 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 ! f: l1 q \; }2 d5 q
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!# q7 q1 V$ h. ~
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
* r J+ m8 _ \3 [
; E* j' A4 E8 g5 o) `您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。7 t# h9 K) y8 z }+ F z/ c# F
/ J; ?) j" Y- |7 r
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.# C$ x' I3 G4 r w* _- q3 B( k
( [2 s- A/ G7 X2 p不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?3 ^* @2 n6 [ ]! A
4 F+ |. o& D$ H0 f3 t; x另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。9 y6 S- C* N& U8 H3 `4 \0 B& {
8 c, Q2 J8 {6 h8 n; D关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):: N! z4 U: q! ~* W) w, @ |
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
9 \3 x5 a9 k) {- I5 e* q2 Y
B/ V5 q: t; b- NOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".1 [4 N0 C! f* h- T( J+ o! v3 \
# A. U A% v9 m7 H( R, d* e' \
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.$ C+ b6 N( o* o0 S
. l |6 X! y$ O, {. j: A& ?
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|