 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|
楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
3 {8 }+ _9 o8 E* C2 k! y楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!0 E) D/ D+ |5 T, x! N6 ?
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
( h3 U1 t7 S. c- T1 G$ x# K8 s7 H0 ], B
您说的对呀，我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理， 所以听您这一说：我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了， 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。3 ], O' d; S. j* ~: o8 M' X( a
3 u; Q% T' w6 V0 K0 H. s
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有：可靠性高（故障率低，ｏｒ ｈｉｇｈ ｒｅｌｉａｂｉｌｉｔｙ）, 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.& h9 T# ^: Z* @5 r
4 u( m7 m# @9 Z/ C
不过，你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择，Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗？. G' H9 [; @/ ^) ^ O
5 J" m e1 S6 c另外，“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息，偶要查他个水落石出，好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
* P' ^6 ^5 s$ f9 S) B
) I: N* ]' w4 l$ t关于安全，我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 （SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了）：7 y1 w% i H2 J. H3 s0 _6 ~" Y
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers., t5 a, W( x. O9 [
1 G# @( J( L e$ }) H# ] A# COr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
: g3 d1 R' t5 {$ V) L; I/ u/ {! s) U/ h7 S5 A
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.7 X% [& N1 Y8 m# V" @9 j
) v7 E/ w. I% t6 m[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|
狗仔卡
发表于 2007-12-9 21:44
提升卡
置顶卡
沉默卡
喧嚣卡
变色卡
显身卡
