 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
: e; P. U+ b/ j* Y9 g0 }楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!# S: z" M: I% r8 o% h& c/ S
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... . }! F. J& v" E) K& m4 j2 A. x
/ p0 E$ D: z* r7 K" s3 C6 y* _1 W您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
3 ]! S/ {3 E, ^8 Z* b- L
1 W6 S! K% U) @4 | a安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
5 J; _$ E+ L9 Q: _& q- Y8 X0 j" _# r5 N- O* U g7 Q9 V8 K
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?1 G* y$ y, U, b8 P0 c( x8 A' B! `
; g p0 O, H6 d2 J- [5 Q
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。$ q. R/ m. ~" c1 e' t) Z
* Z$ O/ w1 g! U, R( v- G关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
; C" e4 z F$ S' f( L$ }Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.3 H7 G, k, q$ O; `
" X/ d1 J4 g) Y) ~9 M
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
# n& o: X6 L4 M4 z5 n" W3 ?# `/ O
$ K% l; o7 V' V! r: sBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
G/ M- E( h4 E8 ]0 ~7 O" g4 r1 v7 @/ [5 {- d
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|