 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
0 ?0 Y3 h# q+ o3 Y: Z8 H% Z楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
1 o9 q `0 S, p8 icorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
8 A( C v- f, q% M
4 h' }7 g5 j" a0 _. ?, J; o# v8 s您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。+ Y8 a* U6 t' h1 d* u4 P1 J
7 P& Q, l. k( x% _. v. U5 F安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
9 C! d. ?) [/ ^6 F) a
. D! g3 m0 }( n7 h不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
8 V( o R/ [! L+ z- ~- G( d3 h
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
1 a5 a! A7 v0 B$ O
* c J% _ Y6 l% d E关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了): x6 s/ V: P4 a; `/ n+ D4 ?
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.5 Y( Y; q7 h, B: r: Z& J$ y
6 W! J; S4 D2 ]9 C' F# ZOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".0 a' F) C8 K. V
- x8 Q& Q- l3 e. J; R
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.8 r* l9 e: o& v; h
' k# ?9 v" [- L J' s1 E
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|