Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
2 J+ P5 E/ s. z0 {3 M% w# RLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

3 j9 I  j- q  q, kNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

  [$ F* g, ^1 [# `3 Y8 @- ALeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

, t% v4 p. F, fTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

1 q' S6 `7 d' J7 x% @" }6 j
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
- P9 Z) u1 `- P. Y+ I) L0 xSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
3 j7 K$ V+ Y! I7 NNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
2 B) w: E; m/ A2 i. Z. n
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

  k9 j$ V: [# {If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

6 Q  W' X+ Q( G Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
7 s1 V2 f5 K( c0 TBoston  20.5 30.2
* r4 w6 Y1 ^3 Q2 [9 v; pSan Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
9 g& o& m2 f4 t3 u# l$ VLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
; k: Z8 {6 n% KSeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
0 L6 r2 g: N5 }* d" g- iChicago  17.2 20.8
& O* F. i3 `: y' T" x" pWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
5 `' W: Y% F, s' c4 @
; J1 f$ H. ^8 a. ^6 O! j& A

% S( X% V9 i7 t$ V+ _- ^. j" p; eIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
7 V' ?$ @1 z& D# x0 s7 X
# o. ^! C) A: j. K) @7 D, g6 c
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

/ r; }1 K6 O6 Wit would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
  u$ J& W) _- E2 S9 P' o
: ]$ I4 q( o( }8 X[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]