 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 $ k* j$ n0 C! a& }$ S% b3 D9 P/ _5 k
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!4 p$ d5 ]1 z1 R- m) O7 m7 Y0 w
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... & i# y$ R3 M- n. c! ^' T3 a
% b2 i1 O. f6 {6 @您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
$ k9 X% t# w3 R: y: `2 k' N X. m0 b8 E. U
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.# {- y9 Q! P; h1 N! Q9 C1 _
& P1 q. ^: L( u$ p( M
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
/ m f* y6 \& ^& V# m
: p( b: Y, G6 x) e$ F( b/ }另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
: y: z5 C* _% k! w o# X; _+ `) Q
/ k# K* Y6 Q$ v6 C( ?/ Y关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
3 U- }# X1 z9 a( t- qYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
; ?2 Z5 z2 `) _0 a, b. J% U4 O3 Z
S$ x0 p, A# TOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
# S0 A. k1 m4 C; I
; x' T3 t' L1 G! b- dBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.) D" q! U& D# Q
3 R" a& B/ v3 ]
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|