Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
, o5 P) J% K, w, `4 u  cLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
2 F) g# D+ r7 W7 F- U# U- e. D
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

" @. F: ~, ^4 c. ^, Y5 Q3 E5 ]$ S: PTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
; g9 F3 K5 J8 v* |
+ Y  r2 s" x. Q4 a5 m! p
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
4 {: `$ a; e+ ]) T
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
& q! W0 n. c4 a! u/ R9 ONew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
& d( L9 p/ h; P1 |) i6 r- _, VYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
( b- C. m" M. I
, ~5 c( {" M4 j- M) |If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
3 T$ ?3 E5 b& ^0 F1 u
4 ]' S. r. k/ F) V. pIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
: e6 N# k8 l# z" T6 D Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
) Z, x, i& L  M( @1 USeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
+ w2 {1 ?7 X, L0 h# NNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
) e. C, o  x0 S8 W. E8 ]4 wWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
% F& }# Z. h. B' J# `


It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

) E* N+ p6 p* g5 Y+ p, \
* I  N' V! g) U+ A9 x/ YFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
( {& W  |9 L4 i9 d- x2 f
it would be a good reference.
/ X8 Z) e3 z) b% W' T; y3 T- \
thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
( c- N9 v5 a7 F
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]