埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2738|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
  R3 \5 v. h4 X$ h, D7 Q+ ?( }) u4 P/ C
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -3 B- a+ {4 K. M! @: u% s) |
1 E3 N# x* ?& V# J
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market$ z0 }* ~& H2 o' p3 g
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
0 ]- b' O( N" m# M' [7 zquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic4 q4 _; ^. u# e% v
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
  ?4 Y6 h9 K7 O! M" {6 H: o; fprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and+ f3 B5 o; P6 ~4 E( }% g
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,. [+ g6 _' M( p# B% X  G: E$ Y
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal1 K5 ^" c1 ?1 ~! P8 ^* @$ h. s
LePage Real Estate Services.
' U9 ]! d  ?, \/ w4 i( c1 S2 g1 }! ]
$ j& X3 K) b0 l6 r9 D6 p# ]6 e    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
- t0 Q) \. d5 W* E. B* }are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic$ f! _" r# o! ]3 I
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
( e) g' i: r$ W2 xsound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the, _" u- i* I% \/ M( [# L$ c: }/ J$ T
residential real estate sector.
% M3 E3 {; r6 t( w5 z4 `+ C+ j& ~3 `# \" o2 q& U- B& l
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation- U+ s+ C% ^; a9 ~. [. O8 Z
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
% E/ L& y: B+ [& I2 U- Qyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5627 _, B! }7 A  A
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
; f7 i$ r2 a2 Z3 H, U1 z(+13.2%).
5 Y0 e& b+ ~: Z: C; `) ~; M1 F
3 ~# ^4 B3 }! P9 p. _    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
: ~" s" ?: g) k+ m% C1 oduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the: f7 [2 B+ B' y- u
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
3 b4 R: Y% P2 L# Npoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
4 S) f" S7 e7 i( M/ Y2 apresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
7 l" a( b: D9 g6 W. `: j1 `"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We+ Z+ g% L" x* U; ^
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
* a: q+ `2 G0 e$ i) q' D# u3 Q7 qbalanced market.", x/ T6 g# Y3 A7 D( h" K

+ i( M# }& b# N    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,0 r* w) G; X' i1 h& p# m
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift8 I& J6 a- i# Y8 D% N6 D9 `  @
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued$ Z: B" u: M; c& `
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core* s3 o3 U% f! z* m# j& y' h$ @
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,0 r9 s# u3 v9 \
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
6 _3 H. q# ?4 V( r, j$ l! `breaking price appreciations.  s' v8 _  \! z* |; X% b

' l4 v8 E0 j" x2 q2 ]- y    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding3 t3 |, p3 L5 l3 S* |' D# b% g
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
* T3 S: m6 q" elargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
: H- p0 D5 o; {, r; C% U! y8 p+ @" x2 ~( b+ a6 b- `/ B& p
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
) A% U5 [9 p* Q/ R6 veconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
1 z) g- j1 S: P# k/ E6 V! Cconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off- Y- k- Z" ?6 |0 q' S! \% t  G
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.. f0 X4 C) t: j3 ^) A+ H( O( H
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
- ?( O# F2 u! p3 |2 R' k; j( Kgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of' l0 O, E& b5 @5 d2 a
price appreciation when compared with 2005.
: {; Y) H' r$ d1 B! G3 B8 R) e) I1 h$ |" _" n
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing" ?5 O" J* `2 M" q* g
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and6 O$ J$ }4 L# O3 ]) @) {3 m* d
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada  h  H; ]$ d5 u
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
: J: T9 Y# T8 ^0 z
- |6 j. b% \: K2 _8 J. u. H    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
! l4 }7 `1 ^( g! RAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
: o- W5 k5 n4 l  r, ?6 d! y, J2 [favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the4 k/ O: |) X+ V' G& a5 X% B$ [! S
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general" f# ?% l" n% R4 s7 t; O
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the$ z1 r4 y8 Z. [( Q
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and5 A+ l1 W$ e) g9 }  m8 T
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization* h4 n% [- t$ x2 `
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."* z; ?! y: T9 R2 a
7 `& W2 |1 n4 V. d% s
    <<
  h7 K( b& v, \                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES
  ]) l" ]' a# m0 J. c- A$ B' u; M' m1 R' u    >>8 T' `: H& \7 O  L% q  \
  ]$ a  S+ i. R! ]4 G% i; M
    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
% J5 Z" Z6 g  d! T6 f, ~Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
% h' d0 {% J4 L3 Tof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time- k3 f: w/ b3 m' G
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of( Z. ~: |$ |6 c4 @
renovations.0 t* @" n1 S% }- k5 s' W  p% d

% _/ n* t7 I: N7 I6 w* |    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight# y* j" J! G" H* ]; u/ M$ F
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
4 G$ Q$ V+ q5 ^. O8 D: l# Vcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
" ~! |* K' ~/ l0 K+ G' T) PSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.  X9 d* k" z0 `. e6 x

( L& ^% I* q5 g* g4 R( u8 C    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer& b0 p7 S6 C6 f3 K* _1 p) o, c+ U
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
7 S3 \: j. |9 B: W& N- qquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new( f5 ]8 d  P* i7 ?
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores+ K1 y4 f) H8 I- {" Q, s
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes9 Q- ?6 b3 [; e( _% p% V
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
/ _9 z7 V9 z  d
1 x8 c5 t7 _4 J% |  B4 W    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced( L( j; O/ }* K3 i' z* A8 h
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their' c( P1 [5 C$ Q% E# S8 j
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
+ x) J6 l; u+ Mwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian8 Z  e5 r" ^1 V) s! s( L
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing7 K2 ~$ O9 Z1 ^- K* G, s' }
buyers with more options when looking for a home.8 m, O$ h/ k! k" ^$ s

" ?2 C+ `, `1 ]8 E( M    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
& X, j  o6 H: _7 e% h/ }; j9 `among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
0 ~2 t* h$ `$ M1 O1 i, `priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,  d& l; v$ O1 c( u
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
8 u; A" h: W% K7 ~. a3 ifew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.; A6 t& ?& o' A

0 G( m+ K7 i. z7 w/ {  E$ M    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house: B4 s( Q) q. ~6 G. N
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory5 M8 V. |* ]0 E% F1 g
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting1 c: k& D2 [9 z
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,: K9 y- {1 Y) @0 O9 s% [( u, ]- K
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the
4 f3 y4 S0 a2 Q% }: Mpressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before5 x9 }5 B% u7 g8 n
making a purchase.) v5 M, n* p$ d. [/ \1 V
7 x2 V& U* @$ \" t/ k# Q- u
    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing# V6 I( C! K8 ~0 n  p
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
7 g* |( L; X- E4 [4 p5 sconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city# M4 m& P6 t' K- |$ @$ s8 s
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
/ J9 a+ n  ]* O' G9 \- {, Nattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
9 q, C# ]0 R( Vamenities.
# p1 @$ @; u$ x0 U* T- d$ r  `7 o5 f9 E3 N
    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
& H9 Z3 Z4 B; ythroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
, `2 {: ], ]' e+ Zacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has( C, P/ Q7 W6 V* ?1 T/ W; ^0 F
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been& D' l9 X2 ?$ |/ M
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle8 [, G$ J0 w" L
residence, rather than for investment.
; f* Z2 Y! M4 s" S* U5 }
( R3 T( X" A0 B5 A    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as% K  S7 s" {4 @; @
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted6 w+ E, u, B& J* t3 T: D' j% t# L
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer- o; ]6 L& E8 F# [* t
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
+ z3 e, {3 B5 z' {: O( _" hrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
2 x) G% [; I7 H3 V5 dthe market.4 ~; y! z/ P! ]/ x0 ?9 w& k7 Q

0 T/ [) D; x; x; [0 a    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through* d3 o3 l6 U- c3 q
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
( E& ^  X% E' S5 d  kAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring6 z2 \. J# k0 q6 B0 ~
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due+ j) i0 n" P- a* S8 H6 ~/ {( a
to the shortage of available inventory.  F9 T/ R, q! l( a5 i6 `+ G# P

7 j; _1 U3 n2 ~! y& Y    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
% U8 v* |; k( o# s: e4 _momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
9 b9 |+ R4 ?% P& o, rvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
: j/ G, F# V8 S: }% wstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
# K7 y. _/ W) D" A; m+ j* d
+ D# b; n+ Z7 S, o0 c    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
2 N) }8 V  e1 G- A5 O8 kin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low1 s; T  W0 F( ?/ \( B7 T
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
% q; \' @, J2 s! ^( ^3 m% hpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
" I0 p4 e; S7 W, d9 A2 `prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer( `6 A/ B8 U% k6 w& T8 P
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as  M0 R% }; b8 a% _; G
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.

/ Q3 B" V9 d: a  n4 F$ O8 p' |8 ^  Q. y; |5 b8 u. b9 F/ b5 r
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
2 I/ S9 u- G2 Y: h$ l3 Fas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
& {* X* M0 e5 M+ ?8 Rremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
, H8 [8 x7 W: g! U, f; hmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices2 e4 C' }+ H- R: O! P
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
1 C( F3 p3 j1 Y7 N) cin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
' P+ |7 i- Z. h4 Htowards the end of 2006.
    / Z) R/ K, n  X! J$ o; m" _+ T

; K2 a6 |! l+ F6 v- r7 }, S0 q! j6 X# QWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
* N, i: D8 I7 V8 m8 [7 ]$ A# n) qinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable7 ~* E' m$ B: B9 r
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
7 h  J) z! D5 y, Z$ I# _( l" Z* Ogroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
  i% w0 s( o* V# t6 K9 p5 Hforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
1 i! G* s! K2 j, L  F5 bpressure on tight inventory levels.9 G$ E. p/ y) `4 d& r

0 L  z8 V, ?* P* L) M1 s    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
3 Z) F' Q# v  K9 V) B" `( ~fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people$ F7 h( q, g  W  G
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
$ x; G, D* D" M& Rwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching3 \6 o0 a- i+ n% W" e* D
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
$ y( W. y( `- q- d8 Q/ z% X9 a" H) ^( I# D' q4 Y1 g2 A  j
    <<
* O$ R5 G  k& \, |* A      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
( Z, Y7 d+ K5 ]( b7 {( o2 C# U# M! ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 R& Q) f* x, J: P! i: a                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey5 K) W: |$ p" ^; J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------) j# T* _* }9 Q
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3# C+ p1 D: n; M4 T8 ^# W
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
! c: M7 `+ C# |' o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) Z  |5 X: |9 X  }) r% _    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000" o- e! H+ d& h) h5 j- `( D
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, m! k3 @( x' s' `5 \
    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
( s, K7 M. M( a( S( M    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
' ]6 V2 J5 ]4 }2 p8 l& _6 q    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000* a' [+ i2 C& x: W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* w' [/ a4 k9 F: Z' g+ o/ I
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
( F* S0 d" q  y; O: n    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 w0 g/ o$ m& I2 x: |0 r( C    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333" V' m) Z/ x7 _. ?8 P
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" |  `* k) e" p1 E; F5 z/ q# @9 y$ Y    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583" z7 z  {7 ?+ e# l1 k) e- W
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
* @! n9 ?4 N' x8 w: z; I  o    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185
' R! l( I+ g2 H    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ q% T* `" M9 ]/ p/ k% Y    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250
: w: r6 X4 U3 N9 N* O3 s    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 k5 t1 d0 N: n* @2 D4 J" E
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
+ \" W8 F) `/ \/ @8 @$ h    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
) B5 ^. ~! x3 c' ]% I4 n  p$ \% ?* o    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,7071 ]1 K7 e$ X* M) u' O
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
  ?; w% o, n& B$ r; u3 i    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
8 r+ y8 w, i4 R0 H( I    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 S) e, k' S5 y$ s$ A/ S! m    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389' q8 y; [/ \0 x
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
( N+ y2 Z/ A0 i    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
1 ?  Z9 u8 w5 [$ i- w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------4 J: M) C0 D- ^4 K5 f3 e& q
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500- R4 O! }/ t' Z2 F' i# `
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- \9 e$ u  y; n    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
! ^  O- `! r8 t    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( v/ h! k. G; C+ S6 ^
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
* Q; L4 A$ H: H" a( w1 F    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' m) o. ~& J2 ^, s2 [) A: w

9 F- B8 l1 E% d8 e  J& F    -------------------------------------------------------------2 k5 }: I' Q( \, v% e* c. `
                               Standard Condominium4 ^% w* y) d" v- C  Y
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: J4 [# M; N( r0 z$ V                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
- N4 c" w0 z& A$ a) l* @/ p( j    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change( @2 \2 ?* M6 d3 J4 R# N) M
    -------------------------------------------------------------
+ N1 @1 k( ]; b% r0 Q    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%' D+ o  o) ^- g# n6 H
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 N! ^) a; C! ?  o    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%
: u" t$ ~6 J# n5 H. d% o    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 z, S% d% |( m& F+ c4 Z    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
) e/ T" q) C4 t; P. `    -------------------------------------------------------------7 X  R: H% K/ i% G! t$ |
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A1 z4 p6 h5 m' p" g3 h
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 H/ Q) r7 d$ q2 ]+ ?% i' T1 y    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
$ H$ F" M" w0 _+ C6 G- _    -------------------------------------------------------------+ n; p. p+ T0 r2 e* d1 F
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
! ~2 [$ x3 z6 e3 v    -------------------------------------------------------------" }' F4 @) N% G
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
4 A$ e7 H3 z7 K8 K6 M/ P) Y    -------------------------------------------------------------
& q. z( P/ s# Y: m: J    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%% e9 z: j, {( E7 e
    -------------------------------------------------------------5 O) S# }3 M3 d2 W2 O9 C
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
" S9 C% ?* I: s* k) [    -------------------------------------------------------------
: {, k- B( K# L; Q" U    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
# y, I$ Z6 X4 P" Z9 v1 L5 e* H0 F4 X    -------------------------------------------------------------, U3 A+ I/ D* I+ x! i- I
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
; u  K; H' h4 _* Q) V# }* w9 l3 q4 v    -------------------------------------------------------------$ w# H! l& b2 o- q
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%4 Q8 D( u3 R4 D& a, p5 x3 h9 W) M
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 [, X3 }3 j; E4 F    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
+ p! o9 K* R/ c9 }8 m4 x    -------------------------------------------------------------  N; f1 u3 L( l/ b) E( i
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%
/ S$ o" b$ U5 Y* v    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 Z6 W0 }( _. L% [$ _    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%+ f) R: O* z) o, _
    -------------------------------------------------------------
, {( E4 c0 {" H; o! U2 J$ B4 n    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
, U, w  {$ @- h% Y/ c$ i    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 G2 W5 s7 `$ x0 l    >>
+ F# P4 o) [; H7 U7 F  e  @
( i1 H" Y; V3 P( R! I    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
4 C; Z5 b4 N/ U* V& R" L/ |" oin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
6 F- u+ ^' C; n* |2 \John and Victoria.# X0 q: s& n2 X. i+ S' ], r

: v  c# [2 t; Z; c8 o    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most1 l8 \3 P, t, @3 m
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of5 P- ^& F1 j7 w
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
0 E% {; I& s" n/ T% C& |references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price, @9 t+ g$ x) ~5 `" ~6 i4 `
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities( q/ s  b0 Y$ D9 x0 y
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
. p8 e- k: F5 ~8 uavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
" n1 W1 k9 n3 i/ x/ Efigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable0 {. o( [; d" A
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
6 i2 q- h" Q2 P  RNovember 15, 2006.
2 H% }' g( B3 _) E0 h1 r1 ^" p    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of, e& n. o0 W" F9 n. x+ [
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
5 e. ~9 L* f* d, @) L* iprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is( j- }. ~' J4 x/ G# `7 V6 @
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-10-5 05:49 , Processed in 0.411751 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表