 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
# M' ~4 q+ Y: V; l0 m" Z( F0 P3 }- i: u! M( ^: `9 N$ {0 j
9 u f% j0 q- A7 C; d2 @) aIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. 4 `3 I& Y- h7 H. t) L' r
2 h4 i- G. r+ K' k/ F2 m
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.039 p9 W/ g) Q2 _7 B
' P% C; @( H/ z6 i+ F- H
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
3 S; K; o2 d6 B. m& u3 f7 q9 X* X# P5 F3 p2 E
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
+ M; E- `" G M; \; I1 c F* ~ |
|