Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
, ?4 i: H: L( G8 E8 b7 J
3 e0 ]9 P% O7 e$ R2 A6 K: PNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
4 g- m+ n9 d+ p
# D- v! |/ `7 K
( F( U; W7 A, Q: [8 T+ j% i) c- JIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
# N) Q5 x% G. W, ^. r3 UNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
) U# `: c$ V' V" O5 s0 e8 ?& ]
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

* ]9 t# J, Y3 t& p3 S; `3 RIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
( s. U. s3 {  \9 _$ K
+ H. q+ o, w# ~3 x9 [" @% h Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
! C1 W1 a& A, K( \' n* SLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
. q2 i+ H1 y) O1 ?6 FSeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
6 I. G6 w; r1 ?New York  21.2 22.5
7 o5 [8 {$ r) t, n0 \$ q. d& d* }. ~. EChicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

. v/ h; s* T- `" |
! G& P+ F) r, s9 K) [- u1 Z+ J
It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
. e8 {( U6 K# [: l2 K* E1 q

From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

7 n/ s$ |+ I; s( _it would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]