 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 1)
|

楼主 |
发表于 2007-12-11 20:39
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 qwyes 于 2007-12-10 23:07 发表 
# ]/ U. l; G: Z楼主真是人家说什么,你就信什么了!
% `: X `2 N- L( scorolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一. 而且没有side airbag opition,也没有ESP(Electronic Stabilization Program ). 你买的不是SUV,平时又不是offroad,哪里有雪让你陷进去?去vw.ca把 ... ' p# M/ R1 d6 ^+ |* ~
$ Z Y+ d W5 _3 g
您说的对呀,我就是听谁说得都觉得有道理, 所以听您这一说:我又把这个可爱的 GOLF 放回到 shopping choice list 来了, 反正我已经有现成的雪铲了。
7 f2 M# h; N) c) N& [" q% C9 m
7 p2 {7 r/ Y2 H! e: Y2 X安全是我的主要考虑因素之一。其他要素有:可靠性高(故障率低,or high reliability), 经济性好。至于好多 enjoyable features, I don't care. Most of them are over enjoyable to me, almost useless.
) {, I6 n. J2 J) z4 C) }5 {) ?# k1 L& J" @9 j
不过,你说的 side airbag option, Golf 好像没有选择,Corolla 的 LE Package 倒是有选, 这是真的吗?
. d5 Z8 K/ I8 w3 }
- O6 u9 o# S# D! J& Y; g, q另外,“corolla 被凭为十大不安全车之一.” 可否提供一点链接信息,偶要查他个水落石出,好让自己心安理得地跟 “烤肉啦”决裂。( S4 u! W2 a7 n, b2 O
+ ` t& R3 k3 ^5 @; X% U关于安全,我看了下面一段话也感觉有道理 (SUV fans 一族可能要拍我了):
) F- E, \2 ?: S, ~1 m$ c, NYes, this whole safety argument is amusing. No one questions SUVs being safe, even though they are the ultimate death traps. You are 43% more likely to die or be injured in an SUV than in any given car (yes, even a xxxx (name of a sub-compact car) in any given accident, and that's according to independent statistics from both the insurance industry and other record keepers.1 |/ T! g& ~9 @- P
; S) B2 J$ M2 D7 V% c
Or maybe you just didn't notice all the huge warning stickers in SUVs stating "driving this vehicle is not like driving an ordinary car".7 i' ~( w( u% ~! l4 p
/ P9 B% `* C! h# O6 _% i" [But it's the old Titanic argument - if it looks safe it must be safe.
! g5 Y( [9 J! V8 M5 o5 T
6 A3 h) V9 l6 p- y& l, k3 @4 D* `% s[ 本帖最后由 望网 于 2007-12-11 20:50 编辑 ] |
|