Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
* M6 K- {( r0 R" ~8 ^/ vLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

3 g8 y% T* p+ TNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

/ m2 ^6 s, s) Q7 k1 r. R) oLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
# b% f" M: s" R& x9 E7 |7 p$ I
' D7 o, H1 m8 b  K3 LTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
1 H/ ?9 E. s  ^# o6 Y1 e
" _9 J9 x8 F9 h4 G0 e7 y3 C; h
: Z1 k+ L! Z/ k( ?' `In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

* w0 v. U( Z5 ~7 i' uSan Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
+ w( ~" L& {+ v" a9 S' N  T& p  S1 bNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
6 {/ V6 p- S6 [+ a- a, X+ e* @
- v+ G8 w4 p3 u. x$ fIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

* q3 K. `# I( K: OIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
6 y0 m2 J7 J/ |, B/ k8 c* F
" J: G- n( N& c* O6 o5 P Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
; j/ `- z# o7 K; _ Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
) |$ P) F/ M$ k- n& F4 |+ L$ tSan Diego  22.8 29.7
% `- x( \1 O8 ^( E0 RSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
- H7 o  ~% @& F6 [8 nLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
" \1 C& I: u4 Q3 ?9 V8 gChicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
, X$ X+ q; c5 @6 l
. K+ `* L- w$ e$ P/ `- ?

It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

& x: N5 P# I/ m# M4 W% e, r! f
1 L- f* O, V) Q7 }) }& K; sFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
, W, f% O% Z: {- A) P/ F
# n& x4 \* A5 Fit would be a good reference.

# l9 h4 \3 z  G; M( A$ ethanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
0 P1 V$ Y9 U* G* M2 ]% _
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]