 鲜花( 9)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
本帖最后由 竹帘儿 于 2010-3-4 21:58 编辑 e/ O$ |) l9 ]2 }& z
是阿,车子就是铁包肉,最重要的不是比谁能撞过谁,应该是比较出事的双方,谁最能保护其中的乘客6 `; A( }' c; y p5 ?! ?0 M
4 I! O; p. `% C+ \
好多人比较的时候,都是想当然地比较正面碰撞的情况,其实,交通事故,又有多少是正面碰撞的?大部分时候,司 ...: O8 ~; W C2 c" O t
Crisis 发表于 2010-3-2 20:25  ) C, s) y( R' g0 F
8 _3 L/ W. {1 f$ s/ H看过一篇文章分析大小车的安全性的,里头也是提到实际交通事故的撞击方式,在所有致命事故里,50%涉及非两车撞击(翻车,撞击障物,比如树,水泥柱子),这类事故里跟安全相关的因素车子重量大小不算其中,主要是
$ |9 q+ b6 t5 R$ U0 `. Y( X2 Ea) an effective restraint system (seat belts and airbags)/ b& @! x9 C) `6 f P
b) effective energy absorption in the crush areas (front end or rear end)
5 P+ D- p; \ g7 O6 Hc) a strong cabin area that does not collapse in the crash
% Q0 K0 m8 {+ K: N+ @, \None of these items are automatically better in large and heavy vehicles. In fact, for item c, the roof of a heavier vehicle is more likely to be crushed in a roll-over accident than a lighter vehicle. This is one reason why rollovers in SUV's cause a higher percentage of deaths than in cars (in addition to their higher center of gravity.)
7 T: n/ L" k. I( P% ^ T8 ~ P
: Y4 o3 l$ U) a, n" l- t
/ |" B' `& M. w$ @- U5 Q而在涉及两车相撞的另50%致命事故里,70%是侧撞和追尾,这里a和c是主要安全因素,车子质量仍然无关。下面的图表反应了这类碰撞时不同品牌车子的安全状况
. M/ R. m0 }8 Z/ tInsurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) are shown below. (see http://www.iihs.org/ratings.)
2 {5 u6 V. X6 g7 w+ E: A6 Z3 X
$ q. J1 m5 Z/ M$ ? r7 C
' k% G2 k9 F) {. n外行看热闹的人飘过,楼上的各学科专家,各地农民请继续讨论。 |
|