 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 % G8 O7 e$ h K/ F8 O
Edmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:14* C( c9 a# ~: ]: e* l/ {7 Q$ i# W
One party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st ...
2 m& Z$ I! @0 L; T' l) ~
1 u( \' k; N# n$ x, K" t$ C2 ^" ZIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
4 o! b8 R4 }2 C5 C4 I1 P0 H: z% X
+ G$ @% Y* f1 b: D* u+ E" D) DLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.039 K, T0 Y/ y9 t. W% Q6 ?
- P( O, l' B. e- Vcomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
/ k8 \" R: W# h8 z' D' `
0 a/ f+ I3 k7 u- Z6 _Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
' K1 L; D3 f+ K8 D8 t |
|