 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
: Y5 E4 K; B( F4 {! _楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!8 Y: s! y% {& C* q
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
6 }' B) q$ y: p r8 Y5 g2 n0 Z2 b0 C8 N$ D
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
0 P; l0 G7 X$ S5 p* W" R1 t
: c5 K- Y8 [# r4 C* ?% l8 y" L安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.0 x9 i6 Z7 f7 Z
C# i3 _9 ]/ j7 Y1 Y+ a
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?/ D! r# z' A0 ?; |) V9 S( B
: w* Q1 w$ r, s! v& G另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。, q) L4 y/ D( Y' o* |
1 T/ b& z: s: h W& j, m
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):6 [% w, u, A1 G/ K" E7 u* W& X
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers., J" x- H I: a; S
/ y$ K% x2 z/ Y! FOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
7 ~. H$ \+ ~; ?
" L5 q* X3 j4 C K% pBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.2 ?' {3 N5 S! I2 g7 p, L, K- @2 R
8 X; P2 l9 p: W P3 o; h' M
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|