Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
, e' J) D1 I3 x' T! E/ ~. o+ A
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

1 _$ [( L  D% z3 aLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
# E+ n. Z7 G4 u3 ~: a( o) h4 }7 w
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

& |* z: ~1 V' P; `. C2 n
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
; y& c0 u! }" v5 @1 o, [6 E( i
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
9 p* J* M6 r: m9 E8 j2 R; sSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
. T7 G+ p* H$ J% j. i, N1 ANew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
" v$ R2 Q) S3 |& J: i
& u2 s9 R# \0 {9 VIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
0 L* |% E# L. O9 x
  S5 `) k3 B4 p6 N# ?3 q5 V Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
. S+ h" m) O0 s- U+ f; u  o. w Avg. 1988-2000 2001
- ?; p* l/ p% x; X0 ~: f/ P. H/ lBoston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
) l% u$ e* ?, s" N7 Q2 gSeattle  20.4 25
$ r& r. V) {* Z4 G# |. UDenver  17.7 23.7
* n3 v3 @! i, ?6 e- G* bNew York  21.2 22.5
; I0 t! H9 \8 R4 gChicago  17.2 20.8
1 V; k$ _5 D, aWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

* G+ m5 x# Y4 n+ g: ]% I! {

8 R+ l+ p. `  R# _$ \It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

& M8 I0 _% S1 }. A+ @
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
* \' C: j6 X8 i
9 l8 g; l7 }" [4 }* ~7 Wit would be a good reference.

# M! v4 Y* ]& O1 @1 Cthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

4 _" t! e* p! L5 e* l2 ~5 p[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]