4 P/ P6 c9 R St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333" l) I$ a$ t( A( y! b! ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 d! K2 S* p5 R Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
' x. p" J* B" w% y8 m, s% ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, b9 c+ [# a l/ C3 ]4 D" ~ Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
& @. c+ P1 b) K* z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 o# _+ ]1 B2 x; W- D Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250# W5 O, [& o X) _7 A* g5 w% P! N$ l
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
- h v" m5 E: }/ N) G$ G/ ]0 G; v Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766: P/ O) K& k; Q F1 o; c
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& ^9 a9 c# I8 X! L' h; O Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707# D0 ]% E% ]. r+ q4 R* G; ^
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& ?' }& m2 A' H# t7 q6 l! ], p Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
0 U, _5 f; o8 D0 U5 V) ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 m- Q, M* |8 N1 t& y7 m! `7 B Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389 W# }6 N( p" k" t7 y3 m! y9 a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 @% \8 G# y3 ]1 _3 _
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
9 W& D2 a3 x# ?- H- p. G -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 n# [# [5 Z9 Y8 e. j Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5004 m) \) K9 S* _5 b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ ^* D- \% y ?$ S& j4 b6 d Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
- c- p, m* g1 X; _! v3 o& s% l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ c5 s! j! e! s) x; ]5 O& F National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
7 Z( ?. y6 A% v8 C$ j -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 O# G8 O9 }- G' _/ y! Q$ t
1 R. s; u3 ?4 w( K$ u. a& n -------------------------------------------------------------& d7 `5 a- I" N" R5 }, k
Standard Condominium6 D7 e& [" Z+ f4 T
-------------------------------------------------------------( t1 A$ u0 w" B3 |0 Y
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo. N0 i! v, Q% o2 H! r! f
Market % Change Average Average % Change! J+ ~6 N" D u0 ^8 ]3 b
------------------------------------------------------------- c% i/ l0 X# A
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%8 {5 o0 ~5 [0 V7 f1 _+ Y% s6 z
-------------------------------------------------------------6 q5 `% ?2 T3 U" S
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
, n {0 ^6 F* q0 P* f' i -------------------------------------------------------------
* M( [4 a7 [4 `- a7 \ Moncton 4.9% - - N/A. M* G. ~, J* c( m [6 ?0 t2 o
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ ^9 q/ Q/ l- r6 V5 y2 q# \* y Saint John N/A - - N/A2 L4 _1 o9 K' J/ ~4 z1 c9 t
-------------------------------------------------------------
* X- B/ i# D) f St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
% ]/ p% m( ~3 n -------------------------------------------------------------
" q( f% A2 k, N Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
7 t6 {5 i2 ~$ _ e h -------------------------------------------------------------
5 m( S1 P) |, v" u& h0 b& D+ e Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
; |, h& U) p) g8 s -------------------------------------------------------------; W' K2 |, Q2 P. X6 S5 W- K8 x. R
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
2 F2 D6 U- i: L. h! X. |+ q. F -------------------------------------------------------------+ ~1 ]4 F7 l$ [$ V; s1 j0 Z* w* R# [
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
8 Q& t" V3 _8 [# T' V( ` -------------------------------------------------------------
( n6 z: o! o+ H4 ~2 K5 N5 A# z Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
4 C+ {, B, f' H( n- \, S2 z -------------------------------------------------------------
1 \8 B8 @2 M* M( }: @ Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%4 g, x- s- ]0 \9 p
-------------------------------------------------------------( e: t. k* [$ N: e$ C; Q0 w
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
$ h7 i0 `% D% T6 }. y- [/ N, z8 Y5 T -------------------------------------------------------------
: k4 ^0 d4 _4 L# b3 h3 ~9 R Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%) O" a' K, W1 u9 f) ^9 D
-------------------------------------------------------------
9 }1 Z$ w. N3 r( N* K Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%) a; f0 G( V* R# S5 Z, M8 k" g3 L
-------------------------------------------------------------4 S( w$ c5 ]/ \0 t
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
6 S1 E2 g1 \ d0 v8 x6 [7 B5 P -------------------------------------------------------------
# U4 H1 P$ `/ W4 P National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
3 R% K1 A; k# c3 {) }3 [. | -------------------------------------------------------------0 t. b2 W( g4 O8 f7 p9 [& w
>>( q* F* j9 |4 S* @9 x
) q. M) Z$ c: ~ Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined0 q3 \" q7 v, _
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint% U2 C7 {- \7 v- p2 x: ?
John and Victoria.$ Q* U1 O, l; s/ Q& ~) C. ?/ z
* t1 s7 v" w0 w- O% R* l X v$ x
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most; M6 J% z$ r+ j5 F# G
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of9 K( ~" J$ C' T
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release1 d: x/ ^% M% E4 E
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
) Z, B! X0 R0 e: @! jtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
5 s- j N" u6 O, @- D7 T( W4 c# Aacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is4 m, `8 Y- r7 }4 b1 |1 F( x; L" S" h
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
0 N) h3 y2 L7 T$ h- y$ V! jfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable, F/ n1 g+ X) w: o( d* ~2 o) C
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
" p! S+ i1 \8 H. jNovember 15, 2006.
$ |' P; R! D0 L Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of' z- l8 E t. U- l1 ~
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
3 a2 l0 [% o, c1 ~' l8 jprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is& {2 j: e$ r9 M% T @1 n! _; y- Q
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|