 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑 % R* U& e8 d2 `7 i1 |1 l% |0 R6 L
$ X- R- N- n- T, }) o8 m
$ z5 S4 k0 g2 H
你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:/ P- K# H, f8 o1 p: }2 A
Ralph Klein
) H, I/ M, I6 r. |$ u4 p$ u. |5 D; [ d
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!8 Q" O$ v* ^6 ?" {+ P8 c: @" L
" ]: N* Z/ P+ I& S) p1 U% `6 s: {7 N所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。
5 n' ~. p! j9 J1 k- \" _* ]
$ r1 q" f" ~/ l+ Q; y: d& f$ X3 T* @
$ B w& ], m! E8 t. t/ B
' X) }# e/ e! q6 Q+ fhttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades& U, w, f3 N' `' v6 M0 W# ]$ m
Historic Alberta budget balances:8 i" L# u7 f6 w
, T0 t3 x5 L" M- n4 ]0 V
1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus3 M1 E8 c# S, e7 b# ?/ k
% @% A7 ~% d+ ]. E; q1 H8 T1982-83: $796 million deficit
6 @1 M1 X; q$ i4 U0 _9 |) y
* |$ f5 q$ Z- ]5 A: T1983-84: $129 million surplus
) p% g( P/ ]7 \0 z; C' h& H+ V) Z5 O' g" m$ S
1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus1 R% \0 b* y2 h ^5 E, o# a; D
2 ^9 G+ ~" b7 h V, Y$ q1985-86: $761 million deficit$ v/ l1 ^% F" X8 c) H$ Q
" p+ ~8 G! ~: }0 C
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit( n! Z, }0 ~, h/ z; [) L
& |9 t; C; N3 v- ]* @- t+ @5 P
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit7 Z" W9 M O+ d5 t
$ U* W0 r5 i3 Y Q0 E; E7 S! k' I
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit. }, M& c' N/ R" P% W; s
$ s, R2 e% w1 t! c' t1 _. H# t1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit# I9 D# l7 {! p* W! y( p$ A) }
" x" S: ^" X2 s1 t" [, e
1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit8 Y/ m; r6 C5 J( H: o
' J( c4 G" ?. v( V4 v& ^$ W* j2 z1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit
; `+ c) b/ j/ d% [( S& Q- u7 ], G- T. ]; A+ n |' @: S4 m
1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
' b5 q! O; ~) p$ K$ e I8 b* M3 |/ ~# @9 w( F7 }* o- ^
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit1 Q/ b3 T9 L2 F8 Q, d
/ g! f: |* W9 H7 w: R+ j1994-95: $938 million surplus$ ^! P2 g" X1 S$ Z V0 r( |
5 B- d- D# k1 |3 ]/ y2 V+ |0 p; Z1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus4 u7 R8 }0 K/ l; X, U" b
- X/ M3 ~. u% |# u1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
( O& f3 f$ u# i; K; a3 |- b" p" E/ _0 [ S) B+ T6 R% _
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
9 g, i' M7 H- {; g' D' l
) h. y0 w8 u1 J; t. x: A1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus. L' }0 Q! s( Y) q) C" L
( G' `9 a9 q/ U# |1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
' U+ c* m. `$ J$ |1 h
* t* P1 i( c% w2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus
1 ^3 o" c+ [) ?" `! g; Q1 V& z- ?7 C* h9 m6 I2 R
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
; m d, e* D; u1 x0 [0 E
( J5 P# @5 z: u6 i/ G% H( K; l U2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
/ t$ L. E) R1 {) v" l) @% @ {# O: o; r0 \) W3 @. g+ Q" A5 [
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
, e% D; H7 P- _
& E) L# O/ I: ~" R1 }2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus$ L. N/ L) s" B
; v; O$ F$ s* m
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus# @" Q( [1 n1 Z' s
/ G; X; K6 a" p' y2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus3 I( {) @, w( E, Y
a3 O4 ]- X5 F& V2 r
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
$ b) L& q0 K# |/ Y
0 i( c: u! X3 B, l' b [2008-09: $852 million deficit5 k- U$ [) u7 p* G# _1 @0 e! k
+ Z' I' T$ c+ V7 m4 A# _2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit
9 w3 `( l5 L, l1 s; y- d3 C! t- A }. A2 i0 j3 Z0 Y( U+ K4 U$ b1 G4 f
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit
6 K% G3 b& c" _6 T6 @- G- H, d; U
1 Z5 S, `; {* m. W: h2011-12: $23 million deficit, V- U% A1 T0 D; d
4 T) K# Z% e3 G7 \' {* ]. e2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
) r4 f, D2 V3 k' Z4 `9 j7 l) G% ]
2 f4 k3 W# h7 l8 w# |2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|