5 n6 x5 i) n* B: ~! O( {; x/ GRead the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.% c5 k- @! v; L- [6 V& v1 L
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected. $ e* v( W% q, w2 N# } & J: b$ W$ s9 E' O2 w
信任zsm2002和scuba1995,不信任另一位。该如何投票? 8 `6 P' N' _* a/ E* dpchell 发表于 2010-7-26 15:45
Read the posts. People were just electing zsm2002 and scuba1995.$ p$ A! b3 M, e/ [ e' o- V& r
There is no proof whatsoever that 上山打老虎 was elected.. i5 r/ i* ~7 `$ q- B! }, U0 A
7 ~! y8 U8 u: s2 n0 Z 7 Z* b9 ~; }! @4 P! |/ X+ o' s' b- K9 ^. N4 n
7 D: W+ q$ s' `) A. e1 T ?! k' }; Q' c% n, K3 M; D& m
5 g* {* U& C1 U5 L- v小黄 发表于 2010-9-8 15:03
3 _8 I5 E* x" g0 X( x; p$ \
$ s7 o3 M) T2 O" |
没错,是有异议,而且提的有道理, " s" e& U) _* s# E+ i4 C' \3 z k {/ ]8 T( |
但是不能改变现行规则还是打包信任投票,三人是符合投票程序,通过投票上任的这个事实0 y( d7 m9 R% G2 L. V D- `' y; B
& i* j* l( ^& o& U$ f! S2 ^$ \/ y
记得你以前也说过,觉得不合适可以改规则,在此之前,你我都应该尊重规则