 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 1 }1 U/ f& o( q
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!* b/ n! s# O9 w* K% z! \ D2 V
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 1 p1 _. s" z- {# x k
, O; O9 V8 H6 a, O- m) o您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
2 y9 \% |1 G3 n" q, _0 U! Q# [; r5 y9 G
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless./ z' h" _) B( j% J
" H3 h0 p2 C8 T! Q* V不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
" ]& F7 h* N! \2 M. o# O& D) |, q& w6 O% X
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
3 @0 |3 p: s, b( K9 X. H, {, Q8 b
" p' {7 F# _' A2 S( @; }关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):5 U" h- x, E, G/ D h6 ^
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
: ~5 {. x$ l$ {) X: B; r
) |5 r3 V+ D* W3 `4 O; s% i! M3 O5 _Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".+ _+ R9 ~! p9 c$ l2 j
8 i r# ^. j9 [6 ^0 a5 _
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.3 V$ T7 I* M9 f0 L0 [3 Q
( K' p" U# B' h8 N[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|