 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 % C7 i: s8 \7 n) s `; f) K* t
Edmontonian18 发表于 2015-11-29 03:14" V" f3 L* s) ~, e+ X1 e: Z' X9 F/ a& Q
One party 2%, the other party 2%, total 4%. Still a little bit less than tranditional 7% of the 1st ... * H* ?1 H: I/ ]* l
, C+ D K) h+ }/ g4 D0 VIf total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. ) e6 y* ~: Q9 ^" ^0 M2 G9 {
. k5 W# B1 ^; u8 Y1 e2 p. Y
Let's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.03
7 M! M7 f8 y, ]6 G! B3 L! m7 u& X6 e/ _3 g" T
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..+ d: j1 k: C n8 h" X
$ k$ Z8 p& S4 S/ F& \
Note: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
8 w$ Q+ I8 P7 e) V0 |* H |
|