I would like to see more Debate, not Fight. Debate for fun, fight to get a headache ) P# B% p% e: e# F7 ?# W3 \6 o' W, M- U/ V8 w$ d; p
Calm down everyone please.) H8 r! S& ^& q1 E- r
$ d( s" }! _0 R不存在 can mean two different things:8 j. I1 f: @0 R' D4 ~$ T
& {4 N8 g; c# q
1: 不存在 (not yet). Such as a house before construction etc. 6 r* H7 V/ V5 E) _5 Q2: 不存在 (never exist) such as 上帝都不能举起的石头 @% @2 u D$ [% z7 r$ C6 ~ & }" y8 M8 z9 `* t- J' w0 AI assumed that dora's 不存在 meant never exist / a# G( O2 O4 S& s' r . @- ?* ?9 Y3 [3 p1 x6 N' |[ 本帖最后由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 03:29 编辑 ]
原帖由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 03:13 发表 6 z' s q+ l+ q4 N6 u2 \9 PI would like to see more Debate, not Fight. Debate for fun, fight to get a headache : b+ G( x2 E1 m3 x/ O 1 o/ e! q! p1 M; HCalm down everyone please. + l2 O m& S, v ! o/ P3 X. @9 G* `+ ]不存在 can mean two different things: j, _. _4 Y2 E( X, P6 }4 B $ g6 L' x% b2 ^ S1: 不存在 (not yet). Such as a house before construction etc.( x" v9 l- o! c% u$ j8 m1 k
2: 不存在 (never exist) such as 上帝都不能举起的石头1 G6 T7 [2 O' B+ V( C: {, P
2 P$ ]4 o5 V5 Q' U5 A
I assumed that dora's 不存在 meant never exist ...
) W# ^8 L, _3 |. x+ k3 J% W8 P2 G/ ^7 A. p: Q0 h; l
小铜子,, 你的1和2根本不是对立关系.. 1并不能否定2. 1只能refer to current state, 2 refer to past state,过去没有,, 现在没有,, 将来就一定没有吗/?/? 上帝的无所不能不应该体现在能创造将来吗/? 她根本不能自圆其说.
原帖由 ︶ㄣ|._紸禵麯゛ 于 2006-6-8 13:19 发表% G9 Z" Q, I. R! ~
balubalu,别人跟大家分享自己的宗教信仰关你屁事啊! 3 N$ w% k, u! {1 r4 d5 h7 k0 p4 x1 L你不赞成你就自己去信你自己那个什么狗屎balu教。 f* `, X' c9 D% J
你妈的。。。自己滚回老家去吃屎。乱七八糟吐一堆屎。9 M9 \; C0 l* Z, e5 C' o2 p* I. k
别人的意见不需要你来评价,你是什么?你以为你是 ...
5 T3 d9 L& x$ d/ I2 @* ~( a! w; j8 g5 _# ~8 U8 i7 j) Z Did your GOD ask you to curse people this way?, U* h" i# I l' C8 l
If you really have a 宗教信仰, I believe your GOD will shame on you!
原帖由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 10:55 发表 * e9 \ h" |7 c8 ~/ J% k, y) | 5 ?+ P* Q) w. m+ v- N& y; {( d/ @' N. d6 ]! F
2:" never exist" refers to 过去没有,, 现在没有,, 将来一定没有!!! w& M5 O0 Q& X
" y) e# _5 |4 X# f
At least dora meant that I am pretty sure.
2 k" U. f7 v3 h \7 b; z
6 @- m2 R& G: Q/ ]3 _% I3 v1 l
Arguments on religious believes always turn out to become very emotional (if not violent). It has been like that for hundreds of years (if not thousands of years) % I7 y7 p) E( ?+ J+ q 8 c& Q2 }+ }8 EMaybe we should stop argument. 9 o: f) d1 X; }$ ^
+ F7 t. {# B5 {# b9 @+ {" |My commoent " Dora's 逻辑 is correct " was with the view point of logistics instead of religion : [. B7 W. a* ~( o b1 a& W% m$ J; R- A+ p; P; Q( ]
[ 本帖最后由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 11:28 编辑 ]