 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 % C2 i& X7 H( d0 E! P. J/ Q9 F
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
4 h6 ~, Y/ I5 l: I- dcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 7 f v( B( k. Z0 J$ H
% c/ o3 r' i/ E( a7 V' I7 a# Z
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
: f. R) v! p7 l5 T
A5 V/ V' a0 `3 U$ @4 E$ o. A/ s4 K安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.9 r9 ]1 s' B- T4 S/ J
+ m% @. `# X r9 T不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?0 B9 N* o: R# U4 c9 }
o( x! S3 J Q5 w. A另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。" n) {1 G+ ?9 `0 N" o( q
; p6 o* {; Z! q7 e4 B
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
% M/ k( y4 f( p. C9 W1 P. X% W5 ~Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
* K3 }3 k' G$ O/ I# ~0 e
1 ?' M/ K7 s9 y0 E6 y. |Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".$ c% F9 d2 ^8 V% o9 T
4 E. y/ b( B" X' @) o CBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.8 k" U1 `4 ^9 k1 C
+ m6 }7 X" w5 \* i. G7 G
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|