Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
/ s! X  p3 O: A# \Leamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

5 h% D7 w" [9 L$ e; z3 l! h. A  HNot everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
  O5 q" ?7 {( s( e0 ~: y  ?$ c
" _, K9 w( j6 E8 d+ E" QLeamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.

4 j9 i; \/ e& a/ d$ {) u! vTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:
8 C8 Q8 K% z" V# u
+ S( b" v1 z8 b( j5 e" J5 a3 s: W
In Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
: j3 Z$ \. u* I2 Q2 a5 P
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
You don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
' u( j$ u, f4 c( ]- u2 H% [7 L
8 \2 ~4 N9 @3 F& m; mIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.

1 @/ G9 G* ^& e( o& Z8 \If home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.

Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
& g# N+ d, f0 _& B, C7 ]Boston  20.5 30.2
San Diego  22.8 29.7
4 U0 r5 J2 H' f+ a% b! KSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
0 Z+ F/ n. ]5 k: X$ ?7 U  ALos Angeles  21.3 25.6
. _$ ^# E) t$ ]8 h0 P/ \0 TSeattle  20.4 25
Denver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
Chicago  17.2 20.8
Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
1 T6 T) T  X: u: V3 R
& m- ~: ~5 N1 V! s4 j

, ^% }% ^* l$ [# d: f; F0 v: n5 TIt's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.
3 `9 l6 A7 c! ?8 L- o3 Z5 |
0 @, |6 ]. n9 G
( v' F/ K7 D( B0 K( QFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.

it would be a good reference.

- A. I" i1 \# o; S# S# ethanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.

* g. a: f3 e# m3 h; W- N. I[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]