 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable " J) u9 E8 l( _% R
- U( J7 K' |" [5 x1 n- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
% q( ]- z( j) i
' T+ L+ [! @- c- \* l TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
% Q4 e& j* f7 H% N# O7 }: n! g" Wexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
6 o. P( z- s0 S+ s3 T# ` x( T4 lquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
/ R7 G7 l) @8 E0 R) R" Min the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
+ W, |- q! Q0 Z# @9 E4 Vprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
$ o2 F: [1 ~1 Gmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,- k& N0 I/ H& i8 W
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal$ m$ s! H# N9 Y! S4 q( q) b
LePage Real Estate Services.. w8 ~2 ?, w9 Y: Q; K# K8 T
- P' i/ D* Y1 w0 g$ C" d8 ^& _ Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters& r) C4 C3 M- N6 Y
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic' M/ _1 K- W( s" L6 H) Q5 [
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
& {: j# {0 v) \* C% c: Ksound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
3 l% S7 Y# c- uresidential real estate sector.5 _. V3 f6 B% E+ k5 `. S/ W
# u8 W) U7 n" M" w/ }; R w
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
, L: }1 ]! A# u$ g( ]occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)& R3 e; @5 I9 i+ h9 `$ s2 T
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5623 z/ d; Y2 F! x6 j: B
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
- u3 ]+ i" ?6 A6 e' l$ _(+13.2%).
; N2 L5 Y* N, t+ H. P) h! T7 J
; C G8 C7 [; `5 D( w: J! ?1 o "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth+ p5 v, ~4 G( n! c# Y/ D5 z
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
U# t( E" }- mfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
) G# _- ~, V9 g7 cpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
4 ~5 i/ O. M4 g6 q- A ~; vpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.1 z/ H+ p9 Q8 |/ d2 g8 P% T! K: ]
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
4 K4 Y) D, ^5 I1 Pwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy% C: L5 c u4 D: s
balanced market."' ~8 n3 D1 t7 N# l1 J
& Z0 q/ J7 b2 n4 I, }
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
9 W$ D7 M4 A: c$ `9 ]9 H! Oconsiderable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
" a3 `. L4 a# @0 rto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued1 q# f4 [% \& y* H ~- t( d. k
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core: y9 m. U0 g6 A7 i' A2 w6 W3 Q9 K5 C
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
0 _, B4 V8 p9 p ^( wmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
! F# S9 t( M: U1 _% W$ N7 j9 @breaking price appreciations.. A0 a. F& _ i4 L$ C
0 T! O( a8 O4 a7 ^, T& N
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding- Q; q1 e1 M6 k% A
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the% f u+ z& {% m8 k: E
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
: N% H- C M8 w- @" z1 ]8 ~3 u0 Y; q+ A7 ]
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid0 h# A3 V9 L( U; M
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
. T/ e& v+ ~, {5 P9 C. lconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
. o7 c7 h+ W! {' X8 E2 fslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth." J) P: @9 Z7 v5 S
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
5 H! ~3 T' f; B( P2 [greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of6 D# r# n1 P# [
price appreciation when compared with 2005.4 i ~) r7 a9 x4 w! J( p g% k
" b8 m5 L4 ~' W/ ]) X9 r
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing/ \, J7 r) X; _0 m/ o5 z
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and, L' G5 M/ v/ X" h8 K3 x
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada. ~- D9 i6 S- R/ E8 h- I
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
: N- Z9 D Y6 w0 b: ]0 h t# [- U5 y! r. m6 U5 d' _( R4 L+ Q- A- Q
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
' J* ], ]7 c; @& q5 c. N VAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's6 L! x: L) ]4 f
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the' S1 [+ h- h" m2 l2 l
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
& T2 L- N9 L' O: j3 z1 m" caffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the% N S2 W5 |( h) r; Y c1 q; K- i
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
5 Q w! y9 ~1 M1 M+ ~0 xaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
. M/ w( B) h1 C1 i+ Bmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
4 r! {4 F" A. x* L8 s/ D
( z" a5 e6 ^. o' V <<0 ~# n, m, _% a. n5 [; l8 J
REGIONAL SUMMARIES. q! f" b) A" `/ {6 W, u8 t! S
>>
% _. i R$ [) M, {& s- v# v$ Q6 L- R8 w8 g
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in: e( U$ N, [; l2 H* T+ h% ]& x9 x
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
. }" w" T2 ?; |$ J6 |8 U) sof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
. ~4 Z. F! O+ G1 Hlooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
1 b9 n' U. i( r; z4 Prenovations.
8 U% W/ [& z h7 S# g" d7 r. S2 X+ @, y& C) X$ c. P
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
+ c4 W) b" o8 W: J; \. gincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
; P/ V' e) g2 j; G$ m7 Acompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
1 F' a. ~( u1 o N8 v1 uSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
5 ~% [7 R* ^. M; g! f7 l5 F1 a; A0 f5 x2 F3 s4 `
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer" q$ A. z9 T: l E, w! J+ _/ E
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
# Y0 |. t6 U* z! A' M2 E, @quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new9 ?/ I0 D f4 j
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores w( J- \2 I1 X; D5 l$ |4 `4 F, [
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes1 C; W) D: w. q
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
* P9 t [$ k0 r& q3 h2 s: k
, h8 P o4 F) G' }; G In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
# v/ ^. x7 d0 O/ ?' Kconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
3 F4 ~& W3 g" q* x/ x: r; C0 Ghomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers! r7 m; C3 z. m) Y% i* N
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
+ x# N* u# _; Y- k$ B% S7 Q- adollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
- b1 I% |0 _. N [buyers with more options when looking for a home." p/ Z4 q$ o, C1 ?# ]. [! p; Y z
. p# F7 T, ?/ v, R6 x7 y Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
; t1 g7 |- t+ m0 Xamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
! A, Z. p$ h k3 Fpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
% p7 f* x9 {- r3 D6 Eas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
) K8 C$ N4 k' z0 W' {% J: p0 mfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
: \3 g' \! V F0 g9 G4 N
( q. R8 w& w% D1 t' e; F Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
$ V2 {& U3 A& t% H7 P- jprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
7 C, C! O& Q* Llevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
& u$ {4 u" p: V) Bfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,) [; _- c) u3 D2 s0 n9 s, W7 v- C7 z
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
' u- m. G: M# \- O- _pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before9 B# f# Z- t( A) q3 L; _
making a purchase.7 W" U) D! ~+ ]4 V& D: N7 t4 c
2 ]* h ]% h. p, L4 @ q! \+ ~ Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
W4 u* w; z" j$ }) lmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
8 M1 ]/ {, A9 }# J( l4 L6 B& bconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
' k0 x: \4 o/ A8 w8 Acentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting0 i- o" Q; }$ b: |' k
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown3 J; V; L' t% r$ ^) ?( f
amenities.
: G3 ^ Q, [2 i9 q, W
% [# J: O1 v$ t6 I The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels8 C/ h; t. x: ?% g7 _- }
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
; J- F. a/ c* g0 h4 l) [8 @; Kacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has% B- k9 k* H' \
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
% H8 W8 I: _$ H# M. V; t! f2 Hdriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle' e6 M8 U( |- } O! n8 S0 P
residence, rather than for investment.7 u: I: @: e2 }4 U h8 L3 W2 |
* h) G# i. B: h; `) f The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
9 l5 N3 w2 N+ V& k5 whouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
1 E1 U/ J/ i6 l( ?/ t! min a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
9 X. ]2 I) a9 [7 a6 dconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization# ?0 Z f$ v0 s `3 M
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
4 ~2 {$ \6 {/ r" U( \7 Bthe market.2 N) [6 O c9 g) m7 }" T
7 M8 L# {3 n$ F2 \& c/ X In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through' _/ y! P5 r3 M, e$ u
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
# i) J1 `& Y+ ~* s8 y3 ^( E" U. |August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
% K [4 T+ ]/ e4 G( o; v, wmonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due0 _& y7 {+ N+ \, H. H# j# f
to the shortage of available inventory.
, d4 f% D% M% H* o
, [3 M) _' G, s3 t, x0 \# w0 w2 R Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
1 r2 {9 ]& a: @- H3 Pmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
8 k, j- s7 V) v' q5 Vvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses6 g$ `! }5 P+ R4 n, Z; z& ~
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
3 {7 `8 i, } {) L6 ]+ Z1 a: `5 N4 q( k- V
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases: K% W& ~3 Z8 O9 |' S& N
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low( N! {; n. g0 M2 q
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
$ C U8 t4 Q# wpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
; O I/ ?% S& Hprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
6 \ Q) |7 @6 V5 F7 ^* X) X: Vseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
$ w8 k! ]$ [. Z" q" ubuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.: h2 r1 z( O* C/ Q
) A! i6 G ~9 V/ S8 F/ S Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter8 B, p# m0 t6 F1 I
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
/ l. s c1 d# K. m8 f) Xremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,1 r9 t, B: u+ c- \9 W
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
0 L! B8 s* P/ G& S7 d9 O1 M7 P; A( mincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
# ?4 D6 Y _$ @4 _9 w6 \7 Uin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
. q( ^/ z! w5 ~9 w5 Gtowards the end of 2006.
: i0 |4 I; q, w5 T" N0 b
5 A. O- s/ Y/ ]7 tWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of7 @) z! Y' j7 q2 p* s
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable) B! A$ _# v& ^' v( d
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse3 t% t: ?2 a1 C. ^( S
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
: i( p' j! q# ]- [1 q; {foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added p& ?! E5 n$ K9 F0 k3 y" C
pressure on tight inventory levels.
% i" v1 U2 d8 B, a0 _0 A' P5 C5 u3 r2 R8 L8 z# @8 }8 {! o
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic) ? ]- D% T! T+ X& [
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people) T3 F5 h. N1 w3 Q) L
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
( `9 J' W' L) g- _' ^while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching/ [2 y0 K" u3 W) |
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
" y2 O9 r% c+ T/ ^1 x% T5 k. w
2 N) w0 H3 S1 j# I <<
% _. z% n, Q( o Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20064 W8 m$ Y* Z6 p& |% l6 d7 k$ N
: z: z! h' i! }9 y) Z$ J! R -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* @3 z& k2 b# v& P9 o4 s/ b/ I Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
& G7 f+ `1 }8 W! b* P; V -------------------------------------------------------------------------% ^* }& h& Z/ A6 z5 E
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
% j3 b0 f8 x8 O' { Market Average Average % Change Average Average
9 q! C$ n( [! U' y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, q: H4 V9 a6 P2 J& Y) M* a, n. h Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000: T) N D* W% w7 i/ M
-------------------------------------------------------------------------1 K1 I" t$ T/ v4 A& M+ `
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000" V1 K! V8 n2 O" d! o; B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" q! x. i( b7 g' r/ k. c( W) L
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0007 ^/ x0 \! c* l' s( L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, }8 t+ q! E6 G+ ] Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
4 T/ G# `4 ]; M2 Q; z -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% a6 p+ H3 q' \0 Y8 M3 ` St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
. Q' N1 F% m, [9 D7 R. v7 f# {6 T -------------------------------------------------------------------------) c% K+ r. k, Y x/ I
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
0 {8 d! n' R$ W1 r* M" h' g! } -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 ~' w6 x, n$ x: X! o& U5 x
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
1 e& t5 P1 G! t8 Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& H0 o5 z' u! \4 W! W# A/ { Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250& ^; S; P! |* J$ h6 F5 q; T
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 V4 a: T' B5 V% x" H5 y! m' { Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
: W1 e* x& n4 l }2 O! I$ L -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! A' \0 I' W+ F" p+ F Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
$ B- a0 V+ l* i* j% \; a -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# I% e. I! Z b/ b" x$ V Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500& t1 X6 ]3 ~/ t
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& X0 A( S" V' D
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
, S, y( v6 k1 s; M' C$ a -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, M* r. z M9 P+ \6 h Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
* j$ v4 @ F$ S& G2 @5 b -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 ?) o; C. R; z1 b$ n/ j5 b& [9 S( t Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
6 Y6 v5 h) O5 f0 G' l -------------------------------------------------------------------------. V: J/ n1 s$ Z D
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
( L" m8 O! v; G) {+ D6 w. K! h, n -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 t( U' D1 ^" n/ s/ C% s& f' J
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
2 c2 m8 G v, G -------------------------------------------------------------------------. D! ~) ?( S5 |* G4 f& @
' A! M- W* }9 Z/ ^: D8 S1 Y -------------------------------------------------------------& t% ^6 d/ ?5 G1 k2 ^# m: L4 B
Standard Condominium; W% r c2 J( X2 z
-------------------------------------------------------------5 [0 j$ S* z' y8 p2 D
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo5 p* v$ s3 r' v9 V2 ~
Market % Change Average Average % Change
# ]6 O% o; {2 i$ \' i/ C -------------------------------------------------------------( u" w! F' K% j8 H. l
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%/ v& K' Q6 q% O+ B& U
-------------------------------------------------------------+ ^9 P4 h! w c
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
: L; |$ M# P( P1 N* j$ z -------------------------------------------------------------( A( g% j+ ~) t% f9 ^- b/ C( m0 ]
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
3 T/ ^! l5 t5 ]& l/ @6 S( Q3 X e -------------------------------------------------------------
+ f1 H1 b2 c$ J6 |" {0 e+ K Saint John N/A - - N/A1 \1 r) S3 N! n* ~, f' j" E6 s& R# Y
-------------------------------------------------------------) V! ?# q0 g8 ?) E" M! y# \/ z
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
6 ^' x* e2 b! u, p3 m( ~ -------------------------------------------------------------
& W& e1 C" X- n6 X) B5 M Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%
0 E' v% ~! G4 ` W2 m0 | -------------------------------------------------------------
' j* W0 Y9 j7 ]: l4 K& m Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
9 E N, C# S1 v: y -------------------------------------------------------------
1 c S3 R! h" g" b Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
6 ~8 J b. j: l# z -------------------------------------------------------------
* s- E5 k; P4 R' z( W$ }+ m Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%4 ~9 q6 J+ |6 o
-------------------------------------------------------------5 B8 j4 A* P ~
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%6 [2 |5 T/ e( P5 q! T; _. F+ ^
-------------------------------------------------------------4 W9 P# W! J; h2 q
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
* @7 F- b0 O$ C, K4 u1 U6 i, L, K0 { -------------------------------------------------------------8 `3 a4 J& Z! U2 `/ I. g/ Y1 ^
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%" H; I! z1 H( o
-------------------------------------------------------------- [4 \' U7 D8 v! s3 |
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%9 n$ b' `' \- K/ \2 V
-------------------------------------------------------------5 y/ s( y$ {0 }4 ^# q
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
9 p7 I- S& s2 h" j G4 T, G* u/ Q -------------------------------------------------------------
. ~& F/ W7 P, n/ k. n# O( l7 G Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
% y' N3 D/ P/ A! _( f7 w2 d: ?- s -------------------------------------------------------------4 R P: Y }0 O: w( N
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
. L$ t" y1 i- R8 @& H3 s -------------------------------------------------------------: R1 w6 A; X# _
>>
. s8 V* S, E; v& J
7 w) Y1 w2 m3 ^( {; t5 z% L. C) e) t Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
+ G/ p# W& ?" ~- Y: h9 }in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint+ E z6 D6 V( T2 z; w
John and Victoria. N3 {- y5 E8 Z
, \' R4 Q! E' D+ e. J# ]6 H& V The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most$ J& R1 m* k# I1 M: O3 Y1 @+ w
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of4 l6 S! d) [: `$ }
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release% q8 ]* r3 E2 ]) Q m
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
" J3 H3 |( Z N3 n& A! M+ |- g% Strends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities6 s# @7 [8 R4 j% h4 q* g
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is; } d" ?$ q7 J
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
; K6 {4 D( B; n1 y0 @* gfigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
; k7 v' C7 n3 f" z6 nversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on$ b% z+ c# U8 r! h% n/ }
November 15, 2006.# o) c+ Z$ q/ m# M+ E/ |
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of9 w7 \! T1 Q# f! \1 |8 I
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge) v4 \* f4 I/ u
provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is" {6 P" _* M8 m& L8 W7 o
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|