请问各位这个房子如何

粽子

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDe ... p;PidKey=-829276348
' m/ C( p7 ]" r
值这个价钱吗

ram

我认为房子不错。

skybird

http://www.realtor.ca/propertyDetails.aspx?propertyId=10659596&PidKey=-829276348
/ j( f: n! l! c- \1 o/ l
% ?* ^7 z, @" w值这个价钱吗
粽子 发表于 2011-5-12 16:04

4 @: K2 c0 \& ^6 d8 ^4 C# ]去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。

ram

去看过这个房子，户型很怪，空间利用率不好。bonus room很小，里面都是不规则形状的布局，尖角和棱角的分割使空间凌乱又不好利用。餐厅很小，没有任何升级。地下室的空间格局难以利用。
. @& ]5 y% E( i8 v+ |* cskybird 发表于 2011-5-12 17:37

眼见为实。

健康营养站

good.worth.

icing

not bad, I like it. And the price is much lower than gov. assess value.
% D( ^4 D4 _3 |( C$ i% h% `3 ^: [Tax Roll: 9982751
Assessed Value: $497,000
100% Taxable: Yes
  S. W. M) @+ ~6 M6 V# {9 O% j100% Complete: Yes
0 y6 y2 }! ?0 s5 q7 uNeighbourhood: Richford
Property Type: Residential
% e! n. B) B4 k; l) L9 ?Land Use: 100% Single Family Dwelling
0 T6 ~: C8 z: v: a4 f, g: B# ELot Size: 467.092 M2 / 5027.9 FT2 / .115 AC
' q  R9 U$ ^& Y2 c: p3 Z# }# EBuilding Count: 1
5 y9 I5 C% c8 v8 Q8 aYear Built, Building Class: 2000, 2 Storey With Basement
Approx Living Area: 201.4 M2 / 2167.9 FT2
4 j8 ^  `& w% b  Y4 V(Does not include basement area or 3rd level of split level)
Basement Development: No
$ |1 i' d  H' J5 rGarage: Yes
* \4 y  v, ^' o3 {* rFireplace: Yes
Walkout Basement: No
4 u" @$ v; f& x# Y/ ^5 bAir Conditioning: No

uil

the position is something need to concern.

Stethoscope

it looks ok.
) w) p# ~% v/ Y8 @- [
you better get there and have a look on ur own, then you can get something different from the pictures.