 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 xchen 于 2015-12-4 17:02 编辑 : l2 t8 p0 b/ O! E* s( [( m% X
n7 n6 p0 l7 a+ G! D
1 v4 b y+ }: k/ }
If total is 4%, then, calculate the amount for traditional way for a house sold in 400,000, you'll find it will be 4% for total (100000*0.07 + 300000*0.03)/400000 = 0.04, so the same for both. / X8 }: v6 _: K& A* ^7 R( u8 b3 z! R
$ y+ P- b/ M6 H* i# u, [8 a) X( aLet's try to calculate the rate for the traditional way: y = (0.07*100000 + (x-100000))/x => y=4000/x + 0.036 p! a. o6 c8 y# s3 N, n
6 I6 j6 X6 C. R7 s; T3 {
comparing 2 realtors using above formular, you will see : 1) if total sale value (x in the formular) > 400,000, traditional realtor < 0.04, then traditional is better since it's < 0.04; 2) total sale value < 400,000, 2% realtor is better since traditional one > 0.04 3) if sale value is 400,000, both are the same..
+ [2 l/ d$ T9 i: [& K
7 @/ @" |( H4 S! k) \ ONote: above comparison is based on the assumption: 2% realtor means 2% for each side realtor (i.e., total 4%)
" u1 Z& A2 M9 `" A |
|