 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 + q2 _1 r- E8 h9 W* H6 v0 u
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!2 w/ m0 b* m/ F4 }! j- y6 X
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
4 }( j2 ^- \ N9 p. l, O$ v7 s6 c4 @9 Z! l
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
e/ l1 o; m5 S! q2 T$ O4 A: t( F- _4 ?) u1 S
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
0 s- }7 U' C$ J( l1 a$ P
0 H# M3 n/ L- z# [- d不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?% ^* X4 I3 K6 x$ N& P/ Y1 ?
% j/ c3 {# L* |# t8 i
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。% u! t( N5 @( G7 H- d* D, `
; q% G, P; Q( N5 B5 m/ e* \
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):5 [! ?! o4 B2 ~% g/ \6 l
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
2 l* k8 e. Y4 M5 M! g3 {/ u0 Y; R% S
- V1 J1 ?3 R& r& l' DOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".7 `, b# i: d) _! R1 H2 N
* A" L* }2 Z/ g0 e( v2 ~9 _- e
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.3 z6 {. E' ?( m- {! N: R! {" ]
( L0 I. y) \% C* O: E! T[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|