 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 , s- ?, A8 a5 f; R! h5 W
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?
1 f0 @( |. H: q! a/ A
1 f H5 n. R+ q' @# {$ A8 E1 Z这明摆着是两码事& a3 S7 t9 s+ w
sweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03  ; G) O0 x$ @7 Q+ m3 K% O
1 M$ |& c: f. ]) b1 Wcan't type chinese at work,% w% P$ w. g/ }) M2 V7 K3 J
) K3 o( n1 J* t" H, F"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me.2 I: D8 V, m6 {* P; x& K; e& ^% N f
/ j% a9 R$ N$ Y1 u
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|