 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑
0 O6 V9 m, O8 X& Z
: y: `# s7 L# h5 [0 R$ v- L4 }
' D! H! N l) U8 Z2 D1 \9 {If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. 0 T" w; v4 L+ a, \9 k m# `7 v
- S& w- W$ f B+ r- X
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
& T' o* z! J8 c- E8 R: B7 R* ~% o" _) p1 ]2 V/ X/ U
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
0 k" o" V7 O* O5 p, {- j9 B
3 A! k8 {6 @& pNote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%) ' o- z5 n& R; k1 h& z+ f
|
|