Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

/ M' T4 }/ P, T% G' eNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
  H% g( b  q' V. s! J. i' c/ j
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
8 v% R" v% m. w' Q& `- B  _
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

; K  b0 `2 n) C& U
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
! f% I3 ?/ s. j0 v0 ?. [
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
0 h/ q9 O4 l% T1 p2 h# UNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

% ]! w0 o4 w0 h/ n+ [% I& w; L8 K6 xIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
/ C7 a5 S8 |& J/ g6 h/ z
# s  F9 S2 K* ~/ L6 [3 F' FIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
4 F6 j; `, G, I0 w1 n" e Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
: w( R/ u2 ?6 y! q, XSan Diego  22.8 29.7
% z* M* [+ J% q( X; ~2 YSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
  ]1 z# K* `- t; \; F6 ~Seattle  20.4 25
2 B) Y7 b- e$ p' }Denver  17.7 23.7
! u) F# @  v& U6 r2 wNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
4 A! g: X+ e7 i" sWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

2 g& Z# J/ s; q

It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
" E+ M/ i" l: {
6 L5 g% N; Y- G% r! b. |
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

: M* q. I9 C6 b' V. a: _it would be a good reference.

) W: \+ ~6 A  B! Tthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]