# y; X/ C; i$ N! [! j5 k/ N; cSorry, I don’t see a correlation between my statement and yours, so to make myself clear:+ c0 n7 y8 M" U
5 b. W! h( c7 E! j3 e: cIf you’re spared from tedious household chores merely because you are the main income earner, it’s only a privilege. 1 U- Y' n9 d0 C& }9 y; s+ c1 O4 Y9 i8 L& {
However it becomes a right (more or less) if you can earn enough to spare BOTH from those. - ?9 v" x0 j) d
本帖最后由 SheJing 于 2013-8-21 11:02 编辑 * p/ Y" d' z/ m3 }/ f, D
小黄 发表于 2013-8-21 09:13 7 j4 c6 _8 Q- ~; {" M* n想钱想疯了?某些族裔的一生就10个8个的生。按照您的逻辑,她们的劳动相当于100万了?0 o/ h& O, `& A7 V' x' B
1 P; }7 P' h2 u a) g
我觉得一个女人 ...
! x+ \' |: x4 @% p ' ^# b. o$ v4 h% W- H$ {You can’t value homemaker production by her implied opportunity cost alone. Not from the perspective of society as a whole, anyway. 9 H, g' j8 D# S5 B& Z( W
2 b/ ~% g7 Z% Y: C! `" S6 [( a
P.S. when did you piss off Sumash? lol.
SheJing 发表于 2013-8-21 10:42 * n, \; N2 p# m& c% M4 n: @9 I, q
You can’t value homemaker production by her implied opportunity cost alone. Not from the perspe ...