 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
M+ ^9 J. t& ^( H! {8 BDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs( E9 m/ T- q* M9 n! B% B' y( Z3 z# |+ S
2 x" R4 u0 u$ V) Z
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
9 _5 R' _4 Y+ p9 B+ n4 F8 f. x$ C8 b$ a$ t) L' `6 @+ H
Mary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
5 y& `4 |2 z: t
0 J% _- ?" b8 A& J. YThe cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.' V$ p5 L: N S. L$ F7 | d1 [/ J
1 [5 m$ D- Y- J5 [+ s4 I: o1 QDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.
# \- V' p8 p5 n S4 r2 g7 f2 F8 V! N8 `' F: D( o q
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.+ V: }2 D G. q0 d0 r
: M) _7 y& h0 c! x% n" K# U; K
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
9 P0 D0 G3 U5 @" y, R T% v5 Z6 b; ?: p- H5 S6 l2 I" k1 ?
Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
7 A4 ~& k8 [' n+ T2 n% _
+ m. v; R% U3 d* ePhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
4 k% e6 u; u; X# [0 C& W3 e4 F6 r0 X% T8 D @
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|