 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
2 o5 V- p# V/ R1 ]; J7 q& v3 X9 d. a3 `4 t/ _
! t" Q& D- J2 _" h+ M0 t2 t你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:! x) U7 o1 F9 B' M
Ralph Klein1 a0 k% d' ?- O
" S! D% o* @! r6 e我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
1 w! `, F. y P; Q, t0 g3 A O
, e; P W* G* N9 L4 d0 t& e所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。
- r" N! U# V2 _* t/ K, c6 [0 ?8 s! {; R; x6 T) j. M/ t$ ~( \
' ]! e& _$ K" ?+ ?& \: |
) K2 M0 H5 M; H+ b; Qhttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
* v. l5 J* Q3 }4 Q6 zHistoric Alberta budget balances:: l6 D( a" U8 ]
4 O; u4 q% l& W" O7 C9 N( U) G1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus
9 F; U" S+ i# B( n: d4 T9 y1 J4 f+ c' P3 A
1982-83: $796 million deficit0 l, i* M& l* l: ?5 m& D- x
* w2 J* C6 `0 c& C
1983-84: $129 million surplus
% {: c5 {( M# j6 x8 \; h$ q) ?* u1 _0 I3 D
1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
6 u% e/ e0 x: O$ \
0 d6 g" T! U$ i9 K1985-86: $761 million deficit' v6 Q9 P+ |8 x# ~9 Z3 q' _
, z/ C6 Z0 d1 {9 B4 t' A5 C' [
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit; V7 p: r J9 k' z0 ^% N
@6 ?& ]9 z+ @* ~) |1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit' f) j' ?& D& O* L0 B
0 p/ i$ `: `# A( w5 p/ b
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
2 T0 L1 H- Q& p" L0 q5 {0 e: h( D% E4 V6 n+ T3 B/ p/ x: d! \* R4 n
1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
) ?- ^3 i) [/ o; X) |. C
+ V$ P& U3 `- d5 U4 r( Q5 c" C# K, n1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit" A6 Z% m, z% ?" ]# l* e* Z5 _
6 r8 G7 B& K# C) b g1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit/ ]1 I1 f; [* o. p
' _$ ^) g5 A- W L" o3 k
1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
' Z; l+ Q' @( _, y) c. @0 P9 v8 O3 k8 @, @7 A; y
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
) _6 T1 P' `1 H- Y% x: W+ r2 o
2 t# \ p' y1 `/ E1994-95: $938 million surplus3 `7 `/ d5 |# l N3 @
5 E5 R9 \8 P0 I7 W1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
1 M8 w, V0 n+ {) K& A8 w M
. x5 X) g4 c% ~. k& I$ R1 s: T y1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
) R# A& b- y ?! _! Y+ {/ @6 O' C6 @3 b( P) M! E" ]- J7 J
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
3 W2 N) r) m. G; l$ M) |. D' N2 N/ c O' |
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus
6 w3 O) D; _8 z* k& H" D& `* j( S2 a1 ^, @) V9 L
1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
1 Z& o8 F4 Y$ C! d) r& u3 B4 N/ t/ ?; M: O1 k
2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus1 }( r4 s, W8 s6 L& E" Z
5 o1 [' K7 \8 S/ m. n, k- B0 R. _: d) ^! V2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
* Q& W! U$ c+ ~# U" }
/ ^: Y; U! y1 u+ V+ K2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
+ z7 Z$ |: z+ X% ]& P5 @* o3 V3 o3 r
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
6 ~4 F7 _0 h2 X9 ~; g# v. o& J' }
8 y1 }+ b% c' v) z" y2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
) [; d' q% [; W2 s% ?7 J/ s1 O P" r1 [1 S/ V4 s
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus+ }$ I9 { u: _" {# S
9 z9 K. \ C9 W* o& W$ w1 u2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus: ~: q2 X& e/ _
: V9 d2 F; B1 J6 W6 g; M
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
# o. a0 K( E9 u' o1 K' e; U6 `* }7 x( [
2008-09: $852 million deficit% w9 o2 t% E' b# W9 _/ J6 h; i# a
. w$ U9 q5 p2 Y; G
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit- y% m6 F2 x x; J- p$ e6 N# }
2 p5 |( B; D; }% {* i9 z2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit
+ K6 r% U4 Y$ i: t6 |1 e
( c) X6 _4 Q2 m! p$ A0 |& p2 V) l2011-12: $23 million deficit
9 ~/ ]5 N8 [% E$ l& p# L+ v/ b; }: l+ p
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
+ t( Z7 d5 k+ K# ]8 h* q. j+ d: {% H; Z }4 \
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|