埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2021|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly
0 q1 d% o& m  T4 ]2 }, T) Sfrom 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove+ g2 D0 `+ p& h* {! x. F+ V
unsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house. C# k* w, A+ v% [, n, Q
prices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by( M! o9 B$ s- ?/ @
fundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This
& q# k" v/ u. c& u7 `overpricing compelled a level of residential construction. W" j$ [- T8 v% X$ d2 b  a
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately
" u- n# z# A% U% o2 D$ Z4 Y- ^12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past1 S$ ^, V  |! P) l  M
three years.
: c9 q4 L; Y7 e( M/ ~7 I: BBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
, ?/ K$ @5 \8 Ptheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of
  u( W3 [# Q6 N# p& a0 f/ qaffordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects. e; a) z0 L2 A6 o8 c! h5 y  q
both a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices+ m/ |7 o! ^/ {; Z
to fundamentally justified levels.
  V2 w0 I; L( c/ k6 aWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”1 M  |5 e: p3 T) k
where homebuyers buy up too many houses and+ I7 Z- o% u; _5 E  d
that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”! _; @6 L( @, W6 Q3 F# j
where builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although
( p, l5 m5 H' L6 othere is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s
8 A/ |# a+ |& |* c7 D“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
- }$ }7 r5 x0 ^3 Q2 khomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch
8 s4 W# \) b1 Z1 L: E& {" dthat is now being rapidly reined in.
8 P' }( {+ Q$ }' yWhile most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,$ g1 X. }3 s( C$ v
the construction of too many new homes over the boom4 w4 N% g/ l* P4 c2 H
means a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh) ^5 j' n3 S0 l
on markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers" v. W+ Q6 u1 p. N4 W; Z) d' n, K
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will9 ?  [: n8 J1 I2 N1 `- w: `, `" Y
remain choppy and new residential construction will be
5 M8 B0 x1 }7 Rdampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction
0 v7 e7 q) u, F) a0 u$ uis now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
1 `  _/ w* P* V) c1 {; Yto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
* j+ C9 Z* s7 [! g$ W) kresidential construction will fall further to around7 T9 |+ [- h; u9 ~; r' k
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
) Z2 _5 m- P3 j' Tin the fourth quarter.: A# l: M: I) W- z$ C0 E$ e7 h! I
To quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
% b1 U+ E1 l" f1 W+ w8 Q7 N9 O3 ywe first develop an empirical model, based on long-run
; X0 U. j1 H6 ]% k& R' F. v" \fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each6 l3 K3 R/ N6 D/ I
province. Affordability is the key concept behind home
- x- u1 F) d8 f: e# @2 o4 t; q. tvalues since house prices should track incomes over the
  Y% K: \! @/ U+ ^+ {long-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
7 c( \: \  f1 X7 p* a, b) r$ bregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers3 h! I& z5 p; ?' P/ |/ O
of residential construction.: A% t% R! s$ i  M$ u) B$ U$ M
To examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a" r) C8 W8 c/ U0 ]0 d2 @
“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction$ h( y. C5 A2 P) y7 D$ P7 p' P
would have occurred if housing had been priced8 C, a$ ^. K  B2 ]( ?6 Q" M) s
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this4 |" M6 Y0 g" x. x& z
fundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new& {9 N- T* Z) C4 e' U
units were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too1 {- @$ U, M7 F( F5 s2 ?6 z
many houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
. Z+ s9 g) e! s: d; ~! w2 h: H& LRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
. I5 v" E9 V/ [2 v5 X& Vwhere housing demand will further contract under waning2 |+ H, w( k, A. V/ w
population inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are; s2 r) z* E. W* ?; ^3 n
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
: K4 E  C- L# Z- ?5 ivery time that the resale market has swung into strong
, E4 I6 ~* b* o. ]7 g6 p( k$ Zbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces
, ~1 g/ w: q$ dhas been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural+ I. P9 M- \6 M2 J
weakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
/ {3 v' @3 n" R. h' E& O7 |1 w5 qQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the" q3 k. }5 X- M2 s6 L
strange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
! E* t9 W" C+ j! Y! D& _. p0 [Montréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,
0 s' M" M* b, L' P) b! }2 F) F+ dgiven the province’s history of under-building and low ownership9 j$ ~( E  ~- G& `" p
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a
# k7 R- M6 E+ Q6 V! G# t/ x$ E) N% \cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears
3 I: P- {7 ?- C% V: m' u3 S6 Tlimited – with the important exception of the Toronto
( x7 ?! E% n- v3 k9 M' _condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically7 o2 l, U; M+ e
high levels of apartment-style units presently under" Y  j& \3 ^3 A; ^
construction mean that record numbers of condos will- h  {8 v) x  ^/ `# F/ x
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as2 e$ M7 ?! t% t. w0 O& c2 C' a
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could
6 G6 ~: w9 P1 _spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while' Y: {" e9 c& a2 \( o
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
& N9 t; n* o& Panticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from4 d( L% l$ p' Q" \& J) k7 w% f$ V
inter-provincial and international migration over the coming
4 s* h; G% m& d( U" e& [9 s# L0 Y" P) `years, which, along with improvements in affordability,0 i0 D0 h* Y, B1 ~& K
will alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.: A* i1 O3 q" o+ b  U0 E
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING' j7 ?! G( Z: a) A+ s
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS
. s  v, I- z* D/ j) Z$ v# h  {' t" mGrant Bishop, Economist
" j/ I- h; J* J7 L, f9 Z5 E" }416-982-8063& J4 |. M. q+ H/ b
Pascal Gauthier, Economist% |9 f4 X$ c3 L9 y# n
416-944-5730, w; `9 u  ]* U  y

1 G& p  q* E3 j( Chttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-6-13 23:40 , Processed in 0.121194 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表