 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
' `. k7 ~9 v+ J. S% D1 V楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!2 c+ M: a5 o2 m& W
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 3 H/ F6 A& E H9 N$ v7 j
9 n) g' |* _, [! e
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。2 J" J. r f* ]8 c/ q
% b; q/ L; D' Q- P4 y8 p: h# X安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.2 S, t" Q, O. M: @; v( N
* v* D, [0 q- G# L6 \9 w. W/ U+ \不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
( c2 z/ U# l$ d X/ Z1 B- t# x6 o" N' Q
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
8 n: Z$ E% M8 E( a" Z1 j5 R- z
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
0 F, n+ q) B7 r+ v6 }" V# IYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
8 ~4 w+ F# B; F7 O( k+ ^6 K+ L! F! K3 m+ v" q% Q, M
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car". i6 u$ Y; b3 T
) b8 @4 }. ]4 m( sBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.% Y$ D# G% z; R, S( s
( A! T" N! }$ `. ~1 z5 x[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|