 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:
. M, M, n& U$ [# D, ^
; d) p" G1 q* }( D* n: `F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
- ~6 e4 o) b, ^% O2 O/ Y) w7 O# j, ?1 Q* Y
**********************************' G1 g6 Y: Y# O* e' [ a
Anyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
0 \: n0 r! P/ E: i. e2 R* \0 A/ m; K5 j
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.
9 m2 a6 s* w( A! u0 }5 F9 S+ m, ?. s
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
^2 B9 Y; b7 Q$ W8 {8 @ X, d j/ t' {: i2 Q x) u* ^: A
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
. D2 r* ^6 O* t* }$ y+ v1 O, l8 @. [7 B- e% n+ u
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8., J+ a: K5 ?2 ~1 c) b
$ e7 { _7 [% n8 j
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|