 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 / {: Y( r; [5 }# O4 _' ~# r! G
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!" s. B. |+ R0 { B2 k
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
9 |7 Z$ a! ~+ t& V) j# I
( F; w& H T# x+ Z5 Z您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
7 b2 p% I: l3 J" N
$ w) B2 [2 m' _ n- Q$ |安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
& R1 t, O, @$ J, T2 V' i5 h: `8 x/ [9 m( B" w; P; `4 ]
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?6 ~: e0 I" O" T4 C; g9 ]7 y
# b& B6 G2 k" m* i! U! g
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
8 k9 t. f1 q+ {, d$ V8 M5 ]9 T* Z- x# Y
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):5 \1 y9 f( g5 n# F
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.7 n* A5 W6 X3 h9 v/ S+ {1 A
" K2 A% i4 v" R. F: `- y: L% BOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
# T+ o x( Q3 U# _9 _
6 q! k6 }: |6 D4 R) H6 [+ gBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
7 b" N* [; U4 Q) o8 a8 u+ Q! `# Y% u( y d# w/ M# P
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|