 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 # W) O" }% w* I# }- K) `7 O3 a
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
- J3 r: a; C, Mcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
$ W" d/ ]. G. X# R( ?' B
# R7 E( M6 [9 a; R3 U5 ?* L您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。3 u6 b- b0 u; i& i. \
" M0 D L( h% b9 E2 n' j安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.2 i8 a( a9 d: {# {0 _5 O: U
4 z! f6 B" Y: O5 v8 s6 ]' q5 ]3 h不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?3 @- [( q) C. G2 k+ l
9 X; G$ Y# m9 Y( ^# f
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
% S8 Z# n$ Z& V
5 c) P" v- z7 I; D8 V& H关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
, s5 Z/ f, {0 C. zYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
' U% Q+ x Z: g" H# U2 k+ J5 l+ s* N. W/ C& u
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".' `* f0 n! N5 E- S) F; Y: Z& v
$ W, U5 o' Y: n( e. H/ @' `& b
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.( d$ S0 Z) u/ B2 K) ~
; f3 k% ?$ M7 w6 a; R! d[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|