 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑
) K8 O8 a6 A4 N. E7 }
: d! }$ A$ \9 Z( q+ \) i
$ b% I: {& t+ X* e你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:
% B* `8 \% p' ?+ X p: ERalph Klein
: ]. z" }& S' v5 ]) D
* w3 @9 F" p% P" T$ q我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!2 V+ y8 s* }) ~$ |+ Q
+ F- M- j% V& S所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。0 N: i& K1 L/ Z% {
. Z% u0 u, u2 _7 P
4 R$ J! }: j6 J7 _
4 I) d3 ?6 `+ O& Yhttp://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
: Y/ |2 Y+ ?7 a, D1 y7 u1 OHistoric Alberta budget balances:
. ?" C0 x5 d/ ]
* A5 R2 S! i3 \9 z# C1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus/ Y+ z( s9 M: k+ H
& ^% ~- c: ], k6 B5 u: C
1982-83: $796 million deficit
3 \4 ^' K& M4 X
2 f, k! W7 D7 W; q1983-84: $129 million surplus
8 r# K" t& m2 |
& ~0 }6 ^- @( @" X" L7 R0 T4 B1 x1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus( {2 U" S' ^5 L
& _; e, G$ K1 H
1985-86: $761 million deficit& a! ?) p$ k g. R! u2 l2 K
0 @* D$ G# d2 I C" ^
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit4 I+ L" W" P; o4 `% [
# h" Z' u2 O/ E0 A, |3 G1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit
% |' o a! z9 y. N9 k) ~0 z
- h: g: y+ V( O. Z q8 J; c6 W1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
+ Z& f$ b- y g% T
$ F, G2 I3 D" a1 p+ Y7 a1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit' n# f! n h3 w6 e, w
4 s% P5 z% s. i8 ]4 j# H
1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit
7 i2 s; c2 e3 S% }) T% ^1 j0 i
0 P: y9 Z0 ~; }$ `1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit7 x C% k& U; ^' M" K
" E0 m1 r7 _7 ], ^, a5 k
1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
: m' k4 X) ^6 U, ?3 k5 C
! g( n4 b6 c1 ^2 T1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit: B/ C. X- p- o* O' m8 {
; K; z; ?# W. S* j1 J5 I
1994-95: $938 million surplus
0 I/ {% S+ Z; j+ m. `4 y; K" `0 O, p- k o- W" O% A
1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
3 M4 i2 `2 [7 q) t6 J. z" ~: k: X
. r3 i+ {* H% A1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus/ r! Z+ u' F# w
& h, L3 c" [: C2 H
1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
0 u+ g/ e3 Q+ L; W& a5 [3 z3 Y. I4 q I" ]2 F+ k) A4 [
1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus
" X; I9 |, ?% O) n' m
# c* e% a7 B- n/ H( g' w1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus# e1 W _' ?7 }+ Q
% J# d# e5 X6 d: v
2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus. U x, z, u( d7 c8 F
5 f8 F9 Q( W+ Y- ?( N2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus
* @5 Z$ I; G, j$ A$ B+ ^: G4 {5 x
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
4 L% ]: B2 g6 B4 O! R
4 ?1 ]/ D& R! Y. M2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus5 N9 j8 N5 s \" f7 `: O( e
8 R1 ]# `: E5 I3 T8 ~2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus
- X, k: V6 n4 Q1 P
5 [1 f7 X7 i/ x2 v/ N* w2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus( {+ ^: ~$ r" i& x! v4 [3 w
! ~! b; S! _4 i8 N. z: ^* c2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus/ e5 |3 q2 X- B1 R- \
5 T( e$ n8 ^$ R, Z0 I2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus
- i4 s8 o7 p6 c; A
, h" R2 J# }2 ` Y2008-09: $852 million deficit
) R$ G5 }" [& r6 r" C* C* G1 G1 [; X; @6 a
2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit# m' M* ~- b1 ?8 ^
! U2 F {5 M2 J+ H6 R5 H2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit3 e% M) v- `+ N0 ?
J9 {8 T6 `/ l8 e: X# q4 ?
2011-12: $23 million deficit$ E; E2 K! u" B! [3 O% y4 j5 F( i
" z2 L% u- q' C1 X1 P: H$ d2 X
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit* `2 I; H0 s: W1 q
' O7 }8 x O+ M, ^' R5 c2 E
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|