 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
* E# ] d. Y @* E8 e/ ^6 A
! f1 b; Z% @+ E9 @3 s6 D8 Z. H. Y8 O! l" ^
你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:4 r( g; F* u- v' w! I
Ralph Klein
. O5 X9 N- |- r( g) B3 M2 N! f% G4 s/ X! T2 ~( i
我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
/ r0 q" B) z' `
, @, U0 f8 I9 _所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。6 ]9 t) @2 P+ A2 E7 ]$ i! p3 Q# ?
. q% Y% U2 t% |
8 S! u- q1 R& @$ Y5 ^
* _% u" J6 F2 h# lhttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades: Q( L$ `- ?) \1 s
Historic Alberta budget balances:
. J) F. X5 T. r
7 s. f0 |7 L" ^1 j9 m1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus4 h$ p8 K; x1 B
3 r* s$ j; t& j* Y2 q* T
1982-83: $796 million deficit) P+ J- ?+ C4 B4 B
) B! \, Z: w# g2 V- ]1983-84: $129 million surplus
7 n$ D5 J1 M& Z+ t: L
; b% B) A- R- O. }# I1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus# c. K" B3 U0 h: n8 k! v8 x( X- E
2 x3 K8 T4 u6 G! Q. G* P
1985-86: $761 million deficit
8 t' K' U, m y0 W
4 x6 L: j/ S( Q7 u3 g1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit% M' }0 A8 ]8 M
# P1 ~+ L4 y5 _1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit2 ], A7 U/ p3 E0 o* Z: z* D
/ A6 U3 K ]- d/ l( B/ N& p* p
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
2 h$ ^: y" e0 E4 M9 W3 g& k% l; n
- R5 K9 } ?( e7 t( L ]1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
w7 g" i, m1 } j# {0 |/ u/ }' ^( z" W/ [, ]8 k
1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
' ?% W4 ?: o$ ~; N
; O3 |3 f, Y4 \0 y. Z1 z% @1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit
4 G% T o4 F, j" n2 W
; S' Q g; Q; `3 T4 k3 O1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
. u x( v S2 l$ l
# _- q1 g9 @, K9 ^1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
* K. B' Z& a v5 E% Z; u2 ?, ~& F8 s; O& F9 T1 c
1994-95: $938 million surplus
% S; n. J; M2 F- {2 N6 o4 w# y+ s* E3 h7 C
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
: D I$ F4 Z1 E( |# j1 {" L4 G* b: ~; s3 k& a* Z+ I$ n
1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
5 V8 K0 |5 b$ [! ~1 o* u' r, b: p5 ?: V5 N/ H5 Q
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus0 U+ e. Z4 d J
4 w$ k0 l, N$ l4 o' ?8 k& z$ d1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus2 o( ?% G; A) ?) f$ {1 u7 f0 |
& c- U. ~. g ~8 O: k1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus
& s. X" D; c2 s& B9 @6 r, _1 Z: z3 P# o, f0 V: V
2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus# f* W7 p9 ]1 Y0 S
2 {+ Q' {: C/ L- M7 E) h2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
5 y0 x& W9 \4 [- d/ ^, }( p& `& x i7 x# t- _7 r
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
" Q- i" s8 l. Y$ e D7 i- j: w* c/ K) `# d( d# T1 j. ~' ]( F: W" C
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
- k$ C- r0 ]% ^
4 @! i9 |% h$ [8 P2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus% Y/ C# e& }. v* s9 h% x. q' u
5 p8 z; V/ m; R3 |2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
' f+ M6 L' D. U& k; `2 a8 l
3 w0 k7 ^$ _) I2 q+ c8 ]2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus
, V5 {7 L6 R a% E
! z. U* J _) l3 c5 `- Y2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus p5 k' ?8 O8 u
9 N+ L0 \, D6 L! T1 ?, l
2008-09: $852 million deficit
) r& D, {$ `/ m. c5 x `7 z
( n! g+ U! b) Z) }5 G+ x" M2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit1 \: ~' s. K' r1 E* U! M: W
0 r) J# x! e! U8 ~6 i/ s4 x3 D" D
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit/ [; k: v' \. q W; C
4 N4 Q( c1 }( W# ~# O( W
2011-12: $23 million deficit2 ^' ^( y; R5 d k% h
3 c% B% \" Q1 T9 h( U( \& B; J
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit* n- b8 d3 F( Q) [1 v: E- L2 W" }" o
" M% }9 {0 N( z ^
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|