 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 * J8 z$ W0 d7 G/ Y
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
1 C' T. H: C* g+ C2 Zcorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... + M8 {3 w. j3 X$ z5 H* p
- }1 f! |% V2 v: I6 S
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。6 ? g5 [( @9 z& R
7 a" S) U9 s: b
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
: p+ _! \" V% ~ P2 q5 H" \6 `) O# O1 F5 T0 c s; D
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
3 a+ m6 z/ f& ~& S7 |. ^& v. w% u% h O* ]
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。9 \+ N8 Z C3 k' B1 f) Y
. [( T9 P6 K ^1 e- {
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):& z5 ^4 U" R$ k1 B* j$ x4 _2 u
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
$ {* M( {) x: }1 |1 Z% s+ \! R9 c
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
3 |* k, J' d! _7 X8 ~
0 M0 \/ M' b* Z. WBut it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
$ a8 p: e% G, q# |% ~
" X+ S8 w, o6 z' Y1 t[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|