埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 2139|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable + o$ @5 S/ y  b

( T1 V& q5 ?. Q- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
1 {6 R: S. p0 c3 z* }7 r) E; p, }) ~# A# _
    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market9 S( f) r) v% t8 v
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
% t: f; |; J5 M2 ^5 Jquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
# t) G  t7 |3 P9 B* i# l$ zin the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit8 b% f. u; o% i2 Y- j! m" p
price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and
. r# [, S0 g2 amore reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
- L5 [5 Y4 I. L5 x* a/ x# l' f: JQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
9 o. x5 u1 `' ~& F& RLePage Real Estate Services.
: ^. L7 i+ y% r* U: @0 A& z: {: q7 [8 V% o; J. ?" J. M9 l7 n
    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
/ o) f# @- b; l$ U& O+ ?# l& Bare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
1 f$ K$ C- a0 ?" I  ], Wconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and0 g$ x) y1 [8 r
sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
) n4 E$ |6 J3 q( B& F( q9 Qresidential real estate sector.$ \8 h5 Z; m& q1 {1 s

! b3 w) [1 T/ B    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation! N$ g& i$ W; i$ J; g8 h8 _# }: O
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
& p! q7 U: f3 e: j2 N1 z+ Eyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562/ B2 s2 S; ^  b$ C
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
# s' a8 X2 r7 \(+13.2%).
6 Y0 A: G3 e% n. l# |6 `3 ^$ @$ r1 h$ I( T: @
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth; b6 c# s- W0 M$ i9 M0 p
during the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
* t, w- s6 h: ^% g/ j& x* p: B) u( Vfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are
9 R, T8 k" @. a' W5 Xpoised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
: C$ s# ?$ O! r8 fpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
4 Y1 k2 R1 Z1 {# `, W6 ^, i$ N% q"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We/ l1 p4 ^% X3 Z! l4 F2 y
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy& Z) f1 e7 L( v* M
balanced market."
: N8 J3 |9 r+ I. q  F, ~$ p# Z& u$ p: u
    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,  D- C$ j1 T: D7 b% O; n; L7 B
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
- ^. c0 P8 ~4 {3 q  jto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
7 _2 B8 n& r# y: U/ b9 h& d0 O# |throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
  `8 r4 I: \- r  k) K& G' xenergy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
4 [4 O) h3 e( M) J( ]manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record+ w6 e- u: O* |+ e- p, k6 o
breaking price appreciations.' ^: k% m" C9 M1 L# ^
! x* R8 d, L; ]9 z
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding7 u* J- h( Z0 t9 |5 S
economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
; [" x; l' D& `7 l  A$ v/ B  o; Llargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
- r1 i7 n- B5 E, [* y6 m
  C+ i6 j1 k: \+ N8 O* U    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid8 U1 T9 C0 j+ Q
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer: b- J: `  L/ a. }1 l' S6 r
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
" ?. e# q, a4 N8 G; bslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.- j; X2 E. p  H: j1 e  b  q# I
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
) P) j* b5 e; s$ @; ?9 L* v% rgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
4 C8 t, s, D8 N2 F( n6 u3 H' fprice appreciation when compared with 2005.
6 |' i+ j! E1 W% B' z
( l* E: n' A. k; h$ q+ E4 d8 i0 u    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
# c% M& {  M0 Z4 q) _- O6 z) b5 Gmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and$ o# g( i; y. I* @# t( X# s* U
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
" H. M. F9 z! R& W7 Aare markedly different than those found in the United States.
- A7 z$ Y* n. W8 h, k. t3 L4 Y, s4 J, Y! S
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
+ B% w$ ~1 C# M- QAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's: O" s0 K  N6 A  ^& N7 c7 k7 B/ q
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the
. \4 ?: m% I, d: ?# e  Erelatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general$ g% d! }3 k" f
affordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
5 C1 g" n7 ?' Z' n& m! v6 h( w$ Kdownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and9 N' H/ O% d% B# y
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization& ~% m! L! y6 `1 M
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."' F+ b; Y4 r; N* `0 a' \/ Q
% b" X. Q6 h8 h2 J
    <<" v4 u4 s$ u& B6 G5 x
                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES- S% S$ ^( }" t" V% t
    >>
& I0 N3 V9 n3 `8 x# B* x
" c7 d* ?' V6 W. Y$ f8 S2 B+ L7 ?    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in5 Q7 g- p0 Y/ c  N0 W+ Q% N0 _
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate# K" V  X, C) k* }! Z1 ~0 I1 t
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time$ \* o! P3 l2 u4 y$ s
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of) {( P3 j  K' O6 e# N6 |& T
renovations.+ }2 _! ~  g; r' p4 g9 D& S
8 f- J* W" \% D
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
. T# |1 K; b$ R+ J8 hincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
' V0 Y1 }6 w- a( ocompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and0 u4 z9 |, q# n3 B9 z( O# y, d
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.4 J' `( ~9 u/ l! K$ ]
# z5 T9 w) b. Y* n0 g& x) c
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer% L+ s6 L/ Z& N3 n5 w# h5 ?4 \
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
2 J- M% l) U5 ?- |' uquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new0 Q5 m7 G! h" I; P" O& }
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores* `- `  e; b* R9 d  C5 W
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes1 _9 M! E0 o. [3 d' z$ x
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.7 \* u: T' j+ @0 T2 t' M7 j

9 `7 l: L6 Z) _7 q* E: `    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced2 i2 n3 {) j, z
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
, k* u. ^; m3 `8 r6 Thomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
; i0 P( i; x2 lwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
* H6 W! U1 d! y; q  X" v' k. [1 `dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing& ]9 ~3 S3 v) d  w0 R
buyers with more options when looking for a home.
7 j# Y/ u* H* S$ P7 Z, Y+ j% R! z
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly, ]" W. K8 P6 e/ g" |1 \" E
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes% [0 \' [& ?! q8 U. I7 B% N
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
, y) s  |/ K8 l4 qas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
/ O! v1 D9 K/ Lfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.4 k  _4 ~) W6 `4 x% L1 u7 L) G4 W+ T
$ b7 _  J, J% {3 x4 f# B( s8 t
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
$ q- H) g& M$ O% l  Vprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
$ U! C4 d% _7 Z9 h8 y+ ~levels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting
9 G. Z4 k3 [2 p  T" Z1 K) rfirst-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,# i( }+ X& f# d; I$ L  o
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the! _# N3 g6 t+ I. I, j
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
# L& m! }4 ^& A: k& Qmaking a purchase.7 a- N# V5 G- m

) `8 Q& P, t7 ~- S$ w8 A  d2 Z    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
6 U. |( J# y) l- Y: e4 i8 \markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
9 U' [- G1 S" E. Bconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
/ b$ l) o7 U. wcentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting: ]# S4 p# c! _) |- w. @
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
0 s. v  I6 x4 K) R8 c# Tamenities.  Z2 c/ O. J7 F$ w% n0 p7 I& x% m

! i$ A8 v: L# n    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
, e* f& P: m& g" pthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand1 n' L2 l( U) F& s1 @7 Y
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has& j; v$ u5 a. N  [  x) p
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been; D1 b" @  \+ L2 e, w
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
5 ^3 C3 e0 L8 K3 u2 @$ Nresidence, rather than for investment.' A3 e1 o4 Q# ^- c5 G: A
1 T; T) C: {% W, G+ d. d
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as3 D3 W4 Z; z3 A2 `$ z( y
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted
6 O4 ^' V3 I# I* K9 ]( yin a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer7 V6 d- Q5 }) J1 L' H' S
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization+ K9 X- M! G; k$ _0 ^4 P
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter* ?0 K& Q$ n  n6 |
the market.: j, x- H) u0 b4 |, d6 v+ s
9 R+ }6 M! r( h. ^! n
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
, L& ]) K8 z& y$ w4 k: |/ tJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
  z: f3 S9 }. l" H6 \' ^August, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring& ^  i% ^! G3 Z
months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due  o9 r" L7 V- @5 x
to the shortage of available inventory.' k' N8 g7 M8 ~+ ?1 X: B

$ ]! v& g" O/ L2 m% i: V: y    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its+ w9 ~$ F6 b$ x7 Z, T
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
0 N- q. L* Z# z9 l' Uvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses: t! y/ e7 H! A3 V, |6 Q8 k$ [. x+ Z
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.% Z9 {& V; |- d  K! C
2 F3 k& x! A! b. v$ K" g
    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases, O; C' j5 N! z) L' ^- q. D( W
in the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
* U: n  [$ F. S5 r& y, `; }unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that& _# g3 A6 i7 n) E/ z& K& F
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring" |! B6 ]7 H6 {& L  ]
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
$ U2 s0 p& j$ z6 b& \; }8 W( F- j5 mseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as
* D5 t. R1 r$ U. I% hbuyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
( I3 V% T' `4 I: W$ T, O# s7 c

0 `& x1 v$ W5 ~    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter
9 i+ l) w8 ?5 h8 H" B; Das activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
( p# y5 s7 j( J9 A* q5 l) mremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,- P9 G/ `" O7 P8 p, o) Z+ M
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
: _! \9 X  Y/ y2 nincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve+ v6 {9 w0 l7 @2 K* m
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly
3 f3 F/ E- D. |; t2 n: O) G9 itowards the end of 2006.
   
6 N  ?, \# [6 q- V# {7 J+ N" k7 T" J) S7 L: F" S0 T0 |
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of8 j, e6 D0 C1 W+ Q' P
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
/ E; i; C# d! q' {8 Bto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse" p6 O3 Q! D! K1 F
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
) |/ n8 d1 g( q! m1 eforeign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added- n8 ^+ i1 [( H3 L
pressure on tight inventory levels.
9 U* k3 L" D7 W) [
3 d2 s6 s3 j6 q+ {* C    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic7 s+ Y( S$ s3 U- q
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
9 X4 ~% |; R. N( B7 ~) [) W+ e9 zinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
) r+ Q) e7 a/ B( D! j$ S, s, o& Jwhile increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
2 v* x  x- }5 @1 Ufor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.% L& A% j  V$ v2 w! P

- `* |& H- V+ m" {  X    <<4 z, U* }9 Y. X# h; j: a  X% Y6 Y
      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006
5 t) P# u8 h7 k
8 S* D6 a. I- }# K7 i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, t6 Z: s- f# ^: }                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey, Z. c( c& t1 T1 H$ v( b9 `7 e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------" I: k  y1 S* H" L; G2 y' X9 x
                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3- J9 E- w9 n* y8 }3 n/ ?8 m$ n7 R
    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
: S( y" n3 L1 O3 w    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, i1 k" t. i0 ~: {3 W' ~- X
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000
8 d5 L7 b9 a8 Q( j6 K    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
, z  I- J' x: ^. A5 f) L) K    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,000
$ |, u/ r+ ?0 X+ ^4 q' v3 ?6 q. I    -------------------------------------------------------------------------( P* B; }$ M: ?7 k8 Y' v
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000
5 }; N) @6 `* T6 u; ^+ y: S    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- }# Q' F3 U8 g
    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
" Y; |( }  m" @2 e8 k+ N& i    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 M: S8 A# Z- [; m& i
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333: a: K& g. {. @% ^  ~# x% H
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------, e' Y1 L( H% o, P
    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583& G2 q; d9 _  ^! z  |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 f" g0 o) w1 h, Y2 N7 d    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185" }- W; ^" w, R+ ?9 `+ M3 J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
# M6 ]3 E- l1 K% w! W# V, S1 v    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,250' W. O! V7 v) J5 h2 L/ I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 p9 j5 H% l( g2 R+ z" P; T/ [    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766) ~8 t! D. b4 K$ Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ X& I9 p+ c; f& P8 j! _/ A  D    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707$ ^! Y, n- X8 `# e
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 A1 r4 I, F  a3 ]5 G0 ], I    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500
8 w% B1 {, u' ~# D. i+ @- o/ r    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 Y: U( l) v$ K( v$ L! q
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,389
+ {% `7 R( p/ `9 ?7 o    -------------------------------------------------------------------------9 d  ~8 k; }' p" Y6 e
    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714$ Q, R& A" }- n! q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------3 ?/ g, B- k. ]3 l$ t  _/ k- s$ F
    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,5008 E$ Y0 x8 k( o' `; v8 b! ~& o
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* O* N2 K3 `* Q7 \5 r" b* p
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
- d( X3 e* j5 p2 g# g) L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
5 r* p2 h$ _0 O/ K    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860
  C& J, d0 W; t! @7 [% x    -------------------------------------------------------------------------0 c( `  ?, q! o: u$ B! C

% e  l) v, M+ l) w6 J    -------------------------------------------------------------, v$ P2 k8 }; ]4 ~3 N3 V" y
                               Standard Condominium
# w* M1 `0 s6 u2 A" y0 h% `    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 O1 w+ M- e$ c! i                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
1 n2 P; _$ N; m/ v- T& j    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change  c; E% g+ @" x/ ^# r
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 R  K( D6 z. _5 G# f. @    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%
+ U7 @: |5 n3 I% W; |    -------------------------------------------------------------
" L' A. J+ s* ]7 ~* s, W    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%, Q- @& X5 b7 r# K; x  y% i
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: z& |$ g7 n* E+ M+ t+ _5 e0 [: z) g    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
+ ~/ V( y2 |" @; p    -------------------------------------------------------------8 K3 s6 J" y  C1 }6 y* h% u
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A; B$ R/ ?2 a0 ]$ Q% L/ n# y/ S# q
    -------------------------------------------------------------: h' _6 c+ j% a' B& L. L9 e
    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%
% m/ R: V. k2 _! ~    -------------------------------------------------------------
. ?; r- }& P; v# C% g5 o0 H& a    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
9 T9 Q8 y- O: y' t! ^6 y) O    -------------------------------------------------------------1 w" X1 N4 p3 F; H
    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
& ~* p* U1 u) d6 @" v    -------------------------------------------------------------
  B6 N! [7 q! n  M- m- N    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%( X8 A" z0 ^( M) D. }7 B
    -------------------------------------------------------------' \7 S; P4 c6 p! C) M& P
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%
  }; s+ v0 o) I: I. V4 p* V% e    -------------------------------------------------------------
  k7 W" z$ t' H( q) h/ O* r7 e1 a! z    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%
; v& h: p& e5 T: q! ?* L6 h    -------------------------------------------------------------, C5 |7 u. x, z* o4 _5 i' R
    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%  H8 r2 p- D+ p4 ~
    -------------------------------------------------------------
' W; r9 u! H* u/ n$ h    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%* P% k, V' b3 b+ h. Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------( R1 t# P; D7 L3 ~( T9 {- K
    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%
( K  u. O/ M" b3 k    -------------------------------------------------------------- L% s* R- G/ t# n
    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%% I: p  m5 V( C2 ]+ K' A* s  y
    -------------------------------------------------------------
% Q4 j4 W; A9 o1 s5 q    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%, @/ Z7 w+ b$ ]: `
    -------------------------------------------------------------- v' l/ P* Q# ~
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%+ Z8 G0 E% c4 r- a0 u/ p+ x1 M7 Q5 {
    -------------------------------------------------------------
; n4 t" U" W1 q0 Z! L/ o    >>
' [0 V; v, K0 _) @( Q: r4 F% {- S+ t, `  S: J+ r
    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
# I! F; v& f# w' \. Z* ^in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint' ^9 Z# y% R1 }& Z) b; V: V5 |
John and Victoria.
' n* N0 M$ ^) ^  @+ P
4 W" T3 f2 d' @  z3 g3 y    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
9 D8 ?; {+ _/ `! b8 fcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of- {" y% u4 W8 [  @& P
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release8 d) ^, B( i. {7 a! r% i* n+ ]2 y
references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price# ?# w8 R1 U& A5 ^! o0 E
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
5 |8 t1 ^5 H! N  Eacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
" f9 c1 y  l  d1 A- s* N1 uavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
- c& i( [1 I6 w4 H0 ?figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
7 L- v+ X$ d3 O: d+ Cversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on, A6 q  O3 S8 f( E8 Y+ b: j, \9 e' T
November 15, 2006.
8 l$ C) P  J9 e( I# L& Z    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of2 f2 d* Q& k0 v  d/ {) r
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
; u$ p) O) Q# n4 H' U- B- uprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
1 h: u( s( R& r# i+ M- M) zavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s.
理袁律师事务所
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2026-2-6 21:06 , Processed in 0.096733 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表