埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1751|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly3 U, X, R7 w9 @% w( s4 y
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove7 I" ^+ F, U& |8 F; T
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
- K& D2 C8 I- i. m$ v$ U4 eprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
  q* \) F* p" n# sfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This3 L# y# Z, G9 X/ t, o: t
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction
  W, p' f4 b" s- E. \that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately0 U5 E! H& P4 R% X
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past
. G6 e, f/ w! }3 Tthree years.
; A- C0 k: B/ Z8 c4 UBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
2 z9 x. K" [6 Y' J# e! m$ etheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
; ~* |# M- K: Q' M+ Naffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
  y9 F9 V( S6 ~; B/ xboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices
3 z) `" O1 C* F" Y$ R$ u  Zto fundamentally justified levels.9 G' F( V( }* \- U7 D% G; [
We consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”, b5 L6 `- i5 T$ p0 g: ^6 ?
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and
$ u. e- C( W% C5 V0 nthat this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
# x4 b7 I6 R4 M/ {/ {& G8 v8 [where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although+ M- I& ~0 u# f5 V3 B8 i
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
/ U( j* H! B% z3 l  P“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where; A# f+ `0 v2 R  T
homebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch: ~0 Z) Z' n) J6 f
that is now being rapidly reined in.
& ?3 I+ z- L0 b3 E& U. MWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,  E3 v# p/ s4 }" y5 I
the construction of too many new homes over the boom
1 Q( F! d3 P& P  xmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh" p# B, {: t5 b7 z8 O( `
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers1 L: W2 `8 g6 X
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will" `2 ?4 ?2 m1 C0 q. O  g  N
remain choppy and new residential construction will be; }6 Z2 [4 O8 U4 L: j
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction# S4 K/ }/ m- m) c: E' y2 Q; B* a
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
6 k/ f+ A% N  [5 ]) |* v- e6 Xto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide0 \1 g0 v2 |0 }9 L6 U+ b0 z
residential construction will fall further to around
8 l* G- s& z( k- o9 d, c125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
4 @' d/ x, e7 I1 jin the fourth quarter.% S- U* ]& R; G' M
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,; p8 y" g2 {, a, e
we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run0 Y6 g4 B5 Y. G% R
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
" y, C& v7 t6 b! V' q/ }: jprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home
/ m) ~  H, Z$ l6 _- J/ {values since house prices should track incomes over the8 ?" W4 f# o, l. C+ N
long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we$ i) t/ L+ ^6 s5 `3 v' P
regard housing prices and household formation as the drivers7 `, G5 ?* u! U/ {
of residential construction.
' J( w4 Z4 q, j) Y. t! Z: g% STo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
: L( `/ X2 G' }( F5 i% c“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction4 g/ N& U0 m9 _# t& W
would have occurred if housing had been priced
2 `( s1 i( p) p; B4 Voptimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this( a2 s- A+ `0 s
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
6 }3 |7 M# K) \: t+ T' ~units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too) T1 `8 y- N1 a% H$ }$ \7 [
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
3 a# O; m2 ?7 a+ r8 d- aRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
3 `; D: F2 D) m8 cwhere housing demand will further contract under waning
& [; }- k' K  L: J* lpopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are3 [0 F0 |( e0 v
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
+ Z; H+ H; b' _4 o- E' gvery time that the resale market has swung into strong# Z' P) l% J$ i: @
buyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces: ~( S7 Q* K6 y0 L6 X
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural& l1 u6 e: q9 q4 A+ T+ w$ i
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
  ^3 @0 U" |7 q4 `8 A9 J9 lQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
+ Q8 K$ e& }) fstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
( D2 A/ \- K/ b3 [4 b" U2 uMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
, i" }  R* {( j* _3 @given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership
. m2 @+ O3 [* D/ c; t9 ~8 l/ }# nrates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a  K# |  r2 D* T4 e1 f
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears  v) N6 \  c  h9 s1 u9 D+ _) L
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto
1 e8 n; X3 [6 V' J: q, Econdo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically! {: A$ Y) K7 J0 ?: j0 R8 q
high levels of apartment-style units presently under) I& P+ \4 p$ q/ u/ n) q
construction mean that record numbers of condos will& z/ {3 z, o. p/ g
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as$ L: b: R# `2 @
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
6 e& f7 Q' Z& g& M" {  Qspike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while
& j2 _- z7 w. x: Wresidential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we7 k1 V5 _1 ^" ~/ u
anticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
* b: k& f7 K; S* R% dinter-provincial and international migration over the coming: E0 ~; x: ]/ y  N8 _3 E* e
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,7 Z% S4 J. n8 |; I* O
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.
3 ], Z7 j. l% `. LOVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING0 k( y% x7 A$ F, B6 k+ U. L
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS4 X, k% [$ D4 h7 i2 I" S
Grant Bishop, Economist8 A- y+ Q  Q% Y5 U4 K
416-982-8063
0 |  L0 T# e8 B7 pPascal Gauthier, Economist
- `/ l- [' G& ?5 C( V) k416-944-5730* C5 C. m+ n2 l( C$ @4 b
; L- |) V, ~2 c- J; n
http://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-30 14:06 , Processed in 0.135250 second(s), 11 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表