 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 6 M" x' {; y% Z. }+ F! r
# _2 W, ? X( ?, c( F- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
1 q1 n6 b) v- g( J: h9 L: a+ x6 k; n, s/ P* g( |1 Y* y. S
TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market6 a! B; V9 e0 Z5 W# D7 l
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third( {# S5 _! Z% ?1 T8 s* m" [1 D
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic. b4 z: H+ p9 n' |' ?/ s) W. M
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit7 f& E# B. Q5 W& Y* _& i( n7 S
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and& P1 t3 n' Q+ m/ r$ c; ^ D$ C
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,$ W$ c0 j1 |) H4 p0 J. u' T
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
+ w; D* u1 r8 I" [3 O8 pLePage Real Estate Services.
! A/ g' b7 a4 k, A" B m
) _5 p' d! M" D$ } Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters& }7 c" ]! T y8 t
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
. A" d: M2 L3 v* Bconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and; t Q% Q3 {* I# t+ M( L
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
. @0 Y3 f% t# g# W3 qresidential real estate sector.4 k( f% K/ I0 F+ b2 `
& k% B; M4 d+ [: v1 y) I8 J# G
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation, e o% |6 m% U- e# x
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)7 |0 L) G0 M9 f4 F
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562) Z5 O, n7 G, q
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
& U! l; W' _ C+ s4 k(+13.2%).9 a5 n$ v6 V& ~- |2 p$ C
# J+ g$ ]7 N9 d, Y7 m "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth% N( ?# x; K2 \: N6 g, _
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the: A+ K9 c& L0 t+ d
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are1 I6 e& g& z0 }- _4 l5 T% ?3 I% V% M
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,' Q& \5 X; a$ v$ R. n1 U
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
7 H) R. g4 T1 V7 l( L* M% C"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
+ J7 {6 `7 y" b) Nwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
6 r9 G% C4 E9 z9 }) {balanced market." [9 {) k, ~ u) _5 g7 G1 ^
7 S$ a! P t |, E& V" w- { Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,+ \& B3 ?8 N* L. D, t. h6 u: ]+ ?
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift/ Q, m) ]4 w" T. m- C
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
% s; b; D: g: {6 { H5 Wthroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core: V; S- @# n& g9 P
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,# t, g2 Z. ^# E& ~3 A( w
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
* p0 v- c b7 `breaking price appreciations.- [' I* X$ k9 O" F7 E2 A, S
@2 m) |' ]( V; R, @
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding/ H8 f+ i; A3 p9 a* Y
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the% k9 ?* P3 E, C
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.9 E+ S7 P1 `; w; R ~
# A8 f: R" q9 N In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid) k: a, S9 |! t& O( _6 |! T
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer7 C6 q: Y$ ~% D3 E: W* v" R
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
, M9 z N! H C3 v2 q( }' {' d, [( ]slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.9 x4 s5 H z' I. s: T3 p
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers2 w {( d5 Z' i: E+ E
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of% P5 `9 J* D3 u% b3 T2 l
price appreciation when compared with 2005.- s; D* ~' n/ o2 B" C; v9 _3 b
5 f! C; \2 I$ ]4 b# J While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing" _4 Y, W, D( U) M8 m
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
3 Z x- [ |8 Q7 E9 L$ ]* ffinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
- ?' u0 C: g) y+ P7 I/ w% Aare markedly different than those found in the United States.# ~ P# m! s- B
+ O0 _6 M. _9 a Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the; K2 I j( p1 w% S
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
1 N2 L/ u1 @9 @$ W, P( Ufavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
# l4 x4 b5 u# Drelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
" S* k! K! g$ v6 Jaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the3 Y i: S2 o2 _1 P6 E0 J V* T- X( w
downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and& H. f' `$ `( A3 [
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
+ }. @4 T, M& M0 Kmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."/ J' n% }/ g9 i" r* A( x: q
a# D) F! ]3 r$ l3 \1 Z( K& e
<<
7 X$ f; f& }& Z& ~* K- q REGIONAL SUMMARIES
' [! B# y) F: R4 _. H >>* y" g% F: C, \& D4 @4 E
8 G& V1 X8 I0 N! X. o* t a
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in% p! W2 F4 `& x" G
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate2 o7 x. I$ }+ H# U; O3 D# I% Z
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
' k5 `, y7 Q* X# Flooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
( D. s% n+ ^* Z3 u h, Hrenovations.
; e, W( @8 o& f8 G
" ~" g* W( X" N- H5 t The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
$ U+ `# S* g5 j8 v1 Eincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
' X- `/ N3 `/ y% W) U# [3 D$ Ncompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and0 { E, J$ C7 o( d. R
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.0 V$ z5 }) e% {1 ~2 E9 K
% _* E" E0 o. m7 h2 G* ~4 b
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
( B4 \) O( `3 u7 y; Rslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
+ Y5 R. ?- Z v8 Hquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new. D% C2 a' j- X0 `, G
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores" M6 @ P3 ]" ?3 Z4 A
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
# U' C! U. _4 s$ M. y5 @, Y8 gand are instead opting for more affordable housing options./ z# ^5 F' _+ I3 F$ w' [
0 c" E2 {$ q& a, }. [* _. {/ f' l" c
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced3 Y: K( X4 }! B6 [- D1 z
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their4 n# ]; h! }# p# g7 m5 z( e
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
C* l/ v4 b" b& d ^& g1 S! ^1 |was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
' |7 Q) Y! ~! t" ]) H0 fdollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
- W) h: z/ \' q' ?. W0 I' r1 W) Nbuyers with more options when looking for a home.4 d5 C2 ~) p6 ~. @) v1 e4 W
+ q' V( R6 d1 z. C" M Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly
. d9 s3 T+ Q q9 W2 h; ^among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
, n, I2 P2 i6 L9 z8 hpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
! ~. ?: ~8 w8 N/ O1 o/ h: D* ~as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
. b+ W0 K0 b4 a& [& J3 _few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
$ y3 }6 w; p. y4 m
: i+ {+ X' v z( @" G Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
- p1 M; [+ I# M' _4 z, Vprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory r3 p$ K, w" e! X
levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting1 u( i% I* C3 u! E& c
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
( i3 z& R6 K0 n! vwhen rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the; D/ H/ I+ a) j) F2 `. L$ A
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before1 [1 a. A3 {8 M& k
making a purchase.
2 _" |8 e) w; S8 @# _: p, ^& f3 z% `; i
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
% n% a0 \- o1 x5 H7 xmarkets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong O5 V4 }" b- b) j8 g3 I
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
% w, A2 Z5 f* g0 vcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting I% r8 q' H' q" t. S
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
1 ~# t, x) m2 camenities.
, u P8 u3 {* |; h9 V" a: k
3 t4 n4 Q3 I& H/ t2 r6 s; i6 b The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels/ Q) b5 V' t2 Q1 J
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand8 [$ H7 l2 O5 I
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
K4 _6 S+ @, ]continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been
- c' P' z8 |( n; P, o$ X9 edriven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle$ x, \# L9 S8 `' j' z2 j+ U4 G1 z2 N
residence, rather than for investment.: {+ q2 ]8 l9 D! ~) I
# \7 {4 z3 x# {5 P x The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as) M3 d5 B7 E% r/ c2 @
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted9 o% g7 `& O6 p8 P+ @5 Y9 |" t
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
1 V2 M9 F: f" Q9 G) ^6 D) S! jconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
# {6 V$ p) s4 s1 o; G, j. _7 _rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter* K% W3 h" j3 L: ~) f& i) N: I
the market.3 u8 j0 G D6 J9 }# ~/ d; w+ W
, N3 ]) B* T v+ w/ ^
In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
* l' o& e) L A- x* p* e$ @4 `: ]July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
7 B. h, |# e8 C0 g* L5 CAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring) K+ X, n( H4 r: ^$ |+ B$ i( T: P# O
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
: H( K9 p- b3 ^# Uto the shortage of available inventory.
, }! ~1 V# S1 v( ?3 ?& { l' C2 f4 r8 n8 y3 u K
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its" `2 k& ^( L$ c! {3 h6 l9 t
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains/ s, n" g$ c4 S) Z# G
vibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses2 O% l! N$ c4 c# j/ R1 h8 ]* J
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.; X6 }2 A8 M) f4 K! @& S+ a
' S3 x' ? ~" s/ {7 {, v3 n Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases/ w5 M0 U! ?+ Y
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
# r7 H9 m! O, X5 F8 M- R( s3 z6 uunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that
: I$ o2 q' e0 \5 F2 D- Mpressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring/ P$ N5 t& Y [
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer0 \9 R, w9 ]( `/ |9 S/ ~) }! ~+ C+ W
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
, M' ^4 B; k' y) Zbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
7 n% h7 y4 @9 B. K' ~6 G" m
3 g8 l+ Q5 a, h Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter5 }3 l- {8 k* v
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton4 z: X3 Z0 f/ D% L$ x( ^
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,. a% t) L+ e, b/ i
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
# z9 z) R% Y' Q) e7 lincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve' R Q0 O4 ~# X
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly/ _* Z) h# s$ `/ Z0 w b5 y
towards the end of 2006.
5 t. X+ {7 b" ]( l8 P+ I+ `
' I) F* z# z, [While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of* X) c! Z m3 y
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable" t5 l" N+ {# u$ y" O8 ^1 b, Z% j% J
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
$ ^9 ~( ^2 o+ q3 u7 Rgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
) B8 u! N0 K% S* k) ]foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
0 y, b" n1 M5 \, \pressure on tight inventory levels./ d$ x/ U9 B1 G4 n" n
+ T( l9 F3 A: A Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
7 R7 U3 x! G3 }; W* F8 qfundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
/ M F& a# F1 h1 ]into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
6 p+ G5 k' H! C5 a+ g! Iwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching# K/ Y- L% z' r1 q: i3 z4 ^
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.4 v# V6 l4 G1 u( _; w- [ P' a
1 |) l0 l" O" F3 O8 N" u* C <<
0 E+ m" x+ Q( y Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
1 W6 z3 h8 @/ A9 E& r
+ A) [) Z8 Z9 `5 m' S -------------------------------------------------------------------------% _) D& d) M, g/ ?3 @5 p
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey$ p% W, | X5 a3 k7 f
-------------------------------------------------------------------------! P8 n7 G4 }5 ^# q! I+ X/ W
2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q39 F1 M1 n8 |9 `! n
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
, A8 I s1 B$ ]# f/ ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- h: @+ j- R5 w* |& a* I1 B
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
D. {# _( Q9 x1 M' i9 [3 ` -------------------------------------------------------------------------
& M, p) c8 T% u# D8 Z$ I Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
9 T p) `, g4 Q) U -------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ T+ j8 \" Q$ i% w5 V% G# O# _ Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000* _/ o# Y& \/ O3 V: s# w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ y2 e% E; L) S, K7 J
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
9 J$ s) o# r7 U% o `$ m G0 u -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ {' z, J) f2 ?8 {, {
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
( C# v& O# @# |, K' e+ P, G* R6 n& w -------------------------------------------------------------------------) d* u) ?- {4 r" G. N: S7 J
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583( K" t6 M6 u) }; E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 H7 A9 H9 L% i$ w Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185
5 R& M: i: \) E( O4 l7 G -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! F, |7 J" F$ u+ {) I' B! a( X Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250' y( b' l/ ]% o% I5 @+ F; b+ F1 L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
% @: d" `2 F- o Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766 r! x+ j# O* F8 M; K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 u; Y5 B7 F- r6 w8 F# R, l/ A Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
4 O n1 u/ S! m4 d8 k -------------------------------------------------------------------------, R; F* I' x# a6 c, U9 N, Y* v x
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500. a7 ?6 n7 r' {! J, D. Z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ v* n0 j% p( y Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
6 ]/ ^5 w7 Q; m2 l& d% H -------------------------------------------------------------------------- _" S" }$ U4 O* ?+ z; K
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,714
6 ^- l- f# g. l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
" e6 ^% Q4 z# R/ W) D3 u Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
/ `) N+ a# F$ g' i3 b% m4 Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 \3 ^4 E F/ ?8 _, Z
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000! U6 l2 r- {4 Z; } U4 ?( K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 S$ W/ f* a: T/ ^, F6 l4 E$ { National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860: e1 j8 u8 ^6 ]5 ?( o: ?! K
-------------------------------------------------------------------------' G. V' X `' h% M$ C
5 O2 w$ g: B2 t -------------------------------------------------------------9 `, y* V- I) B! b
Standard Condominium8 S! w" N9 E5 O+ O. [8 W- A
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 c' g7 S; E4 Y S 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo" i. d- H: |0 x9 V6 w3 l5 z. |/ O
Market % Change Average Average % Change# S0 `% O/ l/ d; I7 ^) f/ d" T( {5 z
-------------------------------------------------------------
2 ? u5 V1 K" j3 _# V+ M Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
" K M# u: Y% l2 @5 y* x -------------------------------------------------------------
, n; B. l" ^& r- ^) U. @ Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
. N- j5 ]# d7 v0 g& M -------------------------------------------------------------
, J) K, p$ T: J Moncton 4.9% - - N/A: x2 Z7 C. t c& k4 G* [0 D
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ D8 x8 B# Y$ n* T Saint John N/A - - N/A" i$ J- ^8 x7 @8 L8 Y
-------------------------------------------------------------
3 i* E y1 x/ { St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%$ |; }' J" p2 {2 z5 @5 X
-------------------------------------------------------------# ?4 x& ~2 \) C3 W" L, ^$ N
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%6 J5 ?+ L( X: F4 w6 A1 z4 y
-------------------------------------------------------------
4 O1 D' z4 G; w3 n0 b. I* u Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%& ^1 Z, r- V8 k7 P$ J, d
-------------------------------------------------------------' B8 C: l- Q6 B1 R) y
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%, L6 _6 i) E1 w5 I; S: i# t
-------------------------------------------------------------. z. a) p! L% O& G3 A4 g) m5 s
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%
1 ^ A9 u2 d! e -------------------------------------------------------------
7 M) ^' \: I j i& i Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%
6 C$ @2 G* ~( Q) {& \% v3 m -------------------------------------------------------------
7 c, l. l c# y# j4 \- j Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%
" P2 v7 X2 s1 J" P( F2 ^$ Q -------------------------------------------------------------0 J7 o n8 e$ y
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
, R {( f2 m, x1 X6 S0 m -------------------------------------------------------------" }. G: x+ |' w: R
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%3 y& k* b* o) s
-------------------------------------------------------------
$ k) s' Q% ]" H7 v1 J Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%" o3 O9 t& Z) x0 c( y) u1 Q
-------------------------------------------------------------& N C" d2 y" H
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
: V d; \8 X0 v8 [ -------------------------------------------------------------
# N# y) ^% l6 L/ O( q1 R g$ C National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%2 l. e# t7 a: A" P! w& R
-------------------------------------------------------------
/ {( h$ @' s! z: { >>9 f9 n4 Q4 J/ I: E# \- R
8 K3 C" B. S, N6 H A% s/ ~" C
Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
/ {* L5 }! `8 X3 fin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
# O9 B" T5 a( \5 pJohn and Victoria.+ K# S% y; G" @* L7 l6 Z
7 e1 E" o% ~3 ^2 c
The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
$ E6 R; `# g# G* C0 g& |comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of( J# ~5 P/ ^' d, O2 W/ K
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
( z5 i9 W! j5 A8 ]: f6 [$ t2 yreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
0 B, e4 f% ?: A6 Etrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
6 n/ K5 D+ J) V# G5 J; h% o* Aacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
' a/ h9 I! i" t4 Z/ Z6 r- H8 B0 @available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
/ d* b- c. v) U0 x( |figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable9 Z! ]: c% O. D$ G
version of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
* i6 f) q4 U% t7 I$ W7 r+ ONovember 15, 2006.& X" `# h9 u, Z
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of8 a6 e# e7 l1 I! E, J6 A* W
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
+ U# x. N- i r% o6 l4 Z8 k7 yprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
# K2 e5 U' p% Uavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|