埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1502|回复: 2

TD Bank:OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 15:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
During Canada’s “Housing Boom”, which ran roughly9 k5 W7 A# ?3 C' b
from 2002 to 2008, unsustainable price increases drove
5 _! Z$ [$ A+ f3 runsustainable levels of building. Our view is that house
0 E  s; l( H4 L& ~2 o2 jprices exceeded the value of housing that was justified by
! O( }9 m0 T" t- Kfundamentals by approximately 9% nationwide. This3 Q6 r2 v( |  L, Q2 l
overpricing compelled a level of residential construction$ I3 l: n0 A4 W& B
that exceeded its fundamental-justified level by approximately7 ]/ u7 G+ ~+ G) u% j( B$ q( A
12%, an excess that was exaggerated in the past8 B+ D+ j% S0 ?
three years.
, c% Q& Q* c) i3 f& _+ JBy “overpricing” we mean that prices detached from
2 ?, B+ T# ~4 J+ ttheir fundamentals, as witnessed by a steep erosion of3 S9 D& w% Q% S6 ?+ d) j9 w
affordability. The current unwinding of house prices reflects
9 `1 w9 s$ `9 j6 m' Gboth a cyclical downturn and a return of house prices2 j! j# q" V6 }6 g$ f; e0 B
to fundamentally justified levels.
; }; B4 B& q- s8 I/ ?+ Z+ KWe consider “overbuilding” of two forms: “demanddriven”
. p9 j1 m. s9 _- t+ W# b7 Bwhere homebuyers buy up too many houses and
, `  E# e9 f( ~! _1 S& i3 Y& B) }that this demand cannot be sustained; and “supply-driven”
* z$ D: b+ W; D+ B& O  Pwhere builders accumulate excessive inventories. Although+ n9 x1 A2 ^$ y" g: C* {  Y: N1 ?
there is evidence of both types, we contend that Canada’s5 u% z! Y; A9 u
“overbuilding” was mainly of the first type, where
# Q7 m) h" @9 Ahomebuyers pushed homebuilding to an unsustainable pitch; l) @( c( J6 l) X; I. p4 O' ~4 m
that is now being rapidly reined in.1 J7 c" @& c  i* `6 I
While most markets won’t face U.S.-style overhangs,
( h# u3 h% F6 O  {/ i) l" M) F5 Rthe construction of too many new homes over the boom
# i+ C7 d7 l1 wmeans a deepened slump. This overbuilding will likely weigh
% i5 ~# {! |( d4 P9 V0 w- aon markets over the next few years. Even as Canada recovers1 s1 n/ Y* A7 k; N5 T0 J) K
from the cyclical downturn, house price growth will! N. W6 L5 b- H5 w% o$ [
remain choppy and new residential construction will be, y( F/ X& L/ Z
dampened, owing to this structural weakness. Construction6 M% r; o8 l" {. X) w* f
is now undershooting fundamentals and we expect this
, ]  S  j! N8 L2 z; hto persist over 2009 to 2011. We anticipate that nationwide
# _% h; [3 [; ]' z) b9 V$ u" U1 ^' Mresidential construction will fall further to around, S6 J. L5 p/ O  l% I* I
125,000 starts over 2009 with a trough around 115,000 units
: `5 f2 I3 F  s1 j/ H( P+ min the fourth quarter.
; K# r" V" u# K" N: |) YTo quantify the degree of overpricing and overbuilding,
8 I: D' J/ Q! a& I1 s1 p" {we first develop an empirical model, based on long-run2 u/ [' N5 {1 f+ B
fundamentals of house prices and housing starts in each
4 r' ]4 O) r9 J: eprovince. Affordability is the key concept behind home& N/ r# e! P5 q4 F1 B, z9 B: D. V; U
values since house prices should track incomes over the
7 |: W  g8 m+ t2 \1 \* olong-run. Since homebuilders build to meet demand, we
: P9 @4 Z  j# H# Q* J$ uregard housing prices and household formation as the drivers
4 d' E, B7 P4 c0 ]% Z1 W% Aof residential construction.
6 n0 D  u9 d. d: |! ATo examine the degree of overbuilding, we employ a
3 H6 e+ `/ [$ W% q. Y“counter-factual,” asking what level of residential construction+ Z" u4 B: R9 f& X
would have occurred if housing had been priced0 A- w1 R' k& n) T3 O
optimally. We find that actual homebuilding exceeded this
+ A5 Z0 k7 s0 D/ wfundamental-justified level by about 12%. Although new
6 q# g9 i/ o% yunits were being absorbed, homebuyers simply bought too
( J4 u5 M* G$ Mmany houses at prices that exceeded fundamentals.
, ^. i. {1 C2 CRegionally, we see the greatest strains on the Prairies,
3 c2 j! E; \' ~7 b) U: v" H+ cwhere housing demand will further contract under waning
9 Q+ e) T7 Z7 spopulation inflows. Saskatoon, Calgary and Edmonton are) C$ n% b" l3 E
already witnessing surges in their unsold new homes at the
' @- O- l6 q& ^8 g  w) Xvery time that the resale market has swung into strong
2 g0 z* _* P4 m- fbuyers’ territory. Homebuilding in the Atlantic provinces# M$ O: X* g- L
has been relatively balanced but, while not plagued by structural
+ V  t% L& e" z& m# a& A) Hweakness, will be singed by the downturn nonetheless.
3 |* @4 n. T9 c" V  ]  I+ B2 ^0 ^# mQuébec shows signs of strain – especially given the
+ {- |" b1 L- U6 sstrange accumulation of unabsorbed multiples on l’Île de
! ^$ ^5 B# a; o' L3 z  O: e( ~3 sMontréal – but recent building has been relatively balanced,2 P1 m" x: y3 c
given the province’s history of under-building and low ownership/ \1 U2 H8 }0 A; U: h7 g' R  |
rates. While Ontario homebuilding will reel from a3 W$ f, H$ v. e1 L' T' W" r) ]# H: s
cyclical downturn, the degree of structural weakness appears, R3 j+ s5 C9 Z& A
limited – with the important exception of the Toronto1 V3 K; G& U1 @4 ]
condo market. Both in Toronto and Vancouver, historically5 Z- ?( N4 b( t7 V& X% C
high levels of apartment-style units presently under
% V% N0 I' o$ _+ Q6 {8 Dconstruction mean that record numbers of condos will) G& @. q  @; @9 `' L
reach completion during 2009. If absorption rates fall, as, k5 @) e6 ]$ k9 ^
cyclical factors would indicate, condo inventories could- X+ j0 U8 O& j. h3 H: k6 H5 G
spike severely – particularly in Vancouver. However, while# T) R. @- W% w9 m3 U( k" a$ R+ E
residential construction in B.C. will definitely droop, we
! r5 I$ X0 f: F) h" `" Y8 C# Tanticipate that the West Coast will continue to benefit from
& ]* I) h+ D( _6 Vinter-provincial and international migration over the coming8 K( g* ~: R5 ?/ Y3 U
years, which, along with improvements in affordability,
. c9 w% q* [5 z. A  Lwill alleviate some of the pressure from overbuilding.* l( x: L* [3 O: }/ k
OVERPRICED AND OVERBUILT: CANADIAN HOUSING1 p" V3 E4 ^- c- d8 q* y# o& X
MARKET RETURNS TO FUNDAMENTALS& H% {2 `- Y) _/ w: X
Grant Bishop, Economist: G% C: s% I6 y  m
416-982-8063! f- s2 G" M# j
Pascal Gauthier, Economist) s- k) ]; ^7 s* m3 U) X
416-944-5730) a5 X  ~, |. a" I2 ?" a3 }

' g% O' Z) T$ y  x- phttp://www.td.com/economics/special/gb0409_housing_exec.pdf
鲜花(52) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2009-4-8 20:39 | 显示全部楼层
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-12-10 09:16 , Processed in 0.132378 second(s), 12 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表