埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1852|回复: 8

Real Estate Reporters

[复制链接]
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:04 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Attention Real Estate Reporters: ( n* ~" H, k3 Z( M% S. U

3 k$ ~7 F* g6 O( A$ q: z5 ZDespite US housing woes Canadian real estate remains upbeat
  w3 S: l/ G/ \6 i    TORONTO, Nov. 5 /CNW/ - Leading real estate experts are predicting the US
0 b9 O) g* V5 F+ `& `/ acommercial real estate market will slow in 2008 and follow a similar pattern' E9 F5 G0 u2 H) f* z( l- V, f
as the current residential market. However, according to the annual Emerging
* ^6 K0 w2 I5 R" bTrends in Real Estate 2008 report, released by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)$ f% n4 {, j) F+ m& C. h/ J
and the Urban Land Institute (ULI), their Canadian counterparts are much more
7 ~$ w$ g: j6 Oupbeat.
9 O. [9 v. ?, O    Now in its 29th year, Emerging Trends is the oldest, most highly regarded
$ D# i0 q4 }6 _( W* U& Vannual industry outlook for the real estate industry. The report reflects
, [; l/ |$ V7 g7 l7 L# H6 l3 `interviews with and surveys of more than 600 of the industry's leading real% K3 K8 v% x5 |; I, @0 x
estate experts, including investors, developers, property company) _1 m/ B- h/ n, s
representatives, lenders, brokers and consultants in both Canada and the US.
- \! @. _- r( r5 }4 o0 ROther versions of this report are conducted in countries around the world& A$ C( y, h7 n- V; s
including Asia Pacific and Europe.
- T# ^% p6 d0 j# k/ e    According to Chris Potter, PwC partner and leader of the firm's Canadian* ~: q# C& H# j/ v
Real Estate Tax practice, Canada benefits from a more conservative investment9 R2 l" w% N/ x7 }
environment than the US. "In Canada, institution-dominated markets appear to2 G2 T0 d- D: n! x9 n
be avoiding 'transaction mania', but real estate values have reached record
. w  B7 ]4 e( }2 Y! Vhighs and a strong economy has accelerated tenant demand for space."
( H7 _( i3 ~- x$ J' J    According to American respondents, a healthy correction south of the
+ U5 L/ F, Z. w1 A7 c$ v( g) kborder will likely bypass long-term investors but penalize late-to-the-game
( d  n5 @% E' Y6 dspeculators and overleveraged buyers. Canadian respondents to the survey
. r, k5 V9 F+ w$ \* t5 y7 S3 Q5 b4 Sremain positive about sidestepping any serious impacts of this possible US- @& I$ z2 k2 B+ W( M
correction. Close to 36% view their prospects for profitability in 2008 to be
- [+ J) D5 O+ l3 d% o4 fvery good and a further 22.4% say they're excellent.; b  d% O" p* W. f) C9 Q
    The strongest areas of real estate business activity for Canadian$ f" T5 A1 x0 \4 T4 n6 T
respondents is predicted to be within real estate services, followed by; M4 H3 v( M4 O5 S. g2 Q
commercial/multifamily development and homebuilding/residential land, @9 L9 F9 ]1 D0 m6 H, |
development. All property sectors share positive prospects across the country
! d  s: N0 F4 F1 v: I7 l& P/ Y; Uespecially industrial and retail with respondents, on average, stating( N5 Q; Y: ?' q# N' d9 E# p# g
development prospects are expected to be modestly good to good. The2 W/ J8 L( S2 N' J! Z1 l
residential for-sale market is also expected to fair well, but might need to
, ^" ]$ J$ Y/ R( E' _  \take a breather as homebuilders cannot keep up with the current pace and
9 Y6 o2 ]1 e' Msingle-family housing looks overpriced., m2 L0 t* \, f
    Office stock is seeing limited inventories and dated product fill up with
, F+ T" E% F) J0 ]" btenants. Except for Montreal, where office vacancies are nearing 9%. Canadian5 `+ V: v3 F+ U7 u( H/ X$ z/ x
metropolitan areas boast below 5% vacancies, and rents have room to push5 H& |* v, i9 F, U3 X
higher. The survey is also showing that costs and land scarcity is limiting
& I- o# z. T! }9 m0 unew development. Hotel investment and development prospects are modestly good,8 X  {7 o0 q' J+ }" L0 r9 t' I+ L8 q) S
and most respondents rate this sector either a buy or a hold. Rental
1 j& z0 H1 E$ dapartments are doing well in major cities with high immigration flows. Primary
) h0 |7 A* f8 |# \western cities - Vancouver, Calgary, and Edmonton - are veering toward housing
% V* z* ^. N' E% b% R+ Qshortages as workers, attracted by a plethora of well-paying jobs, pour into
4 U! o0 z6 S! G4 l8 lthe energy zone. Apartment occupancies are soaring in these areas. Development
/ C, Y" j$ x+ n0 Z. K$ m1 gin other regions remains difficult because of costs and land scarcity.
. l# I% V+ u: [. K
7 U1 J# B% c" t( b    Canadian Markets to Watch" v3 f/ H4 Q! l0 M% }$ @" W

* Q3 \" v/ {6 N- o    The report comments on how Canadians like to live and work in central4 @4 E9 b2 A6 p4 v& @8 R& m
cities, as long as they can afford it. If housing is too pricey in 24-hour3 n! [- W; k1 J' R2 @8 _8 Y6 B4 P
neighbourhoods, people move to inner-ring suburbs or beyond and commute back
1 U! i1 b; P' ~* Winto the cores. Investors, especially the institutions, are concentrated in4 J4 \. l& b$ l5 X( `$ k
downtown areas too. Planners and developers focus on infill and more vertical4 y6 h1 Z9 ^* M. `2 f: r
projects, which reinforce the urban cores. The hot-growth energy cities out/ j0 \# r4 S- \9 R8 T  C* m
west - Calgary and Edmonton - score the highest ratings for investment! K9 K0 x) d5 j5 Q# @
prospects, development, and for-sale housing, although it is not certain
% O8 k* T! I* v# X5 o/ uwhether the recent announcements on royalties will have any effect on this.
" `2 ^& W3 T/ r( |" ^" g% m9 W# `9 ]. \Toronto, Canada's premier global pathway city, and Vancouver also have high2 {- Q8 Y$ q/ j  m$ ?+ q  o3 F
ratings. Ottawa and Montreal follow, with Halifax lagging.  ], `) d6 K( G! l6 w

- X* O) ~7 K* s3 M    Calgary/Edmonton
3 x. |4 a. p; E6 w5 B; P
* H  j3 Y: W' x* n4 Y% Z: A    Calgary is the Canada's "resource" capital and North America's number-one
3 h& u+ L+ ~5 v: h5 ?% O# Hboomtown. Survey respondents foresee strong buys for all sectors: 53.5% give a
/ y8 [9 s. e1 |buy recommendation for Hotel Property, 52.8% for Industrial/Distribution,
, i5 |& j: Z% W! {9 `9 |7 d% S48.1% for Retail and Apartment Residential and 44.6% for Office Property.
" X. Y' U. E4 s* O3 h# x$ qFurthermore, on average the majority of respondents see Calgary For-Sale
9 V9 a+ L. a( c6 V0 X2 s$ J1 jHomebuilding prospects as very good. Edmonton is closely mimicking the
9 f1 L$ I' n/ k. c3 i. j: n! hCalgary-style growth wave and as long as demand for energy resources stays
- P+ Z; e: _# e0 Lstrong, this market will continue to do well.
& s- ]7 k6 Y2 C: I: S
$ A) }- W6 r/ h    Vancouver$ B+ e+ U& A5 L  S% D+ c
' l. r; d0 w, U  A: o
    Vancouver's diversified economy is roaring, the mining industry is1 Q+ S9 V. U# k  u. {
booming and the city provides a large port and a high-tech center. Outrageous/ Q: ?. i8 V, C, t; b) x3 ]1 ]+ h
real estate prices frustrate homebuyers and commercial investors and the" q3 ~! f. S4 R% t. F  B
market is extremely hard to crack. The 2010 Winter Olympic Games is also a
7 Y( O* {4 b1 R9 ogrowth driver and accordingly 44.7% of respondents give Vancouver a buy9 r2 C, [5 G+ M% W+ _0 f( w
recommendation for Hotel Property. A further 43.5% give a buy Retail, 41.3%/ E; \' F, z1 T1 ~' I
for Industrial/Distribution and 36.7% for Office Property followed by 34.1%$ j! N9 R" l) C, z' H; N
for Apartment Residential property. Vancouver also ranks in the good to very
1 F. ~$ Q* u; Kgood mark for for-sale homebuilding prospects.3 M5 g0 v" F8 X4 T0 l

% y6 K$ C2 D% L. J    Toronto
: X' Q6 X3 S, _" V
: J3 y; |) B! z; t# U/ {1 q# b    Toronto ranks as a major global pathway destination, 24-hour city, and: v. a& Z2 H3 R! k4 `  O
manufacturing hub. Compared with other national financial centers, the city is
; x) {# m% L$ Z$ i- ]' c- A% yrelatively inexpensive. However, the rising loonie is hurting manufacturing: X( J! p6 w# k& E  q* y0 T
industries, and clouds over the US economy threaten to stall out momentum.
$ O7 ]1 t, U/ {0 F) _Three new office towers are under construction, adding 3 million new square# M; D  w1 k) h9 T) W
feet of office space. Notably, Office (49.1%), Industrial (46.2%) and" z' R" s! p. ~+ T( |  K
Apartments (40.8%) are given solid buys.
- N& C6 [# \. M) w$ P
1 o1 {% j; Y9 O: o$ X  W' c7 V    Montreal
9 |( x# R  l8 m; u$ Y* H. `0 O' T1 [+ ]
    Montreal continues to face concerns about market stability and overall
( g0 @- q4 S1 Z4 g* z. }6 l. egrowth prospects as major companies no longer choose it as a place to set up
( G0 V4 k) y) |# G! M! d* `shop. But, plenty of government offices fill space. Of the larger cities in9 ]4 H) _+ {( ^4 x/ Z/ L3 S
Canada, Montreal ranks lowest as a "buy" recommendation in all real estate2 l) R$ t5 Q5 j+ W5 }( {4 a: S# R9 g& e
sectors. However, respondents generally rated all Montreal real estate sectors
- ?5 d  K0 R% I: Q1 f# _higher as a "hold" recommendation.
7 y8 s- }" O& m4 i$ o5 b
9 B* M$ _0 E; `) ?    The report notes that best bets for investors for the coming years
1 C) E. D/ ~' Iinclude a focus on all property sectors in the high-growth western energy
/ e+ \: _: }* ]: i1 M- Hmarkets, hold on central business district office space, develop infill condos
# I( J2 n* d# ^6 B; Q* G7 Y1 Ynear subways stops in Toronto, buy infill sites wherever you can and invest
* E  f! ]! t$ d" `0 ^: eoverseas. Potter concludes, "Domestic opportunities are too limited at current9 N9 i' W- O: T/ Z  O
prices."7 e% z" M' N4 i6 w, L
    A copy of Emerging Trends in Real Estate(R) 2008 is available at
5 c+ g5 a$ B6 T9 dwww.uli.org or www.pwc.com/imre.
5 k# s4 S5 M. u6 i( O- w/ I% u$ Q9 G3 h$ v% V( h- c
    About PricewaterhouseCoopers
0 {0 m2 u7 W7 \2 x/ y# @. j( J3 u/ _% F( h3 v* h
    PricewaterhouseCoopers (www.pwc.com) provides industry-focused assurance,# Z) n* B% Y2 a/ n: M+ T. e
tax and advisory services to build public trust and enhance value for its8 c! y+ R2 a8 s; A* P
clients and their stakeholders. More than 140,000 people in 149 countries7 s' ^' \1 w8 @# H* \
across our network share their thinking, experience and solutions to develop/ A& Z7 W4 j4 K1 L. @( Y3 Z
fresh perspectives and practical advice. Now celebrating 100 years of
5 _0 d) c3 _; u: F% Hexcellence in Canada, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (www.pwc.com/ca) and its$ s7 B! e( K2 @2 }' |4 W
related entities have more than 5,200 partners and staff in offices across the9 K! H1 P7 Q2 a* |6 z+ g2 o
country.
" Q4 i7 r5 o3 t0 _0 S4 k    "PricewaterhouseCoopers" refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario7 R; }$ o( A, _1 ]
limited liability partnership, or, as the context requires, the
( t! j2 r  F, t# W  l" b6 k4 P; nPricewaterhouseCoopers global network or other member firms of the network,
, X  p0 C* v* S, k$ Teach of which is a separate and independent legal entity.' p1 B9 q, V) F5 K- S! K. b
0 V; X! X# y0 B2 ~4 m- k
    About the Urban Land Institute
) c9 o1 b. O9 b* \- D. I
) l) u7 R0 N) j8 q# E4 J# ^    The Urban Land Institute (www.uli.org) is a nonprofit education and
1 j5 z. n% V2 f3 x7 u; |8 m, o/ Eresearch institute supported by its members. Its mission is to provide
; v9 A% W! N8 o7 A6 B% Mleadership in the responsible use of land and in sustaining and creating8 d" u6 D6 i0 }/ Y0 ?; N
thriving communities worldwide. Established in 1936, the Institute has more0 u9 [, [3 s8 `0 k" U
than 38,000 members representing all aspects of land use and development
! x. v. [. z2 V7 ydisciplines.( _! i* A. x* I1 V
    The Urban Land Institute is an active and growing organization in Canada.
& m" `0 _- ~1 V- QWith nearly 700 members across the country, Canada's first ULI District
' G+ W% O, X; D) E( B, K* o& v) ^Council was established in Toronto in 2005 and a second District Council is7 X3 F% v' Y* l( b+ [4 z$ M
now being formed in British Columbia. The Toronto District Council will be
( P! r" y9 r  v% h$ I3 Y0 x* rhosting a special event on Emerging Trends in Real Estate on November 20th,
! U8 L8 i/ g" P! ^- @2007, featuring Jonathan Miller, the principal author of the report, Blake
* y  R5 K# e6 n' @/ M9 T' gHutcheson, President of CB Richard Ellis Canada Ltd., and George Carras,
1 C4 t  V% {" ]" z1 [# A. E/ @President of RealNet Canada Inc. For more information on this event, please
0 w$ _0 r# D, A- s' tcall the Toronto District Council Coordinator at (647) 258-0017, or look on
4 f! ?  G' F1 r7 M( K5 J) s" Ethe web at www.uli.org/events/index.cfm?id=3066.* C0 ?. j- h0 ^9 W; b, h
5 N( a! C0 N) h. Z
. a( c% m3 N8 \: h4 t1 _

! N0 r; W$ k! H; s$ H: |* ~; NFor further information: Carolyn Forest, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP," x+ S7 F! u2 D% Q: J  b
(416) 814-5730, carolyn.forest@ca.pwc.com% R# x# i6 x- ?4 @
http://www.newswire.ca/en/releas ... r2007/05/c4080.html
* Q: S' O0 ~3 D8 I; r9 M/ X7 Q7 L& e( F0 y! O
[ 本帖最后由 QWE321 于 2007-11-13 09:08 编辑 ]
理袁律师事务所
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
 楼主| 发表于 2007-11-13 09:06 | 显示全部楼层
注意房地产记者采访时说: 3 w5 C, {, v1 J

, d5 y& @! Z- C: K/ M尽管美国住房疾苦加拿大房地产仍乐观
2 V' ?) C9 J7 M1 h2 D: R- p" w    多伦多, 11月5日电/新华美通/ -领先的房地产专家预测,美国
& d7 Q$ |" I6 a6 i商业房地产市场将缓慢,在2008年和遵循类似模式。 ' `# S0 H' _0 K* v+ y+ z2 X
由于目前住宅市场。但是,根据年报新兴
& M6 ?9 E! b  ~/ h! s6 u( g! a趋势,在房地产, 2008年发布的报告,由罗兵咸永道(预委会)
# g" P% }3 _+ i- K; r和城市土地研究所(宇力) ,其对应的加拿大得多; |0 U6 b: r" r! F4 C
乐观。
6 Y0 U% l' x2 r6 i/ I    现在,在其第29届,今年新出现的趋势是历史最悠久,最受尊敬的
9 X5 l1 k- U# @年度行业展望房地产业。该报告反映了" ~) F! A* _& T8 @1 _7 O
访谈和调查, 600多的业内领先的实时
: b3 i3 [5 F3 Z. T. d4 G  s  ^地产专家,包括投资者,开发商,物业公司
5 O/ z6 _, i& G. d# H6 z% x代表,放款人,经纪人和顾问公司在加拿大和美国。 0 T- a6 b3 f, Y( P# d) l$ `9 i
其它版本的这份报告是在世界各国纷纷+ E" M) H& |7 c1 H. z
包括亚太地区和欧洲。 ) k; q! r: a0 v* k3 ]
    据克里斯波特,预委会的合作伙伴和领导者,该公司在加拿大
, j+ F6 e# q% C7 K9 p# g- }7 Q房地产税的做法,加拿大受益于一个较保守的投资/ X4 L' I, a5 s( V! s4 u: B
环境比美国好。 "在加拿大,机构主导的市场,似乎
  Y+ Z9 @4 j4 b( Z3 s4 h( O! p可避免'交易躁狂症' ,但房地产的价值,已达到了创纪录
6 t* G; n  `- B5 n8 }高点和强劲的经济,加速了租客的需求空间" 。
0 `* ~- u, X' V  ?- K$ L    据美国受访者中,一个健康的校正南方的- y- ?+ Z! e8 x7 e  _+ f* b
边界可能会绕过长线投资者,但惩罚下旬至该游戏5 N! h) V# k* D+ v+ h
炒家overleveraged买家。加拿大民意调查被访者
+ T! U) b/ d2 y2 q# l" ^) |2 c继续积极回避任何严重的影响,这可能美国
, I4 O2 ~+ d- k* g更正。接近36 % ,查看他们的前景,盈利能力在2008年将
8 Y- K/ q7 B$ t: i非常好,并且进一步的22.4 %的人说他们做得很棒。 0 U% L. r7 h0 a$ @- w
    最强地区的房地产经营活动,为加拿大- k7 u2 I2 a( H+ s( ]( D
受访者预测,要保持房地产服务,其次是
1 z4 @3 S( ^/ `2 F0 M商业/多家庭的发展和住宅建设/住宅用地
, t; c$ N9 X  w$ W& z的发展。所有地产行业分享积极的前景在全国推行
/ [1 O7 }* @( j4 [; V+ _尤其是工业和零售与受访者中,平均说明
# ^. ]( ]3 I( ^$ w, O/ r3 E的发展前景,预计会虚心好,以良好的。该
$ _3 n' P  ~: q/ R* D" j, J住宅为售后市场预期也将公平好,但可能需要
$ P7 J: G, v1 ]! C, m, V& p$ ^以喘息为营建不能配合当前的速度和- z3 [( G  e( t1 h4 _- Y
单个家庭的房屋期待过高。 4 T( o" ^* c! d( A9 d% E+ ^
    办公室的股票是看到有限的库存和过时的产品,填补了
: [  K1 v$ i! Y/ b6 r租户。除蒙特利尔,而办公楼空置率接近百分之九。加拿大3 ^1 \! f) u3 e; H. o
大都市区夸耀百分之五以下的职位空缺,以及租金的空间,以推动
% X& u' W9 T% f. L; r5 X  `$ _# q更高。调查也显示,成本及土地稀缺限制
, r: x& v3 F4 K) \- z+ K! P新的发展。酒店投资和发展前景是良好的谦虚, : m* t' M# `3 b
和大多数受访者比率这个行业无论是购买或持有。出租
" c5 n; }1 l7 J2 X, _公寓是搞好大城市与高移民流动。小学+ [: C' T% ?$ Y8 t6 b& t
西方城市-温哥华,卡尔加里,埃德蒙顿和-正转向对房屋( G4 X: B0 K: y# ~6 y9 c
短缺的工人,吸引了大量的好报酬优厚的就业岗位,倒入- |6 o* W% P0 E( \
能源区。公寓占用飞涨,在这方面的努力。发展) V2 ?! G% K/ y3 J/ @
在其他地区仍然很困难,因为成本及土地匮乏。 ; W* ^6 z* B9 M0 a3 l

4 \4 ^7 \+ S0 z# Y, ~& B    加拿大市场上观看/ |. d9 ~/ b0 E% N

! b/ \  d; d  ]# Y1 @1 Z    该报告对如何加拿大人愿意生活和工作在中央+ }) N' w6 v1 c' e7 i  T9 Q
城市,只要他们能够负担得起的。如果房屋是太昂贵,在24小时/ Q% Q" v* \& C
居民区,人们搬到党内环郊区或更远和通勤回
0 I9 D/ p) G. O$ W$ ~! a进入内核。投资者,特别是机构,都集中在' _1 c+ {3 B! u" q0 \
市中心地区。规划者和开发商把重心放在加密和更垂直
4 v4 B4 T6 V, }+ L项目,加强了城市的核心。热点增长的能源城市
0 n3 |6 ~1 `! Y& k( l9 Y" A8 R西-卡尔加里和埃德蒙顿-评分最高的收视率,为投资8 b' D& i( t% D8 g( q5 o
前景,发展,并为出售住房,它虽然是不肯定  s2 ~8 ~) h: \2 c) L. ~" |, ^
是否最近宣布对版税将产生什么影响。 # h* S+ r) s6 S0 K3 n8 h( a8 U
多伦多,是加拿大首屈一指的全球通路的城市,温哥华等,也有高  e8 c/ U. @3 ~0 B: K
评级。渥太华和蒙特利尔跟进,与哈利法克斯还相对滞后。 - `# G2 C7 u3 m, O" M8 j; S4 j* S  E
4 q, e9 }2 k# M4 ^/ D. W
    卡尔加里/埃德蒙顿4 D7 e8 e* D/ Z  b1 `* m

4 o' i' `3 R! y) D    卡尔加里是加拿大的"资源"的资本和北美洲的头号
2 H8 R1 Q# ~; n+ Q新兴都市。调查的受访者预计,强买,为各阶层人士: 53.5 %作6 z" j5 Z8 ]3 y) z9 x: b& X) j6 `
购买建议,为酒店物业,为52.8 % ,为工业/配送, 5 J  Z6 {1 l4 O9 d
48.1 % ,零售和公寓住宅和44.6 % ,为办公室的财产。 & z8 b9 I3 \5 h0 I1 U
此外,每日平均有超过半数受访见卡尔加里为售后
& z. q" q% v' [; F4 e住宅建设前景是非常好的。埃德蒙顿正密切模仿了$ W6 U5 B7 [. m& t: Y
卡尔加里式的增长浪潮,并且只要能源需求的资源留
0 i1 \2 V$ o+ J+ v6 y- O6 R强大的,这个市场将继续向好。
8 j9 i+ c, V! y  O" w
& R$ R: z; ]% _8 o3 p    温哥华
* B% q5 {" E9 |, _3 j
6 d- N  p5 A3 z( W6 @( `8 p    温哥华的多元化的经济,是波涛汹涌,采矿业; I5 V8 S. w# K" Y
红红火火的城市提供了一个大型港口和高科技中心。岂有此理
; _# ?1 `& Q; n4 x房地产价格挫败购房者和商业投资者和" {; p, f, u8 q2 N. n
市场是非常难裂纹。 2010年冬季奥运会也是一个1 |9 i- T8 K" w+ r, A3 J7 y
主要成长动力,并据此44.7 %的受访者给予温哥华买进) |+ P0 U8 x$ x
建议对酒店的财产。另有43.5 %给予买进零售, 41.3 %
9 I. ^/ |3 E* ?# f- A' Q; N工业/分销和36.7 %办公室财产其次是34.1 %
2 s+ U  j5 D2 i: V( v& I: p为公寓住宅物业。温哥华也名列在好的很6 Y: k) S- F" J( r0 z
良好的标志,为买卖房屋建筑的前景。 ) x1 d* G/ n6 t- E1 c- b

. H# J) Z+ E! ^    多伦多
* z1 u& L! r& X3 g# b  r, y" A3 I( o6 E
    多伦多队伍作为一项重大的全球通路目的地后, 24小时市, 3 P3 j: k# K0 ?% N
制造业枢纽。相较于其他国家的金融中心,该市正" I8 g' r. a! d# P' y
价格相对低廉。不过,加元上涨是伤害制造3 T2 C; j, s  U4 f7 L$ ~
工业,并云在美国经济的威胁,以贩出的势头。
, `  {5 f5 d& p( [三个新的办公大楼正在建设中,增加3万个新广场
( ?4 w4 L" N! U( ]% b英尺的办公空间。值得注意的是,办公室( 49.1 % ) ,工业( 46.2 % )和
& i& o, J8 a6 Z& W6 r7 z, M) c公寓( 40.8 % ) ,给出了坚实的收购。
* G# [( L9 x  z% S- t, ?0 D0 j6 y" _9 q/ z3 L
    蒙特利尔
* U. @$ B, A0 ^4 g! {" o3 l+ i6 y! x3 f6 q2 t; r* `
    蒙特利尔仍然面临着关注市场的稳定及整体
& Q- M/ c* H+ u  p+ H6 y经济增长的前景,因为各大公司不再选择香港作为一个地方成立
: e2 V# q- Q2 M% |3 g店。但是,大量的政府办公室填写空间。比较大的城市2 a& r( }$ y5 P8 W! `
加拿大,蒙特利尔排名最低的是一个"买进"的建议,在所有房地产3 s' |4 C: R: s4 E& J4 ^' b
部门。不过,受访者普遍都被评为蒙特利尔房地产行业6 _$ k6 L6 Y7 G8 }' ]% n$ F- ^
高为"持有"建议。
3 ?! C0 c# m; D; p) a1 C
: [: B* y! g+ b; C* r! a- R    报告指出,最佳的赌注,为投资者在未来几年; ]  |- \3 l; c4 J# Q+ _
包括重点放在所有地产行业在高速发展的西方能源
' K& W/ w2 P7 i$ S, j& k市场,忍着中央商务区的办公场所,制定加密公寓/ v4 y$ g# |' h; T7 G9 H5 _; U
附近的行人隧道,停在多伦多,购买加密地点在何处,你可以和投资
0 U8 r6 S$ e2 x5 U) x( {5 Y$ W海外。波特的结论是, "国内的机会太有限,在目前的
8 M6 x1 A" w3 b, J+ m/ Q" p; U; W价格" 。 0 O' n, \9 b3 V9 o1 v1 ~2 a! a
    一本新趋势的房地产( r )的, 2008年是于
2 |) [: d  w2 T3 u+ iwww.uli.org或www.pwc.com /伊姆雷。 7 I) Y+ f4 f* O% H

$ D$ e! w2 f, i% R: N' z    约罗兵咸永道8 i4 l0 e, W3 V" Q& C

3 ~  ]. W# G% }4 b3 k    罗兵咸永道( www.pwc.com )提供行业为重点的保证,
2 ^3 y! B6 T& k. V7 Z7 {税务和咨询服务,以建立公众的信任和提高其值5 J7 w0 H6 i- P" ?; r3 _6 e; o
客户和他们的利益相关者。超过14万人,在149个国家) N$ N  G+ H: B3 p
跨越我们的网络分享他们的思想,经验和解决方案开发
. N+ a% w' K) N4 [新的观点和切实可行的意见。现在庆祝百年的
, h' L% k7 x# e. o+ A9 [卓越在加拿大,罗兵咸永道物流园( www.pwc.com / ca )和其$ B2 g4 T, g5 J: Y! l
相关实体有超过5200名合作伙伴和工作人员在全国各地的办公室7 x$ Z7 k$ I9 D% Y! ]: f
国。
0 \1 Q) n; ~. x- D0 j9 N     "罗兵咸永道" ,是指以罗兵咸永道物流园,安大略( w( N: b6 a% g3 p5 L  R
有限责任合伙,或视情况需要,
9 y% p( I( I$ {6 a; R3 ]7 u4 E普华永道的全球网络,还是其他会员公司的网络,
4 P$ a# @5 x3 I/ ^& M. {1 v每年这是一个独立的法律实体。
: W" `! I7 K& n
$ y* }% E( Z* i- |/ d    关于城市土地研究所所长
; s8 M" K# `6 o) z& X
/ f; b, {4 e! |6 C8 e    城市土地学会( www.uli.org )是一个非赢利性的教育和+ [, ^+ x- H0 _$ @( w( x
研究院的支持,它的成员。它的使命是提供6 f9 Y5 H/ Q. o& Z5 d* r4 e# \
领导,在以负责任的方式使用土地,并维持和创造
: h: {3 B, H; i8 A7 ?6 j蓬勃发展的社区在世界各地。成立于1936年,研究所更8 e* S; M- Z" Z1 ~1 @
超过38000人,代表各方面的土地利用与发展
1 u2 s- A; K) v- E+ D* i学科。 ; A% x0 r2 B2 \4 ]. \( q& W
    城市土地学会是一个积极的和不断扩大的组织在加拿大。 * `3 s: X/ P8 H; P
与近700名委员在全国推行,加拿大的第赫内斯区/ f3 K% G" `! D+ @# W6 i) G! C0 k
理事会成立于多伦多,在2005年和第二个区议会
4 @& d  {( Z5 x6 h" l4 b现在正在形成,在不列颠哥伦比亚省。多伦多区会& B/ F4 i& H! Z# a( d' d
主办了一次特别活动,对新出现的趋势,在房地产上11月20日, 2 U0 b3 q7 Y8 C: \% C3 O5 J
2007年,包括乔纳森米勒,主要报告的作者,卜力
; B( ]# I$ u. F1 H3 D5 ^资讯公司总裁世邦魏理仕加拿大有限公司,和乔治carras ,
9 B) W. O2 x8 k  c4 C4 T总统realnet加拿大公司的更多信息,对这一事件,请' r* n/ r5 u; u# e# J9 }
致电多伦多区议会事务协调员( 647 ) 258-0017 ,或一脸无奈
1 H- ]1 U/ N6 B0 E4 h网站www.uli.org/events/index.cfm?id=3066
/ v* z0 A8 {+ R! B3 ]! s9 K8 p% X+ H: v

$ P. l1 ^+ L. v1 K+ k, X. |4 W& X) w& B0 V; @3 s: `* F
更多资讯:卡罗琳森林,罗兵咸永道物流园, 9 \3 G+ S2 ~- ~
( 416 ) 814-5730 , carolyn.forest @ ca.pwc.com
大型搬家
鲜花(4348) 鸡蛋(18)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:10 | 显示全部楼层
楼主的这个翻译软件好。
鲜花(3) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:15 | 显示全部楼层

Up

老杨团队 追求完美
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 11:20 | 显示全部楼层
( x" r+ L* ]3 G

0 I/ k1 ~5 T1 ]( D2 s
理袁律师事务所
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 13:54 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 15:37 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
看涨派的忽悠水平有很大提高,请继续努力。
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 19:04 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(49) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 21:54 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!

: ]2 d7 S& q+ m% \* yu
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-6-12 00:33 , Processed in 0.165840 second(s), 25 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表