 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
3 T B7 l5 j I; dDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
8 F* W1 W! C& e+ r1 e# J6 p' M- w$ p4 a+ p8 g9 P- }4 z
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.5 o7 J4 [' \" T' y7 x: A
: J6 a! G6 s' x: V$ s
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. $ h' S; v/ Q6 g' p9 L, g2 I
) w; R5 i# R+ `/ E. X& M" GThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
( f( G7 f# A* C. u: C' ^9 ?+ r# _5 n8 G0 r3 z/ f
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
3 i$ \5 s5 `* M4 s, C" u+ u" i8 C5 z7 n, c
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
5 }1 P% h" n* ^2 K' |; A! q2 D- j: t& _5 H! h
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
9 o2 [" l9 y' T" n# ? y' i# V8 w5 Y. l9 M2 y. a, _& f- t
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.* r% U( `& f+ M3 ?# Y% o2 W6 U8 c
- u6 W) T- L' Y" e2 ^Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.* B+ t X% f$ {" X3 n5 T+ C4 Z
. i: _- z* j7 P _Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|