 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑 & w% s- m3 E. X2 ^5 R7 z2 q% x& j
% e9 k- B: t5 `' G$ S9 P- \! H; G
7 L2 D {4 N- E3 t7 T" @你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:/ P J9 i- V9 m2 ]: I8 y% m' k' W
Ralph Klein3 s+ E: w) Z0 d% G4 h
, A& w }/ G h9 i我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
* }: j7 Y+ L8 {+ S( i# S7 F7 n1 x( K/ L9 a
所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。
- [: H* O. E) z* h- H5 q
! O i* ]; N' t. [7 M' P9 h
# t- z5 n! B8 s. P
) a3 ]% m6 x- f; y/ thttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades t+ ?* |) a% M
Historic Alberta budget balances:+ C3 y. Z" @6 K7 y- p+ W) k
" n- [2 _5 ^. f7 z, C: x8 l. _1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus6 H! }' i3 J# a, W7 }1 I, e- o
}* ~- G/ d* X; I0 e
1982-83: $796 million deficit
8 Y2 D& z1 [% M5 g! W6 I0 M4 a) V9 X! j- O) H( N( T& ?& K
1983-84: $129 million surplus7 {# f: ?/ j3 I) W6 p/ I$ `
- n9 C, u- z' A% a/ m4 |
1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus
7 G( h; E# | E( P0 C% X5 e h5 z" b2 j' G, }" _* L
1985-86: $761 million deficit- v2 U% b- T! E
& s5 x! p, A! G6 ]! Y# j
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit/ j4 C7 O$ q/ l0 d
9 h7 J3 A1 Q8 _, K: B0 z1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit
) {% ~3 @+ x/ Q% K9 t- N9 S7 C6 t" x0 S+ B
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
; X/ C I1 F) c" o: Z0 u5 J2 G- G* B. s; Y; I: V
1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit6 c3 h% c$ ~* [ ]( R; S
6 E2 H/ L* J& V; J1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
4 f' P x! V. x' L4 C
/ o2 G) ?, i& z/ k8 @' M1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit5 X4 ^, w( J) r& ^# C3 D
% }. b5 A, Q) P! W
1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
/ L" h5 e" D/ G7 z& d# d) _: _2 d! W% |
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit
3 A; p3 S! u7 O1 I! E, `+ P q. X' c' }- Y' G$ s% O
1994-95: $938 million surplus
+ R$ u. B' m6 I- v s' Y, {$ p, i$ _9 n) u
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
5 d* V5 S0 z$ C8 k- |" |/ g' x0 @
9 ?! l6 ~' q8 l u' p( Q J1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus1 y- f$ _, B: M5 L, M
8 W: L S/ S% ~+ O' A5 l0 ^+ _/ J) [1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
. V' P+ G+ L. X6 T5 ^+ X; R4 t, _
+ `- P2 a p$ w9 G+ W5 n1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus
0 G) ]# i I9 u7 M
2 t) f" d! J, }# _" @2 ^1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus3 f3 W9 K k# T0 A6 s/ E; }
3 s4 A$ ~6 s0 J R0 i2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus3 Z! U$ [0 S6 |+ C& ~* h- M
/ r- K! W1 N: a3 I% J! ~
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
" r) l% d6 w9 r4 |
3 Y9 U6 B& j. y |' S4 b2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus9 G# Z: u0 c% r
1 Z: @, q5 G! |' D- a3 h2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus
* L# z- E5 B! [: |6 n5 z5 z6 i! W' j) @
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus# M/ ^2 _0 H1 O z; p& v0 }9 Z
* E6 S. ^+ R& o+ d9 B
2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus. h* g: C. K. P/ V8 o# y3 \
' T: a! b4 R6 i7 m7 Q) Z2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus0 @2 P3 Q5 x( I7 |5 ?2 o. L1 }
7 I6 R- w: ?+ Z; V% ~: `% r
2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
% s5 {$ \" x/ l/ N A- m
5 r' I- q9 y0 N. t- M4 Y2008-09: $852 million deficit& X( G5 v6 o% b6 ]
( m8 Z6 ^: a4 |' k
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit" r0 I( b7 k G) X9 F/ \
1 ]7 R1 i6 p9 y" g# g6 ]
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit' I$ r* F1 I, W2 o6 e8 I. c6 r8 h
- q! v t& s' E2011-12: $23 million deficit
, K: I0 j" L+ o' o1 b* M; X, a
- k& d8 y3 K0 }( C a2 P1 E8 f2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit2 J/ H% u/ H" P- U( M
5 Q B8 n; t' d9 M( @# x5 W, R2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|