埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1783|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 3 A/ ~  B+ ~7 ^4 m, h
/ r6 l- ~; b( H/ r
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
' J4 t9 t  Z& c; |3 v
# e; y! {9 N! Z6 V2 Q    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
9 A* M! r3 |2 ]! R' }exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
: T$ `" L: t) c4 S) }; |1 {quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic. j$ N% R$ X7 F2 J, O' y3 s
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
/ T; }+ \0 O9 h* J& f% Cprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
1 M1 {, ]/ F$ T, N* Smore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,: q/ x2 C% }: S7 @' L
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal/ b6 j  \) e5 y" J: u
LePage Real Estate Services.
2 l4 d( N& l* W$ _: E6 X* j1 z- j5 o) g
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
3 p; q& I; Z" G2 Care forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic7 N; e! d7 Y' L8 w
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
% I3 O' k7 A7 Esound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the% i; Y8 C7 y) a# ]- f
residential real estate sector.
1 z1 M4 q' h4 W# J+ _7 F- E- x' F& ]) X; ?$ n
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation# Q9 x6 B5 v' d  i) B# w# k9 ]: N
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)* X. S1 }& v( }1 m, N4 K
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
, m& ^( l* F2 n  ?6 I0 p& {(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380# F- o' t1 P. U- J- Y/ J
(+13.2%).
# Y! _: b0 ~# Z6 g/ s/ x2 }5 I
. g) j. z5 k. y# m! T% y% D    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth. Y" S' p4 J8 W7 n
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
: G  D* b: U* d6 C! N2 {2 i3 |frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are+ R& a1 ~5 P9 l" W$ q
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,  [, H  ^% i. v7 M6 C/ i
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
6 [. q7 n& @5 w. h"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
0 D  \) h8 K' y1 l/ Qwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
- P- F3 B$ p0 R2 }; A2 Ybalanced market."# }1 s: N$ g0 U- E4 h

5 i3 x0 x3 [* z2 ?) K    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,6 S" y; I: W% o, U2 s/ D
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
% @, O+ j4 v6 X7 Y. h! g# f5 O7 jto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
. o+ X! K4 z5 Y. t8 C$ vthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
1 g' }& g: a" T* denergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,( b8 f* d; I' Q( c' E% p6 Y+ T
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record0 S6 K9 J: e# ~* K: [* q( k* J
breaking price appreciations.0 X; H& |! y$ N, f: g

$ K+ |5 u5 f8 K* ?" T    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
' |8 m+ H; i. F0 d7 eeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the  U/ }9 n" Y; ~( n' q- G
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
0 E5 J  {& ~( X3 f- H! Q9 v2 H/ D: c9 |
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
6 ?" j' v& }: b, w- u5 N+ Meconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
" h2 m" \# E7 a. F( y& Lconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
3 e  G3 ^$ i, q3 d1 ~& f, \" jslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
. Z5 y& [) h# H8 r  g  L3 Z( ]$ C6 TIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
. d" @3 x- X, R( U) {( Xgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
9 u9 z1 p! ?1 mprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
7 o, i+ _2 T% P/ L
; B1 Z7 N, b/ f    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
% N. T# g4 d  K- fmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and8 J8 N9 P  c) {( }6 `
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
4 B/ Y/ I' O' `' o; ?are markedly different than those found in the United States.
3 P  V, i% x& g5 G3 p, O! j* d: i- \. `7 J$ h8 R1 X" r
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the/ x& H" E9 `' `& U% D8 k! r; l
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's: ?( n! o7 x0 T0 ^6 S: H
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the7 f' T6 b+ o; B; H4 c0 `8 i9 t
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
+ ~, V' R1 t2 S2 f5 Laffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the) M) p( T* y0 [) F: V
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and8 s0 [" L& c# s$ @6 l
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
8 {* M- X, z6 W0 T4 M# ~" ymortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
, X/ o, R9 i2 G" ]9 G* [$ `3 C$ q1 J) n0 ~3 M: m3 G6 c3 s7 y
    <<
5 l- @- `8 J) w  E4 O0 c                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES7 [: E. {( j6 ?) M6 y0 x- F/ u; I
    >>
# p% n4 d6 t$ w4 y9 @! ~& h
' D0 e; i9 M, x3 Q    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in0 V- `% P; t& i8 s( D: M4 W7 m* [* {- N
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
2 V' s8 J  Y9 S" h9 fof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time# s2 z$ M9 |+ ?" P' h# t
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of4 s* p+ k+ {7 L  m8 F8 r& I
renovations.1 }5 r$ Q+ a' V
1 X) D" J7 W: r+ S
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight* D# A' z5 w" K% D: D
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation- p* w9 s& D9 P+ I5 ]* {6 S
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and. J0 h. p& i" r6 Q0 j
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
* H8 D2 a2 b3 V6 N1 t
  _  e& P( [9 w, W7 y    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer, k% v, `: [& x5 g: ^: B
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the( l4 X) ?' U2 I# I5 P9 ]
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new' N4 ?* ?6 }5 I. m' l
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores- J4 O8 c9 Q- g
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
* U) h& u8 P1 I  W7 @! Q: O+ T0 uand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.& l; M# a% Y$ O7 }. ?6 `

; y! H  I8 i6 X0 J2 m    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
- I# P; @9 S! V# a/ ^conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their1 D5 l+ C" l. Z, \* D0 Q% S8 h* ?
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers) q# z4 f5 g' ~5 ^; E0 a! V8 _
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
6 P; @+ r- ?5 x* S: F0 ~. S' ^dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing" H+ L) K7 o0 ^% l' n7 u
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
; F, O+ S  @+ b- K: l2 E5 {7 E5 U) z. j3 j3 q/ X* Z
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
8 [9 A+ K- y5 ]  d- e0 mamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
" R, [8 m1 y, Z' c; Opriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
$ |9 x# w0 j2 W1 W3 a5 Vas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last5 Z6 c$ l1 ~" c. _% L
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.; T  Y1 ?( a9 k3 N! @3 ?3 |
9 H2 `: B1 F. k! ?& }- `( T
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
2 E- j' a* L1 [7 g( |prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
# O* a  u9 h' Z' c! j, [# }  F: klevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
) w4 |; l+ M  t" Mfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,& p2 L- n$ ~/ I% f& C
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
! _$ F9 n# s' W5 j+ T- ^pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before6 n# m0 d! u& l" L" R% I# x
making a purchase.
6 j7 e5 ]; s- b3 b+ r, m
! m2 w) S* a2 s! I* ]- O    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing4 f. ]* l, G0 n, l8 x/ C! Y' Q
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
  W8 Y7 k5 N% S- g' h4 G$ r+ {confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
& D+ S* L+ e5 u3 r/ e+ f9 hcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
5 L) l7 `' L! ~% V3 Oattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
' m1 B4 J$ D' d/ Famenities.
) j6 B' M/ o# @) {8 s0 ]( L5 Y. w5 a! ^2 Z
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
7 Y+ J$ p) f3 P8 ~; Othroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand) K+ y2 O) t5 Q; E/ s" O; @
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
' ~, u- V  [4 H! k6 C5 N6 \continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been6 i# ~$ J! p% C8 q
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
! m) a& }5 Y" p( }0 @% G, J/ _$ hresidence, rather than for investment.
+ F' z, h% }2 w1 C. a5 o5 s6 f0 h2 H
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
+ Q( O; k- l6 Uhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted; S( W6 z' z  M1 ]
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
4 y6 K) b! k) d1 t2 z5 f  {confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization# F4 s4 C4 ]3 _$ @% t. Z
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter' y$ Z. S  ^8 o1 R' e5 }- N- o
the market.5 ]; g8 N& Z# q6 P1 ^3 \3 @
. w  W" B( z" y3 E3 y: V8 q
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
2 i/ _" |- N9 G+ y) E7 |July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In1 \# Y  U( k5 B  h/ V, S
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
1 ?6 ^1 ?; o; J( E1 K' f6 Qmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due. Z1 {& x0 ?( @" z
to the shortage of available inventory.& `( Z% _( ?  Z! |
) c# o( r7 T  S# w
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
! m! s/ n6 _4 U9 g( emomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains4 X* K0 a& G" n/ G% k7 _% B
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses2 r0 m# a, z0 e8 d3 J
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.% \4 I' p* h' P4 L& H
; u5 A) p9 @8 |& Q4 g) b5 _* S
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases  a4 b7 j" l- ^6 F  E. u- Z$ t3 O, g
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low9 E" y. v* ~  i9 U5 u
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
1 G" G( |3 G1 v  v2 X5 Qpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring( v6 P; ~( r% s4 |$ z% D  j
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
7 k, l0 y8 f+ T9 c& V0 wseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as3 m2 A7 b5 q" z
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

/ y2 p1 t! A6 D0 Q' z- V9 X5 ?' u+ G
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
* \' O8 B; I/ @as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
) [  B) d3 z  H3 D5 Xremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
/ x8 @) ?9 T/ B1 F0 |# C. K3 ~maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
' z  v1 b+ @. Z2 w4 m: Wincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve# z/ C, ~2 C3 g
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
& W0 P, Z/ L. j' F4 O( b0 E: rtowards the end of 2006.
    ( F! |0 A5 }+ F& h( N& i
3 N8 h; l6 ~/ K- o/ z
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of8 P3 j' R$ ]7 e7 ^" y4 d
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
. @0 G/ [, g7 |+ Z. Vto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
9 N+ k: [7 D4 e# ~& k7 a/ i- fgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
; x& ?8 l2 q9 j0 @- u5 @' e, g4 Fforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added0 f6 N" E: L1 M* ?
pressure on tight inventory levels.
& D% F( H: e+ z" p% _; P
8 @, x8 K' L# t    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic# R/ X$ W' H7 U2 s
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
8 w) W+ \, k+ H" @! Linto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
3 T4 N7 L$ P3 `while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
, C! J) @/ |7 ufor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.) ^. }: S: S+ }2 W0 J# r; w

. h2 w( @- {0 ?2 y* J  [* }    <<! C# c2 y9 `: Y" z; m$ }
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006* G, t$ t: ]  V8 x* _0 B+ ?

% |$ z4 s1 I4 G* v+ Z    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 I3 V& e  k/ k6 `  e5 d4 @- s                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey' r% a( @% `5 |5 C0 v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 ?+ E9 u/ k4 ^3 x0 j
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
6 D. A* t2 U/ G3 w    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average6 C" ^) R( Q+ U* K5 |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) ]2 r' D  O+ P' d8 F    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000! }" e8 U" V- f# G8 d4 e: S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 u/ m4 U7 c7 B, T/ f! V    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
1 g+ Q. W& w' T" ^    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) J: a9 [/ S+ F! z) g    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
. u1 G. b2 F3 P" t/ j: q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ Q: r3 [9 G. Q" S" U) d9 P    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -/ l, n5 C4 c/ [3 q4 m
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 S% ]/ @& u' J' S# j) ?5 t- q
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333& d# s, ~' ^$ ~+ A
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) X% I5 l$ v, H3 S1 t" R
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583* j( H) E, A+ U( N
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' V4 Q& t3 E9 p/ [! |# k
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185$ ~$ t9 b4 G6 X
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; a# n  n( i2 n& w    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250& o% ^! O, @6 t* z1 {$ G
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ j/ {  X  T: n7 ?5 X( G
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
1 p( g5 X/ H: q2 W2 l5 f    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! F& d! U: H! `3 _$ M0 K    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
7 H% S) Q, E: @* c+ m    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 J- n$ V2 I/ a6 N
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500: |0 V) s& s; J1 s6 G7 ~* v+ H$ I% i
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 L6 j8 G4 L4 U0 J' F( C% E
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
, R  r9 i; c- o* g* D5 A8 a/ |    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% Q( _. R( P( ~; D) x    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
3 Y1 Y$ r3 ]- t. V: {7 }4 s' g    -------------------------------------------------------------------------# q- S% w! f( g- p  q
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500) l2 W1 L' X( l* _; p8 V
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. X. t; A9 t+ w, J! P7 B    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
2 x  `; A7 ^: o9 Y4 p* v    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 N! @4 q8 i! C# n, O
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860, R+ F5 ^, c2 t7 ]+ l
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 R& h2 E2 \) [7 X) p3 p/ u5 W
* [4 y; e; c3 ^* A3 {    -------------------------------------------------------------
$ P+ u: Y* r% l3 T8 s! c4 ], |                               Standard Condominium( `3 T4 R1 I9 p* ^' t
    -------------------------------------------------------------
# W- B1 ]$ T: T2 R% N3 q                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
1 h3 [8 P! ?- `& z    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change. S* R9 Q* b) x9 G$ A# e
    -------------------------------------------------------------
  j+ ]1 [5 K9 @, |  b    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%6 ^7 n0 l: D( z1 ^' q2 n
    -------------------------------------------------------------- k( Q& u2 Y# `2 K" p
    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
4 g* t$ O. M3 J8 Q    -------------------------------------------------------------
; `) g  L' y# Y# x7 Y! [& b) J    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A! s' K- k1 j8 b# V9 F& P% ~8 D) V% ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------4 i1 L6 [' _5 R7 {) d" ]+ r
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
$ y' A) N# O7 U& \7 O; \    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 u3 g4 M  S3 c1 s/ w3 p' T0 G' x    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
, c6 j4 k7 H2 j& Y, a7 g4 S    -------------------------------------------------------------- r9 z' p0 S5 L: k! B
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
7 e" t& K8 g; s8 V6 u9 m$ F, W    -------------------------------------------------------------
* {" h7 A' f/ ]( O: S* o! P    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
, d! D8 e: A  i- E    -------------------------------------------------------------
% w$ u1 B" @$ v6 e    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%. [/ h. s5 u' F! F1 m4 L
    -------------------------------------------------------------
% C" C; i! y3 \: J' [6 V# f    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%* J  J1 B/ c# G& s0 t
    -------------------------------------------------------------5 R+ Z) c; x+ P. G/ g7 R# ^
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%- O6 n4 m6 x0 F$ F' Q8 |0 t6 b
    -------------------------------------------------------------- p; f( ?/ O3 [& }% `1 k  J1 s
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%: s0 S/ b$ ]* n1 T/ b/ k
    -------------------------------------------------------------
1 ]1 r8 w" c, }# }4 V4 J    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%% L/ t1 F# [7 \8 C5 M( B
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; ?3 q4 k& p* u( o    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
8 Y2 u6 o* [0 p    -------------------------------------------------------------; m, v1 }1 O7 j0 ]8 Z% @
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%5 o5 S/ z2 Y' W; c" p
    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 T7 Q, y4 _" W1 q    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%- d" C9 s6 W  l0 h( V! N' u
    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 U4 P* `( m9 ?: `( x% Y  k    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
( D8 n! l" R0 S" @) a2 ^    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 I* d: Z% Q8 l+ K: H& l* ^    >>
8 u( h* n5 F6 b) Y
# o' \: f4 g: O8 [/ [, f" a; V# l% }    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
# R/ `: J3 e6 p9 Q; W( tin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint8 D# _" V" v% }3 s6 R! m9 d9 @/ |$ k
John and Victoria.0 S3 K# a5 l. X" J) F. l4 A$ R% }

# J! p" ?& \1 V+ U3 l    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most& N! i( C2 f( G7 w1 _
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of7 G# {" R, w2 Q$ ~# ?
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
& f  ^# R+ I" Oreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
6 A1 U+ n" _  I7 p6 dtrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
. |$ `, R9 L$ [; |+ q% V5 S: b0 Uacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is' I6 P8 k7 W% O# F
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current- i( Y5 @4 s% a* Q* I5 n
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable% B. x- i8 o8 ?, y, G
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on: ?+ i' }$ {+ a9 `
November 15, 2006.
6 n% z9 B* y8 K) q/ x# I2 V    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of! l  i2 [! a. q9 p
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge1 V* A% e+ y* b2 m3 j8 j5 M" ?
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
' V5 n/ A' b4 V) N. I+ W! L: X; N% Davailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-2-21 05:27 , Processed in 0.087987 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表