 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 , A' H' w1 ~* I M
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?9 \" [; c& [% n2 E
" a1 w0 K3 F$ j# [* T这明摆着是两码事! c+ E: @8 W' W: x$ Q3 a8 ~$ W
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  2 L5 k. G, l9 L
% S; O. N+ ~) {4 J& [3 f
can't type chinese at work,
. r7 p: d& s6 n, l0 J. a$ l% P0 A# J+ j* U9 k
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.
% D: h: ]6 f* O- w) G9 |3 t
- S0 l, r& r& I5 x9 B+ vWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|