 鲜花( 3)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 leohu 于 2011-11-3 14:39 编辑 8 D- g) N5 b% d, h- f* W
还是没明白你是怎么从“时事政治某个版主不想发表过多的政治言论”推出“这个版主支持时事政治需要一位积极发表政治言论的版主”这个结论的?7 G, s9 W% p, j, k6 s2 r
$ ~1 v! U% f4 M& p. P
这明摆着是两码事
0 b9 A) V! e) s! }9 Lsweetlele 发表于 2011-11-3 14:03 
( y, z% P# u4 m0 u' k) d2 \4 h# R# w ~7 ^ n; l/ W+ f3 d! U
can't type chinese at work,
* U. d1 v, ~6 T4 b# n# Q! ^# y' T/ l- K$ B7 K
"没傻到要在网上正经谈政治观点的地步" and "不想发表过多的政治言论" are 两码事 to me., z A+ @. D( y
9 x' T% G( q* N8 j) o% f
What's obvious to me may not be obvious to you. If I said "1+1=2, its obvious." And you want to act like you are smarter and argue "prove it, it is not obvious to me". Then I don't think we should talk more from there. It's just a waste of time. |
|