 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable 7 [/ t$ x9 M2 T/ a8 a
/ ]$ q* O/ v9 w z, P2 s
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -
3 l6 c# ~+ v, w# o1 E1 F
! Q) D3 c' h2 N TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market
$ E1 T [$ S1 G: ?7 H7 N8 Pexhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third
' y; _! H" S$ A# \3 Y" Oquarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic1 ]" E" \' i- P& q- k% Y* X
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
0 L( p6 c; O% uprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and, I# q1 P1 p9 O9 ?% |& p# G5 p
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,
6 F* ^$ h0 F3 n% o2 c$ IQuebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal5 a. G9 v. d4 t% I
LePage Real Estate Services.
2 v" v, T1 B+ O/ j: X+ X& S: o
! E. Z2 H/ ~* |+ B Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters6 |; J% y% F/ @, p
are forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic
" Q4 P9 `! G4 uconditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
4 m9 A. F7 x% p; U" Isound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
/ B5 J5 G# p5 kresidential real estate sector.0 F0 f0 H& v1 m
9 l2 U3 I( c2 J& r {- {0 {& b
Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation
6 p4 S6 _) W! @ foccurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)
- @: l7 i3 D3 g# Oyear-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,5624 K1 w) M' M# H
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
2 U( R/ u5 c* H G7 P" f8 b+ a, P% f(+13.2%).
6 f! s2 K; ?/ K& C! f3 ~' l# B" [: A5 C+ a6 g
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
' |! v' o- q. Jduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
; c* M4 |6 I- Y% J; s) D/ M1 e3 vfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are3 ]9 h) m! ?0 q8 F# {/ b' m
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,6 e) _ [9 D$ Z
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.
1 I, L, d: |: W' C+ ~" T' n5 ["Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We
$ z8 l) j& W+ j5 f- zwelcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy
; Z/ f$ r+ X3 r; L# |' U6 n+ x/ D! Lbalanced market.": C1 D5 ^" ]9 m( M
: K) Y( a6 V9 c+ |: k
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,5 ~$ I" \8 a7 ^* u, Z0 a# k/ i
considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift
+ E8 I9 s1 U& u' i& [; U( wto balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued- B- t7 O+ y" d/ P" h8 G# b
throughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core& v0 k I4 b, Z/ E6 [
energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,& m U& p& [4 J0 t9 N
manageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record
4 I1 D, a+ c; _: O$ `breaking price appreciations.! O& h& _* y+ F$ y# I7 l( l
, u7 b7 j" w7 y Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
2 }# F3 e# B, I5 @" z7 [; ]economy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the# `( Q/ O3 C' Q( L3 Y2 q8 ]9 l4 @
largest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.& p# k4 \0 D( e1 E) P/ T+ Q
# I/ J+ O# k: U9 \" [8 a; Y In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid$ ]1 R" m0 D6 v7 p" t
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer1 r# J. g9 W2 v' k% j
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off
3 v `4 v! [8 |2 qslightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.
! K% t- f: ^; h) s/ d/ VIn Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
4 D4 e, F9 V Z! _7 A" Tgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of+ ~1 A4 T& G- C" x! i# b
price appreciation when compared with 2005.$ k0 {5 y' E. T& g8 A8 t
0 U0 A8 k" S& Z
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
, Y$ E3 Z& D( i3 T2 jmarket is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and* A! n! l8 u7 z' p, k0 `1 X
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada% ?, ]- l6 A: [( X# A" _
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
0 X) U/ P" j* d: _& \: f, N( c5 w3 g* l s3 Q
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the
# f) x- p# M- _2 i6 WAmerican market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's5 s1 l0 [2 [) r. a4 O# M
favour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the# r3 V% `- e# D' Z* h W; o
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
7 p1 X' t$ I3 G: U- g/ gaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
2 e \) |: v) Y/ w( `downside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
/ o; p* @2 a6 T# V" C* V" U* Gaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization) _. P; P# Z2 A q
mortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
/ q j& M" W- M9 W+ g* ]
$ P) t- c* {1 u# @4 z! V+ R0 Q <<3 ~2 o4 Y6 O" @; |
REGIONAL SUMMARIES6 w+ L$ Y6 Z5 \, u: K
>>
& g4 ~$ _! U8 A' T( Q4 R
3 B- b! t# U1 D" C Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in( |* T) h9 y$ B. \" G) q% a
Halifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
* p- p* t$ p0 Z2 X6 ]of price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time6 } F2 }+ o! \
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of2 m- c0 f0 O, \" e
renovations.
/ \, i, c/ p: A: }& Y6 F: y( G
& n, H& C( D1 J* d0 Q' F1 \# E The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight {, o- g5 e' R
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation1 W% W+ f; `( r- @
compared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and
- F- |: p! d* Z7 rSeptember and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.. R" E. W ?% J) o8 A
2 k5 y( I3 I) S3 s6 v
The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer
$ K3 }- @+ N9 N8 L& m: ^3 }slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the
! |6 C. e! K2 Z! g/ a9 t* M. fquarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new- P4 V6 N8 ]6 L. G
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
/ p' @2 J! K* t7 D2 fto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes
( B w5 m$ v- r* Y9 @' A& _ o5 `and are instead opting for more affordable housing options., k3 R7 G: Z$ P+ t0 a5 R- p
( ^7 W7 n" p1 T( q% u% X In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced
( b- P- L7 ] V- I: l* [conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their' i/ E6 O# V; w9 O3 W) l8 a
homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers
N" o' R3 C1 s2 a* b. K, f: N bwas down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian
& j9 w7 f1 l8 H7 u# a0 j# |dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing3 _% v4 [' k. ^
buyers with more options when looking for a home.; W+ ]( R: }! O/ r. c
8 |+ w8 x7 U0 ]3 A% N Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly) a0 O2 J+ W: L Q4 s* e
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes
5 A, |9 T1 I& f- Wpriced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,
5 X, x' w6 ^3 g2 tas some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last8 Q# V' n3 I, A
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.* P& O1 {) c& z2 \- ?
" O, Z9 e6 @: S( r* x3 Q1 V3 r
Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house6 p6 O3 h6 u3 s) H8 ~
prices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
& A& X0 k/ S+ v1 w8 o; nlevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting$ T$ \; A9 I. D$ G0 c( N! f! ~
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,# ]0 T8 v; m9 O% k: J7 E' K' w
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the+ B) [2 j/ ?/ ^0 G L: U# j
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
+ J& J; W1 c3 [7 ?; Ymaking a purchase.5 K$ P5 P9 J3 R5 }
( S0 t4 n1 M$ {
Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing& o/ d3 C1 ] R1 ] l+ ^ O
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong. t9 j. ^. ?3 j& h# H3 b
confidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city5 n0 ?- V5 N- y& O+ g( O
centre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting
$ p! h7 w) m! {2 J. kattention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown
1 l' w. @+ [8 [2 I& v. Ramenities.
4 M6 o0 {# h& Q$ @2 S6 `$ q1 u$ G& f" G/ Q& g- W& m% G8 w
The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels- ?; Z2 w- k2 m- K, M5 `3 y
throughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand
( ^ y8 r1 h% y' p0 s# cacross the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has+ x5 |- p& v8 f \3 p
continued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been$ I# }" s9 m+ j! [# C
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle R- P; B$ n2 H2 T( x0 w
residence, rather than for investment.
' A9 r' J; \! a7 Q8 { t V2 q M5 l7 D+ Z
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as' A9 v- z* Y* S: I6 x5 [* e
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted3 O' S: ]9 j6 W/ T, ~* p
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer
: v! l- Q- {8 r6 iconfidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization
$ \" ~, }; [" V% N( yrate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
) v, t* u0 B- q, wthe market.9 Q' }; \9 r9 G+ \% k
/ y+ w+ ^: \+ s' Z8 ^5 A In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through
# T# A- M- _. ]7 GJuly, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
6 ~. f4 B3 e9 c7 HAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
* {3 ]7 t6 Q' omonths, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
- X0 t+ n! E) T8 {to the shortage of available inventory.
- Z) k/ S" `' b* W# H. b' @7 k8 o* S5 H+ [; _ B* E4 `0 |- I' ?6 U
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its
" d( I7 n" J+ `1 h1 bmomentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
/ |+ _* t" f) p) S2 v. Xvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses
- v1 c- m! v* b+ U" Mstruggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.# b' G# U" {/ ^# G
, J2 e( i, Y$ y! S4 n( O! g- c Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
- K0 Y- K3 R& E; Y1 pin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low# }7 }/ l! r2 k6 b4 ]" \- Z
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that! D0 t* e3 @7 ]
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring+ t0 L+ K" I9 f+ C# Y
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer
' H a- L5 M; o- o( Vseason - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as' g9 d9 B; b" R
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
$ ]* C* }- _$ ~$ a! y( _
* l7 K# K$ D) H6 W Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter6 ^& U2 z K2 o% s
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
5 p9 c* `9 _- r% q0 M, z% U3 R' [/ bremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,- j% `9 j, y6 G+ V
maintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
5 b6 x1 m' O" {7 N- H3 W, ]increasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve
9 u. \& ?1 O% Xin the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly9 [4 E \8 ?( ~) @% r9 h K# Y( C
towards the end of 2006. 5 E; L" D |5 l8 K8 D1 e0 ^
4 O' R2 i) H* e7 R! _While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of
+ j9 j8 O1 y# I9 @# m( w0 rinventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
m7 E; ~8 w/ c$ |/ kto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
8 ?6 @% B. B& J$ Vgroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to
" ?4 v1 [, K# k C7 N$ }" A) ~# M% |foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added
9 b& w2 ?' P$ [pressure on tight inventory levels.
- \8 t6 U; u9 e& j7 X% k. B8 d2 _1 b( ]: ]. Q5 u3 i
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic/ P4 L4 D7 V/ t" a
fundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
% ]" m) J; M% I& Pinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;: _! Q, s$ g1 b I) d
while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching
5 C+ W9 m: |) x7 lfor a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
l/ O* g1 R# \" X( q- N
1 |# V7 U9 _9 A# |8 ^- L <<( a S1 |! F4 l: [
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006) m, I5 z2 w& g* _8 F2 G
) w' X* `4 C+ Q5 W$ s$ a" U4 U$ G
-------------------------------------------------------------------------# Y a1 Y9 s& p
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey- L7 `. s! `: C; w
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 ]% M" U. P8 A7 { 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q3) Q2 j: ]- l: v1 Y7 T
Market Average Average % Change Average Average
, d7 N* ?# {9 n9 `! x -------------------------------------------------------------------------5 n, I; _0 b. R+ z4 e. A
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000+ ^: y1 h9 ]' z
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
S% I9 D: p9 l) @" \' p Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000
4 b" P" W' {* A' V, | -------------------------------------------------------------------------! n9 n, W% v6 W% e5 ^ m
Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,0006 i! X) A& z* E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------: X; a f* s; B1 \
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
7 C/ A; s, g: Z8 O" _3 j5 w% q -------------------------------------------------------------------------; N7 q( _; j0 R0 x! D( N! @1 ~0 n- \
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,333
) q* U' d L. a9 |( j- w. Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------8 c5 k5 L" K) a/ P1 p
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583/ e6 p7 Q8 l- t4 k" v. y+ D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------7 p! k/ `. @; [/ l; J. ~4 k
Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,185% L( G/ Y! }2 w" Y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------. U* p& u% Z+ H1 k3 A
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,2500 r, a4 [/ n# M0 {
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
( w' w1 ^: L) b0 h& R# ?: a Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,7665 V+ A" ~" [1 F! E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------2 F5 G& I6 Q2 _& x/ ^! n5 G
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
& X( P. w4 [ r1 x3 l -------------------------------------------------------------------------
! n. [; v6 G. I7 k% p# h Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500+ D9 c( j; e6 s# \' `
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ T5 g$ ~! |" {: i/ {9 { Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,3893 q! o3 B" K& A& B
-------------------------------------------------------------------------$ a. H2 e0 o" M% x1 W
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7149 {3 z& w2 n9 m/ y* A% t5 ?: M8 O5 y
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: X7 G* m8 G% C Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
: }- }+ X3 p( Q# V0 ? -------------------------------------------------------------------------: J. u( @* H3 U( U7 j; }
Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000! x3 m5 l0 Q- a# V H5 s+ f, L
-------------------------------------------------------------------------& r, S' ]. a! ^+ I# k: D
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,8605 }! r/ ~3 G0 n# y) ~3 [
-------------------------------------------------------------------------" b% B7 x% w( I* x* ^6 z
, u/ r2 q" x4 s
-------------------------------------------------------------
& g( L* x9 E% Y" Z Standard Condominium
( e3 O! h9 ~3 F; T" L# Q3 i -------------------------------------------------------------
) B4 [ w* X8 ]" m6 b( [5 r8 } 2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo, d8 t/ U7 E; y% g( O6 G/ q, v
Market % Change Average Average % Change" A# n$ D( @$ ^7 z7 h* u
-------------------------------------------------------------$ z7 z0 I- A4 _3 h
Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%- i# B; m" p$ W4 x
-------------------------------------------------------------
, r" t2 E4 E" u, G# Q, B C Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%) J2 O4 F0 a# a0 F# T
-------------------------------------------------------------8 ^7 ^& J8 T9 t! b1 V
Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
, M* }5 b& t: y5 I -------------------------------------------------------------
8 E, f! \4 f& P& Z+ z Saint John N/A - - N/A/ t/ }0 L. ]5 i# w9 |* m' v4 W
-------------------------------------------------------------
7 {1 l! t* [3 ^0 i. T3 e4 G2 d# l St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%. _' N: I, Q2 b6 s
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 l( A& ^2 u3 D. w. @8 E9 x* B$ z Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%7 i* D) W* Z* K' V& E+ p7 _
-------------------------------------------------------------
N& C) T- S$ w- R# F Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%6 C. Q1 Y$ F' d7 ~, |( T
-------------------------------------------------------------! d0 s' j& ]" r% e2 x6 y0 Z, K
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%( o9 x9 { N' F
-------------------------------------------------------------% W4 t2 H% P4 u2 h3 O) I# W+ G W
Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%) b# r: o" M) M6 B1 p' z j
-------------------------------------------------------------
- y3 y7 |- m4 Y1 } Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%0 d Y6 s- h; u# W
-------------------------------------------------------------: o0 C6 u4 g5 v) G6 m/ r* P$ W
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%! X5 V" e/ ~3 n+ a$ ?" Y, z" |; o
-------------------------------------------------------------! q+ @/ t; @8 y3 r9 @
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%
5 h) v2 f) c6 q4 d6 y5 L8 D3 U0 f -------------------------------------------------------------. L! ? S3 Q. Y7 E& z5 ]5 X
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%
8 p4 t7 P$ h0 M -------------------------------------------------------------* ~. a* V% q+ r" E6 W, h9 [! s/ _
Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%# e" I' w P. y2 G. c8 y
-------------------------------------------------------------) O4 {; w& Q1 x9 `/ O
Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
: X4 {0 A4 a5 z& q W* T$ c -------------------------------------------------------------1 @* _# p1 v- `( Z( r6 T
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%% o5 l8 f/ \ u; P
-------------------------------------------------------------
8 a8 S: W `& n8 F# p6 Z >>
. |$ n4 A- M+ V T
3 Z! u2 m1 _# d; { Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined9 A" i+ i7 Q' D3 W" d
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint
6 |5 T% v4 I2 ]. tJohn and Victoria.
, Q1 e) e% M& A5 T
2 F) I+ R: Y4 X The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most, k1 Y6 L, g2 J* X# \2 M8 y
comprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of5 z5 c0 {* W+ N5 I6 {' J8 t/ Z5 x9 L
housing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
4 l* S! ?0 k" u$ J3 r9 X* sreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price/ I" s" T" H- B _) f
trends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities% J( N3 u3 a# T( y& D% M
across the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
5 S o4 L$ ^. X* F5 mavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current
$ f/ G+ I9 v3 F# x: b* x# ifigures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
+ P' S" i1 q+ W2 d$ o1 x" s6 cversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on- a7 e) ?/ W1 Z% i& I8 ^+ z
November 15, 2006." h# o( q% Y7 l; j C
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of J( W4 U3 I$ c6 S9 ^
fair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
7 y, Y$ m/ y( t, M! U" f2 X) gprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is
& x/ [5 ` P2 a. X C' Vavailable for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|