Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
: h; X+ b% M- G5 N) |6 xLeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

+ r5 S* p8 D' r2 B6 Q3 C9 B7 {( zNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.

Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

To calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
+ T/ F. r1 o  c* V5 e  z  R
$ i4 O7 A2 q, A' h
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
: c3 ], F. E8 O. ]New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
  o6 X  y+ c* J+ f( k& `You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
) J! p6 p9 a7 e# z3 C- m3 O
" c" ^1 x5 l( `% y& y! U4 `' W2 IIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
. S3 z( ]. t$ T: w. t$ ]2 s
If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
# i- C7 n! a+ j% f8 I' |. p7 {- o
$ l6 K& m& ?7 y' R Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
+ R8 |6 s+ J8 k: G$ ISan Francisco  23.8 27.2
Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
& ^5 _# Q- N7 ]4 S  m( ]8 u7 bSeattle  20.4 25
# o) r# O9 Y  W) ]4 b2 ?Denver  17.7 23.7
1 w$ p0 U: U4 @: ?. i7 \: GNew York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
! X& {. |' k+ F* |. \8 w
1 h4 i4 R, x$ X

It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.


From: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
1 ?* J0 s& x' E' h: Q
it would be a good reference.
; c2 G4 P# Z- t. I/ c, ~
; |, Y: s9 n& s' K1 Ithanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
; O8 A" Z* t) O! L
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]