 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
5 N5 g; V. |: B
& @2 |+ G- ]- o; j诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。& x! v3 p0 c# j# d' ~9 x9 B
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。; t; j( J7 Z* m' O6 b6 }
1 X7 z/ O4 j% n1 Uhttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse# g" h9 ? ^2 h/ [. l# e
( a+ v/ a- ]% L' @6 ABraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
( I. s! r: }% j: ?/ W- L" O8 v; x
. r* y/ D* z& {7 y- S: tOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.
6 S" g4 u# r+ ?5 g/ E! v4 G6 \+ p0 ]" Z) v E+ i) c2 p7 [
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.- `% C5 V8 a$ H
9 ^3 k5 s4 n4 P( N& O, vHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.( S7 ?2 ]/ f$ b; H
: A1 z! L8 \" d: r$ z0 V7 KAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
6 K5 o) _8 K' O& |, V6 c( X) {$ z6 m
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
# @' x W1 b$ N4 c4 R4 j
, u" V; S, T: |. L0 R* y1 P* hBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.5 Q O6 U, a9 Q+ x3 ]+ b
! N# V% v& Q- |' `! M7 x“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
$ P4 k, i! A& s( j0 ?% ~. S5 S
0 e0 }! C' _4 }- iPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
( l4 i7 A" q6 I: C& V8 A
- D, O( i* C: F7 \& @2 K ) e! y. n7 [! V# P1 T* d9 O' U- B
2 n$ N7 n# s, rThe job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.3 C2 X1 U [' x! G
9 U- w3 q3 ?- U' k
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
7 @. K0 U0 R; b: ]! F y) G2 S% L- X; x
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up./ p+ C+ Y) N) d0 [
, O/ K; `% X' w$ D( C7 H; x. i5 DGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
3 x: u4 }) c" D& X3 \( l$ v( ?# E! T2 S& y6 O$ j% e3 P/ K, F
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
! `* B6 C. r6 y- b6 i6 {4 d3 s- y2 k: E
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
2 v% ^. [; k3 R5 H; v2 j: i' J7 _( k* O, M% d. \! ]
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
5 _9 W) p! n# H9 `) y$ A! c U/ T" O5 h3 i6 ?
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
6 a4 E5 f1 w! k% [% B) ?4 F+ q. B- }* g0 Z& g V( @0 m
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.; t, z' C0 h8 |+ G# X7 ~$ t
% v9 `# w3 v; W; N" H* E) I8 v
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
; d2 M8 w: e/ T1 C( X: J9 g* O0 _. c3 s5 ?
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 2 a; l l+ q r) R0 v5 M
