埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1928|回复: 0

Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006

[复制链接]
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2006-9-29 08:09 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable
6 P5 W, B* O; r7 w4 R' w
0 h+ W3 F+ D, v* {! u- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -: g+ t+ x+ v, o% r

! s6 u( h( G: J9 l) ?    TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
) k& H: q6 G- Q; u2 d) Aexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third) B  u& Q& O! b8 P  p" a/ A6 I
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic
# F1 H0 L  v7 F7 Y" din the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
/ S/ e; N. u$ k" ?( x- n1 b% {3 }price gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and; G: o4 w1 j- o* o& F7 B4 W+ y
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
$ L9 S: w% h1 r- ?: ^Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
  s4 e" s: j) h- Q% `- Z5 Z5 h& o+ CLePage Real Estate Services.0 s' [' ?: |6 o. h! D; `, [

6 D) Q. C% G  s# X% [    Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters, O' {4 R; w! b9 @9 y  O. [
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic$ R* N% t: v& U$ T0 d- h
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
' `/ t; R/ k4 D  [! s9 |sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
* C% I8 X, H5 P) uresidential real estate sector.4 z! P. d7 F2 W2 F8 ^( J
4 E' @! v* u  @$ ~, V& |
    Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
  z! W: ^8 ]; V! ^8 ]occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)  x: }. k8 b) \- \7 l0 i
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562
1 x. N5 V' p# a. ~0 f2 f(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
# v& n2 Q% }% c7 ?1 ](+13.2%).
5 |, _% t0 ]) p7 c  }+ L( z5 P' `; I
    "Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
1 d" q. f5 B4 |2 i6 i, Qduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the' i) @% @: a6 q6 o$ [
frenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are7 f& ~6 b$ \6 D9 W4 S
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,
$ e$ ?9 n, V% Y7 z" fpresident and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.' D" p# k6 O* o: h% A  |
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We( c3 {2 r6 q# p+ ?* g
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy& p" `5 ~( e$ X1 q8 `7 \
balanced market."
+ y5 W8 b) E; x/ E9 I# z! ~
" y+ Z  m1 ]# i, t+ T    Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
5 r" H- v- X0 A% i: L  Q" ?considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift' C- a: ~$ U1 h0 G& i. I/ u
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued& ?$ L5 d" v! Z* e; s* Z2 t
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core' S9 R4 U  H0 W  p5 a1 V( Q
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
! h: k- [* S4 Tmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
) J( Q+ Y3 O% G0 Kbreaking price appreciations.5 q8 Z1 R: l) r
2 z9 N, U! W4 _* D
    Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
/ |7 B2 L: J7 l( Y# W* W, D1 @economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the+ f6 x7 Y  J( z* P
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.
6 A; V3 a0 x0 U5 b. z' R: U: t' j- f) v* z0 U! K! S
    In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid
# R$ }( Z- p' \: l) [! a2 oeconomic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer
* {0 S. r/ i+ n0 Pconfidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
, Y: D1 ?* Y& Gslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.! {8 G5 o3 c' Q
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers+ S) _( z4 S2 T2 g$ F% C: }
greater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
8 {  `# C! R7 V9 J) g/ Nprice appreciation when compared with 2005./ S; M: a6 r7 M3 o, ?8 g
. n1 p/ o6 K/ K4 J" a0 W! Z
    While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing8 q: J4 {8 M6 }7 e. P9 E8 a
market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and
1 S$ c, [" a2 O5 bfinancial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada
# x+ Y5 s" }' z! D$ {! vare markedly different than those found in the United States.# i! G1 t( H4 m- n  Y, i. L( E
0 `% Z% M3 H& i" |; G7 \
    Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the+ ?5 F! D( Y9 \3 D4 f9 o) k
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
3 o  ~/ R0 |, `9 {/ \favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the: I5 p/ v9 u; t/ l
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
4 z* C% y" A( J5 Gaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
9 D9 H+ v( U. l! u1 }2 A9 ~downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and: k! i5 f5 P7 h" i5 \- {
aggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization3 q$ z, R# u6 n% G. h6 s
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."/ P8 \3 l2 Z- k# p: L, \7 ]

- W( I& o# M' \9 q, M    <<
- n3 b1 F# x2 w) A. Z# ]: z( C/ Y                             REGIONAL SUMMARIES! [0 ~: e+ w' ?5 E# @
    >>+ X5 t6 [; @4 D/ A2 n

  e4 b; E( A( H& p- w& K    Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
6 n9 e- v( ?7 Z/ q; i9 aHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate) h# v# s5 ]$ h; p8 |1 d
of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time
5 v, ?' ~- f0 l  m( {+ G$ n) elooking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of0 }. h+ o0 I8 y' G* }3 B6 [
renovations.
# y, n! f9 c, m! s8 F6 o, j' N3 b; [, I( H$ h7 l
    The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight
% l8 J; _" u7 Hincrease in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
! @5 i$ A/ y; r' \, f) x1 @. o  ?compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
  C- r" z2 L$ j* v' W/ E0 VSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.% k7 G% D9 ^( a
$ `3 e8 v3 ^+ L; ^! o2 d# b! y$ @
    The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
4 }# {; C, D' |7 [  Pslowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
# M3 s, u0 y6 {( L( t' N- h6 g' kquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new, b# @( v5 F/ A/ @4 z* F
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores, T0 {: T7 L) W/ z$ ~  B$ C
to the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
+ {5 r, S0 K9 U' {7 S9 t% c$ f# Mand are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
$ _. ^" p& p9 `- y
+ ^7 Y6 a5 h: ]) p" a    In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
8 ?2 W" J, t0 V9 J, `- n5 x, M, Yconditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
7 U/ a- d* R, K! k! l; ]0 W& bhomes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
" N2 y5 k. D0 q5 `3 v& swas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian# p+ \/ [" t, k5 P! G. i& w
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing/ T1 t  N6 W  K+ b
buyers with more options when looking for a home.! J% Q+ ?  k8 B8 E! x: R4 w
9 q; D6 K6 k' G! [
    Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly3 r% Y( w. K5 J: G6 c- z
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes" o; d3 w) v+ U! u
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,  R- s  Y3 ?! X1 u' a
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last
8 W4 Y) X4 }  e$ E1 pfew years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.& r% @/ m! X$ j% Z3 A$ p" R: e
0 |( ]8 ~2 V9 o1 j/ ]2 _
    Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
- d' C0 ~. p$ u6 l  iprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
2 z6 _5 }5 Z& p. y. ulevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting' ?) _+ z1 B+ z
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,
' ~* f! w. L1 \. @when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the$ c, p  A/ a) J- O4 O
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
9 @* I$ s0 j, i/ k$ f# o& U8 bmaking a purchase.+ Z% j- Y# }6 M. i7 L

1 o* {( a6 q- P' x5 |    Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing
7 M" A# _$ k' _' k3 u6 ^markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
% w% q4 u1 A. r" U* {1 Uconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
" L' r+ V( m! F1 I' Ccentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
) @4 _; V' G; y" G4 @6 xattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown/ O1 i& }0 c; i- `6 G
amenities.
! a% b( O$ u5 ^  X
8 `# Q/ l/ h9 C+ Z. ?3 \* {, W& q    The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels. |; p' s4 V9 r& f
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand$ o6 ^/ X6 J* P% t5 |$ r
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has8 e, c# i  o) P' D8 g
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been3 _( K8 Q+ ~( P( M; N! E
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle% J2 d; V+ \8 }/ V9 r% q. `
residence, rather than for investment.
% `& Z. _, c* y/ ^+ p. \9 k1 G& ^3 l! ]. V& ]  N
    The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as
* ^3 N) H- _, r1 x' Rhouse prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted: T% a# \/ c. |" E
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
$ f6 M- ~: \' Nconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
, |. o$ T0 N5 g4 {rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter( U8 _8 ^5 B; F9 x5 P
the market.+ m0 z5 p+ i% B+ z
0 C7 z% p7 G7 H( m1 u% C
    In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
6 X4 g1 y7 T# S; [# z; BJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
  l' S5 }8 u. |$ ?* ZAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
; Q, X3 m6 \! y1 emonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
  \2 a+ h  C" O" Nto the shortage of available inventory.) u# m/ ~# d. ]# y8 ?* i. P
9 O& W! U% ^  C6 ]
    Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
0 Q, B6 Z$ `5 o/ V' E6 {' }& Umomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
( D6 m7 h* G! M" ]9 Cvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
' b/ _% t! B7 cstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.
$ ^0 U; \% y# t; v; ~
. p) V3 z2 b" X    Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
+ J$ O! G) g9 y" a+ Rin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low
$ l  A! P" E2 c0 N# gunemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that7 O* ^/ m8 o- R2 [
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring
! a# p, K8 s+ r" ^prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer. w- r8 I7 C" J8 G, K* s" H
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as$ [8 S" t* w+ Y9 P
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
6 e) `" \" ~0 V$ ^4 A, r" C. M
9 d1 s# g% s% S: j4 V' N2 l
    Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter1 x( v5 `! s" n; ?0 z* p! W1 ~# Y
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton7 X5 {$ o- V4 n+ ^
remained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
  R! y/ N% Z- ~% D2 Zmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices% q" u1 r( j7 N; w% o
increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve! U9 \# l+ I$ P6 e# x4 v7 T
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly4 v, I: }4 N: T/ ~% |
towards the end of 2006.
    : _8 Q) R, k; x/ V+ K% A
9 j  `- ^6 h0 t9 [
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
; U2 R  `( d9 ~inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable& e( D/ W1 G+ ^- M
to meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse8 D/ h# p! \/ B/ ?, [$ C& f6 y
group of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to& L+ H4 j1 h" b! J' j
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added, z+ T9 i+ d1 X* [! M2 _3 k, [
pressure on tight inventory levels.
. i4 M( W$ t' H( Q" A
7 i# q: I. O0 ~$ g    Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic+ s! Y9 D) J7 \3 m  i* H5 A
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people. v  F3 n7 I8 a4 p" ~( P, P2 D
into the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;4 W/ T- P3 |* \1 z2 I
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
- [% s* F! M" Kfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.$ v+ Z8 m. D2 t

1 u; k0 v# H3 ~    <<
2 r, w9 Q! z# w: v. }0 x      Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006' e7 _, B+ t$ _) e
& v! r% }2 t2 d, J5 J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------- T& }% S4 f6 `! I; l
                 Detached Bungalows                Standard Two Storey& E3 M, T! ^$ R: `" v
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; O: b" m9 L! P  d* N3 T                     2006 Q3     2005 Q3    Bungalow     2006 Q3     2005 Q3
. X3 Y1 l( h  [/ G2 m! P    Market           Average     Average    % Change     Average     Average
! n# D* n) P) ~% Q" J5 A    -------------------------------------------------------------------------* y& D3 u! q5 |7 }% l0 z
    Halifax          186,333     173,333        7.5%     198,667     199,000+ h8 w( K% ?4 e% v4 z; ^- J
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! Q# j3 y6 O1 y9 T    Charlottetown    145,000     141,000        2.8%     175,000     170,0007 s5 C( b0 P0 x2 _: x7 Q
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 y# e9 j: {% E/ n
    Moncton          135,000     127,000        6.3%     129,000     123,000$ r: g- @. j  U- k" F
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 e' i1 v& ?2 U1 s; v    Saint John       141,200     142,900       -1.2%           -           -
( N4 g$ H4 B# Q    -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 G5 G, m0 Q* ]# v1 T+ j! c8 ?8 V
    St. John's       143,667     142,667        0.7%     200,667     202,333- \7 o; Z3 l. A$ j0 b
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! N6 |6 @" t3 Z" S% X! T* O, O    Atlantic         150,240     145,380        3.3%     175,833     173,583' ~* v" H" I& x$ q1 F  o* N5 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. I, r/ @" ]* o
    Montreal         213,691     203,500        5.0%     321,141     316,185* w* @( N% d2 ]; v$ q6 Z
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 \6 ^9 M% A& p. G& R
    Ottawa           290,083     278,417        4.2%     285,667     273,2506 g8 \7 b/ q( ]" E4 J+ ~; S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------1 Q9 U1 v" w  U/ m4 R
    Toronto          373,368     355,882        4.9%     481,523     474,766
' T! H: i/ O* Z$ _% H    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 `9 N3 E/ e, {    Winnipeg         181,579     159,860       13.6%     202,337     180,707
: q* Z) [9 g- _  U# G) }7 b    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
; P! Y- t* A- b7 Q2 b) d+ ~    Saskatchewan     170,667     156,083        9.3%     182,600     166,500: d9 E" x% Y. e8 K$ I
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ V1 g. }/ \) ?
    Calgary          395,067     252,411       56.5%     405,778     264,3893 `, b' N) z+ f/ `3 R" G- a+ D, R
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 {& U2 S5 h2 Z1 ]7 g, e* s- Y2 H8 Q    Edmonton         286,857     194,857       47.2%     316,429     206,714
! I$ s* o" m* }3 F6 ~% y    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 l) G9 T% T; q% K) M. R    Vancouver        704,250     601,000       17.2%     794,000     697,500
/ x( H/ Q8 _& \: [. M$ P: L    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' Q7 i, t. I' a7 c) t
    Victoria         375,000     348,000        7.8%     403,000     391,000
3 R3 L% H9 I9 Q$ @% `( V    -------------------------------------------------------------------------' x7 Q1 g) t+ V0 u3 L4 v2 m0 J
    National         300,365     258,202       16.3%     365,380     322,860" F& C* B! y& {) X0 L3 S
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------. F/ C; ]- |% ~$ a3 {
8 r: q( _. {' z% R. I1 @
    -------------------------------------------------------------
0 U' m0 k; Q5 b& p4 N# E0 q; ?4 g                               Standard Condominium" U: u( n' s& A
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 a8 c, ?8 A% M7 l7 V                    2-Storey     2006 Q3     2005 Q3       Condo
5 {1 Z* v0 W+ d- b/ j) T$ c( o    Market          % Change     Average     Average    % Change
" P, h1 c9 H' Z( o1 e( ?# T    -------------------------------------------------------------, l* A, F3 T8 F( p- G% A8 C; k4 c
    Halifax            -0.2%     142,000     103,000       37.9%: d4 o$ s7 M' v) B. a
    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 P$ p. _/ ~1 G3 a; }% [    Charlottetown       2.9%      98,000      98,000        0.0%1 g$ D" Z5 k/ |; I3 h3 y
    -------------------------------------------------------------' R- d5 U; @9 h! T$ R, T6 n
    Moncton             4.9%           -           -         N/A
) ^- z- m9 T/ {, O6 t& y- _; O, x    -------------------------------------------------------------2 I; g2 B( S6 ?6 \
    Saint John           N/A           -           -         N/A
0 J" d7 B) ~- F/ \- E    -------------------------------------------------------------
3 B+ F" |( `6 e$ W- w' V    St. John's         -0.8%     146,333     145,667        0.5%. Z$ s) v4 O& w7 Z9 @  `
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ g2 d7 G( K8 g9 u
    Atlantic            1.3%     128,778     115,556       11.4%
; |2 b5 R4 `8 N7 H  V1 m    -------------------------------------------------------------
# k- r* r: `* i! j) K+ ]- A    Montreal            1.6%     193,190     188,016        2.8%
7 }+ X6 T% i6 t6 P! a    -------------------------------------------------------------
- o1 r3 i2 Z5 s4 d) Z, u    Ottawa              4.5%     181,083     172,250        5.1%
, ~4 X% o! j  i4 G    -------------------------------------------------------------% ~* F2 l# k9 ^7 W6 k: t
    Toronto             1.4%     252,088     242,918        3.8%5 D6 X- V5 \; p' y  E, ?
    -------------------------------------------------------------
: c! a3 D$ h2 T$ h) D7 I    Winnipeg           12.0%     105,648      96,008       10.0%$ Z* a7 v( \% N# y7 d2 z7 |1 Q3 o
    -------------------------------------------------------------
" x' z: [2 i: _/ v" ?6 G" n1 g" L    Saskatchewan        9.7%     106,250     101,000        5.2%
: ?5 }6 e' a" i. m7 `3 \+ G    -------------------------------------------------------------0 F4 e- Z' ]2 m5 z  T, |
    Calgary            53.5%     245,844     153,867       59.8%
  Z  q: h, C! O2 R    -------------------------------------------------------------
5 M: d& B: W( y- n' C    Edmonton           53.1%     200,433     131,500       52.4%  N/ j8 i; ]! n8 [& X0 C
    -------------------------------------------------------------
6 d( j& u' w7 k7 b8 P" S    Vancouver          13.8%     366,250     323,250       13.3%( ^+ u' L" j# }8 i
    -------------------------------------------------------------$ C# d5 T$ g% ]2 s
    Victoria            3.1%     229,000     220,000        4.1%
$ k9 a: X  s, E  S+ D' t# Y    -------------------------------------------------------------) r2 ^8 r6 G6 w8 j1 b; c
    National           13.2%     211,562     185,296       14.2%
; M8 \% V7 b6 _9 K6 P    -------------------------------------------------------------7 ~4 o7 i9 z! h# c" x. e9 M
    >>
# o! J) H1 l- q& `7 j! [; N  K8 {
( d( e; \: _  T. b    Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined
7 j0 \( M/ m5 L. ]- Nin the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
- `! p2 }) `/ j! ^9 ?- W! _John and Victoria.9 [0 l3 J% E, W: ?0 ?& P) G" L0 C, P

( N- e  U6 Z* c3 w$ |    The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most+ R8 M: j1 E' u# G: d! \; X0 s
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
: h% g: X- {8 t3 v  b$ K5 ^, qhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
/ f* k3 a6 r3 z# \references an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price% K8 s' y- h0 [* N7 C" f
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities- Z  l' C& z3 Q0 P. c
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is( T" [/ N8 |0 o- H9 y
available on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current9 c8 l! h# n; @0 ^- Z; }
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
1 [; A) ?: u- O/ B8 S7 xversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on
# v8 L, k  ^1 f; T2 n. `November 15, 2006.
/ W8 m% v8 r0 [3 G( F' ]    Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
% W3 K, w# A# w( }# i0 b* `! }4 n/ ?fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
6 ?0 ?5 L4 p) ]1 Hprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is3 `+ a  f; p0 g' H
available for some areas back to the early 1970s.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-11-7 18:31 , Processed in 0.112579 second(s), 10 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表