 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
' Y0 `6 H9 N. M5 J3 v9 I. z8 ~" v- x: z& @4 ^9 v [- E
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -% i2 s: h! g2 ?8 N S2 }
0 m& m2 A/ S m( T
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
# C# s5 g8 c7 z$ {& Texhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third5 }2 v! c$ e3 E
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
6 k% W5 m; X2 p3 vin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
. \& O( C: _: V! Bprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
6 ~& |, F4 R! i2 ^more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
7 w, x, S& a- a+ S# t' O6 AQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
/ w( A3 T( n: @7 cLePage Real Estate Services.
* }, R7 `- C7 E1 ^
) n. i h* M$ F K) W, } Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters/ u& C/ _/ N5 l1 n
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
3 D2 z- q# C% _& K9 {+ wconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and, w0 }3 M4 {' C' w2 b
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the# x! I) H1 D9 K2 z. J- S
residential real estate sector.' A/ s! F; a. Z6 Y5 d$ u( k6 \
) P# H7 p0 R+ k- ~# {
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
+ a+ N; \3 L8 ~% n/ zoccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)/ j/ ], y# m' D
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562, t: B9 i) I( F: Y# b9 Y1 o3 y
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,3809 x; v3 A4 r% ]% l) Q
(+13.2%)." V9 n& V6 P4 Y! k
9 L! a1 O" p, g: r0 {) U: {
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
. u, m% R. K; v4 ?0 bduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
Q- {' K: O- Z x8 q$ b% Kfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are) G) r' H4 v, \. N; X' n; L4 _
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper, s3 E- r) ?. g# L2 T3 o8 ]
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services./ j |( f6 D" b% h% T. e& m
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We6 B* e6 L# B) `9 N
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
9 c' x6 n. F: S% R5 Nbalanced market."3 J4 R a8 u0 I' i
! Y4 c1 @! ~+ `! M; c, S5 L; m
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
) L9 X8 c% Z4 iconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift6 Z+ e& F: A& m% y
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued4 C- Z7 o; J; N X2 K. M
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core2 }2 ]1 s6 ] L1 Z, I2 L5 [( }
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
; W1 t' G; O0 c `manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
1 J$ j- Q" [3 U4 b9 C) Q+ X6 ^breaking price appreciations." _1 `9 |! ]5 ]+ [$ ? M: Y
. V! o% j- `# T/ h' w5 l6 K Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
. R) B& g! X i9 M: D0 z- ^economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
4 \5 _) b) {! M3 h8 Clargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
2 V1 V4 I: p9 d$ `' u H. B# J8 ^3 t! t3 h. ^) e* V
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
- L% B4 c3 }7 Q( Jeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer, L+ x0 Y, q- ^
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
& c, H$ b& z" b( {slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.4 r+ T5 V0 i' p3 f5 K* ^
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers" P) t. l! p8 O& I i. ^, c) e
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
' I5 J) ~; P) ]9 iprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
) N1 _* Q/ B1 a# Z- D
/ m4 j, z, g4 p9 c: n While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
2 _3 U4 |( I9 [6 F& a4 E0 Xmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
f h) y: X$ ^ F9 ~3 B, Mfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
* _& z2 B& g- i& L1 s, S7 u; pare markedly different than those found in the United States.
' L7 Q8 B% y( H; G3 Q
`5 i; L) |; l' Q Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
/ b# i/ m. Y0 M3 S N b! iAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's$ i I! Y+ p4 F
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
; R% z5 e# S! s( F. {relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
2 {" a7 ~3 `$ `9 I5 E* paffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
) `( k K# z; hdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and, ~9 ^5 q; \- R) ~" N
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
! i/ ~. b+ F6 ~, ^% x5 \: W* F/ Omortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."8 \) v, j0 }2 P" @$ i5 b
" \% [8 }) L/ D' j
<<3 {! ~' l( w& g* B( z+ p( e' `* T0 z
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
! f9 y8 d" i8 I8 G' @ >># K3 f/ S) k" @- ~" B$ w
7 u2 j% N! o, d8 y( R; n Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
+ \$ U# z, P, y" F2 h8 Z- R" \Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate8 ^- H6 v& j* y" K
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time* c) f; E9 T$ f( X
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
, f+ y5 ~( f+ g( o- v# d( ?& Vrenovations.
1 i# w L+ Y: R! ^) e$ J5 W! _8 y$ z5 Z* L4 }! r1 P
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
. l0 K6 T, Y" U3 U( Aincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
7 j% C. h) o, `+ qcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
; @+ x- e) ]: eSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter. g4 n4 V! z6 `
4 p: N6 v8 A" s+ x The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
; Q+ ^, h( F! X* Cslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the, z/ t8 J, M7 r& R2 L9 F. }
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new' [2 f* c) |0 \$ ]0 G
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores7 X) E( U3 h- `+ s7 E! T
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes1 k u6 v, @9 ?0 |% @! g5 n- s
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.0 {# T' A4 F. Q' b
( W6 {5 {+ s) o( U4 l
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced' _9 v- S7 {5 J' s( z
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
! ~2 H6 [. N- q' Y9 i0 I) ohomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
8 G7 ^6 K+ e& A7 d7 V i$ Ywas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian0 z) i' B& s6 r
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing) b" f. I' a# Z, F& c
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
( {. T) d" a5 N0 m/ w
1 _# c# V7 y# p3 q4 c Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
4 [& p! t$ K" t6 f. v9 m, s ~$ j* damong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
b2 V& f2 `( D1 Q6 _4 ~' U7 kpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,/ C/ I, E2 Y, q) N1 a
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last! g$ x# y0 m2 w* |2 ~& u1 ?% @
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
- n- e* D2 H7 p- \2 E- ~/ n$ Z; m7 Z- @8 v% F' H/ m( d4 t6 v
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
1 u; e$ G1 ~+ s, ?( Eprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory: o! l) Q' n0 t3 q
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
/ O1 T2 _% G, \, B+ {9 nfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
, F0 b3 N+ b3 nwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
, A G# X/ ^# Z4 e1 N* {: \ {pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before! J/ s8 q% C# e" T+ D4 B
making a purchase.
+ P. |, F" L' J7 d
4 Z! P7 v S4 J9 o1 j4 C Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing; ~2 P, @6 K* V& N7 s2 P0 a
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong8 B7 E: e+ `6 b# H5 p7 O% C
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city! }; P5 {' [2 U4 `
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
% g+ V% z- E6 e% Yattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown% x& @$ Q G" D+ g5 B$ R+ r; D
amenities.6 V* I. ?* j; u; q* h9 W
' w6 ]% l( D8 @; i9 x- x4 s
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
& E' v; G8 }, ~6 |throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
% G/ ~- W$ D% h# Iacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
, R. J! K6 w+ {1 d" F& f3 Ucontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
/ O# y( O2 G' J) E$ Ddriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle; t/ v q, e1 O8 l) R( s5 l
residence, rather than for investment.4 D& J: A- w4 h) W
8 {! W1 ]: l9 y The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
. _0 m9 [% T% T! W1 Xhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted& t, Y" q' A$ C$ e7 b: A+ L
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
* v" y+ m% H! O7 @confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
/ q# p$ ?2 y" B$ P8 i; w1 mrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter* \6 a7 l d" c3 T4 e
the market./ U9 V7 J* G5 a" a+ y
& y( \8 Y- k. v; r In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through1 w" I s3 Q& z# N- w/ I4 f
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In/ S9 w! i5 P: D1 Z- C
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring" |+ |8 ~; F5 k; q Y
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due: C6 S- J! O5 _( ?7 \$ P; t
to the shortage of available inventory.
+ b- }# Y. A! V. L0 Y) I0 b8 `% h; V p! i) P2 L' C
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
+ Y$ P ]) ?7 j a4 f3 Fmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains: I0 r1 k+ }$ z$ A$ ~. w; N( E
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
0 C5 I7 o8 a- d7 Y1 }' X4 `, _struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
/ O( D6 m$ w0 K, i& L
8 n6 f% j/ k2 [3 w, c( _6 H# B Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases6 ~, f" j- s1 K/ j/ u5 q: s
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
6 I- b: Q, L4 Q9 zunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that, S" i, k1 P& t P
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring6 J2 S! ^ _. [4 O7 I! \" p7 x
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer" x9 e1 r$ v- K. d
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
' M* _$ V7 m9 j$ O U7 h$ ubuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
( E0 y- I6 @1 X h/ |1 F* d( @8 d( e8 v2 g0 }5 m2 n
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter4 P7 c# Y' m* R
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton5 H' O }- v9 C$ y3 C6 I6 y% H
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,+ h+ k4 n1 j3 T7 u3 h) |7 V
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
" B* o2 \# w$ L& z/ L1 K0 N/ Hincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
; P- E4 S! Y+ g. U7 j7 b5 W! K! Hin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly3 ^& {, s+ }! N5 a' G2 g
towards the end of 2006.
6 f7 L, v5 }; Q8 K1 \( }1 b
( D" T9 @$ s) G; ^) AWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
[- b3 g& |& w2 kinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable5 F3 e: f2 _; g% ?( F. J) i9 O
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
! z- u. C0 Q4 y/ k7 Y4 Jgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
" G5 i7 ?& r) z; k6 `% Hforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
( v* Z$ L. g# C) z6 j* Fpressure on tight inventory levels.
; X: e! ~4 _2 K3 f
: L* ?) S u) K Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic2 H% {" d- ]' z# o) d
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people; V$ t6 T' Z( x" n" R N
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
; \$ T0 b4 G8 C' t$ e' M8 y' z' Ewhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
! W3 d' r' b! b9 gfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
5 {# r8 E% y0 ?! i+ h6 ]
$ A1 m% ^+ z2 ]$ r <<1 s$ x" B/ B5 g0 r _
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
. b# S9 ]7 C6 N `/ Y: D0 L! J- {* D% r: {9 p. y: F4 M: s3 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: h) N% |9 W8 D2 V# L$ z1 r Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey: q/ ]/ {5 j3 H9 j& J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, H9 b" h9 ]) P4 D9 o; E3 @4 W 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q31 @) t/ W9 B. H4 \7 v( D, w( L
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
6 g$ N) m; I# U$ I1 K+ X" I" S D -------------------------------------------------------------------------
8 \. d8 {+ g# _$ W Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000. {0 q" e2 o0 ~: ]% J* K0 g3 k
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ ~) C$ s& |# n: R$ N! P
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
a3 f, Y1 `% v4 t -------------------------------------------------------------------------' Y5 P5 K, c" S
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000/ }. q6 v) O' }& B1 _! t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
" \3 ?8 z7 r. X# i3 u# e5 p5 V Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -. g( V: z2 N* c& G" j, t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ C) J& F @. W7 G2 ?: w) A
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333: X5 i& r+ S$ x3 H. v h: l9 w5 L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 b+ o! D1 ?8 `- g( V/ V
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583- ?1 b7 F8 c5 \7 M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Z% F0 K8 l# ]0 Z Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185' Y8 z0 h. P+ ^9 t- d5 W' r8 ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
F! g5 D$ X3 z+ F% y# a Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250
, s. I9 A( }+ [0 k7 | -------------------------------------------------------------------------' f6 R9 I( k! t; ~: X
Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766& p& l i4 @& d4 C1 A. f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ M! A$ g# k% p2 q Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,7075 q4 S2 I2 W7 y% d
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; z2 q- z9 y4 ^9 K2 u
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500$ ]* G! m5 s( j' r, I. ]# L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ j# m5 \8 i; F% q6 j3 W F5 Q1 S5 [ Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389 t7 O: f3 H& a( q0 R% J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------) j) Y0 z1 V! V Z4 V
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714) x. N0 E9 w- }- y3 j& j7 u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( \8 b- r) {, y# p. x) V Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500( B6 \ o. M0 L- g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 I) [* |( U& q: \' x Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,0008 o, Q; ~7 H5 P- a# b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
. Y4 K5 J7 J: g/ a% l, s National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
7 `! d6 x4 d0 h$ h -------------------------------------------------------------------------) F. w- a6 A+ l* w
& }3 H/ o1 h3 \& F/ ~, ~ h8 n
-------------------------------------------------------------
! P0 |/ {: {7 B1 G5 d Standard Condominium2 [) d( @! i8 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 I$ k% ]; U$ Y3 ^% @; {9 b 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo
2 E6 P. V, t3 {6 [* s! ] Market % Change Average Average % Change
( N$ h0 J/ M8 l* b: H% l3 w' E, L -------------------------------------------------------------8 v" v* g9 B0 K7 N7 O9 c, T2 j
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9% [- P$ B, l5 |9 e5 B
-------------------------------------------------------------
( ~2 R: [3 l. e/ K6 {. M% d Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
7 U1 B; y4 `- l! U3 Q3 B) t -------------------------------------------------------------
+ J; [2 Y' G+ w: l2 C8 c Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
5 {. V, ^" L( S" r8 T -------------------------------------------------------------
8 |$ [" d1 G& f" C. w( d8 p Saint John N/A - - N/A
2 K: t R7 m1 c. b! R, J3 d -------------------------------------------------------------% Z8 _9 P0 j; T% A
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
6 D+ S0 @: F7 S0 I; x -------------------------------------------------------------
! z) t1 N% M9 L- w Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%" T6 t2 U3 P3 E
-------------------------------------------------------------/ X/ m0 I1 G; Y- g( ^0 M. U
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%+ ^+ @1 R7 ]- G8 b/ V+ w/ E
-------------------------------------------------------------" b: ~% V4 {6 V+ V2 M' O% K w
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%' c6 h k' f. W( p6 B3 z1 ?; o
-------------------------------------------------------------
0 |# P) l$ G! V Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
0 g+ r: X0 ]2 L F* Z- q, S: D -------------------------------------------------------------0 r6 m3 U: T1 H+ v2 N. T& R5 [
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
" n; o8 t# N4 z# r& N% _ -------------------------------------------------------------/ J G: E t2 S
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
4 u9 I9 l e. ~" D: a -------------------------------------------------------------
7 D. T1 u. u7 j! S5 {' J& u Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
# }0 i- p, J' B8 g2 }: q6 d -------------------------------------------------------------
- H3 v; p6 ?; l3 @7 L Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
* B& ~; g; S; S -------------------------------------------------------------* \4 Y& h4 b( ^9 M3 S* ~# c
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
2 B: d+ b1 V9 u+ N& @ -------------------------------------------------------------
3 ^8 v2 j" }# P Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%" k; H% j8 F/ _) ~1 Z: G
-------------------------------------------------------------) ~% S0 ?( O" X( c2 B% e) W( [- t
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%: R- {) \1 X" `( C# }9 g$ l
-------------------------------------------------------------
6 [' u5 A7 }. Z. e >>
p, ?" v2 P: D; j: g3 Y$ p% O: W, E9 Q
; q* s, H/ e7 \, E7 X9 A8 C& x Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined% f8 o: q) W2 { ~: M7 O
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
* w% z( s- F/ t% `" s8 `John and Victoria.
1 F+ s, u$ ~0 B6 L% X2 r% n, G
3 ]6 c% ^$ U4 P' P+ Z& E The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
! }/ |( w$ F9 l/ h5 Z4 A- [comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of( C1 r7 j! N- b" e q4 B/ z& R
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
& B* t* D# G7 X$ {7 ]references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price1 s4 p5 S& p) m9 E
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
; h# v2 {% i- u, A" _across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
* D) v. [- }" O9 N S8 v' d$ [available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current$ B# u4 I5 _" u% j# w
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
4 F# F4 Z h% q2 p+ bversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on6 d, n3 A8 r2 ]7 x* n
November 15, 2006.
2 l% L9 w7 B! S/ x! S5 p Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of0 W% ^% l% J4 s' l0 D5 e. v4 J
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge! I. E* A% }0 B. u0 w3 ?& Y* n1 T
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is/ h- p, g3 O* H, f
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|