Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.
8 \3 E( P. m; {- }2 ~! U9 a
Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
4 a9 |! b$ }7 t  g* ~
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
8 ~$ z3 O% F2 Q
6 T/ g$ v9 n/ @3 q. x) b5 s& PTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:


' o8 p8 a! y/ X9 wIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.

San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
6 T3 B; b) \3 A+ {2 x( {4 L6 bYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
/ ^- m% H: H: N' E+ Y. t% z7 z
If home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
" x+ D, h( ]8 e! Y9 H! B
4 M' O( k) R' h$ ^4 N% z- SIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
% m/ O( D& B3 q: }* y0 O. M$ w) H Avg. 1988-2000 2001
% q+ t5 K4 |$ v! {- iBoston  20.5 30.2
1 A( [! E( A1 ]# Y( R. kSan Diego  22.8 29.7
San Francisco  23.8 27.2
( b$ A8 u  G- O* e" o) [. m* W* |Los Angeles  21.3 25.6
( P5 A" w  ]) ISeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
7 r: P( J! E- _+ Y8 B0 A) s9 _: H% }New York  21.2 22.5
4 g# G! H1 u- i0 W% Q  dChicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4

" X: \/ p1 N. X+ l: c6 x8 T

: n1 L7 ]" c% d( `8 ^, b. @# t. CIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.


# h) P, e2 s& P. ?* ~& n0 `) nFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

/ {3 D( K. `& S0 x, ]it would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]