埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2281|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
' Y0 `6 H9 N. M5 J3 v9 I. z8 ~" v- x: z& @4 ^9 v  [- E
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -% i2 s: h! g2 ?8 N  S2 }
0 m& m2 A/ S  m( T
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
# C# s5 g8 c7 z$ {& Texhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third5 }2 v! c$ e3 E
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
6 k% W5 m; X2 p3 vin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
. \& O( C: _: V! Bprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
6 ~& |, F4 R! i2 ^more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
7 w, x, S& a- a+ S# t' O6 AQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
/ w( A3 T( n: @7 cLePage Real Estate Services.
* }, R7 `- C7 E1 ^
) n. i  h* M$ F  K) W, }    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters/ u& C/ _/ N5 l1 n
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
3 D2 z- q# C% _& K9 {+ wconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and, w0 }3 M4 {' C' w2 b
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the# x! I) H1 D9 K2 z. J- S
residential real estate sector.' A/ s! F; a. Z6 Y5 d$ u( k6 \
) P# H7 p0 R+ k- ~# {
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
+ a+ N; \3 L8 ~% n/ zoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)/ j/ ], y# m' D
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562, t: B9 i) I( F: Y# b9 Y1 o3 y
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3809 x; v3 A4 r% ]% l) Q
(+13.2%)." V9 n& V6 P4 Y! k
9 L! a1 O" p, g: r0 {) U: {
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
. u, m% R. K; v4 ?0 bduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
  Q- {' K: O- Z  x8 q$ b% Kfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are) G) r' H4 v, \. N; X' n; L4 _
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,  s3 E- r) ?. g# L2 T3 o8 ]
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services./ j  |( f6 D" b% h% T. e& m
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We6 B* e6 L# B) `9 N
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
9 c' x6 n. F: S% R5 Nbalanced market."3 J4 R  a8 u0 I' i
! Y4 c1 @! ~+ `! M; c, S5 L; m
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
) L9 X8 c% Z4 iconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift6 Z+ e& F: A& m% y
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued4 C- Z7 o; J; N  X2 K. M
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core2 }2 ]1 s6 ]  L1 Z, I2 L5 [( }
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
; W1 t' G; O0 c  `manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
1 J$ j- Q" [3 U4 b9 C) Q+ X6 ^breaking price appreciations." _1 `9 |! ]5 ]+ [$ ?  M: Y

. V! o% j- `# T/ h' w5 l6 K    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
. R) B& g! X  i9 M: D0 z- ^economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
4 \5 _) b) {! M3 h8 Clargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
2 V1 V4 I: p9 d$ `' u  H. B# J8 ^3 t! t3 h. ^) e* V
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
- L% B4 c3 }7 Q( Jeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer, L+ x0 Y, q- ^
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
& c, H$ b& z" b( {slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.4 r+ T5 V0 i' p3 f5 K* ^
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers" P) t. l! p8 O& I  i. ^, c) e
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
' I5 J) ~; P) ]9 iprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
) N1 _* Q/ B1 a# Z- D
/ m4 j, z, g4 p9 c: n    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
2 _3 U4 |( I9 [6 F& a4 E0 Xmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
  f  h) y: X$ ^  F9 ~3 B, Mfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
* _& z2 B& g- i& L1 s, S7 u; pare markedly different than those found in the United States.
' L7 Q8 B% y( H; G3 Q
  `5 i; L) |; l' Q    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
/ b# i/ m. Y0 M3 S  N  b! iAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's$ i  I! Y+ p4 F
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
; R% z5 e# S! s( F. {relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
2 {" a7 ~3 `$ `9 I5 E* paffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
) `( k  K# z; hdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and, ~9 ^5 q; \- R) ~" N
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
! i/ ~. b+ F6 ~, ^% x5 \: W* F/ Omortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."8 \) v, j0 }2 P" @$ i5 b
" \% [8 }) L/ D' j
    <<3 {! ~' l( w& g* B( z+ p( e' `* T0 z
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
! f9 y8 d" i8 I8 G' @    >># K3 f/ S) k" @- ~" B$ w

7 u2 j% N! o, d8 y( R; n    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
+ \$ U# z, P, y" F2 h8 Z- R" \Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate8 ^- H6 v& j* y" K
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time* c) f; E9 T$ f( X
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
, f+ y5 ~( f+ g( o- v# d( ?& Vrenovations.
1 i# w  L+ Y: R! ^) e$ J5 W! _8 y$ z5 Z* L4 }! r1 P
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
. l0 K6 T, Y" U3 U( Aincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
7 j% C. h) o, `+ qcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
; @+ x- e) ]: eSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.  g4 n4 V! z6 `

4 p: N6 v8 A" s+ x    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
; Q+ ^, h( F! X* Cslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the, z/ t8 J, M7 r& R2 L9 F. }
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new' [2 f* c) |0 \$ ]0 G
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores7 X) E( U3 h- `+ s7 E! T
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes1 k  u6 v, @9 ?0 |% @! g5 n- s
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.0 {# T' A4 F. Q' b
( W6 {5 {+ s) o( U4 l
    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced' _9 v- S7 {5 J' s( z
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
! ~2 H6 [. N- q' Y9 i0 I) ohomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
8 G7 ^6 K+ e& A7 d7 V  i$ Ywas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian0 z) i' B& s6 r
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing) b" f. I' a# Z, F& c
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
( {. T) d" a5 N0 m/ w
1 _# c# V7 y# p3 q4 c    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
4 [& p! t$ K" t6 f. v9 m, s  ~$ j* damong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
  b2 V& f2 `( D1 Q6 _4 ~' U7 kpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,/ C/ I, E2 Y, q) N1 a
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last! g$ x# y0 m2 w* |2 ~& u1 ?% @
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
- n- e* D2 H7 p- \2 E- ~/ n$ Z; m7 Z- @8 v% F' H/ m( d4 t6 v
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
1 u; e$ G1 ~+ s, ?( Eprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory: o! l) Q' n0 t3 q
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
/ O1 T2 _% G, \, B+ {9 nfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
, F0 b3 N+ b3 nwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
, A  G# X/ ^# Z4 e1 N* {: \  {pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before! J/ s8 q% C# e" T+ D4 B
making a purchase.
+ P. |, F" L' J7 d
4 Z! P7 v  S4 J9 o1 j4 C    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing; ~2 P, @6 K* V& N7 s2 P0 a
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong8 B7 E: e+ `6 b# H5 p7 O% C
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city! }; P5 {' [2 U4 `
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
% g+ V% z- E6 e% Yattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown% x& @$ Q  G" D+ g5 B$ R+ r; D
amenities.6 V* I. ?* j; u; q* h9 W
' w6 ]% l( D8 @; i9 x- x4 s
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
& E' v; G8 }, ~6 |throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
% G/ ~- W$ D% h# Iacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
, R. J! K6 w+ {1 d" F& f3 Ucontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
/ O# y( O2 G' J) E$ Ddriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle; t/ v  q, e1 O8 l) R( s5 l
residence, rather than for investment.4 D& J: A- w4 h) W

8 {! W1 ]: l9 y    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
. _0 m9 [% T% T! W1 Xhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted& t, Y" q' A$ C$ e7 b: A+ L
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
* v" y+ m% H! O7 @confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
/ q# p$ ?2 y" B$ P8 i; w1 mrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter* \6 a7 l  d" c3 T4 e
the market./ U9 V7 J* G5 a" a+ y

& y( \8 Y- k. v; r    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through1 w" I  s3 Q& z# N- w/ I4 f
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In/ S9 w! i5 P: D1 Z- C
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring" |+ |8 ~; F5 k; q  Y
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due: C6 S- J! O5 _( ?7 \$ P; t
to the shortage of available inventory.
+ b- }# Y. A! V. L0 Y) I0 b8 `% h; V  p! i) P2 L' C
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
+ Y$ P  ]) ?7 j  a4 f3 Fmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains: I0 r1 k+ }$ z$ A$ ~. w; N( E
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
0 C5 I7 o8 a- d7 Y1 }' X4 `, _struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
/ O( D6 m$ w0 K, i& L
8 n6 f% j/ k2 [3 w, c( _6 H# B    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases6 ~, f" j- s1 K/ j/ u5 q: s
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
6 I- b: Q, L4 Q9 zunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that, S" i, k1 P& t  P
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring6 J2 S! ^  _. [4 O7 I! \" p7 x
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer" x9 e1 r$ v- K. d
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
' M* _$ V7 m9 j$ O  U7 h$ ubuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

( E0 y- I6 @1 X  h/ |1 F* d( @8 d( e8 v2 g0 }5 m2 n
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter4 P7 c# Y' m* R
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton5 H' O  }- v9 C$ y3 C6 I6 y% H
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,+ h+ k4 n1 j3 T7 u3 h) |7 V
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
" B* o2 \# w$ L& z/ L1 K0 N/ Hincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
; P- E4 S! Y+ g. U7 j7 b5 W! K! Hin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly3 ^& {, s+ }! N5 a' G2 g
towards the end of 2006.
   
6 f7 L, v5 }; Q8 K1 \( }1 b
( D" T9 @$ s) G; ^) AWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
  [- b3 g& |& w2 kinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable5 F3 e: f2 _; g% ?( F. J) i9 O
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
! z- u. C0 Q4 y/ k7 Y4 Jgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
" G5 i7 ?& r) z; k6 `% Hforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
( v* Z$ L. g# C) z6 j* Fpressure on tight inventory levels.
; X: e! ~4 _2 K3 f
: L* ?) S  u) K    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic2 H% {" d- ]' z# o) d
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people; V$ t6 T' Z( x" n" R  N
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
; \$ T0 b4 G8 C' t$ e' M8 y' z' Ewhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
! W3 d' r' b! b9 gfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
5 {# r8 E% y0 ?! i+ h6 ]
$ A1 m% ^+ z2 ]$ r    <<1 s$ x" B/ B5 g0 r  _
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
. b# S9 ]7 C6 N  `/ Y: D0 L! J- {* D% r: {9 p. y: F4 M: s3 Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: h) N% |9 W8 D2 V# L$ z1 r                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey: q/ ]/ {5 j3 H9 j& J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, H9 b" h9 ]) P4 D9 o; E3 @4 W                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q31 @) t/ W9 B. H4 \7 v( D, w( L
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
6 g$ N) m; I# U$ I1 K+ X" I" S  D    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 \. d8 {+ g# _$ W    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000. {0 q" e2 o0 ~: ]% J* K0 g3 k
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ ~) C$ s& |# n: R$ N! P
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
  a3 f, Y1 `% v4 t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' Y5 P5 K, c" S
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000/ }. q6 v) O' }& B1 _! t
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" \3 ?8 z7 r. X# i3 u# e5 p5 V    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -. g( V: z2 N* c& G" j, t
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------/ C) J& F  @. W7 G2 ?: w) A
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333: X5 i& r+ S$ x3 H. v  h: l9 w5 L
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 b+ o! D1 ?8 `- g( V/ V
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583- ?1 b7 F8 c5 \7 M
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Z% F0 K8 l# ]0 Z    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185' Y8 z0 h. P+ ^9 t- d5 W' r8 ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  F! g5 D$ X3 z+ F% y# a    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
, s. I9 A( }+ [0 k7 |    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' f6 R9 I( k! t; ~: X
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766& p& l  i4 @& d4 C1 A. f
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ M! A$ g# k% p2 q    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7075 q4 S2 I2 W7 y% d
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------; z2 q- z9 y4 ^9 K2 u
    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500$ ]* G! m5 s( j' r, I. ]# L
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ j# m5 \8 i; F% q6 j3 W  F5 Q1 S5 [    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389  t7 O: f3 H& a( q0 R% J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) j) Y0 z1 V! V  Z4 V
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714) x. N0 E9 w- }- y3 j& j7 u
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( \8 b- r) {, y# p. x) V    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500( B6 \  o. M0 L- g
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 I) [* |( U& q: \' x    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,0008 o, Q; ~7 H5 P- a# b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
. Y4 K5 J7 J: g/ a% l, s    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
7 `! d6 x4 d0 h$ h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) F. w- a6 A+ l* w
& }3 H/ o1 h3 \& F/ ~, ~  h8 n
    -------------------------------------------------------------
! P0 |/ {: {7 B1 G5 d                               Standard Condominium2 [) d( @! i8 Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 I$ k% ]; U$ Y3 ^% @; {9 b                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
2 E6 P. V, t3 {6 [* s! ]    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
( N$ h0 J/ M8 l* b: H% l3 w' E, L    -------------------------------------------------------------8 v" v* g9 B0 K7 N7 O9 c, T2 j
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%  [- P$ B, l5 |9 e5 B
    -------------------------------------------------------------
( ~2 R: [3 l. e/ K6 {. M% d    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
7 U1 B; y4 `- l! U3 Q3 B) t    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ J; [2 Y' G+ w: l2 C8 c    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
5 {. V, ^" L( S" r8 T    -------------------------------------------------------------
8 |$ [" d1 G& f" C. w( d8 p    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
2 K: t  R7 m1 c. b! R, J3 d    -------------------------------------------------------------% Z8 _9 P0 j; T% A
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
6 D+ S0 @: F7 S0 I; x    -------------------------------------------------------------
! z) t1 N% M9 L- w    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%" T6 t2 U3 P3 E
    -------------------------------------------------------------/ X/ m0 I1 G; Y- g( ^0 M. U
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%+ ^+ @1 R7 ]- G8 b/ V+ w/ E
    -------------------------------------------------------------" b: ~% V4 {6 V+ V2 M' O% K  w
    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%' c6 h  k' f. W( p6 B3 z1 ?; o
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 |# P) l$ G! V    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
0 g+ r: X0 ]2 L  F* Z- q, S: D    -------------------------------------------------------------0 r6 m3 U: T1 H+ v2 N. T& R5 [
    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
" n; o8 t# N4 z# r& N% _    -------------------------------------------------------------/ J  G: E  t2 S
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
4 u9 I9 l  e. ~" D: a    -------------------------------------------------------------
7 D. T1 u. u7 j! S5 {' J& u    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
# }0 i- p, J' B8 g2 }: q6 d    -------------------------------------------------------------
- H3 v; p6 ?; l3 @7 L    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
* B& ~; g; S; S    -------------------------------------------------------------* \4 Y& h4 b( ^9 M3 S* ~# c
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
2 B: d+ b1 V9 u+ N& @    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 ^8 v2 j" }# P    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%" k; H% j8 F/ _) ~1 Z: G
    -------------------------------------------------------------) ~% S0 ?( O" X( c2 B% e) W( [- t
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%: R- {) \1 X" `( C# }9 g$ l
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 [' u5 A7 }. Z. e    >>
  p, ?" v2 P: D; j: g3 Y$ p% O: W, E9 Q
; q* s, H/ e7 \, E7 X9 A8 C& x    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined% f8 o: q) W2 {  ~: M7 O
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
* w% z( s- F/ t% `" s8 `John and Victoria.
1 F+ s, u$ ~0 B6 L% X2 r% n, G
3 ]6 c% ^$ U4 P' P+ Z& E    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
! }/ |( w$ F9 l/ h5 Z4 A- [comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of( C1 r7 j! N- b" e  q4 B/ z& R
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
& B* t* D# G7 X$ {7 ]references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price1 s4 p5 S& p) m9 E
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
; h# v2 {% i- u, A" _across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
* D) v. [- }" O9 N  S8 v' d$ [available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current$ B# u4 I5 _" u% j# w
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
4 F# F4 Z  h% q2 p+ bversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on6 d, n3 A8 r2 ]7 x* n
November 15, 2006.
2 l% L9 w7 B! S/ x! S5 p    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of0 W% ^% l% J4 s' l0 D5 e. v4 J
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge! I. E* A% }0 B. u0 w3 ?& Y* n1 T
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is/ h- p, g3 O* H, f
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-3-26 02:59 , Processed in 0.137507 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表