I don't care if 政治板 need an extra 版主 or not..That is between you and 十字..I never request an extra 版主 for 政治板. So I have no idea why you ask me instead./ f* K' n- |4 r0 y
leohu 发表于 2011-11-3 12:50
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的? R0 d, i7 C1 a* \3 G % r8 W8 r5 M d6 K! {; z0 a* d1 u/ B这明摆着是两码事- y# W) W* {/ m
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03
' q& p4 ]) I$ j7 n$ A0 y+ O7 g
& `" U( b% A6 N0 F# _
can't type chinese at work, % Y/ ?; }* p- G: [6 ~9 u2 ]- |4 B- R! |$ X6 {; l( d# g
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.; q* W+ |& H: n& B$ `
6 D/ C2 `3 Y6 \5 J3 N# F
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time.
$ ]! }5 v- X* x; e" E"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me. 9 J5 s- j r( Y0 a$ H" y9 U$ @/ t8 K# t+ t; E& j6 D/ [& ?! O, i
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious. ... y/ C9 O4 a' C) t/ L" _leohu 发表于 2011-11-3 13:15
I* d( z0 g2 [- j我就不明白了,明显在哪里? . I$ H) H7 v& M4 C" v: U: q: J# T % Q, V+ g0 y/ g0 G你之所以觉得明显,是因为你觉得时事政治需要一个大量发表政治言论的版主,而我任为不需要,所以从一开始我们的基本点就是不同的5 C' D3 \* r/ w7 f
0 g0 X1 Q& `: g- ^5 `2 z* `1 N
没有人在这里觉得谁比谁更聪明,你当然可以想当然的认为你认为的东西是明显的,这是十字所谓的自由嘛