 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员
0 @3 K8 I7 T5 a1 `/ C1 QDow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
h3 _; z: L0 O+ u2 f; N8 G1 a. `1 `! e1 D0 X
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.
6 ]+ x5 E9 {$ R* i
$ Q/ L" D% E1 q+ _- W+ H% [9 u: HMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far.
4 H8 y" ^, H- M% N, u W+ ?
2 ~2 b, m8 W, `1 f; I! w' ]The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said., M) D, s; y5 @0 I
* n/ x* i' t6 Y6 ?' a' C! `$ I
Dow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer. O9 X$ q ^* s
' ?, D. H( n% A0 L" B+ D
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
- Y& C4 x/ R! T2 |) N' d( ?4 {, g& n5 S7 d
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
% [8 j+ |0 |* {6 T5 R6 }4 y; v
$ d# G2 a* R; r u+ q; x! ~Dow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
" y9 [& p1 C3 |+ A9 ]6 y: ]& u7 N7 F) s+ q0 P7 }2 T
Philadelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.
# M* Q; {) c! x( A) L0 p* j- t0 C0 ]3 A
Dow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|