 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 1 ^3 b+ t0 v' K( Z1 Q9 u
9 r2 N2 u: w" k; p
) T% Y8 @# |$ _: J* Z" J6 j1 uIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. & F% @0 X/ @8 Y, t5 h# n1 J
. k2 n/ c7 H) Y |6 NLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
# s3 q |5 d" ~0 u; C7 e+ c/ X# v% V0 c1 V0 k# E9 y0 d( o
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..6 C9 Y* D) ~' `. n4 D
6 M8 C% R+ u; n8 y! Z
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
! M( x0 A% f8 d: A- p1 ^ |
|