 鲜花( 1181)  鸡蛋( 48)
|
+ f6 s; v+ F7 ] Z% [3 R0 a
0 h6 X% }, R5 V1 W, d3 S3 F
诺特利2018年9月5号在和小土豆面谈中要求小土豆立法。白纸黑字有图片。4 ]9 C3 s# ]' Q9 ?5 M
阅读英文新闻对你来说很困难吗？请看文章红字部分。
* s. _/ r8 w. @. \9 L: B8 U' t$ _1 q5 O# h6 H; e3 X
https://calgaryherald.com/news/p ... f-pipeline-collapse
/ H, W& t1 M( S/ ?7 l# j4 ~3 ]1 i9 A6 Z3 Q* R
Braid: Trudeau sees the sunny side of pipeline collapse
) l0 ]: k: W' G2 W3 V
! C- a' b O7 U8 wOh, so that’s it. The pipeline rejection is just a bump in the road. In fact, you could even see it as proof of just how robust the Liberal approval process is.1 V7 u6 t" X! k9 [' j2 _& r1 f8 J. O+ I
9 z% g+ e2 m( j/ g8 D8 _# C1 p
That’s what a person might think, listening to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on Wednesday, as he actually tried to turn this mess into an affirmation of his ideals.
1 `7 j! ~# ?7 O7 p* _0 I2 F7 g9 Y3 ?' N: ?9 o
He said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling, mind you. He knows it “really hurt” Alberta. Ottawa will do better and meet the Federal Court of Appeal’s concerns.# ?( h& `; o" m T9 c
, i# g5 r( E* N8 H: q
At one point, he slammed the Harper government’s approach and said “the court has just confirmed that was never going to work.”3 p! W k; {! u1 o/ b& v6 F( j
' i! E3 x4 T3 Q& G0 o
Actually, the court ruled on a Trudeau government approach that was never going to work.
% [$ B0 W9 O5 W! H2 ?3 B
, t- V8 ^# i6 w: MBut the court also agrees with Trudeau on the need for rigour, it seems.
% V/ d+ b# q' E% n6 f) l- L1 z" W! e: z0 a) I
“This is something I’ve been saying for a long time, that the only way to get projects built in this country is to do them responsibly.”
( F2 F( M7 D: q4 c4 l k* K( c. N* ?' L0 J z* F% F6 J3 |( I
Premier Rachel Notley, distancing herself from her favourite ally, demands a legislative cannonade, a federal bill to reassert the former approval. She decries the “regulatory merry-go-round that isn’t going to help anybody.”! Q, T. D# f% R$ j0 U" b9 @# o
* a0 N8 F$ I+ n
! E8 ^, j; T; ~! Q/ t# }) G% z s& F
The job now is to get the project back to where it was last Wednesday, before the court ruling came down.
3 Y" c% O* c- ? h$ K5 J v3 L$ R3 J0 \+ b% \, z ^
It had been signed and sealed. This was an officially approved interprovincial pipeline, ramping up to full construction.9 y3 q: F& n9 f# o0 k0 y) K; Q
. B+ a o4 J) o5 c9 v5 W# m6 B o$ \# e* _
Now it’s nothing. The approval process even overturned a federal cabinet order. The workers will be going home, the contractors packing up.; U/ \0 v" l' Q3 Z8 Y% F V: Z
/ l, D( b2 j. s) o1 A. F
Getting back to “YES” (that is, last Wednesday) will take time and money. And nobody knows what further legal horrors might await, even after another approval. _' K$ U4 g$ R5 z2 G
& n* Z; x6 g) u0 v# y( n) R, b: uBut Trudeau paints it as a simple matter of improving consultation and looking into maritime transportation.8 L# g$ A( _3 C0 p2 s! K
& ?6 u( N9 X& ^' X! x! i+ l7 TTrudeau also says that if Ottawa hadn’t bought the project, it would be dead today.
: ^; \' Z3 A+ d0 q& \- k6 q. i, x9 B5 D
Actually, if Ottawa hadn’t purchased it for $4.5 billion in May, the assets would now be a much better buy.8 R2 O" o8 @% p* d9 Q+ W
5 l5 u% \! F* b' a. n# T) w. r; P“Why didn’t the federal government wait until after the ruling?” retired oil and gas analyst Gordon Tait asks in an email.5 G6 o: p% U$ F0 o0 u
$ }! l. p/ K: I) \( j9 _- ?7 T$ F+ p8 ]
“They could have acquired the pipeline for a lower price than they paid a few months ago. There was no downside in waiting.7 z3 G! J! I8 ?* R: U! w2 P- a
, g( y, d' T/ _4 O8 X2 V0 v# z“If the expansion had been approved, Kinder Morgan shareholders would have paid for the expansion — not Canadian taxpayers.”
8 M; [- v. Z+ ~2 H
3 B! K0 l$ S( N! ~7 N, T" A( S% O6 ? |
|
楼主: 驻足闻香
狗仔卡
发表于 2018-9-6 23:08
显身卡
小黄还有功夫吵架。
明白人 8 Z- `' A; l" n# n
