 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 ' @: E, w* B5 O- a3 s
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了! _. y$ @3 v6 a1 B+ _: c5 C' J
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
' ~# C: S! O! r' F! M
9 C, d8 H4 @( Y您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
`0 s. v8 B. Z# ?% Y5 ]
% c6 ~& X0 p' O2 z) g& a安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
Y+ {! }. |8 I' }$ E, P$ s+ v; k
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
4 Y0 d) e5 I# g3 ]; @. h5 S) Z, f& H. j) V6 f: B, o0 h1 D' ]
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。" _( c6 | J& X/ P# z: J- F) K
" @: `% h- u% P) i; x+ K
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):, z _/ t. I3 S( d0 c' l
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
1 [+ j" ]# e; G! l
2 y) H ?9 G3 O# O" e. L: ]2 }! JOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".* j8 G. W" f7 n. S2 a8 F
+ l. D% d ]" v4 E( |9 EBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
. C0 A' W2 n# e$ U
7 O. P8 h7 ?* X% K5 s4 V+ D j[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|