 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
Canada's housing market both vigorous and stable , ~" S( }0 i- R: ^5 R/ a$ h4 m& u( a
. I* G T2 C# Z4 E
- Country's market poised to show growth throughout 2006 -& I) o! `( P6 B2 \7 e, d- N
. z- | C8 D+ Q- W0 {' f. |9 Z TORONTO, Sept. 28 /CNW/ - For most of Canada, the housing market$ i: E5 f- v8 K' w/ N1 \
exhibited moderate price increases and stable unit sales during the third/ ~1 L! `; Y! {' [# r: y' v8 @6 c4 ~7 @
quarter. Wide regional variances continued to be the dominant characteristic7 X! \% w( ^- B6 ?5 z3 N
in the market, exemplified by frenzied levels of activity and double digit
, a$ s* u% J! T! s5 Pprice gains observed in the energy and commodity rich Western provinces, and/ a D# b: P, B
more reasonable sales volumes and moderate price appreciation in Ontario,# W- F0 `$ r' V6 ~/ ]
Quebec and Atlantic Canada, according to a report released today by Royal
5 o; h( ~8 R3 GLePage Real Estate Services.
# ]6 F" G: |2 O2 z* J$ B$ s2 R2 _8 w$ x6 j1 }
Nationally, market trends established through the first three quarters
. h- ]; h7 k p' A+ rare forecast to continue for the remainder of the year. Robust economic; J2 O4 v" A) Z
conditions, low unemployment rates, modestly growing salaries and wages, and
) w* [% j9 ~* ]4 W, ]/ ?sound consumer confidence contributed to the overall strength of the
% e, S1 k' D, j# E- k3 Yresidential real estate sector.( e8 J. _: q% u( ^2 ?* s) v! x
7 i. \7 t! M, p; H* H S Of the housing types surveyed, the highest average price appreciation8 ?' U* K. [( d
occurred in detached bungalows, which rose to $300,365 (+16.3%)8 U7 E/ F% Y8 o# Z! U( z' R
year-over-year, followed by standard condominiums, which rose to $211,562- q6 O2 Y6 {9 c
(+14.2%), and standard two-storey properties, which increased to $365,380
6 _' [5 N# s" k(+13.2%).
, J" l. ]8 Q2 Y: L4 h5 U% ]- n! ^; K! K% |! \
"Canada's sturdy housing market continued to demonstrate steady growth
0 n( D5 E6 A5 F3 e! ?5 K3 ?* mduring the third quarter. For all but the west, we have moved on from the
4 z; }7 H8 j8 a8 G$ x( t2 M! Yfrenzied expansion that characterized the first half of this decade, and are3 d. E1 l: Q0 j, r
poised to show continued growth at a more moderate pace," said Phil Soper,6 n' b; [! J* E3 v
president and chief executive officer, Royal LePage Real Estate Services.$ C% T; ?2 \$ R# N) a
"Gone is the sellers' market that we have lived with for some years. We3 e0 X& j6 A2 W3 F* x2 [' ?
welcome the more reliable conditions that are characteristic of a healthy0 m9 y$ e' n/ Z2 @
balanced market."! I: A' f8 y% g b* l6 {
$ q, w( y: g9 c" a5 E, X
Despite the double-digit rise in average national house prices,
! c0 _% `; t7 R: j5 n( G6 }considerable regional variances were exhibited again this quarter. The shift3 @) o: ]+ `7 T2 k1 C
to balanced market conditions, which began in late 2005, has continued
2 E. X$ N, h0 V7 d! s4 athroughout most of the Central and Eastern regions of the country. In the core
6 E+ Y: \- I" |+ V; X% @energy producing western provinces, the combination of very high in-migration,
: P5 |: D8 A8 P3 t. U$ Xmanageable affordability, and a shortage of inventory has driven record2 j) [; }; v8 A I; q8 b' m" [5 |
breaking price appreciations.
/ C0 M/ h' p/ I( }4 g) U! Z9 }: l) ^( g; U# {- E
Echoing the second quarter and supported by Alberta's rapidly expanding
/ {- e# P: D+ W8 Jeconomy, Calgary and Edmonton led the charge of Canadian cities with the
7 U7 h6 _ T! S0 }2 s% J J$ elargest house price appreciation in all housing types surveyed.( n6 k0 q3 }/ W+ C7 P1 c5 n9 a( R
% |" q0 t5 s0 A9 q
In Ottawa and Toronto, growth remained steady, supported by solid4 q9 q' K4 Q5 c% j6 O- s
economic fundamentals, an increase in available inventory and strong consumer1 u- N: B# H# R) y
confidence. While the pace of price appreciation in Ontario leveled off9 n# H4 C( o; g. p/ e \4 L" Z
slightly, the province's real estate market remains poised for modest growth.2 w+ H$ g0 C9 ^4 V2 G. v
In Atlantic Canada, new housing and condominium construction offered buyers
+ I, y/ H- V1 r1 q* w- jgreater selection at more competitive prices, resulting in a slower rate of
/ |: u; o9 a9 ^. M; gprice appreciation when compared with 2005.) u, n& L' L; M( _. i& U: B6 F6 K. r
6 m" d9 R+ X+ H
While the pace of growth in Canada has slowed, the domestic housing
2 o J* ^- p$ K0 E9 |market is expected to outperform the American market. The economic and. P( c i6 s+ w; c. x8 x" p+ P
financial fundamentals driving the residential real estate sector in Canada/ ~) \: P) B: D: l+ M# c& Y+ k
are markedly different than those found in the United States.
& ^0 G& K/ R4 w' F C' Q2 Q+ m6 o: x# J, ]
Added Soper: "Canada's housing market is likely to outperform the4 w5 y b8 K# v- q
American market through 2007. A number of factors are working in Canada's
7 ]) u8 u- @9 X! @" C3 Hfavour, including healthy personal and governmental debt levels, the2 h& x1 |/ Q4 d l
relatively modest rise in interest rates in our country, and general
3 ] w3 @! l" V3 Yaffordability in our major cities. In addition, Americans are now seeing the
3 ^: i$ {' u. Z$ d2 S0 `+ Ldownside of a tax system that encourages maximum homeowner leverage, and
( Y5 ]0 k$ u0 p+ r% V- T* yaggressive financial products such as zero- and negative-amortization
# d) F+ m* g" E5 Y3 hmortgages that work only in a high price growth environment."
2 | N) W. k9 x. }2 ^1 m0 ]* w0 d5 S. S0 P6 ?3 {3 s: P3 K k$ U
<<
- Q [! v; j3 K REGIONAL SUMMARIES- h* K6 e5 i4 D$ l4 Z! f
>>
/ v9 {; _2 c; A1 H$ B$ m0 _8 `0 _; A: c
Balanced conditions continued to characterize the housing market in
' H- M t$ A+ `! V& MHalifax, as significantly higher inventory levels helped to moderate the rate
) ~) @" J1 {' \1 T5 h Pof price appreciation. Buyers were increasingly choosy, taking more time; s2 g( @! k" E
looking for newer, low-maintenance properties that were not in need of
7 T0 d0 x/ b# F* K1 \8 nrenovations.1 A* y! u/ w& E9 @! L
. t+ |4 Y3 }6 g: z8 D3 G6 w
The housing market in Moncton remained healthy and strong as a slight0 {: K u+ p$ p: @/ G' L
increase in inventory helped to moderate the rate of price appreciation
+ s5 `8 v0 r9 o: J- r9 `& C- tcompared to the same period in 2005. Activity was brisk throughout August and' q# D9 D, x+ W* v
September and is expected to remain this way through the fourth quarter.
3 u. z6 y# S3 z4 y _
/ ]0 Z H$ ?' n' {' e8 M The housing market in Saint John underwent its traditional summer" i6 E2 `! y3 T$ G1 a- u- a
slowdown in the third quarter, with activity picking up towards the end of the3 h ~" D/ K- L) e$ r
quarter. The local economy continued to thrive, as construction on a new/ _% g# o2 C6 e5 s* @& y( I/ O
600,000 square-foot shopping area has begun, bringing several new box stores
7 i5 P( t/ P' U3 b4 v X+ X: |# O' Lto the area. Buyers have begun seeking less expensive fixtures for their homes7 {" w6 t5 ]' Z, E( e0 I3 e' l
and are instead opting for more affordable housing options.
) a5 g* `: X. `4 ]# i6 H( h: G4 W3 }& y$ w
In Charlottetown, the housing market started to move towards balanced1 A2 [8 O- V6 ?3 o# S
conditions, as some sellers had to begin to lower the asking prices on their
6 Z0 L' b3 F: t# |3 a* f7 G ~homes to make them more competitive. Activity from out-of-town and US buyers$ [2 w& c3 C- Q4 W
was down slightly compared to 2005, likely attributable to the strong Canadian7 w: G5 p' V% k5 c) ^+ v4 e8 U
dollar. Inventory levels began to creep up in the third quarter, providing
, N8 t$ Y5 r4 O8 t* S" Zbuyers with more options when looking for a home.
6 V0 e! W, `. R( `3 b) m) L% R7 s
: `+ O: t% Z5 z: Z/ Q Activity in St. John's slowed slightly in the third quarter, particularly; \5 ]. P3 G7 Z8 S2 Z% S
among higher-priced properties, where there was a slight over-supply of homes7 f% F3 H6 j3 r! ^7 T
priced over $200,000. Listing periods have increased when compared with 2005,' K7 O$ _, W7 b& z7 U4 B+ d) ^1 k
as some of the pent-up demand that had characterized the market over the last2 J2 k0 x5 O: I3 @, U4 q
few years has been satisfied, resulting in more normal, balanced conditions.
! D8 y- h7 V0 t* j$ Y8 c
+ P; Y7 ?0 E) W. A# `: j9 F# I ] Montreal's housing market recorded modest increases in average house
, f. R, B' Y; W& T( Nprices, due to a slight seasonal slowdown in the third quarter as inventory
' y0 P( Z$ ]: s; a8 Ylevels rose. Part of this can be attributed to the fact that many renting0 Q" L) N- n& `$ N; e5 X
first-time buyers were motivated to close on the purchase of a home by July 1,( b+ g/ [- A& A; s3 { g3 ?
when rental leases expire in Quebec. Once this date has passed some of the+ T* |7 T ^9 @1 e8 D* C
pressure is taken off the market, allowing buyers to visit more homes before
. S6 k+ v4 t2 Z2 |3 N# \9 l ^making a purchase., X5 I5 \- H2 R5 X& p
$ U" Y+ ]4 t4 m- z" [2 ^ Ottawa held its position as one of the country's most stable housing& z' F, @4 I1 h
markets in the third quarter, reinforced by a vibrant local economy and strong
' G5 B# B/ L4 m; hconfidence, resulting in modest increases in average house prices. The city
. G5 Z5 T( W& H4 U$ e; Ncentre remained a bright spot in Ottawa, with homes in this area attracting" e8 x& G, u& Q
attention due to their convenient location and proximity to downtown* V1 V' L( J; M' \
amenities.
; v8 ?" R) I' @4 e; k9 N
2 F0 s8 C0 d8 B. @. P! b0 O The housing market in Toronto sustained healthy activity levels
1 Q5 u @! T) l4 M0 Mthroughout the third quarter, as a strong economy helped to maintain demand) S. _: k9 \$ w
across the city, causing average house prices to rise moderately. Toronto has
3 h5 W: r9 n, L2 V8 R1 ]+ vcontinued to experience modest growth in average house prices, and has been4 l9 e% |4 }& }
driven primarily by purchasers who are buying homes as their principle
: G8 ~& e! p2 k4 lresidence, rather than for investment.9 _5 E; j! M, R ], c. N" z
* o5 `5 ^' V) @- v: b' @& [- K
The vibrant Winnipeg housing market continued to show its strength as+ }+ B4 T5 D5 K9 y- z
house prices rose during the third quarter. The booming local economy resulted0 ]& z8 K* C9 t* \1 n
in a historically low unemployment rate, helping to bolster consumer* C' D, A4 W/ Z( G: {
confidence and Winnipeg's ranking as the city with the lowest capitalization5 c( W. U4 L+ U5 z8 q% I0 C9 W
rate among the country's larger cities - helped to encourage buyers to enter
* H, y8 m$ A# a. e$ W7 u. L7 \the market.$ A* f+ \$ L7 U7 y. M0 n$ h' |
% W* ]3 k$ h& I0 w( ` In Regina, the market experienced a slight seasonal slowdown through0 \6 i0 m |$ W1 v2 K. ]" s
July, as there were fewer purchasers in the market due to summer vacations. In
) S1 Q( Z2 v3 Y7 w3 LAugust, activity resumed to the busy pace previously seen in the spring
- P# { F# \# [' p( n1 {months, as the influx of purchasers made it more difficult to find a home due
0 c7 }0 C; B/ K4 W H* g& sto the shortage of available inventory.
8 s& }1 Z& w N$ ?- A- ^! k. |! n0 m$ ]5 J C1 R
Activity in Saskatoon remained brisk as the market maintained its* `# v! P8 M2 z: e5 n2 Q* U
momentum from the busy spring sales period. The economy in Saskatoon remains
" a, t8 u+ p! R8 Yvibrant, as employment opportunities are abundant with many businesses* u: v8 L% r+ y
struggling to make hires and having to recruit outside the province.& ]; u( f- ?9 ^# ?) A/ {
7 ~+ t" d `( R6 x$ ~6 B Calgary's housing market recorded blazing average house price increases
& M" x3 v" v3 V% Kin the third quarter, in all surveyed categories. The burgeoning economy, low/ N2 g% M1 ^- r+ b4 L
unemployment rates and low inventory levels remained the leading factors that$ u, Q+ @0 v+ \# @
pressured Calgary's house prices upwards. However, regardless of the soaring6 R! E8 @) s( g1 B7 r
prices that characterized the market - even during the typically slower summer4 W2 \. j7 v$ c) w p/ d9 y% H
season - it is expected that activity will become slightly more balanced, as, |/ b0 n- K/ a+ ?- f, u
buyers are becoming more reluctant to participate in the frenetic activity.
) b( R7 r0 D+ g& A3 E* j$ b1 o4 [* ? }
Edmonton's booming local economy continued to thrive in the third quarter1 w% f, h3 p5 G( W' |
as activity in the oil sands north of the city continued to flourish. Edmonton
; ^* P) R" s3 }2 O/ Rremained the hub of activity for those coming to work in the oil industry,
# F& Y! e# t5 Mmaintaining tight inventory levels across the city, resulting in prices
& d% D0 C$ n E' s: rincreasing at record levels. However, as inventory levels continued to improve; i" u% P" |* g4 ~! U) A$ y( `
in the third quarter the rate of price appreciation should moderate slightly: Z- j3 D& N4 w7 {7 I* h
towards the end of 2006. # E s. v* S8 b; ^
; i* i0 o# d5 G6 m
While Vancouver has seen a slight reprieve from the severe shortage of6 k8 G; ^5 i2 r8 Q& w! {
inventory that had previously characterized the market, supply is still unable
* q6 _) b( U: o! m) h. Jto meet demand, driving house prices upwards. Vancouver has a very diverse
{5 [+ u! ~/ ]4 @; w1 @/ ngroup of active buyers - from first-time home buyers to baby-boomers to5 k4 c) b" i7 g6 V
foreign investors - all of whom fuel the demand for houses, placing added6 x1 i4 E! x( M5 f1 K* r( @
pressure on tight inventory levels.
' ]! t6 |4 h; W& G2 M$ j4 ]! A s9 } L4 \" H) m
Victoria's market is vibrant and supported by strong economic
$ T; E- E7 A& afundamentals, fuelled by a booming tech sector and a migration of young people
' X+ U& {7 ?& qinto the city that has continued to support the area's house price increases;
6 p) `# k9 ?( I9 [9 ]while increased inventory levels have afforded buyers more time when searching- s! H# p& u9 H$ K; p( Q5 r
for a home, helping to normalize the market's pace.
4 |; w2 s3 T4 i9 U4 b: w& s9 g2 ?8 w
<<9 a- N" S# r9 J8 p. K
Survey of Canadian Average House Prices in the Third Quarter 2006$ ?0 v" _1 `3 ~% E* N. t( d
- u" T$ p0 g( c2 v _ -------------------------------------------------------------------------2 H# ?! G( I; D8 L
Detached Bungalows Standard Two Storey3 t$ e( e+ ]9 G0 P7 E5 A/ Q5 A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 g9 e6 T! \, K5 _1 Z, L) P 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Bungalow 2006 Q3 2005 Q36 g j h) M0 F5 P3 b3 Q
Market Average Average % Change Average Average: s T9 U/ u$ t! J
-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ I* s$ p" t/ m
Halifax 186,333 173,333 7.5% 198,667 199,000
+ T, A( T# \; L' f3 P1 t -------------------------------------------------------------------------' X0 e ^& U: i! T3 l9 G
Charlottetown 145,000 141,000 2.8% 175,000 170,000$ u( z( y" \8 k; ~ t0 E" E
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 d* y' ?9 |! B+ B- \$ |; Y0 s9 R Moncton 135,000 127,000 6.3% 129,000 123,000' |% r) r' m5 t, w9 `0 ]9 A" d# b
-------------------------------------------------------------------------; n) r: b, v% V' Y, H/ c
Saint John 141,200 142,900 -1.2% - -
1 B: v' H8 E/ C# L$ Y -------------------------------------------------------------------------' a0 p- Y' \- X) i5 O
St. John's 143,667 142,667 0.7% 200,667 202,3336 x* f; C b: T& X9 x9 h
-------------------------------------------------------------------------6 H4 |- E' U' i" f. a6 P
Atlantic 150,240 145,380 3.3% 175,833 173,583) h+ Q4 E" |3 y' t# ?% j( C: K& b/ g
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# P, h+ h! ~3 } Montreal 213,691 203,500 5.0% 321,141 316,1853 y' j ?1 d" O$ e6 A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------/ C; G! \+ a+ Z: w
Ottawa 290,083 278,417 4.2% 285,667 273,250 Q3 w/ |9 X" ~/ Z, a, r+ q8 u
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
# d( H N. H {# e Toronto 373,368 355,882 4.9% 481,523 474,766
; R4 S1 ?! O) R. J -------------------------------------------------------------------------& b, u2 ^ b! W0 B: @
Winnipeg 181,579 159,860 13.6% 202,337 180,707
$ I5 z9 s4 y& p0 ] -------------------------------------------------------------------------7 j" k: N5 t7 ~7 ]. M8 v/ D
Saskatchewan 170,667 156,083 9.3% 182,600 166,500
, r; O: ~5 u5 Z" ]8 Y# V1 K -------------------------------------------------------------------------$ b2 k6 z) f2 e Q" n
Calgary 395,067 252,411 56.5% 405,778 264,389
' A* W8 w5 F; O& B6 Q -------------------------------------------------------------------------) r/ Z4 n! U: e9 |' c0 i6 A
Edmonton 286,857 194,857 47.2% 316,429 206,7147 ]4 G2 X) x/ W% M& A9 J5 r* e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
) H$ x0 K ~& C* |* }( c0 o Vancouver 704,250 601,000 17.2% 794,000 697,500
) y- ^$ F8 e8 g7 A; I1 c -------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ G d- \3 ^& i6 U9 C Victoria 375,000 348,000 7.8% 403,000 391,000
5 v* b5 C! O# r. o( p -------------------------------------------------------------------------! |' N, b6 W; k& K; [) R
National 300,365 258,202 16.3% 365,380 322,860
0 g2 V$ I; P# L. W -------------------------------------------------------------------------
/ N7 |/ K" W' {" p/ k1 a; O" K7 K$ ~! ?$ p1 n
-------------------------------------------------------------( x C& v5 f( L
Standard Condominium
$ x& Z7 P+ `: g+ z7 _- {+ f -------------------------------------------------------------5 D- H& d( E9 K3 }
2-Storey 2006 Q3 2005 Q3 Condo+ _. p7 c/ J" y' G, k
Market % Change Average Average % Change
4 o/ N) J* N. n -------------------------------------------------------------
8 I A& W4 I3 c% C Halifax -0.2% 142,000 103,000 37.9%
% `8 T8 K1 b$ x1 O -------------------------------------------------------------5 a+ Q. x& j' J5 k0 E/ r& q
Charlottetown 2.9% 98,000 98,000 0.0%
% Z, q& T' r3 g" s -------------------------------------------------------------
- a2 x# o# i* T; b/ j+ V4 F R Moncton 4.9% - - N/A
7 C- o1 Q% ]- x -------------------------------------------------------------
, r& W" w8 u1 I0 X s5 S+ C Saint John N/A - - N/A0 l/ E( F7 T K- \6 s# h3 c
-------------------------------------------------------------
- D1 R+ B! _3 x St. John's -0.8% 146,333 145,667 0.5%4 A( L1 a2 a, y7 f
-------------------------------------------------------------- Y* o* T- j3 p" K/ V, Y: K: Q
Atlantic 1.3% 128,778 115,556 11.4%% N: n0 q" G. P0 [- K
------------------------------------------------------------- R' q& |4 V8 M. \% n& M
Montreal 1.6% 193,190 188,016 2.8%6 v, C, V, A6 s/ U# ]
-------------------------------------------------------------; d" u; g" c5 W, F
Ottawa 4.5% 181,083 172,250 5.1%
- B$ g& r9 ]- j! p) `! I" | -------------------------------------------------------------
; _* ~* K7 h6 B2 e- } Toronto 1.4% 252,088 242,918 3.8%2 [: }' }0 H: J* e# O7 c
-------------------------------------------------------------
" p; _2 Y$ Z8 M# D, u Winnipeg 12.0% 105,648 96,008 10.0%' r4 _- ^% Q6 Q- U4 j) t1 F. [
-------------------------------------------------------------- ~& b. |! U8 t4 p
Saskatchewan 9.7% 106,250 101,000 5.2%, `+ {( D7 O T9 ?/ {% a
-------------------------------------------------------------5 u: e# I& E" F0 p- N! L
Calgary 53.5% 245,844 153,867 59.8%& u: ^! ?+ M6 X5 S0 X3 M) o
-------------------------------------------------------------0 H& P' T1 G. D) Q" V! j
Edmonton 53.1% 200,433 131,500 52.4%' h: n0 `; i b; L
-------------------------------------------------------------
. @( Y+ A/ r4 ?- L0 ^0 Z$ ~$ ]9 u Vancouver 13.8% 366,250 323,250 13.3%
% u& T, w0 u4 y5 A -------------------------------------------------------------
. H4 W9 D7 |- L5 B/ M' [- S4 e R7 g Victoria 3.1% 229,000 220,000 4.1%
- n1 u U8 O9 a! W -------------------------------------------------------------, p+ s$ F! P1 E- R) W
National 13.2% 211,562 185,296 14.2%
- o" s _' K7 [4 {8 p -------------------------------------------------------------
& Y' |* k1 l7 {2 l >>
! x' W% C0 \& o- } S% L! K: u
6 E/ M7 s2 d$ a8 q3 D Average house prices are based on an average of all sub-markets examined# o4 j0 {* E z2 r" d3 Y9 J
in the area, except for the smaller markets of Charlottetown, Moncton, Saint$ D( ~& M( y, H% `4 z
John and Victoria.
6 @8 {- g5 i5 i5 Z% D- I
, N ]6 I. `" {) M% a5 {: K; Q The Royal LePage Survey of Canadian House Prices is the largest, most
9 U6 a2 _# s9 Wcomprehensive study of its kind in Canada, with information on seven types of
' o8 S2 i) d D7 i3 D7 L- }) Fhousing in over 250 neighbourhoods from coast to coast. This release
}1 Q, M7 L* H0 Yreferences an abbreviated version of the survey, which highlights house price
$ Y `/ w" s5 ^ otrends for the three most common types of housing in Canada in 80 communities
+ w- W5 p, T, R0 Oacross the country. A complete database of past and present surveys is
4 C( i. {6 j$ x; F! Uavailable on the Royal LePage Web site at www.royallepage.ca, and current8 h( y6 E% S6 @) ?
figures will be updated following the end of the third quarter. A printable
0 @0 C/ |( X- y3 Fversion of the third quarter 2006 survey will be available online on! l* }: S2 p; k& j4 I6 H
November 15, 2006.' Q/ ]) h: M! H: X% W5 D
Housing values in the Royal LePage Survey are Royal LePage opinions of
Z: t4 |6 }4 M9 kfair market value in each location, based on local data and market knowledge
# y- z7 M% P2 \1 bprovided by Royal LePage residential real estate experts. Historical data is" M2 P* d: _! J$ r5 D3 H9 }4 K
available for some areas back to the early 1970s. |
|