原则上讲已经没什么回旋余地了,但知道以前类似的情况,有这样两个不是理由的理由:5 C7 g+ K+ q. D% d
1.在高速上超速,被逮了个正着,后来他上法庭狡辩说因为小便实在太急了,不快不行.2 v5 d2 O* n/ N- v
2.还有个人闯红灯,也是没什么好争的,但他又不想付那么多罚款,他就说他是学生,如果付了罚款的话就没钱过日子了.3 S5 ?- W. l7 z) e A0 \
- m* b" L* s( u' C$ p
上述两位仁兄都获得了减免.虽是下策,但如果抱着尝试的态度那也不要紧. $ }$ n. U1 `5 Z9 J9 u 9 t9 i0 T/ R4 b6 W9 z0 I[ Last edited by 社员都是向阳花 on 2005-2-14 at 10:03 AM ]
Here is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005 5 Z. ~* L6 w. a) u% Q" S: o) k7 BThe title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb"8 m! ^# a( f8 z8 T" w0 B
' f1 J4 r! F7 t% H. P0 v4 V8 S
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in 2004 and now range from $115 to $575, depending on the circumstances."( }. C* X, e4 H& T# J
! Z& Q' _: b2 |9 v/ i8 a, U) LYou should have a chance to ask some discount.
到哪里查看到这个报告? 请告知。 这也许是个突破口。十分感谢。老实说,靠着托时间我很没谱儿。 不过,当时我确实没有让那个行人受任何惊扰。 是他看到我在前面,先停了下来。那眼神然我觉得他让我先走。 % Z/ l P" |& n1 i- { 9 W. ]: B, a: z. m, {& L* B; A9 s. v
Originally posted by yuexu at 2005-2-17 09:39 PM: M" i" _$ a) FHere is a report from The edmonton Examiner Jan 19,2005% c, M* |* g" r% w
The title is "Number of fatall collosions in city continues to climb"3 ~" E0 H, G( ]- s1 y# ?. `8 _
0 g' q5 K4 G( f9 N% @/ M6 L$ p/ ]( {
"Fine for failing to yield to pedestrians jumped in ...
' n9 o' f5 L7 k! Y: KDo you have a witness ? Did you see the man give you expression that you just pass it first? Did you wave to him after you passed? Think about it and make a decison.