 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 $ u# r0 i% m; @! P: S) M
3 o) F8 z+ e K$ W2 Y& \" y3 a& d1 @
" [1 ^* R" C9 e' ?
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both.
7 i! L, Y1 t! |* @
! d% M g' O2 ]8 f! V0 a d; a# ?9 pLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
. k' V: @2 G9 \7 F% \
6 T' \$ t" W) P( rcomparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..' `+ P4 r$ B! P& g6 F
8 X) T, j. U6 m/ A2 d+ h1 U( z
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) 8 h, H# o4 ?/ M: B) I
|
|