 鲜花( 332)  鸡蛋( 23)
|
本帖最后由 一盎司饭 于 2015-10-5 13:53 编辑 8 m; h" E H, o! c: R
' @- c$ x6 U) m+ u
% U! |* ?$ \+ H
你想问“为什么PC有盈余”,答案很简单,就两个字:1 Y* K& N7 {' g: p* [3 v
Ralph Klein# H: V: E6 S8 ~0 m$ ]" z
) ?% U8 f; {: o2 Q我下面列举了能够查到的历年的省赤字情况。从数据可知,只有Ralph Klein任上是有盈余的。在他之前,要上溯到1985年,也就是30年前,才有盈余。其他的每一年都是赤字!
1 K8 m* `. q; k+ a) f* {
7 [8 g! Y- w- H6 Y! Z$ J所以结论很简单。如果Ralph Klein参选,我肯定选他。如果没有Ralph Klein参选,我有充分理由相信PC会赤字。从Stelmach到Prentice,已经充分证明了他们仅仅是用PC的名义。他们的政策和Ralph Klein完全不同。Ralph Klein一上台就把省府部门砍了1/3,这次选举只有WR提到了裁减。你用PC10几20年前的情况套用到现在属于刻舟求剑。事实上Ralph Klein在PC历史上属于一个异常情况,Stelmach/Redford/Prentice才是PC的本质。Ralph Klein时期是没有WR的,右翼选民觉得PC可以代表他们。Ralph Klein之后PC往NDP靠拢,才会出现WR的支持基础。7 y- l0 _5 l+ T, y" B* N
* [- l% U6 B! a8 `2 x
2 y4 m, @+ U* T0 V+ n" h7 F4 L' Q+ Z5 Q; ?& s
http://www.edmontonsun.com/2015/ ... it-in-three-decades
+ t& N7 |* G7 X5 z- \Historic Alberta budget balances:4 ~! v) g* m) f1 X
! C2 ]7 y( d! d. f& q8 J
1981-82: $2.133 billion surplus
c5 P" N. \6 u8 t# }* u6 B) K6 _: b9 C9 J* p! V
1982-83: $796 million deficit" g% ^8 D: X- o+ t1 R
7 z' s! I$ b' e8 w1983-84: $129 million surplus
' t; t# _# c" q& ~% o' {2 s/ L4 v+ V4 y0 ^
1984-85: $1.245 billion surplus8 A' T' H6 Y) h
6 A" {- J: H; x6 b" N( v( k, D& h1985-86: $761 million deficit7 c' U7 ~' S- F x/ R; B
# Q: ]% X: `5 f# s9 r/ _
1986-87: $4.033 billion deficit, d% c7 u; W2 k6 Y
) ], A% |3 p2 a7 E4 L8 T
1987-88: $1.365 billion deficit
- B5 @9 `( r1 C$ R: B3 I: F1 w/ R1 p5 R3 l! l4 M5 j+ K- ~
1988-89: $2.007 billion deficit
5 c/ @+ {5 {) {5 [& X
! T! x9 y* ?; F9 V6 ?) {1989-90: $2.116 billion deficit
3 I" {3 S" N4 b" d7 b& h, \% o2 U) d$ t% J% e) a6 Y( a
1990-91: $1.831 billion deficit& U# g! D S* M+ S0 V# z0 X. E, d
7 x5 k& c) \- h+ n8 x( y; e9 X: l
1991-92: $2.629 billion deficit) T1 f! q+ y* u' ^/ T4 e
r7 R! r I7 h* ?* [# I1992-93: $3.324 billion deficit
7 c0 X2 r" r. }9 B6 B' S; s- }4 I' z- i$ K1 m
1993-94: $1.371 billion deficit4 Z/ ?6 \% Q6 d3 X$ F1 k% Z
" O# r3 L0 ^, E3 v* w0 ^7 x1994-95: $938 million surplus. W" A; z+ P; i4 D) q, B5 g
. h) I% B8 A0 }3 N" I( Y) e6 m1995-96: $1.151 billion surplus
% z k7 E. S/ i; }, c' ]4 _
5 V2 L' n4 H1 Y k4 ^, a1996-97: $2.489 billion surplus
n: S& u0 D* c# p0 f1 ~- Y
: Y: S! Q! w( L; J6 o, }1 L, ?1 P" @* {1997-98: $2.659 billion surplus
0 C# R& K& N4 ~/ a8 D
+ `. b2 I! I& J$ Z1998-99: $1.094 billion surplus
* y+ E3 C) l# ~3 A ~5 R. p. O
, h& I7 l! K4 @$ _1999-00: $2.791 billion surplus7 R* r$ k" G$ Q2 l- {
# d( g6 M# [) ^# t- T2 c! \: v2000-01: $6.571 billion surplus9 o4 z0 Y) t* F% ?& H
6 i3 R2 x4 s" V+ V/ i9 r5 P
2001-02: $1.081 billion surplus4 X* ~( r! _! y: F' X' m, S
5 Z2 \/ h9 F, F
2002-03: $2.133 billion surplus
& l; l2 A0 W. A$ d4 S& s3 n+ ^. M4 c/ @3 t6 M) H$ f1 G
2003-04: $4.136 billion surplus) r; ^; D8 T% |# t" `& y
2 B' |4 D* v' @
2004-05: $5.175 billion surplus( k' o6 z2 A0 K7 u+ }6 p
! G F4 y- @: H8 m2005-06: $8.551 billion surplus
" [& s5 H& t8 j- K H3 t! \5 z& M% ]2 Z+ b- {9 v/ o4 i; U
2006-07: $8.510 billion surplus
" a$ K- X& z9 i9 A/ Z8 N
3 Z2 Z) x; m0 H c& ?6 r5 R) U2007-08: $4.581 billion surplus% h) ~( r5 ~; D/ F# Y- S; h1 W
$ m6 V) d7 y" X: C- r) e' N2 c
2008-09: $852 million deficit
2 w6 M8 e# \: g6 I8 {
8 ]1 a5 n% }' j( ?3 I0 N& a; D( s0 H2009-10: $1.032 billion deficit; }- ?4 T; V. f, U. W2 G! I
9 Z9 }) B7 e; Q" @
2010-11: $3.410 billion deficit9 P0 U1 ~: w S. u7 v# I, ^
/ x+ V( ^9 A+ s
2011-12: $23 million deficit
" \1 P3 U2 X* Y% i9 Z5 }! T0 O" {
2012-13: $2.842 billion deficit
; s1 ~. O3 D2 G/ k+ Z( _3 y! l6 c) ]4 ?; ]6 i( S
2013-14: $302 million deficit |
|