 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 + C4 A. M# V0 b+ R4 T: _$ c" B! b
楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
/ D1 E$ R1 N+ V P7 q, a! a- scorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... 1 U; K. c1 x+ R
* A% T- g# D! b! J) ?" ]7 b您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
# ~9 d2 Z6 a8 W) p% ~- O$ d0 i0 v4 `
安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
+ o$ s5 O( b) S7 _& ?+ `" X4 c9 _8 d( X
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?$ H' P- A" L7 e. s5 D7 U
, b/ S# b( O9 p' R
另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。
2 U4 H m+ E# w% G, N) M" o* o5 o, J' o- {- I
关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
7 M8 L5 q6 [) m5 k6 V- WYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.9 C0 ^9 Z! S* ~% }( b8 p
, J5 H$ `( g# s: o7 {
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".
! r5 s: U' _) B6 Q" e; o
* {, }7 N \3 l. A1 [7 ]But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
1 X% `* Q( b$ y4 O/ L+ F% C+ }* }( U- Z
[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|