 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 ; r6 l+ O" f; h; g l7 {. P6 `
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!) `0 y2 E. b9 t6 b
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 8 C1 w' f- ~- `. ?; u( r0 M! W3 a
; ^) Z% H) u* ?& E) q. j
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。% U2 v9 c5 F. n4 f6 c" U' a
* Y9 q/ m8 w( K$ N安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
9 @8 u5 H" f, e5 d$ M6 S' G- a( g) _
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?0 u6 h5 r' K1 [5 _+ H4 z k& a
0 S$ V8 ]% r }6 i% W/ Q: ?另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。' W. i6 g' F/ t/ y2 K3 B
# O$ W: O4 p9 D; [$ s关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
0 t/ \4 G8 C2 ~) u( aYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.* l r+ Z, y9 N$ g/ Z
( y/ F0 |/ w- ?/ M, } O hOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car"." s1 R7 p# k2 F
) A! p3 F* e/ eBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
. i/ s+ L3 J7 }4 g+ P, w- l& R
. r% G6 s% y- M5 E' U" ]- `# d[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|