Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
* X- O! b$ {* U8 q2 O& T3 LLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

3 c% m( X1 V  j- TNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
; b* e* D  w  w5 p- N- p( Y
" o& P$ p# S% A7 RLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

+ u5 G! J* ?: t4 [6 ATo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
' r5 j  j" M" J- `
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
" f/ C7 M" m* M( C& \$ bNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
7 P' b( d% g5 JYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

7 A0 z& }. A6 r# e( q- a& DIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
6 Y: ]3 a2 C/ ]) W
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
" i5 {! E& X6 s: c; |1 G4 _4 y
Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
" E2 r, ~( f  N* F: `Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
3 y7 O$ L' ?% c$ U( a+ ^Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

& }% C, E* L  ?" I' a

It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
6 M4 V7 c% U  j
  L2 L' n; g# s. J. C% u
# M- }$ F( R. r1 E. pFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
4 r! d4 t& ?* z9 k, [3 z# j2 `9 D1 m
( g$ p! t. ^+ o3 dit would be a good reference.
3 X1 x" d) H1 ?) N( v
thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]