怎么能有致癌成分呢?不理解

cyy2006 · 发表于 2010-4-6 18:02

http://preventdisease.com/news/0 ... cine_analysis.shtml

cyy2006 · 发表于 2010-4-6 18:05

Squalene in AS03 adjuvant

Too dangerous for human use, Squalene is not officially licensed for use in the United States or Canada. Oil adjuvants like squalene have been ordinarily used to inflict diseases in animals – for experimentation and study. According to anthrax vaccine expert Gary Matsumoto and other reliable sources, the US military used an unlicensed, experimental anthrax vaccination laced with squalene, with disastrous consequences, including Gulf War Sydrome.

"There are now data in more than two dozen peer-reviewed scientific papers, from ten different laboratories in the US, Europe, Asia and Australia, documenting that squalene-based adjuvants can induce autoimmune diseases in animals, observed in mice, rats, guinea pigs and rabbits. Sweden's Karolinska Institute has demonstrated that squalene alone can induce the animal version of rheumatoid arthritis. The Polish Academy of Sciences has shown that in animals, squalene alone can produce catastrophic injury to the nervous system and the brain. The University of Florida Medical School has shown that in animals, squalene alone can induce production of antibodies specifically associated with systemic lupus erythematosus" writes Matsumoto.

Oil-based vaccination adjuvants like squalene have been proved to generate concentrated, unremitting immune responses over long periods of time according to a 2000 article in The American Journal of Pathology. The study demonstrated that a single injection of the adjuvant squalene into rats triggered a chronic, immune-mediated joint-specific inflammation, also known as rheumatoid arthritis. The researchers concluded the study raised questions about the role of adjuvants in chronic inflammatory diseases.

cyy2006 · 发表于 2010-4-6 18:07

According to the Australian National Research Council, fewer than 20% but perhaps more than 10% of the general population may be susceptible to formaldehyde and may react acutely at any exposure level.

More hazardous than most chemicals in 5 out of 12 ranking systems, on at least 8 federal regulatory lists, it is ranked as one of the most hazardous compounds (worst 10%) to ecosystems and human health (Environmental Defense Fund).

Formalyn a 37 percent solution of gaseous formaldehyde which includes methano (used in vaccines as a tissue fixative) is considered a hazardous compound, and its vapor is toxic.

In the body, formaldehyde can cause proteins to irreversibly bind to DNA. Laboratory animals exposed to doses of inhaled formaldehyde over their lifetimes have developed more cancers of the nose and throat than are usual, as have workers in particle-board sawmills… Formaldehyde is classifed as a probable human carcinogen by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and as a known human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer

cyy2006 · 发表于 2010-4-6 18:12

The average quantity of squalene injected into the US soldiers abroad and at home in the anthrax vaccine during and after the Gulf War was 34.2 micrograms per billion micrograms of water. According to studies, this was the cause of Gulf War syndrome in 25% of 697,000 US personnel at home and abroad.

The soldiers developed a cascade of reactions including arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, rashes, photosensitive rashes, malar rashes, chronic fatigue, chronic headaches, abnormal body hair loss, non-healing skin lesions, aphthous ulcers, dizziness, weakness, memory loss, seizures, mood changes, neuropsychiatric problems, anti-thyroid effects, anaemia, elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, ALS, Raynaud’s phenomenon, Sjorgren’s syndrome, chronic diarrhea, night sweats and low-grade fever.

The AS03 adjuvant in the Arepanrix H1N1 vaccine contains 10.69mg per dose. This corresponds to approximately forty times more squalene per dose than the anthrax vaccine.

How much more evidence is necessary to convince public health officials that the risks of the Arepanrix H1N1 vaccine exceed any benefits?

Please do not play roulette with your health. Do not listen to the Public Health Agency of Canada or any public health or medical official that advises you to protect yourself from the flu with this vaccine. Its design and toxicity will only destroy your health.

vilna · 发表于 2010-4-6 19:35

甲醛这个比较难说，因为是灭活处理过程中的，如果真空干燥等处理一下可能都已经挥发了。角鲨烯看起来是有些问题。

cyy2006 · 发表于 2010-4-6 19:58

角鲨烯看起来是有些问题???

vilna · 发表于 2010-4-6 20:19

角鲨烯看起来是有些问题???; j* Y0 y! d' |
cyy2006 发表于 2010-4-6 20:58

抱歉哈，这句话说得简单了些，完整地说是：角鲨烯加在疫苗中看起来是有些问题。虽然角鲨烯都被当做保健品在卖。

vilna · 发表于 2010-4-6 20:20

我记得过去pchell好像在移民版块里贴过有关的视频，永安里等人还讨论了。

cyy2006 · 发表于 2010-4-7 06:36

美国已经早不在疫苗里用它了。。。。。。

vilna · 发表于 2010-4-7 11:52

美国已经早不在疫苗里用它了。。。。。。% O9 _' [5 v# n
cyy2006 发表于 2010-4-7 07:36

唉，加拿大健康部门那帮负责人，拿着高工资不知道在干什么。估计和中国过去形容的官僚一样------“不读书、不看报”。业务不精呀~~~

cyy2006 · 发表于 2010-4-7 12:05

就是，海湾战争都20年了，人家证明不能用的，我们居然用！

vilna · 发表于 2010-4-7 12:23

就是，海湾战争都20年了，人家证明不能用的，我们居然用！
" I- i3 h& e6 n9 Rcyy2006 发表于 2010-4-7 13:05

不过话说回来，我还是有些置疑：GSK是著名大公司，应该有比较健全的反馈和信息部门。如果真是如文章里所说的那样20年前就证明已经导致那么多副作用的话，它还敢用到疫苗里？这里的新闻报道是自由的，它就没想过后果吗？加拿大要是有证据告它一状，它不就死翘翘了？

所以我猜测它应该有自己的理由才敢在疫苗里用上这些的。

cyy2006 · 发表于 2010-4-7 16:34

关键没人去管, 即使真的是它的副作用导致的各种疾病,你能证明么? 很难证明的, 很多是慢性的......

vilna · 发表于 2010-4-9 20:28

关键没人去管, 即使真的是它的副作用导致的各种疾病,你能证明么? 很难证明的, 很多是慢性的......* n- f7 Q2 A2 @0 W' u7 y6 C
cyy2006 发表于 2010-4-7 17:34

要证明还是可以设计动物实验证明的~~

cajn · 发表于 2010-4-9 21:22

学习中

ftmm2009 · 发表于 2010-4-19 15:00

咳，医药公司为了赚钱.....

knifeforman · 发表于 2010-4-19 20:05

说到底，这也不能说是版主的错呀。
还好，我打的美国苗。

vilna · 发表于 2010-4-19 21:47

说到底，这也不能说是版主的错呀。
# e3 ~8 |' Z! n2 g/ M+ E0 C5 y8 _还好，我打的美国苗。4 X1 P7 r. e. \% n9 {
knifeforman 发表于 2010-4-19 21:05

呵呵，他的意思是开板块的错，在另一帖里说的。

就好像病了怪新闻报道一样~~~

账号		自动登录	找回密码
密码			注册