 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
" s# v% Y) B/ O9 |/ m b5 e! A4 _& K- |$ S% Y. I
. C2 t4 ~2 g! K& v& v% K" l
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. 5 i+ k8 @* n2 F; X4 @8 }/ f9 ]3 y
; c$ G/ y' |& Z5 p% `6 |& p; ?. rLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
* w u; @. J4 }. P: r3 _+ C
9 D" G+ [9 k' Tcomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
) _- z- h+ [ ^; O( S6 |; I7 n ` M) E- H1 @% p8 A9 c
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
. N: O1 y0 y O& M7 K0 m |
|