; t: c1 ^4 x2 A* R3 I: a 0 {- D7 B/ j4 z6 |3 s2 mSorry, I don’t see a correlation between my statement and yours, so to make myself clear:, x9 u5 }1 m s3 d. l
7 s0 D6 a1 M" {6 d+ g
If you’re spared from tedious household chores merely because you are the main income earner, it’s only a privilege. 4 |% `& A6 J5 C; {6 a j( j+ Z2 C6 r; i
However it becomes a right (more or less) if you can earn enough to spare BOTH from those. + I4 z* p3 n" Q5 A- i
小黄 发表于 2013-8-21 09:13 % a7 j- R. e: I/ h想钱想疯了?某些族裔的一生就10个8个的生。按照您的逻辑,她们的劳动相当于100万了?0 N1 E0 l$ _6 H1 y
; ^ C- c8 \. x9 w& f( P- a我觉得一个女人 ...
% Q* o3 g, G) h% U6 r$ l 5 y7 K8 ^2 b2 }9 l/ m8 cYou can’t value homemaker production by her implied opportunity cost alone. Not from the perspective of society as a whole, anyway. ; \9 e0 \) q% }) b
5 S7 A7 ?9 l9 x4 p- {" c6 T) sP.S. when did you piss off Sumash? lol.
SheJing 发表于 2013-8-21 10:42 1 e" V7 o; p6 l& q9 Y0 t
You can’t value homemaker production by her implied opportunity cost alone. Not from the perspe ...
6 w6 o1 G( F7 t* E h H
2 @5 Z" I0 r: H
如果老公赚得多,没孩子一样可以请保姆,所以不存在用钱换生育。如果老公赚得少(没钱请保姆当然算少)那还不应帮忙还該什么。自己也不是什么很有本事很有能力的人,找个愿意跟自己好好过日子的就应满足了,真不明白有什么可以指责老婆的。而且婆婆还帮着一起,真不知这些人是怎想的。