 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑
: j! o% J5 U9 a' d" d; n5 Z# s还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?
1 l# ~; o4 d' O, P/ N9 {
% V, P% g- g- W. w: ^/ `' q这明摆着是两码事- I ~+ l6 s4 {) ]3 N k- z4 O" m
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  & z- y. B% W! F) Y; z4 s9 }
8 X1 \& @/ ~" u% l2 N3 wcan't type chinese at work,
$ @$ { K. l* c% o* j
v4 N3 O# n4 r1 I1 A- K"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.
0 g, j( G0 C1 T( C7 r, J( v
4 b. s, |: s3 w7 E: rWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|