 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 . Z* V6 K1 {" L$ _3 R" G( v1 d$ r4 @$ ~
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
4 g# w Z6 F9 Y Zcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 8 v( u2 h2 C" [8 i/ j. J( M
7 K" x3 R0 I& A% W
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。; r# ?, _! ?& p6 z
0 I! v* }, L* v/ |1 g
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.* ^& |/ m3 u1 M4 k( k
( u5 P3 L% Z j; A
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?) Q3 y* R/ b: E! ]2 U5 w' O; |
) s& {: M" a8 N1 v
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。3 x. t0 n9 Y2 f0 n8 j' z
1 i4 L3 u' t) [3 ^% g! w# Y关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
/ \* h- `, L! j' @; {) _( |Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
4 d. M3 Z9 Z& P4 j8 {
2 u' w' w. V* O# TOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
" T/ _+ f% f! X7 n7 h% S3 n" }% x3 f% o G
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe., O' s+ R+ V: O( X8 m) S! N" H4 l
4 N+ V3 g4 `( e e1 [" A* G- h
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|