 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 3 a; v- W2 {$ P
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!# V$ F2 U" ~. e/ `
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... % y3 q! L7 O) X
' J3 L; Z$ s$ \" Q9 C您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
0 M7 v. Z/ k# [7 t8 w) a. X$ y, c8 t4 V( G1 k
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.2 y& S& `: J# C1 Z3 J. B7 H
, } U/ n9 b) ^ { X0 j+ ]: L不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
" N- _" i/ G0 B5 n c% Z
- T! e q) F* E" W. H6 g另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
l$ t& R* h6 z6 _! X* C n$ g& E& Y" k/ ^3 P; e
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
. b7 ~/ f' b( i5 J7 wYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
( `9 X0 J9 r! J# u$ s) H
4 ~$ l+ w2 l; ^: x! R! m9 ROr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car". l/ u0 d7 h# O3 `: m
3 A! ~3 n3 r- w: B( n; w. o
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
6 l7 g! R; J: G6 \: R9 {, W& c4 `2 w6 X- X# M2 h0 j- S
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|