 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑
8 W( z/ C% X6 N+ H$ V3 t9 q+ n还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?
H0 H, \$ O: j7 P8 {. }, H2 L( c9 U' o3 N* j$ U- \2 i/ Q3 }
这明摆着是两码事
$ \& @" s5 N) ?3 Q6 }sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03 
2 S7 U( I9 b5 @7 s" Y- a
4 I" n+ P- S* xcan't type chinese at work,
0 X6 e, x8 d. } {( i+ u7 u- w
% L q8 [ }2 W' y' D# x5 ^"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.
' B" @# y, I- L7 ?; M6 @8 w) B4 q- P
" v6 C- H2 j$ y; w. sWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|