公告：xiaodou_112255 禁言二周

云山水月

公告：xiaodou_112255 禁言二周

8 J0 K- c" f5 U其实这个规则未必人人清楚，但是有投诉只好有处理。

我决心判下去，还在于被告的发言在这里颇不妥当，煽风点火的味道很重，不单单是个禁言期间发言的问题。
" h. t( j/ n# _2 M6 `  a- e+ F
http://www.edmontonchina.cn/view ... &extra=page%3D1

xiaodou_112255

.......................i just want to explain to you what happened, you didnt listen to me instead you judged unfairly..
7 C. e9 x; }; F3 Q1 ~
please look carefully about what you said at the first time of warning me then you will know that i didnt go against the judge.

云山水月

原帖由 xiaodou_112255 于 2009-3-22 14:31 发表
- X- b* P  u* J. T; l, ]9 p.......................i just want to explain to you what happened, you didnt listen to me instead you judged unfairly..

$ T$ F) g/ B  kplease look carefully about what you said at the first time of warning me th ...

0 Y. r/ b2 ^3 M6 b6 P# V朝阳可以认为你的发言有挑衅的嫌疑。我觉得这个你很难辩解清楚你同意吗？
4 Z5 M( q4 ~" p, |- g  o
只好如此判决。谢谢理解。

无敌魔羯

原帖由 云山水月 于 2009-3-22 14:33 发表

朝阳可以认为你的发言有挑衅的嫌疑。我觉得这个你很难辩解清楚你同意吗？
( Y& X/ v0 L( I9 w
- o! E- m+ }+ r" ^只好如此判决。谢谢理解。

, F1 g: {: n8 X& x- a4 J
. S! s; Z1 A0 t0 G. B 好像两个案件弄混了。。。
7 o4 j4 J$ d- f6 v. l. E* ]朝阳投诉的不是他。。。

xiaodou_112255

原帖由 云山水月 于 2009-3-22 14:33 发表

2 k, S9 {# X8 J- v% x朝阳可以认为你的发言有挑衅的嫌疑。我觉得这个你很难辩解清楚你同意吗？

只好如此判决。谢谢理解。

haha, you need proof to prove the suspect guilty. how come if the suspect cant prove he didnt crime then he is criminal????

xiaodou_112255

原帖由 云山水月 于 2009-3-22 14:33 发表

朝阳可以认为你的发言有挑衅的嫌疑。我觉得这个你很难辩解清楚你同意吗？

只好如此判决。谢谢理解。

- f3 M2 ~& o. z+ B% f/ s: Zshe could say that i am teasing, but where is the proof??????

云山水月

原帖由 醉清风 于 2009-3-22 14:35 发表
% }; b  n, M, ]  ^! E. O' y% V
; U5 [8 ~6 O; F' X! z
& K: w( x+ R9 U 好像两个案件弄混了。。。
. o7 `& e7 ~+ P& Q, V* g; E$ ~$ W0 f朝阳投诉的不是他。。。

http://www.edmontonchina.cn/view ... &extra=page%3D1

xiaodou_112255

because we are talking at the same time, so i didnt see your warning until i posted my reply. i will not say anything in other poples topic but only my own topic, thanks

xiaodou_112255

up up