 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 9 r0 `) r! {7 X$ K. H$ Y- G, _
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?, B$ R% {/ u& m5 ]5 O& x
5 j# g1 [4 [" Z2 O t这明摆着是两码事% |/ i# d/ Y4 f9 O
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  ; {8 g2 i! v. J6 @: d
2 d6 A/ J0 ~3 ^! {1 P" wcan't type chinese at work,
$ i& U k& e. {8 _
" L$ W! D, c5 @. |# @"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.' g7 ^$ C4 e* B0 s
9 S% Q1 b, n7 T1 v$ d# L% PWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|