 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑
, E; b7 G+ D6 e还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?
8 D. V& z9 C3 p! ]) g3 M) t$ ^4 R8 b w8 t/ [. k# h, W2 L8 R
这明摆着是两码事* _" M! Z, |1 e5 n7 N5 F
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  4 G0 M: h( q: R
1 ?7 M2 U' `% v
can't type chinese at work,
4 r e$ {) |; D; n3 \: X7 P
- [5 C: v+ a9 s"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.
) ]( B: r3 X" y# f/ L' ~
& _& ]: Q' S$ G8 E! E7 P- ^$ R6 `# qWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|