请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348
& \! H# C/ x: @6 |- I
9 e' _6 A$ X) U4 `3 n" c值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348
( L& F  K/ `2 P0 A
值这个价钱吗
# a  ^3 j% q4 \粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

; \+ {! z* W1 h% X去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
) v! ]/ P9 i) o1 M2 H& qskybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
; @2 ~6 n- N. X5 x* {Tax Roll: 9982751
: y; c; L8 j$ l- q) ZAssessed Value: $497,000
100% Taxable: Yes
0 B& Q) m  V( y/ I; ^3 N100% Complete: Yes
1 g0 z9 y7 m: J2 F! o* CNeighbourhood: Richford
5 m3 P" [8 z: P# Q  p: I  m3 ]Property Type: Residential
$ G1 {9 e# c5 `% TLand Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
Lot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
Building Count: 1
Year Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
0 f$ s( V* n( j% n1 v: t, N: c. L7 z* }) TApprox Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
/ N0 |. V, g: m. T(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
- X) g% a3 i. e; MBasement Development: No
6 K1 \4 _5 ~8 [+ H$ b5 ?8 N9 }Garage: Yes
" u0 o: T# L) M9 ?4 Q' s( UFireplace: Yes
Walkout Basement: No
( A5 m5 @1 }# S- V+ i9 hAir Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.

you better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.