 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 ; |( L9 M. I$ W
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!* h$ L2 x' J, z2 X" M# B
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
' V4 g! R& h# F- t
0 w# a4 ~9 r, v0 [% M0 Z您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
) i6 ^0 x6 L" G G6 Q; Q5 l* Y* X4 r$ @$ t
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
3 F3 m+ b3 ^- _2 [
* d+ P5 h, Z2 {+ K8 ^4 d! |不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
, J/ ^" i* K/ i/ p+ n3 R. `8 Z, ~* N/ W2 V) f
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。. D& ]: L7 [4 [ b
* g. R/ ^( \& v6 `$ c( B关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
0 n. C6 V5 m" M6 d5 }Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers., J; \! \8 m' G1 Q3 ]& h
2 u$ r, }6 G H
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".' [6 [( ]0 F" h) ^# b* f
' C# y [; t) f/ k" Y9 |
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.7 |. Y; P( a7 o; c" U) c% a
0 }3 G! a) }% \: J W2 C: |
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|