 鲜花( 0)  鸡蛋( 0)
|
道化工亚省工厂将裁员. @: F M( k0 d4 ]
Dow Chemical's Alberta facilities will see layoffs
2 s4 G9 _7 C- j- x( w# g% ^4 j( z- D4 A0 T
EDMONTON — Some employees at Dow Chemical’s Alberta facilities have been notified they will be laid off but the full extent of the job cuts won’t be known until late next week, a company spokesperson said Wednesday.1 O4 U4 T% t% b. B9 K( Z
8 A1 D/ b6 i/ Q% J' X5 P& hMary-Lea Crawford, public affairs manager for Dow at Fort Saskatchewan, would not say how many layoff notices have been handed out so far. ( g+ K$ m4 b3 A" W5 L
1 t( c/ h; p! s. I, e
The cuts are not expected to be as deep as the 11-per-cent target announced by the U.S.-based company in December, she said.
/ \% N6 T3 Z5 N* [9 |+ D* o, I
x5 l- v! l5 N7 R' l0 i2 RDow employs about 630 people in Alberta, with 550 in Fort Saskatchewan with the balance at its Prentiss facility near Red Deer.1 J8 k1 w8 Q8 k7 a
. s3 h5 m2 G2 h- u9 s" {
Dow posted weaker-than-expected fourth-quarter results on Tuesday because demand has plummeted in markets such as the construction, electronics and automotives.
7 p% C5 u0 K4 a, R/ D3 B+ H( f. k7 B( e/ b
Dow has tried to revamp its earnings profile over the past two years, first by announcing plans to sell a 50- per-cent stake in its cyclical basic plastics business to Kuwaiti investors for more than $9 billion. Then, in July, it announced plans to spend more than $15 billion to acquire Rohm and Haas using proceeds from the joint venture.
/ I, [' D* z# `3 x4 `" p9 V. J
3 H" c1 T; @+ }' G: v( Z7 P+ HDow’s plans faltered when Kuwait backed out of the joint venture. Rohm and Haas said its merger agreement with Dow, was not contingent on the Kuwait transaction.
- Q' a8 r/ y6 Q9 C# N+ R
* \$ l9 d" Z8 ]3 f6 J- E: P; A2 mPhiladelphia-based Rohm and Haas sued Dow in a bid to force the deal to close. Dow filed its response to the lawsuit on Tuesday.6 n/ B- P8 B7 s& d
5 e3 i' y8 f# P- ~) mDow argued the agreement was not binding, because it was impossible to carry out “without jeopardizing the very existence of both companies.” |
|