 鲜花( 19)  鸡蛋( 0)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2009-1-7 17:29
|
显示全部楼层
Ford F150 Vs Tundra
I did google the topic, the first shows up is a clip, a tundra pulls a F150.
+ W$ G; v8 H8 F1 ~/ W, F0 c$ g3 H7 P
Becuase it is made by a toyota dealership, so, I doubt the credibility: no engine or model shown at all, so, it is not fair.7 R7 a7 f. s# J, ]' J
, u' w: t+ L7 A5 ], L7 E- i2 v! _$ E. `But I do found a guy's comment, very similar to my experience about F150 and Tundra.: ~3 v# J- ?. F2 p: Q( j$ _' M3 f9 O
( Y3 ~8 l8 R1 E7 v. H$ tI am totally agree with 1-4 points, but I have no idea about gasmilage at all. 4 ~% C4 ?; M8 Z3 {" z; L
4 z5 i6 E, \8 K% U _I do believe if anyone had chance to drive a Tundra (2007-newer), will change their mind. 4 J0 S0 y% P( o q. }2 R
3 K9 ]7 E* `+ O7 F7 J2 K+ e$ [# dI personally believed U.S brand is superior than Jap in full size truck before, now, I am convinced that if Jap wants, it makes good truck as well.
3 g/ [1 G% H( R# v2 v1 p2 K- S+ t/ h; H+ W. S9 e$ \ I
The following is the google result I found and quote:( Q2 r4 K( k9 {* g: _* N* m
. t1 r8 G) r; G ^' |I recently drove a King Ranch F-150 to SC from MN, about 1400 miles. I do have to say that even though I'm a bit biased (being a Tundra owner), the Ford just can't hang with my Tundra. Some key differences:) }- _$ R' w0 [2 t
8 `5 }1 L1 M3 H9 D5 V& U
9 t: C2 k7 \( H" H- ^- q1 The Ford was hard to drive on the road. It had a tendency to "wander". My Tundra tracks rock solid straight, the Ford needs lots of little corrections. AGREE WHEN TOW A BOAT (HRU: I HAD TO KEEP CORRECTING STEERING WHEEL ON FORD, NOT TUNDRA, SAME BOAT, SAME ROAD)5 k0 v N }# U; G
! [2 k! E9 w/ R( g2. When going through mountain passes, the Ford was difficult to drive at speed through curves. I always felt like it was hard to control. I've driven my Tundra through passes, and it's much more "reassuring". hRU: AGREE0 O' D* l- U/ v
9 C6 S* l% k: c7 d" Z0 C; R/ }3. The Ford rides pretty well. I'd give the two a tie for interstate cruising. HRU: AGREE EVEN IN CITY, FORD HANDLES NICE ALSO
) l- W. r5 h; ^, a! U
7 W4 U/ w5 p2 b" M. v; O( O4. Power wise, no contest. I think the King Ranch is a very heavy truck, and it accelerates like it, even with the 5.4 L HRU: AGREE% I& U7 O. d6 P2 W9 C
% D$ _7 ~! U2 K. W
5. Mileage: King Ranch - 14, Tundra - 18. HRU: NO IDEA
, e7 z+ P- P; @+ A/ p5 E
E2 U7 x4 r7 Z9 m H; d4 @Quality - the front plastic fascia on the Ford has already come loose.( HRU: AGREE )
" X: M: f7 K" Z% \
: ?) [: s, f0 b7 SThe score here seems to lean strongly towards the Tundra. I still don't mind the King Ranch, though. The climate controls, rearview mirror, and leather seats ROCK!
$ e" D* |! |$ r6 J' Y
4 K$ E/ i3 W% u0 c* V# O% LJust thought I'd share.: }7 z, u7 E! [/ z
" E- S9 b1 R7 g+ L J$ FHRU: I also like Kingranch two tone seats and the farm smell of it! It is really a nice taste of color, but not the radio, center console cluster, green light of tach and speedo etc..
1 j! e w0 p' W8 W! v; a: p) z5 E: T8 O
[ 本帖最后由 HRU 于 2009-1-7 17:35 编辑 ] |
|