Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
7 N% Q, S- v% V9 F; o
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
/ K$ Y6 s* e  u8 w$ g% ]- C: i- K
" u; J, z( G& X+ ~2 y/ hLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
6 E5 \! |  P4 k
To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
% m+ t# z4 h2 s4 q
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
; E$ c, {0 u) s% vSan Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
8 c5 J; \* A+ M! ~8 u8 L; f# wNew York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.

If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

. Y6 M2 B% ^. O Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
' _  C" C' o6 L" l  XBoston  20.5 30.2
; ]! i3 ]4 N+ C- DSan Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
# K6 \2 S3 f  g/ E# KLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
( r# O7 @/ J0 [4 D( XSeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
/ I% @! o, j3 s+ G7 m3 \. O) CNew York  21.2 22.5
& ~4 u( C6 e4 T! U0 I% \. }0 ~! qChicago  17.2 20.8
: }" Y2 O6 x0 n; N' {$ }Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

  @, o1 ^& t. d# G2 n

7 U' r+ L) `. t0 xIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
1 f; l, X9 \1 ]) d, B
# @: s! e( A3 V5 C
1 Q1 p! H0 G* LFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

" ^* Y  G3 P3 F) s( j: r2 Ait would be a good reference.
7 U; j. g( J3 G9 X* _1 T
, c$ Z( H, h" j7 vthanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
& z; M+ \5 O6 c( X
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]