 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable ' a, A" ~0 r) e, }& `
; e% w9 h" O! q/ G/ B3 P$ ]- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
& P) e% S( `% B' g* y' s9 b7 b5 C" Q2 K: [- l3 g4 ~
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market! \! _- h7 v: x: C
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
) R8 e: \4 m4 s$ X+ t# kquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic3 Q3 H7 V! n* p+ w
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
6 z2 U& F0 H2 B: t+ Qprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and3 W' G$ ]+ Z: w5 H
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
3 D z, k3 Q, g2 x4 w3 F2 WQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
8 a6 F4 M+ K2 l ~) pLePage Real Estate Services.: U( b2 a; | H! \0 j
1 d. a z3 X. ], G7 ]% d
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters& ]( A/ m W; E* I( C
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic- b* o) Y* w" c' ?6 p6 H. r% I
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
. _. e3 [0 ~7 Osound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the _2 G" N2 D% H0 T! {
residential real estate sector.
4 ^( P1 [( g- w: y, P
! _" s" e4 {, n$ `' y2 c4 d$ g Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation; @, z- K3 M7 s# b
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
* h0 t8 d/ W& c _2 C4 c0 _& kyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
- ?! S: N' n1 u(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380+ N7 ^# C1 \2 F, Y4 Z4 _; I
(+13.2%).
; f1 N! E: D' m E$ M7 @5 m2 M E" Y! x1 C8 Q" I/ n
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
0 ?9 `* U% O x; J" k r2 m+ Qduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
% Y' b, w2 s" n( H8 I+ z' z1 Mfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are1 ]6 h4 u0 p6 i! ?' E. w: x
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
# \. I" h+ O& X, P8 A! K Hpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services." N) l! S+ |& u" p J$ h
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
, e( e( B5 D5 |% s9 t: K1 ewelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
; \5 E' Q% `0 `* Pbalanced market."2 `! v6 X; W, P% k+ ?
2 {0 \5 [3 J+ T3 V4 d Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
" m( _: s( m" A& b. T* _considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
) |% v8 p& L6 ^+ Z4 \to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
/ z7 r. ]2 n7 o; x, w9 \throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
6 O) |1 m& x1 ] T$ ?( C1 B1 ~energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
/ c$ V ^* P# F/ C1 ymanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record: a. b( k2 Y0 ^/ x* f8 L& x
breaking price appreciations.
. t. E0 N; @5 A& R6 i. T6 G% [. O; n# d8 }4 f; Y0 S; {6 D% \5 [
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
4 ~, w$ Y& u1 c: f6 zeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
; g1 y% \: M( \, elargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.; d) m4 m/ r9 Q- y# j
* y. Y4 m' V) W% A$ L$ c0 d
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
+ u( ^' \: Z& h+ t' Keconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer! d* k0 F4 X( u5 J5 `$ X* b7 U
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
3 t4 o+ z2 L+ Fslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
, j$ n! M/ W5 k6 ?, F$ a! jIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
% o* v9 e' U% |$ |greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
4 ~* t. Z9 r9 C+ m3 x" H4 pprice appreciation when compared with 2005.) E5 {& m" f. |/ e- b" c% K# |
- ?& D6 R: m7 y0 e. _% C
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing+ S$ h7 r, p$ I u% P( l5 a
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and S; K/ s3 D `) h( G
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada$ I4 |. j, G+ A8 |% R) n
are markedly different than those found in the United States.0 F3 I2 C: X- E) g! h6 H5 @1 ]
; t, E0 I4 n) C9 s, r Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the! w7 Y3 c8 t' E, A4 u0 I
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
4 n+ n, ?3 m% Q: m# L+ Xfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the% O# B H: }5 i- t$ ]
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general% I9 p$ _2 O5 O4 M2 W2 }5 K8 N
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the0 ] Q1 W8 A* J+ F" [
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and. F& c$ V2 V) b+ \( d
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization# v. X: X' P- \& _0 A/ a- f( z* a
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
& y1 q6 z' O( _+ P2 f9 O% F
/ j5 x; c& v M) I <<
" b" ]! A. ~3 c5 y" V3 T& ?4 A REGIONAL SUMMARIES
9 ~% ^8 m0 @" c >>( R M$ {7 O; a
% ?" g# O; i- v2 E Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
# z3 E6 \0 N9 W9 B/ u. @Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate, w1 {# T- [' e. z
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time) k- x" e7 }7 S5 A* ~. B) K9 r
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
8 T9 L+ O3 ]% c1 Z9 a6 u2 R! Nrenovations.
& I! k5 N9 ]8 c, z3 k2 h; _. s0 Q( f, t( s! N I( B
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight; \/ @/ |/ S- o* \
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
3 b: _+ o) s( h) u1 U0 W7 Ocompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and' E: g) R& ~/ z( B- r
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
( s7 E ~9 D9 }. d
. D- S- F3 _; [) F6 P- l. I5 B The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
# W- N( P! }1 E( Cslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
% S9 A% i7 e1 D4 k! }# ?; a# J) rquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new7 U' I8 E$ R ^% b' j
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores7 V3 y1 j5 D8 w& B0 c) F
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes5 x9 b* O8 Y `5 L+ w( o6 H& ]
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
/ J5 e1 j# [7 p
. L8 ?& Z& `6 g& o$ H7 e In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced1 ~& A( u! A8 H) Y5 ?8 ]
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
3 v M, Y6 i7 n7 C8 `homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers; u5 {" e8 G$ F. Q2 e8 |
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian2 c0 ~+ ^2 R- X) l3 Z" N
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
8 @. w3 Q$ ~, w: g7 [4 Vbuyers with more options when looking for a home.! M; R) F. C8 J" B7 P5 U0 w" p
4 v) |' `1 G0 [1 Z4 k7 l$ S" F! z
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
: N( }6 m" w: s; q- bamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes; Y. e9 H: Q0 W& x
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
( ]% V- z1 s- R6 H q1 has some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
& {* r7 i- C: y# Q; jfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
" d i& F" g8 K; v4 ?* v
3 `+ f( r! i& U( d, i Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
) e7 t; y& |, p3 W5 l# Zprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
) S/ J# r. t9 {) Rlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting0 _ q. o" t1 Z
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,8 h$ s" P1 h& n; S( Z
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the( Z7 k( T3 K- U
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
3 U8 ^- X& T: H- F6 Jmaking a purchase.; Z; ^0 }5 ^ z# J$ f
; A$ `* ~, s1 X+ F8 S! l. x$ g Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
' h. d9 {7 l8 m; O& _, |' ?8 emarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
. r8 o" [* P& @# ^% `confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city& C3 x! F1 s; J( H1 b, a
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
" Y! ^) V, L9 I7 vattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
- i5 r3 J L% z, qamenities.
8 ^2 A2 ]7 K( B/ M. K1 d, V( c8 `2 z
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
, K% q' {4 G7 f( jthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
& ?( k& Z& r( s: {$ v( i- o7 D+ @across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has5 N/ w# }. u9 p
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been9 r! K! ]' w2 z6 \$ ?( U
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
3 U5 e1 |4 u, x. W2 j- p+ iresidence, rather than for investment.( E9 O5 m+ j! T9 r3 v& v, z
! }+ {, D7 K& B The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
4 x. m' ?9 s- n+ }house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
5 n) B% x! A/ x! l# bin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer. P6 ^8 @! L u z
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
- y( k& {0 ~+ |7 Krate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
. Z5 n' B2 U) A4 n) @, Jthe market./ W! @$ Y+ a. l) [ ?
; x- T! \4 ^& z; Q! a In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through+ w, ], M' j+ D9 ?6 ^
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In! B8 Z3 G [$ Z |5 r
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring) c# j' C* O- U: P) ~5 w% h
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
/ A# P4 {, K' e! r" ito the shortage of available inventory.5 D) @2 t/ `$ \! H g; a8 K3 `
% G3 W) ?6 r8 \ Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its! ^3 q- h( r# ^. K4 Z! C9 m# ]
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains2 {$ n) ]6 W7 \( y& x
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses3 J1 Q5 ]. N0 ]- [
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
+ d; r) `7 k( d. O" q2 r: m, d* E! Y& _( ]
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases! V4 o2 G4 Q% N! o9 y, K
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
- B$ [6 F+ h$ {1 kunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that$ J+ Y/ O; Z( E& E" q
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring" N, k+ F3 @ @7 _0 R3 N
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer8 [1 n/ H" s& {" [1 M
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as5 b! l z x, d& M5 p! {) a9 y
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
3 N5 b; j0 M5 ^! o) ?# k K7 q/ _) [* N* M* f) z
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter5 z% S8 q9 T0 r6 L
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
) C T# P: [: ]7 Hremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,& t: ]( { r5 F. N
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices6 a4 Q) f: s/ Z0 ?
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve7 f$ X% @4 l0 p# w+ `- ^
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly3 P" n5 @1 \2 W: i' o* T6 C
towards the end of 2006.
: b) s$ i3 F8 T" b( n1 I5 P( r# F
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
2 D4 {1 O; @( T0 q9 r- M2 ninventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
6 ^$ E0 X- Z, Wto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
, K( x- f: c( M7 B* o$ pgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to6 R/ w! h: F0 f4 [
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
& m. R& X, g% K0 Vpressure on tight inventory levels.
: q- [- q# @* m$ l. }; n* n3 z" ^* x+ a, A* B, X
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
2 d! |2 g8 e; g5 O# e* _% Afundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people! k% |/ o& w. A
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;7 F9 U+ `, n, f- q7 K" E6 \
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
( W* s6 J) e" D: K; E+ zfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
6 T$ N) g/ }1 N( m/ X% Y k: f+ t
! g: v# o2 r! { <<
+ E1 C% n1 `# c0 a1 \- B Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
5 v. | t' }4 m3 X" ?: A v4 v
4 _8 o( }& [( y8 l6 G -------------------------------------------------------------------------( v! R3 d( D# R9 J
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey. t; _/ v" u# H5 a; g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' q0 ?$ w/ c# _, ~" O
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3& e' H6 o; v }8 e
Market Average Average % Change Average Average* n2 [( ]: X2 }5 y/ b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, M8 C8 X/ W, N Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000. }1 v8 j! b0 Q ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------- t8 y, g9 g/ _/ R
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
$ t+ m! d; \3 T: h8 o -------------------------------------------------------------------------) D1 w1 z2 c& B$ E
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000. S$ U7 y$ ^. ]% J" i
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) ?. U8 n& _- q7 x Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
' P! L; q9 X/ [3 q -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% R5 n5 U/ j) @7 P& m: o5 J2 k4 [ St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
$ g6 O4 I% @ J6 L/ L -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 \% b" x' }) q( W H Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,5839 K6 p" o: C3 Y0 i. Y8 @; i; F
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ y: D1 Q/ s. p0 I ^, n$ s. q8 R% T+ ] Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
1 Z3 P$ C# a; i+ G1 Z5 N -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 w# a$ F2 t& u8 V2 u! e Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2508 ]9 F2 W a2 @ `' v, |% Z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
! _; I u5 i# M0 z* r+ d Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
5 I+ O1 X: Q$ ~- [, N' @( ~! [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ c/ ^6 V$ {3 q# q1 B+ l! d
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707( ~# h2 t3 q5 N1 P6 ^8 C: n2 o
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 q- H5 M8 `/ y" ~* o Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
, Z: n) G* F: h j) q9 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ r9 e" M# n% R z) x Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
* {, _* ]8 T) ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------# y9 V8 L1 _* U; l' k7 \$ I, ^
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7142 O5 p: _. T% |( E3 L5 d* }
-------------------------------------------------------------------------9 D4 Q& j8 j( y1 U5 r' }& w* j6 C
Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,5006 l) ^. O1 v1 R) R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* \* W) r- V, f( p2 Z Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
2 ~7 n7 }5 H! J9 t2 d. M, G* j -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 {6 S/ A% c( D National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8608 R9 D/ @) p$ D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ ^3 S% i$ S1 e1 c. F
$ Q8 k1 \9 A: m7 ]
-------------------------------------------------------------' l5 u" o8 J& a0 T! l
Standard Condominium) c s! s! z0 H; U5 O) r% K
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 X7 H$ y; ?& e+ V: K( U 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
/ i% v0 E& C8 u i5 S Market % Change Average Average % Change
- |5 F8 W3 g8 x' L( k' g -------------------------------------------------------------
& P! s' ]/ q0 y Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%! o; z) N5 O0 a) |3 g" }. D
-------------------------------------------------------------" ^8 q; g, i/ D3 X0 E
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
4 z# k9 g v0 W! g/ V; M: N -------------------------------------------------------------& d/ {( c3 Q. y' Y
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A6 C; b3 Q+ A, {& r+ ^2 c4 ^
-------------------------------------------------------------' J w7 A) P! w- k$ x% k
Saint John N/A - - N/A
; x' _3 i# b" M' i1 ] -------------------------------------------------------------
+ ]. M" {% q" r3 T4 b7 I5 G St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%1 R, p1 r) B. T$ D
-------------------------------------------------------------) T7 ]# Q: p2 l$ x N
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
8 ~6 A# R1 e4 M1 ] -------------------------------------------------------------# r2 Z0 W0 h. Y
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%" I! W; g( k. n: |
-------------------------------------------------------------+ {" D4 |7 b0 a7 b' S1 t
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%! o1 Q6 \! [7 S. v: e E9 U) ?
-------------------------------------------------------------
) v9 s; L2 N1 J( ^ Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
. b+ b3 r- ]* M" i -------------------------------------------------------------
+ ~$ Z$ _- @8 L* m' V1 s& I" ?1 { Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
. l: @" d4 R! H, d -------------------------------------------------------------
d4 J7 @) [2 Y" Z" B4 S/ j, M! a# l; t$ l Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
+ i/ I( \% z/ O: K -------------------------------------------------------------
; \* |; W3 I8 d8 u- U Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%' D9 J* |7 c! j9 c0 B
-------------------------------------------------------------
5 m. x Z# s& @% {0 g s Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
, `0 v" F2 K& i -------------------------------------------------------------
$ r' z% j8 j6 B0 { Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
9 s: m6 R% a9 C# T -------------------------------------------------------------
+ o1 n2 u) n1 K# v: i. C S Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
' P+ P$ I5 O! I& B! k -------------------------------------------------------------
& N9 D/ y: h( n8 e5 k" h v National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
$ v9 z$ p2 N" }+ z( U -------------------------------------------------------------7 b1 w9 i2 U/ {4 y. E; d0 J
>>
5 d: g* D! K" R# |4 D3 ]+ F' j% y% w$ W' K
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
0 L0 @5 ~# o1 p$ Y% |in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
; w8 s$ x& G- C0 F+ MJohn and Victoria.: D3 z- v0 C) W9 ?& G! ]3 z& m5 [; b
/ ?$ D# u1 f1 g% J The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most- s% F: r8 i) A0 E- w, k7 g) i
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of& w I0 T% L! t9 _; h8 k
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
, J$ \7 {. V3 Yreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price2 w' y& f% U5 `1 y" R
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities. P+ U: t6 Q# h$ f Z) t, c
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is$ A! `: [. q1 i$ e
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current$ ^% C ~/ |, E! G4 g" U: d
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
2 p& }5 Z# M' N3 Nversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on+ T! q- T8 Y& B
November 15, 2006.
& z/ l1 B `( J7 @" L Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
) \* @7 p$ q, ?! [) `. T: `; P. hfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge, ]2 `0 b3 h6 A1 n% n5 _% o" n& b
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is0 p% i( j, G4 T9 o+ I
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|