 鲜花( 1)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2008-12-17 16:37
|
显示全部楼层
20. Which of the following is a correct statement regarding impact costs?
9 G% x: t* o) E: H. e - i! ]* ^' ?" P$ c0 y, y" q! K
A. contractors are not permitted to claim impact costs ' l' z, O* i) Q$ g8 l6 H, i ~$ R
B. in the absence of evidence to the contrary, impact costs are generally deemed to be included in the change order amount agreed to
. ^* m8 l6 [9 vC. public policy prevents a contractor from reserving the right to claim impact costs later in the project # d) x& o- T- X/ o1 e. H: ?
D. none of the above
$ \0 F0 ~$ V8 V5 g2 A" F
" [" J2 }* w) h2 a/ J21. The phrase "unforeseen conditions" usually refers to: " A9 b, Z# o! t. C9 @
" q! `% I0 R' ~A. conditions that the parties to the contract knew possibly existed, but knew would not occur
) H2 E3 d; O) @B. conditions that neither party to the contract anticipated # x2 \9 O4 ~# G7 D; }+ G
C. conditions that the parties to the contract knew possibly existed, but did not expect to occur - y8 g( Y9 q. A B# h/ @ Q
D. conditions that the parties to the contract anticipated, but did not address in their contract
$ c* |6 e" z: V3 ]% O
, Z, E0 K9 b) h7 Y0 M) {( T22. Which of the following is a true statement about allocation of the risk of subsurface soil conditions?
& V' ~3 g8 v2 [7 S4 L
3 D) v: f/ e: qA. it is always economically efficient to have contractors bear this risk
7 B5 t& x( D1 R, gB. regardless of the conditions of the contract, courts will not expect contractors to conduct soils investigations
( I1 O3 Y }+ x2 [; _% UC. where contractors are required to accept the risk of subsoil conditions, they should conduct an investigation or include a significant contingency for this risk - ?% ?8 Y* p" c" Z
D. none of the above |
|