 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 3 h B, N# |( ^$ B
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!7 \& J2 m" G+ k2 A3 T
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
0 R" C* M: ?6 ]6 E9 i [3 F, p$ q$ {7 C5 P6 ?; Z7 }
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
1 E* }4 `, E5 S: h5 d) m2 C. j/ I: X) |
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.' Q$ ?3 Z7 c( y1 s I# g
1 v. n6 \2 |2 i! F! x! f$ x+ f. I不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?. L0 `' o( a$ g L* U$ H9 v
8 N/ t+ [. W9 k. f另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
3 B- X* i4 P% }; s# O
9 E& n" m4 z9 Z% u" d7 ?: m6 ?: p* {3 Q/ x关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
. Q/ g# I) n+ J0 V8 n, SYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.7 c" g& I& P: ]' \& n, t
; ]" [8 f$ e/ Y0 U: eOr maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
- P. C+ O( r0 E( d$ Q0 h- j# m% e' o% Z5 H, S2 X/ i
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
& n7 h% ^6 i8 r$ d: l6 [2 L: G, G# m% U1 K, h" p7 |3 u3 h
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|