埃德蒙顿华人社区-Edmonton China

 找回密码
 注册
查看: 1620|回复: 8

Real Estate Reporters

[复制链接]
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:04 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
Attention Real Estate Reporters:
2 j4 O# `4 I" m% ?9 B$ d+ ^! g; i0 T  \3 h% F
Despite US housing woes Canadian real estate remains upbeat
1 m" [- a, x4 \. {  ~! U6 s    TORONTO, Nov. 5 /CNW/ - Leading real estate experts are predicting the US3 u1 m' ~: h* t
commercial real estate market will slow in 2008 and follow a similar pattern$ ]3 q- ~$ ]7 Z" Q9 p
as the current residential market. However, according to the annual Emerging+ k  `0 I  p1 G1 ]& b+ I8 F! d% @
Trends in Real Estate 2008 report, released by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC)5 [7 i! _5 B6 @' A' z# s& A
and the Urban Land Institute (ULI), their Canadian counterparts are much more. \. q3 S: p& ?1 m' e
upbeat.) \; Q8 K  |- p, }" ?" u
    Now in its 29th year, Emerging Trends is the oldest, most highly regarded0 s7 |5 }2 |- F  t
annual industry outlook for the real estate industry. The report reflects
" a  ?, u/ S/ }5 Ointerviews with and surveys of more than 600 of the industry's leading real
0 h4 Q; \9 `# m: Kestate experts, including investors, developers, property company' A8 G- Z' h4 e+ V! w
representatives, lenders, brokers and consultants in both Canada and the US.
2 I. M  k+ D& f$ p  ~# NOther versions of this report are conducted in countries around the world
, {) J% _5 P/ p- u+ y: N3 y9 Cincluding Asia Pacific and Europe.
, |; g( S' k2 Q5 G* @- m$ ?5 P    According to Chris Potter, PwC partner and leader of the firm's Canadian  u5 b, @1 I* \: D9 [6 G# @4 m
Real Estate Tax practice, Canada benefits from a more conservative investment
: B- B, C! @; N& z* Z9 wenvironment than the US. "In Canada, institution-dominated markets appear to
/ T( d8 i2 c" b8 o9 b, Hbe avoiding 'transaction mania', but real estate values have reached record# g* Y; f9 s% _# A
highs and a strong economy has accelerated tenant demand for space."
0 A  a- Z1 L' ?1 y; [7 F5 e7 l0 x    According to American respondents, a healthy correction south of the6 z+ o5 m4 `: }% R' P- Q; y
border will likely bypass long-term investors but penalize late-to-the-game+ E" m7 v8 }0 s$ X
speculators and overleveraged buyers. Canadian respondents to the survey
$ y* Y. L$ o* _- }  P' n& Iremain positive about sidestepping any serious impacts of this possible US
+ m4 Z6 Y, h* d. A  X' P6 acorrection. Close to 36% view their prospects for profitability in 2008 to be
# M  l0 u. a7 h2 X3 G/ f7 f+ qvery good and a further 22.4% say they're excellent.
. u) ~$ }8 w( [) n3 {0 N. w    The strongest areas of real estate business activity for Canadian+ b' `+ h5 `$ M. n8 @0 R! H" F
respondents is predicted to be within real estate services, followed by, F5 ~; J# b+ w  F# }4 u' M1 g
commercial/multifamily development and homebuilding/residential land5 G0 \5 g) U. @; V" _0 S
development. All property sectors share positive prospects across the country
" H8 R0 ?" I7 S1 p0 Hespecially industrial and retail with respondents, on average, stating9 h; P3 f7 h/ H$ O" T* t4 N" U! `
development prospects are expected to be modestly good to good. The
. K9 k( E" c5 dresidential for-sale market is also expected to fair well, but might need to5 m7 h6 V/ ^( R- m5 Z
take a breather as homebuilders cannot keep up with the current pace and4 \( y2 R) p2 d8 y' A2 t2 J9 o
single-family housing looks overpriced.
. ?) S. X/ i2 L( ?* E    Office stock is seeing limited inventories and dated product fill up with
. i0 H) ]  t) L1 [7 m) mtenants. Except for Montreal, where office vacancies are nearing 9%. Canadian
" a  |0 U$ U1 H  S0 M- @8 gmetropolitan areas boast below 5% vacancies, and rents have room to push: N" N. P9 \! a8 G% p8 x1 t6 q9 [/ K
higher. The survey is also showing that costs and land scarcity is limiting
- h+ T/ L5 s1 V* Mnew development. Hotel investment and development prospects are modestly good,
1 A3 U4 S4 \& z: fand most respondents rate this sector either a buy or a hold. Rental+ r: T% Y# a4 F( ~$ y! T# \
apartments are doing well in major cities with high immigration flows. Primary! t5 ]4 n# z1 B
western cities - Vancouver, Calgary, and Edmonton - are veering toward housing
# B+ k. ?5 C9 p$ [. l* bshortages as workers, attracted by a plethora of well-paying jobs, pour into
- U" Z0 C$ W3 I- Hthe energy zone. Apartment occupancies are soaring in these areas. Development/ y0 I. m$ z, h8 ?1 S5 X; R
in other regions remains difficult because of costs and land scarcity.6 m- x( e+ |3 n  v; x* q6 d
4 G9 s8 u& }1 V; t$ o$ Q8 B0 `$ e
    Canadian Markets to Watch" E* X: ~: l+ {5 J
2 e% C$ l/ l2 F1 E! q! z
    The report comments on how Canadians like to live and work in central
6 ~' s* P, G4 F% Jcities, as long as they can afford it. If housing is too pricey in 24-hour/ @  ^: x3 H2 Z9 d6 ~; q# t* b
neighbourhoods, people move to inner-ring suburbs or beyond and commute back
6 M( K: \: h2 F* i" b- kinto the cores. Investors, especially the institutions, are concentrated in
7 I- `$ w. e+ a' q0 f! p* m+ X5 B, hdowntown areas too. Planners and developers focus on infill and more vertical, |. W) C9 U9 b
projects, which reinforce the urban cores. The hot-growth energy cities out( w2 H* U2 [' F) I" G& K% N
west - Calgary and Edmonton - score the highest ratings for investment
# s! s1 W7 M# N( s2 a# r* Jprospects, development, and for-sale housing, although it is not certain# }6 Q3 _" @8 h9 l1 J: {3 Y( I, }/ T9 U7 o
whether the recent announcements on royalties will have any effect on this.
% ]4 Q$ y. A5 S; cToronto, Canada's premier global pathway city, and Vancouver also have high' _) A9 Q* l4 P
ratings. Ottawa and Montreal follow, with Halifax lagging.
4 z9 M+ Q! y5 S2 g0 d4 a9 I/ J* M5 w1 x3 |4 A5 ^9 Q# Q. ]
    Calgary/Edmonton
1 u- H) o) M0 \* X; y! d# m" Y' y  \
    Calgary is the Canada's "resource" capital and North America's number-one" y' B: f/ a# |5 U
boomtown. Survey respondents foresee strong buys for all sectors: 53.5% give a- p5 M! d9 c0 a% z4 T& A
buy recommendation for Hotel Property, 52.8% for Industrial/Distribution,
4 h, X; K  f$ [/ ^48.1% for Retail and Apartment Residential and 44.6% for Office Property.
4 C" i8 @: t: q( \Furthermore, on average the majority of respondents see Calgary For-Sale
1 R1 Q2 i3 ?" g3 T( f; C4 U6 _Homebuilding prospects as very good. Edmonton is closely mimicking the+ B# a: {" E6 O1 S- e# g! L2 L
Calgary-style growth wave and as long as demand for energy resources stays
/ L7 {; H% N' ]strong, this market will continue to do well.
6 K% d0 }: k& ]" ?" i7 v
+ @; H! V( c/ P* S9 \; k    Vancouver
( C: r7 F4 L5 g$ Z; j, u! E; P  b2 @! [
    Vancouver's diversified economy is roaring, the mining industry is( K; L$ X4 e& M/ F
booming and the city provides a large port and a high-tech center. Outrageous
8 A1 r4 z6 X) Q+ qreal estate prices frustrate homebuyers and commercial investors and the
% z: m# ~( k: {/ Vmarket is extremely hard to crack. The 2010 Winter Olympic Games is also a+ d2 o4 |# x; }4 V4 B9 W9 o
growth driver and accordingly 44.7% of respondents give Vancouver a buy
2 p4 d" O) [0 Frecommendation for Hotel Property. A further 43.5% give a buy Retail, 41.3%
' D& c7 N$ h  c3 |for Industrial/Distribution and 36.7% for Office Property followed by 34.1%8 s3 U* ], M- }5 m5 }
for Apartment Residential property. Vancouver also ranks in the good to very1 t% ]8 T* y4 }" q8 X1 Y
good mark for for-sale homebuilding prospects.
2 t$ D, g( g/ ^; Y9 b4 p+ n3 Z3 ~9 Q$ F) N; A
    Toronto
: ~$ r( y9 X$ k# L- X
! }7 v7 g9 |4 f1 s    Toronto ranks as a major global pathway destination, 24-hour city, and
' D4 J% [4 c4 }" c1 Cmanufacturing hub. Compared with other national financial centers, the city is$ P: @- O: t' ~/ Y6 @
relatively inexpensive. However, the rising loonie is hurting manufacturing
, z" G0 g* C' ]industries, and clouds over the US economy threaten to stall out momentum./ J, ?3 E" E) V9 ?3 W
Three new office towers are under construction, adding 3 million new square
! f* q8 j! R# |5 |1 Mfeet of office space. Notably, Office (49.1%), Industrial (46.2%) and4 {, y* y$ l) ]5 h
Apartments (40.8%) are given solid buys.
9 \  P: {7 C! L4 ~8 o3 K" h' y5 R2 @
, `. [5 t. @* ]) d! ?2 M& Q' D    Montreal
3 w  l: x% T2 g8 Q+ x; T- P8 K% R5 c) \; r: l2 g
    Montreal continues to face concerns about market stability and overall
5 S/ P5 J# `% r) mgrowth prospects as major companies no longer choose it as a place to set up0 @4 A- Q, q# v+ c  F3 C* q: M
shop. But, plenty of government offices fill space. Of the larger cities in/ L1 E! P  v: q, q
Canada, Montreal ranks lowest as a "buy" recommendation in all real estate
3 w  A8 U: x$ nsectors. However, respondents generally rated all Montreal real estate sectors& g1 Q( S* y: G
higher as a "hold" recommendation." Q' {( q4 Q8 M5 p5 H9 b6 s! P+ M* b
7 F/ S* }! p' G
    The report notes that best bets for investors for the coming years! a& a# C1 e6 N# F
include a focus on all property sectors in the high-growth western energy
8 L: r7 e- r: y6 imarkets, hold on central business district office space, develop infill condos1 N9 Z/ @1 |$ V4 O7 D
near subways stops in Toronto, buy infill sites wherever you can and invest2 f! P2 [) V* Z- Z, r4 T# p
overseas. Potter concludes, "Domestic opportunities are too limited at current! Q6 E; o) y7 x9 @- ~/ c
prices."' x- X) ^! _9 y8 ]0 e
    A copy of Emerging Trends in Real Estate(R) 2008 is available at# S' o' j& S* v$ q7 f  A
www.uli.org or www.pwc.com/imre.
! ~$ m8 g1 t, c5 P
1 j8 c2 L6 [1 a' c( {, I' A3 N: x1 h    About PricewaterhouseCoopers
! L9 R# A1 E, t. {! I: o& r. _+ g( W1 b! X
    PricewaterhouseCoopers (www.pwc.com) provides industry-focused assurance,
' z/ N* a  h& ~( w- Z9 e5 ?tax and advisory services to build public trust and enhance value for its
& S5 O! n! F8 H  _! g  Cclients and their stakeholders. More than 140,000 people in 149 countries
! M0 U+ c( ?+ S; b9 o; ^across our network share their thinking, experience and solutions to develop
8 ?0 B, d7 i8 h- f; r- q( gfresh perspectives and practical advice. Now celebrating 100 years of) k. o0 i& l$ d. Z
excellence in Canada, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (www.pwc.com/ca) and its5 f' H" J' X7 M& \
related entities have more than 5,200 partners and staff in offices across the
$ ~- j6 |" ?7 |country.: T( y; L( a/ ]8 Z, k* `" d; C
    "PricewaterhouseCoopers" refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario
( W& L# C& Q) olimited liability partnership, or, as the context requires, the
. A- ?, }. r6 Y" N" jPricewaterhouseCoopers global network or other member firms of the network,
$ ?" I2 N! L+ f: Y3 A+ \3 J9 seach of which is a separate and independent legal entity./ r9 ^3 d2 p$ D. c1 U6 f' M; u
: _, ~% a5 V- W7 N0 W. a8 u
    About the Urban Land Institute
0 z7 ^9 Y+ u  F/ B  P
: q% K& x4 [8 ]    The Urban Land Institute (www.uli.org) is a nonprofit education and
3 M" z& B" @3 e2 @5 Y: x( @- vresearch institute supported by its members. Its mission is to provide6 k1 @5 N/ {& A3 b/ c# N
leadership in the responsible use of land and in sustaining and creating- q0 Q: z' r. b# X8 s
thriving communities worldwide. Established in 1936, the Institute has more
5 v( M$ a9 }2 D$ a* zthan 38,000 members representing all aspects of land use and development
/ F5 r; K4 ~  w; C: A- o, W, zdisciplines.1 U: Q5 v2 d4 P( F% M9 |( V  t
    The Urban Land Institute is an active and growing organization in Canada.
  {* z+ R) J; Q4 _9 LWith nearly 700 members across the country, Canada's first ULI District( C; z  j$ N. @' T; [
Council was established in Toronto in 2005 and a second District Council is
! t% ~0 P' z+ J# ]2 \7 ]6 V4 B  Bnow being formed in British Columbia. The Toronto District Council will be
$ N& ]$ c7 \' M8 S1 {# x! mhosting a special event on Emerging Trends in Real Estate on November 20th,
+ Q& e# A& R& `% w- f" w' Z: B2007, featuring Jonathan Miller, the principal author of the report, Blake! r- k0 |9 U& R0 ]' Y, r
Hutcheson, President of CB Richard Ellis Canada Ltd., and George Carras,
6 q1 c' W* ^: y2 ]# o/ @6 C7 Z  @# nPresident of RealNet Canada Inc. For more information on this event, please* X: E5 Q$ I2 L% O+ i) L2 f3 D6 c
call the Toronto District Council Coordinator at (647) 258-0017, or look on) ?* @6 s* S. {% R" O
the web at www.uli.org/events/index.cfm?id=3066.
$ W) M( q: j) E  Z
3 I( G. z5 q1 f9 ^& y( ~; i0 v2 A- ~. f7 s1 a. \5 j
( B7 L- M1 C" H# \$ N' F
For further information: Carolyn Forest, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,
1 z9 t$ b1 t) m/ Y(416) 814-5730, carolyn.forest@ca.pwc.com
" V7 k! \. y2 h. ]; p: [% ]http://www.newswire.ca/en/releas ... r2007/05/c4080.html
' P) q- S2 R7 x$ t: b. q( P
' j' M! V( H7 `# T/ z[ 本帖最后由 QWE321 于 2007-11-13 09:08 编辑 ]
鲜花(1) 鸡蛋(0)
 楼主| 发表于 2007-11-13 09:06 | 显示全部楼层
注意房地产记者采访时说:
9 N' K( ]; ^$ J. S4 q3 v5 G7 Z+ [. h6 q7 z. r" J
尽管美国住房疾苦加拿大房地产仍乐观, i' A: b" `, x! r/ f; W* ?
    多伦多, 11月5日电/新华美通/ -领先的房地产专家预测,美国
8 R3 G! Q4 w/ I商业房地产市场将缓慢,在2008年和遵循类似模式。 ) U0 t2 e3 I' z' t3 q* n- L- ?- a
由于目前住宅市场。但是,根据年报新兴
: o: E6 G: h  c+ r+ T6 f趋势,在房地产, 2008年发布的报告,由罗兵咸永道(预委会)   T  a. h7 ^2 b/ ?
和城市土地研究所(宇力) ,其对应的加拿大得多
) F3 J* ]9 X* q( Y7 M乐观。
8 T' k  m; T9 W. q  v$ L0 y    现在,在其第29届,今年新出现的趋势是历史最悠久,最受尊敬的8 I7 @+ ^5 U& M* h8 a! |0 d* d
年度行业展望房地产业。该报告反映了
4 J: S% ]$ k  Q! _访谈和调查, 600多的业内领先的实时
, K0 y* o+ A$ J# a/ f9 R# `. g7 [地产专家,包括投资者,开发商,物业公司+ b2 j8 C. M" [$ O. I" K% k" [, T/ g
代表,放款人,经纪人和顾问公司在加拿大和美国。 ' A) }! z5 c# g0 K! R6 u
其它版本的这份报告是在世界各国纷纷7 x$ ]  M5 T% p
包括亚太地区和欧洲。 . v* c6 b/ ^0 _
    据克里斯波特,预委会的合作伙伴和领导者,该公司在加拿大
- {7 {1 t9 E' l$ X- i# M: ?房地产税的做法,加拿大受益于一个较保守的投资$ r% v6 [- q0 K7 l' Z
环境比美国好。 "在加拿大,机构主导的市场,似乎8 s1 h$ ]+ P: i/ q+ ]
可避免'交易躁狂症' ,但房地产的价值,已达到了创纪录- i5 ^! u) p, U6 }  A
高点和强劲的经济,加速了租客的需求空间" 。 9 G0 `0 W9 q( [9 n
    据美国受访者中,一个健康的校正南方的
  b' K  E2 [. c) M. P, |) O边界可能会绕过长线投资者,但惩罚下旬至该游戏
, U$ W6 N5 j) S7 w炒家overleveraged买家。加拿大民意调查被访者
( V5 C6 \, \5 x0 D! r继续积极回避任何严重的影响,这可能美国5 b& M* W+ T: P3 D* w
更正。接近36 % ,查看他们的前景,盈利能力在2008年将, T" x, j: t8 I6 Y3 J
非常好,并且进一步的22.4 %的人说他们做得很棒。
9 W. I; U$ M8 ]% @' f- u0 E    最强地区的房地产经营活动,为加拿大5 d; v7 a' A* i: }
受访者预测,要保持房地产服务,其次是
- M* X- C3 K* K' P/ Z& y. m  N商业/多家庭的发展和住宅建设/住宅用地
5 m. e6 K! B! |9 u9 |" F的发展。所有地产行业分享积极的前景在全国推行% T7 a8 G/ G* V# I. [
尤其是工业和零售与受访者中,平均说明+ f0 v: [8 A) ?
的发展前景,预计会虚心好,以良好的。该
+ F  u: G, {+ p1 w/ z  n+ M1 K2 L住宅为售后市场预期也将公平好,但可能需要
, f* u5 w7 K0 b. g  a+ Q0 X+ z以喘息为营建不能配合当前的速度和
0 n# U' o* u+ W# A/ c单个家庭的房屋期待过高。
$ x; |- T1 Y$ o( e    办公室的股票是看到有限的库存和过时的产品,填补了) h( f/ [, N3 l0 T
租户。除蒙特利尔,而办公楼空置率接近百分之九。加拿大( P# o3 a2 N9 t9 ~: a/ o5 c% j
大都市区夸耀百分之五以下的职位空缺,以及租金的空间,以推动
# t, X5 u7 i8 X' v更高。调查也显示,成本及土地稀缺限制0 Q6 L7 p4 ~/ }$ I' C1 ^  r6 O( G
新的发展。酒店投资和发展前景是良好的谦虚,
$ J1 p$ |' ^2 N& [3 ]和大多数受访者比率这个行业无论是购买或持有。出租
! h7 u+ C# i) t公寓是搞好大城市与高移民流动。小学
& A3 ]2 @$ ^9 e/ K0 b& v; q" v西方城市-温哥华,卡尔加里,埃德蒙顿和-正转向对房屋
' z+ @3 \+ H7 w6 X+ v2 D& w9 U( O/ j# r短缺的工人,吸引了大量的好报酬优厚的就业岗位,倒入
# f6 v. e2 T5 ?; E* P9 K' ?( V能源区。公寓占用飞涨,在这方面的努力。发展4 B& r% i- E  F9 |' \5 y! j# H
在其他地区仍然很困难,因为成本及土地匮乏。 2 X& E2 D9 v3 j% A% S3 h0 s( D- l
0 T) l# D9 k7 E0 F  A
    加拿大市场上观看
* \7 r4 a) V4 i3 |% F( X) q& K. @: k1 Q: y* S- ]
    该报告对如何加拿大人愿意生活和工作在中央
5 F) |9 e/ c) C. d$ n6 d6 |( J城市,只要他们能够负担得起的。如果房屋是太昂贵,在24小时
! q2 H$ S8 M: W4 }居民区,人们搬到党内环郊区或更远和通勤回
- {+ g$ {9 S) _% h1 Y& b进入内核。投资者,特别是机构,都集中在
: d5 L- \9 Q# l2 y5 B1 k- F市中心地区。规划者和开发商把重心放在加密和更垂直: T: O9 Q% X, v, h3 s" g! G4 X8 N
项目,加强了城市的核心。热点增长的能源城市2 @7 B/ t7 H& q( h2 U4 R+ l
西-卡尔加里和埃德蒙顿-评分最高的收视率,为投资+ \8 z: O$ y5 b4 \) \7 s
前景,发展,并为出售住房,它虽然是不肯定
, V3 x$ `' e; {( M7 j, s9 a$ K1 y是否最近宣布对版税将产生什么影响。 6 W9 U8 o$ `, ^" M. s- n
多伦多,是加拿大首屈一指的全球通路的城市,温哥华等,也有高
* U2 w+ ~8 G) n. m; U. D1 j评级。渥太华和蒙特利尔跟进,与哈利法克斯还相对滞后。 8 N4 _3 Q/ g' @6 |4 s1 e

! V; f5 y1 l- ]3 Q    卡尔加里/埃德蒙顿) Z) O& Q6 V8 n
, B, t; `" ?- [9 h" v" J8 B
    卡尔加里是加拿大的"资源"的资本和北美洲的头号8 O4 Y: |# @0 `- [; |7 V3 U& q" \
新兴都市。调查的受访者预计,强买,为各阶层人士: 53.5 %作
/ F* {/ i6 l, n9 w7 I' N购买建议,为酒店物业,为52.8 % ,为工业/配送,
& U9 W" s9 `3 T48.1 % ,零售和公寓住宅和44.6 % ,为办公室的财产。
/ I% }+ Y. {3 H. g& c3 W此外,每日平均有超过半数受访见卡尔加里为售后' \1 G3 |: ~3 L
住宅建设前景是非常好的。埃德蒙顿正密切模仿了
: ~" ]( }6 I9 G+ y/ C卡尔加里式的增长浪潮,并且只要能源需求的资源留
8 n& m: s, B6 J. s) E: A% u; c强大的,这个市场将继续向好。
4 f9 Z* ?- F* o* y" z' o. l2 t5 j: \+ b& `# `! _( n
    温哥华" K; b* P2 k6 k. O1 s% p
" _  a; }9 U4 a- r2 Q
    温哥华的多元化的经济,是波涛汹涌,采矿业0 o* A, r. L5 F' B/ `4 L
红红火火的城市提供了一个大型港口和高科技中心。岂有此理
# w9 m7 }1 E) {  w房地产价格挫败购房者和商业投资者和
- D5 i! L1 k6 E" i4 A1 S市场是非常难裂纹。 2010年冬季奥运会也是一个
* O$ B! l2 Q5 \5 y" a# R9 ~5 f主要成长动力,并据此44.7 %的受访者给予温哥华买进! X5 B' y4 |4 U9 _. _( G/ Q* I
建议对酒店的财产。另有43.5 %给予买进零售, 41.3 %
: M' F3 g7 W) s工业/分销和36.7 %办公室财产其次是34.1 % / i$ b, ?- F' u7 Y
为公寓住宅物业。温哥华也名列在好的很
, k9 g. s: ^* |. E. P2 G良好的标志,为买卖房屋建筑的前景。
0 u! @- i/ R5 Q5 G, D6 e& T: b& h$ _0 M; w9 J& G, E2 p
    多伦多
7 S5 D: |8 S& g# `1 c5 [1 G' l% a) J" i# T) j' j
    多伦多队伍作为一项重大的全球通路目的地后, 24小时市, * z1 c0 q9 }, w+ p$ ]& A) h+ Q; @
制造业枢纽。相较于其他国家的金融中心,该市正
) j' p$ i% J; q& ?- `, n! d6 ~: u价格相对低廉。不过,加元上涨是伤害制造- b9 f2 w! D# I7 E0 Q
工业,并云在美国经济的威胁,以贩出的势头。
3 [* E* @- }0 V0 C; w/ r4 A三个新的办公大楼正在建设中,增加3万个新广场+ W0 a. ]( ]# z" f- ^2 O
英尺的办公空间。值得注意的是,办公室( 49.1 % ) ,工业( 46.2 % )和
9 u% p6 n' W" I8 d公寓( 40.8 % ) ,给出了坚实的收购。
% P0 u& r9 k! c8 ^5 B
- W6 \" k+ R/ ?' J: g( O( J. a    蒙特利尔2 p: S. Z! d. y" w

. e; x% P) M) M7 d! ~3 {    蒙特利尔仍然面临着关注市场的稳定及整体9 K6 n0 j% U/ ?! K% v
经济增长的前景,因为各大公司不再选择香港作为一个地方成立
' J% H: a1 q* O: [店。但是,大量的政府办公室填写空间。比较大的城市
  x+ u$ C# R8 E加拿大,蒙特利尔排名最低的是一个"买进"的建议,在所有房地产. S5 m, Q/ s; T6 q# c# f! U
部门。不过,受访者普遍都被评为蒙特利尔房地产行业
  Z, A  F: h' U( J6 ?: W高为"持有"建议。 " y6 b1 e' U1 t" u3 L
* R- y1 X+ W; ?" T
    报告指出,最佳的赌注,为投资者在未来几年( p3 m6 c3 v  A. h# }2 Y
包括重点放在所有地产行业在高速发展的西方能源
& f( R( s* ~$ W* F$ @5 s! q市场,忍着中央商务区的办公场所,制定加密公寓
6 R9 p8 t! @; q9 }) A附近的行人隧道,停在多伦多,购买加密地点在何处,你可以和投资
/ v4 h! b1 J. n7 X7 r海外。波特的结论是, "国内的机会太有限,在目前的
2 y7 X* a$ ^6 d4 \) ]1 P0 Y! S( [价格" 。
8 i. }+ b3 U: q" E' L5 n3 Q    一本新趋势的房地产( r )的, 2008年是于
. F. J" n, B' Z. e0 q4 M# Ewww.uli.org或www.pwc.com /伊姆雷。 + q1 E  r% p1 s6 K

5 B: _( [' y5 _5 R7 N/ Y; C    约罗兵咸永道4 k9 ^% M% [: _4 c4 U2 E. F( c
7 x  V& ]) [0 _0 Z
    罗兵咸永道( www.pwc.com )提供行业为重点的保证, 1 R8 a  @8 x' p! m5 Q: H) b
税务和咨询服务,以建立公众的信任和提高其值
: \- a1 b$ B9 E9 G( t: A5 l/ B客户和他们的利益相关者。超过14万人,在149个国家
5 P1 O+ E% t- [- `# H" n跨越我们的网络分享他们的思想,经验和解决方案开发
6 y0 b: ^: S$ J  e/ K. c0 }' @新的观点和切实可行的意见。现在庆祝百年的9 X* ]( `2 C  C& u8 U$ y% l* w: W
卓越在加拿大,罗兵咸永道物流园( www.pwc.com / ca )和其( n3 }! Z1 {( W* o4 C
相关实体有超过5200名合作伙伴和工作人员在全国各地的办公室
4 S+ x4 |; t6 H# g6 x- d/ s国。
8 b( d* q7 }' ~! w+ }     "罗兵咸永道" ,是指以罗兵咸永道物流园,安大略8 ^2 q7 }+ L% t5 [; d1 e
有限责任合伙,或视情况需要,
$ ?+ O8 p/ o( h7 l$ W普华永道的全球网络,还是其他会员公司的网络,
" J( m8 z8 U# G2 A6 }! _$ j2 H每年这是一个独立的法律实体。 1 d: O8 O0 i. o  H! z

# l" n% Q& c, J* D5 ?" }0 ^    关于城市土地研究所所长
2 @" y' N) M; l$ g" p$ _1 `: `/ P$ C; p! G  m, g8 m
    城市土地学会( www.uli.org )是一个非赢利性的教育和  A3 a3 Y. d' `! [% e  ]
研究院的支持,它的成员。它的使命是提供
9 t$ T2 X' w5 \领导,在以负责任的方式使用土地,并维持和创造
2 [# Q4 a1 S$ z蓬勃发展的社区在世界各地。成立于1936年,研究所更
7 M5 V8 Q( f8 c1 Z) ~! L9 W; t" p超过38000人,代表各方面的土地利用与发展+ _1 A9 T, \4 w7 `/ c! X7 o" @
学科。 5 z2 R, U8 ^1 j% F4 }
    城市土地学会是一个积极的和不断扩大的组织在加拿大。 2 Y& J! c: t( {5 Y" ^3 Q/ e) z
与近700名委员在全国推行,加拿大的第赫内斯区
  M% G3 U3 T6 Z9 y- |理事会成立于多伦多,在2005年和第二个区议会
& a  T) r' g$ @/ C8 _1 A6 z现在正在形成,在不列颠哥伦比亚省。多伦多区会
+ \- m9 M* [  t! O主办了一次特别活动,对新出现的趋势,在房地产上11月20日,
) {* K; Z! f* {: b4 y2007年,包括乔纳森米勒,主要报告的作者,卜力$ ^- p& n% \/ W: R4 X' P
资讯公司总裁世邦魏理仕加拿大有限公司,和乔治carras , 8 L! e4 h3 Y! H( ~
总统realnet加拿大公司的更多信息,对这一事件,请7 q" ~8 _* p: r$ r  n. |
致电多伦多区议会事务协调员( 647 ) 258-0017 ,或一脸无奈
$ i+ m6 @1 S5 d+ }/ ]网站www.uli.org/events/index.cfm?id=3066
$ m' e5 e5 T6 a. d+ E+ T- P3 E; l$ ~7 u1 ~7 M

& u5 }, t- M' o2 X/ p* T+ u+ G0 K+ D$ ]$ j# j: E; _& @# o/ O( R
更多资讯:卡罗琳森林,罗兵咸永道物流园, 3 Q2 F+ u) t9 z! b( P
( 416 ) 814-5730 , carolyn.forest @ ca.pwc.com
鲜花(4348) 鸡蛋(18)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:10 | 显示全部楼层
楼主的这个翻译软件好。
鲜花(3) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 09:15 | 显示全部楼层

Up

老杨团队 追求完美
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 11:20 | 显示全部楼层
" Y) B9 y$ q7 t$ n8 x3 ^2 A0 \
/ ^& t! @, B4 J
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 13:54 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 15:37 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!
看涨派的忽悠水平有很大提高,请继续努力。
鲜花(0) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 19:04 | 显示全部楼层
鲜花(49) 鸡蛋(0)
发表于 2007-11-13 21:54 | 显示全部楼层
老杨团队,追求完美;客户至上,服务到位!

6 x) M+ U) d! M6 l7 x, `u
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

联系我们|小黑屋|手机版|Archiver|埃德蒙顿中文网

GMT-7, 2025-7-23 07:05 , Processed in 0.156097 second(s), 25 queries , Gzip On, APC On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表