 鲜花( 21)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2010-10-5 20:41
|
显示全部楼层
正好刚看到一个类似的问题在别的英文论坛:' z$ ~/ Z0 c* G, y) V/ [
( I: r) U8 s& t4 N2 x: s
F4 IS Vs. F2.8 non IS, 贴过来大家都评论评论。
" \# f. R( B. x4 l' \6 o# B j/ C& p
**********************************
# @) Q! ]6 d/ g$ {9 i: t- ^' HAnyhow, you pose a good question - f/4 IS or f/2.8 non IS. Here are the main points:
, H( d, T2 r! L+ z7 K/ D2 ~% A! v8 I+ b/ S, |+ m
1) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of hand-holding possibility, but at the cost of depth of field, whereas the 4.0 gives you 3 stops of hand-holding possibility at any aperture. Winner: f/4.- m! O7 |) L- _. \7 n; l
v9 M# j3 ~! J1 T
2) The f/2.8 gives you one extra stop of light in darkened conditions when photographing moving subjects. The f/4 doesn't. Winner: f/2.8.
* |' t5 ?& F- d+ F# f4 m3 z3 L/ l/ L" ~+ `' \" V
3) The f/4 is lighter and smaller. Winner f/4.
5 U( |1 Q, y% }+ |: S. h$ S( n& x4 ~
4) The wider aperture of the f/2.8 can offer more creative possibilities, especially when taking portraits. Winner: f/2.8.
" _: w. I4 R, _: H' d; O6 E) t8 o9 N% [: C3 D6 G% ]* v& I3 q. Q8 j
5) The f/2.8 has better bokeh (creaminess of the blurred areas). Winner: f/2.8. |
|