埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2988|回复: 0

关于 邮购是否免税的问题 退税表 D6-2-6

[复制链接]
鲜花(2) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2011-9-29 22:42 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Memorandum D6-2-6Refund of Duties and Taxes on Non-Commercial Importations
4 R$ o6 C! T% y# M) Y上面说 非商业 进口 可以免关税?$ e( N* c8 H! ?
' ~  B5 G. D+ h" ?
% G: @, r3 n. v  w, g2 }5 K' A

3 ]% w* E3 \+ o$ @8 X7 o9 G; phttp://www.cbsa-asfc.gc.ca/publications/forms-formulaires/b2g.pdf! J; K2 J% E3 D

1 P, r# S/ \$ |2 a) E" P* O, O! ^- E
Refund Requests
" t' m8 Q* b- U& T+ G" }( Z# }74. (1) Subject to this section, section 75 and any regulations made under section 81, a person who& G' S/ p/ c$ H$ h  a
paid duties on any imported goods may, in accordance with subsection (3), apply for a refund of all or part: q6 `- ?9 {" o6 c5 G
of those duties, and the Minister may grant to that person a refund of all or part of those duties, if$ `+ ~1 x/ Q* Q4 o) ~# q$ Z7 @
(a) they have suffered damage, deterioration or destruction at any time from the time of shipment to
  N! B1 i0 @$ M: y6 M$ R; NCanada to the time of release;5 [  O, w2 K1 P4 r7 C
(b) the quantity released is less than the quantity in respect of which duties were paid;( o9 M  J) m5 O
(c) they are of a quality inferior to that in respect of which duties were paid;4 T% c3 w+ f0 N7 U6 R
(c.1) the goods were exported from a NAFTA country or from Chile but no claim for preferential& h9 |; h& d& f/ f. ?
tariff treatment under NAFTA or no claim for preferential tariff treatment under the CCFTA, as the, d2 Q4 Q& T( A1 z
case may be, was made in respect of those goods at the time they were accounted for under& B, S0 e# O4 a& w, I, ]
subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
4 q1 y5 d, ~! V3
2 P& h8 m2 u% i; k(c.11) the goods were imported from Israel or another CIFTA beneficiary but no claim for
  u+ e- D4 g, A& c* v7 x& \preferential tariff treatment under CIFTA was made in respect of those goods at the time they are
( }: ~" F% @. M- Taccounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5);
4 ~' }) B+ K, n(d) the calculation of duties owing was based on a clerical, typographical or similar error;2 K# Z% z0 y+ u! d' i3 `
(e) the duties were paid or overpaid as a result of an error in the determination under subsection 58(2)1 |2 r# [2 N' D& ?  p0 Y
of origin (other than in the circumstances described in paragraph (c.1) or (c.11), tariff classification or4 V$ N; q( f; L
value for duty in respect of the goods and the determination has not been the subject of a decision- t) r3 x/ l5 |" a2 z$ ?$ e/ d! K
under any of sections 59 to 61;
& y8 S3 m) L1 q; s6 r6 F  w(f) [not applicable to non-commercial goods];' y0 l3 X! [! Y
(g) the duties were overpaid or paid in error for any reason that may be prescribed.! Z) J( [6 U; M3 t/ Q: S2 Z
(1.1) The granting of a refund under paragraph (1) (c.1), (c.11), or (e) or (f), if the refund is based
+ d. ~& O% {6 q0 j( [on tariff classification, value for duty or origin under paragraph (1)(g) is to be treated for the purposes of3 Q' S6 q2 }, s6 A4 K
this Act, other than section 66, as if it were a re-determination made under paragraph 59 (1)(a).- H- G7 E, D7 v1 B* v
(2) No refund shall be granted under any of the paragraphs 1(a) to (c) and (d) in respect of a claim
4 m. \  F) Q  aunless written notice of the claim and the reason for it is given to an officer within the prescribed time./ i8 e) |. M; _9 P+ ?
(3) No refund shall be granted under subsection (1) in respect of a claim unless) g3 l. ?' u4 q" K
(a) the person making the claim affords an officer reasonable opportunity to examine the goods in
7 ]+ g% M5 i* `2 T# {4 |) b' w; Srespect of which the claim is made or otherwise verify the reason for the claim; and
- v+ S% n+ _6 P(b) an application for the refund, including such evidence in support of the application as may be( X. V- ~1 d& \9 B& e; L
prescribed, is made to an officer in the prescribed manner and in the prescribed form containing the+ {$ R, g+ L3 x) A. d  \
prescribed information within0 U* \- ~! J; L
(i) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(a), (b), (c), (c.11), (d), (e), (f)# z, T$ }9 T! ^# t3 [! [
or (g), four years after the goods are accounted for under subsection 32 (1), (3) or (5), and, v' j, p% w9 X
(ii) in the case of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), one year after the goods! F6 _+ q9 k; z4 M
were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5) or such longer period as may be prescribed.  E8 }. m! _2 ?; L/ @* a
(4) A denial of an application for a refund of duties paid on goods is to be treated for the purposes of9 Z# `, @8 M; U+ v0 C. o+ S+ O
this Act as if it were a re-determination under paragraph 59(1)(a) if
( R8 M" I. k4 b(a) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1) or (c.11) and the application is denied/ |7 Z+ Y  n" @8 ~% [: c/ \1 [8 f+ _
because at the time the goods were accounted for under subsection 32(1), (3) or (5), they were not
8 c; M% B, r0 W5 S* |' x" aeligible for preferential tariff treatment under a free trade agreement; or
$ o1 ~0 M, U' c+ d+ Z1 b5 }(b) the application is for a refund under paragraph (1)(e), (f) or (g) and the application is denied% L* v8 A/ F1 e6 O& J1 k
because the origin, tariff classification or value for duty of the goods as claimed in the application is5 A7 O% \. @3 d
incorrect.
6 t; ~5 Q  `" t' u* r" f- t, H$ y(5) For greater certainty, a denial of an application for a refund under paragraph (1)(c.1), (c.11), (e),2 y" f1 x5 f; W. |0 ?, Z# m. j
(f) or (g) on the basis that complete or accurate documentation has not been provided, or on any ground( L( F& n6 [7 I7 z( c- B3 O* ~+ y5 q
other than the ground specified in subsection (4), is not to be treated for the purposes of this Act as if it. l9 Z9 N* e! E5 c( ]
were a re-determination under this Act of origin, tariff classification or value for duty.
7 ~( d* V% b; O* z5 k
# h* k% Y, t( C  r, n6 ?  w" ?5 `' A这到底是说可以还是不可以啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-6-30 05:23 , Processed in 0.131296 second(s), 9 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表