 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 ! C, V. z& J# q2 H; H
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?+ z3 w8 v [, h. j! o6 O
: w1 {; z+ ]. s0 E. ]
这明摆着是两码事% F1 F; T8 ~& [! [1 H7 ]* z" B2 t' I
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03 
: b7 d0 r4 M: y' P
7 e7 _; d1 ` r& p l: tcan't type chinese at work,3 X& Q5 z5 c6 q# Y7 x; { ]
) j& ~ d/ o& Z. ^; K9 N"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.1 L( p T, ], M+ j2 y1 o4 d
% R6 E0 O( S& w3 \6 @: \/ ~
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|