Which lot is better?

fourseasons

Sorry, can not type Chinese. Could you help to look at these two lots, which one is better?

6 Q, \4 t2 w7 P, JLot 46 in Block 3  $207900 (Back yard facing future school zone)
% j1 o% y4 B" H6 F3 E9 P& dLot 44 in Block 5  $198500

( _3 d3 n& U- {Link is here:
http://www.melcor.ca/community/edmonton/mactaggart/Mact_4B.pdf
http://www.melcor.ca/community/edmonton/mactaggart/StagePlan.pdf

执迷不悔

Lot 38 in Block 5 is better

Rapala

44, bigger lot, Conner lot, close to the pond, and not facing school yard.

fourseasons

2# 执迷不悔
0 f* R! L& H- Y9 n) ?1 Y

4 h) h+ S% h6 M/ I- a' MBut this one is gone. Have to choose between those two.

fourseasons

3# Rapala
) L1 S. \5 }8 {' j, }
; C* I: R5 _2 k8 k6 ]9 z% n( J5 oThanks for your feedback.

If the backyard is facing future school zone, will it affect the house value eventually? It is really attractive since the backyard will be green area.
& {* J; H+ R" ]* A! L6 L; `: u. t
& N3 \) W( o8 h( T44 is good too except for the narrow font (only 34 feet) and you will facing other people's back yard.
  Q7 l7 H7 i2 |- k0 Z# j" e' D
Thanks anyway.

Rapala

3# Rapala
+ G8 |# @. z$ f0 |, P
Thanks for your feedback.
0 \% C# L. w  l. d- n) s% o
If the backyard is facing future school zone, will it affect the house value eventually? It is really attractive since the backyard will be green area.

4 ...
fourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

) X% F( l/ P5 ]
9 e& \1 W! R* l7 e+ v1 r8 iYou don't want the baseball hit your windows, do you? School back yard is good for some people, and bad for some people(no privacy) .
2 ^4 w. f/ i0 }- ^
2 \# ?' Y; u# T' Z. t4 O) Z46 has two backyard neighbor too.

辣椒

; @: U/ C- A4 U$ T& }lot 34对于我来说是最好的啦，虽然钥匙圈是宁静

WST

Sorry, can not type Chinese. Could you help to look at these two lots, which one is better?
& O5 d1 I8 s% C
Lot 46 in Block 3  $207900 (Back yard facing future school zone)
) J; t# o7 X. U+ @1 S" r4 HLot 44 in Block 5  $198500

Link is h ...
( i0 O* `+ B6 `* m* c) L2 ?# g" jfourseasons 发表于 2010-1-31 22:27

3 q' V1 ^; K9 Y$ ]* p% Z9 V1 ~5 r' `以性价比来说，Lot 44 in Block 5 合算一些。
lot 44 基本价= 40/2 = 20 万，很接近要价。
lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万，实际价高出两万，虽然背靠绿地，但学校绿地不足以溢价2万。背靠绿地由劣到优顺序为：
高压线，高速公路，学校，公园，小湖， Ravine, 大湖。

小黄

当然是44好。前面通小池塘，后面是小路。小路南侧是池塘和贵房子。车库在北侧，客厅在南侧正好和邻居相隔较远，客厅可以做两侧窗，或者做成八角形的格局。

46虽说是靠学校绿地，但那块绿地地势高于房子，不爽。

小黄

以性价比来说，Lot 44 in Block 5 合算一些。
lot 44 基本价= 40/2 = 20 万，很接近要价。
lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万，实际价高出两万，虽然背靠绿地，但学校绿地不足以溢价2万。背靠绿地由劣到优顺序为：
9 E: H/ \+ F( p* Z! v$ [- ]3 m+ `高 ...
WST 发表于 2010-2-1 16:21

5 m) B3 C2 g/ C+ e9 o6 K7 v最好是高尔夫。Westbrook那些很不错。

小黄

3# Rapala

44 is good too except for the narrow font (only 34 feet)
* o' J$ p& S8 S5 Ffourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 11:14

7 I1 A1 [9 S6 ~; o& t0 D那只是某指定进深的宽度。

5 ?. F! _1 x- {3 a9 K' z# F房子的射影不是方形的。在最窄的地方只有车库，34肯定够用。等到了要摆客厅的进深，宽度肯定已经不止34了。具体pocket形状要拿开发商的图纸和建筑商一起讨论如何利用最大面宽。

fourseasons

11# 小黄


看来看好44的居多，原来有些取舍不定，现在看来就44吧，多谢各位！
另外有一点疑问，WST回帖中说  “Lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万”, 38 是pocket size吗？我看着两个pocket都是40的pocket 呀？
还有site plan 上注明44是RC (Restrictive covenant),有没有什么说道？

WST

11# 小黄
) ?# h2 M* i" p$ m" t3 W6 x
  ]3 B6 k9 O. O7 O  }+ z
' r  j$ ~0 z- K& n7 d& a看来看好44的居多，原来有些取舍不定，现在看来就44吧，多谢各位！
3 c$ d2 \" s' s  m5 i0 P. F# Y另外有一点疑问，WST回帖中说  “Lot 46 基本价= 38/2 = 19 万”, 38 是pocket size吗？我看着两个pocket都是40的pocket 呀？
8 }6 R; a1 Q$ o7 B2 t& V还 ...
5 g  b6 w+ K+ Y1 P( pfourseasons 发表于 2010-2-1 20:34

; ?, P" ~5 \& ~- [5 k4 Q38 是pocket size. 我又看了 lot 46 (block 3) 的pocket是38。你再看看。