 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
/ d0 E+ t5 N8 }; I: G3 B- e
0 @0 y# b& ^1 ~- Z诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
4 W0 d" x* f! X7 E9 A8 e阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
- c4 |2 j* O5 F1 h1 A) E1 M% Q6 p7 O% e* w, v
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
: P" E& ]; L) C9 k# J/ f$ A: c( v3 n1 ^8 l- x
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
2 a5 q/ U5 `5 J7 I {* |" w' q+ i u$ s
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.: ]8 y2 S0 ]/ K, j
* D0 |! ~& c# b/ @4 a2 r- L% LThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.( G2 \; s" o! j3 I. T) A
, S! A" v r) s, O2 e- g% t( }He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.
! A4 ?1 `) h2 I" U
$ b8 j' W2 S2 L) U3 T. B4 [* q. HAt one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
2 l: i: F% Z/ D/ ~
& v% ] k5 @/ P7 pActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.* |5 d0 g' L5 c9 U$ p2 m7 G
# j+ X' S. F. h8 T n3 f% d4 R: N6 p% n
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
8 V$ y) n; }+ ~7 a& @+ L! I$ @6 V; K/ f0 R9 b! D, t) q, @
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.” X2 N/ q% j/ ^3 S( V& R
9 H2 a& |( S* `9 J; j
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”2 t q5 e2 r) g" @5 O; t
9 o$ I1 T- w, y) G- {# {6 ~" {
( P: g- V: L# M. V3 D3 v8 G. g F! R* O& Q4 z
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
8 j5 b! L( I8 f6 g" x/ m6 u
! [$ ]0 g+ V5 @; ~$ \' ?It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
( n0 Q' i/ }& f5 N9 {3 ]- H
+ J& o& G6 y/ B! B% k# rNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
; {- V) f2 e! H! @- H. S3 P' ?+ V% d6 Y ^- N
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.' U3 h& D$ S6 Q7 E- S
3 e9 a3 [6 U }/ d* HBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.. m* W8 u# }/ F0 j
- c. h5 D o4 m- M, E6 z# tTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
6 Z9 M) z& i' t5 h. ]* D" |$ w
* a6 k9 p, w5 ]/ rActually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.- n0 O7 S# K# r% Z( V# b
1 o, R5 e, n& H# J" c/ H) }
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
' f3 _1 f$ H6 o* E7 j5 R! G
/ O% k3 @5 f7 v“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
Z! l( `! r" @* i: i9 F+ @) c7 F! A) L/ p, O6 `
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”! U/ c4 x9 R) C/ @) x" D/ A. F
7 v& B+ t1 z# g% j1 U# g" m( ` |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 " u" |- W* p0 E; z1 L! n; j/ _0 u
