公告：xiaodou_112255 禁言二周

云山水月

公告：xiaodou_112255 禁言二周
8 e7 N! V8 J8 q; a  t+ s$ g
其实这个规则未必人人清楚，但是有投诉只好有处理。

我决心判下去，还在于被告的发言在这里颇不妥当，煽风点火的味道很重，不单单是个禁言期间发言的问题。

http://www.edmontonchina.cn/view ... &extra=page%3D1

xiaodou_112255

.......................i just want to explain to you what happened, you didnt listen to me instead you judged unfairly..

9 j8 s1 B$ ]& Z5 T* mplease look carefully about what you said at the first time of warning me then you will know that i didnt go against the judge.

云山水月

原帖由 xiaodou_112255 于 2009-3-22 14:31 发表
.......................i just want to explain to you what happened, you didnt listen to me instead you judged unfairly..
  W. d! Y3 `2 i3 [- C4 Q, C- v
please look carefully about what you said at the first time of warning me th ...

朝阳可以认为你的发言有挑衅的嫌疑。我觉得这个你很难辩解清楚你同意吗？
0 f' A7 @) }4 n$ F
只好如此判决。谢谢理解。

无敌魔羯

原帖由 云山水月 于 2009-3-22 14:33 发表

" [: w( [) u6 m$ O$ F; h朝阳可以认为你的发言有挑衅的嫌疑。我觉得这个你很难辩解清楚你同意吗？
+ y- x$ J# L, p. N& E
只好如此判决。谢谢理解。

5 _8 K, x! P" L; {& L  L
& ~0 G3 e4 e3 O 好像两个案件弄混了。。。
朝阳投诉的不是他。。。

xiaodou_112255

原帖由 云山水月 于 2009-3-22 14:33 发表

8 f4 G) o4 H, z0 f% u朝阳可以认为你的发言有挑衅的嫌疑。我觉得这个你很难辩解清楚你同意吗？

* @5 j$ n9 B( _* G7 H0 u只好如此判决。谢谢理解。

haha, you need proof to prove the suspect guilty. how come if the suspect cant prove he didnt crime then he is criminal????

xiaodou_112255

原帖由 云山水月 于 2009-3-22 14:33 发表

" Z* A8 D4 t% Y+ a; Y8 `朝阳可以认为你的发言有挑衅的嫌疑。我觉得这个你很难辩解清楚你同意吗？
; z3 n" ^8 T' x0 n8 R* a9 r% E# S) X
% \6 v! \2 _7 @0 I. g& W) u只好如此判决。谢谢理解。

she could say that i am teasing, but where is the proof??????

云山水月

原帖由 醉清风 于 2009-3-22 14:35 发表

9 e- Q, l; e/ W7 [4 A6 h3 {
好像两个案件弄混了。。。
. f$ j1 f- g" `# h朝阳投诉的不是他。。。

: G6 z! |3 k7 ~. n7 h3 K  Uhttp://www.edmontonchina.cn/view ... &extra=page%3D1

xiaodou_112255

because we are talking at the same time, so i didnt see your warning until i posted my reply. i will not say anything in other poples topic but only my own topic, thanks

xiaodou_112255

up up