Which lot is better?

fourseasons

Sorry, can not type Chinese. Could you help to look at these two lots, which one is better?

1 T  a. ]6 i, e; h4 N( yLot 46 in Block 3  $207900 (Back yard facing future school zone)
. a9 }3 f  n0 P& E, I: HLot 44 in Block 5  $198500
7 z: u: O  \* u# f9 ]5 j
: F3 b; h/ J& }: d1 S+ Q2 d' S. hLink is here:
' m* X9 g4 ]: j8 U* d5 _http://www.melcor.ca/community/edmonton/mactaggart/Mact_4B.pdf
/ O5 [( u4 s+ i' g2 thttp://www.melcor.ca/community/edmonton/mactaggart/StagePlan.pdf

执迷不悔

Lot 38 in Block 5 is better

Rapala

44, bigger lot, Conner lot, close to the pond, and not facing school yard.

fourseasons

2# 执迷不悔

0 X" S7 U& d. j6 F8 ]
+ Q2 `0 ~5 x4 ?) J) Q+ ?5 UBut this one is gone. Have to choose between those two.

fourseasons

3# Rapala

% ]- e/ ]% ]# D4 U3 P3 eThanks for your feedback.

If the backyard is facing future school zone, will it affect the house value eventually? It is really attractive since the backyard will be green area.
1 y% q0 C$ g; U8 e1 A" O" r
44 is good too except for the narrow font (only 34 feet) and you will facing other people's back yard.
  I" u8 ]& v0 \* e
9 b: F" v+ R6 Q* C. W7 i! jThanks anyway.

Rapala

3# Rapala

2 F( Y& W/ v1 Q3 i' C7 ~- GThanks for your feedback.

  N! Z# {: e/ f  T, XIf the backyard is facing future school zone, will it affect the house value eventually? It is really attractive since the backyard will be green area.
! S* w5 P1 h) ~/ R
4 ...
fourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

You don't want the baseball hit your windows, do you? School back yard is good for some people, and bad for some people(no privacy) .
2 u; h6 q6 E1 {. f! L
46 has two backyard neighbor too.

辣椒

! G% j0 z  j. {
lot 34对于我来说是最好的啦，虽然钥匙圈是宁静

WST

Sorry, can not type Chinese. Could you help to look at these two lots, which one is better?
9 \" E+ p# q# N! |$ O
Lot 46 in Block 3  $207900 (Back yard facing future school zone)
& C+ g! Z" `: ~1 e6 DLot 44 in Block 5  $198500
" J: i: ]- D( o
Link is h ...
fourseasons 发表于 2010-1-31 22:27

以性价比来说，Lot 44 in Block 5 合算一些。
% q6 |5 q# f5 S) @lot 44 基本价= 40/2 = 20 万，很接近要价。
lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万，实际价高出两万，虽然背靠绿地，但学校绿地不足以溢价2万。背靠绿地由劣到优顺序为：
$ a4 q' [8 T3 G高压线，高速公路，学校，公园，小湖， Ravine, 大湖。

小黄

当然是44好。前面通小池塘，后面是小路。小路南侧是池塘和贵房子。车库在北侧，客厅在南侧正好和邻居相隔较远，客厅可以做两侧窗，或者做成八角形的格局。
: R3 X* Q8 T) j/ \, ^0 R# m& k6 ]
% n9 h1 {: }3 [# P  I; ~5 U46虽说是靠学校绿地，但那块绿地地势高于房子，不爽。

小黄

以性价比来说，Lot 44 in Block 5 合算一些。
lot 44 基本价= 40/2 = 20 万，很接近要价。
lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万，实际价高出两万，虽然背靠绿地，但学校绿地不足以溢价2万。背靠绿地由劣到优顺序为：
- Y  h6 C- S0 T$ `' @+ A! N高 ...
7 ~( H/ ^; d3 K# s: y) TWST 发表于 2010-2-1 16:21

最好是高尔夫。Westbrook那些很不错。

小黄

3# Rapala
' u& ]$ B3 O& a- Q2 K) |/ r
1 |" E+ G* N' t% b" V( I. p44 is good too except for the narrow font (only 34 feet)
! Y- H7 M) U  j$ d: ifourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

那只是某指定进深的宽度。

# C+ j/ K7 U- t" s. o  y" u5 U房子的射影不是方形的。在最窄的地方只有车库，34肯定够用。等到了要摆客厅的进深，宽度肯定已经不止34了。具体pocket形状要拿开发商的图纸和建筑商一起讨论如何利用最大面宽。

fourseasons

11# 小黄
, A. h/ P6 N/ ?' D3 c& C7 X# V% f. j

' h8 o4 K" C9 X2 G. ]* N看来看好44的居多，原来有些取舍不定，现在看来就44吧，多谢各位！
) T6 I4 b# O! F( J$ o8 Z- D0 V另外有一点疑问，WST回帖中说  “Lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万”, 38 是pocket size吗？我看着两个pocket都是40的pocket 呀？
还有site plan 上注明44是RC (Restrictive covenant),有没有什么说道？

WST

11# 小黄

6 D/ z, P) a* v
7 w6 _2 J/ K7 `看来看好44的居多，原来有些取舍不定，现在看来就44吧，多谢各位！
另外有一点疑问，WST回帖中说  “Lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万”, 38 是pocket size吗？我看着两个pocket都是40的pocket 呀？
- @, v) k9 s. z还 ...
% V& ~, c  L$ b9 x- O( f; e" jfourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 20:34

* ]6 M# A+ X2 B! [  Y% b" a38 是pocket size. 我又看了 lot 46 (block 3) 的pocket是38。你再看看。