 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
d5 I x2 z! T) f8 K, Y" u! x2 A( r+ S" }8 Q# Z& o9 G" u+ L
% y/ I+ U7 Z6 q }7 wIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. 1 O3 n' X. Y7 ]
4 @( E& Y' d# v) e1 G- U4 ^) dLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
2 I& t" [1 A" E- ? Z5 `8 |9 k& c, Y' M5 ]" ?5 l0 `2 D
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..& u8 M+ a; B$ {' u+ K% A h) Q
+ k i6 y) M5 M- e, ?( h" k5 }Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
. {5 m# {6 L8 W$ V |
|