 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
) U: G1 E4 W. b! E9 s. ?from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
7 H y3 `9 S8 |6 bunsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
5 S Z, {! w' S* t" ]4 [1 iprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
* i# {( d2 {- k' F3 Pfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
! _9 t1 Q9 p% Y! Koverpricing compelled a level of residential construction% t8 t, x5 R5 e% x: L1 P' a
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately7 E3 l4 V: L7 S5 b9 s* W
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past) [& B. V* E2 A' n
three years.3 U+ m" u M6 t4 K
By “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from# _( ^% z% l2 Z z b
their fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
: E5 @% F E- N$ P: s. a0 Baffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects# z9 R- g6 m4 e# @8 Z( |6 W
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
* ~9 n3 O9 ?' |& R3 N2 k' W P; Y" ?to fundamentally justified levels.
4 U/ x' O" L7 eWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”: [% v c* G7 x4 m
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and2 a4 e5 ` \/ t2 ]' t7 ~1 K
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”! U6 G1 X i$ G* H9 M& t1 W
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although$ n6 |+ t; Q. I0 ?5 |3 Y
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s5 Q" i$ H& [; F2 ^; n R4 d. \
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where2 h2 k8 U( u0 L5 ^% L6 s/ A
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
$ D% T0 _! W/ W6 [0 N+ M7 ?" Z0 U7 Jthat is now being rapidly reined in.
! a i3 |1 O+ h0 rWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
8 _7 O1 i" n+ {1 Cthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
9 k2 J+ `* u5 e# ]! Emeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
: H( P; Z& W) U! _! o7 q* H" Xon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers
7 b$ e& f' l5 `% u0 u9 Cfrom the cyclical downturn, house price growth will1 P2 n F( Y) Q' S
remain choppy and new residential construction will be9 i- P4 o# J/ H
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
s7 ~' b" _3 Z+ I& R3 k" Vis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this/ G0 C& @% v& m0 R& {+ ~
to persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide/ R9 n' ^* K5 U* |" H5 _# T
residential construction will fall further to around: z6 L1 D0 u9 w- f2 ]: B% u7 f
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units5 N! s( L) M+ d9 {7 U
in the fourth quarter.
. B! ?* t9 w& o" a9 bTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding, z0 A" U& ~; h0 Y7 u6 j- W) V
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run5 t* g1 s" K* b1 W/ G
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each1 Z$ ?# X3 H. g$ Z2 f( ~0 m, H; | Q
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home( q6 j* A' h3 [4 Z/ s
values since house prices should track incomes over the7 J& N' g% ?2 l' A. j) h
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we- E$ f0 b0 r4 h- a# d0 b
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
) ]+ t( f$ i2 Sof residential construction./ z- \- Z+ Q/ |6 C8 z' C
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a$ U9 E" w! K4 | W \6 L9 I$ Y- b+ J
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction
% n4 c7 ]# |5 Hwould have occurred if housing had been priced% y8 {$ r& D. y5 H
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this7 }1 b8 ^3 h7 B4 {3 `6 ]
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new" @4 @+ T4 H' }$ Y
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
6 w# }. b7 T. N& k0 i; Ymany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.; p; F9 q: f* ?6 \- L3 T7 C3 l& @
Regionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,* t2 s- v5 Q6 o; O
where housing demand will further contract under waning
: D( A4 Z! p8 y0 {population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are
2 N6 M0 c0 T% a, R3 halready witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the( f: C, Z: L( I9 V8 l
very time that the resale market has swung into strong
( c4 [- z5 q+ Z! Xbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces6 }2 G9 ?4 n# J9 Y( D+ y9 U
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural; R: S. c1 u' i& z
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
; {) h( D1 Z- B6 k/ EQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the$ L% E8 k& H5 N4 f* M( a& g8 W8 I7 x
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de& T* l. e4 J* U5 O w
Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,4 L( u* H: e" u( ~3 n; }
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership- V7 S o; h) \/ K8 a) w
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a6 g; _+ j K% t6 {, l" s
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
1 s2 s4 U' [- { Flimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
+ k$ o8 e4 U* h& J7 dcondo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically# n7 \6 d7 v. _0 B, {: z/ J% e
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
9 D1 r$ [) P5 m+ \construction mean that record numbers of condos will' F! d! }: s! f3 l9 E' d( }
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as. B+ A# }7 C ~+ `4 H0 v
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could4 l. r i9 i3 P S9 o" O
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while! w8 s- n8 [. j& u
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we, P& g5 l/ r3 h* s' }
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
. r+ `. c2 Q4 X: S2 E$ q! tinter-provincial and international migration over the coming5 L/ k9 N! W3 S* m) U! e6 d
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
h9 G3 Y0 L' iwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
`6 v8 {, p/ }OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING
2 j" G; k; g- u. x2 zMARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS; {2 g3 r6 D% C s
Grant Bishop, Economist
; A( }5 p3 s& r! W2 W- D7 i" g416-982-8063
6 D( j) `, R; {/ T" ]' \" @Pascal Gauthier, Economist
4 x0 e5 {8 B2 X" l$ }$ O% {1 P416-944-5730
1 O8 O. x& b. w7 |$ Q4 b& G, _9 u$ e. V8 I
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf |
|