Is there a house bubble in Edmonton?

smalltown

How to figure a home's fundamental value
/ x/ R) |7 `6 V, a" w8 K( ILeamer says he can tell because homes, just like stocks, have a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) that he believes determines their fundamental value. The “earnings” part of the ratio consists of the annual rent the house could command. Homebuyers can compare current P/Es with historical levels, Leamer says, to get some idea of whether houses in their cities are becoming overvalued.

Not everyone buys the idea that P/Es dictate value. But investors who completely ignore P/Es do so at their peril, as many have learned in recent years. Leamer, who heads the prestigious Anderson Forecast at the University of California in Los Angeles, points out that the P/E for the Standard & Poor’s 500, a key stock benchmark, was nearly double its previous historical high when the stock market bubble burst in 2000. When home P/Es peaked in California, Boston, Dallas and other markets in the mid-1980s, devastating real estate recessions followed.
# [* E8 s/ K. _: i" w
Leamer didn’t invent the concept of P/Es for homes. But his willingness to proclaim bubbles in several of the nation’s hottest markets has brought him lots of attention recently.
8 s% @6 @4 K  w7 p' Y  F" p
; K5 ~& {% x, m6 i# r: ?! k/ zTo calculate P/Es for entire cities, Leamer divided the median home price in each by the annual rent for a two-bedroom unit in each city -- and looked at P/Es each year since 1988. Here’s what he found:

0 D" A) s. {# r2 d9 J
' [/ i. k/ C$ z2 j5 R8 h' T7 Y# _0 LIn Boston, the residential real estate market’s P/E recently topped 30 -- compared with just under 20 in 1988.
3 f3 e# P2 ^4 C+ g$ S  a
San Francisco’s previous peak of 25.6 in 1989 has been eclipsed, with the P/E currently at just over 27.
San Diego’s current P/E is nearly 30, compared with a 1989 high of 23.4.
New York, by contrast, is actually well below previous peaks. The area’s current 22.5 P/E is above its recent nadir of 17.6 in 1993, but down from 28.6 in 1988.
2 `8 N+ s: V' C& ~( `  m0 AYou don’t have to know exact P/Es, however, to spot signs of trouble, Leamer says. Any time there’s a disconnect between prices and the underlying value of homes, as measured by their market rents, there’s the potential for a bubble.
- j" c, ~6 G3 N3 h
2 P0 F# V+ j. H8 u2 iIf home prices are rising much faster than rents, as is true in Los Angeles, that’s a strong indication a bubble is forming.
; }* `7 C1 E. g
1 U! v# Q  S, Q* r# QIf home prices are rising while average rents are falling -- which is the situation in San Francisco -- the bubble is pretty much unmistakable.
' E6 D, K% F0 J
; `3 ^' \' I' K Home P/E ratios for 9 metro areas
Avg. 1988-2000 2001
2 J! P! Q% K" E6 q( aBoston  20.5 30.2
: e" d) [- j! r' \San Diego  22.8 29.7
; S+ K4 A4 B: J( `. mSan Francisco  23.8 27.2
6 R- Q2 J+ w  U2 ]$ fLos Angeles  21.3 25.6
Seattle  20.4 25
+ e, T6 t# \4 Z$ ?% q0 A" ~% tDenver  17.7 23.7
New York  21.2 22.5
( n% S5 a4 K! I5 EChicago  17.2 20.8
7 b! G: n; _$ A& }. {Washington, D.C.  17.1 20.4
( f* [) e* X. T4 O8 c4 v4 c

0 J+ k5 _( B; B: ?
It's difficult to compare P/Es from one city with those from another. P/Es in Atlantic City, N.J., have wavered between 17.3 and 11.6 since 1988; in San Diego, P/Es have not dropped below 20. But you can look on the P/E as a measure of risk -- that is, the higher the P/E is above its average level, the greater the risk, no matter where you live.

: F1 @! o; W) S6 [% A. ~8 j
( {: ?; `" c' t# c1 XFrom: http://moneycentral.msn.com/cont ... ingguide/P37631.asp

CANDYMAN

Who has the P/E for Edmonton for the last 20 years, please post it here.
1 L' `6 A, d1 w# ?. x$ V
. D9 T2 A+ i- n, b9 Uit would be a good reference.

thanks

醉酒当歌

20% buble at least. And it can take 3-5 years to digest the bubble if not burst.
% ~6 L& P' M5 C) e
[ 本帖最后由 醉酒当歌 于 2007-1-14 16:41 编辑 ]