Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
( A; o! m/ p0 b9 U) |Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
1 z, A! g  [& G# k! k% Z+ n9 V
. F  P0 `6 b1 ]( ]) u! ]( ]. g- ]Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
3 {4 @3 v4 S; K* l+ r
: `- B1 S2 s" e( pLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
3 g9 U9 v1 q, _6 r: u
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
- B1 n0 \% ^; u
' u- Y/ a* @$ p! C9 R0 @, h' j
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
; U( q$ }6 P; U8 w- u7 d
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
8 P4 _- F( W) G' L" A  l4 X# `New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
* r  z) W, m$ s' [- DYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
0 I7 h$ {# Y0 K6 L9 C
" y7 Z, T! P' b. B/ `If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
7 a, P) U2 Y+ h% }1 eSan Diego  22.8 29.7
2 ^+ |$ b( A1 A5 j1 c  sSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
. t* j  p# @. D5 S: h) w4 m/ wWashington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
! \  C! ?' P4 C, r6 k  k; ^

% P9 |  V$ q0 u0 ^
# L/ i$ k) D0 A( A; J4 L$ n0 P  ]8 {It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

" [4 v- O: b% g# M
From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

) ~. S0 y; Q8 C: R" Tit would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
, s4 _+ {8 `2 ^4 F: g
* [8 V' f# J! I$ p[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]