 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
- a+ V' m% l3 J4 T b& K9 O) |) r U! g z2 z! U* \
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
& Y" Q9 O; W0 y; i" e3 d. Y) Z( N4 c! ?4 i f% r1 Z& T- W
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
& I) R" A5 S0 uexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
% `& n; r8 \. R! Wquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic2 A k% I7 G6 f+ L; g. w
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
' R7 q" H# Y% Y9 L# lprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
+ d( b' X9 y# W: J* U& ]- zmore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
. s G) G$ n: k: O6 h- iQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
8 P; `, m( o& D' B8 z3 F& r1 n/ X& OLePage Real Estate Services.
% [* @ X: `; g( [* f& D2 \% Y$ V! g7 Y7 b6 {1 s6 N
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters, C5 F. ~" u% d4 I5 `: s7 h' f
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic) I, _0 I( D3 a& ^+ ?$ ~
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and) `( p7 e1 g R8 X8 d& o9 ]
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
5 i$ E N- t5 z8 m6 wresidential real estate sector.
! k& F6 V* y/ ]* T9 |
) A, l" x1 O& s4 O' t Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation, N7 v( C; y3 F I
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
6 r) m/ D3 u1 u% X& R: hyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562& k) u8 L# s U, {# c- F
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380* c H9 ~" O. C( K2 u6 V, R
(+13.2%).+ d9 m( Z% n) M! k C5 U$ o
) H7 c) m6 g5 B! K& W% E "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
: N* L, a: q* l0 R) I% |3 U) C P1 y& Mduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the. [8 o8 _. z0 R
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are2 d( e, C5 u" Q% v. ?
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
A/ P* W" O+ e* q1 p$ Gpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.2 ^! o M9 e& l+ @
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We7 t( Z2 ?# n& g+ ^0 a$ r
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy l4 q3 M8 v( w& N
balanced market."6 X& O; O0 p" e; W' W( u8 G# f
& @/ h7 ]1 X: J. T d! {4 N( _
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,! F/ L1 q# ?2 r4 m/ Y1 v" b
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
* P& q% Y7 \+ w3 l% uto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued- @, x8 f, v$ _8 ]! _
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
+ I3 o$ P O- R, F, H# }9 Fenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
6 b6 y6 m0 v' D4 O* wmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
% t, M6 e4 Y8 K' I8 x$ D9 zbreaking price appreciations.
- S) u' X* ^: q: F0 J" M& X
2 p7 g& G: R2 r# r* ~& f Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding) A! [1 D7 Z3 [# _# k3 J. i4 n
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
! d2 S1 J, z0 F5 ~largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
" p+ B, O2 J. b2 m( S* k0 _8 F- _# I* N: m& ]
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
% l( u1 u+ U# t* neconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
' P8 y' v& \3 U3 I5 \, xconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
7 n; L5 \& j4 ^% ]slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
# F" S' ]& h5 F: `9 EIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
3 P/ z# c8 E* M0 dgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
/ b( t T! h* K4 B, n( L* {4 sprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
+ i! P7 y. r$ l. m
; F& E4 C5 l3 O6 W While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing$ G& H" |8 f, _7 f0 z& E: f
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
* _% c/ l+ I* ~0 Ufinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
* T5 n# U3 w! G) R) Vare markedly different than those found in the United States.& B9 P* C$ j" q6 }; @8 v R
+ O! u6 U. E% M' `' Z
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the s5 J! a# o/ v2 p9 F( f0 M
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's6 h$ o" P* v: g, h# F
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
, h* ^+ J/ D ^" x' nrelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
. {9 g' M/ M1 v* @0 M( L) h6 eaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the$ u$ ]' r' w9 R7 m7 U' |
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
& C8 a$ l0 o1 q+ d( y% s3 Xaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization# c& H1 v' m, [( `
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."7 L1 `6 B6 `- k2 x2 L- l
8 m9 \" f8 u3 { ^7 z7 o F+ ^ <<9 U' Y; P% J* c' ?" H
REGIONAL SUMMARIES
0 M; X z1 m+ h1 x' r >>$ b! n0 {: `$ y5 N' a
) Z( z8 B! T5 e# N8 e' _ Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in) @6 M$ N" N6 {: | W2 V* x1 K
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
8 O1 R2 q4 {: k, a6 t3 Z" Jof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time1 Q: X# u( m; z2 n2 R+ e, ]# c
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
! {8 T% Z. b8 ~6 }renovations. }9 @5 o$ ^2 ^0 A2 v- Q/ @* }, S x
2 x0 c6 n' ]; H3 D. w: K( A! y, b
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight, Y" z9 y# k" J5 i E8 T6 c
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
. r v( j8 w6 b7 l4 J, Ccompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
) [/ a; g/ N; ^5 V1 NSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
/ w0 S, K8 v% u! X4 l7 [) ~: K3 C4 X W" j9 l) o5 A H! T' R
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
0 K; x" T* L: t2 d s& f( @! M' |slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
' L* Z( |2 [; hquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new7 Z `- i1 H7 u2 ~3 w- C* g1 w
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
3 A7 N f) r {to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
" J2 c9 u1 v) Aand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.- G5 ~" C2 u8 W# M
/ p3 ]& l. u+ `& Z4 V
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
6 {$ n0 n0 G8 Dconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their2 x& T! Z: a, f3 O9 ?
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
" r- v1 p2 O' w/ w+ w" Wwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian2 o8 A" C( _% O y4 S, |
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
m1 y4 O, Q( }" n2 lbuyers with more options when looking for a home.; ]3 I" t4 [( ~# t. A* z& z' a
L: v* O) \; A7 b
Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
* R9 a& F2 b/ R* H0 g- C2 jamong higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes4 Q/ p( D0 p) T0 I: w) O
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
% ~: l1 {$ N8 d( w/ \% X+ ^4 G0 gas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last6 h$ ]$ T: j4 ^- L2 v- r
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.5 x {9 R" O) p: r
! n# M; r N( {: W. x- ]0 X Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
; S+ p9 x/ _ i' J) l( I* j4 Vprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
) m# H S7 S6 Q- alevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting" B! x# f8 f6 }3 _5 k% C* \0 u# N
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,7 w& b! ?4 a$ V5 l4 J
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the% C( h; i0 `( l% s4 p( |. w, b3 [
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before: J0 J1 @1 }5 F2 d, Y* ]
making a purchase.
# c! s) v0 L$ ]( h) j8 L
1 X. o; D; O/ r' [9 k Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
$ ]% y1 ]2 P- d0 v; S8 B! j; mmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong9 W3 p( _ C; v0 R
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
( v: M' T* S+ Xcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
" |* W1 S0 v6 R0 J6 Dattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown! ^# a J8 S; e0 S- }/ ^% v2 @5 p
amenities.
2 z' x( H3 m9 o+ |" r& q6 @. v
& _1 e' A8 \# a The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels& x! X1 O- k% w$ l; Z" D* C" A
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand9 n- D1 n" `! C, Y% D4 W
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
6 o6 R/ U2 m/ B; M' c+ L i/ S) wcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been: B! x$ B2 f0 o( K
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
* T- Y% K3 E2 T' G+ _: Z9 @residence, rather than for investment.2 e7 p! B1 e5 a% e
" u7 v" O1 B7 d The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
~, Y4 W7 L( Ahouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted% e/ b- s2 k) i. @6 ^0 }8 z
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
, ]. t, a' ~' u" H2 I' uconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
- y+ p% `8 a# o* Hrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
" ?7 p6 x, L6 m$ Lthe market.
* [0 Y% y% i; R; f; C( f8 [: r. [* I$ q: h# z: c1 s! \
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through7 m; h. h' P* \5 B
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In' M$ V g V6 |1 s) d# j
August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
# m" x7 @% Y, F* amonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
7 v% G3 h" C3 Q+ i' tto the shortage of available inventory.% Y0 Y/ Q* R, e8 n! b7 c
& m5 E5 E5 C/ b Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its& C6 t1 b* z% l
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains: o) I& [# m: t8 D- b
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
, |6 R [# X( ?0 @6 ystruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
; Y. c) q- k5 _4 Q$ q7 A3 n2 ~8 l- z) m# V4 m
Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases9 r* s. I k$ }5 v
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low! Z' V+ q& J* {; ^ k% f. G, z" i
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
- \: p; {, A4 b' m) v# Spressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
9 M& [0 D# O% D% v# tprices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
6 M6 ]; r, h. l, {season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as) S9 T; R- K! c
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
6 D* Q! c0 {9 J9 a- {- T! I3 P
# a% r7 |% j5 l- r Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
: y7 u& \. h3 eas activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton. \: b2 f/ W, J& m0 M4 Q
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
" J P5 I w: w `- b) U1 X- f* P' Jmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
0 k6 V+ W; | P: J6 sincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve$ o' g" {1 n7 A+ x& D
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly, e! ], u; n% @& T$ |1 Q
towards the end of 2006.
9 M# s, \0 f* i" \! ~
) r' y5 J; Q# c+ }( r' W8 FWhile Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
* P6 t$ \& f6 finventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable: R1 t* X- j7 `
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse) O4 L4 @7 x8 Q* m) o
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to# C. y8 W9 c4 ^+ [5 J3 i+ u' T! I
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
9 t& ?8 U* K* R% a1 npressure on tight inventory levels.* S6 x6 _0 n4 a: ^2 d
1 A* V0 `8 Y$ F7 x6 X/ c
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
8 @2 G' S3 ^- _* W( ofundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
) Q$ D2 o% f0 ]. E4 k! winto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;8 U) |! `) C+ M" Z
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching& C1 x4 K! G( R' k" }; ~
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.9 T/ ^) f( {) o, i, P
9 E) [5 ]; A1 q' z+ Z( T* K8 T6 z* C u
<<
/ g6 }% H- z: A Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 20062 _% x* [5 R0 A6 Q
' r7 v; ^, `' f, W& h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
& [* s2 s, q0 `, v Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey
3 A0 c* k; h2 x- n: | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Z5 `0 l: Q" `
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3
9 v% N2 H4 N2 c7 q) Z: L Market Average Average % Change Average Average
9 f: N2 @. E. G4 L) c7 O -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 O& P S* d) {) o/ ?
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000' F9 b% q& |! I, \4 s+ \* q
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 k3 c( @# I$ c
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000$ K$ |2 Q1 I! q% c) _, c3 R
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& V2 S' u' x2 E ~/ ~: C+ z
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000
; P1 y0 E$ s# D( _* T# t -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" A/ p2 f* v0 a Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -1 I2 ^9 b0 v" p
-------------------------------------------------------------------------4 f) }- R) B$ T: w
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333, a8 X5 z$ z) f, W
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; [* K5 }0 s- }3 l8 v( t* |
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583
; H+ C% K o n5 p -------------------------------------------------------------------------& B' l; Z/ l( n. l# C% V- w j. `0 P9 O# I
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
# }% Y9 r( ]0 x3 N- u -------------------------------------------------------------------------
: F. y1 |/ \) v4 l/ g Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250$ ^( o z9 X# r5 N" _* O
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
, d l0 W; E* s2 u Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
, S- P, J9 M4 Q' S/ y -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 M2 o- c* o3 J' x Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
5 k2 W( K* V9 F4 L$ [ -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 S8 _! x9 S3 N/ @4 Y4 Q
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
9 p) f' F' G* ?3 T -------------------------------------------------------------------------
% Z% W' `* u# V5 x1 F Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3895 l( f+ }' R2 {% A7 d# a
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 W' A. o: v. w5 O/ d1 R
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714# |4 ~7 h1 I# W8 Z, K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
; E2 |, r7 n( Y. w- ` Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500. s: U0 @( M; Z8 Z/ @
-------------------------------------------------------------------------( A: y4 {/ ?6 q4 k+ |6 s
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000; T& b( \5 R# M- Z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
' D. W: D! \+ W National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
- t0 U% J4 y5 O9 H1 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! t) y" q' n$ i: z
, w8 j7 D# @( e @, N -------------------------------------------------------------
& W$ \& Y3 l: i Standard Condominium
+ F. d5 ~* ~2 {3 F( h -------------------------------------------------------------
( x2 I; D) C& ?4 i: i; w& i" U 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo9 A0 x( k7 I1 [% K5 Z
Market % Change Average Average % Change
2 v1 Q. v8 i- P2 @- f -------------------------------------------------------------, }: Y6 M. }) Z& Q# f
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%) c: U$ q( k( M
-------------------------------------------------------------
: A9 P6 A# O+ \* q! Y) O Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%0 ?! l- j1 P* H5 C8 }; z8 o% @0 x
-------------------------------------------------------------1 q5 v w" M7 u) ]6 j8 K7 f0 h& ?
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
& h/ _ ~3 r/ b2 j -------------------------------------------------------------
! ?7 I/ D3 Y8 U; e' F Saint John N/A - - N/A
; r( c+ l9 x* \1 g* T: x5 M -------------------------------------------------------------2 _ F7 q# Z' E- e( W% L1 t
St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%
1 n. T7 B- [& `& F7 Q9 k9 N# I% L8 A -------------------------------------------------------------& K5 c7 w! R q S; a- V
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%1 ~, U! {# `* Q) f
-------------------------------------------------------------6 {( N* e; V/ {0 t, G
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%
8 P/ \+ D8 y4 R6 f" V5 t+ k -------------------------------------------------------------- T# c0 X [3 l" J; u% h6 F
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
: g: A& V6 N8 v+ V* f -------------------------------------------------------------# F8 p1 S. }5 \" Y1 l( |6 t% P: [+ `
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%+ m& y2 O% T6 a. O
-------------------------------------------------------------& _5 F) S+ \* Z: k) |" f- ^: Y( P
Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
; t; x7 {8 g! u! S* Z" A, h: g -------------------------------------------------------------* E7 [" Y, O4 w! E3 m% ^) q2 L B
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
3 E- r3 \) r% D1 F; N -------------------------------------------------------------! U4 \6 c- b+ w. T# ] W6 \
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%& [0 f/ L1 p7 T; a# Z! z, [% s D
-------------------------------------------------------------# v; I( S4 P/ ]2 b9 W, b6 M
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%1 k7 ` k/ K" e/ g
-------------------------------------------------------------
- D/ _$ r/ s7 X3 p# c; p Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
6 I9 A. r' ?" z% ]+ r* m -------------------------------------------------------------
9 {2 M4 D6 [! `, {5 D" O Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%9 l- j2 m6 v4 F/ v
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 D5 \& Z) m6 \2 \ National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
1 }4 w: C% c* `0 d& N& R -------------------------------------------------------------! g% x6 G( D$ x6 c' N4 D! R
>>, [5 k9 v, P4 g3 o3 m
6 [) i8 Z) {! \9 K$ g7 A Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined. P2 Z$ ^% \! d0 _: l) H- D, A6 G
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
: K$ _/ M( Y7 c- y2 j* `John and Victoria.
8 P5 p+ x/ e0 C2 w2 q
2 O0 y0 s% k+ z. Q- S% U The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most1 I9 F# J9 a G, y
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of s1 ~2 p& b5 O* {8 z/ W: p4 E
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release$ t8 K" M8 h$ k3 b# ^
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price% ~& J3 V& |) ? N. A3 x' d: J
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities/ [* U2 l) P8 Z7 ~
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is* U" V+ Q& F# w, a/ U; K: L
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current' R0 C( y$ R. `& k
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable- z' K @8 L5 F. L" a
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on* S ]- t. G+ e
November 15, 2006.6 r5 |) ]+ A8 n* w- Z$ m3 |
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
' i9 g2 y6 H jfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
1 i' j* k+ O. p* @/ [provided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is! {/ c6 @ e# N4 O, P" Q
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|