 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
+ k! N' z5 `) \
* {& I+ ?8 c' ^4 p
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。
2 o5 A6 f. S0 U% p* ?阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。4 `/ B3 M1 S2 q i
8 l; v3 M5 q* c# Chttps://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse' D/ b# u2 k; i
$ J/ A2 z; a+ @& e" M" r; } W0 f
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
3 k7 E* H% Z3 x, F; h# l* B
7 X( \) `- v9 R TOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.' i2 q6 m8 k1 C8 R9 T6 K5 q
2 Z' ?5 V9 g) G# Z
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
+ {& X I3 W/ } ?
" F: z$ ^/ q( n7 ~* Z8 Y* C! [- X" X" sHe said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.: T5 B( H& o, Y! q( Q8 U8 r5 @
! }+ y1 n% q/ H7 c' ^
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”% N8 Z& b* t8 C# J
- v2 c) ^; s& i; S0 c+ ~- }" UActually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
* p( p4 F/ c( y$ o) a" e( z$ H, e4 ?6 r) p, t" x$ \) L( p" `
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
8 H$ L7 a# D# B. D4 F8 T( X7 S$ B7 [( F2 v* m8 V
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
( T# c0 B& K7 k& n: M' Z; f+ X" k0 T6 J& x6 Y0 _- A
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
- ?7 Z+ R+ N$ t j7 [
/ T* k/ g9 P+ z$ [. } 4 u; e/ ~2 s: ?+ L0 k1 P9 M2 y
6 x7 d& ~% C: A, Z Y& i0 k5 ^The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
. \+ V/ G6 @% v$ R0 S, R0 b; a' [" Y* d/ r4 {) o
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.2 c. k/ l7 C" O# \4 x4 w$ V* W# c6 r) z
, I# Z/ e3 l) h1 O$ y5 N
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up./ V- W4 e8 M" U, l+ L+ l6 ]- W
9 g" |) G2 W( Q. S* r9 P# ^3 ?& P0 tGetting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
% J* j2 c( ]( U1 P0 u2 ^( F- B7 x( `" U, a- Z) D
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.
, ~% E. E" z- n( K* ]0 s+ b- e) ?" F! \% r2 H, b" j F
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.. J8 l4 P+ G" k+ D
* j r/ g' F# u2 d5 x+ N4 M! Z
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
6 A% ]2 v$ A7 R! C, |; Y/ A0 F8 }2 }/ A o i
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.
, [* O* ]1 s# s! h" F8 x% S5 P
7 R( N. V3 W9 M) M2 K4 J3 B. F“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.2 {' ?4 C2 i" T# d5 [( L- T
' O- s9 w5 r2 w+ N! z: l
“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
( P* E8 R; ]' @9 ]3 r6 _& z" q: f, ~. d5 F& `: [: i+ I; {- E g0 o
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
