Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
1 z& O; v- e( y& @
. |3 |0 T* o( T8 o. ^. {2 Y8 b( nNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

, ?$ H: a7 m  M6 N; I  rLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
# R" h5 u9 C- n, {4 `
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
- W7 R3 w, h1 k
% j2 o; x3 u$ E+ Q8 G+ x8 N
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
5 [" X' t2 E, O) `/ f5 @
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
  \+ o- K1 T; G* h5 ANew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
. [3 T; O+ A3 z' v( f# C' rYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

( [% [9 {1 d+ b- qIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
4 S' L2 K. R  Z4 O9 f6 u# K
0 B5 G: H* k- \; M3 u# gIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
) W# n1 @+ |5 Y$ [4 H$ }! W/ BBoston  20.5 30.2
1 d# t" c. P3 _6 p- e8 wSan Diego  22.8 29.7
4 P$ B9 v6 i0 sSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
- e7 m  |: ^# s5 J; P% |Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
# z- N* m& H" G* j8 zSeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4



4 D- m5 P, t3 K1 K# [1 Q2 r2 U# dIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
" ]1 h/ O+ e1 R

From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.
2 C0 ]- g7 U$ ]) v, V
+ _6 I% Y; K& n# W8 a9 W$ Zthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
3 o& E2 S& ^' H, Z% b! h9 q
: U  v0 u6 V7 b1 W* m[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]