 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
, x% b2 _! @+ a$ x3 \$ b( D6 }# R0 X) k7 X* {/ ~7 i) |
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
8 [6 s* f% Z3 F8 M. m& ?2 P# q阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
1 n/ l5 I7 m6 d/ O- d
' V' o) ?% t q, f$ }& b; U* O0 M! mhttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
7 c( L6 B4 H5 y8 d& M6 ~( H
0 Q2 o; R7 K" H1 tBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
) j4 Z& L% e. A. `. g2 I) X! J0 U* ?( l
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.- n& g- V }$ P7 V3 J6 v) P
* s& i5 T' J# U. l( W6 CThat’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.$ \ _6 ` f, o1 p6 X
- ]: s- U: z) i5 v, a k; L
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.! ?8 D. k) | P9 @9 m
. L( M* Y# ?% j
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”
5 `5 g( x* B7 @; `1 ^, r' g0 F6 J% x: W. z6 m' _8 P, z
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.' F: o4 v0 ?: N) |: Z" m
; O) H. U( _% X2 a; X. ~# HBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.' z! u7 M$ t; R# C6 B; ?4 B- ?+ z
. X1 }, L2 I. s# }8 t" o& V( O( Y+ G“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
. L; W$ b" v4 R2 r" h; C* l% [# H. r0 p6 f* ~! r, o2 V* L2 ^
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”- j- N: u6 J; B
* ]% |* j+ D7 y* ?2 y) ^
 5 n+ s' v/ b7 ^6 `+ Y! o1 X
. o/ D& N" B; _
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
9 b' K5 m8 M! Z4 W0 Z) L+ D1 ]
8 o+ ]+ m1 o- ^2 u" a" OIt had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction./ D. s1 x! ~; e; `+ y4 Q! y/ i
2 D4 N- ?' K* [1 y( T
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.
9 Z" f/ f; N: {! ^! s; O& W
' I' \: f. B- Q$ u1 q. BGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.& Q( W4 P1 V! r. D+ q6 }
7 N# o! z! ?% kBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation." K5 P) q0 w0 ~8 B7 ^* C# s
' R. {9 ^" |9 W5 m: L
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
3 g7 A4 ^3 |0 h {2 c v' I6 n4 d3 G4 T/ e$ n4 \) V, v
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
% k. t$ c) x7 v
0 G, y- V; o; k2 p* W“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
5 C, e! }, B) K+ X+ r" ^. s9 O1 V9 o6 r% L6 J
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
( {& |4 }5 b4 G& O$ v4 @
* | o/ z/ Y+ p, I/ P+ x“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
" N+ f" d3 g3 I) ~
. w9 P, w2 f: ~6 F9 L- v! J |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 6 H! t* r. w3 S! X5 b
