 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 , e4 v' {" ]& C! v/ p6 q3 e
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!' K/ L3 [ P; e+ F$ a2 ]% r6 C
corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ...
; ]7 V' U* M1 I L, p- P
# K0 }6 k& }2 a( ^, \- D& u您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
: V/ i9 o; D4 o1 o7 D* o: |# T* r' ]8 f! s+ H w6 B. S
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
5 j' [2 u; q. p% n e" q/ Y `. u: f- \
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
1 @2 l" r" x* {/ l9 o$ |5 s# w4 u( K% w, I7 g% _
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
7 w- S$ [. D: u9 b9 D& {5 I: n% W" Y0 R( j2 ]
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):$ y/ V+ l, o. i
Yes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.
, _ U1 d, R d. ]2 s; a0 _: g3 p+ p3 |0 S6 [ ~- q
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
' Q0 [: i4 [; Y" ~" J; ]6 c! \# A5 h2 Z' W9 e* z2 `, R; m
But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
; Z/ d7 |5 J0 J, l, l% Q; _- W2 ^4 J: P$ E
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|