I would like to see more Debate, not Fight. Debate for fun, fight to get a headache 8 Y* B ~- E# S1 j, P6 O! B* r
Calm down everyone please. : r/ q; w1 n5 ?* M) Y2 V5 D4 c m7 Z* u7 i0 N
不存在 can mean two different things: $ t! R6 L& t n1 U" N) A8 M 8 H; A' v. n7 j) P/ e6 q! A" Y$ t1 B1: 不存在 (not yet). Such as a house before construction etc.! n/ u t% ^' v5 S
2: 不存在 (never exist) such as 上帝都不能举起的石头, ^: F: L Y3 R2 g0 `* J7 ^
3 O: e8 e) t, W' FI assumed that dora's 不存在 meant never exist 6 \ }7 ^7 @$ Z6 }* Z. w6 J2 k& ?9 w) o# ]; ?* q8 B6 T
[ 本帖最后由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 03:29 编辑 ]
原帖由 eastroster 于 2006-6-8 03:13 发表0 I; z9 X% a5 N% x1 H2 Z* r' b$ |
I would like to see more Debate, not Fight. Debate for fun, fight to get a headache# D, x) Y8 M' u
" \1 `6 k- J! W# T& F( _5 K& o
Calm down everyone please.* ~" U: o5 \- V. ^8 K6 ^
( _ ?% E0 G/ Q3 L+ u$ U& A3 p1 m
不存在 can mean two different things:3 J2 F' b. }# z: U
' V9 g: ~8 `# C5 E z
1: 不存在 (not yet). Such as a house before construction etc.0 U) z# l+ M7 k4 T5 r) `
2: 不存在 (never exist) such as 上帝都不能举起的石头5 d! y! J: O* |+ {4 m
9 Y- l( R6 Q: N) _# m# LI assumed that dora's 不存在 meant never exist ...
2 D/ }( I0 Q1 D! S
, P6 R0 h# z4 W/ D$ m小铜子,, 你的1和2根本不是对立关系.. 1并不能否定2. 1只能refer to current state, 2 refer to past state,过去没有,, 现在没有,, 将来就一定没有吗/?/? 上帝的无所不能不应该体现在能创造将来吗/? 她根本不能自圆其说.
' S0 V$ ]/ H* s! H$ p" D! G, R* \6 E- r Did your GOD ask you to curse people this way?9 ^% U7 p% s6 k& ~ }& H1 v
If you really have a 宗教信仰, I believe your GOD will shame on you!
宗教信仰是一种自由,信也好,不信也罢,别恶意攻击别人,这是最基本的道德标准!- _* x) f* A0 H, U/ u
7 D9 O l! L \5 S. Z7 p# g
另一方面,我挺佩服在这儿跟贴吵架的网民,最起码在我眼里,这些人都挺有激情的,这年头,难得还有这种激进人士啊.服了!3 P: u4 ?+ j. l+ L
/ S) Z7 u. k0 H6 i4 t有一点我倒开始了思考,是否信教的人都不太会吵架?这楼主吵不过别人,骂不出脏话,招架不住了就只得向版主请求删除太脏的贴子,这一点实属可爱啊.! P% i, g0 ^# i( X
* N) t% L6 H3 X _8 G( _# M
我本人尊重宗教信仰,都什么年代了,还有有一种追求一种信仰,难能可贵啊.
原帖由 也无风雨也无晴 于 2006-6-8 10:30 发表3 m/ d& W' y, ?; j! O. v
宗教信仰是一种自由,信也好,不信也罢,别恶意攻击别人, ...
# g; [; e0 b8 u4 r) [2 `
' G7 D3 p( F7 a
Arguments on religious believes always turn out to become very emotional (if not violent). It has been like that for hundreds of years (if not thousands of years)7 s0 V& t3 n* j' e
1 {: N- d3 M+ a4 z: TMaybe we should stop argument. ( f, A1 u3 Z' S$ T$ H# U/ z
$ } w. X* U5 ?# n, Z- H
My commoent " Dora's 逻辑 is correct " was with the view point of logistics instead of religion( ?" A* W) q9 r9 @5 K$ n