I don't care if 政治板 need an extra 版主 or not..That is between you and 十字..I never request an extra 版主 for 政治板. So I have no idea why you ask me instead. ( j( b5 h' x3 zleohu 发表于 2011-11-3 12:50
( V W! A: S9 Ncan't type chinese at work,7 P. S( n7 T( Q
! i' i F A4 T: X0 B" U. x/ m
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me. 4 c% L: R% s# T9 V, w' T $ s; j Q+ x' n$ ?* ]" ZWhat's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time.
can't type chinese at work,* Q" [9 ], f M, G* U p: i
& F K! t# ]+ \# D
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me. 2 x' R' {# P; c8 x2 x) B/ T0 ]6 W) p8 L. t
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious. ...3 w' [8 V: B4 ~
leohu 发表于 2011-11-3 13:15
0 s0 k# w) v( x/ x' q我就不明白了,明显在哪里? 6 z, o: @ B$ F0 n: r0 c; L : @9 V% h# T c7 p. f1 m你之所以觉得明显,是因为你觉得时事政治需要一个大量发表政治言论的版主,而我任为不需要,所以从一开始我们的基本点就是不同的 2 p( Y7 y- j6 Y$ x1 e6 R( T9 V6 v) c7 n" e
没有人在这里觉得谁比谁更聪明,你当然可以想当然的认为你认为的东西是明显的,这是十字所谓的自由嘛