 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
; {0 ~; g' r$ Q6 w+ C7 o. F
+ v# F% o S% q" Q" J' g# j
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。; G+ ]" K5 a8 g- P! E
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
: Q! c7 b. A, r+ O! t9 h% W& M" M, l* {
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse% _( q2 \ G4 {/ v& m
1 n5 g- w8 x% p5 n; vBraid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
0 Y% L* K( W1 M; R; {& a8 W% v9 x9 @& ~9 ?/ C. Z* z8 g/ i2 D
Oh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.. ]7 Q6 L* D6 z' I
+ k" G, N# V, U. `
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.4 ]) x8 Q' e# d: B) v
+ a3 U0 E7 q6 f
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns., N2 O$ ?! R1 v) s9 O W( p0 d
+ y& U. |; n" |; s% R" X$ P8 r# p3 ^
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”# P# U1 m* y+ s3 _3 s
2 [$ |. ]5 }+ t3 h& X
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.# { A, b( q! ~7 h N
% q! C3 Q# b3 l5 x4 I
But the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.5 i# W2 y+ _7 g# j/ k |
% \+ T9 K$ A. g" P5 J" t( f
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
9 H9 x" ]! B; D$ q
% ?/ T5 }4 G; E1 }9 F) M, bPremier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”
( [6 i1 G. }4 t" z
% f) |- P6 d! S; L/ L' _2 a& P1 R 0 W/ D: b* d0 z4 @+ O. r
8 k: u, o: ^4 a8 f) s" _
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.8 e! t ?6 x! O% ^/ h: `5 K" }5 v' O
5 J5 p& p" ^$ }It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.
+ T1 Z" b7 f; l) x, Q% e( l5 k: n3 c' |3 J
* I0 z" B/ C# O/ ~/ v% M& Z% _" nNow it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.6 s( _! @ @8 T7 f
7 \! f+ F: Z6 K3 p! b" k! O& D
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval.
( D4 C8 h, i5 y+ X3 D& K" k) D Z" ^* J. p' M
But Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.' v9 E9 k4 K" X4 i
8 l, P6 @; x; F r) x0 i
Trudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.8 \0 a8 q0 q. Y" ~( P
" e% j6 U. K9 c& p& r
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.
6 }4 i6 D9 G3 w5 O) l( {! Z( E0 F( H& }. [. z% k5 c! e
“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.2 z# z/ \5 M" f# @+ W& X+ I% L
; C' @) r5 o" ^5 M/ A% }0 _# `* i
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.
! p/ D- S, J+ d: S6 F
( n; _% v' g* B, \“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”: F$ U7 W; C1 s$ d
* ^+ P" T8 s2 I! t4 j
|
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 
